schisms and divisions The Apostle John 1. 4 6 7. layeth down a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a mark or character how we may know the spirit of Truth from the spirit of Error the spirit of Truth is a Fountain of love and consequently the spirit of Error is the spring of discord as we have found by woful experience Error in doctrine is by our Saviour compared to Leaven Mat. 16.6 compared with the 12. Verse now as Leaven diffuseth a sowrenesse into the whole mass or lump whereever it cometh so also doth Error diffuse a sowreness and moroseness of spirit whereby he becomes unsociable and apt to divide and separate himself from the rest of his brethren that is leavened with it even as the Pharisees did in our Saviours time whose name with the name of Nabal are symbolical Sect. 13. Now then that obedience to the Act of Uniformity is the way to unity as it is a blessed means for the mortifying of these grand ring-leaders of division and disobedience may be thus evidenc'd as it doth remove the occasions of committing these sins For did all that professe the true Reformed Protestant Religion observe an Uniformity in their publick Worship and in the rites and ceremonies thereto belonging all distinctions of men and parties would soon vanish away there would be no occasion given for the drawing forth those woful fruits of Pride before-named neither in Ministers or People Sect. 14. As the Minister by his obedience to these indifferent things acts and exercises those graces which are diametrically opposite to pride and self conceitedness viz. humility and self-denyal and declareth that he hath got the victory over that to which the reverend Calvin saith the wit of man is nothing more adverse and contrary to viz. subjection Sect. 15. So the People are thereby delivered from the occasion of putting forth those dividing sins before named in whom there is a natural aptitude upon the forbearance of the Ministers in these modes of Worship to atgue Surely those men do see more into the iniquity of the Common prayer the Surplice c. then all the Governours that enjoyn them or the rest of their Brethren that observe them and have therefore a more pure delicate and tender conscience and consequently their Ministry is like to be most soul-saving And thereupon all other Ministers are usually censured for Time-servers and men-pleasers by which means Christian love and charity is destroyed and divisions are contracted and continued That therefore which removeth these occasions as for all to be uniform in their external modes of Worship doth as I have before shewed must needs be the way to unity Sect. 16. Secondly as Pride so Error also is a dividing sin as I have before shewed Now that which taketh away one occasion and a great one too of diffusing and spreading Error must needs be the way to unity now Uniformity in prayer doth this and was therefore by the Church in the primitive times appointed for this end and purpose Because that Hereticks did convey and spread their poysons in their Prayers In the Council of Milva which was in the year 416. it was appointed That none should use any prayers but such as were appointed by a Synod Sect. 17. There is a desultory levity in the minds even of some good men whereby they are subject to offend in their publick Devotions without a great measure of humility and spiritual prudence which all Ministers have not and therefore it was the judgement of the reverend Calvin in his Epist ad Protector in the Reign of King Edward the Sixth that there should be a set form of prayer and Ecclosiastical rites saith he Quoad formulam precum rituum Ecclesiast valde approbo à quo pastori in functione discedere non liceat c. Observe he would have a set Form of prayer and certain rites and ceremonies but were they to be left to the Ministers choice whether he would conform to them yea or no I suppose not he was not of Mr. Baxters mind in his Disputations as to this point nor yet with the Petitioners for peace but saith expresly From which form of Prayer and Ecclesiastical Rites it may not be lawful for the Pastors in their function to depart They were then to be imposed by Law upon them and for what end for these three Reasons first that thereby provision may be made for the simplicity of some secondly that the consent that all the Churches have amongst themselves may more certainly appear and lastly also that the extravagant levity of some that affect novelties may be prevented So that it is very evident that this reverend person did approve of a Uniformity in prayer and other rites as the way to unity as it did conduce to concord and agreement as it prevented dividing sins Sect. 18. I proceed now to the second Branch for the proof of the proposition and that is this That which tends to the honour of our Religion the edification and building up of the Church that must needs be the way to Unity But now if all persons both Ministers and People would be Uniform and there were an universal agreement about these modes of Worship and Discipline the Reformed Protestant Religion which for our Non conformity and divisions amongst our selves by our Adversaries the Papists is very much reviled as you find Harding in his Answer to the Apology of the Church of England flouting them even for the Non-conformists that were amongst them in Queen Elizabeths dayes Sect. 19. I say how would our Religion be honoured nay not onely so but how would it strike a terrour into the hearts of all Romish Catholicks and fill them with despair of ever seeing the Church of England reconciled to the Church of Rome for to see these woful divisions that have been amongst us removed by an universal conformity amongst Protestants in these matters which are and have been the cause of such unchristian discords Now if this would not edifie and build up the Church judge you Besides how amiable then would our assemblies be and how delightful would Gods publick Worship be to such as desire to fear his Name and to reverence his Sanctuary to behold it celebrated orderly and uniformly while all that worship do sit and stand and kneel together as if but one body while all do speak the same things required of them as if but one mouth Sect. 20. This was the practice of the primitive Church long before Popery I remember I have read that the whole Congregation were then so uniform in publick prayer lifting up their voices so all together when they said Amen which affixed to our prayers signifieth a full consent and agreement to what is prayed for I say it was uttered with such uniformity that St. Jerome as I have read compared their sounding of Amen in the Church unto a clap of Thunder and St. Basil to the roaring of the Sea You see therefore that this Uniformity
things Mr. Ball saith pag. 11. Antichrist hath unjustly usurped the Church of God may lawfully lay claim unto And therefore if our Book of Common prayer saith he pag. 12. please the Papists it is but in some things wherein in reverence to Antiquity we come too nigh them in some Rites and Ceremonies But with the substance of the ministration it self they cannot be pleased unlesse they will be displeased with their own service and will renounce their own Religion Sect. 12. Surely methinks the judgment of this learned and moderate man might very much defend us against not onely the fear of Popery he having affirmed that the Papists cannot be pleased with our Book of Common prayer as to the substance of its Ministration unless they will renounce their own Religion But may cause such a day-break of light to shine upon some of our understandings as that we may be perswaded that it is lawful to declare they will conform to the use of the Common prayer of the Church of England it being no false and Idolatrous Worship as too many might apprehend from what hath been within this year or two written to exasperate mens minds against it But that I may make the lawfulness thereof to appear more evidently I shall proceed to consider of the English Liturgie and ceremonies as they are by some apprehended to symbolize too much with the Mass-book and being too like the same and that therefore upon this account conformity is unlawful it being absolutely affirmed Plus ultra pag. 30. We say it is unlawful for the Church of England to retain either in Doctrine Worship or Discipline any conformity to the Church of Rome Sect. 13. I do profess before the searcher of all hearts out of any desire to abstain from all appearance of evil When I first saw this Book I desired to take great notice how this Authority did by the authority of the Scriptures convincingly prove the same For to conform to the Doctrine of the Church of Rome is doubtless unlawful to conform to the Worship and Discipline of the Church of Rome in statu corrupto in that stace wherein it was before Reformation and is now in at this present time is sinful and unlawful But that to conform to the Common prayer book of the Church of England and those few retained ceremonies because that they symbolize with the Church of Rome That this should be sinful and unlawful notwithstanding so confidently affirmed I leave to the determination of the wise and learned upon the examination of the proofs of Plus ultra for the same Sect. 14. I do find indeed that Mr. Ball doth speak to this purpose That if any have mistaken the book of Common prayer because that it hath too much likelihood to the Mass-book he saith that hath not been the judgement of the Non-conformists alone others have said and written so much that never condemned the use of the book or all things therein contained pag. 9. From whence I observe that there is a great deal of difference between the disliking of a form that doth in something as is supposed symbolize with that form that is in a corrupt Church and the condemning of it as sinful and unlawful as Plus ultra doth And yet that I may deal faithfully before I come to speak to the arguments of Plus ultra I think I should do a good work tending to our healing if I should offer but some honest inferences from Mr. Balls conclusions and concessions that may take off that dislike may be in the minds of men which may hinder an unfeigned assent and consent in declaring their confo rmity Sect. 15. For it being granted that a form of prayer is lawful and this of the Church of England so much vindicated as you have heard and may find further in pag. 3. where Mr. Ball saith that the Non-conformists can prove the Religion and the Worship of the Church of England to be of God and that by such plain Texts of Scripture against which the gates of hell shall never prevà il I humbly conceive that the offence taken at its too much likelihood to the Mass-book pag. 9. may be taken away by the very reason that Mr. Ball giveth for the same pag. 12. which he saith is in Reverence to Antiquity To avoid the imputation of novelty in a Church it is necessary to keep to those externall modes as to phrases of speech and rites for comeliness in Gods Worship which have been most ancient in the Church But if this do it not sufficiently deferring to answer what I find alledged but not proved by Mr. Ball pag. 7. as exceptions against the said book as in some points disagreeing with Gods Word pag. 7. for which they judge it unlawfull to subscribe as agreeable to the Scripture which doubtless may lawfully be done by Mr. Balls own Doctrine Sect. 16. I say forbearing to speak further to these particulars being but the same objections made by Mr. Josias Nicholls and other Non-conformists long before which I shall through divine assistance speak more particularly to in the next Chapter I shall desire that what Mr. Ball doth declare in the name of all the Non-conformists to his time that did judge the book in the form thereof so nigh the Papists pag. 15. may be considered who saith that herein they shew but what they judge most convenient not condemning the book for the substance thereof So that some of the Non-conformists of our time are gone much beyond this pious and prudent man who upon this argument doth but onely shew what was the judgment of the Authors of the Admonition and others in this case that it was not convenient to use a form so near the Papists but he saith no such thing himself being more wise then to judge in a case already determined by the Law of the Land which God had not determined against by his Law in his Word Sect. 17. But though Mr. Ball is so modest yet Mr. Plus ultra is more magisterial who as you have read out of the place before quoted affirmeth that it is unlawful for the Church of England to retain any conformity to the Church of Rome in Worship or Discipline Come we therefore to examine his grounds for it pag. 30. And because we know from whence I observe many heads were laid together to form this argument this will hardly down by any reasons we can lay before you we shall commend this argument to you under the credit of your right learned Prelate Jewell please you to peruse pag. 325 326. of his Defence The learned and godly men at whose Persons it pleaseth you so rudely to scoffe saith Jewell to Harding Mr. Doctor Harding used to scoffe at Calvin and Zuingliùs and to upbraid Jewell with them that refuse either to go in your apparel or otherwise to shew themselves note Sir like unto you have age sufficient and can answer for themselves notwithstanding thus much I 'le
he is said to be in this exercised as Gods Minister to take vengeance on him that doth evil the greater therefore the evil is the more to be suppressed and the greater the good is the more to be inforced Sect. 5. St. Augustine in his 50. Epistle hath a very considerable passage to this purpose Who being in his right wits will say to Christian Kings Take you no care who defendeth or impugneth in your Realms the Church of Christ your master let it not pertain to you who list to be sacrilegious or religious within your Kingdom And upon this account he doth challenge the Donatists Cry thus if you dare Let murthers be punished adulteries c. onely sacriledge which he expounds to be a contempt of God his Truth his Church we will not have punished by Princes Laws And again saith he will the Donatists though they were convinced of a sacrilegious schism say That it belongeth not to the Princes power to correct or puâ—ish such things Sect. 6. Observe I beseech you besides the Scripture the judgment of this ancient Father and that it was the opinion of the Donatists who were very great Scismaticks as I find in the Arraignment of schism by Mr. Brinsley they also it appeareth did deny the Christian Magistrate to meddle in matters of Religion I wish this error be not found amongst such as Mr. John Ball wrote against in the answering of John Can or any other besides the great Factors for Rome the Jesuites Sect. 7. I proceed therefore to prove this to be the Magistrates office in the third place by the practice of the first Christian Emperors that submitted to Christs Gospel Constantine commanded matters of Religion as Eusebius in vita Constant lib. 3. cap. 38. lib. 3. cap. 27. he sheweth what a Nursing father he was to the Church of Christ how he called Councils and in many of their Synods did not sit idle but as a Moderator among them and confirmed their decrees with his seal And as Constantine so also did Constantius and after him Justinian who in his Code repeateth not onely thâ— Laws of former Emperors touching the Christian Faith Baptisme the Church c. but in his Authenticks he maketh many new constitutions in which he disposeth oâ— matters about Gods Worship as in what places by what persons with what loudness of voice they are to administer The like also did Charles the great the Emperor of the West part 800. years after Christ in his Preface to his Laws Praefat. Caroli in leges Francisc there is this passage Therefore O you Pastors of Christs Church and Teachers of his flock have we directed commissions untâ— you that will joyn with you to redress those things which need reformation in our Name and by virtue of our Authority And that this did belong to Christian Kings ever since the plantation of Christian Religion in our Land I find by a Letter of Eluthorius Bishop of Rome unto King Lucius 169. à passione Christi in this Letter he saith That hâ— is Gods Vicar in his Kingdom according to the saying of the Psalmist Give the King thy judgments O God and thy righteousness to the Kings son The Kings sons be Christian people and folk of his Realm Fox Mon. pag. 96. who if they be divided you ought to gather in concord and peace Sect. 8. And that this belongeth to this day to our Kings to meddle in matters of Religion is evident by several Statute-Laws that Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction is annexed to the Imperial crown of this Realm I may have occasion to name some hereafter and therefore forbear at present Having I hope fully proved by the Light of Nature Scripture the practice of Christian Kings at all times to this day that it belongeth to the Magistrates office to command in matters of Religion though not to make God a new Worship yet to command about the modes thereof Sect. 9. I shall speak but a word of the second part of the Proposition That it belongeth to the Church-governors and Pastors to command about matters of Religion also but so as to be subject to the Higher powers 1 Thes 5.12 13. Heb. 13.17 1 Cor. 11.34 The Apostle Paul having given as it were several Canons for reforming the great abuses that were about the administration of the Lords Supper he saith The rest I will set in order when I come And the like commission he giveth to Titus 1.5 For this cause left I thee in Creet to set in order the things that were wanting as I appointed thee or commanded thee He doth not say as God hath commanded but as I have appointed The practice of the Synod in restraining the Christian Gentiles from their liberty of eating bload doth shew that it belongeth to Church-governours to command about indifferent things and the modes of Worship and Discipline And thus now having proved that which I judge very necessary to reconcile mens minds to obedience if once the conscience be perswaded that it belongeth to the Magistrates Office to command what is the subject matter of this Uniformity I shall in the next place proceed to explain what this Vniformity is which the Act requireth in order to the proof of my Proposition That obedience to the Act of Vniformity is the way to Unity CHAP. IV. The term Uniformity explained and this Proposition proved That obedience to the Act for Uniformity is the way to Unity Section 1. COncerning the term Vniformity I shall not spend much Ink or Paper in a critical or Etymological discourse thereof for to speak de nomine of the Name is to no great purpose further then it makes the thing required more intelligible I must confess I do not find the term in Scripture but yet as Epiphan lib. 3. haeres 73. Nomen substantiae non ponitur nude nec in veteri nec novo Testamento sensus verò ubique est But the sense or essence thereof we may find in many places of Scripture commanded and commended that we should all speak the same things and with one mind and mouth glorifie God And that is the chief thing propounded by this Law pag. 71. viz. An universal agreement in the publick Worship of Almighty God Sect. 2. I have therefore but one thing from the term Vniformity to observe as to its Etymoligy if I mistake not and that is this Uniform doth signifie one form mode or manner in which by a universal agreement the publick Worship of God is to be performed And were this but well considered this Act would be the more readily obeyed it requiring of us no more then what Gods Word commands or allows and his Church hath practised as you shall read hereafter that in the manner of our publick Worship we should be uniform the whole Church to have but one mode and one rule for its rites and ceremonies Now take the term Vniformity in my proposition in this sense for one form mode or worship to be observed by all
that are members of our visible Church and I humbly conceive it to be a seasonable Truth to be treated on That obedience to this Act for Uniformity is the way to Unity Sect. 3. The reason in general why it is likely so to be is because that our chief discords dissentions and divisions which we so long have laboured under have been about our modes of Worship and Discipline That they have been so from the very first beginning of the troubles of Frankefort to this very day he is a stranger in our Israel that knoweth it not yet if you will not take it from me be pleased to take it from Mr. Baxter who in the Postcript of his Epistle to the Reader before his Treatise of the Vain Religion of the Formal Hyppocrite having cleared the Doctrine of the Church of England from being any matter of our most unchristian discord he sayes The more is the pity that the very modes of Worship and Discipline should be the matter of such sharp and uncharitable discords Now then if our sharp and uncharitable discords be and have been about the modes of Worship and Discipline then for all to observe one mode or form or rule in publick Worship and Discipline must needs be the way to unity and agreement Sect. 4. This at first view may seem to be Durus sermo a very hard saying who can bear it and I do the more incline to believe it by what I have read which discovers how contrary the apprehensions of some learned men are to this Truth Who have therefore pleaded very much for Non-conformity and a liberty for persons to chuse or refuse what form or mode of Worship they please as the way to peace Now this I say being the general argument against Vniformity with the means conducing thereunto as I find in the Petition for peace and also in Mr. Baxters sive Disputations I shall make bold with all tenderness and meekness and with much respect to those worthy persons to weigh and consider of the truth and strength thereof Sect. 6. The argument I find in the Petition for peace pag. 14. in these or the like words Nothing more affects us then to think of the lamentable divisions that have been caused and are still like to be whilest things unnecessary are imposed and on the contrary how blessed a unity and peace we might enjoy if these occasions of divisions were removed So that here in short lyeth as is said if I mistake not the ground of all these lamentable divisions about modes of Worship even since the Reformation begun in King Edwards dayes to this time That things unnecessary have been imposed And that this is the chief exception against our Superiours commands I find pag. 12 16 17. and others in the said Petition for peace that they are esteemed unnecessary but that I find them not to be charged as absolutely sinful in themselves in all that book is worthy of observation For this being acknowledged in the general by those persons of that moderation and piety which were to review the Book of Common Prayer c. That they are but unnecessary and not sinful Sect. 7. I humbly conceive that it should put a great stand to the thoughts of such who are methinks too forward to consider Whether onely for non-obedience to unnecessary things in their own judgment or in the judgment of some others that have taken up this tradition from the troubles of Frankfort it be lawful for them to lay down their Ministry or to do that which might by Law deprive them of the same Before I proceed further I shall crave leave to ask this modest question Whether or no this argument against obedience to the commands of our Superiours because we judge the things commanded to be unnecessary is not onely a principle of division but of confusion in all Government Sect. 8. I remember that I have somewhere read that Licurgus the Law-giver to the Lacedemonians being moved by one to establish a Democratical Government in the Commonwealth he bid him go home and exercise it first in his own family And surely if we do but seriously consider of it we shall find that were but this objection brought against our commands as we are Parents or Masters in the government of our Families that they are unnecessary what can be expected but disorder disobedience division and confusion Sect. 9. And had the converted Gentiles whom the Governours of the Church Acts 15. enjoyned to abstain from bloud and things strangled as necessary not to salvation but for the setling of the peace which was broken by the Jewish Teachers ver 2. and to propagate the Christian Religion which are the two professed ends of the framing this Act for Vniformity pag. 71. had they but pleaded This is an unnecessary Imposition and so have been non-conformable how had the Christian Religion been interrupted in 〈◊〉 first plantation and the dissentions and divisions occasioned by the Jewish Teachers been propagated and continued I humbly conceive therefore that this argument or objection against the commands of our Superiours That their Impositions are unnecessary is a very unnecessary objection and a principle of confusion and division in Church State or Family But now that a universal agreement in one mode and form of publick Worship and Discipline is the way to peace and unity and therefore no unnecessary Imposition I thus argue Sect. 10. First that which doth deliver us from dividing sins must needs be the way to unity Secondly that which tends to the Honour of Religion the edification and building up of the Church that must needs be the way to unity Now to have one form and to agree universally in the modes of Worship and service of God doth conduce to both these and therefore Uniformity is the way to Unity I shall begin with the first and shew what are these dividing sins naming but the principal ring-leaders amongst them and they are Pride and Error Sect. 11. First Pride that it is a dividing sin and the spring of division if not of disobedience the Wiseman tells us Prov. 13.10 onely by pride cometh contention as if this were the spring of all division and disobedience But besides from this root spring many more dividing sins as self-conceitedness and thinking of our selves more highly then we ought to think a sin forbidden with an unusual preface Rom. 12.3 a sin whereby we are apt to think our selves wiser then seven men that can render a reason Prov. 26.16 and more holy then the rest of our brethren as did the proud Pharisee From whence also floweth the judging censuring condemning and despising of each other which are all dividing sins and exceedingly tend to the tearing of that Badge by which Christ would have all his Disciples to be known even by their love to each other Sect. 12. Secondly as Pride so Error is a dividing sin for though Truth be but one yet Error is the seminary of all
for the very thing for which you plead the changing of further reformation thereof which occasioned this Reply of Jewell which cleerly evidenceth that he did so much approve of the present frame of the Liturgy that he said by Gods mercy it should not be changed no more And therefore I pray remember your promise yield and subscribe to the book of common prayer according as the Act requireth Sect. 28. And that this may be done with an unfeigned assent and consent I doe beseech you all who are zealous haters of Popery seâ—iously to weigh what is the judgement of the most judicious Jesuited Papists of this our present Liturgy as I find it published long since by their great champion Harding saith he that which ought to be written upon the heart of every true Protestant Every good man and zealous keeper of the Catholick Faith will never allow the Service devised in King Eâ—wards time now restored again not so much for the Tongue that it is in as for the order it self and disposition of it wanting some things necessary and having some other things repugnant to the Faith and the custome of the Carholick Church Reply of Jewell to Harding pag. 162. Let me intreat all Non-conformists especially to ponder upon this passage The Liturgy and Service of the Church of England to which we are to conform though some account it Popish Idolatrous and at the best too like the Mass book in the order and disposiâ—ion of it which is the great exception of the wisest Non-conformists at this day yet this Harding with the Separatists against whom Mr. Ball hath written agree together in calling it a Devised Service an Humane Invention Now consider what is predicated of this subject that the good men and zealous keepers of the Catholick Faith viz. the hottest rankest and most violent Papists they will never allow of this devised Service I think very good news Sect. 29. But to proceed to the reason that he giveth for this not so much for the tongue in which it is being now English whereas the Service of the Romish Church is Latin to this day which some make to be the onely difference between the Mass-book and the English Liturgy grounded upon a politick Proclamation in King Edwards time to quiet an Insurrection about it But saith Harding for the order it self and the disposition of it that which is a great exception of the Non-conformists why they cannot allow it is given as the reason why the good and zelous Catholicks cannot allow it also But how doth it appear further that the good Catholicks cannot nay he saith will not allow it because that it lacketh some things necessary as prayers to Saints to Angels to Images and for the dead to bring them out of Purgatory a thing very necessary to make the Popes Pot boyle together with many of those Bables Trifles and Follies which Bishop Jewell reckons up in his Sermon at S. Mary's quoted by Plus ultra to another purpose But to make our English Liturgy completely different from the Romish Mass-book he saith that it hath many things in it repugnant to the Faith and customes of the Catholick Church For these reasons the zealous Catholicks will never allow of our book of common prayer and therefore for these reasons the Book of Common prayer devised as they say in King Edwards time restored in Queen Elizabeths time confirmed since by King James King Charls the First and the Second should be worthy of a better acceptation then yet it hath received from those that declare themselves to be the most zealous professors of the true Reformed Protestant Religion Sect. 30. And thus now having proved it to be very lawfull to declare conformity to the Book of Common prayer having by the help of an old Non-conformist uncloathed it of that Idolatrous dress in which it hath been presented to the World by the Author of the Temperate Discourse and Plus ultra who having thereby but new-vamâ—t the arguments of the old Brownists and brought them forth as new lights to mislead weak people I shall through the help of the said Mr. John Ball give you but one general answer to what the said Author of the Discourse of Liturgies and others are very copious in cha ging the Common prayer with many particular defects and errors and so conclude Which answer you shall find part 2. pag. 22. Your long Catalogue of corruptions to be found in our Liturgy is to small purpose unlesse you could prove so e of them to be sundamental heretical and really Idolatrous Suppose saith he pag. 30. the seventy errors which you reckon up were all true and justly taken against the Book and as many more to them might be named yet the quotation that he giveth out of Usher de Success Eccles Chapter 1. answers all That the main truths which concern the very life and soul of Religion be few and the failings which may stand with the substance of Religion many Sect. 31. To conclude therefore with this Memorandum to the Authors of Plus ultra who upon the Authority that I have brought in King Edwards time from the Reverend Martin Bucer in Q. Elizabeths time from the Reverend Bishop Jewell that they are under an obligation to yield to subscribe and turn conformists even all the Zuinglian-Gospellers as he calleth them pag. 13. And that it will be expected they should shew themselves to be as good as their words I shall be a further help unto them in endeavouring to remove what may be an impediment to the subscribing of the 39. Articles of Religion with what followeth in the Act for Uniformity pag. 83. hoping in the following Chapter to make it appear that the particular ceremonies and rites of the Church by Law enjoyned together with the Books of Ordination c. which are part of the 39. Articles may lawfully be subscribed and conformed to CHAP. X. That to subscribe to the 39. Articles of Religion and to declare an unfeigned assent and consent c. is not contrary to any command of Christ but lawful and warrantable notwithstanding all the objections made of old by Mr. Josias Nicholls against subscription which are in this Chapter laid down and modestly removed Section I. THat we may be the more clearly informed and more fully resolved in this case the matter of this question being the subject matter of that obedience which the Act for the Vniformity of publick prayers c. doth require That we may the better judge of the iniquity or equity of what is required I humbly conceive it would be worth our time to make a particular inspection into this Act concerning what is enacted about these things aforesaid To which end I shall offer these three particulars to your consideration First what is required Secondly of whom it is required Thirdly after what manner the things required are to be done Sect. 2. First that which is required is a Subscription or Declaration of an
to represent a seale to confirme and an instrument to conveigh grace and I humbly conceive that where any of these are wanting it is no Sacrament A Ceremony may be as a sign to signifie or present to our understanding a spirituall truth or moral duty but being not affirmed of them that they are appointed as instruments to confer Grace or to be as seals of the covenant of Grace such a Ceremony though it may be of morall and spirituull use yet is it not a Sacrament And I humbly conceive to use such are no additions to Gods Word or Sacraments The signe of the Cross is no addition of a Sacrament to a Sacrament as is often said but onely a sign to put us in minde of such a Christian duty wherein if we fail Christ in whose name we have been baptized will be ashamed of us at the last day My argument at present is somewhat considerable I believe that there is no command of Christ forbidding any such mystical and significant ceremonies to be appointed by the Church Sect. 4. I now proceed through divine assistance to offer to consideration what I have propounded to prove concerning the power of the Church about Rites and Ceremonies Desiring such as would be more fully satisfied to consult the judgement of that godly and leaaned man Mr. John Randall who in his most Excellent Lectures of the Church published by that faithful Minister of Christ Mr. William Holbrooke and his Son-in-law Mr. Ithiel Smart late Minister of Ashby de la Zouch doth most clearly and solialy discourse on this subject whom though you shall find very exact and strict in affirming the Church hath no power to decree any mattters of substance in Religion without or besides the Scripture XXV Lecture of the Church pag. 131. which he proveth by clear and pregnant Scriptures and strong reason yet he granteth nay layeth it down as a Thesis or proposition which he proveth by Scriptures and giveth four reasons for it pag. 145. viz. That every particular visible Church hath power from God to ordain some outward rites and ceremonies for the outward carriage of Gods Worship Amongst which rites and ceremonies speaking of the bounds the Church is to keep in ordaining matters of ceremony under this head that they must have no opinion of Gods Worship placed in them as the Surplice and the Cross if the Church so enjoyn them it makes them unlawful if they have been abused so by the Papists That is not their sin now take away the abuse and the things may still be imposed and put in practice Sect. 5. If this be not a sufficient proof or vindication of the Power and Authority of the Church abou ceremonies in general and these two significant ones the Surplice and sign of the Cross I shall presume to give you in my poor and weak observations from the Scriptures of truth by way of furthe illustration And I argue thus That which is a Christian duty may lawfully be done without Superstition or Will-worship and may be subscribed as agreeable to Gods Word Now if Christians might not lawfully make use of terrene and common things to represent to their understandings spiritual and heavenly truths and to mind them of their duties our blessed Saviour would never have repeesented himself to us by such things whereby his spiritual worth and usefulness might be the more evidently presented to our understandings How often doth he by meat and drink by a Vine a door and such like affect our understanding with his usefulness and worth Now that which Christ hath sanctifyed by his own example is a sufficient warrant for us to observe and do Sect. 6. True it is some things there are about Gods worship which are particularly forbidden in the second commandement as to the making to our selves any graven Image though to worship God by or the second person in the glorious Trinity But any meanes that God hath not forbidden whereby we may signifie our inward Worship of God this is warrantable We do not find our Saviour condemning the Publican for using that significant ceremony of smiting upon his heart while he confest his sin Though doubtless it might signifie how angry he was with his wicked heart from whence all evil springs by smiting upon the place of its residence the breast though I can find no command for this in the holy scripture And the like might be said of that against which Mr. Josias Nicholls so excepteth against as a Sacrament that holy Ordinance of Marriage because that it signifieth as the Church expresseth it the Mystical Vnion that is between Christ and his Church Surely we may make use even of this representation by Matrimony to endeare our affections to Christ our spiritual Spouse and yet not be guilty of Will-worship or superstition because the Apostle Paul doth from this very argument presse husbands to love their wives Eph. 5.15 32. and therefore what we know of matrimonial love may teach us to love Christ with a conjugal affection Sect. 7. And might we not lawfully use such common things in themselves to affect our understandings with spiritual things the Spirit of God would never teach us by them It is no superstition calling to minde the affection that we see in Mothers to their children to strengthen our faith in the love of Christ to us If this might not lawfully be done without superstition and Will-worship God himself would never teach us by such representations saith he can a Mother forget her child c. yet will I not forget thee In like manner the consideration of the sign of the Cross which is a representation of all that Christ suffered for us to mind us of our duty of confessing of Christ to which nothing can more engage us then the remembrance of what he endured for us upon the cross when he despised the shame thereof for us as the Apostle speaketh To subscribe to the use thereof in Baptism is lawful Sect. 8. Now though it may be objected that there is a particular Ordinance even that of the Supper to remember us of his death and sufferings upon the cross and therefore the use of this sign of the cross if it be not superstitious yet it is superfluous It may be considered of that besides an Ordinance appointed of God for a general use it is warrantable to make use of particular reembrances of Gods mercy and our duty though we have no particular command for them Many instances of this might be given in the Church of the Jewes who were most strictly tyed to particular circumstances in Gods Worship in matters of Religion yet for to keep up particular remembrances of Gods mercy to them and their duty to witness that they were Members of the true Church to avoid contention in after-ages and such like ends referring to Religion they have without any particular command from God instituted significant signs for the purposes aforesaid Sect. 9. Passing by many I
Now if upon a serious search into Gods blessed Book we find no command of Christ forbidding the command of our Superiours in my poor apprehension the conscience is set at liberty from doubts fears and scruples and the more evidence we have thereof the more perswasion but some you may observe from Mr. Randall is necessary And thus now having presumed to shew how in my weak judgement this fourth Direction of his may be practicable I shall proceed to the next which I reckon his fifth 5. Take such a course whereby thou mayest obey the Magistrate and the Church and yet not offend the weak herein is wisdom Sect. 8. That this may be done that weak Christians that is such who yet know not their Christian liberty concerning these circumstantials in Worship not determined by Gods Word who are apt to judge and censure those Ministers that do conform to the use of these indifferent things which are of the same nature with those matters of offence about meats drinks and dayes that were Rom. 14. that I say weak Christians may not be offended and be delivered from their fears and scruples about sinning against Christ in their own use of the same I humbly conceive that as this weakness hath been much contracted and is much continued by what they have sucked in from the general exhortations of their Teachers against Idolatry superstition and humane inventions in Gods Worship amongst which the things before spoken to have been baptised into that name because reducible to no command So the way to strengthen them is for such Ministers who have not been cleare in their expressions and whose Ministry hath a command of their consciences and affections in other substantial truths plainly to instruct them and inform them in the nature of these things to which they conform and yield obedience Sect. 9. I say did such Ministers who zealously in their preaching set forth the excellency and necessity of Christ of Holiness and Regeneration and of the sinfulness of sin with the like faithfulness present their hearers with the sinfulness of the sin of disobedience to the commands of our Superiours in matters not simply unlawful faithfully shewing them that the best way for to make these things not simply unlawful in themselves not to be so to them is to rectifie their judgements and perswade their consciences as aforesaid And also That the onely cure for our contentions about these lesser things is to mind the substantials of Christs Kingdom indeed Rom. 14. directing them to proportion their zeal more about these things then these poor circumstantial matters in difference Sect 10. I do verily believe that did such Ministers who are holy and unblameable in their lives and powerful in their preaching but make these particulars aforesaid the subject matter of their information of their hearers in the Ministry of the Word and not confound things that differ and in general terms declaime against superstitious inventions of men and additions to Gods Worship c. There would be great hopes through Gods blessing upon on this means that those who now speak evil of those things which they understand not that cannot say as the Apostle Paul in the like case Rom. 14. I know and am perswaded But they are perswaded against indifferent things as sinfull though they have no clear and distinct knowledge of the nature of these things and therefore are but weak in knowledge whatever they may think of themselves They would by this means come to be enlightned to be better informed to understand their christian liberty and so the grounds of their offence and scandall through their weakness would be taken away Sect. 11. And in order to this if I mistake not what the Law of the Land now requireth every Lecturer to do the first time he preacheth before Sermon and also upon the first Lecture-day every moneth pag. 86. may very much comport with the advice aforesaid and together may much conduce to the practice of Mr. Randalls Fifth Direction viz. to take such a course whereby we may neither offend the Magistrate or our weak Brother But what now if this cannot be done but at some Ministers first conforming according to the Act Some Christians till they be better informed will be offended what is to be done in this case This Reverend Person whose memory is precious with many old professors to this day proceedeth further to that which for methods sake I call the sixth Direction pag. 143. 6. Yet rather obey the Magistrate though with offence Sect. 12. And the reason that he gives is this which I desire may be seriously weighed For here disobedience is the greater sin and so takes away the sin of offending the weak and indeed in this case I give no offence because my hands are bound and I have no liberty to do otherwise CHAP. XIV Contains the course that a Minister is to take as to conformity Though scandal be taken by weak brethren in which Chapter the Doctrine of scandal is considered and what is alleadged by the Author of the Temperate Discourse is answered and the Magistrate freed from what is charged upon him under this consideration Section 1. NOw because that much is rapt up in a very few words I shall endeavour to let it into the understandings of weak Brethren by taking them into these proportions 1. First that though to offend the weak in things wherein we are at our liberty be a sin yet when these things come to be commanded by the Magistrate and I obey not here disobedience is the sinne to be laid to heart And the reason is because that though the matter of the command be indifferent yet obedience to that command is an express Gospel-duty 1 Pet. Rom. 13. c. And therefore as Mr. Randall saith taketh away any just cause of offending the weak 2. Secondly that where Christians are not at liberty being not sui Juris but under the command of their superiors to do those things which are not simply sinful and unlawful and in conforming to their commands I give no offence to my weak brother this may be scandalum acceptum but non datum I give no offence saith Mr. Randal And the reason is because my hands are bound where I am not at my own liberty but for the Peace of the Church the propagating and honour of Religion which is weakned by differences and divisions about modes of Worship c. I am commanded to do such things which may seem to be superstitious or superfluous to weak Christians and they may be scandalized thereat and take offence yet observe what Mr. Randall saith I give none by so doing And therefore what I find concerning the judgement of the Doctors of Aberdeene of old is very confiderable That the scandal of brethren weighs light when put into the scale with the command of Authority Sect. 2. This being the great argument used against Non-conformity in the Treatise of the Discourse of Liturgies
I shall but offer to your consideration as a motive to this work what you will find propounded by Mr. Baxter though by him there used to another purpose in his Five Disput pag. 4. after a worthy commendation of some of the Bishops So eminent in Gods graces and gifts that their names will be precious whilst Christ hath in England a reformed Church besides the godliness of their lives and painful preaching One Jewell one Usher one Davenant hath done so much against the Romain usurpers as they will never claw it off them o the last Sect. 16. Saith he that which I offer as a great incouragement to Episcopal Ordination and Subscription pag. 4. Moreoven who knoweth not that most of the godly able Ministers of England since the Reformation did judge Epscopacy some of them lawful and some of them most fit for the Non-conformists were but few and that even before these late troubles and wars c. The most through the Land did subscribe and conform to Episcopal Government as a thing not contrary to the Word of God so that it is very evident that it is very consistent with a godly life to judge Episcopacy lawful and fit or else we should not have had so many hundred leanred and godly men of that mind Observe here if it bevery evident that it is very consistent with a godly life to judge Episcopacy lawful and fit which are two of the most considerable qualifications that can be in any Government either of Church or State Be perswaded now laying aside our prejudices and perplexing fears to become of the same mind with those many hundred of godly and learned men that did judge Episcopacy to be lawful and fit eveâ— for us who are under a mixed Monarchical Government Especially lâ—ying this close to our hearts which Mr. Baxter saith It is consistent with a godly life so to judge which will not onely keep us from judging others who are of that perswasion but may also very much perswade all pious and peaceable spirits to be of their mind who judging Episcopacy to be lawful did receive Ordination by Bishops And not onely by their example be perswaded to receive Ordination from Bishops as they did but also to subscribe to the 39. Articles according to the Act. Mr. Bâ—xter here tells the Non conformists were but few That most throughout the Land did subscribe and conform to Episcopal Government as a thing not contrary to the Word of God And will you now be singular again by your Non-conformity and Non-subscription I beseech you be pleased to what I have in the former discourse spoken by way of argument for subscription consider seriously what you will find written by Dr. John Burges in his Defence of the three Innocent Ceremonies one that after some years deprivation for Non-conformity after some years practice of Physick though he found it his best imployment for profit yet returned to the Ministry subscribed and writ in the defence of conformity I say his whole Book may be of great use in this juncture of time especially what he writes about Subscription pag. 23. of his book To all which be pleased to consider of the quotation out of Mr. Baxter it being such a passage in my weak judgement that whatever may seem to be said in the Five Disput. to the contrary yet there is so much truth therein as may engage all that love the truth and peace after all our divisions and sore discords which as Mr. Baxter saith are not about matter of Doctrine but of modes of Wership c. to come to settlement And in order hereunto be perswaded to come in and receive Ordination from the Bishop though ordained before by Presbyters as being the way to make your Ordination the more valid and complete and thereby to continue you still in the Ministry CHAP. XVI That for our Ministers to receive Ordination by Bishops though ordained before by Presbyters will not conclude the Reformed Churches that have no Episcopal Ordination to have no true Ministers and consequently to be no true Churches Section 1. BUt it may be objected That to receive Ordination from Bishops by those that have been ordained by the Presbytery without Bishops will make us to yield not onely that our Ordination is invalid but also that the Reformed Churches in France and that other Churches beyond Sea that have no Episcopal Ordination have not true Ministers amongst them and consequently are not true Churches of Christ c. To this may be answered That the case in England and in France and other Reformed Churches is not alike most of the aforesaid Churches especially in France and Germany are under persecution and that may be said of them which I find in a Letter of E. M. to Mr. Baxter printed before his Disputation about Ordination which to the said E. M. was given in answer to an objection somewhat of the same tendency The Churches in those places were very much under a cloud being persecuted and had not liberty to settle Diocesan Episcopacy in that glory which the Apostolical Institution aimed at and that the Church was then what it could be and not what it would be Sect. 2. I say this is the case of the Churches in France they being under a Prince that professeth the Roman Religion and in a state of Adversity Their being without Episcopal Ordination doth not null or make void their Ordination of Ministers without them the want of Bishops having not been through their own occasion having never put down any or induced others by vows and other violences so to do And therefore they have been acknowledged by the Church of England to be their Sister-Churches and so have the Belgick Churches also who therefore sent over some from this Church to the Synod at Dort which was a great owning of them And how much even in Holland they inclined to our Church-government if the Government by States did not hinder it I find by an Attestation published 1626. avowing that the Discipline of the Church of England was not impeached by the Synod of Dort pag. 6. the Attestators also saying That in our private converse with the most eminent of the Ministers there we found divers times upon occasion of our declaring unto them the order and manner of our Church-government that they were more ready to deplore then defend their own estate and wished to be made like the flourishing Church of England But besides what is reported of the Belgick Churches I will give a taste of the spirits of the French by what I find in Zanchius thes de vera reformand Ecclesiae ration Qui universalis omnium locorum temporum usque ad hanc aetatem usum sensum Ecclesiae certum habet sequiturque interpretem facilè intelligit diversos gradus Presbyterorum Episooporum in gubernatione ecclesiastica esse secundum Dei verbum srmper fuisse proinde ubi vigent non esse abolendos ubicunque iniquitas
temporum eos abolevit aut non tulit esse restituendos He that will receive and follow the use and the opinion of the universal Church in all times and places unto this Age for a certain Interpreter will easily understand that the several degrees of Presbyters and Bishops in the Ecclesiastical government are and ever were according to Gods Word and therefore where they stand still they must not be abolished and where the iniquity of the times hath abolished or not suffered them they must be set up again Sect. 3. By which and other before quotations it appeareth that their judgment was long ago for Bishops and their Ordination by them and that the several degrees of Presbyters and Bishops in the Ecclesiastical government are according to Gods Word that they were not the same as is so strongly supposed Be perswaded therefore not onely to stand and wonder at the counsel this holy Zanchy giveth but resolve to follow it where the iniquity of the times hath abolished or not suffered that Ecclesiastical government he saith it must be set up again it must not be endeavoured to be undermined or extirpated for this is contrary to a Scripture-Reformation otherwise he would have ascribed their abolition to be from the piety and not the iniquity of the times Sect. 4. I beseech you Sirs therefore take no care for the Reformed Churches as to their Ministry and Ordination but take care of your own and take heed that you give no occasion of scandal or offence to them by suffering your selves to be deprived of the exercise of your Ministerial gifts because that you will not yield to that which may make your Ordination which hath hitherto been by the classes and so done but by halves to be more valid and complete and consonant to the practice of the primitive times Sect. 5. But if what I have said may not satisfie you as to your thoughtfulnesse and great care for the Reformed Churches lest by your being ordained by Bishops they should be unchurched as having no true Ministers because not Episcopally ordained Be pleased to take but a View of the Government and Publick Worship of God in the Reformed Churches beyond the Seas Wherein is shewed their Conformity and Agreement with the Church of England as it is established by the Act of Uniformity A Book lately set forth by Mr. John Durel And herein you will find so much said by himself and quoted from the learned Spanhemius late Professour of Divinity at Geneva and of Ludovicus Capellus late Divinity-Reader and Professour of Hebrew at Saumers with others that will not onely give a very satisfactory answer in this case but also to a serious question propounded in the Petition for peace pag. 9. What judgment all the Protestant Churches are likely to pass on your proceedings meaning the Bishops and how your cause and ours meaning the Petitioners for peace and Non-conformity will stand represented to them Sect. 6. And I hope withall will very much prevail upon you to be ordained by Bishops and to conform lest that you should be a further scandal and offence to them and give them a further occasion to be confirmed in the mean opinion that some of the most learned Pastours beyond Sea had of our work of Reformation in taking away Bishops and Liturgy and setting up the Directory in the stead thereof You will find more then what I say implyed in the great commendation that the learned Spanhemius of Geneva giveth of the beauteous face of the Church of England with her Reverence in publick Worship before these late times vide his Epistle before the third part of Dubia Evangelica quoted by Monsieur Durel pag. 66. And more then I will write in English you will find Durell pag. 15. quoted Ex Ludovic Capell Thes Salm. Th. de Liturg. part 7. Thes 6 7. who after a commendation of the Liturgy of the Church of England as free from all Popish saperstition and Idolatry and how happy we might have been c. he saith Dorec tandem nuperrimè exorti sunt in Anglia morosi scrupulosi delicatuli nimium ne superstitiosos planè dicam homines quibus Ecclesiae suae hactenus usurpata Liturgia visa est multis sed levissimis nulliusque penè momenti de causis non improbanda solum verum etiam planè abrogan la penitus unà cum toto Episcoporum Hierarchico regimine abolenda obliteranda c. Sect. 7. Now as by these two quotations you may as I said before easily see how you have stood represented to the Reformed Churches of Geneva and others so also you may apprehend what judgement the Protestant Churches are like to passe upon you for your Non-conformity and for chusing rather not to preach then to receive Ordination from the Bishop whereby that of the Presbytery may be completed and to declare an agreement with them by your subscription Oh Sirs be perswaded after all your doubts fears and scruples to observe the Act for Uniformity and take more care of giving offence to the Reformed Protestant Churches abroad by your Non-conformity then of any offence they will take at you thereat how far they are from it you will find plentifully proved in Mounsieur Durells Book aforesaid to which I refer you Sect. 8. It is confessed that in yielding to this seasonable Counsel there will be some kind of self-denyall and a departing from that sentence and opinion which many have taken up to the contrary Yet being lawful to be done and conducing so much to the Peace of Church and State and giving an opportunity to many persons whom God hath qualified for the work of the Ministry to exercise the same Be perswaded for Christs sake if ever you will shew your selves to be Christs Disciples indeed deny your selves and follow the wholsome Counsel of holy Beza before spoken that leaving all bitterness as long as the truth of the doctrine and purity of conscience was safe Bear one another with patience and obey the Queens most gracious Majesty and all her Prelates with a free heart Beza 12. Epist ue ante Sect. 9. That the Truth of the Doctrine is safe I beseech you seriously to consider what I have already quoted from Mr. Baxter and what now followeth from that Revernd and holy Mr. Robert Bolton in his Saints sure and Perpetual Guide pag. 126. Saith he Certain it is that our Church in that most exquisite and Worthy Confession of Faith contained in the Articles of Religion doth hold and professe all substantiall points of Divinity as soundly as any Church in the world none excepted either in this age nor in the primitive times of the Church Oh therefore subscribe unto these 39. Articles which the Act for Uniformity requireth and that ex animo as Beza counselled in his time the Queen and her Prelates should be obeyed Sect. 10. Especially considering that not onely the truth is safe but that whatsoever is required by this Act
for Uniformity may be lawfully observed with a safe conscience if I be not mistaken This hath been my work and endeavour to prove by the holy Scriptures the practice of the primitive Church the judgement of the most Eminent Divines of the Reformed Churches abroad by the concessions of severall pious Non-conformists which are dead and by what I have alleadged from Mr. Baxter Five Disput. First that an Vniformity in Gods pulick Worship by obedience to a form of prayer Secondly that to conform to the use of the Common prayer of the Church of England with the Rites and Ceremonies of the same Thirdly that to subscribe to the 39. Articles of Religion Fourthly that to receive Ordination from Bishops though ordained before by Presbyters Fifthly to declare against the binding power of the Covenant That all these are lawful and warrantable Sect. 11. Consider therefore I beseech you that the way to keep your consciences safe and sound is to yield obedience to the lawful commands of our Superiors Rom. 13. It is given as the reason why we should obey our Superiors even for conscience sake For If conscience be truly tender it will check and chide us for our disobedience and our hearts will smite us for the same For Take heed therefore as you love your souls of this delusion in pleading conscience for disobedience for the heart being so deceitful we are very apt so to do I have in the integrity of my heart I hope made publick that Christian compassion and charity within me to the end that what I fear are like to be the sad effects of Non-conformity may be prevented And surely except the decree be gone forth against us for that general impenitency that is upon all parties for our new sins since new rare and unexpected mercies received and the continuance in our old ones Sect. 12. I should hope through the great piety wisdom and moderation of our Superiours in pressing more for the substantials of Religion the Power of godliness then the form and by the obedience of Inferiours to their commands in both these black clouds of Gods anger which I am apt to fear do still hang over our heads may be blown over our discords and divisions about these matters of mode in Worship and Government which I believe are both our sin and punishment may be healed and that spirit which I fear in many that at this day lusteth not after envy but bloud again may be subdued by a plentiful effusion of the Spirit of love and peace anb of a sound mind Sect. 13. In order to all this I have in the first place laid before you the consideration of this proposition That obedience to the Act for Uniformity is the way to Unity I have endeavoured to prove it I beseech you once more be perswaded to improve it by your practice I have as I said before shewed what is required may lawfully be done without sin I shall therefore desire you that laying aside all prejudice you would be pleased to grant me these two requests that I find made in Five Disput pag. 271. First that before you let out your displeasure against me for contradicting any of your conceits received opinions and traditions you would humbly impartially and with modest self-suspicion both study and pray over what you shall read written by so weak and worthless an one who can tell but that what I now offer cometh to your view as an answer to your prayers for information in these doubtful matters Secondly the next request of Mr. Baxters which I make is this That you will alwayes keep the faith charity self-denial and tenderness of Christians upon your hearts and the great ends and interest of Christ and Christianity before you and take heed how you venture upon any controverted points or practice that contradicteth the Churches unity peace and holiness Sect. 14. Oh Sirs if you will be pleased to keep that faith charity self-denyal and tenderness of Christians upon your hearts it will keep you from setting your wits on work as you are Scholars in this juncture of time to give a seeming answer to what I have said not as a Disputant having never been so high as a Sophomore in the Schools but as a compassionate Advocate for the Churches unity peace and holiness which last cannot better be promoted then by the continuance of holy men in the Ministry I say this faith charity humility self-denyal and christian tenderness kept close to your hearts at this time will keep you not onely from controverted points which contradict the spirit of Christianity but also from such practices which may contradict the spirit of Christianity also and obstruct the progress of the Church in holiness peace and unity Sect. 15. How much disobedience to the Act for Uniformity together with the deprivation of some Ministers thereby for the same may obstruct the Churches unity and peace may contradict the spirit of Christianity may hinder the propagation of the Protestant Religion may gratifie the hopes and expectations of the Romish Jesuites I wish you may not see when it is too late to repent thereof I conclude therefore with that pathetick cry for audience that came from Jotham when he uttered his parable Judg. 9.7 Hearken unto Me that GOD may hearken unto You. FINIS Courteous Reader These Books following with others are printed for Nath. Brook and are to be sold at his Shop at the Angel in Cornhill Excellent Tracts in Divinity Controversies Sermons Devotious 1. CAtholick History collected and gathered out of Scripture Councils and ancient Fathers in answer to Dr. Vanes Lost Sheep returned home by Edward Chesenhale Esq Octava 2. Bishop Morton on the Sacrament Folio 3. Grand Sacrilege of the Church of Rome in taking away the sacred Cup from the Laity at the Lords Table by Daniel Featly Quarto 4. Quakers Cause at second hearing being a full answer to their Tenets 5. Re-assertion of Grace Vindiciae Evingelii or Vindication of the Gospel a Reply to Mr. Anthony Burges's Vindiciae Legis and to Mr. Rutherford by Rob. Town 6. Anabaptists anatomized and silenced or a Dispute with Mr. Tombs by Mr. I. Cragg where all may receive clear satisfaction 7. A Cabinet-Jewel wherein is Mans misery and Gods mercy set forth in eight Sermons with an Appendix concerning Tithes and expediency of marriage in publicly assemblies by the same Author Mr. J. Cragg 8. A Glimpse of Divine Light being an explication of some passages exhibited to the Commissioners at Whitehall for approbation of publick Preachers against J. Harrison of Land-chappel Lancashire 9. The Zealous Magistrate a Sermon by T. Threscot Quarto 10. New Jerusalem in a Sermon for the Society of Astrologers Quarto in the year 1651. 11. Divinity no enemy to Astrologie a Sermon for the Society of Astrologers in the year 1653. by Dr. Thomas Swadling 12. Britannia Rediviva a Sermon before the Judges August 1648. by J. Shaw Minister of Hull 13. The Princesse Royal