Selected quad for the lemma: religion_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
religion_n	church_n	faith_n	roman_a	4,619	5	7.9310	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A54796	A vindication of The character of a popish successor, in a reply to two pretended ansvvers to it by the author of the character.	Settle, Elkanah, 1648-1724.; Phillips, John, 1631-1706.	1681 (1681)	Wing P2114; ESTC R6364	14,481	18

then granting the truth of this his opposers has more reason to dread his Power for 't is a known Maxim The greatest and truest friend the most implacable and revengeful Enemy But for those Acts of Parliament which we find ordering and disposing of the Succession they make says he very little for the purpose for which they were produced Yes they prove that the Succession has been given by Act of Parliament where the King and the Parliament thought fit and upon those reasons they afterwards thought more weighty the Gift has been recalled and they have placed a Right elsewhere and who shall dare to say these Acts or any made by King and Parliament are unjust Indeed the King without his People or the People without their King cannot alter the Succession but with a joynt consent Those Acts of Parliament declare it has and may be done again and certainly there never was a Cause that did require the changing of the Succession half so much as we have now But he is drawn to an end and I thought nothing could have been more audacious than his Answer is throughout in notorious Accusations of all our Great and Honourable Parliaments but the dedicating his Libel to those very men with the same hand he writ it of them is a boldness that certainly has no president but is an Original of Impudence A REPLY TO Roger L' Estranges PAMPHLET WELL but now for our Second Masquerade who Begins just like his Brother and carries on the Argument of Forty one throughout every Paragraph of his whole Pamphlet to answer all that can be said against Popery with that He tells us The Character of a Popish Successor were an excellent piece in the kind if it had not too much Sublimate in it The truth of it is says he the Author has made the figure of his Successor too frightful and too enormous and then he finishes his Master-piece with a paradox by the supposal of a most excellent Prince and yet making him the greater Devil for his Virtues I cannot suppose it any Paradox to say the intoxication of Romish Principles and that Religious frenzy in the brains of Majesty will pervert all his Natural Virtues and make him imagine he does his God and his people good service and think he improves his Talent sevenfold when he puts the severest Roman Laws in force against us which is no less than the forfeiture of our Estates next the loss of our Liberties and our Lives in a very short time after Nor are we to suffer any death more merciful than burning alive which is the Popes own Law in these words Decerminus ut viva in conspectu hominum Comberatum De Hereticis 7 Decretat sect in consutilem Nay his obeying his Superior Ecclesiastick Power in executing these Laws shall be so far from making him or any other Papist else think him the greater Devil as he says that on the other side the Pope and all of that Church will tell him he has improved all his Virtues to that height that he deserves to be a Saint has merited that Heaven which they will give him But before I go any further says he let me recommend to the Reader one Remark as a thing worthy his attention That he cuts all the way upon the Successor as presupposing him to be a Papist and consequently dangerous and insufferable by reason of that perswasion and very magisterially gives his own bare word for the dangers of that perswasion why does he not rather tell us in particular terms These and these are the principles and then make his inference from those principles to the dangers that attend them I thought both the Principles of the Roman Church and the dangers that attend them had been too well experienced in England as well as other places not to be known to the most Vulgar person in it for what was Q. Maries Tyranny but an impulse of Conscience derived from those Popish Principles that told her that all Hereticks are all notorious Traytors Traytors against God himself and therefore guilty of the highest High Treason which they call Crimen Laesae Majestatis Divina and therefore they deserve that worse penalties should be inflicted for that than other High Treason And it is besides enacted by a General Decree That whatsoever King Bishop or Nobleman shall believe that the Decrees of the Roman Bishops may be or shall suffer them to be violated in any thing be accursed and shall remain for ever guilty before God as a betrayer of the Catholick Faith Caus. 25. 91. cap. 11. and therefore considering all this we cannot with reason think that such barbarous Cruelty could be the delight of naturally soft and tender hearted woman or that Majesty could be so perjured so ungrateful and so dishonourable for little or no advantage but she was a servant of the Church and Pope and durst not incur his curse that was to open her the Gates of Paradice and 't is impossible for any Papist to have such a Soveraign Power as hers and not to be the same Tyrant that she was Now in Answer to a paragraph which his Brother the wiser of the two skipt over concerning the barbarity of the known Doctrine of the Roman Church that pronounces damnation to all that differ from it in any one matter of faith and to justifie his Masters and his Religion from such a terrible Accusation as tearing up his Fathers Sacred Monument branding his blessed memory with the name of Heretick and the compleating the horrid Anathema of most impiously execrating the very Majesty that gave him being He says the Characterizer lays down a false supposition and then raises out of it a most uncharitahle consequence for the very position That there is no salvation out of that Church is yet qualified with an exception In case of an invinsible perswasion I think that case was plain in that Royal Martyr who sealed the invinsible perswasion of the Protestant Faith with his blood And next he says If this be so lewd a principle in one Religion why is it not so in another Which being admitted involves every individual member of the Church of Rome in the same condemnation So that he says in asserting this Doctrine the Characterizer himself damns all the Papists as well as he makes them damn all the Protestants Now as I never thought the Protestants in a more likely state of damnation for the Papists saying or believing so so I always thought it was the proof of Crimes and not the accusation that must condemn all men before so just a Judg as God Almighty and there are such proofs of that Hellish Doctrine that it bears witness against it self for 't is not the Protestants knowing and judging their principles but their believing and following them damns the Papists but he is a Protestant that holds the Romish Tenents as good as those of the Church of England and is of whether for a peny so that 't is

tho' a Papist King cannot influence the Judiciary Officers of his own creation have already depraved the Bench and obstructed Justice as in the last line of his 8 th page where he says Iustice has been denied where it might give distast to the Representatives of the Nation Well but after much sensless quibling upon the Characterizer's being a Papist because he was of their minds so far as to believe their design of establishing Popery in England might have took effect he at last has not only granted the possibility of their belief but the introducing of Popery feasible Yet says he does it follow that because they thought so then that they think so still sure they have little reason to believe that that design which was in so hopeful a forwardness as never since Queen Maryes days could be boasted of carried on with all the art and contrivance all the secresie and cunning of a diligent and active party favoured by several the greatest persons in the kingdom and those most eminent for their Riches and Interest to support the Cause and the universal security of the Nation conspiring with all these and after all this brought to nought should ever at all or at least in this age be effected when all their measures are broken and all their wicked contrivances laid open and the whole scene of that Religious Villany displayed to publick view when the whole Nation is still awake with continual fears and fresh Alarms against them Yes Mr. Scribler 't was and might still be possible if the people of England be yet more sensless than in that security you spoke of and does yet leave them the hopes of a pernicious Popish King there will be then no need of Plots his Power will undoubtedly perform much more than all their Hell-born stratagems cou'd ere design It was indeed an over-hasty Roman zeal to mount him on the Throne before his time they were impatient of delays thought long till they arrived at their dear promised Land and wou'd have took delight to have waded through that Sea of blood that wou'd have brought them thither 't was that and Providence that it seemed had not designed we all should perish in our dreams made them so unhappy to themselves and fortunate to us Their fear that death might interpose betwixt them and all their hopes and snatch their darling Prince before his Brother's or their work was done their dread of this and eager thirst of blood made them plot on for what they might have had without and ruin all But to prove 't is possible in case of a Popish King 't is in the power of any English Prince to remit the punishments due to that party when convicted as has been experienced and I think none will doubt but a Popish King and an obedient Son of Holy Mother Church will extend his Negotiation a little further for them than an Heretick so far no doubt as to encourage his own Religion and suppress its enemies and give them leave to revenge their long sufferings Well admit this King and more certainly the impowering his party to all they can desire what will the cackling of all our Protestant Geese do then to the preserving our Capitol even as much good as our Scriblers Vindication has done his Master Next if it were possible that we shall ever suffer a Papist King in England and put the reins of Government into his hands whose Arbitrary Principles we so abhor when we do this we shall no doubt not only be content to let him have a standing Army but shall every man voluntarily contribute to the setting up and maintaining that Army we know before-hand is design'd to enslave us or cut our throats But I will hope and believe it impossible for the whole Nation to be mad at once and on that presumption agree with my Pamphleteer in that point That we shall have no standing Army no Arbitrary Government and indeed I fancy the Jesuits have just cause to say now Perditur haec inter miseros Lux. Well but he says again It were folly for a Papist King to attempt the bringing in of Popery for says he young as the Reformation was in Queen Maryes days it might indeed with some ease have been pluckt up ere it had taken root the Papist in those days equal at least if not exceeding the Protestants all longing for the restoration of their Religion but now when this Idolatrous Superstition has been so long worn off the minds of the people and the Reformation so deeply and so strongly rooted the Roman Church so detested both for the dangerous Innovations of its Doctrine and the Idolatry of its Ceremonies and so odious in the eyes of the people for its pernicious principles exprest in the Villanous practises of its professors in Massacres and Plots all detected All this indeed is very true and I confess he is so far much in the right But soft and fair how came this to pass how has the Papists disobliged you now that you are so briskly treating of their pernicious Principles the dangerous Innovations of their Doctrines Idolatry of their Ceremonies and their Villanous practices in Plots and Massacres How came the wind to be thus turn'd now Or has my good friend forgot himself since he writ the second page of his wise Answer where he was showing that the principles of a Papist and a Protestant so little differ 't is contrary to reason or common sense a Papist should be less an honest man for them as only differing in a few disputable matters of faith and not very material ceremonies of divine worship And is it possible that he who has so exclaimed against contradictory discourse and arguing and has so much endeavoured to find it out where it never was by leaving out or adding words of his own should at last be found so grosly guilty of the same fault Well but perhaps he may as justly as his Master say the case was alter'd so he could not help it for indeed his first business was to perswade us to believe what a happy condition we should be in under the reign of so virtuous and heroick a Popish King and to take off our dreadful apprehensions of his Religion therefore he tells us the small difference betwixt us and them as only a few disputable matters of faith c. but fearing that work with all his painful arguments may not be perfectly finisht therefore he now says we have no reason to think it can do us any harm because it can never be establisht in England for the dangerous Innovations of its Doctrines and the Idolatry of its Ceremonies and villanous practises of its professors in Plots and Massacres have rendred it so odious But this contradiction was a little unlucky in this place just where he is accusing the false Satyr of blowing hot and cold with the same breath but in that we may suppose he did forget himself which may be forgiven