holding opinions that slow from meer conscience when they publish preach and print them from no principle but meer conscience not for gain or a morsell of bread or for preferment in the state or Armie To this I answer lay aside opinions and answer me this how the Judges that are for libertie of conscience are not to punish some words except they would be guilty of persecution to wit such as these the Trinitie is but a fiction Christ is no more God then another holy man Yea Christ was but an Impostor and yet they punish words and deeds of the same kinde that come from meere conscience The answer must be the former words are from meere conscience and the publishers thereof will swear they hold them as the meere inforcing light and judgement of their conscience But these other words and deeds which the Magistrate censures are not from meere conscience But I beleeve these that acted in the late controverted Parliament and by vertue thereof yea and many Godly men of them that are punished by the Judges and many of the Godly that fled for fear act from meere conscience and will sweare they did so act according to their sworn covenant and to prevent a new warre and that they did it neither for gain nor for preferment in State or Armie And if it were referred to the consciences of most of the Armie why they disbanded not when the Parliament commanded them but doe by their practices treat a warre to themselves and the land a judgement of God of all others the saddest when they have none to fight against but shadows and enemies of straw and hay I judge they would swear that they judged the charge of the Houses against their conscience and unjust and that they hold up warres out of meere conscience and to vindicate the oppressed subjects and for preventing of a new warre and not for gaine or preferment So the question is not yet answered why some externall actions of words and deeds comming from meere conscience without any carnall pretext as they will swear cannot be punished but violence must be done to conscience so the men persecuted and others that doe the like and speak the like from no principle but pure conscience without any carnall pretext as they will sweare are punished and yet neither violence is done to conscience nor the men persecuted for acting according to conscience and a sworn Covenant But they justly punished if acting from meere Conscience be the formall cause why men are not to be punished it should hold in all such acts 4. They seeme to me sick in the braine who hold that it is an act of love and charity in the Magistrate to restrain 〈◊〉 Socinianisme c. and to discountenance such seducers and yet bring arguments against all externall 〈◊〉 in matters of Religion or compulsion in generall a discouâ—â—â—nancing and a keeping of men from places dignities offices is the highest compulsion of penaltie you can devise What arguments fight against any compulsion of the Magistrate positive or negative doth fight against all If it be lawfull for the Magistrate as for all other men to doe all hee can for the truth as some say and the Magistrates invitations recommendation exemplarie profession generall tuition excluding coercing are all nothing but words these agree to all Christians as Christians and are nothing peculiar to the Magistrate the Magistrate as a Magistrate cannot request he must command as a Magistrate and all his commands if disobeyed are in order to the sword 5. The question is not whether Religion can be inforced upon men by the Magistrate by the dint and violence of the sword or onely perswaded by the power of the word Wee hold with Lactantius that Religion cannot be compelled nor can mercie and justice and love to our neighbour commanded in the second table be more compelled then faith in Christ Hence give me leave to prove two things 1. That Religion and faith cannot be forced on men 2. That this is a vain consequence Religion cannot be forced but must be perswaded by the word and Spirit Ergo the Magistrate can use no coercive power in punishing Hereticks and false teachers For the first we lay hold on all the arguments that prove the word preached to be the onely means of converting the soule begetting of faith and that carnall weapons are not able yea nor were they ever appointed of God to doing down strong holds nor can they make a willing people and Lactantius said well What is left to us if anothers lust 〈◊〉 thâ—t by force which we must doe willingly And that of Tertullian It is of the law or right of man and of his natural power what every man worships what he thinks he should worship nor doth the Religion of one either doe good or doe evill to another man nor is it religion to compell religion which ought to be received by wâ—ll not by force since sacrifices of worship are required of a willing minde In which I observe 1. Tertullian speaks not of the true Christian Religion which is now in question but of Religion in generall as it is comprehensive of both true and false Religion Because he speakes of that Religion which by the Law of nature a man chooseth and is humani juris naturalis potestatis but it is not of the law of man or naturall power nor in flesh and bloods power to chuse the true Christian Religion that election is Supernaturall saith Tertullian there and else where often as also the Scripture Joh. 6. 44. Math. 16. 17. Math. 11. 25 26 27 2. Religion is taken two wayes 1. for the inward and outward acts of Religion as seen both to God and man as Lactantius Tertullian and others say so it is most true Christians ought not with force of sword compell Jews nor Jews or Pagans compell Christians to be of their Religion because Religion is not begotten many by perswasion of the minde nor by forcing of the man Again Religion is taken for the externall profession and acting and performances of true Religion within the Church or by such as professe the truth that are obvious to the eyes of Magistrates and Pastors and thus the sword is no meanes of God to force men positively to externall worship or performances But the sword is a means nâ—gâ—tively to punish acts of false worship in those that are under the Christian Magistrate and professe Christian Religion in so farre as these acts come out to the eyes of men and are destructive to the souls of these in a Christian society T is even so not otherwise punishable by the Magistrate for he may punish omissions of hearing the Doctrine of the Gospel and other externall performances of worship as as these omissions by ill example or otherwise are offensiveâ— to the souls of these that are to lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godlinesse and honestie nor does it follow
hypocritically peaceable chast content with their own true in their word as well as punishing false teachers and hereticks maketh many hypocritically sound in the faith So Augustine contra Petilian l. 3. c. 83. 2. There is no ground in Scripture to say that because the Canaanites erred against the duties of the first table onely that therefore israel was to destroy them in warre For Joshua 11. 26 27 28. the contrarie is clear Joshua made warre with them because God having hardened their heart they came out in battle against Israel and so the cause of the warre was not Religion and their madnesse of Idolatrie though on the Lords part it was a provoking cause but violence in invading an harmelesse and innocent people so Ioshua and Israel compelled them not to embrace the true Religion then from thence it cannot follow therefore no lawes were to be made against the false Prophets and blasphemer And if that consequence was null then it cannot be strong now So we say under the new Testament we cannot bring in to the faith the Heathen and Pagans by violence and the sword it follows not Ergo no blasphemer within the visible Church should be forced 3. violence and the sword is no means to work men to subjection to Christ it follows not Ergo because the weapons of our warfare are not carnall but spirituall 2 Cor. 10. 5. 6. the Apostle should not say shall I come unto you with the rod or in love or in the spirit of meeknesse 1. Cor. 4. 21. and therefore he should not deliver any to Sathan 4. nor is this a good consequence because the fear of bodily death or punishment by the sword cannot convert therefore it cannot terrifie men from externall blasphemie and tempting of others to false worship for the externall man his words solicitations doe ill by teaching and his actions not the inward man or the conscience and the soule is the object the Magistrate is to work on For neither under Moses more then now could the sword convert men to the true Religion yet bodily death was to be inflicted on the seducer then as now Deut. 13. 11. And all Israell shall hear and fear and shall doe no more any such wickednesse as this is among you and afflictions work the same way now Rom. 13. 3. for rulers are not a terrour to good works but to the evil wilt thou then not be afraid of the power doe that which is good and thou shalt have praise of the same There be five pull-backs that keep men even in heresie and in a false way as may be collected out of Augustines writings from which by the terrour of just lawes they may be affrighted from seducing of others as 1. fear of offending men especially those of their own way 2. an hardning custome in a false way 3. a wicked sluggishnesse in not searching the truth of God 4. the wicked tongues of enemies that shall traduce them if they leave heresies 5. a vaine perswasion that men may be saved in any Religion See Augustine epist 114. ad Vincent epist 48. epist 50. ad Bonifacium contra Petilianum l. 3. c. 83. lib. 3. contra Cresconium cap. 51. contra Guidentum l. 1. c. 19. lib. contra Parmen c. 10. contra Gaudent l. 1. c. 24. de unitate Eccles c. 20. epist 166. And so that which the Objector Mr. John Goodwine long agoe objected is easily answered that the Magistrate cannot in justice punish that which is unavoydable and above the power of free-will to resist but such are all heresies and errours of the minde For this might well have been objected against that most just law Deut. 13. why should God command to stone to death a seducer that tempts any of his people to worship false Gods because such a man is sick but of an errour in the minde he beleeves he does service to his God whom he beleeves to be the true God in so doing and had the heathen and Jews under Moses more strength of free-will and more grace to resist Apostacie Blasphemie wicked opinions against the true God then we have now under the Gospel And the Lord hath expressely said Deut. 13. 11. Israel shall feare bodily death and doe such wickednesse no more now this was not Ceremoniall or typicall fear but meere naturall feare sufficient to retract and withdraw men from externall acts of seducing and blaspheming which is all that the Magistrate can doe 2. this is the verie objection of Donatists and Augustine answers truely By this answer the Magistrate should not punish murtherers and adulterers for they have not grace to resist temptation to murther certainly the Spirit of Revenge and of whoredoms must be as strong above free will as the Spirit of errour and lies Achab then sinned not in beleeving the lying Prophets who deceived him and it was not in his power to resist the efficacie of lying inflicted on him for his former sins And what sinnes the Magistrate punisheth he doth punish as the formall Minister of God Rom. 13. and so this is the Pelagian Arminian and Popish objection against God and free Grace as much as against us 3. the wickedest seducer is punished for his externall acts of false teaching and seducing which may and must be proved by witnesse or confessed by the delinquent before he can justly punish him but not for any mind-error which is obvious neither to judge nor witnesse Then the true state of the question is not whether the sword be a means of conversion of men to the true faith nor 2. whither heathen by fire and sword are to be compelled to embrace the truth nor 3. whither violence without instruction and arguing from light of Scriptures should be used against false teachers nor 4 whither the Magistrate can punish the opinions of the mind and straine internall liberty But whither or no ought the Godly and Christian Prince restraine punish with the sword false teachers publishers of hereticall and pernicious doctrines which may be proved by witnesse and tends to the injuring of the souls of the people of God in a Christian societie and are dishonourable to God and contrary to sound doctrine and so coerce men for externall misdemeanours flowing from a practicall conscience sinning against the second table as well as from a speculative conscience to borrow these tearmes here when they professe and are ready to swear they performe these externalls meerely from and for conscience For since false teachers and hereticks in regard of the spiritualnesse of their sinne are the worst of evill doers and such as work abomination in the Israel of God and there is no particular lawes in the New Testament for bodily coercing of Sorcerers Adulterers Thieves Traitors false witnesses who but speak lies against the good name of their neighbour not against the name of God nor against Sodomites defilers of their bodies with beasts perjured persons Covenant breakers liars
changed Yet let not us go on with Egid-Coninck to say that if it was lawfull to make war with any nation for wrongs done to men how much more for injuries done to God for making of war is an act of Magistracy and so suppose some jus some power and authority that we have either by the law of nature to defend our life peace liberties or for avenging of such heineous inâ—uries done to the Nation as cannot in justice be decided but by the sword So that sin as sin or as greatest sinnes are not the just cause of war but sinnes as most distructive to humane society for which by the Principles of the Law of nature they may be convinced of fearfull breaches Now these that are Idolators the nations that worship God in Idolatrous way and being of a strange Religion worship a strange God though they doe the greatest injury to God that can bee yet in regard they being other nations as independent on us as we are on them and doe it not in order to the destruction of our of our paece liberty and lives we have not jus over them nor authority to make Warre with them except God gave us a Command to destroy them nor is this a good consequence we may by war revenge injuries done to men ergâ— far more by war may we revenge injuries done to God for war is an act of revenging justice that supposeth some authority given of God over such a nation as we come out against in war 2 Every just war is some way defensive in regard every act of Magistracy is an act of defending of the peace life and liberty of the society or the members thereof and a propulsion of violence by violence and this is the intrinsecal and of Magistracy to hold off unjust violence by just and harmelesse violence for if the life of a murtherâ—r be not taken away by the sword of a Magistrate he will still take the life of another man qui semel â—alus semper malus presumitur â—e that is once wicked is still presumed to be wicked except his wickednesse be restrained and to offend a nation or person that hath not offended us must be unjust violence and unlawfull war and to make war against a nation that hath worshiped a strange God and injured God and not us supposeth that we must instruct them of a wrong done to God by teaching them and instructing them in the true Religion for suppose they worship the workes of mens hands and worship Sathan as some Indians do and so by their own conscience may be convinced and so are inexcusable in foro Dei before Gods tribunal yet are they not so inexcusable in foro humano before mans tribunall as we can make warre against them till we informe and instruct them positively of the true Religion But they that shed our blood and invade our peace and liberties are by the Law of nature convinced and by demands of reparation made to them quickly silenced and need not to be instructed in the principles of the law of nature which are written in their hearts But it may be said What if that Nation will not be informed of the true Religion and will go on contumatiously to dishonour God and reproach the true God Shall we not upon a meer quarrell for Religion make war against them and avenge the injuries done to God and defend his truth no lesse then with the sword we defend our own lives and liberties I Answer there is not the like reason for God and nature have given to the strongest a jus and authority over oppressors to repel unjust violence with innocent violence but that we should force the true Religion on Idolators we have not the like ground except they did attempt to obtrude their false ways upon us and injure our soules for there is a vast difference between a people never receiving the true Religion and a people who have imbraced and submitted to lawes that have inacted the profession of the true Religion those that never professed the true Religion cannot bee compelled to receive it by the Sword of another Nation except they first subdue them in a just warre and be masters of them and they may educate the posterity of the subdued people and discharge the duty of parents to them and impose lawes on themselves to cast away the Idols of their fathers house and to learn the knowledge of the true God but they cannot make the not receiving of the true Religion the ground of a war for we read not of any such cause of war in the Scripture It is true God did command his people to destroy the Canaanites but Idolatry was not the quarrell Josh 11. 19. There was not a nation that made peâ—â—â— with the Children of Israel save the Hittites the inhabitants of Gibe on all other they tooke in battell 20. For it was of the Lord to harden their heart that they should come against Israel in battell that he might destroy them utterly and that they might have no favor but that he might destroy them as the Lord commanded Moses And those that they subdued in the Wildernesse denied them harmelesse passage through their Land It is true some Popish writers as Masius Cornelius a lapide Abulensis say if the Canaanites would have sought peace and imbraced the worship of the true God the Israelites would not have destroyed them but the Text Calvin and famous Papists as Cajetanus Swarez Gamachaâ—s and Augustine before them say plainly Israel made warre against them and Israel but defended themselves against the Canaanites Libertines say the teaching of the Gospell Mat. 28. and not the sword is a means to spread the Gospell so say we I see no warrant wee have to obtrude the Gospell in the purity thereof upon Papists in France and Ireland but we may lawfully avenge the blood of the people of God on Irish Murtherers who excercise extreame cruelty and Tyranny over persons and the Consciences of the Martyrs and the oppressed people of God amongst the Papists The question seemes harder when these of a false Religion in regard of their neernesse and vicinitie to a Kingdome professing the true Religion when as they may infect them or if they be in one Nationall Covenant and under the oath of God to indeavour the extirpation of all false religions and what is contrary to sound doctrin It is certain the Kingdom of Judah might justly have avenged the Apostacy of the ten Tribes from Davids house and from Jerusalem where the Lord had set his name for the worshipping of the Golden Calves if the Lord by his Prophet had not expresly forbidden them to fight against their brethren 1 Kings 12. And the children of Israel did justly attempt Warre against the two Tribes and the halfe because they erected a new Altar for worship as they conceived which was Apostacy from the Covenant of God and the true
nor can an English Judge as a Judge judge of transporting of wines out of France or of crying down or up the worth of Monies within Scotland only the judges of France can and ought to judge of the former and that not as Judges simply but as â—â—th Judges of France and only the Judges of Scotland as they are such can judge of crying up or down monies in Scotland and upon the same ground Judges as Judges are not nor ought they as Judges to determine what Gospel truths are praise-worthy in order to civill rewards and what Gospel heresies are punishable for of these they are to determine judicially as such judges as Christian Judges who are hearers of the Gospel Though Christianitie adde nothing to the essence of a judge as a judge yet Christianity addeth something to the being and authoritative power of such a judge a Christian a Scottish an English judge this remaineth then true of a judge What a Judge doth as a Judge that all Judges may do for quod convenit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 convenit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but what such a judge doth as such a judge as Christian as Scottish as English that all judges may not nor cannot doe So a Christian husband father master as Christian is to give Christian Counsels and instructions to his wife children servant but it followes not that all husbands all fathers all masters though heathenish and Pagan though they never head of Christ are to give Christian counsells and 〈…〉 to the principles of the Gospel to their wives sons servants So the Christian Prince not as a Prince simply but as a Christian Prince is to confer his royall authority in a politick and co-active way to promote the Mediatory Kingdome of Christ which all judges on earth are not to doe for these Judges only Psal 2. are to kisse the Son who hear the decree published Thou art my Son Psal 2. 6. for a Law never proâ—â—â—gated neither by heart ingraving neither by minister all publication can oblige no man as is cleer Rom. â— 12. Rom. 10 14 15. and 5. 13. Joh. â—5 22. Matth. 11. 2â— 23 24. Yet shall it not follow that the Christian Judge is a sub-mediator under Christ and subordinate as a Vice-gerent to the Mâ—diator for the christian Magistrate does not promote Christs Kingdome as the Minister of Christ or as representing Christs person for the Christian Magistrate is the Minister of God and the Vice-gerent of God now God as the Soveraign Lord hath a co-active power overall the Magistrate Heathen or Christian is his Vicegerent and the Christian Ruler may compell with the Sword all to serve the Son yet the Son as Mediator whose kingdome is not of this world sends not men out to promote his Kingdome with the sword Joh. 18 36 37. Mr. Williams civill peace is pax civitatis the peace of the citie Jer. 29. 7. Pray for the peace of the Citie which peace of the citie or citizens so compacted in a civill way of union may be intire unbroken safe c. notwithstanding so many thousands of Gods people the Jewes â—â—re there in bondage and would neither be constrained to the worship of the City of Babell nor restrained from so much of the worship of the true God as they 〈◊〉 practise as is plain in Shadrach Moshaâ—â— and Abedaego Daniel 3. in Daniel c. 6. who would rather suffer then deâ—ist from true worship or practice falsâ— So the 〈…〉 Papists keep the peace of their Townes and Cities safe and distinct where there is no spirituall and heavenly peace Answ All this is to prove that there may be no breach of Citie peace or civill peace where there are 〈◊〉 of sundry Religions But 1. the mans should remember there is a Christian externall peace which 〈◊〉 an 〈◊〉 providence can not be kept where there be divers Religions and sundry waies of worshipping Christ we beleeve our Saviour intendeth so much Mat. 10. 34. Thinke not that I am come to send peace 〈◊〉 earth I came not to send peace but the sword v. 35. For. I am come to set a man at variance against his father and the daughter against hâ—r mother Luke 21. 16. And ye shall be beâ—r dyed â—oth by your parents brethren kinsfolks and friends and some of you they shall cause to be put to death And what is the quarrell but divers Religions and waies of worship about Christ So Paul exhorteth to Christian peace Ephes 4. 3. Indeavouring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace not because of contrary Religions and many Sectaries called the holy partie that are to bee tolerated in meeknesse and mutuall forbearance But v. 5. Because there is but one Lord one faith one baptisme and but one Religion whether Presbyteriall or Independent and since the Apostles and Christ in the New-Testament so often recommend peace and never once insinuate forbearance in diversitie of Religion and all the Apostles and Apostolike Church had but one Religion toleration of many Religions not being a part of the New Testament liberty where with Christ hath made us free as is the libertie from Ceremonies and righteousness by the Law that the foolish Galathians affected Gal. 5. 1 2 We conclude there is a Law against Toleration of many Religions not any repealing of that Law in the New Testament but divers Religions expressely forbidden as contrary to peace and foretold to fall out as sad judgements Mat. 19. 35. Mat. 24 24 Luke 21. 14. 15 16 17 18. 1 Tim. 4. 1 2 3 4. 2 Tim. 3. 5 6 7. 8. 2 Joh. 10. Affirmanti incumbit probatio Our Adversaries are obliged to give us precept promise or godly practice why a morall sin forbidden and severely punished in the old Testament should yet remaine a Moral sin in the New Testament and yet not be punishable by men or Churches yea Solomous toleration of the Idolatrous worship 1 Kings 11. provoked the Lord to anger yet his wives consciences should not have been compelled to leave off the worshipping of the Gods of the Moabites Ammonites by this way Rom. 14. 19. Let us follow after the thing that makes for peace saith Paul but Toleration of many Religions is contrary to peace if one of them be the only true way the rest are all false waies the mixture of the two contrary seeds the seed of the Serpent and the seed of the woman must be against peace and Paul exhorting to union and Christian peace thinks many Religions many Sects and opinions tolerated 1 Cor. 1. 10. to be just contrary to peace Now I beseech you brethren by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ that ye all speak the same thing and that there be no divisions among you but that ye be perfectly joyned together in the same minde and in the same judgement Hence he seriously dehorts from Schismes and Sects whereas upon supposition of divers Sects all being godly we should have
be reverenced ibid. Of obligation of Conscience and the acts therefrom resulting p. 10. Of witnessing of Conscience and self-reflection p. 11. The knowledge of our own state of grace may be had by the fruits of the spirit of Sanctification p. 12 Acts of Conscience in relation to the Conclusion p. 14. A Conscience good or ill p. 15. A good Conscience ibid Conscience the rarest peece that God made ibid. A tender Conscience p. 19. Who ingrosse the name of tender Consciences to themselves ibid. Of a scrupulous Conscience p. 21 The causes of a scrupulous Conscience ibid. Chap. 2. Conscience under Synods and how and that the Conscience cannot have absolute libertie in matters of Religion How a Synod compelleth p. 23. The Conditions that Libertines require to be in a Synod p. 24. Libertie to question every thing is Licence ib. The Church though not infallible may determine infallible points ib. A Confession Covenant or Synodicall decree a secondarie rule of Faith p. 25 A Ministeriall and publike and a Christian and private judgement and faith how they differ ibid. Libertines give us Sceptisme and Fluctuation for Faith p. 28 There is need of Interpretation and decision of Synods ib. That Confessions ought to be only in expresse Scripture words is â—â—â—ther false principle of Libertines p. 29 Ancient bonds of Liberty of Conscience p. 32 The end of Synods is not to remove heresies by any means good or bad or to crush Heresie so effectually as these Heresies shall never 〈◊〉 heard of in the world again ibid. The necessity of Synods p. 33 Pastors subject the disobedient to wrath yet are not Lords over the Conscience Ergo neither are Synods Lords â—ver the Conscience for that ib. The subject of a Synod not a Sceptick Conjecturall truth as Libertines suppose p. 34 The sence of Scripture from Synods beleeved truly to be infallible though Synods consist of men who are not infallible as an 〈◊〉 Pitcher doth contain gold and precious Rubies and Saphires in it though there be no gold in the matter of the Pitcher but only clay 2 Cor. 4. 7. ibid. How a true decision of a Synod is ever the same and not retractable p. 36 Though all truths be peremptorily decided in the word yet is there need of a Ministeriall and declarative decision of men because Teachers may deceive and those that are taught are ignorant and dull p. 37 Men are to come to Synods not as Nullifidians but as ingaged for truth p. 38. Synods may impose upon others and how ibid. Ancient bonds or Libertie of Conscience stated p. 40 The Conditionall imposing of Synods consisteth well with trying of all things what Libertines say on the contrary is naught ibid. Conditionall imposing proveth the imposeâ— to be no Lord of the Conscience p. 42 Chap. 3. The Church may complain of Hereticks p. 43 Pastors are not out of their calling nor Apparitors nor tale-bearers if they complain to the Magistrate of Hereticks p. 44 Chap. 4. The State of the question of compulsion of Conscience and toleration p. 46. Opinions cannot be compelled nor the mind or will in the elicite acts ibid. The question is Whether the Magistrate may compulsorily restrain the externall act of the outward man in religion ibid. Shame and feare of rebukes by Pastors and Church-censures have the same compulsorie influences on false Teachers that the fear of publike punishment by the Synod hath p. 47. Church censures are as compulsorie on the Conscience as coercing by the Sword p. 48 Some externall actions of injustice flowing from meer conscience are punished justly without any note of persecution by grant of Libertines and why not all others also p. 49 Ancient bonds of Libertie of Conscience p. 50 Discountenancing of men and negative punishing of them for their Conscience is punishing of them ibid. Ancient bonds p. 12. ibid. How Religion may be compelled how not p. 51 One mans Religion remaining in the mind and will may hurt or benefit the man himself not any others but true religion as it comes forth into acts of teaching may edifie and win others and false religion may subvert the faith of others ibid. The Magistrate does not command religious acts as service to God but rather forbids their contraries as disservice to Christian Societies ibid. How Tertullian and Lactantius are to be expounded of forcing to Heathen religion ibid. Though we can compel none to Religion it follows not that the Magistrate may not punish those that seduce others to a false religion ibid. Lactantius speakes of compulsion without all teaching p. 53 Those that are without the Church are not to be compelled ibid. Because the Magistrates compulsion makes Hypocrites it followeth note hee should not punish Hereticks for so he should not punish murtherers p. 54 The Magistrate may by the sword curbe such impediments that keep men from embracing the truth according to Augustine p. 56 Answer to Doctor Adam Stewart ibid. Impotencie of free will objected by Master John Goodwin no reason why the Magistrate ought not to punish seducing teachers as of old the Donatists objected ibid. State of the question more strictly proposed p. 57 It may as well be said because there be no expresse Laws against murtherers Parricides Sorcerers Sodomites in the New Testament more then against false Teachers that therefore Sorcerers are no lesse then Hereticks to be tollerated p. 57 Chap. 5. Of Fundamentals The number of Fundamentalls p. 59 A saving disposition of faith to beleeve all truths revealed though the man be ignorant of many may consist with the state of saving grace ibid. Three things among those that are to be beleeved 1. Things simply necessarie 2. Simply profitable 3. By consequence necessarie how the Papists erre in these page 60 Some Consequences necessary ibid. Builders of Hay and stubble on the foundation may be saved and those that fall in murther and Adultery out of infirmitie may be also saved yet there is no consequence Ergo the Magistrate should tollerate both p. 61. Chap. 6. Errors in non-fundamentals obstinatly holden are punishable Obstinacie in ceremonies after full information deserveth punishment p. 62 Those that erre in non-fundamentals may deserve to be punished ibid. To teach the necessity of Circumcision not an error formally primarily but by consequence fundamentall and the contrary truth not necessary necessitate medii ibid. The toleration of all who erre in non fundamentals examined p. 64. Queries proposed to M. Joh. Goodwin who asserteth a Catholike toleration of all religions upon the ground of weaknes of freewill and want of grace p. 61 Most arguments of Libertines infer a Catholike toleration in non-fundamentals as well as in fundamentals p. 64 What deductions the Spirit makes in the soul of an elect knowing but a few fundamentals and going out of this life who knoweth p. 65. To know revealed truths of God is a commanded worship of God ibid. One generall confession of faith without a particular sense containing the true
that the sword is a kindly means to force outward performances for the Magistrate as the Magistrate does not command these outward performances as service to God but rather forbids the omissions of them as destructine to man for example a Physician commands fasting Pastors after the example of James commands fasting when judgements are on us the physician commands it in so farre as eating troubles the common societie of humours members and temper of the body and the Physician forbids eating so as he will have no more to do with the patient if he will disobey and so trouble the temper of the bodie which is the onely object the physician works on Pastors command fasting to be in sincerity for afflicting and humbling the soul under the mightie hand of God So the Magistrate forbids cutting of a veine or shedding of blood as a thing troubling the peace of humane societie yet his command is not a direct means of preventing diseases in the bodie of a subject and for healthie living But the Physician commands to cut a viene and to shed blood for health and to prevent a disease and sinnes neither against the Magistrate nor God in so doing so doth the Magistrate not directly command going to Church as a worship to God so as his commands have influence on the conscience as the Pastors commands have but he commands going to Church and hearing so as the omission of hearing harts the societie whereof God hath made him a civill and politick head in this latter sense must Lactantius Tertullian and others be taken otherwise these words the Religion of another does his neighbour neither good nor ill in rigour are not true the ill example of others in Idolatrie brings ill upon all the Church Deut. 13. 5. yea and the fierce anger of God v. 17. Again Laâ—â—antius saith false Religion cannot be compelled but he denyes not that Christians may punish blasphemies in true religion 2. he denyes we may propagate the Gospel among Pagans with the sword both which points we teach There 〈◊〉 saith he of force and injurie because Religion cannot be compelled the business is to be tranâ—acted by words rather than blowes that there may be willingnesse Let them enemies of the truth draw the sword or sharpnesse of their wiâ—â— if their reason be good let it be produced we are ready to 〈◊〉 if they teach nothing more cleare then that he speaks of the Pagans that would force Pagans worship on Christians we beleive nothing of their Religion whilt they are silent as we cannot yeeld to them while they rage against us let them imitate us and declare the reason of the whole matter for we Christians doe not allure as they Pagans frequently object to us but we teach we prove we demonstrate therefore none by us are kept against their will for he is unprofitable to God who wants devotion and faith and yet no man departs from us when the truth detains him But saith Celsus fol. 84. if in the time of Lactantius Christians killed men for their religion no man can doubt but Lactantius in these same generall words inveighs against Christians who would compell men to their faith against their will and that he abhorres the violence of ours against hereticks Answ These are of a wide difference to kill blasphemers and false teachers for spreading heresies and blasphemies and to compell them by warre and fire and sword to be of our Christian Religion As I hope to prove for the formers lawfull â—he later unlawfull It s true Lactantius speaks of all Religion true and false that we are to compell none with the sword to any Religion but he no where saith that the Magistrates may not kill open and pernicious seducers and false teachers who pervert others for the Magistrate is not to compell yea nor to intend the conversion of a pernicious seducer but to intend to take his head from him for his destroying of souls And Lactantius denyes Religion after it is begotten can be defended that is nourished and conserved in the hearts of people by the sword but by the word and Spirit Those are farre different tormenting and pietie saith he nor can violence be conjoyned with veritie nor justice with crueltie And again but as in Religion so also in defending of Religion they are deceived Religion is to be defended not by killing but admonishing others read by being killed not by crueltie but by patience not by wickednesse but by faith But here he speaks of defending in a hostile way by killing those that will not be of our Religion be it the Pagan religion and most develish not of defending the Christian professors from the infection of wolvish seducers by the sword of the Nurse-father of the Church who is to defend good men and to execute vengeance on evill doers For in all this Lactantius speaks of such a violence as is without teaching parati sumâ—s andire si doccant tacentibus certe nihil credimus But suppose some father were in that errour as Augustine was but retracted it though Augustine 〈◊〉 we may compell man to the faith yet 〈◊〉 of improper compulsion and of Donatists the such as are 〈◊〉 the Church whom he thinks the Magistrate on 〈◊〉 to punish which is not a compelling of the 〈◊〉 to the sound faith but an act of justice in punishing him for his 〈◊〉 of heresiâ—s to the perverting of the faith of others Upon these 〈◊〉 is Cyrilius saith Moyes Law is one and he Kingdom of Câ—â—â—t is wholly heavenly and spirituall and 〈◊〉 â—efore hath spirituall 〈◊〉 and spirituall armour and therefore a spirituall not a carâ—â—â— sword to punish the enemies of this Kingdom 〈◊〉 Christian men But he speaks of 〈◊〉 without the Church who as I constantly 〈◊〉 are not with warres and the sword to be compelled to 〈◊〉 the Christian Religion and therefore aâ—deth on the 〈…〉 did fight against Amorites Canaanites and 〈…〉 with 〈…〉 of iron but he speaks not of the Laws 〈…〉 24. and 〈◊〉 in which death was decreed for the false Prophet within the visible Church At 〈…〉 the fathers have 〈◊〉 with unsound Emperours who have tollerated 〈◊〉 Arrians and Jews but that is no law for us But the other point is that though these that are without are not to be compelled to embrace the true Religion it followeth nto that the Magistrate should not 〈…〉 Prophets or pernicious teachers such as Baals 〈◊〉 who openly 〈◊〉 the people of God to Idolatrâ—â— 1. Become the Magistrate cannot 〈◊〉 ought not to compell 〈…〉 lyars to be 〈…〉 it with their own as well as they must be such externally no more then he can compell them to inward fear love faith in God and to the externall performances 〈◊〉 But it doth not follow that therefore the Magistrate cannot command externall acts of mercie câ—â—astitie selfe-contentednesse and should not punish murther adulterie theft robberie perjurie for to punish these makes many
Commandement as it is probable it is true and acceptable and worship to God and though it were false worship it is as probable that to punish it is a sacrilegious invading of Gods place as it is an act of justice in the Magistrate 4. If the Magistrate must beleeve as the Libertine doth doth and teacheth him what he will if it were King and Parliament and all the Judges in Britain if they be of the faith of Libertines what conscience have they to take away the â—ead of a father who sacrificeth his onely childe to God upon meere religious principles what warrant have they before the tribunall of God to cut off his head as a peace-breaker rather then to spare his life as a sacrificer and a devout and zealous whether it be blinde zeal or no the Libertine Magistrate hath nothing to do to judge worshipper of God whether or no hath the Magistrate who in that case killeth aâ— innocent man according to his own libertine-conscience greater respect to false peace in a humane society then to true piety and innocent walking with God which forbids him to punish any thing that is onely to the subject he punisheth a meere devout worshipping of God 5. Upon the same ground should not the masse and all the broad worship on earth be tolerated since it hath farre lesse connexion with disturbance of peace then the Anabaptists children-killing worship of God 6. If the formall is ratio the onely formall reason and cause why the Magistrate is to use corporall coersion against none now under the New Testament but is to suffer every man to worship God as he best pleaseth because the worship of the New Testament is more spirituall the Law-giver Christ a meeker Mediator then Moses and there is no warrant now to hinder any man or lay bands and coactive violence upon Christs free subjects with force of sword to restraine them in one worship more then another what reason an Anabaptists offering his son a sacrifice to God should be restrained in his sacrificing more then in other acts of worship is not the man persecuted for his conscience is not this a carnall and no New Testament way of restraining him when he is restrained by the sword is not the onely word of God and no weapons that are carnall the way of rescuing men from all false worship and the onely way 7. Nor can the bloodinesse and cruelty of that worship be a sufficient ground why the Magistrate may restraine the conscience of the devout worshipper for who ought to sit as Lord Judge above the conscience of this father and sentence the worship as destructive to peace or the worshipper as a bloody man his conscience is under the New Testament and the Lord his onely judge But by the light of nature that the father kill the sonne to God 〈◊〉 murther and â—ruelâ—y But I answer if it be gratefull worship to God it is no more cruelty then to burne a beast to God and you are to suppose that a godly Anabaptist hath warrant from God for that worship as well for burning of beasts and offering yearely thousands of bullocks and sheep to God in memory of Christ once already sacrificed for sinners and that there is in it neither cruelty to beasts nor hurt to the Common-wealth that the Magistrate can restraine for though there be no reason at all for the worship ex natura rei if we consider the worship it selfe yet there is such reason to tolerate the worship so as if the Magistrate restraine he tyranniâ—eth over the conscience and a bloody conscience is a conscience as uncapable of violence and as immediately in the New Testament subject to God onely not to the sword as a good conscience then if the sword can straine no conscience as conscience how can it squeeze a conscience wading in bloody son-butchery more then any other conscience 8. If the Magistrates punishing of any for his conscience be a violent compelling of him to sin to worship or to forbeare worship against his conscience how will Libertines cleare Magistracy in the Old Testament from being intrinsecally a sinfull ordinance for the Magistrate in the Old Testament in stoning to death the seducing Prophet and the blasphemer must compell him to sin against his conscience and to professe Jehovah not Baal was the true God whereas the seducer believed in his conscience the contrary since to compell men to sin is intrinsecally sinfull let Libertines answer the query if God ever in Old or New Testament could command sin or if there was ever such a thing heard that a Magistrate might by his office command men to sin or then punish them 9. Let Libertines answer if Arminians extend not liberty of prophesying as farre as mens lusts can carry them in these words But to suffer every man say they to 〈◊〉 publickly in Religion every thing iâ— perilous Why for either that which 〈◊〉 asserteth is true or false if it be true why admit we is not why doe we imprison the Author thereof this injury reflects upon God the Author of truth if it be false the truth shall easily overcome â—â—ar of it self it shall melt like was before the Sunne if ye offer violence 〈◊〉 it yee strip Religion of its glory and furnish oyle to errâ—â—â— Whether is not reason as strong to refute errours fundamentall as non-fundamentall whether if ye offer violence to truth in fundamentalls as well as in non-fundamentalls yee strippe Religion and truth of its glory and furnish oyle to errour They goe on and tell us Wee need not ever bee in learning these that are clearely determined in the word for they are cleare open and of undoubled truths in the Scripture in other points not fundamentall a Christian is ever a disciple and a searcher not that he doth ever doubt and hesitate but because though for the present he neither doubt nor hath cause of doubting yet can he not be sure of these points with such a certitude which is free of all danger of errour and therefore he is often to examine these according to the rule that cannot erre and so it is enough before God that he may be said ever to learne and to come to the knowledge of the truth as far as frailty in this life can permit Answ 1. There is then no stability of faith but in two or three points in which all Papists Latherans Antiâ—â—niâ—arâ—ans Arrians Socinians Libertines Familists Sabellians Nestorians Macedonians Arminians Antinomians Seekers Fâ—thystasts Anabaptists c. agree and make one true Church beleeving what is necessary for salvation and holding the foundation Christ and we have no divine faith of the miracles that Christ wrought that the old world perished with waters which God speakes as clearly in the word as he doth fundamentalls But Libertines should distinguish the formall reason of beleeving truths which breedeth an obligation and the necessity of beleeving for the one onely
and perswasion nor yet in no faith in no perswasion And Augustine tells us the Donatists objected the same God compelleth none but hath given men freewill to obey him contr petil l. 2. c. 83. Epist 48. ad vincention Contr. Gaudentiâ—â— l. 1. c. 25 Contr. Cresc l. 3. c. 51. which I often re-minde the Reader of and the Donatists also said this compulsion makes hypocrites when they are compelled to goe to heare the word Augustine answers Although some that are compelled to beare remain hypocrites and counterfeit yet for these such as are sincere should not have been left ungathered in And for that of Gods calling to repentance he is but an ignorant senselesse man who wrote that booke The Spirit waits saith hee and violates not liberty If the meaning bee the Lord is long-suffering and patient and lets men goe on in their sins and in his owne time effectually calleth them this is a senselesse sense for God waits not on one out of his longanimity and forbearance lest he should force freewill for the freewill is ever alike impotent rebellious and refractory till God subdue it if the meaning be as another sense it cannot have The Spirit waites and violates not liberty that is the Spirit waites untill freewill be in a good blood and a congruous disposition to obey and then the Spirit for feare of forcing of it if he should come on it undexterously to worke it against the haire catcheth the opportunity when he sees it is not on a straine of rebellion and in a distemper and then he drawes the freewill without force the man I judge is innocent and uncapable of this schoolheresie of late Jesuits who devise a Pelagian congruous calling and this were nothing to the purpose and should neither have head nor feet to the matter in hand for the Spirit who can carry freewill though most rebelliously distempered his way is not afraid of freewills contradictorious opposing but can in every moment subdue freewill without forcing he never waites on for such a matter except there bee a time when freewill is to hard a party for the Spirit to yoake withall or when nature or some preparatory grace makes it easier for the Spirit to conquiesse consent at one time more then another 2. Gods not forcing of freewill is no rule to the Magistrate not to awe men to abstaine from perverting of soules for fear of the sword for by the same reason because Gods Spirit moves the Saints to be subject to every ordinance of 〈◊〉 Judge or good Law for the Lords sake and for conscience for hee must obey this Rom. 13. 5. 1 Pet. 2. 13. and the Spirit compells not in these more then in the others so this argument God must worke faith give repentance and make a willing people ergo the Christian Magistrate cannot with his authority doe it is all granted This is but a very rotten rush a straw Entbysiasts so argue God teacheth sufficiently ergo the Scriptuâ—â— and ministery of men are not requisite the discipline of the godly Magistrate cannot ascend so high as to have influence on the conscience and beget faith no more then the preaching of the word by the Ministers of the Gospel without the 〈◊〉 ergo the godly Magistrate cannot with the sword keepe the externall man in outward obedience to Gospel-ordinances it in no sort can can be a good consequence nor is it good divinity to say with Pelagians and Arminians that the calling of God extends no further then to arguments perswasions intreaties and threatnings for the calling of God extendeth further then to so much as man can doe in calling of sinners to repentance but men can act upon the minde will and reasonable soule by arguments perswasions intreaties and threatnings for all that is done by the Ministery of men But in effectuall calling of which we here speake it is certaine the Lord infuseth a new heart a new spirit 〈◊〉 efficaciously to the Son which is a further and higher 〈◊〉 of omnipotencies calling and drawing then all the morall perswasion by arguments intreaties and threatnings performable by men or Angels so this man is either an ignorant or a grosse Arminian Now from all this it is easie to expound that character which the Holy Ghost putteth upon the hereticke Tit. 3. 10. he is judged or condemned of himselfe that is the truth is so clearely opened to him or he may if he did not wincke and shut his eyes clearely see and beleeve the truth if he did not knowingly prudently and willingly resist the truth and therefore is condemned by his owne heart But Minus Celsus saith the words carry a farre other sense to wit That by sinning he is the authour of his 〈◊〉 condemnation because in chusing true Religion be thinkes he both made a right choice when he hath chosen a false Religion being deceived by his owne judgement he falleth into damnation which miserable man he hath created to himselfe and in which he chuseth to persist and therefore is to be esehewed So it is said the Jews judged themselves unworthy of eternall life but knowingly they judged not so of themselves but they did so behave themselves as if they made themselves unworthy of eternall life So I beleeve the hereticke is called selfe-condemned because he doth those things that renders himselfe worthy of damnation So Castalio or he is selfe-condemned that is he is damned though there were none to condemne him but himselfe So Erasmus Answ He is selfe-condemned who may be condemned by his owne conscience though for the present the conscience be burnt with a hot iron and the man will not permit it to summon accuse condemne no lesse then hee who is actually condemned of his conscience for it is a laudable act and a naturall vertue of the conscience to give sentence against a heresie when it ought so to doe as it is a vice of the conscience to be dumbe at heresies but if he love the truth though he cannot actually condemne the heresie hee is not selfe-condemned The hereticke saith Celsus is an innocent man and is not such a man as sins against light nor maliciously nor with an ill conscience nor is his end gaine pleasure nor an ambitious lusting after a name hee seeth none of these are attaineable yea it is his desire of life eternall and his â—eale that setteth him on worke and rather or he dishonour God and deny the knowne truth and sin against his conscience he had rather chuse torment and dye a martyr and drinke that direfull and bitter cup of death which was so terrible to Jesus Christ that it caused him to fall to the earth sweat blood and water So he fol. 14 15 16. which if it be true an hereticke is rather an innocent Angell then a guilty man condemned of his owne conscience Yet Minus Câ—lsus saith here he behaveth himselfe as one worthy of damnation and damned though none but himselfe
the Lord instamped his divine Image of making just Lawes upon any nomethetick power of the most free and Independent Kingdome on earth so as the breach of lawfull promises Covenants Contracts which are against the Law of God of nature of nations should or can be the subject matter of any nomethetick power for God gives no power to make unjust decrees The pretended liberty is against the Articles matteâ— and ends of the Covenant a Parliamentary power interposed for the not punishing of deformity as touching many Religions must destroy the commanded nearest uniformity of the one only true Religion 2 Nor can they defend the one onely reformed Religion of Scotland commanding the Magistrate the Minister of God to use the sword against false teachers who give liberty to all Religions 3 Nor can the word of God bee our rule of Reformation except this rule be one and injoyne one only true Religion and forbid tolleration of all others 4 There can be no way so prevailing to promote cherish and foment Heresie and what is contrary to sound doctrine as for publique authority by law to permit it except wee would praise and reward such fleshly wayes 5 The Lord cannot be one nor his name one in both Kingdoms when by Law multitudes of names wayes and Religions are tollerated 6 Many Religions suffered must be contrary to the true religious liberty of Christian States and Churches when men are licenced to professe slavery and bondage to the efficacy and power of errour to beleeve professe and disseminate lies and blasphemies in the name of the Lord. 7 Many false wayes of religions doth in the Scripture argue a change of Gods for these that are no Gods which Heathens doe abhorre Jer. 2. 9 10 11. and a multiplying of Gods according to the number of each Sect and Societie Jer. 2. 28. and a manifest countenancing of Scepticisme of many Gods and of no God since then the Parliament not onely as Christian men but as a Parliament and as Magistrates have sworne the Covenant they must sweare each one of them to defend his owne Religion Familisme Arrianisme Antinomianisme which he beleeves to be the true religion and that as a Magistrate with the sword of God and so to oppose his fellow members with his Parliamentary power how then can the Parliament command others or ingage themselves to the Lord their God to indeavour the preservation of the one reformed Religion in Scotland that we and our posterity may live in faith and love for this is many faiths professedly different and that the Lord may delight to dwel in the midst of us and this is many Gods in the midst of us and that we shall indeavour the extirpation of heresie superstition prorpanenesse and whatsoever shall be found contrary to sound doctrine It is not every Parliament man who by law may be of any Religion oblieged by the oath of God to endeavour the extirpation of the true Protestant Religion since to him who is a Familist and Antinomian it is heresie and contrary to sound doctrine Are not Papists though known Papists to be Judges and Members of Parliament why should they be debarred for their Religion and they must by this oath indeavour the extirpation of Heresies and Hereticks that is of Protestanâ—s 8 The foresaid licentiousnesse is contrary to the indeavour to preserve the Rights Liberties of Parliaments and just power and greatnesse of the King now both King Parliaments and all Rulers have the sword committed to them to defend the Church against Seducers Wolves Hereticks false Teachers and by the sword are to stand against the violation of mercy righteousnesse and the peace of humaine societies and so against such as from meere grounds of conscience serve God in sacrificing their children to God promiscuous use of wives a part of the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free community of goods robing the just owners of their inheritances and possessions because the word saith the meeke shall inherit the earth lying and denying of our Religion before men For should the Magistrate kil the father whose only conscience nothatred which is the only essentiall ingredient to make killing of our neighbour without lawfull authority that murthering of our brother which by the law of God and Man is punishable with death Deut. 19. 11 12 13. c. 4. 42. c. 19. 4. and the sword of the Magistrate not any hatred I say or desire of revenge towards his sonne whom he loves as tenderly as Abraham did Isaack presseth out of meere religious obedience to God to offer his sonne to God in a sacrifice he should not punish a murtherer but offer violence to the conscience of his father since the word of God condemneth this as false worship not as murther yea as superstitious adding to the Word and as wil-worship Deu. 4. 31 32. Jer 7. 30 31. 9 Divers Religions being contrary to Christ and the one truth of the Gospell of their owne nature raise fire and sword betweene brethren and the mother against the daughter in law and must be a seminary of factions and devisions which is distructive to the unity in our Covenant Micah 7. 5 6. Matth. 10. 34 35. Luke 5. Verse 51 52. Gen. 3 16. 10 By which it cannot be possible we should defend one another in this common cause of Religion except a reconciliation be made betweene the seed of the woman and the serpent 11 And many being of divers Religions must need give themselves to a detestable indifferency and newtrality as touching the Common cause of God Since it cannot be the common cause of God but of Sathan and of forcing conscience by persecution to them Many men yea it s the cause of God to many to hate and persecute the Gospell by this 12 By which meanes every man may resile from this blessed union and conjunction so far must he be from zealous and constant continuing therein all the dayes of his life for Parliamentary authority frees them to imbrace any new Religion contrary to the Protestant Religion 13 And to what Church Sect or Religious societie can the Christian Magistrate be a nurse-father by his office is it not to the one onely true Church of Christ that professeth the sound faith certaine the Scripture saith as the sonnes of strangers shall build the wals of the true Church so Kings shall minister unto her Esay 60. 10. And she must sucke the brests of Kings Esay 6. 16. which evinceth that Kings as Kings are by their Office to doe some princely and royall acts of justice and favour for the good of the true Church and true Religion then must either the King by Office be indifferent and newtrall to all other Religions and Sects which must be inconsistent with his duty as nurse-father to the Church Esay 49. 23. whose part it is that according to his place he take care that the children sucke not poyson for milke or he must be newtrall to all Religions except to
and envied that he should go to their enemies though I deny not that the Samaritans had too base and irreligious thoughts of Christ yet that was not all the injury they did to Christ 3. The Samaritans worshipping a false God They know not what Joh. 4 22. and no salvation being in their Religion cannot be called Hereticks and we confesse to burn Cities because the in-dwellers are of a false Religion is no fit way to convert them to the true Religion and because the Apostles to whom God hath not given the sword but onely the spirituall armour of the word 2 Cor. 10. 5. are not to use fire and sword and that out of a vindictive spirit against Samaritans who despise Christ and the Gospell it is no consequence Ergo Christian Magistrates by this place Luke 9. must not use the sword against false teachers and apostates 4. I grant Christ the Mediator and the Embassadors of peace whose office it is to save soules are not to kill men because they are of another Religion then they are or because they seduce souls nor are we to neglect what Beza saith against Monfortius p. 160. in opus de punien heret Elias did from Gods command what he did the Disciples call for fire from a wild spirit 2. It was not a proper function for the Apostles nor had they any extraordinary calling from God as Elias had 3. There is one consideration of Elias who came to restore Religion after great apostacy another of Christ who came to propagate the Gospell I see not much inconvenience in the answer of Swarez They were not to use violence and threatning against the Samaritans but to shake the dust of their feet against them for Christ and his Disciples bare not the sword as Magistrates Whatever arguments Libertines extort from these places which say Christ is so meeke as he shall not cry nor strive nor breake the bruised reede the Ministers must be so gentle that they must teach with meeknesse Isa 42. 1 2. 2 Tim. 2. 25. Not strike but be apt to teach and keepe themselves to the foolishnesse of the Gospell and onely shake the dust of their feet off against rejecters Acts 18. and not judge before the time 1 Cor. 4. 5. for the sword may make a whole Nation of hypocrites Isa 10. but can never recover them out of the hands of Sathan I say whatever arguments they throw by the haire from these places are but tokens of the prejudices of Libertines For 1. Is not Christ as meek to whores publicans the theife and robber on the crosse persecutors and to seducing teachers and hereticks and should not Ministers in all gentlenesse teach and instruct drunkards adulterers murtherers yea and as many as are taken Captives in the snare of the Devill at his will and are in such a case as God peradventure may give them repentance For of such speaketh the place 2 Tim. 2. 24 25. and must not Pastors be gentle patient apt to teach and labour the conversion of all drunkards whores bloody men as wel as hereticks What warrant have Libertines to straiten the meeknesse of our Saviour and his Embassadors in these Scriptures and confine and limit the sweet qualifications of Christ to onely seducing teachers whereas the word doth extend these to all sinners of what ever rank that are slaves of Sathan but especially if they be sin-sicke for Christ and bruised reeds such as seducing teachers and Wolves that worry the Lambs and lead silly women captives are seldome and such sinners as the Phisician came to cure whereas false teachers are all for the most part selfe righteous sonnes of pride Now make an argument from these Scriptures and it concludeth that it is against the meeknesse of Christ that murtherers drunkards adulterers be punished by the Sword for since Christ and his Ministers are no lesse with all patience gentlenesse forbearance to instruct these if at any time God shall give them repentance and this strongly sinels of Anabaptists and Socinians way who contend that the meeknesse of our Saviour hath deposed the Magistrate from his place of shedding any mans blood be he never so notorious an il-doer so saith Socinius Catechesis Raccoviensis Ostorodius Smalcius Meek Jesus warranteth no Magistrate to take away any mens life for any fault or to make warre for the Scripture wil have the meeknesse and mercy of Christ if it stand in not punishing with bodily violence evil-doers as these men suppose to bee extended to all sinners of whatsoever kind 2 The argument hath no foot except it so run That which is no means of the converting of soules Christ will not have to be used for the conversion of soules But such is bodily violence we grant al for the Sword avengeth hurting of soules but is not a meanes ordained of Christ for the converting of soules or if it doe it is by accident as afflictions doe as Hos 5. in their affliction they will seeke mee early 3 If Christ be merciful and meek and wil have his Ministers with gentlenesse and patience to instruct gain-saying sinners then wil hee not have the Magistrate to draw his Swordand be severe against seducing teachers D. Adam Stewart in his learned and solid answer to Mr. Goodwin of Right de jure denies the proposition and so doe the learned professors of Leyden answer Arminians objecting the same and say Christ is meek to repenting sinners but a severe judge and a revenger of ill-doers Re. 2. 6. 9. 14. 20 21 22 24. his garments are red died with the blood of his enemies he is so a Lambe as he is a Lyon 2. Nor is the meeknesse of Christ inconsistent with his justice and righteousnesse in commanding the nurse-fathers of his house the Rulers of the earth that which the Morral and perpetual standing Law of God requireth to wit that they use the Sword against il-doers of all sorts and degrees for they stand together in the person of Christ who is a meeke King Zach. 9. 9 and lowly and just having salvation and breaketh not the bruised reed nor quencheth the smoaking flax which is not meant of his forbearing the use of the Sword against grievous Wolves that spareth not the flock and Wolves in the skin and cloathing of Sheepe seducing hereticks for neither Calvin Musculur Gualther Junius Scultetus Marlorat nor any sound interpreter Protestant Lutheran or Papist save Socinians and Anabaptists professed parties render any such sense for not to breake or to quench by a figure Merosis or Litote is to cherish and deale meekly and tenderly with weak beleevers that have something of the life of God and saving light of grace in them as weake growing reeds and smoaking flaxes and it saith that Christ doth cherish saving seeds of grace in them â—ay 50. 5. The Lord God hath opened mine eare that I was not rebellious that is that I was very
Testament he shall thrust through the false Prophet that speaketh lies in the Name of the Lord Zach. 13. 1 2 3 4 5 6. Kings as Kings must confer some royall service to the Church over which they are Nurse-fathers But all the power that Kings have is essentially co-active and in order to rewarding or punishing Rom. 13. 3 4. therefore they must confer coactive service Piscator saith well That the Prince is called the keeper of both Tables of the Law by our Divines therefore he is to vindicate Gods glory in both He that hath the keeping of two pits one more horrible and dark another more mild and heartsome for two malefactors a theef and an adulterer he must not cast the theef in such a dark dungeon as the adulterer So if the Magistrate keep both Tables he must not punish according to his own will but according to the rule and prescript of God Nor saith the Author of the Bloody Tenet any thing when he tels us that the Magistrate owes to the true Religion 1. Approbation and reverend esteem 2. Personall submission to the spirituall government Mat. 18. 1 Cor. 5. 3. Protection to the Subjects whether they be apart or met together To a false Religion he oweth permission not approbation Mat. 13. 30. 2. Protection from violence to their persons and estates Answ All this is very nothing 1. Approbation and submission to truth is no royall power Isaiah giveth a paternall and fatherly power to the King in Church matters when he saith He shall be a nurse-father Now all he gives in these two former points to wit approbation of and submission to truth is no more then any tradesman or son owes to the Church So Isaiah makes the King a father this author makes him a son subject to the Church which subjection I deny not in another consideration but that as a nurse-father he should approve the truth and submit thereunto as all the members of the Church makes him both a father and a son a commander and a humble submissive obeyer in the same considâ—ration which is most contradictorious and uncongruous for he must speak of him as a Ruler or else he saith nothing The third thing which is protection to the true Church is nothing to the purpose for that he owes to them as subjects not as they are serving God in the duties of the first Table for the King by this man can neither command them nor forbid them by his Magisteriall or coactive power to serve God or not to serve him in the duties of the first Table and by the true Church that the King owes protection to the Author meaneth not the Church that is in it self sound and true but the Church that seemeth and appeareth so to the conscience of the Magistrate though most erronious Now this is the Church of Seekers and Anabaptists but suppose the Magistrate or Commander in war be a Familist a grosse Anabaptist the Author will not say That he ought to protect the Church assembled to worship God and to excommunicate and deliver to Satan such as subvert the faith of many and say the Resurrection is already past or that he ought to protect an Assembly of Divines that are for Presbyteriall Government and the truth that Calvin and our Reformers delivered These are to him Antichristian Synagogues or if he owe them protection he ought to offer violence with his sword to Anabaptists such as rose in Germany under John Becold of Leydon that out of meer principles of Religion killed all that were not of their way and to displace imprison and confine Presbiterians So yet in a defensive way the Magistrate must offer violence to the conscience of men who for meer Religious grounds doe labour to scatter and violently to hinder the meetings of the servants of God for how many of the Sectaries of England who are for liberty of conscience have come into Churches in England and stepped up to the Pulpit and hindered the Minister the discharge of his conscience to the flock and offered violence to the meeting of the true Church now it is not enough to say the Minister was but an Antichristian service-bookman and it was no true Church whose service such Sectaries interrupted but giving and not granting it were so yet are Libertines not to offer violence to the conscience of any Church true or false if they be true to their own principles but this Author being an Anabaptist and a Seeker will say neither warres nor such violence are lawfull but if so the Magistrate then cannot with the sword protect the true Church against the violence of men who upon meer conscience disturbe their Assemblies 2. To Libertines all Churches professing true Religion as all Churches on earth Indians and Mahometanians not excepted do must be true Churches for they are not to judge but that they follow their conscience and so the Magistrate owâ— protection to them though their conscience be most erroneous even for such as they conceive to be true Churches they are not infallibly perswaded they are such and so the Magistrate gives no protection to them as true Churches but only as Subjects which the Author tells the Magistrate he owes to false Churches so the King by this is a Nurse-father by his office and by the places Isai 49. 23. and 60. 10. to bring his glory of protection to the where of Rome if they be his Subjects as well as to the New Jerusalem but sure the King by these places ows father-nursing and Magistratical protection to the true Church not to the false because Isai 49. 23. 1. The place is clearly of such a Church as the Lord can no more forget then a woman cannot have compassion on the fruit of her wombe v. 14 15. 2. Such a Church as is graven on the palmes of Gods hands v. 16. 3. Whose â—â—sters and destroyers shall be removed v. 17. and destroyed vers 18. 4. Which shall be inlarged by the incomming of the Gentiles whose place shall be too narrow for multitude of Sons and daughters begotten by the power of the Gospel though she was a captive removing too and fro v. 19 20 21. 5. A Church that shall lift up a standard to the Gentiles and Nations to take in their Sons and daughters to fight under Christs colours as being baptized to the same faith vers 22. 6 A Church whose spirituall Government Kings and Queens shall obey licking the dust before them v. 23. 7. A people that wait for the Lord and so shall not be ashamed v. 23. Now to say that a false Church shall have all these glorious priviledges needeth no refutation and they must be stupid who teach that Kings are made Nurse-fathers by this Text to Antichrists Kingdom as if the Lord had the Beast and his followers written on the palmes of his hands or that Kings being made Nurse-fathers to the true Church owe nothing to those that wait on the
warrant Christ to offer up himself to God But upon the supposition of Libertines it 's no murther nor is it punishable at al because the father may yea lawfully ought to worship God according to the indictment of his conscience whither the conscience be right or bloody and erroneous and yet he is not punishable for blood-shed by their way for meerly and simply without any malignancy or hatred to the child he beleeves he ought to preferre his maker to his dearest childs life as well as Abraham and the conscience doth naturally and as under no Law simply beleeve it is the like service and worship that Abraham would have gratefully performed unto God if God in reward of that love had not forbidden him againe to kill his Sonne And this answer presupposes also that it is impossible for a father to have such a conscience as may stimulate and command to kill his son and that in the authority and name of God as he erroneously yea and as he invincibly holdeth as Socinians Familists Papists beleeve purgatory merits justification by workes who yet are not to be punished for their conscience according to Libertines Again there is no intrinsecall malignancy in the act of naticide or son-sacrificing but what it hath from the Lords Law forbiding to kill now those that killed their Sons to Molech yea to God as they thought strongly yea invincibly beleeved God commanded them to do him such bodily service as is clear from Jer. 7. 31. Jer. 15. 5. And that this is invincible ignorance I take the word invincible in the Libertines sense Libertines grant for in our condemning son-sacrificing they wil say we are not infallible Yea the understanding being spirituall cannot be restrained saith Dr. Taylor Sect. 13. n. 6. and no man can change his opinion when he will saith he ibid n. 7. and so should not be punished for it and n. 13. there is nothing under God Almighty that hath power over the soule of man so as to command a persuasion If hee be then perswaded that he ought to kill his Son he ought unpunishably so to do Lastly Doctor Taylor yeelds the cause when he saith that certaine known Idolaters may be punished with death or corporall inflictions For there is no Idolatry so grosse that strongly deluded consciences may not be carried invincibly I speake in the Libertine sense out of meer conscience to act Ergo some are justly punishable for their meer conscience and yet are not persecuted for conscience 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 If a man preach treason saith he his opinion doth not excuse If a man preach murther and preach that Christ was an impostor that the Scripture is a fable how can his opinion excuse in a great sin and not all sins CHAP. XXVIII Divers other Arguments for pretended Toleration answered DOctor Taylor objects from the Arminians he that persecutes a disagreeing person doth arm all the world to persecuâ—â— himself if he say he is no Heretick he is as confidently beleeved to be an Heretick as he beleeves his adversarie to be an Heretick if it be said every side must take their venture this is to make the Christian world a shambles Ans 1. Because sound and orthodoxe Magistrates punish Hereticks they doe no more arm Hereticks against them to punish them then they arme murtherers to punish them because no law of Conscience teacheth that a seducer is obliged to publish to others his erroneous opinion touching mansacrificing the unlawfulness of Magistracie under the New Testament Libertie of Conscience Familisme and the 〈◊〉 for then the Law of nature must teach men are obliged in conscience to sin and pervert others 2. They are obliged to beleeve that their Conscience must be a rule to others which two the Law of nature cannot teach since it is the just law of God If yee argue what Hereticks doe unjustly they persecute the sound in the faith and there is reciprocation of persecution amongst false Religions its true the Christian world is a shambles through the corruption of mens nature But if yee argue what Christian Orthodox Magistrates ought to doe they ought to punish only Hereticks and Seducers but they do not justly 〈◊〉 Hereticks and those of false Religions reciprocally against themselves for by this argument those that are just Magistrates and take away the life of Pirates Robbers 〈◊〉 of other Nations doe they therefore justly arme all Pirates and Robbers to take away their Lives I thinke not Obj. 2. Where the Christ or his Messengers charge the Magistrate to establish by his arme of flesh and 〈…〉 worship of God the beast indeed gets the power of the earth Rev. 17. Bloodie Tenent Answ Kisse the Son O Rulers Psal 2. The Kings of the earth shall lick the dust before Christ Psal 72. The Kings shall bring their glory to the new Ierusalem Ergo They shall guard the Law of God from violence 2. The Beast gets the power of Kings to bear down truth but this power of Kings shall burn the whore Rev. 17. 16. and act for Christ and his ordinances 3. Where reads Mr. Williams that Christ and his Messengers are to charge the Magistrate to give libertie to Wolves Boares Lions Foxes Serve your consciences O beasts in wasting the Mountain of the Lords House and in not sparing the flock the Nurse-father grants you libertie to waste the mountain of the Lord. Obj. 3. Artaxerxes knew not the Law of God which he confirmed how then could be judge it 2. In such fits and pangs of a terrifying conscience what lawes have Nebuchadnezzar Cyrus Darius Artaâ—erxes put forth for the Israel of God yet were they not charged with the spirituall crowne of governing the worship of God Answ That was their Error they knew not the Law of God but it was their dutie that they ratified it 2. Those Princes did their dutie as Magistrates in those Laws no matter what Conscience renewed or not renewed put them on to act the duties in the substance of the act were lawfull the corruption of nature they being unrenewed might vitiate the work and put them a working to act lawfully in the duties Saul as King did fight the battels of the Lord and led his people and that lawfully according to the substance of the work but God knowes his motives and end 3. This ignorant man never heares of a Magistraticall act to promote the worship of God in a civill way but he dreames of a spirituall tribunall given to the Magistrate which we abhorre as much as he for the materiall object of the Magistrates power though spirituall rendreth not his power spirituall as the Magistrate punisheth spirituall confederacie with Satan in Magitians and Sorcerers a Witch should not be suffered to live and Sodomie flowing from Gods judiciall delivering men up to a reprobate mind Rom. I. 28. and yet the Mastrates power is not spirituall nor terminated upon the consciences of men Not is this Argument
sect 2. The conditions that Libertines require to be in a Synod Liberty to question every thing is lycence Remonst Apo. c. 1. fol. 41. The Church though not infallible may determine infallible points Apol. in Pref. et in declar in Pref. A Confession Covenant or Synodicall de 〈◊〉 a secondarie rule of faith Remonstr in vindic l. 2. c. 6. fol. 126. Note Ibid 133. A ministeriall and publike and a Christian and private judgment and faith and how they differ Remov 16. 〈…〉 〈…〉 That Confessions ought to be onely in expresse Scriture words is another false principle of Libertines Roman Vindi l. 2. c. 6. 135. 13. 〈◊〉 post quam acceptavit decretum 〈◊〉 illo â—â—â—tius quam ea lege quatenis quamdia 〈◊〉 in 〈…〉 indicat ill deffâ—â—â—rum Ancient bonds of Liberty of Conscience 〈◊〉 Apol c. 25. 291. The end of Synods is not to remove heresie by any means good or bad 〈◊〉 to ciuil heresie so effectually as these heresies shall never be heard of in the world againe Remon c. 25. Apol. 294. The necessitie of Synods Pastors subject the disobedient to wrath yet are not lords over the conscience ergo neither are Synods lords over the conscience for that fol. 2â—5 Error of conscience 〈◊〉 from â—â—igation of obedience Apo. 25. f. 226. The subject of a Synod not a Sceptick conjecturall truth as Libertines suppose The sense of Scripture from Synods beleived truly to be infallible though Synods consist of men who are not infallible as an earthen pitcher doth contain gold and precious Rubies and Saphires in it though there be no gold in the matter of the pitcher but onely clay 2. Cor. 4. 7. How a true decision of a Synod is ever the same and not retractable Remon Though all truths be peremptorily decyded in the word yet is there need of a Ministeriall and declarative decision of men because teachers may deceive and these that are taught are ignorant and dull Anabaptist dimâ—ed interpretation of Scriptures as 〈…〉 〈…〉 Anabaptist l 3. c. 11. Daâ—â—aut Anabaptistis Scripturiram â—â—terpretatiâ—rem recitari evangelium debere 〈◊〉 verbi a 〈◊〉 ut cuique liberium sit prosuo Spritu hoc est prosua voluntate â—â—â—dine interpretaâ—i 〈◊〉 non esse verbum Dei 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈…〉 7. Men are to come to Synods not as Nullifidians but as ingaged for truth Synods may impose upon others and how Ancient Bonds or Libertie of Conscience stated c. 10. Sect. 3. p. 74. 45. The conditional imposing of Synods consisteth well with trying of all things what Libertines say on the contrary is nought 〈…〉 〈…〉 16. 75. Pastors are are not out of their calling nor Apparitours nor tale-bearers if they complaine to the Magistrate of hereticks and all evâ—â—-doers Opinions cannot be compelled not the 〈◊〉 or will in the 〈…〉 â—he question is whether the 〈…〉 Shame and fear of rebâ—kes by Pastors and Church censures have the same compulsorie in 〈…〉 false teachers that the feare of publick punishment by the Synod hath Church censures are as compulsâ—rie on the Conscience as coercing by the sword Some externall actions of unjustice sâ—â—wing from meere Conscience are punished justly without any note of persecution by grant of Libertines and why not all others also 〈…〉 bonds pag. 12 Lactan. Inst l. 5. c 14 quid 〈…〉 quod 〈…〉 fieri 〈◊〉 libido 〈…〉 Tertullian ad Scapulâ—â— Humani juris naturalâ—s potestatis est unâ—cuique quod putavertis colerâ— nâ—â— alii prodostâ—nt oâ—est alterius Religio Sed nec Religionis est cogere Religionem quae sâ—ont◠〈◊〉 debeâ— non 〈◊〉 How Religion may be compelled how not One mans Religion remaining in the minde and will may hurt or benefit the man himself not any others but true Religion as it comes forth iâ— to acts of teaching may coine and winne the souls of others and false Religion may subvert the faith of others The Magistrate does not command Religion acts as service to God but rather forbids their contraâ—â—â—â— as disserâ—â—â—â— to Christian societies How â—ertull and Laâ—â—antâ—â—s are to be expounded of forcing to heathen Religion Though we can compell none to Religion it follows not that the Magistrate may not punish there that 〈◊〉 others to a false Religion Lactanâ—â— 5. c. 20. non est opus vt 〈…〉 cogi non potest 〈◊〉 potius quam verberibuâ— res agenda 〈…〉 Distringant hostes Religionis Christianae aciâ—m ingeniorum suertâ—â— si ratio corum vera est offeratur parati sumus audire si doceaâ—â— Tacentibus certè nihil credimus sicut ne saevientibus quidem cedimus imitentur nos aut rationem rei totius exponant nos enim non illicimus ut ipsi objectant sed docemus probamus ostendimus itaque nemo a nobis retinetur invitus imutilis est enim deo qui devotione ac side caret tamen nemo discedit ipsa veritate retinante Lactan 〈◊〉 longè diversa sunt Carnificina pictas nes potest aut veritas eum vi aut justitia eum crudelitate conjungi Ibid. Sed ut in ipsa Religione sic defensionis genere falluntur Defendenda eâ—im Religio est non occidendo sed monen lo alij codices moriendo non sevitia sed patientia non scelere sed fide Lactant. speaks of compulsion without all teaching These that are without the Church are not to be compelled 〈…〉 〈…〉 punish heâ—â—â—ides so so he should not punish murtherers The Magistrate may by the sword curb five impediments that keep men from embracing the truth according to Augustine Answer to Doctour Adam Stewart Impotencie of free will objected by Mr. John Goodwine no reason why the Magistrate ought not to punish seducing teachers as of old the Donatists objected State of the question more strictly proposed It may as wel he said because there be no expresse laws against murtherers parricids sorcerers Sodomites in the new Testament more then against false teachers that therefore Socerers are no lesse then hereticks to be tollerated De vivendis Christianorian animus in fide illibata tom 1 l. 1. c. 10. The number of Fundamentals An saving disposition of faith to beleeve all truths revealed though the man be ignorant of many may consist with the state of saving grace Calv. epist ad Martinum Shallingium an 1557. Three things among these that are to be believed things simply necessarie 2. simply profitable 3. by consequence necessary how the papist erre in these Joan. Durens in consulta Theologica p. 14 15. Some Consequences necessary Builders of hay and stubble on the foundation may be saved and these that fall in murther and adultery out of infirmity may be also saved yet there is no consequence ergo the Magistrate should tollerate both Obstinacie in Ceremonies after full information deserveth punishment These that err in non-fundamentals may deserve to be punished To teach the necessity of circumcision not an error formally and primarily but by consequence fundamentall and the contrary truth
14. Cavils against coercive judiciall Laws for punishing false Prophets in the old Testament removed Laws punishing false Teachers were morall not temporary and pedegogicall p. 189 Power of fathers and masters in the fourth Commandment coercive p. 190 Compelling to hypocrisie for fear of shame and reproaches as guiltie 〈◊〉 compelling men with the sword not to publish heresies nor sedâ—â—â— others p. 191 A third Answer p. 191 Blasphemers and Idolaters never were judged to die by consulting with the immediate oracle of God as John Goodwin imagineth Hagiomastix sect 34 35 36 37. ibid. We have as sure a word the Scripture as immediate consulting with the oracle of God p. 192 Want of infallibilitie should exclude all judges to judge pastors to preach or write Synods to advise because we cannot doe these with Propheticall infallibilitie p. 194 A twofold typicalnesse in the old Testament one meerly ceremoniall unreducible another typicall but of civill and naturall use the use of the latter ceaseth not because it was sometime typicall so is punishing of seducers p. 197 Seducers of old denied no other-waies God then our false Prophets now a-daies doe deny him p. 19â— Not only those who offend against the principles of nature but those that publish and hold Errors against the supernaturall principles of the Gospel are to be punished by the Sword p. 200 Such as slâ—w their children to Molech denied no more the word of God then our Hereticks now doe p. 201 There be false Prophets now under the new Testament as there were under the old Testament 202. Chap. 15. Christs not rebuking toleration and the Law Deut. 13. vindicated Christs not expresse rebuking of the Magistrates tolerating of heresies makes not for Christs approving of toleration of Heresies more then of tolerating the absolving of a murtherer at the time of the feast or other crimes against the second Table p. 203 The Laws Deut. 13. three in number explicated the first two were morall the third Ceremoniall for the most part p. 205 Thewars in the Old Testament warrant wars in the New according to the naturall equity in them but they bind not according to the Ceremoniall and temporarie typicalness annexed to them page 209 Chap. 16. Prophecies in the Old Testament especially Zach. 13. 1 2 3 4 5 6. for punishing false Prophets vindicated The prophecies in the Old Testament especially that Zach. 13. 2 3 4 5 6 7. prove that false Teachers under the New Testament ought to be punished with the sword p. 209 So Joh. Goodwin answereth in his Appendix to Hagiomastix 210 The prophesie Zach. 13. and the house of David noteth not the Jewes only excluding the Gentiles ibid. Master Goodwins answer to Zach. 13. p. 211 Answer of Mr. Goodwin p. 213 It is not metaphoricall thrusting through that is spoken of Zach. 13. but really inflicted death and bodily punishment ibid. Chap 17. Places in the New Testament especially Rom. 13. for punishing of false Teachers vindicated So John Goodwin Hagiomastix p. 218 The ignorance of the Christian Magistrate in matters of Religion no ground why by his office he ought not to know so far truth and falsehood as to punish Heresies published and spread p. 219 Ordinary professors may know who are Hereticks and who false Teachers ibid. Magistrates as Magistrates cannot judge all evill doers for heathen Magistrates who never heard the Gospel cannot judge Gospel Hereticks p. 220 How Christ taketh service of a Christian Magistrate p. 2â—â— Master Joh. Goodwin p. 225 How Master Goodwin would elude the place Rom. 13. to 〈◊〉 that false Teachers are not evill doers p. 2â—â— Paul Rom. 13. speakes of Magistrates in generall what they ought to be not of Roman Magistrates as they were then ibid. Roman well-doing and ill-doing not meant in this Text p. 227 Chap. 18. The place 1 Tim. 2. 1 2. for coercive power 〈◊〉 false Prophets cleared The place 1 Tim. 2 1 2 3. explained p. 2â—9 We are to pray that Magistrates as Magistrates may not only 〈◊〉 but procure to us that we may live in godlinesse p. 2â—â— Rev. The ten Kings as Kings punish the whore and burn her 〈◊〉 for her Idolatrie p. 231 Extraordinarie punishing of Hereticks no case of the Magistrates neglect argueth that the Magistrate ought to punish them p. 232 Chap. 19. Exemption of false Prophets from coercive power is not Christian Libertie This Libertie of Conscience is not Christian Libertie p. 233 A Speculative Conscience no more freed from the Magistrate then â— practicall Conscience p. 235 Ecclesiasticall censures as compulsory as the Sword ibid. Chap. 20. The parable of the Wheat and the Tares discussed and cleared The scope of the parable of the Tares and the vindication thereof p. 236 The danger of punishing the innocent in lieu of the guiltie through â—â—â—stake is no argument that Hereticks should not be punished by 〈◊〉 magistrate p. 237 The Tares are not meant of Hereticks but of all the wicked who shall be burnt with unquenchable fire p. 238 The Parable of the Tares and of the sower most distinct parables 〈◊〉 matter and scope p. 239 Let them grow not expounded by Christ and what it meaneth p. 240 What is understood by tares p. â—â—â— Heresie may be known ibid. What is meant by plucking up p. â—â—â— What is meant by the field what by the wheat ibid. All the tithes of the parable must not be expounded nor the time exactly searched into when the tares were first 〈◊〉 p. 243 How sins are more haiâ—â—â—â— under the new Testament and 〈◊〉 God is now no lesse severe then under the Law and a Citie that will defend and protect a false Prophet against justice is to bee dealt with the same waies as under the Old Testament except that the typicalnesse is removed p. 244 What let them grow imports p. 245 How we are to bear permissive providences wherein evils of sin fall out ibid. Christ must mean by tares and wheat persons not doctrines good and ill p. 246 Whether false Teachers if they repent must be spared or because they may repent p. 247 Chap. 21. Of the Samaritam and of the non-compelling of Heathens how the Covenant bindeth us The not burning of the Samaritans doth prove nothing for the immunitie of Hereticks from the sword p. 249 How far we may compell other Nations or Heathens to imbrace the true faith p. 250 Of the Covenants obliging of us to the religions observance thereof p. 251 The word of God as it is in every mans Conscience no rule of Reformation in the Covenant p. 252 The equivocation of Sectaries in swearing the Covenant ibid. The Author of the Ancient bonds an ignorant provaricator in the Covenant p. 254 All morall compelling of Hereticks and refuting of false teachers by the word is as unlawfull as compulsion by the Sword according to the principles of Libertines p. 255 The Magistrate as the Magistrate cannot send Ministers but in a compulserie way p. 256 How Independents were insuared
by Presbyterians to take the Covenant as the Author saith p. 258 How Independents swore to defend the Presbyterian government and with tongue pen and sword cry out at it as tyrannicall antichristian and Popish p. 261 Libertines make Conscience not the Word of God their rule p. 262 How appearing to the Conscience makes not the word of God to be the obliging rule but only as touching the right and due manner of 〈◊〉 obliged thereby p. 2â—3 Chap. 22. The pretended Liberty of Conscience is against the National League and Covenant the Ordinances of the Parliament of England ingaged by Oath for a reformation of Religion 265 Chap. 23. The place Acts 5. 34. to wit the counsel of Gamaliel discussed and found nothing for Libertie of Conscience Mr. Goodwins unsound glosse touching the counsel of Gamaliel Acts 5. p. 2â—â— Gamaliels argument proveth as strongly that murtherers and adulterers should not be punished as that men ought not to bee punished for their Conscience p. 28â— The Argument of Gamaliel owned by Adversaries rendreth all 〈◊〉 fundamentals of the Gospel uncertain and Topick Sceptismâ—â— all the most well setled beleevers p. 285 Gamaliels Argument doth conclude that we are not to oppose by arguments and Scripture any blasphemous way against the gospel 286 Immediate providence is not the rule of our actions 288 Chap. 24. Whether punishing of seducing Teachers be inconsisâ—â—â— with the meeknes of Christ place Luk. 9. 54 discussed The Lords not burning Samaria with fire from heaven Luk. 9. is no colour for pretended Toleration p. 288 The case of Elias calling for fire from heaven and of the Apostles much different p. 289 The meeknes of Christ being extended to Publicans Extortioners and Harlots doth as well conclude such ought not to be punished by the magistrate is that false teachers ought not to be punished by him 291 By places from the meeknesse of Christ Socinians labour to prove the Magistrate is to shed no blood under the new Testament 292 Christs not breaking the bruised reed would prove that Hereticks are gracious persons though weak in saving grace and lovingly cherished by Christ if the place Isa 42. Mat. 12. 19 20 help the adversaries p. 293 Christs meeknes not inconsistent with his justice ibid. Rash judgement condemned 1 Cor. 4. 5 6. is nothing for pretended toleration p. 294 That many through the corruption of their own heart render hypocriticall obedience because of the sword proveth nothing against the use of the sword to coerce false teachers p. 29â— Matters of Religion â—ught to be inacted by the law of Princes Christian Rulers that such as contravene may be punished p. 299 Lawes of Rulers in matters of religion 〈◊〉 only bind the outward man ibid. The false teacher is to be sent to the Church and Pastors thereof that he may be convinced before he be punished p. 297 Chap. 25. Whether the Rulers by their office in â—â—der to â—â—nce are to stand to the laws of Moses for punishing seducing teachers ibid. How judiciall Laws oblige to punishment 298 Judiciall Laws were deduced from the morall Law p. 299 True cause of War with other Nations p. 300 Two Kingdomes becoming one body by a religious Covenant if it be mutuall the one part may avenge the quarrell of the Covenant on the other in case of breach p. 302 The new Altar erected by the two Tribes and the half beyond Jordan Josh 22. how a just cause of war ibid. Christian Princes Laws against Errors and Heresies p. 305 As Constantine gave out severe Laws against Donatists so did Julianus the Apostate restore Temples to hereticks and granted liberty of conscience to them that so he might destroy the name religion of Christians as is before observed so Aug. Ep. 166. â—d Donat. 309 God only determineth punishments for sin ibid. The punishing of a seducing Prophet is morall 301 The punishing of seducing Teachers is an act of justice obliging men ever and every where p. 311 False Teachers in seducing others apprehend the hand of divine vengeance pursuing them as other ill doers doe and so it must be naturall justice in the Magistrate to punish them p. 312 The punishing of false Prophets is of the Law of nature ibid. Idolatrie is to be punished by the judge and that by the testimonie of Job c. 31. who was obliged to observe no judiciall law but only the law moral and the law of Nature p. 313 How the Fathers deny the sword is to be used against men for their Conscience p. 315 Church censures and rebukes for Conscience infer most of all the absurdities that Libertines impute to us p. 316 That there was an immediate response of Gods oracle telling who was the false Teacher is an unwarranted forgerie of Libertines 318 If Heresie be innocencie seducing hereticks ought to bee 〈◊〉 and rewarded 319 The Magistrate as a Magistrate according to prophecies in the Old Testament is to punish Seducâ—rs p. 〈◊〉 What Mr. Williams giveth to the Magistrate in Religion 〈◊〉 sufficient ibid. Christian Kings are no more Nurse-fathers Isai 49. 23. 〈…〉 true Churches of Christ then to the Synagogue of Antichrist according to the way of Libertines p. 〈◊〉 The mind of divers famous Authors touching the parable of the 〈◊〉 p. 〈◊〉 The parable of the Tares considered p. 〈◊〉 Mr. Williams holdeth that the Prince owes protection to all Idolâ—trous and bloodie Churches if they he his Subjects p. 32â— How the Magistrate is to judge of Heresie p. 329 A Magistrate and a Christian Magistrate are to be differenced 〈◊〉 can or ought all Magistrates to judge of or punish all Hereticks p. 330 Whether peace of Civill societies be sure where there is toleration of all Religions p. 33â— Peace is commanded in the New Testament no word of 〈◊〉 of divers Religions nor precept promise or practise thereâ—â—â—â— p. 〈◊〉 No ground for abolishing of judiciall Laws touching that point ibid Libertines give us heathenish not Christian peace under many â—â—ligions p. 3â—â— Chap. 26. Whether punishing of Seducing Teachers be persecution for Conscience There is a tongue persecution condemned by Libertines themselves p. 〈◊〉 Libertines persecute others for Conscience p. 〈◊〉 Libertines ought not to suffer death for any truth p. 3â—â— The Lords patience toward sinners in the old Testament no Argâ—â—â—â— of not coercing false Prophets p. 34â— Hope of gaining Hereticks no more a ground of sparing them then of sparing murtherers who also may be gained p. 345 Whether to be persecuted for Conscience true or false he a note of 〈◊〉 true Church ibid. No new Commandments under the New Testament p. 〈◊〉 They that suffer for Blasphemie suffer according to the will of God in Peters sense by Libertines way p. 34â— Chap. 27. Whether our darknesse and incapacitie to beleâ—ve and professe together with the darknesse and obscuritie of Scripture be a sufficient ground for Tolaration Our inabilitie to beleeve is no plan for Toleration p. 350 Preaching of the Word without the Spirit
hypocrites and malicious opposers of the wayes of God enemies to and persecuters of the true Prophets sent of God v. 13. and who were these but Scribes Pharisees in whom there was as much malice against Christ and his Disciples as can be in the devill or such as sin against the Holy Ghost as may be seen Matth. 13 14 15. Matth. 12. 31 32. Matth. 15. 1 2 3 7 8 9. And God powred the spirit of slumber on the Jewes Rom. 11. 7. 8. and there was superlative malice in them against the knowne truth Act. 13. 45. 46. and blasphemy Act. 14. 2 3 4 5. and yet these men in evill and as touching litterall knowledge know well what they were doing though they were spiritually blocks See Matth. 2. 4 5 6. Joh. 7. 28. Joh. 3. 2. They privily bring in 2 Pet. 2. damnable heresies they make merchandise of you with faire words then they wanted not devillish wit enough And 1 Tim. 4. 1. They speake lyes out of hypocrisie and the doctrine of Devills forbidding meates and marriage there is wit for these look like singular mortification yet they have a conscience so stupid as it were burnt with a hot iron This also is grosse ignorance in Libertines that they thinke those who sinne against knowledge and conscience and out of malice as those that sin against the Holy Ghost doe not sinne through ignorance also which is most false for the most malicious sin against knowledge hath an interpritative ignorance conâ—oyned with it as the Pharisees who sinned against the Holy Ghost in crucifying Christ some of them as is cleare Joh. 8. 28. Joh. 9. 40 41 and else where yet they sinned ignorantly also for had thy knowne they would not have crucified the Lord of glory 1 Cor. 2. 8. CHAP. IX Of Liberty of prophesying of erroneous inditement of Conscience that it is not our Rule BUt we judge that Hereticks admonished and convinced of their errour doe sinne on the borders at least of the sin against the Holy Ghost in regard they be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 selfe condemned as Paul saith Tit. 3. 10. A man that is an hereticke after the first and second admonition reject 11. Knowing that he that is such is subverted and sinneth being condemned of himselfe Where the Apostle saith an admonished and wrought upon hereticke who is convinced of the truth and yet still resisteth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He is perverted or subverted desperately perverted like a building throwne downe to the foundation 2. he finneth as condemned of himselfe that is judged and condemned by his owne conscience and so sinneth willfully and with a high measure of light but hee shutteth his eyes against the light and known truth and resisteth it 1 The Hereticke here spoken of Tit. 3. 10. is not the man who moves such questions say they as he knowes to be vaine and light as Arminians say For as Vedelius saith he expresly speakes of an heretick 2 It is a question if any bee called an Hereticke in the word because he moves such questions 1. The Hereticke here is subverted and so turned off the foundation Christ But he that moveth vaine and unprofitable questions can at best but build his hay stubble upon the foundation Christ now such a man may bee builded on the foundation and saved though the fire destroy his worke and so he is not turned off the foundation Yea if he wittingly and willingly move vain and light questions he cannot be saved nor doth that follow for his knowledg of the levity of these questions aggravates his sin but cannot cause to amount to a sin so high as to subvert the mans faith because he may keepe the foundation though he hold these vaine and light opinions for they are not in themselves destructive of the foundation 2. There is no mention nor any hint here of vaine and light questions but of admonished heretickes therefore Eusebius l. 4. c. 13. referres it to those that deny Christs divinity to Marcion and Corinthus and they say John would not stay in the stoves with Cerinthus and Polycarpus his disciple would not speake with Marcion but said I know thee to be the first borne of Sathan 3. It is here to be noted that these Authors also make the conscience though erroneous even in fundamentalls the rule of faith if the person beleeve that he worships God according to the rule of the word and there be some morall honesty in him and so teach there should be a toleration of al hereticks then no man is the heretick but he who professeth points of truth which he believeth to be lyes untruth but so there is not an hereticke in the world but the devill and such as professe a false Religion before men which in their conscience they beleeve to be false But the Apostle saith 1 Tim. 3 1. Now the Spirit speaketh expresly that in the latter times men shall depart from the faith giving beed to seducing spirits Popish Priests and Familists and doctrine of Devills 2. Speaking lyes in hypocrisie having their conscience seared with an hot iron 3. Forbidding to marry and commanding to abstaine from meats Now a seared conscience burnt with an hot iron may and doth teach marriage to be unlawfull to some and doe beleeve it for a truth that Church-men should not intangle themselves with the affaires of this life such as marriage and care of children because Pastors goe a warfare for Jesus Christ yet the text saith they that so teach are seducers who with a seared conscience speake lyes in hypocrisie and so must be hereticks and worse 2. No rule can be falser and more crooked then the conscience for if ye must be obliged to follow conscience because it is conscience or because right or wrong if you must follow conscience because conscience yee must ever follow your conscience though never so wrong for the most erroneous conscience is conscience though the devill should immediately actuate it yet doth not leave off to bee conscience and to be the rule and if so when the conscience of some saith its good service to God to kill the Apostles of our Lord because they preach the Gospel then doe persecuters nothing but what they are in duty bound to doe when they murther the Apostles because they preach the Gospel for to follow the rule which God hath appointed must be a bounden duty And the same must follow if the conscience as evill be the rule for then should men serve God in sacrificing their sonnes to God in community and plurality of wives when ever their conscience should dictate any such thing to be lawfull though in it selfe it be most contrary to the word of God If the conscience as good or as the Arminians seeme to say as principled with morall honesty be our rule then the conscience as conscience is not the rule but as it is ruled by morall honesty this wee cannot say
Magistrates judges of what is truth and heresie since the generallity of Magistrates yea of men are ignorant thereof and uncapable in questions of doubtfull disputation 2 Say that the Synod were equally divided whether Presbytery or Independence be the way of God or say the major part which is ever the worst determine amisse what shall the Magistrate do and the evill doer Rom. 13. cannot be he that doth evill without limitation or thinks evill but pro subjecta materia But he that doth evil whereof ordinary Magistrates heathen or Christian are competent judges which is manifestly of politicall consideration as that which is contrary to the light and law of nature as whoredome adultery murther theft unjustice sedition treason Answ 1. This argument is against the wisdome of God in appointing Magistracy as well as against us for there be a world of questions of doubtfull disputation what is according or what contrary to the light and law of nature in murther medicine usury polygamy incest marriage contracts false witnesse and these are so controverted yea and there be matters too hard in judgement for ordinary men between blood and blood plea and plea stroake and stroake Deut. 17. 12. no lesse then in matters of Religion and to erre in taking the life of a guiltlesse man in any subject is as great misgovernment as can be though I dare not charge God with it as the Objecter doth 2. When the Holy Ghost forbiddeth the Master of every Christian family and there must be a far larger number of heads of families then Christian Magistrates to owne a hereticke as a guest or to salute him 2 Joh. 10. and commandeth Christians not to eat with an Idolator 1 Cor. 7. 11. to reject an heretick Tit. 3. 10. to avoyd false teachers that creep into houses 2 Tim. 3. 5 6. and such as cause divisions contrary to the doctrine of the Gospel Rom. 16. 17 18. sure he supposeth they have knowledge to judge what is error and heresie what is truth otherwise he commands us to turne our backs on such as the blinde man casts his club May not one say This is against the wisdome of God in the government of Christian families and societies to interpose our judgement in doubtsome disputations to judge who is the hereticke and to be avoyded who is the sound beleever 3. The uncapability of Magistrates and most men to judge here is the want of infallibility such as the immediately inspired Prophets had then it s against the wisdome of God that we try the spirits and doctrines and beleeve them for if the generality of men let alone Christian Magistrates be uncapable of fundamentall truths they cannot judge them to be truths nor heresies except they be infalibly and immediately inspired by this argument it is then against the wisdome of God to bid any beleeve the Gospel but the Prophets and Apostles 4. The Magistrate being a Christian should see with his owne eyes and judge the Presbytery worthy of his politicke sanction and though Synods divide or erre the error and uncertainties of men that are accidentall to all Ordinances are no rule to Magistrates on earth and by this reason which hath as much force against preaching the Gospell as against the Christian Magistrates politicall judging when Ministers are divided and the equall halfe or the major part preach Arrianisme Socinianisme Familâ—â—â—e c. and the lesser number sound doctrine the Objecter needs not aske under which of their shadows shall the Magistrate repose for peace and safety I inlarge the question and let the Objecter answer under which of their shadows shall all their hearers repose for faith and establishment in the truth And I answer call no man Rabbi let Magistrates and others receive the truth in love and let him answer when foure hundred Prophets say to Achab goe to Ramath Gilead fight and prosper and one Michajah saith goe not left thou be killed under which shall Achab repose shall then Achab heare the voice of the Lord in no Prophet because foure hundred speake lyes or shall not foure hundred Michajahs declare the minde of God to the Prince because so many false Prophets speake the contrary 5. It s true Ill-doers here must be such as Magistrates generally may judge but not all ill-doers false Prophets or the like Magistrates as Magistrates are to judge ill-doers but it followes not that all Magistrates whether Heathen or Christian are to judge all ill-doers whether Gospel-seducing teachers or murtherers for there wanteth a condition in heathen Magistrates for the want whereof they cannot actually and in the capacity of heathens judge false teachers Arrians Socinians and the like not because they are not essentially Magistrates as well as Christian Magistrates but because they want the knowledge of the Gospell even as inferiour Judges are as essentially Judges in Israel as the Priests and the great Sanedrim at Jerusalem and may judge of their office between blood and blood but if it be a controversie too hard for them between blood and blood and the party be willing to appeale these inferiour Judges cannot actually judg that controversie but it must go to the Sanedrim Deut. 17. 12. 13. So a father as a father whether heathen or Christian and a Master of a family by his place the like I say of a husband a Tutor a Doctor in their respective places are by their place and relation to teach their children and servants the principles of the doctrine of the Gospel by these places Gen. 18. 18 19. Exod. 12. 26 27. Ps 78. 4 5 6 7. Joel 1. 2. Prov. 4 3 4 5. Eph. 6. 4. 2 Tim. 3 14 15. Deut. 6. 6. 7. yet while they are heathen fathers and heathen masters they neither can nor are obliged actually to teach any thing of the Gospel they never hearing of the Gospel are obleiged not to beleeve in a Christ of whom they never heard Rom. 10. 14 15 16. and those that Christ was never preached to are not condemned for Gospell-unbeliefe Joh. 15. 22. But for sinnes against the Law of nature Rom. 2. 12. 13 14 15. Rom. 1. 19 20 21 22. and the like must wee say of Judges whether heathen or Christian though in the state of heathenish they never having heard of Christ freeth them from an obligation of actuall punishing Gospell hereticks yet as Judges their office is to punish such but neither heathen Princes nor heathen fathers masters husbands tutors and teachers of Schooles are obliged to an actual exercise of all and every Magistraticall fatherly masterly maritall and tutory Gospell-duties toward their underlings and pupills if they live in a Countrey where they are invincibly ignorant of the Gospell if the Lord by no providence send Preachers of the Gospell to them And how shall they beleeve in him of whom they never heard And how shall they judge hereticks sinning against a Gospell of which they never heard Let no man stumble at this
speake de genere singulorum or did those that took the Covenant speak or meane that tolleration of all these Sects and Reformation and nearest uniformity can consist or that he and all these had this sense under-hand of these words according to the word of God that is as Socinians Libertines Familists Antinomians c. expound the word of God If so we must justifie the Jesuits equivocation and their oaths with mentall reservation for the sense of Prelaticall men and of those that goe for Heretickes and Schismatickes now as then to wit Socinians Libertines Arrians Familists and the rest were knowne Heretickes and Schismatickes and their Socinian Arrian Familisticall c. sense of the word of God was excluded in the second Article of the Covenant in these words We shall endeavour the extirpation of Popery Prelacy Superstition Heresie Schisme c. by this Jesuiticall sense we all sweare we shall endeavour to be perjured and to reforme each mans Religion according to his owne sense of the word and whereas in former times it was beleeved that Christ was God-man We Familists sweare to reforme Religion in the three Kingdomes in that part and to teach and professe that every Saint is so Godded and Christed that there is as much of the fulnesse of the Godhead dwelling in every Saint as in Christ so that there be as many Saints as many Christs and as many Gods manifested in the flesh as there be Saints for since liberty of conscience was then not professed and was a point holden by no Reformed Church yea not by the Church of New England the best Reformed Church as this man saith but detested by all it was presupposed that the true sense of the word of God was against it and Independents who then did sweare the Covenant knew our minde and did sweare the preservation of the Reformed Religion in the Church of Scotland in doctrine worship and discipline against the common enemy and they knew Presbyteriall Government approves both of the censures of the Church and of the Magistrates sword against heretickes and therefore Turkes and Pagans would never have sworne a Covenant to endeavour uniformity in one Religion according to the word of God and after petition the Parliament to set up in England the widest multiformity that Sathan can devise and say they have sworne to endeavour the nearest uniformity in Religion and yet to preach and print and endeavour by the same Covenant and the word of God the rule of sworne Reformation the widest multiformity and that the Lord should be one and his name one in both Kingdomes and yet that the Lord be two or ten and his name that is the maners and kinds of Religions be two and twenty that Gods name may be divided amongst Socinians Arrians Familists Antinomians Anabaptists Seekers Antiscripturists Libertines Scepticks Enthysiasts Brownists Independentsâ— this is worse then a Popish implicit faith which we disclaim The other thing saith he left out which yet referres to all The Covenant is that hee that sweares shall by all lawfull wayes and meanes and according to his place and calling endeavour to performe the Covenant v. 13. to bring the Churches to uniformity and to extirpate heresie As for instance it is the godly Magistrates duty their place and calling to send forth Ministers to the darke places of the land and to set up lights to guide mens feet into the wayes of truth and peace and reclaime them from errors and he cannot be urged upon his calling to punish or compell gainesayers And the Minister is to doe it in his place by exhorting rebuking instructing but he is to goe no further he is not to deliver men up to judge and be an executioner Answ The words by all lawfull meanes and wayes which this man puts in Italian letters and says are left out by the Authour whom he refutes may soon be left out for they were never in the Covenant The man will defend the Covenant and apparently hath sworne it but I thinke he hath scarce read it for these words are not in the Covenant let him read againe Turpe est doctori cum culpa redarnit ipsum 2 He sweares to bring the Churches to nearest uniformity according to his place but when this man defends the tolleration of all the sects in England Socinians Arians Familists for he writing anno 1645 when above twenty sundry Religions in England came to the streets he excepts not one in all his Treatise but calls them all the godly party Saints Brethren the Godly and ownes them so in his preface and whole booke He must grant there is no uniformity in faith discipline worship by the word of God for if all these be Saints Godly and holy Brethren they have all one faith and are saved but let him tell me by the next if he can answer whether there is a nearest or any uniformity in faith worship and government betweene Presbyterians and Socinians Familists Antinomians and Seekers yet this man sweares to indeavour the nearest conjunction and uniformity amongst all the Saints who are to be tollerated but let him say if he hath in this case ingenuity or learning what nearest uniformity hee knowes amongst all these whether the Covenant should not obliege a Libertine to indeavour the widest contrariety and deformity of religious amongst these and to plead for forbearance of them all as he expoundeth it 3 But wee are saith he to indeavour by all lawfull meanes and wayes the nearest uniformity among the Churches and the onely lawfull way as he thinks is not by force but by rebuking instructing exhorting and by no weapons but onely by the word of God But since this Authour and all the Nation of Libertines goe upon this principle Religion is not to be compelled by force for we are not infallible and those whom we force as hereticks may be no hereticks for ought we know but as sound in the faith as our selves Then we have no faith nor any well-grounded perswasion of the word of God to refute them by the word and we refute them not of faith but sinfully and erroniously for they may be as sound in the faith as we our selves for ought wee know and this is a strong argument against morall wayes of gaining hereticks by the power of the word for if they may be sound in the faith and we the hereticks though we refute them by the word we may be perverting the right wayes of God and â—ight against Christ as Elimâ—s for Eliâ—â—s onely by morall wayes not by force or violence laboured to pervert the faith of Sergius Paulus and it is not apparent that Elimas was perswaded in his conscience that the Gospel Paul preached was the truth of God and so by no meanes lawfull or unlawfull by force or by the word of God are we to indeavour uniformity for our indeavouring is not of faith nor from the real grounds of the word but from meere opinions
endeavour the extirpation of Schisme and whatsoever shal be found contrary to â—ound doctrine c. be levelled onely against the Congregational men it was not faâ—re to draw them into a Covenant to destroy themselves It s disservice to the State to spoyle the State of so many Godly and brave men and seemes to be but the birth of that challenge against these men to bee the Sanballets and Tobia's of this present worke and is the highest breach of love Answ It is apparent the Congregationall men he meaneth are the Independents who would have their Churches gathered out of true Churches Who will not be called Schismaticks as if ensis and gladius were not one thing then this Author levelled these words against Presbyterians as the Schismaticks for where ever one Church is rent from another true Church one of the two is the Schismatick Church sure but the Author will not have Independents the Schismaticks then was it faire to levell these words in the Covenant against Presbyterians and draw them in a Covenant to destroy both their soule and body 2 The Congregationall men were not drawne but they came to another Kingdome with faire words to draw Presbyterians in a Covenant and said and swore to indeavour uniformity and yet practise this day multiformity of Religions and have put to the saile the blood of many gallant men in Scotland that so they may buy with their lives cursed Liberty of Conscience But will it not be bitternesse in the end 3. The Author hints at a story that fell out in the Assembly of Divines where I was witnesse Mr. Phi. Nye having sworne to endeavour the preservation of Presbyterian government in the Covenant was pleased in the face of the Assembly in the hearing of that renowned Generall of England for the time the Earle of Essex and many other honourable and noble persons to declaime against Presbyteriall government as formidable to States and free Kingdomes as of old some called Jerusalem the rebellious City and the Prelates the same way burdened the Generall Assembly of the Church of Scotland but Mr. Alexander Henderson a man for piety learning prudency and singular moderation from zeale not from the spirit of gall and wormewood as the Authour slanderously speaketh said they were the words of Tobiah and Sanballet to hinder the worke of Reformation now whether that worthy man spake what hath now come to passe let the godly Divines of the Assembly be judge 4. We know no service to the State done by these men but that they set up with the sword all the blasphemous and hereticall Sects and Religions that Th. Muncer or John of Leydon phancied contrary to the oath of God for they all professed they were for the Covenant many of them did sweare it with what conscience to perfome let Crumwel and others speake God will not be mocked which is such disservice to the State of England as cannot but draw downe from heaven the vengeance of the Lord and the vengeance of his Temple upon the land or was it fair when the Congregationall men did hide their conclusion of liberty of conscience would keepe that intended Idoll in the bottome of their heart and joyne in Covenant with Presbyterians and sweare against multiformity of Religions in words known to be contrary to the sense of those who drew up the Covenant contrary to sense and reason and the same words of the Covenant and now obtrude on us multiformity for uniformity 5. The Authour insinuates as much as not to give them liberty of conscience as a reward of their valorous fighting is disservice to the State But ingenuous workmen speake of their wages before they ingage in the work but to keepe up any word of liberty of conscience untill the worke bee ended and it come to disbanding is no fair bargaining but rather in plaine English either sell to us Law Liberties Religion and give them to us beside our arreares or we must be a perpetuall standing Army to governe England and manage Religion with the sword and to set up all Religions and destroy the Covenant and the Protestant faith and live upon the sweat of other mens browes The Covenant with a faire interpretation may be urged against Presbyterians and for the Congregationall way as well as otherwise The Covenant binds no man nor number of men to State or Church for their parts respectively to any paterne or degree of Reformation conformity or uniformity with other Churches but what shall satisfactorily to them and each of their consciences appeare to be according to the word of God and such a Reformation doe the Congregationall men desire pray preach endeavovr for and after in the pursuance of the Covenant as if there had beene no such outward Covenant obliging them would yee have men driven in droves to the Sacrament still and the pretious and the vile mixed and Idol-shepheards suffered and Bishops Courts and Consistories continued had these beene beaten downe had not we under God as a forlorne hope first given them battell how can ye say we hinder Reformation when we are for a further and purer Reformation your selves being judges you would â—it down on this side Jordan we would advance Siâ— you quiet if you will not helpe us as we helped you Answ When you of the Congregationall way that is of the Church way for none are Churches but you we are excommunicated and all else but your selves did sweare to endeavour the preservation of the Reformed Religion in the Church of Scotland in doctrine worship discipline and government which to your consciences and all the Reformed Churches is Presbyterian can the Covenant be turned against Presbyterians as well as against you 2. You write and preach that the government Presbyterian is Popish Antichristian more tyrannicall then that of Babel of Aegypt so all your way and particularly Mr. Burton in his conformities deformity and your Independents in the Assembly yet you did sweare to endeavour its preservation and all the Independents in both Houses spake against it as tyrannicall and have voted to clog it with Erastianisme I would beleeve Erastus if he had sworne to endeavour the preservation of it better then your oath I think Pagans would not sweare to endeavour the preservation of any religious way which with tongue pen lawes and sword they endeavour to undoe and extirpate see if distinctions will defend it against the common enemy and whether these words according to the word of God expounded by you will save you from the quarrell and wrath of God for a broken Covenant Passe over the Isles and goe to Turkey to America and see if such a thing as this hath been 2. The Covenant bindes no man saith he to any degree of Reformation but what shall satisfactorily appeare to each mans conscience to be according to the word of God 1. Then the Reformed Religion in Scotland in doctrine worship and government according to the word of
God appeared once satisfactorily to your conscience to be according to the word of God for you tooke the Covenant yet ye say it is Antichristian it drives men in droves to the Sacrament it is the Bishops Courts and Consistories continued But yee did sweare to endeavour the preservation of their Reformed Religion according to the word of God the onely rule But if it was sworne to as the Reformed Religion was it not according to the word of God is it reformed and not according to the word of God or was these words according to the word of God A condition insinuating what is in the doctrine and discipline of the Reformed Religion of that Church not according to the word of God to that you did not sweare But so if the Turke should come and wage warre against Papists for their Religion and a heathen people that maintaines there bee more Gods then one and that the Old Testament is not the word of God should raise Armes against the Jewes you might as well swear you should defend the doctrine of the Church of Rome and the Religion of the Jewes against the Turke and those heathen people according to the word of God for sure these fundamentalls that Jewes and Papists hold in doctrine are according to the word of God and so you did swear no otherwise to defend the Reformed Religion of the Church of Scotland then that of the Church of England before these troubles arose for that ye swore to defend in so far as it agrees with â—â—e word of God yea so ye did sweare to defend any Religion of any Nation you never heard of according to the word of God if you say But we knew the Reformed Religion of the Church of Scotland therefore ye might sweare to it but yee know not all the Religions of any Nation you never heard of But if so then yee knew the Reformed Religion of Scotland to be according to the word of God then it appeared satisfactorily to your conscience so to be But did their fundamentalls against Familists Antiscripturists Socinians Arrians so appeare to your conscience to be according to the word of God and their Antichristian and tyrannicall Presbyteries that are but as you say Episcopall Courts and Consistories appear to be so and that satisfactorily to your consciences if so why judge ye Familists Socinians such as deny the Trinity and such as make all the Saints to be Christ and Godded with the indwelling fulnesse of God to be Gods manifeâ—â—ed in the flesh to be Saints brethren the godly party to be indulged then you must question the fundamentalls of the doctrine of Scotland and they did not satisfactorily appeare to your conscience to be according to the word of God And why did you simply without any limitation sweare to endeavour the preservation of the Reformed Religion you should have said truly Reformed Religion of the Church of Scotland and why did you sweare simply to the doctrine worship discipline and government of the Church according to the word of God when yee knew then as now their government was Antichristian and not according to the word of God and their doctrine even in fundamentalls not so sure but Socinians Arrians and the Saints your brethren the Familists may hold the contrary and bee tollerated as Saints and their doctrine though opposite in fundamentalls to ours may be as satisfactory truths to your conscience as ours of Scotland Confesse and glorifie God you sware the Covenant in a Jesuiticall reserved sense kept up in your minde as you insinuate pag. 66 67. and such as the words cannot beare 3. There is here a new Tricke put on the Covenant it bindes to no truth but what shall appeare satisfactorily to the conscience of each swearer to be according to the word of God If a Merchant promise and swear to a simple man to give him for such wares an hundred pounds he gives him but an hundred pounds Scotch whereas the wares are to the man as dear as an hundred pounds Starling is the Merchant absolved of his oath and promise if he pay him but an hundred pounds Scotch and say it appeares satisfactorily to my Antinomian conscience the 〈…〉 of no more value then a hundred pound Scotch and my oath and promise obligeth me to no more then satisfactorily appeareth to my conscience the onely rule of my obligation to be according to equity and justice and so you are fully paid with an hundred pounds Scotch So this Authour absolves us from all oaths and covenants though we sweare not to kill a captive taken in warre and sweare to adhere to the fundamentalls that there is one God Christ is the one onely Mediator God and man consubstantiall with the father yet if after you have talked with Saâ—marsh or put your faith in the power of the sophismes oâ— a cunning Jesuit he makes it satisfactorily appeare to your conscience that it is according to the word of God that the captive â—e killed â—e is a murtherer and there be as many Mediators as there be Saints in heaven and as many Christs Godded with the fulnesse of the Godhead as there be Saints of the family of love and so your oath to your fundamentalls obligeth you not and you are guilty of no perâ—ury though first you sware to the necessary truths of God and now ye turne apostate from both faith and oath Libertines infuse such a magick in your erroneous conscience that it is your onely rule and displaceth the Law of nature from all obligation or the word of God the onely rule of faith and manners you are tyed no longer by the oath of God then your weather-cock-conscience with this new Moon hath catched a new light you are as if there had been no such outward Covenant obliging you take it upon the word of this Gamaliel dormii securd in utramque aurem But though it be true nothing doth oblige but it must appeare to be according to the word of God that it may oblige in the right and due manner and way yet it is most false that it obligeth as it shall appear or quaâ—â—nus because it doth appear to the conscience to be the word of God for a quatenus ad omne valet consequentia Then every thing obligeth as it appears to be the word of God to the conscience most erroneous then are some obliged to murther the innocent Apostles for it appeares satisfactorily to their conscience to be the word of God and service to God so to doe Joh. 16. 1. and some are obliged to sacrifice their sons to God though they did vow and covenant the contrary in Baptisme for it appeares satisfactorily to their conscience it is according to the example of Abraham to offer their sonnes to God except God from heaven forbid them as he did Abraham 5. To Libertines no Covenants nor Oaths of the most lawfull things layes on any more obligation to performance then if these Oaths
had never been made if the erroneous conscience gainsay 6. You did know the discipline of the Church of Scotland debars not all from the Sacrament except known unregenerate persons yee knew their Consistories to be hatefull to the common enemies why then did you swear to defend them against the commmon enemy since both to your conscience and the common enemy they are contrary to the word of God 7. You durst not give the first battle to Bishops Scotland gave it to them when your Grandees were as low as shrubs as feared as Harts 8. You hinder Reformation your Independents wrought with all their power there should be no Assembly and that no old non-conformists such as sound and learned Mr. Ruthband gracious and zealous Mr. Ash and others to bee members thereof and would rather have had Prelaticall Conformists in the Assembly then they You joyne with all the Sectaries who are against Covenant Government Confession of faith and Directory of worship retarded the proceedings of the Assembly we heard often in Scotland you wished Prelacie were gone if ye knew what to put in its place as if no Government known to you could fit England but Prelacy and that of the Reformed Churches were not so good 9. You would goe further on then we and be over Jordan but we had rather sit downe on this side of Jordan as go over with you for ye was not well over when yee set up at the Kings house Idolatrous bowing to Altars and the abjured Masse-booke and Familists Socinians Antinomians Seekers Arrians preaching Souldiers who teach as many Saints as many Christs and Gods manifested in the flesh and when these perverters of the right wayes of God were silenced by a godly Preacher at London they prayed woe with learning it opposeth all the wayes of God and is that a Reformation on the other side of Jordan which sends out Apostles to preach that are as blinde as Moles in the principles of the single Catechisme who know not whether there bee-one God and one Mediator Christ or millions of Gods and Christs yet these are the onely aâ—ointed ones It were good that such a Reformation were over Jordan and millions of miles beyond America CHAP. XXII The pretended Liberty of Conscience is against the Nationall League and Covenant and the Ordinances of the Parliament of England ingaged by Oath for a Reformation of Religion A Midst our greatest feares and the inlarged sorrowes of our heart for the calamitous condition of our dear brethren in England by reason of an unnaturall warre raised by a Prelaticall popish and malignant party tending to the destruction of the Kingdome subversion of Religion Lawes and Liberties we exceedingly rejoyced when the Lord mighty in counsell did lay in Sion the foundation of a hopefull building and stirred up the spirits of the Honourable Houses of Parliament to declare to the Commissioners of the Generall Assembly of the Kirke of Scotland their sense of Church government by Archbishops Bishops c. to be dishonourable to God by arrogating to themselves a preâ—â—minence and power which he had not given justly offensive to the Kingdome a great impediment to the growth of Religion and promising to remove the same desired for the obtaining of aâ— happy union with the Church of Scotland and other Reformed Churches abroad the Generall Assembly to send to the Assembly of Divines at Westminster some godly and learned Divines of that Church whereby an uniformity in forme of Church government might be obtained and tâ—ereby a more easie passage made to the settling of one confession of faith one Liturgie or Directory of publicke worship and one Catechisme in all the three Kingdomes and when for our faith fulnesse to our brethren in sending an Army to England to helpe them the enemy had wasted our land and we were given for lost and filled with the cup of astonishment of waters of gall and wormewood in our greatest midnight darkenesse it was to us the morning dawning of the flourishing condition of the Isle of Britaine when we did reap first fruits of that blessed union of both Kingdomes by that Nationall Covenant with the Lord the most high and of the three Kingdomes amongst themselves never to bee forgotten and when we received the Directory for the publicke worship of God throughout the three Kingdomes passed in Ordinance of Parliament in each Kingdome But now we are stricken with amazement exceedingly when we reape no other fruit of our expence of blood wastation of our Kingdome attendance on this Assembly four years but in stead of the nearest uniformity of the Churches of God in the three Kingdomes in Religion Confession of faith form of Church government Directory for worship and catechising a far more capacious and wide deformity in all these then there was before our taking of the Covenant yea or since Christian Religion came first into this Island When we see a licentious tolleration in one of the three Kingdomes of all formes and wayes of serving God established by Law and no limitation nor bordering provided to hedge in the fleshly and lawlesse exorbitances of men whose apprehensions and phancies of the one onely true God in three distinct persons and of his revealed will in his word are now by nature vaine superstitious Idolatrous blasphemous impure and devilish save onely a poore narrow and dubious circle of some few fundamentalls that may be and are by men of corrupt mindes changed in lyes and blasphemies We therefore the Commissioners of the Kirk of Scotland according to the trust committed to us are necessitated in the name of Jesus Christ the onely King and head of his Church and at the commandement and in the name of the Kirke of Scotland to protest and by these presents doe protest and declare against the said pretended tolleration as followeth 1 Such liberty is inconsistent with and repugnant to the word of God Deut. 13. 1 2 3 to ver 12. Rom. 13. 1 2 3 compared with Phil. 3. 2. 2 Joh. 10. where false teachers are câ—â—â—ed evill doers so Ezra 7. 23 24 25 26 27 28. Neâ—em 13. 15. 17. 21 22. 25. 30. 2 Chron. 34. ver 33 2 Chron. 15. 12 13. 16 17. 2 Kings 23. 5 6. 9. 20 21. Dan. 3. 29. Dan. 6. 26. 1 Tim. 2. 2. Revel 17. 12 16 17. Zach. 13. 1 2 3 4 5 6. Esay 49. 23. Exod. 20. 8 9 10 11. Levit. 20. 2 6. Deut. 17. 2 3 c. Exod. 32. 26 27 28 29. Numb 25. 1 2 3 c. Deut. 28. 18 19 to ver 22. Josh 22. 10 11 c. 2 God severely avengeth and plagueth breach of Covenant either with the Lord himselfe or men We therefore appeale to the righteous Judge of the whole earth whose dreadfull name is ingaged in this Covenant Nor can wee imagine that this Covenant is temporary for we swear to continue in this blessed union all the dayes of our life zealously and constantly Nor hath
oblieging us but an inward law in the mind beyond all ordinances must regulate us now under the Gospell The Honourable Houses in rules and directions for suspending from the Lords supper enumerating most of the fundamentals doe by divers Ordinances evidence they are by law to bee punished who professe or teach contrary to these And in rules for trying of Ministers before they be ordained though thousands now are constant Preachers without any ordination at all the Minister must be one that is able to defend the Orthodox doctrine contained in the Scriptures as the Scripture saith 1 Tim. 3. Tit. 1. 9 10 11. against all unsound and erronious opinions especially those of the present age such as these of Arrians Socinians Arminians Anabaptists Brownists Familists Antinomians Libertines Seekers c. Where the Houses mention the great duty lying on them to settle matters concerning Religion and the worship of Almighty God and have continually before their eyes the Covenant which they have so solemnly taken and in pursuance of the ends of the Covenant have removed the booke of Common-prayer with all its unnecessary and burdensome Ceremonies and have established the directory in the roome thereof and have abolished the Prelaticall hierarchy by Arch-Bishops Bishops and instead thereof have laid the foundation of a Presbyterian Government in every Congregation with subordination to Classical Provinciall and Nationall Assemblies and of them all to the Parliament Both Houses of Parliament and the Parliament of Scotland agree that the Kings Majesty take or at least approve and ratifie the Covenant and that all the Subjects of either Kingdomes sweare it What then shal become of the Covenant shall it not be buried if a law passe it shall be voluntary to men to take it or not to take it The Honourable Houses ordaine That any preaching or writing or maintaining such errours as doe subvert any Articles of the true Protestant Religion shall be excluded from the Lords Supper and in case of refusal to compear before the Eldership or obstinate persisting in the errour shall be imprisoned by the Justice of peace till he submit to order The Houses give thankes to the Commissioners of the Kingdome of Scotland that the Lords of privy Councell do so farre respect the welfare and peace of England that they are pleased to second the desires of the Generall Assembly of that Church for unity in Religion and uniformity in Church-government in his Majesties three Kingdomes We cannot thinke the Honourable Houses would passe an Ordinance for an universall Fast through all the Kingdome to seeke assistance from God to suppresse Heresies and Errours except the whole land be injoyned to take the name of God in vaine if it were not the will and minde of the Houses to detest liberty of conscience especially since in the Ordinance they mention the wonderfull assistance of God since their engagement in the Covenant in which they are to endeavour sincerely really and constantly the Reformation of Religion in doctrine discipline and worship and the extirpation of Popery Superstition Heresie Schisme and Prophanenesse and whatsoever shall be found contrary to sound Doctrine And that they are resolved to improve the utmost of their power that nothing be said or done against the truth but for the truth Now by the utmost of their power they must meane their Parliamentary power of the sword committed to them as the Ministers of God for that is their utmost and highest power otherwise all private men are to improve the utmost of their power for the truth In the Ordinance for Reforming of the University of Oxford the Honourable Houses ordaine to punish those that take not the Covenant or oppose the execution of the Ordinances of Parliament concerning the Discipline and Directory The Honourable House of Commons say their true and reall intentions are and endeavours shall be to settle Religion in the purity thereof according to the Covenant Nor can the Parliament loose men from the oath of God nor put any exposition on the Covenant other then the words naturally hold forth nor can any one Parliament obtrude any Law interpretation of the Covenant on the subjects different from the true sense and genuine meaning conceived by the Parliament of the other Kingdome since it is not the Covenant of any one single Kingdome nor can we say without mocking of God and dallying with the oath of God that the Covenant was conceived in any such doubtsome equivocall and two faced sense so as each Kingdome may sweare it according to their owne sense and the one sense for or not against the pretended liberty of conscience the other for it And both Kingdomes esteeme the end of the Warres an abundant reward of all that we can doe or suffer in this cause to settle Religion and we have resolved and decreed never to lay downe Armes untill truth and peace be settled in this Island upon a firme foundation for the present and future generations Then what ever Kingdome shall resyle from the Covenant to a detestable liberty of all pretended truths as they breake with God so must they breake with men seeing the two Kingdomes are mutually and reciprocally ingaged to one another in the meanes and the end and they must looke that the righteous God shall avenge breach of Covenant and such apostacie from his truth with the saddest and heaviest of judgements that we or our fathers have heard of the rumour whereof shall cause our eares to tingle The Honourable Houses professe an union in doctrine discipline and worship to be a more strong bulwarke against the bloody practises of Papist and deceitfull errors of other Sectaries and more profitable use of the Ministery Other Sectaries can be no other then such as swarme and abound in the Army and Kingdome And this diversity of Religions by tolleration utterly weakens yea and dissolveth the blessed union betweene the Kingdomes For the Houses say Religion cannot be altered in the one Kingdome without the other and the Lord would not have put it in the hearts of both Kingdomes if he had beene minded to destroy us They acknowledge that Religion is the band and foundation of the safety and happinesse of both Kingdomes When therefore God suffers it to enter into our hearts to breake our Covenant with God and our Brethren the Lord hath a minde to disquiet the inhabitants of England so as the fierce anger of the Lord and his jealousie must smoake against them as fire The Reverend Assembly of Divines give their sense of this pretended liberty to be against the will and minde of God in his word FINIS CHAP. XXIII The place Acts 5. v. 34. to wit the counsell of Gamaliel discussed and found nothing for liberty of Conscience THe most of the strength of Master John Goodwins Argument stands thus Theomachia ser 2. 11. This doctrine or way is either of men or of God saith Gamaliel If it
he of men you shall not need to represse it for it will of it selfe come to naught which he proves by the instances of Judas and Theudas If it be of God it is in vaine to strive against it for it must prevaile and the counsell of Heaven must stand for then ye run the hazard of fighting against God and incurring the displeasure of the Romans by whose courtesie and meere grace you have the liberty of capitall punishments The Grounds that Master Goodwin layes downe are Gamaliel at this time was a convert and tooke on him the patrociny of the Apostles 2. His reasoning to abstaine from them is Orthodox and sound and from the holy Ghost 3. It holdeth That when Judges are not infallibly perswaded as these were not knowing the way of Christ to coerce any Religion or way never so false is persecution straining of free consciences and fighting against God I Judge John Goodwin hath ploughed with the Heifer of Vaticanus who writes a virulent peece against Caloin and condemnes the burning of that Monster Michael Servetus brings the same argument Vaticanus some thinke it was Castalio adversus Calvinum Num. 10 and Bellius arg 5. But 1. Though Libertines espouse and owne the Argument of Gamaliel as from the holy Ghost to condemn all use of the sword against false teachers yet it is Gamaliels rotten Dialemme not the holy Ghosts 2. Abstaine from these men is according to the medium or reason of Gamaliel speak no boasting words Deale not morally with the conscience though ye by office ought so to do as sitting in the chaire of Moses far lesse use the sword against them The reason is if the Doctrine be of God it shall stand and ye are no more to fight against God with the tongue than the hand and with corrupt reason than with a steele sword and if the Doctrine be of men it shall fall of will neither then are you to preach nor with the arme of flesh to act against them and the word in the Greeke is stand up from them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and in the Syriack 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 omittite eos v. 38. Let them alone v. 38. and the intention of Gamaliel if he speak as a Convert to Christ as Goodwin and Vaticanus suppose must import no lesse 2. The Argument is as strong in the matter of adultery treason bloody rebellion and murder against the lawfull Magistrates power coercing all disorders against the second table as against Religion or a way of God or of men by which wee worship God and therefore as Beza sayth The man was no favorer of the Gospell but feared the evill that might follow upon the displeasure of the Romans And Piscator and Gualther saies well It was an evill counsell Gualther sayth Since the scope of Gamaliel was onely to save the Apostles from present danger they abuse this argument who thereby shake all discipline civill and Ecclesiasticall For the Magistrate beares not the Sword in vaine and ought to extirpate Heresies by his Office And Calvin saith It was a sentence unworthy of a wise man because that which is of God shall stand Gamaliels consequence is null that therefore the Magistrate whom God armed with the Sword should doe nothing against sinne The consequence is as strong in murthers Paricides Sedition as in Heresies whatever Vaticanus says in the contrary applying this argument only to doctrine and to plants that our heavenly father hath not planted For 1. It is not the purpose of Gamaliel to draw his doctrin to so narrow a channel as to doctrins only as if doctrins of men only came to nought for Gamaliel alledgeth the examples of Iudas and Theudas the Galilean whose fault was not only false prophecying but rebellion and sedition for foure hundred armed men gathered to this man and obeyed him Greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syriack 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Et abierunt post cum quasi quadringenti homines They went after him as their Captaine in the fields And the other Judas of Galile drew away much people Now they were drawn away in a course of tumultuary rebellion as is clear by the two words they obeyed him and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Syriack 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dispersi sunt they were scattered as an armie of men then these men were not onely false teachers but levied men to rise against authority as Anabaptists doe after them so shall it follow that when men rise in bloody murthers and insurrections we must leave them to God for when they rise to cut the throats of innocent people whether that ignis fatuus the foole fire of blind zeale or a treasonable designe raise them in armes their way is either of men and so God will bring it to nought and we must sit still and suffer our selves to be murthered contrary to the law of Nature because God will not faile to crush these novators and firebrands or their way and courses of God and so yet we must sit still and all the most just defensive warres shall be unlawfull for if we stir one foot against them we run the hazzard of the bold blind Gyants to fight against God it is all one to the dialemme of Gamaliel whether he speakes of Theudas the Magician or Sorcerer as Josephus antiq lib. 20. cap. 2. and Eusebius who rose in the time that Cuspius Fadus governed Judea who said hee could divide Jordan and gathered his men to the banks of Jordan in the fourth year of Claudius or if it bee Theudas that rose long before Fadus before the reigne of Agrippa who did reigne seven yeares under Caligula and Claudius or who this Iudas was it is sure the argument will prove that Magistrates are not to draw their swords against rebells and traitors and this subverts all policy and Government Civil or Ecclesiastical 3 The Argument of Gamaliel cannot conclude that God is lesse watchful and lesse severe to take vengeance on Sorcerers Murtherers Lions and cruel tyrants bloody and deceitful men than against new false religions for if the way of Robbers Conspirators Armies that rise in rebellion against their masters Covenant-breakers bee of men God wil bring it to nought and destroy it as he overturned the way of Theudas and Iudas as is cleare God turnes the way of the wicked upsidedown Ps 146. 9. And the bloody and deceitfull man shall not live halfe his days Ps 55. 23. And so shall the old Lion perish for want of his prey Job 4. 11. and shall want and suffer hunger Psalm 34. 10. ergo Iob or any Magistrate should refraine from plucking the prey out of the Jawes of the oppressours contrary to Iob 29. 16 17. or if the way of Oppressors bee of God and if God have armed them with his power to be a scourge Rulers should not defend the fatherlesse the widdow and the stranger from the pawes of the Lions and Murtherers but should refrain
punishment of killing and not for the ruining the soul and making him the childe of perdition Let not any say by this reason to tempt to any sin by any evill counsel â—â— provocation to immoderate anger or envy should deserve death for every tempting to sinne is a ruining of the soul of such as we give bad counsell unto and tempt to sin Answ If we do so tempt them by a sinfull way as a sinfull injuring and railing on them or by a wicked course it is sure it doth deserve punishment by the Magistrate but the act of so counselling and tempting to sin though Eâ—conditione operis it be soule-ruin yet it is not such as deserveth death Otherwayes killing adultery sorcery beastiality tempt also to sinne and soule-ruine besides the other injury in them against the life and châ—stity of men 2 The Proposition is proved because the will of God can be the Creator and first Author of nothing but which is morrally good For the Scripture is as full in the duties of the second table touching mercy and righteousnesse as in the duties of the first touching piety and religion and any thing pretended to be morrall hath God for its authour in either the first or the second table of the Law nor can the will of man be the author of any thing morrally good and will-righteousnesse is as unlawfull as will-will-worship or will-piety since the word is a perfect rule in matters of doctrine or faith or of life manners and conversation and teacheth the Judge what he should doe Deut. 17. 18 19 20. Psalm 119. 9. Psalm 19. 8 9. Prov. 3. 21 22 23 c. 3 What ever by order of justice doth concerne the life and death of our neighbour rewarding or punishing him in name body goods so as if it bee justly inflicted it is justice and if unduely and undeservedly it is unjustice and murther as wronging of him in his body by stripes wounding death in his liberty by prison in his goods by fines that must be determined in the word by him that is Lord of life death libertie of our name and goods otherwayes the word should not teach us when the Judge sinnes when not when he makes just Lawes when unjust when he exceeds in punishing when he is deficient I come to the assumption The punishing of a seducing Prophet is morrall In that it is commanded to father and mother not to pitty him Deut. 13. 6. holden forth as the zeale of God in father and mother under the Messiaâ—s Kingdome Zach. 13. 1 2 3 4 5 6. and every one is forbidden To bid him God speed yea and commanded to deny him an act of humanity and hospitality and not receive him in his house 2 Joh. 1. If we be commanded to put any shame on him far more must the Ruler bee taught of God what shame he should put on him For what ever under the New Testament is capable of a command is morall And if morall what the Magistrate should doe to him can no more be determined by the will and wit of man than it can be determined what punishment the Magistrate must inflict upon the murtherer the adulterer the Sorcerer the Sodomite which all the wisdom of God hath determined in the word otherways God hath left the Magistrate in the dark that from the word he hath no direction when he committeth murther or when he doth acts of justice And that it is a morall act also to seduce soules is cleare in that 1. We are commanded to beware of such Matth. 7. 5. and avoid them Tit. 3. 10. Rom. 16. 17. 2. That the Lord condemneth them in his word as such as make their followers the children of perdition Yea Matth. 22. 15. They subvert the hearers their word cate as a Canker 2 Tim. 2. 15 17. Lead silly women Captive 2 Tim. 3. are Deceivers Tit. 1. 10. Now that God hath appointed a punishment for this of old and hath spoken against this sinne so much in the New Testament and bidden private Christians cry shame on Seducers and fly them and yet left the Magistrate under a discharge and inhibition to draw a sword against such who can beleeve it except that inhibition given to the Christian Magistrate wer written in the Testament of our Lord. To say the new Testament-dispensation is so spirituall that God wil have no remedying of seducing but by the spirituall armor of the word is said without ground when the New Testament-dispensation is as spirituall to gaine the Sorcerer the Theâ—fe the Sodomite the drunkard the Reviler as the Idolater by the spirituall aâ—mor of the Word Act. 19. 19. 1 Cor. 6. 9 10 11. and by this reason the Magistrate may draw the sword against no theife Sodomite Drunkard Sorcerer contrary to Rom. 13. 1 2 3 4 5 6. 1 Pet. 2. 14. Especially since the Magistrate is not indifferent towards ill-doers and well-doers since hee must punish the one as a Nurse-Father praise and reward the other 1 Peter 2. 14. gaining of soules is well-doing Matthew 25. 21 23. And seducing of soules is by the Law of Nature and Nations the worst of injuries done to men 2 Argument That which is perpetually morall and one act of Justice at all times and places must oblige us Christians and the Christian Magistrate as well as the Jewish Rulers But to punish the seducing Prophet is perpetually morall and an act of justice at all times and in all places as the rewarding of such as teach truth is a commendable act of justice Ergo The proposition is cleare in regard the morall Law doth therefore oblige us Christians because it is morally perpetuall and perpetually morall and that in all times and places as to serve God honour our parents not to murder c. is perpetually morall now as among Jewes with us as among the Indians and Tartarians but to punish the seducing Prophet is such 1. because the Heretick is condemned by his owne conscience Tit. 3. 10. in believing lies Ergo Farre more by his owne conscience by leading others into that same condemnation with himselfe and if he apprehend the vengeance of a God-head there must be a conscience naturally apprehending such as we see the conscience of murtherers and of Cain feare some revenging hand If therefore the Minister of God the Magistrate inflict this it must be nothing else but an act of naturall Justice which the naturall conscience doth apprehend But what acts of Justice the conscience naturally feares must be acts of Justice perpetually morall not respecting one man or Nation more than another 2. All Countries by an instinct apprehend a God and conceive their Priests and Prophets are to be entertained and rewarded as Egypt Gen. 47. 22. Midian Fâ—xed 2. 16. Exod. 18. 1. Judg. 17. 5. c. 18. 4. 2 King 15. 18. The Philistims 1 Sam. 5. 5. c. 6. 2. Baal and the Zidonians had their Priests 2 King 10. 8 19 Lycainia Act 14. 13.
And if their Rulers feed their Priests the false Prophets and Priests that deceive them and mis-lead them they must punish So the King of Babylon roasted in a fire two false Prophets Jer. 29. 21 22. And it is cleare that Jeremiah argues not from any judiciall Law when he saith The Prophets that speake lies in the name of the Lord shall die by the sword c. 14. v. 14 15. It was by the sword of the Chaldeans who had nothing but the Law of nature that they perished for no Judiciall Law of God taught them that he ought to die by the sword of the Magistrate who speaks lies in the name of the Lord whereas the Chaldeans knowing that Jeremiah had prophecied truth and was sent of God they intreated him well as the Lord had fore-told Ier. 15. 8. Nor can it be said that the consequence is null and that that cannot oblige Christian Magistrates which hath no better warrant than the corrupt practises of Heathens for they persecuted the true Prophets and Apostles that spake in the name of the Lord as Herod beheaded Iames Acts 12. and apprehended Peter Nero persecuted Paul and Dâ—mitian confined Iohn to the Isle Pathutos for the Word of God To which I answer That the Argument is not drawn simply from the practice of Heathen Magistrates but from the light of nature that teacheth all Magistrates Heathen and Christian to punish publike impostors false Prophets and liers as most pernitious enemies to the peace of all humane Societies And if the Law of nature and Nations dictate to all Societies That deceivers and such as raise false reports and lies upon earthly Judges should be punished far more is it a principle of the Law of nature that publike lyers and such as speake lies in the name of the Lord and deceive and seduce the soules of father and mother King and Ruler and of all ranks of men in the Society should not be tollerated in the society And what though Emperours and Kings have abused the power that God gave them for the truth to persecute the servants of Christ for the truth it followes not but they had just power as the Ministers of God to punish seducing Prophets as well as other ill-doers by the law of nature and Nations And this I take is holden forth by Iob 31 26 27 28. who being under no Judiciall Law obliging the Jewes but a Gentile and so in this led by the Law of nature and Nations maketh Idolatry and worshipping of the Sunne and Moone to be an iniquity to be punished by the Iudge That this is not an iniquity to be punished by God as if heresie be innocency as Libertines say it must neither be punished by God nor man but by the Judge on earth is cleare For 1. the expression v. 28. varies onely in the number from that which is v. 11. Now there Iob saith of Adultery 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ipsum iniquitas Iudicum And ver 98 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 etiam hoc iniquitas Iudie is The English Divines do well observe That adultery is a capitall crime to be punished by the Iudge Gen. 38. 24. Levit. 20. 10. Deut. 22. 22. And they expound ver 28. the same way Pagnin est iniquites Iudicanda Iudice diâ—na vel Iuditiaria Mercerus Exod. 21. 22 He shall give 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according to the Iudges Isai 16. 3. do Iudgement Shimlerus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Judges that cognosâ—â— of causes Deut. 31. 31. Our enemies being Iudges Job 31. 11. Inquitas dignaque Iudicetur puniatur It is true the LXX expound it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the Chalde Paraphrase 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 est enim iniquitas maxima But it is taken for a crime that comes before an earthly Judge So Hieronimus And Exod. 21. 22. If a man strike a woman with childe and she live he shall give according to the sentence of the Iudges Hieronimus quantum arbitri Iudicaverint The Chalde Paraphrase 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dabit per sentâ—ntiam Iudicum LXX 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Syriak Dabit quantum decernent Iudices The Samaritan Dabitque ex sententia Iudicum Vatablus Job 31. v. 11. Iniquitas capitali supplicio persequindâ— v. 28. Nam ea iniquitas capitali supplicio digna Junius Iniquitas à Iudicibus animadvertenda Piscator Iniquitas Iudiciaria Complutentes Iniquitas Judicanda Pineda in Job 31. 28. Iniquitas digna Iudicio Iudicumque sententiâ severissima gravissimo supplicio All agree to this That Idolatry according to Iob from the Law of nature deserveth canitall punishment to be inflicted by the Judge And Piâ—eda saith this agreeth with the Law of God Especially Deut. 4. 25. 23. Sanctius gathereth from Job 31. 11. That Adulterers in Iobs time were by the sentence of the Judge burnt Now the same expression is v. 28. spoken of Idolatry Hence is Socrates condemned to die for his false Religion as is supposed by the people Maximus condemned the Priscilliaâ—s as Hieronimus observes for Heresie Nor is it much to be valued that Ier. Taylor saith That Maximus was a Tyrant and put to death Catholike Hereticks Without choyce it proves punishing of Hereticks as supposed of old to be warranted by law Vrsatus and Stacius procured at Court Law to death against Priscillianists And the Niceue Fathers that Arrius should be banished Nor doth Spalato cite Tertullian Cyprian Lactantius Hiâ—rome Severus Sulpitius Minutius Hilary Damascen Chrysestome Theophilact Bernard for any other purpose whatever Taylor say on the contrary but 1. To prove that forcing of men to Religion is not to the way of God which also I teach for the preaching of the Word not the using of the sword is the meanes of conversion of sinners 2. That killing is not to be practised on all Hereticks 3. That the Law and the Sword are not to go without convincing of the conscience by the Word of God 4. That to deliver up godly men to persecuting Tyranes because of some errors hath more scandall to cause men stumble at truth than to make truth victorious 5. That neither Church nor State can judge heart-opinions nor punish them but only professed and taught opinions that are both unnecessary and unsound 6. That Pastors have not the Sword to compell to Religion 7. That Nations of another Religion are not gained to Christ by the Sword not can we make warre against them because they are Idolators and follow a false Religion nor was Idolatry the ground of the warre that Israel raised against the Caâ—aanitos and other Nations To all which I adde the words of Ier. Taylor The best and ablest Doctors in Christendome have been deceived actually in 〈◊〉 of Religion in that all sorts of Christians dissent from the errorâ— of Papias Irenaeus Lactantius Iustin Martyr Cyprian Firmilian c. Ergo by
mouth Zach. 13. Lastly Baptist is so charitable of all Saints that are not for liberty of conscience as that he makes it their doom to be cast out as Ishmael and to have no share in Christ or in the Gospel But Baptist if you judge us and be not infallible you take the Lords throne upon you and you judge us before our day which is to you a strong argument against liberty of conscience c. 3. pag. 14. Know ye we are selfe-condemned and saw you Gods secret book and saw our names dashed out of the book of life and that we are inrolled with Ishmalites Take the beam out of your own eye CHAP. XXVII Whether our darknesse and incapacity to beleeve and professe together with the darknesse and obscurity of Scripture be a sufficient ground for Toleration AS Mr. John Goodwin the Lord pardon his perverting of Soules led the way from Arminian principles who teach with Socinians that 1 To know is not in our power which he and they borrowed from Aristotle but wickedly understood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And 2 Arminians taught that God by an irresistible power works illumination in the minde So opinions not being in our power the Magistrate can have no power over men to coerce them from spreading of heresie Hence Baptist the Bounder the Stormer and other Libertines M. Goodwin speaks for That which is not in our power to doe or not doe and is wrought in us by supernaturall grace and by God onely we are not punishable by the Magistrates sword but to beleeve to repent to be sound in the faith is wrought in us by supernaturall grace and by God onely Baptist heaps together but eighteen Scriptures produced against Pelagians Papists Arminians and his brethren Socinians and old Anabaptists that no man can come to the Son except the Father draw him the naturall man understands not the things of God c. And I am sure he is ignorant of the conclusion for we professe the sword is to be drawn against no man because he repenteth not or beleeveth not c. Hence Baptist spitting out with other Antinomians his venome against us though no matter excepting the sin of it if he wronged not Christ and his truth For when a weak Christian a disciple of Servetus Socinus an Apostate denying the Lord Jesus to have come in the flesh and all the Scriptures to be the word of God tyred of longer imprisonment and death shall say You say well but how shall I prevaile with my selfe to beleeve what you say Thus reply these miserable comforters Yeeld obedience to what is taught you meditate on it often desire to beleeve it and God in time will bring you to beleeve it Then poore Popery why art thou evill spoken of and this is a lie why It is the Spirit that teacheth us to pray Abba Father This is merit and supererogations ground-stone Answ 1. What if a man void of the Spirit cannot pray ergo we should not advise him to pray Is it Popery to advise him so to doe or to pray when he wants the Spirit sure Peter taught no Popery to Simon Magus a man as void of the Spirit as any Socinian or Familist a man in the gall of bitternesse and in the bond of iniquity Act. 8. 22. Repent therefore of this thy wickednesse I conceive this is yeeld obedience to what is taught you and meditate on it and your evill wayes and change your minde and pray God though thou hast no Spirit of Adoption more then a Familist who makes you beleeve hony words or the very Spirit given to his Anointed ones such as they onely if perhaps the thoughts of thine heart may be forgiven thee and whom does the Lord command Ezek. 18. that they would make a new heart I conceive such as were as unable to doe it as to make one haire white or blacke as the Bounder saith and this is our advice not because we thinke they can do it without the Spirit of Christ more than those that move the question Act. 2. 37. What shall we doe to be saved Act. 9. 6. Act. 16. 30. But if unconverted they may be humbled and convinced that they are in a lost condition And I confesse if Antinomians will advise them to beleeve and pray though they have not the Spirit and to pray as they can and beleeve as they can and without any preparative work of the Law or sense or knowledge of sin or sicknesse for Christ immediately and forth with beleeve Christ dyed for thee obstinate Socinian and wrote thy name in the booke of life and beleeve thy election to life Baptist is a miserabâ—e comforter and how he censureth this Its Gods absolute will and pleasure you should beleeve and that you must necessarily beleeve upon perill of damnationâ— which he saith is our Catechisme I understand not except he shew us a conditionall Commandement to beleeve the Gospell and a conditionall election and reprobation suspending Gods decrees on what we are foreseen to doe and except he deny the threatnings in the Gospel which shall finde out an unbeleever Joh. 3. 18. 36. If the man be a weak Christian or a weak beleever when the advice of yeelding obedience praying desiring to beleeve is given him appearingly he would have weak Antinomians and all anointed ones loosed from all precepts rule of obedience and have them under no rule but the immediate impulsion of the Spirit which if it be his mind he should have set it down and must prove a miserable Comforter in so teaching 2. But are we in all these Scriptures that hold forth our impotencie to beleeve to thinke a good thought to doe the works of righteousness mercie truth chastitie sobrietie prescribed in the second Table unable only to conceive sound opinions of God and eschew Hereticall wayes and false Religions Are we not also unable to abstain from murther adulterie c. without the supernatural grace of God Yea all these places shall prove that the Ministerie of men Pastors and Teachers of the word are as unlawfull means of converting soules as the Magistrates Sword to beare down Heresiâ—â— O say they preaching is an Ordinance of Christ and a spiritual means ordained to convert soules the Sword is nothing but a carnall humane device I answer it is an humane device of converting souls to shed the blood of their bodie but it is to beg the question and not to prove it to call it a humane device to punish ill doers and false Teachers who pervert the souls of many 2. I speak to the Argument the only preaching of the word it alone without the Spirit can no more make an hair white or black or draw us to the Son or work repentance in sinâ—â—rs then the sword of the Magistrate can work repentance What can man doe saith the Bounder Is it not God that must give repentance to the acknowledgement of the truth So say I what
name How doth this follow but that wee must put none to an Oath but such as are regenerate and wee know wil swear sincerely and not prophaine the name of God None then can bee witnesses under the New Testament to sweare but such as are regenerate where is this divinity warranted Or if it be because the substance of the Oath is sin in that we sweare to put to death the innocent and unrenewed we crave a ground for it in the word But we know no such Covenant or Oath But here if toleration of all Religions stand the Parliaments of both Kingdoms grievously sin in that they proclaime not an open liberty to the Masse to Jesuits Priests to set up Altars Temples the whole body of Popish worship and they ought to proclaime liberty to all Jewes to come and dwell in Britaine erect Synagogues blaspheme Christ for this is the Liberty wherewith Christ hath set us free by Libertines way Obj. Papists would cut our throats Jewes would destroy us and blaspheme Christ Answ No doubt they would but Libertines do ill that good may come of it in not acting lawfull liberty for Christ though the firmament should fall we are not to oppresse consciences force Religion abandon the Gospell liberty and meeknesse in gaining all to Christ in finding truth c. Obj. Henry the 7 Leaves England Papists Henry 8 brings all to halfe Papists halfe Protestants Edward the 6 stirres about the wheele to absolute Protestanisme Mary turnes about all againe to Popery Elizabeth againe sounds the Trumpet all are Protestants are not we even now making unregenerate men the subject of these nationall changes by a nationall Covenant Answ Does not this man lay upon the National Church of the Jewes a Church framed by the wisdome of God the like revolutions from Jehovah to Baal and the golden Calves from Baal and the golden Calves backe againe to Iebovah according as David Achab Ieroboam Ieâ—u Afa Hezekiah Manasseh Iosiah Ammon Godly or ungodly Kings came to the throne and God must so institute and procreat hypocrisie prophaining of the name of God domineering over and compelling consciences then at now onely subject to the Lord of spirits and his word by a sword of steele Whereas now as then hypocrits change from Religion true or false and backe againe in a circle as times blow faire or foule through the corruption of nature and this is not to be fathered upon that lawfull punitive power that God hath given to the Christian Ruler to coerce wolves and seducing teachers which power Kings whose breasts the Church should sucke often doe abuse to establish Popery and tyrannize over the conscience of the Godly and undo religion but both now and then Sophists may bring a caption ab accidente against any lawfull power What if murtherers Sorcerers Drunkards abound under unjust and loose Princes and when a just and watchfull Prince comes to the throne men out of hypocrisie return from these sins and again when another unjust King Reignes they return to their vomit is this against Nationall righteousnesse and Magistracy 2 Under all those Revolutions Christ had a Church professing the Protestant faith under gracious Kings and sealing the same faith with their blood under persecuting tirants so that change was never in the true invisible Church but onely in the scum and outside of the Church and the change came never from the pâ—â—itive lawful power rightly used but from the hollownes of the hearts of time servers or some weake men that denied their Master in an hour of temptation and repented again 3 By this Argument Mr. Williams wil give us no visible Church but the Church of Anabaptists consisting of sinlesse regenerated and justified men who are beyond the courtesie of the Law free grace and a Redeemer or pardon of 〈◊〉 Obj. An arme of flesh and 〈◊〉 of steel cannot reach to cut off the darknesse of the mind the hardnesse and unbeleife of the heart saith Mr. Williams A woolfe saith Dr. Taylor may as well give lawes to the understanding as bee whose dictates are only propounded in violence and written in blood and a Dugge in 〈◊〉 capable of a Law as a man if there be no christ in his obedience noâ— discourse in his choice nor reason to satisfie his discourse Aman cannot saith the Bounder beleeve at his own will how much lesse at anothers Who can reveale and infuse supernaturall nation and truth but the spirit Answ This strongly concludes that the understanding and wil cannot bee forced by the sword but must move a connatural way by the indictment of reason and nothing followes but that the internal and elicite acts of the understanding and will cannot be produced by external violence which we yeeld ye say that it involves a contradiction that the elicite acts of the understanding and will can be produced by external force but if masters of Logicke infer Ergo the Magistrate cannot punish a Seducer a false Prophet for teaching what his erroneous conscience dictates to him then we say this argument is against the Holy Ghost not against us and blaspheming Celsius Lucianus doe c. object the like against Moses Lawes as unjust and bloody and Scripture For 1 Whatever involves a contradiction in the Old Testament involves a contradiction in the New and contra then Gods Lawes in Deut. 13. Levit. 24. are contradictions to reason 2 Then God forced the understanding and will in their elicit acts in the Old Testament as if a Wolfe had given Lawes to the conscience of the false Prophet yea so a dog was as capable of a law as the false Prophet being forced by stoning both under the Old Testament and under the New stons were as hard weapons as steel swords to the Jewes as to us 3 Stones were as unable to cut off the darknesse of the mind and unbeleefe and hardnesse of heart of Iewes as a steele sword can prevaile with our hearts 4 None but the spirit of God could infuse supernaturall notions and truths into the mind and will of a Seducing prophet among the Jewes more then of an heretick among christians except Libertines think the Iewes had no need of the spirit of grace free will was stronger of old than now 5 They must say a Iew might have beleeved at his will or not beleeved and could have commanded his conscience which we cannot doe 6 The Law of God compelling conscience made hypocrites then or then forced men to beleeve against their mind and will as well as now 7 Carnal weapons then could have produced spirituall repentance saith and obedience but steele hath lost its spirituall vertue now but sure though the Jews administration was rough servile and harder and ours under Christ milder sweeter and easier Gal. 4. 7. yet were these Laws of Moses righteous but are not made milder as Socinians say the will and understanding were not then compelled to obedience but now led with
all the bloods and oppressions that the Saints suffer 3. The Apostle saith Heresies must bee our Saviour saith more of offences and sins in generall Matth. 18. 7. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and Luke saith more chap. 17. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It s needfull scandalls shall come and its impossible but scandals must fall out then all the murthers parricides sorceries rapines for the which Christ saith there is a woe befalling the world fall out by necessity of a divine working decree yea the crucifying of the Lord of glory came to passe Acts 2. 23. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the determinate counsell and foreknowledge of God Acts 4. 28. but yet the Magistrate is not to tolerate the shedding of innocent blood and all the offences that fall out in the Common-wealth though never so bloodie and atrocious 2. Varietie of judgements was no question a grief to Paul when he so pathetically exhorteth the Philippians to fulfill his joy and remove his grief and to be of one accord and one mind Phil. 2. 2. 2 Cor. 13. 11. Be of one mind 1 Cor. 1. 10. I beseech you be joyned together in the same mind and in the same judgement Heresies no question and errors in matters of God are not free nor can there be one spirit of grace and heavenlinesse in Arrius Apollinaris Nestorius Eutiches no more then there can be one spirit of grace in sin nor see we a glasse of Gods manifold wisedome in many sundry phantastick opinions teaching God and his son Christ it is a spotted and broken glasse and he might say variety of sins are the expressions of Gods infinite wisdome for the scripture calls Heresies works of the flesh doctrines of devils gangrenes lies delusions corruptions of the mind perverse disputing deceits perverse things dreams of their own heads false dreams vain and foolish things false burdens which cannot be spoken of opinions in Philosophy and so these windmills and midnight fancies being the brats and the dunghill conceptions of mens corrupt head and heart must be contrary to that wisedome exprest in the word 1 Cor. 2. 6. Deut. 4. 6 Psal 37. 30. and they may bee for the declaration of the wisedome of God as for the finall cause but nothing from the wisedome of God formally being themselves meer fooles Object 15. If the Magistrate be above the Church and Head thereof and to judge their matters and if he have his power from the people to govern the Church will it not follow that the people as the people have originally as men a power to govern the Church to see her doe her dutie to reform and correct her Answ Though the Magistrate punish false Teachers by the Sword he is not for that a Church governour far lesse the head of the Church no more then hee is the head of the Church because he defends them against their persecuting enemies and by his sword procureth civill peace and protection to their assemblies persons and estates for doing any thing in favour of the Church doth not make Cyrus Artaxerxes Darius spiritual Officers and give them a headship over the Church 2. The Christian Magistrate having power from the peoples free election to imploy his sword for the external peace of the Church hath not therefore power of governing the Church from the people 1. Because the civill using of the sword for the outward peace of the Church is not a governing of the Church but the civil external and corporal sheilding of them 2. It no more followeth that the people as men have the ruling of the Church because they chose a godly Magistrate to watch over their external peace then the people as Christians can be said to have a power to preach the word and administer the Sacraments or Seals of the covenant because the people as Christian men choose ministers who have power from Christ to preach administer the Seals for to chuse a governor to rule over them is no act of government no more then the wives chusing of the Husband to be her head and govern the family is an act of the Headship and governing of the Family nor doe the people in chusing a King exercise an act of royall and Kingly power over themselves by such an act of chusing nor doth an Armie in chusing a Captain General over themselves in so doing exercise any act of a Captain Gerall over themselves 3. Neither doe the people as men but as Christian men walking by the rule of the Word which is a Catholike directorie to all men and all societies in all morall duties Psal 119 9 96 105 130. Ps 19. 7 8 9 choose such and such Christian Rulers who may procure the good of the Church and keepe and guard both Tables of the Law for the word of God giveth direction to the people that they should not as men or as Heathens choose any sort of Rulers but godly men fearing God and such Kings as read in the Book of the Law when they sit upon the Throne Deut. 11. c. 17. 15 16 17 18 19 20. Exod. 18. 21. Nor is it true which Vaticanus replyeth to Calvin thefts rapines and adulteriâ—e are punished by the Magistrate not to make up the Kingdome of Christ and to justifie men and make them godly as we say and Calvin saith the Magistrate punisheth Hereticks For where doth Augustine say that the Magistrate punisheth Seducers to convert them to God as if the intrinsecall end of the Magistrate were to conquer a spirituall Kingdom to Christ Calvin saith the just contrary in that same place verum quidem esse fateor utque vi armatâ erectum ab initi suisse regnum Christi neque armorum praesidio stare Evangelii enim pradicatione regnare Christum oportet Itaque Dominus quo illustrior esset vocis sua efficacia nudes inormes misit Apostolos nec modo destitui veluit terrenâ potantiâ sed totum faere mundum habere infestum ut calestem esse Evangelii victoriam omnibus constaret Obj. 16. But the Apostles sought not Laws from the Emperors by which Hereticks might be compelled to imbrace the sound faith Answ Gaudentius a Donatist Bishop objected the same to Augustine and Augustine answers Because Emperors were enemies to Christian Religion therefore Christians sought not their helpe Obj. 17. But the particulars of your directorie of worship are not in Scripture how then can the Magistrate punish for not following the Directorie Answ That there should be prayers preaching reading praising of God Sâ—craments in the publike worship is evident by the Scripture but for the ordering of these worships secundum prius posterius the words of prayer so they bee according to the pattern of sound doctrine the Preface of the Directorie is clear that no man is therein to be compelled though to transgresse the Holy Ghosts expresse order in the celebration of the Lords Supper and to break bread
potius videndum quid Deus nobis mandet vult autem maleficia a nobis coerceri in hunc finem instituit Magistratus eosque glâ—dio armavit Rom. 13. Piscator Nam 〈…〉 â—â—ones humano consilio audacia 〈…〉 dâ—ssoâ—v untur â—â—men 〈◊〉 Magistratus est operum dare ut alas conpescant prohibean hujusmodi Novatores pro merito puniant * Gualther Dubius ambigus in sermone apparet longe igitur alia illorum Magistratuum ratio est qui vâ—ritates vera cognitione illuminati illam ex officio tueri errores extirpare debent Vaticanus citeth Bullinger a contrary to Calvin in Gamaliels arguing but both commend the moderation of Gamaliel â—ut Bullinger saith Adversus Anab. lib. 5. c. 8. Nil adeo iniquum injustum de quo dici non potest si ex deo perficietur si non ex Deo sponte cessabit Gamaliels argument proves as strongly that murtherers and adulterers should not be punished as that men ought not to bee punished for their conscience The argument of Gamaliel owned by adversaries readers all the fundamentalls of the Gospell uncertain and topick Scâ—pticisme to all the most well settled beleevâ—rs Gamaliels argument doth coâ—cluâ—â— that wâ— are not to oppose â—y arguments and Scripturâ— aâ—y Blasphemous way agaiâ—â—t the Gospeâ— Immeâ—iate 〈…〉 is 〈◊〉 the rule of our actions The 〈…〉 burning 〈…〉 from 〈…〉 Lu. 9. 〈…〉 Ambroâ—â—us 〈…〉 tibi clementâ—â— ad 〈…〉 Samaritani a quibus 〈…〉 crediderunt Hieronimus in Locu ut Apostolicus sermo haberet efficientiam voluntatis est domini nisi enim ille jussetit frustra dicunt Apostoli ut ignis discendaâ— The case of Elias calling for fire from heaven and of the Apostles Luk. 9. much different Swarez com de virt Theo. disp 18. sect â— nu 2. Iohn Baptist or a necessity for liberty of conscience c. â— p. 10. n. 12. Bloody Tenet c. 29. p. 63 64. M. S. on Iohn Goodwin to 2. 5 p. 1. Antient bounds 5. p. 24. The meeknesse of Christ being extended to Publicans Extortioners and Harlots doth as well conclude such ought not to be punished by the Magistrate as that false Teachers ought not to be punished by him By places from the meeknesse of Christ Socinians labour to prove the Magistrate is to shed â—o blood under the New Testament Sâ—cinius defens verae sent de Magist polit adver Jac. Pal. bar 2. so 233. 235. Sed negant Raccovienses cum qui Christianus effe velit humanum sanguinem fundere posse sive privatus sit sive Magistratum gerat par 3. fo 288. Christianus Judex in sententia ferenda Christianae aequitatis clementiae non est obliturus Ostorodiâ—s inst Rol. c. 28. Praecepta Christi elementissimi non permittunt ulli homini ad amore vitam â—malcius contra Frantz dis 6 de â—on-oper Nec Christus praecepit homicidas morte plectere disp 6. de reb c v. semper Magistratus habenda est ratio legum Chriâ—ti Catech Raccoviensis de proph Mun. Chi. c. 2 fo 136 Somâ— defen vet sent de Magist poht. li. 1. fo 13. Smaltius disp 6 dereb eiv D. Stewart his 2 part in Answ to M. Goodwin p. 182. Censur Professores Leidenst 2. 24. sec ult p. 321. Christs not breaking the bruised reed would prove that hereticks are gracious persons though weak in saving grace and lovingly ch â—rrished by Christ if the place Is 42 Mat. 12. 19 20. helpe the adversaries Christs meeknesâ— not inceâ—sistent with his juâ—tice Rash Judgement condemned 1 Cor. 4. 5. 6 is nothing for pretended tolleraâ—â—on That many through the corruption of their own heart render hipocriticall obedience because of the sword proveth nothing against the use of the sword to coerce false teachers Antient bounds c. 5. p. 24. Matters of Religion ought to be inacted by the Law of Princes and Christian Rulers that such as contravene may be punished Lawes of Rulers in matters of Religion do only Finde the outward man c. c. 1. p. â—54 156. The false teacher is to be sent to the Church and Pastors thereof that he may be convinced before he be punished How Iudiciall Lawes oblige to puniâ—â—ment Profess Lâ—id in Synâ—p pair Theo. Disp 40. Gamachaeus in 12. q. 101. c. 7. Iudiciall Lawes were deduced from the Morall Law Thomas 22. q. 104. art 2. Swarez de legib p. 9. c. 11. n. 2. Epiphanius de heres 8 Augustinus de haeres 8. Irenaeus l 1. c. 26. Augus de her 9. Soto de insiâ—t Jurae l. 2 c. 5. Aquinas 12 q. 9. ar 5. Medina 12. q. 13. ar 3. q 100. ar 1. Valentia 22. dis 7. q 7 punc 2. Gamacheus 12. 104. c. 2. Conink de acti Supeâ—n dis 10. dub 12. no. 182. True causes of war with other Nations Mâ—sius Cornelius a Lapide Abulensis in Josh Cajetaâ—us in Josh c. 11 v. 2â— Swarez de vâ—r Theo. disp 18. sect 4. n. 3. Gamâ—chaeus in 12 q. â—o de infid q. 32. Augustinus q 4â— in Num in John q 3 10 Two Kingdoms becomâ—ing 〈…〉 a Reâ—igious Coâ—â—nant if it be 〈◊〉 the one part may aveâ—ge the quarrell of the 〈◊〉 on the othâ—r in case of brâ—â—ch The new Altar 〈◊〉 by the 2 Tribes â—â—â— the halfe 〈◊〉 Jordan Josh 22. how 〈…〉 cause of war Calvin comment in Josh 22 Non dubium quin sancto zelo excanduerint non omnibus quidam daâ—as glâ—dius in manum sed pro suâ— quisque vocatione officio viriliter constanter asserere studet purum religionis statum contra omnes corruptelas Calvin Ratiocinantur a minore ad majus Piscator in Cor. English Divines annot on Josh 22. Diodatie on Ios 22. 19. Genevâ— Notes Dutch Annotations Vatâ—bâ—us an in Josh 22. Cajetan com in Josh 22. Cornelius a lapide com in Josh 22. Venerunt ut dimicarent contra â—os quasi apostatas schismaticos Vide hic Zâ—â—um omnes enim duodecem Tribus faciebant unam Rempublicam unamque Ecclesiam Tostatus com 2. in Josh c. 22. q. 10. Necessitas autem pugnandi contra duas tribus incumbebat Lex Deut. 13. id jubebat Consilium autem est de contingentibus de modo Hugo Cardinal com in Josh 22. Masius in Iosh in loc Seâ—rar in loc Nicho. de lyra Menochius annoâ— in Iosh 22. v. 13. Ferâ—s in Declama in Iosh c. â—â— Utinam talis zelus in nobis esset quidem non unum altare erectum videmus sed innumera Swarez de vir the dis 18. sect 3. Augus Epist 166. ad donatistas Constantinus prior contra partem Donati severissimam legem dedit hanc imitati filii ejus talia praeceperunt Quibus succedens Iulianus deserâ—or Christi inimicus supplicantibus vestris Rogatiano Pontio libertatem perditionis partis donati permisit denique â—eddidit Basilicas hereticis quando templum daemoniis eo modo putans Christianum nomen posse perire de terris si unitati Ecclesiae de qua lapsus fuerat invideret
the false Religions of Jew Papist Indian American who receive the letters of it Mr Iohn Goodwin Hagiomast sect 28. p 38 39 denieth that any now living on earth hath the Scriptures or any ground of faith but that which is made of mens credit and learning Though the meanes of delivering to us Scripture be fallible yet it neither followeth that these meanes are the foundation on which our faith is resolved or that the Scripture it self is not infallible Tannerus disp 1. de fide c. 5. as 1 Bellarm. l. 2. de concil c. 12. Staplâ—ton doctrin princip l. 8. c. 21. ultima resolutio fidei non est in Deum revelantem simpliciter sed in Deum revelantem ut sic id est per ecclesiam c. Val. dis 1. de fide q. 1. p. 1. Sect 10. p. 38. col 1. Card. de Lugo de side spe dis 1 sect 5. n. 56. Malderus de object fidei q. 1. art 1. sect 10. p. 6. Suarez de fid disp 3. de object forma fidei sect 10 pag. 9. dis 9. dub 8. concl 4. Lod. Maratius tom 2. tract de fide dis 17. iect 2. n. 6. Duvilliusde object fidei l. 2. q. 1. litâ—e d. Fr. Silvius Professor Duaceâ—sis m. 22 q. 1. art 1. Lod Casâ—ensis Capucinus Curis Theol. tom post tract 15. dis 1. s 3. Reasons to prove that we have divine certaintie that the Books of the old and New Testament that we now have are the word of God contrary to Mr Goodwins Assertion That we have no warrant so to say but mans credit and authority As Matth. 2. 5. Matth. 4. 4 6 7 10. Matth. 11. 10. Matth. 21. 13. Matth. 26. 24. Mark 14. 21. 27 Mark 1. 2. Luke 2. 23. Luke 4. 4. 8. 10. Luke 7. 27. Luke 19. 46. Joh. 6. 31. 45. Joh. 12. 14. Act. 1. 20. Act. 7 42. Act. 13. 33. Act. 15. 15. Rom. 1. 17. Rom. 2. 24. Rom. 3. 4. 10. Rom. 4. 17. Rom. 8. 37. Rom. 8. 13. Rom. 11. 8. 1 Cor. 1 19. 31. â— Cor. 2. 9. 1 Cor. 3. 19. 2 Cor. 4. 13. 2 Cor. 8. 15. Rom. 12. 19. Rom. 15. 3. 1 Cor. 14. 21. Gal. 3. 10. 13. Gal. 4. 22. 27. Heb. 10. 7. 1 Pet. 1. 16. Luke 24. 14. Rom. 15. 4. 1 Cor. 10. 7. 2 Cor 9. 9. Luke 4. 17. Joh. 2. 17. Rivet to 1. contra tract 1. 46. Whitaker to 2. de authoritate Scrip. l. 3. c. 7. Calvin Comment in Act. 17. Hagiomast Ser. 36. p. 47. Dr. Taylors liberty of prophesying Sect. 4. p. 73 74 75 c. Liberty of Prophesie Sect. 11. p. 171. The knowledge of God is commanded and the minde is under a divine Law as well as the will and the affections The trying of the two Missals of Gregory and Ambrose by a miracle was meer folly Liber of Prophe Sect. 12. p. 185 186. The causes of heresie All ignorance of things revealed in the word though most speculatively are sinfull errours The Place 1 Cor. 3. 11 12 13. expounded and vindicated from the glosses of Adversaries Dr. Taylors mistake of heresie What vinciblenesse must be in heresie Dr. Taylor maketh the opinion of Purgatory no heresie and groundlesly Of errours how they are sinfull in matters revealed in Gods word Liber of Proph Sect. 12. n. 6. Liber of Proph n. 6. N. 7. Simple errours of things revealed in Gods word are condemning sins Ob. 1. Sect. 13. How opinions are judicable and punishable For the Father to kill the son upon a meer religious ground is no murther nor punishable by Libertines way Sect. 13. n. 5. Bloodie Tenet c. 95. p. 145 146. The Magistrates ministry is civill not spirituall Bloodie Tenet 16. 148. The Laws of Artaxerxes Cyrus Darius Nebuchadnezzar ratifying the Law of God by civil punishments were their Magistraticall duties How fear of civill Lawes may work men to soundnesse in the faith Bloodie Tenet page 129. Artaxerxes made lawes by the light of nature to restrain men from Idolatry Bloody Tenet c. 97. p. 152. From punishing of false Teachers it followeth not that the Jewes and all the Idolatrous Heathen should be killed Bloodie Tenet c. 113. p. 107. Bloody Tenet cap. 98. The considerable differences between punishing such as rebell against the first Tables of the law in the old Testament and now in the new and their swearing of a Covenant and ours Obj. 8. Bloody Ten. c. 1â—8 p 197. Circular turnings from Protestanisme to Popery proves nothing against punishing of seducers Obj 9. Bloody Ten. c. 120. p. 202. Dr. Taylor Liber of pro. Sect. 13 n. 10. Ancient bounds c. 6. 1. p. sect 26. The objection of a carnall way by swords as no fit means to suppresse heresie answered The objection from carnall weapons and forcing of conscience and contradictions involved inforcing the elicit â—nâ—ernall acts of will and understanding c. as strong against laws in the old Testament as in the New The Law Deu. 13. Lev. 24 c. was not executed upon such onely is sinned against the light of his conscience and the Law of nature and upon whom the immediate response of the Oracle fell as false Prophets No need of a Law-processe judge witnesses accusers or inquiring in the written Law of God if an immediate oracle from heaven designed the false Prophet in the Old Testament Ecclesiasticall and civill coaction do both worke alike upon understanding and will Ancient bonds c. 2. page 7. Errors against supernaturall truth are not rebukeable because not punishable contra Vaticaâ—us contra libel Calvin â—n 12. Vaticanus coâ— libel calvi ad not So si interficis qua sic loquitur ut sentit intersieis propter veritatem â—am veritas est dicere quae senrits Psal 15. beatum pronunciat eum qui vere dicit quae habet in animo Libertines make all blasphemers all seducing Prophets of Baaâ— priests of Heathen Gods if they speakâ— what a conscience 〈◊〉 with a 〈◊〉 Iron doth 〈◊〉 unto them to be true Prophets and to dwell 〈◊〉 them 〈◊〉 of the Lords House 〈◊〉 15. Bloudy Tenco c. 35. p. 59. In four sundry considerations sins are censured Augus Epis 48 ad Vincen The Magistrate is subject to the just power of the Church and the Church to the just power of the Magistrate neither of them to abused power and the word of God in point of conscience supreme to regulate both How the Jews suffered heathen Idolaters to dwell amongst them Baptist c. 6. p. 3â— 35. Joh. Baptist would have us selfe selfe carefull of being carried 〈◊〉 with false and strange doctrines because we are elected to glory and the chosen cannot fall away then of other abominable sins Joh. Baptist and Libertines teach that liberty of conscience is a way to finde out truth When the holy Ghost forbids us to beleeve false Christs and to receive Antichristian teachers into our houses he bids us also receive them as Saints and beleeve them by the way of Libertines Libertines make the judging of Hereticks to be Hereticks a bold intruding into the Lords caâ—â—net counsell Ancient bounds cap. 6. sect 1. Reas 14. p. 30. Bloodie Tenet Mr. Nicholas Loâ—kâ—er ser 1. Col. 1. preface to the reader Liberâ—ines say God hath deâ—â—red Heresies to be Varietie of judgements in Gods matâ—eâ—s is a grief to Paul and the godly Ministers Gal. 5. 20. 1 Tim. 3. 1 2. 2 Tim. 2. 17. 2 Thes 2. 17. 1 Tim. 6. 5. Rev. 2. 20. Acts 20. 30. Ier. 23. 27 32. Zach. 10. 1. Lam. 2. 14. Necessitie of Toleration 1647. qu. 53. Borrowed from Bloodie Tenet The punishing of heresies investeth not the Magistrate in a headship over the Church The intrinsecal end of the Magistrate or of his office is not the conversion of Souls August lib. 3. cont perm cap. to Quis enim tune in Christum crediderat Imperator qui ei pro pietate contra impietatem leges ferendo servitet quando adhuC illud propheticum esset quare fremueâ—unâ— Gentes c. Libertines make Preaching and commanding to receive and beleeve and professe the Truth a monopolizing of the truth A twofold obligation the word spoken or preached lay on the hearers one objective another ministeriall Private men have not the like warrant to prescribe what Ministers should beleeve and practice as Ministers have to prescribe to private men Argum 19. Libertie of conscience maketh every mans conscience his Bible and multiplies Bibles and sundry words of God and rules of faith All Hereticks are in a safe way of salvation according to the way of Libertines
condemne him 1 Joh. 3. 20. For if our heart condemne us God is greater then our heart and knoweth all things It is like then an innocent man is condemned and his company to be eschewed as a pestilent wretched man Yet the Arminians say though discipline is to be exercised on hereticks condemned by themselves yet are they bewitched with A great prejudice so as heresie is a vice of nature rather then of free-will And in another place onely nature by no fault of heretickes void of grace begetteth these errours and not freewill despising the help of grace they are seduced not of their owne accord but by necessity of nature for they seduce not because they will seduce but because they cannot seduce It needs not an answer that they say the Jews judged themselves unworthy of life eternall not knowingly for knowingly they did it Act. 13. v. 45. they spake against the convincing and enlightning Gospel contradicting and blaspheming So â— 14. 1 2. for which sin against the Holy Ghost Paid turned from them and preacheth the Gospel to the Gentiles yea Minus Celsus will have the Jewes to erre innocently in that malicious fact Answ To forbid marriage and meats can hardly be arraigned as fundamentall errours nor the Authours such as must deny the Scriptures to be the word of God yet they are such as depart from the faith teach doctrines of devils speke lyes in hypocrisie and have their conscience burnt with an hot iron and if hereticks be as innocent as their sin if it be but a fault of nature as blindnesse from the wombe or deafnesse not of will but of nature why are they to be rebuked accused condemned of their owne conscience But they little know the heart of man who finde not malice prejudice pride desire of glory to hold up a faction often gaine and hunger for court to lodge with errours of the minde and whereas Libertines say we promote truth with blood we retort it thus they promote heresie with the sword and deny thousands of Atheists bloody men their way because theâ—â— purse the Parliament the sword the Army is on their side CHAP. XII Arguments against pretended toleration HEnce I proceed to argue thus against this pretended liberty 1. Every duty of the Christian Magistrate hath warrant in the Old or New Testament which exactly teacheth the duty of Ruler and subject Father and children Master and servant c. Argument 1. BUt toleration of many false wayes and the permitting of men to speake lyes in the name of the Lord and to seduce soules hath no warrant in the Old or New Testament ergo such a toleration is no duty of the Magistrate the major is cleare from the perfection of the word of God the assumption is proved by a negative argument from the Scripture it is no where written expresly or by consequence to be the duty of the Ruler therefore it is not his duty to tolerate or permit If it be replyed because it is not holden forth in Scripture to be the Rulers duty to punish men for their conscience therefore it must be the Rulers duty to tolerate and permit them It is answered the word of God is as perfect in teaching for what sinnes the Ruler should not punish as for what he should punish the son for the fathers transgressiâ—â— should not be punished by the Magistrate for that iâ— injustice in men and he should not punish except the 〈◊〉 be confessed or proved by the mouth of two witnesses The 〈◊〉 that was forcâ—d in the field and had none to helpe her 〈◊〉 free of punishment also and so is the man that 〈◊〉 hiâ— brother and hated him â—ot before Againe if those that seduce soules be most hurtfull and pernicious to Christian societies and those that teach the way of God truely to be usefull the Ruler must not be newtrall and indifferent as touching the use of his power toward either but as he is for the praise of well-doing by vertue of his office so must he be an executer of wrath on evill-doers especially such as hurt Christian societies whose peace and quiet living in all godlinesse and honesty he is to procure Argument II. THat which inferreth necessarily many Religions many faiths many sundry Gospels in one Christian society is not of God But the toleration of all wayes and many Religions is such ergo this toleration is not of God The proposition is evident because there is but one old way Jer. 6. 16. One Lord one faith one baptisme Eph. 4. 4. One faith once delivered to the Saints Jud. 3. one truth to be bought Prov. 23. 23. one Christ which the Apostles heard saw and handled with their hands from the beginning 1 Joh. 1 1. One name of Jesus not any other under heaven by which we may be saved Act. 4. 12. not Jehovah and Malcom Zeph. 1. 5. not Jehovah and Baal 1 King 18. 21. not the true God and the Gods of the heathen the Samaritan mixture 2 King 17. 33. 2 And this one way we are to keepe with one heart Ezek. 11. 19. with one judgement one minde one tongue one shoulder Act. 4. 32. 2 Cor. 13. 11. Phil. 42. 1 Cor. 1. 10. Zeph. 3. 9. Zach. 4. 9. Being rooted and established in the faith Col. 2. 7. Not tossed to and fro nor carried about with every wind of doctrine Eph. 4. 14. Without wavering Heb. 13. 9. For the assumption That God hath appointed in his revealed will that every man should serve God as best pleaseth him and as it seemes good in his owne erronious conscience and that every man should pervert the soule of his brother and the Magistrate should put no man to shame for it is as good as if there were no Magistrate and that it is against his calling as a Magistrate is clear for the Holy Ghost saith that Jud. 16. 5. Micah had a house of Gods and made an Ephod and a Teraphim and consecrated one of his sonnes who became his Priest was from this v. 6. In those dayes there was no King in Israel but every man did that which was right in his owne eyes ergo the Magistrate by his office is to take care that Micah and others serve not God as it seemes good to their owne erroneous conscience and so that another follow not another Religion and a third another third Religion as seems good in every mans owne eyes 2. If the Magistrate restraine not the high places for which he is rebuked as some sacrifice at Jerusalem at Gods command so the people for the most part sacrifice in the high place through the Princes fault and then there bee two Religions and upon the same sinfull indulgence they may multiply groves and alters according to the number of their Cities And as there were false Prophets among the people then so now who with faire words make merchandise of mens soules who by the revealed will of God must bee tolerated to
doe the like and others the like till Religions bee multiplyed and this wee must say except it be affirmed that under the New Testament The corruption of our nature is not so great through neglect of Magistracy to doe what seemes good in our owne eyes under the New Testament and to runne a whoring from God to other high places as they did and if so neither should there be a Magistracy under the New Testament to restraine us in wayes of conversation touching the second Table to wit to hedge men in from robbing and stealing from incestuous Marriages and Polygamie upon meere conscience for if the Saints be the onely â—ust owners of the earth as many now hold it is no more punishable by the Ruler as robbery that a Saint take the Oxe Asse Monies Possessions of his neighbour who is a carnall and wicked man then that he take of his owne goods for his use when he is naked and starving which by the Law of nature hee ought to use before hee famishâ— and incestuous Maâ—riages are to some consciences as unpunishable now as when Cain and Abel married their owne sisters and if conscience ought not to bee forced in one thing neither can violence bee offered to it in any thing that unfainedly pretends to conscience Argument III. THAT indulgence and forbearance of all from the Ruler which layes an undeniable ground for Scepticisme Fluctuation and doubting in matters of Religion is not of God But such is toleration of sundry Religions ergo The major is thus proved True Religion suggesteth an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and a perfect understanding Luke 1. 3. knowledge and perswasion of faith Rom. 14. 14. 23. faith by many infallible tokens Act. 1. 3. Full perswasion Rom. 8. 39. 2 Tim. 1. 12. 2 Tim. 3. 16 17. All riches of the full assurance of understanding Col. 2. 2. The assumption I thus prove Because the Libertines say that speciall and principall ground of no indulgence to false Prophets under the Old Testament was because the Prophets were infallible God himself who onely knows the heart designed the false teacher and the blasphemer by immediate resolution from his owne oracle and made it out of question whether that was heresie or no and whether presumptuously against the light of conscience the man held professed and taught others so to doe and beleeve as he did So Arminian Libertines So Minus Celsus So Vaticanus So Jo. Goodwin and the English Libertines But now since the Prophets and Apostles fell asleepe no Magistrate no Synod is infallible all men are apt to deceive and be deceived for whether in fundamentals or non-fundamentalls none now can challenge Propheticall or Apostolicke infallibility the Synod condemning Socinians Familists as heretickes are not infallible but may as rather be the heretickes as those whom they condemne for they have not monopolized the Holy Spirit to them-themselves so say they wee have no immediate Oracle to determine heresie and what we beleeve in all except some few fundamentalls wee are to beleeve with a reserve leaving roome to a new contrary light say the Independents yea but it holdeth in beleeving fundamentalls as well as non-fundamentalls for in neither have wee Propheticall infallibility and immediate Oracles and Scripture shewes wee have as great darknesse blindnesse of minde naturall fluctuation to beleeve nothing in supernaturall fundamentalls in the Gospell as in non-fundamentalls but with trepidation and doubting of minde wee no more having monopolized the Spirit to us then Sectaries nor Sectaries more then we in the one then in the other in fundamentalls then in non-fundamentalls what ever wee beleeve upon this principle of Reciprocall Toleration both wee and Sectaries are to beleeve with a speciall reserve to change that faith with the next new Moone when contrary new light shall appeare so are wee taught to have faith of nothing but to bee tossed to and fro and to bee carried about with every wind of doctrine with wavering not rooted nor established nor fully perswaded of any thing contrary to Ephes 4. 14. Hebrewes 3. 19. Coloss 2. 2. 7. Roman 14. 2â— 2 Timoth. 1. 12. And this destroyes faith and makes it a meere conjecture and an unsettled opinion with a fluctuation of minde to waite the tyde of a new contrary light and send this old faith away and admit of another yet so as to lodge that new one with a moveable reserve and so must we live and dye doubting and meere nullifidians Argument IV. THat which destroyeth all our hope comfort of the Scriptures zeale constancy and rejoycing in suffering for the truth for Christ and the Gospel is not to be held nor is it from God But toleration of sundry Religions is such ergo The Proposition is cleare for the places of Scriptures placing these Christian graces in beleevers as Heb. 5. 19 20. 1 Pet. 1. 3. 1 Thess 5. 8. Rom. 15. 4. 5. Rom. 12. 11. Rom. 5. 1 2 3. Eph. 3. 1. Phil. 1. 12 13. Heb. 10. 33 34. Matth. 19. 29 30. Now Toleration layes this ground as a principle Men are not to be troubled for their conscience because they beleeve hold publish and reach what they do right or wrong according to their conscience be it erroneous or not erroneous and their zeale hope perswasion comfort carrieth them to undergoe the reproaches of Heretickes Seducers false Prophets imprisonment torture death burning quicke rather then they would sinne against knowne truth and offend against a conscience though erroneous yet because the sufferers are not infallible and it may be a lye they beleeve publish and suffer for their hope may be grounded on a lye their comfort not bottomed on the Scripture and so false hope and comfort their rejoycing in sufferings and undergoing torture and violent death but fleeting and counterfeit joy their zeale without knowledge a bastard zeale having nothing to doe with the word and Gospel-promises but in the bottome as contrary to them as light is to darknesse for what any Saint or Professour beleeves and publishes hee is to beleeve and publish and dye in it and for it with a faith that the contrary may bee a truth of God and so to bee tolerated and borne with now the hope of the hypocriâ—e is therefore compared to the spiders web to a broken tree to a blasted olive tree his joy to a night vision a dreame the cracking of thornes under a pot because both hope and joy and all his comfort is grounded on an erroneous conscience a lye an imagination not on the word of God Now so is the joy comfort and hope of all Religions which Libertines contend must be tolerated they confesse they may bee truths they may bee lyes yet if they bee punished for them they suffer persecution for righteousnesse for Christ for truth Argument V. THAT which taketh away all wayes of removing Heresies under the New Testament both by the Sword and refuting of gaine-sayers by the word all rebuking all