Selected quad for the lemma: religion_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
religion_n	apostle_n	church_n	doctrine_n	4,033	5	6.2595	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A39997	A counter-essay, or, A vindication and assertion of Calvin and Beza's presbyterian judgment and principles drawn from their writings, in answer to the imputations of a late pamphlet, entituled, An essay concerning church-government ... attempting to fasten upon them an episcopal perswasion ... / by a minister of the true Presbyterian Church of Scotland, established by law.	Forrester, Thomas, 1635?-1706.	1692 (1692)	Wing F1594; ESTC R35532	63,101	86

Right flowing from Christ's immediate Institution nor Apostolick from the Apostles doctrine and practise or of the Apostolick and primitive Church and consequently that the having not the wanting of such a Government is pernicious to the Gospel and Christian Religion which overturns the scope of the whole Pamphlet parti●●larly Postulatum 3d 4th Axiom 2d 3d 4th CHAP. Second THe Authors groundless Suppositions and Perversion of these Divines cleared in general from the Structure of his Reasoning THe Scope of this Author is to prove that in Calvin and Beza's Judgment a president Bishop with a fixt Power of ordination preheminent unto and above Pastors with a proportioned Power of Jurisdiction over them is an ordinary standing Officer appoi●ted by Christ in the Church of the New-Testament This is clear by comparing Definition 3. with Axiom 2 3 and 4. and with Postulatum 2 and 3 And this preheminency he makes them assert as extended to a whole Diocess Province or Patriarchat as he calls it For proof of which several passages of Calvin and Beza but of Calvin especially are adduced Wherein in general his obvious Perversion and Abuse of these Divines is evident to any that compares his Assertions and Citation First in that Calvin and Beza are supposed by him to hold the Apostolick and Evagelistick Inspection and Authoirty which are supposed in the Scriptures here cited and in the passages of Calvins Institutions here adduced to be ordinary and of perpetual necessity Thus he grosly perverts the subject and state of the Question which is this What is that ordinary ministerial Authority and these Officers which they hold to be of a perpetual continuing Nature and Necessity and not what they might suppose to be de facto in the Churches infancy exercised by the Apostles or Evangelists So that if we can prove that these Divines did not judge the Authority and Power of Apostles and Evangelists or their formal Office as such to be of a moral nature continued in the Church or that there are constant necessary Officers succeeding them in preheminency or superiority in office all that he says falls to the ground To prove this first in general it is evident from what is said that both Calvin and Beza with all sound Protestant Divines do hold the Offices of Apostles and Evangelists and consequently their official Power as such to be expired and that neither of them are succeeded in idem officium § eundem ministerii gradum this is evident to all who have read these Divines and for evincing it I would but ask this Pamphleter whether Calvin and Beza do not hold and suppose that our blessed LORD was when upon earth the Churches visible universal Head and Monarch and that the Apostles afterward had an universal unconfined Inspection and Authority over the whole Church and that particularly and Apostle Iohn who outlived all the rest had solly as an Apostle an universal Authority and Inspection over the same but will he or any man of common sense infer from this that Calvin and Beza are for a moral standing Primacy over the Church universal or a visible political Head and Deput-Vicar under Christ Certainly he would rationally assert this ●●erence of a ●apist against Calvin and Beza to be very gross and impertinent and no less is his own throughout this Pamphlet 2. If these Divines do hold that Bishops Presbyters and Deacons are the only standing Church Officers of a moral nature perpetual use and necessity Then they did not hold the Office of Apostles and Evangelists to be such or their proper O●ficial Authority comp●tent to them as in that capacity to be of this nature But the first is true ergo so is the second the Ma or is evident for this man will not say that Calvin and Beza do hold their Offices one and the same with Pastors and that Apostles and Evangelists were not distinct from and superior unto them in their Official Power The Minor is evident from what is above adduced from Calvin and Beza Yea even from his own Citation of Calvin to confirm Axiom third viz. his Instit. lib. 4. Cap 6. Sect 11. The Primacy of the Roman See takes not its Original from Christs Institution nor the custom of the Ancient Church as the other Offices have done viz. of Bishops Presbyters and Deacons cap 4 Sect 1 mentioned already Now surely if he had judged other Offices perpetual and warranted by Christs institution and the antient Churches practice he would not in this place have mentioned with such Emphasis these three only and none else when in opposition to the unlawful Popish Primacy he is shewing what Offices 〈…〉 and the ancient Churches Custom will allow as warrantable To shew it further take this passage of Calvin whom I find our Pamphleter doth mainly insist upon speaking of Philip the Evangelist he tells us that Evangelists were set in the middle betwixt Apostles and Doctors had an office next to that of Apostles that they might every where preach the Gospel for no certain station was assigned to them Now to make their Office and Authority ordinary in Calvins Judgment this Author is obliged by his Argument to say that he held them to be fixed to some certain Station for in Postulatum 2 he holds that according to Calvin Timothy in Ephesus and Titus in Crete were from the nature of their Office invested with a fixt power of Ordination and Jurisdiction in these places 3. If these Divines held the Apostolick and Evangelistick Inspection and Authority to be moral and perpetual then they behoved to hold it such either as one and the same with the pastoral Office and a superior degree thereof or as an Office specifically distinct and superior But neither of the two can be said to them not the first for we heard them both assert that all Pastors do hold one and the same Function and that none of them have any official Authority over another particularly we heard that Calvin whom our Phamphleter mainly appeals to upon Phil. 1. reprehending the abuse of the Word Bishop in appropriating it to one Pastor only he gives this Reason That from this abused Signification of the Word there hath followed this evil that as if all Presbyters were not Colleagues called to the same Function one hath usurped to himself a Dominion over the rest under pretext of this new Appellation So that he holds the Pastoral Official Authority to be one and the same in all Pastors and none to have an Authoritative Inspection over the rest Again Calvin could not hold this fixed Preheminent Authority to be continued in the Church as importing an Office specifically distinct from and superior to that of the Pastor First for the Reason already given for since that supposed inferior Officer were thus both an ordinary Officer and were likewise Eminenter a Pastor How could Calvin quarrel a distinction and peculiarity of a Name to point out a superior Pastor or how could he affirm that all