Selected quad for the lemma: religion_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
religion_n	church_n	doctrine_n	england_n	6,989	5	6.3346	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A55486	Christophagia, The mystery of eating the flesh and drinking the blood of Christ and the modus or manner thereof discovered / by Edm. Porter ...	Porter, Edmund, 1595-1670.	1680 (1680)	Wing P2983; ESTC R4670	79,869	188

erroneous and untheological and will appear anon to be Heretical because it is destructive of the Doctrine of Redemption except we will confine it and understand it to be spoken only of the Soul of Adam which was the first and the only human Soul that ever could truly and properly be said to be so created and infused Neither is the time of Drinking the Blood of Christ to be confined or thought to be first performed when we receive the Sacrament thereof because the Blood of Christ is not really in the Sacramental Chalice neither is his Soul there but his blood or Soul are in the Communicants for this drinking of his Blood which is really intended by those words must have been performed although the Sacrament had never been set up for we drink the Blood of Christ at our quickning in the Womb because then our blood or souls are united with the Blood or Soul of Christ when we are not in any capacity of Receiving the Sacrament thereof Therefore all the Latine Fathers and all later Theological Writers although they are of several and opposite Persuasions in Religion yet they generally Read those words of Christ Nisi Biberitis which I conceive to signifie a Tense of the time past Except ye have drank as is observed before of the word Eat The flesh and blood of Christ is not now to be eaten and drank really for that was actually performed before even at our Union with his Flesh and Soul in our Mothers Wombs St. Austin upon those words Psal 22. Aug. in Psal 21. 10. Thou art my God from my Mothers belly observeth that although God the Father was the Father of God the Son before his Incarnation and from Eternity Yet that he could not be called the God or the Lord of the Son but only in consideration of his intended Incarnation And because the Son in the womb of the Virgin assumed the whole Human Nature and not only Flesh nor only a Soul but both therefore God the Father became his God and his Lord the God and the Lord both of his Body and of his Soul This the same Father divers times observeth as namely on the 136 Psalm and also in his To. 6. n. 17. 19. Polemicks against the Arians The Church of England evidently declareth the same Doctrine in the 2 Article of Religion in these words Christ took Mans Nature in the Womb of Art Rel. 2. the Blessed Virgin of her Substance so that two whole and perfect Natures that is to say the Godhead and the Manhood were joyned together in one Person It being granted that Christ took the whole and perfect Human Nature upon him in the Womb it must needs be consequently granted that he there received his Human Soul because neither the Flesh alone nor the Soul alone can be truly and severally called the Perfect Human Nature We know that the Ancient Church accounted Athan. de Incar n. 22. Epip haer 77. them to be Hereticks who taught that Christ assumed only his Flesh but not his Human Soul in the Womb of the Virgin The Athanasian Creed also declareth Athan. Symb. that Christ was Man of the Substance of his Mother Perfect God and Perfect Man He could not be Perfect Man of the Substance of his Mother except he had received both his Flesh and his Soul from her otherwise by her he could have been but Semivir i. an imperfect or half-man The true and real Union of the Son of God with Mankind consisteth in the assumption of his Flesh and Soul from Mankind by which assumption the Son of God became the Son of Man and by it only he is stiled Emanuel And the Union of Mankind with Christ which is called Eating the Flesh of the Son of Man and Drinking his Blood consisteth only in the propagation or derivation of our Bodies and Souls with the Body and Soul of Christ from that one Original Mass and Fountain of all Human Bodies and Souls viz. from Adam in whose loyns and Soul all Mankind with Christ himself were in the beginning United CHAP. XXII THE Doctrine of this Vnion is so necessarily to be joyned and considered with the grand Doctrine of our Redemption by Christ that it cannot reasonably be by us apprehended how our bodies or our souls can with Divine Justice be redeemed by him without the mutual Union of his Body and Soul with our bodies and souls For if Christ must necessarily have taken his Flesh of Man because he might not otherwise destroy or condemn sin in the flesh the like reason will hold concerning the Soul that he might not condemn sin in the Soul but by assuming his Rom. 8. 3 Soul from Man The Soul by sin fell as much as the Body or rather much more for the transgression of Gods Command was principally or soly the act of the Soul the body did but only execute that which the Soul prescribed and dictated The body by it self could not sin more than a sword by it self can wound or a pen alone can write St. Austin often tells us and truly Non peccat nisi Anima only the Soul Aug. de Gen. lib. 10. c. 11. sinneth The same kind of Arguments by which the Fathers answered and confuted those Hereticks who denied the traduction of the Body of Christ from the body of the first Man are as firm and strong to confute the other sort of Hereticks who denied the propagation of the Soul of Christ from the Soul of the first Man both which Heresies depraved and indeed destroyed and nulled the Doctrine of Redemption of our Bodies and Souls by the Body and Soul of Christ Epiphanius and after him St. Austin report this as the Heresie of Apollinarius Epip haer 77. Aug. in Joh. Tract 47. that he affirmed that Christ had no Human or Intellectual Soul but that his Godhead supplied all the Offices and actions of a reasonable Soul in his Body St. Jerome and St. Austin charge Origen Hier. n. 42. Aug. Epist 27. that he had taught that the Souls of Men were more Ancient than their Bodies and that they were created before their Bodies and that they came from Heaven this error of Origen appeareth in his Third Book Orig. Per. Arch. l. 3. c. 3. Lib. 4. c. ● Perj Archoon in which he agreeth with the Opinions of Plato and Aristotle who had said that the Souls of Men were not derived from their Ancestors but came from without 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 These erroneous Opinions disturbed the doctrine of our redemption by Christ which Redemption necessarily presupposeth an Union of our souls with the Soul of Christ which Union cannot otherwise be found but only in the Original Fountain of all our Souls viz. in the Soul of the first Man Let it now be considered whether the present vulgar Opinions and the Doctrines of some Divines and Neoterick Writers be not altogether as destructive of the doctrine of Redemption