Oath as In any case whatsoeuer Neither is the Popes spirituall authoritie limited or once touched therein as by his Maiesties intention sufficiently made knowne vnto vs doth manifestly appeare And Caietan teacheth that in such like case if the intention of the man that commandeth may be knowne Caietan ver praecepti trangressio it is inough because the force of the precept dependeth of the intention of him that commandeth Now to end this matter I wish you to note the fraude of that Catholicke letter writer for to haue set downe in plaine termes that his Holinesse may depose his Maiestie dispose his kingdomes to whom he list licence subiects to raise tumults take armes against him or murther him and such like he knew would sound to good subiects most odious therefore he thought it to be a point of policie not to deale plainely but leaue the Reader perplexed with this obscuritie What his Holinesse cannot do towards his Maiestie in any case whatsoeuer Whose bare assertion without proofe or truth can in reason conuince none but such as want their common sense Now that it hath bene proued nothing to be contained in the Oath against the law of God nor decrees of any generall Councell and that his Maiestie in making this law and requiting of his subiects the performance thereof according to his intention which is but iust and good hath not gone beyond his bounds will any yet be so wilfully blind as not to see that by the immaculate law of God he is bound in conscience to render to Caesar that is Caesars to be obedient to higher powers as well the ciuill in temporals as the Ecclesiasticall power in spirituals Saint Peter prince of the Apostles taught this doctrine to the Christians of the primitiue Church that they should submit themselues and be obedient to secular Princes and Magistrates though they were heathens 1. Pet. 2. Subiecti igitur estote omni humanae creaturae propter Deum siue Regiquasi praecellenti siue Ducibus tamquam ab eo missis c. Be subiect therefore to euery humane creature for God whether it be to the King as excelling or to rulers as sent by him to the reuenge of malefactors but to the praise of the good for so is the will of God that doing wel you may make the ignorance of vnwise men to be dum And a little after exhorting thē to feare God his next lesson is to honor the King Deum timete Regem honorificate How I pray you is a King honoured when his iust precept is neglected or contemned Some haply without consideration both ignorantly vnwisely wil grant that Catholick kings are to be honoured and obeyed but doubt may be made of such as by the Church are reputed or rather condemned heretikes and aduersaries to the Catholicke faith I aske these if there be any so simple whether Emperours Kings and Princes to whom the Apostles preached this subiection and obedience were not aduersaries yea and persecutors of the Catholicke faith and continued such the space of more then three hundred yeares howbeit the Christians of those dayes instructed both by the doctrine and example of the Apostles in all dutifull humilitie did not giue freely but rendred to Caesar his due how peruerse soeuer their Gouernours were Which lesson Saint Peter their chiefe Pastor immediatly after in the same chapter had taught them Serui subditi estote in omni timore dominis non tantum bonis modestis sedetiam dyscolis Seruants be subiect in all feare to your maisters not onely to the good and modest but also to the wayward Ephes 6. Colos 3. This dutifull subiection likewise teacheth Saint Paul Serui obedite Dominis carnalibus cum timore tremore in simplicitate cordis vestri sicut Christo Seruants be obedient to your Lords according to the flesh with feare and trembling in the simplicitie of your heart as to Christ not seruing to the eye as it were pleasing men but as the seruants of Christ doing the will of God from the heart with a good will seruing as to our Lord and not to men If seruants then commanded by the Apostle were bound to serue and obey their temporall Lords and maisters with such care and diligence were they neuer so froward and wicked Pagans for such no doubt many Christians did serue who by their examples threats or enticements might hazard to withdraw them from the true worship of God are not subjects now by the same law as well bound to be obedient to lawfull Kings and Princes be they neuer so wicked in manners or opposite to faith and Christian religion as heretikes and apostates are Were they not Pagan Princes and Potestates whom Saint Paul willed Titus to admonish Christians to obey at a word Admone illos saith he Principibus Potestatibus subditos esse dicto obedire Admonish them to be subiect to Princes and Potestates to obey at a word S. Ambrose Vpon which place Saint Ambrose Admonish as if he should say Although thou hast spirituall gouernment ouer spirituall matters yet admonish them to whom thou preachest to be subiect to Kings and Princes because Christian religion depriueth none of his right The same holy Father and also Saint Augustine write of the prompt obedience of Christians to Iulian the Apostata which may be a verie good example for Catholickes of these latter times to shew like obedience if they light on like Princes saying Iulianus extitit infidelis Imperator Aug. in Psal 124. Super illud Non relinquet Domi nus virgam Habetur 11. q. 3. c. Iulian. nonne extitit Apostata iniquus idololatra c. Iulian was an infidell Emperour was he not an Apostata wicked an idolater Christian souldiers serued an infidell Emperour When they came to the cause of Christ they acknowledged not but him that was in heauen When he willed them to worship Idols to sacrifise they preferred God before him But when he said Bring foorth your armie go against that people they obeyed incontinently The distinguished the eternall Lord from a temporall Lord and yet for the eternall Lord they were subiect also to the temporall Lord. Hereby is euident that Iulian had right to command Christian souldiers in temporals and they shewed all prompt obedience knowing that their religion taught no iniustice that notwithstanding his Apostacie he being lawfully called to the Empire they were not nor could be absolued of their loyaltie and ciuill obedience towards him Was so notorious an Apostata to be of dutie obeyed and not a king who cannot be iudged an hereticke because he doth not pertinaciter defend any opinion against the Church of Christ but royally promiseth to forsake the religion he professeth if any point or head thereof belonging to faith can be proued not to be ancient catholicke and Apostolicke Here Cardinall Bellarmine will answer That the Church in her nouitie or beginning wanted forces forsooth after three yea foure hundred
glorie of God obstinately refuse to performe their dutie in obeying that precept of our Sauiour Render vnto Caesar that which is Caesars and that of S. Peter Regem honorificate and also the commandement giuen to Moyses Honour thy father and thy mother These assure you are they who giue cause of scandal indeed wherby their persecution if so they please to cal it is continued the Church perturbed Catholicke religion little regarded and many a soule lost But Vaeilli per quem scandalum venit Woe to him by whom scandall cometh Time will make triall who it is whether they or we In the meane while we say that the proper and true definition of scandall as it is defined by S. Thomas and others most aptly agreeth with the doctrine and example or words and deedes of such English subiects as withdraw men from performing their dutie to their dread Soueraigne not on such as perswade it and yet remaine no lesse Catholicke then they do pretend in euery point of faith Scandall is a word or deed not right Definition of scandall Tho. 2.2 q. 43. ar 1. Ieron in comment super Math. c. 15. giuing occasion of ruine that is of spirituall ruine or sinne Now what euill or shew of euill or sin is there in those who by their deedes and words example and doctrine teach and labour to induce all to do that which is right and due by the law of God What scandall or offence or occasion of sinne do they giue who perswade nothing against any one article or point of faith but meere allegiance to their Prince Doth this offend or scandalize any If they will be scandalized for well doing and take offence where none is giuen do they not shew how imperfect they are in the loue of God Pax multa diligentibus legem tuam non est illis scandalum Psal 118. To such as loue thy law ô God there is great peace and to them there is no scandall May not these be well likened to the Pharisies that of enuie and malice were offended or scandalized at the sayings and doings of our Blessed Sauiour who being told by his disciples of their scandall taken answered Omnis plantatio quam non plantauit Pater meus coelestis eradicabitur Math. 15. All planting which my heauenly Father hath not planted shall be rooted vp Let them alone blind they are guides of the blind And if the blind be guide to the blind both fall into the ditch Such are to be pitied and praied for not enuied whom we may answer in the same sort and with Haimo Haimo in Math c. 18. Greg ho. 7. in Sipro veritate scandalum oriatur magis veritas eligenda est quà m scandalum vitandum If for truth scandall do arise as it doth in this our case rather truth is to be chosen then scandall sought to be auoided The same affirmeth S. Gregorie the Great Ezech. pag. 2. as before pag. 45. And S. Thomas disputing whether spirituall goods are to be pretermitted for passiue scandall Tho. 2.2 q. 43. ar 7. saith That such goods as are de necessitate salutis ought not to be omitted for auoiding scandall because they cannot be pretermitted without mortall sinne as in our iudgements we take allegiance in the Oath to be but it is manifest saith he that none ought to sinne mortally to saue an other from sinne because according to the order of charitie a man ought to loue more his owne spirituall health then another mans The same likewise hath Ioannes de Burgo Pupil oculi Opera necessaria ad salutem non sunt omittenda ad vitandum scandalum proximi ex quacunqueradice procedat Workes necessarie to saluation are not to be omitted for auoiding the scandall of our neighbour out of whatsoeuer roote it proceedeth Herby deare brethren in our Lord Iesus I trust you rest satisfied that such as haue taken the Oath of allegiance wherein nothing hath bene hitherto proued by any learned man to be contained against any one point of faith haue not giuen cause of scandall as they haue bin slandered to haue done but by that their fact performing their bounden dutie to their dread Soueraigne according to the law of God haue sought to take away that horrible scandall giuen indeed by a few vngracious Catholikes in the gunpowder treason and which others daily giue to his Maiestie and the State in resisting the law made vpon so great reason and for the commō good of the realme Besides I trust your wisdomes will consider that to take the Oath being bonum spirituale wherein no euill thing against religion is contained they are not to pretermit it for the imperfections of some who are readie to suffer or take scandall where none is giuen Wherefore I exhort you all most dearely beloued Catholikes in the bowels of our Sauiour Iesus Christ as the very Reuerend and learned maister George Blackwell sometime our Archpriest did in his letter to his Assistants and you all both Clergie and Laitie for abolishing and ending this controuersie which hath scandalized the whole State you wold desist to impugne supreme authoritie in this case of the Oath most lawfull and iust as hath bene proued and ceasse any longer to prouoke to wrath his Maiesty our most clement Prince clement I say for I dare boldly auouch that neither the Pope nor any King or Prince in Christendome had he had the like cause offered by any his subiects especially of a contrarie religion and finding others of the same religion to refuse to make profession of their loyalty by an Oath required at their hands would shew such mercy and clemencie as his Maiestie hath done and doth Conferre the fact or enterprise of the Moores in Spaine now two years agone who wēt about as report goeth treacherously to bring in Turkes and forreiners to inuade the countrey with this Catesbeyan and Percian most barbarous treason and I doubt not but you will iudge them both worthy condigne punishment Compare againe the two Princes who by Gods ordinance carie the sword ad vindictam malefactorum to take reuenge on malefactours you shall find them both iustly prouoked to indignation against the delinquents yet the one viz. King Philip with great seueritie chastiseth the innocent with the nocent old yong men women and children expelling all alike out of his dominiōs to the number of nine hundred thousand as appeareth by his edict within the space of xxx dayes to the losse of all their immoueables Whereas the other our dread Soueraigne of his pitifull inclination did not punish in such sort the guiltles nor all the offendours according to their deserts but repressed by his edict the furie of his people readie to haue taken reuenge yea on many innocent persons for their sakes that had offended Embrace then deare brethren the mercie and long sufferance of this our milde and clement Prince whilest time is granted you lest through your default it be turned
yeares from her beginning to depose Iulian Constantius Valens and other hereticall Princes and therefore permitted Christians to obey them in temporals Saint Cyprian saith that in his time the number of Christians were verie great Cypr. in Demetrianum Tertul. in Apologet. And Tertullian writeth thus Were we disposed not to practise secret reuenge but to professe open hostilitie should we want number of men or force of armes Are the Moores or the Parthians or any one nation whatsoeuer more in number then we that are spread ouer all the world We are not of you and yet we haue filled all the places and roomes which you haue Your Cities Ilands Castles Townes Assemblies your Tents Tribes and Wards yea the Imperiall Pallace Senate and seate of judgement Euseb l. 3. de rita Constan Niceph. l. 5. c. 25. c. Eusebius likewise and Nicephorus report That the whole world as it were vnder Constantius was Christian and the greater part Catholicke How then is it true that the Church in her nouitie wanted forces And therefore she permitted Christians to obey their Princes in temporals saith the Cardinall Euen so permitted as father Parsons in his letter to the Catholickes of England against the Oath of allegiance affirmeth that Pope Clement by a Breue had permitted ciuill obedience to our King and recommended to all Catholickes soone after his Highnesse entrance vnto the Crowne As if ciuill obedience had not bene otherwise due but by his Holinesse permission Who would haue thought such an imprudent and strange kind of phrase could haue so escaped his pen But it seemeth he had learned the same out of Cardinall Bellarmines writings and so presumed it would passe as current without controlement And may not the world maruell be it spoken with due reuerence to his great dignitie which I haue euer and in heart still do honour that a man so excellently learned will teach that Christian subiects vnlesse they be permitted by the Church are not bound to render obedience to their lawfull Kings and Princes if they become heretickes or aduersaries to true religion and persecutors Princes infidels lose no right but are the true and supreme Princes of their kingdomes as he himselfe teacheth Lib. 5. de Ro. Pont. c. 2. for dominion is not founded either in grace or in faith so as the Pope hath no authoritie to meddle with them Marry if these become Christians and after fall to heresie what then In that case saith he Potest regna mutare vni auferre Cap. 6. alteri conferre He may change kingdomes and take from one and giue to another saith he Then is their condition worse as touching temporall possessions then it was when they were infidels worse then the conditiō of the basest of their subiects But Christian religion depriueth no man of his right who had right in infidelitie cannot lose the same by receiuing the grace and faith of Christ which is agreeable to the doctrine of the Cardinall howsoeuer he seemeth sometime to teach contrary to himselfe Bellar. lib. 5. de Ro. Pont. c. 3. Christ did not saith he nor doth take kingdomes from them to whom they belong for Christ came not to destroy those things which were well setled but to establish them And therefore when a King becometh a Christian he doth not lose his earthly kingdome which by right he held but purchaseth a new interest to an euerlasting kingdome otherwise the benefites receiued by Christ should be hurtfull to Kings and grace should destroy nature If Christian Kings lawfully attaining to their dominions by right of nature enioy the same as cannot be denied and so are to be obeyed why not also if they happen to fall backe into heresie or infidelitie their right not being founded in grace or in faith To say that such Princes or magistrates are not to be obeyed cometh neare the heresie charged vpon Wickliffe and condemned in the Councel of Constance and is repugnant to the doctrine of the holy Ghost in sacred Scriptures and practise of all blessed Saints and Martyrs who most promptly without any permission of the Pope or Church obeyed Pagan Princes vnder whom they were subiect in all ciuill causes onely in defence of faith and Gods truth made choice rather to shed their bloud then by obeying Caesar to disobey God And where such a permission was euer granted as to obey Iulian or other hereticall Emperour cannot be found in any generall Councell or ancient Fathers writings before the dayes of S. Thomas of Aquine 2.2 q. 12.2.2 of whom the Cardinall learned his doctrine of permission to obey till such time as they had forces to depriue them of their Empire Consider I pray you that S. Paul hauing receiued his doctrine immediatly from heauen writing to the Christians in Rome permitted not for a time but strictly commanded them euer to obey higher powers Rom. 13. Sap. 6. Omnis anima potestatibus sublimioribus subdita sit Let euery soule be subiect to higher powers Was this meant trow ye for onely higher powers Christians or heathen onely for a time No but for all sorts of rulers and as long as there be superiors and inferiors The holy Apostle in this and other his Epistles often inculcateth this necessary vertue of obedience diligently exhorting and commanding as well subiects to be obedient to their Princes as seruants to their masters and all inferiors to their superiors And were not these maisters and higher powers for the most part Pagans Were they not enemies to Christian religion whom they were taught to obey Was any sort of inferiors exempted from obeying S. Iohn Chrysostome will put you out of doubt that such subiection is commanded to all sorts Priests Monkes Chrysost in cap. 13. Rom. hom 23. August in lib. expositionis quorundam propos ex epist ad Rom. and secular men as the Apostle himselfe declareth in the verie beginning Omnis anima potestatibus sublimioribus subdita sit etiam si Apostolus sis si Euangelista si Propheta siue quisquis tandem fueris neque enim pietatem subuertit ista subiectio Let euery soule be subiect to higher powers yea if thou art an Apostle if an Euangelist if a Prophet or finally whosoeuer thou art Marke well For this subiection subuerteth not pietie or religion And he specially noteth that S. Paul saith not simply Obediat but subdita sit And why because power is of God Non est enim potestas nisi à Deo For there is no power but of God Quid dicis saith this holy Father to S. Paul Omnis ergo Princeps à Deo constitutus est Istud inquit non dico Neque enim de quouis Principum sermo mihi nunc est sed de ipsa re What saist thou O Paul is then euery Prince constituted of God This saith he I say not For neither of euery Prince do I now speake but of the thing it selfe that is of power And the Apostle
saith further Quae autem sunt à Deo ordinatae sunt And those that are of God are ordained Therefore he that resisteth the power resisteth the ordinance of God adding Tho. 2.2 q. 105. ar 1. contrarie to the loue of God in not obeying his commandement and contrarie to the loue of his neighbour withdrawing from his superior obedience due vnto him And they that do resist what get they They purchase to themselues damnation hauing committed a deadly sinne in resisting Which kind of purchase I wish many in this our countrey to note diligently and in time to take heed of But I know some will inferre that this place of S. Paul may well and ought to be vnderstood of Prelates and the chiefe Prelate Christs Vicar who are also higher powers and therefore toucheth such as by obeying the King in the Oath of allegiance disobey their spirituall Pastor the Pope These deceiue themselues not considering the drift of the Apostle for if they marke well they will easily see that S. Paul in this chapter vnderstandeth not the spirituall directly but the secular power as must needs appeare manifestly to him that readeth the text Nam Principes saith he non sunt timor◠boni operis sed mali c. For Princes are no feare to the good worke but to the euill But wilt thou not feare the power do good and thou shalt haue praise of the same for he is Gods minister vnto thee for good But if thou do euill feare for he beareth not the sword without cause for he is Gods minister a reuenger vnto wrath to him that doth euill By whom can all this be meant but by the secular power To whom is tribute due to be rendered not giuen gratis because it is an act or worke of iustice but to the secular power Who carieth such a sword to punish corporally to death and by the ordinance of God but Kings and secular Princes who are Gods ministers and vicegerents in earth for this purpose This sword neuer belonged to Peter nor his successors by Christs institution as D. Kellison confesseth against M. Sutcliffe D. Kellison in his Reply to M. Sutcliffe cap. 1. fo 13. his words are these If beside this spirituall power which he hath ouer the whole Church Sutcliffe suppose that either we giue him or that he challengeth to himselfe any temporall power ouer Christian Kings and kingdomes he is foully deceiued for we confesse and so doth he that Christ gaue him no such sword nor soueraigntie c. We acknowledge indeed two swords in the Church of Christ the one spirituall the other temporall but we giue them not both to the Pope For the supreme spirituall power is the onely sword which he handleth the supreme temporall power out of Italie pertaineth to the Emperour Kings and Princes For as there are in the Church of God two bodies Idem fo 14. the one politicall and ciuill the other Ecclesiasticall or mysticall the one called the common-wealth the other the Church so are there two powers to direct and gouerne these bodies and the one is called ciuill or temporall the other Ecclesiasticall and that ruleth the bodies this the soules that the kingdome this the Church that makes temporall this spirituall lawes that decideth ciuill causes this determineth and composeth controuersies in religion that punisheth bodies by the temporall sword this chastiseth soules with the spirituall glaiues and bonds of excommunication suspension interdicts and such like and the end of that is temporall peace the scope and butte of this eternall felicity and so that being inferiour this superiour that must yeeld to this when there is any opposition And so we giue to the Pope one sword onely ouer the Church and not swords as Sutcliffe saith They are secular Princes likewise who may exact customes and to whom tribute ought of dutie to be paied by all subiects thereby to sustaine and maintaine their dignitie gouerne their kingdome in peace and iustice and protect them from all enemies such excepted as by their priuiledges for the honour of Christ are exempted Tributum Caesaris est Ex. de trad Basil ep ad Valentin non negetur saith S. Ambrose This was neuer due to the Apostles the spirituall Princes of the Church nor consequently to Bishops wno as they are bishops only either did they exercise such a sword or euer acknowledge to be permitted thē by the institutiō of our B. Sauiour of whō they receiued their cōmissiō al power they could practise for gouernmēt of his Church till the worlds end Coste c. 14. Costerus a reuerend and learned Iesuite in fidei Demonst pag. 95. commendeth Erasmus for writing thus Erasm ep ad Vulturium Neocomum Nihil vi gerebant Apostoli scil tantùm vtebantur gladio Spiritus neminem agebant in exilium nullius inuadebāt facultates c. Haec Erasmus non minus disertè quà m verè They that is the Apostles did nothing by violence they vsed only the sword of the Spirit they droue none into exile they inuaded no mans possessions c. This Erasmus saith Costerus no lesse wisely then truly And a litle before in the same booke cap. 12. he teacheth Cost propos 3. cap. 12. that the materiall sword belongeth not to any Ecclesiasticall person Nulli enim competit Ecclesiastico vel sanguinem fundere vel capitis quenquam condemnare For it appertaineth not to any Ecclesiasticall person either to shed bloud or to condemne any man to death Then not to the Pope as he is an Ecclesiasticall person and successour to Peter doth it belong to vse such a sword Hereto agreeth Sir Thomas More in his treatise vpon the passion Morus in pas Dom. pag. 139◠Bern de consid li. 4. c. 3.4 See Gratian. 23. q. 8. in princ Mitte gladium in locum suum c. Put vp saith Christ to Peter thy sword into his place as though he would say I will not be defended with sword And such a state haue I chosen thee vnto that I will not haue thee fight with this kind of sword but with the sword of Gods word Let this materiall sword therefore be put vp into his place that is to wit into the hands of temporall Princes as into his scabberd againe to punish malefactors withall Adding that the Apostles haue to fight with a sword much more terrible then this that is the spirituall sword of excommunication the vse whereof pertaineth to Ecclesiasticall persons alone as the other to secular Iustices This he most learned in his time and no lesse zelous in Catholicke religion Morus in passione Domi. He goeth on pag. 1393. saying that Christ after this told Peter that he had done very euill to strike with the sword and that he declared also by the example of the ciuill lawes Matth. 26. who saith Omnes qui acceperint gladium gladio peribunt c. For by the ciuill lawes of the Romaines vnder which
not onely that impious opinioÌ„ or heresie of Anabaptisme or Brownisme which he held before but also all other heresies as Pelagianisme Arianisme Nestorianisme c. which haply he had alwayes before detested This therefore is but a vaine verball shift of some who not knowing what to say against the maine points of the Oath are driuen out of the profundity of their wits to seeke a knot in a rush to inuent a difficultie where none is therby to intrap the soules of scrupulous consciences and deterre them from performing their dutie to their Prince making no conscience to ouerthrow them also in their temporals If any insift saying that they thinke indeed the doctrine which teacheth it to be no sin to depose or murther a good and lawfull King such a one as gouerneth for the good of the common wealth to be hereticall but if he become a tyrant such a one as hath more care of his owne vtilitie then of the weale publicke and seeketh to subuert the State persecuteth the professours of the true religion and sets vp idolatrie in steed of Christian faith in the iudgement of the people it is not heresie to teach that he may be deposed by the State assembled or lawfully murthered by any man whatsoeuer And is not this pernicious doctrine of many sectaries of this age heresie It being directly repugnant to the doctrine and example of our Sauiour Christ and his Apostles against the law giuen to Moses Thou shalt not kill as also against that saying of our Lord Qui acceperit gladium gladio peribit Whosoeuer shall take the sword to strike withall without authority shal perish with the sword This was that dangerous positioÌ„ worthily condeÌ„ned as heretical in the Councel of Constance Quilibet tyrannus potest debet licitè meritoriè occidi c. Conc. Constant sell 15. an 1415. Euery tyrant may and ought lawfully and meritoriously to be murthered by any his vassall or subiect wharsoeuer either by close trechery or by smooth practises and insinuations notwithstanding any Oath taken or promise of allegiance made vnto him nay not so much as expecting the sentence or warrant of any Iudge whatsoeuer Against which error this holy Synode endeuoring to arise and vtterly to extinguish the same after mature deliberation doth declare and define that this doctrine erroneous in faith and manners and doth reiect and condemne it as hereticall and scandalous opening a gap to fraude deceipt dissimulation treason and periury It doth moreouer declare and define that they who shall obstinatly maintaine this pernicious doctrine are heretikes and as such to be punished according to the canonicall decrees And that this is the intent and purpose of the Synode Molanus de fide haeret ser lib. 5. c. 6. Molanus sheweth thus Patres indistinctè de quolibet tyranno loquuntur doctrina illa de vtriusque geâ—er is tyranno est in fide moribus erronea The Fathers speake indistinctly of euery sort of tyrant and that doctrine of killing a tyrant of either sort is in faith manners erroneous land it giueth way to fraudes deceipts lyings treasons periuries for those things which concerne the commonwealth are not to be handled or accomplished of priuate persons among which is the occision of an inuader Thus farre he This doctrine or position was also long since two yeares before the Councell condemned as impious hereticall and damnable by 141. Diuines of the Faculty or schoole of Paris anno 1413. December 13. and now lately againe by the same facultie anno 1610. since the bloudie parricide of the French king Henry the fourth The decree is this The decree of the Doctors of Sorb as it is set downe in Antimariana Censet seditiosum impium haer eticum esse The sacred Facultie iudgeth or decreeth that it is seditious impious and hereticall for any subiect vassall or stranger vpon what occasion pretence or diuised colour soeuer sacris Regumpersonis vina inferre to do any violence note wel against the sacred persons of Kings Whereunto accordeth S. Thomas that yea a tyrant may not be slain by his subiects otherwise he should be contrary to himselfe for thus he writeth Tho. de regim prin lib. 1. c. 6. Essetmultitudini periculosum eius rectoribus It were dangerous to the people and their gouernours that any should attempt to take away the life of Princes though they were tyrants for commonly not the well disposed but the ill affected men do thrust themselues into that danger And the gouernement of good Kings is as odious to bad men as the rule of tyrants to good people Wherefore the kingdome by this presumption would be rather in danger to forgo a good Prince then a wicked tyrant So S. Thomas By this Catholicke censure of that famous Vniuerfitie and by the definitiue sentence of the generall Councell and the doctrine of S. Thomas you see it to be condemned as hereticall and damnable doctrine that Princes as in our Oath which be excommunicated or tyrants by the Councell may be deposed which cannot be effected without violence to their persons and slaughter of many men by their subiects Nobles or commons or any other whatsoeuer Whereby you may secure your conscience this part of the Oath to be lawfull and may be taken without feare or preiudicating the Popes spirituall authoritie Sir what say you then to the Friars killing his liege Lord Henrie the third of France the mod Christian King supposed to be a tyrant in gouernement and a fauourer of heretikes applauded or allowed of as seemeth to some by Pope Sixtus 5. in his oration made in a secret Consistorie before the Cardinals anone after the certaine newes of the act and the Kings death My opinion is that as the doctrine teaching to be no sinne to kill a tyrant is worthily condemned as impious and hereticall which you haue heard sufficiently proued in the precedent pages so such a fact of such a one in such sort must needs be most impious and damnable yea supposing we should grant that King to haue bene such a one as is aboue said albeit the French know right well he was their true and rightful King and besides liued and died a member of the Catholicke Romane Church And whosoeuer will go about to excuse this inexcusable fact and to say that he did it either out of a great zeale to deliuer the commonwealth from such a supposed wicked and tyrannical King or else that he did it by diuine inspiratioÌ„ being ordained and appointed by God so to do Saint Paul teacheth otherwise to wit Non faciamus mala vt veniant bone Let vs not do euill that there may come good And Dauid a man according to Gods owne heart elected to be King of the Iewes both by his example proceeded and in his doctrine taught otherwise For when Dauid persecuted by Saul yea who at that time sought his life came euen to Sauls Tent whilest he was sleeping