the Lords Supper this is a Fundamentall Doctrine That it must bee celebrated in bread and wine that therein the memory of Christs Passion is ever to be renewed that Christians in that Sacrament have not only an empty 1 Cor. 10.6 or shadowy representation of Christ crucified but do truly really and savingly partake of the body of Christ Hee that beleeves all things soundly and sufficiently embraceth the Fundamentall Doctrine of this Sacrament to the sucking of Grace out of it Although those difficult questions tossed and tumbled betwixt Divines about the manner of the Presence and eating of Christ never came into his head much lesse did he give his consent to one side or other To this threefold kind of Fundamentals Whereof the first is seen in the Creed The second in the Commandements The third in the Sacraments of Baptisme and the Lords Supper We may adde a fourth contained in the Lords Prayer For seeing invocation or Prayer is a duty belonging to the worship of God absolutely necessary for the obtaining of Grace and Salvation it must needs have certaine fundamentals which being unknowne or slighted it becomes of no moment but is effectuall if they be retained and observed This is a fundamentall point God alone is to be invoked by Religious Prayer he is to be called upon through his Son our Mediator trusting on whom we call him Our Father He is to bee Prayed unto for all good things wee want but chiefly for Grace Pardon and Glory which we most stand in need of Lastly he is to bee prayed unto in Faith Charity and a good Conscience He that contradicts these things is a slat Heretique and perverts the fundamentals in the duty of Prayer That these foure things which wee have touched are alone to be accounted Fundamentals of the Christian Religion seemes to me plainly to appeare out of the practice of the Apostles themselvs and Primitive Church well known unto all For they have judged no particular Church to have cast away the Fundamentall points of saving Faith or to have fallen off from the Communion of the Catholique Church who holily professe the faith in the Creed and obedience to the Commandements who administred the Sacraments according to Christs Institution and called upon God in the Name of Christ For they conceived them to deserve an admonition for their errors of lighter moment but would therefore cut off no particular Churches Chap. 8 called by the Name of Christ from the body of the Catholique Church CHAP. VIII That Brotherly Communion is to be kept betwixt the Protestant Churches is proved by Reasons drawne from the Communion which they have in Jesus Christ the only Personall Foundation FORASMUCH as this one thing is the greatest hinderance of setling agreement betwixt Protestant Churches that some learned and godly men conceive that such a Brotherly agreement and Communion is altogether unlawfull we to our ability shall endeavour to shew that this Communion of particular Churches amongst themselves is not only lawfull but acceptable to God and necessary to themselves For the proving whereof long since wee have laid our foundations in those things which were largely discussed concerning the personall Foundation and the foundations Ministeriall and Doctrinall This one thing remaines that we call our Reasons which are scattered and dispersed thorough this whole discourse to come in to their colours that they may present themselves at one view We will begin as it is fit from those Reasons which flow from the consideration of that one foundation Jesus Christ our Saviour to whom all dostick and from whome all Good Temporall Spirituall and Eternall is derived to all Reformed Churches With those Churches it is fitting to retaine Brotherly Communion Reason 1 which we will not deny but that they retaine Conjunction and Communion with Christ the Head and Foundation of the holy Catholique Church Yea except we will yeeld and confesse our selves to bee estranged from the body of Christ we cannot but be their Brethren who are esteemed to hold brotherly Communion with Christ our elder Brother For the band of holy Brotherhood betwixt the Churches themselves cannot be broken at mens pleasures except they be also broken betwixt them and Christ who is the head of all Churches If the Saxon count the Helvetian or Helvetian the Saxon Churches so alienated and torne asunder from Christ by their errors that they are neither founded in Christ nor by Christ the Elder Brother taken into the brotherly society of fellow-members then they may pretend some reason why they renounce communion with them But if in no wise they dare affirme this wee cannot have just cause to disclaime Brotherly Communion with those whom Christ himselfe blusheth not to owne and call his Brethren August Epist 162. It was the peevish frowardnesse of the Donatists neither to receive from other Churches any letters importing a Communion nor to acknowledge any right of Brotherhood with them But in the meane time what did the Orthodox Churches Out of Augustine wee may learne it in whome wee read That the Donatists angry for this thing Contra Donat post Coll. cap. 35 were notwithstanding by the Orthodox acknowledged for Brethren The same also appeares out of Optatus Milevitanus who thought That the name of Brotherhood was not to be denied unto them Yea De schism Donat. lib. 1. in initio lib 4. in initio thought it an impious act to suppresse or conceale the name of Brethren Either therefore it must be justified that some Protestant Churches have lost their conjunction with Christ the Foundation of the Church and forfeited their Brotherly Communion with Christ their Elder Brother or else we must not depart from Brotherly Society with them In the second place wee argue from most certain Signes and Markes 2. Reason whence we may and ought to be perswaded that this or that Church is conjoyned to Christ the corner stone for from the same notes we may conclude that other Churches are bound and obliged not to separate themselves from the same They therefore which want not the knowledge of God and Christ necessary to eternall life who have true Faith true Repentance and true Endeavour after a New life and holy obedience to such we ought to grant that they enjoy a saving conjunction with Christ their foundation But none for ought I know as yet is found which hath given this bloody Sentence That in this or that Protestant Church there is not so much knowledge of God and Christ as sufficeth to Salvation That there is not in it the ordinary Justification of Christians by Faith That there is not the earnest exercise of Repentance and endeavour after New Life But if all these things agree to all Protestant Churches it is manifest that they remaine conjoyned with their Head and Foundation not lesse manifest that they have inward Brotherly Communion and ought to have outward with all the members of Christ Rom. 12.5 For we being
against them because the common consent of the whole Church doth not in the same appeare Those who would not have the Churches themselves Arg. 4 to bee rent and torn asunder because of the controversies bandied betwixt Protestants they seem to be of this opinion that every one may be saved in his own Religion and that a promiscuous multitude of erroneous people may bee received into the same Church Militant and Triumphant but this must not be granted If we will speak with the Scriptures Answ the name of one Religion is to be fitted and applyed not to difficult questions but to the points of Christian Faith preached to all and received of all Christian Churches throughout the whole world They therefore embrace the true and one only Religion which believe those things of God of Christ of the Church of all other matters and doe them which are necessary to be known done to the attaining to Salvation Wee conceive not therefore that every one may be saved in his own Religion which he feignes to himselfe but believe that they may be saved in the Christian Religion and be received into the same Church both Militant and Triumphant who so farre forth agree in the Doctrine of the Gospell as it is required that the Faith of Christians be saving to those that beleeve and that the worship which they yeeld unto God be gratefull and accepted of him in Christ But they who thinke that the perfect consenting of Churches is necessary to their meeting together in the Communion of one Church Militant and Triumphant can scarce free and disengage themselves from their error who conceived the Catholique Church to reside in one determinate party They therefore who in things either to be done or be beleeved defend such points with which the saving of Soules and Spirituall worship of God cannot consist they are truly said to have made a defection from that which is the alone saving Religion but they who retaining all fundamentals of faith and Gods worship differ from others and erre in some consequences or Doctrines of lesse moment professe no new or other Religion but are convicted not as yet to have attained in that one onely Religion to perfect knowledge For such imperfection of knowledge God excludes none from the Church Militant neither ought we to doe it We ought not to retaine brotherly Communion with those Arg. 5 whom it is an heinous sin to admit to the Lords Supper together with our selves But it seemed unlawfull for the Lutherans in taking the Lords Supper to communicate with the Helvetian or French Churches See the pres to the confer at Mompelg For the holy Supper of the Lord amongst other ends hath this use that it should bee the note and badge of the Religion which every one professeth For they who communicate with any Church in the receiving of this Sacrament by this deed doe publikely professe that they embrace the doctrine of the same Church and reject the contrary and separate themselves from others We must therefore in no case sport and play with the receiving of the Lords Supper nor therin dissemble any thing from which our heart doth abhorre and therefore wee cannot communicate with those Churches which embrace not our Confession For by such communicating we should seem to derogate from our Confession and syncere Religion and either to Patronize or surely closely to favour the errors of other Churches It is more safe therefore to Imitate the Christian Emperours who when the Arians did request to be received into Communion with the Orthodoxe they would not grant it unto them before they did approve the doctrine of the Orthodoxe We make no strife about that which is affirmed in the first place Answ But as for the Assumption namely That it is unlawfull to admit any to the Lords Table except them alone who are ready to subscribe to the Confession of one the same particular Church this seemes to me ought not to be defended For the Principall use of the Lords Supper is to recount the death and Passion of Christ which he suffered for the Salvation of men and to receive eternall Life by the Partaking of his Flesh and Blood It serveth also to witnesse and confirme the Union which Christians ought to have betwixt themselves 1 Cor. 10.17 and with Christ Jesus their head Lastly we confesse that this Sacrament as also that other of Baptisme is the note and badge of that Religion which wee professe Aug. cont â—austum 19.12 For men can be united together into no name of Religion whether true or false unlesse they be bound together in some fellowship of signer and visible Sacraments But as Baptisme is indeed the badge of the Christian Religion we professe and not of the particular opinions and confessions which we embrace before others so also must we conclude of the Lords Supper For to the mutuall Communion of all Christians in the Eucharist it is not required that all who Communicate together should agree in the same confession either the English or the French or the Dutch but that they agree in one Profession of the Christian and Catholik Faith Let us leave these rigid and Tyrannicall domineerings to the Papists who adjudge all to be separated from their Communion which would not sweare unto the Confession of Trent Cyprianus Cornelius The holy Fathers did not doe soe but they kept the Lords peace with those Churches which were of different opinions from themselves removing none from the right Communion because he refused to consent to the private Judgement of another particular Church for they acknowledged the Catholike Faith received with an unanimous consent of the Catholike Church to be the certaine Aug. Ser. 181. and sole Rule of Faith by which Beleevers retaine the Catholike Vnity But let him who can shew that Particular Churches ever usurped this to themselves that they did cut off others from the Brotherly Communion with themselues for diversitie of opinions in matters not as yet determined by the Judgement of the Catholike Church Socrat. l. 5. c. 21. on one side or other Victor indeed attempted to doe this and after him Stephen Lib. 5. cap. 23. lib. 7. cap. 4. both Bishops of Rome But it is plaine out of Eusebius that this Separation was founded on no right and therefore highly displeased the pious and Godly Fathers Therefore farre be it from us that in the very Communion of the Lords Supper we should as it were proclaime war against all other Churches which will not make our particular Confession their owne or will not forsake their own that they may embrace ours If we conceive our Churches to be of the righter and truer opinion than other Churches in certaine Questions not as yet determined wee have just cause not to Communicate with them in their errorss but thence have no cause at all to Communicate with them in the Sacraments Forasmuch as no errour in which
Churches that wee keep and preserve our own people safe and sound from their Errours and not that wee may render the others odious branding them for obstinate Heretiques Seeing it is easie to call any man an Heretique but not so easie to comprise in a certaine regular Definition what makes an Heretique Yea if we beleeve Augustine it is a matter of very great difficulty CHAP. VI. Chap. 6 Of the notes and markes whereby we may know that any Point is not Fundamentall WEE have showne already that Fundamentall points have this character plainly printed upon them that without the knowledge of them neither Salvation of Christians nor the Worship of God can consist Now let us adde some other signes and tokens out of which we may safely set down that any point is not Fundamentall although some urge and enforce it for Fundamentall and they especially who have long laboured and sweat soundly in the maintaining of it First therefore that is not Fundamentall which was never clearely revealed from the beginning by the Prophets and Apostles inspired from Heaven to Christian people and to Christian Churches founded by them through the whole World For they had not been pure from the bloud of them all if they had shunned to declare all the Counsell of God to all so far forth as it was necessary to the procuring the Salvation of all by Faith in Christ Jesus And the saving Truth in such necessary and fundamentall things was so revealed by the Apostles that all might behold it Mark 16.15 Go ye into all the world and preach the Gospell to every creature Rom. 1.16 For it is the power of God unto Salvation to every one that beleeveth We preach Christ Col. 1.28 warning every man and teaching every man in all wisdome that we may present every man perfect in Christ Jesus What therefore in the time of the Apostles was not declared to all that cannot in our Age begin to bee Fundamentall Yea neither the Papists themselves dare deny this although they arrogate to the Pope of Rome and Romish Church more power than is meet over the Articles of the Christian Faith For Canus set all those things apart from the Doctrines of the Catholique Faith Lib. 4. cap. ult pag. 145.146 which were not univorsally preached by the Apostles How much more then ought they to be severed from the Fundamentals Lib. 12.6.10 p. 391. The same Author alloweth that some propositions may bee called Truths of the Christian Doctrine which he thinks not worthy to be called Truths of the Catholique Faith For this name he counts peculiarly to belong to those Doctrines which so nearly concerne the Faith that by removing them Faith it selfe is taken away Lib. i. quest 17. p. 148. And Corduba to the same purpose saith It is no Catholique Truth nor is the contrary opinion Heresie unlesse such a Truth be revealed and generally propounded to all to be necessarily beleeved Last of all Bellarmine himselfe grants us Lib 4. de Verbo Dei cap. 11. That those things which are absolutely necessary for all to Salvation were preached unto all by the Apostles themselves Let this therefore bee the first signe of a Doctrine not Fundamentall that it hath not beene delivered by the Apostles to all publiquely generally and plainely Secondly that is no Fundamentall Point which was never admitted and held for such in the Primitive Church succeeding the Apostles and never recommended to all by generall consent of the Catholique Church For if any will maintaine that the Catholique Church did ever refuse or was ignorant of any Fundamentall Doctrine he must by the same reason maintaine that the whole Church was severed from her Foundation which no man well in his wits will ever suffer to enter into his Thoughts It was well observed by the right Reverend Arch-bishop of Armach a man of singular Piety and stored with the commendation for Learning in all kinds That if at this day wee should put by the points wherein Christians differ one from another and gather into one body the rest of the Articles wherein they generally agree Vsher Sermon before the King pag. 43. which worship Christ God and Man and acknowledge him for their Saviour We should find that in those propositions which without all Controversie are Vniversally received in the Christian World so much truth is contained as being joyned with holy Obedience may be sufficient to bring a man unto everlasting Salvation Which plainely evinceth that these things alone of the common Faith are those which rightly are called Fundamentall but as for those points which we so dearely prise and for love of them clash the Protestant Churches together because of the right of neare alliance which they have with the Fundamentals they may sometimes be ranked amongst true and profitable Doctrines but may not be accounted absolutely necessary or Fundamentall Thirdly it is not a Fundamentall maxime of the Christian Religion which is so handled or propounded that to conceive the truth thereof and to apprehend it with Faith we stand in need of the Wit and cunning of Logicians and of the abstracted and abstruse speculation of Metaphysitians Nazian Orat. 21. For nothing were more unjust than the Christian Faith if it should only sit and belong to those who are Learned and Skilfull in these Arts. Nothing is more usuall amongst Learned Men than in their minds and conceits to abstract the manner of things from the things themselves nothing more common than to propound the same single numericall thing to be considered under severall formall differences and to reare and raise these touring speculations on the plaine Doctrines of the Christian Faith If any such matter were Fundamentall or necessary to be knowne to Salvation there were no hope of the Salvation of all unlearned People But we defend with Augustine Epist 3.22 that the Faith of the holy Church is apprehended not by the Reason of Disputation but the Piety of beleeving otherwise none but the Philosophers should obtaine blessed happinesse Yea we say with the Apostle 1 Cor. 1.20 27. Where is the Wise where is the Scribe where is the Disputer of this World c. But God hath chosen the foolish things of the World to confound the Wise As if he had said Where art thou O Learned man and skilfull in lofty speculations Art thou alone meet to receive the Doctrine of Life Yea every one of the plaine countrey People is more fit than thy selfe and thou altogether unfit if thou thinkest that in these things thou mayst rely on thy own Art and witty apprehension for the way of Salvation is not only a holy way but also so plaine and direct that the foolish cannot wander in it Isa 35.8 So be it they stick to the Word in the simplicity of their hearts On the place As Luther well affirmeth Therefore saving and Fundamentall Doctrines are not to be sought for in the dark
Foundation of Religion Catholike Faith But if we should let the matter run on so long till all the controverted Problemes betwixt Protestants bee counted Fundamentall long since they have grown to too numerous hereafter they may grow to an almost numberlesse multitude For this solemne course and practice is observed of many that what they themselves have added to any Fundamentall Axiom as over weight and what they beleeve to be a consequence of the same this they presently require of all to be counted in the number of Fundamentalls If we grant to any particular Churches or to their Doctors this power of creating and multiplying Fundamentalls all hope is past of the certainty of the Catholike Faith all hope is gone of the Brotherly communion of the Catholike Church The mad error of the Church of Rome may confirme the Truth of our opinion who by stuffing a medley of uncertain opinions into the Creed of Trent by the same deed did both shake the immoveable certainty of the Catholike Faith and the Union of the Catholike Chuch so much desired of all we ought not therefore to mingle controversies lately born betwixt us with the foundations of Catholike Faith which are few and published by the preaching of the Apostles through the Christian world and received by the joynt consent of Christians In the last place that these things whereabout we contend Reas 6 were never counted in the number of Fundamentalls plainly appeares out of the very Augustane confession penned by Ph. Melancthon and approved and commended by Luther It is not likely that the Authors of so solemne a confession would have omitted any Fundamentall Doctrine of the Christian Faith without the knowledge and beleife whereof Salvation could not be attained by Christ Jesus But in this confession none of those points doe appeare about which so fierce a strife hath been been maintained betwixt the Helvetian and Saxon Churches In the third Articles of the Union of the two Natures in Christ in the tenth Article of the presence of the Body and Bloud of Christ in the Lords Supper they have established nothing which is not approved by the consent of all the Protestants And if we should run over the rest of the Articles we shall finde very few things after the last correction of which there is any dissenting betwixt the Protestant Churches nothing of so great moment that it should bring in a Schisme into the Church But grant some things to be in this confession to which other Churches cannot afford their consent it sufficeth to the retaining of Peace that they consent in all things necessary to be known for the Salvation of Christians For the confessions of particular Churches are not streitned to fundamentals alone but sometimes are extended to the declaring of their judgement of all heads of Divinity as they conceive it expedient for the Aedification of their people in Truth and Piety Therefore their errour is not to be born with who what ever they finde in their confessions will have it counted so fundamentall that they feare not to ranke those forreign Churches which in all and every thing will not admit the same to be the Rule of saving Faith among damned Hereticks overthrowers of the Foundation in a word amongst wicked men estranged from the holy brotherhood of good Christians Nothing could be done or thought of more injurious For if we weigh the confessions or disputes of all Reformed Churches and place on one side those things wherein they exactly agree and set on the other side those things which are in controversie wee shall perceive that the former out of the very Nature and Quality of the points themselves belong to the foundations of Faith and Piety the later either to the no wise necessary speculations of subtile braines or if they have any soliditie in them to the true inferences of the more skilfull Divines out of well grounded Propositions But those things which in this manner are built upon the foundation are not to be made equall with the fundamentalls themselves nor are they to bee accounted to erre in fundamentalls which swarve somewhat herein from the right line of Truth CHAP. XI Chap. 11 That there is no Controversie betwixt Protestants about Fundamentalls is shewn by instancing in three particular questions which are conceived before all other of greatest moment to the disjoynting of Churches BEFORE wee enter into this dispute wee must premise this firme and unmoveable rule That Christian Churches are not to be disjoynted which agree in all things necessary to be known or done to the Salvation of Christian men For no Authority lyes in one particular Church to make enquiry into others or office to compell other particular Churches to the rule of their owne confessions or power to dissolve the bands of brotherly Unity betwixt their owne and other Churches whatsoever which consent in the same common Faith that is in fundamentalls and the saving Articles of the Christian Religion Let us see therefore whether the Protestants agree so farre forth and let us take example only from those three controversies Of the Presence of the Body and bloud of Christ in the Eucharist Of the Communication of Properties in the person of Christ God and man Of Divine election and preterition according to the good pleasure of the Divine will For if in these questions by occasion whereof mighty surges and billows of contention have been blown up betwixt the Saxon and Helvetian Churches so much bee confessed on both sides as is necessary to know to Salvation All the rest may be left indifferent in the middle or to be disputed of betwixt learned men with peaceable mindes the brotherly Communion betweene Churches being no whit broken or torne a pieces Wee will begin from that which gave beginning to all the rest namely from the Presence of the Body of Christ in the Lords Supper and the eating of the same First of all nothing can be conceived fundamentall which is not by joint consent admitted by or received on both sides This is Fundamentall That the Body and Bloud of Christ are so truly present in the Administration of the Sacrament that Communicants may partake of them so as to draw life from thence and they may justly be condemned who so receive Bread and Wine as that withall they receive not the Flesh and Bloud of Christ to the Salvation of their Soules Hospin ad annum 1544. p. 191 Of this there is no dissention For Bucer grants That the Body of the Lord in the Eucharist is truly present and partaken off An annum 1540. p. 178 Calvin saith Wee all confesse with one mouth that we when we receive the Sacrament by Faith according to the Lords institution In Cons Mompelg p. 66. are made truly partakers of the Substance of the Body of Christ Beza saith we deny not the Body of Christ to be truly present to bee truly given and received I passe by the rest because no
by the Act of Repentance are made subject to God and his Commandements by the act of Loving and Obeying him No doubt is to be made but that these Churches remaine firmely fastned to their saving Foundation Therefore this saving and undoubted Union of them with Christ ought to bring a Tye and a Band of no meane Consequence to the binding of the Affections of all Reformed Churches together CHAP. IV. Chap. 4 Of certaine Foundations which use to be called Ministeriall and of their Office and Power ALTHOUGH We acknowledge our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ the only personall Foundation of his Church yet do we not deny but that the name Foundation is in a different sense ascribed to others To whom in what respect this high Title is given and what Power and Command they have who are thus intitled it must be afterwards enquired into The name therefore of Foundation is sometimes lent to others but then always in a lessened and restrained acception For they are called Foundations in no other right than because the personall Foundation is layd by their Ministery through the preaching of the Gospell and by the continuation of that preaching always kept in the Church Amongst these Ministeriall Foundations the Prophets and Apostles possesse the prime place Hence the wall of the Heavenly Jerusalem is said to have twelve Foundations Rev. 21.14 and in them the names of the twelve Apostles of the Lambe Also Christians are said to be built upon the Foundation of the Apostles and Prophets Eph. 2.20 In this sense Peter and Paul and all the Apostles were Ministeriall Foundations because all they as wise Master-builders bestowed their excellent paines in laying that only Foundation of which we spake before Wherefore when the Prophets and Apostles are adorned with this honorable Title it is rather to be referred to their saving Doctrin concerning Christ than to their own particular Persons The power of these was far greater than that of their succeeding Ministers because they were so enlightned and governed by the holy Spirit that they could not at all erre either in Preaching or Writing Therefore we acknowledge their Doctrine as the Doctrine of God and Christ certaine infallible and wholly Divine with Tertullian that saith There is no Divine Word but of God alone In that his booke of the Soule Which Word was thundred both by the Prophets by the Apostles by Christ himselfe But the Papists to these Ministeriall Foundations endeavour to joyne another in words calling it a Second and subservient but in very deed making it a Principall and plainly Divine one This honour the Jesuites thinke fit to be conferred on the Pope alone whom they so appoint to be the Second Foundation of the Catholike Church that in the meane time they maintaine him to be the only Foundation of the Church next unto Christ But there is no need to speake much of this fading foundation and palsy-shaking head the Scriptures being silent of any such sole Ministeriall foundation as the Papists do faine Besides all Protestant Churches long since have cast this filthy Idoll of a secondary head and foundation with others of the like nature to the Moles and Bats as fit for so blind companions We owne no power placed in this secondary foundation of the Papists to subject the Faith of Christians unto it counting those little better than mad when they write and maintaine Bellâ—â— praefâ—t in lib. dâ— Rom. Poâ—â— That the power and infallibility of the Pope of Rome is the summe of Christian Religion and his judgment is to bee accounted the square and Rule of Faith But leaving the Pope of Rome le ts come to the Catholique Church which on a farre better title might challenge to her selfe the name of Ministeriall Foundation because the Faith of every one may seeme in some sort to rely upon her For in this even to the end of the World that Doctrine shall bee kept and preached to which those Christians which afford beliefe and obedience are rightly joyned to their foundation and in it shall obtaine eternall Life To this purpose that of Paul to Timothy is often alleadged where he calleth the Church the Pillar and Ground of Truth 1 Tim. 3 15. Neither may we doubt but that in this Holy Catholique Church which wee beleeve in the Creed the truth of the Gospell ever hath and ever will be preserved so farre forth as it shall suffice for the Salvation of those that beleeve it Therefore to know what hath been beleeved received and published of all Christian Churches always and every where is to know all those things which are sufficient for the obtaining of Salvation in Christ the Foundation thereof But this Catholique Church scattered over all the world is presented rather to our mind than outward senses Wherefore when we desire to heare the voyce of the Catholique Church wee are forced to fly to the Church which they call Representative that is to say to a Generall Councell Of which Representative Image of the Catholique Church and of the Ministeriall power therof we will briefly discourse That this Representative Church did excellently discharge the Office of a Ministeriall Foundation in Oecumenicall Synods is witnessed by those foure Councils of Nice Constantinople Ephesus and Chalcedon In which the Divinity of Christ against Arius of the holy Ghost against Macedonius the Union of two Natures in Christ against Nestorius the distinction of two Natures against Eutyches were declared defended and established In these and the like Councils those Doctrines of the Christian Faith which were there in common handled and discussed because therein all that professed Christianity were represented are therefore with great reverence to bee received For it ever belongeth to the Office and lawfull power of this Representative Church to divide and distinguish Fundamentall Doctrines of the Christian Faith from those which were not fundamentall provided alwayes that they passed not the bounds set by the Apostles and Primitive Church to multiply or diminish the Number of these Fundamentals 2a 2ae Qu. 1. Art 7. Resp ad 4. For it is credible what Aquinas observed that the Apostles and others which were nearer to Christ had a fuller Knowledge of the mysteries of the Faith than we that are further off which Cajetan in the same place confesseth to be most true For however that the Apostles and the Fathers of the Primitive Church were not much given to controversall Divinity and disputing about Questions yet were they of all most skilfull in saving necessary and Fundamentall Divinity Moreover after this Representative Church had once published her resolution founded in Gods Word of Fundamentall Articles which were simply necessary to the Salvation of Christians the care and charge also lay upon her to defend fence and fortifie those Articles against all fraud and force of Heretiques For it is the wont of Heretiques to undermine the very Foundation of Christian Religion whilst they retaine the words
clouds of speculation but in the plaine propositions of the holy Scriptures to the conceiving whereof there is more need and use of Faith than Art of an obedient Heart than of a subtile and piercing Wit Fourthly as all points justly challenging to themselves the Title of Fundamentall are plaine and naked for the manner of their Expression so ought they to be few and so framed that they do not swell to an infinite number yea that they grow not into so great a bulk burthensome to bee portable in the memory of Gods little ones Hence Aquinas cals them the First things to be beleeved 2a 2ae Qu. 2. de Fide cap. 2. and speciall Articles of the Faith William Paris termes them the Fundatories of Religion Others stile them Radicall Truths But although these first Fundatory and Radicall Doctrines of the Christian Religion may beget and bring forth a great uncertaine and numerous of-spring of Consequenceâ— arising from and following after â—â—â—m yet it beares no proportion with reason that they in themselves should 〈◊〉 many or uncertaine When therefore wee behold that to these First credibles of the Divine Essence and Attributes of the Incomprehensible Trinity of the Hypostatical Union of two Natures in Christ of the Cómunication of his Properties and almost of every Object of Knowledge in Divinity there is annexed so great a traine of severall points as thick Volumes are not able to containe them it is most certainely sure that the greatest part of them is not Fundamentall All Christians ought to heare the Counsell of Learned Nazianzen Orat. de Modest observ in D sp Contemplate saith he on Divine things but stay stil in the Termes Speake the Phrases and Language of the Spirit and if it be possible nothing else Do not thou curiously pry thorow those narrow rifts into the Nature of the Father the Essence of the only begotten Sonne the Glory of the Holy Ghost and one God in three Persons Vse the words accustomed the reason of them belongs to those that are Wiser to inquire Let it satisfie thee that thou hast the Foundation and let alone to Artificers to build thereupon Would to God only Artificers would build upon them would to God they would not mingle their many and almost infinite superstructures with the few and plaine Fundamentals to bee embraced with equall affections and to bee received with honour alike If they endeavour thus to do yet it becomes all pious and prudent Christians to discerne and make a difference betwixt those first and few things to bee beleeved immediately revealed by Christ and his Apostles and those numberlesse deductions of Divines which they according to their severall minds and opinions seeke to thrust and crowd into the same roome with Fundamentals Fiftly it is no Fundamentall point which though furbished and attired in new termes is not the same in effect with the Doctrine expressed in the words of the Holy Scripture For if the addition of our new coyned words importeth any thing more than what is in the Scripture this new accession may bee allowed for a consequent of the Fundamentall Doctrine but it cannot with this new peece bee urged for a direct downeright Fundamentall Doctrine But if the new word or the addition therein for matter of the Sense of the Proposition brings no new thing at all but so that understanding the Termes the effect of both appeares to be the same then wee acknowledge both to bee Fundamentall For the disserence of the expression alters not the nature of a Fundamentall Doctrine where the essence and meaning of the Proposition remaines the same What wee have said somewhat obscurely we will make plaine by an example Christ is God and the Sonne of God This is a Fundamentall Point and so also is this Christ is coessentiall with God his eternall Father For although in the latter there is a new Terme yet it addes no new thing nor affirmes any thing which will cause the cumberance of a toilesome deduction to extract it out of the former but whosoever understandeth the termes of both presently understands that they agree so well as in sense they are the same For no man of sound sense can have a conceit of diverse Gods in the same Essence or substance But if the Doctrine or Proposition deck't in forraign Termes and new language cannot bee annexed to a plaine and cleare Fundamentall Article without a busie and artificiall deducing of it it ought not to bee inserted into the Catalogue of Fundamentals Indeed those which perceive the force of the Consequence or Deduction are bound to afford beliefe to such Consectaries But they to whom it doth not sufficiently appeare that such a Proposition followeth from any Fundamentall point they are not bound to embrace it for a tried Truth much lesse for such a Doctrine without which no hope is left to obtaine Salvation To conclude in a word As often as it is inquired whether any Doctrine bee Fundamentall or no let us not give heed to the clamours of Disputants But have recourse to those Notes which now wee have reckoned up If the Doctrines they presse on us bee not clearely recommended by the Apostles themselves to the Catholique Church in the first preaching of the Gospell if in succeeding Ages they were not Universally received if they bee not suited to the capacity of simple Christians but only fitted to the braines of Philosophers and Logicians if they bee too many and not comprised within certaine bounds Lastly if expressed in such formes of Speech that they cannot bee reduced to an equivalent sense with a cleare and of all confessed Fundamentall Article sometimes they may bee Truthes but they can never beâ— counted Fundamentals CHAP. Chap. 7 VII Of the Summe of Fundamentall points contained in the Creed and Commandements so farre as wee ought to Beleeve or Practise MANY of the Papists and somme of ours when we maintaine that the difference betwixt the Reformed Churches is not about Fundamentals presently require of us to bring in a Bill and set forth an acurate Catalogue of Fundamentals so that we may say so many Fundamentals there be of the Christian Faith neither more nor lesse We easily answer the Papists that it were presumption in Protestants who confesse themselves subject to errour to undertake so hard a Taske let Papists rather addresse themselves to the Pope of Rome who alone can speake Oracles and is said to have all Laws Humane and Divine lockt up in the Closet of his Brest But if any of our men shall earnestly maintaine that unlesse this first be done no Brotherly love can be renewed betwixt the Protestant Churches let him try which is somewhat more easie if he can but only reduce the Propositions in Controversie which he desires should be Fundamentall to a certain and stinted number If he shrinkes to do this let him not blame the backwardnesse of others in the same matter Although it be not hard to show the reasons why