glorie of God obstinately refuse to performe their dutie in obeying that precept of our Sauiour Render vnto Caesar that which is Caesars and that of S. Peter Regem honorificate and also the commandement giuen to Moyses Honour thy father and thy mother These assure you are they who giue cause of scandal indeed wherby their persecution if so they please to cal it is continued the Church perturbed Catholicke religion little regarded and many a soule lost But Vaeilli per quem scandalum venit Woe to him by whom scandall cometh Time will make triall who it is whether they or we In the meane while we say that the proper and true definition of scandall as it is defined by S. Thomas and others most aptly agreeth with the doctrine and example or words and deedes of such English subiects as withdraw men from performing their dutie to their dread Soueraigne not on such as perswade it and yet remaine no lesse Catholicke then they do pretend in euery point of faith Scandall is a word or deed not right Definition of scandall Tho. 2.2 q. 43. ar 1. Ieron in comment super Math. c. 15. giuing occasion of ruine that is of spirituall ruine or sinne Now what euill or shew of euill or sin is there in those who by their deedes and words example and doctrine teach and labour to induce all to do that which is right and due by the law of God What scandall or offence or occasion of sinne do they giue who perswade nothing against any one article or point of faith but meere allegiance to their Prince Doth this offend or scandalize any If they will be scandalized for well doing and take offence where none is giuen do they not shew how imperfect they are in the loue of God Pax multa diligentibus legem tuam non est illis scandalum Psal 118. To such as loue thy law ô God there is great peace and to them there is no scandall May not these be well likened to the Pharisies that of enuie and malice were offended or scandalized at the sayings and doings of our Blessed Sauiour who being told by his disciples of their scandall taken answered Omnis plantatio quam non plantauit Pater meus coelestis eradicabitur Math. 15. All planting which my heauenly Father hath not planted shall be rooted vp Let them alone blind they are guides of the blind And if the blind be guide to the blind both fall into the ditch Such are to be pitied and praied for not enuied whom we may answer in the same sort and with Haimo Haimo in Math c. 18. Greg ho. 7. in Sipro veritate scandalum oriatur magis veritas eligenda est quà m scandalum vitandum If for truth scandall do arise as it doth in this our case rather truth is to be chosen then scandall sought to be auoided The same affirmeth S. Gregorie the Great Ezech. pag. 2. as before pag. 45. And S. Thomas disputing whether spirituall goods are to be pretermitted for passiue scandall Tho. 2.2 q. 43. ar 7. saith That such goods as are de necessitate salutis ought not to be omitted for auoiding scandall because they cannot be pretermitted without mortall sinne as in our iudgements we take allegiance in the Oath to be but it is manifest saith he that none ought to sinne mortally to saue an other from sinne because according to the order of charitie a man ought to loue more his owne spirituall health then another mans The same likewise hath Ioannes de Burgo Pupil oculi Opera necessaria ad salutem non sunt omittenda ad vitandum scandalum proximi ex quacunqueradice procedat Workes necessarie to saluation are not to be omitted for auoiding the scandall of our neighbour out of whatsoeuer roote it proceedeth Herby deare brethren in our Lord Iesus I trust you rest satisfied that such as haue taken the Oath of allegiance wherein nothing hath bene hitherto proued by any learned man to be contained against any one point of faith haue not giuen cause of scandall as they haue bin slandered to haue done but by that their fact performing their bounden dutie to their dread Soueraigne according to the law of God haue sought to take away that horrible scandall giuen indeed by a few vngracious Catholikes in the gunpowder treason and which others daily giue to his Maiestie and the State in resisting the law made vpon so great reason and for the commō good of the realme Besides I trust your wisdomes will consider that to take the Oath being bonum spirituale wherein no euill thing against religion is contained they are not to pretermit it for the imperfections of some who are readie to suffer or take scandall where none is giuen Wherefore I exhort you all most dearely beloued Catholikes in the bowels of our Sauiour Iesus Christ as the very Reuerend and learned maister George Blackwell sometime our Archpriest did in his letter to his Assistants and you all both Clergie and Laitie for abolishing and ending this controuersie which hath scandalized the whole State you wold desist to impugne supreme authoritie in this case of the Oath most lawfull and iust as hath bene proued and ceasse any longer to prouoke to wrath his Maiesty our most clement Prince clement I say for I dare boldly auouch that neither the Pope nor any King or Prince in Christendome had he had the like cause offered by any his subiects especially of a contrarie religion and finding others of the same religion to refuse to make profession of their loyalty by an Oath required at their hands would shew such mercy and clemencie as his Maiestie hath done and doth Conferre the fact or enterprise of the Moores in Spaine now two years agone who wēt about as report goeth treacherously to bring in Turkes and forreiners to inuade the countrey with this Catesbeyan and Percian most barbarous treason and I doubt not but you will iudge them both worthy condigne punishment Compare againe the two Princes who by Gods ordinance carie the sword ad vindictam malefactorum to take reuenge on malefactours you shall find them both iustly prouoked to indignation against the delinquents yet the one viz. King Philip with great seueritie chastiseth the innocent with the nocent old yong men women and children expelling all alike out of his dominiōs to the number of nine hundred thousand as appeareth by his edict within the space of xxx dayes to the losse of all their immoueables Whereas the other our dread Soueraigne of his pitifull inclination did not punish in such sort the guiltles nor all the offendours according to their deserts but repressed by his edict the furie of his people readie to haue taken reuenge yea on many innocent persons for their sakes that had offended Embrace then deare brethren the mercie and long sufferance of this our milde and clement Prince whilest time is granted you lest through your default it be turned
to obey the Popes prohibition of this Oath of allegiance Pag. 44. A boy vnder age hanged in Rome Pag. 46. A nephew of old Nauarre the Canonist by the Popes commandement hanged in hast Ibid. Card. Mendoza depriued of his Deanry of Toledo by force Pag. 47. A Gentleman of Card. Farnesius put to death by Pope Clement Pag. 8. 48. The opinion of some ouermuch deuoted to the obedience of the Pope Pag. 50. Obedience due to all superiors yet is their power contained within certaine limits Pag. 51. Ecclesiasticall and ciuill power both immediate from God both distinct and independant of each other Pag. 53. A superior yea the Pope in diuers cases may be disobeyed without sinne Pag. 57. The Breues of Paulus 5. prohibiting the Oath of allegiance may be not obeyed without sinne Pag. 59. Many euils ensue vpō obeying the Pope in this case of the Oath Pag. 60. A cōmandement vpon error of wrong information bindeth not Pag. 62. The Popes bare precept not alway sufficient to cause men to hazard their temporall states Ibid. Cases not doubtfull but manifest as is this of the Oath need no solution from the Pope Pag. 63. Subiects bound to obey all iust lawes of their temporall Princes Pag. 64. The law of the Oath of allegiance iust Pag. 65. The Kings Maiestie in setting forth this Oath hath not exceeded his limits Pag. 66. All lawfull Kings be they heathens or heretickes are to be obeyed by their subiects in temporals Pag. 68. That the Pope or Church do permit euill Princes to reigne a strange phrase Pag. 70. The place of S. Paul Omnis anima to be vnderstood principally of subiection to secular power Pag. 72. The material sword forbiddē to be vsed by Ecclesiasticall persons Pag. 74 Not without a mystery that Peter shold strike none but Malchus Pag. 78. The Apostles and their successors subiect to Emperours and Kings de iure Pag. 79. Gregory 7. the first that chalenged tēporal power to depose Princes Pag. 84 The doctrine and practise of deposing when it began according to Cardinall Bellarmine Pag. 85. Whether the Pope by his spirituall power wherein he is successor to Peter may depose Princes Pag. 87. 91. Excommunication what it is the nature and effects thereof Pag. 95. No denial of the Popes power of binding to say that Princes notwithstanding excōmunicatiō ought to be obeyed of their subiects Pag. 100. The Popes spirituall power of excommunicating Kings not denied as Cardinall Bellarmine in Tortus affirmeth Pag. 104. Whether I may renounce all pardons dispensations which shal be against this Oath of Alleg. without denying the Popes power Pag. 108. No deniall of the Popes power of absoluing to say that he cannot absolue me of this Oath Pag. 112. Whether the Pope may remit lawful oaths compelled by feare Pag. 114. How a matter onely of opinion may be truly sworne Pag. 116. The doctrine that teacheth That Princes excommunicated by the Pope may be deposed or murthered by their subiects may be abiured as impious and hereticall Pag. 119. To teach it lawfull to murther yea a tyrant is hereticall Pag. 123. The Oration of Sixtus 5. in the Consistorie of the murther of the King of France Pag. 128. The Pope as a temporall Prince may wage warre but not inuade any Kings dominions as he is Christs Vicar Pag. 149. Priests and reconciled persons as such onely no traitors by the intention of the Oath Pag. 150. How an Oath is to be interpreted Pag. 152. In what sort a man is to sweare before a lawfull magistrate Pag. 153. Not such as take but the refusers of the Oath giue cause of scādal Pag. 154. The Authors exhortation to Catholickes Pag. 156. Strange Reports or Newes from Rome Pag. 159. TO THE CATHOLICKES OF ENGLAND BEloued brethren in Christ Iesus Whereas the Kings most excellent Maiestie being the true lawful and right inheritour to the Crowne and Realme of England by the prouidence of almightie God entred and possessed the same with tranquillity and peace and the great applause of all his subiects as well Catholickes as Protestants or others of different sects and opinions his Highnesse as it were to requite their dutifull affection forthwith gaue great hope of a most happie and prosperous regiment and out of his bountie and clemencie extended many his most royall fauours indifferently vpon all till such time as some of the one sort to wit a few giddie headed desperate and disloyall Catholicks associated with certaine of the Societie prouoked his wrath and indignation against them yea and all the professors of the same religion for their fact Who was not moued as all men will confesse without iust cause for that they viz. Catholickes onely either concealed or most barbarously attempted in that hellish-like manner of gunpowder fire the memorie whereof must needs remaine for euer most grieuous to all true hearted Catholike subiects the cruell murther of so many worthie Commons and Noble personages in Parliament assembled yea of the most towardly and innocent yong Prince the Queene and King himselfe and then soone after also had followed vndoubtedly the desolation ruine and destruction of the whole realme of England Hereupon by the generall consent of all three estates and the Kings Maiestie it was thought necessarie an Oath of allegeance in such forme should be framed and enacted as Catholikes for whom chiefly it was made should haue no cause scrupulously to refuse to take the same and the Kings Highnesse with his whole estate might be better secured and freed from all feares and dangers imitating herein other Kings and Princes as occasions shall be offered them If euer the Kings of France or Spaine or other Princes whatsoeuer had cause to exact an Oath of fealtie of their subiects for safetie of their persons or state then certes no man that hath but common sense will denie but our King hath more then iust vpon so horrible and monstrous cause giuen as the like haply was neuer heard of from the beginning of the world Could any man haue thought it strange or held it crueltie if being in such wise and by such persons prouoked he had in his wrath and indignation rigorously proceeded against all others of the Romane religion as suspecting them to beare no better mind towards him though manie thousands doubtlesse no way consented nor were euer priuie to that horrible fact And if he had what ruine of Catholike families what hauocke of Christian bloud with the destruction of soules and other infinite miseries should we haue seene But the omnipotent God whose name be blessed for euer who hath the rule and gouernment of the hearts of Kings inclined his royall heart to mercie and compassion of his subiects knowing right well the faith and loyaltie of many of the same religion as his Maiestie most benignely expressed in his Proclamation and that he should haue punished the innocent with the nocent as well his friends as his foes Oh what follie were it for a
into surie for oft times patientia laesa specially of a King vertiturin furoreÌ„ And resist no longer but coÌ„forme your selues to his Maiesties iust demand in this case of the Oath that wherein they that is such as are of a different religion misreport of you as of malefactours by the good workes considering you 1. Pet. 2. they may glorifie God in the day of visitation Also with this blessed Apostle S. Peter I wish you to be subiect to euery humane creature of God whether it be to the King as excelling or to rulers as sent by him to the reuenge of malefactours but to the praise of the good for so note well is the will of God that doing well you may make the ignoraÌ„ce of vnwise men dumbe I desire likewise with S. Paul that obsecrations prayers â—1 Tim. 2. postulations thankesgiuing be made for all men for Kings all that are in preëminence that we may leade a quiet and peaceable life in all pietie and chastitie If Tertullian were liuing and those ancient Fathers of the primitiue Church Tertul. Apologet c. 50. See master Blackwels letter they would questionlesse following the doctrine and example of the Apostles exhort you likewise to pray for the long life of our Soueraigne no lesse then they did the Christians of those dayes for their Emperours or Kings howsoeuer they differed in religion Finally as Baruch the Prophet wished such Iewes as were left in Ierusalem after the captiuitie Baruch 1. to pray for the life of Nabuchodonozor King of Babylon and for the life of Balthasar his sonne that their dayes might be as the dayes of heauen vpon the earth so do I desire all Catholickes professing with me the Romane faith heartily to pray for the long life and prosperous reigne of King Iames of great Brittaine together with his deare Spouse our most gracious Queene Anne and the hopefull yong Prince Henrie his sonne with the rest of his most roiall issue that in this world they may long continue to the glorie of the eternall God and afer this mortality euer to enioy that felicitie which neuer shall haue end Vui Trinòque Deo omnis honor gloria STRANGE REPORTS OR NEWES FROM ROME THis my discourse of the Oath of Allegiance being fully complete ended written specially for satisfying and perswading such Catholickes of our countrey as thinke it not lawfull to be taken at least by reason of the Popes Breues prohibiting the same behold certaine strange newes diuersly spread aboade from diuers parts and persons haue ministred me occasion to continue on my labour by adding this briefe Treatise following for and in defence of my selfe and some others my brethren Priests who for no crime committed in our iudgements but onely for performing our duties to God and man haue bene and are calumniated to be depriued of all faculties granted by any authoritie from the Sea of Rome whereby we are vtterly disabled to liue for not being any longer regarded but forsaken and in affection abandoned by such as formerly vsed of charitie to releeue vs. Audite ergo coeli quae loquor audiat terra verba oris mei Heare therefore ô ye heauens what I speake let the earth hearken to the words of my mouth For I am to vtter that which to Saint Peter and Saint Paul and to the blessed Apostles and to all glorious Saints will seeme strange and wondrous tidings and whereat all good Christians on earth that shall enter into consideration of the case may stand amazed and posteritie will scarce beleeue when it shall be told them Talking not long since with a friend that came newly from beyond the seas I asked him what newes in those parts and what was said of vs that had taken the Oath of allegiance he told me the report was there that we had lost our faculties but could not tell by what meanes or by whoÌ„ And here at home in our country the same is bruted abrode by many and in many places but in sundrie manner the reporters disagreeing so much in their tales as no certaine truth can be gathered by theÌ„ For some say that fiue Priests onely of the Clinke were by name depriued of their faculties one of which is lately deceassed and maister Blackewell was not mentioned because he was thought to be dead Others haue reported that he alone was named but all other Priests likewise had lost them that did concurre with him Others againe that such were depriued of their faculties that is vnabled to exercise certaine priuiledges granted Priests at their mission into England as hauing taken the Oath do constantly persist or perseuere in teaching or allowing the lawfulnesse thereof Now which of these reports so much differing is true for all cannot be true I greatly desire to know but cannot learne any certaintie Then as touching the manner how and by what meanes they be taken away little agreement do I find but such varietie in relation thereof as wise men may well admire to see such proceedings in a matter so important as this is and that some of our owne profession and religion should receiue satisfaction and contentment in beholding our miseries by being in such wise punished who haue as it may seeme long expected and Tantalus like hungred and thirsted after the same First some say that we haue lost them and had long since by vertue of the Archpriests Admonition directed To all the secular Priests of England which anon shall be set downe verbatim that all discreete persons may iudge thereof Another report is that the Cardinals of the Inquisition haue giuen their iudgement and censured our faculties to haue dene lost by the Archpriests Admonition at the first A third report is that the Cardinals of that congregation haue themselues taken them from all such Priests as either haue taken or shall hereafter take our Oath of allegiance From these the fourth sort disagree saying That the Viceprotector of his owne authoritie that he hath ouer our nation in his priuate letters writing to the Archpriest signified his depriuing such of their priuiledges as had taken the said Oath and do persist in defending it Fifthly that indeed he did it but by order from the Popes Holinesse And lastly that the Pope himselfe hath sent to the Archpriest a Breue wherein he commandeth him in virtute obedientiae to depriue all those Priests of their faculties which do concurre with maister Blackwell or else haue taken or shall teach it lawfull to take the Oath of allegiance Yea and in such seuere sort as the like was neuer seen ab initio nascentis Ecclesiae viz. Omniexcusatione posthabita etiam ipsis delinquentibus non admonitis nullo iuris or dine seruato That is all excuse set aside yea the delinquents not admonished and no order of law obserued in proceeding with vs. That this is true by mine owne knowledge I can testifie and proue if need were Which of all these reports deserue
man to wake a sleeping Lion or stirre a nest of waspes or hornets whereby he might endanger himselfe to be bitten or stong most grieuously Then how much greater is the follie of such as feare not to irritate or incense a King who naturally desireth nothing more then peace and quietnesse to himselfe and his people We learne in holy writ how dreadfull is the terror of a King in that it is compared to the roaring of a Lion Prou. 20. Sicut rugitus Leonis ita terror Regis qui prouocat eum peccat in animam suam As the roaring of a Lion so is the terrour of a King he that prouoketh him offendeth against his owne life Example we haue of King Dauid who was stirred to wrath by Hanon King of Ammonites vpon ingratitude for his loue and kindnesse For Dauid hearing of his fathers death sent some of his seruants to comfort him Hanon following euill counsell forsooth that Dauid did not send to condole with him and comfort him but to espie the Citie and ouerthrow it Whereupon most vngratefully he euill intreated the embassadours shauing halfe their beards and ignominiously cutting their garments vnto the buttockes King Dauid herewith moued to anger prouided an armie to reuenge this iniurie ouerthrew of the Syrians that assisted the Ammonites seuen thousand chariots and slue forty thousand footmen made hauock of the Ammonites bloud and wasted the cities of King Hanon destroying the people in most rufull maner as you may reade in the second booke of the Kings and Paralipomenon 2. Reg. 10. 1. Paralip 19.20 Consider the imprudence and wickednesse of this king imprudence in not foreseeing what dangers he might cast himselfe into by making his friend his foe and stirring him to ire that sought to liue in peace Wickednesse in rendring euill for good and procuring warres the euent whereof is various which was cause that many innocent persons who were not consenting to Hanons fact nor euer haply wished Dauid hurt were in that fury slaine We reade likewise how this holy king Dauid 1. Reg. 25. being in the desert persecuted by Saul purposed and prepared to reuenge himselfe on malicious Nabal for contemning him and his seruants whom in his distresse he had sent in peaceable and friendly sort for victuals and reliefe saying Who is Dauid and what is the sonne of Isai There are seruants multiplied now a dayes which flie from their maisters Shall I then take my breads and my waters and the flesh of my cattell which I haue killed for my shearers and giue it to men whom I know not whence they are Hereupon Dauid in wrath set forward to be reuenged and purposed not to haue left nor Nabal nor any belonging to him to pisse against a wall had not his wife Abigail by her wisedome preuented the shedding of innocent blood meeting with Dauid and pacifying him with gifts prudent speeches and discreete behauiour In the Ecclesiasticall historie is likewise noted Theod. lib. 5. cap. 17. how that renowmed Emperour Theodosius vpon rage caused many innocents in Thessalonica to be put to death for the murther of one Noble man of his court Many moe examples both sacred and prophane might be here alledged to this purpose but these may suffise to giue vs a taste of the miseries that fal on many yea on such as neuer offended when a Prince is iniured and prouoked to anger Indignatio Regis nuncij mortis Prou. 16. vir sapiens placabit eam The indignation of a king is messengers of death and a wise man will appease it If king Dauid or Theodosius might pretend iust cause to reuenge their wrongs in such sort by seuere punishment not onely of the offenders but also of the guiltlesse then surely none can deny but king Iames our dread Soueraigne had much more against the conspirators in the notorious gunpowder-treason and many others of the same religion whō he might well suspect to be of the same confederation In this there was not a contempt onely of his seruants nor a shauing of beards or paring their garments to the buttocks nor yet the murthering of one of his Nobles but out alas here was intended a most pitifull slaughter of the Kings owne person the Queene his wife the yong Prince his sonne the Nobilitie and people in great numbers and then eftsoones had followed a finall destruction of infinite soules and bodies and of this whole florishing kingdome as euery one that is but meanely wise must needes know In that his Highnesse then proceeded no further in furie and indignation against Catholickes being by them so incensed but staied his hands by the execution only of a few principals in that actiō must needs be imputed first to the prouidence of Almightie God who guideth the hearts of kings and next to his rare and singular clemency See his Maiesties proclamation who seemed ready to pardon loath to punish by bloud so many as in that conspiracy offended or to vse such seueritie as the crime deserued In punishing some he practised iustice in pardoning others he extended his mercie which two vertues make a Prince renowmed and by which especially mercie or clemency a king is most strongly fortified and preserued according to that of Salomon Misericordia veritas custodiunt regem Prou. 20. roboratur clementia thronus eius Mercie and Truth keepe the king and with Clemencie his throne is strengthned Greatly were it to be wished that this his mercy might not but it is to be feared that through the default of some it may be turned into furie as sometime it happeneth when the clemencie of a Prince is not regarded or abused that no Nabal were to be found so presumptuous hardie as to contemne not the Kings seruants but himselfe in withstanding his will by vndiscreete if not obstinate refusing to take the Oath of allegeance so iust and reasonable made onely for the safety of the King and kingdome and exacted as a note to distinguish friends from foes good subiects from euill affected and to take from Catholicks the heauie imputation of treason and treacherie which hath lien long on their necks A child if he see his father in anger chastising his brother feareth though he offended him not and so doth the scholler in the schoole dread the rod when the maister in rage correcteth one of his fellowes The Lion roareth in the desert and all feare that here the noyse Leo rugiet quis non timebit How much more then is a king to be feared Amos. 3. who vnder God hath power of life and death as Pilate said to our Sauiour Nescis quia potestatem habeo crucifigere te potestatem habeo dimittere Doest thou not know that I haue power to crucifie thee and haue power to let thee go a Aug. Trac 116. parum à medio Tom. 9. Which power was giuen him from aboue as is plaine Consider in what case rich Nabal was when he
in this point towards his liege Lord and secular Prince If it must be granted that Christians by the law of God are strictly bound to obey all iust determinatiue sentences and decrees that proceed from the Sea Apostolicke being the highest spirituall tribunall in Gods Church why must it not likewise be granted that subiects as wel Clercks as laicks are by the same law no lesse boūd in foro cōscientiae to be obedient to the King and his iust lawes the chiefest tribunall in the common wealth This I thinke no Christian wil deny as being most cleare and euident in holy Scriptures taught and practised by all ancient Fathers and holy Saints I confesse you will say that humane iust lawes haue their efficacie of binding all subiects to obey in the Court of conscience Tho. 1.2 q. 96. ar 4. from the eternall law of God of which they are deriued according to that of Salomon Per me Reges regnant Prou. 8 legum conditores iusta decernunt By me saith God Kings do reigne and Law-makers decree iust things But whether this law of the Oath which you aime at be such some make doubt for that Cardinall Bellarmine in Tortus and father Parsons in his Catholicke letter affirme many things to be contained therein against the spirituall primacie of the chiefe Pastor and his authoritie of binding and loosing and concerning the limitation to vse father Parsons owne words of his Holinesse authoritie to wit what he cannot do towards his Maiestie or his successors in anie case whatsoeuer Moreouer besides promise of ciuill and temporall obedience in the Oath other things are interlaced and mixt therewith which do detract from the spirituall authoritie of the highest Pastor at least wise indierectly saith he Therfore this law is iniust as being preiudiciall to the law of God and holy Church Some I know will be carping at me for affirming father Parsons to be the author of that Catholicke letter who being ashamed as may be thought of the slender and insufficient clearing the important matter of the Oath by foure seuerall and distinct waies according to his promise denie that euer he wrote the same But will they nill they it is so well knowne to be his and was to the Inquisition in Rome if I haue not bene misinformed and by a verie credible person that heard it from a gentleman present in the citie in his life time and at his death that he could not denie it and vpon the acknowledgement thereof whether with sorrow and griefe for some points vnaduisedlie or erroneously written and brought in question in his old age or somewhat else in some other booke of his against Doctor Morton touching the lawfulnesse of the Oath of Supremacie in some case I cannot say soone after fell sicke and died within eight daies But to returne to our matter Then lawes are said to be iust Tho. 1.2 q. 96.24 first when they are made for the common good secondly when they exceede not his power that maketh them and thirdly when they haue their due forme to wit when the burdens or penalties are imposed on the subiects with a certain equalitie of proportion in order to the common good or vtilitie of the weale publicke as S. Thomas noteth Such is this law of the Oath of allegiance made by full authoritie in Parliament for the conseruation of his Maiestie and whole commonwealth in tranquillitie and peace Tho. 22. q. 67.2.4 Innoc. 3. cap. Per venerabilem Extra Qui filij sint legitimi which is both priuate and common good When I say full authoritie I meane in temporals for so the Prince hath and onely in temporals in the common wealth no lesse thē the Pope in spirituals in the patrimonie of the Church Which law was generaly enacted for all English subiects though principally intended as a distinctiue signe to detect not Catholickes from Protestants nor such as denie the Kings spirituall supremacie in causes Ecclesiasticall from the Popes spirituall primacy as Cardinall Bellarmine in Tortus affirmeth but turbulent spirited Catholickes and these to represse from milde and dutifully affected subiects of the same religion such as disliking haply in words that most horrible conspiracy of Gunpowder King-slaying would in heart haue applauded the euent from those who in affliction for their conscience with patient perseuerance to the end how long soeuer God permit it to continue for our sinnes will in word and deede loue their enemies beare wrongs without murmuring and sincerely pray for the conuersion of their persecutors if they haue any following the example and doctrine of our blessed Sauiour and his holy Apostles That our dread Soueraigne in setting forth this Oath by Act of Parliament hath not exceeded the limites of his power is manifest in that it was framed onely for this end that his Maiesties subiects should thereby make cleare profession of their resolution Praefat monit Apolog. Reg. to vse his Maiesties owne words faithfully to persist in his Maiesties obediēce according to their naturall allegiance And so farre was his intent by the same Oath to detract from the Primacy or spirituall authority of the Pope of binding or loosing by Ecclesiasticall censures or sacraments as the Cardinall and father Parsons affirme that his Maiestie as it were by a most prudent preuention Praefat. monit to take away all scruples that might arise in Catholicke subiects consciences tooke speciall care that that clause inserted by the lower House into the Oath which detracted from the Popes spirituall authority of excommunicating his Maiestie should be forthwith put out And withall declared that the vertue or force of this Oath was no other then that the Popes excommunication might not minister a iust and lawfull cause vnto his subiects to attempt any thing by open or priuie conspiracies against his Maiestie or state What more I pray you could he haue done for clearing this controuersie and satisfying his subiects If then it be so that nothing is contained in this Oath but what appertaineth to naturall allegiance nor more by his Maiestie required then profession of ciuill and temporall obedience which nature prescribeth to all borne subiects as his Maiestie the interpreter of his owne law hath most sufficiently in his Premonition and Apologie made knowne to all by his pen nor that he intended by interlacing or mingling any thing to detract from the spirituall authoritie of the Pope no not indirectly nor against the law of God as is likewise manifest none can iustly say he hath exceeded his limits or that the law is vniust And wheras the Catholick letter hath That there are some things but specifying none of those some concerning the limitation of his Holinesse authoritie if he meane spirituall it is vntrue to wit what he cannot do towards his Maiestie or his successours in any case whatsoeuer That is a glosse of his owne inuention beside the text a notorious vntruth for there are no such words to be found in the
Oath as In any case whatsoeuer Neither is the Popes spirituall authoritie limited or once touched therein as by his Maiesties intention sufficiently made knowne vnto vs doth manifestly appeare And Caietan teacheth that in such like case if the intention of the man that commandeth may be knowne Caietan ver praecepti trangressio it is inough because the force of the precept dependeth of the intention of him that commandeth Now to end this matter I wish you to note the fraude of that Catholicke letter writer for to haue set downe in plaine termes that his Holinesse may depose his Maiestie dispose his kingdomes to whom he list licence subiects to raise tumults take armes against him or murther him and such like he knew would sound to good subiects most odious therefore he thought it to be a point of policie not to deale plainely but leaue the Reader perplexed with this obscuritie What his Holinesse cannot do towards his Maiestie in any case whatsoeuer Whose bare assertion without proofe or truth can in reason conuince none but such as want their common sense Now that it hath bene proued nothing to be contained in the Oath against the law of God nor decrees of any generall Councell and that his Maiestie in making this law and requiting of his subiects the performance thereof according to his intention which is but iust and good hath not gone beyond his bounds will any yet be so wilfully blind as not to see that by the immaculate law of God he is bound in conscience to render to Caesar that is Caesars to be obedient to higher powers as well the ciuill in temporals as the Ecclesiasticall power in spirituals Saint Peter prince of the Apostles taught this doctrine to the Christians of the primitiue Church that they should submit themselues and be obedient to secular Princes and Magistrates though they were heathens 1. Pet. 2. Subiecti igitur estote omni humanae creaturae propter Deum siue Regiquasi praecellenti siue Ducibus tamquam ab eo missis c. Be subiect therefore to euery humane creature for God whether it be to the King as excelling or to rulers as sent by him to the reuenge of malefactors but to the praise of the good for so is the will of God that doing wel you may make the ignorance of vnwise men to be dum And a little after exhorting thē to feare God his next lesson is to honor the King Deum timete Regem honorificate How I pray you is a King honoured when his iust precept is neglected or contemned Some haply without consideration both ignorantly vnwisely wil grant that Catholick kings are to be honoured and obeyed but doubt may be made of such as by the Church are reputed or rather condemned heretikes and aduersaries to the Catholicke faith I aske these if there be any so simple whether Emperours Kings and Princes to whom the Apostles preached this subiection and obedience were not aduersaries yea and persecutors of the Catholicke faith and continued such the space of more then three hundred yeares howbeit the Christians of those dayes instructed both by the doctrine and example of the Apostles in all dutifull humilitie did not giue freely but rendred to Caesar his due how peruerse soeuer their Gouernours were Which lesson Saint Peter their chiefe Pastor immediatly after in the same chapter had taught them Serui subditi estote in omni timore dominis non tantum bonis modestis sedetiam dyscolis Seruants be subiect in all feare to your maisters not onely to the good and modest but also to the wayward Ephes 6. Colos 3. This dutifull subiection likewise teacheth Saint Paul Serui obedite Dominis carnalibus cum timore tremore in simplicitate cordis vestri sicut Christo Seruants be obedient to your Lords according to the flesh with feare and trembling in the simplicitie of your heart as to Christ not seruing to the eye as it were pleasing men but as the seruants of Christ doing the will of God from the heart with a good will seruing as to our Lord and not to men If seruants then commanded by the Apostle were bound to serue and obey their temporall Lords and maisters with such care and diligence were they neuer so froward and wicked Pagans for such no doubt many Christians did serue who by their examples threats or enticements might hazard to withdraw them from the true worship of God are not subjects now by the same law as well bound to be obedient to lawfull Kings and Princes be they neuer so wicked in manners or opposite to faith and Christian religion as heretikes and apostates are Were they not Pagan Princes and Potestates whom Saint Paul willed Titus to admonish Christians to obey at a word Admone illos saith he Principibus Potestatibus subditos esse dicto obedire Admonish them to be subiect to Princes and Potestates to obey at a word S. Ambrose Vpon which place Saint Ambrose Admonish as if he should say Although thou hast spirituall gouernment ouer spirituall matters yet admonish them to whom thou preachest to be subiect to Kings and Princes because Christian religion depriueth none of his right The same holy Father and also Saint Augustine write of the prompt obedience of Christians to Iulian the Apostata which may be a verie good example for Catholickes of these latter times to shew like obedience if they light on like Princes saying Iulianus extitit infidelis Imperator Aug. in Psal 124. Super illud Non relinquet Domi nus virgam Habetur 11. q. 3. c. Iulian. nonne extitit Apostata iniquus idololatra c. Iulian was an infidell Emperour was he not an Apostata wicked an idolater Christian souldiers serued an infidell Emperour When they came to the cause of Christ they acknowledged not but him that was in heauen When he willed them to worship Idols to sacrifise they preferred God before him But when he said Bring foorth your armie go against that people they obeyed incontinently The distinguished the eternall Lord from a temporall Lord and yet for the eternall Lord they were subiect also to the temporall Lord. Hereby is euident that Iulian had right to command Christian souldiers in temporals and they shewed all prompt obedience knowing that their religion taught no iniustice that notwithstanding his Apostacie he being lawfully called to the Empire they were not nor could be absolued of their loyaltie and ciuill obedience towards him Was so notorious an Apostata to be of dutie obeyed and not a king who cannot be iudged an hereticke because he doth not pertinaciter defend any opinion against the Church of Christ but royally promiseth to forsake the religion he professeth if any point or head thereof belonging to faith can be proued not to be ancient catholicke and Apostolicke Here Cardinall Bellarmine will answer That the Church in her nouitie or beginning wanted forces forsooth after three yea foure hundred
yeares from her beginning to depose Iulian Constantius Valens and other hereticall Princes and therefore permitted Christians to obey them in temporals Saint Cyprian saith that in his time the number of Christians were verie great Cypr. in Demetrianum Tertul. in Apologet. And Tertullian writeth thus Were we disposed not to practise secret reuenge but to professe open hostilitie should we want number of men or force of armes Are the Moores or the Parthians or any one nation whatsoeuer more in number then we that are spread ouer all the world We are not of you and yet we haue filled all the places and roomes which you haue Your Cities Ilands Castles Townes Assemblies your Tents Tribes and Wards yea the Imperiall Pallace Senate and seate of judgement Euseb l. 3. de rita Constan Niceph. l. 5. c. 25. c. Eusebius likewise and Nicephorus report That the whole world as it were vnder Constantius was Christian and the greater part Catholicke How then is it true that the Church in her nouitie wanted forces And therefore she permitted Christians to obey their Princes in temporals saith the Cardinall Euen so permitted as father Parsons in his letter to the Catholickes of England against the Oath of allegiance affirmeth that Pope Clement by a Breue had permitted ciuill obedience to our King and recommended to all Catholickes soone after his Highnesse entrance vnto the Crowne As if ciuill obedience had not bene otherwise due but by his Holinesse permission Who would haue thought such an imprudent and strange kind of phrase could haue so escaped his pen But it seemeth he had learned the same out of Cardinall Bellarmines writings and so presumed it would passe as current without controlement And may not the world maruell be it spoken with due reuerence to his great dignitie which I haue euer and in heart still do honour that a man so excellently learned will teach that Christian subiects vnlesse they be permitted by the Church are not bound to render obedience to their lawfull Kings and Princes if they become heretickes or aduersaries to true religion and persecutors Princes infidels lose no right but are the true and supreme Princes of their kingdomes as he himselfe teacheth Lib. 5. de Ro. Pont. c. 2. for dominion is not founded either in grace or in faith so as the Pope hath no authoritie to meddle with them Marry if these become Christians and after fall to heresie what then In that case saith he Potest regna mutare vni auferre Cap. 6. alteri conferre He may change kingdomes and take from one and giue to another saith he Then is their condition worse as touching temporall possessions then it was when they were infidels worse then the conditiō of the basest of their subiects But Christian religion depriueth no man of his right who had right in infidelitie cannot lose the same by receiuing the grace and faith of Christ which is agreeable to the doctrine of the Cardinall howsoeuer he seemeth sometime to teach contrary to himselfe Bellar. lib. 5. de Ro. Pont. c. 3. Christ did not saith he nor doth take kingdomes from them to whom they belong for Christ came not to destroy those things which were well setled but to establish them And therefore when a King becometh a Christian he doth not lose his earthly kingdome which by right he held but purchaseth a new interest to an euerlasting kingdome otherwise the benefites receiued by Christ should be hurtfull to Kings and grace should destroy nature If Christian Kings lawfully attaining to their dominions by right of nature enioy the same as cannot be denied and so are to be obeyed why not also if they happen to fall backe into heresie or infidelitie their right not being founded in grace or in faith To say that such Princes or magistrates are not to be obeyed cometh neare the heresie charged vpon Wickliffe and condemned in the Councel of Constance and is repugnant to the doctrine of the holy Ghost in sacred Scriptures and practise of all blessed Saints and Martyrs who most promptly without any permission of the Pope or Church obeyed Pagan Princes vnder whom they were subiect in all ciuill causes onely in defence of faith and Gods truth made choice rather to shed their bloud then by obeying Caesar to disobey God And where such a permission was euer granted as to obey Iulian or other hereticall Emperour cannot be found in any generall Councell or ancient Fathers writings before the dayes of S. Thomas of Aquine 2.2 q. 12.2.2 of whom the Cardinall learned his doctrine of permission to obey till such time as they had forces to depriue them of their Empire Consider I pray you that S. Paul hauing receiued his doctrine immediatly from heauen writing to the Christians in Rome permitted not for a time but strictly commanded them euer to obey higher powers Rom. 13. Sap. 6. Omnis anima potestatibus sublimioribus subdita sit Let euery soule be subiect to higher powers Was this meant trow ye for onely higher powers Christians or heathen onely for a time No but for all sorts of rulers and as long as there be superiors and inferiors The holy Apostle in this and other his Epistles often inculcateth this necessary vertue of obedience diligently exhorting and commanding as well subiects to be obedient to their Princes as seruants to their masters and all inferiors to their superiors And were not these maisters and higher powers for the most part Pagans Were they not enemies to Christian religion whom they were taught to obey Was any sort of inferiors exempted from obeying S. Iohn Chrysostome will put you out of doubt that such subiection is commanded to all sorts Priests Monkes Chrysost in cap. 13. Rom. hom 23. August in lib. expositionis quorundam propos ex epist ad Rom. and secular men as the Apostle himselfe declareth in the verie beginning Omnis anima potestatibus sublimioribus subdita sit etiam si Apostolus sis si Euangelista si Propheta siue quisquis tandem fueris neque enim pietatem subuertit ista subiectio Let euery soule be subiect to higher powers yea if thou art an Apostle if an Euangelist if a Prophet or finally whosoeuer thou art Marke well For this subiection subuerteth not pietie or religion And he specially noteth that S. Paul saith not simply Obediat but subdita sit And why because power is of God Non est enim potestas nisi à Deo For there is no power but of God Quid dicis saith this holy Father to S. Paul Omnis ergo Princeps à Deo constitutus est Istud inquit non dico Neque enim de quouis Principum sermo mihi nunc est sed de ipsa re What saist thou O Paul is then euery Prince constituted of God This saith he I say not For neither of euery Prince do I now speake but of the thing it selfe that is of power And the Apostle
the Iewes at the same time liued whosoeuer without sufficient authority were spied so much as to haue a sword about him to murther any mā with was in a manner in as euill a case as he that had murthered one indeed If Peter exercising a materiall sword in defence of Christ and at such time as the vse thereof might seeme to him very necessary was sharply reprehended for that he had no lawfull authoritie in such wise to fight for him is it not a sufficient document for his successours not to vse violence on secular Princes by exercising the materiall sword no not in ordine ad spiritualia in defence of Christs spouse the Church for that she hath no warrant so to do Our Sauiour a little before his passion seeing his Apostles to contend about superiority teaching them their duties and in them all their successours and the different gouernment betweene them and secular Princes said Luc. 22. Reges gentium dominātur eorum qui potestatem habent super eos benefici vocantur vos autem non sic c. The Kings of the Gentiles ouerrule them and they that haue power vpon them are called beneficials But you not so but he that is the greater among you let him become as the yonger c. Vpon which place Origen S. Hierome Chrysostome and Basil with one assent vnderstand that secular Princes are not content onely to haue subiects but also by ouerruling they vse thē but you not so to wit you my Apostles and successours after me for it is your part to serue to minister and to feede by word and example c. And in Saint Matthewes Gospell Math. 20. our Sauiour said vnto two of his disciples Iames and Iohn You know that the Princes of the Gentiles ouerrule them and they that are the greater exercise power against them It shall not be so among you but whosoeuer will be the greater among you let him be your minister c. Is it not plaine tnat our Lord Iesus though he teach not paritie with Puritans nor forbiddeth superiority among Christians neither Ecclesiasticall nor temporall yet he will not that his Apostles nor their successors Bishops and Priests being called to the state of a celestiall kingdome that differeth from the conditiō of a temporall kingdome should rule like vnto Kings and secular Princes who cary a materiall sword ad vindictam malefactorum for reuenge of malefactors and some now and then imperiously gouerne their subiects with pride tyranny contempt of inferiours and for their owne lucre more then the vtility of their subiects Which kind of gouernement is forbidden both by the doctrine and example of our Sauiour 1. Pet. 5. Presbyteros Compresbyter so readeth and expoundeth S. Hierome ep 85. So translate Erasmus and Beza and humility commended to all the Cleargie yea to Peter himselfe who cōformably to this likwise instructed such as at any time to the worlds end should beare rule in Gods Church saying Seniores igitur qui sunt inter vos obsecro ego consenior c. The seniors therefore that are among you I beseech my selfe a consenior with them c or Priests my selfe a fellow Priests feede the flocke of God which is among you prouiding not by cōstraint but willingly according to God neither for filthy lucre sake but voluntarily neque vt dominātes neither as ouerruling the Clergie but made examples of the flocke from the heart Whereby appeareth that all violence coaction and compulsion by exercising the temporall sword which is the sword of Kings is wholly forbidden all Ecclesiasticall persons To me it seemeth not without a mysterie that onely Peter among the rest of the Apostles should not strike any in all that hellish troupe coming in fury to lay violent hands on their Lord no not the traytor Iudas that with a kisse betraied him the ringleader of the rest and so better deserued to haue had his head cut off but onely him whose name is so precisely recorded by the Euāgelist to be Malchus and that he should be checked and reproued by our Sauiour Iohan. c. 18. of whom haply he expected to be commended for his zeale But though Peter might pretend iust cause to be moued to strike as he did yet was his fact reprehensible in two respects First for that asking Christ the question whether he and his fellow for no moe of the eleuen had swords about them should strike or no stroke without his grant yea against his will Secondly because his fact had rather a shew of reuenge then of defence For what might he think to do with 2. swords against so many what possibility to preuaile And as may appeare likwise by Christs words vnto him Math. 26. Returne thy sword into his place for all that take the sword shall perish with the sword And in S. Iohns Gospell Iohan. 18. Put vp thy sword into the scabbard the chalice which my Father hath giuen me shall not I drinke it By all which is cleare that Peter was iustly reprehended for striking without commission the high Priests seruant Malchus which name in Hebrew or Malcuth signifieth Rex or Regnum doubtles in my iudgemēt not without a great mystery the admirable prouidence of God thereby haply instructing posterity that no lesse reprehensible is it in Peters successours as they are Peters successors to dethrone Kings and depriue them of their kingdomes which cannot be done without drawing forth and striking with the materiall sword then it was in Peter himselfe for cutting off Malchus eare And that they ought not to vse such kind of violence on the persons of Kings no nor inferiors to Kings hauing no commission from Christ to punish corporally no more then Peter had against Malchus but onely spiritually Now to returne to the authoritie or power meant by S. Paul Rom. 13. Omnis anima It is most plaine that the Apostle in that chapter recommended to Christians their dutiful obedience to secular Potestates because hauing preached obedience to spirituall Pastors some newly conuerted thought themselues being Christians See S. Chrysost in c. 13. ho. 23. Ro. to be freed by Christ from al former subiection now not bound to obey either Emperour King or any temporall Lord for that they were heathens and persecutors of the Apostles and Christs religion For which cause and for that the Apostles generally were slandered and said to be seditious and vntruly charged of their aduersaries that they withdrew men from order and obedience to ciuill lawes and officers Saint Paul here as S. Peter doth in his first Epistles to stop the mouth of such flanderous tongues cleareth himselfe and expresly chargeth euery man and woman to be subiect to their temporall Princes and superiors howbeit in such matters as they may lawfully command and in things wherein they are superiors Conformable to his doctrine was likewise his example and of the rest of the Apostles who in all matters not repugnant to
freed from the law as touching the compulsiue force of the law because no man may giue iudgement of condemnation against him if he do against the law if none then not the people nobles or commons assembled whereupon on that of the Psalme Psal 50. Tibisolipeccaui To thee only O God I haue sinned the Glosse saith Quòd Rex non habet hominem qui sua facta dijudicet That a King hath not any man that may determine his facts But as touching the directiue power of the law the Prince is subiect to the law by his owne will as it is said Extra de constitut cap. Cum omnes Quod quisque iuris c. What law any do decree for another he ought to vse the same law himselfe According to that Patere legem quam ipse tuleris What if a Prince will not do what he ought to do what then who may compell him None but God to whom onely he is inferiour Tert. Ad Scapulam in Apologet. Greg. Nazian orat in Iulian. Amb. orat ad pop inter ep 32.33 Tertullian and other Fathers affirme who ruleth the hearts of Kings at his pleasure being his Vicegerents in earth and other remedy then prayers teares and patience subiects haue none at all I will not deny the Popes Holinesse to haue power to dispence in vowes yet if I should affirme that in solemne vowes of religion he cannot I should not disagree from S. Thomas and other Diuines Papa non potest facere c. 2.2 q. 88. a. 11. The Pope cannot make one that is professed in religion to be no religious man that is release or free him of the bonds of chastitie pouertie and obedience vowed Abdicatio proprietatis c. The renouncing of proprietie as also the keeping of chastitie is so essentially annexed to the monasticall rule or the state of a Moncke that against it the Pope himselfe cannot dispence This is the opinion of S. Thomas as Caieta◠affirmeth as much as it dependeth of the Decretall Extra de statu Monach. in fine illius cum ad monasterium And he concludeth And therefore in a solemne vow of religion it cannot be dispenced withall by the Church Who will say that this holy Doctor denieth the Popes spirituall power though he differ from Cardinall Bellarmine Were he not a great Doctor and blessed Saint that writeth in this wise I know some of our tender consciences would be much scandalized for they cannot endure to heare any man talke a word of the limitation of the Popes power what he cannot do forsooth as if he were omnipotent But these are for the most part the ignorant sort that beleeuing him to be Christs Vicar beleeue also that he is endued with Christs power of excellency and can do all that he could do as man when he was here on earth Let these learne that his Holinesse neither challengeth Christs power of excellencie as to institute sacraments to remit sinnes without out the ministery of a sacrament to make an article of faith and such like but onely that which it pleased our Lord to communicate vnto him nor the most learned Diuines yeeld him all authority without limitation For beside that which S. Thomas writeth of dispensation in vowes Victoria de sacram ord Franciscus à Victoria disputing whether the Pope may delegate power vnto a Priest who is not a Bishop to giue orders concludeth that S. Thomas Paludanus and all say he cannot And against his dispencing in matrimony before consummatiō Idem tract De matrim cland nu 282. Teneamus cum tota caterua Theologorum quòd Papa non potest dispensare in matrimonio rato Let vs hold with the whole troupe of Diuines thant the Pope cannot dispence in matrimony called ratum that is before it be consummate And Cardinall Bellarmine admitteth a limitation Dicimus Papam habere c. Bellarm. lib. 5. de Ro. Pont. cap. 4. We say that the Pope hath that office which Christ had whē he liued here on earth but we cannot giue him those offices which Christ had as he was God or as a man immortall and glorious but onely those which he had as a mortall man Whereby you see that the Popes power is not without some limitation howbeit he exceedeth in yeelding him all that Christ had as he was a mortall man as is said before Now remaines to be discussed whether his Holinesse may absolue from all oathes and so from this Oath of allegiance Which question serueth most for our purpose in hand It is to be noted that euery oath is either assertory that is of things present or past or else promissorie of things to come and either of good and lawfull matters or of euill and vnlawfull An vnlawfull thing and that which cannot be performed without sinne is not matter of an oath and therefore requireth no dispensation or absolution from it as is manifest for whosoeuer should sweare to commit adultery which is promissorie or neuer to pray neuer to fast and such like will any man say that he must seeke to be absolued from that oath and not rather that he is bound ex naturarei not to performe it 2.2 q. 89. ar 9. ad 3. being euill in it selfe S. Thomas saith Sometime it happeneth that that which falleth vnder a promissorie Oath is repugnant to iustice either becausce it is a sinne and so is bound not to keepe it or else for that it is a hinderer of a greater good as not to liue a virgine not to enter into religion and such an Oath needeth no dispensation but is lawfull for him that sweareth to keepe it or not to keepe it And somtime he saith somewhat is promised of which there is doubt whether it be lawfull or vnlawfull profitable or hurtfull absolutely or in some case and in this euery Bishop may dispence But in an assertorie Oath Syluester verbo Iuramentum 5. n 2. S. Thomas in the place aboue said ad 1. and all Dolors hold there can no dispensation or absolution be granted by any Bishop or Pope The reasons such as vnderstand may see in S. Thomas When in an Oath is any thing sworne or promised to Prince or priuate man which is manifestly iust according to the law of God and accompanied with these three associates Veritie Iudgment and Iustice that ought duly to be performed of him that so sweareth Exod. 20. Matth. 5. Reddes Domino iuramenta tua and cannot be dispenced withall when as the obseruation of an Oath falleth vnder a diuine precept which is indispensable as S. Thomas writeth in the place aboue noted ad primum And in euery such Oath yea though it be coacted riseth an obligation whereby a man resteth bound to God which is not taken away in foro conscientiae as he affirmeth To which purpose S. Bernard writeth thus Bern. lib. de praecepto disp c. 5. Illud quod non ab homine traditum c. That which
not onely that impious opinioÌ„ or heresie of Anabaptisme or Brownisme which he held before but also all other heresies as Pelagianisme Arianisme Nestorianisme c. which haply he had alwayes before detested This therefore is but a vaine verball shift of some who not knowing what to say against the maine points of the Oath are driuen out of the profundity of their wits to seeke a knot in a rush to inuent a difficultie where none is therby to intrap the soules of scrupulous consciences and deterre them from performing their dutie to their Prince making no conscience to ouerthrow them also in their temporals If any insift saying that they thinke indeed the doctrine which teacheth it to be no sin to depose or murther a good and lawfull King such a one as gouerneth for the good of the common wealth to be hereticall but if he become a tyrant such a one as hath more care of his owne vtilitie then of the weale publicke and seeketh to subuert the State persecuteth the professours of the true religion and sets vp idolatrie in steed of Christian faith in the iudgement of the people it is not heresie to teach that he may be deposed by the State assembled or lawfully murthered by any man whatsoeuer And is not this pernicious doctrine of many sectaries of this age heresie It being directly repugnant to the doctrine and example of our Sauiour Christ and his Apostles against the law giuen to Moses Thou shalt not kill as also against that saying of our Lord Qui acceperit gladium gladio peribit Whosoeuer shall take the sword to strike withall without authority shal perish with the sword This was that dangerous positioÌ„ worthily condeÌ„ned as heretical in the Councel of Constance Quilibet tyrannus potest debet licitè meritoriè occidi c. Conc. Constant sell 15. an 1415. Euery tyrant may and ought lawfully and meritoriously to be murthered by any his vassall or subiect wharsoeuer either by close trechery or by smooth practises and insinuations notwithstanding any Oath taken or promise of allegiance made vnto him nay not so much as expecting the sentence or warrant of any Iudge whatsoeuer Against which error this holy Synode endeuoring to arise and vtterly to extinguish the same after mature deliberation doth declare and define that this doctrine erroneous in faith and manners and doth reiect and condemne it as hereticall and scandalous opening a gap to fraude deceipt dissimulation treason and periury It doth moreouer declare and define that they who shall obstinatly maintaine this pernicious doctrine are heretikes and as such to be punished according to the canonicall decrees And that this is the intent and purpose of the Synode Molanus de fide haeret ser lib. 5. c. 6. Molanus sheweth thus Patres indistinctè de quolibet tyranno loquuntur doctrina illa de vtriusque geâ—er is tyranno est in fide moribus erronea The Fathers speake indistinctly of euery sort of tyrant and that doctrine of killing a tyrant of either sort is in faith manners erroneous land it giueth way to fraudes deceipts lyings treasons periuries for those things which concerne the commonwealth are not to be handled or accomplished of priuate persons among which is the occision of an inuader Thus farre he This doctrine or position was also long since two yeares before the Councell condemned as impious hereticall and damnable by 141. Diuines of the Faculty or schoole of Paris anno 1413. December 13. and now lately againe by the same facultie anno 1610. since the bloudie parricide of the French king Henry the fourth The decree is this The decree of the Doctors of Sorb as it is set downe in Antimariana Censet seditiosum impium haer eticum esse The sacred Facultie iudgeth or decreeth that it is seditious impious and hereticall for any subiect vassall or stranger vpon what occasion pretence or diuised colour soeuer sacris Regumpersonis vina inferre to do any violence note wel against the sacred persons of Kings Whereunto accordeth S. Thomas that yea a tyrant may not be slain by his subiects otherwise he should be contrary to himselfe for thus he writeth Tho. de regim prin lib. 1. c. 6. Essetmultitudini periculosum eius rectoribus It were dangerous to the people and their gouernours that any should attempt to take away the life of Princes though they were tyrants for commonly not the well disposed but the ill affected men do thrust themselues into that danger And the gouernement of good Kings is as odious to bad men as the rule of tyrants to good people Wherefore the kingdome by this presumption would be rather in danger to forgo a good Prince then a wicked tyrant So S. Thomas By this Catholicke censure of that famous Vniuerfitie and by the definitiue sentence of the generall Councell and the doctrine of S. Thomas you see it to be condemned as hereticall and damnable doctrine that Princes as in our Oath which be excommunicated or tyrants by the Councell may be deposed which cannot be effected without violence to their persons and slaughter of many men by their subiects Nobles or commons or any other whatsoeuer Whereby you may secure your conscience this part of the Oath to be lawfull and may be taken without feare or preiudicating the Popes spirituall authoritie Sir what say you then to the Friars killing his liege Lord Henrie the third of France the mod Christian King supposed to be a tyrant in gouernement and a fauourer of heretikes applauded or allowed of as seemeth to some by Pope Sixtus 5. in his oration made in a secret Consistorie before the Cardinals anone after the certaine newes of the act and the Kings death My opinion is that as the doctrine teaching to be no sinne to kill a tyrant is worthily condemned as impious and hereticall which you haue heard sufficiently proued in the precedent pages so such a fact of such a one in such sort must needs be most impious and damnable yea supposing we should grant that King to haue bene such a one as is aboue said albeit the French know right well he was their true and rightful King and besides liued and died a member of the Catholicke Romane Church And whosoeuer will go about to excuse this inexcusable fact and to say that he did it either out of a great zeale to deliuer the commonwealth from such a supposed wicked and tyrannical King or else that he did it by diuine inspiratioÌ„ being ordained and appointed by God so to do Saint Paul teacheth otherwise to wit Non faciamus mala vt veniant bone Let vs not do euill that there may come good And Dauid a man according to Gods owne heart elected to be King of the Iewes both by his example proceeded and in his doctrine taught otherwise For when Dauid persecuted by Saul yea who at that time sought his life came euen to Sauls Tent whilest he was sleeping
in temporals wherein they ought by the law and ordinance of God to be no lesse obedient then to their Pastors and Prelates in spirituals It followeth now to know what authoritie it is the Pope pretendeth to haue whether Ecclesiasticall or ciuill to depose lawfull Kings and dispose of their temporals and absolue subiects of their bounden dutie and naturall allegiance Which question who so desireth to see it more at large he may reade D. Barclai de potestate Papae and M. Widdrington de iure Principum where it is most sufficiently and learnedly handled and before in this my treatise pag. 17 I haue briefly touched it whereto I adde in this place a word or two more for your better satisfaction Among such Catholickes as refuse to take the Oath of allegiance are many who thinke indeed the Pope to haue no power to depose Kings or dispose of their kingdoms howbeit either vpon pretended scruple of conscience or other humane respects are against the taking and takers of the Oath as if they were little better then Heathens or Publicans And some so simple and ignorant as beleeue that no Pope euer challenged or attempted such authoritie on any Kings or Emperors and that no Iesuit or other learned man allowed or euer taught such doctrine so odious it seemeth vnto them But the wiser sort and more learned know how it hath bene challenged and practised by Popes on the persons of Henrie Otho Fredericke Emperours Iohn King of Nauarre for neither heresie or apostasie and since on Henrie 8. and Queene Elizabeth as by censures do appeare And that it is the moderne doctrine of many both Canonists and Diuines in these latter ages which at the first teaching thereof being so farre dissonant from the writings and practise of all antiquitie was generally adiudged to be noua haeresis as Sigebert reporteth S. Iohn Chrysostome that great Doctor vpon that place of S. Paul 2. Cor. 1. Non dominamur fidei vestrae We ouerrule not your faith Sigebertus in Chro. ad an 1088. Chrysost lib. 2 de dig sacerd c. 3. attributeth such power as forcibly restraines offenders from their wickednesse of life vnto secular Iudges vnder whose dominion they are not vnto the Church because saith he neither is such power giuen vnto vs by the lawes with authoritie to restraine men from offences nor if such power were giuen vs could we haue wherewith we might exercise such power c. So in his time and long after such power of compelling offenders by temporall punishments to conuert to better life was vnheard of to be in Bishops of the Church Cardinall Bellarmine in the catalogue of his ancient writers which he produceth against Barclai for the Popes temporall authoritie ouer Princes beginneth with one who was iudge in his owne cause Gregorie the seuenth that began his reigne in the yeare of our Lord 1073. not able of like to proue it out of any more ancient Father or generall Councell That this Pope was the first that challenged or attempted to practise such authoritie Otho in chro l. 6. c. 35. witnesseth Otho Frisengen a most learned and holy Bishop and highly commended by the Cardinall himselfe lib. 4. de Rom. Pont. cap. 13. Lego saith he relego Romanorum Regum Imperatorum gesta nusquam inuenio quenquam eorum ante hunc à Rom. Pontifice excommunicatum vel regno priuatum c. I reade and reade ouer againe the acts of the Kings and Emperors of Rome and in no place can I find any of them before this to wit Henrie the fourth to be excommunicated or depriued of his kingdome by the Bishop of Rome vnlesse haply any take this for excommunication that Philip the first Christian Emperor who succeeded Gordianus for a short space Euseb hist Eccl. l. 6. c. 25. was by the Bishop of Rome or as Eusebius reporteth of the Bishop of that place where he then resided placed among publicke penitents and Theodosius sequestred by S. Ambrose from entrance into the Church for cruell murther Whereby we may note that this learned man could not find no not one example in all precedent ages of depriuing kings of their regal scepters though of excommunication he proposeth onely these two which may haue some shew of truth for meere excommunication howbeit more probable it is they were not excommunicated at all maiore excommunicatione Then this Author in the next chapter following Otho ibid. c. â—6 describeth the intestine warres destruction of soules and bodies setting vp of Pope against Pope schismes and other manifold lamentable miseries that ensued vpon that fact of Pope Gregory against Henrie the 4 who commanded the Bishops of Ments and Colen to constitute Rodolph Duke of Burgundie Emperor Spec. hist l. 27. and to put downe Henrie whereupon followed a most grieuous warre wherein Rodolphus was ouercome who dying repentant said The Apostolicall commandement and the intreatie of Princes haue made me a trangressor of my oath behold therefore my hand cut off or wounded wherewith I sware to my Lord Henrie not trecherously to practise any thing against his life nor his glorie Who being ouercome the Bishop of Ments by the Popes commandement and with helpe of Saxons raised an other aduersary against the Emperor one Hermannus Knoflock whereupon followed likewise bloudie warres After this Henrie gathering his armie together driueth the Pope into France and setteth vp the Bishop of Rauenna against him whom he named Clement and so caused a schisme This sparsim out of the history Such like calamities are more then probable to fall on people and the Church when Emperors or Kings are so violently proceeded withall assured destruction of many and no hope of the correction of any by such means is like to ensue Was such power trow ye giuen by Christ to his Apostles tending to destruction not to edification No all to edification according to S. Paul 2. Cor. 10. none to destruction Otho Frisengensis in another place of his workes Li. 1. de gestis Frederici c. 1. writing of the Popes excommunicating the Emperour sheweth that Henrie 4. thought it to be such a nouitie as he had neuer knowne the like sentence to be denounced against any Romane Emperor before He liued an 1150. And Sigebert in Chronico 1088. affirmeth the doctrine of Priests By euill kings he meaneth such as are deposed Cont. Barcl cap. 5. teaching that no subiection is to be yeelded to euill Kings and though they sweare fidelitie are not bound to performe it to be noua haeresis a new heresie sprung vp Howbeit Cardinall Bellarmine will tell you that such doctrine and practise began about the yeare of our Lord 700 for before that time there wanted as he affirmeth either necessitie or oportunitie to teach or vse such power By reason of like there were no hereticall Princes impugners of the true faith before that time or that the paucitie of Christian Kings to assist the weake forces
of the Church against her persecutors was such as there could be no hope to preuaile As if true faith and religion which is now beside the Indies restrained into a corner of Europe onely did not replenish before that time Europe Africke and Asia No there wanted not necessitie to practise such authoritie on Constantius Iulian Valens Valentinian and other like professed aduersaries of Christ and his Church nor oportunitie Christians being so many so potent replete with maruellous zeale and constant courage in defence of Gods truth to the losse of lands and life if they had knowne such power of deposing to haue bene in the Church and chiefe Pastors thereof and the Pastors knew well what their dutie was in that behalfe But where I pray you lay this power hidden for the space of 700 hundred yeares after Christ by the Cardinals confession suppose I should grant so much vnto him of disposing of temporals in ordine ad finem spiritualem no Scripture no tradition no ancient Father or generall Councell in all that time teaching it If he say there was where or how doth it appeare His Grace hath not yet neither in Tortus nor against our Kings Apologie nor in his last against Barclai produced any such cleare testimonie as may conuince Our Sauiour Christ himselfe refused to intermeddle in deuiding a temporall inheritance betweene two saying Quis me constituit iudicē aut diuisorē super vos Luc. 12. Who hath constituted me a iudge or a diuider ouer you disdaining as it were as Iansenius noteth that he should be troubled or drawne frō the celestiall businesse Iansen conc for which only he was sent by his Father to haue care of carnall and base things thereby also to teach such as are his that they ought not to intangle themselues in profane businesse that gouerne the Apostolicke office According to this is that of S. Paul Nemo militans Deo 2. Tim. 2. implicat se negotijs secularibus No man that is a souldier to God entangleth himselfe with secular businesse What more intangling what more secular then to intermeddle in deuiding and disposing of temporals Non est discipulus super magistrum The disciple is not aboue his maister Therefore his Vicar ought not in such wise to be iudge ouer Kings in things terrene when they are taught by our Sauiours example not to be hindered from celestiall affaires which onely do concerne them whose power is ouer sinnes of men not ouer their possessions In criminibus non in possessionibus potestas vestra Bern. lib. 1. de consid cap. 2. Againe S. Peter prince of the Apostles hauing receiued of Christ all power necessary for the gouernement of his Church which was to be deriued to his successors had not that power which is temporall but onely spirituall for in the Apostles times the Ecclesiasticall and ciuill were distinct and separate as the Cardinall confesseth lib. 5. de sum Pont. cap. 6. Which could not be but were conioyned if they had any such power yea indirectly If then Peter had no temporall power directly or indirectly giuen him by Christs institution who doubtlesse foresaw that it was necessary to be in him and his successours for the correction and direction of soules to their spirituall end it were absurd to say that succeeding Popes as they are Peters successors should haue more ample power then he or any of the Apostles had De Ro. Pont. li. 5. c 4. And the Cardinals argument which he maketh against the Canonists helpeth for confirmation of this matter in hand to wit Christ saith he as he was man while he liued on earth receiued not nor would haue any temporall dominion but the Pope is Christs Vicar and representeth Christ vnto vs such as he was while he liued here among men Therefore the Pope as Christs Vicar and so as Pope hath not any temporall dominion How then cometh it that Popes in these latter ages practise on exorbitant Princes deposition and disposing of temporals when they shall iudge it necessarie or expedient to a spirituall end hauing no commission no warrant of our Sauiour so to do Is it by temporall onely or spirituall onely or by both By their temporall power which reacheth no further thē the patrimony of the Church it is euident they cannot for so they are but equals not superiours to absolute Princes and Par in parem non habet imperium No neither haue they which is more being no Monarchs authority from Christ to put any man to death to banish or to depriue any priuate man of his goods Cost in Osiand propos 7. as Costeru◠a learned Iesuite and other good Authors do hold Nemo Pontifex sanguinis leges tulit hoc munu◠Imperatorum est qui varia◠poenas de haereticis scripserunt quos bonorum spoliatione infamia exilio morte imòigne puniri iusserunt c. No Pope hath made lawes of life and death this is the office of Emperours who haue written downe diuerse puniments for heretickes whom they haue cōmanded to be punished with losse of goods infamie exile death yea with fire c. He goeth on The Pope at Rome putteth no man to death he hath his secular Iudges who minister iustice by the lawes of Caesar To this agreeth Iacobus Almain De ratione potestatis laicae est poenā ciuilem posse infligere Almain de dom nat ciuili in vlt. edit Gersonis vt sunt mors exilium bonorum priuatio c. It belongeth to the secular power to inflict a ciuill punishment as are death banishment depriuing of temporall goods But the Ecclesiasticall power cannot by the institution of God inflict any such paine no not imprison any as many Doctors hold but it reacheth onely to spirituall punishment that is to excommunication and the other punishments which he vseth ex iure purè positiuo sunt are onely by a positiue law Who in another place hath thus Alm. de pot Eccles laic c. 13. q. 1. c. 9. Christus secundum humanitatem c. Christ according to his humanity had greater power then the Pope hath as to institute the Euangelicall law neither had he his power limited to sacraments for he could pardō without application of sacraments his Vicar hath not such but onely that which is declared in his Vicarship for he gaue him power to remit sinnes to preach to giue indulgences c but it is no where found that he gaue him power to institute and depose Kings therefore by any power giuen him from Christ note well he hath not soueraigne power of iurisdiction in temporals This he With these may be ranked Ioannes Maior Maior in 4. dist 24. q. 3. Maximus Pontifex no◠habet dominium temporale super Reges c. The chiefe Bishop hath not temporall dominion ouer Kings For the contrary being granted saith he it followeth that Kings are his vassals and that he may expell them de facto out