and Synods that they may so farre as conveniently can be make use of common consent and mutuall assistance especially in those things that are of greater moment But yet how much greater and further space and remotenesse of distance there is between particular Churches so much the lesse also is the visible communion of those Churches because the danger of scandall and infection and the opportunity of mutual edification is lesse or more according as the distinct distance of places is greater or lesse Wherfore there is a more strict visible Ecclesiasticall communion between the Churches of one Province or Nation then between the particular congregations of the Church Universall and consequently the jurisdiction and Ecclesiasticall government is also lesse visible between these then between the Churches of one Nation This communion of Churches in government and Church discipline is not only for the informing of Churches what is commanded by the word of God but also for the governing of them by laws and spirituall jurisdiction for there is an authority and power of rule belonging by the word of God to Churches joyned in Classes and Synods which to particular Churches singly and severally belongeth not to wit a power of making Canons and laws Ecclesiasticall which may bind all the particular Churches of one Province or Kingdome to obey them We grant in this controversy 1. That the power of Classes and Synods doth not take away or hurt the power or liberty Ecclesiasticall of a particular Church for it serveth to direct preserve and promote the power of Synods is not privative but cumulative and granted for this end that the power given to particular Churches may be more efficacious orderly regular able and apt for edifying 2. That there is a power belonging to a particular Church immediatly granted from God not derived from Classes or Synods as likewise there is belonging to Classes and Synods a power of their own immediatly granted by God and not derived from the particular Churches For though in regard of the Originall or the rise and constitution of a Synod particular Churches intire in themselves collaterall one to another and equall in Church power do in common contribute associate and exercise their Church power and so make up a collective and combined body of a Synod yet the Synodicall authority of it selfe is not granted to any other first subject from whence it should be derived to the Synod then to the Synod it selfe to which alone by the word of God and Apostolicall institution that power belongeth for no particular Churches singly and severally considered may exercise a Synodicall power over other Churches But we affirme 1. That this union and communion of particular Churches in a government and discipline Ecclesiasticall in common which is exercised in Synods and Classes is grounded upon the word of God and in the examples of the Apostolicall Church is proposed to us to imitate 2. That these Synods and Classes have a power and authority Synodall and Classicall whereby they do by spirituall jurisdiction authoritatively decerne matters Ecclesiasticall and impose those decrees under paine of Ecclesiasticall censure on particular Churches Our opinion is proved by these following arguments 1. In Act. 15. we have in the Apostles practise an expresse example of a Synod held at Jerusalem about a question concerning the observation of the Law of Moses In which Synod that businesse which had wrought a disturbance in the particular Churches ver 2 4 5 23. is by the deputies of severall Churches ver 2 6 23. Act. 21. 17 18 25. determined with power authoritative to bind particular Churches to obedience ver 22 28. chap. 16. 4. 21 25. And the false doctrine of those who subverted the soules of their hearers is by an Ecclesiasticall judgement condemned with spirituall power ver 28 29. which thing is an act of Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction as appeareth Revel 2. 2 14 20. and the determination of this Ecclesiasticall law was not by an extraordinary Apostolike authority but by an ordinary authority Ecclesiasticall for it was done not by the Apostles alone extraordinarily acted by the Spirit of God but by the Elders and brethren of the Church joyned with the Apostles acting not by their Apostololicall but by their ordinary Pastorall authority with great discussion and disputation and the assent of the Churches which argue that the decrees of this Synod were not made by an extraordinary Apostolicall authority but by an ordinary Ecclesiasticall power 2. Our assertion is proved from Christs institution Mat. 18. 17 18. where he doth institute such Ecclesiasticall Assemblies as may by Ecclesiasticall authority make provision and prepare efficacious remedies against all scandals and offences If the members of a particular Church do give scandall to one another he bids that it be shewed to a superior Ecclesiasticall Judge to wit the Church representative which by Ecclesiasticall authority doth condemne and punish and remove from Ecclesiasticall and brotherly communion the person offending and therefore doth likewise command that if particular Churches give offence to one another it should be carried to a superior Ecclesiasticall Judge which may by spirituall authority condemne punish and put from Ecclesiasticall communion the particular Church offending for where the law makes no distinction or restriction there must not we distinguish or restrain And certainly the remedy instituted in this place is ordained by Christ for the removing out of the visible Church all scandals not only caused by particular members but also by whole Churches and therfore there must be acknowledged a superior Ecclesiasticall Assembly which may by authoritative Ecclesiasticall power judge of the scandall of particular Churches as well as a superiour Ecclesiasticall judge in a particular Church is to be acknowledged from this institution for judging the scandalls of particular members For since that according to the holy Scriptures we must grant that there is an Ecclesiasticall communion between the visible Churches of one Province Nation yea and of the whole World as is proved before which communion is not only fraternall but Ecclesiasticall whereby Churches as Churches or bodies Ecclesiasticall are joyned and united in doctrine government worship discipline and Ecclesiasticall polity and seeing that in this holy communion scandals are committed which are unbeseeming those Churches and to be cast forth from that Ecclesiasticall communion therfore both by the law of nature and this divine law here instituted by Christ we must acknowledge a superiour Ecclesiasticall Senat furnished with spirituall and Ecclesiasticall authority which may remove those scandals Hence Parker himselfe de politia Ecclesiast lib. 3. cap. 24. groundeth the authority of Synods on this place And the Professors of Leyden disput 49. thes 10. discourse thus The institution of Ecclesiasticall Assemblies and so also of a Synod is not of humane but of divine right being founded on the words of Christ Tell the Church if he heare not the Church c. Whomsoever ye bind on earth c. Where
whole particular Church or a Church Consistory Christ in Matth. 18. 17 18. establishing the power of Excommunication in his Church by divine institution doth not restraine the exercise thereof to be applyed only to a single brother in a particular Church though he give the instance in such an one for he doth institute that Order in his Kingdome whereby all scandals may be removed out of the Church and cured by spirituall authority whether committed by a particular Church or by a particular person or by whomsoever And therefore if a particular Sister Church in the Ecclesiasticall Society of many Churches doe give a scandall to those other Churches they may by this institution of Christ be brought into order by this spirituall Power And surely it is cleare even out of Parker himselfe that the divine institution of Classes may be proved from Christs institution in Matt. 18. 17 18. For lib. 3. cap. 24. de Politiâ Ecclesiasticâ he thus argues from the proportion Christ Commands that upon the despising one mans admonition we should proceed to admonition by two or three and if that be contemned to the censure of the Presbytery and if that be despised to the censure of the whole Church and why not therefore from the despising of one whole Church to more in a Classis and againe from those more in a Classis to yet more in a Synod And therefore also by this Institution of Christ not a particular Church only but a Classis and Synod also have power given of Excommunicating such as commit scandals if by this institution of Christ the nature and authority of Classes and Synods may be concluded And accordingly in those hard times of the Belgick Churches when the Church amongst us was infested by the troubles and errours of the Remonstrants whole Presbyteries of Churches were exauthorated by the Power of Classes and Synods We reject therefore the contrary Assertions 1. Of those who hold the Power of Excommunication to be so appropriated to a particular Church so that it may not be attributed to Classes and Synods But we hold that a particular Church by reason of that arct Ecclesiasticall Communion which it holdeth with other neighbour Churches in the same Classis or Synod whereby it makes up one Ecclesiasticall corporation or body and one visible sacred Society with the associate Churches hath not an absolute and compleate power to cut off and cast out a member from that particular Church because that member hath a near arct and visible union and communion with the Churches associate amongst whom he doth daily converse and celebrate the worship of God so that he doth occasion to them danger of scandall and infection and receiveth from them meanes of edification wherefore without the judgement and consent of the associate Churches he may not be cast out of that brotherly and visible Church communion by the decree of one particular Church 2. Of those also who make the highest power of Synods and Classes in the exercise of Ecclesiasticall censures toward a particular Church to consist in a denying or withdrawing brotherly communion But this Non-Communion as it is called we conceive to be such an act as a brother may exercise towards a brother a particular Church towards another particular Church who yet cannot exercise any authority or censure of Ecclesiasticall power amongst themselves one over the other nor hath it that Efficacy by Gods ordinance to bind in Heaven nor was it ordained by the Institution of Christ for this end to save the spirit of man in the day of the Lord and to teach from God such as be erroneous not to blaspheme which to the legitimate censure of Excommunication doe appertaine Matth. 18. 17 18. 1 Cor. 5. 4. 1 Tim. 1. 20. In the correction of a Sister Church the same degrees are to be observed by the Ordinance of Christ Matth. 18. 17 18. which are observed in the correction of a brother and therefore we are not to rest in the admonition of two or three Churches but by that order proceed to Excommunication thereby to cast out from the holy Communion of the Churches as a heathen and a publican and to deliver to Satan an obstinate offending Church CHAP. VII Of set Formes Question WHether it be lawfull for Churches to prescribe to themselves constituted lawes and formes and certaine Canons by Ecclesiasticall authoritie wherein Articles of Faith and things necessarily required by God for the Governement and Discipline of the Churches are out of the holy Scriptures expounded and determined and things not necessarily required are by Ecclesiasticall power prescribed according to the generall rules of Scripture from the precepts of the law of Nature and holy Prudence for the edification of the Church and the order and decency of Gods Worship and imposed on particular Churches and Church-Governors as bonds of Peace and Unity Answer VVE grant in this Controversie 1. That these Formes are not absolutely necessary to the constitution of a Church For we know that the antient Church of the Jewes wanted such Formes when as being collected in one people they had expresse rituall lawes and the Prophets frequent directions Nor did the Christian Church want its being or well being before such time as the branches of the Apostles Creed gathered out of severall places of Scripture were in a briefe Abstract joyned together in one 2. We deny that these Formes or declarations of Faith and Church-Government are to have that authority and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or authenticknesse attributed to them which belongs only to the Word of God as that they should be obtruded as a rule of Faith and that in the Examination of Doctrines and of Church Discipline judgement should be made ex formularum terminis as they speake by the letter of such formes We approve not the judgement of those nor would have their practise to be imitated of whom our Divines did heretofore justly complaine in that writing which Zacharias Vrsinus in the name of the Vniversity of Neostad opposed to the Bergenses concordistae who would obtrude the words of the Augustan confession and the writings of Luther as a rule of faith and Ecclesiasticall proceedings See Chap. 4. of that booke where much is said concerning the use and abuse of Confessions 3. We judge formes of confessions and Canons of Ecclesiasticall Government to be declarations of the true faith and discipline badges and tokens of union and communion in the Church collected in the meetings of the godly learned and ratifyed by an unanimous consent after a diligent inquiry out of Scripture wherein those things which are in divers places of Scripture pertaining to the summe of Christian faith and discipline gathered as it were into a bundle are together and at once proposed to a few eyes and by the comparing of all places wherein mention is made of one and the same article the wholsome truth in each one is expressed and explained that the controversies arising concerning the
Pastors from that function CHAP. V. Of the Ecclesiasticall Ministery and the Exercise thereof p. 66 Q. 1. WHether the end and effect of the work of the Ecclesiasticall Ministery be only the Confirmation and Edification of those Church-members who are already converted and truly godly so as that Pastours are not more obliged by vertue of their Ecclesiasticall function to convert the straying soules of such as live in the world and in sinnes out of Church-communion then all beleevers indued with the gifts of the holy Ghost are by the common duty of Charity bound to doe Question 2. p. 70. Whether the Minister of a particular Church may not only by vertue of his gifts and from the common duty of Charity but also by vertue of his Ecclesiasticall Function lawfully performe ministeriall acts of his office in the Ecclesiasticall Communion of another particular Church to whose ordinary ministery he is not called Question 3. p. 75 Whether the exercise of Prophesie be a perpetuall institution in the Church of God whereby private men who beare no Church-Office may for the exercise of the gifts of the Spirit publikely before the whole body of the Church preach the Word of God with all authority in the Name of God and explaine and apply it for instruction confutation reprehension and consolation of the hearers Question 4. p. 84 Whether those Infants whose next parents doe not by a solemne Church-Covenant joyne themselves to some particular Church are not to be baptized in the Church but are to be accounted as incapable of Baptisme and to have no right to Church-priviledges CHAP. VI. Of Classes and Synods and their authority p. 89 Q. 1. VVHether Classes and Synods have an authoritative power whereby they may authoritatively judge causes Ecclesiasticall with Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction so as that particular Churches ought to submit themselves to their decrees under the penalty of Ecclesiasticall censure Question 2. p. 103 VVhether Classes and Synods have power of sending or ordaining Pastors in a particular Church Question 3. p. 118 Whether Synods and Classes have power of Excommunication CHAP. VII Of set Formes p. 130 Q. 1. VVHether it be lawfull for Churches to prescribe to themselves constituted lawes and formes and certaine Canons by Ecclesiasticall authoritie wherein Articles of Faith and things necessarily required by God for the Government and Discipline of the Churches are out of the holy Scriptures expounded and determined and things not necessarily required are by Ecclesiasticall power prescribed according to the generall rules of Scripture from the precepts of the law of Nature and holy Prudence for the edification of the Church and the order and decency of Gods Worship and imposed on particular Churches and Church-Governours as bonds of Peace and Vnity Question 2. p. 143 Whether it be lawfull to use in the Church prescript Formes of Prayer Administration of the Sacraments c. or whether those Churches who use them be guilty of superstition and will-worship and whether it be lawfull to hold Ecclesiasticall Communion with those Churches where such Formes in the publike worship are in use FINIS VVE whose names are subscribed Delegates of the Walacrian Classis doe testifie that our Reverend Colleague Mr William Apollonius was injoyned by the said Classis that in these sad troubles of England he should by writing set downe what is the Government practised in the Churches of the United Provinces which we also judge agreeable to the Word of God and what are the Controversies at this time agitated in England concerning the Government of the Church of God and state that controversie by way of Theses and Antitheses shewing the Grounds of them And that we have diligently perused and approved that writing of his We desire from our soule that there were a way of Government as much as may be Uniforme observed in all Reformed Churches for the greater edification of the Church of Christ and the destruction of the kingdome of Satan We pray that the learned and worthy our Brethren and Fellow-labourers in the Kingdome of England would be pleased fairly to interpret this our affection Iacobus D'Herde President of the Wallacrian Classis pro tempore Iodocus Larenus Assessor pro tempore Isaacus Hoornbekius Preacher at Middleburgh Cornelius Beuckelarius Preacher at Vere Melchior Burs Minister of the word at West-Souburch Maximilianus Teellinck Preacher at Middleburgh This writing is set forth by prescript of the 46. Article of Ecclesiasticall Policy established by the most Renowned and Noble the States of Zealand Melchior Burs Minister of the Word at West-Souburch
's certaine also that beleevers amongst themselves have charge of each other by vertue of the communion of Saints whereby they all dispersed through the whole world are associated into one body Eph. 4. 1 2 3 4 5 6. and 1 Thes 5. 14 15. and by the duty of Charity which requires this mutuall care from all Lev. 19. Heb. 3. and 10. 3. We reject also the opinion of those who affirme that the Sacraments of the Old and New Testament are signes and seales to confirme this Church-covenant and so instituted by God for the ratifying of it that they are to be administred to those only who are by such a Church-covenant united amongst themselves but to be denied to others though knowne to be Godly who be not in such a Church-communion and strict fellowship Whereas it doth most cleerly appeare out of the holy Scriptures that the Sacraments were instituted by God in his Church chiefly and in the first place to be signes and seales of the Covenant of Grace and of the benefits promised in the Covenant of Grace and of Salvation procured by Christ for us as is manifest by the Sacrament of Circumcision Gen. 17. 7 10. Rom. 4. 11. of the Passeover 1 Cor. 5. of Baptisme Mark 1. 4. Act. 2. 38 39. and 22. 16. Rom. 6. 3 4. Tit. 3. 5. and of the Lords Supper Matth. 26. 26 27 28. 1 Cor. 11. 24 25 26. But in a secondary respect we acknowledge the Sacraments to be seales of our outward ingrafting into the Church visible and our conjunction into one body of the Church Act. 2. 41. 1 Cor. 12. 12 13. and that as we conceive of the Catholicke Church so that he that is baptized is not baptized into the communion only of this or that particular or parochiall Church but is joyned into that one body of the Church Catholike and universall as the whole Ministery of the Church is given by Christ to men to bring them to the unity and conjunction of the Church Catholike and universall and to ingraft them as members into it Eph. 4. 11 12. 1 Cor. 12. 28. Rom. 12. 5 6 7. And as by Excommunication duly performed the person excommunicate is not cast out of this or that particular Church only but is bound all the world over and shut out from the brotherly communion of the Church universall Matth. 18. 17 18. so the Sacraments of Baptisme and the Lords Supper are seales to a man of Ecclesiasticall communion not only in a particular Church but in the Church universall And therefore we hold that these Sacraments are to be administred not to those only who by a Church Covenant have joyned themselves to some particular Church but to all the members of the Church Catholike who have duly prepared themselves for the partaking of them Thus our Belgick Churches deny not the seale of Baptisme to the children of those parents who have not by a confession of faith and submission to Ecclesiasticall Discipline joyned themselves to any particular Church according to the practise of the Jewish Church Josh 5. 4 6. as neither doe we deny the participation of the Lords Supper to those who by reason of the necessity of their calling cannot joyne themselves to any particular Church but are forced to travell through divers Parochiall Churches CHAP. III. Of an institute visible Church Question VVHether no other externall visible Church be described in Scripture and acknowledged by the word of God but a parochiall or particular Church which is confined to such limits as that of necessity it must be such as may be contained and ought to meet ordinarily in one place for the celebrating of Gods publike worship and all the Ordinances of God with mutuall edification so that the constitution of such a Church which by reason of their multitude or some other cause cannot in all their members meet ordinarily in one place for the celebration of the worship of God and exercise of all Gods ordinances is unlawfull and repugnant to the word of God and the Apostles institutions concerning the constitution of a Church described in the holy Scripture Answer VVE judge an externall visible particular Church to be a Church duly and lawfully constituted according to the patterne of the Churches erected by the Apostles which when it may be doth in one Place under the inspection of one Pastor and Elders adjoyned frequent the service of God for their mutuall edification But when by reason of the multitude which God daily addeth to the Church or some other cause it cannot meet in one place but doth in severall places exercise the divine worship of God and the work of the Ministery under more Pastors and Elders joyned into one Consistory Presbytery or Classis the constitution of such a Church we say doth very well agree with the word of God and the Apostolicall institution And therefore wee also conceive that the visible Church described in the holy Scripture is not only a parochiall or particular Church but that there is also a Nationall and Universall Church dispersed through a whole kingdome yea through the whole world which doth in Ecclesiasticall communion make up one body Catholike Yea we affirme that the name Church in Scripture is applyed to a company of Elders with Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction assembled together for transacting Church affaires Therefore concerning a visible Church instituted by the word of God we defend these following positions 1. That the constitution of such a Church which by reason of its multitude or some other cause cannot meet ordinarily in one place for celebrating Divine worship and exercising the ordinances of God is lawfull and consonant to the word of God and the Apostolicall institution though they exercise the worship of God and the work of the Ministry in diverse places under severall Pastors and Elders joyned into one Presbitery This position is proved 1. From the constitution of the Church of Jerusalem instituted and erected by the Apostles which could not meet in one place but must by reason of their multitude meet distributively from house to house in divers places under the inspection of divers Pastors and yet was a visible instituted Church and is called in Scripture a Church in the singular number For the number of that Church was so great that three thousand were added to it in one day Act. 2. 41. and the number of those that beleeved and were added to the Church grew up to the number of five thousand men Act. 4. 4. and the number of those that believed increased daily more and more both of men and women Act. 5. 14. Act. 2. 47. which yet daily met and that in the time of persecution from house to house for performing the exercises of Divine worship Act. 2. 46. and 5. 42. 2. The Church of Ephesus duly constituted according to the word of God was one Church Revel 2. 2. which yet was governed by divers Pastors joyned in a common Presbitery for Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction Acts
Church and judge of Church affaires so as that the company of beleevers governe and judge by those Elders as their instruments and deputies like as the Kings deputy represents the King himselfe For the multitude of Beleevers in the Church hath not by the Word of God a power of ruling and judging Church affaires by a spirituall jurisdiction and therefore cannot delegate it to the Elders and Presbyters But the Presbyters doe themselves immediately from Christ the King of the Church receive power of ruling and Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction 2 Cor. 5. 20. 1 Cor. 4. 1. In this sense therefore we doe not acknowledge a representative Church Neither doe we acknowledge such a Representative Church as by commission from the multitude of beleevers should have absolute power by their lawes and acts of jurisdiction to bind the multitude and subject their faith and consciences so as without triall they should receive and imbrace what soever should be determined by this Church For this is the Papists tyrannicall Antichristian representative Church in the Pope and his popish Bishops which by Reformed Churches is denied and cast out But this representative Church we acknowledge out of the holy Scriptures viz. a company of Presbyters chosen by the multitude of the Church which by authority and ecclesiasticall jurisdiction received from Christ is set over and takes care of the Church and rules it by spirituall jurisdiction and decrees made consonant to the Word of God to whom the whole multitude of beleevers is bound to yeeld obedience in all things which from the Word of God and by the power by Christ committed to them they decree This governing ministeriall or representative Church is proved by these Arguments 1. From Matth. 18 17 18. Tell the Church This is that Church which hath the power o◠the keyes the power of binding and loosing in heaven and earth But now this power was not given to the whole multitude of beleevers but to the Elders and Governours of the Church who must be obeyed in the Lord under the penalty of Excommunication For the Government of the Church is not a promiscuous and popular Government but is committed by God to the Presbyters and Elders which are the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Rulers and Guides in the Church This is that Church which is to receive and judge of the beleevers complaints brought before them concerning the scandals and offences of the members of the Church which is the office of the Pastours and Presbyters to whom the Holy Ghost hath prescribed lawes and rules according to which they ought to receive and judge of those complaints Tit. 1. 13. which to all the multitude of beleevers in the Church is not injoyned This is that Church-which hath the power of remitting and retaining sins which was given to the Apostles and their Successours Matth. 16. 18 19. Joh. 20. 21 22. but no where to the whole multitude of beleevers The ruling and ministeriall Church of Presbyters is therefore here understood Whence also saith Beza upon Matth. 16. 18. that in the Holy Scripture the word Church is sometimes used for an Ecclesiasticall Senate as Matth. 18. 17. to wit because convened in the name of the whole Church over which they are set it 's elsewhere called by Paul a Presbytery 1 Tim. 4. 14. and that in this place by Church the Evangelist understands a Colledge of Elders he proveth from hence that he doth after make mention of binding and loosing which power and jurisdiction was allwayes in their power who were therefore called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 rulers of the Synagogue And Tremellius in his notes upon the New Testament translated out of Syriack To the Church saith he that is to that Councell instituted by God and the congregation of his Saints that the authority both of binding and loosing according to God should be in their power as appeares in this and the following verse Deodate in his notes on the Italian Bible upon this place expounds Church to be a meeting of them that have the care of governing the Church amongst Christians and the inspection of the order peace and discipline thereof 1 Cor. 5. 3 4. 2 Cor. 2. 6. according to the custome of the Jewish Church which allso had their Consistory for correction of manners The Doctors and Professors of Geneva in their notes on the French Bible in this place do understand those who have the care and ordinary calling of administring Doctrine and Discipline in the Church as there had alwayes been use of it among Gods people but was specially renewed in the Ecclesiasticall Ministery under the Apostles The Dutch interpreters in their notes on the new Dutch translation upon this place expound Church by Church Governors who as it were represent the whole Church 1 Cor. 12. 28. 2 Cor. 2. 6. 2. It 's proved from 1 Cor. 5. where is an Ecclesiasticall assembly described which by a spirituall jurisdiction transacts the Church affairs and represents the Church to wit the Presbytery taking care of the Church discipline which is gathered together with Pauls ministeriall spirit and the power of the Lord Iesus that is the power of the Keys which Christ as Lord of his Church only hath Revel 3. 7. which therefore consisteth only of the Churches Ministers and Christs Embassadors as being they who alone have the ministeriall spirit of the Apostles and the power of the Lord committed to them which is allso gathered together for this end to deliver to Sathan an incestuous person a Church member which exercise is committed not to all the Church-members but to the Ministers and Pastors We must therefore acknowledge a governing and representative Church We reject therefore these opposite opinions following 1. That there is no other Church visible described in Scripture but a particular or parochiall Church which might meet together in one place to celebrate the holy worship of God For there is such a visible Church described in Scripture which hath those attributes given to it which agree not to a particular Church as such as that it 's dispersed through Pontus Galatia Cappadocia Asia and Bithinia 1 Pet. 1. 1. compared with chap. 5. 1 2. that all both Jewes and Greeks whether bond or free make up one body thereof 1 Cor. 12. 13. 2. That a particular visible Church is by the Word of God limited to such bounds as that of necessity they may be ordinarily contained and ought to meet in one place for performing the publike worship of God with mutuall edification For we have shewed that the constitution of such a Church as by reason of their multitude or some other cause cannot ordinarily meet in one place doth well agree with the word of God and Apostolicall institution For the essence and lawfull constitutiō of a Church dependeth not on the outward circumstance of place but on a due Profession of faith and bond of holy communion For as Ames saith that same in
and that golden rule is to be followed To obey God rather then men yet a pious sonne of the Church will not rudely insult on them but with a reverentiall bashfulnesse avoid them as Waldensis elsewhere speakes But when Formes are composed and established by Synod call authority for the promoting and deciding of truth the establishing integritie and order in Church Government they have then Ecclesiasticall and definitive authority whereby they may be imposed on particular Churches in Doctrinall Causes and Ecclesiasticall affaires under the penalty of Ecclesiasticall censure For the spirits of the Prophets are subject to the Prophets 1 Cor. 14. 32 and all the Sonnes of the Church are to be subject to the Discipline of the Church Matth. 18. 17 18. We hold therefore that to Churches congregated in Synods there belongs power by the Word of God that they may be Ecclesiasticall authority prescribe and impose Formes both of Confession of Faith and Ecclesiasticall Government which particular Churches and their Governours and private members are bound to confesse and receive under paine of Ecclesiasticall censure This Assertion is proved 1. Because the Synod at Jerusalem by an ordinary Power Ecclesiasticall did prescribe and impose such a Forme to other Churches in a question in controversie Acts 15. 22 29. and 16. 4. 2. Because those things which the Churches of God ought to beleeve with the certainty of Divine Fiath and undoubted Conscience these may Synods also injoyne by Ecclesiasticall authority to particular Churches For by the Word of God their power extends to require of others obedience to the Faith and may in the Name of Christ with spirituall power bring under those that are obstinate and who stubbornely oppose themselves against the decrees and constitutions of those that are to governe the Church They may therefore by Ecclesiasticall authority impose on others Formes of Faith and of obedience to the Faith drawn up according to the Scriptures 3. Churches have Ecclesiasticall Power to prescribe just and approved meanes for preserving the purity of true Doctrine and the peace and union of Churches and for overthrowing the wicked counsels and endeavours of Hereticks and disturbers 2 Cor. 10. 4 5 6. and 13. 10. Gal. 5. 12. 1 Cor. 4. 21. But Formes of service and confessions determined concerning questions in controversie are approved and just meanes for preserving the purity of Doctrine and the peace of Churches that they be not indangered by distractions and the poison of errours Act. 15. 23 24. c. They may therefore be imposed on particular Churches by Ecclesiasticall authority Accordingly in the ancient Synods of Churches such Symbols Ecclesiasticall Canons Confessions and Declarations of Faith were set forth that they might thereby testifie not only what themselves did beleeve but also what ought to be beleeved by others with whom they would hold their Ecclesiasticall Communion as all the acts of Synods doe testifie in which where they speake concerning Doctrines of Faith they doe by Paul's example Anathematize those who thinke or teach otherwise whence also is that Preface of the Athanasian Creed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Whosoever will be saved before all things it is necessary that he beleeve c. And Calvin rightly Epist 87. to the Protector of England It is requisite to provide against petulant wits who assume to themselves too great a licence and the gate is also to be shut against curious doctrines And the ready course for this purpose is one to wit That there be a summe of Doctrine extant to be received by all and this in preaching to be followed by all and to the observance thereof all Bishops and Ministers to be bound by oath so as none be admitted to the Ecclesiasticall Function but who promiseth to retaine that consent of Doctrine inviolate That there be also a common Forme of Catechisme for the use of children and ignorant people Thus will the truth be made familiar to them and withall they will learne to distinguish it from impostures and corruptions which are apt by degrees to creepe upon the slothfull For this you must be certainly resolved of that the Church of God cannot want Catechising for that therein the true seed of sound doctrine is contained from whence a pure and good harvest is afterward to arise and so to be multiplyed more and more c. Nor yet doth the benefit of a Catechisme consist only in the instruction of Children for there is withall this other benefit that both the people being thereby instructed will be better able to profit in the ordinary hearing of the Word and also if any one being puffed up would bring in some new opinion being called to examination by the Catechisme he will straight be discovered Thus Calvin And thus also in our Belgick Churches is that authority applyed to our Formes of Harmony to wit the Confession the Catechisme and Ecclesiasticall Order decreed and confirmed in Synods that the Profession the Doctrine and observation thereof is by Ecclesiasticall authority injoyned to all who will enjoy the dignity of the Ecclesiasticall Ministery and who live in the holy union of our Churches See the Syned at Embden Anno 1571. art 2. at Dort Anno 1574. art 2. Anno 1578. art 8. c. We reject therefore The opinion of those who grant it indeed lawfull for a private person or even for a particular Church yea and for all the Churches of a Kingdome to make Confessions and Formes of Doctrine and Discipline but hold it unlawfull and unprofitable to prescribe them either by Ecclesiasticall or Civill authority as binding Rules of Faith and Practise that men should be constrained to observe them in Faith and the practise of Divine Worship But now those things that are to be retain'd with that firme faith and unmoved constancy and certainty of mind as that for the profession thereof all beleevers should not doubt to shed their bloud and suffer Martyrdome and the Churches with the certainty of divine faith judge that so they ought to doe those things surely they may by Ecclesiasticall and spirituall authority prescribe to others and constraine men to observance thereof in faith and practise under the penalty of Ecclesiasticall censure But for the profession of the pure faith and of the spirituall Governement of Christ's Kingdome all who are faithfull sonnes of the Church are bound to shed their bloud See Rev. 2. 13. Act. 7. 57 58. Luk. 21. 15 16. Therefore Canons and Rules of this profession prescribed out of the undoubted Word of God may be Ecclesiasticall authority be imposed on the Churches of God by those who are by Office to watch over the purity of Faith and integrity of Ecclesiasticall Government Yea and we may bind our soules by Oath to preserve and professe the saving truth of God in faith and the obedience of faith that we fall not away from the holy Profession and exercise thereof See Psal 119. 106. Nehem. 9 38. And if we may lawfully
bind by Oath our owne soules and the soules of others who live under our power to such a profession of saving Faith we may bind them also by Lawes and Canons to the same profession for of like things there is like judgement Question 2. VVHether it be lawfull to use in the Church prescript Formes of Prayer administration of the Sacraments c or whether those Churches who use them be guilty of superstition and will-worship and whether it be lawfull to hold Ecclesiasticall Communion with those Churches where such Formes in the publike worship are in use Answer IN this controversie we easily assent to what is written by Ames upon this question in his Cases of Conscience lib. 4. cap. 17. quaest 4. and to what the professors of Leyden have in their Synopsis Theologiae disput 36. Thes 33 34. And that we may handle the question distinctly 1. We reject such Formes of prayer of Administration of Sacraments c. which for the matter of them are vitious for we may not in prayers and other parts of the publike worship of God propound any thing unlawfull impertinent and unfitting which savoureth of superstition Idolatry or heresy or carnall profanenesse and pomp of the World and which introduceth a communion with the unfruitfull workes of darknesse And for this cause we reject the ceremonies and forms of publike worship introduced in the Church of England in these last corrupt times by the Hierarchicall Bishops as which being superstitious and idolatrous did deface the Church and worship of God and obscure the brightnesse and beauty of a glorious Reformation and a Church which takes up superstitious and idolatrous ceremonies partakes in superstition and idolatry 2. We reject also those Forms of prayers and publike worship which by a tyrannicall and violent command are imposed on the consciences of men as absolutely necessary and as essentiall parts of Gods worship though for the matter of them they be legitimatly disposed yet for the Form of them and the manner of their introducing they become illegitimate instruments of cruelty and pretences for perverse wickednesse and occasions of violent tyranny against the worthiest and best sonnes of the Church For there are not by Christ or the Apostles whose institutions are not defective in the absolutely necessary parts of Gods worship any Forms prescribed as simply and absolutely necessary wherein they have drawne up an exact and immutable rule for all Christians in Churches in matter and form and method to which all faithfull worshippers of God to the worlds end are to be precisely bound 3. The question is not here of the absolute necessity of Forms whereby they are obtruded as parts of Religion and essentiall meanes of divine worship but of such a prescribing them whereby they are by Ecclesiasticall authority commended for the order and decency of the worship of God as usefull and profitable for those who want either sufficient ability or freedome of exercising it for the seemly expression of those parts of divine worship that they may be as it were guided by them as helps in their meditations petitions words and actions and that the attention of the auditors especially in great Congregations may by those forms be helped and directed and that there may be an Uniformity observed in the exercises of publike worship in all Churches for the preventing of scandalls and for the greater edefication of the Churches But we judge those Forms as well publikely as privatly used to be lawfull and profitable so that they be read out of the booke with due attention reverence faith and spirituall affection and zeale towards God and that not only in case of necessity when he that is to perform those parts of divine worship is destitute of sufficient ability and fit words to expresse the prayers and other parts of divine worship but also for the helping and directing the attention of the auditors thereby and for keeping an uniformity in the exercises of Divine Worship for the edification of the Churches of God This Assertion is proved 1. Because we may in a prescript form sing Psalmes and offer thanksgivings to God with due reverence faith spirituall affection and zeale Asaph and his brethren had Forms for the due praising of God prescribed them by David according to the prescript whereof they were in set words to celebrate publike thanksgivings See 1 Chron. 16. 7 8. So in the dedication of the Temple the Priests and Levites did celebrate the publike worship of God according to the set-Forms prescribed by David 2 Chron. 7. 6. The like examples we have Numb 6. 22 23. 2 Chron 20. 21. Esra 3. 10 11. Psal 92. 1. But now if thanksgivings and singing of Psalmes which ought to be performed with spirituall affection reverence and understanding and joy 1 Cor. 14 15. Ephes 5. 19. Col. 3. 16. both lawfully may be and were performed according to the Word of God in set Forms then also Prayers and other parts of Divine Worship may in set Forms be duly and lawfully conceived and offered to God for thanksgivings and blessing of God are kinds of prayer and of the same nature which require the same affections of mind with other parts of Divine Worship 2. That is a just and lawfull forme of prayers in which are observed the essentialls and necessary requisites to all prayers But all things which in the holy Scripture are required to the due constitution of prayers may be observed and by the godly are observed in a holy manner in prayers conceived in set Forms and pronounced out of a booke Therfore this form of prayers is just and lawfull For what is there in Scripture required to the worship of supplications and godly prayers but that the matters of them be lawfull and stily disposed according to the present necessities that they be offered to God in a holy manner with reverence zeale humility and faith and that they duly expresse our urging necessities But we know by certaine experience that a prayer holy and lawfull for the matter of it may in a set Form be pronounced and offered to God with an humble sence of our necessities desire and zeal holinesse of affections faith and religious motions of our will towards God and that according as our affairs require The faithful reade the text of holy Scripture with understanding humility reverence zeale religious motions of the will and faith in God and application of them to particular necessities and why may not prayers in like manner be pronounced in prescript formes when as prayers differ in this only from hearing and reading the Word of God that in the one our will is moved towards God that we may be moved by him but in the other our will is moved towards God that he may be affected with our desires as Ames elsewhere observeth 3. Our Lord and Saviour Christ hath prescribed us a form of prayer For he hath given us the Lords-Prayer not only as a pattern or platform according to