AFFIRMETH. Exod. 4. vers 14. Our Lord being angrie at Moises saied c. God angered at Moises and Aaron Deuteronom 9. v. 20. Against Aaron also being exceeding angrie he would haue destroied him Michee 7. v. 9. I will beare the wrath of our lord because I haue sinned to him Roman 2. v. 9. Wrath and indignation tribulation and Gods wrath on all that doe euill anguish vpon euerie soule of man that worketh euill CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Catechismus ad Parochos in orat Dom. Albeit the act of sinne be past yet sinne remaineth by guilt and staine ouer which Gods anger euer hanging doth follow it as the shadow the bodie PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Luther in c. 42. Gen. to 6. fol. 575. Nether must we beleiue him when he is angrie For in deed Christ that is God incarnate is not angrie Doth he not seeme to be angrie No surely he is not angrie Nor suffer thy selfe to be so persuaded for it is not true but God but feignedlie angrie feigned anger In c. 3. Galat. to 5. fol. 336. Follow not the iudgment of reason which saieth that God is angrie with sinners Et in argum Epistolae fol. 272. Thou canst not be saued vnles thou forget the law and determine certainly in thy hart Not angrie with sinners that there is no law or anger of God but mere mercie and grace for Christs sake Caluin 3. Instit cap. 4. § 31. God is not so rigorous in his iudgmeÌ„t of chastyzing the faithfull as he becometh angrie § 32. God alwaies withhouldeth his anger from the faithfull Item Neuer angrie with the faithfull Nether hindreth it that the lord is often saied to be angrie with his Saintes when he chastizeth their sinnes For that is not ment of Gods counsell or affection when punisheth but of the vehement feeling of sorrow wherewith they are affected who sustaine how litle soeuer of his seueritie CONFERENCE OF THE FORESAIED WORDS Scripture expressely saieth that God was angrie with Moises exceeding angrie against Aaron had wrath against Micheas and that wrath and indignation is vpon euerie soule that worketh euill The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely saye that God is not angrie with sinners is not angrie indeed his anger is not true but feigned hath anger but mere grace and mercie alwaies withhouldeth his anger from the faithfull that what is saied of Gods anger against the faithfull is not meÌ„t of his mynd but of their feeling of his chastisment Which are so opposite to the holie Scripture as euen Protestants some times confesse See lib. 2. c. 30. ART VIII WHETHER GOD DOTH punish sinners for sinnes past SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Genes 3. vers 17. God saieth to Adam Because thou hast God punished Adam and Euer for sinne post heard the voice of thy wife and hast eaten of the tree whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eate cursed is the earth in thy worke with much toiling shalt thou eate thereof all the dayes of thy life 2. Kings 12. vers 14. Our lord hath taken away thy sinne Also Dauid thou â—halt not dye Neuerthelesse because thou hast made the enemies of our lord to blaspheme for this thing the sonne that is borne to thee dying shall dye Ihon. c. 5. v. 14. Iesus saied to him Behould thou art made whole sinne no more lest some worse thing chance to thee CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Card. Bellarmin l. 2. de Paenitent c. 2. We see that the punishment inflicted vpon Dauid had respecte to that which was past rather then to that which was to come PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Caluin 3. Inst cap. 4. § 33. Whiles the reprobates are scourged of God with whippes they begin in some sorte to taste the punishments of his iudgment But his children are beaten with God punisheth not his children for sinnes past rods not for to paye to God the penaltie of their offences but to increase thereby in repentance Wherefore we gather that they respect more the time to come then the time past Et § 30. What I pray you had Christ done for vs if yet punishment were exacted for sinne Zanchius de Perseuerant q. 1. c. 2. This is most certaine that God neuer imputeth sinne to the elect The same say others as we shall see hereafter c. 16. art 1. CONFERENCE OF THE FORESAIED WORDS Scripture expressely saieth that Adam was punished because he had eaten of the aple and Dauid because he had made Gods enemies blaspheme The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that Gods children are not punished for sinne past that no sinne is imputed to the elect That no punishment is exacted of vs for sinne And hitherto we haue seene that the Scripture teacheth vs how God carieth him selfe towards sinnes and sinners plaine contrarie to that which Protestants teach Now we will see the like touching good workes ART XIII WHETHER GOD REGARD good workes or be delighted with them SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Genes 8. v. 20. Noë built an altar to our lord and taking of all cattle and foules that were cleane offered holocausts vpon Noes sacrifice a sweet smell to God the altar and our lord smelled a sweet sauour 4. Kings c. 22. v. 2. And he Iosias did that was liked before our Lord. Malachie 3. v. 4. And the sacrifice of Iuda and Hierusalem Sacrifice pleaseth God shall please our lord Actes 10. vers 4. And he saied to him Thy praiers and thy almes deeds are ascended into remembrance in the sight of God Hebrewes 13. ver 16. And forget not beneficence and communication for with such hostes God is promerited Or as the Greek hath is pleased 1. Ihon. 3. v. 22. We do those things which are pleasing before him CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Card. Bellarmin l. 4. de Iustificat c. 15 The seuenth testimonie is taken out of those places of Scripture which teach that the workes of the iust do please God And l. 5. c. 2. He saieth that the sense of the forecited words Hebr. 13. is this With such hostes God is delighted or God is pleased with such hostes PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Luther de Captiuit Babilon to 2. fol. 69. Nether can God careth not at all for workes we any time deale otherwise with God then by faith in the word of his promise He careth nothing at all for works nor needeth them by which we are to deale rather with men and with our selues Et Postilla in Domini 1. Aduentus fol 8. God careth Respecteth not yea loatheth them not for workes In festo S. Stephani fol. 376. God respecteth not workes We foolishly feigne that God is much delighted with our workes whereas he greatly loatheth them In festo Assumpt fol. 435. Truly workes are of no accounte before God In cap. 1. Ionae to 4. fol. 411. The Papists haue a conceit of God as if he were a God that is delighted and may be appeased with our good No God that is delighted with
Ghospell or the new testament must haue beene tried by the ould See more art 6. CHAPTER VII OF THE PASTOVRS OF THE CHVRCH SCripture If my couuenant with the day can be made voide Pastours alwaies c. also my couuenant may be made voide with Dauid my seruant that there be not of him a sonne to reigne in his throne and Leuits and Preists my ministers Not alwaies Protestants It is false that the externall ministerie must be perpetuall The Church hath osten no man Pastour Some short time the Church may be depriued of Pastours See more art 7. Scripture Thou art Peter c. And to thee I will giue the Authoritie in the Pastours keyes of the kingdome of heauen Protestants The authoritie is not in the Prelats but in the Not in them worde the Church hath nothing but mere ministerie See more art 2. Scripture Thou art Peter c. and whatsoeuer thou shalt One pastor cā excōmunicate bind on earth it shal be bound also in heauen Protestants VVe must remember that this power of excommunicating One cannot is giuen to no one man but to the whole companie of the Presbiterie See more art 3. Scripture And he Paul walked through Syria and Silicia Pastours can make lawes confirming the Churches and commanding them to keepe the precepts of the Apostles and the Auncients Protestants The Church hath no power to make lawes See They can not more art 4. Scripture The Holie Ghost hath placed you Bishops to rule Pastors rulers of the Church Not rulers the Church of God Protestants The true nature of a ruler of the Church is in no pure man one or manie See art 5. Scripture You shal be called the preistes of the lord Pasters to be called preists Not to be so called Protestants Who administer the word and Sacraments amongst the people nether may nor ought to be called preists See more art 7. Scripture But how shall they preach vnles they be sent No preaching without mission Without mission Protestants Euen they who are not lawfully called may preach the word fruitfully Euerie Christian man hath authoritie to preach Christ in what place soeuer where they are desirous to heare See more art 8. Scripture Moises and Aaron in his preists Moises a preist No preist Protestants Moises did not exercise at all the preisthood but was onely a Prophet See more art 10. CHAPTER VIII OF THE CHVRCHE SCripture There shal be made one fould and one pastor Church but one onely Not one onely Protestants We say that there are twoe societies of men that is twoe Churches to the one belong the predestinate to the other the reprobate Christ and the things themselues teach vs that there are twoe Churches See more art 1. Scripture VVe are one bodie all that participate of one All those one bodie who participate one Sacramēt bread Protestants The godlie are no more ioyned in one bodie with Not all those the wicked then light with darkenes Christ with Belial See more art 2. Scripture The gates of hell shall not preuaile against her of Church can not faile It can faile his kingdome there shal be no end Protestants It is no meruaile though the Church be cleane fallen downe long agoe Antichrist had rooted out the Church euen from the ground Christes kingdome was cast flat downe See more art 4. Scripture You are the light of the world A cittie can not be Church can not be hidde hidde situated vpon a mountaine Protestants Often times God will haue no visible Church It can be hidde on earth The whole visible Church may faile See more art 5. Scripture Which is the Church of the liuing God the pillar Church is infallible and strenght of trueth Protestants The vniuersall Church may erre The Church Not infallible may erre The Catholik Church may erre and that most greeuously See more art 6. Scripture If he will not heare the Church let him be to thee Church simply to be heard Not simply to be heard as the Heathen and the Publican Protestants VVe must not simply receaue whatsoeuer the Church teacheth See more art 7. CHAPTER IX OF TEMPLES OR MATERIAL CHVRCHES SCripture Who Anna departed not from the temple by Churches for priuate praier fasting and praiers seruing day and right Protestants Churches are for preaching onely It is no lawfull Not for priuat praier end of Churches that the faithfull may priuatly pray in them See more art 1. Scripture Twoe Cherubins also thou shalt make of beaten Images to be set in Churches Not to be set in Churches gold on both sides of the oracle Protestants The Iewes had no manner Image nether painted not grauen in their temple God abhorreth images We must not suffer that Images be in Churches See more art 3. Scripture reporteth these words of a Heathen This Heathens thought idols to be Gods They thought not so Paule saieth that they are no Gods which be made by hands Protestants It is a lie that the Heathens did beleiue the Images of their Gods to haue beene their Gods them selues See more art 4. CHAPTER X. OF BAPTISME SCripture Vnlesse a man be borne againe of water and the Water necessarie to baptisme Not necessarie Spirit he can not enter into the kingdome of God Protestants Though water be wanting yet if the baptisme of one cannot be differred with edification I would baptize as well with anie other liquour as with water See more art 1. Scripture Going teach ye all nations baptizing them Baptisme cōmanded of Christ Not cōmanded of him c. Protestants Baptisme is of lesse importance then that the lord should haue greatly cammanded anie thing about it See more art 3. Scripture Vnlesse one be borne of water and the Holie Baptisme necessarie to saluation Not necessarie Simon Magus was baptized He was not baptized Baptisme profiteth all Not all Ghost he cannot inter into the kingdome of God Protestants Children who die before they be christened are not shut out of the kingdome of God See art 4. Scripture Then Simon Magus also himself belieued and being baptized he cleaned to Philippe Protestants That Simon Peter and Simon Magus receaued the same whole baptisme is most false See more art 5. Scripture As manie of you as haue beene baptized in Christ haue put on Christ Protestants Baptisme bringeth no commoditie to those that are not elect See more art 6. Scripture Christ loued the Church cleansing it by the lauer Baptisme purgeth sinne It purgeth not sinne of water in the worde Protestants VVho will say that we are cleansed by this water Doest thou thinke that water is the lauer of the soule No. Baptisme cannot wash away the filth of sinnes See more art 7. Scripture Be baptized and wash away thy sinnes Sinnes washed away by baptisme Not by baptisme All borne in in state of dānation Not all Protestants Paule
that in case of necessitie a lay man becometh a Minister and Pastour yea that where men want a woman may preach and absolue from sinnes Which are so plainly against Scripture as some Protestants confesse it See l. 2. c. 30. ART IX WHETHER A PASTOVR OF the Church may haue also temporall iurisdiction SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Gen. 14. v. 18. and Hebr. 7. v. 3. Melchisedech is saied to A Pastour of the Church may haue temporall iurisdiction haue beene both a Preist and King Exod. 18. ver 13. Moises did sit to iudge the people And yet withall was a preist as we shall shew in the next article 1. Reg. 1. 4. Heli is saied to haue beene high Preist and iudge of the people The same is euidtē of the Machabees CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME C. Bellarm. l. 5. de Rom. Pont. c. 9. It doth not repugne that the Pope should be both a spirituall Prince and also a temporall Prince of some prouince PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Zuinglius Art 36. to 1. Iurisdiction or administration of He cannot law which the saied Church men do chalenge belongeth wholy to the secular Magistrate if he wil be a Christian. And in explan art 36. All administration of law is forbidden to Church men Caluin in Luc. 12. v. 13. So is the robberie of the Pope and his men condemned who though they pretend to be Pastours of the Church notwithstanding dare take vpon them terrene and profane iurisdiction which is contrarie to their function The same he hath 4. Iustit c. 11. § 8. Daneus Controu 4. pag. 560. Let vs shew that vnder the Gospell it is not lawfull for Bishops to haue execute practise both ecclesiasticall and politicall iurisdiction Polanus in Disput priuat disput 13. No man can be at once both a Bishop and a politicall Prince Hutterus in Analysi Confes Augustan p. 622. It is manifest that both powers cannot agree to one and the same man at one time THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that Melchisedech was at once both King and Preist that Moises was both iudge and preist the same of Heli and the Machabees Catholiks say the same Protestants expressely say that all temporall iurisdictiō belongeth to the ciuill Magistrate all temporall administration of law is forbidden to Church men that the same man cannot haue ecclesiasticall and temporall iurisdictiō the same man cannot be both Bishop and Prince ART X. WHETHER MOISES WERE a Preist SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Psal 98. v. 6. Moises and Aaron in his Preists and Samuel Moises was a Preist among them that inuocate his name CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME C. Bellarm. l. 5. de Rom. Pont. c. 9. Moises was both a soueraigne temporall Prince and a high preist as is euident it out of the Scripture PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Whitaker Cont. 1. q. 5. c. 4. Nether did Moises exercise at all He was no Preist the preisthood but was onely a Prophet Iuel in defens Apol. Part. 6. c. 11. diuis 4. Whether Moises were a Preist or no we are not certaine Daneus Cont. 4. p. 561. I answere that Moises had not nor exercised both the functions of Preihstood and Magistrate but onely the functions of a Magistrate and Prophet The same saied Hunnius in Colloq Ratisbon sect 2. Where he addeth that he sacrified as a Prophet not as a Preist Chamier l. 1. de Pontif. p. 71. I graunt that Moises as superiour to Aaron but as Magistrat not as Preist THE CONFERENCE Scripture saieth plainly that Moises was a Preist as it saieth that Aaron was one The same say Catholiks Protestants plainly say that Moises was no preiste exercised no preisthood THE SVMME OF THIS CHAPTER OF PASTOVRS What we haue rehearsed in this Chapter doth shew that Protestants do propose farre other kinde of Pastours to vs then the holie Scripture and Catholiks do For the Scripture together with Catholiks teacheth vs that Pastours are perpetuall haue in themselues authoritie to rule the Church that one single Pastour hath power to excommunicate that they haue authoritie to command and make lawes be true rulers of the Church do rule the true Church be to be called Preists cānot be made nor preach without lawfull calling may haue also temporall iurisdiction and finally that Moises was a Preist All which Protestants denie They also shew that Protestants steale from the Pastors of the Church their perpetuitie their authoritie their power to excommunicate in particular their authoritie to command and make lawes their true power of ruling or ruling the true Church their name of Preists and temporall iurisdictiō and finally from Moises his Preisthood And thus much of Pastours now of the Church CHAPTER VII OF THE CHVRCH ART I. WHETHER THE CHVRCH be one SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. I HON 10. v. 16. There shal be made one fould and One Church one Pastor Rom. 12. v. 5. So we being manie are one bodie in Christ Ephes 2. v. 16. That he may reconcile both in one bodie to God by the crosse CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME D. Stapleton Controu 1. quaestion 2. artic 1. The Catholik doctrine is that there is one onely Church which we professe in the Creed PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Whitaker Controu 2. quaest 1. cap. 7. pag 432. There Twoe Churches must needs be one Church of the wicked an other of the good And cap. 14. pag. 453. Where Austin saieth that which we say that there are twoe societies of men in the world that is twoe Churches To the one belonge the predestinate to the other the reprobate Humfrey ad Ration 3. Campiani We haue shewed that This and that Caluin and our Churches put not onely that inuisible Church but also this which is visible and apparent by her notes Morton in Apol. part 1. l. c. 1. The question is whether that Church which in our Creed we beleiue and professe to be one holie and catholik be inuisible and necessarily distinct frō any visible Church Protestants affirme Papists denie And cap. 3. Manie are in the visible Church who haue nothing to doe with the inuisible Therefore there must be admitted some inuisible Church out of which they are distinct from that in which they are Magdeburgenses Centuria 1. l. 2. c. 4. col 171. Christ and Twoe Churches the things themselues teach vs that there are twoe Churches Gesnerus in Compendio doctrinae loco 24. Thē will there be twoe Churches one visible the other inuisible We must needs distinguish betwene the visible congregation of them that are called embrace the Sacraments and professe the pure word of God and betwene the true faithfull and elect Vrsinus in Catechismo p. 343. The militant Church is twoefould visible and inuisible The visible is the companie of those that agree in doctrine hauing manie members dead or not regenerate The inuisihle is the companie of the elect and regenerate Daneus Cont. 4. p. 707. But if this man be of that opinion Twoe Churches that Austin
parte in working But this is wrongly giuen to man that he obeyeth preuenting grace with an attending will Et ib. § 10. It is false that men are drawne willingly Which also he hath in Ioa. 6. v. 44. In Actor 9. v. 5. The Papists attribute the praise of our conuersion He doth not cooperate to Gods grace but in parte onely because they imagin that we cooperate Beza in Confess cap. 4. sect 17. There can be no concurse of Doth not concurre grace and free will when the Spirit of God by his mere grace freeth vs from sinne Pareus l. 6. de Grat. lib. arbit c. 9. God taketh away the ill will and maketh a good In this the Scripture attributeth no operation to the will but mere passion THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely teacheth that a man must prepare his soule prepare his hart turne himselfe from iniquitie make a new hart cleanse and sanctifie himselfe The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely teach that a man doth not cooperate not concurre hath no parte in working is merly and purely passiue in his conuersion is like a block that the conuersion of a sinner is the worke of God alone as the raising of the dead yea that a man in his conuersion actually resisteth and rebelleth against God ART XVI WHETHER AFTER IVSTIFIcation there remayne at anie time any temporall punishment due SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. 2. Reg. 12. vers 14. Nathan saied to Dauid Our Lord hath Dauid punished after he was forgiuen taken away thy sinne thou shalt not die Neuerthelesse because thou hast made the enemies of our Lord to blaspheme for this thing the sonne that is borne to the dying shall die Numbers 20. v. 12. And our Lord saied to Moises and Aaron Also Moises and Aaron Because you haue not beleiued me to sanctifie before the children of Israel you shall not bring in the peoples into the lād which I will giue them Et Gen. 3. v. 17. Punishment is imposed vpō Adam because he had eaten of the forbidden aple and yet it is not doubted but his sinne was forgiuen him CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Councel of Trent Sess 14. c. 8. The Councel declareth that it is altogether false and contrarie to the word of God that the fault is neuer remitted of God but that all the punishment also is pardoned PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Caluin in Luc. 21. v. 43. Away with that naughtie deuise of No punishment after forgiuenesse the retaining of punishment when the fault is remitted In Rom. 4. v. 6. The Scholastiks do fable that the fault being remitted punishment is retained of God Beza in Math. 6. v. 12. It is not onely false but also a fond and foolish opinion of the Sophisters who thinke that punishmēt being retained the fault is remitted Daneus Contr. 6. p. 1204. It is an errour that the fault being remitted any punishment is retained Bullinger de Iustific Serm. 6. What I pray you had Christ Anie temporall punishment cōtrarie to Christs suffrances profited vs if yet punishment temporall were exacted of vs for sinnes Spalatensis l. cont Suarem c. 2. The fault is neuer remitted but the whole punishment is with all pardoned THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely saieth that Dauid was punished with the death of his sonne euen after his sinne was remitted The like it saieth of Moyses Aaron and Adam The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely say that it is false foolish and erroneous to thinke that the fault being remitted anie temporall punishment is retained that Christ had profited vs nothing if anie temporall punishment were exacted of vs for sinne Which is so coūtrarie to Scripture as sometimes Protestants themselues confesse it See lib. 2. c. 30. THE SVMME OF THIS CHAPTER OF iustification Out of that which we haue rehearsed in this chapter clearly appeareth that the Protestants doctrine of Iustification is quite contrarie to the holie Scripture For the Scripture and Catholiks with it teacheth that iustification is of workes and not of faith onely that the iustified are iust indeed and before God that they are cleane and that the sinnes from which they are iustified remaine not in them that there is in them inherent grace or iustice and that it is imputed to them that they are not certaine by infallible faith that they are iustified that pennance goeth before iustification that iustification may be lost and that the iustified ought to feare lest he fall that iustificatiō is not proper to the elect that a sinner cooperateth to his iustification and that sometimes after iustification temporall punishment remaineth All Which Protestants denie It appeareth also that Protestants euen in this matter keepe their ould custome of stealing For they take from iustification the vertue of abolishing sinne in those that are iustified and of making them truely iust and cleane and of giuing them internall iustice and of making that it be imputed to them They take also from it that it can be communicated to the reprobates And thus much of Iustification CHAPTER XVII OF LIFE AND DEATH EVERLASTING ART I. WHETHER LIFE EVERLASTING be a reward SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. MATH 5. v. 12. Be glad and reioyce for your reward Reward in heauen Euerlasting life rendered to vs. is very great in heauen Rom. 2. v. 6. God will render to euerie man according to his workes to them truelie that according to patience in good worke seeke glorie and honour and incorruption life eternall Colossens 3. ver 24. Knowing that you shall receaue of our Heauenlieinheritance a retribution or reward Lord the retribution Beza and the Anglish Bible translated Reward of inheritance CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Councel of Trent Sess 6. c. 16. Euerlasting life is to be proposed to those who worke well to the end and hope in God both as a grace mercifully promised to the childrē of God by Christ Iesus and as a reward and to be faithfully giuē by Gods promise to their good workes and merits PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Perkins in reformed Catholik Contr. 5. p. 110. The kingdome Kingdome of heauen not a reward properly Not a reward or recompēse of heauen is called a reward not properly but by a figure or by resemblance Ministers of Saxonie in Colloq Aldeburg pag. 6. reiect this proposition Life euerlasting is giuen for good workes as a reward or recompense Illyricus in Math. 5. v. 12. The Lord calleth goods to come a Called a reward by abuse reward abusiuely And in Clane part 2. tractat 6. col 545. It vseth to be called sometimes a reward by abuse Gerlachius to 2. disput 26. These guifts do not properly deserue the name of a reward Zuinglius de Prouidentia cap. 6. to 1. These are hyperbols By ouerlashing of speech and ouerlashesse If thou wilt enter into life keepe the commandments Who shall do the will of my father c. and what other promises soeuer haue beene made to workes Et in 2. Cor. 5. to 4. Not
power did open the shut dores The dores were not shut in the very instant of his passing See more art 23. Scripture Hauing a great high preist that hath penetrated Christ penetrated the heauen Not penetrated them Christ praieth for vs. He praieth not for vs. the heauenes Iesus the Sonne of God Protestants Christ ascended without penetration of quantities VVe admit no penetration See art 14. Scripture I will aske the Father VVho also maketh intercession for vs. Protestants VVe may not imagin that Christ as a Suppliant praieth for vs. His death and resurrection are in steed of an eternall intercession See more art 25. CHAPTER IV. OF ANGELS AND SAINTES SCripture And the Angell of our Lord answered and saied O Angels pray for vs. Lord of Hostes how long will thou not haue mercie on Hierusalem Protestants The Scripture teacheth not that Angels pray They pray not We denie that the holie Angels do pray in particular for our necessities See art 4. Scripture And he preuailed against the Angel and was Angels to be praied vnto Not to be praied vnto strenghtned and he wept and besought him Protestants The inuocation of Saints and Angels is impious See art 8. Scripture Our lord opened the eyes of Balaam and he saw the Angels to be bowed vnto Angel standing in the way with a drawne sword and he adored him flat to the ground Protestants We must beware that we nether adore nor worship Not to be bowed vnto Angels He could not fall downe to the Angel without diminishing Gods honour See art 11. Scripture Nether take thou away thy mercie from vs for God to be praied by the names of Saintes Not so to be praied Abraham thy beloued and Isaac thy seruant and Israel the holie one Protestants In the Prophets there is not found anie such inuocation Heare me o God for Abraham God is not to be besought by the names of Saintes See more art 9. Scripture For your selues know how you ought to imitate vs. Saintes to be imitated Not to be imitated God protecteth vs for the Saintes sake Not for their sakes Some Saintes bad power to worke miracles None had such power Santes receaue men into eternall tabernacles They do not receaue Be ye followers of me Protestants These trifles ought not to be sung to the people that they should imitate the Saintes God requireth that we follow his scripture only and not the examples of Saintes See art 12. Scripture I will protect this cittie and saue it for my self and for Dauid my seruant Protestants It is not to be borne that they say through Gods liberalitie and Christs grace the merits of Saints do profit vs to protection See art 10. Scripture And he gaue them power to cure infirmities and to cast out Diuels Protestants God neuer gaue anie man power of working miracles ether mediatly or immediatly See art 16. Scripture Make vnto you freinds of the mammon of iniquitie that when you faile they may receaue you into the eternall tabernacles Protestants VVe must not vnderstand that men shall receaue vs into eternall tabernacles See art 13. Scripture They shal be priests of God and Christ and shall Saints reigne with him reigne with him Protestants The Saints do not reigne with Christ. See art They reigne not with him 16. Scripture And he that shall ouercome and keepe my workes Saintes rule nations vnto the end I will giue him power ouer the nations and he shall rule them with a rodde of yron Protestants It is an errour that Angels or the soules of the They rule them not blessed men are appointed of God to rule and gouerne vs. See art 16. cit CHAPTER V. OF THE SCRIPTVRE OR WORD OF GOD. SCripture Paule according to the wisdome giuen him hath Some things in Scripture are hard written as also in all Epistles speaking in them of these things in which are certaine hard to be vnderstood Protestants Peter saieth not that Paules Epistles are obscure No thing hard no nor that there are some obscure things in Paules Epistles No parte of the Scripture is obscure How can the Scripture be called obscure in anie parte See more art 1. Scripture Iesus began to preach and say Doe pennance for The Ghospel preacheth pennance It preacheth it not the kingdom of heaune is at hand Protestants The Ghospell properly is not a preaching of pennance The Ghospell preacheth not to vs that this or that is to be done or exacteth any thing of vs. See more art 4. Scripture If thou will enter into life keepe the commandments Promiseth life conditionally Protestants The Ghospell promiseth saluation euen to those Not conditionally that haue no good workes at all The Ghospel requireth not workes to saluation See more art 6. Ghospell not contrarie to the law Scripture Doe we then destroie the law by faith God forbid But we establish the law Protestants The Ghospell is truly opposite to the law The law It is contrarie to it aad the Ghospell of themselues wholy fight one with the other See more art 7. Scripture All things must needs be fulfilled which are written Moises law commandeth faith in Christ It commandeth it not Traditions to be kept Not to be kept in the law of Moises and the Prophets and the Psalmes of me Protestants Faith in Christ the law neuer knew The law of Moises commandeth not faith in Christ See more art 8. Scripture Hould the traditions which you haue learnt whether it be by word or by our epistle Protestants VVe care not for vnwritten traditions we acknowledge no word but that which is written See more art 9. CHAPTER VI. OF S. PETER AND THE APOSTLES SCripture Thou art Peter and vpon this rock will I build Church built vpon Peter my Church Protestants Peter is not rock because Christ did not build Not vpon Peter his Church vpon Peter See more art 2. Scripture And I say to thee Thou art Peter And to thee Keyos giuen to Peter I will giue the keyes of the kingdome of heauen Protestants Christ called faith the rock to which rock not to Not giuen to him Peter be gaue these keyâ—s See art 3. Scripture I haue praied for thee Peter that thy faith faile Peters faith failed not It failed not Protestants For a time surely Peters saith failed whiles he denied Christ It is a blasphemous speech that Peter denying Christ did not lese his faith See more art 4. Scripture And the wall of the cittie hauing twelue foundations The Apostles foundations and in them twelue names of the twelue Apostles of the lambe Protestants The Apostles were not the foundations See Not foundations more art 5. Scripture He that heareth you heareth me The Apostles simply to be heard Not simply to be heard Protestants The Apostles be not simply to be heard but to be examined according to the rule of Scripture S. Paules
that are adiudged to eternall punishment Not cause of damnation are not therefore damned because they sinned Onely incredulitie damneth See more art 10. Scripture Euerie one of vs for him selfe shall render account Account is to be giuen of sinnes to God That euerie one may receaue the proper things of the bodie as he hath done ether good or euill Protestants If workes come into iudgment we are all damned Not to be giuen These sinnes shall not come to account before God See more art 11. Scripture reporteth that Dauid saied of him selfe I haue Dauid did ill done ill before thee Protestants Dauid neuer committed sinne The regenerate He did not ill commit noe sinne See more art 12. Scripture reporteth these words of Dauid I am he that Dauid him selfe sinned haue sinned I haue done wickedly Protestants The elect him selfe doth not sinne but sinne that Not him self dwelleth in him The true faithfull or regenerate doth not sinne See more art 13. CHAPTER XVII OF IVSTIFICATION SCripture Abraham was he not iustified by workes Abraham iustified by workes Not by workes Man iustified by workes Not by workes Sinnes forgiuē for loue Not for loue Protestants Abraham was not iustified by his good workes He was iustified by no other thing at all but by faith See art 1. Scripture Doe you see that by workes a man is iustified Protestants We saye they are not iustified by workes we can not be iustified by workes See art 1. cit Scripture Manie sinnes are forgiuen her because she loued much Protestants Not because the woman loued much therefore her sinnes were forgiuen her See art 1. cit Scripture By workes a man is iustified and not by faith Man not iustified by faith onely By faith onely Some iust before God None iust before God onely Protestants We are iustified by faith onely By faith onely we receaue remission of sinnes See more art 2. Scripture They were both iust before God Protestants Before God none is iust none can be iust Where shall anie such iust be found amongst men See more artic 3. Scripture You are cleane The blood of Christ cleanseth vs Some cleane from all sinne Protestants The beleiuers are iust and yet vncleane The None cleane pious man is in him selfe vncleane and filthie See more art 4. Scripture As farre as the East is from the west hath he made Sinnes taken from the iustified Not taken frō them our iniquities farre from vs. There is no iniquitie found in me Protestants In the regenerate there are manie sinnes and great filth Innumerable sinnes euen such as are worthie of death remaine in the regenerate See more art 5. Scripture Before him God iustice hath bene found in me Iustice in mē No iustice in them Protestants There can be no iustice in vs. There is no inherent iustice in the iudgment of God See more 8. Scripture To him that beleiueth in him who iustifieth the Some inherēt thing imputed No inherent thing imputed Men not certaine of grace Certaine impious his faith is reputed to iustice Protestants What is inherent is not imputed See more art 9. Scripture Man knoweth not whether he be worthie of loue or hatred Protestants It is lewednes to say that none can know by certaintie of faith that he hath obtained grace See more artic 10. Scripture Ye are fallen from grace Some fall frō grace None fall frō grace Protestants It is impossible for those that beleiue to fall from grace The elect neuer fall from grace The faithfull neuer fall from the grace of God See more art 12. Scripture Thou by faith doest stand Be not highly wise but VVe must feare feare Protestants That is not to be suffered that they exhort vs VVe must not feare to feare I cannot be damned vnlesse Christ be damned See more art 13. Scripture If the iust man shall turne away him selfe from his Some reprobates iustified Noreprobates iustified Man prepareth his hart He prepareth it not iustice and doe iniquitie in his sinne which he hath sinned in them he shall dye Protestants No reprobate is iustified The elect only repent and doe good workes See more art 14. Scripture It perteineth to a man to prepare the harte Protestants In our conuersion to God we haue our selues wholy passiuely A man is like a blocke in his conuersion See more art 15. CHAPTER XVIII OF EVERLASTING LIFE AND DEATH SCripture Your reward is very great in heauen You shall receaue Saluation a reward or retribution No reward or retribution There is a crowne of iustice No crowne of iustice Faith alone saueth not It saueth Some already suffer the paines of hell None yet suffer the paines of hell Hell a place of torments No place the retribution of inheritance Protestants That he saueth is mere grace not a reward or retribution See more art 1. Scripture There is laied vp for me a crowne of iustice Protestants Paule acknowledgeth nothing in the whole course of saluation but mere grace See more art 2. Scripture Shall faith be able to saue him Protestants Faith alone saueth By faith alone we are saued See more art 3. Scripture As Sodome and Gomorrha and the citties adioyning in like manner hauing fornicated c. were made an example sustaining the paine of eternall fire Protestants It is a false position that the soules suffer in hell before the bodies See more art 6. Scripture Lest they also come into this place of torments Protestants We must not imagin that hell is anie certaine definite and corporall place A locall hell is a fiction See more art 7. Scripture Departe from me ye cursed into fire euerlasting Hell fire true fire Protestants They feigne that the soules of men and diuels Not true fire are tormented in hell with true and corporall fire See more artic 8. CHAPTER XIX OF GODS LAW SCripture My yoke is sweet and my burden light Gods law possible Not possible Some haue kept Gods law None haue kept it Some haue loued God with all their hart None haue loued him so Gods law in the harts of some In the harts of none We pray to fulfill Gods will We pray not so Keeping the cōmandments necessarie to life Not necessarie Protestants The law is impossible to be kept It is impossible to keepe the commandments See more art 1. Scripture I haue kept thy law They haue kept thy word Protestants No man performeth the law or euer performed it See more art 2. Scripture faieth of Iosias He returned to our lord in all his hart and in all his soule and in all his power according to all the law of Moises Protestants There was no Sainte who in this mortall life loued God with all is soule with all his hart with all his power See more art 3. Scripture The law of God in his hart Protestants Euen after regeneration the word of the law is not properly saied to be in
workes workes whereas there is no such God no such Godhead which is delighted with these things And to 7. Serm. in Hebr. 11. God careth not greatly what kind or what notable workes we doe Tindall in Fox his Acts printed 1610. p. 1138. There is no To make water pleaseth God as much as preaching work better then an other to please God To make water to wash dishes to be a sowter or an Apostle all is one To wash dishes and to preach all is one as touching the deed to please God Other Protestants as testifieth Schusselburg to 7. Catal. Haeret. p. 551. Melancthon in Respons ad artic Bauar to 3. and Manlius in locis tit de Eccles saye God careth not for good workes And the same also do they thinke who as we shall relate hereafter saye that before God good workes are mere iniquities filth stench and dung For surely God careth not for such things THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that good workes are a sweet sauour before God are liked of God please God are pleasing before God The like saye Catholiks Protestants expressely teach that God careth not for workes careth not at all for them doth not regard or respect them is not delighted with them careth not what notable workes we doe maketh no accounte of them yea greatly loatheth them that to wash dishes to make water to playe the cobler pleaseth God as well as to be an Apostle ART XIV WHETHER GOD BE WORSHIPED or serued with good workes SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Isaie 19. v. 21. The Egyptians shall know our Lord in that day and shall worshippe him in hostes and in giftes God worshiped by workes Luke v. 2. c. 37. Who departed not from the temple by fastings and praiers seruing night and day CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME D. Stapleton in Ioan. 4. v. 23. Therefore God is so serued inspirit and trueth that as this worshippe doth not exclude the outward acts of pietie and workes of charitie towards our neighbour wherewith we worshippe and serue God in iustice so c. PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Luther delibertate Christiana to 2. fol. 5. For we do not Not glorified by workes glorifie God by working but by beleeuing Ibid. cont Regem Angliae fol. 334. God is serued by faith onely De bonis operibus Not serued by them to 5. fol. 580. Onely faith is the true worshippe of God In c. 1. Ionae to 4. fol. 412. The true God is not serued with workes There is one onely worshippe pleasing to God to will true faith Tindal in Fox before cited God is honoured on all sides in Not worshiped by workes that we count him righteous in all his laws and ordinances and also true in all his promises Other worshippe of God is none except we make an idoll of him Confession of Basil art 13. Faith is the onely true worshippe of God The like saye other Protestants who as we shall see hereafter teach that good works are sinne before God For God is not serued or worshipped with sinne but disserued and dishonored by it THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that God is worshipped and serued with good works The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that God is not glorified by working that God is not serued by works that faith is the onely true worshippe of God that God is serued by onely faith that onely faith is the worshippe of the true God that there is no other worshippe of God but to beleiue him right in all his laws and true in all his promises ART XV. WHETHER GOD DO ACcount those good workes which are not commanded SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Mark 14. v. 3. and 6. There came a woman hauing an alabaster box of ointment of pretious spike-nard and breaking the A worke not commanded good in Gods sight alabaster box she powred it out vpon his head But Iesus saied let her alone why do you molest her She hath wrought a good worke vpon me 1. Corint 7. 25. And as concerning virgins a commandment of our Lord I haue not but counsell I giue CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Card. Bellarmin l. 2. de Monachis c. 16. God is worshipped with euerie act of vertue though not commanded yet done for God PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Confessio Heluet. c. 16. God liketh not workes and worshippes chosen by vs. And Confessio Saxon. c. 17. We teach that works as they say not due are no worshippe of God Luther Postilla in festo S. Ioan. fol. 92. Nothing pleaseth Workes not commanded not pleasing to God God vhich is done without his commandment Melancthon in Disput to 4. p. 602. Works not commanded from heauen are no worhippe of God Caluin 4. Institut c. 13. § 2. All voluntarie worships which we deuise without his commandment are abhominable to God In Rom. 5. v. 19. They dote who vaunte to God of their works deuised by themselues who esteemeth them no more then dung Lobechius in Disput 9. p. 184. Without Gods commandment Nor good a worke though done with neuer so good intention nor forbidden nether is nor can be good THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely affirmeth that S. Magdalens anointing of Christ though not commanded was a good worke gratefull to him that virginitie is good though not commanded The same saye Catholiks Protestants expressely teach that God liketh no worke not commanded by him that no worke not commanded is any worship of God that no worke whatsoeuer not commanded of God is good that what we do without Gods commandment is no more respected of God then dung and is abhominable to him ART XVI WHETHER GOD BE PACIfied with good works SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. 〈…〉 11. and. 13. But Moyses besought the Lord his God pacified by workes God saying why 〈…〉 furie angrie against thy people c. And our lord was pacified 〈…〉 the euill which he had spoken against his people 2. Paralipomen 30. v. 18. and 20. And 〈…〉 for them saying c. Whome our Lord heard and was pacified to the people Psalme 105. v. 30. And Phinees stood and pacified and the slaughter ceased Ezech. 43. v. 27. The preists shall make your holocausts vpon the altar and those which they offer for peace and I will be pacified toward you saieth our lord God CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME D. Stapleton in Matth. 17. v. 21. Diuers examples in Scripture do teach vs the force and power of fasting ioyned with praier for to pacifie God PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Luther in c. 1. Ionae to 4. fol. 411. Papists haue an opinion that God can be pacified with our good workes whē as there is no No God that is pacified by workes where such a God In Galat. 2. to 5. fol. 363. The workes which I do according to Gods law do not pacifie his wrathe but prouoke it Workes prouoke Gods wrath Caluin 4. Inst c. 15. § 4. It is the doctrin of the Scripture that our good works are alwaies stained with
not yea they be not thy freinds Luther Postilla in Dom. 9. post Trinit Nether are they thy freinds but theirs of whome in their life time they receiued benefit Caluin 3. Instit c. 20 § 23. For what Saint is to be thought Take no care of vs. to take care of the safetie of the people Moises giuing it ouer who whiles he liued farre surpassed all others in this point In Luc. 16. vers 19. Here the Papists are fondly subtill whiles they will proue that the dead haue care of the liuing which is a stincking cauill In Zachar. ver 12. We know that the offices of charitie Charitie onely for this life are restrained to the course of this life Which also hath Zuinglius respons ad Luther to 2. fol. 379. Beza in Lucae 15. v. 10. Who can therefore rightly perswade himselfe or others that the Soules of Saints in heauen haue care of those things which are done on earth or that they know theÌ„ and much lesse that they ought to be praied vnto Pareus in Colloq Swal 3. The Scripture denieth that the Care not for our necessities Saints in heauen know and care for our necessities THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely teacheth that charitie neuer falleth away that Hieremie had care of the people after his death The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that the offices of charitie are restrained to this present lâ—fe that Saints in heauen are not our freinds that they haue no care of vs or of our necessities ART VI. WHETHER ANGELS AND Saints heare our praiers and know our affaires SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Tobie 12. vers 12. the Angel saieth When thou didst pray Angels heare our praiers with teares and didst burte the dead and left thy dinner and didst hide the dead by day in thy house and by night didst burie them I offered thy praier to our Lord. Luke 15. vers 10. So I say to you there shal be ioy before the Know our repentance Angels of God vpon one sinner that doth pennance And cap. 16. vers 19. Abraham being dead saieth They haue Moyses and the Prophets Apocal. 4. vers 1. After these things I looked and behould a doore open in heanen and the first voice which I heard was as it were of a trumpet speaking to me saying Come vp hither and I Know things to come will shew thee the things which must be done quickly after these And c. 19. v. 1. and 2. After these things I heard as it is were the voice of many multitudes in heauen saying Alleluia praise and And punishments of the wicked glorie and power is to our God Because true and iust are his iudgements which hath iudged of the great harlot that hath corrupted the eorth in her whordome and hath reuenged the blood of his seruants of her hands CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME C. Bellarm. l. 1. de Sanctis c. 20. It is not true that Saints do not know what we aske of them PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Whitaker ad Ration 4. Campiani It is certaine that the Saints know not what we doe Heare not our praiers Saints do not know what we doe Apologia Confess Augustan c. de Inuocat It cannot be saied that Saints do heare our praier Caluin 3. Instit cap. 20. § 24. Who tould that they haue so long eares that they can stretch them vnto our praiers so quicke eyes that they can perceaue our necessities And in 1. Cor. 13. v. 8. The Saints do not know our estate Beza in 1. Ioan. 2. vers 1. The blessed spirits haue no knowledge of things done here below And l. quaestion respons vol. 1. It is easie to refute as a foolish and grosse fiction that they say that God reuealeth our praiers to the blessed spirits THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that the Angel heard the praier and knew the good deeds of Tobias that the Angels know and reioyce of the pennance of a sinner that Abraham knew of Moises and the Prophets that Saints knew the wickednes of the great harlot and Gods punishment vpon her The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that Saints know not what we doe that they heare not our praiers perceaue not our necessities know not our estate that to say that God reuealeth to them our praiers is a foolish and grosse fiction ART XVII WHETHER ANGELS OR Saints in heauen do offer our praiers to God SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Tobie 12. vers 12. cit the Angel saieth When thou didest Angels offâ—r our praiers to God pray with tears I offered thy praier to our Lord. Apocal. 5. v. 8. And when he had opened the booke the foure beasts and the soure and twentie Seniours fell before the lambe hauing euerie one harpes and goulden vials full of odours which are the praiers of saints And c. 8. v. 3. And an other Angel came and stood before the altar hauing a goulden censar and there were giuen to him manie incenses that he should giue of the praiers of all Saints vpon the altar of gould which is before the throne of God CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Cardin. Bellarmin lib. 1. de Sanctis cap. 16. Caluin intimateth that not onely the Saints but nether the Angels can offer our prayers to God which is against most plaine Scripture PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Willet Controuers 9. quaestion 3. pag. 440. That Saints They offer not vp our praiers should offer vp our speciall praiers and make particuler request for vs to God is no where found in the Scripture but rather the contrarie Reineccius tom 4. Armaturae c. 7. The words of the Angel Tobiae loc cit are spoken after our fashion For there is no need that Angels should offer our praiers to the Lord because God is not farre of Caluin 3. Institut cap. 20. § 20. Christ hauing entred into the Sanctuarie of heauen till the end of the world alone doth offer to God requests of the people which sitteth a farre of in the entrie THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely teacheth that the Angel offered Tobies praier to God that the foure and twentie seniors did offer the praiers of holie men before the lambe that an Angel did offer the praiers of all Saints before the throne of God The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely teach that Angels do not offer our praiers to the Lord that Saints do not offer our speciall praiers to God that Christ onely offereth to God the praiers of the people ART VIII WHETHER ANGELS OR Saints be to be praied vnto SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Genes 48. vers 16. Iacob thus praierh The Angel that Angels praied vnto deliuereth me from all euils blesse these children and be my name called vpon them the names also of my fathers Abraham and Isaac Osee 12. v. 4. And he Iacob preuailed against the Angel Iacob praied an Angel and was strenghned and he wept and besought him Tobie 5. vers 21. And Tobias answering saied well may you walke and
God be in your iourney and his Angel accompanie you Luke 16. ve 24. Christ ether in a historie or in a parable maketh the rich man thus praying Father Abraham haue mercie on me And v. 27. Then Father I beseech the that thou wouldest send c. And nether he nor Abraham condemneth this praier as impious or idolatrous but onely reiecteth it as two late Apocalyps 1. v. 4. 5. S. Ihon thus praieth Grace to you and peace from him that is and that was and shall come and from the seuen spirits which are in the sight of his throne and from Iesus Christ who is the faithfull witnesse CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Councel of Trent Sess 25. c. de Inuocat It is good and profitable humbly to call vpon the Saints that reigne together with Christ PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE The English Articles art 22. The doctrin of the Romanists Saints not to be praied vnto touching inuocation of Saints is a fonde thing vainly deuised In like sorte writeth Confes Heluet cap. 5. Wirtenbergica c. de Inuocat Augustana c. 21. Saxonica c. 22. and Articuli Smalcaldici c. de Inuocat Perkins in Serie causarum cap. 21. The inuocation of the Nor Angels Saints and Angels is much more impious So in reform Cath. pag. 251. Rainolds in his Conference c. 1. sect 2. calleth it a most pestilent basiliske Melancthon in Disput to 4. pa. 531. The inuocation of the dead is manifest idolatrie Beza in 1. Ioan. 2. ver 1. The Soules in heauen of Saints departed this life cannot be inuocated without impietie And lib. quaest resp vol. 1. affirmeth that the inuocation of Angels and dead Saints is impious idolatrie The Like say Protestants commonly THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely teacheth that Iacob made praier to any Angel besought an Angel with teares that Tobie praied an Angel that the rich man inuocated Abraham that S. Ihon praied vnto the seuen spirits which are before the throne of God The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely teach that the inuocation of Angels or Saints is a found thing vainly deuised impious idolatrous and most pestilent ART IX WHETHER GOD BE TO BE praied vnto by the names of Saints SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Exod. 32. ver 11. and 13. But Moises besought the Lord his God praied by names of Saints God saying Remember Abraham Isaac and Israel thy seruants to whome thou swarest by thine owne selfe saying I will multiplie your seed as the starres of heauen Psal 131. v. 10. For Dauid thy seruants sake turne not away the face of thy Christ 2. Paralipomen 6. v. vlt. Remember the mercies of Dauid thy seruant Daniel 6. ver 35. Nether take thou away thy mercie from vs for Abraham thy beloued and Isaac thy seruant and Israel thy holie one CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME C. Bellarm. l. 1. de Sanctis cap. 19. In the ould testament men prayed God and alledged the merits of Saincts which were departed that their praiers might be holpen by them PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Confession of Saxonie c. 22. saieth that in the Prophets Not to be so praied there is not found any such inuocation Heare me O God for Abraham Confession of Bohemia art 2. They teach that God is to be praied and inuocated by the name of Christ onely Caluin 3. Instit c. 20. § 21. In Papistrie God is besought by the names of Saints Ibid. Their merits are obtruded for to purchase Gods good will The like teach commonly all Protestants So Perkins reform Catholik Contr. 14. p. 257. THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely teacheth that Moises praied God by the names of Abraham Isaac and Iacob that Azarias in Daniel did the same that Salomon praied God for Dauids sake and for his mercies The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely teach that there is no such kinde of praier in the Prophets Heare me ô God for Abrahams sake that God is to be praied vnto onely by Christs name that to pray God by the names or merits of Saints is vnlawfull ART X. WHETHER GOD TAKE MERcie on men for the merits of Saints SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMITH 3. Reg. v. 4. But for Dauids sake our Lord his God gaue him a God hath mercie for the Saints sake lampe in Hierusalem that he might raise vp his sonne after him and establish Hierusalem because Dauid had done right in the eies of our Lord. 4. Reg. 19. ver 34. And I will protect this cittie and I will saue it for my selfe and for Dauid my seruant CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME D. Stapleton in Prompt Cathol in Festo Om. Sanctorū The Scripture by manie exāples doth shew the merits of Saints by which the godlie are holpen C. Bellarm. l. 2. de Missa c. 8. We aske mercie of God by the merits and praiers of Saints through the mediation of Christ PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Apologia Confess Augustan c. de Inuoc We thinke that we ought not to trust that the merits of Saints are applied vnto vs that for them God is reconciled to vs. Whitaker l. 9. cont Dur. sect 38. We know that you are God hath not mercie for the Saints sake blasphemous and iniurious to Christ who pray to Saints that their merits may helpe you Caluin 3. Instit c. 20. § 21. In Papistrie Now and then the merits of Saints are obtruded for to get Gods good will De vera reform p. 339. It is not to be borne that which they say that through Gods liberalitie and Christs grace merits of Saints do profit vs for protection and obtayning of fauour Perkins ref Cathol Cōtr. 14. p. 266. We vtterlie denie that we are helped by merits of Saints ether liuing or departed THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely teacheth that God did good to Abias Dauids great graundchild for Dauids sake and because Dauid had done right in Gods sight that is for the good deeds or merits of Dauid that he protected Hierusalem for himselfe and for Dauid The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely teach that God is not reconciled vnto vs for the merits of Saints that it is blasphemous to say that the merits of Saints do helpe vs that they profit vs not ether for protection or obtayning of fauour ART XI WHETHER ANGELS OR SAINTS are to be worshipped with the bowing of our bodie SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Gen. 19. v. 1. And the twoe Angels came to Sodom at euen and Lot sitting in the gates of the cittie who when he had seene Angels Worshipped them rose vp and went to meete them and adored prostrate on the ground and saied I beseech you my Lords turne into the house of your seruant Numbers 22. v. 31. Forewith our Lord opened the eyes of Balaam and he saw the Angel standing in the way with a drawne sword and he adored him flat to the ground Iosue 5. v. 13. When Iosue had seene an Angel and asked him who he was and the Angel had answered I am a Prince of the hoaste of our Lord Iosue fell flat to the
ground and adoring saied c. CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Councel of Trent Sess 25. By the Images which we kisse and to which we put of our hatts we worshippe the Saints whose images they are PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Confessio Mulhusnia art 10. We dislike the veneration Not to be worshipped of Saints And Heluet. c. 5. We nether adore nor worshippe nor inuocate the Saints in heauen Perkins reform Cathol Controu 14. c. 2. p. 249. Because No not with ciuill worshippe Angels appeare not now as in former times not so much as ciuill adoratiō in anie bodilie gesture is to be done vnto them We denie that anie ciuill worshippe in bending of the knee or prostrating of the bodie is to be giuen to the Saints Humfrey ad Ration 3. Campiani pag. 263. Vigilantius tought that Saints are not to be reuerenced nor that we ought Not to be reuerenced superstitiously to runne to their monuments We say the same Whitaker Contr. 2. q. 6. c. 3. Papists worshippe Angels and the Saints Luther postilla in Domin 23. post Trinit For what other was the worshippe and reuerence of Saints but a diuelish thing Caluin 1. Instit c. 12. § 3. He could not fall downe to the Angel without diminishing of Gods glorie Bullinger Decad. 4. form 9. We must be ware that we nether adore inuocate or worshippe Angels The same say Protestants commonly THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely teacheth that Lot seing Angels adored prostrate on the ground that Iosue hearing of an Angel that he was a Prince of Gods hoaste fell flat on the groūd and adored that Balaam adored flat to the ground an Angel and yet was not reprehended therefore ether of the Angel or of the Scripture Catholiks say the same Protestants expressely teach that it is not lawfull to reuerence venerate adore worshippe or bow to the Angels or Saints but it is a diuelish thing And yet Luther himselfe thus writeth epist ad Erphurdienses tom 7. fol. 500. I do not thinke that they are to be reiected or condemned who whorshippe Saints without presuming trust For whatsoeuer they doe to Saints they do to Christ. Nether can it be but Christ is partaker of the honour which is giuen to Saints ART XII WHETHER SAINTS BE TO be imitated of vs SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. 1. Cor. 11. v. 1. Be ye followers of me as I also of Christ Philippen 3. ver 17. Be followers of me brethren and obserue Saints to be imitated and followed them that walke so as you haue our forme 2. Thessalon 3. v. 7. For your selues know how you ought to imitate vs. Hebr. 13. v. 7. Remember your Prelats who haue spoaken the word of God to you the end of whose conuersation beholding imitate their faith CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME D. Stapleton in Lucae 9. v. 54. The faithfull Christians piously and carefully imitate the examples of the holie Fathers PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Luther Postilla in Festo S. Ioann fol. 378. These trifles Saints not to be imitated or followed ought not be sung vnto the people out of the pulpits in preaching that they should imitate the Saints and follow their footesteppes And in ferijs eiusdem fol. 91. An ould error hath gotten possession and force that we all looke vpon the deeds and liues of Saints and endeauour to follow them thinking like fooles that this is a great pietie The way of the Lord admitteth not examples of Saints but in all things expecteth the commandments of the Lord onely In die Epiphaniae fol. 130. God Nor their examples requireth that we follow his onely Scripture and not the examples of Saints THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely teacheth that we must follow Saints and imitate them Catholiks say the same Protestants expressely teach that Saints are not to be imitated or followed their examples not to be admitted that it is an errour to looke vpon the liues of Saints and follow them ART XIII WHETHER HOLIE MEN receaue vs into euerlasting tabernacles SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Luc. 16. v. 9. And I say vnto you Make vnto you friends of Holie men receaue vs into Heauen the mammon of iniquitie that when you faile they may receaue you into the eternall tabernacles CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME D. Stapleton in Lucae 16. ver 9. Christ teacheth that they to whome we haue done good do receaue vs into eternall tabernacles that is Christ for thē not onely by reason of the good worke but also for their praiers giueth vs life euerlasting PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Luther postilla in Dom. 9. post Trinit fol. 107. We must They receaue vs not into Heauen not vnderstand that men shall receaue vs into eternall tabernacles Illyricus in Claue part 2. tractar 6. Pore men are saied to receaue their benefactours into eternall tabernacles whereas this is the deed of the Father alone for the merit of his Sonne Caluin in Lucae 16. vers 9. citat He meaneth not that we must get patrons and intreatours who by their protection may sheild and defend vs. But they do fondely and absurdly who hereupon gather that we are holpen by the praiers or suffrages of the dead THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely teacheth that holie men to whome we haue done good do receaue vs into eternall tabernacles The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely teach that no men receaue vs into eternall tabernacles that that is the deed of the Father alone that we are not to get patrons or intreatours for vs. ART XIV WHETHER ANIE SAINT may be called our hope SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. 1. Thessalon 2. v. 18. For what is our hope or ioy or crowne Saints called our hope of glorie Are not you before our Lord Iesus in his coming For you are our glorie and ioy Ihon 5. v. 45. Thinke not that I will accuse you to the Father there is that accuseth you Moises in whome you trust CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME C. Bellarm. l. 1. de bonis oper in part c. 15. The B. Virgin is called our hope because after God we trust especially in her intercession PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Caluin in Cōfes p. 109. Many kinds of praiers were brought Not to be so called in which had horrible blasphemies as when the Virgin is termed of infidels the gate of saluation our hope Beza in Ioan. 2. v. 5. Idolatrie hath so farre preuailed that they are not ashamed to call Marie the Queene of heauen their hope and saluation P. Martyr in 1. Cor. c. 3. They call the B. Virgin their hope as if they would put their hope in a creature Pareus in Colloq 3. Swal You salute Marie by the Title of your hope Which salutation tendeth to the dishonour of God THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that the Thessalonians were the hope ioy and crowne of glorie of the Apostle before our Lord that the Iews did trust in Moises and yet were not reprehended therefore Catholiks say the like Protestants expressely say that it tendeth to the dishonour of
threats of death vnder the onely condition of incredulitie Those promises and threats alone are proper to the Ghospell and Euangelicall all others are mixt partely euangelicall partely legall THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely teacheth that if we will enter into life we must keepe the commandements that patience is necessarie for to receaue the promise that without holines no man shall see God that to be baptized and to eate the flesh of Christ is necessarie to life that vnlesse we haue pennance we shall perish that if we liue according to the flesh we shall die The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely teach that the Ghospell promiseth saluation euen to those that haue no good works at all that it requireth no good workes to saluation offereth life without condition of anie worke that the promises of the Ghospell are absolute in respect of workes are not conditionall that the Ghosdell requireth onely the acceptance of the thing offered requireth onely beleife to life onely the condition of faith Which are so contrarie to Scripture as some times the Protestants themselues confesse it See lib. 2. c. 30. ART VII WHETHER THE GHOSPELL be contrarie to the law SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY DENIETH. Rom. 3. v. 31. Do we then destroie the law by faith God forbidde The Ghospell not contrarie to the law but we do establish the law Gal. 3. v. 21. Was the law then against the promises of God God forbidde Mathew 5. vers 18. Do not thinke that I am come to break the law or the Prophet I am not come to breake but to fulfill CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY DENIE S. Thomas 1. 2. quaest 17. art 3. Something is contained in an other by power as the whole tree is contained in the seed and after this manner the new law is contained in the ould PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Confessio Heluet. c. 13. The Ghospell truely is opposite to It is cōtrarie to the law the law For the law worketh wrath and denounceth maledictiō the Ghospell preacheth grace and benediction Illyricus in Sacrae Scripturae part 2. tract 1. eol 10. There are twoe kinds of doctrins the law and the Ghospell and they of themselues and of their nature truely contrarie Col. 11. This surely is the key of all the Scripture and Diuinitie to know that in Twoe maie◠to heauen those contrarie it is cōtained a twofould kind of doctrine and a double way of saluation which are of themselues plainly contrarie the one to the other Col. 39. The law and the Ghospell of themselues wholy fight one with the other These doctrins fight but the law being the inferiour yeeldeth to the Ghospell the superiour and so the one contradictorie falling the other obideth true And Tract 6. col 547. 551. he saieth that the Ghospell correcteth the law Luther in Gal 4. f. 373. Let the godlie learne that Christ and the law are twoe contrarie all together incompatible Scusselburg tom 7. Catal. Haeret. p. 446. True it is Entire and perfect obedience is necessarie to saluation for the Lord himselfe hath saied If thou wilt enter into life keepe the commandments But contrariwise there is full power giuen to me to Protestants mittigate the rigour of the law interprete or mitigate this rigour Wherefore I interprete and mitigate it thus Perfect obedience is necessarie to one that is to be saued to wit ether his owne or an other mans And p. 446. saieth that the Ghospell correcteth and amendeth the sayings of the law Caluin 2. Instit c. 9. § 4. Paul maketh the iustice of the law and the Ghospell contrarie one to the other Vallada in Apolog. cont Episcop Luzon c. 30. Luther speaketh not simply of Moises but of Moises opposite to Iesus Christ that is of the law opposite to the Ghospel And seing al Protestants thinke that the doctrin of the law is this Our keeping of the law is necessarie to saluation and the doctrine of the Ghospell this Our keeping of the law is not necessarie to saluation they must needs all say that the doctrine of the Ghospell is quite contrarie or contradictorie to the doctrine of the law Whereupon Beza de Praedest cont Castel vol. 1. p. 393. writeth in this sorte These are contrarie vnlesse you doe all these things you shall die and Albeit you do them not yet if you beleiue you shall liue Whereof the first they say is the doctrine of the law the second of the Ghospell THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that the faith of the Ghospell doth not destroie but establish the law that Gods promises are not against the law that Christ came not to breake the law The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that the Ghospell is truely opposite to the law that the law and Ghospell are twoe doctrins of their nature truely contrarie plainly contrarie and fight one with the other that the Ghospell correcteth the law that the iustice of the law and of the Ghospell is contrarie one to the other and that this is the key of all Protestant diuinitie and that Protestants haue full power to mittigate the rigour of Gods law Which are so contrarie to Scripture as Protestants some times confesse it See l. 2. c. 30. ART VIII WHETHER THE LAW OF Moyses did command faith in Christ SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Ihon 1. v. 45. Him whome Moises in the law and the Prophets Moises in the law wrote of Christ wrote of we haue found Iesus the sonne of Ioseph of Nazareth c. 5. v. 45. For if you did beleiue Moises you would perhaps beleiue me also For of me he hath written Luc. 24. v. 27. And beginning from Moyses and all the Prophets Written of Christ in the law he did interprete to them in all the Scriptures the things that were concerning him And v. 44. All things must needs be fulfilled which are written in the law of Moises and the Prophets and the Psalmes of me Act. 3. v. 22. Moises indeed saied That a Prophet shall the Lord your God raise vp to you of your brethren as my selfe Him Moises commanded to beare Christ you shall heare according to all things whatsoeuer he shall speake to you c. 26. v. 23. Saying nothing besides those things which the Prophets did speake should come to passe and Moises if Christ were passible c. See c. 28. v. 23. CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME C. Bellarm. lib. 4. Iustif c. 4. Euerie where in the Ghospell we read that diuers misteries were fulfilled in Christ because it was so written in the law and Prophets PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Perkins in Gal. 3. to 2. The Ghospell requireth faith in Christ The law knew not Christ The law of Moises commanded not faith in Christ The law teacheth not faith in Christ the Mediatour God and man which faith the law neuer knew Pareus l. 1. de Iustif c. 16. Faith is no worke of the law for the law of Moises commandeth not faith in Christ And l. 2. c. 4. The law knoweth nothing
of faith in Christ of iustifying faith of faith of remission of sinnes The like hath Ambing apud Hospin in Concord discordi fol. 140. Beza de Praedest cont Caste l. vol. 1. p. 393. There is no mētion in the law of this benefit of free redemption by Christ For the declaratiō of this will belongeth to an other parte of Gods word which is called the Ghospell Apol. Cōf. Augustan c. de Iustific The Ghospell preacheth iustice of faith in Christ which the law doth not teach THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that Moises wrote in the law of Christ that Moises wrote things concerning Christ That Moise commanded the people to heare Christ in all things The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that the law neuer knew faith in Christ that Moises cōmandeth not faith in Christ that the law knoweth nothing of faith in Christ that in the law there is no mention of free redemption in Christ that the law teacheth nothing of faith in Christ ART IX WHETHER ANY VNWRITTEN word or Traditions be to be kept SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. 2. Thessal 2. v. 15. Therefore brethren stand and hould the traditions Traditions not written to be helde which you haue learned whether it be by word or by our epistle CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Coūcell of Trent Sess 4. The holie Coūcell doth with equall pious affection reuerently receaue and honour traditions belonging to faith or manners as ether deliuered by Christs mouth or the holie Ghost and by continuall succession conserued in the Catholik Church PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Whitaker Cont. 1. q. 3. cap. 10. We care not for vnwritten Not to be helde traditions And Contro 2. q. 5. c. 18. We acknowledge no other word then that which is written And what doctrine soeuer is not written we hould for bastard doctrine Perkins in Cathol ref Contr. 20. c. 2. We acknowledge the onely written word of God Luther Postil in ferias S. Stephani Nothing is to be affirmed Nothing but that which is expressed in Scripture which is not expressed in Scripture Iacobus Andreae l. cont Hosium p. 169. That faith is no faith but an vncertain opinion which is not grounded vpon an expresse testimonie of Scripture Wigand apud Scusselb to 7. Catal. Haeret. p. 681. Onely those doctrines whose very words or equiualent for sense are extant in the Scripture are to be tought and deliuered in the Church Caluin in Gratulat ad Praecentorem pag. 377. Nothing is to be beleiued which is not expressed in Scripture And cont versipellem pagin 353. There is no mention of vnwritten traditions Beza in Rom. 1. v. 17. Christians acknowledge no other object of this faith then the written word of God Etad Reprehens Castell p. 503. Whosoeuer beleiueth in doctrine of religion that which is not written I say he embraceth opinion for faith and an idol for God Vallada in Apol. cont Episc Luzon c. 13. In all the holie No speech of an vnwritten word Scripture there is no speech of an vnwritten word Daneus Controu 7. pag. 1350. The foundation of Christian faith is one onely to wit the word of God and that onely written Hospinian part 2. Histor Sacram. fol. 23. The Magistrates of Zurich commāded that hereafter nothing should be proposed or preached in their Church but the pure fined word of God contained in the bookes of the Prophets and Apostles THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely teacheth that traditions as well they which are learned by word as they which are learned by writing are to be obserued Catholiks teach the same Protestants expressely teach that onely written doctrin is to be tought nothing to be beleiued but what is written onely the pure fined written word to be tought no obiect of faith but what is written nothing to be beleiued but what is expressed in Scripture and that in verie words or in equiualent sense that there is no mention of vnwritten traditions no speech of vnwritten word that they care not for vnwritten traditions A SVMME OF THIS CHAPTER OF THE WORD of God or Scripture What we haue rehearsed in this chapter doth clearly shew that Protestants do farre otherwise iudge of Scripture then the Scripture it selfe and Catholiks doe For the holie Scripture together with Catholiks teacheth that in it are some things hard to be vnderstood that it cannot be vnderstood without the light of the holie Ghost that the Ghospell is or containeth a law that it doth preach pennance and good workes reproueth sinne promiseth saluation vnder condition of good workes and is not contrarie vnto the law of God that the law of Moises commandeth faith in Christ and that vnwritten traditions are to be obserued And Protestants defend all the contrarie They shew also that Protestants steale from the Scripture Protestants steale from Scripture her excellencie wherewith she surpasseth the capacitie of mans wit and from the Ghospell that it containeth any law preacheth pennance or good workes reproueth sinne promiseth saluation vpon condition of well doing and agreement with Gods law whereby we see what a libertin Ghospell they bring in to wit such as containeth Libertin Ghospell of Protestants no law preacheth no pennance or good workes reproueth no sinne promiseth saluation without all condition of well doing and is quite contrarie to the law of God And that they steall from the law of Moises that it commandeth faith in Christ and finally they take away all the vnwritten word of God CHAPTER V. OF SAINT PETER AND THE APOSTLES ART I. WHETHER S. PETER WERE first of the Apostles SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. MATHEW 10. v. 2. And the names of the twelue S. Peter first of the Apostles Apostles be these The first Simon who is called Peter CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME C. Bellarm. l. 1. de Pontif. c. 18. Peter was put first by reason his dignitie PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Whitaker Contr. 3. q. 5. c. 3. Wheresoeuer mention is made Not first of Peter if we looke well into the place we shall find that nothing is giuen to him which agreeth not to the other Apostles And Controu 4. quaest 2. c. Paul maketh himselfe equall to Peter in all points Tindal in Fox his Acts p. 1139. S. Paul is greater then Peter by the testimonie of Christ Articuli Smalcaldici pag. 345. We giue no prerogatiue to Peter Luther in Gal. 2. to 5. This place clearely sheweth that all the Apostles had equall vocation and commission There was altogether equalitie amongst them no Apostle was greater then an other Illyricus in Praefat. lib. de Sectis It appeareth that Christ gaue no primacie at all in his Church to any man Caluinus in Matth. 20. v. 25. Christ shewed that in his kingdome No primacie or firstnesse there was no primacie for which they contended Beza in Matth. 10. v. 2. What if this word First were added of some who would establish Peters primacie Festus Homius disput 12. All the Apostles were equall in dignitie authoritie
sect 8. In all these things the Apostles did alledge their testimonie and themselues also as witnesses of that trueth which they tought And l. 3. sect 3. The Apostles were witnesses of their doctrine and they gaue authoritie to their doctrine See him Cont. 4. l. 8. c. 9. PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Whitaker Controu 1. q. 3. c. 11. God alone is a sufficient witnesse None but God is a sufficient witnesse of himselfe And l. 3. de Scriptura c. 13. sect 3. The people did not beleiue Moises for himselfe but for that diuine and great miracle Beleife was giuen to Moises and Paul not for themselues but for Gods authoritie which appeared in their ministerie And ib. sect 1. The testimonie of the Church as of the Church is but humane And Contr. 1. q. 3. c. 11. cit The iudgment of the Church is humane The same followeth euidently of that which they saied in the former article For if the Apostles doctrine must be examined it is manifest that they are not sufficient witnesses of their doctrine The same Whitaker Contr. 2. q. 4. c. 3. Yea after Christs Not the Apostles ascension and that descent of the Holie Ghost vpon the Apostles manifest it is that the whole Church erred about the vocation of the Gentils and not the vulgar Christians onely but euen the very Apostles and Doctors These were great errours and yet we see that they were in the Apostles euen after the Holie Ghost had descended vpon them THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely affirmeth that the Apostles had the holie Ghost giuen them to testifie of Christ that they were ioyned with the holie Ghost witnesses of Christ that they were witnesses appointed of God that their testimonie is true that all may beleiue through Saint Ihon that the faithfull beleiued God and Moyses The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that none but God is a sufficient witnesse of the trueth that nether Paul nor Moises were to be beleiued for themselues that the testimonie of the Church is but humane That the Apostles erred and that greatly euen after the holie Ghost had descended vpon them ART VIII WHETHER THE APOSTLES learnt anie point of Christian doctrine after Christs ascension SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Ihon 16. v. 12. Yet manie things I haue to say to you but you The Apostles learnt some thing after Christ cannot beare them now but when he the Spirit of trueth cometh he shall teach you all trueth CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME D. Stapleton in Ioan. 16. v. 12. By this testimonie is clearly proued that Christ tought not all by word of mouth but that both the Apostles and the Church learnt many things of the Holie Ghost PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Whitaker Contr. 1. q. 6. c. 10. The holie Ghost did suggest no They learnt nothing other things then those which Christ had tought Caluin in Ioan. 14. vers 26. Marke what all these things are which he promiseth that he Spirit shall teach He saieth He shall suggest or bring to mind whatsoeuer I haue saied Whence it followeth that he shall not be a coyner of new reuelations And 4. Institut c. 8. § 8. That limitation is carefully to be noted where he appointeth the holie Ghost his office to suggest whatsoeuer he had tought by worde of mouth Beza in Ioan. 14. v. 26. The Apostles nether learnt nor tought any point of Christian and sauing doctrine after the departure of the Lord. THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that manie things were tould to the Apostles which they could not beare in Christs time that the holie Ghost was to be sent to teach them all trueth The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely teach that the Apostles learnt no point of Christian doctrine after Christs departure that the Holie Ghost reuealed no new thing to them that he suggested no other thing then Christ had tought ART IX WHETHER IVDAS WAS TRVELY a disciple or in the true Church of Christ SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Matth. 10. v. 1. seq And hauing called his twelue disciples Iudas was truely a disciple of Christ together he gaue them c. And the names of the twelue Apostles be these The first Simon who is called Peter and Iudas Iscariot who also betrayed him Et c. 20. v. 14. 47. Marc. 14. v. 10. 43. Luc. 22. v. 3. 47. he is called one of the twelue Ihon 12. v. 14. One therefore of his disciples Iudas Iscariot Actes 1. v. 17. Iudas who was the captaine of them that apprehended Iesus who was numbred among vs and obtained the lot of this ministerie v. 25. Shew of these twoe one whome thou hast chosen to take the place of this ministerie and Apostleship from the which Iudas hath preuaricated And the lot fell vpon Mathias and he was numbred with the eleuen Apostles CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Card. Bellarm. l. 3. de Eccles c. 7. Iudas was once of the true Church for he was an Apostle one of the twelue and called a Bishop of the Prophet Dauid psal 108. Which could not be true vnlesse he had beene of the Church PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Whitaker Controu 2. q. 1. cap. 7. I answere that the reprobate Iudas neuer of the Catholik Church Iudas was neuer of the true Catholik Church He held for a time a principall place in the outward societie of the Church because he was an Apostle but this made him not of the true Catholik Church But how he was one of the Apostles Austin telleth Tract 61. in Ioan. That how he was one in number not in merit Neuer an Apostle indeed Neuer true member of the Church are in shew not in vertue But what is in shew seemeth to be but is not indeed Daneus Controu 4. c. 2. Iudas Iscariot and Simon Magus were neuer true members of the true Church of God Of the same opinion are Protestants commonly who denie that anie reprobate can be in the true Church as we shall see hereafter c. 8. THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that Iudas was one of Christs disciples one of the twelue Apostles was numbred amongst them obtained the lot of their ministerie had the place of Apostleship which S. Mathias afterwards had The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that Iudas was neuer of the true Catholik Church seemed to be one of the Apostles but was not indeed ART X. WHETHER IVDAS WAS a Bishop SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Actes 1. v. 20. For it is written in the booke of psalmes Be Iudas was a Bishop their habitation made desert and be there none that dwell in it and his Iudas Bishoprick let an other take CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY DENIE C. Bellarm. cited in the former article Iudas is called a Bishop of the Prophet Dauid PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Whitaker Cont. 2. q. 1. c. 7. Iudas was an Apostle therefore no He was no Bishop Bishop because the Apostles were no Bishops The same say other Protestants who denie that the Apostles were
are to be had and kept especially in Churches PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Iuel art 14. sect 2. The Iewes had no manner of Image nether painted nor grauen in their temples Luther in Deuteron 7. to 3. I do not much loue images and would they were not in Churches Zuinglius l. de ver fals relig c. de Statuis Images must Not in tēples be taken out of Churches Sadeel ad Art 59. Abiurat God abhorreth images Peter Martyr in locis tit de Cult Imaginum § 22. We must not suffer that Images be had in Churches And in this point the Protestants doctrine is well enough knowne by their deeds yea some of them goe so farre as they denie that we may paint any Images of Christ or the Saints For thus saieth Leo Iudae in Zuinglius to 2. f. 627. If Christ and his Saints be in heauen it is wickednes euen to make their images With whome agreeth Zuinglius ib. 630. Hoffman also ib. f. 631. saieth That good man thinketh that images may be kept and suffered so that none do adore or worshippe thē But this opinion is contrarie to the testimonies of Scripture wherein the Lord commandeth that we shall not make them The same intimateth Confessio Heluet. c. 4. THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that God commanded twoe Images of Angels to be made and put in the Oracle that Salomon made twoe others and put them in the middest of the inner temple The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that God abhorreth images that they are not to be suffered in Churches no that the Images of Christ and his Saintes are to be made that the Iewes had no manner of Images in their temple ART IV. WHETHER THE HEATHENS or Idolaters did thinke their Idols to be Gods SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Exod 32. v. 8. God himselfe thus speaketh vnto Moises They haue made to themselues a molten calfe and haue adored and immolating hostes vnto it haue saied These are thy Gods Israel that haue brought thee out of the land of Egypt Actes 19. v. 26. Demetrius a Heathen hath these words Heathens thought theirs Idols to be Gods Sirs you see and heare that this same Paul by persuasion hath auerted a great multitude not onely of Ephesus but almost of all Asia saying That they are no Gods which be made by hands CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME C. Bellarm. l. 2. de Imagin c. 13. It is false that the Heathens did not thinke the idols to be Gods PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Caluin 1. Instit c. 11. § 9. Nether are the Heathēs to be thought They thought not so to haue beene so blockish as that they knew not that God was an other thing then stones and stockes Daneus Controuer 7. p. 1394. It is a lie that the Heathens did beleiue the Images of their Gods to haue beene their Gods themselues Zuinglius in Resp ad Valentin to 1. f. 247. The Heathens did no more account their Idols to be Gods then now we vse to account of our Images The like say Peter Martyr Controu Gardiner col 396. and Sadeel ad art 59. abiurat THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely teacheth that the idolaters did say that their molten calfe was their God that Demetrius a Heathen reprehēded S. Paul because he tought that they were no Gods which were made by mens hands The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely say that the Heathēs did not thinke stocks or stones to be their Gods that it is a lie that they thought the images of their Gods to be Gods themselues And yet these men who against the plaine testimonie of Scripture do defend the Heathens do accuse the Catholiks that they make Images their God THE SVMME OF THIS CHAPTER OF TEMPLES or materiall Churches Out of that which we haue rehearsed in this Chapter it appeareth that Protestants haue other kind of temples then the Scripture and Catholiks haue For the Scripture and Catholiks teach that temples or Churches are also for priuat praier that they are to be adorned and that images of Angels or Saintes are to be put in them all which Protestants denie and consequently they robe the Churches of one of their ends for which they are instituted and of their ornaments and holie Images CHAPTER IX OF BAPTISME ART I. WHETHER WATER BE necessarie to Baptisme SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. I HON 3. v. 5. Vnlesse a man be borne againe of Water necessarie to baptisme water and the Spirit he cannot enter into the kingdome of God Ephes 5. v. 26. As Christ also loued the Church deliuered himselfe for it that he might sanctifie it cleansing it by the lauer of water in the word CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Councel of Trent sess 7. com 2. If anie say that true and naturall water is not necessarie to baptisme be he accursed PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Beza Epistola 2. vol. 3. Theol. Though water be wanting if Not necessarie the baptisme of one cannot nor ought to be differred with edification surely I would as well baptize with any other liquor as with water Polanus in Sylloge Thes part 2. p. 556. The externall and sensible matter of baptisme is water and that wanting an other liquor proportionable Festus Homius in Disput 45. We do not greatly denie but where no water can be had there some other liquor which hath the some vse that water hath and is very proportionable thereto may be vsed in the place thereof Vorstius in Antibellarm p. 367. Bellarmin and his do more restraine this essence of baptisme then our men are wonte to doe Whiles he auoucheth that pure water and that solemne forme In the name of the Father c. is simply in all places and times precisely necessarie Agayne Extraordinarily and in some most rare and vnusuall cases we do not deny but that some other kind of liquor which hath the same vse that water hath may be vsed The same teacheth Luther in Colloq Mensal cap. 15. and Riuet iudgeth it probable tractat 3. sect 3. Nether is it disliked by Saddel ad Artic. abiurat 11. CONFERENCE OF THE FORESAIED WORDS Scripture plainely saieth that vnlesse one be borne againe of water he cannot enter into the kingdome of heauen that Christ cleanseth his Church with the lauer of water The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely say that water is not simply necessarie that extraordinarily and in case of necessitie one may baptize in other liquor as well as in water that where water wanteth an other liquor proportionable may suffice Which is so euident a contradiction of Scripture as Protestants themselues sometimes confesse it See lib. 2. cap. 30. ART II. WHETHER INVOCATION of the holie Trinitie be necessarie in baptisme SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Matthew 28. ver 19. Going teach ye all nations baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Sonne and of the Holie Ghost CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Catechismus ad Parochos cap. de baptismo Pastors shall teach that this is the perfect and absolute
Church there is Sacrifice and offering of a cleane oblation and Sacrifice in iustice The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that there is no more Sacrifice in the Church And yet Whitaker Controu 3. quaest 6. pag. 2. 615. writeth thus Without Preisthood there is no Church And Vallada Apologia cont Episcop Luzon c. 26. No man denieth but the celebration of the Eucharist is a true Sacrifice ART XII WHETHER THERE BE AN altar in the Church SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Hebrewâ— 13. v. 10. We haue an altar whereof they haue no Christians haue an altar power to eate which serue the tabernacle Isaie 19. ver 10. In that day there shal be an altar of our Lord in the middest of the land of Egypte and a title of our Lord to the border thereof CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Councel of Trent Sess 24. c. 1. The Apostle Paul writing to the Corinthians when he saieth that they who are polluted with participation of the table of Diuels cannot be made partakers of the Table of our Lord by a table in both places vnderstandeth an altar PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Caluin in 1. Corinth 9. vers 19. There are no altars to They haue noÌ„â—â—tar sacrifice Beza in Colloq Montisbel p. 350. Paul maketh mention Paul speaketh not of an altar of a table of the Lord and not of an altar Ad Repetit Sanctis c. 4. I confesse there is no altar in the Christian Church And l. Quaest Resp vol. 3. In the Apostolicall writings there is no mention of an altar but onely of a table of the Lord. Peter Martyr in Rom. 11. Altars haue no place in the time of the Ghospel Herein also the Protestants doctrine is well knowne THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely saieth that we haue an altar The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely say that we haue no altar that Paul maketh no mention of an altar that there is no mention of an altar in the writings of the Apostles ART XIII WHETHER THE PASCHAL lambe was sacrificed SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Marc. 14. v. 12. And the first day of the Azimes when they Pascal lambe sacrificed sacrificed the Pasche Exod. 12. ver 6. And the whole multitude of the children of Israel shall sacrifice him Pascal lambe at euen CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Councel of Trent Sess 24. c. 1. The multitude of the children of Israel did sacrifice the ould Pasche in remembrance of their going out of Egypt PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Perkins in Cathol reform Controu 11. c. 5. The Paschal No sacrifice lambe was a sacrament but no sacrifice The same hath Plessie l. 2. de Missa c. 2. Reineccius to 4. Armaturae c. 19. The holie Bible no where Not sacrificed teacheth that the Paschal lambe was immolated and sacrificed Tilenus in Syntagmate c. 64. We do not graunt that the Paschal lambe was a sacrifice properly called yea Moises expressely denieth that it was a sacrifice Pareus in Colloq Theol. 9. disput 27. The Minor is false That the Paschal lambe was a sacrifice properly called Beza in Marci 14. v. 12. I vsed the word of Killing rather then of Sacrificing that the domesticall bankets of the Pasche might be distinguished from those Sacrifices which in the temple were done of the Preists THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that the Paschal lambe was sacrificed Catholiks say the same Protestants expressely say that it was not sacrificed that it was no proper sacrifice that it was a domesticall banket that Moises expressely denieth it to be a Sacrifice Which is so repugnant to Scripture as same Protestants confesse it See lib. 2. c. 30. THE SVMME OF THIS CHAPTER OF the Eucharist Out of all which hath beene rehearsed in this chapter it is cleare how different an Eucharist Protestants haue from that which the holie Scripture proposeth For the Scripture and Catholiks with it teacheth that the holie Eucharist is the true bodie and blood of Christ that it is his testament that Christs flesh is to be eaten that whilest the Eucharist was instituted Christs bodie was giuen and his blood shedde for vs that the chalice was shedde in remission of sinnes that bread is a necessarie matter of the Eucharist that vnleauened bread is a couenient matter and that we must prepare our selues to receaue the Eucharist Moreouer the Scripture teacheth that there is a Sacrifice and altar in the Church and that the Paschal lambe which was a figure of the Eucharist was sacrificed all which Protestants do denie It is cleare also that Protestants do steale from the What Protest steale from the Eucharist Eucharist the trueth of the bodie and blood of Christ the nature of his testament the necessitie of bread the conueniencie of vnleauened bread to make it of and necessitie of our preparation to receaue it They steale also eating and drinking from the flesh and blood of Christ oblation and shedding of them when the Eucharist was instituted And from the Church they steale both Sacrifice and altar and sacrificing froÌ„ the Paschal lambe And thus much of the Eucharist Now of the other Sacraments CHAPTER XI OF THE OTHER SACRAMENTS ART I. WHETHER PREISTS CAN forgiue sinnes SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. MATHEW 16. v. 19. And I will giue to the the keyes Preists can forgiue sinnes of the kingdome of heauen And whatsoeuer thou shalt loose on earth it shal be loosed in heauen Math. 16. v. 19. Amen I say vnto you whatsoeuer you shall binde vpoÌ„ earth shal be bound also in heauen and whatsoeuer you shall loose vpon earth shal be loosed also in heauen Ihon. 20. v. 24. And he saied to them receaue ye the Holie Ghost Whose sinnes you shall forgiue they are forgiuen them and whose you shall retaine they are retained CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Councel of Trent Sess 14. Can. 9. If anie shall say that the Sacramentall absolution of the Preist is not a iudiciall act but a bare ministerie of pronouncing or declaring that sinnes are forgiuen be he accursed PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Perkins Galath 4. tom 2. The Pope challengeth to They cannot himselfe proper and iudiciall power of forgiuing and reteining sinnes Zuinglius in Art 51. to 1. Who attributeth remissioÌ„ of sinnes to a creature robbeth God of his glorie and is an idolater In resp ad Luther to 2. f. 430. These words whose sinnes you shall forgiue c. haue not that sense as if Christ in speaking theÌ„ would giue his disciples power to forgiue sinnes In Exposit fidei They cannot certifie a man of forgiuenes of his sinnes ib. f. 557. Wherefore all these things seeme friuolous I absoluethee I certifie thee that thy sinnes are forgiuen This is deceit and mere trifles Et in Hebr. 6. to 4. he saieth that Christ spooke the words cited out of Math. 18. by hyperoche or ouerlashing Bullinger in Marci 2. Men do not forgiue sinnes but teach that they are or haue beene forgiuen in Christ by faith Caluin in Ioan. 20. v.
that good workes are not necessarie in nature of debt new obience not due that all the obedience which God requireth of vs is to beleiue that he requireth nothing of vs but to beleiue this onely that we beleiue that onely those who beleiue not well are to be vrged to good workes that we owe to God nothing but faith and that in all other things God hath left vs free to follow our owne will that good workes pertaine not to the kingdome of Christ but of the world that Christians with good workes belong to the Diuel that we must praie to perseuere without good workes That when the Scripture biddeth vs doe workes we must vnderstand that it forbiddeth vs to doe them ART XIX WHETHER GOOD WORKES may be done for rewards SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Psal 118. v 112. I haue inclined my hart to do thy iustification Dauid did good for reward And Moises For euer for reward Hebr. 11. vers 26. By faith Moises being made great denied himselfe to be the sonne of Pharaos daughter rather chosing to afflicted with the people of God then c. For he looked vnto the remuneration c. 12. v. 2. looking vpon the author of faith and And Christ consummatour Iesus who ioy being proposed vnto him sustained the crosse contemning confusion 1. Corinth 9. vers 25. And euerie one that striueth for We striue for an incorruptible crowne the maistrie refraineth himselfe from all things and they certes that they may receaue a corruptible crowne but we an incorruptible Philippens 3. v. 13. Stretching forth my selfe to those that are For a prize before I pursue the marke to the prize of the supernall vocation of God in Christ Iesus CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Councel of Trent Session 6. cap. 11. It is manifest that they are contrarie to the doctrine of true religion who say that the iust sinne in all their workes if stirring vp their sloth and encorraging themselues to runne their race in them with this especially that God be glorified they do also looke wnto eternall reward PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Tindal in Fox his Acts p. 1144. They that for feare of hell Not for ioyes of heauen or for the ioyes of heauen do serue God do a constrained seruice which God will not haue Luther de libert Christiana to 2. f. 10 If thou pray at all Not for eternall profit fast c. beware thou doest it not for that end that thou mâ—est reape anie temporall or eternall profit Deseruo arb f. 453 Yea Nor for the kingdome of heauen if they did good for to obtaine the kingdome they should neuer obtaine it and should belong rather to the impious who with a noughtie and mercenarie eye seeke those things euen in God which are for themselues Postilla in Dom. 9. post Trinit Good Not for eternall life workes are not to be done for the cause of eternall life Againe All good workes must be done altogether freely and no fruite or profit must be sought by them How can we do any thing for obtaining the inheritance which already we possesse by faith And Not for the prize in Festo Om. Sanctorum We must not exercise pietie for this cause that we may get the prize The like he hath Serm. in Hebr. 11. tom 7. Vrbanus Regius in locis com tom 1. fol. 359. saieth that good workes are not to be done for anie respect of merit or reward Not for reward Apologia Confess Augustan c. 20. Paul with his whole speach condemneth all workes if they be done that for them we may obtaine life euerlasting Not for life euerlasting THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely saieth that we may do good for reward for remuneration for ioy for an incorruptible crowne for a prize The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely say that we may not do good for anie eternall profit not for the kingdome of heauen not for the ioyes of heauen not for eternall life not to obtaine the inheritance not for the prize not for respect of reward ART XX. WHETHER GOOD WORKES be to be done for the glorie of God SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. 1. Cor. 10. v. 31. Whether you eate or drinke or do anie other All workes to be done for Gods glorie thing do all things vnto the glorie of God Mathew 5. v. â—5 So let your light shine before men that they may see your good workes and glorifie your father which is in heauen CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Councel of Trent cited in the former article Workes are to be done especially that God be glorified PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Confessio Argentinensis cap. 6. Nothing is to be reckoned Nothing is the dutie of a Christian but what is profitable to others among the duties of a Christian man but that which is somewhat profitable to our neighbour The same hath Bucer in Math. 5. Luther de libertat Christian to 2. fol. 9. A Christian in all his workes ought to be imbued with this opinion and onely looke to this that he serue and profit others in all things he doeth Hath nothing before his eyes but the profit of others hauing nothing before his eyes but the necessitie and commoditie of his neighbour Fol. 10. What worke soeuer is not directed to this onely end that it be done ether to chastize the bodie or to-pleasure our neigbour so that he aske nothing against God is not good nor Christian lib. de votis fol. 280. A faithfull conscience doth apprehend and teach that his good workes are Doth good onely for the profit of others Before God we must cease from workes Good workes not to be directed to God No good worke but what is profitable to maÌ„ to be done freely onely for the profit of his neighbour and to exercise the bodie In 1. Petri 1. to 5. fol. 449. In Gods sight we must cease from workes but towards our neighbour we must be diligent at them Postilla in Dom. 4. post Trinitat fol. 289. Workes are to be directed to maÌ„ onely and not to God In Natali Dom. f. 56. after he had saied that reason can not find out his doctrine he putteth this example thereof Who could thinke with himselfe that there are no good workes but such as are profitable to our neighbour or are referred to this end In Dom. 14. fol. 319. Those onely are good workes which serue and profit our neighbour Nether it is to be meruailed if they teach that good workes are not to be done for Gods glorie seing as before is shewed they teach that God is nether worshiped nor delighted with theÌ„ that in his sight they be stenches dung mere iniquitie and sinne THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely biddeth vs to do all our workes for the glorie of God that God may be glorified with them The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that in doing good workes we must onely looke to this haue this onely before our eyes that we profit our
mouth Math. 3. v. 4. And his S. Ihons meate was locusts and wild And S. Ihon Baptiste honie Luc. 1. v. 15. And wine and sicer he shall not drinke c. 7. ver 33. For Ihon baptist came nether eating bread nor drinking wine The like is saied of the mother of Sampson Iudic 13 v. 4. and of the Rechabits Hieremie 35. Rom. 14. v. 21. It is good not to eate flesh and not to drinke Good not to eate flesh or drinke wine wine nor that wherein thy brother is offended or scandalized or weakened CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME C. Bellarm de bonis operibus in part l. 2. c. 7. If Ionadab could for euer forbidde his children and nephews wine and both his commandment and their obedience pleased God why cannot our mother the Church forbidde her children some meates for a time so that both the Churches precept and our obedience please God PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Whitaker ad Ration 9. Campiani It is madnesse to haue Madnesse to vse choice of meates for religion Foolish and wicked No seruice of God anie choice of meates for religion sake Perkins in Cathol Contr. 12. cap. 2. We hould this distinction of meates both to be foolish and wicked Confessio Argentinensis c. 9. We haue omitted that choice of meate which was commanded vpon certaine dayes which Saint Paul attributeth to the doctrine of Diuels Caluin in Luc. 1. v. 15. We must not imagin a seruice of God No seruice of God Fond superstition in oâ—stayning from wine Beza in Confess cap. 5. sect 41. This choice of meats which some make a seruice of God we doubt not with the Apostle to call a diuelish and most fond superstition THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressâ—ly saieth that Daniel many days abstained froÌ„ fleâ—h wine and desiderable bread that S. Ihon Baptiste nether eate bread nor drunke wine or sicer that it is good not to eate flesh nor to drink wine Catholiks say the same Protestants expressely say that the choice of meats is superstitious foolish madnesse wicked and diuelish doctrine that there is no seruice of God in abstinence from wine And thus much of Fasting ART VIII WHETHER IT BE LAWFVLL to pray for all SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. 1. Timoth. 2. vers 1. I desire therefore first of all things that We must pray for all men obsecrations praiers postulations thanks giuings be made for all men Exod. 32. v. 32. Moises thus praieth for the idolatrous people Moyses praied for all Ether forgiue this trâ—spasse or if thou do not strike me out of the booke that thou hast written CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME C. Bellarm. lib. 1. de Septem verbis Dom. c. 1. saieth that Christ vpon the crosse praied for Pilat and the chiefe Preists Scribes and people of the Iews PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Rainolds in Apologia thesium p. 245. Nether must we pray We must not pray for euerie one for euerie one For we are forbidden to pray for them that sinne to death Wherefore where we are bidden to pray for all the world All designeth all kinds not all of euerie kinde Beza in Ioan. 5. ver 16. Hereof it followeth that no sinnes Not for reprobates are veniall to the reprobates and therefore we must not make praiers for the sinnes of the reprobates Daneus in orat Dom. p. 593. saieth that Thy will be done belongeth not properly to reprobates as if we praied God that they quietly and willingly submitt themselues to God and doe and execute his will out of their harte faithfully and obediently Piscator in Thesibus lib. 3. loco 11. We ought to pray for all Nor for those that sinne to death that are aliue they onely excepted whome we see do sinne to death The same also saieth Bucanus in Instir loco 17. to which he addeth loco 37. that a man must not pray for the obdurated or those that sinne against the Holie Ghost THE CONFERENCE Scripture plainely saieth that we must pray for all and that Moises praied for the idolatrous people amongst whome manie were reprobates The same say Catholiks Protestants plainely say that we must not pray for all not for reprobates not for those that sinne to death not for the indurated not for those that sinne gainst the Holie Ghost ART IX WHETHER IT BE LAWFVLL to pray for the dead SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. 2. Mach. 12. vers 43. And Iudas making a gathering sent twelue thousand drachmes of siluer to Hierusalem for sacrifice to be offered the for sinnes of the dead Et ver 16. It is therefore a A holie thing to pray for the dead holie and healthfull cogitation to pray for the dead that they may be loosed from sinnes CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Councel of Trent Sess 25. c. 1. The Catholik Church teacheth that the soules detained in Purgatorie are holpen by the suffrages of the faithfull PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Iewel art 18. sect 3. p. 433. This kinde of praier for the dead It is superstitions is mere superstitious and vtterly without warrant of Gods word Confessio Seotica generalis We detest his Popes praiers Detestable for the dead Caluin Epistola 366. That forme of praier God giue the One may wish well to the dead but not pray dead a good and happie resurrection because it is not fitting to the rule of good praier is to be reiected yet I do not denie but that one may make such a wish Brentius in Dom. 12. post Trinit Albeit we may wish all happines to the dead yet praier for them is vaine Confessio Witten bergen c. de Memoria de functorum Charitie requireth that we wish all rest and happines in Christ vnto the dead But there is no testimonie of Propheticall and Apostolike doctrine that they be holpen by our praiers THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that the people of God vnder the law offered sacrifices for the dead which Caluin also confesseth 3. Instit c. 5. § 8. and that it is a holie and healthfull thing to pray for them that they be loosed from their sinnes The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that it is lawfull to wish good to the dead but that to pray for them is vaine superstitious and detestable And yet Luther Serm. de de Diuite Lazaro to 7. f. 268. de Captiuit Babylon f 72. and cont Catharin f. 151. Et in Hospin Concordia discor f. 225. Apologia Confess Augustan c. de vocabulis Missae Agenda Anglica apud Bucerum p. 427. 449. Zuinglius art 60. Vrbanus Regius and others allow praying for the dead ART X. WHETHER IT BE LAWFVLL to pray for that which God hath not promised SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Math. 26. ver 39. Christ thus praieth My Father if it be Christ praied for that which was not promised to him And S. Paul And Abraham and Dauid possible let this chalice passe from me 2. Cor. 12. vers 8. For the which thing thrice I besought our Lord that
in Math. 6. v. 12. To remit sinne is nothing els but not to exact the punishment thereof Piscator in Thesibus l. 1. p. 428. The remission of sinne is nothing els but not to punish for sinne Kemnitius de Origine Iesuitarum c. de Peccato The remission of sinne is one thing the abolition is an other Or as Luther saied in the words cited It is one thing for sinne to be remitted an other to be taken away THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely teacheth that God taketh away sinne putteth out sinne as a cloud or mist that he maketh our iniquities as farre from vs as the East is from the West that he found no iniquitie in Dauid that there is no damnation in them who are in Christ Iesus The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely teach that manie sinnes innumerable sinnes great sinnes worthie of death great filthinesse worthie the wrathe of God remaine truely remaine are continually in those that are iustified that sinne liueth and preuaileth in the regenerate that sinne is not taken away no sinne quite taken away that it is not made to be no more that remission of sinne is nothing but forgiuenesse of the punishment Which are so contrarie to Scripture as sometimes Protestants confesse it See lib. 2. c. 30. ART VI. WHETHER SINNES BE simply forgiuen SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Ioan. 20. v. 23. Whose sinnes you shall forgiue they are forgiuen Sinnes simply forgiuen them CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME C. Bellarm. l. 5. de Amiss Grat c. 7. Nether can it be graunted without impietie that the sentence of the Apostle that there is no damnation in the Iustified is not simply true PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Pareus l. 5. de Amiss Gratiae c. 7. It is most true that sinnes Not simply forgiuen are not simply remitted but with continuall praier of remission Et l. 4. de Iustif c. 17. he saieth that Christ doth not absolutely cleanse his people The same teacheth Illyricus in Apologia Confess Antuerpiensis c. 3. and all Protestants who say as we haue seene before that sinnes remaine in the iustified and that they are still guiltie of sinne and deserue damnation and that remission of sinnes is nothing but forgiuenesse of punishment For if onely punishment be forgiuen the iustified if the sinne stil remaine in them by which they are guiltie and deserue damnation manifest it is that sinne is not simply remitted to them THE CONFERENCE Scripture simply saieth that sinne is remitted The same say Catholiks Protestants simply say that sinne is not simply remitted ART VII WHETHER ALL THAT ARE iustified be equally iust or holie SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY DENIETH. Iob. 1. v. 8. Hast thou considered my seruant Iob that there None like to Iob. is not the like to him on the earth a man simple and right and fearing God and departing from euill Numbers 12 v. 3. Moises was the mildest man aboue all men Moises mildest of all mē that dwelle vpon the earth Math. 8. v. 10. I haue not found so great faith in Israel Greatest faith Greatest loue Ioan. 21. v. 15. Iesus saied to Simō Peter Simon of Ihon louest thou me more then these Apoc. 22. v. 11. He that is iust let him be iustified yet and let the holie be sanctified yet CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY DENIE C. Bellarm. l. 3. de Iustif c. 16. Lutherans teach that all iust men are equally iust so that none is iuster then an other nor the same increaseth in iustice PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Luther in Math. Math 7. to 7. fol. 96. A Christian is as good and Euerie Christian as holie is S. Peter holie as S. Peter and Paul nether is anie greater or better then he Postilla in Domin 24. S. Peter is not better then the theife on The B. Virgin excelleth not the sinner We are as holie as the Saints Better then they the crosse Marie the mother of God doth not excell Marie the sinner In festo Natiu Mariae We are as holie as Marie and the other Saints If they were now vpon earth they would not be ashamed to subiect themselues to me and to all and to honour vs as better then they Brentius homilia in die Visitationis Marie is not preferred before all weomen for her owne holinesse or other such like vertues Polanus in Disput priuatis periodo 1. disput 37. One is not None more iust then an other No lesse then Christ more iust then an other before God Pareus l. 2. de Iustif c. 7. By Christs iustice imputed to vs we are accounted no lesse iust then Christ himselfe at least keeping the proportion of the head and members THE CONFERENCE Scripture expressely saieth that there was none on earth like to Iob that Moises was the mildest man vpon earth that there was not so great faith in Israel as in the Centurion that Peter loued Christ more then others that the iust may be yet iustified The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that euerie Christian is as good and holie as the Apostles that we are as holie as our B. Ladie and the Saints in heauen that we are better then they that we are are as iust as Christ himselfe that one is not more iust then an other ART VIII WHETHER THERE IS ANIE iustice or grace inherent in the iustified SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Daniel 6. v. 22. My God hath sent his Angel and hath shut Iustice in Daniel vp the mouthes of the Lyons and they haue not hurt me because before him iustice hath beene found in me Luc. 1. v. 28. And the Angel being entred in saied vnto her B. Virgin full of grace Haile full of grace our Lord is with thee Act. 6. v. 8. And Steuen full of grace and fortitude Ephes 4. vers 24. Putte on the new man which according to God is created in iustice and holinesse of trueth 2. Tim. 1. v. 6. Resuscitate the grace of God which is in thee by Grace in Timothe the imposition of my hands CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME D. Stapleton in Rom. 4. v. 2. The Scriptures plainely teach inherent iustice in man PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE French Confession art 18. Casting away all opinion of vertues No opinion of vertue No iustice in vs. Not a crume of iustice or merits we rest altogether in the obedience alone of Christ Caluin in Rom. 8. v. 3. There can be no iustice in vs. In Gal. 3. v. 6. Seing men haue no iustice in them they get it by imputation De caena p. 2. There is none of vs who can finde anie crūme of iustice in himselfe There is no good in vs. Et in Confess fidei p. 158. We openly confesse that there is nothing in vs which if God looke vpon he may not iustly condemne Beza in Confess cap. 4. sect 8. Faith compelleth vs to confesse Nothing in vs but cause of damnatiō that there is nothing in vs besides causes and proofes of damnation Humfrey ad Ration 2. Campiani p. 142.
Fratres Finally Luther in Postilla domest Dom. 1. Aduentus saieth Oh sorrow The world dayly becometh worse by The world worse by Luthers doctrine this doctrine and Castalio in Caluin de Prouident These are the things Caluin which thy aduersaries reporte of thy doctrine and warne men to iudge of this doctrine by the fruits thereof For they say that thou and thy disciples carrie manie fruits of thy God that most of you are contentious reuengefull myndfull of wrong and endowed with such vices as thy God doth suggest Where thus I argue in the 27. place Whose doctrine is not onely so opposite to the expresse words of Scripture as was seene in the first booke but also taketh away encouragements to vertue yea all vertue out of the world and remoueth impediments of sinne and giueth allurements theertoe that is opposite to the true sense of holie Scripture But such is the doctrine of Protestants Therefore c. CHAPTER XXVIII THAT PROTESTANTS HAVE NO infallible interpretation of Scripture THE 28. Argument to proue that Protestants must needs contradict the true sense of holie Scripture is because they haue no sure and infallible means to attaine to the true meaning thereof But before we proue that they haue no infallible mean to come to the right sense of Scripture we must proue that Scripture at lest in some points of faith needeth some means to interpret or expound it to wit ether because no where it deliuereth some points of faith so clearely that the onely words thereof sufffice to captiuate the vnderstanding or because though some where it deliuer clearly enough some points of faith yet other where it seemeth so to teach the contrarie as without some infallible interpreter it would seeme vncertaine whether of the twoe it did teach That therefore Scripture doth not of it selfe teach That Scripture needeth an Interpreter clearely all points of faith so as it need no interpreter for that purpose I proue first out of the Scripture it selfe For the holie Eunuch did read the Scripture speaking of the passion of Christ Actor 8. and yet being asked of Philip whether he vnderstood what he read answered And how can I if none shall shew me You see that the Scripture did not clearely foretell the passion of Christ as that a pious man by the onely words thereof without an interpreter could vnderstand the meaning thereof And Luk. vlt. v. 27. And beginning from Moyses and all the Prophets he did interprete vnto them in all the Scriptures the things that were concerning him Et v. 45. Then he opened their vnderstanding that they might vnderstand the Scriptures But if Christs disciples did not vnderstand the Scriptures which spoake of him and the Apostles had need that Christ should open their vnderstanding for to vnderstād the Scriptures it is euident that the Scriptures by themselues doe not so plainely teach all matters of faith as they need no interpretation for to be rightly vnderstood of the faithfull Besides 2. Pet. vlt. it is saied that in S. Pauls epistles there are some things hard to be vnderstood And that these hard things do containe points of faith is cleare both because without cause they should be limited to other things as also because it is added that the learned and vnstable doe depraue these hard things to their owne destruction but such things are especially matters of faith Moreouer if the Scripture did so clearely teach all points of faith that for them it needed no interpreter it would follow that the guift of interpretation had beene superfluously giuen to the Church for to expound Scripture in matters belonging to faith Secondly I proue this out of the Fathers but for breuities sake I will content my selfe with one testimonie of S. Austin He lib. de Vtil cred c 7. to one that saied When I read the Scriptures by my selfe I vnderstood them thus answereth Is it so Without some skill in poetrie thou darest not read Terentian Maurus Asper Cornutus Donatus and manie more are necessarie for to vnderstand anie Poet and thou fallest vpon those bookes without a guide and darest giue thy opinion of them without a teacher Loe how plainely he saieth that we can not vnderstand the Scriptures by our selues and by how familiar an example he proueth it Thirdly I proue it by the verie cōfession of Protestāts For Protest confesse that Scripture alone sufficeth not thus writeth Whitaker Cōt 1. q. 4. c. 1. When Bellarmin maketh this to be the state of the questiō Whether the the Scripture by it selfe be so cleare as without anie interpretatiō it sufficeth of it selfe to determine and decide all controuersies of faith he fighteth without an aduersarie for surely in this point we are not against him Agayne They say that we thinke but falsely that all things in Scripture are plaine and that they without anie interpretation are sufficient to determine all controuersies without Behould how plainely he denieth that Protestants think that Scripture of it selfe without anie interpretatiō is sufficiēt to end all controuersies of faith And the like hath Iunius l. 3. de verb. Dei c. 3. When he graunteth that Scripture needeth an interpreter Kemnice 1. part Exa p. 104. It hath need of the guift and helpe of interpretatiō And the Magdeburgiās Cēt. 1. l. 2. c. 4. The Apostles thought that the Scripture cānot be vnderstood without the holie Ghost and an interpreter and the same meā all other Protestāts who admit that the Scripture is obscure or that the guift of interpretatiō is needfull for the expositiō thereof For doubtles they meane that as well of such places of Scripture wherein points of faith are deliuered as of others this Caluin 4. Inst c 17. § 25. clearely enough insinuateth where whē Catholiks obiected that they had the word of God wherein he affirmeth that the Eucharist is his bodie he answereth Indeed if they may banish the guift of Interpretatiō out of the Church Wherefore he thinketh that there is in the Church the guift of Interpretation euen for to expound Scriptures touching points of faith such as the Eucharist is Furthermore Plessie l. 3. de Eccl. c. 3. writeth that the cōtrouersie of Schisme cānot be properly decided by the Scripture because it is rather a question of fact then doctrine If therefore Scripture by it selfe can determine nether the questiō of Schisme nor yet all controuersies of faith it is manifest that the interpretation of some is necessarie and that also infallible because fallible interpretatiō is not sufficiēt to put vs out of doubt And surely Protestants must needs teach that Scripture by it selfe alone is not sufficient to decide all controuersies of faith both because els it had decided all controuersies amongst themselues or betwene anie that are not obstinate as also because scarce in anie controuersies that are betwixt vs and them Scripture doth so much as in shew directly and immediatly giue sentence for them but they haue need to
conferred by them and ioyned with some humane principle and brought into sillogisticall forme Whereas a Iudge must be such as by himselfe without anie helpe of ether of the parties he can giue sentence Besides the sentence of the Iudge and especiallie if there can be no appeale from him must be so cleare as no man can doubt for whether partie it is But such is not the sentence of Scripture in manie controuersies Agayne there is controuersie betwene vs about diuers bookes of which the rest of the Scripture saieth nothing Finallie before Moises the Church had no Scripture and for sometime after Christ it had no parte of the new testament and yet she neuer wanted a Iudge And as we saw in the Chapter before Protestants confesse that Scripture of it selfe is not sufficient to determine all controuersies of faith and therefore not to iudge all Wherefore we must needs haue some other Iudge For these and the like causes some Protestants seing how absurd it is that Scripture is the onely Iudge in the Church say that Christ or the holie Ghost speaking in the Scripture is the Iudge Whitaker c. 7. cit We say that this Iudge is the holie Ghost speaking in the Scripture In like sorte Confes Heluet. c. 12. Academia Nemaus loc cit Lutherans in Colloq Ratisb sess 9. and others But seing Christ or the holie Ghost is no otherwise in the Scripture then as in a signe of his will to say that the holie Ghost as he is in Scripture is Iudge is no other thing indeed then to say that the Scripture is iudge And as the King as he is in his written laws is not a sufficient iudge of the common wealth because els eueÌ„ after his death he should be iudge but besides there must be a liuing iudge who both heareth and speaketh who can heare the parties and giue senteÌ„ce So nether is the holie Ghost a sufficient iudge is in the holie Scripture Others therefore acknowledge that there must be in the Church a speaking iudge or man For thus Eliensis loc cit Wherefore we all of long time demand a free and lawfull synod Protest admit a liuing Iudge in words And Lutherans in Colloq cit sess 9. We professe that God hath giuen some power to the Ministers and Doctors of the Church to iudge of controuersies of religion Neuerthelesse in trueth they denie the verie nature of the Iudge For ether they will not admit such a Iudge as we are bound to obeyâ— as appeareth by that they denie the vniuersall Church all Pastors or generall Councels to be infallible yea Moulins in the preface of his Bucler saieth that there But not in effect can be no greater temeritie then to desire that men sinners may be infallible iudges of the seÌ„se of the law And the LutheraÌ„s loc cit It is simply and absolutely certaine that the Ministerie may erre But this in trueth is to denie the Iudge whose end is The iudge in the Church admitteth not appeale to make peace and to compose debates which he cannot doe vnlesse men be bound to obey him and all the foresaied authorities reasons which proue that there ought to be a iudge in the Church proue also that he ought to be such from whome we may not appeale Wherevpon Whitaker CoÌ„t 1. q. 5. c. 4. thus writeth I answere that those words Deuteron 17. cit are to be vnderstood of authoritie to define hard contentions and controuersies as Ecclesiasticall by the Minister and politicall by the Magistrate that there might be in both some from whome there should be no appeale els there would be no end of contending But this he meaneth onely in the Nether in outward nor inward Courte externall or outward courte not in the inward courte of conscience For thus he addeth A great weight of iudgement was in the Priest and what he had once determined was good in the externall courte that so controuersies and debates might be ended And Cont. 4. q 1. cap. 2. Controuersies may be brought to the externall Courte and there defined but conscience resteth not in that Courte But this shift is easilie refuted First because the distruction of the externall Courâ—e is without cause deuised in this matter Secondlie because the peace of the Church especially consisteth in the internall courte to wit in faith Wherefore in this Courte we may not appeale from the Iudge of the Church otherwise there would neuer be peace of conscience Thirdly the practise of the Church in the Councell of the Apostles and in other generall Councels sheweth that the Iudge of the Church hath power to end controuersies euen in the inward courte of conscience Finallie if one were bound to obey the iudgement of the Church in the outward Courte and not in the inward it would follow that sometimes he were bound to denie Gods trueth before men to wit if the Church should define against Gods trueth Besides the authoritie of the Church is spirituall and ouer the soule and therefore her power of iudging extendeth it selfe euen to the inwarde Courte of the â—oule Wherefore let this be our 29. argument Whose doctrine in manie and weightie matters doth so contradict the expresse words of Scripture as they dare not admit anie Iudge in the Church they are to be thought to contradict the true sense of the Scripture But such are Protestants Therefore c. CHAPTER XXX THAT PROTESTANTS DOE SOMEtimes confesse that their doctrine doth contradict the holie Scripture THE last proof which we will make to shew that Protestants doe contradict the true sense of Scripture shal be taken from their owne confession wherewith sometimes they confesse it implicitlie sometimes plainelie and expressely Implicitly they confesse it diuers wayes First because they acknowledge that they Protest cannot reconcile their doctrine with the Scripture know not how to reconcile their doctrine with the holie Scripture Luther de seru arbit to 2. fol. 466. How this is iust that he God condemneth those that deserue it not is now incomprehensible yet it is beleiued till the Sonne of man be reuealed Et f. 486. In the light of grace it is vnanswerable how God condemneth him who with all his power can doe nothing but sinne and be guiltie Here both the light of nature and the light of Grace teach that it is not the fault of wretched man but of vniust God Et to 1. f. 390. It is a wonderfull probleme that God rewardeth iustice which himselfe reputeth iniustice Melancthon in Rom. 9. edit 1. This misterie is inexplicable that God both willeth sinnes and yet truelie hateth them Peter Martyr in locis Class 1. c. 16. § 9. It is no meruaile that we cannot vnderstand how it is not contrarie to Gods iustice to punish sinnes and by tempting to enforce them because God can doe more then we can vnderstand Caluin 1. Institut capit 18. § 3. By reason of the weaknesses of our vnderstanding we doe not
of saluation in which he was set But it could not be other wise What then Is he therefore faultles Beza de Praedestinat cont Castel p. 415. That he saieth Necessarily do sinne the reprobats doe necessarily sinne is most true In 2. parte Respons ad Acta Colloq Montisbel p. 178. With an other necessitie Adam is saied to haue fallen necessarily to wit what belongeth to Gods appointement Gods decree necessitateth to sinne Tilenus disput 8. de Praedestinat By this decree of God a double necessitie falleth vpon the reprobats the one sinning the other of perishing Zanchius l. 5. de natura Dei c. 2. We graunt that reprobats by this appointment of God are tyed with the necessitie of sinning and consequently of perishing and so tyed as they cannot but sinne and perish Piscator l. 2. de the sibus p. 183. It is falsely saied that it was in mans will not to eate of the fruite of the forbidden tree that is Adam necessarily sinned not to transgresse the commandment And pag. 282. Through the decree of God man could not but transgresse Polanus in Disp priuat disp 3. Adam sinned necessarily CONFERENCE OF THE FORESAIED WORDS Scripture expressely saieth that the lust of sinne is vnder vs that we haue dominion ouer it and that God will not suffer vs to be tempted aboue our power The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely say that the wicked do necessarily sinne that the reprobats are tyed by Gods appointment necessarily both to sinne and perish that it was not in Adās will not to eate the forbidden aple that through Gods decree he could not but transgresse that he sinned necessarily and could not doe otherwise that Iudas was necessarily a traitor and could not change his mind that God cōpelleth the theefe to sinne Which are so impious as S. Prosper saieth He is no Catholike who saieth that by Ad c. 16. Gallor Gods predestination as it were with a fatall necessitie men compelled to sinne are forced to death and so contrarie to Scripture as Protestants some time confesse it lib. 2. cap. 30. And thus much of God touching sinne Now of God concerning sinners ART IX WHETHER GOD HATE ALL that worke iniquitie SCRITVRE EXPRESSELY AFFIRMETH. Psal 5. v. 7. Thou hatest all that worke iniquitie God hateth all workers of iniquitie Ecclesiast c. 12. v. 3. The highest hateth sinners Math. 7. v. 23. Departe from me you that worke iniquitie CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME D Stapleton l. 3. de Iustificat c. 8. Sinne of it nature in whomsoeuer it is separateth from God and maketh him in whome it is hatefull to God PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY DENIE Whitaker l. 8. cont Dur. sect 34. The godlie though God hateth not all such they sinne grieuously yet are alwaies most assuredly perswaded of Christs loue and will Perkins de Praedest to 1. God being offended doth change the effects of grace into the effects of a certaine hatred not against the faithfull themselues but against their sinnes He doth not put away his fatherlie affection and they are still children concerning the right of eternall life Caluin 3. Instit c. 2. § 12. We see that God wonderfully is angred with his children which he leaueth to loue not that in him selfe he hateth them but because he will terrifie them with some feeling of his wrathe Beza de Praedestinat cont Castel p. 409. Albeit the lord God neuer hateth the elect hate all iniquitie yet hateth he not all in whome iniquitie is Zanchius l. 4. de natura Dei c. 7. q. 2. God neuer hateth the elect Agayne It cannot be that God at anie time hateth them And in depuls calum to 7. God is angrie with the elect whem they sinne but neuer hateth them Pareus l. 1. de Amiss Grat. c. 7. God doth not hate his children when they sinne CONFERENCE OF THE FORESAIED WORDS Scripture expressely affirmeth that God hateth all who worke iniquitie that he hateth sinners that who worke iniquitie shall departe from him The same say Catholiks Protestants expressely denie that God hateth the faithfull when they sinne that euer he hateth the elect that the faithfull though they sinne are euer assured of Gods loue that God hateth all in whom iniquitie is Which are so opposite to Scripture as Protestants some times confesse it See lib. 2. c. 30. ART X. WHETHER GOD IVSTIFIETH that is iudgeth him to be iust who is wicked SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY DENIETH. Prouerb 17. v. 15. He that iustifieth the impious and he that Iustifier of the impious adhominable to God condemneth the iust both are abhominable before God Isaie 5. v. 23. Woe to you who iustifie the impious for giftes Rom. 2. v. 2. We know that the iudgment of God is according to veritie CATHOLIKS EXPRESSELY DENIE Card. Bellarmin l. 2. de Iustif c. 9. A wicked man cannot be truly iustified that is pronounced iust vnles he who pronounceth him iust do withall make him iust PROTESTANTS EXPRESSELY AFFIRME Bucanus loco 31. de Iustificat q. 18. p. 313. Seing God God iustifieth the wicked forbiddeth to iustifie the wicked Prouerb 17. 15. Can he be saied to do that rightly which him selfe forbiddeth Rightly because he it aboue all law Caluin l. de Caena p. 2. Let vs be assured that albeit we be God accounteth wicked for iust wicked and impure yet we are acknowledged and accepted of the lord and accounted for iust Et 3. Institut c. 19. § 2. It is not inquired there how we may be iust but how being vniust and vnworthie we may be held for iust Pareus l. 2. de Iustificat c. 9. What he obiecteth that a wicked man cannot be truly pronounced iust vnles he be made The wicked may be iudged iust according to the Ghospell iust is true of inherent iustice and according to the law but it is false that he cannot be pronounced iust with imputed iustice and according to the Ghospell Illyricus Praefat. in epist ad Rom. It is all together contumelious against Christ that he cannot by his iustice and efficacie iustifie and saue such sinners as are impious and want all good workes Scarpius de Iustificat Controu 9. We are called iust by the imputation of Christs iustice but we are also called vniust for iniustice which is in vs. CONFERENCE OF THE FORESAIED WORDS Scripture expressely saieth that it is abhominable before God to iustifie the wicked and pronounceth woe to him that doeth it and addeth that all Gods iudgments are according to veritie which that iudgment is not that pronounceth the wicked for iust The same saye Catholiks Protestants expressely saie that God doth that which him selfe forbiddeth to wit that he pronounceth the wicked for iust that though we be vniust we are held of the Lord for iust that Christ iustifieth and saueth such sinners as are impious that with imputed iustice the wicked are pronouncd iust ART XI WHETHER GOD BE ANGRIE with the faithfull when they sinne SCRIPTVRE EXPRESSELY