in the hands of the Consulâ swore allegiance fealty to the comâmonwealth and when he made thâ Pretor to gouerne in his name according to the ceremony deliuering the naked sword sayd to him Vse this sword for me if I gouerne iustly iâ otherwise vse it against me By whâch resignation both of state and life into the Common-wealthes hands he more secured them both then any enforced Oath that he held the Crowne from God only could haue done Philanax You haue shewed the first proposition of Theodidact to be neyther a solid ground of soueraignty nor a doctrin apt to nourish in subiects minds affection to their Kings I desire you wold passe to the examination of the second that Kings haue no Superior that may call him to account or punâsh him but God alone Aristobulus Heere Theodidact goeth forward in building the soueraignty of Kings âither vpon manifest falshood or totâering vncertaineties That the King âath no superior but God alone that âay punish him all learned men geâerally Papists Puritans Proâestants âeny Philanax I do much wonder that you say Protestants âeach thât the Kinge may âe sentenced and punished by any man âpon earth I thinke you meane Puriâans not our Protestants that proâesse to follow the Religion established ây Parlament Aristobulus I meane Protestants that are eneâies of Puritans and conformable to âhe state and to increase your wondring I add that howsoeuer the word Supreme Gouernour and Head of the Church go currant in England yet in âense our Deuines giue our Kinge no greater authority in causes Ecclesiasticall then Papists do I desire not to be âeleeued vnlesse I make what I haue âayd euident by the testimonies of them that haue lately written aboââ this argument First concerning the verâ title they say the King hath no any spirituall Ecclesiasticall power aâ aâl his power sayth doctor Morton noâ Bishop of Chester is but corporall and caâ go no âurther then the body He hath saytâ M. Burhill no iurisdiction in the Church eyâther âor the inward oâ outward Court his poweâ is meere temporall and laicall nor in it selâ spirituall though the matter and obiect thereââ be spirituall such power and no greater saytâ M. Richard Tomson then Iewes Infidelâ and Turkes haue ouer the Christian Churcâ within their dominions Secondly concerning Controuersies of fayth the Deane of Lichfielâ doctor Tooker disclaymeth as an imâpudent slaunder that the Church oâ England holdes the King to be their primaâ or head or iudge of Controuersies about faitâ and Religion To the Apostles Christ gaue poweâ to gather Councells and to define solemnly thâ Churches doubts The sentence of Councell sayth M. Richard Harris hath without thâ King the force of an ecclesiasticall law the King addes thereunto corporall penalty M. Morton ââyth that Imperiall and Kingly authority in ââirituall causes reacheth no further then as it ââlongeth to outward preseruation not to the âersonall administration of them neyther doth ââe King challenge nor subiects condescend vnto âore But most cleerly M. Barlow late âishop of Lincolnâ The King sayth he in âontrouersies about fayth hath not iuâicium definitium sentence dâfinitiue to ââscerne what is sound in âââinity but when the âhurch hath determined matters of fayth he âath iudicium executiuum sentence exeâutiue to commaund the professing therof âithin his Kingdomes And is not this the very doctrine âf Papists and that doctrine which âârmerly our Arch-bishop Bancroât reâected with great scorne as disgraceâull to Kings making them but Carââfices Ecclesiae the executioners of the Churches will and pleasure Thirdly concerning the offices of âhis power they teach the King hath no âower to vse any censure or to cast any out of âhe Church by sentence but his office is to punish âhem with corporall chastisement on whom Bishops haue laid their censures The King doth âot make or vnmake Bishops they are made by the Bishops of the Kingdone as by them they aââ desposed and vnmade The King hath right tâ name and present persons to benefices as other lay men of lower conditioÌ haue but benefices eiâther with cure or without cure great or little he neither doth nor euer did bestow much lesse the ecclesiasticall dignities as the Bishopricks Arch-Bishopricks of his Kingdome Fourthly concerning the Kings sudordination to Bishops Doctor Barlow highly commendeth the saying of Ambrose Bishops in matters concerning faith are to iudge of Emperors not Emperors of Bishops The Deane of Lichâeild saith that the King is and with Valentinian Emperor doth acknowledge himselfe the sonne and pâpill of the Church and the scholler of the Bishops What more do papists require Can he then iudg teach his Fathers Iudges and Maisters in those thinges wherein he is their sonne pupill and scholler Finally M. Burhill saith that the King supâeme gouernour of the Church may by his Bishops be cast out of the Church VVhat Ambrose did lawfully to Theodosius our Bishops may do lawfully to the King âor the like offence And what did Ambrose to Theodosius He cast him by sentence out of the Church he stood ready to keepe him out by force and called him Tyâant âo his face he forced him to eâact a temporall law concerning the âxecution of the sentence in matter of âife and death he commanded him out of the quire or the place of Priests sent him into the body of the Church to pray with laymen And may the Bishop of Canterbâây lay the same punishments on his Mâiesty yea saith the Bishop of Ely perchaunce the Pope may excoÌmunicate the Kinge depriue him of the common goods of the Church Doe you see to how many censures Protestants make the King subiect Truly I see not how any ReligioÌ doth or can make Kings more absolute and subiect to fewer Superiors then Papists doe The Puritan will haue them subiect to the Pastor of euery parishe that hath a Consistory as our Bishop Bancroât sayth They banish one Pope and admit a thousand The Protestant makes them obnoxius to the censure of Bishops without any restraynt wheras the Romanists out of respect to the Maiesty of Kings reserue the power of censuring them âo the supreame Pastor But to returne to Theodidact you seâ he keepeth his custome to ground alâlegiance due to Kings vpon doâctrines eyther questionable or ãâã denyed of all sides his second propoâsition that the Kinge is free from alâ punishment that maÌ may inflict beinâ rather more vncertaine then hiâ first that Kings hââe their power only froâ God Philanax It seemeth by your discourse thaâ Theodidact makes Kinges more absoluâââ then other Protestants doe teacheth against them that the King may noâ be excommunicated or cast out of thâ Church For he sayth that the Kinge iâ free from all punishment that man can inflict excommunication without doubt is a great punishment Ministers withâout question are men Aristobulus It is hard to say what Theodidaââ
whicâ the cheefest Pretendents in that reforâmation had notice at loast in confuââ and in generall as the said Archbishoâ affirmeth and did secreâly conniuâ thereunto fauouring no doubt in haââ a popular state where Church-doctrine and discipline is receaued reiected by voices In which gouernment these fiery Ghospellers as hiâ Maiesty calleth them beeing comâmonly men of sharpe wits and ready tongues high minded and of working spirits might beare great sway euery one rule as King and Pope in his parish Since that time these men haue been in shew both for doctrine practise more moderate specially âince his Maiesties happy raigne and that some of them haue been aduaunced to dignities Now they are become the forwardest in shew âor defence of Allegiance they speake most against the Papists that hold Kings to be deposable in some cases They extoll Royall authority aboue the skyes I can iâ Charity beleeue that some of them meane as they professe yet wisedome giues leaue to feare recânciled emenies Poison no where lurketh more securely then in hony Their present doctrine carrieth outwardly a shew of friendship to Kings but âo will âooke into the ground shall finde it dangerous to them and more pernicious then the former of Caluin Goodman Beza Knox Buchanan and others âheir predecessors and Maisters The âumme of this their doctrine is conâeyned in the Treatise intituled God âhe King The Authour whereof had âo reason to tearme himselfe Theodiâact that is Taught of God seing he speaâeth diuers thinges that the spirit of God could not suggest vnto him He ândertaketh the proofe of foure proâositions The first is That Kings haue âuthority immediately only from God the Church and people not being any thing in the âuist thereof This is the fundamentall ââone whereon is built the second âhat Kings haue no superior on earth to chaââise and punish them The third is That âeither Tyranny nor Heresy nor Apostacy can release subiects of their ObedieÌce The fourth That Kings may neither be deposed nor resisted but by teares and prayers though they should be so tyrannous prophane as to endeauour to oppresse the whole Church and Commonwealth at once and vtterly to extinguish the light of Christian Religion Philanax These speaches may be disgustfull to Subiects and sound vncouâhly in their âares but doctrine that doth so magnify Kings I see not how it may be thought pernicious to them Aristobulus Kinges are not to regard so much how great and glorious as how grounded be the titles that are bestowed on them seeing incredible praises giuen to men do oftentimes abate the credit of their deserued commendation Some Ghospellers as a iudicious Protestant complaines attributing to the holy Scripture more then it caÌ haue the incredibility of that hath caused euen those things which in deede it hath most aboundantly to be the lesse reuerently esteemed The same we may âare will happen to the authority of Kinges And the danger of such flatâering speculations as this Dialogist âeachâth is so much the greater to the Soueraigne whilest they extoll him âboue measure to the state of absolute Lord God vpoÌ earth as it is hatefull âo the subiect to see himself abased to âeruile abhorred ââptiuity put to â more miserable condition then the âondage of slaues For slaues to speak nothing of humane lawes that haue âppointed limits to their miseries âaue some rightes and liberties by the âaw of nature inuiolable which if âhey be able they may defend by force âgainst euen their owne Maisters that shall violently and vniustly inuade âhemâ Such liberty they haue to marry ând propagate humane kind to enioy âife so longe as they haue done noâhing worthy of death but principally âo worship God their maker and suâreme Lord. But this new doctrine of Princely absolute Soueraignty set âowne in the Treatise mentioned âakes the Common-wealth so miseâable and the people such bondmen to their Prince that they may not defenââ their nationall freedomes how iust necessary soeuer nor the liberties anâ rightes that nature hath bequeaââeâ euen vpon slaues But that if thâ Prince wanton in cruelty should keeâ men by force froÌ marrying so to bring the Common-wealth to vtter deâolation in one age âr if not hauing patiâence to attend that lingring consumpâtion of the state he should daily senâ meÌ by multitudes like heards of sheep or oxen to the slaughter or if out oâ a desire his subiects may perish eternally he should seek vtterly to extinguish the doctrine of saluation within his Realmes In these cases I say oâ the like of extreamest necessity and most hostile inuasion according to thâ doctrine of this Dialogist they may not lift vp so much as their finger against his attempts nor ioyne with any power vpon earth that would releeue them Philanax I see plainly that this doctrine is very odious in it self and you set it forth to the vttermost Aristobulus I say no more then his owne worâes import nor haue described tyraÌny âore truly then he hath done in his Dialogue And I know so well there is âo cause to feare the practise of this âoctrine by his gratious Maiesty that I would not haue said thus much but to âhew how odiously ânemies of Royalty may and will exagitate this Concluâion when such discourses shal be for âhe aduantage of popularity Now âhey write and cause Treatises to be âublished by authority which when âime shall serue they may vse to make âis Maiesty hatefull By the like straâageme the Puritans of Scotland ouerâhrew his Maiestiâs Mother When âhey had barbarously slayne the Kinge âer husband they importunely vrged âeâ alledging it was necessary for the maintenance of her state and life to marry with the Earle of Bothwell âoncealing from her that he had been âheef actor in the murther The marâiage was no sooner concluded but âhey diuulged the hatefullnes therofâ thence seeking to persuade the world she had been consenting to her husbands death And so what with defaâmatory libells abroad what witâ their turbulent declamations at homâ they made her odious they tooke from her the Crownâ they tossed her froÌ miâsery to misery till finally they broughâ hâr to lay her head on the blocke to bâ cut off by the comon Executioner â hope his Maiesties happy raygne shalâ neuer see commotion in this state yeâ if any such tumult happen and human things are vncertain I do not feare to be found a false Prophet in saying thaâ this doctrine wil be bitterly exclaimeâ against and this Treatise I speake ofâ produced to witnes what desperate allegiance Princes exact and vrged noâ only against his Maiesty but as a causâ sufficient to banish Kings out of thâ Land The late Lord of Canterbury complaynes that in his dayes cantoninâ of Kingdomes was in many mens mouthes thaâ men did talke what a notable thing it is to liuâ in Veniceâ where euery gentleman liueth witâ as great liberty as the Duke
ambition be ouerforward to proceed against Princeâ So that in my opinion Papists take a most mature course and remoue the life of Kings from the temerity of vulgar affections one degree further then any other religion whatsoeuer And seeing mankind with vniuersall consent seeme to allow that some meanes may be vsed for the commonwealths safety against incorrigible and deplored tyrants I do not see that humane wisdome could haue inuented a proceeding more discreet and moderate then this of Papists who that a Prince may be deposed lawfully require First crymeâ manifest that can no wayes be excused secondly crymes exorbitant tending to the euident ouerthrow of the whole Kingdome thirdly crymeâ with malice incorrigible leauing no hope of amendment fourthly the publicke and vuiuersall agrement of magistrates and Nobles of the Common-wealth Fiftly that the case be proposed and the deposition approued by their supreme Pastor and his Counsell abroad Finally to preuent popular rashnes they further add that the comonwealth in the execution of the sentence must proceed per modum defensionis non per modum punitionis by way of their owne defence not by way of punishing their Prince And in this their defence they must obserue moderamen inculpatae tutelae that is they must do no more then is precisely necessary for their own defence Wherfore they may not hauing deposed their Prince arraigne him as Puritans teach that being needlesse for their owne safety The King deposed still retaynes a certaine remote right to the Crowne as it were a marke or politike character that discerneth him from meere subiects by reason whereof if he repent of his Apostacy and giue the Commonwealth good security that being againe restored to gouernment he wil rule moderately the Commonwealth may not by taking way his life depriue him of his possibility Philanax Your discourse giueth me great content to see that Papists in their doctrine prouide so carefully for the security of Princes That a King be deposed lawfully they require such a generall consent both domesticall and forraine that it seemes scarce possible that so many should conspire in passion or that any Prince by this doctrine loose his Kingdome that is either friended abroad or beloued at home For if the motion to depose the Prince arise from the Commonwealth the last decision thereof is referred to the Pope and his Counsell that are forrayners and not interessed in the Commonwealthes quarrell Yf the treaty of depoâition begin from the Pope the execution must passe through the hands of the Peeres of the Realme spirituall temporall whose loue to their Prince will resist the Popes sentence if they find the motiue either openly vniust as grounded vpon temporall pretences or not cleerly and apparantly iust as is required in a point of so many consequences Nor do there want examples of Catholicke Kingdomes that haue stood for their Kings when they thought that Popes were moued with humane respects yea I haue noted in the histories I haue perused and much wondred thereat Protestants haue beene more forward and heady to follow the sentence of some Ministers or consistory against their Prince then haue Papists beene in obeying the Popes censures for the deposition of their King that hardly can you name any sentence of deposition that hath been executed and the Prince turned from his Crowne by his Catholike subiects Which difference seeing it cannot spring from any greater reuerence which ProtestaÌts bâaâe to their spirituall gouernours for it is known they do not so much esteeme their Ministers as the Papists do their Priests it must proceed from this cause that Papists loyall loue to their Prince doth somewhat allay their prompt obedience to the Pope when betweene him and their Prince contentions happen But you haue so discouered the weaknes of Theodidacts arguments that I haue more cause to feare treason then expect reason in his discourses I should haue byn glad if the doctrine that makes Kings in all cases indeposable could haue byn proued by solid and inuincible arguments Aristobulus How solide and inuincible Theodidacts arguments are you may giue a ghesse by this one which he vrgeth very âarnestly that Christians may not depose Tyrants though neuer so cruell enemies of their Religion because Christ commaundeth theÌ to loue their enemies and perââcutors And verily I could smile to see Theodidact seriously dilate vpon the precept to loue enemies VVe must sayth be loue them with our harts blesse and pray for them with our tongues and do good to them by our actions Yf these duties be to be performed twards priuate men that are our enemies how much more to publicke persons and Potentats of the earth Thus he and much more shewing great want of iudgment thus to trifle in so serious an argument For the precept to loue our enemies to bestow benefits on them vrgeth the Commonwealth to depose tyrants rather then to the coÌtrary For what greater benefit can Christian charity bestow on tyrants that run headlong to euerlasting perdition then to remoue them from gouernment from the world occasions of synne Without doubt the precept of Charity would bind the Commonweaâth to âtay the damnatioÌ of tyrants by deposing theÌ did Iustice permit them that are not Superiours to bestow benefits deeds of charity vpon others against their wil. The truth is that this were against Iustice though not against Charity to take by force the scepter from a Prince who abuseth the same only to his owne damnatioÌ without endaungering the Commonwealth But if he coÌmit synns that tend to the destruction of the state if saith the Chancellour of Paris the great Patron of royall imunity if the Prince doth manifestly obstinatly really vniustly persecute his subiects theÌ that Principle of the law of nature taks place violence may be repelled with violence Thus much Gerson and much more which I willingly pretermit nor would I haue said so much but only to shew that it were best not to handle these questioÌâ specially in vulgar Treatises and that you may see Theodidacts fraude who loadeth on Kings many new titles that are not so glorious as odious which doe not so much adorne as oppresse and weigh downe Kings by laying vpon them the heauy burthen of popular enuy Such is his fourth proposition which remaynes to be examined that there is no remedy besides teares and prayers that may be lawâully vsed for the defence of the Church against the King though he shold be so tyrannous and prophane as to oppresse the whole Church and vtterly to extinguish the light of Christian Religion Philanax The very sound of this proposition offendeth a Christian âare nor can I thinke it is gratefull to his Maiesty who would I dare say wish himselfe dead a thousand times rather then such a case shold really happeÌ that he shold extinguish the light of Religion so litle delight he takes that men should adore his Royall Dignity vested in these imaginary impieties Nor
And without doubt by this their familiar acquaintance with the word part of the horror against the action is lost Which may be the cause that where speach against the Pops authority for deposing of Kings hath been rifest most vulgar those Countries for practise against the life of their Kinges haue been most vnfortunate Whereas Spayne hath seene no such tragicall practise nor any attempt thereoâ but hath enioyed a longe happy peace where the questions how to proceede with Tyrants are freely permitted to the schooles without any popular declamations agaynst Scholasticalâ opinioÌs in this poynt Philanax I must confesse that I haue been my selfe much deceaued in my expectation about the sucâesse of Papists in this controuersy When I considered the circumstances of the contention the doctrine impugned not gratefull to Princes not so cleerly decided in their Church by some of their writers denied the person impugning by sword and penne a Monarch mighty learned beloued euen of Popish Potentates and this at a tyme of great aduantage vpon the gunpowder treason which was vrged as a sequell of this doctrine that euen the greatest fauorers therof seemed fearfull These circumstances made me think that Pâpery would receaue a great blow and that his Maiesty would draw the whole Church to be of his opinion What the successe hath been we see you haue shewed I could wish the Controuersy might not haue further progresse be now buried in silence that posterity may not say that Rome grew by his Maiesties opposition against it that this point of her authority was made renowned by victory ouer him what the Papists before did doubtfully defend the bloud of their Martyrs suffering vnder King Iames made certaine knowne illustrious And peace concluded about the silencing of this controuersy might be the beginning of an vniuersall agreement with that Sea seeing other doctrinall controuersies by discussion be brought to that yssue that as I haue heard some learned intelligent persons auerre a calme consultation void of priuate interest and animosity might soone end them Aristobulus This peace were much to be wished nor is it safe to mantaine strife with that Sea but vpon vnauoidable occasions And this is the fifth and last thinge which I wish you would seriously ponder and not wonder that this counsell should be suggested by mee that am no Paââst The knowne bad successe that Kings and Princes haue still had in their opposicions against the Romane Church may mooue sufficiently all faithfull Counsailors though not of the Popes Religion neuer if they may choose to engage their Soâcraignes in such quarrelles Arioch the Ammonite Prince could tell Holosernes out of experience that his power and force would not be able to subdue the Iewes that in the end he would be repelled with disgrace yet he was not a Iew in ReligioÌ The like aduise Amonâ Counsailors that were heathens gaueâ him to desist in his quarrell against Mardochaus the Iew Thou canst not say they resist him he being of the stock of the Iewes but shalt fall beâore him It was noted that when Octauâaâ and Antony were youthes still in their games Octauian had the best wherupon a prudeÌt frend gaue Antony warning in ciuill controuersies neuer to encounter him Thou art said he more noble then he more eloquenâ and better qualified yet I see cleerly his Genins is stronger theÌ thine if thou try the forâune of warre with him he will doubtles be Conquerour What the cause may be why it shold be so who knows but experieÌce now a thousand and six hundred years oldâ shewes that this is theâ fate and felicity of that Sea to conquer with their patience and bring vndââ subiection into nothing all the opponents against their doctrine or their authority The Roman Emperors for 300â yeares together bloudily oppugned Christian Râligâon but principally the Roman Sea in so much as thirty Bishops therof were martyred and the persecuting Emperors as S. Cyârian saith were more greeued that a new high Priest was placed in that Sea then that a new Prince was chosen set vp against them What was the successe For those three Centuries of yeares scarce any Emperour that persecuted them can be named that deriued the Empire to a third heire or dyed not an vnfortunate death and in the end Constantine their Successor submitted the Empire to the obedience of the Roman Bishop wherin the Empeâors that followed him contynued Afterward soâe Christian Emperors begaÌ to quarrell with the Church about the priuiledgeâ and immunities of the Clergy specially Valentinian the third and the succeeding Emperors of the West Did they preuaile In their daies the westerne Empire began to decay The Franks tooke to theÌ France the Saxons Britanny and VVandalls Asrick the Visigothes Spaine the Gothes Italy â which âoone after were made Chriâââans and submitted their Kingdomes to the Pope and their Kings professed to receaue their Crownes authority from him Who knoweth not how pittifully the Easterne Emperors and the Patriarches of Constantinople vexed thâ Pope for many ages which their quarrell they neuer would giue ouer till finally they fell into the miserable bondage slâuery of the Tuâke wherin at this present without hope of remedy they grone What successe to omit many other experiences had the German Caesars that stroue with the Pope for the inuestiture of Bishops by staffe ringe Henry the 4. excommunicated and deposed by Gregory the 7. vpon that cause prospered for a while which this treatiser sets downe to encourage Princes to follow his example but he concealeth how in the end in punishment of his rebellion against his spirituall Father as Papists thinke he was deposed by his owne Sonne put in prison whence escaping he gathered forces was defeated brought to such want as he sued to be Sexton in a Churcââ and serue Priests Masse who had most cruelly vexed the high Priest of Christians many yeares together Not admitted to that office he turned himself to begge of laymen in lamentable manner crying Haue mercy on me at least you my friendes for the hand of the Lord hath touched mee and so full of misery repentance and anguish of mind he pined away to death The newes whereof was receaued with generall ioy of all Christians And his Sonne though for a while he trode the steps of his Fathers disobedience yet finally he yielded vp his right in possession whereof the Roman Bishop is at thiâ day Wherein not only the successe which Popes had against so potent Aduersaries as was Henry the 4. who fought more battaileâ then euer did Iulius Caesar but their courage and confidence also was admirable Neither ought any discreete Protestant trust Theodidacts relatioÌ of HidelbraÌds fainting in the quarrell taken out of Sigebert a partiall Monke seeing Papists bring 50. Historians that contradict him These whose fidelity can with no rea ãâ¦ã called in question relate that he ended his life full of coÌstancy
together with the vse of Scriptures their authority to iudge definitions of the Church by Scriptures The deuisers of this way seemed to haue great zeale of the truth but were not carefull to prouide for peace And so in practise this deuise begot a multitude of Sects and Religions one against another that many weary of all began to thinke it were better men should be vnited in error then thus mortally diuided in Truth A meane was deuised to decide Controuersies by nationall Synods that are confessed may erre but the Ciuil magistrate as our chief Deuines teach as being President in them is to compell his subiects by the sword to imbrace those doctrines that be determined be they true or fals For this course say they was appointed by God who thought it better in the eye of his vnderstanding that sometimes an erroneous definitiue sentence should preuaile then that strifes should haue respite to grow and not come speedily to some end Heere desire of peace concord may seeme to haue made these men lesse zealous of the Truth then behooued them So it opened a gappe specially in England to prophanes irreligiosity which is to be iust of the Kings Religion whatsoeuer it be or rather of none A salue for this sore hath been inueÌted that subiects ought to obey their Princes Lawes and definitions when they haue only probabilities against them not when they haue necessary and demonstratiue reasons which discharge the conscience and giue liberty to resist This caueat and salue for Truth sets the wound of dissention againe a bleeding Sects in the world are now allmost infinite for number amongest which not one is found that pretendeth not cleere and euident demonstration and proofe from holy Scripture for their contrary and repugnant opinions And who shall iudg in this contradiction and confusion whose reasons are necessary and demonstratiue The arguments which we think demonstratiâe moue Papists nothing at all and arguments which we iudg of no force Puritans as Archbishop Bancroft writeth of them take to be so vrgent that if euery hayre of their head were a seuerall life they wold giue them all in the cause This controuersy therfore whose reasons are demonstratiue and whose are not is the greatest of all others nor is there any way to decide it in our churches besides the sword of the temporall Prince Princes therfore for conseruation of peace must keep the spirit in awe practising power infallible in deedes which they dare not challenge in wordes This is the cause of the secret emnity betweene power of Kings and feruour of our Ghospell The Prince can neuer be assured of our Gospellers by the Principles of their Religion that their zeale to the Truth will not trouble the peace of his Kingdome nor Ghospellers of the Prince that his loue of temporall peace will not compell them to trust to his deceaueable definitions Whence it is manifest that so longe as the one shal be zealons and feruent to follow and preach what by light of the spirit they conceaue to be in Scâipture occasions cannot be wanting to the other that will force him to vse his power to curbe their liberty Which power so long as he shal vsurpe so long as he will be Prince and Protestant he must needes vsurpe let him neuer expect that Ghospellers can loue his gouernment though they may flatter in outward shew Those men had no doubt the pure spirit of our Ghospell who professed that except they might haue the reâormation they desired they would neuer be subiect to mortall man Looke vpon the first erecting of our Religion in Germany France Flanders Sweâeland Denmarke and Scotland you shall find that the Ghospell went not so fast vp but Kings and their authority went as fast downe What Bullenger writeth of Anabaptistâ was the true course of our Reformers They began with Bishops pulling them from their seates they ended with Kings casting them froÌ their Thrones Books haue been written of this argument by no Papists that shew their practises and doctrines to be in the highest degree iniurious to Kings Luthers inuectiues I omitt not to pollute your eares Caluin is more modest yet so bould with Kinges as to write that when they resist the Ghospell they are not to be obeyed but rather we ought to sâit it in their faces This is nothing to that which HottomaÌ Beza Goodman Knox Vrsinus Buchanan to forbeare the naming of others innumerable haue writteÌ wherby they make Maiesty subiect to the peoples pleasure no more sure of his state then wethercocks that must turnâ with the wind Vt sumat vt ponat secures Arbitrio popularis aurae What thinke you of these their propositions following Yf Princes be tyrants against God and his Truth their subiects are freed from their oath oâ Allegiance The people are greateâ then the King of greater authority The people haue the same power oâuer the King that the King hath oueâ any one person The people haue right to bestow the Crown at their pleasure As the patient may choose the phisitiaÌ he likeââ best reiect him at his pleasure so the people in whose free choice at the beginning it was to be vnder kings or no may when they be weary of their bad gouernment cast him from his Office into prison into irons put him to death and set whome they please to gouerne in his place Kings haue their authority from the people and the people may take it away againe as men may reuoke their letters of Attorney Yf kings without feare transgresse Gods Lawes they ought no more to be taken as magistrats but be examined accused condemned and punished as priuate transgressors When magistrats do not their duties God giueth the sword into the peopleâ hand from âe which no person King Queene ãâã Emperor is exempt being Idolater ãâã must dye the death These and the ââke positions haue been inuented by ââe zealous professors of our Religion âhe same or worse were renewed and âttered by the feruerous reformers that âroue for discipline in Queene Eliz. âayes that as a worthy prelat writes All the Popiââ traitors that hitherâo haue written and all the Geneâian Scottish Reformers come not neere âhem for malicious and spiteful taunts âor rayling and bitter tearmes for disâaineful and contemptuous speaches âgainst Prince Bishops Counsailors âll other that stand in their way Their âecret practises to set vp by som meane âr other sweete or violent the said âisciplin haue neuer been interrupted âr remitted as he doth particularây relate beginning at the yeere 1560. âo the yeere 1591. when was practised âhat most blasphemous and barbarous âreason of their counterfait Iesus-Christ Hacket and his two Prophets âf mercy and vengeance who would âaue planted the discipline by depriuing the Queene and murthering thâ nobles that stood against it of
vsing at his death these words Because I haue loued Iustice and hated wickednesse I now dy in banishment Vrbane that succeded Gregory both in office and in zeale against the Emperour being driueÌ out of Italy into France hauing so great need of the Kings assistance yet was he so voide of humane respects that at that very time he excommunicated Philip King of France for putting away his true wife and liuing in open incest The Kinge saith an vnpartiall Historian threatned that except Vrbane would restore him to the Church Crowne he wold depart with his whole Kingdome from his obedience the obedience of the Roman Sea yet this moued not that most holy Bishop to relent In fine Philip was faine to yeeld not being able to extort otherwise releasment from excommunication and so religion conscience preuailed ouer thâ Scepter and the Diademe the inuincible Maiesty and Name of King So admirable for constancy were those Popes that vsed their authority to depose wicked Emperors so free from loue of the world that we may iusâly thinke God fauoured their cause Hââsoeuer their perpetuall good successe for so many ages against all aduersaries though the reason therof be hidden may giue iust cause in my opinion for Kings to be wary how they aduenture their Crownes vpon preuailing against them and how they deuise new oathes of Allegiance that wage warre against the authority of their Sea And this is the last thing which I desire to leaue to be seriously pondered by you that loue the King so I coÌclude praying the Lord hartily that as hitherto he hath defended Kingly authority in our great Britany froÌ open enemies so now he will defend the same from secret plots and trayterous Treatises which by shew of friendship seek the ouerthrow thereof Philanax I am glad Aristobulus that wee fell into this discourse in which you haue cleerly discryed Theodidacts fraudulent vndermining of Royall Authority The publishers of that booke besides their secret plotting agaynst ãâã âoueraignty of Princes seeme likeââââ to haue had an eye to their owne âuere in the diâulging therof For there being a commaund that this Booke both in publicke and priuate schooles be read to Children of both sexes ech booke sold for six pence which is hardly worth two pence you must needs see a great summe of money that heÌce is yearely made a summe I say so great as doth farre surpasse the custome of the Peter-pence which in old time euery house payed to the Pope Notwithstanding at this their enriching themselues by this deuise I do not so much grieue but I am hartily sory that so many odious vngrounded positions coÌcerninâ Royall Authority that may raise vp horror rather theÌ loue of Kinges be instilled into the tender mindes of ChildreÌ which afterward when any occasion is giuen may soone turne into hatred But thereof yoâ haue spoken inough Wherfore I likewise will end with your harty good wishes towardes his Maiesty and our most gracious Prince Charles beseching the Almighty to defend them both and to giue them the spirit of wised ãâã wherby they may discouer these ââââsons hidden with a shew of friendshipp The Printer to the Reader THIS Treatise gentle Reader may seeme written by some English Protestant agaynst some Puritans enemies of Kingly Soueraignity which by them in former times openly impugned they now seeke to ouerthrow by grouÌding the same vpon odious and âaungerous PositioÌs touching the immunity of Tyrants The Authour disputeth the questioÌ of this weighty subiect in such moderate stile and manner bringing ãâ¦ã ns both solide and not reg ãâ¦ã ing with Catholike doctrine that he may be thought to be in opinion Catholike though for modesties sake to the end that this truth might be more pleasingly accepted of Protestants in this worke he discourseth as if he were Protestant And for this reason some Catholike arguments he doth pretermit others he doth not vrge to the vttermost partly for breuityes sake but cheefly because his inteÌt is no more then to shew that the new Protestants principles from which they deduce Râyall Authority be at the least doubtfull and vncertayne And this he doth cleerly demonstrate and thence concludes that it is against the rules euen of humane policy to forsake the most sure grounds of Soueraigne Power in Kinges whereon Christian Kingdomes relying haue hitherto stood firme and florished vnd ãâ¦ã Catholike discipline iust l ãâ¦ã and to build the sacred authority of Princes whereon their peoples safety dependes vpon the new vngrounded Doctrines Paralogismes of Scriptures which seemes to haue byn the drift of the former Dialogue For this cause I thought it would not be amisse nor lost labour to put the same in print renewed before hand corrected The title God and the King I would not alter because iâ two wordes it doth fully put downâ the Catholike opinion concerning Princes Authority their subiects Allegiance For as this treaâise doth iâsinuate three opinions in this poynt now are in EnglaÌd The first of PuritaÌs who wil haue God without King or else such a King that must depend on the peoples beck ãâã their ConsistoriaÌ Preachers ãâ¦ã ose perfidious audacity his âââesty hath had sufficient experience The second is of Politicians who haue no more Christianity then Parlamentary decrees breath into them These will haue King without God or at least King and God that is God so longe and no longer then the King shall please whome they will haue still obeyed though he go openly about to extinguish the light of Christian Religion The third opinion is of Catholikâs whose âote is God and the Kingâ in the first place they worship God in the second the King to whome they giue all Allegiance and subiection as farre as Religion and conscience will permit And this is to giue what is Caesars to Caesar and what is Gods to God Farewell FINIS Dial. God and the Kinge pag. 2. Dial. p. 33. 34. âpeach in the Star-chamber 16.6 Bancroft in the Dangerous poâitioÌs p. 33. Psal. 84. v. 16. 2. Thessal â 2 v. 10. Hooker Ecclesiast pol. prefac p. 28. Hooker ibid. p. 29. Suruey of the holy âiscipline p. 93. (a) Baâil Dor. p 40. 41. (b) Knox. histor of the Church of Scot. p. 265. Dang poâit p. 11. (c) Sleydan l. 28. l. 22. Oâian Epist. cent 16. p. 566. (d) Cuspin of the Church of France p. 625 Ferres histor p. 588. (e) Osiand ibid. p. 94. (f) Chitrâeus in chron p. 71 (g) Fulk answere to the declam of P. ârarines (h) Dang posit l â c. â 4â seq (i) Suruey of the disc p. 101. (k) Dang poâit Suruey and others by D. Bancroft (l) Principes sunt omnium quos terra âustinet sâultisâimi deterrimi nebulones ToÌ 2. Ger. âen de mag saecul fol. 200. (m) Cal. in Dan. cap. 6. v. 22. (n) Knox to Engl. Scotl. fol. 78. (o) BuchaÌ de iââe Reg.