at Westminister November 4.1548 and being by them perused after thanks returned to the King for his care and pains he is petitioned to let it passe unto an act and by Authority it was enacted that in all Churches and Chappels Sacraments and all other ordinances within the compasse of that bock should be performed solely and wholy by it appointing penaltys to the not users or defamers of the same It might very well be Inquired considering the premisses and our practises whether a set for me may not be as necessary in our days as it was in those considering how various men are in their form manner place or gesture in the administration of ordinances not that I would have mens gifts hindered but their spleen rancour and rage stopped unto which well composed for me would be a proper remedy which truly as it is to be suspected is the cause why a forme is by many called down knowing that it would cut be their extravagant notions their abilitye and parts being neither so high nor so great but a liturgy might be used by them but to let them passe The compilers of the Book of Common-prayer were Doct. Cranmer Arch Bishop of Cant. Doct. Goodrick Bishop of Ely Doct. Skip Bishop of Hereford Doct. Thirlby Bishop of Westminster Doct. Day Bishop of Chichester Doct. Holbeck Bishop of Lincolne Doct. Ridley Bishop of Rochester Doct. May Deane of Pauls Doct. Taylour Deane of Lincolne Doct. Heynes Dean of Exeter Doct. Redman Dean of Westminster Doct. Cox King Eâ—wards Almoner Doct. Mr. Robinson Arch-Deacon of Leinest All these being then owned for sound professors of the faith afterward great sufferers by death exile or banishment for their not yeelding to the errors of the Church of Rome Shall their work be thought to be unlawfull which after much deliberation they composed for the edification of the Church were they difstracted or mad or Hypocrites that they should thus put down and erect Popery For all the zeal of the Guisel before Latimer shall be accused as a Papist let him be indicted for an Atheist he that so says fearing neither God nor regarding man had that holy soul no religion when he gave his body to be burned I do now imagine I smell Cranmâ—ns flesh burning through the Cruelty of the Papists and let my right hand forget her cunning if I should not rather kisse the straw he lay upon and bow to thâ— chain he was fastened to the stake by then kick the ashes he was burned to or condemn him for a cheat a dissembler for a Papist which consequentially must be affirmed when that book of Common prayer is reviled and â—corned and as Popish asserred 2. This book of Common-prayer appears to be lawfull from that authoâ—ity by which it hath been established It is strange that that young Iosiah of England viz King Edward studying to root out Popery should so farre befoole himself and his counsel as to be glad at that bookes compiling if it had strengthâ—ned the Papal power was there nor a wise man in all the Parliaments of his time was there no religion in Qâ— Elizabeth was she such a notorious dissembler as under a pretence of throwing the doctrine of Rome aside would hug the Pope the closser in her armes or if she had been such was there never a holy man nor a religious Parliament in her time to rectifie that abuse â— was King Iames and his Parliaments all out of the way and King Charles of glorious memory and his Parliaments all Papists or Ignoramuses that they knew not what they did when they established this book Certainly those glorious Princes and wise Parliaments in establishing successively that book did find in it nothing that was unlawfull or that was contrary to true Godlinesse 3. From its conformity to sacred Scripture Let the Common-prayer be abserved and the matter of it be marked and bring it to the Bible Old or new Testament to Moses the Prophâ—ts or the Psalms and if there be a word sentence petition or prayer that is not agreeable to either of these all of these or a part of these the Author of these lines at this present engages himself to recant publickly what either here or elsewhere he hath written in defence of that book and become a proselyte to the profession of the Guisels In the book of Common prayer there are two things considerable 1. The matter of it 2. The Ceremonies in it 1. The matter or subject of the book of which it is composed to passe over scripture is either 1. Holy songs 2. Pious prayers 3. Godly exhortations 4. Christian confession 5. Scriptural Comminations Which may be again subdevided into 1. The Priests Versicles 2. The Peoples Responses In all which there is nothing but what is agreeable to holy writ and the will of God revealed in his Scriptures The Ceremonies in it which are those particular gestures or acts to be performed in the administration of such and such particular services and they are cheifly these 1. The crosse in Baptisme 2. Kneeling at the Supper 3. The Preists standing at the north side of the table at the communion 4. Marrying with a ring 5. Standing at the Creed In giveing obedience unto which ceremonys there is no more scripture to prove it a sin then there is to maintaine it unjust to be thrice asked in a Church before marriage as the Guisels in their directory enjoyn or to be married by a minister which there by them is also thought to be expedient 4. From the sutablenesse of it to the Common Christians capacity The service of the Church of Rome were it not repugnant in other points to the word of God yet in this it is sinfull that it is performed in a strange tongue which the common sort of Christians understand not In the Church of England there is no ordinance no service but the exhortations thanksgiveings and confessions therein are all of them so plain so easy that the bluntest understanding may reach them and the shallowest capacity may upon a certain knowledge say Amen So be it unto them all 5. From the agreements of it to the set formes of other Churches to those of Geneva Sweden France yea to the Church of Rome so farre as they are agreeable to scripture and to those formes that were of old used and at this present are in the Easterne Church doth the sevice of the Church of England agree and correspond an argument of it self were there no other of its excellency and dignity the wise composers of it having drained the errours from all other formes and thrown away what ever was a misse in other liturgys retaining what was pure and holy agreeable to found doctrine and religion which being methodicall digested and composed was presented to the King and ratified by Parliament as a standing rule to be used in the house of God which is the Church 7. Fâ—om the excellent order and uniformity that is in the
remis Saxaque Sisyphi Juditer delabentia Frustra revolvite En Phoebus oritur cujus matutinum vel jubar Ad fugandas valet Fanatici erroris nebulas En Phoebus oritur acutis armatus radiis Ad extirpandam foseresin deleudamque funditus Hercules strenuus qui clava Biblica Hydram a fronte adorieris Tantum ab est ut ad strepitum Hujus Draconis horridum expavescas Plaudite Togatae Gentes plaudite Invictus in arenam jam nunc descendit Agonista Nec de frivolis quibusdam nugis Sed pro Aris focis dimicatur Veritatis causa agitur Fideque Catholica ab infandis Erronum contumeliis vindicatur Aspiret studiis divina caelitus gratia Favonius Ut in sui nominis gloriam Ecclesiae imolumentum Reipub. tutelam Tendant omnia E D. H. A. M. e Col. in Oxon. THE AUTHOR TO HIS BOOK SHake off this panick fit there is no fear poor heart to cause a fear Englanâ—'s not what it was its Holy Ground since CHARLES was crown'd The Bores the Wolfs the Foxes and wild men are chain'd or watch'd in den The Crown the Mitre Cassock and the ✚ Hath purifi'd the land remov'd the dross Of Schisms Factions Errors Heresie Truth 's got her palace Church her Armoury Then shake off dull Delâ—y and now at lengâ—h With man-like sâ—rengâ—h Go thou the rounds of Albions soyl and view Phanatique Crew And with thy plainer Rhâ—troâ—ck cause them say This Old is the best way That they may learn anâ— love both fear and serve Gods Laws Christs Church and from them never swerve Yea leaving Satans Syâ—agogâ—es may turn Into our Temples there theâ—â— incense burn So with thy faithfull Optick digitate and shew The way that 's new Make known that Via Lactea Heavenly path Cal'd Catholick Faith In which our Fathers walk'd and walking were Secur d by Angels care Fear nor the Frowns nor surly looks of those Who Truth and Order's Popery doth oppose Inform the Quaking sinner to his face There 's Revâ—rence due to Person Time and Place Hold out thy Lamp present thy spiced Wine They 'r both Divine And thy Baptismal water make appear As Jordan's clear A ✚ is there 't is true declare its loss Was to the Church a ✚ Salute each house with Peace and to each eye Of all thy Treasure make discovery If any sume bite lip or wag their head Abide not there the Son of Peace is fled Put on this Pilgrimes weed poor Baby mine And Heavens shine Upon thy weak endeavours by success much Add daily to the Church Thy Fathers Blessing thou hast also got and now Go forth and prosper thou AN INDEX Directing to the ORDINANCES AND QUESTIONS Contained and discussed in this TREATISE Of the Church page 1. Questions I. WHether the single Testimony of the Church be to be received in matters of faith pag. 19 II. Whether the Church hath power to ordain Ceremonies not ordained of God p. 18 III. Whether the Church hath power to compel any irregular person to her Ordinances p. 24 IV. Whether the Civil Magistrate hath power over or in the Church of Christ And if he have whether his Law be binding to the Consciences of men p. 30. V. Whether the Segregated Churches now in England be true Churches p. 40. VI. What may justifie a mans separation from a true Church p. 75. VII Whether more religions then one are to be tollerated where the true Church is established p. 84. VIII Wherein consists the individuality or singlenesse unity or onenesse of the true Church p. 87. IX Why is the true Church called holy p. 90. X. Why is the true and holy Church called Catholick p. 91. XI Whether the Elect only be true members of the Church p. 93 XII What are the markes of a true Church p. 95. Of the Scripture p. 99. Questions I. Whether the Scripture be the word of God p. 143. II. Whether the Scripture ought to be mans only rule p. 148. III. Whether men may come to a saving knowledge of God without the Scripture p. 150. IV. Whether pefection may be attibuted to the Scripture p. 152. V. Whether salvation may be had by single knowledge of the Scripture p. 154. VI. What may perswade one that doubts to believe the truth of the Scriptures p. 156. VII How fâ—r the Saints may be our rule besides the Scripture p. 158. VIII Whether the bookes called Apocrypha be not Scripture p. 160. IX Why would God coâ—municate his to his Church by writting of the Scripâ—ure p. 162. X. Whether men be bound to believe all that is in the Scripture p. 164. Of Reading the Scripture p. 165. Questions I. Whether there be a God as is declared in Scripture p. 175. II. Whether God be a spirit p. 178. III. Whether there be but one God p. 180. IV. Whether there be three persons in the Godhâ—ad and how these persons do agree p. 181. V. Why are Kings and Magistrates called Gods and Rebellion to be like witcâ—craft in Scripture p. 191. VI. What was that Image wherein God made man and why was man created naked p. 194. VII Whether the reading of the ceremonial law be profitable to a bâ—liever or whether any part of that law be established under the Gospel p. 196. VIII Why would God suffer his dearest Saints to lye under such sad â—fflictiâ—â—s as are mentioned in Scripture and whether the book of Joâ— be a reall hictâ—â—y p. 211. IX Whether there be any diffeâ—â—â—ce betwixt the old and new â—â—â—tament and why the Scriptures are called a Testament p. 215. X. Wâ—â— are there some things in Scripture hard to be understood and whether the Scripture can dwel richly in â—â—ose that cannot reade p. 218. Of the Sabbath p. 221. Questions I. Whether the keeping of a sabbath be a ceremony and abolished by Christ. p. 235. II. Whether it be lawfull to make feasts on the sabbath p. 236. III. Whether sporting or gaming is to be followed upon the sabbath p. 273. IV. Why did God give charge concerning the resting of beasts upon the sabbath p. 239. V. Why did not God give Charge concerning a wifes resting upon the sabbath p. 240. VI. Why is not the change of the sabbath in Scripture mentioned p. 241. VII Whether the Church may command any other day to be rested on beside the sabbath p. 243. VIII Why doth God put a Remember before the Commandment of the sabbath only p. 245. IX Whether the first day of the week may be termed sabbath or sunday p. 247. X. Why is the sabbath called Holy p. 251. Of a Fast. p. 252. Questions I. Whether the fasts of the Church of Rome differ from those of the Church Catholick p. 249. II. Whether fasting be not a ceremoniall or Iewish Rite p. 251. III. Why is the fast of Lent observed by the Christian Church p. 252. IV. Why are the fast of the weekes of Ember observed by the Church p. 255. V. Whether it would bring advantage to the Church to have those
the name of a Catholick no more then a theife when he gets into a House deserves the name of a true Heire for by their new fangled toys brought in by the keys of the Pope a new word also the true antient and Catholick faith is robbed of her gracefull purity yea the antient Church of Rome is divested of her glorious Apparel by which those Popish impostors passe the better undiscovered and Romish Polititians make the better show but set them passe Are all the members of the Catholick Church holy No All are not Israelties that are of Israel Rom. 9.6 Would all the Lords people were Prophets Christ hath some Branches in his Body that bring not forth fruite and therefore shall bee taken away Iohn 15.2 There are some that by profession are members of his visible Church yet are dead Branches not having in them the sap of the Spirit to bring forth the fruits of Holinesse and good Works which alone makes them members of his invisible There are Prophane and Hypocritical sinners which are part of Christ but so as Mos or dead Branches are of the Tree accounted so of God and by Christ esteemed so to be Yet they professing the Doctrine of the Gospel owning the Sacraments of our Lords institution must be looked upon as members of the holy People There were prophane men no doubt in Israel yet by outward profession they were all the Lords people there were in our Saviours time those whom he threatnâ—d should be cast out and with the same breath acknowledges them Children of the Kingdom Mat. 8.12 It could not be that a Prophet should perish out of Jerusalem and the whole multitude with the high Priests and Elders of that City having seen the man that was Gods Fellow cryed out away with him away with him Crucify him Crucify him in her God found as in a common slaughter house the blood of all the Prophets and the Blood of the Son of God was charged upon her yet at the seâ—f same time the holy Ghost acknowledges Jerusalem to be a holy City Matthew 27.53 For there the law of God was read the worship of God performed and outwardly the people of God dwelt and the house of God was frequented There were divisions among the Corinthians contentions Law suits Fornication great haughtinesse of mind great prophanenesse and loosenesse in the administration of the Lords-Supper yea some receive it drunk and for all this the Apostle call them Saints prefacing the Epistle he sends to them for the redressing of those disorders thus viz. unto the Church of God which is at Corinth 1. Corinthians 1.2 Their profession made them outwardly holy and by their owning the Gospel ordinances it is manifest that they were outwardly called though their sins did demonstrate that they even those whom he had called before Saints were carnal 1 Cor. 3.3 If we in this age could but learn or see that the gate of the Church is wider then the gate of Heaven we should have less noise amongst us and more charity for each other Laodicea had lost her first love and was wretched miserable blind and naked nigh to be spued out yet the true and faithfull witnesse beares this record of her that she is a Church and her Pastor or Bishop is an Angel Revelations 3.14 In a word profession of the most holy faith and beleiving of fundamental Doctrine is sufficient among men to own any man as a member of the visible Church and to denominate him there from but not to give them interest or Title to the invisible or to make them fellow Citizens with the Saints in the new Jerusalem for without holinesse no man can see the Lord Hebrews 12.14 And therefore the Church is compared to a draw-net which draweth up Fishes of all sorts both good and bad Matthew 13.47 And to a field wherein is found both darnell and good corn both tares and wheat and they must not be plucked up before the time If Saul had been plucked up as a tare we should never have had such a pretious Paul To this Doctrine consent the reformed Churches Art 17. of the Church of Helvetia Art 8. of the Church of Bohemia Art 26. of the Church of France Art 27. of the church of Bel. Art 7. of the Church of Auspurge c. It is now time to come 2. To resolve some Questions concerning the Church Question 1. WHether the single Testimony of the Church be to be received in matters of Faith Quest. 2. Whether the Church hath pâ—wer to Ordain Ceremonies that are not Ordained â—f God Quest. 3. Whether the Church hath Power to compell any irregular person to her Ordinances Quest. 4. Whether the civill Magistrate hath power in or over the Church Quest. 5. Whether the segregated congregations now in England be Churches Quest. 6. What may justifie a Separation from a Church Quest. 7. Are there more Religions then one to be celebrated where the true Church is established Quest. 8. Wherein consists that individuality singlenesse unity or Oxenesse of the true Church Quest. 9. Why the true Church is called holy Quest. 10. Why is the true and only Church called catholick Quest. 11. Whether the Elect be onely Members of the true Church Quest. 12. What are the Marks of a true Church Quest. 1. Whether the bare and single Testimony of the Church to be received in matters of Faith or Salvation The Church of Rome defends the necessity of her Members yielding to the simple Testimony of the Church in matters of faith but very unsoundly for 1. Every particular Member of the Church hath erred and therefore the whole Church may for what ever be the quality of the parts the whole must be of the same as the simples are so is the Electuary that is made of them hot ingredients can never make a cooling plaister It is dangerous to make it the ground of my faith of which I have no surer testimony then he or they sayes so The Popes we know have sinfully erred whom they would make the Church virtual Councels have erred whom they would make the Church representative the Councels of Basil and Constance cannot both be true Peter erred Demas may fall back Laodicea may lose her first love It s hard to make a sound Christian believe he shall be damned for not doing that or not believing that which God hath nowhere commanded or spoken of Certainly to make the precepts of men equally binding to Scripture is against that text Deut 12.33 What thing soever I command you observe and doe it thou shalt not and the reto nor diminish therefrom why then should I believe that there are pains in purgatory which I must undergo with as strong a faith as to believe there are joyes in Heaven And why must I be damned if I believe not that the Pope is as really head of the whole Univarsal Church as to believe that Christ is risen from the dead The reason is the Church it
says my Author I will leave them yet since the New year is so near and having now a fit opportunity I am loth to leave my Reader without a New-years-gift a small pack of Religions that may if well Husbanded carry him through the whole Year without want I intend to discover the naked truth and therefore I will present the first with a sound-limbed Adamitâ— he wil save the buying of clothes that 's something and assure thee that thou hast no sin he 'll shew thee nay perhaps conduct thee to Paradise before the year go round If thou like not him Here is a Familist he will have thee to obey all Magistrates though never so tyrannical be they Jews Gentiles or Turks a good Religion for some of this age when thou art served of him sufficiently lend him thy neighbour That there is no Heaven nor Hell but upon Earth is a note that thou shalt hear constantly from him fall but out with thy wife and accuse her for a whore he will give thee a Bill of divorce and give thee a new one If there be any that will not believe this Doctrine they shall never be forgiven in this world nor in the world to come I am perswaded if this be true thy wife will finde it a hard matter to come to the Kingdom of Heaven Put up this Religion close and use it not often left the good woman hate thee But Here is a grave Socinian he will bind thee to nothing that is commanded in the old Testament That eternal death is nothing but a continual lying in the grave is his judgement Upon this ground thou mayst live merrily all the year long Or if you please you may entertain This pretty Traskit as long as he knows thee thou shalt know it is not thy duty to keep the Christian Sabbath I cannot affirm it but possibly he will circumcise thee shortly his nail appear as if he were good at such an act If neither of these please you Here is an Antinomian he thrusts both Tables of the Law from himself and will affirm that they are of no use at all to thee by which meanes thou needst neither fear God nor regard man It is a sin for thee if thou wilt credit him to beg from God a forgiveness of thy sin because he knows thou hast none good works will neither further thee to Heaven nor bad works keep thee from it So that thou mayest live as if there were no King in Israel but thy self But what say you to this Millenary or fifth Monarchy man he 'd have thee expect that Christ will corâ—e Reign a thousand years upon the Earth and for that purpose all the wicked must be slain and know that if a wicked man live by thee it he be rich thou mayst make him a begger for the wicked you must note have no right to the creature He wil take very great offence if he hear thee or thy Family sing any one of Davids Psalmes All the time of Christs Reigning shall be spent in Eating Drinking and other Fleshly delights so that though thou be poor now thou mayst live in hope sutable to the appetite of Cernithus who first broached it An. C. 7â— For Tares in all Ages grew up with the Wheat who was a Person given to Gormandizing and lustfull Sports the same Doctrine taught Ebion and withal that Iesus was not born of a Virgin and that Christ as it were another Person came into Iesus after his Baptism hence by these two the Gospel of Saint Matthew was only Canonical and the Epistles of Paul rejected and by consequence thou may now refuse them In this box lies a painted Anabaptist you may see some part of him all you must not for he is a monstrous Creature you have heard of a Man that had another growning out of his side it may be this is the Anabaptist he is not a single Person I have read of a Countesse of Cracovia that was delivered of 36. Children at once An. C. 1270. of another of Holland that was delivered of 365. at a Birth An. 1276. Neither of these are to be compared to this Anabaptist for fruitfulnesse in his Belly is contained all the Spawn Seed Roots of all the Heresies that ever molested or troubled the Church no opinion that is destructive no principle that is abominable no doctrine that is infective no Seed that is hellish but he hath a Wombe to contain it all coloured over with a painted Skin which if once uncovered would amaze my Reader that he should not know what Religion to choose of all those that I have presented before him But know that our Modern Anabaptist denies this he is ashamed to own the old German Anabaptist the very Father that begot him like a Begger he will deny his Father to get a peace of Bread and when he hath got it on him trust me nor if these we have in England would not appear to be the very sones of their German Father if they had but that which they wish for long for and gape after Religion Humility Fasting and Praying was his practice untill he got the Prey are not their Cloaths of the same colour now We must note that he is not so much painted over or Cloathed but we can see something of his wickednesse I shall uncover but a little of him and you shall see 21. severall mouths gaping out of one of his sides haveing Tongues of Error and Blasphemy and though privately like true Envy they hate and speak against each other yet they all agree to spit venome and poyson against the members of the Catholick Church and cast and shake their filthy drivel upon the Officers of the same To give each of these blabber-lips their peculiar name might infect my Paper I shall name but a few this Map that he holds in his hand is a Map of Germany and Munster once his Fathers Metropolis and at his banishing out of Germany A. 1535. brought it over into England which by his posterity is wrapped that none should get a sight of it but so far as we are willing let us see the Monsters that grow and live about this Creature This is called a Melchiorist the first thing that he Teacheth or as soon as it learned to Speak it Teacheth and learned to Curse and execrate the Body and Flesh of the Virgin Mary and that Christ came onely through her Body as the Sun comes through glass without receiving any thing from it This is caled Puer he cals upon the Christian to ride on sticks and hobby horses and other Childish brutish uncivill actions affirming withall that unless you learn like little Children you shall not inherit the Kingdom of God so that what is to play or act the beast with others is to act the part of a Saint with him for save in this literall sence that text is onely true Mat. 10. 3. This is called Hulit Christ with him is not God
Whether it be a sin to receive the Communion in a mixed congregation and if private examination be necessary By a mixed congregation the age makes us to understand 1. A congregation wherein any Communicant is not of the same judgement principle or opinion though in things circumstantial 2. A congregation wherein there are some Communicans that have sin in their mortal bodyes though it be repented 3. A congregation wherein there be drunkards or sweaters though adhearing professedly to the doctrine of the Gospel Unto which we will add this also though he was never reproved nor admonished by us The Question is then whether a man that hath prepared himself by sound hearty real and holy examination for that Ordinance may altogether forbear it and omit it upon the account of his knowing or foreseeing that such a drunkard will be at that holy banquet It is answered in the negative he ought not to forbeat upon any such pretence For 1. That Ordinance is not arbitrary It is not left to our own will and discretion that we may or may not as we will we ought to do our duty and prepare our selves to be worthy receivers if another neglect his and yet receive let him look to it the Lord is at hand 2. We might neglect other Ordinances as well as that we might refuse to read the Scriptures to pray to hear upon the same reason and indeed this doctrine as it hath kept some from the Chancel that is from receiving it hath kept others from the Church that is from hearing and this again hath kept some from the Scripture resolving to keep company with none but such as are altogether without sin and therefore the light within is their rule 3. God requires no such condition he craves faith repeatance and new obedience on my part but not that my companion should have the same or then I to be refused and my offering not to be accepted one Christian shall never be bound hand and foot and cast into utter darkness because another of the company wants the wedding garment 4. It is plainly against that Text 1 Cor. 11.29 he that eaâ—eth and drinketh unworthily eateth and drinketh damnation or judgement to HIMSELF therefore not at all to another he that prepares himself aright need not fear what the unworthiness of others can do against him 5. It would clearly take away this Sacrament out of the Church who would prepare himself to come if he should be cursed by anoâ—hers unworthiness or approach that table though full of faith with boldness except he knew that every heart at the table were as holy as his own and others that were as full of faith as he might hang down the head least his unworthiness procure unto them a judgement and so the devotion even of the devout should receive a bar â—nd be shut from all comfortable actings and holy duties This is not spoken to countenance prophaness but to inform the weak and tender conscience there being Laws in the Church to dâ—bâ—rth scandalous from that table and also thâ— ignorant which may and ought to be put in execution by the Church Officer after his admonishing the one and instructing the other for to exclude either of these without tryal save in case of necessity is arrogant and rash and without Authority but upon certain knowledge to debaâ— such is both religiously and lawfully done No Minister shall in any wise admit to the receiveing of the Holy Communion any of his cure or flock which be openly known to live in sin notorious without repenâ—ance nor any who have maliciously and openly contended with their neighbours until they shall be reconciled c. The scandalous are found out by the ear and secluded by Law the ignorant cannot be found but by discourse conference or examination which leads in the second part of the Question Whether private examination be necessary There is a twofold examination in reference to the Sacrament of the Supper 1. In respect of God 1 Cor. 11.28 men are bound and it is necessary for them to examine themselves 2. In respect of the Church that the ignorant and unlearned make not that Ordinance undervalued the Question is of this latter and amounts to this Whether the Church Officer may lawfully debar a sober pious Christian or one of whom he neither sees nor hears evil purely upon the account he will not submit to his examination a practice of late too commonly known nay several thousands have been excluded except they came under the tryal not of the Church Officers only but of his lay-Elders an office not heard of in the Church until these late years and are parts of the Church no more then those Anticks whose mouths supplie the places of spouts unto the temples but to let them pass it is denied private examination in this sence is not necessary For 1. The Scripture would have given some Item of it when the nature of the Sacrament is stated and examination required 1 Cor. 11. No word that tended in the least to this is written but every man enjoyned to examine himself 2. It cannot be shewed that ever the priests examined the fitness even legal of those that aproached the Paschal and yet the danger of unworthy receiving the one seems as great as the other 2 Chro. 30.20 1 Cor. 11.30 3. That Parable Matth. 22.9 is against this practice wherein the servants are appointed to bring in all that they could find without Order to try if they had the wedding garment the want of which condemned the party but not the servant Yet by the Law of the Church particularly of the Church of England none are to be admitted to that Ordinance until they have given sufficient testimony of their knowledge in the principles of the Christian religion Which Law though not expressed in Scripture in direct terms yet consequently it is approved In regard that the Church Officers are called Watchmen Stewards Shepherds c. which titles denote what a care they ought to have of their people or flock This even this being not taught unto the people was a firebrand of division between the Pastor and his people in these last days examination being by them required and that rigidly not declaring it as necessary in respect of the Church which would have satisfied the minds of all sober Christians but as from Scripture when the people knew that no such thing was required and they themselves not being able â—o produce the Text wherein in it was enjoyned It was pretty sport to hear men publickly and privately affirming that those who submitted not themselves to examination ought to be secluded for breach of that Order or discipline they themselves erected and yet not conforming themselves to those Orders that by Law had been established By which two things to all of understanding occurred First their arrogance to make Laws and compel the people without authority to submit under the pain of leâ—ser excommunication
be taken Quest. 1. Whether swearing be an ordinance of or under the Gospel There are them that live about us and among us who denies that swearing is any part of Gospel worship and therefore though called thereunto refuse least they should sin but erroneously For 1. Swearing was no part of the Ceremonial law but used long before Moses and the ends of it are morall and therefore it is not abolished by the death of Christ. 2. It is prophesyed that the Church of the Gentils shall swear by the Lord and by the God of truth Isa. 65.16 Ier. 4.16 Implying that whereas they did swear by Baal and other false gods they should by knowledge be brought from that Idolatry and give that point of worship to the God of Heaven who alone is the true God 3. By a holy Apostle it is frequently done even by him who was an eminent preacher of the Gospel viz. St. Paul an oath is nothing but a calling of God to witnesse of the truth of that which is done or spoken that it may be received with the greater belief now how often doth that eminent servant of the Lord Jesus deliver himself in the very substance of an oath as God is my witnâ—sse Rom. 1.9 God is my record Pâ—il 1.8 God is my witnesse 1 Thes. 2.5 10. God knoweth 2 Cor. 11 11 31. Before â—od I lie not Gal. 1.20 I say the truth in Châ—istiâ—n Christ I lie not Rom. 9.1 As the truth of Christ is in me 2 Cor. 11.10 I speak the truth in Christ and lye not 1 Tim. 2.7 All which are as substantial oaths as any we read of in the oâ—d â—â—â—pensation 4. Even in the close of the Gospel we find a holy Angell to swear Rev. 10.6 we pray that the will of God may be done by uâ— as it is done by the hoâ—y Angels and hear we have an Anâ—ell for greater certainty sealing his threatning by an oath From these reasons we may without errour conclude that the oâ—dinance of swearing is in full force and power under the Gospell to all intents and purposes any thing that our adversaries can bâ—ing to the Contrary notwithstanding Those texts Math. 5.34 and Iames 5.12 speaks of swearing in our common communication and of such oathes as are sworn by the creatures as may appear by the contexts not of Judicial swearinâ— oâ— any other kind of oathes when necessity and authority draws men to it for clearing of the truth and ending of controversie against which the Gospel speakes not one word but confirms it by severall passages yea St. Paul writing to the Hebrews says Heb. 6.16 That an oath for confirmation is to men an end of all strife not that it was but it is q.d. while I am writing and preaching now when the found of the Gospell is gone over all the world is an oath the end of strife and that not to some only but to men i.e. to all sorts of men whether Jew or Gentile now had it been a sin to have used an oath under the Gospell for that end we should have heard of it in this most proper place or in some other And if any will be contentious let them consider that Pauls before God I lye not 1 Gal. 20. and the Angells by him that lives for ever is more then yea yea and yet who dare reprove either of them of sin To this doctrine consents the reformed Churches of Helva Art 30. of Ausp Art 16. of England Art 39. the Art itself is this Art 39. of the Church of England As we confesse that vain and rash swearing is forbidden Christian men by our Lord Iesus Christ and James his Apostle so we judge that Christian religion doth not prohibit but that a man may swear when the Magistrate requireth in a cause of faith and Charity so it be done according to the Prophets teaching in Iustice Iudgement and truth Quest. 2 Whether the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy required by the Kings of England c. of their Subjects may lawfully be taken That Covenants or oaths in cases of necessity or suspition may be made by the subjects of a land to their lawful Prince appears by that Act of Iehoiadah at the Coronation of King Iehoash 2 King 11.17 where we have the footsteps of a Coronation and allegiance oath but to come to the matter in hand either of these oaths may lawfully be taken For 1 Swearing is a Gospell Ordinance and therefore under the Gospell may be performed being ratified taken and used by a holy Apostle and blessed Angell 2 There is nothing in them oaths that is contrary to the word of God God who made the heavens is only called to testifie the reallity of the intentions 3 The taking of them gives assurance to his Majesty of his Subjects faithfulnesse and loyalty and indeed as the case now stands he may be suspected of disloyalty that will not satisfie the law in that particular 4. It is but equall that subjects swear to defend his Majesties honours and prerogatives since he hath sworn to maintain his subjects rights and properties Next swear not at all the grand objection is his Majesties supremacy But 1 It is under Christ none acknowledgeth him as absolute head of the Church that being his sole prerogative who is King of Kings and it would be considered whether God hath not made as good and as many Laws touching the government of the State as he hath for that of the Church yet who will thence conclude that the Magistrate is not supreame in civill affairs that is next immediately under God For no otherwise is he head that is governour of the Church 2 It is only to exclude the Popes Authority His holinesse at Rome looks upon all Kings and Emperours as his Vassals and servants and did he not exalt him above all that are called Gods he would want one mark of the Antichrist 1 Thes. 2.4 by the way they being called Gods we are to know that none on earth no no Presbytery their superior nor contain the Pope therfore pretending a power over the Church making himself or giving out himself as head of all civil Ecclesiastical officers and withall making the Church to be so absolute a distinst body from the state that no state officer whether the King though he only be supream ought in the least to meddle with it or if he do to be excommunicated or deposed for his presumption this power is by this Oath taken from the Pope and given to him that is the true as the Pope makes the Church to be so absolute a distinct body from the state as that the state hath nothing to do with it or in it there are them in our dayes to be quit with the Pope that would have no Church officer in the least to meddle with the state supposing such an absolutnesse in the one that it hath no coherence with or dependance upon the other in this absolute sence the