or three S 7. yet 't is plain it was his own Will because he commanded it to be drawn written and sealed and never revoked it Besides it is subscribed by many witnesses and inrolled in the Chancery by his own command enough to make it good against the assertion of those few who to please the time wherein they spake in Queen Maries time might say and ghess the King was past memory when his stamp was put to it Now to make good what he did two Acts of Parlaments 28 35. of his Reign gave him full authoritie to dispose of this Point of Succession as he and his learned Council should think best for the Common-wealth By a Statute made in the 27th of Elisabeth 27. Elisah a Statute was made That whosoever shall be convinced to conspire attempt or procure the Queens death or is privie or accessary to the same shall loose all right title pretence claim or action that they or their heirs have or may have to the Crown of England Now the late Queen of Scots being attainted and executed by the authoritie of the said Parlament and for breach of the said Statute 't is easie to determine what Title her Son hath claiming only by her The Uniting of Scotland with England dangerous to the English or like to be 1. Only the increase of Subjects but those rather to participate the Commodities of England than to impart any from Scotland 2. The natural hatred of that People unto us and their ancient inclination to joyn with our enemies the French and Irish against us are Arguments of great mischiefs likely to ensue by that conjunction 3. The Scot must needs hold in jealousie so many Englishmen competitors of the Blood Royal and therefore will fortifie himself against them by those Forrein Nations of whom he is discended with whom he is allyed as the Scots French Danes and uncivil Irish which will prove intolerable to the English 4. The King both for his own safety and for the love he beareth to his own Nation will advance them and plant them about him in chief Places of credit which must needs breed Emulations and Controversies between them and the English Then must he of Force secretly begin to favor and fortifie his own to the incredible calamitie of the other as Canutus did his Danes and William the Conqueror his Normans neither of them enemies to the English blood nor evil Kings but careful of their own safeties for herein it is impossible to be neutral 5. The Romans with all their Power and Policie could never unite the hearts of England and Scotland in peace nor hold the Scots and North-Irish in obedience of any authority residing in England What then are we to hope for of this King herein The Religion of Scotland unpleasing to our State His Religion is neither fit for our State wherein Archbishops c. and Officers of Cathedral Churches are of much dignitie and there suppressed nor will be pleasing to our Nobilitie to be subject to the exorbitant and popular authoritie of a few ordinary Ministers which the King himself is there content to yield unto And therefore it is likely that few will be forward to entertain that King for the reforming of Religion here that hath no better Order in his own at home For the Ladie Arabella For the Ladie Arabella is alleged her being an equal degree of Discent with the King of Scots Her being above him in all hopes for herself or benefit to the English that can be expected in an English Prince and a Prince born in England Against Her Neither she nor the Scot are properly of the House of Lancaster and the Title of Lancaster is before the Pretence of York ut suprà 2. The testament of King Henry 8. barreth her as well as the Scot 3. Her Discent is not free from Bastardie for Queen Margaret soon after the death of her first Husband married Steward Lord of Annerdale who was alive long after her marriage with Anguis and it is most certain also That Anguis had another Wife alive when he married the said Queen All this confirmed by the Lord William Howard Father to the now Admiral sent into Scotland by Henry 8. of purpose to enquire thereof who reported it to King Henry Queen Mary and divers others For this cause King Henry would have letted the marriage between Anguis and his Sister and chiefly caused him to exclude her issue 4. She is a Woman and it were perhaps a great inconvenience that three of the weak sex should succeed one the other 5. All her Kindred by her Father is meer Scotish In England she hath none but by her Mother the Candishes a mean Familie and Kindred for a Princess CAP. VI Examination of the Title of the House of Suffolk being Darby and Hartford Sect. 29. 30. The Earle of Hartford's Children illegitimate THe Children of the Earle of Hartford Discending of Ladie Frances the eldest Daughter of Charles Brandon are proved illigitimate 1. Because the Ladie Katharine Gray their Mother was lawful Wife to the Earle of Pembroke when they were born not separated from him by lawful authority or for any just cause but abandoned by him because her House was come into misery and disgrace 2. It could never be lawfully proved that the said Earle and Ladie Katharine were married but only by their own Assertions not sufficient in Law Therefore was the marriage disannulled in the Arches by publick and definitive sentence of Parker Archbishop of Canterbury not long after the Birth of the said Children 3. When the Marquess of Dorset married their Grandmother the Ladie Frances he had another lawful Wife sister to H. Fitz-allen Earle of Arundel whom he put away to obtain so great a marriage as was the Lady Frances This bred much hate between the Marquess and Earle ever after but the Marquess favor with K. Henry deprived the other of all remedy And therefore may their Mother the Lady Katharine seem illegitimate too Bastardie in the issue of Charles Brandon Charles Brandon had a wife alive when he married the Queen of France by which wife he had issue the Ladie Powyse wife of the Lord Powyse and this wife of his lived some time after his marriage with the Queen Darby's Evasion This Wife say the Friends of Darby died before the birth of the Lady Eleonor the yonger daughter their ancestor though after the Birth of the Lady Francis Hartford's ancestor Hartford's Confutation of the first Bastardie To the first Bastardy of Hartford their Friends affirm That the Contract between the Lady Katharine and the Earl of Pembrook was dissolved lawfully and judicially in the time of Queen Mary Hartford's evasion of the second Bastardie in the behalf of his Second born Edward Seymore The Lady Katharine being found with Child affirmed the Earle of Hartford to be the Father Hereupon he being sent for out of France where he was with Sir N. Throgmorton and had got leave to
the great succeeded in the Empire and was the man that all men know and the first Emperor that publickly professed himself a Christian and planted our Faith over all the world CONSTANTINE SIXTH And IRENE Constantine the Sixth was for his evil Government first deposed * and his eyes put out by his own Mother Irene who usurped the Empire but being not able to Rule it in such Order as it was needful for so great a Monarchie she was deprived thereof by the Sentence of Leo the third and by consent of all the People and Senate of Rome and Charles the Great King of France and of Germanie was crowned Emperor of the West and so hath that Succession remained unto this day and many worthy men have succeeded therein and infinite acts of Jurisdiction have been exercised by this authoritie which were all unjust and Tyrannical if this change of the Empire and deposition of Irene and her Son for their evil Government had not been lawful Examples out of France CHILDERICK 3d. Childerick 3d. King of France for his evil Government and Faineantise was deposed by Zacharie the Pope at the request of the whole Nobilitie and Clergie of France Who alleaged That their Oath to Childrick was to honor serve obey maintain and defend him against all men as long as he was just religious valiant clement and would resist the enemies of the Crown punish the wicked and conserve the good and defend the Christian Faith Which being not observed on his part they ought not be bound to him any longer nor would not be any longer his Subjects and so chose and Crowned Pepin in his place whose Posteritie reigned for many years after him and were such noble Kings as all the world can testifie CHARLES of Lorrayne Charles of Lorrayne last of the race of Pepin for the evil satisfaction that the French Nation had of him was by the Authoritie of the Common-wealth put by the Crown and Hugo Capetus preferred to it whose Line hath remained and possessed it unto this day Examples out of Spain FLAVEO SUINTILA Flavius Suintila King of Spain was both he and his Posteritie put down and deprived in the fourth Council National of Toledo and one Lissinando confirmed in his place ALONSO 11th Don Alonso 11th King of Castile and Leon Son to Ferdinand the Saint for his evil Government and especially for Tyrannie used towards two Nephews of his was deposed of his Kingdom by a publick Act of Parliament in the town of Valliodolid after he had reigned 30 years and his own Son Don Sancho 4th was Crowned in his place who for his valiant acts was sirnamed Elbravo and it turned to great commoditie to the Common-wealth PEDRO Don Pedro the Cruel Son to Alonso 12th having reigned 18. years was for his injurious Government dispossessed of his Crown by King Henry his bastard Brother whom the States of the Country had called out of France and Crowned and though Pedro was restored again by the black Prince of Wales yet God shewed to favor more Henry because he returned and deprived Pedro the second time and slew him in fight hand to hand and being set up in his place which his Progenie hath enjoyed to this day he proved so excellent a King as he was called el Cavallero and el delas mercees the knightlie and bountiful King Don SANCHO 2d Don Sancho Gapelo lawful King of Portugal having reigned 34. years was deprived for his defects in Government by the universal Consent of all Portugal and approbation of a General Council at Lyons Pope Innocentius the Fourth being there present who did authorise the said State of Portugal at their Petition to put in Supreme Government Don Alonso Brother to the said Sancho who was Earl of Boulongne in Picardie by the right of his Wife which among other great exploits was the first that set Portugal free from all Subjection and Homage to the Kingdom of Castile which unto his time it had acknowledged Greece MICHAEL CALAPHATES and NICEPHORUS BOTONIATES Michael Calaphates Emperor of Greece for having troden the Cross of Christ under his feet and being otherwise also a wicked man was deprived As was also the Emperor Nicephorus Botoniates for his dissolute life and preferring wicked men to authoritie Polonia HENRY 3d. In our dayes Henry 3d. King of France was deprived of the Crown of Polonia wherof he had also been Crowned King before by publick Act of Parliament for his departing thence without license and not returning at the day denounced by publick Letters of peremptory commandment Suetia HENRY Henry late King of Suëtia was put down and deprived by that Common-wealth and his Brother made King in his place whose Son reigneth at this day and is also King of Polonia And this Fact was allowed by the Emperor the King of Denmark and all the Princes of Germanie neer about that Realm Denmark CISTERNE Cisterne King of Denmark for his intollerable crueltie was deprived and driven into banishment together with his Wife and three Children and his Uncle Frederick Prince of Holsatia was chosen King whose Progenie yet remaineth in the Crown England King JOHN King John of England for his evil Government and for having lost Normandie Gasconie Guyenne and all the rest which the Crown of England had in France made himself so odious and contemptible as first he was both Excommunicated and Deposed by the Pope at the sute of his own People and to make his Peace was enforced to resign his Crown in the hands of Pandulfe the Pope's Legat and afterwards falling back again to his old defects though by making his Kingdom tributarie in perpetuum to the See of Rome he had made the Pope of his side for a time the People notwithstanding did effectuate his Deprivation the 18th year of his reign first at Canterbury and after at London And called Lewis Prince of France Son to Phillip 2d and Father to Saint Lewis and chose him for their King and did swear him Fealtie with General Consent in London Anno 1216. But King John's death following presentlie after made them turn their purposes and accept of his Son Henry before matters were fully established for Lewis And this Henry which was 3d. of that Name proved a very worthie King and reigned 53. years which is more than ever King in England did leaving Edward 1. his Son Heir not inferior to himself in manhood and virtue EDWARD 2d But this Edward 1. had a Son Edward 2d who falling into the same or worse defects than King John had done was after 19. years reign deposed also by Act of Parliament holden at London the year 1326. appointed to be called Edward of Carnarvam from that hour forward and his bodie adjudged to perpetual prison where at length his life was taken away from him in the Castle of Barkley and his Son Edward 3d. was chosen in his place who
either for Valor Prowess length of Reign acts of Chivalrie or the multitude of famous Princes his Children left behind him was one of the noblest Kings that ever England had RICHARD 2d Richard the 2d Son to the black Prince of Wales for having suffered himself to be misled by evil Counsellers to the great hurt and disquietness of the Realm was deposed also after 22. years reign by a Parliament holden at London the year 1399. and condemned to perpetual Prison in the Castle of Pomfret where he was soon after put to death and in his place was by free Election chosen the noble Knight Henry * Duke of Lancaster who proved afterwards so notable a King as the world knoweth HENRY 6th Henry 6th after almost 40. years reign was deposed imprisoned and put to death also together with his Son the Prince of Wales by Edward 4th of the House of York And this was confirmed by the * Commons and afterwards also by publick Act of Parliament because the said Henry did suffer himself to be over-ruled by the Queen his Wife and had broken the Articles of Agreement made by the Parlament between him and the Duke of York and solemnly sworn on both sides the 8th of Octob. 1459. though otherwise for his particular life he were a good man and King Edward 4th was put in place who was one of the renownedest for Martial Acts and Justice that hath worn the English Crown RICHARD 3d. This man having left two Sons his Brother Richard Duke of Glocester put them to death and being the next Heir Male was authorised in the Crown but Deposed again afterwards by the Common-wealth which called out of France Henry Earle of Richmond who took from him both life and Kingdom in the Field and was King himself by the name of Henry 7. And no man I suppose will say but that he was lawfully King also which yet cannot be except the other might lawfully be deposed If the said Deprivations were unjust the now Pretences are unlawful Moreover is to be noted in all these Mutations what good hath succeeded therein to the Common-wealth which was unjust and is void at this day if the Changes and Deprivations of the former Princes could not be made and consequently none of these that do pretend the Crown of England at this day can have any Title at all for that from those men they discend who were put in place of the deprived If Kings established may be Deprived much sooner Pretenders And if this might be so in Kings lawfully set in Possession then much more hath the said Common-wealth power and authoritie to alter the succession of such as do pretend Dignitie if there be due reason and causes to the same Wherein consisteth principally the lawfulness of Proceedings against Princes which in the former Chapter is mentioned What interest Princes have in their Subjects Goods or Lives How Oaths do Binde or may be Broken by Subjests towards Princes And finally the difference between a good King and a Tyrant CAP. IV. 1. Objection against the Assertions in the last Chapter BUt although by Nature the Common-wealth hath authoritie over the Prince to chuse and appoint him at the beginning yet having once made him and given up all their authoritie unto him he is no more subject to their correction but remaineth absolute of himself As every particular man hath authorised to make his Master or Prince of his inferior but not afterwards to put him down again howsoever he beareth himself towards him 2. Objection When the Children of Israël being under the Government of the High Priest demanded a King of Samuel he protesting unto them Well quoth he you will have a King hearken then to this that I will say Hoc erit jus Regis qui imperaturus est vobis He shall take away from you your Children both Sons and Daughters your Fields and Vineyards c. and shall give them to his servants and you shall cry unto God in that day from the face of this your King and God shall not hear you for that you have demanded a King to Govern over you Assertions of Bellay Yea Bellay and some other that wrote in flatterie of Princes in these our days do not only affirm That Princes are lawless and subject to no accompt or correction whatsoever they do But also That all goods chattels possessions and whatsoever else commodities temporal of the Common wealth are properly the Kings and that their Subjects have only the use thereof so as when the King will he may take it from them by right Answer to Bellay his First Assertion But for the first That Kings are subject to no Law Is against the very Institution of a Common-wealth which is to live together in Justice and Order for if it holdeth so insteed of Kings and Governors to defend us we may set up publick murtherers ravishers theeves and spoylers to devour us Then were all those Kings before mentioned both of the Jewes Gentiles and Christians unlawfully deprived and their Successors unlawfully put up in their places and consequentlie all Princes living at this day are intruders and no lawful Princes Answer to Bellay his Second Assertion Of the second saying also That all temporalities are properly the Princes and that Subjects have only the use thereof no less absurdities do follow First it is against the very first principle and foundation of the Civil Law which at the first entrance maketh this division of Goods That some are common by Nature to all men as the Aër the Sea c. Others are publick to all of one Citie or Countrie but yet not common to all in general as Rivers Ports c. Some are of the Communitie of a Citie or Common-wealth but yet not common to every particular person of that Citie as common Rents Theaters the publick hous and the like Some are of none nor properly of any man's Goods as Churches and Sacred things And some are proper to particular men as those which every man possesseth of his own Besides it overthroweth the whole nature of a Common-wealth maketh all Subject to be but very slaves for that slaves and bondmen in this do differ from freemen that slaves have only the use of things without property or interest and cannot acquire or get to themselves any dominion or true right in any thing but it accreweth all to their Master Lastly If all Goods be properly the King's why was Achab and Jezabel so reprehended and punished by God for taking away Naboth's vineyard Why do the Kings of England France and Spain ask Money of their Subjects in Parlament and that termed by the names of Subsidies Helps Benevolences Loans Prests Contributions c How have the Parlament oftentimes denied them the same Why are there Judges appointed for matter of Suits and Pleas between the Prince and the People Why doth the Canon Law inhibit all
heads For which cause the States of Venice and Genoa which were wont to have simply this Government of Aristocratia were inforced in the end to chuse Dukes The Division and Factions among the Senators of Carthage was the cause why Aid was not sent to Hannibal their Captain in Italie after his so great and important Victorie at Canna which was the very cause of the saving of the Romane Empire and the loss of their own As also afterwards the Emulations and Discord of the Romane Senators in the Affairs and Contentions of Marius and Sylla and of Pompey and Caesar was the occasion of all their Destruction and of their Common-wealth with them Why Helps are given to Kings Therefore it appeareth that of all other Governments Monarchie is the best But for that a King is a Man as others be and thereby not only subject to Errors in Judgment but also to passionate Affections in his Will It was necessarie That the Common-wealth should assign him the best Helps that might be for Directing and Rectifying both his Will and Judgment Lawes the first Help why given The first Help is the Law which Aristotle saith Est mens quaedam nullo perturbata affectu and in the same place addeth That he which joyneth a Law to Govern with the Prince joyneth God to the Prince but he that joyneth to the Prince his Affection to Govern joyneth a Beast So that a Prince Ruling by Law is more than a man or a man Deified and a Prince Ruling by Affections is less than a man or a man Brutified In another place also the same Philosopher saith That a Prince that Ruleth hemself and others by his own Appetite and Affections of all Creatures is the worst and of all Beasts is the most furious and dangerous for that nothing is so outragious as Injustice armed and no Armor is so strong as Wit and Authority Councils the second Help why given The Monarchie of ENGLAND tempered The second Help that Common-wealths do assign to their Kings and Princes be certain Councils as we see the Parlament of England and France the Courts in Spain and Diets in Germanie without which no matter of great Moment can be concluded And besides this commonly every King hath his Privie Council whom he is bound to hear and this was done to temper somwhat the absolute Form of a Monarchie whose danger is by reason of his sole Authoritie to fall into Tyrannie as Aristotle noteth In the Monarchie of England all the Three Forms of Government do enter more or less In that there is one King or Queen it is a Monarchie In that it hath certain Councils which must be heard it participateth of Aristocratia And in that the Commonaltie have their Voices and Burgesses in Parlament it taketh part also of Democratia All which limitations come from the Common-wealth as having Authoritie above their Princes for the good of the Realm Restraint of Kings among the Romans Why Kinglie Government left in Rome This Restraint hath been in all Times and Countries as for example The Romans that began with Kings gave their Kings as great and absolute Authoritie as ours have now adaies but yet their next in Blood Succeeded them not of necessitie but new Kings were Chosen partlie by the Senate and partlie by the People So as of Three * most excellent Kings that ensued immediatelie after Romulus none were of the Blood nor yet Romans born but rather Strangers Chosen for their Virtue and Valor So for the neglecting of their Laws the Senators slew Romulus their first King and cut him in pieces and for the same reason expelled Tarquinius Superbus their last and all his Posteritie and with them the Name and Government of Kings which was changed in the Regiment of Consuls Restraint of Kings among the Grecians In Greece and namely among the Lacedemonians their Kings Authoritie was so restrained by certain Officers of the People called Ephori which commonly were five in number as they were not only chastened by them but also Deprived and somtimes put to death Restraint of Kings in Christendom In Germanie The Emperor can neither make War nor exact any Contribution of men or Money thereunto but by the free leave and Consent of all the States of the Germane Dyet or Parlament And for his Children or next in Kinn they have no action interest or pretence to Succeed but only by free Election if they shall be thought worthie Nay one of the chiefest Points that the Emperor must Swear at his entrance is this That he shall never go about to make the Dignitie of the Emperor Peculiar or Hereditarie to his Familie but leave it unto the Seven Electors free in their power to Chuse his Successor according to the Law made by the Pope Gregory the Fift and the Emperor Charles the Fourth in this behalf In Polonia and Bohemia The Kings of Polonia and Bohemia can neither do any thing of great Moment without the consent of certain principal men called Palatines or Castellans neither may their Children of next Blood Succeed except they be Chosen as in the Empire In Spain France and England In Spain France and England the Privileges of Kings are far more eminent both in the Power and Succession for their Authoritie is much more absolute and their next in Blood do ordinarily Succeed for as touching Authoritie it seemeth that the Kings of France and Spain have greater than the King of England for that everie Ordination of these Two Kings is Law in it self without further Approbation of the Common-wealth which holdeth not in England where no general Law can be made without Consent of Parlament But in the other Point of Succession the restraint is far greater in those other Two Countries than in England For in Spain the next in Blood cannot Succeed be he never so lawfully Discended but by a new Approbation of the Nobilitie Bishops and States of the Realm as it is expresly set down in the Two ancient Councils of Toledo the Fourth and Fifth Nor can the King of Spain's own Son at this day be called Prince except he be first Sworn by the said Nobilitie and Estates as we have seen it practiced in the King Philip's Children In France Women neither any of their Issue though Male are admitted to Succeed in the Crown And therefore was Edward 3d. of England though Son and Heir unto a Daughter of France which was left by her Three Brethren Sole Heir to King Phillip * the fair her Father put by the Crown As also was the King of Navar at the same time Son and Heir unto this Womans eldest Brothers Daughter named Lewis Huttin notwithstanding all their allegations And Philip de Valois a Brothers Son of Philip the fair's preferred to it by General Decree of the States of France and by Verdict of the whole Parlament of Paris And albeit the Law Salica
the Order holdeth the Crown The Duke of Gasconie and Guyenne the First Banner quartered The Duke of Normandie the Second Banner quartered The Earle of Tholosa the Golden Spurs The Earle of Champanie the Banner Royal or Standard of War The Earle of Flanders the Sword Royal. And this day the King is apparrelled three times and in several sorts 1. As a Priest 2. As a King and a Warrier 3. As a Judge Philip 2d This day Lewis specially for the Coronation of his Son Philip Agustus whom he caused also to be Crowned in his dayes In this Coronation whereunto Henry 2. of England as Duke of Normandie who held the Crown and one of his Sons as Duke of Gasconie were present the King being summoned by the Archbishop to keep all Priviledges of the Church Law and Justice answered I do promise and avow to every one of you and to every Church to you committed That I will keep and maintain all Canonical priviledges law and justice due to every man to the uttermost of my power and by God's help shall defend you as a good King is bound to do in his Realm And then laying his hands upon the Gospel made his Oath in these words Au nom de Jesus Christ re jure promets au peuple Chrestien à moy Subject ces choses c. First that all my subjects be kept in the union of the Church and I will defend them from all excess rapine extortion and iniquitie Secondly I will take order that in all judgments justice shall be kept with equitie and mercie to the end that God of his mercy may conserve unto me with yo◠my people his holy grace and mercie Thirdly I shall endeavor as much as possibly shall lie in me To chase and drive out of my Realm and all my Dominions all such as the Church hath or shall declare for Hereticks as God shall help me and his holy Gospels Then he kissed the Gospels and after Te Deum sung and other particular Prayers said by the Archbishop he was Vested and the Ring Scepter Crown c. were put upon him with declaration what they signified After all that the Archbishop and Bishops did bless him and then by the said Archbishop and the other Peers was led unto the Seat Royal where the Crown was put upon his head c. France Author of this manner of Coronation Albeit the substance of the Ceremonie of Sacring and Anointing Kings be much elder than the Christian Kingdom of France yet is this particular and Majestical manner of doing it by way of Coronation the most antient in France above all other Kingdoms round about And it is probable that most of them have taken their forms of anointing and Crowning from her for the affinitie and likeness of the one to the other as may be seen by that of Germanie and Polonia before recited by that of Navarra brought in by certain Earles of Champanie according to the use of France and others But among all England seemeth to have taken it most particularly from them not only for that divers English Kings have come out of France but also for that in very deed the thing it self is all one in both Nations The Manner of Admission in England First As the Archbishop of Rheims doth this Ceremony in France so in England the Archbishop of Canterbury And the first thing the said Archbishop requireth at the King's hands is about Religion Church matters and the Clergie whereupon the King sweareth and giveth up his Oath in writing which he laieth down with his own hands upon the Altar the words are these That he will during his life have reverence and honor unto almightie God and to his Catholick Church and unto his Ministers and that he will administer Law and Justice equally to all and take away all unjust Laws Which after he hath sworn the Archbishop turning about to the People declareth what the King hath promised and asketh Whether they be content to submit themselves unto this man as unto their King or no under the Conditions proposed Whereunto having yielded he put's upon him the Royal Ornaments as the Sword the Ring the Scepter and Crown and namely he giveth him the Scepter of St. Edward the Confessor and then addeth this exhortation Stand and hold thy place and Keep thy Oath with a great commination on the behalf of almightie God if he taketh the place and breaketh his Oath Henry 4th In the admission of Henry 4. the People were demanded thrice Whether they were content to admit him for their King And the Archbishop of Canterbury having read unto them what this new King was bound by Oath unto he took the Ring wherewith to wedd him to the Common-wealth which wedding importeth a mutual Obligation which was shewed to the People by the High Constable and then put upon the King's finger who kissed the Constable in sign of acceptance c. Edward 4th Edw. 6th Mary Elisab In the admission of Edward 4th the Peoples Consent was asked at two several times very solemnly notwithstanding that he had proved his Title by Succession before in Parliament And in the Coronation of Edward 6. Queen Mary and Queen Elisabeth's the Peoples consent and their acceptation was not only demanded but the Princes corporal oath also taken upon the Evangelists What is due to only Succession by Birth and what interest or right an Heir apparent hath to the Crown before he be Crowned or Admitted by the Common-wealth and how justly he may be put back if he have not the other parts requisite also CAP. VI Belloy's Assertions upon this Matter Assertion First BElloy's Assertions about this matter are plain and gross flatteries and opposite to all reason of State and practise of the World First he saith That all Families which enjoy Kingdoms in the world were placed therein by God only and that he alone can change the same Which indeed if he refer unto God's universal providence it is true that all is from God either by his Ordinance or permission but speaking of the next and immediate causes clear it is that men do also concur therein and that God hath left them lawful authoritie so to do for the publick benefit Assertion Second His Second Assertion is That where such Princes be once placed in Government and the Law of Succession by Birth established there the Princes Children or next of Kinn do necessarily succeed by only Birth without any new choice or approbation of the People Nobilitie or Clergie or of the whole Common-wealth together Assertion Third Whereunto he joyneth That a King never dieth for that whensoever or howsoever he ceaseth by any means to Govern then entereth the Successor by Birth not as Heir to the former but as lawful Governor of the Realm without any admission at all having his authoritie only by the condition of his Birth and not by adoption or choice of any
Book of Knox of the Monstrous Government of Women 6. And John Leisley Bishop of Ross in Scotland confuteth the first point 1 That the Statute that beareth the inheritance of Aliens made 25 Edw. 3. is only to be understood of particular men's inheritance 2 There is express exception of the King's Children and Off-spring in the Statute 3 The Practice both before and since the Conquest to the contrary 7. The second If Henry 8. made such a Testament it could not hold in Law But that he made it not besides many probabilities the testimonies of the Lord Paget Sir Edw. Montague Lord Chief Justice and William Clark who set the King's stamp to the Writing avowed before the Council and Parlament in Queen Maries time That the testament was signed after the King was past sens and memory 8. Robert Heghington Secretary to the Earle of North writeth in favor of the King of Spain as next Heir to the House of Lancaster Another writeth in the behalf of the Dukes of Parma as next Heir of Portugal another for the Infanta of Spain as the Heir of Brittanie CAP. II. Of the Succession of the Crown from the Conquest unto Edward the Third's time The issue of VVilliam the Conquerer WILLIAM the Conqueror had four Sons and five Daughters Sons 1. Robert Duke of Normandie 2. Richard died in his youth 3. William Rufus 4. Henry the first Daughters 1. Sicilie a Nun 2. Constantia wife of Alain Fergant Duke of Britanie 3 Adela or Alice wife of Stephen Earle of Bloys c. The other two died yong Robert Duke of Normandie Robert of Normandie and his Son William were ruined by Henry 1. Robert pined away in the Castle of Cardiff William slain before Alost in Flanders whereof he was Earl by an arrow Henry 1. Of all the Children of Henry 1. Mande first married to Henry 5. Emperor had issue Henry 2. by Geoffrey Plantagenet Duke of Anjou c. her second Husband he Reigned after King Stephen The beginning of the House of Britanie Constantia the Conquerors second Daughter had issue Conan 2. le Gros who had issue Hoel and Bettha wife of Eudo Earle of Porrhet in Normandie her Father made her his Heir on his death bed disadvowing Howel she had issue Conan 3. He Constantia wife to Geoffrey third Son to Henry 2. by whom she had Arthur whom King John his Uncle put from the Crown of England and murthered After which Constantia married Guy Vicount of Touars a Britan and their issue have continued till this in the infanta of Spain and the Dutchess of Savoy her sister whose Mother was sister unto the last King of France Anna the Heir of Britanie had by Lewis the 12. of France one Daughter Claudia of whom and Francis the first came Henry 2. whose Daughter was Mother to the Infanta c. King Stephen Adela or Alice the Conquerors third Daughter had issue Stephen Earle of Bouloyne chosen King after Henry 1. before Mande his Daughter because a Woman and before her Son Henry 2. because he was but a Child and a degree further off from the Conqueros but especially by force and friends whereby he prevented also the Duke of Britain Son to his Mothers eldest sister He had two sons who left no issue and Mary wife to the Earle of Flanders whose right if any is discended to the Spaniard Henry 2. his Sons Henry 2. had issue by Eleonora the Heir of Aquitaine William who died yong Henry Crowned in his Fathers time and died without issue 3. Richard Coeur de Lyon who died without issue 4. Geoffrey who married Constance the Heir of Britain as aforesaid 5. John the King who had issue Henry the third Henry 2. his Daughters His Daughters were 1. Eleonora married to Alphonso 9. of Castile 2. to Alexis the Emperor 3. to the Duke of Saxonie 4. to the Earle of Tholouse Eleonora had Henry of Castile who died without issue and Blanche married to Lewis of France of the Race of Valois whose issue continueth and Berenguela married to the Prince of Leon whose Son Ferdinando by the death of his Uncle Henry without issue was chosen King of Castile before Saint Lewis the son of Blanche aforesaid because a stranger 16. The right which France had to Aquitain Poictiers and Normandie came to them by the aforesaid Blanche who was married thither on condition to have for her dower all that John had lost in France which was almost all hee had Henry 3. his Issue Henry 3. had Edward 1 hee Edw. 2. hee Edw. 3. and Edmund Crook-back Earl or Duke of Lancaster whose heir Lady Blanch married John of Gant the third son of Edw. 3. from whom came the hous of Lancaster Also Beatrix married to John 2. Duke of Britain from whom descended the Infantas Mother That Edward Crook-back was not elder then Edward 1. Edward Crook-back was not Edw. 1. elder brother and put by onely for his deformitie 2. hee was born 18 Junii 1245 and Edward 16 Junii 1239. Matth. West who lived at the same time 2. hee was a wise Prince and much imploied by his father and brother in their wars 3. his father advanced him in England and would have made him King of Naples and Sicilie 4. having the charge of the Realm at his father's death and his brother absent hee attempted no innovation nor hee nor any of his children made any claim to the Crown after that 5. If hee had been elder the title of Lancaster in John of Gant his Issue whose mother was heir unto Edmund had been without contradiction nor could the house of York have had any pretence of right The Issue of Edward Crook-back Henry the second Earl of Lancaster and grand-childe to the aforesaid Edmund was created Duke of Lancaster by Edward 3. Hee had but one childe the Ladie Blanch wife of John of Gant by whom hee became also Duke of Lancaster His three sisters were matched one to the Lord Maubery of whom the Howards of Norfolk Joane 2. Mary married to the Earl of Northumberland from whom the now-Earl 3. Eleonor married to the Earl of Arundel of whom the late Earle descended CAP. III. The Succession from Edward 3. The houses of Lancaster and York Edward 3. his Issue EDward the third had five sons 1. the Black Prince hee Richard second in whom his line ceased 2 Lionel Duke of Clarence 3. John of Gant Duke of Lancaster by his wife Blanche 4 Edward of Langley Duke of York 5. Thomas of Woodstock Duke of Glocester The Title of the Hous of York Lionel of Clarence had one onely daughter and heir Philippe married to Edmund Mortimer Earl of March they Roger hee Anne Mortimer married to Richard Earl of Cambridg second son of Edmund L. of York His son Richard by the death of his Uncle slain at Agincourt came to bee Duke of York his father of Cambridg beeing executed for a Conspiracie against Henry 5. And was the first of the
his minion to put away his wife a goodly young Ladie daughter of Isabell his father's sister and to marrie another openly to her disgrace And in the last evil Parlament hee made would needs have all absolute autoritie granted to 6 or 7 his favorites to determine of all matters Grieved with these exorbitant indignities the more or better part of the Realm called home by their Letters Henry 4. deposed Richard 2. by Act of Parlament by his own confession of unworthie Government and his voluntarie resignation of the Crown to the said Henry by publick instrument All this without blood-shed And in almost all this Edmund L. D. of York the head of that familie together with Edward Duke of Aumale his eldest son and Richard Earle of Cambridge his yonger the Grand-father of Edward 4. assisted the said Henry That Henry 4. had more right to Succeed unto Richard 2. than Edmond Mortimer heir of Clarence much more any other King Richard 2. deposed the question is Whether Edmond Mortimer then alive his Father Roger being slain in Ireland a little before Nephew removed of Lionel Duke of Clarence or Henry Duke of Lancaster son of John of Gant should have Succeeded in right For Henry is alleged his being neerer to the former King by two degrees and proximitie of Blood though not of the elder Line is to be or hath been preferred in these cases 2. His Title came by a Man the others by a Woman not so much favored by Law nor Reason 3. The said Edmond being offered the Crown by Richard Earle of Cambridge who had married his Sister Anne and other Noblemen at Southampton he judged it against equitie discovered the Treason to Henry the fifth by whose command those Noblemen were executed 1415. Thirty years after which Richard Duke of York son of the aforesaid Earle and Anne for Edmond her brother died without issue set his Title on foot And whereas Roger Mortimer Father of this Edmond was declared Heir apparent by a Parlament 1382 that was done by Richard 2. from the hatred he bore to John of Gant and his son Henry rather than for the goodness of the others Title the cause whereof was Because immediately after the death of the Black Prince divers learned and wise men held opinion That John of Gant eldest son of Edward 3. then living should rather succeed than Richard jure Propinquitatis This made the old King Edward 3. confirm the Succession to Richard 2. by Parlament and the Oaths of his Uncles and made the yong King Richard 2. hold first and his son in jealousie and hatred ever after as distrusting the likelihoods of their Title Declaration of the Heir Apparent in the Princes life being Partial no sure president Partial establishing of Succession by Parlament is no extraordinary thing with Princes which yet most commonly have been to little purpose So did Richard 3. cause John de la Pole Earle of Lincoln and Son to his sister Elisabeth Dutchess of Suffolk to be declared Heir apparent thereby excluding his Brother Edward's four Daughters c. So did Henry 8. prefer the issue of his yonger sister before that of his elder So did Edward 6. declare the Lady Jane Gray his cozen Germain removed to be his Heir and Successor excluding his own two sisters Such say they was the aforesaid Declaration of Roger Mortimer by Richard 2. to as little purpose as from little equity Uncle preferred before the Nephew divers times Contra Sect. 83. That John of Gant should have in right succeeded his father rather than Richard himself as neerer to his father is proved by the course of divers Kingdoms where the Uncle was preferred before the Nephew 1. In Naples much about the same time Robert before Charles the son of Martel his elder Brother 2. In Spain Don Sancho Bravo before the Children of Prince Don Alonso de la Cerda from whom the House of Medina Celi is discended by sentence of Don Alonso the wise and of all the Realm and Nobility Anno 1276. 3. In the Earldom of Arthois Mande before Robert son to her Brother Philip by sentence of Philip le Bel of France confirmed by the Parlament of Paris and by his Successor Philippes de Valois whom he the said Robert had much assisted in the recovery of France from the English 4. In Britanie John Breno Earle of Montfort before Jane Countess of Bloys Daughter and Heir of Guy his elder brother by sentence of Edward 3. and the State of England who put him in possession of that Dukedom 5. In Scotland where albeit Edward 1. of England gave sentence for John Baliol Nephew to the elder Daughter excluding thereby Robert Bruse son to the yonger yet that sentence was held to be unjust in Scotland and the Crown restored to Robert Bruse his son whose posterity holds it to this day 6. The like whereof in Naples Lewis Prince of Taranto son to Philip prevailed before Joan the Neece of Robert aforesaid who was Philip's elder brother though Philip died before Robert because he was a man and a degree neerer to his Grand-father than Joan. 7. And in England it self Henry 1. preferred before William son and Heir of Robert of Normandie his elder brother And King John preferred before Arthur D. of Britanie the son and Heir of his elder brother Geoffrey because he was neerer to Richard his brother then dead than was Arthur Which Right of his the English inclined still to acknowledge and admit and thereupon proclaimed him King notwithstanding that the French and other Forrein Princes of stomach opposed themselves against it King John rightfully preferred before his Brother Arthur Against this last King Richard when he was to go to the Holy Land caused his Nephew Arthur to be declared Heir apparent to the Crown thereby shewing his Title to be the better Answ 1. It was not by Act of Parlament of England for Richard was in Normandie when he made it 2. Richard did it rather to repress the amhitious Humor of John in his absence 3. This Declaration was never admitted in England but renounced by consent of the Nobility in his absence 4. Richard himself at his return disadvowed it appointing John to be his Successor by his last Will and caused the Nobles to swear Fealtie unto him as to his next in blood The Opinion of Civil Lawyers touching the Right of the Uncle and Nephew Contra Sect. 83. This Controversie divided all the Lawyers in Christendom Baldus Oldratus Panormitanus c. for the Nephew Bartolus Alexander Decius Alciatus Cujatius c. for the Uncle Baldus himself at length concludeth That seeing rigor of Law runneth only with the Uncle being properly neerest in blood by one degree and that only indulgence and custom permitteth the Nephew to represent his Father's place whensoëver the Uncle is born before the Nephew and his elder brother dieth before his Father as in the case of John of Gant and Richard 2. he may be
preferred for the elder brother cannot give or transmit that thing to his Son which is not in himself before his Father die nor can his son represent what the Father never had The Common-Law dealeth not with the Point of Succession to the Crown Touching the Common Law the right and interest to the Crown is not expresly decided in it nor is it a Plea subject to the rules thereof but superior and more eminent nor are the Maxims thereof alwayes of force in this as in others As in the case of Dower Copercenars and Tenancie by the courtesie No more ought they to be in this case of inheritance as by the former eight Presidents hath been shewed The Common Lawyers then refer this point of the Crown to Custom nothing being in effect written by them touching it Only the best of our old ones favored that title of Lancaster and Chancelor Fortescue and Sir Tho. Thorope chief Baron of the Exchequer in Henry 6. his time were much afflicted for it by the contrary faction The Princes of York often Attainted The Princes of York forfeited their Right by their Conspiracies and Attainder thereupon as R. Earle of Cambridge put to death therefore by the Judgment of his Peers his elder brother the Duke of York being one of the Jury that condemned him His son Richard Duke of York was also attainted of treason after many oaths to Henry 6. sworn and broken by him and his son Ed. 4. with the rest of his off-spring to the ninth degree at a Parlament at Coventry Anno 1459. But the House of Lancaster was never attainted of any such crime The Hous of York came to the Crown by Violence and Crueltie Edward 4. entred by violence wilfully murthering besides divers of the Nobilitie Henry 6. a good and holy King and his son Prince Edward dispossessing the Hous that had held the Crown about 60 years together in which time their Title had been confirmed by many Parlaments Oaths Approbations and publick Acts of the Common-wealth and the consent of all forreign Nations All which had been enough to have autorized a bad Title Those of Lancaster better Princes than those of York The 4 Henries of the hous of Lancaster were far more worthie Princes then the 4 Princes of the Houses of York as Edw. 4. Rich. 3. Hen. 8. Edw. 6. And if the affairs of any the former especially the 3d succeeded not the chief caus thereof was the sedition rebellion and troubles raised by those of York and their contention against the Princes of the Houses of Lancaster The Cruelty of the Princes of York one to the other The Princes of York have not been onely cruel to their enemies but to themselvs too embrewing their hands in their own blood Then when they had ruined th'other George Duke of Clarence conspired against Edw. 4. his own brother with whom reconciled Edw. caused him afterwards to bee murthered at Calis Rich. 3. murthered his two young Nephews and Henry 8. a great number of that Hous as Edmund de la Poole his Cousin German Henry Duke of Buckingham his great Ant 's son extinguishing that and ruining this familie Also Henry Courtney Marquis of Exceter his own Cousin german the Ladie Margaret Countess of Salisbury and daughter to George D. of Clarence and her son the L. Montague c. The kindness of the Princes of Lancaster But the Love Union Confidence Faithfulness Kindeness and Loialtie of the Princes of Lancaster towards th'other was very notable as in the 2 brothers of Henry 4 and the 3 brothers of Henry 5. and in five or six Dukes of Somerset their near Cosens which argueth both a marvellous confidence those Princes had in that quarrel and a great blessing of God unto the whole familie that agree'd so well The Successes of such noble Houses as followed either partie Another blessing seemeth to bee bestowed on them That no antient great Houses are remaining at this day in England but such as chiefly took their parts as Arundel Oxford Northumberland Westmerland and Shrewsbury whereas the chief partakers of the other Faction are all destroied as Mowbray Duke of Norfolk De la Poole Duke of Suffolk th' Earl of Salisbury th' Earl of Warwick and many others CAP. III. Examination of the Title of the Hous of Scotland Sect. 28. Allegations for the K. of Scots 1. THat hee is descended of the eldest daughter of Henry 7. without bastardie or other lawful impediment and therefore hath the right of prioritie 2. The benefit would accrew unto the Common-wealth by the uniting of England and Scotland a point long sought for 3. The establishing of true Religion in England Hee is not of the Hous of Lancaster but rather of York Hee is not descended truly of the Hous of Lancaster becaus not of the Ladie Blanch the true heir thereof but of Kathathine Swinford whose children were unlawfully begotten though afterwards legitimated by Parlament so that his best Title is by York inferior to that of Lancaster and therefore is to com in after them of that Hous Forrein birth not just impediment in Succession to the Crown of England Hee is Forrein born and therefore excluded by the Laws of England from inheriting within the land Answ 1. This Assertion in an universal sens is fals for a stranger may purchase and inherit by the right of his wife 7 9 Edw. 4. 11 14 Henrie 7. 2. The Statute of 25 Edw. 3. is to bee restrained unto proper inheritance onely viz. That no person born out of the Allegiance of England whose father and mother were not of the same Allegiance at the time of his birth shall not demand inheritance within the same Allegiance 3. This Statute toucheth not the Crown nor any except express mention bee made thereof 4. The Crown cannot properly bee called an inheritance of Allegiance or within Allegiance beeing held immediately from God 5. The Statute meaneth inheritance by descent onely but the Crown is a thing incorporate and therefore goeth as by Succession Now if a Prior Dean c. or other head incorparate though an alien may inherit or demand Lands in England notwithstanding the Statute much more may the Inheritor to the Crown 6. Express exception is made in the Statues of Enfants du Roi which word cannot but include all the King's off-spring and blood-Roial 7. King Stephen and Henry 2. born out of the Realm and of parents that were not of the Allegiance of England when they were born were yet admitted to the Crown without contradiction which argueth that by the cours of the Common Law there was no such stop against Aliens and that if the Statute would have abridged the antient libertie in this case of Succession it would have made special mention there which it doth not The King of Scots excluded by the last Will of Henry 8. Henry 8. his Will whereby he excludeth the off-spring of Margaret S. 4. Which though somwhat infringed by the testimony of two
by her came to bee exstinct as it was in the children of H. 6. there is no reason but the issue of his daughters those that claim by Portugal Sect. 23 should succeed at least in the inheritance of that Duchie The Crown of England to John of Somerset son to John of Gant But for the right and title to the Crown of England which came by John of Gant himself third son of Edw. 3 and eldest that lived when hee died John Earl of Somerset though begotten out of matrimonie yet afterwards legitimated Sect. 25. his eldest son by Katharine Swinford was to inherit before the Ladie Philippe his sister by the Ladie Blanche The first reason of Portugal against Somerset Against which the favorites of Portugal allege divers reasons 1. Beeing born out of Wedlock and in Adulterie Sect. 25. and continuing a bastard many years hee could not bee made legitimate afterwards by Parlament to that effect of Succession to the Crown before Q. Philippe of Portugall and her children born before his legitimation who thereby had vim acquisitam as the Law saith which could not bee taken away by any posterior Act of Parlament without consent of the parties interessed Second Reason John King of Portugal married the Ladie Philippe with condition to enjoy all prerogatives that at day were due unto her which was six or seven years before his legitimation For Don Alonso and Don Edwardo the two sons of the said John and Philippe were born in the years 1390 and 1391. And John of Gant married Katharine Swinford and legitimated her children in the years 1396 1397. Third Reason The marriage of John of Gant with Katharine Swinford helpeth litle to better this legitimation which by the rules of the Common and Civil Laws is but a bare deposition for their children were Spurii begotten in plain Adulterie not in fornication onely and consequently the Privilege that the Law giveth to the subsequent mariage of the Parties by legitimating such children as are born in simple fornication where the parties are single cannot take place here nor can any legitimation equal much less prefer the legitimated before the lawful and legitimate by birth The Fourth Reason alleged by the Favorers of Portugal against the Issue of John of Somerset When Henry 6. and his son were extinguished and Edw. 4. usurped the Crown there remained of the Ladie Philippe Alfonse the Fift King of Portugal her Nephew of John of Somerset Margaret Countess of Richmond his Neece The Question is which of these two Competitors of the Hous of Lancaster and in equal degree from John of Gant and Henry 6. should have Succession by right immediately after the death of Henry 6. Alfonso say they for three Reasons First hee was a man and Margaret but a woman though shee came of the man and hee of the woman 2. Hee descended of the lawful and eldest daughter shee of the younger brother legitimated 3. Hee was of the whole blood to H. 6. and shee but of the half In which regard hee was to bee preferred at least in all the interests of Succession which were to bee had from Henry 4. onely and were never in his father John of Gant which were many as his right gotten by arms upon the evil government of the former King his Election by Parlament and Coronation by the Realm c. see for the rest Sect. 35. 43. Besides when King Richard 2. was dead hee was next in degree of propinquitie unto him of any man living as hath before been proved Sect. 36. CAP. IX The Genealogie and Controversies of Portugal 76. The Genealogie of Portugal Emanuel had by one wife six children 1. John 3. hee John that died in his father's time hee Sebastian slain by the Moors in Barbarie 2. Isabel Grandmother to the present King of Spain 3. Beatrix Grandmother to the Duke of Savoy 4. Lewis father of Don Antonio lately deceased in England 5. Henry Cardinal and after King 6. Edw. father of Mary Duchess of Parma who hath two sons Ranuntius Duke of Parma and Edward a Cardinal and father of Katharine Duchess of Bragança yet living whose Issue is Theodosius Duke of Bragança Edward Alexander and Philippe young Princes of great exspectation Five pretenders unto the Crown of Portugal Sebastian beeing dead Henry son of Emanuel succeeded who beeing old unmarried unlikely to have issue before him was debated the right of five Pretenders to the Succession of that Crown vid. Philippe of Spain Philibert Duke of Savoy the Duke of Parma his mother beeing then deceased Don Antonio and the Duchess of Bragança the three first by their Deputies the fourth Anthonio by himself and for himself the fift by her husband the Duke and his learned Council Of these the Duke of Savoy was soon excluded becaus his mother was younger sister to K. Philip's mother and himself younger then Philippe Don Antonio a Bastard and excluded Don Antonio was also rejected and pronounced a bastard by the said King Henry for many reasons 1. Hee was taken to bee so all his father's life time and that without question 2. Certain Decrees coming out from Rome in the time of Julius 3. against the promotion of bastards hee sued to the said Pope to bee dispensed withall 3 His father Don Lewis hath oftentimes testified by word and writing that hee was his Bastard and signified asmuch in his last will 4. It is likely that if Lewis had married his mother who was base in birth and of the Jewish as som stories affirm hee would have made som of his friends and kindred acquainted therewith as a matter so much important to them to know which hee never did though the King avowed himself was present with him at his death 5. If hee had been legitimate why did hee not pretend the Succession before the said King next after the death of Sebastian beeing son to his elder brother as well as was Sebastian 6. Whereas hee had produced witnesses vid. his mother sister with her husband and two others to prove that his father before his death had married with his mother in secret the said K. Cardinal affirmed that upon their examination hee had found they were suborned by Anthonio becaus they agreed not in their reports and becaus som of them confessed they were suborned whereupon hee hath caused them to be punished If not why not Duke of Lanc. Seeing that in England wee hold the said Don Anthonio for true King of Portugal I see not how wee can deny his children their right at least to the Duchie of Lancaster whereof whosoëver is right heir of Portugal should bee rightest heir Sect. 70. Allegations to prove the Duke of Parm's right That hee represented his mother and shee her father Lo. Edward who had hee been alive had carried it from his elder sister Elisa K. Philip's 2. mother consequently his issue to bee preferred before hers 2. Against the Duchess of Bragança that his mother was the elder sister therefore