the Amalekits contrary to GOD's command pretending that he did so For the good purpose of Sacrificeing 1 Sam. 15.21.22 Neither should Books be approven in which Errours are mixed with Verities since evil is through any defect but good from the intire cause So I distinguish this Rule if a Writter having a good design mistake in a few things of no great moment and upon sound Advice will revoke his Errours I grant this should be favourably interpreted but if the Errours be gross and many and the Author boasting of being Divinely inspired in writting them and to have had more Light and Piety then all men in that case I deny that such mistakes should pass uncensured Lastly as to the first of the four Pre-concessions for disputing that we should be well acquainted with what we censure that is a very good Rule and by it the Ap. seems to insult his Opponents that either they did not well know the French Language in which A. B. wrote or had not read all her Twenty two Books So not only the Ap. but likewise all that own A. B. whensoever her Errours are mentioned they answer warmly that whatsoever seemeth hard in some of her Writtings is explained in others which the censurers either have not read or will not be at the pains to compare places together Now to ward of this thrust the Reader shall be judge if I censure any thing of A. Bs. Writtings but what I understand well enough having had sufficient means for it by reading sundry of her writtings and particularly The Light of the World which is held for the chiefest of them all and the standard of all both be herself and Poiret see the admonition prefaced thereto by P. P. p. 36. And now I have read the Ap. which is aequivalent to the reading of all her Books since the Author hath read them all and defends all and if I quarrel nothing but what he mantains it were a frivolous shift to bid me go and search any of A. Bs. Books for any explication of her Opinions And if there be reall Errours and Contradictions found in her writtings what explications can remove them To conclude this Section I shall to the foresaid four add other three rules of arguing and especially anent Points of Divinity 1. To explain the Termes and state the Question aright 2. To reason and answer candidly without Sophistry or Deceit 3. To seek Verity rather than victory and therefore though we may justly commend some good things in any Person or his writtings not to mantain their Errours and Evtravagancies which if through fondness we have failed in upon second thoughts to do so no more SECTION III. If A. B. was Divinely inspired A. THis Question cannot be well resolved untill the Terms thereof be cleared in the first place and the Question be rightly stated according to my first Rule for unless this be done all abrupt disputs turn to a meer Logomachie or a proud and ignorant doting about Questions and strife of words which God expresly forbids 1 Tim. 6.4 Divine Inspiration is taken in very different Senses for First in a large sense every man may be said to be Divinely Inspired because of his Rational Soul which was made after the Image of God Gen. 2.7 God breathed into Mans Nosethirls the Breath of Life and Gods breathing into Man is a Divine Inspiration 2ly One is said to be Divinely Inspired to whom God giveth a capacity Genius or fitness for an Office or Imployment as it is written Judg. 3.10 The Spirit of the Lord came upon Othniel and he judged Israel and went out to Warre so it is a necessary Qualification of a Bishop that he be Apt to teach 1. Tim. 3 2. and the Holy Ghost maketh Bishops Acts 20.28 Yea this is ascribed to men of Manuary Callings as to Bezalcel and with him Aholiab Exod. 31.3 I have filled him with the Spirit of God in Wisdom and in all manner of workmanship for the tabernacle 3ly A Spiritual man judgeth not of Divine things by carnal reason Church Authority only Tradition or Custom but according to the Truth and Minde of God revealed in the Scriptures 1 Cor. 2.14.15 But the Spiritual man judgeth all things c. Job 32.8 The Inspiration of the Almighty giveth man Knowledge Which Apothegme may also be referred to the former sense that God qualifies and fitteth every person whom he commissioneth for any Imployment as to teach others Yea persons unregenerated may have something like to this Orthodoxie as that understanding Scribe who in Conference with the Lord did give the true and Spiritual sense of the Law upon whom it was accordingly pronounced That he was not far from the Kingdom of God Mark 12.34 Yet being at a distance from true Conversion all the knowledge he had was only by the common illumination of the Spirit which and other common gifts of the unconverted whether they differ specifically or gradually only from the saving knowledge and graces of the Godly I shall not here abide to determine 4ly Every Pious Person is led by the Spirit of God both in his Conversion when Gods Spirit enlightneth the Understanding and reneweth their Will and likewise afterwards directing and quickning to all Duty which Light and Grace he bestows in such measures as fitteth the work wherein He in his Infinite Wisdom imployes them as reading the Scriptures Praying Preaching Writting doing of good Works and suffering when called thereto Of this the Holy Spirit is the efficient cause he bids us do well Yet it is God who worketh in us both to will and to do of his good pleasure Phil. 2.12.13 so 1 John 2.20 Ye have an unction from the Holy One and ye know all things And this Illumination is by Divines called Subjective Revelation because of the agreement betwixt our Souls and the Divine assistance and to distinguish it from the pretended Enthusiasm of deluded Persons who boast of new Revelations as the chief Rule of their Faith and Manners And in this sense Luther Zuinglius and other Divines who are cited in Quakerism no Popery from pag. 19. are to be understood when they write that the inward word of God and the dictats of the Holy Spirit are the true word of God which profit unto Salvation which is also the Sense and meaning of the ancient Holy Fathers when they speak of the leading of the Spirit of God as S. Chrys upon John 6.63 Christs words are to be heard according to the Spirit And whoso heareth them after a carnal manner profiteth nothing And S. Cypr. de S. sancto p. 485. edit Par. cum Annot. Ja. Pamel Suspiration Inspiration and Aspiration in the Godly they have from the Holy Spirit the cause and effect Matter and Increase 5ly The Prophets and Penmen of the Holy Scriptures were in a strict sense Divinely inspired 2 Pet. 1.21 They spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost 2. Tim. 16.17 All Scriptures is given by the Inspiration
Divinely Inspired or to be led by the Spirit of God in writting to write by an Infallible Spirit as the Prophets and Apostles did who were the Amanuenses of the Holy Ghost 2. Though she durst not speak it out in plain Terms that she acclaimed no less than such a Spirit as the Prophets and Apostles had lest the Readers at the first sight had cryed fy upon her for Blasphemie but goes on in Clouds and Darkness never declaring in what Sense she was Divinely inspired yet I say on the matter she acclaimed no less for these Reasons 1. First because when it was objected to her by Divines that she had not such Knowledge as the Prophets had and wrought no Miracles she shifted to give any direct answer but slily strived to diminish their Credit and of the Holy Scriptures also alleadging that the Prophets knew not all things which they wrote that all of them wrought not Miracles that the Devil had opened the eyes of the blind and raised the Dead and that the Lord himself was mistaken I tremble relating it anent the Fig Tree Mat. 11.19 L. W. pt 1. p. 136. Ap. p. 168.203.204.205.206 and 222.223 All which Calumnies might be easily refuted but I leave that Task to those who are writting against them more Copiously 2. The very Title of her Book is Blasphemous to wit The Light of the World which is the Epithite given to CHRIST and his Apostles and in assuming that Title she equaliseth her self to them tho injuriously 3. It is evident that she pretended to such a Spirit as the Apostles had when she affirmed that she could write such a Book as the New Testament L. W. pt 1 p 133. Now if she could have so written then she could have done it either by a fallible or infallible Spirit if only by a fallible Spirit then it could not have been such a Book but if by an infallible Spirit then she acclaimed such a Spirit as the Apostles had which the Objector denyes Many more Instances might be adduced to this purpose but these may suffice 3. Thirdly I answer to the grand Objection that she pretended not to write a New Canon or Rule of Faith but only to expound the Scriptures giving but not granting that her pretensions did run no higher that same is too high The Quakers acknowledge that their Spirit is somewhat inferiour to the Prophets Quakerism no Popery p. 32.33 Mr. G. K. The learned Author whereof is no Quaker now Yea the Roman Church it self would be offended if any man should say that they coine new Tenets in Religion or that they did more by their Dogmatising then to expound the Scriptures and dispense the Churches Traditions but by a Prophetical Light and Divine influence as their doctrine in this point is well collected by Amyrald in Thes Salmur de aut Script n. 15.16 So for A. B. to pretend Divine Conduct to expound the Scriptures better than all others is too great Arrogancie Q. Will you not allow A. B. to have had more of Divine Conduct than you have done alreadie that possibly she had it only in some things which she did and taught as ordinarily every Godly Person hath in what he does aright A. I have granted enough in the said Terms and more I cannot because it is sufficiently proved that she was not Divinely inspired as the Pen-men of the Holy Scriptures were either to add to the Canonical Books or to interpret Scripture infallibly as they did neither was she led by the Divine Spirit as an ordinary Officer in the Church to interpret and apply the Scriptures which is Preaching since she was not fitted for that end by the means of Gods appointment nor yet observed the Rules thereof Neh. 8.8 Ezra the Scribe with the Priests and Levits read in the Book of the Law distinctly and gave the sense and made the People to understand the reading Timothy the Evangelist was enjoined Reading 1 Tim. 4.13 and since his Days all Holy and Wise Men who interpret the Scriptures pray to God for the Direction of his Spirit which indyted them that they may Prophecie according to the Proportion of Faith Rom. 12.6 They compare Scripture with Scripture and look to the Scope of the place they study the Languages in which the Scriptures were first written Histories likewise and Customs of several Countries Proverbial Speeches and famous Writters of them which are often cited and frequent Allusions made thereto in the Holy Scriptures they read the Creeds Confessions of Faith Catechisms and Systems of Divinity of the Orthodox Churches both Ancient and Modern they search for Truth by the Literal Sense of the whole Scriptures pondering well whether or no the speech be in Terms proper to the things treated of or borrowed from other things which is called a figurative Speech By these and the like means the settled and ordinary Teachers and Expositors of the Scriptures doe begging the blessing of God Humbly and Assiduously endeavour to be fitted for the great and Sacred function of labouring in the Word and Doctrine But A. B. does not so much as pretend to use these means nor yet to expound the Scriptures by the true Rules but on the Contrary she laid by the Scriptures and contemned all Systems of Divinity and other helps of Learning Therefore she was not fit or qualified to expound the Scriptures even as an ordinary Teacher So since A. B. was not led by the Spirit of God to write her Books and expound the Scriptures either in an Ordinary or Extraordinary way It remains then that she performed these things by no other Faculty but by Guessing and vain Divination nor can I add a Fourth Member to this Tripartite Division tho possibly the fertile Brain of a new Ap. will gender one shewing how one can be led by the Spirit of God to write not by an Infallible Spirit nor as an Ordinary Teacher nor yet to be a Meer Guesser or pretender to it which as the Roman Proverb was Let the credulous Jew believe not I. To put a Period to this long Section I shall produce all the pretended Reasons which the Ap pt 3. p. 240 and 241. Alleadgeth for proving A. B. to have been Divinely Inspired and shall answer them severally as if they had been Objected against my Conclusion on this Head Obj. 1. Her Doctrine was conform to the Scriptures therefore she was Divinely Inspired A. 1. Denying the Antecedent for her Doctrine was mostly contrary to the Scriptures as God willing shall be Manifested in the next Section 2. I deny likewise the Consequence because a persons Doctrine may be conform to the Scriptures who had no extraordinary Inspiration Obj. 2. She was Unlearned and yet exceeded the greatest Divines A. 1. She exceeded them only in Vanity 2. George Fox was unlearned so he gave it out that all his Divinity was revealed to him among the Hils of Lancaster And Jacob Bhemen the pretended illuminated Sutor wrote seventeen Books
D. D. AN ADVERTISEMENT Anent the Reading of the Books of Antonia Borignion By GEORGE WHITE Minister at Mary-Culter near ABERDEEN They have a Zeal of GOD but not according to Knowledge Rom. 10.2 All Hereticks diminish the Authority of the Holy Scriptures Tert. de praesc c. 49. Enthusiasm is an Impiety whereby a Person hardily bent for the Inward Worship of GOD doth boldly violat and despise His Commands as to outwards Mr. Henry Scougall P D in Aeth l 4 c 8 de justitia ABERDEEN Printed by JOHN FORBES Printer to the TOWN and UNIVERSITY Anno Dom. 1700. The TABLE or INDEX SECTIONS SUBSECTION 1. NUM POINTS SUBS. 2. SECTIONS Sect. 1. The Occasion and Purpose of the Advertisement page 1 Sect. 2. How I have read her Books and the Rules of Arguing p. 3 Sect. 3. Q. If A. B. was Divinely Inspired p. 7 and Sect. 4. Subs 2. N. 2. p. 83 Sect. 4. Q. If her Doctrine be conform to the Holy Scriptures p. 23 Subs 1. Of the Essentials of Religion p. 24 N. 1. Concerning GOD and the Blessed Trinity p. 25 N. 2. Of CHRIST and his Satisfaction for Us. p. 31 N. 3. Of Mans future State p. 40 N. 4. Anent the Love of GOD. p. 45 N. 5. Of the Holy Scriptures p. 51 N. 6. Miscelanies relating to the Essentials of Religion p. 53 Whereof the 1. Point is Of GOD'S Decrees and the Doctrines depending thereupon p. 54 2. Of the Image of GOD in Man p. 60 3. If Man sinned before he sinned p. 61 4. Of Perfection p. 62 5. Of Perseverance p. 64 6. Anent the Sacraments p. 66 7. Of Pastors and Church Government p. 69 N. 1. Of Accessories in the general p. 73 N. 2. Of A. Bs. Accessories in particular p. 77 N. 3. Of her Contradictions p. 89 Sect. 5. How Errours in Books shall be discerned p. 92 Sect. 6. If any should read the Books of A. B. p. 94 Sect. 7. If Borignianists be a New Sect. p. 96 Information to the Reader LEt the Reader of this little Book remember that for brevities sake the two Letters A. B. Signisie Antonia Borignion Ap. the Apologie for her S. V. Solid Vertue L. W. Light of the World Pt. the Part of the Book that is cited P. the Page thereof And according to the Table Sect. the Section Subs the Subsection N. the Number of the Subsection And Po. the Point of it Q. Question A. Answer Obj. Objection SECTION I. The Occasion and Purpose of this Advertisement HAving observed with Regrate for several Years bygone sundry well-meaning Persons and some of them not Unlearned to have vented many Errours concerning the Holy Scriptures the Gospell-Sacraments Church-Government the Pastorall-Office and other most Sacred Establishments of the Christian Religion which they had pick't out of the Pamphlets that are said to be written be A. B. a Flandrian Yea some young men of good expectation by reading these books inadvertently had their Melancholy height'ned to an excessive degree therefore it seemed good for the Truths sake which we ought to contend for Jude 3 and for preventing by the LORD's Blessing further inconvenience that way to write a seasonable Advertisement in meekness and love Eph. 4.14 That we be no more children tossed to and fro and carried about with every winde of Doctrine by the sleight of men and cunning craftiness whereby they lie in wait to deceive That Christian People may not through blind zeal snatch up any pretence of piety without due examination and it often fals out that some out of a Capricious fancie of defending Innovations leave the high and troden way to Heaven so wander in a Wilderness of Errours It is here proposed that all who tender their Souls Interest may in this case observe the Divine Oracle Rom. 16.17 18. To mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the Doctrine which they have received and avoid them who with good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the Simple This Tractat shall be short and so not tedious to any Reader because in a late Apologie for A. B. printed at London Anno 1699 two pious and learned men to wit Dr. John Cockburn and the Author of the Snake in the Grass and the History of Sin and Herefie are fiercely attaucked for writting against her who doubtless if alive will answer for themselves which yet will require a considerable time for them to answer all the Defences which the Ap. hath alleadged for A. B. and her Abetters her whole Life Actions and Writtings So my present undertaking is only to act the pairt of their fore-runner as one who doth what he can to stop the progress of devouring Fire till greater power arrive to extinguish it SECTION II. How I have read her Books and the Rules of Arguing BEfore I come to adduce the Rules of Disputing it is to be noticed how the Ap. in his Preface declares that he is perswaded in his Conscience that the Writtings of A. B. tend to the reviving of the Spirit of Christianity Which can have no more force to perswade others to be of his Opinion than the Canting Insinuations of the Bygots of all Parties declaring assevering and swearing that themselves only are in the Right and their Opposites in the wrong A mans erring Conscience cannot oblidge himself to believe a Lye or to do ill things it only binds him for to use the means to get it better informed and far less should such a vehement Protestation of his Conscientious Perswasion of the goodness of such rare Teneds as are here questioned procure the Assent of Rational men but the solidity of his Reasons if he hath any according to the Scripture 1 Pet. 3.15.16 There are four Rules of reading Books aright and judging of the Authors Sentiments or there are so many Postulats pre-required to the right disputing of any matter as they are set down in the Ap. Pt. 4 p. 334. 1 To be well acquainted with what we censure 2. If the Scope of A. Bs. Writtings be good and agreeable to the main end of Religion in that case to bear with litle escapes 3. To read her Books without prejudice or an evil eye 4. To narrate and interpret faithfully All which Rules he alleadgeth these gentlmen have transgressed who did write against A. B. And to obviat such an Objection against my self I have observed and shall firmly adhere unto the third and fourth of these Rules without exception being so far from having a Prejudice against A. B. and her Abetters that I wish with meek Moses Numb 11.29 That all the Lords People were Prophets and that the Lord would put his Spirit upon them And the Teneds or Sentiments which I intend to examine shall be truly narrated either in the express words of A. B. and her Ap. or the import thereof without distortion The second Rule needs some Qualifications for a good Purpose doth not justifie an evil Action no more than Sauls sparing the Cattel of
without sin The foresaid Errour of A. B. is a great one but behold a greater Against the Satisfaction which Christ the Redeemer made to Divine Justice for us That there was no need for Christ to become Man to suffer or die for our Redemption that He had been Incarnat tho Man had never sinned to converse with us visibly upon Earth that GOD was not honoured by His sufferings and that he suffered only by accident for the instruction of Men and their relief and to give them a good example L. W. pt 1. p. 139. 140. 141. 142. and pt 3. p. 53. This Heretical Doctrine is catcht from Photinus and from Socinus L. de Serv. c. 3.4 per tot That Arch-Heretick and Heir of Arrius who denyed the Divinity of Christ and is the Father of the Atheists that now infest many places in Europe whether they call themselves Deists Theists Unitarians or under whatsoever Denomination they pass at the Time The foresaid Doctrine is no less Absurd and Heretical when it proceeds from A. B. and her adherents than as it is disseminated be the Socinians who pretend to be Christians as well as they for they all strick at the root of Christianity teaching that Christ suffered for our behoof but not in our stead that it is enough to say He set Captives free whereas Redemption imports paying of the Ransom also for us both of them deny the Vindicative Justice of GOD pretending to cry up his Love and though they pretend to the highest Reason yet how unreasonable is it to say that the SON of GOD suffered as He did without a necessity of satisfying the Justice of GOD thereby and suffering of the greatest of Punishments due to Us for Sin And without which all Mankind had perished eternally as well as the Devils It was the admirable free Love of GOD which made the Difference and it is the great Foundation of Saving Faith That when we were sinners outlaws and rebells Christ dyed for Us Rom. 5.8 Now I shall cite the Scriptures for the Satisfaction of Christ whereby I am perswaded that the Impartial Reader will easily perceive that the foresaid Doctrine of the Socinians and A. B. is inconsistent therewith and so inconsistent with the Creed and the Essentials of Religion notwithstanding of her Profession and her Ap. to the contrary John 10.25 I lay down my Life for my Sheep Mat 20 28. The Son of Man came to give his Life a Ransome for many Acts 4 12. There is none other name under Heaven given whereby we must be saved Gal 3 13. Christ hath Rdeemed us from the Curse of the Law being made a Curse for us Eph 5 2. Christ hath given himself for us an Offering and a Sacrifice to GOD 1 John 2 2. He is the Propitiation for our sins Rev. 5 9. Thou hast Redeemed us to GOD by thy Blood These Texts pondered It may probably seem strange to some who rashly were taken with A. Bs. Books how any Christian could have written so perversely of Christ as is forementioned but they may marvel the less when they finde her writting very often liker to an Infidel than a Christian as when she asserts that Mahometans and Gentiles may be saved by resigning their wills to GOD without mentioning Faith in Christ that the Jews are yet the People of GOD that they love GOD more than any other People that their being despised may perhaps satisfie for putting Him GOD to Death and that their hopes of the Messiah yet to come is well founded on the Word of GOD. L. W. pt 2. p. 127 131 and pt 3 p. 3. 168. How can the Jews be the People of GOD who were cast off for their Infidelity in S. Pauls days Rom. 11.15 If the Love of GOD which A. B. boasts of so much be of that kinde with the Jews love to GOD then it is but a lifeless Fancie instead of the true Love of GOD since the Jews have not Faith in Christ and True Faith worketh by Love Gal. 5.6 of which in a number a part afterwards neither Jewes Gentiles Mahometans or any Infidels can resign their will to GOD remaining Infidels so it is nonsense and repugnancie in the adject to write that they doe for none can be Accepted of GOD but by Faith in his beloved Son the only Mediatour Eph. 1.6 What a rare piece of confidence is it for A. B. and the Ap. to aver that they own the Creed and the essentials of Religion and to mantain the direct contradiction thereof for if the Jewes expectation of the Messiah yet to come be well founded on the Word of GOD as she sayes in the fore cited place then the Christian Belief is not well founded thereupon that in the fulness of time as Gal 4.4.5 he was conceived by the Holy Ghost and born of the Virgin Mary and the rest of the Articles of the Creed concerning Him are false if A. B. speak Truth For the Messiah to have already come according to the Prophecies in the Scripture and performed the work of our Redemption in the exercise of His three fold Office and to be yet to come as the Jewes vainly expect is a flat contradiction nor can I conjecture what the wit or cunning of any Ap. can answer for A. B. in these things unless it be said that A. B. is generally misunderstood for her Christ is not our Christ mentioned in the Belief who was Prophecied of in the Old Testament and of whom the New Testament is an History But her Christ is an imaginary Christ which proceeded from Adam before the Woman was made and came not of the Seed of the Woman L. Etoile dumatin p. 32.33 and Ap. pt 1. p. 47. And to evite a very strong Argument against her fantastical Christianity taken from Gen 3 15. which is the first promise of Christ importing the very tenor of the Covenant of Grace she brings forth a rare sort of new coined blasphemy like John of Leyden or Nailour the Quaker who called themselves the Messiah so she affirms that she is That Womans Seed which should bruise the Head of the Serpent L W. pt 3. p. 47. This is that A. B. of whom De Cort. her admirer says Pref. to the L. W. p. 41. That no Body since the Creation of the World Explaines the Scriptures so well as she doth but behold what it comes to The Ap. pt 2. from p. 90. to the 100 useth much Art to smooth the Doctrine of A. B. against the Satisfaction of Christ He distinguisheth a mans being substituted to suffer for another and declares that A. B. held such a substitution to be false and diabolical as procures a discharge to the Party offending but granted a substitution of love whereby Christ merited that we should by our penitence merit Salvation adding our own merits to Christs Sacrifice to satisfie the Justice of GOD and mockes at a man who declares he is but a frail creature and hopes to be saved
Sacraments have we not as luculent Precepts for the constant use of them as of any other duties Mat. 28.19 Go teach all Nations baptising them c. 1 Cor. 11.23 I have received of the LORD that which also I delivered unto you and V. 26. As often as ye eat this Bread and drink this Cup c. A. B did snatch the Objection against the baptising of Infants from the Socinians and Anabaptists which is most frivolous that it is not commanded in express terms in the Scriptures Origen who lived in the second Centurie writting on Mat. 6.5.6.7 Assureth us that the Church had it always and that by tradition from the Apostles Yet are we more sure that it is a clear consequence from the Scriptures which being natural from the Text and undistorted doth ever import a Scriptural truth As we read Mat. 22.29 Our Saviour charged the Saducees anent the great Article of the Resurrection That they did err not knowing the Scriptures albeit not the express words of the Text Exod. 3.6 which he cited were directly against them but the consequence thereof so upon this sound foundation Infant Baptism is firmly grounded for the Sacraments are not only Signs but likewise Seals of the New Covenant and they to whom the gracious promises and conditions of the Heavenly Charter belong have a right also to the Seals appended thereunto Gen. 17.7.10 The Promise is to Thee and thy Children said GOD to Abraham Baptism comes in the place of Circumcision which was administred to Children when eight days old The right Preaching of the Word and Administration of the Sacraments are the ordinary means of our Salvation and undoubted marks of the true Church The Ap. pt 2 p. 154. to 159. Alleadgeth what he can to justifie A. B. in this which doth not satisfie 1 That she was above Ordinances Which is a vain boasting and contrary to GODS direction Gant 1.8 2 That she durst not go to the Popish Churches for fear of her life She could not be in alike hazard every where and how doth that excuse her for teaching that no Bodie needs go to Church or partake of the Sacraments 3 That she wrote a Book in defence of the Sacraments against the Quakers The Quaker who offended her was rebuked therefore by his Partie and they were reconciled with A. B. And at the best she contradicteth her self in this Point POINT VII Of Pastors and Church Government THe supposed Gentle-woman and pretended Illuminated A. B. and her Defender or Ap. transforming themselves into Angels of Light S. V. pt 1. p. 112 in all their writtings about Religion have indulged the swing of their absolut and independent free will in nothing more than in their ranting and railing at the Pastors of CHRISTS Flock and the Church Government For thus they write that it is unlawful for any to make it a trade or office to teach others S. V. pt 1. p. 115. L. W. pt 3 p. 90. The office of a Priest is an enemie to the resignation of Souls to GOD and Ap. pt 1. p. 53. All the evils of Christendom comes from the Pastors and all the Peoples degeneracie from their Guides I could adduce many more passages to the purpose but it is needless when the Ap. pt 2. p. 158. declares that the L. W. which is the chief of A. Bs. Books the Key and Rule of all the rest was written on purpose against the Pastors because of the degeneracie of the Roman Church Hereupon it may be reflected without debaiting if she was not injurious to write so against all the Pastors of the Church of Rome without exception of any how can it be thought true that she wrote against the Pastors of that Church only since she declares the Pastoral-Office it self to be unlawful and declaims as much against Protestants as Papists and besides them all Pastors in Christendom not excepting any either in the Greek or Abassine Churches or any where else in the World But on the matter it self how contrary is their Doctrine to the Holy Scriptures Whereby we are well instructed that the Alwise GOD who made Man a social Creature naturally inclined to society and thereby needing both Laws and Government did always prescribe Laws to Mankind and for the benefite thereof positively appointed the Government both Civil and Ecclesiastick and by a special designation Pastors and Church-Officers for his own immediat service and the Salvation of Peoples Souls Eph. 4.11.12.13 He gave Pastors and Teachers for the perfecting of the Saints for the work of the Ministry for the edifying of the Body of CHRIST till we all come in the unity of the Faith and of the knowledge of the SON of GOD unto a perfect Man unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of CHRIST Heb 5.4 No man taketh this honour upon himself but he that iâ— called of GOD as was Aaron Where the true Pastor is there the true Church is and when the Shepherd is smitten the Sheep are scattered abroad Mat. 26.31 So it is one of the main Policies of Satan for destroying the Church altogether to endeavour to bring all the Pastors under contempt as a fit mean for subverting the office it self and consequently to ruin the Church of CHRIST Such railing against all Pastors and the Sacred Function it self is as A flood of water cast out of the mouth of the Old Serpent the accuser of the Brethren for To drown if he could the Woman who is cloathed with the Sun that is the Church of GOD. Rev. 12.9.10.15 The accute Ap. when he readeth this part of the Advertisement may possibly say that the language savours of too much passion and the inference is too hard for may not A. Bs. words bear a more favourable interpretation such as that of the Disc Academ p. 16. 23. That Pastors and Church Government Sacraments and the publick Worship of GOD have no certain connexion with Mans Salvation nor are they certain necessary and infallible means of recovering the love of GOD and A. B. one where or another of her writtings mentioneth the Office of Pastors as a thing that may be reformed and to say that Sacred Offices or means ordained by GOD for his own Glory and Mans Salvation may be reformed is a more moderat Sentiment to hold their phrase than that they are simply unlawful and should be quite abolished Hereto it is answered that I designed in this Censure to evite all hard words as much as possible could be without prejudice of truth which is herein defended yet it is allowed as a maxime among moralists either in speaking writting or other actions to sharpen reason not by our own passions or affections but by these which the cause requireth I called her writting on this point against the Pastoral Office Ranting because her language to that purpose is the same with that of the wild Sect of the Ranters and railing which is calumniating or a wrongous caracterising and ascribing undue epithites to
4. Subs 1. n. 3. how the exotick opinions of some School-men gave her wrong Sentiments of Angels in like manner hearing of some nice points debated among School men and Philosophers she was apt to adopt the worst side of the Problem which being once made hers out it flyes into the World as a new revealed verity for example A. B teacheth S. V. pt 1. p. 96. And the Ap. homologates pt 1. p. 62. That both our Souls and Bodies are propogated from Adam Contrary to Heb. 12.9 where GOD is called the Father of Spirits or the creatour of our Souls in contradistinction to our natural parents who are there termed the Fathers of our flesh And many other of her Accessories she might have learned by ordinary discourse as that the Heretick Eunomius and generally the Gnosticks out of a pretence of magnifying Faith said that good works were not necessary This false and odious opinion her La. after her charitable manner doth most frequently father upon all Protestants without due consideration that St. Aug. confuted it L. de fide oper Whose orthodox strain is followed by Calvin and all Proteslant writters and Billarmine himself de Justif L. 3 c 6. Vindicats Protestants of the foresaid imputation Obj. 2. It was asserted in my hearing by some whom the Borignianists had mistuned that there are more than two thousand verities speaking of these Accessories set out in the Books of A. B. which are not to be read in all the writtings either of Papists or Protestants A. I have discovered in her Books more than an hundreth falsities but have seen none of these new disclosed verities and if any favorite of hers shall be at the pains to number them let him take heed that he make not a false muster or rather such an appearance as drunken men see of great armies in the Air which instantly and quite disappear when sober people are curious to view them And if Accessories be called New Verities they should be rejected on that very head by reason that no truth can be new and all Truths are older than Errours Obj. 3. Have there not been some persons Divinely Inspired Teachers in all Ages such as Antonie and Paul the Anachorets St. Terese St. Briget and St. Katharine Theular and Thomas a Kempeis And were it not for fear of your Pastoral Office A. B. would be respected as one of these and her Books held worthy of all acceptation A. 1. There should be no ground to fear the falling of the Pastoral Office altho many now living were inspired in the measure of the Prophets and Apostles which will never be seeing the Canon of the Scriptures is compleat because the Pastoral Office is appointed of GOD for his especial Service and his perpetual presence is promised to be therewith even as if a King should reveal his will secretly to some special favorits it would no wayes follow from thence that the standing Laws should not be the peoples Rule and be expounded and executed by the settled Judges 2. None of these were infallibly inspired and no more was A. B. neither do I read that Paul and Anthonie the Egyptian Monks spake against the established Offices in the Church though they chused a Monastick Life in time of Persecution If A. B. had any Precedent it was the Spanish Nun Teresa who yet pretended not to be the singular or sole Doctrix of the whole World as A. B. did Thomas a Kempis and Teular were good men but why doth not the Ap. call St. Aug. Bernard and many more eminent men as well inspired as they Obj. 4. To what purpose is all this reasoning against A. Bs. Accessorie Doctrines Since the Ap. did premonish pt 1. Car. 13. p. 38. That if any person did not relish the Accessories he might let them alone that is to say he shall not be bound to believe them and let him forbear to dispute against them how much soever he be dipleased therewith A. That is a shift put into the mouths of all who are become raâ—hly fond of all A. Bs. writtings but it is such a silly shift that I marvel to hear any rationall person pronounce it for a defence when he is pressed with good Arguments against her Errours from Scripture and Reason In the common use of the phrase to let a thing alone is to forbear or to medle or concern with it on such an occasion as when a Boy is to be chastised for a fault he cryes let me alone but let us examine the Aps own gloss of the expression 1. First he says the meaning is you need not believe A. Bs. Accessories to be true unless you please Here he enjoins a rare thing Did ever any other persons pretending to be Divinely Inspired in all their writtings leave the Readers at libertie to believe the half of them to be true or no! Why did she mix and confound them in all her twenty two Books with the Essentials of Religion which ought to be believed and how can unlearned people seperate the Gold from the dross 2. He sayes dispute not against them so says Mahomet in his Alcaron c. 5. and elsewhere If Truth be in them it should be believed if falsehood it ought to be confuted or disputed against and many of them are such as is already proven Obj. 5. It hath been said to me that whoso writes against A. B. will be answered even as the writtings of Le. Clerk at Amsterdam and all Socinian Books are still defended by some persons tho they give much offence to the Church men were it not better then to forbear disputing in matters of Theologie than to increase it A. I aprove not A. Bs. Sentiments in this case who declares that the writtings of Luther Calvin and all the Reformers whom she accounts Hereticks should have been quite despised and not answered or themselves cut off L. W. pt 1. p. 27. It is our duty to dispute for the Truth and altho Errours have Abetters and defenders yet the Truth which is stronger than Errours will at last prevail Obj. 6. The harmonie or consent of all the parts of the Holy Scriptures is one evidence that they were given by Divine inspiration so A.B. never contradicteth herself which sheweth that she was led by the Spirit of GOD in all her writtings A. If she was led by the Spirit of GOD in all her writtings then she should not be opposed but there is one thing said and another thing seen and her deeds in writting falsities proves her saying the contrary to be untrue one may write Books without contradicting himself therein and yet without Divine Inspiration but the tryal of that point anent A. B. shall bring the fourth Section anent her Doctrines to an end NUMBER III. Of her Contradictions IF one proposition be true then the contradictory assertion must be false and no palliating or favourable interpretation can reconcile them as for Instance That is a most true saying which also is