Selected quad for the lemma: religion_n
Text snippets containing the quad
|
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
|
A70390
|
A sermon preach'd at Turners-Hall, the 5th of May, 1700 by George Keith ; in which he gave an account of his joyning in communion with the Church of England ; with some additions and enlargements made by himself.
|
Keith, George, 1639?-1716.
|
1700
(1700)
|
Wing K209; ESTC R14185
|
28,024
|
34
|
our Blessed Lord to his Disciples Matth. 5. 11. Blessed are ye when men shall revile you and persecute you and shall say all manner of evil against you falsly for my sake This I thank God is my case I charge my Adversaries to prove any thing against me of evil Conversation I have with Zeal and Resolution which God hath been pleas'd to give me and who has greatly supported and strengthened me opposed and testified against their vile Errours and this is all the cause of their Hatred against 〈◊〉 and that God has been pleased to bless and prosper 〈…〉 with some Success so that both in America many and here in England both in City and Country divers have come from Quakerism and gone over to the Church of England with me yea divers have prevented me and gone before me and divers here I hope will go along with me I also remember what Christ said John 16. 2. The time cometh that whosoever killeth you will think that he doth God Service Persecutors commonly follow an erring Conscience few Persecutors and be sure they are of the worst sort that knowingly and wilfully persecute the Servants of God Having thus far proceeded according to the Doctrine I mentioned at the beginning of this Discourse on the foregoing Verse 1 Pet. 3. 15. I think it my Duty and a weighty Concern lyeth upon me to give to this Auditory the Reason of the Hope that is in me of my Faith and Persuasion in this very particular Why I have joined in Communion with the Church of England although I retain Charity to all the honest-hearted of other Communions hoping that in God's due time the more Sincere will follow my Example and that God will make all the Sincere to be not only of one Faith as many at present are but of one Way and Practice and Uniformity Worship and Church Discipline so as with one mouth and one heart and mind to glorifie God Rom. 15. 16. This will be a Joyful Day which I hope many here and elsewhere pray for Why then will ye not help it forward by your good Examples laying aside all weak and insufficient Scruples which upon due Examination will be found without just ground And why find ye fault with those that begin to give you good Example Though this Change of mine is not so great as some imagine I was never so uncharitable as I find some are though I grant I have been too uncharitable which I have retracted I have been for a considerable time very charitable to all sober and religious Protestants of all sorts and have oft in secret bewail'd their Opposition one to another perceiving that in great part it came more from Prejudice of Judgment and Education than any just Cause I date not my Conversion to Christianity from this Change nay nor from my first turning to the Quakers My gracious God began early to deal with me and turn'd my Heart towards him I was well instituted in the Fundamentals of Christianity by the good Education I had for which I praise God before I knew the Quakers and though in too many things I was misled by them being deceived by their high pretences to Perfection and divine Enjoyments by which they have deceived many as well as me yet I retained a sound Faith of the Fundamentals of Christianity and did constantly profess the same which I can sufficiently prove both by my printed Books from time to time and divers Manuscripts and from my Childhood to this day God has in mercy preserved me from all scandalous Conversation and Practice whereof some of good Credit are ready to give a Testimony who have known me for Fourty six Years past and my manner of Conversation I am the more concerned to give the reason of my said Change chiefly for the sake of some of my good Friends here present who though by the Blessing of God have been by me as an instrument brought off from the Quakers Errours that were opposite to the Fundamentals of Christianity yet have some remaining Scruples that at present hinder them from so cordial a joining with the Church of England and seem to be concerned with my joining with her which I hope God in due time will remove and so far as is possible for me I will endeavour as his instrument to be assisting to them as also for the more confirming of such who are cordially ready to join with me And in the next place to silence the unjust Clamours and false Accusations of my professed Adversaries and others ignorantly prejudiced against me I am desirous to let them know that I have good reason for what I have done and have acted as a rational Christian Man in my so doing A chief Reason therefore which I offer is this Suppose there were a parity or equality in all other respects betwixt the Dissenters and the Church of England I mean the more sound and orthodox among them as in Doctrine and Worship Sacraments and Church-Government Discipline and Constitution of Members yet this with me doth cast the Balance and I think ought to cast the Balance with any rational considerate person that on that supposition the minority or lesser number should yield to the majority or greater number and the younger should yield to the elder and the Daughters to the Mother For certain it is that the Church of England as she was in King Edward VI. and Queen Elizabeth's time and in Queen Mary's time was the Mother Protestant Church The Dissenters Forefathers had their Christianity Baptism and Christian Education and Profession in her Communion and were nursed as it were in her Arms and suckled at her Breasts and the more sober of all Dissenters will say she was a true Church then in all the main things of Religion Now unless they can prove that she is changed from what she then was either in Doctrine or Sacraments or Worship or Discipline or church-Church-Government in any material thing from better to worse which I think they cannot do how can they justifie their Separation from her And I think I may safely add that the wiser Men and ablest in solid Learning and Piety and in the sound Knowledge of the Scriptures to instruct the Ignorant and convince or put to silence Opposers to refute Antichristian and Popish Errors as well as all other old and late Heresies are much more numerous to be found in the Church of England And what solid Learning the ablest of the Dissenters have had so far as may be acquired by outward means has been originally by means of Church of England Men. She hath been all along and still is the greatest Bulwark against Popery whereof she hath given sufficient Proof from time to time witness the many elaborate and excellent Books and Tracts written by her Members against Popery especially and other old and new Heresies as Deism Atheism c. yea let the Libraries and Closets of the generality of the Dissenters Ministers be searched who
in the invisible Creation of Angels and Spirits the Scripture doth plainly inform us as Angels Archangels Thrones Dominions Principalities and Powers Cherubim and Seraphim Jethro Moses's Father-in-Law advised him to set Captains over Tens over Fifties over Hundreds and over Thousands of the People of Israel for the better and easier Government of them both in War and Peace and Moses hearkned to his Advice Exod. 18. 24. And we find in Scripture that the Church is compared to an Army and the Members thereof to Soldiers the chief General and Captain whereof is our Lord Jesus Christ who hath appointed divers Officers in his Church under the New Testament distinct not only in degree but in kind as Bishops Presbyters otherwise called Priests and Deacons answerable to the three Officers that were in the Church of the Jews under the Old Testament to wit the high Priest Priests and Levites and because they were but one Nation all living within a small Compass of Ground one High Priest did suffice according to God's Appointment This threefold distinction of Church Government by Bishops Presbyters and Deacons upon a further search into the New Testament I find so very clear as doth fully satisfie me notwithstanding that by prejudice of Education I was formerly Principled against it and also by searching into Church-History and the Writings of the Ancients nearest to the Apostles Times and the succeeding Ages in the purest and best State of the Churches as well as when there was a great declining from that purity yet as many other things both of sound Doctrine and good practice still remained so this distinction of Church Rulers did all along remain generally in all Places as well as in all Ages where God had any Visible Church or where there was any Society of People professing the Christian Religion until the beginning of the Reformation where in divers Countries abroad there was no Protestant Kings the Protestants set up Churches without Bishops not rejecting the Office nor condemning it as unlawful or Antichristian as some in late Times have done but excusing the want of it by that general maxim Necessity has no Law I need not insist to prove the distinction of Presbyters and Deacons out of the New Testament it being in some sort generally acknowledged by the Dissenters But the Superiority of Bishops over Presbyters is that which is condemned by some as Antichristian and by some others judged at best unnecessary and no part of Christian Discipline belonging to Christianity either essential or integral But if you will lay aside all prejudice of Education and uncharitableness you will clearly and evidently see it in the Holy Scriptures That the Apostles had a Superiority over not only the LXX but all other Ministers and Pastors or Teachers is very clear from 1 Cor. 12. 28. compared with Eph. 4. 11. That Bishops were to succeed the Apostles and have the like Office both with them as Churches came to be planted in divers parts of the World before their Decease and also after their Decease not with respect to the extraordinary gifts of Prophecy and Miracles but with respect to the Government of the Church by a regular Succession is evident from Mat. 28. 19 20. compared with the above-cited Eph. 4. 11. otherwise all standing or setled Ministry as an Ordinance of Christ may be rejected as Enthusiasts generally do yea what can these Governments be mentioned 1 Cor. 12. 28. but as really the Superiority of Bishops over Presbyters as of Presbyters over the Deacons and the People otherwise why Governments in the Plural Number Also what are these Dignities mentioned Jud. 8. that some despised in the Apostles days and 2 Pet. 2. 10 11. And how should any doubt of the Office of Episcopacy being an Ordinance of Christ in the Church when the qualifications requisite to such an Officer are so expresly set down 1 Tim. 3. from v. 1. to v. 8. But whereas it is objected that seeing there is only mentioned in that Chapter a twofold Order 1. Of Bishops 2. Of Deacons it would seem that Presbyters are there understood by Bishops otherwise Presbyters should be wholly excluded from Church Government I answer that will not follow 1. Because Presbyters though not expressed yet may be understood and implied under either the one or the other expresly mentioned the name Deacon being sometimes a general Name in Scripture signifying the most superiour as well as inferiour Officers in the Church 1 Cor. 3. 5. St. Paul called himself and Apollo by the Name of Deacons as it is in the Greek and 2 Cor. 3. 6. he calls all Ministers and Teachers at large by that Name But 2. in the order of things there were but these two Officers at first excepting the Apostles Bishops and Deacons The Churches in many places at first being small the Bishop could both sufficiently teach and rule his Flock and so did without Presbyters only by the assistance of Deacons but the number of the Flock increasing he did chuse and raise up those that had well used the Office of a Deacon to the higher degree of Presbyters which is called by St. Paul 1 Tim. 3. 13. a good degree which they purchased to themselves even as those that well used the Office of a Presbyter were afterwards raised up to the Office of a Bishop as was accordingly practised in the Church so that in priority of Nature and also of Time the Deacon is before the Presbyter though in priority of Dignity the Presbyter is before the Deacon Hence according to the Order established in the Church none is to be ordained a Presbyter until he first be ordained a Deacon nor can he at one and the same time be Ordained to be both The Distinction and Superiority of Bishops over Presbyters or Elders is very clear to me as well as to many out of St. Paul's Epistles to Timothy and Titus 1 Tim. 1. 3. I. St. Paul writes to Timothy to Command or give in Charge to some that were Teachers at Ephesus to teach no other Doctrine than the pure Doctrine of the Gospel such as he had heard of him And had not Timothy had a Superiority of Office above other Teachers which were then at Ephesus why did he direct both his Epistles to him only laying down excellent rules and method of Government for him to follow in the exercise of his Episcopal Function 1 Tim. 3. 15. with respect to several States of Persons both Male and Female II. Why did St. Paul give the Charge to Timothy to count the Elders that ruled well which were no doubt under him worthy of double Honour especially them who laboured in Word and Doctrine but that he was able to confer that double Honour upon them a part of which was an Honourable Maintenance according to what follows ver 18. for the Scripture saith Thou shalt not muzzle the Ox that treadeth out the Corn and the Labourer is worthy of his reward By this it is plain