besides her Authority She will have your Assent to their being of Divine Authority to depend wholly upon her Testimony Notwithstanding that God Almighty hath vouchsafed to the World marvellously full and plentiful Evidence thereof and such as is adapted to the capacities of all those who have the use of Reason but never once mentioned this as a part of that Evidence and therefore much less can it be thought the Whole How infinitely ill hath this Corrupt Church deserved at the hands of all Christians although this were the onely Abuse she had put upon them For to say nothing of her Horrible Pride and Uncharitableness in making the truth of the Scriptures dependent on her Testimony that her Pretence supposing her making her self the onely true Church this is the greatest injury imaginable to Christianity nor can she take a surer course than this to make all men Infidels And that upon these two Accounts First This Pretence of hers is immediately founded upon a Precarious and most Evidently false Principle viz. That of her Infallibility I dare appeal to those of her own Sons who have studied the Controversie whether there was ever a more shamefully baffled Cause in the World than this is Whether by their Infallible Church they mean with the Iesuits the Pope alone or with others the Pope with his General Council that is a pack of Bishops and Priests of his own Faction As the Psalmist saith If the Foundations be destroyed what shall the Righteous do So if this be the Foundation of our Christian Faith and that be proved to be a Rotten Foundation as nothing was ever proved if this be not then what shall we Christians do We must then acknowledge our selves a Generation of most Credulous Fools and that our Faith is vain If the Foundation be tottering the whole Superstructure must fall to the Ground But so fond is this Unsatiably Covetous and Ambitious Church of her Great Diana Infallibility by the Pretence whereof she hath raised her self to such a Height and Grandeur that she is well content if that must fall that our Saviour and his Apostles both the Old and New Testament should fall with it And she hath done all that lies in her to make it necessary that those who shall have the wisdom to reject her Ridiculous Doctrine of Infallibility should at the self-same time renounce Christianity If Popery were Chargeable with no other Crime as it is with innumerable others and many of them intolerable I say were it Chargeable with no other Crime but the making our Belief of the Authority of the Books of Scripture to be founded on the Infallibility of the Romish Faction we ought to be as zealous for the Preventing its Reestablishment in this Nation from whence it hath happily been twice Expelled as we are desirous to Preserve the Christian Religion Secondly The Romish Churche's making her Authority the sole Foundation of our Belief of the Scriptures makes the Testimony of the Spirit to the Truth of Christianity in our Saviour when on â—arth and in the Apostles and others in the Primitive Ages to be now perfectly Insignificant I think it makes them to be so as to the Church Representative for she pretends to her Infallibility and consequently to her Infallible Assurance of the Truth of Christianity as an immediâ—te Gift of the Holy Ghost therefore what need hath she of the Testimony of Miracles But as to Private Christians I can by no means understand in what stead they stand them for if the Churches Authority be necessary to their believing the truth of the Scriptures and therefore to their believing that there were those Miracles really wrought which the Writings of the Apostles tell us of then why may they not without any more ado make her Authority the immediate ground of their Assent to the truth of Christianity It is said that the truth of the Matters of Fact are not knowable at this distance such as whether there were such Persons as our Saviour and his Apostles whether they performed such Miracles and the Apostles wrote such Books c. but by the Tradition of the Church because no such Matters are to be known at any considerable distance but by Tradition To this it is Answered that it is one thing to believe the Matters of Fact upon the Churche's Tradition and another to believe them upon her Authority founded upon her Infallibility Now this latter we reject but adhere to the former as a Ground of our belief of those things But then by the Tradition of the Church we are far from meaning that of Rome onely We mean the Catholick Church or the whole Collective Body of Christians throughout the World from the Apostles times down to this present Age of which the Roman Church is but a Part and therefore does Impudently in appropriating Catholicism to her self and that a very Vitiated Part too and that Church Representative an exceedingly small Part. And we receive the Tradition of the Catholick Church as a Ground as I said of believing these Matters not as tâ—e Ground because we take in another Tradition viz. that of those who are out of the Church and Enemies to Christianity the Iews especially In short we believe those and the like matters of Fact upon the same ground that we believe all other wherein Religion is not concerned but there are Circumstances which give the Tradition of Christian matters of Fact a mighty Advantage above other Traditions as unquestionable Assurance as these give men when they are General and Uninterrupted But 't is well known to all who are not strangers to the Popish Writers what lamentable work they make in proving the Testimony of the Church to be the foundation of our Faith concerning the Authority of the Scriptures This Proof they fetch out of the Scriptures themselves and their main Text for this purpose and for the Infallibility of their Church is those words of S. Paul 1 Tim. 3. 15. where he calls the Church the Pillar and Ground of Truth But what a manifest Circle is this We ask them how it appears that the Scriptures are the Word of God They answer it appears from the Testimony of the Church We ask again how it appears that the Testimony of the Church is true They reply it appears from the Scriptures And so they prove the Authority of the Scriptures by the Testimony of the Church and then wheel about again and prove the Authority of the Church by the Testimony of the Scriptures But again We can either be certain of the truth of these words of S. Paul setting aside the Authority of the Church or we cannot be Certain If we can be Certain why then not of the truth of the whole Scripture as well as of this single Text If we cannot be certain of the truth of this Text without the consideration of the Churche's Authority what Folly or rather Knavery is it to make this Text an Argument to prove the thing
Inferences from each of the Arguments of the foregoing Sections CHAP. X. Which treats of the First Inference from the First Proposition That the most Excellent Liberty doth consist in an Intire Compliance with the Laws of Righteousness and Goodness Or in Freedom from the Dominion of Sinful Affections Namely That those are most Vnreasonable and Depraved People who complain of the Divine Laws as intolerable Intrenchments upon their Liberty Where it is shewed First That upon supposition our Liberty were restrained by the Laws of God it would nevertheless be most unreasonable to complain upon that account Secondly That the Laws which oblige Christians do not restrain their Liberty pag. 127. CHAP. XI The Second Inference viz. That such a Freedom of Will as consists in an Indifferency to good or evil is no Perfection but the Contrary pag. 135. CHAP. XII Which Treats of one Branch of the First Inference from the Argument of the Second Section That in Freedom from the Dominion of Corrupt Affections doth that Liberty Principally or rather Wholly Consist which Christ hath purchased for us Namely that several Notions of Christian Liberty which have too much prevailed are false and of dangerous Consequence The First of which is That which makes it to consist wholly or in part in Freedom from the Obligation of the Moral Law Certain Texts urged by the Antinomians in favour of it vindicated from the sence they put upon them And the extreme wildness and wickedness of it exposed in Five Particulars pag. 143. CHAP. XIII A Second False Notion of Christian Liberty viz. That which makes it to consist in Freedom from the Obligation of those Laws of Men which enjoyn or forbid indifferent things This Notion differently managed by the Defenders of it First Some extend it so far as to make it to reach to all Humane Laws the matter of which are things indifferent Secondly Others limit it to those which relate to Religion and the Worship of God The 23. Vers. of the 7. Chap. of the 1 Epist. to the Corinthians cleared from giving any Countenance to either of these Opinions The Former of them Confuted by three Arguments And the Latter by four Vnder the Second of which several Texts of Scripture which are much insisted upon in the defence thereof are taken into Consideration An unjust Reflection upon the Church of England briefly replied to And this Principle that the imposing of things indifferent in Divine Worship is no Violation of Christian Liberty proved to be no ways Serviceable to Popery by considering what the Popish Impositions are in Three Particulars pag. 164. CHAP. XIV An Answer to this Question Whether the Prescribing of Forms of Prayer for the Publick Worship of God be not an Encroachment upon Christian Liberty Wherein it is shewed that this is not a Stifling of the Spirit or Restraining the exercise of his Gift And what in Prayer is not as also what is the Gift of the Spirit Whereby is occasioned an Answer to another Question viz. Whether an Ability for Preaching be properly a Gift of the Spirit pag. 198. CHAP. XV. A Third False Notion of Christian Liberty viz. that which makes Liberty of Conscience a Branch of it Two things premised 1. That Conscience is not so sacred a thing as to be uncapable of being obliged by Humane Laws 2. That no man can properly be deprived of the true Liberty of his Conscience by any Power on Earth That what is contended for is more properly Liberty of Practice than of Conscience The Author's Opinion in reference to this Liberty delivered in Ten Propositions That whatsoever Liberty of this Nature may be insisted on as our Right it is not Christian Liberty but Natural Liberty pag. 219. CHAP. XVI The Third Inference from our Notion of Christian Liberty viz. That Popery is the greatest Enemy in the World thereunto Where it is shewed First That the Church of Rome Robs those who are subject to her of that Natural Liberty which necessarily belongs to them as they are Men viz. That which consists in the free use of their Vnderstandings in matters of Religion That She will not permit men to Examine either her Doctrines or Practices by the Holy Scriptures nor yet to receive the Holy Scriptures themselves otherwise than upon her Authority The Wickedness of this exposed in two Particulars The alledging of Scripture for it shewed to be the grossest Absurdity Their great Text 1 Tim. 3. 15. spoken to Her Tyranny over mens Minds further shewed pag. 254. CHAP. XVII Where it is shewed Secondly That Popery is as great an Enemy as can be to Christian Liberty And First To that Liberty which our Saviour hath purchased for the World in general As 1. That it tendeth as much as is possible to the Corrupting of mens Souls by subjecting them to vile Affections This shewed in the general viz. in that it is apt to beget false Notions of God and more particularly in that it brings men under the Power of the Lusts of Malice Revenge Cruelty Pride and Ambition Covetousness Uncleanness Intemperance and the greatest Injustice and Unrighteousness 2. That it no less tendeth to Disquiet mens Minds with certain troublesome Passions pag. 272. CHAP. XVIII The Third Particular discoursed on viz. That the Admirable Method our Lord hath taken to Instate us in our Christian Liberty is made lamentably Ineffectual by Popery This shewed as to each of those four Particulars that Method consists of The Second Head briefly spoken to viz. That Popery is also the greatest Enemy to that Liberty Christ purchased for the Jews in Particular A Pathetical Exhortation to a higher valuing of the Priviledges we enjoy in the Church of England concludes the Chapter pag. 299. CHAP. XIX The Fourth Inference That he onely is a true Christian that looks upon himself as obliged to be no less Watchful over his Heart and the frame and temper of his Mind than over his Life and Conversation pag. 318. CHAP. XX. The Last Inference Viz. That the most Proper and Genuine Christian Obedience is that which hath most of Liberty in it namely that which proceeds from the Principle of Love to God and Goodness pag. 322 ERRATA PAge 247. line 15. for Six read Thirty Six Page 259. line 6. after Controversie add this Parenthesis if they could be ingenuous Page 287. line 17. after opportunities for add or in order to A DISCOURSE OF Christian Liberty The Introduction THERE is nothing toward which Mankind is more naturally or vehemently affected than Freedom and Liberty there is so great a value and price set upon it that Life it self is not thought too precious to be hazarded or laid down for it And many have rather chosen to die by their Enemies hands than to be inslaved by them It was the saying of Cato Malui mori quà m uni parere I had rather die than that one man meaning Iulius Caesar should Lord it over me And he was as good as his word he laid
Words not by Blows And the Arguments used by the most Ancient Fathers against persecuting people for mere dissenting in matters of Religion are as strong against the persecuting practices of Rome Christian as they were against those of Rome Pagan And this means hath proved always as unsuccessful as it is improper the best success it hath ever had hath been to make some Hypocrites and the rest more averse and obstinate than they were before That way of Religion they before disliked they now hate and oppression making even wise men mad as King Solomon observeth multitudes from modest Dissenters in their own defence turn Factious and Seditious and down-right opposers And nothing hath been more ordinarily observed than that Persecution doth mightily encrease instead of diminishing the number of Dissenters As it is grown into a Maxim Sanguis Martyrum est semen Ecclesiae The bloud of Martyrs is the seed of the Church so nothing makes any party so considerable nor any thing gains them so many Proselytes as their bearing Death or Torment or any cruel usage like Martyrs which we need not be informed the very worst of men have frequently done Thanks be to God the Church of England is as far departed from that of Rome in this point of merciless Severity as in the rest of her Abominations Which hath made me stand amazed at the Tragical out-cries of one or two of late against our Church as if the Inquisition it self could hardly match her in her savage cruelty towards sober Dissenters Such Libellers as these have as little Wit as Christianity or Common Honesty for can they more expose their Reputation than by publishing to the World such things as every body can confute from his own knowledge These people cannot but believe in their Consciences that modest Dissenters nor immodest neither as themselves know by experience cannot hope to have fairer quarter in any part of the Christian world where there is any Establishment than they have in this Church Nay that there is hardly any one Party of the Dissenters that would be half so favourable to the rest should they get into Power as our Constitution is to all of them The principal of our divided Parties 't is well known have been tried in England Scotland and New-England and how exemplary they have been for their Moderation towards men of a different perswasion is too well understood to be quickly forgotten But old sores shall not bleed afresh by my rubbing them as great provocation as is given by some at the most unseasonable time imaginable Prop. 5. But notwithstanding what we have now Asserted there is a necessity of making it more mens interest to comply with the publick Establishment than not to comply with it Which cannot be done so long as those who are conformable thereunto and those which dissent from it are both put into the self-same circumstances It is as good nay better to have no legal Establishment at all than not to back it with motives of Temporal Interest to disswade from Disobedience to it it is so so long as this sort of interest hath so great a power over the generality of men nay of professors of Religion too as we see it hath and so few comparatively are governed by pure Reason and Conscience as great pretences as there are to both Penalties of one nature or other are necessary Sanctions of Laws and were it not for the annexing of them Laws would be so far from being generally obeyed that they would be generally despised and contemned Nay the perverse natures of men do so incline them niti in vetitum to do what 's prohibited through their excessive fondness for Liberty that I am perswaded the way to have this or that done by the far greater part would be for Authority to forbid it without a Penalty And as for that Objection that Civil penalties make men Hypocrites how is it possible that those who make it should not at the same time see that it is as much levelled at all Laws as at those which relate to matters of Religion Then men ought not to be prohibited Murther Adultery or Theft under Civil penalties because they will be apt to make them Hypocrites as 't is certain those are no better who abstain from those crimes from the mere fear of the lash of the Law But it is better for the Publick that men should be Hypocrites in their Obedience than that they should live in Disobedience and somewhat better for themselves too And no man will be made a Hypocrite by penalties but such a one as would disobey and be an open sinner were it not for them I add that this Objection is also levelled at leaving it to every bodies Liberty to comply or not comply with the legal Establishment What a Temptation would this be to those to plead scruples of Conscience against some condition of Communion who are only swayed by some motive of Interest to get better trading to please their Wives or the like to leave the Church and joyn themselves to separate Congregations Prop. 6. We must distinguish between a Liberty of serving God according to our Consciences and a Liberty of making others to be of our perswasion There is a wide difference between these two It is inconsistent with Government for this latter Liberty to be Allowed Nothing can come of Authorities giving licence to Dissenters to make Proselytes to their several Parties but downright Confusion I appeal to themselves whether if any of them now sate at the Helm and were in the chair of Government they could endure to have their Authority publickly confronted they know they could not and much less give Liberty that is Encouragement to those to confront it who have a mind to it But what is it to put an affront upon Authority if publick Endeavours to withdraw People from Obedience be not so It is the greatest immodesty to desire of Governours such a Liberty as this and supposeth them either not to understand or to have no concern for their own interest as Governours And those that dissent from the legal Establishment ought to think themselves most kindly dealt with and to be very thankful may they enjoy upon tolerable terms their own way of Religion without free licence to do all they can to encrease their Party How happy would our good Ancestors in the Reign of Queen Mary have thought themselves had Her Majesty vouchsafed them such a Liberty as that They would hardly have thought they could pay too dear for 't It may be objected what if a man be immediately commissionated by the King of Kings as the Apostles were publickly to withdraw men from Obedience to those Laws which require of them unlawful things and withal he prove his Commission by working of Miracles is not Authority obliged to give Liberty so to do in that case Surely it is I answer surely it is not but 't is obliged to do that which is much better
may be easily mistaken when we undertake to determine of the Fitness of them Thus having with submission to my Superiors offered my Opinion about this weighty Argument in the foregoing Propositions I hope I shan't be censured as immodest if I also add that I do not see but Governours might avoid the two Extremes in reference to Liberty of Conscience as it is called by having a constant regard to such like Rules And that the Governed on the other hand by doing the like might understand without much difficulty within what bounds they ought to confine themselves in Craving of their Governours or Expecting from them this kind of Liberty But I think it seasonable to suggest this one thing more to these that they would so behave themselves that those who have Power to grant it as far as is sitting might not be tempted to think it a thing onely adapted to the serving of Interest and by that means be the more inclined to a total Refusing of any such Liberty I mean that there be no Occasion given to what is so Commonly not without ground said viz. When 't is mens Temporal Interest to plead for Liberty of Conscience then they are Zealous for it but the Tables are no sooner turned but who like them against it Were we as honest as we should be we should be more fixed and constant and not so vary in our Principles as our Circumstances vary We should not in one Circumstance build what before we destroyed and in another destroy what we before built And so declare amidst all our Stir and Noise about Liberty of Conscience that we have either none at all or but very little Conscience But in the Conclusion of all I must not forget that which hath occasioned all this Discourse about Liberty of Conscience viz. that whatever that Liberty of this kind is which we have a Right to it is not a Branch of Christian but of mere Natural Liberty There is no Text of Scripture that mentioneth this as a Liberty of our Saviour's Purchasing and therefore no Christian may claim it as a Christian. 'T is due to men of all Religions who may be supposed to make Conscience of what they do and not only to the Professors of the Christian Religion And 't was always and in all places as much mens Right as it hath been since our Saviour's Appearance in the World and is in those Parts of it where his Gospel is received CHAP. XVI The Third Inference from our Notion of Christian Liberty viz. That Popery is the greatest Enemy in the World thereunto Where it is shewed First That the Church of Rome Robs those who are subject to her of that Natural Liberty which necessarily belongs to them as they are Men viz. That which consists in the free use of their Vnderstandings in matters of Religion That She will not permit men to Examine either her Doctrines or Practices by the Holy Scriptures nor yet to receive the Holy Scriptures themselves otherwise than upon her Authority The Wickedness of this exposed in two Particulars The alledging of Scripture for it shewed to be the grossest Absurdity Their great Text 1 Tim. 3. 15. spoken to Her Tyranny over mens Minds further shewed HAving now spoken to all the False Notions of Christian Liberty that I know of and discovered the intolerable Mischievousness of them as well as Falsity I proceed to another Inference from our Notion thereof namely Thirdly That Popery is a Religion if I honour it not too much in calling it so that is the greatest Enemy in the whole World to Christian Liberty Should all the wicked Wits in the World meet together to Consult and Complot how to Banish out of it this Liberty they could not devise more effectual means for the doing of it than those which are pitch'd upon by the Church of Rome And here we will shew First That She Robs those who Subject themselves to her of that Natural Liberty which necessarily belongs to them as they are Men or Reasonable Creatures And much more Secondly That She Robs them of that Liberty which it was the Design of our Saviour's Coming into the World and of all he did and suffered here to instate us in First That She Robs those who Subject themselves to her of that Natural Liberty which necessarily belongs to them as Men or Reasonable Creatures There is no Liberty so Essential to Humane Nature or so much its Inviolable Right as that which consists in the free use of our Understandings But a Papist is miserably tied up and inslaved here and that in those matters wherein it is of Infinitely the greatest Importance and Concernment to him that his Mind should be free namely in matters of Religion which have such a necessary influence into the Welfare of our Souls and our Eternal Happiness But notwithstanding that Injunction of S. Paul 1 Thes. 5. 21. Prove all things hold fast that which is good And that of S. Iohn 1 Epist. 4. 1. Beloved believe not every Spirit but try the Spirits whether they be of God c. This Church denieth to her Children all judgment of Discretion in Points of Religion at least except in this one Point the choice of the Church for their Guide which having Chosen they must follow her blind-fold all their lives after They must be Implicit Believers and Implicit Chusers She will 〈◊〉 and believe for them All their â—â—dgment and Faith must be resolved into hâ—rs as being if you will believe her 〈◊〉 and Uncapable of being either deceivâ—◠〈◊〉 self or of deceiving others And therefore to take our Saviour's 〈◊〉 to 〈◊〉 thâ— Scriptures except for the forementioned one thing nay for that too as we shall see anon is to put an Affront upon Her Authority and the Bereans who were so highly commended for so doing were guilty of great Sauciness and high Presumption And She takes the most successful course that can be thought of that you shall not Search the Scriptures by locking them up as She does and making the Bible so scarce a Book to be light upon where she hath Power enough to do it and in those places where her Power is Clipt by using a many wicked Artifices to keep the Vulgar from looking into it who are so miserably imposed upon by their wretched Priests as to think it a lighter sin to be Drunk or to commit Fornication and transgress many an express Law of God than to cast their Eyes upon the Holy Scriptures So well aware is this Church that a great part of her Religion is neither to be found there nor agreeable with them but as expresly as it can be done by words contradicted by them And as you may not Examine any of her Doctrines or Practices by comparing them with the Rule of Faith and Practice the Scriptures so neither which is but a necessary consequence from thence may you have any other Foundation for your Belief of the Books of Scripture themselves
Cruelty Pride and Ambition Covetousness Uncleanness Intemperance and the greatest Injustice and Unrighteousness As for Malice and Cruelty as now we intimated they are the Natural and Genuine Off-spring of that most Horrible Uncharitableness that is proper to Popery When men have once conceived such an opinion of any of their Fellow-Creatures as that they are hated of God and damned Reprobates they think themselves obliged to Hate them too and Hatred and Cruelty are never separated We have already given Instances of Popish Cruelty in Butchering Protestants and shewed what a vast Sea of Bloud hath been shed by the Papists which hath been at the command of their Holy Father and the instigation of his cursed instruments the Iesuits And I now add that they have not satisfied themselves with the mere shedding of Bloud but have devised the most exquisitely tormenting Methods of doing it such as can hardly be recited without great Horror and Consternation of mind To pass over the inexpressible Tortures of the Holy Inquisition what say you to long protracting the torments of those whose Bodies have been committed to the merciless Flames by letting them down by degrees with Pullies that the lower parts might be consumed before the Fire could reach the Vitals What say you to Roasting alive To Flaying off mens skins alive To Boiling of the Young Children of Hereticks alive and casting them alive to be devoured by Swine What say you to Ripping up the Bellies of Women Great with Child their hands and feet being first nailed down To Hanging men at their own doors by their privy Members To Burying men alive and young Children making holes in the Ground out of which they have put their hands and made sad moan for their Mothers What Heart is so hard as not to bleed at the mere Reading or Hearing such things as these But these and innumerable such like nay far more horrible things we might shew are Instances of Popish Cruelty And those inâ—licted upon the account of no greater Offences than Refusing to be Idolaters and not daring to be partakers of Rome's Sins lest they receive of her Plagues But how should those think that these Devilish Barbarities do not well become them who presume the poor Wretches they so torture to be Accursed of God Devoted to destruction and to far more grievous and intolerable Torments and that the Hatred God bears to them doth cause him to accept it as an Excellent piece of Service at their hands to be their Destroyers and Tormenters that is the Executioners of His Wrath Moreover the Absolute Obedience they owe to Christ's Vicar imposeth a Necessity upon them not to boggle at the greatest Cruelties whensoever his Holiness shall please to imploy them in such Services which his Pride and Malice will never permit him to fail to do whensoever he thinks it consistent with his interest And that a power to employ his Vassals in such work as this was conferred by Christ upon S. Peter and his Successors Pope Pius the Fifth tells you in the beginning of his Bull against Queen Elizabeth Saith he Regnans in excelsis c. He that Reigneth on High to whom is given all Power in Hâ—â—â—en and in Earth hath committed the one Holy Catholick and Apostolick Church to one alone on Earth viz. Peter Prince of the Apostles and to his Successor the Bishop of Rome to be governed with a plenitude of Power This one hath he constituted Prince over all Nations and Kingdoms but what to do The next words tell us Qui evellat destruat dissipet disperdat plantet aedificet That he may pluck up destroy break in pieces waste Blessed work plant and build i. e. upon those Ruines And Pope Innocent the Third applieth to the Popes in a literal sence those words in the Prophecy of Ieremy See I have set thee over the Nations and over the Kingdoms to root out and to pull down and to destroy and to throw down to build and to plant And it would be a most tedious piece of work to shew what use the Popes have made of this their pretended power and how they have menaced with Excommunication those good-natured or prudent Princes whom they have not found forward to obey their Commands in destroying Hereticks So necessary is it that a Papist if he will be true to his principles should be either actually Cruel or in a ready preparation to be so And where is the Lust of Pride and Ambition so gratified to the height as in the Church of Rome As for the Head of this Church can there be a prouder or so proud a Creature upon Gods Earth Who claims as Universal and Unbounded an Empire over Mankind as the Father hath invested his Son Iesus withal Who pretendeth his Authority to exceed as much the Royal Power as the Sun doth the Moon Which are the words of the now mentioned Pope Innocent in the place cited Who assumes to himself as great a Power over Kings and Emperors as over the meanest of Peasants and Authority to dispose of their Crowns and Kingdoms at his own pleasure And whensoever he hath been strong enough hath made them feel it Who claims as great a power over Mens very Consciences their Minds and Understandings as we have seen in matters of Religion as God himself can Nay usurpeth such a Power as God himself abhors to have as shall be shewn anon So that if the Man of Sin who sitteth in the Temple of God and Exalteth himself above all that is called God be not to be found in Rome no part of the World ever was or will be able to shew him And how is it possible that such prodigious Pride in the Head should not affect and influence the Members both Clergy and Laity and that there should be none or little contagion in such an Example Surely the Example of the profoundly Humble Iesus cannot have a more powerful influence upon his Disciples than that of his Diabolically proud and haughty pretended Vicars must needs have upon their Proselytes especially considering the great propensity of Humane Nature to this Sin of Pride But as for the Popish Clergie they have infinite temptations to the gratifying to the height this Lust and as great Opportunities for it To pass by the Cardinals and Bishops the former of which have the stile and go in the Equipage of Princes and are co-partners with their High and Mighty Lord in his forementioned vast Rule and Government And the latter not inferior to the greatest of the Nobility and have been Censured for going too much out of their way to meet Princes I say to pass by these their Common Priests Monks and Friers have the greatest incentives to Pride haughtiness and Contempt of others that the most Ambitious of them all can well wish to have As for the Priests I need not say how much their pretended Power of Transubstantiating the Elements in the Eucharist which is no less than making a