irrationality Secondly Let us compare the fallibility of Reason with the infallibility of Scripture When the Papists lift up the Pope as supream judge in matters of Religion it is a sufficient answer to tell them the first Clement held the Platonical community of all things even of wives Marcellinus sacrificed to Idols Liberius subscribed to Arianism Innocent the first taught that little ones could not be saved without the Eucharist Vigilius was an Eutychian Honorius a Monothelite Hildebrand a brand of hell and impiously diabolical John the 23th was accused in the Council of Constance of this opinion That the souls of men dye with their bodies even as the souls of brutes and should such be judges in matters of Religion When the Socinian by subjecting articles of Faith unto Reason makes not one but as many Popes as men we need say no more to him but humanum est errare reason is a fallible thing The Philosophers were the Patriarchs of heretiques Platonical Philosophy in the Fathers and Aristotelical in the Schoolmen hath much debased the truths of God saith a great Divine All the errors and heresies which have swarmed abroad in all ages have been the progeny of corrupt Reason upon this the devil begets all the black monstrous opinions which crawl within doors in the Church or without in the Pagan world And should such a thing as this come and sit in judgment on the pure words of God which are surer then the voice of Angels and stand faster then the pillars of heaven and earth which in so many successions of Ages never contracted the least speck of falshood or shed a leaf in the fall of the least tittle or iota thereof Surely when reason thus forgets it self and its own fallibility it degrades it self and becomes unreasonable Thus far of the irrationality of the Socinian faith But Secondly The nullity of it is considerable it is a nullity in its foundation and at last it proves a nullity in the consequence It is a nullity in its foundation the Socinian believes the Scriptures not as a divine testimony but as congruous to reason and so trusts not in God but in himself and his own heart Thus Socinus expresses himself Non generalem comprobandi rationem quaerimus quod eam qui dixit ejusmodi esse appareat ut nullâ in re mentiri posset sed singularem quandam quâ id nominatim quod comprobandum est per causas effecia propria ita se babere demonstratur adeò ut non modò quia Deum ipsum dixisse appareat id verum esse constet sed etiam quia verum esse appareat id Deum dixisse nobis certò persuadeamus Qaomodo poterat clariùs prodere 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 suam saith a Learned man how could he more clearly betray his infidelity he would not have us only believe a thing true because God says so but believe also that God says so because it appears true to our own reason where this is the foundation faith is a meer nullity and that which is a nullity in the foundation at last proves a nullity in the consequence Reason corrupting it self in its own pride casts away the found principles of the Gospel and these being gone putrifies in abominable errors like Herod assuming a Deity to himself it is spiritually smitten of God and eaten up of worms I mean those errors which are but the putrefactions of reason How do the Socinians Paganize in worshipping a creature a Christ whom they deny to be God Mahometize in denying the sacred Trinity Judaize in standing for an interpreting Messiah only and not a satisfying one Manicheize in undervaluing the old Testament Arianize in denying the Deity of Christ Pelagianize in denying original sin Anabaptize in denying baptism to infants how do some of them Divelaze in horrid blasphemies calling the sacred Trinity tricipitem Cerberum and to those who assert Jesus Christ to be Gods son asking An Deus habuit uxorem Whether God had a wise and such like hellish stuff in which much of the devil appears After all this fearful shipwiack of faith what remains too too little to denominate them Christians Ignatius called the Ebionites because they denied Christs Deity men-worshippers the antiont Church styled the Samosatenians upon the same account God-killers and a great Divine passed this censure on the Socinians that they were a company of baptized Turks indeed their corrupted reason dissolves their faith into little or nothing Fifthly This belief must be such as owns the holy Scriptures for the rule of faith To the Law and to the testimony saith the Prophet If they speak not according to this word it is because here is no light in them Isa 8.20 As soon as the morning of faith breaks in the heart the word is owned as the rule Enthusiasts going oft from the Scriptures take the spirit for their rule Swenckfield was altogether for the spirit and the internal word and little or nothing at all for the external Henry Nicholas boasting of the holy anointing looked on the Scripture as a literal fleshly elementish thing John Valdesso saith that Christians may at first serve themselves with Scripture as an Alphabet but afterwards leaving it to beginners they attend to their proper Master the spirit of God Others say the Scripture is but a dead letter a thing of paper and ink and we must not try the living by the dead the holy spirit by the Scripture Such as these bragging of their own revelations call all other Christians Vocalists and Literalists because of their adherence to the Scriptures Mr. Saltmarsh makes three sphears of administration the Law or meer letter the Gospel which hath duty and grace in it and the spirit the pure spirit which is the third heaven higher then Scriptures and ordinances The Weigelians talk of a seculum Spiritus Sancti in which there shall be higher dispensations then before and we shall be wiser then Apostles The Quakers make the light within that is as I take it natural conscience the standard of all their actings All these though clothed in various words agree together to crucifie the Scriptures as if they had somewhat more noble Unto them I shall offer some considerations First The Apostles direction is Try the spirits whether they are of God 1 Joh. 4.1 in the original 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 try them as Goldsmiths try metals by the touchstone or by the fire or as Magistrates question offenders or examine those that stand for an office use all manner of ways to find out whether the spirits be right or not upon this as a sufficient warrant I shall put some interrogatories to the Enthusiast Thou sayest the spirit of God is in thy heart and is it not in the Scriptures too and where-ever it is is it not congruous and harmonious to it self And what doth it say in the Scripture doth it not say that the Scripture is the rule To the Law and to the testimony
and there 's the sea and yonder 's the Sun Moon and Stars sensibly pointing from one creature to another so it is with the believer when he is irradiated by the holy spirit he can look into his own heart and experimentally say this is the pretious faith and that is the love in incorruption and the other is the meekness of wisdom and so go over all the parts of the new creature formed within him or at least over such or so many of them as may assure him that he is in a state of grace This is the way of assurance first there is a constellation of faith and other graces in the heart then these graces irradiated by the holy spirit send forth a kind of splendor which the soul reflecting on it self taking up it comes to attain assurance well knowing that such and such things accompany salvation and import no less then a Divine favour notable is that of St. Paul in whom after ye believed ye were sealed with the holy spirit of promise Eph. 1.13 Mark after ye believed first there must be faith and the train of graces attend thereon and then comes the seal of the spirit of promise the same spirit which endited the promises in the word comes and seals them on the heart whereas in the word there are such promises made to faith and love and holiness the irradiating spirit plainly discovers that faith and that love and that holiness to be indeed in the heart and so seals up the promises to the believer in particular as if it had expresly said this or that promise belongs to thee Hence the believer so sealed may say of the promises as Origen did of those Scriptures which did much affect him haec est Scriptura mea this promise is mine and that promise is mine nay all the Land of promise as much as I can set my foot on is mine own There are three seals to the promises first God seals them for true in the blood of his own Son in whom all of them are Yea and Amen then man seals them for true by faith he that believeth sets to his seal that God is true and then again God seals them for true to the believer in particular by his irradiating spirit Faith then goes before all other graces but assurance comes after them as being no other then the clear evidence of their true existence in the soul Unless we allow this distinction we gratifie the Enthusiasts who declaim against all marks of grace as legal things and sandy foundations Sixthly Faith stands upon the word of God purely totally and entirely In point of expectation it will not look without a word of promise in point of obedience it will not stir a foot without a word of command in point of doctrine it will not lend an ear without a word of instruction Hence Reverend Calvin saith Inst l. 3. c. 2. Perpetuam esse fidei revelationem cum verbo nec magis ab eo posse divelli quà m radios à Sole unde oriuntur Faith hath a perpetual relation to the word and can no more be sundred from it then the beams from the Sun from whom they arise should it be sundred from it it would lose its nature and cease to be faith but assurance doth not stand so purely totally and entirely upon the word this is also manifest by the manner of attaining assurance that is not made axiomatically in an Enthusiastical way as if there were an inward voice saying thou art justified but discoursively and after some such manner as in this practical Syllogism Whosoever believeth his sins are forgiven but I believe Ergo my sins are forgiven Here the conclusion which imports assurance in it stands upon two propositions the Major is meerly grounded upon the word but the Minor stands upon spiritual sense and experience caused by the holy spirit irradiating the soul in its reflections upon its own estate therefore assurance which is comprized in the conclusion doth not stand so meerly upon the word as faith doth Thus the Learned Pemble speaking of that Syllogism saith the major is of faith the minor of sense and experience And the conclusion of both but chiefly of faith as it follows on the premises by infallible argumentation and partly of sense as it is founded on the inward experience of Gods grace working upon our souls What the doctrine of Faith is is to be sought in Bibles but whether there be a particular act of faith or not such as is comprized in the minor Com. R m. 8. cap. must be looked for in the heart Fides non creditur sed habetur sentitur in corde saith Learned Pareus Faith is not believed but had and felt in the heart Actus reflexivus in ipsam fidem quo credo me credere non est ipsa fides sed potiùs sensus fidei Loc. Com. 689. saith Maccovius The reflexive act whereby I know that I believe is not properly faith but the sense of it But you will say if the minor stands upon sense and experience how can the conclusion which imports assurance be de fide And Bellarmine argues thus D. justificat l. 3. c. 8. Nothing can be certain with a certainty of faith unless it be conteined in the word of God upon which if it lean not it is not faith but that such or such a man is justified in particular is not conteined in the word neither can it be deduced from thence for then I must argue thus the word saith All that truly turn to God shall find mercy but I do truly turn to him therefore I am sure of mercy in which the minor is not in the word By the way we may observe what an excellent foundation the Jesuite layes for his disputation Fides non est nisi verbi divini auctoritate nitatur that is not faith which is not bottomed on the authority of the divine word Oh rare if this were believed what would become of Popery What of all the hay and stubble of their vain Traditions Why do they play the wily Gibeonites with their old bottles and clowted shoes obtruding their unwritten verities and mouldy customs upon the Church of God I can be assured of no Religion which is not founded on Scripture But for answer The certainty of the Doctrine of Faith which respects the whole Church is to be found in the Scripture but the certainty of an act of Faith which is in a particular man is to be found in the heart by spiritual sense and experience and so in Bellarmines minor the certainty of my turning to God stands not upon the word but upon spiritual sense and experience yet nevertheless the conclusion which imports assurance is de fide for every conclusion is so which stands upon one proposition contained in Scripture and upon another gathered from sense or experience as the case is in all such practical Syllogisms yet withall as I said at first the
desperation Adding moreover That it is Antichrists proper work to weaken the Faith and Hope of Christians Indeed this Doctrine doth dispirit and emasculate Religion turn Faith and Hope into meer Meteors and set the Consciences of Men a-fluctuating in perpetual doubts and labyrinths But let us see what they say for it first distinguishing between the certainty of Faith and the certainty of Hope they allow the latter to Believers And what manner of Hope is this Is it a fallible conjectural Hope only such a Spiders web may be found in an Hypocrite who hath no lot or part in this matter Or is it a true Divine Hope sutable to a real Believer This even the School-man Durandus will confess to be such That non potest non evenire it cannot but come to pass this will not make ashamed Rom. 5.5 by disappointing the Soul where it lodgeth It is the Believers anchor pure and stedfast Heb. 6.19 Such as will never leave him to the courtesie of a wave or rock for it enters in within the Veil and is fastned in Heaven Faith and Hope which they here vainly distinguish are coupled so together in a Believer that Hope cannot fluctuate unless Faith do so neither is Faith certain without an Hope congruous thereunto Faith is the Hypostasis or Subsistence of things hoped for saith the Apostle Heb 11.1 And Hope as an Ancient hath it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The very Blood of Faith They say indeed That the Promises are sure and infallible but withal they put such an uncertainty upon our Dispositions as to evacuate the very drift and scope of the Promises which is That Believers might have strong consolation Heb. 6.18 Streaming out from those two immutable Things The Word and Oath of God who cannot lie But if the Believer must still be in doubt whether he have true Faith and Repentance O how weak must his Comforts be and how cold the Promises He doth as it were but Tantalize at the pure fountain of Joy and Consolation It 's true the Promises are Conditional But are not those Conditions found in true Believers May they not know that they turn unto God with all their heart that is seriously and sincerely Remission and Salvation hang not on the degree of Faith and Repentance but on the truth thereof They cannot say their Heart is clean with a sinless Sanctity but they may that it is so with a true Integrity such as hath all the Promises entailed on it A true Believer saith St. Austin may say Sanctus sum I am holy and to say so is not Pride but Gratitude They cannot understand all the errors lying in the deep of the Heart but they may the Graces brought in there by a new Creation That Jâ—m 3. Who can tell if God will turn Non tam dubitantis quam bene sperantis est It speaks not so much doubting as hoping that God would avert the imminent Judgment That Acts 8. Perhaps thy thoughts may be forgiven puts not a scruple on Gods Mercy towards Penitents but upon Simons Repentance whether he would truly repent or not Happy is the man that feareth always saith the Wiseman Not he that feareth with a servile Fear for the Spirit of Bondage makes not happy but with a filial And that well consists with Assurance for we may rejoice with trembling as the Psalmist hath it Psal 2.11 Nay it is advanced thereby For it fears the Lord and his Goodness The heart of man is deceitful even the Believer's so far as it is leavened with the reliques of Sin but as it is renewed with Principles of Grace it is a true heart as the Apostle calls it Heb. 10.22 and so may pass a true judgment on its own estate Though it cannot know all that is in its own abyss yet it may know the general frame and byas of it self and thereby discover its Sincerity Hence the Apostle saith If our hearts condemn us not then have we confidence towards God 1 John 3.21 If natural Conscience be a thousand witnesses inlightned is ten thousand Faith say the Romanists leans on the Word and there is no Word That such or such an one hath true Faith and Repentance or that his sins are pardoned and remitted Unto which I answer As to that That no Word saith that such an one hath true Faith and Repentance it is to be considered That when one Proposition stands upon the Word and another upon natural light or experience The Conclusion is de Fide When in the 6. General Council the Fathers proceeded against the Monothelites by this Argument Whosoever is true God and true Man bath two Wills But Christ is true God and true Man Ergo he hath two Wills The Major stood on the Light of Nature and the Minor only on the Word yet the Conclusion was de Fide And when the Believer thus communes with his own heart in a practical Syllogism Whosoever believs and repents bath his Sins pardoned But I believe and repent Ergo I have my Sins pardoned The Major stands on the Word and the Minor on Experience but the Conclusion is de Fide If a Conclusion drawn from two Propositions one standing on the Word and another on other Evidence be not de Fide What will the Romanists do for their darling the Popes Supremacy To prove that such or such a Pope suppose Gregory or Innocent were Supream in the Church They must argue thus Whoever is Peters Successor is Supream in the Church But Gregory or Innocent were Peters Successors Ergo They were Supream in the Church In which Argument though they would fain set up the Major upon Scripture yet the Minor stands only on Election No Scripture saith That Peters Successor must be a Gregory or an Innocent nevertheless they would have the Conclusion de fide But if a Conclusion drawn from such Propositions be de fide then may the Believer according to the practical Syllogism abovementioned conclude in Faith That his sins are pardoned though no Word tell him That he hath true Faith and Repentance It suffices that Experience tells him so But as a further answer Neither is the Word altogether wanting herein for it sets out Faith and Repentance by infallible marks and characters as common touchstones to try them by to the end of the World And where those marks and characters are it pronounces those Graces to be of the right stamp and virtually tells Believers as much and they being irradiated with the Holy Spirit which shines upon both Scriptures and Evidences may receive the saying and considently say as St. John doth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 We know that we know him This is the Faith and this the Repentance marked out in Scripture Again as to that That no Word saith That such or such an one in particular hath his sins pardoned The answer is easie Universals include Particulars That 1 Joh. 4.3 Every spirit that confesseth not that Christ is come in the flesh is
my Glory manifested For the right understanding of these we must note Christ did not come only or chiefly to cure the Bodies of Men no those Miracles which in transitu cured their Bodies Miracula christi corporaliter facta Spiritaliter intelligenda snut were ultimately levelled at their Souls that by Outward Cures they might be led to seek Inward ones from Christ Neither did he do all his Miracles on Earth no being Ascended and Sitting at the Right Hand of Majesty in Heaven he works 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 those Spiritual Miracles on the Souls of Men which are incomparably greater than those on their Bodies How many blind Hearts and those worse than blind Eyes hath he cured by a Touch as he passed by them in the Ordinances causing them to see himself the True light and Sun of Righteousness together with all the Heavenly Mysteries which stream as so many Beams or Rayes from him How many deaf Souls have upon his Divine Ephatha been obedientially opened to the Commands of God and though lame before have Rose up walked holily and praised God what Spiritual Lepers hath he by a Touch of his Spirit and Word cleansed Quae enim immunditia quae incredulitas quae duritia quod peccatum ad hunc contactum Christi consistere poterit saith Ferus No uncleanness unbelief hardness sinfulness can stand against the Touch of Christ What Sinners of all forts dead in Sins and Trespasses hath he raised up to a Divine Life Saint Austin reciting that Christ had raised up three Persons viz. The Maid in her Fathers House the Young-Man carried out upon the Bier and Lazarus four days dead and stinking in the Grave adds Ista tria genera mortuorum sunt tria genera peccatorum quos suscitat Christus these three dead ones are three sorts of Sinners raised up by Christ As the Maid in the house so is the secret Sinner raised up intra latebras conscientiae within the doors of his own Heart As the young Man carried out upon the Bier so is the open Sinner raised up out of known Sins And as Lazarus dead and stinking in the grave so is the customary Sinner raised up out of his old putrified Sins At the voice of Christ the strongest bonds of custom are broken and the poor Sinner comes forth into an holy life These things being so it appears That the Believer may experiment the Spiritual Miracles of Christ and from thence gather a proof in his own Heart That the very same hand wrought the Corporal ones especially seeing these latter are but types and shadows of the other which he finds verified in himself Thus much touching this Fundamental Experiment of the Scriptures A Believer may experiment the Laws Promises Threatnings Supernatural Truths Sacred Ordinances and Great Works in Scripture to be Divine and so have a Practical proof that the Scripture is of God CHAP. XIII Of the top and highest stature of Faith the Believers Assurance of his good estate of Pardon and Salvation That this Assurance is attainable many ways demonstrated HAving passed over the Believers Experiment touching the Scripture I shall now proceed to another touching his own Estate He may certainly know 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Dionysius speaks That it is well with him That he is in a good state of Pardon and Salvation This is apex fidei the top and highest stature of Faith a Priviledg which transcends Earth and antedates Heaven to us Here are those three things Lumen Laetitia Pax Light Joy and Peace which as the Schoolman Halensis saith render the experiment of Grace in the Soul truly certain Here are Coelestial Beams unspeakable Joys admirable Serenities Sabbaths of Rest Seas of Sweetness and Beatitudes too great for the tongue of Men and Angels to express Before the Believer walked only with the single staff of Recumbency and Resignation but now he hath bands and troops of Comfort following after him from the Promises His darling Soul is now richly provided for to all Eternity Eternal Beanty is in his Eye Infinite Goodness at hand for his Embraces the lines are fallen in a kind of Paradise his Portion is no less than God himself all his Blessings are dipt in Love The World may brand him but the Spirit seals In the midst of sweeping Judgments he is still one of Gods Jewels and as soon as Death dissolves him Heaven receives him Touching this great Experiment I shall first prove That it is attainable by a Believer and then shew in what ways it is to be attained The Romanists hold That no Man without special Revelation can be certain of his Pardon and Salvation not with a certainty of Faith Bellar. de Juslif lib. 3. which is infallible but only with a certainty of Hope which is conjectural The Promises indeed are sure say they but our Dispositions are uncertain The Promises run Conditionally If they return to thee with all their heart 2 Chron. 6.38 and who can be sure that he doth so Who can say I have made my heart clean saith the Wise-man Prov. 20.9 Who can understand his errors saith David Psal 19.12 Some Scriptures put a peradventure upon Remission Who can tell if God will turn and repent Jon. 3.9 Repent if perhaps the thought of thy heart may be forgiven thee Act. 8.22 And the reason is because of the uncertainty of our Dispositions Faith is not Faith unless it lean on the Divine Word and no Word saith Such or such an one hath true Faith and Repentance or is truly pardoned Happy is the man that feareth always Prov. 28.14 The heart of man is deceitful above all things who can know it Jer. 17.9 Assurance if vouchsafed would but puss up Pride and open a door to Licentiousness Thus the Pontisicians Their Divinity in this great Point is much like the Philosophy of the old Scepticks those Patrons of all Uncertainty who used to say 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Reason against Reason puts all Propositions in aequilibrio the Balance hangs even without Declension this or that way after all debates imaginable still 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 perhaps it is so perhaps not It may be they do see and hear it may be not at least they doubt whether they do it distinctly or no. After the same sort the Romanists do what they can to perswade Believers out of their Spiritual sense out of which Assurance ariseth It may be will they say thou repentest and believest it may be not or if thou dost them it may be not sicut oportet in such a manner as they ought to be done Hence the Council of Trent Can. 9â—â— calls the certainty of Remission vain and remote from all Piety This is that Doctrine of theirs which Luther calls Monstrum dubitationis the monster of doubting and withal asserts That if they erred only in this it were a just eause for us to separate from such an infidel-Infidel-Church Learned Pareus stiles it Desperationis ossicina the shop of