of Prayer is the result sometimes of Impudence and Presumption Pride and Ambition or some worse Principle 'T is not to be expected that the H. Spirit help us immediately to the matter and words of Prayer Rom. 8.26 considered Three Arguments to demonstrate the Proposition The Spirit helps us to the matter and words of Prayer by the use of proper and fit means among which may be reckoned pious and useful Forms composed to our hands by others Grace most considerable in Prayer and the principal work of the H. Spirit is to excite assist and strengthen the exercise of proper Graces Where the Form is prescribed one grace more to be exercised The chief operations of the Spirit of Supplications he inwards in fixing the intention illuminating the understanding inflaming the affections c. A wide difference between saying Prayers and Praying-Prayers from p. 300. to 323. Chap. 15. Singing of Psalms the Catechist's third Gospel-Institution slily passed over Six points propounded about it to be resolved from Scriture Of Preaching the Word the fourth Gospel-Institution Needful distinctions about it Difference between Preaching and Teaching Evangelists and Doctors Word and Doctrine between Preaching by Inspiration and by Pains and Industry Preaching more ways than that of Sermons by the Vulgar fixed on viz. By Reading by Writing by Proxy The fifth Gospel-Institution Administration of the Sacraments Baptism and the Lords Supper Sacraments no Scripture-word The proper subjects of Baptism proper Church-members The Anabaptist misledd by the Catechists principles Baptism ill confined to the Infant-seed of Believers onely The carriage of the Synod of Dort as to that point Sitting not a gesture prescribed for the Lords Supper 'T is not certain to conscience that Christ and his Disciples used the same gesture at the Supper as at the Passover The gesture of the Passover different from our sitting No evidence of the Will of Christ that we conform to the gesture then used rather than to other circumstances The last Gospel-Institution Church-Discipline The power given to the community of the people Women excepted in the Administration thereof by the Catechist His Scripture-instances considered A threefold Directory given by him for the Exercise of Discipline The politick contrivance of the separate Churches for perpetuating themselves The Catechist's two concluding Questions from pag. 323. to 347. FINIS An APPENDIX Of the Authority of KINGS AND Obedience of SUBJECTS The Contents A Specimen of the Separatists Loyalty and Opinion of the Magistrates Power in matters of Religion Government an Ordinance of God In all orderly Government some Supreme necâ—ssary That Supreme so far Independent Absolute and Vncontroulable There can be but one Supreme all besides must needs be Subject That the Supreme over us is the King's Majesty undeniably evidenced His power about Religion proved by four considerations No Ecclesiastical person hath an exemption from his Tribunal A Scheme of the orderly subordination of Government appointed and approved of God Active obedience the principal due to Authority and that in matters antecedently good indifferent and doubtful but not in matters evidently sinful Here the passive obedience takes place The reasonableness of that Subjection SInce the committing of the foregoing Pages to the Press I have considered with my self that among all the Brethren of the Separation whom I have either known or heard of there hath not one been found of that Loyal Disposition as to call the War against the last King a Rebellion or his Death a Murther or the Government of O. C. an unjust Vsurpation but then as to Religion it is most palpable that they do all deny any Authority in the King to intermeddle with it and are no less professed Enemies to his Supremacy in matters Ecclesiastical a foundation-Principle of the English Protestant Reformation than the Jesuited Papists Their Judgement joyntly is Let Kings take care of Civil State Let Church of Church-matters debate Now so long as these Doctrines are entertained and acknowledged it is but labour lost to press them unto obedience and conformity to the Laws of the Realm about Religion and the Service of God since these Laws themselves are adjudged by them no other then extravagancies beyond the compass of their Rulers Commission invasions of Christ's Authority the Churches Priviledge and every Christians Liberty unjustifiable in themselves and therefore of no power to oblige them unto duty or brand their most contemptuous neglects for sinful transgressions I have therefore thought it requisite in order to the fuller confutation of their way and principles to annex this Appendix for the rectifying of their apprehensions who shall be willing impartially to deliberate upon what is here offered to them briefly of these two heads First the Power and Authority of Kings or Governours And Secondly The obedience due from Subjects For these two are relatives not to be separated each from other First then concerning the former I take it for granted that Government and Magistracy is an Ordinance of God and they who list to dispute it may if they please confront and oppose St. Paul's thirteenth Chapter to the Romans That which I design to recommend shall be comprised and demonstrated in the following particulars 1. In all regular Governments needs must there be some Supreme and Principal Some 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Some Princeps Some first and chief Some uppermost and Head of the rest to whom the last appeal must be made and at whose tribunal and decision they must acquiesce Ordo non datur nisi cum relatione ad aliquid primum for without this there can be no settled and determined order but there will be a progress to infinity and controversies can never be ended A necessity there is in all Government for some to be uppermost 2. The supreme or chief power where-ever it is seated must needs be so far independent absolute and uncontroulable Independent upon any but God himself for otherwise there will be some above it and so it will not be supreme and uppermost Absolute it must needs be to obtain the ends of Government where by absolute I mean not freed from an obligation to observe the Laws of God and Nature and to Govern according to humane Laws so far as equity will bear but freed from the fetters of all humane Laws when the necessity of Government whereof the Supreme is also to judge calls for it And without this no Government can well be upheld and managed there being ever some cases happening which humane Laws cannot in particular foresee and provide against and therefore the breast of the Supreme must make a supply And then being independent on any upon earth and absolute in the sense explained it must needs follow that it is unaccountable unto any uncontroulable by any but God Subject to the coercive restraint of none besides for if so that to which it is subject will be above it and so it is no longer Supreme and Uppermost and we shall lay the Principles of confusion
whatsoever which shall be made against his or their persons their Crown or Dignity and use our best endeavours to disclose them and make them known It is we see undoubtedly evidenced from our most publick Declarations and acknowledgements that the Sovereignty and Supremacy is seated in the King's Majesty only And therefore For any persons to challenge or plead for a superiority over or co-ordination and equality of power with the Kings Majesty is notorious usurpation And For any of his Subjects or all of them together to resist or fight against the King their only Supreme Governour can never by the wit of man be reasonably excused or defended from the crime of Rebellion yea as the case stands with us a Rebellion grounded on and accompanied with horrid perjury Which are points certainly to be religiously and severely pondered on by all and every one of those who had an hand or share in the late unnatural War that by their repentance they may procure pardon and peace of Conscience from the King of Kings whose Authority is violated in the affronting of his Vice-gerents But hitherto we have considered of Supreme Power in the General and in whom it is seated amongst us in particular it may be requisite now to suggest somewhat of the extent of this power as to Religion and Religious persons which shall be the work of two farther propositions 6. Then The King's Majesty hath a coercive power about the matters of Religion Bishops and Priests indeed as an excellent Author speaks are the great Ministers of Religion but Kings are the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the great Rulers and Governours of it Religion is ministred by persons ordained and appointed to that service but yet Govern'd by the Supreme Magistrate 1. If it be well considered how great an influence Religion hath into the happiness and the neglect of it into the misery of Polities and Commonwealths we must certainly conclude that either the care of it belongs unto Kings or they want the best means of obtaining the end of Government the peace and happiness of their people A considerable influence true Religion hath on people to make them loving and charitable just and honest and therefore Plutarch well call'd it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Cement of every Society and bond of Legislation It is that which lies at the bottom of an Oath which the Apostle calls the End of all Controversie i. e. the last resolution among men An appeal unto God which without Religion were a vain matter Nor is there any security for a Ruler against Treasons and Conspiracies like to the fear God and true Religion obtaining among his Subjects But whatsoever opinions are entertain'd in the name of Religion are not without effect Suetonius observes of Tiberius that he was Religionis negligentior quippe persuasionis plenus cuncta fato agi Careless of Religion because full of this perswasion that all things come by destiny Nor indeed can it be well imagined men should be over-careful either of serving God or their Prince or doing any vertuous action that drink in this perswasion That if men are bad they are so unavoidably and if good they are so necessarily and fatally inclined and determined to be and therefore Plato wisely pronounced that such are not to be suffered in a Commonwealth who teach God to be the cause of sin and we know too well what malignant influence other Opinions also espoused for Religion have been and are daily of to work all manner of confusion such Principles I mean as these That Dominion and Authority is founded in Grace That evil and Heretical Princes lose and fall from their Authority That Kings are but the Ministers and Executors of the Popes or Parliaments or Presbyters or peoples Decrees That all things ought to be common That inferiour Magistrates may reform things supposed amiss against the will of the Supreme That men are to act according to the impulses of the spirit within them which they can give no reasonable account of That Oaths are in themselves unlawful and forbidden to Christians These and the like Principles of Religion as they are esteemed by some and have been furiously prosecuted by the Zealots of several parties have given evidence enough how intolerable they are in a well ordered Government But besides this energy and power either of the true Religion to dispose persons to live together happily or of whatever is entertain'd under the notion of Religion to drive men on fervently to prosecute it God himself blesseth or punisheth Kingdoms and Nations according to their care and neglect of Religion The very Heathens have observed this Dii multa neglecti dederunt Hesperiae mala luctuosae saith Horace And Livie remarques in the general Omnia prospera eveniunt colentibm Deos adversa spernentibus Godliness 1 Tim. 4. saith the Holy Scripture hath the promises of this present life as well as of that to come S. Mat. 6.33 Seek ye first the Kingdom of God saith our Blessed Saviour and his righteousness and other things shall be added to you And it is clearly legible throughout the Old Testament how an happy fruitful peaceable and victorious state is promised upon the condition of Piety and the contrary threatned to impiety Hence is that of Solomon Prov. 14.34 Righteousness exalteth a Nation but sin is a reproach a ruine to any people And upon this is that expostulation grounded 2 Chron. 24.20 Thus saith God why transgress ye the Commandments of the Lord that ye cannot prosper because ye have forsaken the Lord he hath also forsaken you Unless therefore the Supreme Magistrate have power about the matters of Religion he wants the main thing necessary to the end of his office the happy Government of his people This is no trivial argument 2. Parents without question have a Power and ought therefore to have a care of bringing up their Children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord Ephes 6.4 i. e. teaching instructing and disciplining of them in the matters of Religion Gen. 18.19 I know Abraham saith God that he will command his children and his houshold after him and they shall keep the way of the Lord. Now what belongs to Parents in their Family is not to be denied to him who is Pater Patriae the Father of his Countrey in his Dominions Judges 5.7 2 Chron. 29.11 Apud Gerarenses commune Regum nomen erat Abimelech i. e. Pater meus Rex Gen. c. 20 21 26. Rivet in Decal For thus Deborah was call'd a Mother in Israel and Hezekiah a Father yea and that of the Priests too for them he calls his sons And therefore the fifth Commandment which bids us to honour our Father and Mother is understood not only of natural Parents but political likewise i. e. of Governours and Superiours An houshold as Aristotle observes is a kinde of little Commonwealth and a Commonwealth a great houshold 3. Kings being God's Vice-gerents 't is very incongruous and unseemly that they
so far from being a favourer that he is a professed enemy to his pretences but withall must acknowledge himself to have given a precedent for all the unreasonable claims and violences and oppressions in the world which must all commence regular and just when it shall once be allowed that any power belongs to any which cannot justifie and doth not so much as plead the derivation from above A consideration very fit for our times and those especially who presume upon their own conceited gifts and qualifications without legitimate ordination to venture on the weightiest part of the Ministerial function CHAP. VIII The Catechist's opinion of the indispensable necessity of Ministers being chosen by the people largely declared His two Scripture-instances examined Act. 6. Act. 14. The choice of the seven Deacons no rule for all Churches in the constitution of Officers The choice it self an occasional permission The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth not signifie to ordain by the election or suffrages of the community A taste of the Catechist's Learning and Modesty Antiquity untruly referr'd to by him for the peoples right to chuse their Ministers His reasons strike at the Civil state no less than the Ecclesiastical that there must be no Rulers in either but by the peoples choice There is no duty required of the people as to their Officers and Governours which makes this choice contended for necessary Arguments against Popular Elections as un-conformable to the way of the Old Testament made by incompetent judges the occasion of divisions and factions reflected on extreamly by St. Paul's Prophesie 2 Tim. 4.3 4. leaving Ministers under too great a temptation to please and humour the people and very injurious and dangerous to the concernment of Christian Kings in the ordering of the publick Religion and Reformation Bishops Priests and Deacons of the Church of England made ordained and consecrated by the Vertual consent of the People THe fore-going Discourse makes it needless to bestow any farther reflections upon very much of what the Catechist next offers concerning the differences between those whom he calls extraordinary and ordinary Officers or Rulers in the Church Cat. p. 124 125. And as to the rest we shall have occasion to discover the falseness of his affirmations in that which follows That then which I fix upon is the fourth thing required by him to the due constitution of an ordinary Officer of the Church an Elder Pastor or Teacher Cat. p. 125. That he be called and chosen by the suffrage and consent of the Church And this he before assigned as the most characteristical difference of the ordinary Ruler from the extraordinary p. 124. That he is called by the suffrage choice and appointment of the Church it self And again he goes over it as a main foundation to be relyed upon ibid. That his authority is derived from Christ by the election and designation of the Church and therefore confined in the exercise to that Church wherein and whereby it is so derived And this among others is said to be indispensably necessary unto him that would be accounted to have taken that office upon him according to the mind of Christ p. 126. and plainly expressed in the Scripture Whereto I will annex all that he hath spoken in the explication of this particular Fourthly Cat. p. 131. 132 133. 134 135. Election by the suffrage and consent of the Church is required unto the calling of a Pastor or teacher so that without it formally or virtually given or obtained the call however otherwise carried on or solemnized is irregular and defective There are but two places in the New Testament where there is mention of the manner whereby any are called in an ordinary way unto any Ministry in the Church and in both of them there is mention of their election by the community of the Church and in both of them the Apostles themselves presided with a fulness of Church-power and yet would not deprive the Churches of that which was their liberty and priviledge The first of these is Act. 6. where all the Apostles together to give a rule unto the future proceeding of all Churches in the constitution of Officers amongst them do appoint the multitude of the Disciples or community of the Church to look out from among themselves or to choose the persons that were to be set apart thereon unto their office which they did accordingly verses 2 3 5. This was done when only Deacons were to be ordained in whom the interest and concernment of the Church is not to be compared with that which it hath in it's Pastors Teachers and Elders The same is mentioned again Act. 14.23 where Paul and Barnabas are said to ordain Elders in the Churches by their election and suffrage For the word there used will admit of no other sense however it be ambiguously express'd in our translation Neither can any instance be given of the use of that word applied unto the communication of any office or power to any person or persons in an assembly wherein it denoteth any other action but the suffrage of the multitude and this it doth constantly in all Writers of the Greek Tongue And hence it was that this right and priviledge of the Church in chusing of those who are to be set over them in the vvork of the Lord was a long time preserved inviolate in the primitive Churches as the Antients do abundantly testifie Yea the shew and appearance of it could never be utterly thrust out of the world but is still retained in those Churches which yet reject the thing it self And this institution of our Lord Jesus Christ by his Apostles is suited to the nature of the Church and of the authority that he hath appointed to abide therein for as we have shewed before persons become a Church by their own voluntary consent Christ makes his subjects willing not slaves His rule over them is by his Grace in their own wills and he will have them every way free in their obedience A Church-state is an estate of absolute liberty under Christ not for men to do what they will but for men to do their duty freely without compulsion Now nothing is more contrary to this liberty than to have their Guides Rulers and Overseers imposed on them without their consent Besides the body of the Church is obliged to discharge its duty towards Christ in every institution of his which herein they cannot if they have not their free consent in the choice of their Pastors or Elders but are considered as mute persons or brute creatures Neither is there any other ordinary way of communicating authority unto any in the Church but by the voluntary submission and subjection of the Church it self unto them For as all other imaginable ways may fail and have done so where they have been trusted unto so they are irrational and unscriptural as to their being a means of the delegation of any power whatever
none of those Antients and apparently slights the authority of the Antients in other matters And I challenge him to produce any of those Antients who assert this 1. To be the right and priviledge of the Church and then 2. As such to have been preserved inviolate a long time in the Primitive Churches 'T is acknowledged indeed that St. Cyprian and others do teach that the ordaining of Ministers ought to be in the presence of the people to the intent they may object any thing against them if they can and that it was the ordinary custom more 's merita singulorum communi consilio ponderare to advise and weigh with common advice viz. of such as knew them every man's manners and deserts but they no where affirm it the right of the people to Elect those that shall be set over them Secondly We are pointed to the suitableness of this imaginary institution of Christ to a Church-state which is said to be founded by voluntary consent and to be a state of absolute liberty and to have their Rulers and Overseers imposed on them without their choice is contrary to that liberty We have seen †Chap. 3. before this Church-state of his to be as very a dream as this vvhich he now calls Christ's institution in it and it may not be unseasonable here to remarque That his argument of entring into a Society by consent and the liberty of Christians no less strikes at the Civil government than the Ecclesiastical having before told us Cat. p. 117. that without this consent no Society of any kind can exist In reasoning thus therefore against the Government of the Church the state of the Kingdom is certainly concerned Christ requires a free and voluntary obedience for conscience sake to the Civil government no less than to that of the Church and subjection in lawful matters to the lawful powers of both is no piece of slavery and bondage nothing opposite to Christian liberty save unto those only who make all dutiful obedience unto their Superiours such If so it be that our Catechist's reason stand good that where the people have not their free consent in the choice of their Pastors they are considered as mute persons or brute creatures This reasoning extends no less to the Commonwealth than to the Church and there must not be in the one any more than in the other any Rulers but such as are of the peoples choice and appointment And vve have seen enough in these late times to perswade us that this is the mind and sense of the separate brethren had they but power answerable to their wills Thirdly It is insinuated that The body of the Church hath some duty to be discharged towards Christ in this institution of Church-government which they cannot perform if the choice of Pastors be denied them But what duty of the people he means is not farther expressed nor do I know any obligation which the people have as to the Officers set over them besides their Prayers for them their endeavours by testimonies of known crimes to lawful Authority for to prevent unfit persons ordination and their obedience unto those that shall be set over them all which may well enough be performed though the choice of their Pastors be denied them Lastly It is boldly affirmed That there is no other ordinary way of communicating authority unto any which is either Rational or Scriptural but as this is affirmed only without either Reason or Scripture to back it so it may suffice as peremptorily to deny it Which I the rather do to shorten my discourse on this subject and because I am now according to my promise to demonstrate That it is upon several accounts unmeet and unreasonable whatever is by the Catechist and others pretended that the election and choice of Ministers should be left unto the people 1. The Priesthood under the Law was not of the peoples choice but of God's by the hand of Moses Exod 28.1 And in their consecration afterwards the people are assembled indeed for solemnity-sake and it may be a suffrage of Prayer but act nothing towards the performance of the whole business Levit. 8.6 7. And again after that upon Aaron's decease Moses alone without the peoples suffrage substitutes Eleazar into his Office Numb 20.18 True indeed at the consecration of the Levites the people put their hands on the Levites heads Numb 8.10 12. but that was done only in token of their being presented to God's service instead of their first-born as God had chosen them Numb 3.45 There was not then this way of Election as to the Old Testament and what saith the New No man taketh this honour unto himself but he that is called of God as was Aaron Heb. 5.4 But I will not urge this matter farther 2. The people have not requisite and fitting parts to make a competent and meet judgment in the choice of their Pastors and therefore 't is not likely God hath call'd them to a work they are not first fitted for I will appeal to the Catechist here as Judg Whether the first qualification for any Office Cat. p. 125. 126. be not the Gift for it the gift in order to the discharge of the work It is the doctrine taught by himself That It is not lawful for the Church to call any man to that work p. 137. where the Lord Christ hath not gone before them in qualifying him for it 3. There is nothing so likely to occasion Divisions in the Church and which more usually ends in factious determinations than popular election Contention and Sedition have been the known fruit of this way of chusing Pastors where it hath obtained 4. That which is prophetically spoken by St. Paul reflects extremely upon these popular elections 2 Tim. 4.3 4. The time will come saith he that they will not endure sound doctrine but after their own lusts shall they heap up to themselvs teachers having itching ears and they shall turn away their ears from the truth and shall be turned unto fables Where the people are at their own choice every one will seek to gratifie their itching ears and those whom they chuse are left under some obligation to claw them The people will if it be possible chuse one suitable to their own humours one that shall speak pleasing things unto them and the Minister's dependence upon their choice will byass and incline him vehemently not to displease them though in the performance of his bounden duty Lastly This election of Ministers by the people would be highly injurious unto Christian Kings unto whom the especial care of God's publick service in their respective Dominions doth appertain They shall never be able to procure such reformation consent or agreement in matters of Religion as when they have the placing of the chief of the Clergy at their disposal for the people who are commonly bent to noveltie and factions and most ready to receive that doctrine that is
by St. Paul's Prophesie 2 Tim. 4.3 4. leaving Ministers under too great a temptation to please and humour the people and very injurious and dangerous to the concernment of Christian Kings in the ordering of the publick Religion and Reformation Bishops Priests and Deacons of the Church of England made ordained and consecrated by the Vertual consent of the People from pag. 196. to p. 219. Chap. 9. Imposition of hands in Ordination limited by the Catechist to the Presbytery of that particular Church wherein the person is ordained The Scripture gives this power to Bishops Calvin's judgment of the laying on of the hands of the Presbytery Two Questions resolved by the Catechist in the negative Qu. 1. Whether a person may be lawfully call'd to of employed in a part of the office or work of the Ministry only The Catechist's grounds examined and disabled Scripture-presidents instanced in the seven Deacons Christ's baptizing by his Disciples St. Paul's allegation as to himself The Catechist's own Pastors and Teachers divided in the parts of their office and his Ruling Elders opposed to Preaching-Elders No repugnancy herein with the authority of the Ministry or relation between the Elders and the Church The exercise of gifts restrainable till there be right and authority given and after that too by the rules of prudence good order and edification The Church may lawfully admit to a part of the ministry only and advance her Ministers by degrees Qu. 2. Whether a person may hold the relation or exercise the duty of a Minister to more Churches than one at the same time The Catechist's opinion set down at large with the reasons of it and then refuted under six propositions which are manifested to be asserted by him 1. That none can be a Gospel-minister unless first chosen by some particular Church 2. That none can be ordained a Minister but with relation to some particular Church at his cure and charge 3. That no Minister hath power to depute another for his Curat Vicar or Substitute 4. That no Minister may exercise his power or office out of that particular Church wherein and whereto he is ordained 5. That no Minister may have relation to more Churches than one at the same time Arch-Bishop Whitgift's Answer to T. C. about the Similitudes vulgarly used from a Shepherd and his Flock c. 6. That no Minister may remove from one Church or Charge to another without re-ordination Mr. Hooker's judgment for the avoiding confusion in such like questions as these moved by the Casechist from pag. 216. to p. 237. Chap. 10. The necessity of a rightful derivation of Church-authority from Christ usually suggested by the Catechist Of the Peoples consent required to the exercise of the Elders Authority and the Catechists Directory in case of their dissent and from thence how poor and weak a thing the power of Church-governours appears to be made by him What kind of obedience is allowed by those of the Separation as due to Ministers Dr. Jacksons of the necessity and nature of true obedience with the dtnger of the sin of Disobedience to their Pastors The Catichist's difference between Pastors Teachers considered with the fond grounds of the same from p. 237. to p. 246. Chap. 11. Of Ruling Elders The distinction of the Church into Clergy and Laity defended 1 S. Pet. 5.3 no proof that the whole Church is call'd Gods Clergy-Ministerial power a mark of separation That Lay-men among us have a principal rule in the Church and upon that account our objections against Lay-Elders unreasonable disproved The scarcity of persons fit for this ruling Eldership in every Church and the burthen of their maintenance acknowledged by some friends to the cause grear prejudices against them What kind of Elders or Seniors are countenanced by Antiquity The Jewish Elders joyned in the Sanhedrim and other assemblies with the Priests no pattern to be urged here An examination of the express Scriptures prerended to authorize these Officers Mr. Mede's excellent discourse upon 1 Tim. 5.17 Who are means 1. by Elders there Five expositions which do all exclude these Lay-Elders pleaded for in contra distinction to the civil Magistrate as well as Catechist's exceptions to some Branches of the Exposition given of these words answered The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth not denote that ordinary labor which is incumbent upon all Pastors and Teachers as their constant duty Bishops may pertinently enough be meant by the Elders spoken of notwithstanding the Catechist's cavils The same qualifications absurdly required in the Ruling as in the Teaching Elder however their office be said to be so distinct from p. 246. to 273. Chap. 12. Of Deacons Stephen and Philip two of the seven Deacons did preach and baptize The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of a large signification The Office of Deacons in the Christian Church to be gather'd not only from Acts 6. but other places The Catechist's rash censure of all Churches which confine not their office to the care of the poor The ordination of the first Deacons managed wholly by the Apostolick prudentials The circumstances of our state vastly different from the Churches then The change of the Levites when the Temple was built from their first office in attending on the Tabernacle a competent plea for our case 1 Cor. 16.2 considered The Catechist urgeth that occasional Precept as a binding Law to perpetuity and so in effect addeth to the Word of God A sort of She-officers Female-Elders Deaconesses and Widows in the Apostolick and Primitive Church forgotten by the Catechist in describing the pattern given in the Mount His unkindness in excluding that Sex from a share in Church-discipline noted and the good women admonished by what he hath said elswhere to look to their priviledge and duty as Church-members from pag. 273. to 285. Chap. 13. Of Prayer A Catalogue of Scripture-forms of Prayer out of the Old and New Testament The lawfulness of imposing them The Catechist's Arguments against the use of such Forms answered Publick Prayer is to provide for common not personal wants Among all gifts in Holy Scripture no gift of Ex-tempore-Prayer mentioned No injury to any Gift to be confined to a subserviency unto good Order The promise of the Spirit not rendred hereby needless or useless Abba Father at no odds with Our Father The gift of Prayer no more promised the Minister than People Part of our Ministry to be fulfilled is Officiating according to the Publick Liturgy-Prescribed Forms hinder not but tend rather to forward and promote Edification from pag. 285. to 300. Chap. 14. Of the Spirit Gift and Grace of Prayer The agency of the Holy Ghost necessary in order unto right Prayer 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in St. Iames what it signifies The gift of prayer soberly understood nothing else but a gift of Oratory owing its rise to former Premeditations Quick Parts a competent degree of modest Confidence and frequent Exercise What the Vulgar call a Special Gift
should not have a primary regard unto the honour of their master by whose authority and for whom they rule Nay they are commanded in this capacity to serve God Be wise now therefore O ye Kings saith the voice of God in the Psalmist Psal 2.10 11 12. be instructed ye judges of the earth serve the Lord with fear and rejoyce with trembling Kiss the Son lest he be angry and ye perish Now the Religious service proper to and expected from Kings is not only personal such as is required of all other men but that of their regal Capacity in the use of their Royal power and authority St. Austin declares excellently well how Kings ought to serve God In hoc Reges sicut eis divinitus praecipitur Deo serviunt in quantum reges sunt si in suo regno bona jubeant mala prchibeant non solum quae pertinent ad humanam societatem verum etiam quae pertinent ad divinam religionem Aug. contr Cresc l. 3. c. 51. In this saith he Kings do as 't is commanded them serve God as Kings if in their Kingdom they command what is good and prohibit what is evil and that nto only with reference to humane or civil Society but concerning Divine Religion And again saith he Quomodo ergo Reges Domino serviunt in timore nisi ea quae contra jussa Domini fiunt religiosâ severitate prohibendo atque plectendo Id. ep ad Bonifac. How do Kings serve the Lord in fear unless by prohibiting and punishing with a Religious severity such things as are done against Gods Commands Quomodo ergo Reges Domino serviunt in timore nisi ea quae contra jussa Domini fiunt Religiosâ severitate prohibendo atque plectendo Id. Ep. ad Bonifac. For they serve God otherwise quà homines as men and another way quà Reges as Kings As men vivendo fideliter by living uprightly but as Kings leges justa praecipientes contraria prohibentes convenienti rigore sanciendo by establishing Laws with a convenient rigour which command righteous things Thus Josiah made all Israel to serve the Lord their God 2 Chron. 34.33 and forbid the contrary In this they serve God as Kings cùm ea faciunt ad serv endâ—m illi quae non possunt facere nisi reges when they do those things in order to the serving of him which they cannot do but as Kings which none else can do but Kings To this purpose was that Injunction to the King of Israel That he should write a copy of the Law in a book out of that before the Priests the Levites Deut. 17.18 19. and it shall be with him saith the Sacred Text and he shall read therein all the dayes of his life that he may learn to fear the Lord his God and keep all the words of this Law and these Statutes to do them And at the inauguration of Joash 2 Chron. 23.11 the Book of the Testimony was given unto him as an intimation that he was to be custos utriusque Tabulae an observer of both Tables and that not only himself but to see them observed by others and if not vindex to punish them And that we may not think this charge of Religion peculiar to those Kings of Israel it is promised to the Church of the New Testament also That Kings shall be her nursing Fathers Isa 49.23 60 16. and Queens her nursing Mothers and that she should suck the breasts of Kings And besides this a supply of Arguments might be drawn from the largeness of their Commission specified in the New Testament it self Where they are called The Ministers of God Rom. 13. and the Ministers of God for good and revengers to execute wrath upon evil-doers indefinitely and Prayers are required to be put up for Kings and all in Authority 1 Tim. 2.2 that we may under them lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty But 4. It seems to deserve some special observation that Kings as such are properly enough to be called Christ's Vicars deriving from and holding under him their Kingly Power Prov. 8.15 By me saith he Kings Reign and he is elsewhere styled The King of Kings Rev. 17.14.19.16 ch 1.5 and Lord of Lords and Prince of the Kings of the Earth And so they are to be look'd upon not only as the Ministers of Divine Providence in the general for the good of humane Societies but Christ's Vicars also in the external Government and Administration of his Church The Kings of Israel were Types of Christ to come and Christian Kings now are and ought to be as his Vice gerents and deputies in his Kingdom to exercise that coercive power which he prohibits the Officers of his Church as such to execute Our Blessed Lord and Saviour indeed in the state of his Humility on earth did not much exert his Kingly Authority by using of outward force in matters appertaining to God's Religious Worship and Service and yet two notable instances we have wherein he hath set a copy to be transcribed by others St. John 2. St. Mat. 21. both of them upon the occasion of his finding in the Temple those that sold Oxen Sheep and Doves and the changes of money sitting He made saith the Text a scourge of small cords and drave them out of the Temple c. And This we finde he did when he came as King riding on an Asse the multitudes crying Hosanna to the Son of David Christ the Head of all Principality and Power to whom all power is given in Heaven and Earth hath some things in his Kingdom reserved peculiar to himself but yet in others he useth certain Ministers and Deputies The Actions in the administration of the Kingdom of Christ which he reserves as peculiar to himself to his own management are such De imperio sum pâ—test c. 4. sect 5. as Grotius calls Terminales referring to the beginning and ending the entrance and conclusion of his administration such as concern the beginning and entrance are the giving of Laws to his Church under hope of eternal reward or under pain of eternal damnation and the constituting of a Ministry unto himself and thus is he the only Law-giver as I had occasion to intimate towards the end of the first part of the discourse precedent That which concerns the end is a definitive Jurisdiction at the last day the final sentence of Absolution and Condemnation in which respect he is the only Judge of all and as he alone hath done the former so will he do the other himself alone in his own person without a Substitute or Vice-gerent But then There are other Actions of Christ's Kingdome call'd by Grotius Mediae of a middle nature coming between these two terms i. e. between the beginning and ending of Christ's regal Administration and these partly concern the inward and partly the outward man Christ acteth in the inward man by the secret motions of his Spirit in subserviency unto which yet
he useth the Ministry of men in order to the ends of Illumination Conversion strength against Temptations the forgiving and retaining sins In reference to which those Ministers of his produce not acts of the same kinde with the Spirit it self but acts subservient only unto his But then the actions that concern the outward man consist in defending delivering adorning and ordering of the Church and herein he useth not only the Ministry but the Vicar-ship of Kings and Magistrates as being capable in this matter to produce acts congeneal to his own These outward acts now belong to his providence over his Church and as the universal Providence of God which is of it self sufficient for the managing all things yet for the manifestation of a manifold wisdom useth the higer Powers on earth as Vice-royes to preserve and order the common Society of men from whence they are call'd Gods so also the special Providence of Christ which watcheth over his Church not only makes use of and implyes the Ministry of Angels for the good of the Heirs of Salvation but taketh also the Ministers of God's more general Providence in the world into part of this care as his Vicars having once submitted to his Scepter and by them governs and orders his Church who are called likewise after his name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Christ's the Anointed of God Christianity then is so far from taking away the power of the chief Magistrate in the matters of Religion which hath been proved necessary to the obtaining of the ends of Government that it highly establisheth it and gives the Magistrate both a stronger obligation and a greater capacity to discharge his duty therein 1. A stronger obligation being now to esteem himself not only the Minister of God's ordinary Providence but a Substitute of Christ in the external ordering and ruling of his Church And 2. a greater capacity because it acquaints him more clearly with the rules of God's will and pleasure which he is to see observed More I think need not be said for the evincing That Kings have certainly a Power in the matters of Religion in the ordering and governing the external Administrations of the Church A power of reforming what is amiss A power of adding outward penalties the better to inforce an observation of the Divine Commands And A power of ordering and appointing the outward circumstances of God's Worship undetermined by God as may be most decent and comely and beneficial to the unity and peace and edification of Church and State Lastly I add That no Ecclesiastical Person whatsoever hath an exemption from the King's Tribunal or from being ordered and governed by him in the external Administrations of his Office and Function It hath been observed that some Church men are of that make and temper Vt ni pareant territent That unless they obey they may terrifie and affright and the multitude as Curtius once said Vanâ religione capta meliùs vatibus quà m ducibus paret being blinded with a vain Religion obey their admired Prophets better than their Captains and Leaders and therefore it is good reason that Princes for their own security should have an eye even over these and a hand long enough to reach them Rom. 13. Let every soul saith the Apostle be subject to the higher Powers St. Chrisostom's Commentary upon it is That the Command reacheth not only to seculars but to Priests and Monks also yea saith he Be thou an Apostle be thou an Evangelist be thou a Prophet or whatsoever thou art And Aeneas Sylvius could once say Nec animam Papae excipit Neither doth St. Paul except the soul of the Pope though when himself was afterwards made Pope under the name of Pius the second he seemed to recant it Quod Aeneas probavit Pius damnavit Our learned King James in his Declaratio projure Regio against Cardinal Perron well observes p. 65. That this general command by which all Christians are equally obliged is yet directed by St. Paul especially to the Church of Rome as if he had foreseen and would have premonished Illâ in urbe seditionum fontem erupturum ibi nascituram belluam quae civili obedientâ—ae nervos corroderet that in that City the fountain of Seditions would burst forth and there the Beast be born which should gnaw asunder the sinews of Civil obedience What Samuel said of Saul belonged to other Kings of Israel as well as he Wast thou not made the Head of the Tribes of Israel 1 Sam. 15.17 and the Lord anointed thee King over Israel King over Israel and Head of the tribes of Israel are all one Now we read that those tribes had their several Heads but Saul was the head of those Heads as well as of the rest of the tribes of Israel and certainly Levi's tribe was not exempted Moses the first Supreme Governour of the Jews was to be a God to Aaron the High-Priest and the whole ordering of their Religion was subject to him and I might lead you through the series of Scripture History to exemplifie the same in other Kings and then annex a particular reply to the exceptions wont to be made in these matters but that would swell my Discourse into too great a bulk All I shall now say farther is to borrow Saint Bernard's arguing upon the Apostles Universal Let every soul be subject to the higher Powers Si omnis vestra so saith he in an Epistle written to an Arch-Bishop Bernard ep ad Archiepisc Senonensem If every soul then yours Quis enim vos excipit ab universitate For who can except you from every one Si quis tentat excipere conatur decipere If any one attempt to make an exception he doth endeavour to deceive To conclude here is the Scheme of that orderly subordination appointed and approved by God 1. God and Christ above all 2. Vnder God and Christ the King 3. Vnder the King 1. The whole series of Civil Powers deriving all their Authority from him And 2. The Ecclesiastical Order deriving indeed their Spiritual Powers and Functions from Christ himself yet for order sake subjected to the King's Government in all their external administrations and owing all their Temporal Priviledges unto the Kings Laws as the proper Fountain of them I will end this subject with a memorable saying of Marcus Aurelius the Emperour Magistratus de privatis principes de Magistratibus Deum autem de principibus decernere ac judicare Magistrates are to judge of private persons Princes of Magistrates and God of Princes Wherewith agreeth that of Horace Regum timendorum in proprios greges Reges in ipsos imperium est Jovis A few words now II. Secondly Of the Obedience due from Subjects and I have done what I intended The prime Due unto Authority is active Obedience to its commands doing what is required and forbearing what is prohibited for therefore are things commanded that they may be performed and therefore forbidden that they may be forborne and