without any disadvantage to our Cause For suppose we grant that Faith is Dead which is not moved with a desire of doing good Works according to the saying of St. Iames yet it doth not therefore follow from hence that no Faith Iustifies without Works From which two things do follow worthy of consideration First That no Faith justifies that is not lively And next though it abounds in good Works and never is without them yet it only without Works Iustifies This will appear evident by the Example of St. Paul Who though he was not conscious to himself of any Wickedness yet he durst not affirm himself to be thereby Iustified I think nothing hinders but the whole Argument may be yielded unto if so be the terms are rightly placed The Adversaries gather out of the Apostle Iames that Faith is dead which is without Works and herein we do not much oppose them But what follows from hence Therefore as they say dead Faith without Works doth not justifie And I deny it not But what Conclusion flows from this manner of Arguing Therefore only Faith doth not justiste Why so If no Faith but that which is lively justifies and if it receives Life only from Works then this is the consequence that Faith justifies only upon the account of good Works I Answer First though we grant it is true that the Faith which justifies us in the sight of God is lively and always joyned with a Godly Life Yet that this Faith justifies and reconciles us no other ways but upon the account of good Works is most false For this is not a good consequence from the premises Because Faith is not alone in the Life of the Believer therefore Faith is not alone in the Office of justifying Or because the Faith that justifies is not a dead but a lively Faith therefore it doth not justifie alone without Works For herein is a fallacy of the Consequence But you may object Whence then is Faith said to be lively and not Dead but from Works Which if it be so of necessity it must draw all its Life and Vertue from Works Nay the matter is quite contrary For though in the sight of Men Faith is not discerned to be Lively and Vigorous but by Works yet Faith receives not Life from Works but rather Works from Faith As Fruits draw their Life and Sap from the Root of the Tree but not the Root from them Iust so external actions proceed from Faith as the Root which if they be good they evidence the Root to be sound and lively and this is all they do but they communicate no Life thereunto And this Life and Vertue of Faith is not one but Twofold And it acteth partly in Heaven and partly in Earth If you ask what it doth amongst Men upon Earth It does good to its Neighbour working by Love But before God in Heaven it justifies the Ungodly not by Love but by the Son of God whom it only lays hold of Therefore those Men seem not to have got a clear insight into the Vertue and Nature of the Grace of Faith that suppose the whole Life thereof to consist in Love as if Faith of it self could do nothing but as it receives Vertue and Efficacy from Charity Indeed both may seem to be true in the External Actions of Human Life in which Faith lyes like a dead thing unless it be enlivened by Charity to the exercise of good Works And hereunto belongs that saying of Paul whereby he so much commends Faith working by Love understanding such Works as Faith working by Love brings forth to the view of a Human Eye Yet with God Faith hath a far different operation for it only without any reliance upon Works or assistance of Charity but trusting to the naked promise of God and the dignity of the Mediatour climbs up to Heaven and gets access into the presence of God where it does great and wonderful things combating with the Iudgment to come fighting against the terrours of Death Satan and Hell pleads the cause of a Sinner obtains his pardon absolves and justifies him from the accusations of a guilty Conscience takes away all Iniquity reconciles God to the Sinner appeases his wrath subdues the power of Death and the Devil and procures Peace yea and Paradise it self with theThief that had led a wicked Life and yet at Death was justified by Faith in the Redeemer Who would desire more or greater things And now so many and great things being done by Faith let us enquire After what manner it does them Not as it lives and works by Love but as it lives only by Christ and relies on the promise for the Life of Faith which lives before God is not Charity but Christ not receiving Life from Charity but communicating life unto it and justifying Works that they may be acceptable to God which would otherways be abominable Unto the truth of this we have a sufficient Testimony given us by Paul When he says my Life is Christ and again the Life that I now live in the Flesh I live not by the Love but by the faith of the Son of God who loved me and gave himself for me And elsewhere speaking of himself he says That he was not conscious to himself of any VVickedness and yet he denies that he is thereby Iustified as the same Apostle discoursing about the works of Abraham though they were never so Eminent for Holiness yet he saw nothing in them which that Great Patriarch might make a matter of Glorying before God Hereunto may be added the Arguments of others that have been strangely wrested out of Scriptures There are six Reasons principally which they pretend the Evangelists furnish them with against the Righteousness of Faith First they draw an Argument from these words of Christ Come ye blessed of my Father to the Kingdom prepared for you For I was an hungred and ye gave me Meat Argument Da. That which is the cause of blessedness is also the cause of Iustification Whom he hath Iustified them he hath also Glorified c. Rom. 8. Ri. Works of Mercy are the cause of blessedness for I was an hungred and ye gave c. Mat. 25. I. Therefore Works of Mercy are the cause of Iustification Answer I deny the Minor For Works of Mercy as they are considered in themselves are not the cause of Iustification or blessedness but rather effects and furits of Iustification for they are no otherways pleasing to God but as they are performed by persons in a justified state and it is by the Faith of Christ that they become acceptable For unless Faith go before and justifie the person of him that worketh his works are not at all regarded by God because they do not satisfie the Law of God being tainted with the corruption of depraved Nature and come far short of that perfection which Divine Iustice requires Wherefore if we will Reason aright about
for Mercy and cast himself wholly upon Christ what would the Apostle Iames say in such a case Will not Faith only without Works justifie such a man as this The penitent Malefactor is an evident proof of the truth of this who had no other thing but Faith only to commend him to Christ and so to be admitted into Paradise Like unto which there are many Examples daily of them that die on Gibbets so that the Iudgments of God are very wonderful who hath mercy on whom he will have mercy But now let us return to what we were saying of Abraham If we look upon his Faith what was more sincere If we consider his Works what was more glorious and wonderful Therefore upon both accounts he was certainly an admirable man Now let us compare his Faith with his Works And because it is evident that he was justified before God let us enquire whether he was justified by Faith 〈◊〉 Works because he could not be justified upon both accounts as the Apostle witnesseth If it is of Faith then it is not of Works but if it is of Works then it is not of Faith What shall we say then to these things let the Scripture answer Abraham believed God when he promised and it was accounted to him for Righteousness And the same Abraham obeyed God when he commanded and why doth not the Scripture in like manner add That this was imputed to him for Righteousness Let us hear what the Apostle answers The Scripture foreseeing that God would justifie the Gentiles by Faith he first told the glad tydings to Abraham and what glad tydings was this That he and his Seed should be Heirs of the World A great Promise indeed But how did he obtain this Promise by Faith or by Works There is an answer ready made to our hand by the Apostle The Promise came not by the Law to Abraham or to his Seed that he should be Heir of the World but by the Righteousness of Faith Why so Paul why not by the Law and why by the Righteousness of Faith That he might be the Father of all the faithful who walking in the footsteps of the Faith which was in the Uncircumcision of our Father Abraham shall have Faith in like manner imputed unto them But here St. Iames is represented as fighting with all his might against this Doctrine For the Adversaries say thus Did not the Apostle Iames assert with great Authority That Abraham was justified by Works and will ye deny it God forbid that any man should undervalue the Authority of that holy Apostle And yet I suppose St. Iames would not have us to disbelieve the Scripture which teaches us far otherways attributing the Iustification of Abraham not to Works but to Faith For Abraham believed God and we read it was imputed unto him for Righteousness But God hath not said in his Word concerning Abraham's going to sacrifice his Son That it was imputed to him for Righteousness Or let us grant the assertion of St. Iames That Abraham was justified by Works But where and how was he thus justified before God St. Iames says not so Then it is before men And Paul himself denies not that So that there is no real disagreement between Paul and Iames. But this doth not satisfie some Sophisters who account it is not enough that the holy Patriarch is justified by Works before men as Paul teaches unless he be also thereby justified before God For though he was first justified by Faith as they say yet nothing hinders but that afterwards he might be yet more justified by Works and this they call a second Iustification But Reason shews that to be an utter impossibility for it implies a manifest contradiction for it is a contradiction not to be justified by Works and again to be justified by Works And seeing one of those is denied by the Apostle How can they maintain and plead for the other But hereunto may be added another Reason If there is a twofold Iustification one by Faith and another by Works it would follow that there is a twofold manner of Iustifying But there is one and the same manner of Iustifying as there is one God as hath been proved out of Ambrose Therefore it appears that there is not a twofold Iustification A third Reason is this seeing Iustification consists of the Remission of Sins and God forgives no Man his Sins to whom he doth not perfectly forgive them Therefore it follows that the Iustification of those that are justified is compleat and perfect and cannot be made more perfect than it is already Now in the next place let them prepare to answer this Argument of Paul Whosoever is justified by Works hath whereof he may Glory before God Rom. 4. Abraham hath not any thing whereof he may Glory before God Therefore Abraham is not justified by Works before God By these things which we have quoted out of Paul and other sacred writings I suppose it appears evident enough what we should judge of the Works of Abraham Which though they were excellent and worthy to be admired before men yet they found no place for glorying before God according to the Testimony and Interpretation of the Apostle We need not be at any great trouble to find out the cause thereof Tiletan and other Iesuits produce a cause thereof out of Augustin Because the Works of Abraham were not of the Law but of Faith not of the Flesh but of Grace which because they were not done by the Power of Free-will only but in the Faith and expectation of Christ therefore all Praise and Glory was due to Christ and none to them which Invention of theirs though it savours more of Wit than Solidity yet though we grant all this to them there is no inconvenience in it seeing both of us acknowledge with Paul that the Patriarch Abraham found neither matter of glorying nor Iustification before God by Works and therefore that he had no cause of glorying because he was not justified by Works for otherways if he had been justified by Works he should have had wherein to Glory as the Apostle Paul speaks But now he hath not any thing wherein he may Glory before God therefore he was not justified by Works And thus hitherto we have treated of the Arguments of the Adversaries as much as may suffice not only to discover but also confute their Sophistical Wiles and captious Deceits who fight with so great eagerness for their inherent Righteousness against the Testimony of the Holy Scripture and the Sacred Gospel of Iesus Christ and the bright shining Light of Grace yea and against their own Salvation It remains in the next place that we should hear what those Men on the other side answer and oppose to the Arguments and most approved Reasons manag'd not only by us but by St. Paul and with what Cavillings and fraudulent Devices they darken and baffle the clear meaning of the
God through the Redemption which is in Christ Iesus whom God hath set forth to be a Propitiation through Faith in his Blood Is not this evident in the writings of Paul c. And yet Vega not being contented with this Gospel nor deterred by the Curse which the Apostle denounced hath arrived at so great an impudence that he takes upon him to contradict what the Apostle hath confirmed with so great Authority The Apostle says freely without Works but he says freely but not without Works but how is it freely if not without Works Paul says the Righteousness of God by the Faith of Iesus Christ unto all and upon all that believe But what says Vega and Hosius the enemy of Paul This universal Term all saith he is not here by the Apostle applied to every one of the kind but to every kind of every one So that the meaning is this Righteousness is communicated to them that believe whether they are Iews or Gentiles Thus said Vega. O Saint Paul What Ignorance was this in thee or unskilfulness of Speech Thou mightst learn of Vega to speak more curiously and to polish thy Stile according to the elegancy of the Roman Court after this manner The Righteousness of God by the Faith of Iesus Christ unto all and not only all but also unto every one and upon every one present and to come that believe so that thereby you might comprehend not only the kinds of every one but also every species of the kinds and every individual of the Species But that I may answer seriously to the vain-glorious Spaniard It was your Duty O Vega to correct your Spirit of Errour by the divinely inspired Words of Paul and not to pride your self in such vain and empty Notions For who sees not the clear and perspicuous simplicity of this Speech of Paul whereby he proclaims a common Interest in Eternal Life and Righteousness not only to Iews and Gentiles in the general but to every one of them in particular whether they be Iews or Gentiles that believe in Christ Unless the Apostle had together with the universal Term set down the proper Mark of Distinction that is the peculiar Condition of attaining to Righteousness you might have some colour of Reason for what you pretend As for Example when the Scripture speaks thus They shall be all taught of God God would have all Men to be saved and come to the Knowledge of the Truth in such a Case a Man may interpret the universal Term. As Augustine did in such a manner as you speak of To wit that it is not every one of all but some particular Persons of all kind of Men and Nations that attain unto the Knowledge of the Truth but the Case is otherways in this Expression of Paul where the Apostle together with the universal Term adds also a peculiar and proper mark of Distinction So that he doth not only make the Righteousness of God common to all in the general but also expresly sets down a certain manner whereby all do attain unto it and to whom it peculiarly belongs in these Words By the Faith of Iesus Christ unto all and upon all that believe Whence of necessity it follows that every Mans Righteousness consists in his believing in Christ by Faith unfeigned and embracing of him according to the saying of the Prophet The just shall live by Faith But let us again hear what the Prating Sophister hath to say for himself But whereas saith he the Iust shall live by Faith and God is said to justifie Man by Faith it doth not therefore follow by consequence that Works are not necessary for it is one thing to live by Faith and another thing to live by Faith only One thing to be justified by Faith and another thing to be justified by Faith only and if these Words Faith only are sometimes found in the Books of Catholick Doctors by the Word only good Works are not excluded but all other Sects and Ways to Salvation except Faith only and the Christian Religion Thus said Vega. To whom that I may answer First whereas he inferrs that good Works are not necessary because the Iust live by Faith he may as reasonably gather Thistles from the Vine for this is no good consequence The Iust shall live by Faith therefore Works are not necessary Which we also with Paul do notwithstanding account to be necessary And in the next place whereas he says that it is one thing to be justified by Faith and another thing to be justified by Faith only Though we grant this to be true yet I see no great difference between these two Expressions To be justified by Faith without Works and to be justified by Faith only Thirdly Whereas he Cavils about the Word Only what it excludes and what it excludes not in the Books of the Catholicks we do not trouble our selves much about that but this is manifest in the Writings of Paul that Works themselves though otherways they are very excellent and also necessary upon other accounts yet in this free Gift of Evangelical Iustification they are excluded without all Controversie Though that also is an untruth which he asserts of the Books of the Catholicks For Basil that I may produce one of them instead of a great many expresses the same in manifest Words taking away from every Man all occasion of glorying in his own Righteousness and testifies that each one of us is justified by Faith in Christ only And therefore he presently produces the Example of Paul to confirm the same and Paul Glories saith he in the Contempt of his own Righteousness I may also add the VVords of the same Basil upon the 32. Psalm where giving a Description of a perfect Man he says he is such a one as puts no trust in his own good deeds but hath his whole hope and reliance on the Mercy of God alone I think it is not amiss to joyn unto Basil his intimate Friend Nazianzen who assents and subscribes to the words of Basil on this manner Faith only is our Righteousness But let us proceed unto the remaining Testimonies of Paul For as I have said before Vega with his Associates heaps together eight Assertions for Iustifying Faith out of Paul But the other five Assertions of the Apostle together with the Answers of the Adversaries do follow in this order 3 Assertion Rom. 4. If Abraham was justified by the Works of the Law he hath whereof to glory but not before God For what says the Scripture Abraham believed God and it was imputed to him for Righteousness To him that worketh the Reward is not reckoned according to Grace but according to Debt But to him that worketh not but believeth in him that justifies the ungodly Faith is imputed unto him for Righteousness As David also declareth the blessedness of the man to whom the Lord imputeth Righteousness without Works And likewise Rom. 11. If it is
of those Works but only upon the account of its Object which because Faith only without Charity embraces therefore Faith only without Charity receives from thence the power of Iustifying If all things that any way are or are done together should be joyned in one and the same Office it would come to pass that he that hath Feet Eyes and Ears because he hath not these Members alone therefore he should be said to go not with-his Feet only but to walk with his Eyes and see with his Ears as hath been formerly demonstrated Iust so the case is in Faith Charity and other Vertues Which tho' being infused by Grace they inhere in the same subject yet each one of them are distinguished by their peculiar Offices Therefore if it be asked concerning the Office of Iustification What it is that reconciles us to God and procures Eternal Life for us I answer it is Faith and that only If you ask how I answer by Christ the Mediatour Again if you ask what manner of Faith that is I answer It is not an idle or dead Faith but lively and active But if you would know by what marks you distinguish between a true Faith and that which is counterfeit St. Paul answers that question The Faith that is true works by Love What where and How Faith worketh by Charity BUT here there are several things that need to be explained as what Faith works where and after what manner it works for Faith doth not act every where after one and the same manner It acts one way with men and another way with God It is true that it works by Love as Paul says but it must be understood in respect of men not in respect of God Neither doth Faith perform the same in both respects nor after the same manner for with men it works by Love but with God it works not by Love but by Christ only by whom it is admirable to consider what and how great things Faith performs It obtains grants of Petitions pardon of sins it reconciles justifies wrestles overcomes reigns and triumphs Faith only does these things not with men but with God not working by Charity but by Christ our Lord. Therefore Faith works one thing by Christ and another thing by Charity By Christ it obtains Salvation by Charity it performs Obedience to the Law Doth it perform perfect Obedience No. Doth it then perform imperfect Obedience But that is not sufficient to procure Righteousness and Salvation And where then is that excellent integrity of Life Where is Charity 's meritorious efficacy to purchase Salvation Where is the Assertion of the Tridentine Decree which only attributes the beginning of Iustification to Faith but makes the formal cause thereof to be Charity or New Obedience which they call Righteousness inherent in us whereby we are not only accounted righteous but are both called and also really are righteous before God adding also a dreadful Curse if any dare be of another Iudgment Which manner of Doctrine if it be admitted it utterly disannuls the sacred Scripture and overturns all the foundation of our Religion For if this be the condition of our Salvation that it must rely upon good deeds and not free Imputation only Where then is that Righteousness which is attributed unto Faith so often Preached by Paul Where is the difference between the Law and the Gospel which unless it be carefully observed we may be as blind as to the knowledge of the Scripture as Moles and Batts at Noon-day Moreover where is that opposition mentioned by Paul between the Righteousness of the Law and of Faith between Grace and Debt Where is glorying in Works excluded Where is Faith accounted to Abraham for Righteousness And how will the Tridentine Decrees agree with that which Paul says Faith is accounted for Righteousness not to him that Works but to him that believes in him who justifies the ungodly And where be those remarkable exceptive and exclusive Particles whereby our Salvation is wholly cut off from Works and ascribed unto Imputation Moreover where are all those sweet Promises if those Men rob us of the Assurance of Salvation and God's Imputation Let us now proceed to the Prophets that if any are less moved with the Authority and writings of the Apostles if they have any thing to say for themselves they may either Answer the evident Testimonies of the Prophets or yield unto them And first that I may begin at this I ask of them that deny that it is sufficient to assurance of Iustification that Christ hath fulfilled all Righteousness for us unless thereunto be added also a Righteousness implanted and inherent in us being formed in us of his free Bounty which makes us formally Righteous satisfies the Law and merits Life Which if it be so I ask of them Whether any Man will be assured that he is in a state of Salvation in this Life If they deny it where then is that Peace and Ioy in the Holy Ghost whereof there is so frequent mention in the writings of the Prophets and Apostles Where is that frequent singing of Praise in the Books of the Prophets Where is that Everlasting Ioy and Gladness which Isaiah the Prophet foretels shall be upon the head of those who being redeemed by the Lord shall come into Sion with Praise Where is that way so straight that Fools cannot err therein Where is that Voice of the Prophet preaching Peace and proclaiming Glad tidings and comforting his own People which taking away all Fear Grief and Sighing confirms fearful and affrighted Consciences strengthens weak Kness and feeble Hands yea provokes the very Beasts of the Field and the Ostriches to the Exercise of glorifying God If yet we waver in doubtful and uncertain fears and have no firm hope of Salvation but in that Righteousness which is inherent in our selves according to the Pseudocatholick Opinion of the Church of Rome where then is that fiducial reliance where is that Holy Courage concerning which Ieremiah the Prophet foretold In those days Iudah shall be saved and Israel shall dwell safely And again to the same purpose Ezekiel foretelling of the future Peace of the Church And I will make with them a Covenant of Peace And they that dwell in the VVilderness shall sleep safely in the woods and shall be in their own Land without fear And presently he subjoins But they shall dwell safely without any fear Hereunto belongs the encouragement that Isaiah gives the People of the Messiah commanding them not to be afraid Fear not saith he for I am with thee And again Fear not for I have redeemed thee And again Fear not my Servant Iacob c. Hereunto also agree the Words of Zephaniah Prophesying by the same Spirit Be glad O Daughter of Sion and be joyful O Israel and rejoice with all thy Heart O Daughter of Ierusalem The Loard hath taken away thy Iudgment he hath turned away thy Enemies The
Ye have not chosen me but I have chosen you c. These things said Augustine by which it evidently appears how our Election and Iustification purchased by Christ is perfected not by any Righteousness of Works but only by the free gift of Grace whence it is called by Paul the Election of Grace not of Righteousness to wit by this Argument What if it is by Grace saith he it is not now by Works or else grace is not grace but if it is of works then it is not grace or else work would not be work c. Which things being so it necessarily follows that the Righteousness which is wholly exercised in the Observance of Works is not rightly called Grace by Osorius Therefore take the Argument of Augustine Argument Ma. It is grace which both elects and justifies the ungodly Mi. Inherent Righteousness doth not justifie the unrighteous for if he be ungodly how is he just If he is just how shall he be called unjust Concl. Therefore righteousness is not grace otherways according to St. Paul If righteousness is of works then grace is not grace Moreover the grace of God which is his free Indulgence because it hath no place properly but where vengeance would be just neither is there any just vengeance where perfect righteousness flourishes Therefore it must be false which Osorius assumes That it is either righteousness which makes us acceptable to God and that it is grace or it is nothing But now that we may grant this to Osorius for the sake of disputing that it is perhaps possible that this observance of righteousness and glorious furniniture of most holy Vertues wherewith the divine grace adorns us receives this name being given to it by some Writers so that in some respect it is called grace But what then what relation hath this to our Controversie seeing that it is not the grace which justifies us before God but there will be need of another grace whereby that same grace may be justified For it is not a doubtful case in this place whether all that we have should be referred to the grace and bounty of God For who is so ignorant as to doubt thereof neither is it a matter of doubt whether the pious works of Christians are pleasing to God but whether Christians do so please God upon the account of their pious works that they are therefore justified that they escape wrath that being dead they revive that they put on Immortality that they are received into heavenly glory This your whole discourse contends for as if there were no other way or manner of turning away the wrath of God and purchasing eternal life but by the continual exercise of Charity and pious and holy actions And because all instruction of living well proceeds not only from the strength of our nature but from the grace of God which is 〈◊〉 by faith Therefore whatsoever you any where in reading the holy Scriptures of God meet with of the words grace and faith presently you wrest that as a most sure Testimony to confirm the Righteousness of good Works and also to the defence of Grace and Faith Which that the Reader may perceive the more evidently and also admire the sharp 〈◊〉 of this sweet Interpreter I thought good to bring forth one out of many and almost innumerable for an Example As where Paul says these Words Not by Works which we have done but according to his own mercy he saved us c. Osorius having followed his own Hosius interprets this place as if these words of the Apostle should not be otherways understood than of Works not those which are peculiarly ours but those which are performed by faith 〈◊〉 in vigour and stirred up c. We have heard Osorius Receive also Hosius who makes a noise out of the same Tridentine Oracle The works saith he which they do are good in this respect as they are Christ's Works not theirs For in as much as they are tbeirs though they seem to be good Works they conduce nothing at all to Eternal Life But in as much as they are God's and the Works of his hands so through bis bounty they are esteemed worthy both of the title of Righteousness and the reward of the Heavenly Kingdom c. Whence all their reasoning and discourse of good works is of this kind God doth not see and Crown our Works in us but his own And moreover the same Hosius adds pleading after his own manner that the reward of the Heavenly Kingdom will be given to the Works which indeed are ours but not for their dignity as they proceed from us but for Christ's sake whose handy-works they are as Aug. says For he that lives and dwells in us works them And for that cause which is more ridiculous this Phormio goes on to rail at the Lutherans as Enemies of Grace Who forsooth as he says do much more grievously detract from the Glory of Christ than they and make void his Cross and diminish the price of his blood For when they detract from the Works of the regenerate they do not derogate from their merits but from Christ whence all their dignity derives c. These things said Hosius to whom Andradius agrees in a Speech not much differing writing these words When we say that Righteousness is inherent in us we do not at all derogate Power and Authority from the Righteousness and Merits of Christ to whom we are beholden for all the Ornaments of the mind But we rather augment and amplifie them When we say he hath merited for us not a feigned and imputative Righteousness whereby those who are really wicked are esteemed just but are not so but a Righteousness that is true solid express and engraven wonderfully upon the mind c. And a little lower he said Yea indeed ye Lutherans are injurious to the Son of God the Saviour of Mankind ye I say Endeavour to lessen and depress his very gracious benefits Who say that those Sins remain which he hath washed away in the laver of his own Blood ye judge those to be defiled with pollutions whom he hath cleansed by his infinite Vertue and you endeavour to take away from us that Righteousness which he hath merited for Mankind with many labours and Blood Hitherto spake Andradius I need not here warn you Pious Reader what should be judged of the designs and discoursings of those Men and what you your self must beware of with what deceit they prevent the simplicity of the Apostolick Doctrine with what darkness they cover their own deceits what Man is so void of understanding or hath been so little exercised in the Reading of Sacred things but may with his Eyes shut discern how these things are not at all agreeable to the mind of the Apostle By which there is an easie opportunity given to judge what should be judged of this whole Generation of Men and their
exhort unto Works of Piety and by the Authority of Scripture thunder the Iudgments of God against Harlots Adulterers Covetous Persons Highway-men Sorcerers that they may know there will be no place for such in the Kingdom of God and Christ except they amend their lives Who was more zealous than Paul in exalting the Righteousness of Faith And who was more Holy in Life than he or more fervent against the sins of those that walked not after the Spirit but after the flesh The Books of our Divines do evidence the same in which they discourse no less of Repentance and good Works than of Faith joyning always the one with the other Therefore as touching the manner of Teaching you will find that it is not Faith only which is Treated of in the Churches and Books of Men of our perswasion But if the matter of debate between us be about the cause of Salvation and Iustification there is nothing more agreeable to sound Doctrine than that an ungodly sinner is Iustified before God by Faith only without Works But you may object this Doctrine hardens the People in their sinful courses If you understand it of all it is false If of evil doers that run on in sin against their Conscience and take no care to restrain their Lusts As for such who ever said or taught that they are Iustified by Faith only And yet nevertheless the Truth of this Assertion remains invincible whereby we affirm that a wicked Man is Iustified by Faith only without Works if the Scope and meaning thereof be well understood Which will be easie if by adding that which supplies the room of a predicate the proposition be made entire As when Faith only is said to Iustifie add unto the Subject of this Enunciation it s own proper predicate or I may rather say add the proper Subject of Iustification and understand aright who they are whom Faith only Iustifies without Works according to the saying of Paul For herein chiefly lies the difficulty of this Controversie Neither is there any thing wherein the Adversaries are more grosly mistaken And herein they follow the Foot-steps of those concerning whom Cyprian justly complains saying They look at that which is said in the first place but regard not what follows after They catch at that which we assert of Faith only Exclusively and think there is injury done to good Works if Faith only is sufficient to Salvation But they take no notice what manner of Persons they are to whom this Iustification by Faith belongs It is the Advice of those School Divines to consider the reasons of things proposed according to their Subject matter and why then do they not observe their own Rule in this Evangelical Assertion Christ affirms it Paul confirms it yea the common practice of life natural Reason and Experience and the Conscience of all good Men proclaim that Ruine comes only from our Works and Salvation only from Christ. And because we receive this only Mediatour Christ by Faith only hence it is that we assert it is Faith that justifies believing sinners before God But let us see what manner of Sinners they are whom Faith Iustifies Is it the Rebellious and Impenitent No verily Then it must be such sinners as are Converted and Humbled and have the fear of God before their Eyes But there is no fear that such will continue to wallow in their former filthiness but on the contrary they are hereby so much the more stirred up to amend their lives All Ages have abounded with Examples of those to whom the Doctrine of free Iustification by Faith in Christ as it conduced much to their necessary consolation so it was no hinderance to their leading an holy life If Charity according as the Adversaries themselves do testifie is the perfection of the Law which is the Rule of Life I would ask such men whether he to whom more or he to whom fewer sins are forgiven hath the strongest obligation to love either God or his Neighbour which of these two mentioned in the Gospel loved Christ with the greater ardency of affection Simon the Pharisee or Mary that brought with her no good works at all but a great multitude of sins And why was her Love to the Lord more vehement but because she had more sins forgiven her But let us proceed Wherefore were so many and so great offences forgiven her but for her Faith which guided her Love for she did not therefore believe in Christ because she loved him but because she knew him to be the Son of God her Faith being thereby incited to act the more vigorously she loved much For Love proceeds from Faith and not Faith from Love Because we believe therefore we Love but we do not believe because we Love-Whence the Lord regarding more her Faith then her Love said unto her thy Faith not thy Love hath saved thee How Love and Repentance are concerned in Iustification BUT You may say Is Faith alone here Is it not joyned together with Love and Repentance I grant indeed that they are all three together in the person of the Believer But in the Case of Iustification Faith only is regarded And the other do follow as Fruits and Effects thereof For as that Woman unless she had believed in the Mediatour made known unto her by Faith she had nevor loved him So she had never come unto him as her Physician unless the Disease of her Troubled Conscience had driven her Wherefore if we reason aright about Causes these things follow 〈◊〉 as Effects and Fruits thereof but they are no causes of obtaining Salvation We have spoken of Mary Magdalene let us now behold the Pharisee and compare the one with the other If the Woman that was a Sinner by her love mericed as they speak Iustification What shall we say of the Pharisee Did not he also love the Lord Would he have gone to him so Courteously or invited him so lovingly or received him into his House so kindly or entertained him at Dinner so honourably unless he had been moved with some Affection of Love What shall I say of his Faith Did he not believe being instructed by the Holy Scriptures in God the Father Almighty Maker of Heaven and Earth Did he not receive Christ as a Prophet Now he believing in the Father and receiving the Son with Affectionate Love What could be wanting to him that was necessary to Iustification If so be all our Iustification is perfected by Charity And yet I suppose no Man will say that this Pharisee was justified by Christ that is set free from all Condemnation by this love of his Why Because Faith in Christ as a Saviour was wanting But suppose he had Faith and he trusting to his own Righteousness and being puffed up with Pride upon that account had begged no help and imagined he needed no Pardon would this Faith have availed him to Iustification I do no not believe it But
you may say That is true indeed and therefore this proves that Faith only doth not justifie I answer and also request the Adversaries that laying aside the desire of vain jangling they would examine the matter according to Scripture and right Reason Though the manifest Testimony of the Apostle Paul and the Examples of the Saints make it an undoubted Truth that only Faith in Christ the Son of God hath the power of justifying without Works Yet it cannot open this power upon all but only those in whom a fitness is found for receiving the displayings of Divine Grace Of the Repentance of those that are Iustified by Faith BUT None are found more fit than those that seem to themselves most unworthy and none less fit than those that are most highly conceited of their own worthiness Seeing we are all Sinners by Nature nothing can be more reasonable than that we should acknowledge the filthiness of our own abominations and cast our selves down at the Feet of Almighty God And there is nothing that God more requires than this Whose Nature or rather Mercy is such that he delights not in any thing more than in a humble Heart and a broken Spirit as the Psalmist declares He saveth such as are of a contrite Spirit And in the Prophet Isaiah God testifies of himself that he is the high and lofty one that inhabiteth Eternity and dwells in the high and Holy place and also with him that is humble and of a contrite Spirit to comfort the humble Spirit and to revive the Heart of the contrite ones And for that cause he calls aloud in the Gospel and offers his kind invitations chiefly to such as labour and are heavy laden that they may come unto him and be eased What is coming to Christ but believing What is it to be eased or refreshed but to be justified Though indeed he calls all and despises none that come to him Yet so it comes to pass for the most part that none come to Christ as they ought unless they be pressed and burdened under the sense of their Sin and Misery And again that Heavenly Physician is seldom sent unto any others but such As the Prophet bears witness who making a particular description of those to whom Christ was to be sent he sets before us the meek the broken in Heart the Captives the Prisoners the Mourners in Sion them that are walking in Darkness and sitting in the shadow of Death c. And the Psalmist speaks much to the same purpose Ps. 107. describing the Mercy of God on this manner He filleth the hungry Soul with goodness and such as sit in darkness and in the shadow of Death being bound in Affliction and Iron Though he being sent by the Father is given to all yet he is not entertained by all with the like Affection The Lord himself shews the cause thereof For what need have the whole of the Physician Therefore as a skilful Physician doth not Administer his Medicines but when sickness requires it so Faith cleanses none but those whom Repentance also amends neither doth the Gospel heal any but those whom first the Law hath slain and Conscience hath wounded And as that is most true which we Preach by the Authority of Paul the Apostle that Men are justified by Faith only without Works so on the other side it is false which the adversaries assert that by this Doctrine of Faith it comes to pass that all care of good Works is cast off and the reins are let loose to all manner of wickedness Howbeit if they speak of such impenitent persons as go on resolutely in their Sins we acknowledge that such as they are not justified by Faith and yet we assert that this is no way prejudicial to the cause that we plead But if they speak of such as join Repentance with Evangelical Faith and therefore stand in need of consolation if they deny that those are justified by the Faith of Christ only they discover themselves to be utter Enemies of the Gospel and adversaries to Christ. And again if they assert that such penitent believers become worse by this Doctrine they do therein err exceedingly and lye abominably Wherefore that the Mouth of Malice and Slander may be stopped I admonish these professours of Divinity who condem 〈◊〉 this Doctrine of Paul as Heretical that they would take our proposition not by halves but whole and join the legitimate predicate of the proposition with the subject that when Faith is said to justifie they should reckon that is not enough unless they understand aright whom this Faith justifies To wit none of those that continue stubborn and impenitent in their wicked courses but only such as acknowledge their Sins with grief of Heart and being weary of their former abominations fly to Christ by Faith for resuge But here they take another occasion to cavil 〈◊〉 For if Faith justifies none but them that repent then as they say Faith only doth not justifie but together with Faith a Godly Sorrow and Mourning for Sin Iustifie also I Answer It is true indeed that Faith is joyned with Repentance in him that is justified from his Sins And yet Repentance is no cause of Iustification As those that are afficted with a painful Disease Their pain makes them desirous of a cure but yet there is no healing vertue in this desire So Faith and Conversion are joyntly united in the person that is justified But as touching the cause of Iustifying Repentance indeed prepares a Soul for the reception of Iustification but the cause of justifying lyes altogether in Faith and not at all in Repentance For the just Iudge doth not absolve him who hath violated his Iustice because he is grieved upon that account but because he believes in Christ who hath satisfied Iustice and for whose sake Pardon is promised to such as Repent for in him are all the springs of our Iustification But lest this Discourse should grow too Ample for if every thing were treated of particularly it might be enlarged beyond all bounds Let us come close to the Adversary and Fight Hand to Hand that in a Summary Representation it may the more easily appear to the Reader with what Arguments they defend themselves what Arguments they defend themselves what Scriptures they quote what force and what fallacy is in their Arguments THE Third Book A Confutation of the Arguments Whereby the Adversaries defend their Inherent Righteousness against the Righteousness of Faith An Argument taken out of St. Iames. No Dead thing Iustifies All Faith without Works is Dead Therefore No Faith Iustifies without Works Answer First the manner of arguing is captious and transgresses the right Laws of Logick For the terms therein exceed the due number For there is a redundancy in the conclusion by this addition without Works For this should have been the conclusion Therefore no Faith that is without Works justifies And that may be well granted
Works which ye intrude from having a share with Faith in justifying a Sinner what hurt is it to sound Doctrine if the Word only is not expressed when you read such Scriptures as these being justified freely by his Grace Rom. 3. By the Works of the Law no Flesh shall be justified The Righteousness of God is manifested without the Law Rom. 3. a Man is not justified by the Works of the Law but by the Faith of Christ Gal. 3. Not of Works Rom. 11. Without Works Rom. 4. Not of Works Tit. 3. Not of Works Eph. 2. Not according to Works 2 Tim. 1. Without Works Rom. 9. What is the Signification of such Expressions but that all Works being excluded it should be understood that Faith only is the procuring cause of Iustification for what else is Faith without Works and without the Law but Faith only Therefore by the necessary Law of Consequence we may argue thus we are justified by Faith and are not justified by any other thing inherent in us according to the Scriptures Therefore we are justified by Faith only Or we may Confute the Adversaries with this Argument Argument That from which all other things are excluded must of necessity remain alone The Scripture excludes all other things in Man from Faith Therefore of Necessity it is Faith only that justifies But whereas they deny that this exclusive Word is found in the Scripture let them read Mark 5. and Luke 8. where the Lord says Only believe and thou shalt be saved I come now to the Greek and Latin Doctors of the Primitive Church Basilins Nazianzen Hilarius Ambrose Augustin Hierom Chrysostom Theophylact Oecumenius Photius Bernard to whom if you please you may add Thomas Aquin. who all Commenting on the same Words of Christ and Paul do not only agree with us in the same Opinion but also in the same exclusive Word as hath been evidently proved in our former Answer to Osorius Thought it be manifest that we assert nothing here which the Orthodox Divines of the Primitive Church have not confirmed unanimously and in the same Words yet nevertheless these things so evident in themselves do not satisfie those perverse Sophisters who when they cannot deny the very Words of learned Men yet they take occasion to contend with us about the Sense of the Words in which they pretend that we do greatly err for they have found out a curiously contrived Distinction Saying That by Faith only is understood the first Iustification but not the second Thus these cunning Artificers of Words have turned one Iustification into two one that is obtained by the first Grace as they call it before all Works as in Infants when they are Beptized And another which is in Persons come to Years by the practice of good Works That I may Answer this frivolous Distinction First I object this saying of Augustin good Works that follow him that is justified do not go before him that is to be justified which if it be true what remains but that they should either Confess that there is no such thing as this second Iustification which they have devised or else that good Works go before him that is to be justified contrary to the Doctrine of Augustin Moreover if they think there is sufficient cause why Faith only should not be admitted because it is not expresly mentioned in the Holy Scriptures why should not also this Distinction of theirs about a second Iustification by the practice of good Works be rejected upon the same account which is no where expressed in the sacred Oracles But by a manifest Contradiction is opposice to Heavenly Truth It is an Ancient and Famous Rule of Lawyers That there is no occasion of distinguishing where the Law makes no Distinction In what place of Scripture can those Sophisters find this Distinction between a first and second Iustification whereby Infants Baptized are otherways justified than they that are come to years for both were alike dead in their Sins and they are both alike regenerated and live by Faith in Christ the Son of God That we may briefly Consute this Sophistry whereas neither the Holy Scriptures nor the Godly Doctors of the Primitive Church ackonwledge any manner of justifying but one only How comes it to pass that those men have devised a twofold Iustification making two of that which is but one So that the first Iustification consists of Faith only and the second is made up of Works But it is easie to withstand this absurd device by the Authority of sufficient witnesses amongst whom Ambrose comes first into Mind who hath expressed himself thus Because there is one God of all he hath justified all after the same manner and what that manner is he shews in these Words He justifies them no otherways but as they are Believers And presently after he excludes all Merit of Works For nothing saith he is the cause of Dignity and Merit but Faith only And again Seeing that a Man is not justified before God but by Faith only c. Therefore let us inferr from these Words of Ambrose if there is one manner of justifying as there is one God Then no Distinction can make two Iustifications of that which is one only As no Distinction can make the one only God that justifies to be two Again if Believers are no otherways justified before God but by Faith according to the Testimony of Ambrose and there is no other Dignity nor Merit that God regards but only Faith what place is there for a second Iustification made up of the Merits of Works Hereunto let us add the Testimony of Gregory which is very seasonable to confute the Forgery of those vain Sophisters concerning their second Iustification These are the Author's Words Grace begot me being naked in the first Faith and the same Grace will save me being naked at my Reception Thus Gregory spake of Nakedness And what Nakedness is that but the want of Vertue and good Works as he himself Interprets which is the Condition of every gracious Soul not only of Men come to Years but also of Infants when they are Baptized in their first Regeneration If we are found Naked in our Reception into Glory where then is that second Iustification made up of good Works but if it is not so where is that Nakedness whereof Gregory speaks How can these things so much disagreeing consist together that we should both be Naked and void of good Works and also cloathed with good Works and thereby Merit a second Iustification In the mean while this should not be omitted which the same Gregory mentions of Grace which he divides not into a first and second as the Papists do now adays but he shews that it is one and the same Grace which both first regenerates us and also afterwards receives us into the Kingdom of Glory By which it is evident that there is but one manner of justifying which
this subject matter that you appear to be a Philosopher Platonick enough and no bad Ciceronian Orator but not a very Evangelical Divine I can assure you nor skilful enough to plead the cause of Christian Righteousness First As touching the Title of the Book concerning Righteousness I find nothing blame-worthy Though the frailty of our Nature might persuade you rather to discourse some thing to us of Mercy Yet seeing you chuse rather to discourse Philosophically of righteousness you are not therein unworthy of your own praise For being about to treat of righteousness you have undertaken a very honourable subject and I doubt too weighty for your Shoulders to bear and a work indeed very difficult and excellent For what is more excellent than righteousness in the whole nature of Divine and Humane things Which seeing it comprehends within its circumference all kinds of vertues the whole praise of Piety and not only the highest perfection of the Law but also the perfect Image of God indeed it may be found in Heaven but on Earth it cannot be found when you have said all you can Wherefore I am ready the more to wonder and consider with my self what secret design you had in your mind that you have composed Books so accurately exquisite concerning righteousness If it was that by the Trumpet of your commendation you might make it more acceptable to us you have therein lighted on a matter suitable to your wit and large enough for setting forth the riches of your Eloquence that I may confess the truth to you But I wonder for what purpose or end you did that will you say that men may the more evidently behold the beauty of righteousness and admire it the more But this hath been formerly attempted by Plato and many Academicks and Peripateticks and that with no bad success And who is so void of all natural sense but though he is not himself endued with the excellency of righteousness yet he apprehends in his mind the Divine brightness thereof and greatly admires it and wishes for it with all his heart If wishes in this case could do any good Inherent Righteousness unto that perfection which Osorius describes can no where be found in this Nature AND I could wish that the Integrity of Nature wherein we were of old Created had continued unto the compleat exactness of all righteousness But now in this ruinated and disabled nature why do you seek after that which we have lost rather bring forth something if you can whereby we may make up the loss What can it profit a man already dead to know the danger whereby he perished Verily there is more need of a medicine if you have any by which you may either comfort him being destroyed or restore him to the Life that was lost Yea this is the thing say you which I endeavour in these Books disputing of righteousness For righteousness as you say is the only remedy for restoring Life and regaining Health Yea this is the very thing Osorius that I chiefly find fault with in these Books not because you write of righteousness for I commend the argument in which you are exercised I commend also your praises of righteousness which are high and copious righteousness cannot be praised enough by any Man-But there is another thing for which all good Men should be angry with you What that is if you please I will tell you freely and openly for in these Books you represent unto us a spectacle not very much differing from that which Origenes relates of Celsus and Antipho who though they did write very contrary to truth yet they recommended those very Books that were against the Truth with the title of a true saying After which manner you do in a case not very unlike it whilest you write indeed concerning righteousness but at such a rate that nothing can be said more maliciously against true righteousness A twofold and different Account of Doctrine one of the Law and another of the Gospel FOR as there is a twofold manner of Covenant so also there is of righteousness proposed in the Scriptures The one consists in precepts and works under the weight whereof we all of necessity fall down to destruction The other is that of the Gospel which is safe-guarded not by works not by observance of the Law not by any peformance of duties on our side but by the sure and only Faith of Christ the Son of God Verily whosoever rejecting the righteousness of Christ whereof I speak leads us aside unto any other manner of righteousness I say that he pleads not for righteousness but against it and doth not undertake the defence of the Law of God but is a professed Enemy of the Grace of Christ and his Cross and therefore doth not open but wholly shuts up all passages to true Salvation and all Gates and Doors of Divine Grace For I beseech you if we are willing to confess the truth with the Sacred Scripture what is it else in which all the fountains and causes of our destruction are contained unto which as the principal head and spring we may attribute all our calamity but this very manner of righteousness placed in God and his Law by whose infinite immensity not only our faults but also all the Poizes of our righteousness are weighed down to the destruction of damnation If there is nothing but the righteousness of Works that may help our too scanty and short Obedience But perhaps these things that have been said hitherto are enough concerning the Title of the Book By which your prudence may lead you easily to suppose what should be judged of the rest of the Work In which when I contemplate the external form and countenance of the Workmanship verily I see that it is not without beauty nor unworthy to be looked upon when I number the Books themselves I take notice they are both many and large enough When I look on the Words and Pages I see whole Rivers and Sands that cannot be numbred but when I turn to the things themselves when I consider the Reasons and force of Arguments when I compare the Words and Sayings of the Scriptures at a strange rate quoted with the true sense of Scriptures not rightly understood by you and also when I take notice of the end and scope of the whole disputation I am not willing at present to discover to you what I find here lest in what I say I should seem to exceed the bounds of that modesty which here I profess But yet that I may say something for the sake of Truth to which I am more obliged because of necessity something must be said I will speak but in a few words If any other Man had Published these Books concerning Righteousness amongst the common People except your self I should say to him openly and to his face that no Man could ever have brought in a greater plague into the Doctrine
contained in the Law of God So that besides this there is no other way laid open neither in the Gospel nor the Writings of the Apostles whereby we may be brought to the Heavenly Countrey and its immortality but that which is described only in the Law of God Suppose these things were granted you which you affirm though they be in themselves absurd and wholly Iudaical but let me grant or at least feign that this way which you shew is the only way and the most firmly founded and also that the same is the most easie and likewise that there is no other way by which we can come to Heaven but that only which is proposed by the description of the Divine Law Suppose we grant this yet in the mean while see thou teach me this how thou canst know that thou dost as many good works as are sufficient for a compleat obedience to the Law Of old our first Father Adam received but one command and failed in the performance and that in Paradise being placed in the highest degree of Innocency What and thou a miserable mortal man banished out of Paradise compassed about with so much infirmity of the flesh having received the Law of God in which so many and so great things are imposed to be performed and they are so imposed that he is liable to a Curse whosoever doth not most constantly continue in them all do'st thou stand so firmly that no storm of temptation can throw thee down at any time But what if having observed all other commands of God exactly so much as one tittle of the Law is neglected by thee What will thy Righteousness say to us in this Case Do you not see that the Sentence of the Law being pronounced you are as much in the fault as if you were guilty of all 〈◊〉 And yet you talk to us of no other way to the Kingdom of Life but that which is defined by the Ministry of the Law and the Exercise of Charity But now how will you teach that by what Scriptures by what Masters shall this appear evident to us which you assert by Paul I trow What then says he he To wit this is the mind and opinion of Paul say you that he asserts that all manner of destroying and suppressing of Lust is placed in the Grace of God which must be obtained by Faith and teaches that there is no other way of extinguishing and destroying it And a gain elsewhere Paul was never the Man that disapproved the Offices of Bounty as if they were little profitable for Salvation but taught that the only right way to Heaven was that which was Fixed in the continual Exercise of Charity c. I know indeed and confess that all proceeds from the Grace of God alone whatsoever is done by us aright and commendably whether in suppressing the Allurements of Vices or in observing the Discipline of Vertue Moreover that should not be denied which you do well assume according to the mind of Paul that we obtain this Grace from God by Faith Likewise that is not ill said which you add concerning Paul that he was never the Man that disapproved Pious endeavours of Exercising Charity seeing he every where extols those very things with wonderful praises For who knows not that the excellent Sermons of Paul are exceeding full of very serious Precepts and Instructions for governing the Life and that they are not in any matter more affectionate than in this that all every where who profess the name of Christ should together with a sincere profession of Faith joyn a proportionable Holiness of Life 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for necessary uses Suppose this to be most true as it is indeed yet that was never the meaning of the Apostle to place our Salvation principally in the Law as if he thought that the Kindom of God and the Righteousness thereof should be measured by our worthy Deeds and Charity or proposed Heaven to us as fit to be paid for or sold for the commodities of our Works as by a kind of Auction Yea when I read Paul's Epistles of a far different sense this seems to me to be the only scope and mind of the Apostle that he transfers all this Righteousness which you attribute to the Law unto Faith and so transfers it that he shuts out all mixture of Works and leaves only Faith in the Son of God which lays open for us a way into the Kingdom of Heaven For I beseech you he that affirms that we are justified by Faith without Works and who again says but now without the Law the Righteousness of God is made manifest being testified by the Law and the Prophets with what Words could he more evidently shut out the endeavours and merits of all our Vertues from the Divine gift of Iustification These things being thus agreed upon and concluded by the weighty authority of Paul of necessity from thence follows That there is a twofold manner or way of being righteous to be distinguished as I said according to the different conditions of both Covenants of which the one belongs to the Law the other is peculiar to Christ. Then both the Law and Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 have their own righteousness for as the Law which is wholly exercised in works of righteousness endures no unrighteousness and renders the fruits of righteousness plentifully to those who persevering in that which is good have filled up all the parts of perfect Innocency Likewise Christ also hath his own righteousness both much more powerful and also not a little differing from the other though not so much differing in respect of the matter yet exceeding much in the manner of dispensing for the Law communicates only to them that Work but Christ communicates to them that believe perfect righteousness and often also to the unworthy and underserving by a singular grace of dispensation Therefore this Righteousness is properly called the Righteousness of Faith Which is necessarily to be distinguished by us from the other which is called the Righteousness of the Law Which they who do not verily they do a great injury to the Scriptures and quench all light of Doctrine confounding both their own Consciences and the Consciences of their hearers with a wonderful kind of disturbance so that scarcely any Man can certainly know what should be hoped or feared for they who dispute thus concerning the Righteousness of the Law and draw all things to that alone as if there remained no other way to hope for Salvation but that which the strict and severe observation of the Law brings I beseech you what else do those Men do but leave the Souls of Men in a doubtful wavering And by what way those Men encourage us to hope by the same they compel us to fear and utterly to despair of Salvation seeing there is no Man in the World to whom the daily offences of his Life gives not
and damage to his estate and again that a Christian gives only a cup of cold Water to a thirsty man in the name of Christ in the things themselves if merits only be valued there seems a very great disproportion But there is much greater inequality in the distributing the reward Though a Turk bestows many thousands of Talents upon the poor he gains not any thing at all thereby with God A Christian by one Cup not of Wine but of cold Water loses not his reward yea he finds Life What is the cause What should you think O Osorius but because those things are not valued by merits but by faith not by the condition of the work but of the worker not by the price of the thing but by the dignity of the person In Iustification not so much the Condition of the Deeds as of the Persons is regarded SEE I beseech you of how great concernment it is that a person should first be reconciled to God which unless he be received into his favour it is not possible that his works should please him at any time As in the civil and politick nature it is of no small concernment whether a Son or a Servant acteth upon the account of reward in like manner in the Heavenly generation there is a great difference between Sons and Servants The Heirs of God and Mercenaries For one thing is regarded in Servants and another thing in Sons and their condition appears to be far different It belongs to Servants to be compelled by fear but they that are Sons are drawn by love and they do so much the more in the performance of their duties how much the more gladly they endeavour to please their Father They that serve go about their business only for reward and it is given unto them no otherways than according to their merits Who when they have done all they remain nothing but Servants and unprofitable they never do any thing worthy of an Inheritance On the contrary they who are Heirs and Sons though they shew themselves no less obedient and observe the will of their Father yet they do not therefore obey that they may be made Heirs by Works but because they are Heirs Therefore they work Again they that are in a servile condition do not come but when called by their Master and perform his commands by the impulse of the Law But the case is contrariways in Sons who have always access with boldness into the presence of their Father and cry Abba Father performing much more of their own accord than by the incitement of anothers prescription Servants after they have done their task have their wages paid them according to their merits but they receive no reward of Inheritance But they that are Sons and Heirs an Inheritance is made sure to them not according to their obedience nor by their deeds nor after their deeds but by the faith of the promise and a free donation before all obedience concerning which Faith Paul said It is therefore of Faith that according to Grace the Promise should be firm to all the Seed Moreover in those that are Sons it is only the dignity of the person and not the merits of good life it is the birth and not the works that are regarded But the case is contrariways in Servants for it is not regarded what the person is but what the manner of life In short the Servant as Christ witnesseth abides not in the house for ever But the Son to whom the House is delivered wholly and for ever is never driven out of the House And here Christ only is a Son by Nature we only by the Grace of Adoption He by Birth we by Deliverance of which he himself testifies if the Son saith he shall make you free ye shall be free indeed he being partaker of his Fathers Nature is not made a Son by his life but is born a Son we being Servants by Nature are not born Sons but are born again not by works but by faith But by Christ our Deliverer we are changed from Servants into Sons Not that we cease now to be the same that we were in this life sinners miserable weak mortal for this transformation from servants into sons is not so much performed in us or in the change of our qualities but chiefly in the love of God to us For he hath so high an esteem and puts so great a value on Christ his only begotten that with a fatherly love and affection he embraceth all those of mankind throughout the world that believe in this Son of his and looking upon them now as Sons adopts them for his Sons out of their servile estate yea and makes them coheirs together with his Son Whence St. Paul said ye are not now servants but sons and if sons then also heirs of God through Christ for ye are all the Sons of God by Faith which is in Christ Iesus Whosoever of you are baptized ye have put on Christ. Ye are all one in Christ Iesus But if ye are Christs then are ye the seed of Abraham and heirs according to the promise Concerning which also Iohn speaks to this purpose see what love the Father hath given us that we should be called the Children of God And again presently repeating the same Dearly beloved saith he now we are the Sons of God and it hath not yet appeared what we shall be c. The Absurdities that arise from the Osorian Righteousness WHich things seeing they are guarded with most sure confirmations of Evangelical Scripture hence it necessarily follows that all this Discourse of yours about righteousness falls down from the foundation For if there is no union with God the eternal father but to those who by on exact observation of the law conform and direct all their actions to the will of God which is the law of equity and rule of Iustice you make us not now to be Sons nor Heirs according to the promise but mercenaries according to the condition of the law Moreover by this means also it will come to pals that the promise is sure to no man in his life time which is directly oppofite not only to the mind of Paul but also to the genuine condition of Sons For who in the time of this life lives so exactly according to the commands of God that hitherto he hath never passed the limits thereof or knows what he will do in the remainder of his life Whereby it will come to pass that the mind must needs waver hither and thither with a perpetual uncertainty Moreover if that be accounted sure by the word and promise of the Gospel that they are heirs as many as are ingrafted into Christ then the Kingdom of God must of necessity be an inheritance If an inheritance then it is not a recompence nor a reward but a Patrimony which is not due to deeds but to the spiritual birth-right If to the
the internal Skill they have in those Arts and wherewith they are endued as saith Tapperus which would not seem very blame-worthy to me if they understood this of the Divine Righteousness whereby God is Righteous or wherewith Angels are accomplished But as touching our Righteousness who are Men and Sinners this definition hath no place here at all Therefore that I may answer you Osorius and yours to these things first I think you are not a little deceived in examining the nature of Righteousness not that any thing is put in the definition that I call false or that it doth not agree to the thing defined For he that governs all his actions with such constant reason and equity that in no part of his life he starts aside from truth and righteousness him I do esteem to be truly Righteous yea to be God rather or next to God verily I find no mortal man such Therefore herein is your errour that whereas there is a two-fold and divers sort of Righteousness set before us in Scripture the one which is of the Law and peculiar to God the other which is of Faith and peculiar to us you are only so taken up in defining the one that you do not at all touch upon the other about which the chiefest matter of Controversie is here And so you proceed in setting forth the perfect excellency of the Divine Righteousness and justly so indeed to be accounted of that in the mean while you leave no Righteousness to Man at all For what Righteousness shall Man have if Righteousness be so strictly defined that it cannot consist but of works of perfect Righteousness nor be communicated but only to perfect men For now seeing no men are so perfect in this World but that this miserable depravation of our Nature is far from this exactness and there is none as Augustine witnesseth as long as he is in this life who pretends himself to be just in the sight of God By necessary Consequence it follows that either there is no Righteousness of ours at all in this life or it must be another than that which your definition thus circumscribes to us for thus you define it That it is an excellent state of mind conformed by the Divine Law founded upon Divine Prescription free from all wickedness and coming near in its resemblance to the Divine Nature C. And indeed in that state we were Created in the beginning But we have lost it long since neither are we yet perfectly restored but we shall be restored at length by the Divine power and bounty of Christ on the day that this our corruption shall put on incorruption and this mortal body shall rise again to immortality In which state of Resurrection we believe with Augustin that we shall fulfill Righteousness that is we shall have compleat Righteousness In Comparison of that Resurrection saith he the whole life that we now live is but dung c. And where now is that excellent habit of mind coming so near in its resemblance to the Divine Nature Where is that constant equity of reason and moderation of mind free from all sin Or what do you think of this life which Isaiah calls a menstruous cloth and Augustin calls dung if it be compared with that which is true Righteousness Whereby you do evidently discern as I suppose what comes of this your famous Theological Theory of Righteousness for if there is no way of entring into the Kingdom of life but by Righteousness and no Righteousness according to your Opinion can consist but of a perfect observance of the Divine Law and dignity of works what follows then You must either deny that we are sinners in this life and assert that we are righteous by works or if according to Scripture you confess us to be sinners you must despoil us of all righteousness and shut us out of the Kingdom of God And what will you say to Augustin who esteems all the Righteousness of this life as dung What will you say to Isaiah who says it is as a menstruous cloth What will you say to Paul who accounted it as loss What will you say to Christ who calls them that acquit themselves most righteously not only Servants but also unprofitable Servants if the Scripture evidently testifies that every man is a Lyar If the beloved Evangelist condemns him for a Lyar who would seem to himself to be free from sin If according to the Testimony of Paul we have come short of the glory of God If as Iames testifies in many things we offend all if most holy Men in Prayer cry daily forgive us our sins if Augustine doth manifestly deny that any man after he hath obtained the remission of sins hath lived so righteously in this flesh or that he doth live so righteously that he hath no sin at all If with one mouth the publick consent of the most approved Fathers testifies the same if moreover continual private confessions if Conscience it self which is as a thousand Witnesses convince even thy self to be a perpetual sinner darest thou who art a sinful man confuted by thy own works dream yet of the righteousness of works and promise Heaven to thy self and others by works And doth not the example of the Pharisee in the Gospel affright you who having been deceived by a false Opinion of his own Righteousness and who whilst flattering himself he thought he was not like other men c. He was yet so far from that which he perswaded himself concerning himself that he went away worse than those whom he most despised in Comparison of himself But how much more modestly would you behave your self if with a humble meekness restraining that insolency of Spirit you would either frame your self to the Example of David who durst not come forth into the presence of God or would put on that most humble mind of Tertullian who comparing his Life with another Man thou art a Sinner saith he like me yea a less Sinner than I for I acknowledge a pre-eminence in my sins c. At least you might and ought to be admonished by the sharp rebuke of the Laodiceans who when they had highly flattered themselves with a false perswasion of their own righteousness which they took upon them by works They did not in any other thing more displease the Divine Iudgment therefore Augustin said right let no man flatter himself Let Man take Sin which is his own and let him leave Righteousness to God c. But what is that let him leave Righteousness to God but abandoning all Righteousness of works to confess our selves to be that which we are sinners and God only to be just Which also Saint Paul doth more evidently confirm in these words to declare his Righteousness that he may be just and the justifier of him who Believe in Iesus In which a twofold manner of Righteousness presents
which new qualities being received for the Merit of Christ now man himself by that inherent Righteousness as their words express it merits a greater and fuller righteousness reconciliation and adoption and at length Life Eternal Moreover they proceed so far that they assert there is no Righteousness at all but that which is peculiar to every man and they so define it that in all the nature of Righteousness there is no place at all for faith and there appears not so much as any mention thereof For thus they define it the righteousness of God which is revealed in the Gospel is a vertue in God which distributes to every one according to their deserving Alphonsus adds Evangelical righteousness is an equal proportion of merits to rewards I beseech you Pious Reader those that profess such vile and absurd things will any man suppose that they have been exercised with serious meditation at any time in the holy Scriptures or that they have not rather bestowed their whole age and wits in Heathenish and Aristotelian trifles But now it will not 〈◊〉 amiss to take notice with what props of reason they confirm these their opinions Against the Iesuits and their Topick Arguments whereby they confirm Inherent Righteousness out of Aristotle WHAT say they have you not at any time read that form of reasoning in Aristotle He is righteous therefore he is endued with righteousness Such a man is learned therefore he hath learning We have read it Say they in the Topicks of Aristotle That is true indeed But have ye not also at any time read in the Epistles of Paul these forms of speaking Christ is our Righteousness We are made the righteousness of God by him faith is imputed unto righteousness the Iust shall live by faith What then Shall we believe Aristotle more than Paul We believe Fishermen Saith Ambrose not Logicians And should we translate our Faith which we owe to God with faithful Abraham unto men that are Sophisters But now lest those Iesuits should say that they are not answered let us look more nearly into the force of their argument and pierce them through with their own Dart. They deny that ever this external attribution was heard of since the World was that a thing should receive a name extrinsically from qualities that can be within so that they should be accounted righteous before God not by inherent qualities but the righteousness of another to wit Christs which is applyed to us by Faith c. And indeed this Reason taken out of Aristotle might perhaps be of some force if they had omitted these words before God But now seeing there is a twosold and divers righteousness the one which is called the righteousness of the Law the other which is called the righteousness of Faith and seeing the judgments of God and the judgments of men do differ they do foolishly and ridiculously argue from humane things to divine from the righteousness of the Law to the righteousness of Faith for men are not justified in the sight of God upon the same account that they are esteemed righteous before men Yea oft-times it happens otherways that those whom this World does most cry up and judges just by their inherent qualities God condemns the same men chiefly of unrighteousness out of those very same qualities and so on the contrary part This may easily appear evident by the Example of the Pharisee and the Publican either of which if they were to be valued according to the inherent merits of their life what cause was there I beseech you why the Publican should go home more righteous than the Pharisee Even as with a like diversity the Scripture sometimes names them dead whom humane Philosophy would judge to be alive and in perfect health Suffer ye Saith he the dead to bury their dead But pray how dead who unless they were alive they could not bury their dead What shall we then say that the Scripture lyes in calling them dead which were alive Or does that Iesuitical Rule rather lye which judges those alive by reason of their inherent qualities whom the Scripture calls dead How shall these things so contrary to one another agree together But that it is one thing to live to be dead and to be righteous before God and another thing before Men. The Books of Holy Scripture are full of such Examples and they have been often heard of and seen by Men and yet after all these things those pleasant Gymnosophists deny that this external attribution was ever heard of since the World was that a thing should receive a name extrinsecally from qualities whose nature is to be within Is it so indeed that this was not heard of since the beginning of the World what do I hear have ye not then good men read these words of the Apostle in the Holy Scriptures of God By the disobedience of one man many were made sinners and again by the obedience of one man many shall be made Righteous I pray you what is the meaning of these words by the disobedience of one many are sinners Again by the obedience of one many are righteous Does this attribution seem internal to you or rather external was that rebellion peculiar to Adam or was it ours If it was ours how was it ours but by external imputation What when you hear these words of the Apostle He made Christ to become sin for us that we might be made the righteousness of God through him c. Did either of us receive from qualities that can be said to be within he that he was made sin or we that we are called and made righteousness through him Moreover what is that when the Publican in the Gospel is said to have gone to his house justified rather than the Pharisee what was the cause why the one went away justified and the other went away unjustified I think it came not so to pass by a habit of inherent righteousness but upon this account rather because the Publican confessed his own unrighteousness therefore of wicked he is made righteous the other because he seemed righteous to himself through a false opinion of his own righteousness was manifested to be unrighteous according to the testimony of Holy Scripture The Righteous Man no sooner speaks than he accuses himself and in another place confess thy sins that thou mayest be justified therefore that aying of Augustine seems worthy of Praise this is the true way to perfection if every man acknowledge in truth and confess in humility his own impersection And Bernard spake no less to the purpose who bids us consider the Pharisee praying he was no Robber said he nor unjust nor an Adulterer nor careless of Fastings nor unmindful of the poor nor unthankful to God what then was wanting This one thing was wanting that he took no care to know what was wanting to him but made the most of his own merit and therefore returned
somewhat cleared your Eyes you may search more exactly into the meaning of the Apostles debate and the force of his reasons And first I would have you see into this what it is the Divine Apostle chiefly treats of here what he breaths after what he drives at by this similitude whereby he compares Adam together with Christ and proposes him as a Type and Figure of Christ. But where there is a Type it is necessary there should be something which by certain agreement of similitude may be answerable to the Type On the contrary where there is no agreement there is no Type Where there is no signification there is no similitude discerned Now whereas the former Adam bears a type and resemblance of him that was to follow let us consider in what this similitude consists What in propagating sin Not at all in the very Nature of the Persons What is more unlike Where then is similitude To wit not in the persons nor things themselves but only in the manner of the thing But it must be explained what that manner is For herein lyes all the controversie between us and the Papists For otherways as touching the things themselves and the Persons we are well enough agreed in that for there is no Man who is asked concerning Adam and concerning Christ but will answer concerning both according as the thing is in truth that he is by nature earthly and in his life a Sinner and that he brought upon us not only an Example but also a cause of sinning by a certain venomous contagion of Nature And on the contrary that Christ is from Heaven Heavenly and most pure from all defilement of sin and that he only is the Saviour of the World Concerning which if I am not mistaken there is an agreement between us and our Adversaries But concerning the manner how these either good or evil things come to us from these two Originally herein consists all the matter of controversie between us for as there are many who think we are no other way guilty but that by the example of sinning we imitate Adam the first Author of Sinning So you may see many who think we are upon no other account righteous and acceptable to God but that being helped by Grace we attain unto Christs most Holy Works and his most pure Innocency of Life or do very nearly resemble the same Who though they seem to say something yet is not all contained in that For though good Education and imitation wisely used hath no small influence for the becoming Vertuous whereby it may come to pass that some perhaps may seem less wicked than others and in some respect to excel others in the praise of Piety But imitation or any instruction of discipline will never perform this In short nor any way besides will be sufficient for this that you may shake form off your neck that which you drew from Adam or that you should attain that which is in Christ that is that you should appear righteous in the sight of God unless Christ come in to your succour another way than by any of your endeavours how great soever You will say After what manner is all this No Men can tell you that better than St. Paul For after what manner the former Adam ruin'd you after the same manner the Second Adam Christ restores you That first Author of your kind whilest thou was not yet born killed thee in the root by his not by thy rebellion and drew thee into misery and destruction In Adam behold Christ for in like manner being born and having dyed for thee by his won Innocency not by thine hath restored thee again to true 〈◊〉 and Paradice As therefore the transgression of Adam was imputed to thee who didst not Sin after the similitude of his transgression So the Righteousness of Christ is imputed unto thee who didst not Work after the similitude of Christ. In the one of whom behold the severity of Iudgment in the other the excellency of Grace What if this perhaps seems hard and strange to any Man in Adam that I should suffer the punishment of another Man's Sin and that those should be punished for the crime of another who committed nothing For it must needs be another Mans crime seeing I am deprived of Righteousness not for my own fault but for the fault of my Parent Let this same Man again leaving Adam cast back his Eyes upon Christ In whom the bounty of a most plentiful clemency makes amends by a counterpoize for the severity of the former Iudgment For from one Man Death passed upon all on them also who sinned not And justly Though I do not so much regard merit here I only consider the manner of the thing Come then let us compare the Type with the Antitype from the disobedience of one Man as I said death passed upon all Men who sinned not after his example which is a thing that cannot be denied After the same manner again from the Righteousness of one Man Life is communicated unto all who did not like him work Righteousness which is agreeable by the like reason for otherways Christ could not agree to his Type Here now consider whosoever thou art Christian Reader whether the judgments of God in Adam should be more dreaded by thee in which the severity of God imputed unto thee being not yet born that which thou hadst not committed or mercy in Christ the Lord should be more loved who tothee not working but believing in him that justifies the wicked imputes the Righteousness thou didst not deserve By which you see worthy Man if Paul the Apostle should be credited how unworthy of any credit your Doctrine is whereby you take away the Grace of all Imputation and leave no Righteousness besides to miserable Sinners but what every Man purchases by his own good deeds which how true it is let us examine by that place of Paul which convinces you of a Lye and a shameful Error by this most evident Argument Argument Ma. After what manner Christ was made sin for us after the like manner we are made the Righteousness of God by Christ. Mi. Christ was made sin for us no other way but by Imputation only Concl. Therefore we are made Righteous before God no other way but by imputation only I beseech you by your Chatholick Charity what will you say or what will you feign O most dear Osorius to this so clear evidence of manifest Scripture Do you not see that you are tyed on every side with Bonds that are Apostolick and wholly of Adamant Now what Turning what Hole to escape at can you find Christ is made sin for us Wherefore That we might be made the Righteousness of God by him saith the Apostle Will you deny it I suppose you will not What way then was he made sin Will you say by committing it No By Imputation then Certainly it is so Right indeed What
enough of it self alone to merit Salvation And now what then if those are added doth then at length full and perfect Righteousness arise from these together partly from the blood of Christ and partly from renovation by new qualities which may reconcile us being justified unto God For thus Andradius with his fellow Tridentines divides Iustification which Paul attributes simply to Faith into two parts of which he affirms that the one consists in the remission of sins and the other in the obedience of the Law O the Pest of Sophistical Divinity and intolerable deceits for by this distinction it will come to pass that Christ is not the only Saviour nor a compleat one but the Spirit that bestows these qualities for if the only formal cause of our Iustification consists in nothing but only the renovation of the inner man by a willing receiving of grace and gifts what shall now remain that may be attributed to Christ the Saviour and his blood but that he should only give a Dye to our merits which being so Dyed may bring us directly into Heaven But if it be so that the Death of Christ alone doth not fully compleat our Redemption to what purpose or what way did he say it was finished when his passion was finished Or how are all things in Heaven and in Earth reconciled by the blood of his Cross as Paul witnesseth Moreover the same Paul in many places and in all his Epistles places the price and Redemption in no other thing but only in the Blood and Cross of the Son of God In whom saith he we have Redemption through his blood But how shall we say that all things are reconciled by blood if Charity and the other gifts of Renovation and Merits are the things which make us acceptable to God and claim unto themselves the greatest part of our Reconciliation What is this else but to thrust Christ down not only from his Office but also from the Throne of his glory with a gigantick fury Concerning the Reward and Merits of good Works VVHat then Are there no Merits then say they of the Righteous Is there no reward by way of Merit left in Heaven which Christ promises to be so plentiful in the Scriptures What will all that provision of inherent Righteousness avail us nothing towards Life Will so many labours and store of most Holy Works profit nothing wherewith we being Cloathed by the Holy Spirit are advanced daily more and more towards the fulness of Righteousness Augustin will answer to these things and first of Merits If you ask saith he whether there are no Merits of the Righteous There are indeed because they are Righteous but there were no Merits that they might be Righteous For they were made Righteous when they were justified c. Therefore they were not made Righteous by Merits if we believe Augustin but Merits proceed from the Iust By which you may understand that a Person is not valued by the Dignity of his Works or his Grace but that the Diginity of Merits receives its value from the Iustified Person Wherefore seeing Men are not made Righteous by Merits as Augustin witnesseth but Merits receive their Virtue and Dignity from the Iustified it easily appears from hence what should be judged of reward by way of Merit For if after the like manner it be asked whether there is no reward of the Saints in Heaven that which Augustin answers concerning the Merits of the Righteous the same do I also acknowledge concerning the reward of the Saints that the Saints want not a reward and that a large one in the Heavens For they who are Holy a Reward shall be appointed for them not for the Works themselves because they are Holy but because they that work are Holy For not Heaven but a reward in Heaven is given not to Holy Works but to the Workers But if any proceed to ask whence they are Holy I return to Augustin That they are Holy from thence whence they are also made Iust not by Works but by the Faith of the Workers As for Example if any Heathen or Pharisee who is a stranger to the Faith of Christ should do this same thing that a Christian does though he should do also greater things yet the Works would not please God And why should his Works displease Or why should the Works of a Christian please unless it were for Faith And that is it which Prophetical verity in old time foretold should come to pass that the Iust should live by Faith he says not that the Faithful should live by Righteousness By which you see that this Life whereby we live by the Faith of the Son of God is not rendered unto the Merits of Works but consists of Faith and Grace for grace and the gift of God is Etrenal Life If grace where is reward If a gift where then is Merit But what shall be said in the mean while unto Testimonies that are frequent in the Scriptures which oft-times propose great Rewards to Pious Works First it is to be considered by the very Name of Obedience Debt and Duty are implyed Now the Obedience we owe can properly deserve no grace What Man at any time commanding a hired Servant to do his Duty bestows grace or praise upon him for that which he owed upon the account of Obedience or therefore doth assign unto him any portion of his Inheritance What does the Lord himself answer to such Servants in the Gospel Say ye we are unprofitable Servants we have done that which was our duty to do c. Now then wherefore are those things called by the Name of reward which God renders unto our good Deeds I will tell you God proposes rewards verily so he does but the same God proposes Dangers and Combats The most excellent Master of the Wrestlings sees what and how great storms of Temptations must be undergone how many labours must be endured how many difficulties lye before them He sees through how many Casualties and Dangers the strait way to the Kingdom must be undertaken by them who are planted in Christ And therefore that they may not faint in their minds but proceed with the greater courage in their undertaken Warfare rewards are shewed to them as certain prizes and recompenses of Victory to stir up their minds whereby the most Gracious Father may mitigate the crosses of his own Servants and comfort them in their Sufferings with proposing hope of Rewards And hence is that frequent mention of Reward and Recompenses in the Scriptures Not that those things which the Saints suffer in this life are worthy of rewards For the sufferings of this time are not worthy of the glory that shall be revealed in us But because it so seemed good to the Clemency of God to esteem those Merits of ours which are none as if they were Merits indeed and to Crown them as if they were very great
after the spirit And to this purpose our Lord himself speaks though not in the same words Not every one that saith unto me Lord Lord shall enter into the Kingdom of Heaven but he that doth the Will of my Father which is in Heaven For what is it to do the Will of the Father but as Paul expresses it to walk not after the flesh but after the spirit In which place a perfect obedience to the whole Law is not required to Iustification but the meaning of our Lord's words is this that he requires a Faith which is not counterfeit nor hypocritical but upright and sincere which doth not only outwardly and with the mouth make mention of the name of the Lord or the Temple of the Lord the Temple of the Lord as the Pharisees and Hypocrites did of old but heartily endeavours to walk in the fear of God and though it cannot perform all things commanded in the Law yet it strives as much as in it lies to shun all things that are contrary to the Will of God that at least sin may not have the dominion if it cannot be wholly excluded or rooted out Thus I understand these words of Christ To do the Will of his Father which is in Heaven For God requires us to do his Will but does not exact a compleat perfection of Obedience in this Mortal Life On the contrary he that makes an outward shew of Faith and an external profession of the Name of Christ whilst he takes no care to lead a Life suitable to his profession but runs on in sins against his Conscience it is certain that such a Faith according to the saying of Christ profits him nothing though he boast in the Name of the Lord as much as he will not that Faith without Works doth not justifie before God provided it be true and not counterfeit that is if it is received into a heart truly humbled as seed into good ground But because that Faith which doth not provoke unto Love and good Works though it may be boasted of at a high rate yet in reality it is no Faith at all but only a shadow and false resemblance of Faith And the same Answer may serve for all their Arguments which they have wrested out of the Sermons of Christ in the Gospel to defend their Doctrine of Iustification by Works Of which sort are these next following Argument Matth. 7. Many shall say to me in that day Lord we have prophesied in thy Name and in thy Name we have cast out Devils and in thy Name we have done many mighty works Then shall I profess unto them I know you not depart from me ye that work iniquity From these words they draw this Argument Ce. Whosoever is rejected of Christ is not justified La. Every one that works iniquity though he hath the Faith of Miracles is rejected of Christ. Rent Therefore he that works iniquity tho' he hath Faith he is not justified Or thus We are approved by Christ after the same manner that we are justified By Works ofRighteousness we are approved of Christ. Therefore by Works of Righteousness we are justified Answer I answer to the first The Minor must be understood with a distinction He that works iniquity is taken two manner of ways in Scripture Sometimes godly men work iniquity and likewise wicked men for both of them sin but they differ in their manner of working iniquity Godly men commit many things which they hate and which are truly sins But because they delight not in them in their inner man but in their love to Christ they endeavour with all their might to return unto God by Repentance God doth not impute their sins to them wherefore those sins that are done away by remission are not reckoned for sins But the case is far otherways in those that are wholly bent upon the fulfilling of the lusts of the flesh and continue in them with delight and satisfaction And unto them belongs that sentence of Christ whereby he commands all that work iniquity to depart from him As touching the second Argument it is a fallacy a non causa pro causa as we call it if our Vertues were of sufficient efficacy to merit the Grace of God there would be some ground for that which they infer Now our Works being such as have always need of Mercy and never satisfie the Law of God nor bring Peace to the Conscience nor support us under the stroke of Death or the weight of Iudgment How evidently doth it hence appear what we should answer to this Argument Good Works are pleasing to God I grant their assumption But first the person must please God and be reconciled to him that so his works may please and be acceptable for the person being once reconciled the works from thence derive their dignity I acknowledge therefore that works of Piety are pleasing to God but yet only as they are performed by persons reconciled and justified But if the manner how they that do good works are reconciled be enquired into they do not obtain Reconciliation by works but before all merits of works for works go not before him that is to be justified as a cause thereof but always as an effect follow him that is justified As fruits if they be good they receive their goodness from the Tree whence they grow but they are not the cause why the Tree is good So in like manner we grant with Augustine that the righteous have great merits But it comes not from their merits but from another caufe that they are righteous So Iacob was beloved of God before he had done either good or evil What did David before he was anointed King to deserve so great a dignity The same may be said of Abraham of whom we read in sacred Records how great things were promised to him when first he was called away from his Fathers house But the Scripture gives us no account of any merits of his as if thereby he had Right unto so great preferments What shall I say of Adam did he not first lose Paradise before he received the promise of recovery And God had respect unto the Sacrifice of Abel What is your Opinion concerning this Did the worth of his Oblation procure him this favour Or shall we say there was some other thing that made his person acceptable to God before he had any regard to his Sacrifice If you cast your Eyes about upon all the Histories of the holy Scripture and take a view of all the Generations of the People of Israel when God in his great goodness did bear with all the provocations of that People can you discern any thing in their works that merited so great long-suffering and patience or should we say that it was only for the sake of Christ that was to be born of that Nation In like manner it may be said of the Church which though it hath been
Argument There are also many other Scriptures which they have wrested abominably for the defence of their Opinion about Inherent Righteousness As for example where the Lord says That he came not to destroy the Law but to fulfil it Hence they infer that all that would be saved must of necessity keep the Law That I may answer this Objection I acknowledge that saying of the Lord to be very true and I know what he professed in words he performed in the practice of his Life For he came not to destroy the Law but perfectly to fulfil it and that not so much upon his own account as upon ours But it is not therefore a right consequence which they draw from an ill formed Argument Argument Christ came not to destroy the Law but to fulfil it Therefore there is no Salvation to any but those that perform the Law This is a false consequence for there is more in the conclusion than in the antecedent For this should have been the conclusion Therefore should we diligently endeavour to fulfil the Law according to his Example especially in those things that belong to us for we are not subject to the same Ceremonies of the Law that he was As when he was circumcised and went to the Feast at Ierusalem thrice a year abstained from things that were ceremonially unclean and from things strangled and blood and celebra-ted the Passover according to the Law and many things of that kind whereunto we are not now obliged But though it be very true that he came to fulfil the Law yet we are not therefore obliged to the fulfilling of the Law as a thing necessary to our Salvation For the Office of Christ is distinguished by a twofold end For he was sent by his Father partly for this purpose that in our stead he might yield perfect Obedience unto the Law to which impossibility we our selves had a woful Obligation and that he might stir us up unto Vertue by his own Example but the Office of the Mediatour consists chiefly in this That he hath delivered us from the dreadful Curse of the Law and by his Death made full satisfaction to Divine Iustice for all our Debts and translated us from our bondage and slavery into a blessed state of liberty Which makes us now to rejoyce in the hope of the glory of God Therefore it is seasonable here to give notice that they who upon this account take Christ for a Law-giver as if he had been sent by God for no other cause but to make new Laws in the World are in a great Errour For though he made a sound and right Interpretation of his Countrey Laws which were commanded by God and given by the Ministry of Moses yet he was not sent principally for this purpose to make new or old Laws but rather to bring help to those that were under the Curse of the Law and thereby in peril of damnation Another Argument Unless Christ had kept the Law he had neither saved himself nor others Therefore we cannot be saved unless we keep the things that are commanded in the Law Answer Under this similitude there lies hid a great disparity For there is no small disproportion between us and Christ. If he had failed in any thing commanded by the Law there was no other Redeemer that could have interposed for him The same may be said of the Angels if they had sinned But if we through infirmity go astray the blood of our Lord Iesus Christ is in readiness for our Redemption to raise us up when we are fallen to procure the pardon of our offences and to restore us unto a blessed state Argument Unless a man be born of Water and the holy Spirit he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God Iohn 3. Unless ye eat the flesh of the Son of God and drink his blood ye shall have no life in you Iohn 6. Therefore Faith only is not sufficient for Salvation Answer Verily there is no other Weapon put into our hands that we can retort with greater advantage upon Enemy than this very Argument For the Mystical signification of both these Sacraments Baptism and the Lord's Supper is nothing else but Faith in Christ Iesus for as Baptism is called a Sacrament of Faith and therefore is sometimes by Augustin put for Faith so those that are well instructed in the knowledge of Christ understand that to eat the flesh of Christ is the same with believing in him If we rightly consider the nature of this Sacrament there cannot be a more evident demonstration that we are justified by no other thing but Faith only For by what Argument could it be more manifestly set before our Eyes how great benefit redounds to us from the shedding of the blood of Christ than by the Institution of the Sacramental Bread and Wine for a memorial of his Body and Blood Or by what other thing could he more effectually represent unto our Faith the powerful efficacy of his Death than by the Institution of this Sacrament First Pious Reader call to mind and consider with your self this miserable and mortal Nature which how void and destitute it is of all things and how empty of Divine Grace and laden with iniquities you cannot be ignorant Thou who in thy self art a wretched and destroyed man comest to the Banquet where thou art commanded to take the Sacramental Bread and Cup in the name of him that was slain for thee and then thou art bid Eat for otherwise to what purpose should you hold the Bread in your hands when it is broken and reached forth unto you unless it be received inwardly for digestion Eat saith he and drink ye all of it for this is my Body and this is my Blood that was shed for you What was his design in expressing himself thus but to make us understand that his Death would be like a great Supper to his whole Church in which sinners that in themselves were wretched and miserable and empty and hunger-bitten might be refreshed with an everlasting Feast of fat things according as the Lord had long since promised by the Prophet Isaiah For as this mortal Life cannot continue without daily nourishment so neither hope of Eternal Life nor any other Grace can endure unless it be supported by Faith in the Lamb of God and thereby receive spiritual nourishment And therefore unless ye eat saith he the flesh of the Son of Man c. Whence it is evident that there is no Iustification for miserable sinners but that which consists in Christ only who was slain for us Yea there is no Iustification in him neither but by Faith which receives inwardly and digests this Bread that came down from Heaven according as we are taught in the Gospel He that believes in me hath Life eternal that believing ye may have life through his name Unless ye believe that I am he c. Thy Faith hath made thee
whole Wherefore there can be no surer demonstration that Faith only justifies than is held forth in these very words of the Sacrament whereby the flesh and blood of Christ is represented in that holy Banquet under the similitude of Bread and Wine Another Argument Unless your Righteousness exceed the Righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees ye cannot enter into the Kingdom of Heaven Therefore not Faith only but also Works of Righteousness exalt us to the Kingdom of Heaven I answer By these words the Lord gives us serious Instruction what manner of lives they ought to live that are justified But he doth not thereby signifie what is the proper cause of Iustification one Iudgment should be made of the causes of things and another of their effects If you enquire for the cause of Iustification the Lord hath resolved that doubt Thy Faith hath saved thee This is Life eternal that they should know thee the only true God and Iesus Christ whom thou hast sent In like manner Paul expressed himself If thou confess the Lord Iesus with thy mouth and believe with thy heart that God raised him from the dead thou shalt be saved But if you enquire what manner of lives they ought to live that make sincere profession of the Faith of Christ we are taught in this place and many other sayings of Scripture that they ought to differ much from the lives of the Scribes and Pharisees to wit that they who are created in Christ Iesus should behave themselves without a Pharisaical Vizard of external Holiness or a proud conceitedness of their own Righteousness but that they should be adorned and beautified with sincerity and uprightness of mind and persevere in the practice of good Works which God hath prepared that we should walk in them he said not that we should be justified by them but that being justified by his Grace we should walk in them bringing forth fruits worthy of our Vocation Another Argument Every Tree that bears not good fruit shall be cut down and cast into the fire Luke 3. Therefore Faith only is not sufficient to Salvation without Repentance I acknowledge the Divine Authority of that Prophecy which is true as it is generally known to all that have heard of the Gospel For who would endure an Unfruitful Tree that cumbers the ground and beares either no Fruit at all or such as is hurtful to the Husbandman But suppose it brings forth good Fruit and beautiful to look upon I would ask them whether the abundance of Fruit be the cause or whether it is not rather the demonstration of the Tree's Fruitfulness and whether the Fruits do not rather receive their growth from the Root whence they come Therefore if Repentance is reckoned amongst Fruits it doth not make the Man in whom it receives its first beginning perfect and good but only evidences what manner of Man he is now and hath formerly been For unless a wicked Life had gone before no Repentance had followed after Moreover Repentance could do no good unless Faith be joyned therewith by which a broken hearted Sinner may get access to the Throne of Grace But you may say Are not grief and remorse for Evil deeds and resolutions to the contrary things very acceptable to God and are not only conducible to the amendment of former miscarriages but also a great cause of future Reformation I Answer The sorrow of an afflicted Conscience which we call Repentance is a lovely effect but it proceeds from an Evil cause yet I deny not that it is a very excellent thing and never too late but always acceptable to God if so be it is accompanied with Faith in Christ. Neither do I deny that by means thereof Men are deterred from their customary Evil courses and stirred up to the exercise of Vertue Which though we grant to be true what doth all this avail towards the justifying of a sinner from those Sins that he hath formerly committed If a Man hath transgressed the Laws of the Commonwealth and being arraigned before a Iudge is forced to give account of all the actions of his Life will it be enough for him to say I was in an errour or I repent of my fault Will fear of judgment or shame set a Man free from the condemnation due to sin unless the Righteousness of a bleeding Saviour apprehended by faith do interpose and ward off the stroke of Divine vengeance from the guilty Sinner Without shedding of Blood saith the Apostle there is no remission Now then if neither Holiness of Life nor Prayers nor Tears nor the Blood of all the Saints can avail any thing towards the mitigation of the bitterness of this Iudgment and the only remedy be the death of the only begotten Son of God what will your Repentance do in this case Indeed I acknowledge that the Scripture attributes much to Repentance and there are glorious promises annexed thereunto but two things must be considered here First Of how large an extent the Promises are and next to whom they do belong for there are some rewards given in this Life and others that are reserved for Life Eternal Verily Eternal Life which is the benefit of Redemption as it could not be purchased by any works of ours so likewise it is not promised as the reward of Repentance or if in any Scripture it seems to be so promised it is not simply upon the account of Repentance but for another cause To wit the faith of the worker and not the work it self Therefore these things should be put each of them in their own places and comprehended within their own bounds That it may be understood aright what Faith does and what Repentance and what efficacy is in both and how they are distinguished from one another and also how they being joyned together do contribute mutual assistance to one another in the Iustification of the Ungodly For though we deny not that both are very pleasing to God yet the one is acceptable to him one way and the other another way For faith is acceptable through Christ but Repentance only upon the account of Faith And it is also a certain truth that though by faith only as the procuring cause we obtain Iustification in the sight of God Yet this very faith doth not put forth its power of Iustifying upon any but penitent and broken-hearted Sinners and therefore in the Gospel we are so often invited to Repentance Not that it is not true faith only which justifies without Repentance but because faith if it be true justifies no others but them that have turned from their Sins in sincerity and are converted unto God by Repentance For such as have no trouble of Conscience nor sorrow for Sin but run on obstinately against their Conscience and continue in their Evil courses it is a vain thing for them to hope for Iustification by Faith whereof they falsely boast for all such stout-hearted Sinners
of the Works of Christ were not they Works of the Law For he himself hath said that he came not to destroy the Law but to fulfil it were not the things which he performed in fulfilling the Law VVorks of Grace VVhat difference then is there between those VVorks that are called VVorks of the Law and those other that are called VVorks of Grace So that it appears that he who excludes the VVorks of the Law excludes also the VVorks of Grace from Iustification Though I acknowledge there is great difference between the Law and Grace in respect of the manner of Doing and the ends of their Offices For what the Law exacts that Grace performs but in respect of the things themselves and the Actions unto which they are directed seeing both the Law and the Grace of God are exercised in the same subject Matter there is no difference between them The Law commands us to Love our Neighbour and lays a Punishment on him that disobeys But Grace communicates Strength and Ability to perform what the Law commands VVhich when we perform we are said to do not only a VVork of Grace but also a VVork of the Law by Grace so that it is a matter of small concernment whether it be called a VVork of the Law or a VVork of Grace a VVork of our own or a VVork of Faith Therefore if the Scripture denies That a man is justified and attributes his Iustification to another cause that is Faith what should be inferr'd from hence but that Man's Iustification comes neither by the VVorks of the Law nor the VVorks of Grace Iust as if a Man writing to his Friend should say thus This Benefit was procured for him by no Money or charge of his own VVhat matter is it whether it was his own Money or borrowed of some other Man when the meaning of the VVriter was to signifie that this Benefit whatsoever it was was not bought by any Price of the Receiver but obtained by the free Bounty of the Giver So Paul desiring to set before the Eyes of all Men the boundless Immensity of Divine Grace toward Mankind that they might behold and embrace it expresly denies that Man is justified by the VVorks of the Law But here the Distinction of Hosius as I have said presents it self It is true saith he in respect of the Works that are of the Law and belong to our own Free-will which being attended with Imperfection can avail nothing to Iustification To which I Answer in a Word Give then that Grace which may furnish frail Nature with Strength to yield perfect Obedience to the Law and may restore us to perfect innocency in this Life and you have won the cause But in the mean while let those Disputants consider how many gross and pernicious Absurdities proceed from this kind of Doctrine for hereby the infinite greatness of the free Grace and Mercy of God towards us is taken away and abolished this also destroys our thankfulness to him for his goodness and withholds Consolation from afflicted Consciences so that very great injury is done to him that hath freely communicated so many and so great Benefits and much greater injury is done to those on whom they are bestowed Hereby also it comes to pass that there remains no Assurance in the Promise of God no firmness in our Faith no soundness in the Doctrine of Religion nor Comfort or Refreshment in the Suffering of the Saints A second Argument out of St. Paul Being justified freely by his Grace through the Redemption which is in Christ Iesus whom he hath set forth to be a Propitiation by Faith in his Blood to declare his Righteousness at this time that he may be Iust and the Iustifier of him that is of the Faith of Iesus Christ and again we reckon that a Man is justified by Faith without Works Unless the Hearts of these our Adversaries were fully set in them to pervert the ways of the Lord it could not otherways be but these clear and evident sayings of the Apostle must be sufficient to satisfie them and prevail upon them to beware lest they kick against the Doctrine of the Apostles and exalt themselves in their proud Imaginations and vain Conceit of their own Righteousness against such clear Manifestation of Divine Grace But here the Roman Legions make a fresh incursion again and the Ring-leader of them is Andraeas Vega who fights against the Righteousness of Faith Whom there is no need of answering in this World For he hath been removed out of this Life a great while since that he might answer to God his Iudge And because he denied that he was justified by the Faith of Christ only let him look to it what he must answer his Iudge in that Iudgment wherein he must give account of his whole Life where of necessity he must either overcome or fall If he overcome where is the Truth of Scripture in which it is said God only overcomes when he is judged But if he fall where then is the Righteousness of Works What if David so great a King and Prophet could not endure that God should enter with him into Iudgment If Iob a Man of so Holy a Life yet durst not answer to one of a thousand What will our Vega say what will he bring his Cowls his Fastings his lyings on the Ground his Night Watches his Vows his Liturgick-Prayers his Propitiatory-Masses his Mumbled over Confessions his Penances and Satisfactions But who hath required these things at your Hands Nay but he will defend himself and take Sanctuary in the Law which he hath fulfilled not by the Strength of his own Free-will but by the help of Divine Grace Say you so David being guarded with as much Grace as any Man was yet sunk down under the weight of the Law of God I suppose Iob wanted not Divine Grace and yet he dares not appear before God in Iudgment And will Vega nevertheless hope to bring such an account of his Life before the Tribunal of God that if God strictly Mark it and weigh it in the balance of his Iustice he will not find more Sins than Merits therein But I need not ask him what he will answer to God his Iudge To whom I know he can make no satisfaction with all his inherent Righteousness But this is that which I ask him and not him only but all the other Tridentines also what they will answer the Apostle Paul who openly pronounces a Curse both on Men and Angels if any of them should dare to preach any other Gospel than he had preached And what Gospel is it that we have received by the preaching of Paul Is it not the same that he taught so often in all his Epistles with frequent Repetitions and great Care and Diligence and also confirmed it with Miracles Now the summ of the Gospel which he preached is this That Man is justified freely without Works by the Grace of
and being now reconciled to God as it cannot be destitute of the favour of God so being stirred up by his holy breathings begins now to be a Law to it self whereby it fears God and according to its power honours him with due Reverence cleaves unto him with all its might refers its actions and counsels to him calls on him by prayers adheres to him in adversity celebrates his benefits with a thankful remembrance lays its hope and confidence and its whole self upon him and also for his sake loves and cherishes all the Brethren And as there is no Man that denies these Offices of necessary Obedience performed by the help of the Spirit of God are fruits of a well-instructed Faith So there is no controversie between us and you in that matter especially seeing you your self also together with us confess That these are not works of the Law but of Faith and that they should not be referred so much to the Law as to the holy Spirit and Faith relying upon his help as you say But the greatest difference that is between us consists in this that whereas we assert That the Obedience of Man born again by the Divine Power is but begun and imperfect in this mortal infirm state You on the contrary dream of I know not what perfection of obedience in works the Spirit of God so working in us that whosoever is qualified therewith needs nothing that belongs to compleat perfection of righteousness for all your debate about this matter seems to drive at this as being concluded with this one Syllogism Argument Ma. Whosoever walk in the Precepts of the Lord and perform them should be called perfect who can easily live without sin Mi. All the Faithful according to the promise of God walk in his precepts and perform them because God promises nothing but what he can and will perform Concl. Therefore according to the promise of God nothing hinders but Believers may be perfect here who are capacitated to live without sin That I may answer the Argument it is a Sophistical Argument from secundum quid to simpliciter because in the Major those are called perfect who walk in the Precepts of the Lord and frame their life according to them it is true in them who simply and perfectly perform all those things which are commanded in the Law according to that perfection which is requisite According to which Rule if the major be understood that which is assumed in the minor must be upon this account deny'd For though God hath promised to his Saints that the Assisting grace of his Spirit shall not be wanting which may help forward pious attempts in his Elect and stir up their endeavours after more holy obedience but where hath he at any time promised or on whom hath he bestowed that happiness in walking which turns no where to the right hand nor to the left which stumbles not through the whole life which in all kind of vertues by a constant perseverance so conforms the course of life to compleat innocency that it never fails in any thing The Adversaries use for the defence of their own cause to catch at the words that were just now cited out of Ierem. chap. 31. and Ezek. chap. 26. I will cause you to walk in my Precepts and keep my Iudgments c. And then out of Deut. chap. 30. I will Circumcise saith the Lord the fore-skin of your heart that ye may love the Lord with all your heart and with all your soul. I know indeed that in these words there is a glorious promise contained of the gift of the Holy Ghost and the restoring of new obedience but because there is a twofold perfection and a twofold righteousness according to Hierom. one which is suited to the vertues of God another which is agreeable to our frailty And again seeing according to the Authority of Augustine there is a twofold kind of Obedience one that is seen in this Life being but begun and imperfect Another that is perfect which is compleated in the life to come It is not difficult to discern in what sense the perfection of Renovation should be understood in the Scriptures To wit not simply and absolutely but according to the measure and capacity of this Life Therefore Augustine says well that a Man is sometimes called perfect because he hath profited in a great degree And the same again But whereas Men are called Saints sometimes and perfect in the Scriptures I say to this that it is a certain manner of perfection whereby Holy Men acknowledge their own imperfection They are also called perfect who in any respect imitate the perfection of the Heavenly Father who rains on the Iust and Unjust c. And again the same Augustine writing to Boniface The Vertue saith he which is now in a Righteous Man is called perfect upon this account because it belongs to his perfection both to acknowledge in Truth and confess in Humility his own Imperfection Moreover Hierom not much differing from him answered wittily To whom when that place of St. Paul was objected Whosoever of us are perfect we understand this To this Hierom says What then do we understand yea what ought we to understand that we who are perfect should acknowledge our selves to be unperfect and that they have not yet comprehended nor yet attained unto perfection This is saith he the Wisdom of Man to know himself to be imperfect and that I may so speak the perfection of all Righteous Men in the Flesh is imperfect c. And afterwards again in the same Book Therefore we are Righteous then when we confess our selves to be Sinners For our Righteousness consists not of our own merit but of the mercy of God as the Scripture says The Righteous Man is an accuser of himself in the beginning of his Speech And again to Ctesiphon This is Mens only perfection saith he if they know themselves to be imperfect c. Moreover the Adversaries set upon us with another Argument also which they produce out of the words of Deut. 30. To defend the perfection of their own Righteousness after this manner Ma. In these two commands thou shalt love thy God with all thy Soul and thy Neighbour as thy self is contained the summ of all perfection Mi. They that are regenerate can love God with all their Heart and all their Soul and their Neighbours as themselves according to the promise of God Deut. 30. Concl. Hence then it follows that the Regenerate by the help of the Spirit of God can fulfil all Righteousness by the Works of the Law This reasoning as it differs not much from the former so there is implied in it a certain kind of fallacy not unlike it Which of what sort it is if I may with your allowance Osorius I will declare For there lurks under the words of Scripture not rightly understood a fallacy or venom wholly Pelagian But
Augustine will Ingeniously Confute this Fallacy for us in his Book The Title whereof is concerning the Perfection of Righteousness Where he speaks after this manner That the state of this Controversie about the perfection of Love is exercised about two Questions To wit By whom And when First as if the Question be by whom a Man may attain unto such perfection that he may be without Sin He answers that comes not to pass by the strength of Free Will but by the Grace of God And so far there is no debate betweeen us and the opposite party But if there be enquiry made about the time when such a perfection is attained Augustine speaks expresly that this comes not to pass in this Life but in that which is to come And this same Augustine no less oppositely in another Book dispels the mists of this Argument with very evident Words This precept of Righteousness saith he concerning loving the Lord with all the Heart and with all the Soul And also that of loving our Neighbour we shall fulfil in that Life where we shall see Face to Face But here some will object wherefore is it commanded if it is not fulfilled here Augustine Answers To wit That we may be Instructed what we ought to ask by Faith and whither to send Hope before and unto what things that are before us we should press forward not being satisfied with any thing that is behind Therefore according to my opinion saith he that Man hath made a great progress in this Life in that Righteousness which is to be perfected who by profiting knows how far he is from the perfection of Righteousness c. What is that Which writing to Bonifacius he thus reasons about Divine Grace The Grace of God saith he gives in this Life an endeavour to keep the commands And here you have the Obedience begun as we call it and the same if any thing is not fully observed in the precepts Pardons c. And so all commands of God are reckoned as performed because whatsoever is not performed is pardoned By which as I suppose you see that our Righteousness in this Life is of such a sort that it consists rather of the remission of Sins than the perfection of Vertues which perfection must be looked for by us in the Life to come Moreover there is another thing that must not be paffed by in this place that the same Augustine writing to Hierom in the 29th Epistle saith Charity is a Vertue whereby that which should be beloved is beloved This in some is greater in others lesser in others none at all But the fullest that cannot be increased as long as Man lives here is in no Man But as long as it can be increased verily that which is less than it ought to be is faulty by reason of which default there is not a just Man upon the Earth that doth good and sinneth not Because of which default no Man living shall be justified in the sight of God By reason of which viciousness if we say that we have not sin we deceive our selves and the Truth is not in us because of which how much soever we have profited it is necessary for us to say For give us our debts The Books of the Antient Orthodox Divines are full of very Authentick Testimonies confirming this Opinion It is an excellent and grave saying of Cyprian speaking of the Regenerate Let no man saith he flatter himself upon the account of a pure and unspotted heart that trusting to his own Innocency he should suppose that his wounds need no medicine seeing it is written Who shall glory that he hath a chast heart or who shall glory that he is clean from sins But if no Man can be without sins whosoever shall call himself unblameable is either a proud man or a fool c. For this saith Hierom shall every one that is godly pray unto thee if he is godly how doth he pray for pardon of iniquity if he hath iniquity how is he called holy There is not so great a Harmony found in any one man saith Ambrose that the Law which is in the Members doth not oppose the Law of the mind Therefore that which the Apostle Iohn said is true of all Saints in the general If we say that we have no sin we deceive our selves and the truth is not in us I may also add that of Bernard which is very agreeable to this matter Who dare arrogate to himself saith he that which Paul himself confesses he had not attained unto Indeed he that gave the command was not ignorant that the weight thereof exceeded the strength of men but he judged it useful that by this very thing they should be convinced of their own insufficiency and that they should know what end of Righteousness they should endeavour with all their might to attain unto Therefore by commanding things impossible he did not make men transgressors but humble that every mouth might be stopped and all the World might lie under the Iudgment of God I can bring innumerable Testimonies of the like sort out of well approved Authors But why do I take up my time in rehearsing the Names of Men or reckoning their approbations when that I may speak it in one word all the Antiquity of former Ages the publick consent of the former Church and the choicest Writers out of all Eldest Time as many as ever rejected the Antient Pelagianism all those with one mouth agree in this matter against you That there is no integrity of Righteousness in this Life which is not imperfect which needs not forgiveness That there is not so great an Innocency here which is without any wound which needs no Medicine and that none of all the Saints have so lived that a great deal was not wanting to him to compleat Righteousness and who needed not daily to pray for the pardon of his iniquity As Augustine testifies Because saith he there is daily offending therefore there must be also daily remission Which things being confirmed by most evident Testimonies of very Learned Witnesses Where 〈◊〉 is that Salvation which according to your description is placed in Righteousness Holiness Religion and the excellent Merits of all Vertues Where is that Righteousness of Works which reconciles us to God and makes us like God Where is that Way which is paved to Heaven for us with the excellent Merits of Works Where is that Ascent into the Heavenly Kingdom which is opened by the Merits of the greatest Vertues Where are the Mansions of the Everlasting Kingdom which you assert are justly and deservedly given to holy and pure men Where is also that Immortal Kingdom which you conclude is due by best right not only as a Recompence and Reward but also as a Legal Patrimony founded by the wisdom and bounty of the Father What if according to your Discipline there is