Notaries which went between God speaking and the Church which hee speaketh vnto for the perpetuall verity of the thing x Eph. 2.20 Secondly commeth the consent of the Cannon of the Law with the truth Thirdly the assent of the Church which hath allowed the Scripture delivered of God receyved kept and delivered the same by the vse and exercise of Gods Ministery and of Ecclesiasticall Discipline which dependeth thereon Which authority of the Church is secondary not to establish but to testifie thâ— authority of the Scripture for both are to bee acknowledged yet in theyr degree and order for that of the Scripture is Primary sound and essentiall but that of the Church is subordinate accidentall and altogether ministeriall The Materiall Cause of the holy Scripture arâ— divine matters revealed to our salvation according to our capacity and registred in the Canon Wee call the Canon the doctrine that is contayned in the Bookes of both Testaments the forme whereof internall is the vnchaungeable trueth of God but the externall is the holy Scripture the most absolute Symbole of the same for God hath vsed and sanctified the Instrument of the Scripture as it were the Index or declarer of that Essentiall Canon and the truth of the worde for the approving of the truth as it were in a certaine state or habite of an externall forme that by divine ordinance it might bee the Canon of our faith and life as a right even measure both whole and perfect The nature and office of this Canon come now to be declared The Nature for whereas even vnto this day there hath beene a threefold Canon in the Church the one divine the other Ecclesiasticall and the thirde false how the Canon properlie called divine may be distinguished from the Ecclesiasticall and both from the false it is very needefull for vs to discerne first by the partes thereof secondly by the manner of delivering thirdly by theyr proper conditions Wee devide the pattes of this Canon into the bookes of the olde and new Testament according to those two severall times of the olde and new Church The olde Canon is that which being receyved from God the auncient Church of the Iewes kept and next after delivered from hand to hand to theyr posterity by Gods appointment the bookes whereof are reckoned to be 22. by the Iewes but more distinctly by vs 39. and are divided into three rankes the first contayneth the fiue Bookes of Moses the second contayneth the bookes of the Prophets both hystoricall and propheticall whereof some were published before the Captivity to wit the booke of Ioshua Iudges Ruth two of Samuel two of Kinges being hystoricall Esay a good part of Ieremie and the nine lesser Prophets being Propheticall Others were in the time of Captivity and after as Esdras Nehemias Ester which are hystoricall some part of Ieremie Ezekiel Daniel and the three last of the smaller Prophets which are Propheticall the thirde contayneth holy writings before the Captivity Iob the greatest part of the Psalmes the Proverbes Ecclesiastes the songs of Salomon in and after the Captivity the two bookes of Chronicles The New Canon is that which the christian church had more largely since the time of Christ and the Apostles the substance of which Canon is the word by Christ vttered and the thinges which hee did the most faithfull hystory whereof is contayned in the fower Evangelists the examples in the Acts the y Exegesis exposition in one twenty Epistles the Prophesie in the booke of Revelation The manner of the delivery of both the Canons varyed according to the times of the church and persons the internall forme that is the vnchangeable word of God remayning stil the same for as for the time being the law or the bookes of Moses were the Canon in the church so also after Moses that which was added thereunto was the z Exegetica fuller exposition of that Instrument or canon The conditions of this Canon properly called divine are two the one that it contayne in it selfe the truth or haue the expresse forme of the word of truth the second that it bee delivered ruled and sanctified by divine authority to the end it might bee a Canon for vs in the church the latter of which conditions can never bee pluckt away from the former Now God hath sanctified these forsayde bookes to the ende they might be a Canon in the church partly after a generall partly after a particular manner after a Generall manner because God hath approved and confirmed the Bookes of both Canons not onely by the testimony of his spirit but also by the consent of the Canon and testification of the church after a particular manner because God hath specially sanctified the Bookes of the olde Canon to wit Moses his fiue Bookes with his speech miracles signes and events the bookes of the Prophets and holy writings before the captiuity with the extraordinary signes of a cloud and smoake in the Temple g 1. Kin. 8.10 Leu. 16.2 as also of Gods answere by the Ephod Vrim and Thumim h Exod. 28 30. after the captivity with singular testimonies of eventes the bookes also of the new Canon God hath sanctified singularly both by his sonne made manifest in the flesh as also by his wordes and deedes c Heb. 1.2 and by the Ministery of his Apostles which was most effectuall in signes powers miracles d Mat 3.5 pag. 13. And these are the partes manner and conditions of the divine Canon The other Canon is Ecclesiasticall which neyther contayneth the truth perfectly in it selfe nor was sanctified by God in the Church that it might bee a Canon of doctrine and faith and therefore is called of the Greeke fathers a second or inferiour Canon To this Canon belong the Bookes Apocryphall eyther wholy so as the thirde and fourth of Esdras Tobit Iudith the two bookes of the Machabees the booke of Wisedome Ecclesiasticus or being e Appendices additions to the canonicall as Baruch the prayer of Manasses and those which are added to Daniel and Esther these although they be taken into the Canon Ecclesiasticall yet by evident meanes that is by faith order and vse they were of the Fathers lesse esteemed then the bookes of that divine Canon whereby though abusiuely they were called Canonicall to witte by custome yet properly they were distinguished in the church from the canonicall by the name of Apocrypha The False Canon is that which after the Authority of the Apocrypha bookes grew greater was constituted by humaine opinion The office of the Canon is twofold the one is to teach the truth the other by this rule of truth to decide al controversies concerning Religion for it is the prâ—per Iudiciary voyce and sentence of the holy Ghost that soveraigne inward Iudge from which wee may not appeale The Formall Cause of the holy Scripture is twofold inward and outward the one is wherby the Scripture is proportionable
cited as that of the Councell of Carthage and of Milevitum out of Augustine For those Councels doe treate against the Pelagians who at that time denied the baptisme of children and some are suspected as that of the Tridentine Councell and the Testimonies of the Popes III. INfants ought two wayes to bee considered eyther according to common nature or the singular manner of the covenant and grace that way they are conceived in sin but this way they haue obtayned remission of sinnes by the promise In Defence of the Effects of baptisme against the same Cap. 4 and the rest that follow I. SInne dwelling in vs is by baptisme taken away by three meanes and degrees First because it is not imputed Secondlie because by little and little the body thereof is destroyed Thirdly because in death it shall vtterly bee taken away by the power of the same bloud of Christ wherewith wee are washed in Baptisme II. IT is one thing to speake of the cause of Iustification and another thing of the Instrument thereof lastly an other thing of the sealing the cause is the merite of Christ the Instrument is Faith and the sealing is Baptisme III. THe new and vncertaine devise of the Schoolemen concerning the Character or Marke which cannot bee defaced is with the same facility denyed as it is affirmed chiefly whereas neyther Scripture teacheth nor necessary reason sheweth nor authoritie of Fathers proveth any such Character Adde further that the chiefe reason why Baptisme is not iterated is not the impression of the character but Gods onely Institution OF THE LORDES Supper The Part Confirming CHAP. XIII THe other Sacrament of the christian church immediately instituted of Christ for the perpetuall vse thereof is The Lords Supper whereof though there be divers appellations both in Scriptures and with the Fathers for in the Scriptures it is called The body and bloud of the Lord The New Testament The Communion The breaking of bread The Lords Table The bread and the cup The Communicating of the body bloud of Christ a Mat. 26.28 Luc. 22.20 Act. 20.7 1. Cor. 11.25 1. Cor. 10.21 1. Cor. 10.16 which by the Fathers First it is called a gathering together The Eucharist or Thankesgiving Publâ—â—g Administration Secondly the Latâ—â—â— Offering because of collections and sacrifice for the remeÌ„brance of Christs Sacrifie yet most properly by this appellation Of the Lords Supper the thing it selfe hath most fitly beene expressed and indeed it is called The Supper with respect had both of the thing and of the time because it is a holy banquet of the soule and not of the belly instituted of the Lord and that in the Evening but the Lordes in respect both of the Author who is the Lord and of the End which is the remembrance of the Lord. Now it is defined to be A Sacrament of the New Testament instituted of Christ consisting of the Signe and the thing signified proportionable by an Analogicall Relation and action of themselues betweene themselues whereby the full growne members of Christ and his church are trayned vp and taught in the lawfull vse of the visible signes concerning the true and spirituall communication of the body and bloud of Christ vnto life eternall The Efficient Cause of the Lordes Supper ought to be considered eyther as instituting or as vsing and administring the same that is the principall cause but this is the serving or administring cause The Principall or Instituting cause is the Lord from whome it hath beene customably called the Lordes Supper to wit Christ God and man our onely Redeemer instituting the mystery of his body and bloud by the oblarion whereof hee redeemed vs b Rom. 15 18. 1 Cor. 11.23 Of this mysticall and divine Institution there are two parts Christs Deeds and his Words by the one wherof hee limitted and left an example of Administration by the other a doctrine of Institution Of Christs Deeds wherby the manner of the lawfull publicke office or administratioÌ„ is declared there are three partes according as concerning both signes which Christ receyved he orderly vsed holy and ceremoniall actions c Mat. 26.26 Mat. 14.22 Luc. 22.19 1. Cor. 11 24. The first is Blessing and Thankesgiving for the Scripture vseth those two words the one Mathew Marke vseth the other Luke and Paul both signifying the one selfe same thing to witte how Christ by prayers to God by thanksgiving and all that holy action prepared appointed and sanctified the Bread and Wine to a holy vse that they might bee a Sacrament of his Body and Bloud not by their owne nature but by divine Institution and this is that true Consecration or Sanctification of the Sacrament whereof mention is made among the Fathers The Second is The breaking of the Bread and the powring of the wine into the Cuppe which Christ vsed not onely for the cause of dividing and distributing thereof but for the representing of his death for it is an Essentiall and Sacramentall Ceremony of the Lordes Supper pertayning to the end forme thereof d Mat. 26.26 Mar. 14.22 Luc. 22.19 1. Cor. 11.24 The third is the offering and distributing of the Bread broken and the Wine powred in For Christ gaue not the same to his Disciples that they should distribute but that they should receyue that which was distributed e Mat. 26.26.27 Mar. 14.22 Luc. 22.56 because they were in that Supper not the dispensers of Gods Mysteries but the Guestes But Christ as being the Feast-maker with one labour instituted and with his owne hands dispensed the Sacrament of his Grace and withall sanctified the Ministeriall dispensation thereof And all these Actions are Sacramentall and ought diligently to be considered as farre forth as they are vsed for the signifying and sealing of Spirituall things by divine Institution To these Actions that wee may come to the second part of the Institution Christ added Words whereof some include a Commaundement some a Promise and lastly some an Explication These in Schooles haue vsually been tearmed Preceptiue the other Definitiue and Sacramentall Lastly these Expositiue The Words Preceptiue are those by which hee hath injoyned both vpon the dispensers a necessity of their administration and vpon the communicants a necessity of taking and hath prescribed vnto both a forme of both Administration by his deed whereof we haue aboue spoken and by his commaundement of Imitation ioyned therevnto e Mat. 2 6 26. 1. Cor. 11.24 Of Communicating by a double Precept by the one To take by the other To eate and to drinke The Taking is a Sacramentall Rite prescribed to him that commeth to the Lords Table whereby wee receyue with our hand the Bread and Cuppe of Thanksgiving for it cannot bee gathered eyther from the Story of the Institution of the Lordes Supper oâ— froÌ„ the fashion of Christs sitting down and his Apostles that Christ in the first Supper did put those signes into the mouth of every of the Apostles by which
Diuinity CHAP. I. ALL Sciences haue their proper principles aboue which as being those that cannot be demonstrated and are immediately the first wee may not ascend but among many sciences that is the more perfect which is or commeth of the superiour 〈◊〉 Principles and that the most perfect which resolveth a matter into the first Principles which depend not vpon any former of which sort Divinity alone is For the principles of other sciences are not simply the first buâ— onely in their owne kinde because indeed in their owne science they haue no other Former but there ought not to bee any other Former Principles of Divinity neyther in it selfe nor out of it selfe to wit neyther any Principle of being nor any principle of knowing For there are two Principles the one of the thing the other of knowledge those out of which other things are produced these on which the knowledge of other thinges doe depend both these a Analogiâ—e proportionably are of vs to bee considered in Divinity for the true exposition of the word intimateth vnto vs those two beginnings to wit God and the Word God is the Principle of being and the first cause of Divinity from which both the end of Divinity and the means vnto his end doe spring the Word is the principle of knowing by which the end of Divinity and the meanes vnto it may be knowne Both the principles are immediatly 〈◊〉 the first God is a Principle immediately first because nothing was beâ—â—hâ—â— the word is a principle imâ—ediately first because nothing was â—poken before it which two though â—hey goe together in dignity and office of beginning yet in the course of order in the manner of doing and in â—he producing of the effect they are distinguished and are mutually each to other subordinate for God first mediately speaketh vnto vs in the worde then the Worde mediately bringeth vs vnto the knowledge of God which knowledge sith it is entended to be the principall and proper subiect of whole Divinity the meane thereunto subordinate which wee called the Word ought first to be knowne Of the Word of GOD. The parte confirming CHAP. II. THe Primary Principle of Divinity for dignity is God but for the order of better knowledge the wordâ— is the first The word we vnderstand 1. Enâ—â—tiatiue or which is vttered whereby God hath communicated with man eyther specially through Revelation by Oracles visions or dreames or generally through a liuely tradition oâ— doctrine from hand to hand or through a more excellent manner by the Scripture The same wee thus define It is at holy Instrument concerning the truth necessary a Rom. 15 4. 1 Tim 4. â— Ioh. 5.35 to salvation faithfully and perfectly written in the Canonicall b Rom. 1. 2 Pet. 1.19 2 Pet. 3.15 16. bookes by the Prophets and Apostles c 2. Tim. 3 16. as the Secretaries of God for the healthfull instruction of the Church d 2. Pet. 1 22. Psal 1 19.1 1. Tim. 4 13 16. Wee call it an Instrument both in respect of the Covenant whereof God would haue an Instrument to be made and by a renued contract publikely to be registred as also in relation to another thing as in the proper vse and office thereof because the holy Scripture is not for it selfe but as the manner of â—struments is for another thing the â—hority perfection perspicuousnes â—d vse of this Instrument shall be made â—dent by a Methodicall e Analyst resolution the causes The Cause Efficient of the Scripture God f 2 Tim. 3.16 2 Pet. 1.21 the Father in the sonne by the â—rit for the same hath the Father layed â—en to the Church by the word Enunâ—tiue and by the workes of grace â—wer generally and specially ordinaâ—y and extraordinarily g Heb. 11. the Sonne â—th both wayes confirmed it in the â—ew Testament h Heb. 1.2 the holy Ghost seaâ—th the same in the hearts of the faithâ—ll by the word inwardly testifying or 〈◊〉 an inward Testimony i Esa 59.21 Ioh. 14.26 the Scripâ—re then is diuine by originall and by â—e things thereof both Essentiall and â—aturall as also assumed By Originall because every knowâ—dge of truth is from the first truth â—hereof the Scripture is an instrumenâ—ll badge and as it were a shapened â—mage hence it is that God both â—mmediately with his own finger wrote the Decalogue in Tables and k Exod. 34 27. mediately by servants as his l Actuaâ—ios Taâ—ulaâ—ios Notaries and publicke pennemen commaunded that whole m Systema compacted body of holy scripture with every part thereof to bee written n 2. Tim. 3.16 Insitis Adsitis The scripture also is divine for the matters both put therein and put thereto for both the Essentiall parts thereof are divine in matter and forme and the end divine also as hereafter shall bee declared yea and the apparant signification and demonstration of the Spirite and presence of God very antiquity the invincible force of the truth and many other pointes doe witnesse the same to be divine now it must needes bee that the Scripture which hath God to be the author hath also divine authority Further this authority is two wayes considered first in it selfe secondly in respect of vs the authority of the Scripture in it selfe is divine if we consider the cause subiect and certainty of doctrine The Cause because the authority of the Scripture is as great as that of the holy Ghost o. 1 Ioh. 1 9. who endited both the matter and words thereof and whose Prophets and Apostles were onely the Amanuenses pennemen p Ioh. 14.16 The Subiect for whereas there is wont to be a double respect of testimonies concerning the authority of a thing one from the power or efficacy of him that witnesseth the other from the Nature and property of the Instrument the Scripture in respect of the thinges whereof it is the Instrument hath an exceeding great and infallible authority q Heb. 4 12. The certainty of doctrine which the Scripture hath from God by Vertue Verity and Complement by Vertue because he hath confirmed the same both at all times with his spirit and at convenient tyme with his workes of grace and power r 1. Thes 1.5 by Verity because it contayneth the whole truth communicable in it selfe both alone and perfectly Å¿ 2 Pet. 1.19 By Complement because as in substance so also in event all thinges are most certaine and most true in the Scripture t Mat. 24 35. Now in respect of vs or vnto vs the authority of the Scripture is divine by the testimony of God both particular and generall Particular because God hath both publikely testified that soveraigne Authority by ordinary and extraordinary meanes and privately sealed it by his everlasting spirite in the conscience of the godly u Ioh. 1.37 5.6 Generall because first God vsed the vndoubted Ministery of his servants as fiâ—te
to the divine truth and with euery part of it selfe the other is the exquisite Phrase of the holy scripture whereby all things are written with a stile fitly tempered both according to the dignity of the speaker and the nature of the word spoken and lastly according to the condition of them to whome it is spoken From both as also from the consideration of the other causes the perfection of the holy Scripture aryseth both as touching it selfe and oppositely against vnwritten traditions As touching it selfe because the scripture doth most perfectly contayne the whole truth which is communicable the perfection springeth from principle subiect and effect From principle for whereas every principle whether of the thing or of knowledge ought to bee perfect and 〈◊〉 f Apodâ—cticae demonstratiue or true conclusions are drawn from that which is vnperfect it must needes bee that the Scripture is altogether most perfect as being the first only mediat principle of all doctrine concerning the truth g Deut. 4.2 12. ver vlt. From subiect because it hath partes both Essentiall of which wee haue spoken to witte matter and forme and also Integrall which are the law and the gospell and is all or wholy perfect both absolutely and by relation Absolutely because for substance it contayneth eyther expresly or Anologically all that doctrine concerning fayth and manners which is communicable for whereas of divine matters some are communicable and some incommunicable and of those which are communicable it is not expedient that some be communicated vnto vs in this life and yet expedient that some be wee affirme that divine matters are perfectly contayned in the Scripture because they are both to bee known h 2. Tim. 3.16 profitable to bee knowne by relation because as it hath the perfection of the whole so hath it also the perfection of the partes in the whole that is called a perfection according to Essence this according to quantity yet so that considering the seueral bounds of times every part was sufficient for the proper times thereof and all the partes in the whole are for vs. From the Effect for it maketh a man wise vnto Salvation instructeth him to every good worke and maketh him blessed by beginning in this life and by perfection in the other i Ioh. 2. v vlt. Rom 15.4 Ioh. 3.59 Neyther is it onely perfect of it selfe but also as being opposed to vnwritten traditions all which by the perfection thereof it excludeth k Gal. 1.8 By the Name of Traditions we vnderstand not in a generall signification the doctrine delivered both wayes to wit by speech and writing as very often they are taken in the Scripture and with the Fathers but in a more speciall sense for every doctrine not written by the Prophets and Apostles whether it be tearmed Dogmaticall or Hystoricall or Ceremoniall for the perfect matter of Dogmaticall Traditions which pertayne to Faith and Maners is delivered vnto vs by God in the Scriptures and those tye not vs which are delivered without the Scriptures but the generall matter of those which are Hystoricall concerning the thinges eyther spoken or done by Christ or his Apostles is perfectly contayned in the Scriptures which it behooveth vs to know for our salvation those which are delivered without the Scripture are to bee reckoned for humaine writings Of those which are Ceremoniall the Essentiall part is written downe in the word of God according to their owne kinde but the Accidental part of them which is concerning the circumstances is free and changeable The Finall Cause according to the consideration of the double Obiect is twofold the highest and furthest off is the glory of God in the maintenance of his truth The second and the nearest wherof our speech is in this place is the instruction of his Church vnto salvation The necessary means of this instruction are three the plainenesse of the Scripture Reading and interpretation whereof the one hath respect vnto the Scripture the other vnto vs and thâ— last both vnto it and vs. The first meane is the Plainenesse for the doctrine of a darke and doubtfuâ— matter neyther ought to be delivered nor can be learned forasmuch as everâ— Instruction whether it bee by the oâ—der of Nature or Doctrine is beguâ— from thinges more known but whereas there is one thing better known in respect of it owne Nature and anotheâ— in respect of vs wee consider the plaiâ—nesse of the Scripture both wayes boâ—â— in respect of it owne Nature as far forth as it is inspired of God and also in respect of our selues as farre forth as we are inspired of God for the vnderstanding of the same Of the playnenesse thereof in it selfe there are two arguments first the matters delivered in the Scriptures secondly the maner of delivering them for albeit they seeme obscure in respect of their dignity and maiesty yet if you respect the truth of them agreeable with their first patterne l 2. Pet. 1 19. if the â—â—w and the Gospell wherein as in â—e partes they are contayned m Deu. 30 11. 2. Cor. 4.3 if the â—ceeding great consent of all matters â—d wordes if lastly you respect the â—ory of God the Principall n Prou. 6.21 Effect of â—em from the vnderstanding of Docâ—ne and Salvation which is offered vnâ—o vs in the holy Scriptures it must â—edes be that it is in it selfe most perâ—ect o Ioh. 20 31. The Manner or Stile of delivering â—he matters is most applyable both 〈◊〉 the thinges themselues of which â—here is speech made and to those perâ—ons for the instructing of whome the â—cripture was delivered yeelding an â—xceeding great playnenesse both in words as also in sense and signification In Wordes for the Phrases which are proper doe shine in the proâ—riety of Wordes and those which are Figuratiue are perspicuous lights of a holy speech In Sense which of it selfe â—s one onely as being that which the â—ntention of the Speaker and the Nature of the thing signified doe import for the Schoole-men say well the p Theologiam Symbolicam non esse ArgumentativaÌ„ Figuratiue Divinity is not fitte for reasoning or disputation yet it may diueâ—sly be applyed to the vse of the Hearers q Per Anagogas Allegorias Tropologias by Mysticall Allegoricall and Mâ—ralyzing Interpretations that one onely literall and Grammaticall sense 〈◊〉 the holy Scripture neverthelesse remayning whole and entire Of the Playnenesse of the Scripture in respect of our selues there aâ—â— also two reasons the one of absoluâ— necessity because indeed the Scripture is the onely meanes and Instrument oâ— Faith for whereas knowledge Asseâ—â— and full assurance are the first beginnings and degrees of Faith these threâ— can by no meanes stand without the evident playnenes of the Scripture the other is r Exothesi from a supposition of God Promises concerning the writing of hâ— Law in our hearts and the spreading abroad or clearenesse of the Doctrine
oâ— the Gospell Å¿ Esai 59.21 Ier. 31.31 of which promise there would be no accomplishment vnlesse the holy Scriptures which exhibite â—â—to vs the summe of the Law and that â—â—ctrine were evidently playne in all â—â—nges which are necessary vnto salâ—â—tion but as there are degrees and â—â—pediments from the flesh of the feeâ—â—â—g of this faith and promise so are â—ere of this playnenesse in the regeneâ—te whence it is that neyther all â—ings are cleare perspicuous to each â—â—rson alike nor each thing to all perâ—â—ns equally yet to all and singular perâ—â—ns sufficiently vnto saluation accorâ—ing to the measure of Fayth and diâ—â—ne illumination The second meane of Instruction is â—â—e Reading of the holy Scripture â—hich is necessary to all and singular â—odly men First for the precept seâ—ondly for our salvation thirdly for â—e edification of others the consideâ—ation of the precept is declared in the â—criptures two wayes expressiuely t Ioh. 1.39 Aâ—alogically and by consequence beâ—ause in the Scripture God speaketh vnto all therefore by the same â—ight the doctrine of the Scripture is common vnto all also the end of thâ— Scripture is to be the power vnto salvation to every one that beleeveth with many other arguments which from the force of ConsequeÌ„ce may be drawn but whreas the point of our Salvation iâ— perfectly expressed in the scripture the coÌ„mon Edification of others commendeth vnto vs the reading of the scripture as the study diligence duty of attayning the same for sith we are bound to instruct others as in life so also in doctrine wee needes must learne those thinges in which we haue a rule both in life and doctrine written down most perfectly The third meane is Interpretation whether it bee of publicke or private authority the first beginning whereof is the holy Spirite the manner is the truth the rule is the Scripture the vse is Charity now the meanes which are Principall are a continuall collation of the holy Scripture with Scripture the consideration of the Essentiall pointes of a place that is both of the intention of the Speaker and of the nature of the Word spoken The Analogy of Fayth that all thinges bee expounded according to the truth of the Principles 〈…〉 in Divinity but those which are secondary are these the practise of the Church the decrees of the founder Councels and the expositions of the Fathers to all which so farre place is to be given as they consent with the Scripture and Analogy of Fayth OF THE WORD OF GOD The Part Confuting COncerning the truth of the Scripture we haue already spoken in an explication of the Definition by causes a Analytica by way of resolution now for the truth thereof wee will briefly speake against the obiections by an Appendix or Addition of generall solutions and distinctions following the order and methode of the Causes already declared DISTINCTIONS FOR THE Authority of the Scripture against COSTERVS Ench. Lib. 2. Cap. 2. I. There is a double consideration of the Church and the Scripture the one common in respect of the Author the other singular in respect of the Authority which the Author hath put into them God is the Author of both whether mediately or immediately but the Authority from God is diverse that of the Scripture is principall and formall but the other of the Church is secondary and ministeriall II. THe Scripture is two wayes considered eyther according to the substance of the Word principally or according to the manner of Writing Secondarily in that the Scripture is more ancient then the Church as by which the Church was begotten or generated III. SOme thinges are required for the confirmation of a thing absolutely and of it selfe and some by accident and for another thing if the Scripture neede any confirmation of the Church it needeth the same by accident not of it selfe and therefore the confirmation of the Church belongeth not to the Cause Efficient but Ministeriall IIII. IN causes coordinate those which are inferior and latter cannot obtaine the force and faculty of others which are the former Now every Authority of the Church is subordinate yet the vse of both is very great of the Scripture as the meane principal to beleeue of the Church as the meane outward and ministeriall V THere is one corruption of wordes and certaine particular places through the blemish where of the principall parts cannot bee corrupted and there is an other corruption of the essentiall partes of the Scripture the former if any hath happened vnto the Scripture for the latter we vtterly deny is not the corruption of the Scripture but was caused eyther by the naughtinesse of some other or through the infirmity of the church or through the particular ignorance of them that were of the houshold The places of Scripture which COSTERVS wresteth are these Iohn 14.16 I answere that is badly transferred to the church generally which is spoken of the Apostles particularly for the testimony of these is immediate blamelesse and extraordinary but of it mediate weake and ordinary Luke 10.16 I answere that which was spoken concerning the office of the Church in respect of Ecclesiastical censure and discipline is not to be restrayned vnto the office of the same in respect of doctrine 1 Timoth. 3.15 I Answere the prayses which in the Scripture are given to the Church declare the Ministery and not the authority of the same as beeing that church which should keepe the b DeposituÌ„ pledge of the truth committed vnto it as the house of God should set it foorth as a pillar whereon it hangeth and in that pillar should keepe it vnmoueable as the ground therof Basis Distinctions for the Canon against Bellarmine 1. Tom. Lib. 1. Cap. 7. vnto the 16. THe Obiections which are wont to bee brought against the Canon are eyther those which are alleadged against all the bookes of the Canon generally or against every one particularly of all these the solutions are generall I. The Councels which haue their Canons concerning the canonicall and Apocryphal Bookes are eyther ancient or latter the ancient are eyther c Oeconomica generall the credite of which is the worthier such is that of Laodicea celebrated in the three hundred yeare after Christs birth which with vs acknowledgeth the selfe same Canon or Provinciall as that third of Carthage celebrated in the yeare fower hundreth having no authority not onely because it is particular but also because it is convinced of error by the former generall of Laodicea Againe the latter are that of Florence and of Trent of which there is no authority but because they are too late as also because they are papish and tyrannicall II. T Hese tearmes or Epithetes holy Divine and Canonicall are so called eyther properly in very deede and according to the truth or by a certaine similitude that is from the opinion and ordinance of men according to a certaine resemblance and in both significations
Hyperbaticae out of Grammaticall order Phrases Tropes and Figures note any obscurity of them III. THe vse of commentaries doe not simply argue the obscurity of the Scriptures but our Infirmity for wee doe not conceyue the doctrine of the Scripture in it selfe perfect after a perfect manner but according to our size or measure by meanes vnperfect and as they speake proportionated IIII. THe doctrines which are propoundeâ— in the Scriptures are three wayeâ— considered first in themselues â—â—condly so farre as they are propoâ—â—ded in the Scriptures thirdly so far 〈◊〉 they are of vs vnderstood the first anâ— third way the Scriptures in some measure are obscure but the second way they are most playne The Places which Bellarmine there doth cite are these Psal 119.18 Ans It is one thing to treate of our Internall and Naturall blindnesse which must be holpen with the Internall Illumination of the eyes of the mind but another thing of the obscurity of the Scripture in it selfe and therfore the consequence from the persons to the doctrine is a consequence of no force Luke 24.32.17 Act. 8.31 24 An. The meanes which serue for the vnderstanding and exposition of the Scripture appertayne not to the Scripture but to our infirmity which is wont and ought to bee holpen by the interpretation of the same 2. Pet. 3.16 Ans Obscurity of thinges in themselues by reason of that Maiesty they haue ought to bee distinguished from the manner of delivering them for obscure matters may bee plainely delivered Neyther is that consequence of force which is from the integral part to the whole because it is one thing that the Scripture is hard and another thing that certaine points in the scriptures are hard OF GOD AND THE Attributes of GOD the Part Confirmatiue CHAP. III. THe second Principle of holy Divinity is GOD The second wee call it not in the order of Nature for nothing is before God but of our better knowledge or vnderstanding because as the Scripture is the first Instrument of every healthfull knowledge concerning God so God is the first and supreme Principle of the being of those things which serue to this knowledge on whom all thinges immediately depend Now concerning God whom to be both nature and reason hath sufficiently taught the naturall man to make him inexcusable as also the Scripture and Faith hath sufficiently taught the Christian man to his salvation Rom. 1.19.20.21 Ioh. 17.3 we must know two things first what hee is to witte his Nature secondly who he is that is his Attributes The Nature of God according to the manner of divine Revelation and measure of our knowledge may and should bee known two wayes the one is of the Name the other of the thing or definition by which two every knowledge touching any thing is wont to bee made playne or perfect Whatsoever is spoken of God certaine it is that that thing is not God which is spoken of him because hee is Ineffable or vnable to be spoken of yet sith a Name is the signification of that thing which might be comprehended as farre as might be divers Names are attributed vnto God in the Scriptures whereby the Nature of God is not so much expressed as that thing which may bee knowne of vs concerning the same And all those are wont to be expressed and declared in a double manner the one Negatiue the other Affirmatiue or Positiue The Negatiue names which are given vnto God as Incomprehensible Infinite remoue farre from him the imperfections of the Creatures Those which are Affirmatiue are eyther vttered Essentially or Relatiuely or by a Metaphor Essentially whether it bee properly such as that proper and Essentiall name of God IEHOVA and others equivalent vnto the same which cannot bee attributed no not Analogically to any Creature or commonly which may indeede be applied to men yet are meet for God both for the manner of excellency as God King good wise c. as also by meane of the cause not depending as Creator Redeemer c. all which are distinguished in God not in respect of the Essence but of the Effects Those which are sayed to bee Relatiue are the names of the persons of which there is no commeation or confusion but are severally proper to the severall persons to witte the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost These are vtered Metaphorically which are given to God eyther after humane affection or passion as man angrie sleeping or else by a congruency and similitude as a Lyon a Stone a River c. From the consideration of the names of God wee proceede to the explication of the thing or the description of God himselfe Now God is as the Hebrewes most briefly define IEHOVAH ELOHIM b Exod. 6.2 3.13 the Lord God that is one Essence of three persons Of this discription there are two members the one of the Essence and the Vnity of the Essence the other of the Persons and the Trinity of the persons which two can neyther bee separated from the declaration of the divine Nature nor ought to bee confounded in the same for as there is an exceeding great and indivisible vnity of the divine Essence in the plurality of the persons for the Essence of the Father is the Essence of the Sonne and the holy Ghost so is there a reall and different Distinction of the persons in the vnity of Essence for to be the Father is not to be the Sonne or the holy Ghost We discerne the vnity of the Essence two wayes first by the verity of the Essence secondly by the manner of Vnity The Essence is that wherby God both is and existeth by himselfe and of himselfe absolutely for hee alone is that thing which is and who is that is a being not leaning vpon any other The manner of vnity is not of knitting together nor of the generall nor of the speciall nor of consent but of number because there cannot be many Gods This manner of the vnity is proved by three arguments by the testimonies of Scripture both very many and evident even of the olde and new Testament c Deut. 6.4 Esa 44.6 1. Tim. 2.5 1. Cor. 8.4 by beginning which as it is the first so of necessity it ought to be but one for two or more infinite beginnings are not granted by Essentiall perfection which the persons haue in common whole in them all and whole in each one for the whole Godhead is equall in it owne perfection d Ioh. 5.26 Mat. 1.27 Through this Identitie of Essence in the persons or most single and very one vnity Christ is sayed to bee in the Father and the Father in Christ e Iohn 14 10. which thing of the Fathers is called an vnion of the persons This Essence which is one in number and individuall is improperly sayed to bee communicated from one person to another whereas that of the Essence is an Essence of it selfe and in respect of it the three persons in the
we haue more largely treated in the place concerning God The humane Nature of Christ is that whereby hee holdeth the same Essence with vs both the manner of subsisting or being a person and the vitious accidents and sinnes of the substance being excepted For neyther is the humane nature of Christ any thing by it selfe subsisting without dependance but being without subsisting was assumed in the singularnesse of person without any eyther confusion of natures or division of person c Phil. 2.6 Ioh. 1.1 Neyther could any contagion of sinne infect that humane nature of Christ the substance whereof being otherwise in it selfe corrupt originally the vnspeakable operation of the holy Spirite sanctified and most fully purged from every spot nor yet ought to infect as being that wherein the purging of our sinnes was to be performed d Luc. 1.35 Heb. 4.15 These thinges excepted Christ tooke our true and Reall Nature the same both whole and perfect according to the substance properties and infirmities thereof The Substance for Christ had both our whole Nature and the Essentiall parts of it whole Our whole Nature for hence is he called in the Scriptures The seede of the Woman e Gen. 3. 22.16 the seede of Abraham the seede of David according to the flesh or the fruite of his loynes f Act. 2.30 and very where the Sonne of man The Partes for hee had both a reasonable Soule and an Instrumentall body A reasonable Soule this the Scripture and g Ioh. 10.17 Mat. 26.38 the end of his Incarnation prooveth for that which is not assumed is incurable The Verity of Nature because the other partes of man haue their beauty by the Soule An Instrumentall Body this proued the verity of his humane Nature which requireth a limitted matter that is a fleshly and an earthly body h Luc. 22.42 the verity of satisfaction which ought to bee made in a body truly passible mortall Lastly the verity of demonstration for Christ shewed even by signes that hee had a body not phantasticall or heavenly but fleshly and earthly i Luc. 2.40 Mat. 4.2 Ioh. 11.35 Ioh. 4.6 Mat 8.24 Mat. 27.50 Iob. 19.27 The properties which Christ coassumed are eyther of the whole nature to witte to bee created and to bee finite or of the partes as of the Soule for he had vnderstanding k Mat. 26.28 and will l Luc. 22.42 the operations of both and of the body for hee had a shape quantity and circumscription and all the properties and naturall actions of a body m Luc. 2.40 Mat. 4.2 Ioh. 11.35 Ioh. 4.6 Mat. 8.24 Mat. 27.50 Iob. 19.27 Infirmities for it was behouefull for the end of his Incarnation that hee should wholy take vnto him all naturall defects sinne excepted for of defects some are simply miserable as Augustine tearmeth them and some damnable or as Damascene calleth them Detestable those Christ wholy tooke because they were no let to his perfection knowledge and grace n Ioh. 1.14 1. Tim. 3.16 Heb. 5.7 but these hee did not so because they had hindered our Redemption Of these natures the necessity and verity whereof hath beene declared there are divers operations o 1. Pet. 3.18 for there are two natures in Christ as it were two inwarde and effectuall beginninges out of which formally Actions and their manners are deduced wherefore as all thinges in Christ his subsisting onely excepted are two-fold or of two sorts to witte his Nature Properties Will Knowledge p Mat. 11.27 23.37 Ioh. 2.19 1. Cor. 15.27 Luc. 2.47 so are there two-folde operations some divine some humane distinguished by their beginninges manners of doing and the particular Actions of each of them By their beginninges because looke how many Natures there are so many formall beginnings of actions there are By the manners of doing for every beginning worketh according to it owne manner and condition the God-head after a supernaturall and divine manner the man-hoode after a Naturall and Humane manner By particular Actions for the Worde worketh that which is of the Word and the Flesh that which is of the Flesh without any confusion of Natures in the vnity of Person Thus much concerning the Natures the other thing followeth concerning their Subject that is the person and both the vnity and operations thereof Of the Person of Christ there is vsually held and declared a double respect in the Scriptures the one in regarde of the Essence of the Word the other in regard of the office and dispensation In respect of Essence Christ being considered or severally or without commixture as Nazianzene speaketh is in the divine Essence another person from the others but not another thing In respect of the dispensation which wee consider of in this place he is that second person of the God-head Incarnate that is that person who tooke mans Nature by creating it in the singularity of his subsistance immediately and by his person vnited the same with the divine nature mediately so as Christ is one of both Natures not two into both one and the same without time begotten of the Father the Sonne of God without mother and in time begotten of the Virgine the Sonne of man without Father the naturall and consubstantiall Sonne of both This Vnity of Person three things doe proue first the authorities of the Scripture for Christ is as the Prophet teacheth Emanuel r Esa 7. as the Angell teacheth the same Sonne of God which should bee borne of Mary Å¿ Luc. 1.35 as the Evangelist teacheth the Word made flesh t Ioh. 1.1 as the Apostle teacheth the same who came of the Father according to the flesh who is God aboue all things to be praysed for ever u Rom. 9.5 Secondly the end of his Incarnation because that God and man might bee made one in the Covenant It was behoofefull that one should bee made God and man in person not by participation of grace but by verity of nature not by confusion of substance but by vnity of Person Thirdly the denominations of both natures attributed to the same Subject for as those thinges are not incident to the divine nature which are proper to the humane nor those vnto the humane which are peculiar to the divine so all in common and according to truth are vttered of the person according to both Natures x Act. 20.28 1. Cor. 2.8 therefore the one and the same person is Eternal and not Eternall Infinite and Finite holding all the divine and humane properties those from everlasting as he is God these in time assumed as he is man both really yet Intransitiuely as he is man-God This Person is the common beginning of those actions which the Greeke Fathers haue called divinely Humane for the actions of Christ are not onely some humane some divine but also some of common operation which Christ effecteth both as he is Man-God by Nature and as hee is Mediator
the generall of outward calling Gods good pleasure as the foregoing cause therof Christs Ransome as the meritorious cause therof Out of both ioyntly ariseth that singular and benevolent affection of Gods will whereby hee embraceth vs adopted in his beloved Sonne with his Infinite loue by applying vnto vs his saving grace i Eph. 2.17 19. Ioh. 15.19 Act. 6.14 Eph. 1.5 Of this Inward calling or application there are two inward meanes the Spirite and Faith The Spirite which calleth by the efficacy of the cause k 1. Ioh. 2 17. Ezec. 11 1â— Faith answereth the calling by the office of the instrumeÌ„t l Rom. 8.30 â— Pro. 1.22 Now as the giving of the Spirite so also the bestowing of faith is the singular gift of God m Passe To be possible to haue both is of Nature but to haue both is of Grace The Matter of this Inward calling are those whome God fore-knew and predestinated vnto life for whome hee hath predestinated them hath he called n Rom. 8.30 Neyther can this Inward and effectual calling bee of any others then of them whose also is the Spirite of Christ and saving faith according to the purpose of Gods Predestination in Christ all others are excluded for albeit it be somtimes given vnto the wicked not onely with their sences to perceiue those things which are of the outward Ministery but by them after a sort inwardly to be affected in the heart that is in the vnderstanding and will yet this inward saving calling whereof we here treate doth affect them onely to salvation who liue and are moved by the Spirite of Christ and are ingraffed by faith into Christ to life eternall o Ioh 17 â—0 Eph. 2.20.21.22 The forme of this calling is that inward Information of the faithfull by the spirite and faith for the communicating of Gods grace and glory Of this Information there are two partes the one is that effectuall action of Gods Spirite in vs and according to that the whole renuing of man which in the Scripture is commonly called Regeneration p 1 Ioh. 3.9 Rom. 8.1 The other is the action of Faith whereby both the mind is inlightened that it may know and the Will sanctified that it may apprehend God in Christ q Col. 1. â— Rom. 14.14 The End Remote is the glory of God gratiously calling Neerest the salvation of Man effectually called And this is the maner of the outward and inward absolute calling whereof the one is of good pleasure and election the other of the signe the one of Efficacy the other of Signification tending to Efficacy the one proper to the Elect the other common to all But because the one cannot nor ought to be separated from the other in the Elect in the ordinary way vnto Salvation out of both ariseth a calling which wee tearme Coniunct both ordinary effectuall in the matter of our salvation Now is it an effectuall and gracious action of the holy spirite sealing vp in the Elect by the instrument of true faith the preaching of the word the vse of the Sacraments the communion oâ— Christ and his Church for their salvation and Gods eternall glory The Efficient cause of this calling is God for the calling is of gift not of merite of grace not of nature God calling whome hee will and againe whome hee will eyther not calling at all or not effectually calling but both freely without respect of person or without blame The matter are men elect in whom alone onely this calling is effectuall perticularly and savingly though generally the not elected and Hypocrites may both receyue the vse of the outward calling and seeme openly to declare the sence and feeling of the Inward whence it is that the Effect of the calling of these is called in the scripture a r Heb. 6.5 taste onely but of those a commixture of the Word with faith Å¿ Heb. 4.2 The Forme is that divine manner of divine Information Inward and Outward whereof this is fully performed with the preaching of the Word the vse of the Sacraments and other both private and publicke exercises of faith and charity but that with the saving communion of the Spirite and Faith The End is both the glory of God being mercifull as also the advancing and translating of man from his misery to spirituall grace and glory OF THE CALLING OF MAN vnto Salvation The Confuting Part. Distinctions in defence of the Efficient Cause I. THe Vniversall Calling which is coÌ„monly called Naturall is one and the Politicall or Ecclesiasticall which is called Personall is another Lastly the saving is another of which we treate in this place yet of all these the Principall and onely Efficient is God II. THere is one calling Immediate another Mediate Extraordinary Ordinary That God effecteth by himselfe This by the Ministery of men III. OF the Efficient cause of all callings there is commonly had a two-fold notice the one according to the beginning the other according to the Instrument that is properly of the cause this of the r Concausa fellow cause In Defence of the Matter against the Vniversality of Effectuall Grace I. THe grace and good will of God is eyther noted generally whereby God doth benefite all men or particularly whereby hee doth good to the Elect in Christ but this vniversall and generall grace ought to bee discerned from the singular and particular as also the vniversall and common benefits towards all as they are men from the Particular towardes men as they are Christians II. THe Affirmation is Inconsequent from the Generall to all Particular things for all ought not to bee taken vniversally of every man but generally of all sorts of men III. THe Argumentation holdeth not from the communion of Nature to the communion of Grace IIII. THe quantity of Actiue vertue ought to bee knowne by the Effect of the quantity V. THere is one Efficacy of calling outward another inward the outward is when the sences and corporal things are touched moved by the outwarde Ministery the inward when the vnderstanding and will are touched and moved Both these Efficacies againe are two-fold the one saving proper to the Elect the other not saving but leading the way according to the generall order and generally belongeth vnto all that are called The Places 1. Tim 4 10. Ans The benefites of Christ in the saving of men are distinct by two degrees the one is common to all the other is peculiar to the Church and saving to the faithful Adde further that the word of saving importeth sometimes the benefites of God in this life and sometimes that eternall benefite of salvation aequivocally Ezek. 28.26 God two wayes is called the God of men eyther vniversally and commonly according to nature or particularly according to Grace whereby hee chose them from everlasting in Christ In Defence of the Formall CAVSE I. THere is one Calling by grace naturall and another by Grace supernaturall
holinesse eyther of both wayes the iudiciall or law signification remayneth 1. Cor. 6.11 Answ First there is a fallacy of conioyning for these three are not ioyned together as if they were b Synonyma of one signification but as subordinate and opposite to the three-folde accusation going before for to those corruptions whereof hee treated he opposeth washing to defiling or vnrighteousnesse fornication covetousnesse hee opposeth Sanctification but to Guilt which hee expresseth in these wordes They shall not inherite the kingdome of God hee opposeth Iustification Secondly hee treateth of Iustification which is made in the name of Christ and not of that which is by a certaine infusion or inherent righteousnesse In defence of the Efficient Cause of Passiue Iustification or the Instrumentall Cause of the Actiue against Bellarmine from the 13. Chap. lib. 1. De Iustificatione to the 19. THat Faith alone doth not iustifie Bellarmine proveth by fiue Arguments First is That the Fathers and Scriptures doe attribute the power of Iustifying not onely to Faith but also to other vertues Chap. 13. Distinctions according to the rancke of his Arguments I. FAITH in the Scriptures and with the Fathers is wont two wayes to be considered one way properly according to the Nature of Faith simply the other may figuratiuely that is by a h Metaleptice transumption correlatiuely whereby faith apprehendeth her obiect after the first manner Faith is sayde not to be alone after the latter it is sayde alone to iustifie II. Iustification which is the actiō of faith is considered two wayes eyther generally for that whole missery of our reconciliation with God or particularly for the principall and speciall part thereof which consisteth in the application and imputation of Christes righteousnesse The ground of the one is Generall the Instrument of the other is particular III FAith is considered one way in the person of him that is iustified another way in iustification it selfe another way in the effect of Iustification In the person of him that is iustified it is the roote and beginning of all vertues In the act of Iustification it is the instrument in the effect it is the dore of life the gate and way into life IIII. THe feare of the Lord in the Scriptures and with the Fathers is taken aequivocally for it signifieth eyther the fore-goer or antecedent of Faith or faith it selfe or the consequent of Faith the Antecedent of Faith because feare is the first degree of faith vnto Iustification First not in time but in order of nature Faith it selfe because the feare of God in Scriptures very often signifieth the whole worship of God knowledge and trust that is Faith it selfe The consequent of Faith because the feare of God or that desire to avoyde sinnes and to performe righteousnesse followeth faith as the fruite the good tree Now whatsoever things are attributed to the feare of God by the Fathers or in the Scripture they are attributed eyther in the second signification by a Synecdoche or in the third by a Metonymy V. THe Word Hope is sometimes taken for trust it selfe according as the same Verbe signifyeth sometime to trust sometime to hope In which signification it is taken of the Fathers and in the Scripture in the places cited by Bellarmine sometimes it is taken oppositely so that faith is of things past and present hope onely of things to come VI. TRue loue which in this world can never be perfect is neyther in time not nature before Iustification seeing that it beeing as it were the effect by issuing forth followeth faith as the neerest cause neyther doe the places of Scripture which are alleadged point out the cause of the remission of sinnes or of Iustification but the Adiunct and the necessary consequent thereof VII THere is a two-fold repentance propounded in the Scriptures a true and an hypocriticall Faith defineth and limitteth the true but the want of faith the hypocriticall and therefore those things which are attributed in the scriptures and by the Fathers to the true repentance they are attributed not in respect of it selfe simply but in respect of faith d Secundū quid after a sort Adde further that by a frequent and vsuall Metonymy in the Scripture that is attributed to the Effect which is proper to the cause VIII THe Purpose and desire truely to receaue the Sacrament as also a purpose and desire of a new life and obedience are excluded from Iustification but not from the person justified for the cause of Iustification is one thing the quality of the person justified is an other thing neyther are the effectes to be confounded with the causes or the causes with their effects The second Argument If Faith cannot be seperated from loue other vertues then it alone cannot Iustifie Cap. 14.15 DISTINCTIONS I. IT is one thing to treate of Faith as it is considered absolutely as a quality but another thing as it is considered relatiuely as an Organ and Instrument being absolutely considered it cannot be separated from good works but considered relatiuely it justifieth without workes because it alone is the Instrument of Iustification and not workes so it is never alone yet it alone worketh in the worke of Iustification II. ANd yet it followeth not that faith justifieth with vices as it justifieth without workes because Faith onely is cōsidered exclusiuely without works as it iustifieth Quae iustificans est and not what it is iustifying III. WHerefore that third point also is in cōsequent that faith if it be alone shall also alone iustifie vs because as Iustification is never separated from faith so neyther is faith from workes As also that is an Inconsequent if the eye alone seeth therefore it shall see although it bee alone IIII. BVt that which the Adversary proveth that true faith may in very deed bee separated from loue and other vertues leaneth vpon no ground and first as touching the places in Iohn 15. there is speech of faith historicall in 1. Cor. 13. Of faith of miracles In Iames 2. Of faith temporall or hypocriticall Secondly as touching the argument taken from the state of the Church hee playeth with the doubtfull signification in the word Faithfull who in the places now cited are so called for the outward profession of faith and the communion of the Churches and not according to the inward truth and formall manner of faith and the Church Thirdly as touching the argument taken from the proper manner of faith and loue it leaneth both vpon a false consequent and a false supposition for this is a false consequent in that albeit there bee two vertues yet they may mutually be separated the one from the other This also is a false supposition in that loue springeth not necessarily from faith for God hath given Faith as the mother begetter of loue Fourthly as touching the absurdity there is none for Iustification shall not therefore depend vpon workes because it is not without
dispensation wherefore they agree in all the causes In the Efficient Cause for there is the same Author even God by his free mercy and the same meritorious cause even the death of Christ r Ier. 31.31 Rom. 9.7 Mar. 1.15 In the Matter for the thinges promised and sealed vp are the same to witte the Grace and Glory of God Å¿ Rom. 4. â—3 Gal. 3. â—6 In the Forme for in general the maner of administring is the same that is the internall communication of the spirite and the externall communication of the word r Gen. 22.18 Psal 2.22 Mat. 28.19 In the End because the end on both sides is life eternall for the scriptures examples and manner do proue that the Fathers in the olde Testament who were partakers of the same promise with vs had no other end Scripture because the very forme of the covenant and the Prophets the Interpreters thereof make mention of life eternall u Gen. 15 8. Psal 116.15 Esa 51.6 Heb. 11.9 Examples for the Author to the Hebrewes doth testifie that Noah Abraham and the rest that were in the same covenaÌ„t atained vnto that end Manner for they abounded both with the same spirit of faith and with the signs of the same signified thing x 2 Co. 4 13. Ier. 15.6 1 Cor. 10.3 The difference is in the manner of administring and in the circumstances of the disposing In the manner of Administration as well on Gods behalfe as on mans behalfe on Gods behalf for both the internall communication of the Spirite and the externall communication of the Doctrine and Signes was farre more evident and effectuall in the New Testament then in the Olde y Act. 15.8 2. Cor. 4.13 Ier 3â— 31 On mans behalfe for they who were in the Olde Testament had but the Image for the truth absent the shadow for the body but they who were vnder the New haue both the present truth and the perfect body z Heb. 10.1 Adde further that they had Mâ—ses for the Mediatour of that covenant but we Christ a Heb. 8.6 12.24 In circumstances both of time and place Of Time the Olde Testament endured vnto the first comming of Christ the New shall endure from the first vnto the second Of Place for the Olde Testament from the time of Abraham was inclosed onely in a corner of the world but the New passed over all the world b Mat. 10.5.6 Eph. 2.2 Rom. 3.24 OF GODS COVEnant The Confuting Part. Distinctions in Defence of the Efficient Cause I. THe wordes Covenant and Testament are d Homonyma Equivocall Covenant signifieth three thinges First that bargaine made by God with man whether it bee the whole or the partes thereof Secondly aswell al the lawes and holy promises taken vniversally as any speciall commaundement whatsoever or promise added to the covenant Thirdly by a Metonymy the bookes wherein the covenants are written downe Likewise also the word Testament doth signifie three thinges First the meaning of our will concerning that thing which wee would haue to be performed after our death as touching our goodes the Grecians call it a disposing 2. according to the vse of Scripture a compact betweene God man the Grecians tearme it a composition 3. By a Metonymy the books or distinct parts of the Bible II. THe word Covenant is taken eyther absolutely or oppositely Absolutely for the free Covenant both old and new Oppositely for the Legall covenant or the Law it selfe and in the first sence wee here take it but taken in the second as the olde Testament is called in the Scripture the Killing Letter and the Ministery of death so the new Testament is also called the ministery of the Spirite and life III. THe Foundation Condition and Cause of the Covenant when they are pronounced of Christ are in matter the same but do differ in manner for he is called the foundatioÌ„ by way of application the Condition as he is to bee applyed and the cause as he is or was applyed IN DEFENCE OF THE MATTER I. THe Conditions of the covenants on mans behalfe are not Essentiall because both Faith and Workes haue but the nature the one of an instrument the other of a Testimony II. THree distinct kindes of promises doe offer themselues vnto vs in the Scriptures the first is the promise of the covenant of Workes wherein is promised eternall life vnder condition of workes proceeding from the powers of nature the second is of the free covenant vnder condition of Faith the third is of particular promises agreeable to the free covenant vnder condition of the works of Grace IN DEFENCE OF THE FORME I. THe Forme of the Couenant consisteth in Relation for the Relate is God the Correlate is Gods people the foundation is the solemne obligation of the thinges referred each to other II. THere are three principall times before the law vnder the law after the law and there are three notable persons as the captaines of those times Abraham Moses Christ they make not three covenants but onely a three-fold manner of administring one Covenant III. WE must make a difference betweene the thinges substantiall of the Covenant and the thinges accessary those were eternall these temporary IIII. THe dividing of the Covenant into the old and new is not of the generall into the speciall but of the Subject into the accidents and diverse adjunctes make not the substance of the thing divers V. THe new Testament is so called because of a double succession the one of persons for Christ succeeded Moses the other of the dispensation for the Evangelicall Dispensation succeeded the Legall OF THE SACRAments in Generall The parte confirming CHAP. XI THe Second ordinary meane of the execution on Gods behalfe are the seales of the Covenant or the Sacramentes Of these wee vsually and duely holde and expound a two-fold manner the one Generall concerning all the other Speciall concerning each one of the Sacraments Now by the Name of Sacrament which is translated from military affaires to Christian vses wee doe not in the largest signification by a Metalepsis vnderstand every mystery or hidden secret of a holy and divine thing in which sence the Gospell the Incarnation of Christ the calling of the Gentiles are wont to bee expounded in Scriptures Neyther in a lesse generall signification by a Catechresis doe wee vnderstand a divine mystery and vnknowne Symbolicall secret or every such thing as signifieth somewhat else beside the shew which is offered vnto the senses such as are Ceremonies Types Parables Signes and Figures all which because they pertaine to divine matters were called of the old Fathers Sacraments but in a more restrained and most proper signification by the name of Sacrament wee vnderstand a Signe of Grace ordayned of God that hee might both seale vp his benefits in vs and consecrate vs to himselfe for ever for in the signification of Sacrament there is a mutuall respect the one on Gods behalfe offering
for some are Principall Antecedent some Secondary and Consequent whereof those properly respect our Faith before God but these our confession before Men. After the first manner the end of baptisme is to signifie seale and exhibite Sacramentally the Remission of sinnes the benefite of Regeneration and our vnion with Christ The Remission of sinnes for albeit sinne by reason of the state of Nature abide as touching the disease or roote of sinne and the very matter yet it is taken away by reason of the state of the person as touching the guilt or forme which is not imputed to the faithfull Hence it is that Baptisme is sayde to bee given for the remission of sinnes f Act. 2.38 22.26 The benefite of Regeneration because we being ingraffed into Christ by baptisme are changed into his nature and are made partakers of his divine Nature for which cause it is called the Laver of Regeneration g Tit. 3.5.6 Our Vnion with Christ for hence it is that wee are sayde to be Baptized into Christ h Ga. 3.27 and into the Name of Christ i Mat. 28.19 1. Cor. 12 13. by baptisme to be buried with Christ and to be baptized into his death and resurrection k Rom. 6.3.4 After the Latter manner the end of baptisme is first that it may bee a Testimony of our godlinesse and obedience vnto God with Thanksgiving l Ioh. 4.1 Act. 2.41 Secondly that it may bee a badge discerning the Church together with her members frō prophane Nations Thirdly that it may bee the bond of the communion of the Church and their mutuall loue who are dipped in the same Lavar From this consideration of the causes two Consequents are drawn the one of the Necessity the other of the Effect and Efficacy of Baptisme The Necessity two thinges doe circumscribe or limite The Institution of God and the Condition of him that is to be baptized The Scope of Gods Institution is not to tie eyther the things signified to the Signes or the men to the Sacraments by an absolute necessity forasmuch as God by an immediate and extraordinary action when he will and on whome he will conferreth the thing signified neyther can the simple want but the contempt of the Sacrament be hurtfull which doth befall neyther vnto all Infants nor all them that are of ripe yeares but according to the liberty of his will it may seale the things signified in them who both can and should receyue the vse of the signes They that are to be baptized are persons of yeares and Infants to a person of yeares Baptisme is necessary vnto Salvation two wayes eyther by Desire and Will if liberty be not granted him to take the Layer of water or really and in very deed if liberty bee granted For faith hath alwayes joyned with it the desire of obedience To an Infant Baptisme is necessary not simply for the Invisible but after a sort for the visible ingraffing of him into Christ and the body of the Church which if the point of necessity doe bar him from that invisibly is fulfilled with out baptisme which otherwise is shewed in the visible baptisme The Effects of baptisme are not either the doing away of all guilt and punishmen or the conferring of grace by the worke done or lastly an impression of a marke that cannot bee raced out but they are the same with those which are the ends thereof aboue expounded The Efficacy of all which Effects is not ascribed to the outwarde baptisme or the Elements of water but to the bloud of Christ and the inward baptisme of the Spirit which by a hidden operation conferreth that invisible Grace which is signified in the outward Baptisme OF BAPTISME The Part Confuting I. THe Word Baptisme is taken two wayes in the Scriptures Properly and Figuratiuely Properly it signifieth two things first a dipping into the water secondly any simple washing or cleansing and in this signification by an excellency the first Sacrament of the New Testament is called Baptisme Figuratiuely it importeth foure things eyther by an Allegory the deluge of the waters the passing through the Sea and the abiding vnder the cloud or by a Metaphor the crosse or every extreame affliction or by a Metalepsis the powring out of the giftes of the Spirite or lastly by a Synechdoche the whole doctrine of Iohn and his whole Ministery II. BAptisme in kinde is but one but in the manner of considering it is two-fold Outward and Inward that is of the Water this of the Spirite and bloud which three because indeed they are the parts of the whole Baptisme from each one every of the three kindes of Baptisme doe spring to witte the Baptisme of Water Inspiration and bloud In Defence of the Efficient Cause or the Minister baptizing and first that the baptisme of Iohn Baptist and the rest of the Ministers was one and the selfe same against Bellarmine Lib. 1. de Sacra Bapt. Cap. 20.21.22 THe DISTINCTIONS I. THat baptisme cannot bee sayde to haue beene instituted of Iohn himselfe which the Scripture teacheth to haue beene a baptisme administred by Gods commaundement Luc. 3.2.3 To be from Heaven Mat. 21.25 and which the Pharisies refusing are sayd to haue despised the counsell of God Luc. 7 30.15 but in that it is called the baptisme of Iohn it distinguisheth between the Ministery of Iohn himselfe and the mastership of authority of Christ II. THe Invocation of the Trinity is expressed in the Scriptures eyther according to the very formall words or according to the sence and truth albeit those wordes be not expressed in the administration of Iohns baptisme yet the consequence of diverse Arguments doe aboundantly proue the sence truth of the Invocation for therefore is Iohn sayd to haue baptized into Christ Act. 19.4 and to haue preached the baptisme of Repentance for the Remission of sinnes Mar. 1.3 III. THe time of the Institution of baptisme ought not to bee reckoned since Christs resurrectiō from the dead or since his baptisme in Iordan but since the time of his manifestation in the flesh from which the time of the New Testament ordinarily taketh his beginning IIII. THe difference of baptisme is one Essentiall the other Accidentall That according to the substance and effect This acording to the circumstance and manner of Christs manifestation but there are two causes why he would distinguish betweene his baptisme and Christs the first that hee might note the difference betweene the outwarde Baptisme of Water and the Inwarde Baptisme of the Spirite the other that hee might distinguish between his owne person and office and betweene the person and office of Christ Adde further that the Baptisme of the spirite is taken for the visible gift of miracles powred out on the Apostles according as the conferring of places m Parallelorum the one with the other teacheth Act. 1.5 11.16 but in that it is spoken in the future tense it is an Enallage or change
of the tense very frequent in Scriptures V. THe Fathers who treated of the difference of both Baptismes eyther treated of the circumstances the maner of Christ his manifestation onely and not of the substance or efficacy as Origen Iustin Nazianzene Chrisostome Cyrill or of the outward Baptisme of Iohn or the inward of Christ severally as Basil Tertullian Cyprian Hierom or as they are men haue erred from the truth as Augustine VI. THe office of Iohn Baptist ought two wayes to be distinguished one way whereby he receyved from God the office of teaching and baptizing the other whereby particularly hee is called the fore-runner of the Messias in the Scriptures by the former he sealed and conferred salvation ministerially by preaching and baptizing by the later hee fore-shewed Christ the true onely Author of the true Baptisme by both wayes the power and efficacy of Iohns Baptisme and of the rest is evidently proved to be the same VII A Comparison is made of both Baptismes in respect both of the persoÌ„ and of the office of Iohn Christ not in respect of the essence effect neyther is the outward baptisme divers or different but in the administration or both the difference is declared betweene Iohns outward and Christs inward Baptisme VIII THe Consequence is of no validitie from a conjecture though ever so likely whereof notwithstanding there is no testimony extant in Scripture againe according to the vse of Scripture by a Synecdoche a part is taken for the whole Adde further that Luc. 7.8 The Scribes and Pharisies not being baptized are excepted of Iohn IX ACt. 19. ver 3.4.5 the words of Paul speaking are to be distinguished from the wordes of the Evangelist declaring that history as it is confirmed by the proprietie of the two wordes in the Greeke tongue Moreover in that they deny that they ever heard whether that there were a Holy Ghost it is to bee vnderstoode not of the Existence and Substance of the hoâ—y Ghost but Metonymycally of the manner of the visible powring out of the gifts of the holy Ghost Adde further that from the doubtfull significaâ—ion of the word Baptizme nothing â—olloweth for baptisme doth not sigâ—ifie Water onely but eyther the matter of Baptisme or the very doctrine of â—ohn DISTINCTIONS Of the Baptisme of Lay-persons against Bellarmine Lib. 1. cap. 6. De Sacra Baptis I. THe example of Zipporah who circumcised her sonne in asmuch as it was eyther a rash and vnlawfull exâ—mple of a foolish angry woman or 〈◊〉 particular action or deed ought not to bee drawne into a consequence for the Angell was pacified because the Childe was circumcised and not because shee had circumcised him II. THe office of teaching is one Ecclesiasticall an other Domesticall that is publicke this private the Ecclesiasticall and publicke office pertayneth to them alone who haue a calling in the Church the Domesticall and private to all those who being as members of the Church are by the law of Charity bound to respect the good of the whole Church and every member thereof Now the conclusion is not of any force from a publicke office of teaching to a private whereas that is of a particular calling but this of a calling common to all Christians III. FRom publicke persons those vpon whome sometimes the office of administring the word was imposed to those that are of the Laity the conclusion is of no force Adde further that the administration of Baptisme was two-folde in the Primitiue Church the one Immediate by the Apostles themselues the other Mediate by the Deacons who not of themselues but by the commaundement of the Apostles did baptize IIII. THe Testimonies of the Fathers and Councels which are cited are eyther vnfitly alleadged as that of Tertullian who giveth the authority of baptizing not absolutely but by the way of supposition of the order altered in the Church Of Ambrose who treateth of the extraordinary function of the Deacons in the Primitiue church and the ordinary function of the Ministers in the Church which followed after Of Augustine who determineth nothing but doubtingly proposeth a question or are false and are confuted by the testimonies of the fourth Councell of Carthage which in the 100 Canon ezpresly layeth downe and determineth the contrary Of the Nicene Councell which treateth of the Baptisme of Heretickes whose manner is diverse to this and not of the baptisme of the lay-persons or lastly by the testimonies of other Fathers and councels as of Chrysostome and Epiphanius c. For the Matter receyving Baptisme or the baptizing of Children I. FRom those things which are particularly spoken or done with certaine conditions and circumstances of the persons and the times simply and generally to conclude is an Inconsequent II. TO beleeue as touching the present controversie is taken two wayes Actiuely when they which are of yeares haue faith in Christ by the hearing of the word Passiuely and by imputation when for the covenant and Gods promise the righteousnesse of faith is imputed vnto Infants III. THere is a two-fold Act of Faith the first and the second that wherby faith is this whereby faith worketh Infants haue faith in the first Act not in the second in the seednesse and not in the harvest by Imputation of justice not by operation by a hidden verrue of the Spirite and not by outward demonstration IIII. THe diverse circumstances of ages breake not the vnity of Faith and the nature of the promise for the one and selfe same righteousnesse of faith is sealed in the Parentes and in the Infants V. AN Vniversall commaundement includeth a particular neyther must wee restraine that to one part onely of the promise and to the halfe seed of the riper age which pertaineth alike vnto all VI. FRom the deniall of a speciall precept to an vniversall forbidding it followeth not by consequence VII THe truth of doctrine ought not onely to bee drawne forth and confirmed from the outward syllables but from the consequence and force of the whole scripture referred to the proportion of Faith VIII THe consequence is of no waight from the vnlikenesse of time and persons and the divers order of God towards persons of yeares and Infants IX COnfession of Doctrine and faith are not the proper and true causes of Baptisme but onely the consequent Effects For the necessity of Baptisme against Bellarmine Lib. 1. Cap. 4. I. FRom the ambiguous signification of the word Water nothing followeth for it is taken not onely for the outward Element but also for the operation of the holy Ghost which k Exegeticè by way of exposition is wont so to bee expressed in scriptures then the necessity which Christ inferreth is to bee ascribed not so much to the signe as to the thing signified Adde further that the Baptisme of water is after a sort said to be necessary to those who both can and ought to vse it II. THe Testimonies of the Fathers and Counsels some are badly
not that is the Church ambiguously so called or that which is Hypocriticall that which hath neyther these nor that is not a Church at all But because the particular Church which hath these markes eyther hath them perfectly or according to parts and againe both wayes according to the quantity and quality diversly eyther more or lesse eyther more purely or more vnpurely Hence it commeth to passe that particular Churches both diversly erre and oftentimes fayle they erre more or lesse according as they either cleaue to the truth or swerue from the same x 1. Cor. 13.9 Rom. 7.23 Mat. 6.12 they fayle partly because they are not alwayes conspicuous in order regiment and continuall succession and partly because sometimes they vtterly perish by Apostasie and corruption y Apoc. 13 4.8 The End of the Church in generall is the glory of God himselfe or the prayse of the glory of his grace but in Particular the end of the Invisible Church is the salvation of the Predestinate and of the visible the consummation fulfilling of the body of Christ out of them that were generally called OF THE CHVRCH The Part Confuting In Defence of the Invisiblenesse of the Catholicke Church against Bellarmine cap. 12. Lib. 3. THE DISTINCTIONS I. THe Church is two wayes vsually considered eyther according to the outward matter and forme thereof or according to that which concerneth the whole or vniversall and inwarde forme thereof In the former sence it is called visible but in the latter invisible even the Scripture it selfe granting or condiscending herevnto which for this end calleth the Catholicke church the church of the first borne who are written in heaven the body of Christ not naturall but mysticall the Spouse all whose glory is inward II. THe reasoning is of no validity which is drawne from the particular church to the catholicke or Vniversall because those things pertaine not to every singular part which yet are most truely spoken of the whole in generall and indivisibly Now these are particular churches whereof there is mention made Numb 20.3 King 8. Act. 20 Act 15. ver 3. 4. Act. 18. 1. Cor. 15. Gal. 1. Phil. 3. III. THe conclusion is inconsequent from the catholicke church to a Particular for neyther doe all the conditions or properties of the whole church fitte to every part therof eyther alwaies or altogether and those two propositions Mat. 16. 1. Tim. 3. are to bee vnderstood of the catholicke and invisible church as all the circumstances thereof doe evidently proue For the foundation of the church cannot bee sayde to be visible or sensible whether you vnderstand Peter according to the confession of the Adversary for it cannot bee seene or Christ for hee is the mysticall head of a mysticall body or the confession of faith for faith is onely to be perceyved by the vnderstanding Neyther treateth hee of the Church over which Timothie was chiefe in respect of the visiblenesse therof but so farre forth as it was a parte of the catholicke invisible Church and did only comprehend those which were in very deed of the houshold IIII. THe name of Church is termed properly or Figuratiuely by the exposition or opposition of the two entire parts of the Church which are the Pastors and the Flocke For properly and absolutely it signifieth the vniversall body but oppositely this or that parte of the Church but in the place cited Mat 18. it is taken oppositely for the Rulers of the Church themselues who commonly are called the Church representatiue V. THe Argument which is not grounded vpon the authority of Scripture but vpon the bad exposition of Augustine concludeth nothing Now the proper translation and natural sense of these wordes In them hee layde a tabernacle for the Sunne is that God placed Tent in the Heavens or a certaine glorious seate for the Sunne VI. ESay 2. Dan. 2. Mich. 4 Mat. 5. Ans There is no good proceeding from the Figuratiue formes of speaking by which the dignity majesty of Christs kingdome or of the Catholicke church is set foorth to the visiblenesse of the same For eyther all that Majesty of the church as it is catholicke is inwarde or if it bee outward it belongeth not to the church as it is catholicke but in regard of the diverse and particular circumstances of place time and persons Of Place because that may be true a Secundū quid after a sort or in part concerning particular churches which absolutely and simply cannot bee spoken of the Catholicke Of the Time because the maner and fashion or outward appearance of the same is divers For the church is at one time more conspicuous then at another but it was most conspicuous at the time of the first preaching of the Gospell Lastly of the Persons because of the outwarde concourse of men eyther good or bad which Augustine against the Donatists proveth to haue beene in his time most populous VII Two times onely doe not make the vniversality of the church but all times from the beginning of the world to the end of the same Neyther could the church of the ancient people either be knowne by circumcision or were the gifts of the holy Spirit visible in the new Testament Not the one for al they which were of the circumcision did not pertaine to the catholicke church Not the other because the grace of the goly Spirite is not to be perceyved by the outward sence VIII THe church is called so aequivocally either simply absolutly or after a sort as touching some particular limitation of the same the church absolutely so called comprehendeth the Angels but after a sort so called either comprehendeth the whole vniversality of men in heaven and in earth and so the Soules of the dead or onely that vniversalitie of men which is on the earth The Society of these as they are elect is mysticall and spirituall and therefore not well compared to politicke or civill societies neyther doth the outward societie of the sacraments whereof Augustine speaketh cause any man to bee a member of the catholicke Church but of a particular Church onely IX THere is no consequence eyther frō an aequivocation or from the vnlike manner of the church the aequivocation is in the word Church which signifieth eyther the catholicke church Invisible or Visible Now the manner of the Iewish and Popish Church is vnlike because God commanded the form of the one but of the Popish church not at all and they that were partakers with that Church did partake in holy things and such as pertayned to the condition of that church and not in all things promiscuously or confusedly X. THere is one necessity absolute another conditionall the necessity absolute is that if wee will bee saved we adjoyne our selues to the catholicke church out of which there is no salvation but the necessity conditionall is that wee adjoyne our selues to this or that particular church for there is a twofold condition the one
and verity thereof The other concerning the order and Methode of our institution Divinitie wee meane not that first patterne which in God is of God himselfe nay is God himselfe for both God that which is in God is the selfe same in a simple Essence wherein by an indivisible and vnchangeable act he knoweth both himselfe in himselfe and out of himselfe all and singular thinges by himselfe but the stampe out of that former expressed and shapened by a revelation and gratious communication thereof eyther according to the vniversall nature in all men or according to speciall grace measure of the scripture in the Church Hee that would enquire the veritie hereof ought to consider two things first that it is secondly what it is That there is such a stampe of Divinity the Nature of God the light both of our owne Naturall conscience and supernaturall knowledge revealed as also the common experience of Nations and ages doe declare The Nature of God for sith hee is by all meanes infinitely good we must no way think that God wanteth a good meane to communicate good whose property it is to bee a communicator of himselfe or to communicate himselfe with other his creatures according to their condition a Mat. 5.45 The light both of our Naturall conscience by which clearely shining all men haue this setled in their heartes that there 's is a Divination and other kindes of divine communications b Rom. 1 1â—.19 2.24.25 as also of supernatural Knowledge revealed whereby wee know that whole truth to bee fully and plainely registred in the holy scriptures which was behoofefull for vs to know to our salvation Common Experience for even the Gentiles themselues being strangers from God had the Oracles of the Divell in stead of these from God rather then that they would deny that stamped Divininity or bee saide to want the same c Rom. 1.21.22.23 for hence it came to passe that whereas among the Heathen some of their Gods were thought to bee very Gods some others to be such spirites as they called Daemones the heathens Divinity was held to bee of two partes for the one treated of the Gods themselues the other of d Daemones those spirites which they called Daemones that which treated of their Gods August lib. 5. de Civit. Dei cap. 6. was held of them to bee three-sold as Augustine out of Varro teacheth to wit Poeticall Naturall and Civill that which did set forth the power of those spirites was two-fold for whereas of those spirites called Doemones some were good some evill that which discoursed of the evill spirites who were to bee pacified and appeased was called Magicke and Inchantment but the other which delighted the good with sacrifices was called Divine ministration and Expiation therefore there is a Divinity Now if you respect the true interpretation of the word it is defined thus to bee a knowledge of the Oracles or speeches of God but if the thing or matter it selfe it is a true wisedome of divine thinges from God communicated eyther by meane Naturall according to inbred principles or else by a meane more excellent according to grace supernaturall And of this Divinity wee speake in this place wee call it Wisedome by example of Scripture f 1. Cor. 26. first for the excellency of the thing as being the most certaine declarer of principles most noble Princesse of all sciences secondly for the singular meane or manner of knowing for this wisedome is distinguished from that which in the Scripture is called earthly sensuall and diuellish The subject of this Theological wisdome are matters divine both for their Nature and the manner of considering for whereas a Subiect hath two partes the one which containeth the place of the matter is called the thing considered the other of the forme and is the manner of considering it wee obserue them both in the explication of this subiect The thing considered is God himselfe and all thinges disposed vnto God that is all thinges divine eyther of their owne nature or by relation vnto God The manner of considering is proportionable to Gods truth even to the whole truth and everie part thereof alike or equally infused fitted to the dignity of the deliverer to the nature of the argument as also to the condition of those to whome it is delivered And this is the nature and verity of Divinity now wee will briefly shew the Methode of our Institution concerning the same There is a two-fold Methode of teaching the one from Principles the other vnto Principles the one a Priori proceeding from the Cause to the Effect and from the first and highest to the lowest and last the other a Posteriori proceeding from the Effect to the Cause or from the last and lowest to the highest and first The vse of the former is chiefest in sciences contemplatiue of the latter in the practicke or actiue Now whereas Divinity in both these holdeth the first principal place by reason wherof some haue distinguished it into Contemplatiue and Actiue and for that it affordeth a faculty both of knowing and doing well which is the right way of wisedome it hath fallen out that Dâ—vinity hath been handled in a diverse Mâ—thod by diverse men yet by all of them profitably and faithfully For whereas all order is taken eyther from the nature of thinges to bee considered or from our better and easier knowledge thereof Calvin Melanthon Vrsinus haue done well who observed an order of their better knowledge in a method vnfoulding by way of Analysis g Analytiâ—a in like manner Hiperius Musculus Hemingius Zanchius haue done well observing the order of Nature h Synthetiâ—a Synthesis also is contrary to Analysis beginning froÌ„ things granted to that vvhich is in question in a Method of composing and couching thinges handsomly together Wee in this our Institution will ioyne both these together borrowing i a Synthesi from the Methode of composing the disposition and k Ab Analysi from the Methode of vnsoulding the invention of the same that from both the l Systema full constitution of this body of Divinity which we haue in hand may arise Therefore by an order Syntheticall as wee tearme it wee will begin from the first Principles that by the Means wee may come to the last but we wil set downe a declaration such as wee call Analyticall of the first middle and last thinges first in teaching the truth by way of confirmation then in reproving the falshood by way of confutatioÌ„ that by the helpe and benefite of the Definition of every point of Divinitie and by the Analysis of the same through the causes thereof but this by the Appendix or addition of the generall solutions which wee will lay vnder every place or point and set against the principal arguments of our adversaries especially Bellarmines this is our Methode THE FIRST Booke of the Principles of sacred
they are taken with the Fathers in generall in the former when they treate of the bookes truely canonicall in the latter when of the Apocryphal III. IT belongs vnto him only to prescribe giue and maintaine a Canon in the church who is the Author Lord and Preserver of his Church IIII. NEyther doth the Apocryphal confirme the authority of the Apocryphal nor the Councels of Florence and Trent nor the Ecclesiastical reading nor lastly the Fathers eyther by citing of places out of the Apocryphall or intitling the Apocryphal with the name of holy Scriptures for the Canon of ecclesiasticall reading is one and the Canon of saith is another Distinctions for the perfection of the Scripture VVHereas our Adversaries are wont to bring two kinde of Arguments against the perfection of the Scripture the one against the necessity the other against the sufficiency thereof wee will treate of both together Against Bellarmine 1. Tom. Lib. 4. Cap. 4. I. THere is a two-fold necessity the one absolute the other by an d Or supposition Hypothesis or something is sayed to bee necessary two wayes eyther as the Cause or the e Concausa Fellow-cause the word of God revealed is simply necessary to all men as the cause but the Scripture as the Fellow cause Now it followeth not thus to conclude the Fathers vntill Moses vsed the necessary cause without this the Fellow-cause therefore we may for a conclusion drawne from the change of time is deceitfull II. A Tradition onely is sayed to haue beene eyther b After a sort or in part Simply or Absolutely secundum quid that 〈◊〉 without the Scripture and so wee confesse a tradition to haue beene vntill Moses or simpliciter and that we denie for they had in stead of Scripture other innumerable Principles and Ruâ—diments III THe whole is sayde to be two waies eyther according to quantity or according to the perfection of the Essence thereof All the Bookes severally are sufficient in their owne Essentiall â—erfection though according to their â—ntirenesse and quantity they haue not the sufficiency of the whole but their owne IIII. THese Bookes which perished eyther were not Canonicall or their substance is found in those which are Canonicall V SOme precepts of God are expressed and manifest some other inwarde and hidden God commaunded his Word to be written downe both by the inward inspiration of the spirit generally and therefore is sayde to bee inspired i Divinitus of God as also expresly to certaine persons in particular k Reu. 1.11 Apoc. 1.11 VI. ALL thinges are contayned in the Scripture eyther expresly or Analogically so what wee are to thinkâ— of Women not circumcized of Infants dead before the eight day of the Gentiles saved we may know out of the Scripture Analogically VII A Principle of a Principle cannot be had nor ought to bee sought Now the Scripture is knowne to be divine not from Tradition but first from the inward testimony of the spirite of Christ secondly from the testimony of the Apostles as the publicke Notaries in the Church Thirdly from the testimony of the Scripture as a divine Instrument and lastly from the â—â—stimony of the Church of God openâ— and as it were in a pillar setting â—rth the testimony of the Apostles and â—f the Scripture VIII THe Scripture is not doubtfull in it selfe but vnto vs by accident and â—ther seemeth so to be through the corâ—uption of our vnderstanding but God 〈◊〉 an infallible Interpreter of the same â—y his Spirit and word written and â—f this divine tradition wee haue need â—r the vnderstanding of the Scripture or those things which it behooveth vs â—o know concerning the equality of â—â—e persons the proceeding of the Spiâ—ite originall sinne the descension of Christ into Hell are sufficiently declaâ—ed in the Scripture for our Salvation IX THose thinges which are spoken concerning the Virginity of Marie afâ—er the birth of Christ the Passeover to be celebrated on the Lords day the l Paedabaptismo Baptisme of Infantes and Purgatory eyther are not necessary as the first and the second or are found Analogically in the Scriptures as the third or are false as the fourth The Places which are cited by Bellarmine against the perfection of the Scripture 1. Tom. Lib. 4. Cap. 5. are these Ioh. 16.12 Ans The Place treateâ— of speciall thinges the knowledge oâ— which is infinite which therefore alsâ— are expressed in the Scriptures not iâ— particular and one by one but bâ— Word and in generall or else oâ— those thinges the Revelation whereof according to the dispensation oâ— time Christ would defer vntill thâ— time of that extraordinary and visiblâ— communicating of the holy Ghost 1. Cor. 11.2 Ans In the holy Supper of the Lord two things concurreâ— the very substantiall thinges of the Supper to wit the matter and forme seâ—â—ndly the meere Ceremoniall thinges the Rites Those are of themselues â—â—cessary and were most faithfully deâ—ered by the Apostles but these 〈◊〉 after a sort m SecunduÌ„ qu id for that which is morall 〈◊〉 them is necessary and therefore â—ly written downe of the Apostles â—t that which is Ceremoniall onely is 〈◊〉 Indifferent n Adiaphoâ—um and left free to the â—hurches 2. Thes 2.15 Ans The Word of â—â—adition is Equivocall for eyther in â—enerall it signifieth every doctrine â—owsoever delivered by Word or Wriâ—g or it signifieth in Particular or â—ppositely that doctrine which is not â—itten in the first signification the â—postle taketh it and not in the seâ—nd 1. Tim. 6.2 2. Tim. 1.13 Ans â—hat the pledge and patterne of wholeâ—me wordes cannot be otherwise exâ—ounded then of the Scripture it selfe â—nd the substance of christian doctrine â—ll the circumstances of the place doe teach 2 Ioh. 1.2 Ans That kinde of reasoning hath no consequence which is drawne from particulars eyther deedes or rytes which it was not needefull to expresse in writing but the case is altered concerning the very substance of the doctrine of Faith Distinctions for the playnenesse of the Scripture against Bellarmine 1. Tom. Lib. 3. Cap. 1. I. THe clearenesse or obscurity of the Scripture is two-fold the one to vs partly through the Nature of the thinges partly through our owne infirmity the other in manner and meane of the Scriptures every obscurity whereof mention is made among the Fathers is not of the Scriptures but eyther of the thinges in the Scripture for the maiesty therof or else ours who without the inward light of the spirite cannot know them those thinges which wee know wee know onely in part and after an vnperfect manner II. THe matters of the Scripture though for their maiesty they are vnto vs obscure yet as they are proposed vnto vs in the Scripture they are not obscure for the manner of speaking is every way perspicuous neyther is there in the Scriptures eyther any contrariety or ambiguity or falshood nor doe the speeches which go e
Godhead are of themselues God but most properly it is sayed to bee common to the three persons not as the vniversall to the things singular not as the accident to the Subiects not as the cause to the Effects not as the whole to the partes Lastly not as one thing to others but as the thing to his proper manners which are in the thing for the persons are the manners of subsisting or divine Essence from which they are distinguished not by the respect alone nor by the reall distinction but by the degree and manner of the thing The name therefore of persons which was vsed of the Fathers against Sabellius as also the name both of Essence against Samosatenus and of both against the Arians signifieth three thinges first the Individuum it selfe or singular thing subsisting intelligible incommunicable and not sustayned of another secondly the very propertyes of every Individuum by which they are distinguished from others and which also the Schoolemen haue called Principia Individuantia lastly these both together they are called subsisting Individua together with theyr properties and the manners of being because they signifie nothing else then the Essence subsistâ—ng in some one Individuum and by the property thereof severed and limitted These persons are three the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost f Esa 63.7.8 Mat. 3.16.17 Ioh. 15.26 distinct not by degree state or dignity but by order number and the manner of doing By Order for the Father is the first person of himselfe not of another not in regard of Essence but in regard of person existing g Ioh. 5.7 1. Ioh. 6. the Sonne is the second in respect of person in deed of the Father existing by eternall generation of which as the truth is i Hyperphisica supernaturall so likewise is the manner vnspeakeable but as touching his absolute Essence he â—s of himselfe and God of himselfe the holy Ghost is the third coeternally proceeding and comming forth from the Father and the Sonne in regard of person but God of himselfe with the Father and the Sonne in regarde of Essence By Number for they are among themselues truly distinct and every one by themselues subsisting for the relations of the persons are incommutable and incommunicable the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost which are not names of Essence but of relations and persons and the properties which from thence flow and come forth distinguish the persons among themselus to witte paternity or a not being begotten a beeing begotten and a proceeding which are works k Ad intra ad extra from within and divided that is proper to every person incommunicably By the Manner of doing for even in the workes from without which are Indivisible the persons indeede worke the same thinges but not after the same manner the Father createth the Sonne redeemeth the holy Ghost inlighteneth in respect of the cause the effect or absolute finishing equally and inseparably but in respect of the bound distinctly or severally These three persons are God three in vnity vnconfusedly and one in Trinity Indivisibly that the Father is God all men confesse That the Sonne is God three things do proue the equality of divine essence with the Father divine names and the essentiall proper things of God The Equalitie both Christ proveth Analogically by his workes l Ioh 5.18 and Paul layeth it downe expresly m Phil. 2.6 Col 2.9 as also very many places of the olde and new Testament n Parallelorum mutually compared together doe confirme the same The Divine Names which are attributed vnto Christ are all those which are sayed to bee of God essentially whether properly he be called IEHOVA p Esa 43. or commonly hee be called GOD. The Essential proper things of God which are attributed vnto Christ are eyther divine q Esa 9.6 properties as Eternity r Idiomata vniversall presence omniscience Å¿ Apoc. 1.17 omnipotency t Mat. 28.20 or divine workes as of Creation u Apoc. 2 23. Redemption x Phil. 3.21 Miracles y Io. 5.46 or divine worshippe as Invocation Faith z Ep. 1.1.2 That the holy Spirite is God the selfe same course of Argumentes doth proue the equality Christ prooveth a Mat. 8.2 the Divine Names which are attributed vnto him are both that proper name of IEHOVAH b Phi. 2.10 and the common of God and others c Ioh. 15 6 the same proper thinges are attributed vnto him in the Scripture whether they bee the very properties as eternity d Act. 1.16 vniversall presence e 1. Cor. 3.16 Act. 4 24. Inscience f Heb. 9.14 omnipotency g Rom. 8.9 or divine workes as of creation h Ioh. â—4 26 of redemption i Heb. 3.7 of miracles k Iob. â—6 15. or divine worship l 1. Cor. 2.10 Rom. 1.5 Mat. 28.9 And these three persons are one God for although personally the Father be one the Sonne be another and the holy Ghost another person yet Essencially the Father is not one thing the Sonne another thing and the holy Ghost another thing The truth and perfection of this both Vnity and distinction is seene in the knowledge of the Attributes or proprieties both of the Essence and the persons We call the Proprieties of the persons those m Characteristica Idiomata marking Idiomes or limiting Attributes which comming from the persons are not onely limited in the persons but also doe limite the persons both in themselues among themselues for wee consider as it were a double respect of those vnto the persons the one personall the other Notionall both in relation but in a diverse manner and degree The Personall respect is in those properties which together note indeed a Relation yet especially according to the vse which they haue obtayned in the holy Scriptures and among the Doctors of the Church they note and point â—ut the very subiects l Hipostases or subsistings as â—re the names of the persons the Noâ—ionall respect is in those properties which are called Notions or Relations â—he vse of which is in relation alone as â—re the names of Generation Nativity procession The Properties of Essence wee call Attributes in God Essentiall to God whereby both the verity of the Essence clearely appeareth in it selfe and is distinguished from others yet so that they really differ neyther from the Essence nor among themselues not from the Essence because they are so in one Essence as that they are the very Essence for God is a simple working power not among themselues for that which is in God is one and from the first vnity every difference and every number ought vtterly to bee farre away But because they differ neyther from the Essence nor among themselues they are no meane qualities betweene power and act but they are in God most inward actuall perpetuall 〈◊〉 from his forme act essentiall whence it is that
the Salvation of the Elect. Of CREATION the Part Confuting Distinctions for the Cause Efficient I. CReation is sayed to bee eyther properly concerning the work of the first bringing forth of thinges or Metaphorically of those things or works which are of no lesse vertue and power both wayes it is attributed to God alone II. THose things are created which are made of no substantiall and materiall beginning but those things are generated which are made of a fore-being matter the Creation of God is by himselfe but the generation of nature next after God III. NO things being apt to generation or corruption which are brought forth of God by second causes coÌ„ming between are properly sayed to be created because to be created is immediately to be brought forth of God IIII. CReation is two-folde Actiue and Passiue the one sayeth that there is a divine Essence and that the Creature cannot exist vnlesse hee put the case that there is a divine Essence the other sayeth that the Creature was really brought forth by God and noteth withall a creating Essence V. TO Create and to make differ because that more strictly taken signifieth of nothing to make somewhat but this more generally importeth not that onely but also to bring forth somwhat out of a matter lying and being before VI. THe thinges themselues and the nature substance of them ought to be distinguished from the evill that comes vnto them and from the Accidents of the thinges and substances For the MATTER I. THere is one respect or maner of the Primary Creation another of the secondary wherefore that generall u Classicum Alarme of the Philosophers of nothing nothing is made may be fitted or applied to the estate of bodily things but cannot bee opposed to the Creation II. NOthing is sayed to bee eyther privatiuely or Negatiuely Negatiuely of the Primary Creation Privatiuely of the second For the FORME I. THe signification of beginning is threefold for it pertayneth eyther to the time or to the thinges and causes or lastly to the order but it is taken in the first signification when wee treate of the beginning of Creation II. THose thinges which of Moses are written down of the forme and order of things created are not to bee taken Allegorically but Physically or Naturalâ—y OF PROVIDENCE The Part Confirming CHAP. IIII. ANd this is the beginning both Primary Secondary of things created acording to their nature now followeth the powerfull coÌ„servation of the same and the most wise ordering of them vnto their end which by the vse of the Scripture and the Doctors of the Church we call Providence Now whereas a double part of this Providence is wont to bee discerned and distinguished the one of decree according to the eternall fore-knowledge and fore-appointment of all thinges in God the other of Execution according to the externall Administration of the same in time and wheras also the consideration of the former properly pertayneth to Predestination which is a kind of Gods operations Immanent wee in respect of this latter doe here consider and treate of Providence properly so called This Providence then is an outward and temporall action of God whereby he keepeth all and several things which are and disposeth â—ll several things which are done to that end which hee hath determined according to the liberty of his will and that to the end hee might in all and severall things be glorified The Efficient Cause of this Providence or governement is the same which is of Creation sith the one and the self fame beginning is of both from by which all things proceed are conserved to witte God the Father Sonne and holy Ghost a Psal 32.13.15 139.78 Ioh. 12.34 The Father or the loue and goodnes of the Father is the first beginning cause The Sonne in that he is the wisedom and word is the working causes The holy Ghost in that hee is the vertue and power of the Father and the Sonne is the finishing cause The nature of God teacheth this whose presence power operation the scripture coÌ„mendeth in both works b Psal 9 4.8 Mat. 10.29 Ier. 10.23 Prou. 6.19 Esa 45.7 coÌ„mon Nature testifyeth it which as the commoÌ„ Instrument of God being stirred by that vniversall beginning stirreth and being moved moveth it selfe and al things according to it selfe Our nature together witnesseth and feeleth it because as in himselfe we haue our being so in himselfe also we liue and are moved c Act. 17.28 And the operatioÌ„s of this efficient cause are according to degrees distinguished now they are distinguished by a threefolde order maner The first is of Conservation the second of Governing The third of Ordayning to the end of which more at large in the formall cause of providence The Matter about which Providence is imployed according to the twofold consideration of the things which are subiect vnto it may be distinguished two wayes one way in respect of those things which are another way in respect of those things which are don for after both wayes respects all and severall things are ruled by Gods provideÌ„ce The things which are ought three wayes to be distinguished first according to their nature secondly according to their Accidents thirdly according to their vse Of the nature of things whether it be that superior or inferior wherof wee treated in the place of creation there is a double knowledge the one common and according to their natural form or kind the other singular acording to the d Individua things theÌ„selues as they are indivisible The Accidents whatsoever they are are either of common nature in its beginning perfection or of singular nature in the defect and condition thereof f Agnata besides the course of nature Of things according to their vse there is a twofold distinction for eyther they are the ends or the means vnto the end but the ends are some furthest off and some intermediate vnto the same the meanes are severally known two waies first after the manner of doing for some are ordinary some extraordinary and both ordained to their proper ends Secondly by the quality and essentiall condition of them for some are necessary and some contingent Of those which are necessary there are two kinds for some are by themselues absolutely necessary by a necessity of the Consequent as they call it and some by the cause from a g Ex Hypothesi Supposition by necessity of the Consequence Those which are absolutely necessary when we treate of things created we distinguish by two degrees The first is in the first and common beginning of nature first by themselues and by all things necessary as when wee say that twice two is foure which vnchangeably and by an infallible necessity are true The other degree of necessity is from nature out of it owne inward beginning whether materiall as when we say that every thing compounded of contraries must necessarily perish
or Formal as when we say that the fire necessarily burneth Those which are necessary by supposition or by necessity of condition or consequence doe put one a necessity eyther from the inward beginning or from the outward or from both together Thinges contingent are those which may be or not be such as properly happen to every Individuum or singular thing for the power is the matter which is capable of things possible or contingent and the matter is of every singular thing and of every Individuum which are limitted in their owne matter And this is the maner of those things which are now those things which are don or the actioÌ„s are distinguished two wayes by their beginnings and qualities By their beginnings because some actioÌ„s are from a common beginning and arâ— called Naturall which eyther nature by it selfe effecteth neyther is the action of will required for the same as to liue to quicken c. or effecteth them witâ— the action of naturall will as to eate drinke c. other some are from a singular beginning and are called Voluntary which our will Intellectiue effecteth not led by the instinct of nature but by the rule of reason whether by advise or deliberation from which is the will electiue or by an vnadvised motion Voluntas per causam from which is the Will by a cause By the qualities because som are good some evill that which is the goodnes or evilnes of actioÌ„s is discerned both by their own coÌ„mon condition according to the beginnings in actions natural and by a singular manner according to theiâ— speciall kinde and circumstances in actions voluntary and all and every one of these as well those which are as those which are done bee subiect to Gods Providence by wayes both common and singular as in the explication of the cause ensuing shall bee declared The Forme of Gods Providence is that perpetuall Act of directing all and singular things vnto their proper ends which act ought two wayes to be considered and discerned to witte common and singular by the one according to the divers degrees of that act of Gods providence by the other according to the singular nature and condition of the subiects vpon which it worketh The Act of Gods providence is generaly discerned by three degrees the declaration whereof is very necessary for the vnderstanding of this doctrine The first degree is of Conservation whereby all and severall thinges are ordinarily sustayned in the same state of Nature and naturall properties in which they were created This conservation according to the distinction of things which either are or are done is both of Existence and of power The conservation of Existence is the continuance of the substance of things which had their being by creation whether they be of a whole speciall kind or of any Individuum h Psa .. 19.12 104 19.20 c. The conservation of Power is whereby God sustayneth and moveth the proper powers of every Creature which pertayne to the operations and perfections thereof by a singular i Iob. 14.4 Heb. 9.27 Psal 134.2.3 beginning which in thinges involuntary is a singular nature in things voluntary is wil. Both of them is from God as from the vniversall beginning on whome the beginnings both common and singular of thinges and actions doe depend In which dependency two things are to bee noted the one is that the same first beginning of the conservation of things doe so worke in the inferiour beginnings that it detracteth nothing from them but ordinarily leaveth their Actions perfect for God so ordereth all thinges which hee hath created that hee suffereth them also to exercise and doe their owne proper motions The other is that that first beginning worketh by those which are inferior after the manner of those Inferiour for as oft as many causes Coordinate or together ordained doe befal the last effect followeth not the first cause by necessity or contingence but the neerest cause Hence is that tearm Fate or Destiny natural so termed by Christians which is a course and order of naturall causes depending vpon the first cause which vnlesse they be hindered by the same of their owne power nature bring forth the same effect The second degree is of Governing whereby God in whose power is supreme authority disposeth of al things consisting in his own power ruling the same according to the liberty of his owne will Of this Governing there is a threefold consideration the one consisting in Commanding the other in Doing the third in not Doing which they cal Permitting the first verily is of Doctrine and Right and therfore not proper to this place the other two properly respect the action of Gods provideÌ„ce the Action therefore of God governing is two-fold the one performing the other permitting The Action performing is that which of the Grecians is called Fore-Knowledge according to good pleasure whereby God effectually performeth in all and severall things that which belongeth to his owne worke Now hee performeth whatsoever is good in Nature both common and particular as the vniversall beginning of Nature The Action permitting is that which of the Grecians is tearmed Foreknowledge according to permission wherby God forbiddeth not the Actions of others but permitteth to the will of the doer the manner of them Of this Permission there are in the Scripture two kindes the one is of a permission Simple and Absoâ—ute when GOD permitteth simply that which hee might simply and immediately hinder as when hee permitted Adam to fall the other k Ex Hypothesi by Supposition when God after a humane manner tempereth his permissions according to the condition of men such permissions as these are very many in the Olde Testament both are in God from his owne will and are moved to the end which the will of God hath fore-appointed The thirde Degree of GODS Providence is of ordayning whereby God by his admirable Wisedome bringeth all thinges though most out of order vnto their due order and proper Ende In this ordayning three thinges concurre the appointment of the End the disposing of the meanes vnto the end and the directing of the meanes disposed The appointment of the End because God limitteth as all Subiectâ— with their formes so the motions of the forms with their ends whether proper or nerest which are of things according to their own nature or that last or furthest end which is aboue nature to witte Gods glory to which all thinges tend by Gods ordayning This supreme end of thinges though according to perfection signified it be one onely yet according to the manner of signifying which manner is from the obiects it is two-fold his most powerfull Iustice and Grace which in God haue the respect of chiefest good Vnto this double End there is a double disposing of the meanes according as there is fitly laied down by the schoolmen a double intent of God the disposer the one by it selfe chiefly or first intended
of nature from God the naughtines came vnto the Subiect by the corruption of man The Places of Scripture which are wont to bee wrested against the truth of this Doctrine of Providence are for the most part these Against the Materiall Cause 1 Of the Corinth 9.9 Ans Providence is eyther generall or speciall A conclusion from the deniall of the one vnto the deniall of the other is of no force 2 Sam. 1.6 1. King 21.34 Ans Providence and chance are not repugnant the one to the other if the respect of divers causes bee distinguished Esay 31. 1. Act. 5.38 Ans according to the divers considerations of the beginninges wee iudge both of the Causes whether neerest or remote and of the qualities of Actions whether good or bad but whatsoever quality is vitious it is from the particular beginning and not from that which is Vniversall or Common Against the Formall Cause Ezec. 18.33 Ose 13.9 Answ a double consideration of the punishmēt of sinne is wont and ought to bee distinctly noted one is of Iustice in God and hath a respect of morall good another of merite and fault in man hath a respect of evill and in this latter signification these places are to bee vnderstood Prou. 16.4 Answer The working of God in respect of the wicked presupposeth three thinges first the limitation of sinne secondly the withdrawing of Grace thirdly the ordayning of punishment Ierem. 10.7 Answ The Prophet speaketh from the feeling of his own infirmity not of an vntruth in doctrine nor of any wickednesse in life but of his vocation vnto which hee was drawne against his will Exod. 4.21 Esa 69.19 Ezek. 14.9 Rom. 1.28 2. Thes 2.11 Answere A Working is one thing and a working permission is another thing That is in good thinges onely this both in good evil for by permitting God worketh foure wayes first as touching the materiall of sinne secondly as touching the withholding of grace which God oweth to no man because it is grace Thirdly as touching the endes vnto which God disposeth sinnes Fourthly as touching the iust punishment of the sinner whereof this is the highest degree by sinne to punish sinne OF THE WORKES OF Grace or of Redemption CHAP. V. THe Worke of God Externall and Temporall which he bringeth to passe in thinges is twofold of Nature and of Grace The Worke of Nature whereof hithervnto we haue spoken is whereby God hath eyther created thinges not as yet being or conserveth governeth and ordereth them being created by his Providence The Worke of Grace is that which God effecteth in the Elect who shall be heyres of Salvation according to the good pleasure of his will And this Worke commonly is called Redemption for the explication of which worke three thinges concurre the beginning the manner and the Effect or the Application thereof The beginning is Christ as hee is God and man from whome there is no power nor healthfull Action which is needefull for Redemption but doth proceed The manner according to which Christ executed this worke is that holy disposing and dispensation of his offices Now the Effect or Application is discerned first by the degrees hereof in this life that is by Calling and by Iustification Secondly by outwarde meanes that is by Gods Covenant and by his Sacraments Thirdly by the Subiect that is the Church which Christ hath redeemed with his blood Wherefore wee must treate first of Christs person secondly of the offices of his person Lastly of the other places pertayning to the application OF THE PERSON OF CHRIST The Part Confirmatiue CHAP. VI. THe neerest singular and determinate beginning of our Redemption is Christ as hee is God and man because by him Man was to be redeemed in whome our redemption was from everlasting Predestinated by him againe to be restored by whom at first he was created in him he ought to bee made partaker of the loue of God who was the Sonne of loue or the beloved Sonne and at last in him to obtayne the right of Sonnes or adoption who by Nature was the Sonne and heyre of God from everlasting Christ therfore being God and man is as the scripture most briefly defineth the Worde made flesh or God made manifest in the flesh that is a person in whose singularity two Natures the properties thereof remayning whole are vnited for the Redemption of mankind For the explication of this Definition we must consider of three things in order First of the Natures and the necessity verity and actions thereof Secondly of the Subject of the Natures or of the person and of both the Vnity and the operation thereof Thirdly of the Hypostaticall vnion of the Natures and of the manner foundation power and efficacy thereof As concerning the Natures whereas Nature is an outward beginning making the thing it selfe and distinguishing it from other things we acknowledge two such natures in Christ according to the Scripture Divine and Humane both in themselues and in their properties distinct a Rom. 9 1 1. Ioh. 5.20 Phil. 2.6 the one from everlasting immutable immortall impassible the other in time conceyved and borne mutable mortall passible Both are Indivisibly necessary for the redemption of mankind or the dispensation of the office of a Mediator the divine Nature that hee might satisfie God that the satisfaction might bee proportionable to our debt that an Infinite good might helpe an Infinite evill by overcomming death and by vndergoing both the heavines of sinne and the infinitenesse of Gods judgement Adde further that whereas the arbitrement betweene God and man is aboue the humanity because no man can bee a chiefe and supreme messenger of divine thinges but God by his God-head because no working aboue nature such as is a sufficient Intercession with God is of or from nature because no beginning but of the Godhead it selfe can bee the beginning of that satisfaction which may stand before God it must needes bee that according to the divine nature in his person hee tooke on him all the partes of Mediation or Mediatorship But the humane that being man hee might according to the Law satisfie Gods justice that hee might sufficiently suffer for the accomplishment of the worke of satisfaction both by obeying made vnder the law and by dying made a curse according to the Law that in all thinges being like vnto his brethren sinne excepted hee might bee a faithfull and vniversall high Priest in those thinges which are to bee performed before God to purge the sinnes of the people b He. 2.17 Now the divine Nature of Christ that wee may in few wordes speake touching the verity of those Natures is that whereby hee obtayneth the same Essence with the Father and the holy Ghost albeit both according to his person whereby hee is distinguished to bee the Sonne of God and according to the dispensation of his office whereby hee is discerned to bee a Mediator hee is distinguished from the essence of God of which nature
Virgine according to the natures because according to the divine Nature he is coessentiall with the Father but according to the humane coessentiall with the Virgine Ioh. 2.19 Ans The conclusion from the Natures to the person is of no force for the person of Christ is not called the Temple but his Manhood in which the Godhead dwelt bodily Heb. 7.3 The Nativity of Christ is two-fold the one without Mother according to the divine nature the other without Father according to the humane and both were vnited in the one and the selfe same Subject For the quality of Natures I. COncrete or conjoyned names are not multiplyed vnles the Subjects be multiplyed but whereas there is but one Subject alone in Christ of necessity there is but one Christ alone II. THe Actions and Passions are of the person and not of the natures now a conclusion from the persons vnto the natures is in consequent For the Hypostaticall vnion and the communications of Properties against the Vbiquitaries I. A Thing is vnited three wayes Essentially when of many there is made one Essence Accidentally when the Accidents are ioyned to the Subjects Substantially when the substance which otherwise of it selfe might exist is drawne to the being of another Subiect and dependeth on it as a part of 〈◊〉 it II. WEe must make a difference betweene the God-head sending and the person sent and there is one consideration of the Worde by reason of the Essence and another by reason of the office III. VVHatsoever thinges are pronounced of Christ eyther they are divine simply pertayning to his divine nature or humane pertaining the humane or coÌ„mon mediately pertayning to the whole person therefore glory Power and other things when they are pronounced of Christ are these three wayes to bee considered as divine and then they are Essentiall and Incommunicable as humane and then they are proper to Christ in the forme of a servant as mediatory which are proper to the person of Christ in both natures together and in common IIII. SVch as is the substance of every thing such also is the manner of being but there is but one substance of Christs body therefore but one manner of being which is proper to bodies that is circumscriptiue not definitiue which is proper to the spirits nor repletiue which is proper vnto God V. FRom Christ being maÌ„ to Christs manhood the conclusioÌ„ is impertinent for neither the nature ought to be confounded with the nature the persoÌ„ with the nature or the abstract with the concrete VI. THe imitation b Exoequatio equalnesse or communication of Essence or properties maketh not an vnion but the copulation of nature in one subsistence VII WE must distinguish betweene whole Christ and the whole of Christ the first whereof respecteth his person the second his natures for that which is true of whole Christ cannot conveniently or truely be pronounced of the whole of Christ The Places of Scripture Mat. 26. Act. 2. Ephes 1. The right hand is one thing and to sit at the right hand is another Christ is one thing and the man-hood of Christ is another thing the figured signification of right hand is one thing and the proper is another for in the Scriptures the right hand of God importeth two thinges besides the proper signification to witte Power and Glory both Christ hath communicated vnto him as hee is a person God-man whence it is that the Schoolemen affirme Christ to bee ascended vnto his sitting at the Fathers right hand c Aequaliter Aliqualiter equally according to the divine Nature in some sort according to the humane as a double descent is given him in the Scriptures one according to his e Exiâ—anitionem debasement as being God the other according to the locall places as being man Mat. 28. Phil. 2. Col. 3. Ephes 4. The properties of the one nature are attributed to the whole person because of the vnity of the Subject for all that power dignity exaltation is proper to the office and person of the Mediator and not to the natures now they are attributed to Christ being man partly by grace of the vnion and partly because of that exaltation of Christes person which was made aboue every Name OF THE OFFICE OF CHRIST The Confirming Part. CHAP. VII FRom the person redeeming wee passe to the manner of Redemption which the office of Christ doth circumscribe for whereas the manner of Redemption comprehendeth all that action course and manner of Christ which he hath performed according to the ordering disposing and dispensation of both his Fathers will and his owne wee must throughly discerne them by their degrees and the degrees of the office of Christ Now wee discerne them partly Generally according to a common maner partly singularly according to their speciall kindes and partes Generally the office of Christ is defined to be an office of mediation committed to the Sonne a Heb. 5 5. Ioh. 3.17 by the Father and of the Sonne both voluntarily receaved b Ioh. 10.18 Heb. 10.7 and in both natures perfectly fulfilled c Phil. 2.8 Rom. 5.19 that hee might vnite and reconcile vs to God and God to vs for ever d Ioh. 11.51.52 Rom. 4.25 The Cause efficient of this office essentially is God the Father Sonne and holy Ghost e Heb. 1.9 Esa 61.1 but yet the order of proceeding being kept to witte both that which is inward of the persons among themselues and that which is outward as touching the things created for in respect of both it commeth to passe that the Father from whome is both the Essence and vertue of working according to the beginning is sayde to be the Efficient cause of this office of whom the Sonne is annoynted both as touching the calling and as touching the bestowing of Gifts the latter whereof properly pertayneth to the humane nature the former to both Now the forme is sayde to bee the meane or mediating cause by order of person from the Father but by dispensation of office subordinate e Ioh. 14.28 to the Father The matter of this office is considered two wayes Subjectiuely and it is both the natures of Christ f Ioh. 6.33 not severally but joyntly together for there are two parts or offices of Mediatorshippe the first in the thinges that concerne God the second in the things that concerne vs and therefore Christ must bee as a Mediator in office so the middle-one in person betweene God and vs that communicating with both by nature hee might bee a Mediator betweene both by office Secondly effectually and they are all actions which hee performed Divine as God humane as man one and indivisible as Mediator whence it is that they are called Divine-humane because as there is but one Worker of the Workes of both Natures so is there but one absolute ending for the working is of the person but the beginnings of the workings are of the Natures The forme is the manner
of administring or the mediation it selfe which of the Schoole-men is vsually considered eyther in a more large or in a more strict manner in that it is the mediation which is of Christ as the head of all Angels and men generally but in this it is that which is of Christ as the Redeemer of men particularly after which manner hee is of vs here taken But in this Mediation of Christ the Redeemer two proportionable things are considered the person and the working whence it is that there is one mediation tearmed Substantiall another by working The Substantiall Mediation is the conjunctâ—on of the two natures in one person for the worke of mediation But that which is by operation is performed by certaine degrees the first is of an Arbitrator the second of a Messenger the third of an Intercessor the fourth of satisfaction the last of governing and all these parts of mediation the Person of Christ hath yet doth execute the properties of both natures wholy kept For hee is an arbitrator betweene God and Men a messenger from the Father with vs an Intercessor from vs with the father who for vs prayeth and maketh supplication a Priest who for vs offered himselfe Lastly a Governour who ruleth vs by the vertue and efficacy of his spirite And of these degrees the first second is of the Propheticall office the third and fourth of the Priest-hoode but the last of the kingdome of Christ by his Mediatorship The end of Christs office Supreme is the glory of God Subordinate Redemption Iustification and our Salvation And this is the common way and manner of Christs office The particular maner they distinguish and define to bee the speciall kinds and partes thereof The speciall kindes of Christs office are three according as both the necessity of mans condition without Christ of the deliverance of him from out of the same by Christ as also the verity of that annointing whereof hee is named Christ most clearely convinceth i Psal 45.7 Heb. 2.9 Of mans condition without Christ there are three as it were degrees the first of Ignorance the second of Inordination or disorder the third of guilt from both Mans deliverance from the same is performed according to three contrary degrees which the office of Christ sealeth vnto vs for Prophetâ—â— is set against Ignorance the kingdome of Christ and the building of his kingdome in vs against Inordination the priesthood against guilt The same doth the verity of Christs annointing convince for looke what was the manner of the three-folde calling propheticall priestly and kingly which were wont to be confirmed with the outward oyle k Exod. 30 23.24 28.41 .. 1. Sam. 16.14 1. Kin 19.19 the same is also the manner of Christs office annointed of the Father both as touching those callings and as touching the conferring of gifts in them There is therefore a threefold office of Christ the Mediator of prophesie whereby hee teacheth vs our owne ill the good of divine grace l Mat. 3.17 of Priest whereby hee redeemeth vs from our evils and prepareth for vs divine grace m Psal 110 4. Heb. 7.21 of King whereby hee defendeth vs from all evill and conserveth vs in that conferring of n Psal 2.6 Luc. 1.32 grace And these three offices Christ hath in order performed and doth as yet this day performe in Heaven executing the partes of a Mediator in their order towardes vs and towardes God the Father towardes vs teaching sanctifying and ruling by the power of his Spirite towardes the Father exhibiting his message and the offering vp of himselfe yea and moreover most powerfully exercising his kingly authority given him of the Father The Propheticall Office of Christ is a function of the person whereby he teacheth and instructeth his church The verity of this office is to be discerned by the partes and maners thereof the partes are two the outward publishing and the inward illumination or efficacy of doctrine The outward publishing of doctrine is both the preaching of the Gospell concerning the Grace of God and Redemption of mankind as also the Interpretation of the Law according to the mind of the Law-giver himself and lastly the fore-telling and prophesie of things to come o Ioh. 1.13 Mat 5.17 Mat. 4 17. Esa â—1 â— Ioh. 3.18 The efficacy of doctrine is that speciall accomplishment of the Propheticall office whereby the faithfull are moved by the Spirite of God that both in mind they might conceiue and in heart desire those thinges which are taught by publishing p Ioh. 5.25 6.83 Mat. 16.16 The manner of this office is twofold the one immediate the other mediate The Immediate is whereby Christ according to his divine Nature of himselfe instructed the Patriarkes and Prophets in the olde Testament by visions oracles and dreames but according to both natures hee witting and willing taught mankind in the New Testament by outward voyce q Heb. 11 2. Pet. 1.21 Hence it is that every where hee is called in the Scriptures the Worde of the Eternall Father the Messenger of the Lord the Angell of the covenant r Mal. 3.2 counceller Å¿ Esa 9.6 and the Apostle of our profession t Heb 3.1 The Mediate is whereby Christ by the Patriarkes and Prophets in the old Testament by his Apostles their Successors in the New doth instruct the church by the Ministery of the Worde and Sacraments u Luc. 24.45 Act. 16.14 Luc. 21.15 The Priestly office of Christ is a Personal worke of Christ God-man wherby hee was ordayned to satisfie God for men Of this office there is vsually delivered in the Scriptures a twofold manner the one according to type the other according to truth The Type was both of calling or person and of execution or actions according to calling The Typicall person in the olde TestameÌ„t was the Priest eyther having an ordinary calling generally according to the order of Levi or extraordinary particularly as Melchisedecke according to whose order Christ both for the dignity of person as also for the manner of calling is called a Priest x Psal 110 â— Heb. 7.21 Actions according to calling are three fold to keepe the Law to offer Sacrifices and to make Intercession The keeping of Gods Law among other things was severally commended to the high Priest the Tables wherof hee was to keepe being given of God and layde vp in the Arke of the covenant Of Sacrifices y Hâ—lastiâ—orum pacifying which were offered by the Priest and of the types of the sacrifice truely propitiatory there was a twofold sort the one reconciling and z Holocaustum whole burnt the other absolving or redeeming The whole burnt was a sacrifice in which the beast whether greater or lesse being orderly slaine according to the ability of every offerer was wholy burnt and consumed to ashes a Leu. 1.23 and was both Ordinary and Extraordinary The Ordinary one was
administration and the tearme or end thereof Of Administration there are two times the present as of this world the future as of the other In this world Christ administreth or ordayneth his church two wayes by Prescription and by Execution of Lawes The Prescription of Lawes is two-fold outward whereby Christ by the Ministery of the Word prescribeth vnto his Subjects Lawes of u Iac. 4.12 Eph. 4.11 1. Cor. 12.18 beleeving and living Inward whereby he moveth by his holy spirite the hearts of the Elect vnto the obedience of his commandements with a feeling of his present grace and a sure hope of his future glory x Ioh. 1.16 Act. 26.18 1 Ioh. 1.3 The Execution is finished in two partes In the gracious distribution of Rewardes and Benefites whereby all corporall and spirituall things necessary for salvation are ministred to the church vnder a certaine condition of the crosse y Ioh. 14 18. Heb. 13.5 Iac. 1.5 and in the just inflicting of punishments whereby he dealeth with the enemies of his church whether they be corporall or spirituall by repressing and restrayning some z Psal 110 Rom. 16.20 but by punishing and vtterly destroying other some a Rom. 7.24 â—5 1. Cor. 5.36 In the other world Christ administreth his church with a perfect consummation both of Rewardes b Rom. 14 7. Apoc. 21.4 1 Cor. 2.9 and punishments c poc â— 2.8 2 Thes 1.6 the Antecedent wherof shall bee the vniversall judgement the consequent Eternity The terme and end of this kingdome in respect of d Oeconomiae the ordering thereof shal bee when the Sonne being about to deliver vp this kingdome of Mediatorshippe to God and the Father shall be subject vnto him who hath made all things subject to himselfe that GOD may bee all in all e 1. Cor 15 28. for hee shall solemnely professe his voluntary subjection towardes God the Father by a singular and glorious yeelding vp of this Oeconomicall Kingdome receyved of him as touching his Person from the Fathers hand And this is the manner of Christs Office according to the speciall kinds thereof Now concerning the parts wee must in few wordes consider Of Christs Office there are two parts or as they are commonly called two Estates of Christ God-man Humiliation and Exaltation for in these that whole dispensation of Salvation and the execution of Christes threefold Office consisteth wherefore looke what is the manner of Christes Office from the Natures in the person or from the person according to both Natures the same also is the manner of his Humiliation and Exaltation Humiliation is that base and voluntary condition of Christ God-man vpon earth whereby hee debased himselfe as touching both Natures that he might both die and by dying satisfie as touching his Divine Nature he debased himselfe both by a voluntary subjection of his Person and by a hiding of his glory and maiesty before men for the time f Phi. 2.7.8 as touching his Humane Nature both by taking vnto him the Infirmity of our Nature and secondly by his most humble Obedience of Life and Death g Esa 53.5 Ioh. 19.34 Exaltation is the condition of Christ God-man whereby hee was advanced into the glory and dignity which was meete or convenient for the person of a Mediator and that according to both natures according to the divine nature by relation or by a divine manifestation of that maiesty which he hid during the time of his abasement h Rom. 1.4 Act. 2.38 according to the humane partly by the deposition of his servile conditioÌ„ and partly by the receiving gifts in body in soule concurring together vnto the perfection and blessednesse of his humane nature aboue all nature i Phil. 3.21 Ephe. 1.20 2. Heb 2.9 Of both states there are proper degrees opposite one to the other Of Humiliation and first of that which is outwarde or of his Submission vnto death there are three degrees death with the curse conjoyned k Gal 3.13 Burial that the truth of his death might bee ratified l Luc. 23 53. Descent into Hell or that voluntary debasement of Christ to suffer and as it were with wrestling to overcome the paines of Hell which Christ chiefly felt in his soule when he was assaulted first with heavinesse afterwardes with the sorrowes of both deaths m Act. 2.24 Eph. 4.4 To these are opposed three degrees of Exaltation Resurrection in which by divine power having subdued death hee raysed vp himselfe vnto life everlasting d Mat. 28.6 1 Cor 13.4 n Ascension whereby through the same power hee verily and visibly translated his body into the Heaven of the blessed o Act. 1.9 Eph. â— 11 sitting at the right hand of the Father whereby Christ was actually endued with all fulnesse both of glory and power p Heb. 1.3 Psal 110.1 1 Cor. 15.25 OF THE OFFICE OF CHRIST The Confuting Part. Distinctions in defence of Christs Office in Generall I. THere is wont to bee a three-folde signification of the Word Office for eyther it importeth an endeavor or deede wherevnto for some man wee are dutifully employed or an action of vertue as Cicero defineth or lastly an action or worke vnto which when a man is appointed he accordingly executeth the same and in this last signification it ought to bee taken when we treat of Christs Office II. IN the Office of Christ three thinges are to bee distinguished Vocation which in person hee had immediately from God Gifts by Vocation which immediately hee receyved in the Humane Nature Administration which was in person according to both Natures which three the outward vnction in the olde Testament signified III CHrist is sayd to be Mediator partly as hee is middle partly as he is mediant middle in Person mediant in Office IIII. OFfice ought to be distinguished either by the Substance thereof or by the manner of execution by substance according to the partes and speciall kindes of it by manner which hath respect both vnto the person to the natures in the person for the agent is one and the action one in respect of the Person yet there are two powers of the Agent and two beginnings of actions in respect of the Natures In Defence of Christs Propheticall Office CHrist is called a Prophet for three respects first in respect of person for hee is the wisedome of the Father not subiectiuely residing in the Father but impressiuely expressing the same in the Person 2. in respect of Office because he hath taught his Church immediately eyther according to eyther nature in the old or according to both in the new Testament 3. In respect of Ministery mediately teaching men by meÌ„ which were called eyther ordinarily or extraordinarily vnto the office of teaching In Defence of his Priestly Office I. THe Worde Sacrifice is taken in Scripture eyther Analogically or properly Analogically or by a certain resemblance it signifieth the duties of Piety
and Charity but properly eyther the action it selfe conjoyned with the holy ceremonies or the things which are offered II. SAcrifices some are Typicall or Signifying other some not Typical or signified and both eyther Pacifying or Propitiatory or else Eucharisticall or of Thanksgiving III. THe word Leholam with the Hebrewes importeth not the Infinitenesse of time but the continuance of the same sometimes longer sometimes shorter according to the subject matter IIII. THe Sacrifice of Christ is considered eyther properly or q Symbolice comparatiuely Properly It is one onely in verity and efficacy even that Sacrifice of Christs body on the crosse comparatiuely with the olde Doctors of the church the Eucharist was sometimes called a Sacrifice V. THe Oblation of Christ is one onely not onely in speciall kind but also in number for there can bee no oblation of Christ but by his comming betweene and therefore that distinction of Sacrifice into a bloudy and vnbloody is false In Defence of his Kingly OFFICE THe Kingdome of Christ is taken eyther Figuratiuely or Properly Figuratiuely then both Instrumentally for the Gospell and subjectiuely for the church properly for that Oeconomicall dominion of Christ which is called the Kingdom of Grace for the beginning thereof in this world and the kingdome of glory for the consummation thereof in the other In Defence of the State of Christs Humiliation I. THere is one Subiection naturall another Oeconomicall and by this latter Equality is not destroyed because the thing equall as Cyril sayeth is sayde to be subiect to the equall by way of dispensation II. OBedience is not an Act naturall of nature but voluntary of the person according to both natures Now the consequence is of no force from one speciall kind vnto the other from the Act of Nature to the Act of Will In Defence of his Exaltation I. THe maiesty of the Essence of the Word is one and of the dispensation another II. DIspensation comprehendeth two things one the mystery of the vnion the other the end of the mystery In respect of the vnion Maiesty hath properly respect vnto the nature assumed in respect of the end it fitly agreeeth with Christ according to both natures III. EXaltation is not the abolishing of â—ature but the perfection and all other power given to Christ is of Office and not of divine Essence OF THE CALLING OF MAN vnto Salvation The Part Confirming CHAP. VIII FOr asmuch as wee haue treated of the Beginning and Dispensation of our Redemption that is of the Person and Office of Christ Wee now are to treate according to our appointed order of the Application therof Now the verity of this Application ought three wayes severally to bee marked by the degrees thereof by the outward meanes and by the Subject the degrees according to which God in time applyeth vnto vs the benefite of Redemption are chiefly two Vocation and Iustification Vocation is the first degree of Application on Gods behalfe called therfore by Augustine The entry vnto salvation and the first passage towardes the end Of this Vocation there is vsually had a divers knowledge according as it is distinguished eyther as touching the manner of calling into an Inward and outward or as touching the divers condition of the cause Efficient into a Generall and Particular or Lastly as touching the effect of calling vnto an Effectuall and not Effectuall Vocation Now of this Vocation whether Inward Particular and Effectuall or outward generall and ineffectuall there is a double respect the one Absolute in it selfe the other Ioynt or conjoyned in an ordinary vocation For God calleth outwardly in generall inwardly in particular and joyntly both wayes ordinarily Of both we are orderly to treate according to the course of the causes The outward and generall Vocation that wee may speake of it in the first place is a gracious action of God wherby he calleth men forth by word signe and worke from vnbeliefe vnto faith that both the faithfull might bee disposed to the communion of salvation and that others being coÌ„vinced of the grace offered vnto them by God might become inexcusable The cause Efficient of this Vocation is God because it is from him properly if you marke the true beginning therof and is from him first or chiefly by himselfe and principally if you haue a respect vnto the meanes which God would haue to be vsed eyther extraordinarily or ordinarily for the calling of men The beginning is that loue of God towards man wherby as a lover of soules and the Saviour of Men a Sap. 11.27 1 Tim. 4.10 hee beareth his good will towardes all men and generally offereth his Grace vnto them Now hee offereth the same that wee may in few wordes speake of the means by word by signes and by workes all which in respect of God that ordayneth them are generall by word eyther extraordinary such as was in the first times of the Church b Numb 12.8 Heb. 1.2 or Ordinary by the vniversall Canon of faith and life which wee call the Scripture c Ephes 2.17 Rom. 10.14 by signs by which added vnto the word the Lord being author his grace is visibly sealed vp d Rom. 4.11 Gen. 17.11 by works eyther Ordinary or Extraordinary eyther within the Church or without the Church The matter or Subiect of this vocation are all men without difference of nations sexes or states vnto whome by name the meanes whereof we haue spoken doe extend For God wil haue all men to bee saved both generally because hee calleth forth out of all whomsoever hee will or e Ex singulis generum genera singulorum out of every one of the generall sorts the generall sortes of every one vnto salvation as also because the grace of God is offered vnto all not by the vniversall efficacy of Christ but by a generall signe and power f Mat. 22.14 1. Tim. 2.4 The Forme is that outward Vocation which God mediately effecteth by the ministery of his word by the vse of the Sacraments and lastly by the communion of the Church and the members thereof in themselues and among themselues all which are â—ceyved by the outward senses g Heb. 4.12 The End is two-fold Proper both the inexcusablenes of the Reprobates and the salvation of the Elect Remote the manifestation of the Grace of God h 1. Cor. 15.28 And this is the outward and generall calling The Internall and particular calling is a gracious action of God whereby the elect from everlasting in their due time according to the good pleasure of God for the merite of Christ by the holy Ghost are inwardly informed vnto the receyving and communion of Gods grace for their owne salvation the glory of Gods mercy The Efficient cause of this Vocation â—s God according to the particular beginning and the ordinary means therof The beginning is the saving grace of God for Christ for two things doe distinguish this particular beginning of inward calling from
thereof in it selfe and the manner of the truth thereof in vs. Of the truth in it selfe there are two bounds Righteousnesse and the Imputation thereof between these there is a relation because Christ hath perfect righteousnes for no other end then that hee might impute it nor imputeth any other thing then righteousnesse nor is our righteousnesse any otherwise then by Imputation The manner of the truth thereof in vs is in the Scripture two wayes limitted whereof the former teacheth vs that wee are iust not in our selues not in our owne righteousnesse but by the righteousnesse of Christ which being out of vs is made ours by right of giving Hence wee are sayde to be made the righteousnesse of God in him n Cot. 5.21 the second teacheth vs that we haue righteousnesse as Christ hath our sinne now he hath it not subiectiuely or inherent but by imputation Hence is that o Autithesis oppositioÌ„ made by the Apostle in the place already cited to wit of Christ whome God made sinne for vs and of vs who were made the righteousnesse of God in him And according to this forme of Iustification there is one and alike Iustification in all men though in diverse according to the measure of him that apprehendeth it be after a divers maner modified The former â—efore of Iustification is not an haâ—â—â—al saÌ„ctity inherent in vs for albeit Iustification Sanctification agree in the Efficient causes as well Gods grace as Christs merit in the Instrumentall cause to wit faith by receyving that of the one and by effecting that of the other Lastly in the scope and end for they tend to one end saue that the one is as the cause the other as the way yet they much differ both as touching the substance and as touching the Adiuncts As touching the substance that is as touching all the causes for the matter of IustificatioÌ„ is the obedience of Christ of Sanctification our owne obedience the one perfect the other vnperfect the forme thereof that is the Imputation of Christs obedience but of this the drawing backe of our minds from vnpure to pure qualities Of Iustification there is no neerest and inward efficient cause but of this Sanctification the wil of man is being the beginning of human actions the end of that is the peace of conscience but of this an open testifying of the reconciling of our selues with God As touching the Adiuncts because they differ first in the maner of effecting for that is effected by right of donation this by maner of alteration secondly by the Effects that absolveth vs in the iudgement of God This doth not Thirdly and lastly in continuance for That shall haue an end with this life This shall endure for ever The Forme of Iustification taken passiuely is the application of Faith Hence it is that wee are sayde to bee saved p Per fideÌ„ fide ex fide by faith through faith of faith of which wee haue spoken in the cause Instrumentall q Mar. 5.39 Rom. 3.7 Gal. 1.16 Eph. 2.8.9 Tit 3.5 The End of Iustification taken actiuely is the glory of God in the wonderfull tempering of his Iustice and mercy r Eph. 1.5.6.7 Rom. 3. â—6 Of his iustice that he would haue his Sonne to satisfie it of his mercy that he would impute his sonnes satisfaction vnto vs. Å¿ Rom. 5.1 Tit. 3.7 The End of Iustification taken passiuely is peace of Conscience and eternall salvation OF MANS IVSTIFICATIon before GOD. The Confuting Part. Distinctions in defence of the Definition of the Name or Word I. IN the searching out of the interpretation of a Word the derivation and composition of the Word is not simply to bee looked vnto but the vse and the propriety of the same II. THe vse of the Word Iustification is vsually two-fold for eyther Iustification is taken properly or in a signification translated from the speciall to the generall by an abuse of speech it importeth all those thinges which follow Iustification III. THere are two orders of Testimonies concerning Iustification the one Legall the other Evangelicall the testimonies of the Legall Iustice do teach what manner of iustice standeth before the Tribunall of God the testimonies of the iustice of faith or those which are Evangelicall doe some pertaine to the causes of Iustification some to the outward signes and testimonies of the person iustified Lastly some to the comprobation of the worke done by faith The Places by which Bellarmine prooveth that to iustifie signifieth to make iust cap. 3. lib. 2. de Iustitia Rom. 5.16.18.19 Ans First there is a manifest opposition of condemnation and justification Now whereas thinges opposite are vnder the same kinde Genere it must needes be that iustification as well as condemnation is a judiciall Act. Secondly as condemnation is never taken out of that signification which belongs to places of judgment and pleading so justification which is made before God is never taken from the effect of infused grace Thirdly the judgement of God is according to truth as well when hee pronounceth vs just for the imputed righteousnesse of Christ as when hee maketh vs just by the power and vertue of his Spirite both truely though diversly the one perfectly the other vnperfectly Dan. 12.3 Ans Iustification in the signification belonging to courts of pleading is two-fold the one immediate the other mediate of this speaketh the Prophet whereby God by his Ministers absolveth sinners as by the same hee bindeth and holdeth sinners and it is a Figure familiar in the Scripture to attribute that to the Instrument which is proper to the cause Esa 53.11 Answ First the Hebrew word in the third conjugation signifieth to pronounce one just as in the first it signifieth to be just positiuely Secondly the Text hath not in his Knowledge but in the knowledge of himselfe whereby is declared not the manner of Iustification but the Instrument or faith expressed by a circumlocution a Per Periphrasm Thirdly it is one thing to treate of Christs righteousnes which in him is inherent subjectiuely and another thing of that which by Grace is imputed vnto vs. Fourthly Christs satisfaction is the meritorious cause of Iustification which is become onely ours by benefite of Imputation Apoc. 22.11 Ans Iustification in the iudicial signification noteth out two things according as there is a two-fold Court the one of Conscience before God the other of holinesse before men for it importeth to bee absolved eyther before God by the righteousnesse of faith or before men by the righteousnesse of workes In the first signification the sense is thus Hee that is iust let him be iustified still to witte by applying vnto himselfe the continuall remission of his sinnes and the imputation of Christs righteousnesse In the second the sense is thus Hee that is iust let him bee iustified still that is he that desireth to bee iust let him bee informed more and more vnto Iustice and
workes whereas these are two divers propositions to bee without workes and to iustifie without workes The third Argument is taken from the removal of the Causes whereas Faith alone Iustifieth which causes are of Bellarmine referred to three heades cap. 16. The first is the authority of the word whervnto the Adversary answereth That it is no where taught in the scripture That wee are iustified by faith onely Answ Though the Particle alone be not expressed in the Scripture yet the signification of that word is expressed by Synonimall formes of speaking which are these 1. Without Workes 2. Of Grace freely by Grace 3. The exclusiue Particles which are two particulars Galat 2.16 but by Faith Luc. 8.30 By beleeving onely by which formes of speaking as all works aswell Ceremoniall as Moral are excluded so faith alone is included as the only Instrument of Iustification The second head is the will of God who will haue vs iustified with the alone condition of faith The Adversary answereth that it contradicteth the Scripture which layeth downe also the condition of Repentance Answere 1. Repentance is the condition of faith and of the person justified but not properly of Iustification 2. It is one thing to treate of the condition of Iustification but another thing of the cause and Instrument therof for a condition noteth a consequent or effect but a cause the Antecedent or Efficient 3. Neyther is our Iustification with the condition of Faith as Faith is a habite in vs but as it apprehendeth Christ out of vs. The third is the nature of faith which alone hath that property that it apprehendeth Iustification The Adversary answereth that Faith doth not properly apprehend Answ There is a double apprehensioÌ„ the one of knowledge in the vnderstanding the other of trust in the Will both these Faith includeth which in respect of the vnderstanding and the will apprehendeth Christ but the nature of the Sacramentes is otherwise which were instituted not that they might iustifie but that they might confirme the party iustified in the feeling of his Iustification The fourth Argument is from the maner of Iustifying for we affirme that faith Iustifieth not by the maner of cause worthinesse or merite but by relation onely which Bellarmine denyeth and proveth by three arguments that faith iustifieth by the manner of merite and cause cap. 13. The first is taken from testimonies which teach that faith is the cause of iustification Rom. 3. Rom. 5. Ephes 1. Answer First for Faith is one thing and by Faith is another thing The one is of the cause the other of the Instrument Secondly neyther is the maner of works the same with that of faith in opposition because workes haue the nature of righteousnesse inherent in vs but faith the nature of righteousnesse imputed vnto vs. Thirdly nor doe the places which are alleadged note the cause of Iustification but eyther the Instrument thereof or the quality and state of a man iustified The second is taken from those testimonies which testifie that faith is the beginning of righteousnesse and hereby the formall cause of Iustification Rom. 4. First there is a two-fold imputation as in that very place the Apostle noteth the one of debt the other of grace and the Apostle treaâ—eth of this and not of that Secondly â—â—th Faith is the instrumeÌ„t it is no strange â—hing if as it is vsually the manner of â—nstruments the name and the office of the thing whereof it is but the Instrument bee attributed vnto it 1. Cor. 3. First A foundation is vsually considered two wayes properly or by a Metalepsis properly Christ is so but by a Metalepsis Faith which hath respect to Christ For distinctions sake the one may bee called i Primum ad primuÌ„ the first the other to the first Secondly a foundation is eyther vnderstoode to bee as a part of a building or a ground of a building Christ and Faith are sayd to be the foundation of the Church not properly as they are a part thereof but as they are the Ground and Base of the same Act. 15. First the hearts are justified by faith not as the cause but as the Instrument not by effecting but by affecting or applying Secondly the place it selfe doth manifestly distinguish Faith which is onely the inner instrumeÌ„tal cause from the cause properly Efficient to witte the Father in the Sonne by the holy Ghost The third is taken from those Testimonies which teach that Remission of sinnes is obtayned by Faith Luke 7. Ans First men are sayde to bee saved both properly of God our onely Saviour and figuratiuely by the meanes which it hath pleased God to vse eyther inward as faith or outward as the voyce of the Gospell and the signes thereof Secondly the efficacy of faith wholy dependeth vpon the object which it apprehendeth and it is sayde to saue for that it is the effectuall and necessary Instrument of Salvation like as the Gospell is called the power to every one that beleeveth vnto salvation Rom. 4. Ans First The Particle wherefore noteth not the cause of the Consequent but of the Consequence Secondly it is there shewed not what the habite of faith deserveth sith faith and merites are opposites but what is the vse and effect of true naturall faith Rom. 10. Answ First the Apostle doth neyther make preaching the cause of faith nor faith the cause of invocation and salvation but teacheth that as that is the Instrument of the one so this is of the other SecoÌ„dly the degrees of Salvation are reckoned vppe by the Apostle which are badly confounded with the causes thereof Thirdly those things which Faith obtayneth by Invocation it obtayneth as an Instrument and not as a Cause because all the power of Faith consisteth in Relation Heb. 11. Ans First men please God by faith not for faith Secondly whatsoever examples are cited they note not the merite of Faith but the vse and effect thereof The Fift Argument is fee from two principles the first whereof is the Formal Cause of Iustification which the Adversary affirmeth to bee righteousnesse inherent in vs The second is the merite and necessity of good workes Of the former wee shall treate in the explication of the Formall Cause of the latter in the place concerning good workes DISTINCTIONS IN DEfence of the Materiall Cause I. THere is one Iustice Create and another Increate the one is of God of Christ as hee is God the other of the Creature and of Christ as hee is a creature II. THe Create righteousnesse is eyther of the Person or of the cause by that some person is judged just by this a righteousnesse of the Cause of some controversie is vnderstoode the righteousnesse of the Person to speake properly is in Christ III. OF the person there is one inherent another Imputatiue that was in Christ this is in vs by the worke of the Spirite for Christ IIII. INherent righteousnesse is eyther originall or habituall or else
actuall both of these were in Christ yet properly he imputeth this onely V. ACtuall righteousnesse is eyther perfect or imperfect this is in vs that in Christ VI. PErfect actual righteousnesse of Christ consisteth in a double obedience whereof the one is called the obedience of the Law the other obedience vnto death VII THe obedience of the law which is truely and properly the effect of the person being the mediator neyther ought nor can bee called eyther a part making the person or a quality pertayning to the making of that person VIII THe places of Scripture which treat of Christes death are not to bee taken exclusiuely or oppositely but figuratiuely or Synecdochically for the last accomplishment of the whole obedience DISTINCTIONS in defence of the Formall Cause The Arguments which Bellarmine bringeth against the truth of this cause are of two sorts for first hee endeavoureth to proue by certaine reasons that our inherent righteousnesse is the formall cause of our righteousnesse Secondly he impugneth the imputation of Christs righteousnesse The first he endeauoureth to perform by 8. Testimonies Cap. 3. Lib. 2. De Iustificatione The first is in Rom. 5. Of which wee haue treated in the explication of those places which were alleadged against the true nature of the name or word The second is in Rom. 3. Answ First the Grace of God is taken in Scripture aequivocally First for the free and eternall favour of God wherby hee made vs acceptable to him selfe in his beloved Sonne and this is the Grace that maketh acceptable Secondly for the giftes by Grace whether outward or inward whether generall or particula and that in the place cited it is taken in that signification and not in this three thinges doe proue First because the Apostle excludeth the righteousnesse of the law which is of works to the end hee might establish the righteousnesse of faith the causes whereof hee reckoneth vp Secondly because what hee called freely hee expounded by grace that not onely the workes that goe before but also those that follow after faith might bee excluded Thirdly because the Apostle opposeth the very same Grace cap. 4.2.4 against Abrahams works howsoever proceeding from the renuing of the Spirite Secondly neyther in deed doth the conjoyning of those two words Freely and by Grace sith the one expoundeth the other according to the Scripturall Phrase of speaking nor doth the force of the Preposition by which is not found in the originall Text and very often in the Scripture noteth the efficient nor doth the Efficacy of Gods grace the effect whereof ought necessarily to be distinguished from the Cause nor lastly doth it because loue in Scripture is called any Grace whereas both the loue of God towards vs is a grace making acceptable and ours towardes God is a grace freely given any way infringe that interpretation The third 1. Cor. 6. To this wee haue aboue answered The fourth Titus 3. Answ First the Effect is badly confounded with the cause to witte Iustification with Regeneration and Renovation for the matter of that is the righteousnesse of Christ but of this our Inherent righteousnesse Secondly neyther doth the Apostle call Renovation Iustification sith hee expresly distinguisheth the one from the other Thirdly the Apostle sheweth not the cause but the vse of Renovation or good workes when he sayeth that being justified by the grace of God wee might bee heyres according to the hope of everlasting life The fift Heb. 11 Ans First there is a two-folde righteousnesse Imputed and Inherent by both they are called Iust or righteous but after a divers manner by that by way of Relation and perfectly before God by this Inchoatiuely Subjectiuely and vnperfectly Secondly the perfection which is ascribed vnto the faithfull in the Scripture hath a three-fold respect the first of Gods councell from everlasting Secondly of the foundation in Christ lastly eyther of comparison and opposition vnto other mēs vnrighteousnes or of the end or tearme of perfection vnto which it tendeth besides these respects there is no perfection of the faithfull in this world Thirdly the nearest cause in deede of a righteous worke is inherent righteousnesse but the chiefe and principall cause is the Spirit of Christ imputing his righteousnes to vs and by the power of that imputed righteousnesse working this inherent righteousnesse in vs. The Sixt Rom. 8. 1. Cor. 15. Ans first our Conformity with the Image of Christ whereof mention is made in the Scripture is threefold the one vnto the image of glory being opposite to that which is vnto the image of Christs afflictions And of this the Apostle treateth in the cited places The second vnto the image of Christs obedience which in deede in this world we performe vnperfectly but Christ applyeth the same to vs as perfectly performed for vs. The third is of the death buriall and resurrection of Christ Secondly of Christs righteousnesse there is a double vse the one principall of satisfaction and merite the other exemplary and of document as touching satisfaction Christs righteousnesse is imputed to vs as touching example it is the rule of our inherent righteousnesse Thirdly the opposition which is made betweene the image of the first Adam and the second according to the sense of the Apostle in both places hath respect vnto the mortality and immortality the earthly and heavenly qualities of the body not properly vnto sinne and Christs imputed righteousnesse The seaventh Rom. 6. Ans The word Iustification is taken two wayes properly and improperly Properly when wee are sayde to bee justified by the cause Improperly when wee are sayde to bee justified by the effects Secondly the Apostle treateth of our Sanctification and the two parts therof the mortifying of the old man and the quickning of the new of both which partes hee giues vs an example in the death and resurrection of Christ Thirdl◠to bee justified signifieth to bee freede according to the proper phrase of the Hebrewes who comprehend the Consequent with the Antecedent The eight Rom 8. Answere First the degrees of our Salvation Adoption and Iustification are badly confounded together Secondly of Adoption there are two considerations the one according to the truth and foundation thereof in the eternall counsell of our Election the other according to the fruition and accomplishment thereof in the other life In that signification Adoption goeth before Iustification but in thi Adoption is the bound and end of Iustification Thirdly it is one thing to call Iustification Putatiue and another Imputatiue that as being false is falsely also faigned vnto vs this is no lesse true then if we our selues had it subiectiuely because of the truths sake both of Gods promise and our coniunction with Christ That the FORMAL CAVSE of our Iustification is not the Imputation of Christs righteousnesse Bellarmine proveth by ten Arguments Cap. 7. Lib. 2. de Iustificatione To the FIRST IT is false for whereas there are two sorts of testimonies some expressed and some by
of the very Institution Neyther must we referre the words of the Promise in the Supper to Christs Sacrifice but to the Sacrament which hee instituted neyther also in Baptisme is the efficacy of the Sacrament simply expressed but the promise given concerning the efficacy V. THe m Concionale word pertaining to the congregation the word of Institution are not opposite but both in Baptisme and the Supper there is the same worde for that which is n Or of Preaching for the congregation in Baptisme the same is of the Institution and that which is of the Institution in the Supper the same is for the congregation VI. IN every Sacrament two things must needes bee distinguished the Substantiall and the Accidentall thereof the one whereof is properly required for the being the other for the well being of the same Now the Preaching of the same is no part of the Essence of the Sacrament but pertayneth to the manner of Administration VII THe Consecration of Sacraments consisteth in two thinges in the Institution or ordinance blessing sealing of the word and in the promise of God himselfe then in the holy vse thereof which is done by prayers and thanksgiving VIII THe chaunge of the Sacramentall word is twofold Substantiall and Accidentall the one properly pertayneth to the sense the other to the wordes and order of the wordes and yet a conclusion from the change of wordes to the change of the Element is of no force because this cannot bee changed without corruption but those may easily be changed the sense neverthelesse remayning Distinctions in Defence of the Cause Materiall I. SIgnes are eyther of things past or thinges present or things to come and they all eyther pointing out or sealing vp or presenting of all which the Sacramentall signes are mixt II. THe signe signifieth eyther the Element or the Action or both wherefore in a Sacramentall thing all that is called the signe which is perceyved by the fences whether it bee seene or heard for the Element is perceyved by the sight but the action by the sight and hearing III. THe thing signified in the sacrament is both a substance and action the substance is eyther properly whole Christ or Synecdochically the body of Christ delivered vnto death and his bloud shed the Action is Gods alone and is eyther Iustification or Regeneration IIII. THe thing and the signes are both offered eyther joyntly and truely in respect of God who promiseth or distinctly in respect of the faithfull to whome without the sacramentall coÌ„munion the thing signified is truely and spiritually given or of the vnfaithfull to whome even in the Sacramentall Communion the Signes indeede are offered but the thing signified is not given Distinctions in Defence of the Forme and Effect of a Sacrament Bellarmine proveth by ten reasons that the Sacraments of the New Law are the causes of Iustification by the worke done Cap. 8. Lib. 2. de Sacram. Ex opere operato I. THe Sacramentall Signes are sayde to bee practicke not for that they worke by the deede done but because they are effectuall Instruments whereby the truth of Gods Grace in Christ is sealed vppe vnto vs and because Infantes are baptized the Sacramentes doe not therefore immediately effect Sanctity for in respect of the Infants Baptisme is properly a Sacrament of entrance as in respect of them that are growne to full age it is a Sacrament of Sanctification not by effecting but by binding II. GOds institution or authority hath â—ot put a power of effecting in the Sacraments which is proper to the Principall Agent but of signifying sealing and presenting neyther hath humane instirution any place in divine matters sith the nature of those things which concerne faith and religion lerneth vpon the alone word of God III. THe Institution and vse of a Sacrament consisteth in two things first in the Relation of the Signe vnto the thing signified Secondly in the lawfull administration and receyving the verity and vertue of the Relation doth wholy depend vpon the Institutor of the lawfull administration God is the Author according to his will but man is the Minster of the same according to the rule of Gods will and his owne calling IIII. THe Sacraments depend vpon God and Christs Passion after a divers respect vpon God as the cause vpon Christs death and Passion as the object for the Passion of Christ cannot properly be called the cause of the Sacrament but the object and the thing signified wherevnto it is carried V. WE are made assured of the remission of sins by the Sacraments through an assurance not absolute but relatiue not from the former but from the latter not by the Principall but by the Instrumentall not properly by effecting but by scaling VI. THe Sacraments the word haue reference vnto faith not after a contrary but after a subalternall manner because as faith is begotten by the word so it is nourished by the Sacraments both are Instruments yet distinct by manner of working VII SAcraments profite not except they bee well applyed now there are two meanes of Application the one outward the other inward the outward are the Signes and the Word the vse of the Signes is perceyved by the touching but the vse of the Word by hearing the vnderstanding of both is required because the Signes and the word not beeing vnderstood doe not profite the inward is faith which bringeth the vse of the Signes and the word to the Soule VIII THe subordinate Instruments of the stirring vp of faith is the word of preaching or the Scripture and the visible word of the Sacrament neyther doth the one disanull the other but rather settle and establish each other Adde further that the vse of the picture and outward Signes of Baptisme is one and of the Signe is another whereas that hath neyther the worde nor promise this both IX THe profite of the Sacraments is both Generall and Particular in a diverse respect Generall in respect of the entrance and the whole outward action Particular in respect of the Application the one Generally is performed by the Signes and the word the other particularly by faith X. THe Difference of the Sacraments of the olde and new Testament consisteth not in the thing signified but in the manner of signifying and other outward Adjuncts and circumstances whereof wee haue aboue spoken The same Point doth Bellarmine proue by eight Testimonies of Scripture Cap. 4. The First Place is of Mathew the 3. Answ There is no difference made between the Efficacy of Iohns Baptism and Christs but betweene the Persons whereof the one by the outward Ministery onely giveth the water as the Signe of the Remission of sinnes the other by the Inward Efficacy giveth the Spirite as the earnest of the thinges signified And hee vseth the future Tense speaking of Christs Baptisme because he hath respect to the very Ministery of Christs Preaching which he was about to take in hand neyther doth the Place
taking the spirituall sealing within vs both of Christ himselfe and of his benefites by the Instrument of faith is declared The Eating and Drinking is an outward and sacramentall vse and taking of the signes according to Christes Prescription whereby the inward and spirituall eating and drinking of his body and bloud is sealed by divine ordinance for as first there are two persons administring the Supper the one of the Pastor doing that which is done outwardly and openly the other of Christ effecting by his Spirit that which is done inwardly Secondly as the whole Action of the Lords Supper consisteth in two things the one an earthly bodilie perceyuable for the senses the other heavenly spirituall and intelligible for the vnderstanding of the faithfull Thirdly as there are two partes of man the one the body the other the soule so there are two givings and eatings the one outward which is called Sacramentall the other inward which is tearmed Spirituall yet that was instituted of Christ that it might bee a certaine expresse shape or Image of this The wordes Definitiue and Sacramentall are those which declare the inward matter or thing signified and vtter the same whether it bee of the bread or of the cuppe sacramentally of the bread as This is my body which for you is delivered and broken f Luc. 22.19 but of the cuppe This is my bloud which is shed for many g Mat. 26.28 Both expositions are wont two waies to be considered eyther in each words apart and by themselues considered or in the whole exposition together Being considered apart they note eyther the Subject or the Attributes or the Copula The Subject is the Pronoune demonstratiue this not adjectiuely but substantiuely taken for it doth not signifie h Individuum vagum any singular thing but the verie bread which Christ Tooke Brake and Gaue to his Disciples and the Wine which he held in his hands according as the order of the Text i Mat. 26 26.27 the interpretation of Paul k 1 Cor. 11.24.25 and the Analogy of Faith doe demonstrate The Attribute in the first proposition is the Body of Christ not the mysticall which is the church but the proper and the true which for vs is given and broken and that as it was such a body In the second is the bloude of Christ which for vs is shedde and even that as it was such a bloud according as the other member of these Attributes which is pronounced by an Enallage of the present tense for the future Tense dooth most evidently proue The Copula whereby the Attribute is knit with the Subject is the Verbe Substantiue IS which ought not nor may bee taken Substantially wheras by no meanes at all the vnlike cannot properly and Essentially be affirmed of his vnlike but figuratiuely for a mysticall and Sacramentall Being whereby the thing which signifyeth taketh the name of that thing which it signifyeth because of the Analogy of the one with the other for by that litle word Christ taught not what the bread and wine were by nature or substance but what they were by signification office and vse for by nature they are bread and wine by signification they are the body and bloud of Christ The whole Attribution or Predication is not proper or regular whereas neyther the proposition is Identicall nor the body of Christ can properly be affirmed of the bread to witte wheras the Body of Christ is neyther the Generall nor the Speciall nor the difference nor the property nor the accident of bread but it is Figuratiue and Sacramentall Figuratiue not simply Metaphoricall and Allegoricall but Metonymycall to witte such whereby the name of the thing signified is given to the Signe which Metonymycall speaking is very familiar in the Scriptures Sacramentall because the exhibiting of the thing signified is withall promised and yet there is no swerving from the word spoken or pronounced wheras wee retaine the word spoken being Sacramentall which is altogether different from regular Predications and to bee expounded with an interpretation aunswerable to the nature of Sacraments The Expositiue wordes are these by which Christ expounded or layde open the end of this holy action to witte l 1. Cor. 11 16. the remembrance of his death which is not a naked or idle remembrance of a thing past but an effectuall and healthfull apprehension of Christs merites and an explication of the same privately with our selues or properly vnto our selues and withall a solemne Eucharisticall Thanksgiving in the vse of this Sacrament for so great a benefite and this is the manner of the Efficient Cause being principall or that which instituteth the Supper and of the Institution it selfe The Cause Efficient Administring or Instrumentall are the Ministers of the Church called by lawfull ordination by whome God as by active instruments offereth and representeth vs those things outwardly by the signes of breade and wine which by the inward operation of the holy Ghost hee effecteth in vs. Of these Instruments if you respect the Office it is to administer the Lords Supper with those rites of dispensing them in the very which Christ went before by his owne example If the Quality so they lawfully execute their office in the preaching of the Word the administration of the Sacraments it nothing addeth to or detracteth from the efficacy of a Sacrament sith the authoritie of Sacraments if they bee considered in themselues dependeth not vpon the qualitie of the Minister but vpon the Institution verity and power of Christ The Matter of the Lords Supper is two wayes vsually considered eyther as that which partaketh the Supper or as that which constituteth the Supper whereof the one hath the manner of the Subject the other of the partes The Matter or Subiect partaking the Supper are all they who being by Baptisme made the members of the Church and now being of yeares professe sound doctrine and haue the testimony of a holy life m 1. Cor. 11.20 12.13 From the circumscription of this Subiect are excluded first the dead or they that are departed this life from whome both the power of vsing the Sacrament is taken away and vnto whome all the vse thereof is in vaine ineffectuall as also the vse of the preaching of the Gospell whereof the Sacraments are appendents Secondly the Sicke like to die for Christ would haue this communion not to bee private and domesticall but ecclesiasticall and publicke neyther doth the want but the contempt of the same hurt the partie that doth not communicate though peradventure there bee another respect to bee had concerning them that haue slipped and that are Excommunicated out of the church and concerning prisoners who are to bee punished and are now penitent Thirdly Children and Infants for to speake properly the Supper is meat for the stronger and the further grown in yeares and not for Infants neyther can they yeeld a reason of their Faith nor examine themselues
which not withstanding how needefull it is the Forme End of the Lordes institution as also Tradition doe proue with great likely hood Fourthly they who for heresie or for their dissolute life are lawfully excommunicated for this Supper requireth worthy guests which liue to Christ in Spirit Faith Whence it was that the persons who were excoÌ„municated or did Penance after the Sermon ended were in former time commaunded to goe forth The Matter constituting the holy Supper is two-fold the one Earthly Outward Elementall Visible the other Heavenly Inward and Spirituall wherof that is commonly called the Signe this the thing signified By the name of Signe all that is vnderstoode whatsoever is perceyved by the outward senses in the pure and lawfull administration of the Lordes Supper whether it be the Element or the bodily substance or the action or rite agreeable to Gods institution The Elementall Signes for of the Rites wee haue spoken in the explication of the Efficient Cause are two the Bread and Wine which two albeit materially they are distinguished yet formally and perfectlie as the Schoolmen speake they make but one Sacrament now they so make it that neyther more nor fewer bee required for the entirenesse and perfection of this Sacrament Not more because all refreshing or feeding is by them performed and ours in Christ is perfectly noted forth Not Fewer because if the one fayle or be wanting the Sacrament of perfect refection is taken away And in this defect Offence is committed in the maiming of the Elements or in the communion vnder one kinde onely against the Lords Institution the Apostles Tradition The End and Dignity of the Sacrament and lastly against the Orthodoxall consent of the elder Church Christs Institution because if you respect eyther the action of Christ and of the Apostles in the first Supper both were given and both were receyved or the wordes First Preceptiue of both they include a commaundement Take and Drinke Secondly Definitiue they are pronounced of both the Bread and the Wine This is my body and this is my bloud Thirdly Expositiue In both they propose a promise o Mat. 26.28 Mar. 14 24. Luc. 22.20 Apostolicall Tradition because the Apostle by the authority of the Lord injoyneth vpon the whole Church of Corinth a necessity both of eating the bread and drinking the wine Which p 1 Cor. â— 11.25.26 Tradition that it was proposed not to one age but to all ages to bee observed The consequence of the Text doth easily proueq. The End and Dignity of the Sacrament because the end is to seale the perfect refreshing of vs in Christ which by the cutting off of the other Signe is made vnperfect but the dignity is to set forth the grace of that covenant after a more evident manner then in the olde Testament it was set forth vnto those who did all alike partake of the Paschall Lambe and of the water out of the rocke as the Story and Paules eplication teacheth r 1. Cor. 10.1 2 The Orthodoxall consent of the elder Church because all that ancient and purer Church judged that the communication of both kinds did not pertaine to the Cleargy onely but to the Laiety aswell It knew nothing of Concomitancy which from the bad costome of the Eucharist dipped in the Wine spruÌ„g forth aboue a thousand two hundred and twenty yeares after and afterwards was coÌ„firmed in the Councels of Constance Basil and Trent Now by the name of Bread Wine we specially and properly vnderstand those Elements which by those words are wont amongst vs to bee noted and pointed out To witte being Pure and Common Pure that they be not mingled or confounded together eyther by dipping of the bread in the wine or by adding the same together with the Wine Common or Vulgar that they bee such as are in common vse to wit lest by the matter colour and taste of those signes any superstition should bee bredde in the heart or mind The Thing signified or the matter inward and spirituall in the Supper of the Lord the neerest and principall is the body and bloud of the Lord That as it was crucifyed or broken This as being powred out Then the Secondary is the most strait copling of Christ with vs by faith by the meane whereof wee are made partakers of Christes owne person and all his benefites The First or Principall in the Supper is the Body and Bloud of the Lord both as touching the Substance and as touching the singular Attributes of the Substance As touching the Substance because wee aâ—e made partakers of the true and Essentiall body and bloud of Christ though after a spirituall manner of receyving Å¿ 1. Cor. 10 26. for albeit the Supper be an eating of the body yet it is not bodily but spirituall not in respect of Essence but in the manner of communicating and the spirituall efficacy of nourishing for the Spirite of man by faith alone receyveth the body and bloud of Christ and with them really for even spirituall actions haue also their reallity is nourished to a spirituall life by the effectuall working of the holy Ghost Neyther doe wee exclude whole Christ from the Supper t Gal. 3.27 Rom. 6.3 sith by the denomination of his body and bloud the whole humanity of Christ nay his whole persoÌ„ is synechdochicaly vnderstoode because neyther the humanitie without the Divivity not the Divinity without the humanity nor both without their common Subject can bee a mediatrix The reason of which Synecdoche is that albeit he be the one and the same who suffered for vs even Christ God and man yet suffered he not in the very Divinity but in the Flesh for therefore as sayd Augustine was Christ borne that being man hee might deliver men and being mortal hee might deliver mortall and dead men from death The Particular Attributes of this Substance are the crucifying of his body and the powring out of his bloud u 1 Cor. 11.14 Luc 22.19.20 and the fruit of the merite of Christes Sacrifice conjoyned with these to wit Remission of sinnes Sanctification Redemption whence it is that in the Scripture the whole obedience of Christ and all the benefits thence proceeding haue vsually been signified by one word Death x 1. Ioh. 1.7 1. Pet. 1 19. Mat. â—0 28. The Secondary thing signified in the Supper is the most straite vniting conjoyning of vs all into one mysticall body both with Christ and among our selues y 1. Cor. 10.16.17.12.13 for as wee are tyed among our selues by the holy band of the same faith and brotherly loue as the members of the same body so by the true eating of Christs body wee are most straitely conjoyned with him and from him as from the head life issueth vnto vs as vnto his members z Ioh. 6.5.7 By the meane of this vnion it commeth to passe that wee bee made partakers both of the benefits of Christ and of his
of the bread and Wine into the Lordes body and bloud or by k Impanationem a passing into the bread or by locall inclusion or lastly l â—nex stentâ—am IndistantiaÌ„ by a beeing in or closenesse but it is Sacramentall and Spirituall which Gods will and authority declared by the worde of Institution effecteth Sacramentall because according to the nature of Sacraments it consisteth in a disposition and relation by which Christ together with the signe exhibiteth the thing signified to the Communicants and sanctifyeth the breade and wine that they may be the signes of the thing signified being conjoyned together by a Sacramentall vnion Spirituall because the body and bloud of Christ being not simply and as they are in themselues things subsisting but Intellectually and vnderstandingly to be considered are proposed in these mysteries and are offered to the mind not to the body to Faith not to the senses being also with the mind and with faith alone to be taken and receyved Of this maner there are three grounds The Institution the Verity and Manner of Christs body and the Nature of the Sacraments The Institution for Christ instituted the Sacrament of our communion with his body and bloud whereof wee are spiritually partakers by Faith for after no other manner can it bee beleeved that the present body of Christ is exhibited in the Supper but as it is truely receyved as the spirituall meat of the soule vnto life The manner and verity of his body for seeing the body of Christ being coessentiall with ours is circumscriptiuely in Heaven wheresoever he will and cannot be in earth by a maner invisible incircumscribed infinite indefinite al and every of which maners overthrow the verity of a body we must altogether confesse that Christ being bodily in heaven is neverthelesse after a Sacramentall manner in body present in the Supper m Heb. 2.17 Luc. 24.29 The Nature of the Sacraments for Faith should cease in the Sacraments if the very thing which is beleeved were otherwise present then after a sacramentall manner n 1 Cor. 11.17 neyther indeed doth the omnipotency of God or a miracle invert or evert this sacramentall manner of presence Not Gods Omnipotency because when there is speech made of that effectuall and actuall power of God the will of God revealed in the word must needes goe before To which will if any thing be contrary it is from it necessarily excluded as that also which is by nature contradictory not a Miracle because neyther miracles which are indeed aboue nature should be sayde to be against nature taking away and withall leaving a substance or naturall quality nor is it probable that a thing which is extraordinary is done in an ordinary Sacrament of the Church And these things haue wee spoken concerning the Presence of Christes body and bloud in the Supper Now are we to see concerning the Communicating and the eating It is needfull that both the ground and the manner of the Communicating of Christs body be considered and discerned The Ground is the vnion in the Supper and the same two-fold the one of the body and bloud of Christ with the bread and wine which is called Sacramentall and pertaineth to the Forme of the Sacrament the other of the same body and bloud of Christ with the beleevers pertaining to the end of the Sacrament The Former consisteth in 2. thinges in the conjoyning of the Signe and the thing signified whereof wee haue spoken and in the joynt receyving of both in the lawfull vse because in the vse instituted they are receyved o Simul licet non similiter together though not alike both conjunctions are not naturall nor corporall nor yet simply obligatory or binding but Sacramentall whereby the thing signified is conjoyned to the Signe and the matter of the Sacrament to the Sacrament and are ioyntly perceyved in the true and lawfull vse thereof The Latter is our Essentiall Reall and spiritual communion with Christ p Eph. 3.16.17 5.29.30 1. Cor. 6.15.17 1. Ioh. 3.24 Essentiall if the things which are vnited be respected Reall if the truth of the Vnion Spirituall if the manner whereby the vnion is made bee considered The things which are vnited are Christ and his Church the Verity thereof the name of Vnion confirmeth and divers similitudes in Scriptures doe shadow forth the Manner is not simply Intellectuall or vulgarly Supernaturall but plainly Spirituall Divine and Heavenly whereof the question that it is is manifested vnto vs by the word of God both simple and Sacramentall but the question how it is is so mysticall and secret that even an Angell cannot comprehend the mystery thereof r Ep. 5.30.32 From this two-fold vnion a twofold manner of Communicating also ariseth The one is Sacramentall or Externall of the Signes which is made by the taking of the bread and wine as according to the Institution ordinance of Christ they are the holy signes of his body and bloud Å¿ 1. Cor. 11 26. For as the bread and the cuppe of the Lord is corporally eaten and drunke so is the same eaten and drunke Sacramentally wherof the bread and the cuppe are a Sacrament even after that manner as the Sacrament of his body is called his Body and the Sacrament of his bloud is called his Bloud by a Sacramentall manner of speaking And this maner of eating is Temporall and may bee iterated The other is Spirituall and mysticall to witte the very receyving of Christs body and bloud in veritie by the Spirite by which Christ is spiritually applyed vnto vs that wee beeing made one with him might by his spirite be quickned to life eternall t Ioh. 6.46 48. and so this spirituall communicating doth not onely signifie Faith but also application which is made by faith our communion with Christ whereupon sometimes it is called faith in Christ sometime the communion of Christes benefites and sometimes our ingraffing and incorporating into Christ Now it is called Spirituall partly because it is effected by the worke of the holy Spirite u 1. Cor. 12.13 Partly because it is by faith onely receyued and partly also because it pertayneth to the Spirituall life And this manner of communicating is dayly continuall incessant From both we exclude the corporall or all communicating of Christs body and bloud in the Supper From the First because the signe is receyved with the mouth and not the thing signified From the Second because a spirituall thing cannot be receyved bur Spiritually The Adoration or Bread-worshipping remayneth which by a false supposition both of the presence and of the communicating of Christs body bloud superstition hath devised For albeit all the godly doe worthily confesse that this Sacrament is to be handled with great Religion and Reverence which Reverence the Fathers sometimes called by the name of Adoration and Christ himselfe is to bee worshipped in the mysteries both as hee is God as he is
God and man yet wee must not stay in the very signes neyther are the eyes of faith to be lifted vp to the place of the bread but vnto heaven x Col. 3.1 That this popish Adoration is Idolatrous both in it selfe and in the Adiunct Ceremonies wee proue divers waies In it selfe by three Arguments drawne from the cause from the manner and from the kindes of Adoration for seeing the cause of the Adoration of Christ is proper in his God-head for nothing is properly to bee adored but that which is God the worshipping eyther of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cannot be translated to the outward signs theÌ„selues without manifest sacriledge then seeing the manner of Christs adoration requireth that neyther the person be divided nor the natures equalled or the difference of them takeÌ„ away the bread cannot at all bee worshipped or the bodie in the bread but either the nature and the properties thereof should be confounded while the presence of Christs bodie is judged to bee in the bread or that which is not fitte for a humane nature but in regard of the person should Idolatrously bee attributed not onely vnto him simply and as touching himselfe but also vnto his Sacrament Lastly seeing there are two kindes of Adoration Praying Thanksgiving neyther of them can be applyed to the bread neyther properly nor Sacramentally whereas both belong to Christ as being God and man In the Ceremonies it is idolatrous whether you respect the reserving of Reliques the inclosing or carrying about or the Elevation of the Eucharist for albeit there were certain beginnings of these ceremonies in the ancient church yet seeing they were prescribed neyther by Christ nor his Apostles or observed in the most ancient and purest church they were for the good cause taken away in the churches of the Gospell OF THE LORDS Supper The Part Confuting Distinctions in Defence of the Interpretation and signification of the NAME I. THe Supper of the Lord signifieth eyther the signe or the action that is eyther it is taken Relatiuely or Absolutely Being Relatiuely it signifyeth the Symboles or Signes of Gods grace Absolutely taken 〈◊〉 signifyeth the whole Action comâ—â—sed of the visible and corporall 〈◊〉 â—ing of the Signes and of the invisible and Spirituall receiving of Christ and his benefites II. THe Lords Supper is considered eyther abstractly as touching it selfe or applyedly in the lawfull vse this way it is properly called a Sacrament that way it is not but abusiuely and improperly III. THere are fowre formes of speaking concerning the Supper of the Lord the sense whereof and manner of vnderstanding them is the same the First is wherein the Name of the thing signified is layed on the Signe as the Supper is the New Testament The 2. wherein the thing signified of the Supper in respect of the effect and efficacy thereof is given to the Signe as the Supper maketh vs partakers of the new Testament Thirdly wherein the offices of the signes are expounded in their proper signification as the Supper is the signe of the Covenant The fourth when in the lawfull vse of the Supper the Sacrament is conjoyned with the promise of grace as he which receiveth the bread and wine worthily shall eate the body and drinke the bloude of Christ Distinctions in Defence of the Efficient Cause principall and First for the Subiect of Predication against Bellar. Lib. 1. De Sacra Euchar. Cap. 10. I. THe Pronounes demonstratiue and Relatiue aswell with the Greekes as Latines doe not alwayes according to rule agree with the substantiue following but sometimes also with that which goeth before and contrariwise not alwayes with that which goeth before but with that also which followeth Moreover the thing which is only a note in the vniversall and not in the particular according as bread was in the Supper is most vsually vttered by a Nowne vniversall of the Neuter gender II. THose things which are to be vnderstoode Tropically according to the nature of a sacrament ought not or may not be properly and simply taken Now there is a double Trope in the proposition touching the cuppe for by a Synechdoche the cuppe is put for the wine in the cuppe and by a Sacramentall Metonymy the Effect of the thing signified is given to the Signe In Defence of the whole Predication to Cap. 9. I. THe Stile of Scripture doth most manifestly proue that the Sacraments of the olde and new Testament as also Testaments compacts and covenants are found to haue beene instituted in Figuratiue wordes and the precepts to haue beene vttered Figuratiuely II. AN Argument drawne from a Figuratiue speaking to the obscurenesse of the same is inconsequent for it followeth not that if it be Figuratiue therefore it is not perspicuous or on the contrary if it be perspicuous that therefore it is not Figuratiue III. THe Testimonies of the Fathers are Sacramentally to be taken that is to bee expounded according to the maner and Trope which is agreeable to Sacraments Whence it is that they all haue judged that Christs words are to bee expounded not according to the Word spoken but according to his meaning IIII. THe appellation of the Word spoken or the sence of the wordes is taken sometimes in a larger and sometimes in a straiter signification in a strayter in regular Predications in a larger in those which are Figuratiue Wherefore in the very wordes of the Supper we retayne the very word spoken but sacramentall wherein not so much the letter and the sound of the words as the sure and certaine meaning thereof is to bee followed to wit that which may agree with the nature of a Sacrament Of the Wordes of Consecration against Bellarmine Lib. 4. Cap. 13. I. THe wordes of the Institution of the Lords Supper are of two partes some are the words of the Evangelists and some of Christ himselfe those are not onely recited as a history but doe admonish as well the Ministers as the Communicants what Christ did what he commaunded likewise to bee done of both These serue for consecration yet so that neyther the rest ought to bee omitted nor consecration bee circumscribed with foure or fiue wordes onely or lastly Prayers and Thanksgivings bee excluded seeing as well the former as the latter words of the Institution doe finish the consecration and the Substance of Bread and Wine is not changed by a certaine hidden vertue of those few wordes but on the contrary the consecration which is made in the Eucharist is called in the Scriptures a hallowing with thankesgiving II. THere was a double respect of the Apostles in that first Supper one of Pastors and dispensers of Gods misteries but the other of the church or the vniversall company of the faithfull which they represented in the first respect the commaundement to Doe ought to bee referred to all that which Christ did concerning the bread and wine in the second to all that which the Communicants ought to
not by naâ—ure as once the posterity of Aaron the Levites but by Ordinance and Institution But the Office of these Instruments â—s to administer the affaires of the Church according to Gods prescriptiâ—n Now the affaires of the church doe â—oncerne eyther the Doctrine or the â—ignes and Sacraments or lastly the â—cclesiasticall Iurisdiction and Disciâ—line of the Church Wherefore the â—ffice of all Ministers is contayned or â—ounded in the administration of Doâ—trine Sacraments and Ecclesiasticall â—overnement The Administration of Doctrine â—onsisteth in two partes in the assertiâ—n of the truth and in the contrary reâ—â—tation of falshood the right object of â—oth is the word of God y 2. Tim. 2 15 Tit. 1.9 The Administration of Sacraments hath two considerations one of the Persons to whome the Sacraments eyther ought or ought not to bee administred The other of the Manner that they bee wholy conveniently and intelligently administred Wholy as touching the Substantiall and Conveniently as touching the outward quality and forme Intelligently as touching the common Edification of the Church z 1. Cor. 1.23 Luc. 22 19 The administration of Ecclesiastical Discipline is chiefly exercised in two thinges in the punishing of faults and in the execution of Ecclesiasticall judgements as afterwards wee shall shew more at large a 1. Cor. 5.4 2. Cor. 2 8 The Matter of the Church hath respect eyther of the parts or of the Subject The Partes of the Church generally and materially are two The one Superior the other Inferior That 〈◊〉 the head of the Church to which the church is subject and from which alâ— vertue 〈◊〉 into the Church This is the body vnto which the members among themselues and with the head are vnited for the mutuall relation of these partes the one to the other maketh an essentiall manner or nature of the church But particularly the entire parts of the church Invisible are two according as there is vsually had a double respect of this church the one in the Beginning and progresse the other in the Perfection thereof that is commonly called the Militant this the Triumphant both which as touching the Essentiall nature of the church it selfe are but one albeit for the difference of the qualities which are in these partes they are as touching the place very diversly distinguished so that the one is in heaven which triumpheth and the other on earth which is in warfare b Heb. 12 22. Apoc. 21.2 Eph. 6.11.12 but of the church Visible as it is so considered there are two maine partes the Guides and the Flockes the Instructers and the Learners though extraordinarily it often happeneth that the one part is separated from the other the essentiall forme of the church it self still remayning The Subiect of the church Generally is Mankind c Mat. 28.19 Ioh. 10.16 Rom. 1.16 of which partly some are called dayly by the grace of God whosoever are ordained to life eternall and partly others are also called who being convicted of the grace offered might become for ever inexcusable But Particularly the Subject of the church visible are all those in generall which are called and outwardly professe the same faith in which common assembly of the church not onely the godly and elect are but also the vngodly and reprobate Those as touching the verity of the inward and outward forme these according to the shew and resemblaÌ„ce or counterfeiting of godlinesse Those Elect and called these called onely not elect Those the liuely these the dead members of the church d Luc. 8.13 Mat. 22.14 but of the church Invisible are they onely that are predestinated to life who indeed are inwardly affected with the calling of God and perceiue the same by faith according to the election and operation of Grace e Rom. 8.9 Eph. 1.23 Ioh. 14.23 Neyther are eyther the newly catechised Novices though yet not baptized nor those which are excommunicated if they repent excepted out of the visible church not those because albeit they haue not as yet receyved the outward signe yet being indued with faith and baptized with the inwarde Baptisme they ought to be taken for the members of the church according to the perfection thereof Neyther is it lawfull to exclude those from the communion of the church whome the Scripture doth not exclude from the communion of Salvation Not these because as they were conditionally excluded till there be hope of repentance so they must conditionally bee of the Church Now all Reprobates and those that liue wickedly without any pricke of conscience are excluded because whether they seeme to bee inwardly of the church or whether they are outwardly of the church yet they haue beene alwayes separated and continued so from the vnity of this church For this church is the communion of Saintes the Spouse and body of Christ without blemish the Temple of God the holy city c. The Forme of the church both generally according to it selfe wholy and specially according to the double notion thereof ought to be expounded as hath beene done in the causes precedent Generally the Forme of the church is two wayes considered Severally in it selfe and the Efficient cause thereof or ioyntly in her Subject After the former manner the Forme of the church is that divine and precious calling wrought in heaven according to the purpose of Gods will wherby hee decreede from everlasting the communion of himself with the church and of the church with himselfe in his beloved Sonne e Eph. 1.4.5 Ioh 10.27.48 Rom. 8.30 After the latter maner the forme of the church is a divine and gratious calling whereby the church of God is in this world fashioned and waiting vntill after the course of her calling here consummated it be advanced in Christ Iesus to the fruition of the heavenly calling And of this calling as the nature as touching it selfe is most perfect so the manner of the same is also two-fold the one immediate the other mediate that which God by himselfe maketh through the vertue of his Spirite this which he maketh outwardly by speech signe or working ordinarily or extraordinarily as it pleaseth him to make it known vnto men Specially the forme of the church Invisible is an effectuall and inwarde calling and by vertue of that effectuall calling that communion of Saintes both with their head and of themselues each with other g 1. Ioh. 1.12 And of this calling as the nature in respect of God is perfect so the inward and effectuall meane thereof is two-fold the Spirite and Faith the one in respect of him that calleth the other in respect of him that is called by the one God offereth and conferreth the effectuall calling by the other wee take holde of that which is offered and make answere to Gods calling for it is needefull that these two concurre together that the calling bee effectuall to witte the calling of God by the vertue and efficacy of his Spirite and our correspondent
by dispensation his Natures are the beginninges of Naturall Actions but his person is the beginning both of common and particular actions according to both natures wherefore every working of Christ in respect of his person is in number one in respect of his Natures is in kinde two-folde One in number because hee is one effectuall Worker and one absolute Perfection In kinde two-folde because there is one Divine of the God-head and another humane of the man-hood The last remayneth concerning the Hipostaticall Vnion of the two Natures in Christ the Nature Foundation Power and Efficacy whereof are now briefly to bee expounded The Nature of this Vnion we shall discerne by the definition and division thereof for it is a Personall Conjunction of two Natures in Christ a conjunction I say Personall not of persons and of two Natures yet not Naturall not such as is of thinges Superiour with the Inferiour of the Accidentes with the Substances or the parte with the whole but in that both mediately the two Natures are vnited in the person and immediately the humane Nature is vnited to the person after a secret and most straite manner y 1. Tim. 3.18 Gal. 4.4 Col. 2.9 Hence this vnion which in very deed is one in the manner of considering is vsually tearmed and distinguished to be two-fold the one immediate of the person assuming and the humane nature assumed for the humane nature it owne z Personalitate Person-head that I may so say being forsaken or left came vnto the person already perfect not to be perfected by that of which it was assumed that it whole might subsist in the whole person a Ioh. 1.1.2.3 c. Ioh. 1.14 Heb. 2.14 the other mediate of two natures between themselues wrought by meanes of the person without any eyther confusion of Natures or division of person Not by the confusion of Natures for it is made Immutably and inconfusedly the Essentiall Natures and their properties which neyther should bee confounded nor can bee transfused being distinct and entire so that they be neyther confounded between themselues nor changed each one in themselues Not by Division of Person for it is made Indivisibly and Inseparably so that neyther the humane Nature from the person nor the natures in the person from themselues are any while or any where separated The Foundation or ground of this vnion is the Incarnation the Efficient Cause of this Inchoatiuely as the Schoole-men speake is the whole Trinity but Terminatiuely Christ himselfe is being made that which he was not and yet remayning in the meane while that which he was Of this Incarnation there are two partes Conception and Nativity both are ordinary as touching the Verity of the matter for Christ tooke vnto him a Nature like to ours of the Substance of Mary yet extraordinary as touching the manner that is both of forming in the wombe of Mary and of Assumption and of Sanctification as also lastly in respect of fulfilling or accomplishment for the forming was immediate in the Virgine without the meanes of a man The Sanctifying was from all spotte of sinne whether Habituall or Actuall the Assumption was made into the vnity of Person without any alteration Lastly the fulfilling was according to the Prophesies From this vnion that in few wordes wee may expresse the power thereof two things follow the Communion of natures and the communication of properties The Communion is in very deede the same with the vnion of Natures according to Subsistence yet in manner of consideration it differeth because that is as it were the Effecte and Consequent of this for this communion of natures doth properly signifie a Concomitance of properties and operations of both natures in the worke of mediation concurring together vnto one absolute perfection by reason whereof it commeth to passe that the proper things of each nature be and are sayde to bee common in the person and this is the ground of the communication of the properties For it is a Phrase of speaking wherby the property of one nature is really vttered concerning the whole person of Christ yet so that it properly pertayne vnto one nature in respect of the thing itselfe and vnto the other in respect of another thing for wee say that God purchased his Church by his blood c Act. 20.8 that Christ being man is every where d Ioh. 3.13 and this is as the Schoolmen call it That grace of the vnion by reason of which wee may say of Christ that God is man and man is God Christ is God and man Now this communication is after a divers manner both Reall and Verball Reall because of the vnion of the Natures and the vnity of the person for Christ is one who being God hath that which is humane in the verity of humane nature and being man hath that which is divine in the verity of divine nature the same in the Sonne God and man wherefore as the word because of the flesh is man so the flesh because of the word is God and yet neyther is eyther the humane nature coextended with the divine nor the divine concluded in the humane because that looke what e Idiomata properties in the concretiue name are communicated in the person according to both natures these in the Abstract in each natures are not communicated because they are properties Therefore the vniversall presence omnipotence and omniscience no lesse then Eternity it selfe and incomprehensiblenes are the selfe Essential things of God or his Essentiall properties which cannot bee communicated now to bee every where to bee omnipotent omniscient as to bee Eternall and Incomprehensible are truely vttered of Christ being man not according to another person but according to another thing by the communication of properties which is true so farre foorth as the thing it selfe is true From this Reall communication of properties wee must distinguish that reall communication of gifts naturall supernaturall made by the divine nature the gifts of the humane as well according to it selfe as in the person whereof some pertayne to the perfection of the flesh assumed and some to the power of office The gifts of Perfection are all those wherewith the assumed nature according to it selfe and in it selfe was enriched whether they bee those which by force of the Vnion the humane nature of Christ enjoyeth after a most blessed manner or those which were put in and infused and that in the highest degree that ever a humane nature can attayn or lastly whether they were gotten by habite as those which Christ successiuely tooke according to the order of nature vntill his nature was brought vp vnto the perfection thereof The giftes of power or office are those which in respect of the dispensation hee receyved in time not according to eyther Nature apart but according to the whole person which therefore was incarnate that in both Natures and according to them both hee might performe the healthfull office of a Mediator
The Verball Communication is sayde to bee that which pertayneth to the exposition of wordes and Phrases which offer themselues in the holy Scriptures and by which that which is proper to one nature is vttered of the other by name onely by reason of the Identity of the person and the vniting together of the properties in the person Now as there are three sortes of Names whereby the Subject is vttered concerning Christ so there are three kindes of Attributes which of him are pronounced for some agree with the divine nature onely some with the humane onely and some with both natures in his person those which are of the first and second sort are Incommunicable those which are of the third are spoken of Christ in his person in respect of both Natures From this difference both of Subjects and Predicates a double manner of Predication or Declaration ariseth proper and simple improper and figuratiue Proper is when eyther those things which are true in the Subject that is in the person according to eyther nature are likewise pronounced of the same and therefore that which is pronounced divine concerning the person is vnderstoode to bee true according to the divine nature and that which is pronounced humane according to the humane as the Sonne of God is every where Almightie Eternall the Sonne of man is borne Dead in Heaven or when the Predicate common to both natures is vttered or pronounced also by a common name of the Subiect as Christ redeemed vs with his blood Improper eyther when those thinges which are of the whole person are vttered of eyther Nature named in the concrete as God redeemed his church the flesh quickneth or secondly when that which is proper to one nature is vttered of the person named by the other nature as God suffered man is every where which manner of speaking hath beene called t Eâ—all age the changing or communication Of the Person of CHRIST The confuting Part. For the necessity of the Divine Nature in the worke of Mediator-shippe against Bellarmime Lib. 5. 2. Contro 1. Tom. Chap. 3. I. THe beginning of Mediatorshippe is considered eyther absolutely or oppositely the person of Christ God-man is the beginning absolutely but oppositely and distinctly there is one beginning in the same persoÌ„ which is first or Principiant which is the Word according to the divine Nature thereof the other second or principiate that is the humane Nature subsisting in the Person II. CHrist performed some workes according to the forme of a servant some according to the forme of God simply but other some according to both commonly III CHrist when he is compared to God is distinguished from the Creature two wayes in nature and dispensation in nature when according to his person hee is distinguished from the Father In dispensation when according to his office he is distinguished from the Essence of God as he is a Mediator according to nature he is equall with the father but according to dispensation hee is inferior to the Father IIII. THe Fathers when they make mention of the humane Nature exclude not the divine but suppose the vnion of both coÌ„curring together in the vnity of the person for or to the vnity of working V. CHrist in nature coÌ„municateth with both partes which are to bee conjoyned as it were with boundes that must bee vnited together yet in the manner of dispensation hee differeth as he is God-man or God and man VI. CHrist acording to the nature wherby hee is God hath agreeablenes with God but whereby hee is man with vs as on the contrary whereby hee is God hee differeth from vs but whereby hee is man or by his voluntary dispensation he differeth from God VII CHrist is considered eyther as he is God-man or according to the manner of his absolute nature eyther this or that after the first manner hee is sayd to be the mediator of himselfe not after the second VIII MEdiatorshippe agreeth not with the Person according to the common nature of the God-head but according to the speciall nature or the forme subsisting which they call a Personalitas Personhood or Personality IX IT is one thing to speake of the God-head of Christ in himselfe according to his owne nature a parte and another thing as hee is in the b Supposiâ—o Subject Now Christ is a Priest not as hee is God by nature but as hee is God-man by the dispensation of his will The Places 1. Tim. 2.5 Answ Christ is pronounced man three wayes for eyther the person of Christ is noted which person is man or the person of Christ whereby hee is man or lastly his manhood simply Now it followeth not hee is Mediator being man therefore he is Mediator as hee is man or according to his man-hood For the Verity of the Humane NATVRE I. IT is one thing to treate of the Materiall cause of Christs flesh and another thing of the forming cause for the holy Ghost brought not the substance but disposed and sanctified it II. LOoke concerning what the Accident of a thing is denyed concerning the same it is not needefull to deny the matter and Subject of that Accident and so on the contrary III. OF Defects which indeed are Privatiuely so called some are repugnant to perfection in themselues to be shunned and condemned some are common to all in themselues indeede to bee shunned by the will of nature yet not condemned Lastly some are Personall according to the manner of every Individuum of the first Christ had no experience the second because they are Essentiall and naturall defects of man corrupt Christ tooke them all on himselfe of the third the matter is doubtfull The Places 2. Cor. 13.4 Ans It is one thing to treate of Christ oppositely and distinctly according to both natures but another thing of the person with which because of vnity that is communicated which is proper to both natures Ioh. 6 51. There is one descent locall another Metaphoricall another of Nature another of dispensation another according to substance another according to evacuation Exinamitionem Christ descended according to the manner of dispensation and evacuation and not locally Now the flesh of of Christ is two wayes considered either according to it selfe simply or as it was vnited with the divine nature by the meanes of his person and after this manner not after that the flesh of Christ is called the bread of life to witte not causally but Instrumentally For the vnity of Person I. OF Christ there is a two-fold consideration one according to the person commonly the other according to the natures oppositely Now those thinges are vttered of the natures in the person which agree with the person in respect of both II. THe coessence is of the natures not of the person for Christ is not another of or from the Father and another of or from the Virgine according to the person but another of the Father and another of the