them This calling and Ordination was from hand to hand to pass to after Ages for the things that thou hast heard of me Acts 6.6 2 Tim. 2.2 1 Tim. 5.22 saith the same Apostle among many witnesses the same commit thou to faithful men who shall be able to teach others also and upon this account he gives him a Caution to lay hands suddenly on no man till after a due examination about the Doctrine whether sound and a competent knowledge to teach and a strict inquiry about Morals a Good Life and Conversation Moreover doth not the word positively affirm 1 Cor. 12.28 Ephes 4.11 that God hath set some in the Church First Apostles Prophets Teachers c. again he gave some Apostles and some Prophets and some Evangelists and some Pastors and Teachers So in the Church there is a Ministry by way of Office which no Man may take upon himself but he who is lawfully call'd to 't The Church is God's House who is the God of order therefore to prevent confusion and usurpation therein he hath appointed not only the spiritual bread and food for his Children but also the Stewards and Ministers who are to distribute it And verily verily I say unto you he that enterreth not by that Door into the Sheepfold but climbeth up some other way the same is a Thief and a Robber Thus 't is visible enough how dangerous to the Church are Socinian Principles seeing they tend to ruin her Doctrine and allow every one a liberty to give God's Word what Interpretations they think fit also to set up any one for Ministers of the Gospel and thus to destroy the Order and Oeconomy which God hath setled in it whence Confusion will necessarily follow About these things and in all Disputes concerning Religion we ought to have a rule to go by and that is Scripture well explained and understood that is according to the true signification of the Words and Sense in the Original the scope of the Place and the analogy of Faith this rule must be true and certain which cannot be as long as every one is allowed to turn it to his own Sense and private Interpretation * Jonah Schlich ting in Symb. Epist ad loct p. 3. One of their Authors in his Exposition of the Creed saith that 't is most ancient and most simple and from the beginning no Man doubted but that it contained the Apostolical Doctrines But he saith not enough for that Creed must be received not only as to the words but also in the sense wherein the primitive Church took it It is very unreasonable in them to go about setting up their own private Opinions over and above and to the prejudice of the publick and universal ones 't is too much to abound in their own sense and to despise the general consent of the primitive Church as if excepting a number of Hereticks all the World had been blind and in darkness till Socinus came so before there was not nor is there now any true Church but of their own Sect they refuse to joyn with those who went before because say they they were fallible yet they would have us to joyn with them so 't is but reasonable for us to ask them to prove their infallibility it argues a great pride in them that in matters of Religion even as to the Fact which cannot be proved meerly by the light of Reason they will not in the least submit to the judgment of others who are witnesses of the times yet take upon themselves to frame a new Religion make new Articles of Faith and set up for Judges whether or not at their pleasure to receive or reject matters of Faith and the Doctrines hitherto received by the Universal Church 't is true they have been cunning enough to enlarge much the pales of their Society therein to receive more Men and of all sorts to that effect Socinus's System is compiled of a Rapsody of complicated Heresies therefore to avoid the name of Innovator he saith nullum c. †Apolog. Epist ad Martin Vadovit In my publick writings I asserted no doctrine which before my coming hither into Poland had not been owned by others in this Kingdom or elsewhere Yet his Uncle Laelius who had been his Teacher and whose Opinions he defended in the Preface of his Explication of the 1st Chap. of John's Gospel declares his Interpretation to be new the true sense whereof saith he had been mistaken by all Expositors that were before 'T is true that generally most of his Heresies were broach'd before him whereunto his Uncle and he after added some few things and thereunto gave a new form which to give a greater Authority unto he saith how * Epist ad Squarcilupum Tom. 1. p. 382. in what he had written in answer ad palaeo-logum de Magistratu he owned no other Master or Teacher but God and Scripture besides his Vncle Laelius dead long before or rather some few Writings or Annotations of his this in the same place he also extends to the universal knowledge of Divine Things And tho he owns there be still some things which he might learn yet hitherto he met with none therein able to teach him And this Man who seems to scorn to learn any thing of others hath forged and fram'd a new Body of Divinity and squeezed what he could out of his Brains that very same he publish'd and would have us to believe as Divine Truths as if to the exclusion of the whole Church he had been constituted the only true Interpreter of God's Word however this must be said that to gain more Men to himself he allowed others the same liberty he took to Interpret Scriptures as they pleased yet he insinuates how in his Interpretations are the fitter rules for them to go by and to please many Men about this they give leave to bring in commodam Interpretationem as they call it that is not the truest but most to their purpose the easiest most commodious or convenient under which cloak they wrest it to a contrary sense and in matters of Salvation Socinus is so complacent as to say that though one believeth things contrary to Scripture Tom. 1. p. 502. as to believe some things therein to be forbidden or commanded which are not he is thereby in no danger of being deprived of Salvation or excluded from Heaven Yet Men should know how the Gospel and Christian Religion is a Depositum a thing given in trust whereof the Ministers are the keepers for saith the Apostle to his Disciple 1 Tim. 6.20 O Timothy keep that which is committed to thy trust 't is then a thing delivered to not invented by thee not thine own but Christ's 't is not of thy contrivance but like a Steward thou hast received it and must dispose of it not according to thine own fancy but according to the rule prescribed thee without any alteration But as their Principles
are dangerous to the Church so they are to the State for they would not allow the Magistrate either in the legislative or executive part of the Government in matters of Religion to punish any though never so great offenders yet by the Laws of God Blasphemy and Idolatry were punished with Death and as they agree with the Donatists against the Magistrates punishing for Heresy and for leaving every one to enjoy his own Opinions so for all their fair pretences they are with them for a liberty in practices and against compelling any Man to a Godly Life which is an inlet to all manner of Immorality as the other is a gap to every Heresy In relation to the Magistrate Socinians do joyn in most of their wrong Notions about it and though they do not positively and absolutely say the Christian Magistrate to be incapable of bearing the Sword yet they say as good for they would not have him to draw it out of the Scabbard meaning against them tho' for never so just and necessary a cause especially about matters of Religion which they wholly exclude from his Jurisdiction yet as the Anabaptists did at Munster so there is sufficient ground to believe that if the Socinians could snatch the Power out of the hand of the Christian Magistrates that are against them and lodge it in their own no question but they would use their utmost endeavours there to keep it and like the Circumcellions a sort of Donatists in Africa destroy all that are not of their Religion In few words these are the right Notions we must have of the Magistrate first that God is the Author thereof whom he constitutes as his Vice-gerent upon Earth thus he gave his People Captains Judges and Kings who are all by his own appointment for saith the Apostle the Powers that be are ordained of God Secondly Rom. 13.1 Psal 82.6 Christians may be Magistrates because it being an Ordinance of God 't is good therefore Princes who are Head-Magistrates are called Children of the most High Which is to be understood as of Monarchys so of Aristocracies and Democracies according to the several forms of Government in different Countries Thirdly Though the Authority of Magistracy may sometimes happen to be wrongly used when it answers not God's end in the institution yet God made it for a good end for the preservation of peace order and honesty in humane Society therefore the Apostle exhorteth that Prayers be made for Kings 1 Tim. 2.1 2. and all that are in Authority that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty And Fourthly the Magistrate's Office is extended over matters of Religion and by his place he is bound to take care that his Subjects do profess the true Religion according to the Word of God and do what he can to promote his Glory and their Spiritual Good in the ways conducing to it as also to discourage discountenance punish and suppress all that is contrary thereunto whether in Doctrine or Practice Rom. 13.4 the reasons are these first because he is the Minister of God for good Now 't is God's Ministers duty every way to promote his Glory which is never better done than when a due care is taken of true Religion secondly the Magistrate like a Father is bound to bring up his Children in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. Thirdly he is the keeper of both Tables of God's Law so that he ought to punish the breakers of the first as are Idolaters Cursers Blasphemers as well as those of the second as Murtherers Adulterers c. Moses was chief Magistrate over the Children of Israel and into his hands God put them thereby to him Committing the execution thereof according to this the pious Magistrates and Kings under the old Testament as Joshuah Samuel David Jehoshaphat Hezekiah and Josiah took care of true Religion and of God's Worship but if they would not mind those things then they would bear the Sword in vain Rom. 13.4 contrary to Scripture which saith he is a Minister of God a Revenger to execute wrath upon him that doth evil But to corrupt the true Doctrines of Religion is certainly to do Evil directly against God which is worse than against Men and this was the practice of the Constantines Theodosius and other good Christian Emperours against the Manichaeans Priscillianists c. besides we read in plain terms that the Magistrates ought to punish crimes Job saith it first in the case of Adultery Job 31.11 v. 28. this is an hainous crime yea it is an iniquity to be punish'd by the Judges Then upon the account of Idolatry this also were an iniquity to be punished by the Judges so we may say Blasphemy no less Sin than is Idolatry but greater than Adultery is an iniquity to be punished by the Judges Acts 13.20 Ex Stegman p. 42.43 ob id ipsum c. Now no Man may deny that Princes and Chief Magistrates are contain'd under the name of Judges seeing for the space of about 450 years God govern'd his People by several Persons call'd by that name Against this Socinians say that upon no account any violent means should be used in matters of Religion for saith one of them peremptorily no Judge is permitted to use them in religious matters but not to look back this Doctrine is every day maintain'd in Print in those Pamphlets at any time to be seen in Westminster-Hall P. 32. and in every Bookseller's Shop Among others in Mr. Toland's Letter to a Member of the House of Commons in Ireland he declares he is a perfect stranger to any such Power claim'd by that Honourable Body And another in a Pamplet lately publish'd upon the matter hath these words * The grounds and occasions of the Controversy concerning the Vnity of God p 48. God reserves the execution of vengeance to himself and therefore allows the Civil-Magistrate no-Coercive Power farther than to preserve the publick Peace this comes close upon the Parliament which thereby they would exclude from meddling with things of Religion Men may know what they would be at by their petulant carriage towards some of the Honourable Members when according to their Judgment and Conscience they have spoken their Mind in the House as it will appear by a Letter which I think fit here to insert and which was made publick before 't is thus Honoured SIR KNowing you to be a Person of Morals and one that loves not Superstition nor Arbitrary Power Dated Lumbard-street Jan. 11 1698. and directed for J.A. Esq to be left at the Lobby of the House of Commons Receiv'd from the Door-Keeper of the House Jan. 11. and opened afore us C.S. C.T. although your Voting in the House and Arguing out of the House for a Standing Army in Coffee-Houses which indeed was for Chains for your self and Friends and the evil Character you give and some Reflections you have made on the Worthy
nothing and the like according to that Spirit they little care what interpretations they make of God's Word which thus they impiously make a stalking Horse of to their wandring Thoughts and for sinister ends of their own namely as they and our modern Socinians here say to improve theit Parts promote Learning and make 〈◊〉 discoveries that is in plain English they may be prophane at God's own cost if they have a mind to improve their parts let them make choice of other matters as Philosophy Mathematicks and of what other humane Arts and Sciences they please and not for their Pride and Vain Glory to prophane God's Field and therein sow their own Tares and to make Religion and the Church subservient to their Evil intents and purposes Another thing they do as may be seen in most of their late Pamphlets which indeed is neither fit nor decent is often to commend themselves and bring in others who speak well of them but it had been much better not to have brought themselves under a necessity to need Begging or Borrowing such Certificates of their good behaviour This puts me in mind of what our Saviour said to the Pharisees ye are they who justify yourselves before Men but God knoweth your Hearts Luke 16.15 'T is true there hath been some who may be out of a Principle of Charity and a Spirit of meekness would have invited them out of their Errours but these are so far gone in that way as to stand in need to make some kind of Apology for themselves yet that method of gentleness is ill bestowed upon Men of an obstinate and stubborn Spirit and hitherto hath proved uneffectual for by the abuse of the thing they are grown Haughtier and Prouder so that sometimes they make their own Panegyrick as I * P. 27. observed in the Vindication of the Epistle and preface to my Book And in a place of the mock Apology against me one of them saith one †P. 20 21. of our Learn'd Bishops doth not think the Vnitarians would dishonour Christ only they think that to make him equal with the Father is a disparagement to Almighty God Such a passage may be though I do not remember to have read it yet I am apt to believe with passing thorough their hands it hath gotten a tincture of Socinianism but what makes those Men so busy as to decide that to make the Son equal with the Father is a disparagement to God Almighty when the same in several Texts of Scripture quoted elsewhere makes him his equal Zech. 13.7 and in one place calls him my fellow and in many Texts of the New Testament Christ makes himself equal with the Father But let me warn those who have a favourable Opinion of them to have a care of what they Write for thereby we see how apt they are to take Advantage of any thing so every stroke of a Charitable Pen they would use as an Argument of their good and sincere intentions and of their being in the Right for as they make of it a Trade to wrest Scriptures so they do the Writings of others which I have a particular cause to take Notice of because I said that some Arminians went Hand in Hand with Socinians presently as well observed by * In his Letter to Dr. Edwards Mr. Lobb and in the †P. 12. remarks on a Paper sent by some Eminent Presbyterians to the Congregational c. They lookt upon 't with a multiplying Glass and would bring under their Banners not only almost all the Church but half of the Presbyterians c. Which in my Answer to the two Letters I take Notice of as of their want of sincerity and to speak plainly I now may call it one of their Tricks which they are so full of As indeed in their whole Carriage one may easily perceive it for it hangs altogether and in the bottom it appears in their Doctrines and Practices so contrary to Faith and to the Rules of the Universal Church besides the Self-Conceitedness and Pride of their Pen-Men who despise all that are not of their Mind and with Blasphemy deride true Religion and to that purpose make use of lies and Calumnies but when hard press'd are reduced to pityful shifts their zeal for Christ and Gospel Truths which as much as they are able they pervert may be look'd upon as meer Hypocrisy and in defence of their Errours they shew a great hardness of Heart and disingenuity and as they betray the Truth so spare not those who defend it against them and load them with invectives full of gall and bitterness which is an effect of Passion so contrary to the Meekness and Moderation which they would seem to pretend to as we find Socinus doing against Puccius whom he sharply upbraids * Epist 〈…〉 â—â—lith 〈◊〉 1. P. 〈◊〉 for 〈◊〉 much relying upon his Opinions which exactly was Socinus's Original and inherent Sin the extraordinary care also which he took to publish and every where to disperse his Works argues in him no small Vanity and Ambition as for his Passion when he disputed which then he could not command so well as at other times we have the Evidence of a familiar Friend of his in these words * Squarcial Epist ad Socin Scio non suspicor c. I do not guess at but know thine immoderate hate in dispute how often have I warned thee when thou wast about disputing or wrangling concerning light matters and disturbing all things with the greatest Clamourousness This Man who against the proper and natural sense of Scriptures would force his own upon them †Assert posnan 10. in oper Soc. p. 510. to fill up his measure doth scornfully speak of the Nicene and Athanasian Creeds received by the Universal Church but what need we go so far backward as Socinus's time for these things when now among us we have a fresh Evidence of that Spirit of theirs in a late * The Charitable Samar Pamphlet how unworthily doth that Scribler speak of the Council of Nice which saith he was principally Composed of a pack of wrangling contentious Grecians Men bred up in Controversy all their Life and perpetually quarrelling one with another all this he saith gratis and as his own deluded Opinion that among them there might have been some such ones I will not dispute but he cannot say all were so that Council was summon'd by a great and Christian Emperour Constantine who was present and upon that account things must be thought to have been managed with good order besides that what he saith is not to be purpose the question being not about their Temper but about the Matters lying before them Acts 15.39 a cause is never the worse in it self for the frailties of those that own it may any one disparage the Gospel preach'd by Paul and Barnabas because they fell out and parted about a thing of no moment whether or not they
Christian World Sixthly Not only they will not confine themselves within the bounds of the received Faith by the Primitive Church but do forge new Articles of Faith and cannot forbear giving ill language revilings and lies Seventhly they despise and contemptuously reject the Testimonies and Witnesses of the Doctors of the Primitive Church against all rules of decency and modesty Eighthly they take upon themselves peremptorily and magisterially to blame and condemn all Christian Protestant Churches as if they knew nothing and were nothing which in them is an effect of rashness and pride Ninethly not only they cannot forbear opposing the fundamental Principles of Christian Religion but also will not abstain from Impieties Blasphemies and abominable Expressions against the most Holy Trinity the Divinity of the Son of God who is the God of the Christians against his Incarnation c. as it hath already been plainly demonstrated such detestable things the Apostles never did against the Idols of the Gentiles for we read how the Town-Clerk of Ephesus said to the People Acts 19.37 ye have brought hither these Men which are neither Robbers of Churches nor yet Blasphemers of your Goddess the Apostles were for destroying Idolatry but therein they behaved themselves with a Christian Prudence and Modesty though in a good cause thus Paul calmly upon the account of the Altar to the unknown God Chap. 17.23 said to the Athenians whom ye ignorantly Worship him declare I unto you disputed with good arguments not with injuries according to the rule he gives his Disciple 2 Tim. 2.24.25 the Servant of the Lord must not strive but be gentle unto all Men apt to teach patient in meekness instructing those that oppose themselves But Lastly they are Wise in their own conceit setting up for the sole competent judges of all Controversies when alass that Reason of theirs which they so much trust to doth often fail and deceive them is very uncertain and proves a blind guide whereof I shall now give a considerable instance and therein shew their unreasonableness for calling themselves Vnitarians for the oneness of God lies in the Unity of Nature not of Persons Now I come to them and say Our Doctrine consists with it self for one of the Reasons why we confess Christ to be God is because we know there is but one true God but yours contradicts it self because ye make two Gods of different Natures when there is no true God but he that is such by Nature so if there is but one God there must be only one Divine Nature and none is God but he who hath that Divine Nature and if we worship those who by Nature are not Gods we worship false Gods and are Idolaters To make Gods of several Natures is meer Polytheism and Plurality of Gods which Scripture is so much against but to have several Persons yet of one and the same Nature doth not make many Gods so that when we affirm there is but one Divine Nature we assert the Oneness of God whilst they with affirming there are two Gods of different Natures destroy that Unity which consists in the Essence or Nature and therefore the Name Vnitarians which they call themselves by is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 abusively taken they make one God by Divine Nature and another with a human Nature a great Absurdity which to any rational man must appear to bring in many Gods so multiplicity of Gods which without cause they would father upon us is justly fastned upon them Besides let it be taken notice of what kind of God they would make our Saviour to be a God not born but made a God by office and favour not by nature a God who had a beginning and shall have an end and at last be stripp'd of his Divinity a God who is not the first and shall not be the last who hath not made Heaven and Earth which the Apostle after a Prophet gives as a Character of the true God a God not such by Nature Acts 17.24 Jerem. 10.11 13. which Paul opposes to the true God an improper a metaphorical a dependent and without Blasphemy let it be said a Mock-god made by degrees like the Popish Wafer-god a God of about 1700 Years standing such a God they make our Saviour to be who is over all Rom. 9.5 God blessed for ever which is to make a God no God and as much as in them lies to ridicule the Godhead a God who hath not his Being of himself and is not the Author of being to the Creature which all are absurd Contradictions But I elsewhere abundantly proved our Saviour and Lord to be of the same Nature with the Father by an eternal generation Is it not very absurd and contradictious to give one the Essential Attributes of Divine Nature yet deny him Divine Nature which is inseparable from those Attributes so that where the Nature is there the Attributes must also be and where the Attributes so must also the Nature 'T is very strange that this people look upon 't as a thing impossible for God to communicate his Nature to one whom they own to have received Divine Knowledge Wisdom Power and that Divine Worship is his due which are proper Attributes of Divine Nature not really distinct but inseparable from it When men pay honour to a Person they first of all in their mind must be satisfied how in that Person is some Excellency and Dignity which deserves it and this leads them upon this account to make their Heart and Affections willing to entertain a singular Veneration for that person Hence in the third place arises a desire and resolution by some outward acts to express the inward disposition to the Glory and Honour of that Person and to let other men see and know it Now to have first such a Notion of a meer Creature such they affirm our Lord to be then in the heart to receive such impressions of rendring honour to such a person and lastly by some outward act to declare it this I say is perfect Idolatry for 't is to do for the Creature all that can be done for the Creator who unto himself alone hath reserved that Religious Worship for 't is written Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and him only shalt thou serve Out of this it appears how their Opinion sets up Polytheism and Idolatry for to affirm two Persons of different Nature is certainly to make two different Gods and wholly to destroy the Unity of the Godhead for as they own a Plurality of Persons so they do a Plurality of Natures how then can they find the Oneness of God and wherein will they make it consist Neither can they wash off the charge of Idolatry for rendring to Christ whom they say to be a meer Man and a Creature the Worship due to the most high God which to maintain they sink deeper into the mire for by one Idolatry they would defend another and by one false
by the Word John 5.7 the Son must be Understood for Father and Son are relatives and as the Father is a Person so must the Son so must the Holy Ghost yet they deny the most Holy Trinity asserted in Scriptures and confirm'd to have been the belief of the Whole Primitive Church as contained in the Apostolical Nicene and Athanasian Creeds and in the Constantinopolitan wherein the others were Comprehended and owned in the Confession of Faith of all Christian Churches in the World which was and is still made the first Article of Faith of One God in Three Persons yet against these great Lights they impiously say * Catech. Racov. Sententiam eorum c. the Opinion of these who do Attribute Divine Nature unto Christ is contrary not only to sound Reason but also to the Word of God and they do grosly err who affirm that not only the Father but also the Son and the Holy Ghost are Persons in one Godhead and †Vorstius one saith the Arguments by the Ancient Fathers and Modern Divines made use of for the Eternal Generation of Christ are either Fallacious or Frivolous and * Smalcius ad nov monst part 2. c. 22. p. 198. another calls them Ratiunculae Nugatoriae Trifling words the same in another place affirms that †Exam. 100. Errâ—r Er. 26. Christ before his Resurrection was not perfectly Christ or Son of God or God And elsewhere that Christ's Divinity consists in his sitting at the Right Hand of the Father Sessio Christi ad dextram Dei est Christi divinitas I begin to tremble when I think of what I am just now entring upon but 't is fit they should be known in their own Colours Here with Horror read how Blasphemonsly those Hellish and Abominable Monsters as are Servetus Dudithius Socinus himself and several others of those wicked Men so much admir'd by Vnitarians writ of the most Holy and most Blessed Trinity they call it Monstrum Tricipitem Cerberum Tricorporem Gerionem Deum fictitium ac Sophisticum Idolum novum Fabulosam Chymeram humanum Commentum Diabolicam Idaeam Babelis Turrim of many more I shall add the following which makes the Pen drop out of my Hand The most adorable Trinity is call'd Blasphemum dogma ex imô orcô per Filium perditionis virtute Satanae gentium Ecclesiis obtrusum I am at a stand whether or not to put this in English which though it makes my Heart ake and defiles my Pen yet to the end every one which understands no Latin may abhor such transcendent Blasphemies I say The most Holy Trinity they call a Monster a three Headed Cerberus a Geryon with three Bodies a Forged and Sophistical God a new Idol a Fabulous Chymera a Human Invention a Devilish Idea a Tower of Babel a Blaspemous Doctrine by the Son of Perdition and power of Satan drawn out of the very bottom of Hell and obtruded upon the Church of the Gentiles After this Socinians must not find it strange if I who through God's Grace am a Christian do abhor and detest those Principles which do overthrow the Christian Religion to set up a new one of their own and if I cannot be much in Charity with those who are for such Impieties and Blasphemies Tho' what I have already said be too much yet to shew how they break all Rules and do more and more sink into the Mire and if not worse yet are as bad as the Devil himself for Non audet Stygius Pluio tentare quod audet Effraenis Socinus there they will not stop for he must run fast whom the Devil drives I shall upon the matter add one thing or two more out of their Hellish Writings one of them writing against one of his Adversaries takes an occasion to fall upon Austin * Dudiâ—h Epist ad Bezam in Socin Oper. Tom. 1. p. 525. Tuum tibi Augustinum c. I shall speak to thee of thy Austin For having said many things quite contrary to the Gospel he also hath Publish'd this Eostatical Fancy of three Gods they the first drunk of this Wine afterwards they made others drunken with it so to them is happen'd what usually befals Men who when their sight is troubl'd instead of one they see three or more The same in another place saith †Epist ad Petrum Carol p. 538. Tricipitem Ter geminum c. The Apostles never knew this three Headed and threefold God nor the whole Orthodox Church this is impudently to tell this lye who can without Indignation read such things Do such Miscreants deserve to breath God's Air What that Man saith * Socin Animadv 10. in assert Theol. Coll. posnan Socinus Subscribes to when he saith Deum quidem c. The whole Vniversal Church owns that there is one God but that it doth reverence Vnity in Trinity and Trinity in Vnity no Church of God may by any means own seeing 't is altogether a Humane Invention which Divine Truth doth every way speak against After this ever since our Saviour's days the Church hath been in Ignorance and Darkness nay in a great and damnable Error about these Fundamentals of our Religion but this is not all For as to our Blessed Saviour's Incarnation or the Son of God being made Flesh they impiously Ridicule and Revile it * Ostorod Instit c. 17. p. 96. One calls it Purum c. A meer Porgery of Superstitious Men. Then the Evangelists and Apostles by whose means the Holy Ghost convey'd those Divine Truths to us were Forgers of Lyes thus they set Hand and Seal to what said that Impious Pope Leon X. the Fable about Jesus Christ hath procur'd the Church great Riches Another calls that high and adorable Mystery †Smalc Refut Graveri de Incarnâ—t Dogma c. A most Monstrous Doctrine unworthy to be receiv'd by the Christian Church And the same in a direct opposition to what St. John saith The Word was made Flesh hath this * Exam. 100 Err. Err. 49. Verbum non est Caro factum the Word was not made Flesh and to say the contrary is an Error and that vile Man thinks he can say any thing against Christ and in opposition to Scripture for in the same Book he adds Christus c. Christ from his Birth was not full of Grace and Truth Again Christ at his Death ceased to be Son of God Error 50. and therein he calls it a Fable Tanta est Fabula c. So great is this Fable of the Vnion of two Natures also a Dream of old Women Somnium anile many more such Impieties I could quote but it makes my Heart sick and amaz'd thereat strikes me with Horror and makes the Pen drop out of my Hand About the Holy Ghost they hold three Fundamental Errors First They deny him to be God though in several places Scripture simply and absolutly calls him so Acts. 5.3 4. Peter said to Ananias
of Blood Thirsty Had I any hand in his Condemnation and Execution No doubt there is a great deal of Sincerity and Truth in such a charge against me Fy for shame leave off such lying tricks which can do your cause not a straw worth of good and answer my Arguments 't is a general accusation they have against every one that is no Socinian when I say I could wish to see by lawful authority and means that Blasphemous Heresy of theirs suppress'd they presently say you would bring an Inquisition upon us Socinians they blunder out that scare-crow word Psal 9.12 but extremely misapply it Inquisition is a good word if Men do but make a right use of the thing it signifies David calls God an Inquisitor for he makes Iuquisition for Blood So he doth for Blasphemy as in the cases of * Irenaeus lib. 3. c. 3. Euseb Eccles Hist l. 4. c. 14. Corinthus and of Arius forequoted So for Idolatry and after this patern why should not Magistrates who make Inquisition for Blood make it also for Blasphemy and Idolatry God standeth in the Congregation of the Mighty he judgeth among the Gods Psal 82.1 That is if Princes and Judges do not their duty God whose Authority is above theirs will take Vengeance of them In the second place I am mention'd with a witness Pag. 30. The Religious Frenzies of Mr. Gailhard which have been so well chastised by two honest Gentlemen By this stile one may easily know that meek modest moderate and Christian as they would be call'd sort of Men but a Zeal for the Honour of God and Interest of Christ is no Frenzy I am very jealous for the Lord God of Hosts saith Elijah 1 Kings 19.10 14. if this Man had lived in his time he would not have spared him but taxed him with Frenzy though I make no comparison between the Persons yet the cause is the same but such Men should know how a weak fainting and languishing Spirit is no fit nor proper frame in God's Service I find with him the word Religious is a Saddle for any Horse Legat's perswasion was Religious so are my Frenzies when will that evil Spirit depart from them when will they cease to give People ill language however those Frenzies of mine have been well chastised how well let the vindication of my Epistle demonstrate but these two chastisers or slanderers are two honest Gentlemen how can it be otherwise if they be Socinians For Honesty is their Essential Quality but they are a greedy sort of People who would suck in to themselves all Religion Piety Vertue and Honesty In the third place he saith Pag. 52. Mr. Gailhard and the growth of Errour have already declared open war against all Church-Men of the Arminian perswasion The more Enemies we have among ourselves the better for them who are the common Enemy but I find they always are ready to embroil things if they can thereby to fish in troubled Water and may be hence it comes I mean out of their Den that of late we have seen Pamphlets come abroad to revive old and for the present unnecessary Disputes But Sirs what need ye talk of a dispute between Me and my Neighbour whilest there is one depending between you and me let us first of all decide the difference that is between us and then we may talk of that between my Neighbour and Me In the mean while I find they throw their Foam about upon others as well as upon me for the Man saith * P. 50. but as for such furious Inquisitours as Mr. Edwards and Mr. Peter Brown I reckon they are so very Passionate that they are utterly incapable of attending to sober Reasoning from plain Christian Principles better for them to Answer our Books than to give us ill Language Nay like a distempered Man he strikes on all sides for to attain to the end of undermining the Church which they all aim at he spares not the most Eminent Men we have in 't for thus he saith †P. 23. Vnitarians are no Deists much less Atheists or as a Reverend Father out of the abundance of his Charity Complements them irreligious profligate Villains but it is to be hoped that he will recal those bitter words at least for his own sake for I am told they are resolved plainly to make it appear to the World that his Lordship's Doctrine in some of his Books accords as much with the Racovian Catechism as theirs But that Reverend Father knows well what he saith and none of them all can Teach him how to speak but as they presume to Wrest the Word of God so they think they may do with the Writings of any Man but that Eminent Person being well able to Vindicate himself it were in me a presumption to attempt it but how can we believe Men who say * P. 31. the sentiments of the Vnitarians set down in the agreement no one that I know of hath undertaken to refute or charge with Heresy Suppose their Opinions have not been refuted or charged with Heresy as contained in the particular Book he names can he deny it to have been so by several Eminent Authors in their Works but these Modern Socinians would bis coctam nobis apponere Crambem bring the same thing over and over again would not they also against the known Truth make the World believe that †P. 29. the Vnitarians have no particular private Opinions about matters commonly held necessary to Salvation different from the Church of England that is if the Bishops and chief Doctors of the Church know what the Church means Here is Pride he must teach the Bishops and Doctors of the Church what it is that they believe as if they believed they know not what yet that being so notorious and palpable an untruth he sometimes pulls in his horns I do confess saith he * P. 29.30 that I much fear the Vnitarians may have private Opinions about Articles commonly held necessary to Salvation different from the Opinions of the Compilers of the Thirty Nine Articles and from the Grammatical literal sense of those Articles for thorough them as thorough our Homilies there runs a vain of that Scheme which at this day is called Calvinism there he owns they have not Cranmer Latimer and Ridley on their side let him if he can clear these two things from Contradiction What he saith * P. 31. that the difference is only about words elsewhere I sufficiently Answered sure I am we much differ in what he saith †P. 28. that what Christanity teaches beyond that which natural reason dictates hath not the efficacy to prevent Atheism which natural reason hath is not this if by Christianity he means Christian Religion which is the natural signification of word and thing to prefer Human Reason before Reveal'd Religion or Scripture and out of this must not we own those modern Socinians to be as bad as
as Wickednesses go by couples within these few Years is sprung up another detestable Abomination I mean Blasphemy a fit match for Idolatry which is now as bold and insolent as ever the other was and as Weeds usually grow faster and thicker than the good Seed so upon a sudden the Nation seems over-grown with it and no prospect of an effectual Remedy except with a sudden removing of the Props which support it and let Men in high Places look to 't as God in his due time will require it at their Hands for he hath said he will call to account those who consent with and are partakers with Sinners Psal 50.18 19 20 21. which they be if they prevent and punish them not when 't is their Duty and in their Power to do 't Woe be to those who prefer their Worldly Interest before that of Christ and who for their Houses Relations and Lands Mark 5. forsake our Saviour's Cause this is like the Gadarenes who loved their Herds of Swine more than his Presence thus once when upon Earth out of Covetousness and for a little Money he was betray'd by one who made a profession of being his Disciple out of weakness he was deny'd by another and out of fear forsaken by them all but out of what he saith we reasonably infer that whosoever loves Houses Lands Money Places Matt. 19.29 or any thing else whatsoever more than him shall suffer Loss and Punishment as he will reward those that are not ashamed of him nor of his Concerns and this last I may apply to those worthy Persons who hitherto used and still do their utmost endeavours in their several Capacities to promote the Lord's Honour enlarge his Kingdom punish and suppress Blasphemy Prophaneness Immorality and all that is contrary to Piety Vertue and Honour and to carry on a thorough Reformation in Doctrines and Manners such need not to care a Straw for the Frowns Revilings Slanders and Hatred of evil and prophane Men as long as they are sure of the Love and Favour of the Son of God which the World can neither give nor take away from them This is a sufficient Compensation and Comfort in this Life which shall be followed with plentiful and unspeakable yea incomparable Rewards in that which is to come Clogs in a Wheel stop its motion so now when God hath put us in the way and laid a foundation to go upon the necessary Work is to remove Lets and Hinderances Wolves tho' never so much in Sheep's Cloathing must never be made Shepherds when there is any poison in the Spring the safest and readiest way to prevent ill consequences and dangers is to purge and cleanse it as soon as possibly may be Places of Trust and of Influence ought to be in the Hands only of those who are able faithful fearing God and sound in the Faith 'T is a necessary part of Prudence when Officers are chosen to be in a place of Trust in any Capacity high or low to be cautious and examine whether or not such who stand be duly qualifi'd 't is a great folly for a Man to trust a Covetous Greedy Corrupt one with his Purse a Bloody Man with his Life and a Tyrannical one with his Liberty Have we not before our Eyes the Imprudence of a Man who once thought with a Protestant Army to have set up Popery Can I think that an Ungodly Blasphemer Swearer Prophane Immoral Man is a fit Person to secure and propagate our true Christian Religion and Piety and to punish and effectually suppress all that is contrary to 't Or will any Man in the World if he hath any grain of Wisdom entrust with his main Concerns an idle vicious Person who neglects his Business and doth not attend his Service Employ as much as you can Pious and good Men for such are valuable in every relation good Fathers good Children good Masters good Servants good Princes good Subjects and take this for a certain Rule he who is not true to God will prove false to Man he who for Worldly Considerations betrays his Conscience will also betray his Trust have a Man of good Principles and you 'll know where to find him let him be one who hath a Religion the true one who owns the fundamentals of true Christian Religion namely a God the Holy Trinity our Saviour's and the Holy Ghost's Divinity who is no Deist nor a prophane Scoffer who ridicules not only Pious Men but Piety it self and is a favourer of those who do I say such a one is thereby unqualified in any publick capacity to serve in a Christian well regulated State 'T is certainly a great Crime to help to throw Poison into any publick Spring which all do who favour bad Men in their unjust designs and soon or late the Country where such things happen shall smart for it and tho' God in case such Men in Places do ride cross in his way or lay as Blocks before him knows well how infallibly to remove them yet still those that for Self-ends helped them to get up have thereby contracted a Guilt and made themselves accessary to the evil by them committed David who was a good and a wise Man saith The wicked walk on every side Psal 12.8 when the vilest Men are exalted No viler Men than Blasphemers and Idolaters for such when once they are in power would frame Mischief by a Law if they could Ps 94.20 We thank God that Idolaters are by Law excluded from bearing Rule or having any Hand in the Administration of the Government would to God we might in every part say so of Blasphemers for they are the Rust and Moth that can make uneffectual all our Blessings good Men make good Times we have too many of those who pretend to be and would seem to be Christians but in truth and reality are far from it may God be pleased to open the Eyes of those that are concern'd to know and reject them Some would countenance Impiety and support Wickedness in Doctrine and Practise under the specious pretence that they are not for Persecution and so by a side-Wind as much as in them lieth cross any thing tending to punish and effectually suppress it but that Vizard can easily be pull'd off for to punish and suppress Impiety and Blasphemy is Persecution no more than 't is Injustice to punish Murthers Robberies and the like Crimes which if Men do not in his due time God will arise Psal 68.1 and his Enemies shall be scattered Now that those who prophane Religion and would overthrow our Christian Church do deserve Punishment we have the best Instance we could wish for no less than that of our Blessed Lord who himself punished the Impious Men who had prophaned Religion and the Temple with their Worldly Concerns for he cast them all out and overthrew their Tables for Merchandise Mat. 21.12 and herein he not only spake but also employed his Hands for
When he had made a Scourge of small Cords he drove them all out of the Temple And 't is observable John 2.15 that what he said in John Make not my Father's House a House of Merchandise In two other Evangelists 't is said My House is the House of Prayer Mat. 21.13 Luke 19.45 so his Father's House and his is the same And John mentions that his Disciples remembred that it was written The Zeal of thine House hath eaten me up Here is a Precedent for all in Authority that love Religion and the Honour of God to be zealous to suppress and punish those who Prophane and Blaspheme it and I must own it to be sad Times when no restraint or curb is set upon them It hath formerly been made a Question which of these two is the worse either when every thing is lawful or when nothing is lawful Tho' both be extremes which commonly are vicious yet the first I reckon to be the worse of the two for I had rather to be deprived of some kind of Liberty than to see others with trespassing upon that Liberty to do and say what they list I can in Temporals be content to part with some Liberty rather than to see others in Spirituals to take a Liberty of Blaspheming and Prophaning God's Holy Name and Religion Yet I would not have a sort of People in the World to take an Advantage of this so as to deprive me of a just and honest Liberty under the Notion of restraining others from an unlawful Freedom in indifferent and circumstantial Matters Liberty may be allowed when it must not be in necessary and Fundamentals That busie and restless Spirit of Socinianism doth upon all occasions discover it self whereof we have a late instance in what happened at Canterbury which is to huff and defie our Church in the very Face of the Primate 'T is a shame that some few Foreigners Tradesmen and others corrupted by their own Natural Confidence and tho' encouragement they here meet with should be suffered to mock our Holy Religion and in spight of our Laws after Tricks Shufflings and such Circumstances as make the thing the more odious to set up Antichristian Meetings as those who are informed of the Matter well know They have the Face to pretend to the benefit of the Toleration Act passed in the first Year of William and Mary but by a Clause in the same they are not qualified for it except they declare their Approbation of and subscribe the 39 Articles very few excepted which relate to the Church Government and Ceremonies for the Act is intended for the Ease and Liberty only of those who differ in Circumstantials or at most those who overthrow not the Fundamentals which they who do are unworthy of or else it were by Law to allow of Impiety Blasphemy Idolatry or any Heresie and in that part of the Act relating to Quakers a Sect very unsound in the Faith there is a great tie upon them for 't is said they shall subscribe a Profession of their Faith in these Words I A. B. profess Faith in God the Father and in Jesus Christ his Eternal Son the true God and in the Holy Spirit one God blessed for evermore and do acknowledge the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testament to be given by Divine Inspiration Here is a Test for Socinians wherein is asserted the first of the 39 Articles of one God in three Persons so they declare they believe the Holy Trinity and the Divinity of the Son and of the Holy Ghost as also the Divine Authority of Scripture Now I say that tho' this be expressed only in that part of the Act which relates to Quakers yet we must take it to be the Intention of the Law to reach every one that comes under the benefit of the Act and this is so plain that about the latter end of the same all Anti-Trinitarians such are the Vnitarians are excluded from the benefit of it the words are plain Provided always and be it farther Enacted by the Authority aforesaid that neither this Act nor any Clause Article or any thing herein contained shall extend or be construed to extend to give any ease benefit or advantage to any Papist or Popish Recusant whatsoever or any Person that shall deny in his Preaching or Writing the Doctrine of the Blessed Trinity as are declared in the aforesaid Articles of Religion After this we may well wonder at any one who will say there is any benefit by this Act intended for Socinians it appearing so much to the contrary that there is no Toleration allowed them By what I said out of the Act it sufficiently appears how binding it is against those who deny the Holy Trinity as Socinians For they who pretend to the benefit of it to qualifie themselves must not only take the Oath to the Government but also subscribe to every Doctrinal Article of the 39 in the first and second whereof chiefly the Anti-Trinitarian detestable Heresie is fully Condemned This as to the Letter of the Law but herein according to the Gospel there is a Christian Prudence to be used Socinians as well as Jesuits have Equivocations and mental Reservations They sometimes to serve their turn subscribe things which as some of them have been heard to say either they do not understand or else have within themselves a particular meaning thereof Now upon such occasions the Officers concerned to tender the Oaths and receive Subscriptions ought to be Cautious how they admit some Men to 't In a Tract I have written concerning Oaths I mentioned several necessary things upon this matter only this I shall say for the present that when there is no ground of Suspicion nor any thing to create doubts of the Sincerity of him or them that are to Swear and Subscribe then the Oath and Subscription to end the business may be admitted leaving it for God to judge of the Truth and Reality of the Party concerned But it should be otherwise when there is cause to doubt of a Man's sincerity for fear of being Instrumental in his Ruin and Damnation I would not easily believe a Man whom I have ground to suspect he is a Lyar nor tender an Oath to one whom I hear to be apt to forswear I do not say a Man may absolutely refuse to put him to his Oath but not to be accessary to his Perjury I would be very wary and cautious and endeavour to find out whether he be real or comes with an ill design Why should I put a Dagger or a Cup of Poison into the hand of one who may happen not to be sound in his Mind and not Compos Mentis therewith to Stab and Poison himself or others in this case of Heresie we have a considerable instance in the Person of Arrius whom we heard of when I spake of the Council of Nice 't is thus The Emperour Constantine upon the suggestions of an Arrian Priest whom
as if done to himself and consequently will punish the Magistrate for hindring them from worshipping those false Gods when they believe them to be true ones Good God! What Times are we come to that such things are suffered to be Printed and go unpunish'd The Magistrate may not punish those who dishonour the true God when they ought to punish those who dishonour false Gods Thus Papists do well to punish those who despise their Wafer-God but those who despise and blaspheme the true Son of God the Lord Jesus must not be meddled with These abominable Lines of Idolatrous Theology I read a second nay a third time thinking I had been mistaken at the first reading A Man who dares to write such things will say any thing else In another place he denies or at least doubts of God's care of his Church or of his power to defend it For he saith pag. 61. If the Pagan Emperours had been for promoting by force what according to their Sentiments was the true Religion they had utterly extirpated the very Name of a Christian A great mistake in him for several of them as Maxentius Diocletianus and many before and Julian the Apostate through cruel Persecutions did all they could towards it but God suffered them not and he never will for our Saviour hath promised Matth. 16.18 The Gates of Hell shall not prevail against his Church Thus they make little of the Church if at Man's pleasure it may utterly be destroy'd whereunto answers their making Religion to be meerly a Priest-craft as they term it also the Author makes no difference between acting for a good or for a bad Cause and so alters the Question which is not Whether every Magistrate may in matter of Religion punish every Opinion contrary to his own But whether a true Christian Magistrate be bound to suppress what overthrows the Fundamentals of true Christian Religion pag. 81. Therefore his Instances of Gallio of the Town-Clerk of Ephesus and of Felix are not to the purpose I suppose he will own the Christian Religion to be now the true one in opposition to the Pagan or to the Jewish in as much as relateth to the coming of the Messiah that one must oppose not Truth but what is contrary to 't therefore the Persons named are not fit Patterns to be imitated by Christian Magistrates Gallio was a Deputy of Achaia Acts 18.12 17. there to maintain the Roman Authority wherefore he prudently would not meddle nor trouble himself with a Difference about Religion among the Jews which was not his business A Town-clerk wisely took care to avoid giving the Romans cause to say that in a tumultuous and seditious way chap. 19. without a just cause they had gathered together to disturb the Government which thereupon might have call'd them in question As for Felix he was the Roman Governour who minded to enrich himself and not to decide Matters of Controversie about Religion among the Jews a Covetous Man who hoped that Money should have been given him of Paul ch 24.26 So these Examples hold no proportion with the Duty of a Christian Magistrate to act against those who would overthrow Christianity And why should not the Magistrate take care of the good of the Souls as well as of that of the Body of the Subjects and punish Soul-destroying Errors and Practices Among the Jews a stubborn Son upon this Accusation by the Parents before the Elders how that he was a Glutton and a Drunkard Deut. 21.20 was stoned to Death and shall they who among Christians Blaspheme God be unpunished Of two contrary Propositions if one be true necessarily the other must be false 't is so of two Opinions in Religion if the Doctrine for the Most Holy Trinity and Divinity of Christ be true as it is then its contrary must be false And do not God's Laws bid us to follow adhere unto and be for the truth so as to promote it Every one in his Station ought to be against what is contrary to 't And to say the truth as this is the interest of Religion so 't is become the Magistrates concern to mind it upon his own account for that sort of Men with open Mouth and plainly tell him he hath nothing to do to meddle with their Religion whether true or false nor tho' Blasphemous and Idolatrous And on the other side this Author would influence the Members of Parliament who are for Penal Laws against their Blasphemies with suggesting that thereby they may happen to act against themselves which cannot be except they were of the same Principles with them thus he speaks pag. 43. Therefore it shews the greatest Indiscretion in those who tho' they have a share in the Legislature yet are subject to the Laws themselves to consent to any persecuting ones because they cannot be sure but that they are contriving Rods for their own Backs They cannot forbear ever calling Persecution any thing tending to restrain them the cause must be examined to find out the true Name of the thing 't is not the manner but the cause of Death that denominates one a Martyr 't is Justice not Persecution to punish Idolatry and Blasphemy and make use of a restraining Power Herein the Protestant Maxims differ from the Popish that these require a blind Obedience and will not admit others to speak for themselves but Protestants do We cannot approve the Socinians Latitude in advising and encouraging every one to read all manner of Books stuffed with Heresies and Blasphemies pag. 119. which is as dangerous as to put a Cup full of Poison into a Child's Hand or of one who knows not what it is Must every Ploughman or other Ignorant Person who neither knows nor understands the things of himself explain matters of Salvation or be Judge thereof In God's Name let every one read Scripture for all therein is excellent and good no Poison therein as in some Mens Books and therein let them be instructed and when Difficulties occur advised and directed by sound and knowing Men But chiefly upon the reading of the Word let them often be upon their Knees to beg of God to guide them by his Holy Spirit Some are not able to discern a Fish from a Serpent which commonly lies hidden in those unsound Books and by reason of natural corruption some would be apt to choose the worse I know that when the necessary means prescribed in God's Word to inform and make us understand have been used then every one must apply it to himself not of himself for that application is the Work of God's Spirit every one is not able to understand only those whom from above 't is given to pag. 120. 'T is not out of any mistrust of the Goodness and Truth of our Cause as he seems to insinuate that we would not have those that are not sufficiently instructed in the Grounds of it Converse either with the Heretick Persons or
with their pernicious Books For I thank God we are always ready openly to assert and defend it but some not so well grounded as the thing requires might through the Cavils and Sophistry of Seducers happen to be entangled and deceived the Wolves would gladly be among the Sheep for which purpose they often disguise themselves in Sheeps cloathing but the Sheep must carefully avoid coming near the Wolf pag. 127 128 129. But this Author pleads for a Communion hence it is that with us they would be accounted Members of the Church and be thought to agree with us But I wonder not that the Scabby Sheep would come among the Sound for there they can catch no harm but can do some but on the contrary the Sound ones need not to desire the Company of those which be Rotten for they can receive some harm tho' they can do none This People by means of a confused mixture would joyn God with the Idol Christ with Belial and Light with Darkness so Truth with Falshood Protestants with Papists Jews Idolaters and Blasphemers Is not this a kind of Juggling But upon what Terms can this Union be For we must stand upon what God saith to Jeremiah Jer. 15.19 Let them return unto thee but return not thou unto them Now saith there this Author this Communion is the way whereby all Schisms Heresies Hatred Animosities and Vncharitableness would be destroyed yet our Saviour and his Apostles say there must be Schisms and Heresies but they know a way how infallibly to root out all such things What Mountebanks in Religion are they who pretend to cure of all Spiritual Diseases and quickly restore Christendom to Truth and Unity Thus far I stepp'd aside to take notice of these few things among many more which this Author hath said because in general they contribute towards my main design to shew the Spirit of Socinianism and now in particular I must vindicate those places of Scripture which demonstrate it to be part of the Magistrates Office to punish Blasphemers we can plainly see they would make Religion subservient unto what they call the Publick Good and they mind the Glory of God if at all at the most in subordination to the State Two Texts of Scripture they answer one out of the New the other out of the Old Testaments The Words of the first are these Rulers are not a Terrour to good Works Rom. 13. Job 31. v. 3 4. v. 2. but to the evil Wilt thou not then be afraid of the Power Do that which is good and thou shalt have praise of the same for he is the Minister of God to thee for good But if thou do that which is evil be afraid for he beareth not the Sword in vain Here the Magistrate is said to be by God's Ordinance and a Minister of God and can it reasonably be thought that God hath appointed Rulers to mind only the Concerns of their People and not at all his own Honour and Service Scripture saith 2 Chron. 19.6 They judge not for Man but for the Lord often such cases happen as are not between Man and Man but between God and Man Must Justice be rendered for Man and not for God This is as absurd as to say That any one whether Judges Governours or others Commissionated by the King are to take care only of the Subjects concerns but not at all of the King 's whose Servants and Ministers they are Is there any word in the Text that can afford the least ground to confine the Office and Power of Rulers within Civil Matters and to exclude those which relate to Religion I can see no such Clause in the Commission neither they nor no Body else if they do let them shew it Without restriction or limitation 't is absolutely said He is not a Terrour to good Works but to the evil of what nature soever thus the Commission is general and by vertue of it he ought without exception to praise and reward every good Work to punish and revenge every evil one but they cannot deny that in things of Religion as well as in Civil Matters are good and evil Works and the very Name of Conscience v. 5. for whose sake we must be subject which is within the Predicament of Religion doth abundantly express that as for Religion and Conscience sake we ought to obey so it must be about Religious as well as Civil Matters concerning which he exercises his Authority otherwise 't is plainly to introduce Atheism into Human Society for no Religion no God and there is no God owned where Religion is not minded and by whom should it be but by those who have the Power in Hand and the Administration of the Government which if neglected as good to live in Woods and Forests among wild Beasts so it will be homo homini lupus This the very Heathens were so sensible of that the Wise among them to tame the Ferocity of some Mens Nature did in order to 't lay Religion as the Foundation for indeed except there be something of it such is the Temper of most Men that they never will submit to order Hence it is that no Nation tho' never so Wild and Barbarous but had something of Religion by these means Numa Pompilius brought under some Rules and Discipline that parcel of Rogues Murtherers and Villains in every kind of which Romulus had formed his Kingdom and took care to instruct and give them Laws and Principles of Religion such as they were and afterwards the Romans took care to send their Children into Hetruria or Toscany to have them instructed in the way of their false Religion and when an Addition or Alteration was therein to be made 't was ever done by the Publick Authority which shews this Man's great Mistake in what he saith p. 81. But to come to God's People how careful were the good Kings of Judah to reform Abuses crept into Religion as appears by the Examples of Asa Jehoshaphat Hezekiah and Josiah But let us take special notice of Moses's Behaviour upon the occasion of the Golden Calf under God he was the chief Magistrate of that numerous People did he not make use of his Authority when he took the calf which they had made and burnt it in the fire and ground it to powder Exod. 32.20 and strawed it upon the waters and made the children of Israel drink of it Besides he upbraided and chid Aaron his elder Brother and High-priest when he angrily said unto him What did this people unto thee ver 21 that thou hast brought so great a sin upon them Meerly by his complyance to shew how when God's Service was concerned he minded no relation in the World as 't is every Magistrate's Duty to do specially of those who know and worship the true God who also are in Conscience bound to restrain and punish those who are not content to go about robbing the Son of God of his true Divine
Prophaneness and Spiritual Wickedness No Humane Law doth per se and of it self bind the Conscience only in as much as 't is grounded upon God's own who is the only Judge of it and can Men imagine that any Wise Law-giver will make Laws to maintain every Man's Right and Property and not in the least mind his own Therefore we must say that God hath given the Magistrate Power though not to Exercise any Office in Holy things as without a special Call to Preach the Word and Administer the Sacraments yet to defend maintain and be a Nursing Father to the Church which is God's House They would take advantage of this that when the Epistle was written to the Christian Church in Rome they were under the Dominion of Infidels who would not commend or enconrage them in matters of their Religion seeing they were not for but against it Let it be so yet tho' they would not own the Cause the Effects they sometimes would praise and commend as Humility Self-denial Patience Sobriety Temperance Gentleness and such Effects of a Christian Frame and Spirit The very Enemies of Christ sometimes admired to see those Graces which are the Fruits of Faith and of Christian Religion therefore saith the Apostle Be ye holy in all manner of conversation 1 Pet. 1.15 and this is not only for the discharge of their own Conscience but also in Relation to the Infidels and for the Credit of Christian Profession Chap. 2.12 15. for he adds Having your conversation honest among the Gentiles that whereas they speak against you as Evil doers they may by your good works which they shall behold glorifie God in the day of Visitation And because of a Prejudice which Christ's Enemies had against Religion and those who profess'd it which made them speak ill of both he saith For so is the will of God that with well doing ye may put to silence the ignorance of foolish Men. This the Apostle learned of his and our great Lord and Master who had said Let your light so shine before Men Matth. 5.16 that they may see your good works and glorifie your Father which is in heaven So the Good Works of Christians might have praise from Christ's Enemies and Infidels such were the Roman Emperours Besides that St. Paul did intend those Rules not only for the present when he wrote to the Romans but also for after times for all those things were written for our Instruction and of others to the Worlds end it related also to Christian Emperours Kings and other Magistrates in after Ages who according to God's Promise were to be Nursing Fathers to the Church and Defenders of the Faith Now this I say that as in the Text is a generality of Persons exhorted to be subject to superiour Powers for 't is said Let every soul be subject and the Apostle speaking in the Singular Wilt thou Ver. 3. and if thou do Ver 4. meaneth every individual Person in the World So there is an Universality in the things committed unto the Magistrates Care which are reduced under these two Heads Religious and Secular Species are contain'd under the Genus and Particulars as said before under Generals When we pray for our Daily Bread therein Meat Drink Cloathes and other Necessaries for Life are included Now I am to take notice of his Answer to the other Text Job 31.28 This also were an iniquity to be punish'd by the Judge Speaking of Idolatry Here he thinks he hath a great advantage for the words to be punished by the are not in the Original and hereupon applauds himself thus It 's an easie thing to have proofs if Men when they cannot find them are resolved to make them To make Proofs when there are none and to deny Proofs when there are is proper for Socinians which we have too many Instances of but to tho thing 't is true those words are not in the Hebrew but any that is acquainted with that Tongue knows how short and Concise it is that 's the Idiome of it which he nor I cannot change but to make it Intelligible in other Languages something ought to be supplyed in the Original 't is thus This also an iniquity the Judge Which in English and every other modern Language is very lame there is no Verb Substantive is or were an Iniquity which any one may see ought to be understood Now I say that what is inserted is no Addition to the Original with an intent to impose upon the Reader for 't is Printed in a different Letter but only to make it Sense in English without which it hath none or at least a very imperfect one I also add that the Words inserted do express the true Sense and Meaning of the place an Iniquity and the Judge or Judged or Judicial are in the Original to what purpose upon the account of an Iniquity or Crime can a Judge be brought in but to punish it Doth not the Iniquity of Idolatry which is the thing in question deserve Punishment and who but the Judge may lawfully inflict it But he is so afraid of a Judge that though it be in the Hebrew yet he leaves it out for thus he renders the Text For pag. 70. this might he accounted to me an iniquity he is not content to leave out the word Judge but wedges in accounted which is not except he will deduce it from Judge and Judged for a Crime is accounted or imputed when the guilty is punished for it The better to understand this Verse we ought to compare it with another in the same Chapter containing the like expressions in the case of Adultery For this is an heinous crime yea 't is an iniquity to be punished by the Judges in the plural ver 11 there are some Iniquities which God alone doth punish but this of Adultery as the other of Idolatry must be punished by the Judges In this Verse no more than in the other the Word is is not in nor to be punished by yet 't is well known by God's Law Adultery and Idolatry were to be punished with Death so that it justifies bringing in the words to be punished by and as to the thing 't is not material whether Job lived before or after the Law To explain the thing out of several places of Scripture appears the necessity of supplying some words in our Translations to make up the Sense Three only I shall mention The first is out of Amos 't is said chap. 1.3 6 9 11 13. For three transgressions of Damascus and for four I will not turn away the punishment thereof The word Punishment is not in the Hebrew which in English makes certainly the Sense imperfect Turn away what the Punishment thereof of Damascus so that the word Punishment must be added to make up the Sense and that in seven several Verses of the same Chapter The other two are taken out of the Psalms whereof the first in the Original