from Laity and Clergy Protestants of all sorts as well Presbyterians aâ— Independents yea from Antinomians Anabaptists Brownists and Schismatickes of all sorts to reforme Religion especially Church-government set up the Ordinances and worship of God in their purity and settle all matters of Doctrine Discipline Government by Act of Parliament as neere as might be to the word by the assistance of a godly learned Assembly of Divines the daily calling of Ministers of all sorts upon the Parliam to pursue this work the prayers of all piously affected to Almighty God both publickly and privately to assist them extraordinarily from Heaven in this great weighty spirituall building together with the Assemblies submission of all their determinations to the Parliaments alteration approbation or rejection and the Independents own addresses Petitions late tender of the reasons of their dissent from the Assembly to them is to my weak approbation a most irrefragable Argument and publicke acknowledgement of their undoubted right and Legislative power in all Ecsiasticall affaires of what nature and quality soever and that all parties ought readily to submit to their just determinations in point of practise and obedience in all these particulars whereof they have thus unanimously and importunately from time to time petitioned them to be Iudges There is no party or Sectary whatsoever which hath formerly petitioned them in this kinde but would preach and write for universall obedience to that forme of Church-government the Parliament should settle and establish provided it suited fully with their particular way which they judge the truest and most consonant to Scripture and if they should once authorize or settle the Independents hitherto concealed way I am confident they would all preach universall obedience submission to it under pain of contumacy haeresie schisme and the severest penalties Ecclesiasticall or civill since they write as much in effect already in their Pamphlets and that this their way may reasonably yea and upon higher terms then of reason be thought in time that it cannot but overthrow all other sorts of Ecclesiasticall Government and stand up it selfe in their stead If then every side be of this minde in case the Parliament determine for their party then why should not all be willingly concluded satisfied with what they shall rightly determine be it for or against their way since they have all appealled to their judgements alike which must either be altogether fruitlesse and un-obliging to any or els indifferently binde all to voluntary or enforced conformity Add to this that all or most of our opposites in this point of Parliaments juriâ—diction and Legislative power in Ecclesiasticall matters have freely submitted themselves to the Protestation Vow and solemne Nationall Covenant imposed and prescribed by the Parliament which enjoyne them under paine of highest Perjury with their lives and estates to maintain and defend the ancient rights and priviledges of Parliament and this we now debate as well as any other That they have generally acknowledged and obeyed the Parliaments Iurisdiction in prescribing publick monethly Fasts and others upon speciall occasions with publicke dayes of thanksgiving together with their power and Ordinances to suppresse all prophanations of the Lords day with many other abuses Sects Errors in Church affaires which hath for ever estopped them to quarrell or deny the Parliaments Legislative Iurisdiction in any other particulars of Church-government Discipline or Religion which suite not with their humors or opinions I shall conclude this point concerning Our own Parliaments Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction with the determination of our incomparable Jewell which hath more reall worth and value in it then the contrary opinion of thousands of opposites being alwayes hitherto reputed the received Doctrine of the Church of England and with Bishop Bilson a very solid Writer This reverend learned Jewell in his Apologie hath this passage concerning the establishment of the Protestant Religion among us That the matter hath been treated in open PARLIAMENT with long consultation and before a notable SYNOD and CONVOCATION Master â—â—â—ding his Antagonist Anâ—â—gonist answering thereunto just as some Independenâ—â— and others who protest they have abjured all Popery though they follow it herein to an haires breadth do now The Parliaments of these later dayes did make most of you and yet how open was it for you had ye any plaâ—e at all in it were ye admitted within the doores or had ye any thing to do in that assembly Did they tarry many moneths about it had they Bishops had they Divines and the most learned to reason too and fro with all Liberty c. How many of the spirituall Lords a great part of the Parliament and without all doubt the part which must be chiefly and only regarded when the questiones of Religion gave their voyce to your Gospell yea which of them did not resist it save 〈◊〉 alone c If they will needs have their matters to depend of THEIR PARLIAMENT let us not be blamed if we call it PARLIAMENT RELIGION PARLIAMENT GOSPEL PARLIAMENT FAITH This learned Bishop returnes the ensuing reply to him That the Parliament war summoned by royall Authority confirmed and concluded in Order as heretofore hath been used That a Parliament might be held and Acts passed without the consent and agreement of Lords Spirituall for which he produceth sundry examples Farther whereas ye call the Doctrine of Christ that now by Gods great mercy and to your great griefe is universally and freely preached a PARLIAMENT RELIGION and a PARLIAMENT GOSPEL for such sobriety becometh you well and may stand you instead when learning fayleth ye might have remembred that Christ himselfe at the begining was universally received and honoured through this Realme BY ASSENT OF PARLIAMENT and further that WITHOUT PARLIAMENT your POPE himselfe was never received no not in the late time of Queen Mary yea and even then his Holinesse was clogged with PARLIAMENT CONDITIONS that whatsoever had beene determined in Parliament and was not repealed were it never so contrary to 〈…〉 and Canons should remain still inviolable and stand in force 〈…〉 Holinesse had gone home again Such Master Harding is the Authority of a Parliament Verily it Parliaments of Realmes be no Parliaments then will your Pope be no Pope Therefore as you now call the truth of God we professe a Parliament Religion and a Parliament Gospel even so with 〈…〉 and gravity of speech you might have sayd our Fathers in old times had a Parliament Christ And your late Fatherâ— and Brethren had of late in the time of Queene Mary a Parliament Faith a Parliament 〈◊〉 a Parliament Pope Neither is it so strange a matter to see Ecclesiasticall causes debated in Parliament read the Lawes of King Inas King Elâ—â—ede King Edward King Ethelstan King Edmond King 〈◊〉 King Canute and ye shall finde that our Godly Forefathers the Princes and Peers of this Realme never vouchsafed to entreat of matters of Peace of Warre or otherwise touching the
not onely in their Pulpits but likewise in sundry late Pamphlets wherewith they have filled the World That every particular Congregation of visible Saints and Independent Church is under the Government of Christ alone as the ONELY Head King Governour Law-giver of it and subject TO NO OTHER IVRISDICTION then that of Christ his word and Spirit That NO POWER ON EARTH NOR EARTHLY LAW-GIVERS MAY CAN OR OVGHT TO GIVE LAWES FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THIS REPVBLIKE nor claime nor exercise an Headship or undertake the Government of this Body That neither KINGS NOR PARLIAMENTS NOR SYNODS have any Authority to prescribe Lawes or Rules for the Churches Government to order the affaires of Christs Kingdome or institute the Government of his Churches or to make coactive Lawes in any Ecclesiasticall matters to bind the conscience of any Church or Christian to outward conformity or inflict any mulcts or penalties for contempt or disobedience Christ onely being the Lord of mens consciences which ought to be left at liberty That the Members of the Parliament are chosen but by a secular Root by the Generality and Riffe Raffe of the world Papists Atheists Drunkards Swearers Men voyd of the knowledge feare and grace of Christ And therefore the Independent Brethren conceive as great AN IMPOSSIBILITY that a Legitimate Ecclesiastick Power should according to the mind of Christ bee by them conferred upon any men or that they should have any Power or Authority from Christ to nominate or appoint who shall bee the men by vertue of such nomination or election to enact Lawes and Statutes in matters of Religion and to order under mulcts and penalties how men shall worship and serve God as it is in Jobs expression to bring a cleane thing out of an uncleane That the Parliaments claiming or exercising any such Ecclesiasticall Power or others attributing of it to them is a meanes to awaken the eye of Jealousie upon them and seven times more destructive and under-mining of not onely their Power but Honour Peace nd Safety also than any thing that is found in the Independent Way so ill entreated That it is a claiming of the sacred and incommunicable Royalties of Heaven an accounting it no Robbery to make themselves equall with God and such an high provocation in the eyes of the Most High as IF CONTINVED IN by the Parliament will kindle a fire in the brest of him whose name is Jealous which will consume and devoure Yea one of them puts this Question If the whole Kingdome may deny obedience unto Popish Acts and Canons or upon any other like just occasion and they themselves bee Judges whether the occasion bee just or no Whether MAY NOT INDEPENDENTS a part of the Kingdome onely doe the like in all respects Or Whether ought they because a Lesser part of the Kingdome yeeld obedience to Popish Acts and Canons because a Major part approve of and agree with a Parliament and Synod in approving them What if they should be for Popery again Judaisme or Turcisme t is no offence to make a Quere nor impossible to come to passe the greatest part of those that chose our Parliament men being thought to be Popishly or Malignantly affected c. Putting divers such like Queries destructive to the very fundamentall Power and Being of Parliaments and as bad or worse than the Popish Gun-powder Plot to blow up the Soveraign Ecclesiastick and Civill Authority of this High Court in all succeeding Ages These with infinite other Anti-Parliamentall Anti-Synodicall and Anti-Monarchicall Paradoxes at which I professe I stand amazed have not onely dropped from the Lips but Pens of sundry Independents who have avowed them publikely in Print with their Names affixed to their Bookes even before the face of Your Right Honourable Parliamentary Assembly and Supreme Tribunall in such open affront and high contempt of Your undoubted Rights Power Priviledges which Your Honours and wee all are obliged by Late Solemne Oathes Covenants Protestations to defend maintaine with our very Lives and Estates and to discover oppose all others who shall invade them to our uttermost power as I am confident no Age nor History can ever parallel in the least measure the very Malignant Prelates and Anti-Parliamentary Cavaliers having not proceeded in this kind so farre as they which I speake with deepest griefe of heart and spirit out of Conscience of that common Vow and Covenant which bindes mee to discover oppugne reveale abhorre it and detestation of their most pernicious Assertions not out of the least malice or hatred to any of their Persons What the Independents end of publishing these desperate Anti-Parliamentary Paradoxes should be unlesse to prepare their party and all others as much as in them lies utterly to reject whatever publike forme of Church-Government Discipline Reformation and Directory of Worship Your Honours by the advice of the Reverend Assembly shall establish in our Church for the future after all your serious consultations debates paines Prayers and Fastings about it and to set up their owne Anomolous Platforme which they averre is Christs Kingdome and Government and which may upon probable and higher grounds than of reason bee thought in time to overthrow and put downe all other Governments whatsoever and to stand up alone in their stead since Christs Kingdome shall stand up when all opposite earthly Kingdomes like earthen vessells shall with an Iron Rod bee dashed in peeces Which they close up with a Faxit Deus festinet in despight of Your Authority and all humane Power whatsoever I cannot conjecture And their owne late printed Passages with Mr. Iohn Goodwins Sermon that it would be more easie for him and hee should rather yeeld to bee torne in pieces by wild horses than submit to such a Government which proceeded from a Parliament chosen by the Riffe-raffe of the world c. intimate and expresse as much Which what an high contempt it is against Your undoubted Power and pious Ecclesiasticall proceedings in Reforming setling the Doctrine Discipline and Government of our Church the grand desire and prayer of all wel-affected spirits I most humbly submit to Your saddest thoughts and deepest wisedomes who have both Power and Authority in Your hands to suppresse incomparable Prudence and Providence to prevent these growing dangerous Insolencies before they become Masterlesse or Epidemicall past Your cure Farre be it from my thoughts to exasperate Your Power or Iustice against any Delinquents of this kind some whereof are so neare and deare unto mee that it is my heaviest affliction to mention their extravagancies in this kind of which I trust they and all their followers will be now ashamed and a Brotherly Admonition to their Persons though their Writings undergoe the sharper Censure will I hope induce them upon second thoughts both to discerne lament recant their fore-mentioned Paradoxes and abhorre themselves for them even in dust and ashes as one of them professeth hee will doe in case hee be convinced And
then if they will not bee reclaimed Fiat Iustitia better some should suffer than all perish My onely desire is that Your Honours would have a speciall jealous care of preserving your owne undoubted Parliamentary Rights and Priviledges against these unparalleld publike Violations Impeachments of them and of the tranquility safety of our Church and State endangered by them Toward the just defence whereof I have with as much expedition as my many other distracting publike and private Imployments would permit contributed these my indigested Nocturnall Lucubrations borrowed from the houres allotted to my necessary naturall rest in Vindication of the ancient and undoubted Ecclesiasticall Power and Iurisdiction of Parliaments Christian Princes and Magistrates which I have made good by sundry Divine Historicall Presidents and Authorities in all Ages and answered all the chiefe Pretences Objections of Papists Prelates Independents Anabaptists Separatists and all others who oppugne them in such a manner as I hope will silence them for the present and reforme them for the future It was my primitive intention and desire to have published this Treatise complete at first but it swelling to a greater bulk than I expected and my engagements in other publike services for the Common-weale retarding my speedy progresse herein I have thereupon divided it into two Parts the First whereof I here humbly tender to your Honourable Patronage till God and oportunity enable mee to complete the Second of which there is lesse Necessity since learned Mr. Samuel Rutherford in his Due right of Presbyteries and Mr. Thomas Edwards in his Anti-Apologia neither of them hitherto Answered by the Independents and in truth unanswerable with Gulielmus Apollonius and the Wallacrian Ministers Consideratio Quarundam Controversiarum c. quae in Angliae Regno hodie agitantur newly published will supply the present defect thereof and this First Part supply some particulars concerning the Ecclesiasticall Power of Parliaments Christian Princes Magistrates Councells which are wanting in them and in laborious Sir Edward Cookes Fourth Institutes who hath recorded little or nothing concerning the Jurisdiction or Power of Parliaments in Ecclesiasticall affaires and matters of Religion Thus humbly submitting these my distracted subitane Collections and Lucubrations to Your Honourable favourable Acceptation and imploring the God of Verity of Unity speedily to dissipate all our Errors and comprimise all our unhappy Divisions which threaten ruine to us if continued by Your most Religious Care Wisedome and indefatigable Endeavours that so wee may bee all like minded one towards another and may with ONE MIND and ONE MOVTH in one Way one Congregation glorifie God even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ I shall with my ferventest Orisons daily recommend Your Honourable Assembly with all Your pious Endeavours for the Reforming Setling of our Church State to his Divine Benediction and ever rest Your Honours most humble devoted Servant William Prynne To the Reader CHristian Reader I here present thee with Truth Triumphing over Falshood Antiquity over Novelty to settle both thy Judgement and Practice in these unsetled times wherein the very Foundations of Parliaments States Churches Government are shaken and subverted by some of our owne dear Friends from whom wee least expected it For my part I take no pleasure in detecting my Brethrens nakednesse Errors Over-sights nor in disparaging their Worth or Writings yet I must needs acquaint thee for thine owne good to preserve thee from seducement with some materiall Observations touching their Independent Treatises for which thou maist chance to give me thanks First That they all generally take that for granted which they should prove and demonstrate to us viz. That there is an exact and most absolute forme of Church-Government prescribed to all Churches in the Scripture from which no man must vary in the least title And that the Independent Way it is and no other But when wee demand of them how they prove it or what that Way Government and Discipline is they contend for or in what plaine Scripture Texts they find it instituted and universally prescribed to all Nations Churches or how they make good all their transcendent Encomiums of their New Way wee find them altogether silent or unsatisfactory telling us onely a large story of the Patterne of the Tabernacle shewed to Moses in the Mount of the exact forme of the Temple shewed to David by the Spirit and of Ezekiels vision and his and the Angels measuring of the Temple Which are nothing to the point and meere impertinencies fit to delude the ignorant injudicious vulgar who take their weake inferences thence for divine Oracles Secondly That they are extraordinary bold confident peremptory copious in their affirmations and positions concerning their Way but very poore lame impotent deficient in their proofes thereof You must take their bare Assertions for undeniable Arguments Proofes Thirdly That their whole Independent Fabricke is built either upon false Principles As that every Church is a complete absolute independent body of it selfe subject onely unto Christ That no humane Power upon earth hath any Right or Authority to prescribe any Rules or Orders to any particular Congregation That just humane Lawes binde not the Conscience in point of obedience and the like Or else upon false or absurd Inferences from true Principles As that Christ is the King Lord Head and Law-giver of his Church Ergo No man or humane Power may make Lawes or Canons to regulate and order it or any thing in it but Christ alone Fourthly That to maintaine their New Way of Government they are enforced to deny the undoubted Power and Jurisdiction of Parliaments Councells Synods Kings and Civill Magistrates in Ecclesiasticall affaires and to maintaine such Paradoxes Passages against their lawfull Authority as if duly pondered may justly induce all Wel-affected persons to mistrust and abhorre their Way as Anarchicall and destructive to all Christian and humane Society Fifthly That they are constrained publikely to deny that there is any Nationall Church under the New Testament though they acknowledge one in the Old Upon which ground they must of necessity likewise deny one Article of the Creed That there is a Catholike Church and themselves members of it or of the Nationall Church of England They pluck up the bounds and orderly distribution of all Parish Churches absolutely necessary to avoyd confusion to provide competent maintenance for Ministers to bring all to frequent the publike Ordinances Warranted by Scripture wherein wee read not onely of distinct Synagogues and Tribes under the Law but Churches under the Gospel Approved by the practice of all Christian Churches ever since there were Christian Emperors Princes and as necessary as distinct Families Villages Cities Societies of men in civill respects yea observed in New-England it selfe though now disliked in Old and thereby bring in meere Ataxy and Confusion among us Sixthly They are constrained to wrest Scriptures against their meaning to invent many strange Apocryphall new shifts Interpretations Distinctions to evade
And when in the first times of Christs Church Prelates used this power 't was therefore onely because in those dayes they had no Christian Kings And it was then so onely used as in times of persecution that is with supposition is case it were required of submitting their very lives unto the very laws and commands even of those pagan Princes that they might not so muchas seem to disturb their civil Government which Christ came to confirm but by no meanes to undermine CHARLES by the Grace of GOD c. Now for asmuch as the said Lord Arch-bishop of Canterbury President of the said Convocation for the province of Canterbury and the said Arch-bishop of Yorke President of the said Convocation for the Province of Yorke and others the said Bishops Deans Arch-deacons Chapters and Colleges with the rest of the Clergie having met together respectively at the time and places before mentioned respectively and then and there by vertue of Our said authority granted unto them treated of concluded and agreed upon certaine Canons Orders Ordinances and Constitutions to the end and purpose by Vs limited and prescribed unto them have thereupon offered and presented the same unto Vs most humbly desiring Vs to give our Royall assent unto the same according to form of a certain Statute or Act of Parliament made in that behalfe in the 25th yeer of the Reign of King Henry the eighth and by Our said Prerogative Royall and Supream authority in Causes Ecclesiasticall to ratifie by Our Letters Patents under Our great Seal of England and to confirm the same The Title and Tenour of them being word for word as ensueth Wee of Our Princely inclination and Royall care for the maintenance of the present Estate and government of the Church of England by the Lawes of this Our Realme now setled and established having diligently with great contentment and comfort read and considered of all these their said Canons Orders Ordinances and Constitutions agreed upon as is before expressed And finding the same such as Wee are perswaded will be very profitable not only to Our Clergy but to the whole Church of this Our Kingdome and to all the true Members of it if they be well observed Have therefore for Vs. Our Heires and lawfull Successours of Our especiall grace certaine knowledge and meere motion given and by thâ—se presents doe give Our Royall Assent according to the forme of the said Statute or Act of Parliament aforesaid to all and every of the said Canons Orders Ordinances and constitutions and to all and every thing in them contained as they are before written And furthermore We do not onely by our said Prerogative Royall and supreme Authority in Causes Ecclesiasticall ratifie confirme and establish by these Our Letters Patents the said Canons Ordinances and Constitutions and all and every thing in them contained as is aforesaid but do likewise propound publish and straightly injoyne and command by Our said Authority and by these Our Letters Patents the same to be diligently observed executed and equally kept by all Our loving Subjects of this Our Kingdome both within the Provinces of Canterbury and Yorke in all points wherein they do or may concerne every or any of them according to this Our will and pleasure hereby signified and expressed And that likewise for the better observation of them every Minister by what name or title soever he be called shall in the Parish Church or Chappell where he hath charge read all the said Canons Orders Ordinances and Constitutions at all such times and in such manner as is prescribed in the said Canons or any of them The Booke of the said Canons to be provided at the charge of the Parish betwixt this and the Feast of S. Michael the Arch-angell next ensuing straightly charging and commanding all Archbishops Bishops and all other that exercise any Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction within this Realme every man in his place to see and procure so much as in them lyeth all and every of the same Canons Orders Ordinances and Constitutions to be in all points duly observed not sparing to execute the penalties in them severally mentioned upon any that shall wittingly or wilfully break or neglect to observe the same as they tender the honour of God the peace of the Church the tranquillity of the Kingdome and their duties and service to Vs their King and Soveraigne In witnesse whereof We have caused these Our Letters to be made Patents Witnesse Our Selfe at Westminster the thirtieth day of Iune in the sixteenth yeare of Our Reigne By all these Patents with others of like nature directed to all our Convocations by our Kings in former and latter times by Our present Parliaments manner of calling limiting directing our present Assembly of Divines in all particulars of their proceedings and debates appointing some eminent Members of both Houses to sit and consult together with them and to certifie all their results and determinations to them to be considered rectified rejected or approved by both Houses as they in their wisdomes shall see cause and by the fore-cited premises it is most apparent that the Arch-bishops Bishops Clergy and Convocation of England assembled Synodically together much lesse then any particular Independent Minister or Congregation notwithstanding all their late printed vaunts of their Ecclesiasticall soveraigne Iurisdiction by divine right and power to prescribe and enjoyne Visitation-Oaths Articles new Rites and Ceremonies of their owne Inventions both unto Ministers and people which they seconded with their practice to the insufferable grievance and oppression of the people are so farre from having any lawfull right power and authority to make prescribe any Ecclesiasticall Injunctions Canons Lawes Rites Ceremonies or forme of Government to any of his Majesties Subjects that though they be lawfully assembled together in a Provinciall or Nationall Synod by the Kings owne Writ or Parliaments command yet they cannot legally or of right so much as treat debate consult of any Ecclesiasticall affaires without a speciall licence first obtained from the King or Parliament and then only of such generals or particulars as they shall prescribe them much lesse compile enact promulge impose or execute any Ecclesiasticall Canons Lawes Injunctions Ordinances Oaths without their speciall approbation and ratification of them by their speciall Letters Patents under the great Seale and by Act of Parliament too as hath been lately resolved by unanimous consent of both Houses in the case of the condemned new booke of Canons The like I have proved of the Bishops Clergie Councels in other Christian Empires and Kingdomes Where then is that immense Episcopall jurisdiction authority preheminence superiority power in point of dominion over and beyond that of ordinary Ministers which our Lordly Prelats lately so much boasted of and pleaded for as due unto them by no lesse then divine institution if we may beleeve them not by the Grace Patents Grants or connivence of Christian Princes Let these swelling ambitious Grandees
to abate this windy tumour consider with themselves that all their greatnesses piled together in a generall or Nationall Synod though steepled with the Popes owne Chaire and three-forked Miter cannot so much as treat of debate dispute determine any Church-affaires much lesse constitute or promulge any new Ecclesiasticall Lawes Canons Articles Ceremonies Rites c. without the previous licence and permission of those temporall Princes and Powers that summon them nor yet exercise any manner of Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction whatsoever more then the poorest Vicar and Curate breathing that is a Minister lawfully ordained without the Kings Letters Patents or Commission authorizing them which erected their Bishopricks Diocesse and Episcopall jurisdiction at the first and must still support them else they will fall to utter ruine and then all their pretended claimes and crackt title of jus divinum with all Independents Anabaptists Brownists Anti-monarchicall Anti-parliamentall fancies concerning the jurisdiction and authority of their Independent Congregations opposite to the premises will vanish into ayre If any deeme the premised power of Christian Princes and Civill Magistrates in limiting Synods and Councels thus to be derogatorie to the lawfull authority of Bishops Ministers Synods or Independent Churches Ianswer that it is not so forthese ensuing reasons First because the chiefe care of preserving the purity of Gods Worship Ordinances Religion the Churches peace prosperity and of suppressing all heresies errours schismes corruptions superstitions contrary thereunto is committed to Christian Princes and supreme temporall Magistrates both by the Lawes of God the constant acknowledgment use practice constitutions lawes canons of all Christian Empires Kingdomes Councels Synods in all ages and the Coronation-Oaths of all Emperours Kings Princes in the Christian World which oblige them to discharge this trust as the subsequent Sections will abundantly manifest Therefore the power of directing Synods Councels in debating matters of controversie making Lawes Canons c. concerning all or any of the premises and the confirming of them ought principally to belong to them Secondly because Christian Emperours Kings Princes are the supreme heads and Governours under Christ in and over all Ecclesiasticall persons Assemblies Synods Councels Churches within their owne Dominions as well as temporall and our Kings of England are declared to be such by severall Acts of Parliament by the Oaths of supremacy and Allegeance which all ought to take within their respective Dominions Therefore they ought of right to direct and order all manner of proceedings in such Ecclesiasticall Assemblies Synods it being the duty and just right of every Naturall and Politicke head to direct the members as of the head of the family to regulate and direct the family wife c. by way of authority or jurisdiction not they the head Thirdly because the Bishops and Clergy of our owne and other Realmes have no Legislative power or other Ecclesiasticall authority vested in them by the Word of God but onely to preach the Word administer the Sacraments and to binde or loose mens sinnes declaratively by preaching or applying the Gospel to them according as they finde them penitent or obstinate in their sinfull courses and no more of other Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction then what is derived to them by our Kings and the Lawes of this our Realme as is resolved in these expresse termes by the Statute of 37. H. 8. c. 17. The Arch-bishops Bishops Arch-deacons and other Ecclesiasticall persons of this Realme have no manner of Iurisdiction Ecclesiasticall but by under and from the Kings royall Majestie the onely and undoubtea supreme head of the Church of England and Ireland to whom by holy Scripture all authority and power is wholly given to heare and determine all manner of causes Ecclesiasticall and to correct all vice and sinne whatsoever and to such persons as his Majestie shall appoint thereunto And by the Statute of 1. Ed. 6. c. 2. in these words That all jurisdiction spirituall is derived and deducted from the Kings Majestie to all Bishops and Ecclesiasticall persons within England and Ireland as supreme head of these Churches and Realmes of England and Ireland and so instly acknowledged by the Clergie of the said Realmes and that all Courts Ecclesiasticall within the said two Realmes be kept by no other power or authority either forraigne or within the Realme but by the authority of his most Excellent Majesty whereupon it enacts That all their Processe shall issue out under the Kings Seale and in his Name and Stile as in Writs originall and judiciall at the common Law with which sundry other Acts of Parliament concurre Now the Kings and Lawes of this our Realme have given the Clergie assembled in Councels Synods and Convocations no other but such a limited power and authority as is expressed in the fore-cited Statutes of 25. H. 3. c. 19. 27. H. 8. c. 15. and mentioned in the premises Therefore they neither can challenge nor pretend to claime any other but such a limited and confined authority the rather because they are assembled to such meetings as our Assembly is now onely as advisers and assistants not as Judges or Law-givers Therefore the keeping of them to the fore-mentioned limits can neither be an infringement or eclipsing of their just priviledges or Christian liberty Fourthly because every particular Christian is to try the spirits doctrines and determinations of Ministers by the Scriptures whether they are of God or not and to beware yea judge of false Teachers doctrines and no wayes to receive them as the Marginall Texts abundantly evidence and all Orthodox Divines assert Much more then are Christian Princes the chief Defenders of the Christian faith to judge and determine of them therefore to give particular directions to and in all Synods Councels how to proceed and what to treat of for suppressing false Teachers Heresies Schisms Errours advancing Religion Truth unity and sincerity of Gods Worship within their territories and Churches Fifthly because every soule as well Bishops Ministers and all other Ecclesiasticall persons as temporall subjects is and ought to be subject to Christian Princes and the highest temporall powers who are to provide for their spirituall as well as their temporall welfare Therefore they ought to be regulated and directed by them when assembled by their Writs in Councels or Synods for their spirituall good SECT 3. Of Confirming Ratifying the Canons Decrees and Resolutions of Councells Synods by Christian Princes Peers Parliaments before they become valid or obligatory Of the Presence and Power of Christian Princes Nobles and other Lay-men in Councells That many or most Councells Synods in ancient and latter times especially in England were in truth meere Parliaments wherein Christian Princes Nobles Senators and Lay-men met and voted as well as Bishops and other Ecclesiasticall persons And that no Canons Lawes Articles concerning Gods Worship Religion Church-Government Ceremonies were ever lawfully prescribed or imposed on any Subjects of our Realme but
Greeks on the left hand the Latine Clergy on the right and himselfe would have sate in the midst but the Emperor withstood it saying Locum ipsum sibi potiùs quà m summo Pontifici convenire That that place did rather belong to him than to the Pope But after many contestations they all accorded at last that the Pope and his Clergy should sit on the right side the Emperor and his Greeks on the left of the Church one right over against the other and neither Pope nor Emperor in the midst In the Councell of Lateran under Leo the tenth there were divers Ambassadors Princes Nobles and Lay-men present in every Session Sigismond King of Poland had his Ambassadors and Orators there chosen by himselfe his Princes Lords Spirituall and Temporall Nobles and Commons in full Parliament who gave them full Power and Commission for them and every of them Pro Nobis ac Regnis Dominiis Principibus Spiritualibus Secularibus Proceribus Populis ditioni Nostrae Subjectis saith their Commission under the Kings Seale 10. Aprilis Anno 1515. to treat of handle conclude agree and determine of all things in their names and steads that should bee propounded or handled in that Councell concerning Religion or the Church Etiamsi talia forent quae mandatum exigerent magis speciale quà m praesentibus est insertum Promising that they would ratifie grant confirme and establish whatever should be there done and acted by their Orators Maximilian Duke of Millain Francis Marquesse of Mantua Stanislaus and John Dukes of Mazovia and Russia sent Orators and Ambassadors to this Councell with like Commissions under their Seales to ratifie all things therin concluded in their steads recorded at large by Surius in the third Session of that Councell And the like Commissions had the Ambassadors of Lewes King of France Joachim Marquesse of Brandenburge William Marquesse of Montferrat Emanuel King of Portugall Charles Duke of Savoy and Maximilian the Emperor the Constitutions of Councells wherein the Pope sate President being not obligaotory unlesse the Emperor with other Christian Kings and Princes ratified them by their Ambassadors Orators and Proctors if absent from or by their Subscriptions and Seals if present in them In the Councell of Lyons Anno 1245. foure Noble-men chosen and sent by the King and Parliament of England were present as Ambassadors And the Bishops sent by the Church of England to the generall Councell of Pisa Anno 1409. were elected and chosen by the whole Clergy of England in their Convocation In the Councell of Basil King Henry the Sixth of England had fourteene Ambassadors Orators Proctors to whom and to the major part of them hee gave as well a generall as speciall power and Mandate in his name and stead to bee present in that Councell and therein to treat conferre and conclude as well of those things which might concerne the Reformation of the Universall Church in the Head and in the Members as of those things which concerned the Supportation of the Orthodox Faith and the Pacification of Kings and Princes as also of and concerning a perpetuall Peace from Warre between him and Charles of France his Adversary and also to treat commune and appoint and moreover to assent and if need were to disassent to those things which should there happen to bee decreed and ordained according to the determination of the said Councell Promising that hee would bona fide ratifie approve and confirme all and every thing that should bee done acted or effected in the premises or any of them by his said Ambassadors Orators and Proctors or the greatest part of them and that when hee should bee certified thereof hee would see them duly executed as farre as belonged to him and to a Christian Prince The Letters Patents themselves dated the tenth of July are recorded verbatim by Master Selden out of the Tables of France 12. H. 6. memb 2. A sufficient Testimony that it belongs to Christian Princes by themselves their Ambassadors Orators or Proctors to ratifie the Decrees of all Councells and Synods and to disapprove and damne them if they see cause Whence King Henry of France and the Parliament and Synod of Paris Anno 1593. damned and disavowed divers of the Canons of the Councell of Trent as prejudiciall to the Crown Royall Justice and liberty of the Church of France as Bochellus relates at full To conclude with Forraigne Presidents The Conclusions Constitutions and Determinations of that late famous Synod of Dort were ratified by the generall approbations and Edict of the Estates of the Low-Countries under their hands and Seale Visis cognitis maturè examinatis atque expensis praedicto judicio sententia Synodi say they in their Charter of Approbation ista plenè in omnibus approbavimus confirmavimus rata habuimus approbamus confirmamus rata habemus per praesentes Volentes statuentes ut nulla alia Doctrina de quinque praedictis Doctrinae capitibus Ecclesiis horum regionum doceatur aut propagetur praeter hanc quae praedicto judicio sit conformis consentanea c. Actum sub nostro Sigillo Signatione Praesidis Subscriptione nostri Graphiarij Hagae Comitis 2. Julij Anno 1619. All these with sundry other Forragine Testimonies abundantly demonstrate That the Constitutions Canons and Decrees of Councells are of no binding force and power at all unlesse confirmed by Emperors Kings Princes Nobles Subscriptions Edicts Patents Proclamations and Acts of Parliament and that most ancient Councells in forraigne parts were in truth but Parliaments To passe from these to our owne domesticke Presidents It is most apparent by numerous punctuall Examples that the Clergy of England alone had never any lawfull Jurisdiction vested in them to make binding Ecclesiasticall Lawes or Canons in our Synods and Convocations in any age without our Kings Nobles and Parliaments assents and approbations That all or most of our ancient Councells Synods Convocations were nought else but Parliaments wherein our Kings Nobles Senators and Commons were personally present as well as Bishops or Clergy-men And that all matters concerning Religion Church-Government Ceremonies with all binding Lawes Canons Articles relating thereunto have since the first planting of Religion in this our Island till this present time beene alwayes setled resolved confirmed in and by Parliaments or such Councells and Synods wherein our Kings Nobles Commons were present and had decisive Votes It is the received opinion of all our Antiquaries and Historians that King Lucius was the first Christian King of this Island and the first Prince in the world that embraced the Christian Faith That about the yeare of our Lord 185. hee writing to Pope Elutherius to send him the Romane and Imperiall Lawes whereby to governe his people then newly converted to Christ the modest Pope returned him this answer You have requested the Romane and Caesarean Lawes to bee transmitted to you from Vs which you would use
in the Kingdome of Britaine The Romane and Caesarean Lawes Wee may at all times reject but the Law of God by no meanes You have lately by Gods mercy received the Law and Faith of Christ in the Kingdom of Britaine You have with you in the Realme both Testaments out of them by Gods grace PER CONSILIVM REGNI VESTRI SVME LEGEM By the Councell of Your Realme not of your Clergy or Prelates take a Law and by it through Gods power You may governe Your Realm of Britain For You are Gods Vicar as Bracton likewise stiles our Kings in Your Realme c. Lo here the Pope himselfe resolves the King and great Councell of this Realme the Parliament not Clergy or Convocation to bee the only proper makers of Lawes to govern the Church and Kingdom by Anno 446. Germanus and Lupus two learned Bishops being sent hither out of France to suppresse the spreading dangerous Pelagian Heresie there was upon this occasion a Synod assembled at Verolam whereunto a numerous multitude of men together with their wives and children repaired ADERAT POPVLVS EXPECTABATVR FVTVRVS IVDEX The People were present expected to be the future Judge Adstabant partes dispari conditione consimiles Indè divina fides hinc humana praesumptio indè Christus hinc Pelagius autor perversae pravitatis c. After a long dispute Vanity is convinced confounded perfidiousnesse refuted being unable to answer the objections POPVLVS ARBITER vix manus continet JVDICIVM CVM CLAMORE CONTESTANDO c. The People being Arbitrator scarce hold their hands GIVING IVDGEMENT with a shout These things thus acted an innumerable company of both Sexes were converted to the Lord. In this first Synod that wee read of held within our Island the People were present as well as the Clergy and that not only as Auditors but Judges giving the finall Sentence in this great controversie concerning Religion Anno 449. There was another British Councell held by the said Germanus and Severus MAGNOQVE Clericorum ET LAICORVM NVMERO and a great number of Clergy-men and LAY-MEN against the reviving Errors of Pelagius and King Vortigerne 's incestuous marriage with his daughter OMNIVMQVE SENTENTIA pravitatum perversitas cum suis Autoribus condemnatur So that the Laity as well as the Clergy gave Sentence in this Synod against this Heresie and the Authors of it Nennius cap. 37. addes of this Councell concerning Vortigerne Dum conventa esset magna Synodus Clericorum ET LAICORVM in uno Concilio c. Ipse Rex maledictus est damnatur à beato Germano OMNI CONCILIO BRITONVM So that Lay-men were present and gave sentence together with the Clergy in this second Synod held in this our Isle About the yeare 612. King Ethelbert Genti suae Decreta Judiciorum as well in Ecclesiasticall as Temporall causes juxta exempla Romanorum CVM CONCILIO SAPENTVM INSTITVIT c. as Beda witnesseth About the yeare 627. Edwin King of Northumberland being perswaded to become a Christian returned this answer That he was about to conferre with his friends and COVNSELLORS concerning this thing and that if they would agree in opinion with him they would all be consecrated to Christ together in the Fountaine of life Hee did as hee had said Habito enim CVM SAPIENTIBVS CONCILIO For holding a Councell with his wise-men hee demanded severally of them all What this Doctrine which they had not hitherto heard of and the new worship of the Deity which was preached seemed to them And after some debate Coifi declaring his opinion that their former Religion had no vertue in it and that the Christian was farre better and to bee imbraced the rest of the Elders and Kings Counsellors concurred in opinion with him Whereupon they resolved forthwith to anathematize and burne with fire the Altars and Temples they had consecrated without fruit with the Idols in them Which done King Edwin with all the Nobles of his Nation and very many of the common people imbraced the Christian Faith and were Baptized Leo here a Pagan King and his Parliament determine the Christian Religion to be truest and thereupon renounce their former Idolatry and resolve to embrace the Christian Faith In the yeare 663. there was a great Councell held at Strenaeshale to decide the controversie concerning the due time of keeping Easter in which Councell King Oswey and his sonne Alfred with MANY NOBLES Bishops Clerks and LAY-MEN were present Colman and his Scottish Clergy maintained that it ought to bee kept after the Jewish computation Agilbert and his party held the contrary that it ought to bee observed at the time the Westerne Church solemnized it The Councell being sate King Oswey who presided in it before any debate of the Controversie made a solemne Speech unto them to this effect necessary for our times That it behoved those who served one God to hold one rule of living and serving him and not to differ in the celebration of heavenly Sacraments since they all expected one Kingdome in heaven Therefore they should rather inquire which was the truer tradition and that this should bee commonly followed by all Which said hee commanded Bishop Colman to relate what Rite it was which hee observed and whence it derived its originall Which Colman doing the King then commanded Bishop Wilfrid who was of the contrary party to declare his opinion and the grounds of it which hee did After long debate on either side the King gave sentence for VVilfreds opinion against Colman and his party because St. Peter who had the custody of Heaven Gates did by Colmans owne confession keep Easter as VVilfred held they ought to doe The King giving this resolution with his hands lifted up to heaven faverunt assidentes quique sive astantes majores unà cum mediocribus et abdicata minus perfecta institutione ad ea quae meliora cognoverant sese transferre festinabant all the great and meane Persons sitting and standing by concuring with the King gave sentence against Coleman for VVilfred and observed Easter accordingly ever after in their practice Here we finde the Clergy men only the debaters but the King Nobles and Commons the sole Judges and Resolvers of this Controversie and that in a most eminent generall Nationall Councell Anno 673. there was a Councell held at Hertford under Theodor Archbishop of Canterbury praesentibus Episcopis Angliae ET REGIBVS ET MAGNATIBVS VNIVERSIS writes Mathew Westminster at which all the Bishops Kings and great men of England were present All these sitting together Theodor propounded some Chapters or Canons concerning Church affaires before Them all which were afterwards assented to and subscribed Anno 684. There was a Councell held neare the River of Alne sub praesentia Regis Egfridi in the presence of King Egfrid who sate president in it Anno 692. King Ina made and published sundry notable ecclesiasticall laws concerning Religion Church government and
that in a Parliament or Councell wherein the King Nobels Senators and Elders of the people were present as well as Bishops and Clergy men Witnesse this preface to those Lawes of his Ego Inas Dei beneficio Occiduorum Saxonum Rex suasu et instituto Conredi Patris mei Heddae et Erkenvaldi Episcoporum meorum omnium Senatorum meorum et natu majorum sapientum populi mei in magna servorum Dei frequentia religiesè studebam tum animarum nostrarum saluti tum communi Regni nostri conservationi ut legittima nuptiarum faedera justaque judicia per omnem ditionem nostram fundata stabilitaque sint atque ut nulli liceat imposterum Senatori sive alteri cuivis in ditione nostra degenti haec nostra antiquare judicia Anno 694. there was a great Councell held at Becanceld wherein Withred King of Kent sate President and Bertuald Archbishop of Britain with Toby Bishop of Rochester the Abbats Abbesses Presbiters Deacons DVKES EARLES all assembled together deliberating about the state of the Churches in England The King subscribed the Lawes there made for the liberties of the Church in this manner Ego Withredus auxilio Christi his Legibus constitutis Rex pro Mo et Werburga Regina itemque pro filio nostro Arico subscripsi Anno 697. there was a Councell held at Berghamsted in the 5th yeare of the Reigne of Withred King of Kent under Birtuald the high Priest of Britanny Gybmund Bishop of Rochester and all the Ecclesiasticall Orders qui cum viris utique militaribus humanissimè et communi omnium assensu has lâ—ges decrevre Cantuariorumque Iuribus et consuetudinibus prout sequitur addendas edixere The Lawes are 28. in number all concerning Ecclesiasticall matters and are stiled in the Saxon Copy Juditia Withredi made in a Councel at Berghamsted praesentibus omnibus Ordinibus illius gentis cum viris quibusdam militaribus So that this was no other but a Parliament wherein the King Nobles Commons and Souldiers were present as well as the Bishops promulging and conâ—enting to these Lawes About the yeare 712 â—ae King of Westsex assembled a great Councell of all his Bishops PRINCES NOBLES EARLES AND OF ALL THE WISEMEN ALDERMEN AND COMMONS OF THE WHOL REALM wherein he made certain Ecclesiasticall Lawes concerning mariages to suppresse all fornication and uncleanesse Exhortatione doctrina per COMMVNE CONCILIVM ASSENSVM OMNIVM Episcoporum OMNIVM ALDERMANNORVM PRINCIPVM PROâ—ERVM COMITVM OMNIVM SAPIENTVM SENIORVM POPVLORVM TOTIVS REGNI or MVLTAQVE CONGREGATIONE SERVORVM DEI as some others render it About the yeare 714 Naitan King of Picts received a letter from Abbot Celfred concerning the time of celebrating Easter and Priests tonsure which he desired the King to cause to be observed throughout the Nation over which God had made him Kings the King hereupon assembled a Councell of learned men and of his Nobles and reading the said letter before them Rex surgens DEMEDIQ OPTIMATVM SUORUM CONSESSV kneled downe upon his knees giving thanks to God that he had deserved to receive such a gift from the Land of England and professed that he would have this forme of keeping Easter and tonsure to be perpetually observed throughout his Realme which was presently commanded by a royall Edict to be put in publique execution and was accordingly performed Anno 724. There was a Synod held in Northumberland by the Authority and favour of King Osred wherein wilfrid by the Kings favour got the superiority of his enemie About foure yeares after there was another Councell held at Worcester under Archbishop Bertuald by Pope Constantines advise not only of Religious persons Sed etiam regni Procerum But likewise of the Nobles of the Realme The Councell of Clovesho or Cliffe Anno 747. Cui Concilio interfuerunt Ethelbaldus Mâ—rciorum Rex CVMOMNIBVS REGNI SVI PRINCIPIBVS ET DVCIBVS as well as the Bishops and Clergy made sundry Ecclesiasticall Constitutions consented to and approved by the King all the Princes Dukes Nobles of his Kingdom not made or promulged by the Bishops only At this Councell were present 33. Princes and Dukes The Ecclesiasticall Canons in the Councell of Calchyth Anno 787. were made and confirmed by Offa King of Mercians and the secular Princes and Senators of the Land therein assembled as well as by the Ecclesiasticall Persons Convenerunt Omnes Principes regionis â—tam Ecclesiastici quam Seculares c. Tam REX QVAM PRINCIPESSVI CVMSENATORIBVS TERRAE DECRETA SIGNO CRVCIS FIRM AVERVNT Anno 7â—9 Pope Alrians Legates held a Councell at Chalchyth where Jambert Archbishop of Canterbury resigned part of his Archbishoprick to the Bishop of Litchfield and Offa King of Mercians who sate chiefe in it caused his Sonne Egfride to be crowned King it being in truth a Parliament as well as a Synod antiently and yet stiled a COVNCELL Anno 793 King Offa held a Councell at Verolam with Archbishop Humbert and his suffragans ET PRINCIPIBVS SVIS VNIVERSIS and all his Princes where they consulted about and resolved to build an Abbey to Saint Aâ—ban and to endow it with great priviledges and that the King should goe to Rome about it which he did Iuxta sententiam praedicti Concilii Anno 794. at the great Councell of Celichyth there were present 9. Kings 15. Bishops and 20. Dukes wherein the Reliques of Saint Alban were elevated adorned and a Monastery sounded to enshrine his bones And the same yeare King Offa having assembled another Councell of his Bishops and Nobles at Verolam REX VNANIMI OMNIVM CONSENSV et benevola voluntate beate Albano amplas contulit terras et possessiones innumeras Monachorum quoque conventum ad tumbam congregavit c. Cyneulf King of Westsex about the yeare 796. writ a letter to Lullus Bishop of Mentz una cum Episcopis meis neenon CVM CATERVA SATRAPARVM to settle matters of Religion In the Councell of Clovesho under Kenulf King of Mercians An. 800. who summoned to that Synod Episcopos DVCES Abbates CVJVSCVNQVE ORDINISVIROS there were severall Canons made concerning matters of faith and the lands and revenue of the Church At the Synod of Celichyth held on the sixth of August An. 816. under Kenulf King of Mercians there were not onely Bishops Abbots Priests and Deacons present in it but the King himselfe cum suis Principibus Ducibus Optimatibus with his Princes Dukes Nobles who made and published 11. Canons concerning matters of saith and Church affaires Anno 822. there was a Synodall Councell held at Clovesho under king Beornulfe wherein this king sate President Archbishop Wilfred with the rest of the Bishops and Abbots OMNIVMQVE DIGNITATVM OPTIMATIBVS Ecclesiasticarum scil SAECVLARIVM PERSONARVM being present in it debated such things as concerned the profit and necessity of Churches the rule and observance of a Monasticall life and likewise
the stability of the Realme A cleare evidence it was both a Parliament and Synod too Anno 824. There was another Synodall Assembly held at Clovesho under the same king Beornulfe and Wulfred Archbishop of Canterbury assidentibus Episcopis Abbatibus PRINCIPIBVS MERCIORVM VNIVERSIS MVLTI SAPIENTISSIMI VIRI CONGREGATI to determine certaine Controversies and settle the lands of the Church which they did accordingly the Acts of this Councell were subscribed by the king his Dukes Nobles as well as by the Bishops as you may see in the close of it Anno 833. there was a Councell held at London the 26 of May which is intiuled Concilium Pan-Anglicum a Cauncell of all England wherein were present Egbert King of West-Saxons and Withlasius King of Mercians both the Archbishops of England with the Bishops and Nobles In which they conâ—â—ted not onely of Church affaires but also about hindering the incursions of the Danes and confirmed divers Priviledges to the Abby of Crowland by a Charter granted by this King in this Councel subscribed by the King Dukes and other Laymen as well as by Bishops and Abbots Anno 838. I finde Concilium Pan-Anglicum held at Kingston wherein King Egbert and Ethelwolfe his Sonne sate Presidents together with Ceolueth Archbishop and the rest of the Bishops optimatibus Angliae and the chiefe men and Nobles at England wherein certain Charters of Lands given to the Church formerly accorded to by the Nobles were confirmed vnder pain of excommunication and curses to the infringers of them About which time Keneth king of Scots compiled and published certain Ecclesiasticall Lawes intermixed with temporall made in a Parliamentary Councell not an Episcopall Synod Anno 851. there was a Councell held at Kingsbury under Bertulph King of Mercia praesentibus Ceolnotho Dorobernensi Archiepiscopo caeterisque Regni Merciae Episcopis Magnatibus and another Councell at Benningdon under this King about the same year â Praelatis Proceribus Regni sub Bertolpho Rege In both these ample possessions and priviledges were granted to the Abbots and Monks of England Vnanimi consensu totius praesentis Cancilii pro Regni negotiis Congregati the Charters being subscribed by Dukes Lords and temporall Officers present in these Councels as well as by Bishops or Abbots An. 855. There was a generall Councel of all England held at Winchester Concilium Vâ—ntoniae Pan-anglicum 5. Nov Judic 4. celebratum praesentibus Aethelwulfo Rege Westsaxoniae Beorredo Rege Merciae Edmundo Rege East-Anglorum una cum Archiepiscopis Cantuariae Eborum caeterisque totius Angliae Episcopis Magnatibus in which King Aethelwulph by his royall Charter granted the tenth part of his lands and goods to the Church cum coxsilio Episcoporum ac Principum meorum Praesentibus subscribentibus Archiepiscopis Episcopis Angliae Vniversis reâ—non Beorredo Rege Merciae Edmundo Eastanglorum Rege Abbatum Abbatissarum Ducum Comitium Procerumquetotius terrae aliorumque fidelium infintia multitudine qui omnes Regium Chirographum landaverunt Dignitates vero sua nomina subscripserunt These Councels therefore were no other but Parliaments The Ecclesiasticall Lawes of king Alured Anno 887. were made in Parliament and not in a Synod of Bishops Ex Consulto Sapientum Atque in ipsis discernendis ego Alredus Occiden alium Saxonum Rex prudentâ—ssimeram è nostris confilio usus sum atque eis omnibus placuit edici eorum observationem saith the Praeface to his Lawes The Ecclesiasticall Lawes of Alured or Alfred and Guthurne were accorded in a Councell wherein these Kings and their people made a League King Edward the elder upon the letter of Pope Formosus congregavit Synodum SENATORVM PROCERVM POPVLORVM ET NOBILIVM Gent's Anglae in quae prasedebat Plegmundus Archiepiscopus Tum sibi Rex cum suis Plegmundus Archiepiscopus salubre consilium iniverunt and constituted and elected five Bishops in the Province of the Gevisi where there were but two Bishopricks formerly dividing those two Bishopricks into five by a Parliament not Synod The Ecclesiasticall Lawes of King Edward the elder and Guthurne An. 905. were made in Parliaments of the Lords and Commons not Synods of the Clergie as appeares by this Proeme Haec ea sunt SENATVS-CONSVLTA ac instituta quae primo Aluredus Guthurnus Reges deinde Edovardus Guthurnus Reges illis ipsis temporibus tulere cum Pacis foedus Daci Angli ferierunt ac sese mutuo anâ—plexi sunt quae postea a SAPIENTIBVS recitata saepius atque ad communem Regni utilitatem aucta atque amplificata sunt The Ecclesiasticall Lawes of King Aethelstan An. 928. were made in Parliament not in a Convocation as is evident by the temporall lawes mixed with them made at the same time and by chap. 9. Decreta cictaque sunt haec in celebri Gratanleano Concilio cui Wulfhelmus interfuit Archiepiscopus cum eo Optimates Sapientes ab Aethelstano evocati frequentissimi The Ecclesiasticall lawes of Hoel Dha the good King of all Wales about the yeare 940. were made not by the Ecclesiasticall persons onely but by the Laiety too hee summoning sex Laicos viros auctoritate scientia pollentes six Laymen potent in authority and Learning out of every County and then selecting out of them twelve Laicos doctissimos unum Clericum doctissimum qui vocabatur Blanguindus ad instituendas sibi leges usus c. 12. most learned Laymen and but one learned Clerke to compile Ecclesiasticall Lawes for him and his people The Ecclesiasticall Lawes of King Edmund Anno 944. were made in a Parliament at London as appeares by the temporall lawes joyned with them and by the Proocme Edmundus Rex ipso solenni Paschatis festo frequentem Londini tam Ecclesiasticorum quam LAICORVM caetum celebravit c. A sci entissimis Regni mei in celebri tam Ecclesiasticorum quam LAICORVM frequentia studiose requisivisse quo tandem pacto Christiana proveheretur fides Atque NOBIS OMNIBVS commodissimum visum est Edmundus Rex congregavit magnam Synodum Dei ordinis SECVLI apud London c. Ego Edmundus Rex mando praecipio omni populo seniorum ac juvenum qui in regione mea sunt ea quae investigans investigovi cum sapientibus Clericis LAICIS Anno 948. There was a Councell as well of Lords and great men as Bishops and Abbots held in London In festo Nativitatis beatae Mariae cum universi Magnates Regni per regium edictum summoniti tam Archiepiscopi Episcopi ac Abbate quam caeteri totius Regni Proceres Optimates Londoniis convenissent ad tractandum de negotiis publicis totius regni consummatis Omnibus the K. in this Parlia granted a large Charter of lands priviledges to the Abbey of Croyland this Councell therefore was certainly no other but a Parliament An. 952.
Edâ—arus Rex tandem potior emvocate ad Brandenfordiam Regni Concilio Patris Edwini acta decreta rescindit Ablatas Ecclesiis Monasteriis opes restituit c. This no doubt was a Parliament King Eâ—gars Ecclesiasticall Lawes An. 967. have this Prologue which proves them made in full Parliament Leges quas Edgarus Rex FREQVENTI SENATV ad Dei gloriam regiae Majestatis ornamentum ac Reipublicae utilitatem sanciunt Hoc est institutum quod Edgarus Rex Consilio Sapientum suorum instituit c. Anno. 973. I finde a Councell held at London under King Edgar for the regulating of the Abbots and Monkes of Glastonbury and setling of their priviledges wherein King Edgar granted a Charter to this Abbey CONCILIO OMNIVM PRIMATVM MEORVM subscribed by himselfe and Alfgina his Mother Edward Clito his successor Kmedius King of Scotland Mascusus his Admirall Dunstan Archbishop of Canterbury Oswald Archbishop of Yorke caeterisque Episcopis OMNIBVS Regni PRIMATIBVS with others of his officers In the Councell of Winchester An. 975. assembled to determine the great controversie whether married Clerkes ought to bee preferred before monkes King Edgar and his Queen Elferus Prince of Mercians Ethelwin Duke of the East-Angles Elfwold his kinsman Archbishop Dunstan cum cae teris Episcopis Abbatibus c. Brithnotho Comite cum NOBJLITATE TOTIUS REGNS were present to decide this difference In the Councell of Calne Anno 977. called for the same purpose there were present praeter Episcopes caeterum clerum TOTIVS Angliae Majores Natu Omnes aderant Aaglorum Optimates Rege tamen propter teneram aetatem absente There were at it Praesules PROCERES EQVITES NOBILES PARITER IGNOBILES Omnium ordinum conspicui clarique viri write our Historians Anno 1005. King Aethelred granted Lands and priviledges to the Monkes of Christ-Church in Canterbury by his Charter confirmed and subscribed in a Parliamentall Councell as well by his Nobles as Prelates and Abbots as you may read in the subscriptions themselves Anno 1009. There was a generall Councell at Eanham Concilium Aenhamense generale seu Pan-anglieum Optimatibus celebratum In this Councell there were thirty two Canons made which begin thus Haec sunt Constitutiones quaetulerunt Angli eruditi eligerunt etiam edixerunt instanterque docuerunt observandas This writes Spelman was doubtlesse a Parliament Regium fuisse certum est Aenhamense Concilium tum quod edicto Regis cogebatur de rebus statuit ad ecclesiasticos non pertinentibus tum quod in festo habebatur Pentecostes in quibus celebritatibus convocare Reges ex antiqun consuentudine soliti orant Proceres suos utriusque ordinis ad festum Regium adornandum consilia Regni ineunda yet its decrees are stiled SYNODALIA The Ecclesiasticall lawes of king Aethelred Anno 1012. have this Inscription Haec instituerunt Rex Aethelredus SAPIENTES ejus apud Habam They were made in full Parliament not in a Convocation of the Clergy and intermixed with secular Lawes The Councell of Winton under Canutus Anno 1021. begins thus Haec sunt statuta Canuti Regis Anglorum c. Venerando sapientum ejus Concilio ad laudem gloriam Dei sui regalitatem commune commodum Rex Canutus anno regni sui 5. cunctos regni sui Praelatos Proceresque ac Magnas ces ad suum convocans Parliamentum in suo publico Parliamento persistentibitpersonaliter in eodem Wolstano Adelnodo A chiepiscopis Ailwine Episcope Elmhamense alijs Episcopis ipsorum Suff aganeis septem Ducibus cum totidem Comitibus nec non diversorum Monasteriorum nounullis Abbatibus cum quamplurimis gregarijs Militibus ac cum populi multitudine copiosae ac omnibus tunc in eodem Parliamento personaliter existentibus votis Regijs unanimiter consentientibus praeceptum decretum fuit Quod monasterium sancti Edmundi c. sit ab omni jurisdictione Episcoporum Comitatus illius ex tunc in perpetuum funditus liberum exemptum c. This Councell was clearely a PARLIAMENT and so expresly stiled The Ecclesiasticall Laws of K. Knute An. 1032. were made in Parliament not in Convocation as appeares by this proaeme Consultum quod Canutus Aaglorum Dacorum Norvegiensium Rex ex SAPIENTUM CONCILIO ad Dei immortalis Gloriam Regiae Majestatis ornamentum Reip utilitatem Natalatijs Domini Nostri Jesu Christi diebus Vintoniae sancivit the Laws are in number 26. and intermixt with his secular Lawes made at the same time Haec illa humana atque politica sunt Jura quae Sapientum adhibito consilio per omnem Aagliam observari praecipio So as this Councell clearely was a Parliament not a Synod or Convocation Anno 1066. There was a most famous Councell or Assembly held at Westminster under King Edward the Confessor in the last yeare of his Reigne on the Feast of Christs Nativity Praesentibus Rege Confessore Edgitha Regina Stigando Archiepiscopo Cantuariae Eldredo Archiepisc Eboraci caterisque Angliae Episcopis Abbatibus Capellanis Regis COMITIBUS MINISTRIS seu Thanis Regijs MILITIBUS about the endowment priviledges and Sanctuary of Westminster Abby then newly re-edified and consecrated In which Councell the King granted severall Charters of priviledges to this Abbey which were consented unto ratified and subscribed as well by the Dukes Nobles Officers Knights and other Lay-men as by the King Queen Bishops Abbots and Clergy By all these ancient Presidents before the Conquest to which others might be added it is most apparent That all our prisline Synods and Councells were nought else but Parliaments that our Kings Nobles Senators Aldermen Wisemen Knights and Commons were usually present and voting in them as members and Judges and that all our Ecclesiasticall Laws Canons and Constitutions that were obligatory or binding as well concerning matters of faith Church-Government discipline as manners were ever made enacted ratified in and by our Parliaments only and not by the Bishops or Clergy alone or by the King and Clergy in meere Ecclesiasticall Synods without the Nobles Senators and Commons consents or Votes Neither finde I any example or Author from King Lucius his Reigne to the Conquest that either denyed the legislative or coercive power of such Councells and Parliaments either in matters of doctrine Discipline Church Government or manners but all readily and unanimously subscribed to it enough to silence all novell opposits whatsoever King William the Conqueror as he was resolved in a Full Councell and Parliament to bee Christs Vicar and chiefe Governour of the Church within this Realme in these words Rex quia Vicarius summi regis est ad hoc constituitur ut regnum Populum Domini super omina SANCTAM ECCLESI MREGAT ET DEFENDAT c. taken out of King Edward the Confessors Lawes which he established and ratified so he reformed the Ecclesiasticall Lawes and
Canons of the Church in and by a Common Councell and Parliament as well of the Nobles and Commons as of the Prelates and Clergy as is evident by this passage in the Manuscript Tables of Robert Winchelsy Arch-Bishop of Canterbury WILLIELMUS Rex Angliae DE COMMUNI CONCILIO Archiepiscoporum Abbatum OMNIUM PROCERUM REGNI SUI Leges Episcopales quae non berè nec secundum Sanctorum Canonum praeceptae fuerunt sicut nec sunt his diebus OBSERV AND AS IN CONCUSSE JUDICAVERIT c. And by this his rescript to Remigius Bishop of Lincolne WILLIELMUS Gratia Dei c. Sciatis vos omnes caeteri mei fideles qui in Angliamanent quod Episcopales leges quae non berè nec secundum Sanctorum Canonum praecepta usque ad mea tempora in regno Anglorum fuerunt COMMUNI CONCILIO et consilio Archiepiscoporum meorum caeterorum Episcoporum Abbatum OMNIUM PRINCIPUM REGNI MEIEMEND AND AS JUDICAVI Proptereamando Regia authoritate praecipio ut nullus Episcopus vel Archidiaconus de legibus Episcopalibus amplius in HUNDRET placita toneant c. In the Councell of Rhoan Anno 1073. William the Conqueror sate chiefe President And decreed many things as well touching Ecclesiasticall Affaires as the benefit of his new Kingdom of England Among other things it was there decreed Judicatum est praesidente Rege Anglorum Gulielmo writes Matthew Westminster the King himselfe being president that Monkes who by force assaulted their Abbotts as the Monkes of Andoem had assaulted and slaine their Abbot at that time whiles hee was saying Masse in any Abbies should there be thrust into prison for it which before it seemes they could not be This Councell was no other then a Parliament diverse temporall Lawes as well as Ecclesiasticall being enacted therein and both ratified approved by this King who as Eadmerus stories of him would not so much as suffer the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury Primate of all his Realme when hee sate President in a generall Councell of Bishops assembled together to decree or prohibite any thing but such things as were suitable to his will and had first been ordained by himselfe In the Councell of London under Lanfranks An. 1075. Concessum est Regia MUNIFICENTIA Synodali authoritate Episcopis de villis transire ad Civitates By the Kings Royall munificence and the authority of the Synod liberty was granted to Bishops to remove from the Villages wherein they resided unto Cities whereupon Herman Bishop of Schiroburne removed to Salisbury Stigand from Selescia removed to Chichester Peter from Litehfield removed to Chester the King ratifying the constitution of the Synod and ordering this removeall An. 1093. King William Rufus assembled a Councell of his Bishops Abbots and Nobility of the whole Kingdome that they might By their common assent determiue and discusse whether Anselme Archbishop of Canterbury could Keepe his faith to the King or not saving that faith reverence and obedience which he owed to the Apostolike See of Rome which he would by no means violate A weighty question surely of a loyall Prelate The Bishops Abbots and Nobility of the whole Kingdome almost Ex Regia Sanctione assembled at Rochingham Castle on the fifth day of March at one a Clocke in the afternoone to debate this businesse but the King commanded all things to be adjourned till the morrow Quia Dies Dominica erat because it was the Lords Day an unmeet time to discusse such a businesse as this was On the morrow in medio Procorum conglobatae multitudinis eos assistentem Monachorum Clericorum LAICORUM numerosam multitudinem sic loquitur c. Lo here the Nobles Commons as well as the Bishops Abbots and Clergie assembled in a Councell to wit a Parliament to determine a case of conscience and that at Anselms request This matter being long debated and Anselme continuing refractory the busines was defetâ—ed till after Whitsuntide In the Councell of London under Lanfranke summoned by King William Rufus Anno 1095. Vlstan Bishop of Worcester was deprived of his Bishopricke by the Kings sentence and verdict quasi homo idiota c. Ipso rege consentiente hoc dictante decernitur deponendus saith Matthew Paris the King sitting chiefe president in it In the Councell of London Anno 1102. under Anselme the King and his Nobles were present as well as the Bishops and Ahbots that whatsoever was therein decreed might be approved ratified and observed by the unanimous care and solicitud of both orders For soit was necessary A plain testimony that the Councells of England in antient times were no other but Parliaments and that their Canons ound not any unlesse confirmed by King and Parliament At this Councell write Wil. Malmesbury Eadmerus Anselme the Archbishop requesting it of the King Primates Regni the great men of the Kingdom were present quatenus quicquid ejusdem Concilii authoritate decerneretur VTRJVSQVE ORDINIS CONCORDI CVRA ET SOLJCITVDINE RATVM SERVARETVR SJC ENIM NECSSE ERAT quum multis retre annis Synodali cultura cessante viciorum vepribus succrescentibus Christiana religionis fervor in Anglia nimis reripeat which they thus preface out of Anselmes owne Copy and relation Anno 1102. quarto autem Praesulatus Paschalis Summi Pontificis tertio Regni Henrici gloriosi regis Anglorum ipso annuente celebratum est Concilium in ecclesia beati Petri in â—ccidentali parte juxta Londoniam sita communi consensu Episcoporum et Abbatum et Principum totius regni In this Councell held at Westminster therewere 26. Canons compiled some against Priests mariage and Wives which when Giraldns Archbishop of Yorks enjoyned his Clergie to observe all the Clergie of his Province refused to submit to them being unwilling to part with their Wives or to vow Chastity as some of those Canons enjoyned them to the execution whereof the great discord betweene the King and Anselme concerning the investitures of Bishops being an obstacle produced to this effect Necanones hujus Synodi legum vim ac potestatem sortirentur That those Canons should not obtaine the force and power of Lawes Anno. 1107. another Councell was held under Anselme in King Henry the first his owne Palace in which Councell The King assented and enacted that from thenceforth no man should be invested into any Bishoprick or Abbie of England by the King or any Layman by giving him a pastorall staffe or a Ring Proceres Regni the Peeres of the Realme writes Eadmerus were called to this Councell and the King assented to and ratified this Act Astante multitudine ac per Consilium Anselmi et Procerum Regni the Commons standing by him by the Councell of Aâ—selme and of the great men of the Realme This Councell then was a Parliament and this Canon assented to both by the Commons Peeres and King â—o make it valid Not long after this King
HERETIQVES limiting the maner of proceeding against them defining what shal be heresie how it shall be punished and abridging the Authority of the Bishops and Canon Law ch 16. concernes Pluralities ch 19. containes the submission of the Clergy Convocation to the King declares the Kings supremacy in causes Ecclesiasticall the impotency of the Clergy or Convocation to make or promulge any Canons or Ecclesiasticall constitutiâ—ns or to debate any thing in Convocation without his Royall Lycence and approbation The Nullity and invalidity of the Canon Law abolisheth all appeales to Rome and Authorizeth 32. persons whereof halfe to be of the Clergy the other halfe of THE LAITY to survay the Canon Law and to compile a body of the Canon Law to be authorized by the King under his Great Seale by vertue of this Act for to be the only Canon Law to be used within this Realme Chap. 20. takes away the payment of any Annates oâ— first fruits to the Bishop of Rome nullifies his usurped power and Buls settles the forme of electing and consecrating Archbishops and Bishops within this Realme and plentifully manifests the Kings and Parliaments Jurisdictions in Ecclesiasticall affaires chap. 21. doth the like exonerating the Kings Subjects from all exactions and Impositions heretofore payed to the Sea of Rome and enabling the Archbishop of Canterbury and his Officers to grant all Licences and dispensations within the Realme which were formerly granted at Rome only The Statute is worthy perusall consideration fully demonstrating the power of the Parliament in Church affaires 26. H. 8. c. 1. declares the Kings Highnesse to be supreme head of the Church of England under Christ making it a part of his Royall Title and to have Ecclesiasticall authority to redresse and reforme all Errors Heresies and abuses in the Church punishable by any spirituall or ecclesiasticall Law Chap. 3. enacts The payment of the first fruits of all Dignities Benefices promotions spirituall and tenthes to the King and his Heires abolishing the Popes usurpations and authority herein ch 13. abolisheth sanctuarie in cases of High Treason ch 14. Authorizeth the nomination and consecration of suffragan Bishops in sundry places of this Realme and both creates and limits their authority chap. 15. takes away some exactions of spirituall men within the Archdeaconry of Richmond 27. H. 8. c. 8. limits that the Kings spirituall Subjects shall pay no Tithes whiles they are in their first fruits ch 15. authorizeth the King to nominate 32. persons halfe of the Clergy the other of the Laity for the perusall and making of Ecclesiasticall Lawes and manifests the Convocations invalidity to make such lawes or Canons ch 19. Limiteth and abolisheth Sanctuaries and sanctuary persons ch 20. containes an Order touching the paying of Tithes throughout the Realme ch 21. Limits the maner of payment of Tythes within the City of London ch 27. suppresseth divers Monasteries Priories and Religious Houses vesteth their revenues in the King and erects the Court of Augmentations 28. H. 8. ch 10. extinguisheth thes authority of the Bishop of Rome prescribes an Oath of abjuration of it and Popery together with the Popes usurpations and excellently sets forth the Kings supreamacy the Parliaments authority in matters ecclesiasticall as you may read in the Act worthy perusall ch 11. enacts Restitution of the first fruits in time of vacation to the next incumbent ch 13. compells spirituall persons to residence upon their livings ch 16. Releaseth such as have obtained pretended Licences and dispensations from the Sea of Rome 31. H 8. c. 6. enables such as were Religious persons to purchase lands to sue and be sued in al maner of Actions which they were disabled formerly to do by the Common Canon Law ch 9. Enables the King to make Bishops by his Letters Patents only and to erect new Bishopricks which he did ch 13. disolves all Monasteries and religious Houses and vests them in the King wherein you may behold much of the Kings and Parliaments power in Church businesses ch 14. For abolishing of diversity of opinions in matters of Religion most fully and exactly demonstrates the Kings and Parliaments jurisdictions in matters of Religion as the whole Act sufficiently manifests though the Articles therein defined were erronious and the Act too cruell and bloudy 32. H. 8. cap. 8. provides for the true payment of Tythes and offerings chap. 10. containes the punishment of incontinent Priests and of women offending with them ch 12. concernes Sanctuaries and the priviledges of Churches and Church-Yards ch 15. prescribes the manner of proceeding against Heretickes and impugners of the Act for abolishing of enormious opinions in Christian Religion chap. 23 24. concernes Accounts of Bishops and subsidies granted by the Clergie chap. 25. Dispences the Kings marriage with the Lady Iane chap. 24. Dissolves the Hospitalls of Saint Johns of Ierusalem in England and Ireland for supporting and maintaining the supremacy and jurisdiction of the Bishop of Rome contrary to their duty and Allegiance chap. 26. Intitled An act concerning true opinions and Declaration of Christs Religion is most pregnant to our present purpose which you may peruse chap. 38. Concerning precontracts of marriages and degrees of consanguinity is likewise a most punctuall Act for the Kings and Parliaments Ecclesiasticall power and chap 44. 45 47. good evidences of it 33. H. 8. chap. 15. 27 28 29 30 31 32. Enabling Religious persons to sue and bee sued severing the Bishopricks of CHESTER and Isle of MAN from the jurisdiction of CANTERBURY to the See of Yorke making the Church of Whitgate a Popish Church by it selfe and severing it from the Parish of Over which I wish our Independents to observe and to learne from this and other Acts that no new Churches or Parishes can be erected legally but by act of Parliament which none of their Churches are 34. and 35. H. 8. c. 1. intituled An act for The advancement of true Religion and For the abolishing of the contrary is most pertinent to our purpose and c. 15. 17 19 35. H. 8. c. 9. for ratification of the Kings stile and Title of Defender of the Faith and supreame head of the Church of England and Ireland ch 6. Concerning the qualification of the Statute of the 6. Articles c. 16. concerning the examination of the Canon Lawes by 32. persons halfe of the Clergie and halfe of the temporalty to be named by the Kings Majesty during his life to compile a body of the Canon Law to bee used in the Realme 37. H. 8. c. 4. 12. but especially ch 17. That Doctors of civill Law may execute Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction though Laymen and married a Law worthy reading and chap. 21. For the union of Churches not exceeding the value of 5l which could not be done but by Act of Parliament are all most pregnant evidences of the Kings and Parliaments indubitable Ecclesiasticall jurisdictions in matters of Discipline Religion Church-government and all Church affaires whatsoever The Statutes made in King
the Assembly not by any particular man or men in a private way when either House shall require it All things agreed 〈◊〉 and prepared for the Parliament to be openly read and allowed in the Assembly if the major part assent Provided that the opinion of any persons dissenting and the reasons urged for it be annexed thereunto if the Dissenters require it Together with Solutions if any were given in the Assembly to these Reasons Jo Browne Cler. Parliamentorum Having thus sufficiently evidenced the authority and jurisdiction of Parliaments in matters of Religion and Church affaires by these numerous punctuall irrefragable Presidents in all Ages give me leave to add these two considerations to them to demonstrate this their undoubted right and priviledge beyond all contradiction and silence every adverse tongue Pen of all Papists Anabaptists Brownists Separatists or Independents whatsoever First that all our ancient and moderne Writs for summoning a Parliament have ever had this speciall clause in them Pro quibusdam ardnis ungentibus negotiis Nos statum defensionem Regni Angliae ECCLESIAE ANGLICANAE concernentibus quâ—ddam Parliamentum c. teneri ordinavaimus From whence it is most apparent That the state and defence of the Church of England and well ordering of the same is one Principall end of summoning Parliaments and one maine part of the subject matters of our Parliaments as Sir Edward Cooke resolves 2ly That all every of the preâ—ended opposites to Parliaments Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction hand formely and none especially in the present Parliament addressed severall Petitions to this High and Honorable Court for Reformation of the Church suppression of haeresies Errors Idolatry Popery Superstition Schismes Prelaâ—y and establishing Gods true worship Religion Ordinances Discipline as to the most proper Iudicature Tribunall Lawgiver in our Church which they could resort unto and not to the Convocation or any other Assembly of Clergy-men alone or Independent Congregation To give you some few remarkable instances besides those formerly remembred instead of infinite others which I pretermit for brevity Our famous English Apostle Iohn Wickelesse as he professedly maintained in K. Richard the second his Raigne That any Clergy-man yea the Pope himselfe might lawfully be reprehended accused and corrected by Lay-men That the temporall Lords and Princes might lawfully and meritoriously take the possessions and Revenues from the Church and from Ecclesiasticall persons offending habitually c. to the end they might reforme them And that they were obliged to reforme the Church and Prelates under paine of being traitours to Iesus Christ So likewise in the fifth year of this King he Writ and sent to the Lords and great men assembled at London IN PARLIAMENT seven Propositions tending to the abolishing of the Popes usurped power and exactions to selfe the temporalities of Deliâ—â—â—ent Bishops to remove Bishops and Clergy-men from all secular imployments 〈◊〉 reforme the abuses of Excommunications and imprisonments upon them to 〈◊〉 Transubstantiation and reforme the Churches both to 〈…〉 the particulars whereof you may read at large in 〈◊〉 And 〈◊〉 long after his learned Disciple William 〈◊〉 a Martyâ— being unjustly condemned by the Bishop of Hereford for maintaining Wickliffes opinions appealed to the King and Parliament against it and withall writ a pious Letter to the Parliament recorded by Master Fox which concludes thus Deare worshipfull Sirs in this world Theseech you for Christs love as ye yet 〈◊〉 loven Gods Law and Truth that in these dayes is greatly borne abacke that they wollen vouchsafe these things that I send you written to Gods worship to let them be shewed IN THE PARLIAMENT as your wits can best conceive to most worship to our God and to shewing of the truth AND AMENDING OF HOLY CHVRCH My concâ—usions and mineâ— appeale and other true matters of Gods Law if any can finde in them error falsenesse or default privet by the Law of Christ clearly to christian mens knowledge I shall revoke my wrong conceit by Gods law be amended more ready to hold with Gods law openly and privily with Gods grace and nothing to hold teach or maintain that is contrary to his Law By which he made that very Parliament Iudges of his Doctrine had reformers of the Church though for the most part Papists in those dayes On the contrary side the very Papists Prelates Clergy and Convocation in those times did likewise Petition the King and Parliament for suppression of haereticall opinions Preachers Bookes Schooles Conventiâ—les and the punishment and restraint of hereticks sectaries haereticall preachers and Schoolmasters as they deemed them and upon their prayer and importunity the Statutes of 5. R. 2 〈…〉 5. â—2 H. 4. c. 15. â— H. 5. c. 7. to which the Commons never consented were made and 〈◊〉 to that purpose as is evident by the very words of the Acts themselves Master Fox his Acts and Monuments vol. 1. Edi◠〈◊〉 p. 773. And it is as evident that the Popish Commons Petition was the cause of the Statute of 25 H. 8. c. 14. For the punishment of heresie and the Popish Clergyes importunity to King Henry the eight his motion to the Parliament the occasion of the bloudy Statue of 31 H. 8. c. 14. 34. H. c. 8. 1. as the words of the Acts and Master Fox demonstrate both King and Clergy Nobles and Commons even in these times of Popery deeming our parliaments the meetest Iudges and only lawgivers for ordering Church affaires and matters of Religion About the 37. yeare of King Henry the 〈◊〉 Roderick Morse once a Grey 〈◊〉 published a book in print 〈◊〉 A complaint to the Parliament house of England directed to the Parliament wherein he demonstrates many abuses and corruptions of the Church and Clergy of England in those dayes both in matter of Doctrine Worship Discipline manners which he earnestly presseth petitioneth the Parliament effectually to reforme by wholsome Lawes and Edicts as a thing most properly belonging to their place and Iurisdiction as the whole booke manifests which had been very absurd had the Parliament been no meer Iudge of Religion and Church affaires and no 〈◊〉 Reformers of these abuses by Lawes and punishments as some now repute them In King Edward the sixt Queene Maries and Queene Elizabeths severall Raignes the Clergie and 〈◊〉 made their Petitions and addresses to the Parliament for setling reforming establishing all matters of Religion Church-government and discipline as the forementioned Statutes with multitudes of Petitions and bookes printed and dedicated to the Parliaments in their severall Raigns demonstrate especially 1. and 2. Phili. and Mary c. 6. 8. 1 Eliz. c. 1. 2. 4. 8. Eliz. c. 1. Two admonitions to the Parliament Anno. 1572. Iohn Penry his supplication to the Parliament and others The Petitions to all the severall Parliaments in King Iames his Raigne and our present Soveraignes but more especially to this present Parliament from all sorts of people in every County of the Realme
Common State before all controversies of Religion and causes Ecclesiasticall had beene concluded King Canute in his Parliament holden at Winchester upon Christmas day after sundry Lawes and Orders made touching the faith the keeping of holy Dayes publike prayers learning of the Lords Prayer receiving of the Communion thrice in the yeare the manner and forme of Baptisme fasting and other like matters of Religion in the end thereof saith thus Iam sequitur institutum Legum secularium Now followeth an Order for temporall Lawes Thirdly we see that the Godly Catholique Princes in old times thought is their duty before all other offices of the Common weale first to determine matters of Religion and that even BY THE PARLIAMENTS OF THIS REALME In a Parliament holden by King William the Conquerer it is written thus The King for as much as he is the Vicar of the highest King is therefore appointed for this purpose that he should Rule and defend the Kingdome and People of the Lord and above all things the holy Church c. Hereby it appeareth that Kings and Princes are specially and of purpose appointed by God not only to defend but also to Governe and Rule the holy Churh How be it if any imperfection shall appeare in the former Parliaments we give God thankes for the same that is and trust that for his owne names sake he will confirme what he hath begun The hearts of Princes and determinations of Parliaments are in his hands If any thing want the arme of the Lord is not Shorted he is able to supply the same So our incomperable Iewell enough to satisfie and silence all our Opposites Thomas Bilson Warden and afterwards Bish of Winchester bringing in the Prelates and Iesuiâ—s objecting against our reformed Protestant Religion that it was brought in and ratified not by a Councell and Synod of the Clergy but by the Prince Queene Elizabeth and the Parliament who say they had no power to determine or deliberate of those matters returnes this answer May not the Prince command for truth within hee Realme except your consents be first required and hadâ— May not her Highnes serve Christ in making laws for Christ without your likeing Claime you this interest and prerogative that without you nothing shall be done in matters of Religion by the Laws of God or by the liberties of this Realme By the Lawes of the land you have no such priviledges Parliaments have beene kept by the King and his Barons the. Clergy wholy excluded and their Acts and statutes good And when the Bishops were present their votes from the Conquest to this day were never negative By Gods Law you have nothing to do with making Lawes of Kingdoms or Common wealthes You may teach you may not command persuasion is your part compulsion is the Princes If Princes imbrace the truth you must obey them If they pursue truth you must abide them By what authority then claim you this Dominion over Princes that their laws for Religion shall be voyde unles you consent seeing they are the maintainers establishers and upholders of the faith with publique power and positive Lawes which they and their Parliaments may make without a precedent councel of Clergy men to guid them as he there proves at large by sundry presidents If any Concurre not with me in this undoubted Ecclesiasticall Iurisdiction of Christian Princes and Parliaments after all these pregnant testimonies I must tell them in plaine english they directly violate their late vow and Covenant and symbolâ—e herein with Jesuites and Popish Prelates whose doctrines they have abjured by their Nationall Covenant and therefore cannot may not ever hereafter embâ—ace without the highest Perjury and plaine Apostacy unto Popery I shall finish this Section of the Authority and power of Parliaments in matters of Religion Church-government Discipline and enacting Lawes in all and every of these particulars with some forraigne presidents in the Parliaments Diers Assemblyes of Estats in other Realme republikes Should I now relate unto you the many ecclesiasticall Laws of all sorts made in them I might swell this Treatise into many folio volumes I shal therefore only give you a brief touch catalogue of some few which the Studious may peruse make use of at their leisure For FRANCE you may survey the Decrees of King Childebert debated and agreed by him and his people in a Parliament de quibuscunque conditionibus una cum Optimatibus nostris c. 2. 4. c. 15. For sanctifying the Lords Day prohibiting the dressing of any but necessary food on it all Bodily labour under pecuniary mulcts The ecclesiasticall laws of Charles the great Ludovicus pius Charles the Bald collected into one volum by Abbot Ansegisus Benedictus Levita Lindebrogus others printed with some pettinent additions Parisijs 1640. stiled Capitula Regum Episcoporum Maximeque OMNIVM NOBILIVM FRANCORVM were made GENERALI CONSENSV PIDPLIVM SKORVM ET GENERALI CONSVLTV ET COMMVNI CONCILIO by generall consent of the King Bishops and especially of the Nobles and states of France in Common Councells Parliaments and Assemblies of the estates Who had so great a power in making rejecting Canons ecclesiasticall Lawes that when in the yeare 846. the Bishops of France and their suffragans had in their Synods compiled certaine Canons by the command of Charles the Bald and tendered them to him as he had commanded in Sparnaâ— a Village of the Church of Rhaemes to peruse and approve the King Dissidentibus regni sui PRIMORIBVS ab eorundem episcoporum admonitionâ— by reason that the Nobles and other men of his Realme differed from the Bishops in opinion in most of those Canons the King and Nobles out of all their Canons or Chapters haec tantum observanda complacenda sibi colligerunt Episcopis scripto tradiderunt dicentes NON AMPLIVS DE FORVM CAPJTVLIS ACCEPTASSE QVAM ISTA ET ISTASE VELLECVM PRINCIPE OBSERVARE which were Stiled Captule Regis CAROLI not the Bishops Canons By which it is evident that no ecclesiasticall lawes or Canons could be made in France to bind either Clergy or Laity but such at the King Nobles Parliament and three estates approved and confirmed I shall add to this that Anno 1307. King Philip the 4. of France assembled a Parliament at Paris wherein the Laity of France exhibited 65. Articles against the Clergy to regulate their jurisdiction and abuses which were there largely handled and debated as you may read at leisure in Masters Fox who records the passages very fully in the French Histories What the Parliament Estates in France have done enacted in matters of Religion Church-Government and discipline of ancient and latter times you may read at large in Liurentius Bochellus his Decreta Ecclesiae Gallicaiae in Carolus Molinaeus Contra parvas Datas c. in William Ranchin his Survay of the Councel of Trent but above all in Antonie Fontanon
his Les Edicts et Ordonnances dos Royes de France A Paris 1585. Tom. 4. throughout wherein you may see an whole Folio volume of Ecclesiasticall Lawes and Edicts made by the Kings and Parliaments of France to which for brevity I shall remit the Reader For Spain the forecited Councels of Toledo which were but Parliament and assemblies of the Estates The lawes of the Wisigothis especially lib. 1â— De removendis OMNIVM HAERETICORVM SECTIS exterms DE OMNIVM HAERETICORVM ATQVE IVDAEORVM ERRORIBVS AMPVTANDIS which you may read at large in the third some of Hispâ—â— Illustrata p. 992. to 1014. and in Fredericus Lindebrogus his Codex Legum Antiquarum France-furtii 1613. p. 210 to 238. together with the Generall history of Spain Joannes de Laet. Hispaniae Descriptio Hieronimus Blanca Rerum Arragenensium Commentarius will furnish us with sufficient Presidents of their Parliaments Iurisdiction in matters of Religion and making Ecclesiasticall Lawes in all Church matters For Bohemia Georgius Bartholdus Pontanus his Bohaemia pia l. 7. De Rebus Gestis sub Ludovico Rege lib. 1. c. 8 9 10 12 24 25 21 29 30 31. lib. 2. c. 3 to 24. l. 3. c. 2 6. l. 4. c 1 711 18 33 34. Pauli Geschinii Majestas Carolina sine Constitutiones Caroli 4 Romani Imperatoris quibus illo Regniâ—â— Bohemiae firmandum ornandumque censuit Handviae 1607 Rubr. 1. De fide Catholica Rub. 2 4 5. De hareticis c. Aeneas Sylvius his Historia 〈◊〉 Pauli Stranhii Respub Bohemiae Master Fox his Acts and Monuments 〈…〉 Grimstons Imperiall History will furnish us with sundry Presidents where their Kings and Parliaments have determined and settled matters of Religion and Church-government in that Kingdome not Synods of their Clergy For Denmarke Hungary Poland and Sueden the Lawes and Historians of these Kingdomes abundantly testifie that their Parliaments and generall Assemblies of State have alwayee settled matters of religion and Church-government See Guagninus Chromerus Saxogrammaticus Pontanus Chyâ—â—â— Rer um Ungarirarum Scriptores For Italy I find that Theodoricus King of Italy among his temporall Laws intiteled Edictum Theodorici Regis hath many Ecclesiasticall constitutions intermixed as cap. 26. 70. 71 168 125 143. and 174. De die Dominico prohibiting arrests or citations thereon The like I finde among the Lawes of the b Burgundians made by Gundebald their K. by the advise and consent of his Nobles Coram positis Optimatibus nostris universa pensavimus iam nostra quam eorum sententia mansuris in aeuum legibus sumpsimus statuta praescribi cap. 28. 44 45. 51. â— Additamenti primi cap. 18. Additamentum 2. cap. 12. Among the Lawes of the Almains made in the time of King Chlotair una cum Principibus suis id sunt 33. Episcopis 33. Ducibus 72. Concitibus vel cetero populo constiâ—â—ta est writes my Author I finde sundry Ecclesiasticall Lawes intermixed with temporall as cap. 1. 24. and cap. 38. De eo qui die DOMINICO opera servilia fecerit Which first enacts Die dominico nemo opera servilia prasumat facere quia hoc Lex prohibet sacra Scriptura in omnibus contradicit And then prescribes bast inadoing to a servant that shall worke on the Lords day and to a freeman after three admonitions the forfeiture of the third part of his inheritance and for the 4th offence perpetuall villainage Quia noluit Deo vacare in sempiernum servus permanâ—â—â— In the Lawes of the Bavarians first compiled by King Theodoricus by the advise of Wisemen skilfull in the Lawes afterwards proceeded in by King Childebert and Clothaire and renued by King Dagobert by advise of his Parliament as this Preface to them attests Hoc DECRETUM est apud Regem Principes ejus â— apud CUNCTUM POPULUM CHRITIANUM qui intra Regnuâ—◠〈◊〉 consistunt I finde the first Title to bee DE ECCLESIASTIC IS REBVS De libris legum justitutionum qua ad CLERVM pertinent Concerning whom there were many very good Lawes enacted I meet with sundry Lawes made by Tassilo Duke of Bavaria Anno Do. 772. Et per PRIMATES Imperij unmerso CONSENTENTE MVLTITVDINE c. Est ab universis uno ore confirmatum c. Many of which Lawes are meerely Ecclesiasticall As the first for the honour and sanctifying of the LORDS DAY Sicut in Lege Scriptum est in decretis Canonum and cap. 2 3 4 6. De Popularibus legibus cap. 10. 11 12 20. So also in the Aditions of Charles the Emperour to the Bavarian Lawes Addit 1. c. 1. 8. and Addit 2. cap. 7. 8 10. Among the Lawes of the Saxons cap 2. sect 8 9. There are some Lawes relating to the Church In the Prisons Laws chap. 18. There is this Law concerning the LORDS DAY Qui opus servile die Dominico fecerit ultra Laubachi sol 12. in caeteris locis Prisiae 4. Sol. culpabilis indictum Siseruus hoc fecerit vapuletur aut Dominus ejus 4. Solidos pro illo componet Additio Sapientum to these Laws Tit. 1. and 12. Concerne the Church Among the Lawes of the Lombards l. 1. tit 2. chap. 2. lib. 2. tit 8 38 39. lib. 3. tit 1. De Episcopis Clericis tit 3. De decimis tit 10. De Rectâ—â—ibus Ecclesiarum tit 11. De Pontificibus tit 26. De excommunicatione and tit 30. 32 40 are wholly Ecclestasticall In the Lawes and Constitutions of those of Napleâ— and Sicily made in the yeare 1221. lib. r. tit 1. 2. Dâ— Haereticis 〈◊〉 eorum Receptoribus Fauctoribus c. tit 3. De Apostatis tit 5. De Crimine sacrilegij tit 7. De Decimis and Tit. 29. 65 68. lib. 3. tit 1. 2 3. 20 25 26 28 43 51 58 59. are meerely Ecclesiasticall concerning Religion the Church and Clergie Not to mention the many Ecclesiasticall Lawers and edicts made by some of the Roman and Greeke Emperors with the consent of their Senators recorded in Iustinian in Codice Theodosij lib. 16. throughout and many of them inserted by Gratian himselfe into his Decrees and body of the Canon Law and reduced under severall heads by Paulus Windeck in his Theologia Iurisconâ—â—â—torum Canonum Legum Consensus Not to rehearse the many Lawes and edicts of the German Emperors Princes Diets touching Religion and Church affaires of all sorts mentioned scatteringly in Abbas Usâ—eigensis Sabellicus Rerum Germanicarum Scriptures Ioannes Aventinus Auâ—alium Boyorum Master Fox Fasciculus Rerum expetendarum Hermaennus 〈◊〉 Grimstons Imperiall History Constitutiones Imperat Parisijs 1606. 〈◊〉 Comment Chytraus Chron Saxoniae and Augustana Confessto fidei Dictrina Electorum Principum Ordinum Imperij atque corundem Theologorum qui Augustanam Confessionem amplectuntuâ— subscribed by all the Protestant Princes Dukes Earles Barons Councels Senates Senators of Germany presented to the Emperor and printed yea reprinted by all their speciall Commands
confession was againe ratified Anno 1567. in the first Parliament of James the 6. After which there was an Act made against the Masse and the sayers and heares thereof and another Act for the abolishing of the Pope and his usurped Authority in Scotland After this a forme of Church Government and discipline was presented to the Nobility to peruse but not then fully agreed on and setled The like Petitions and proceedings in ecclesiasticall affaires I finde in the yeares 1561. 1562. 1563. to 1580. 1581 1582. and that the Generall Assemblies of Scotland in nature of a Councell or Synod wherein they debated matters of Religion and Church-government consisted not only of Ministers but of Nobles Gentlemen with other Laikes and that their resolutions and Acts were not thought obligatory unlesse ratified by special Acts of Parliament by which they still petitioned they might be confirmed Not to trouble the Reader over long I finde these ensuing ecclesiasticall Acts of Parliament in Scotland against provisions from Rome Iam. 3. parl 6. c. 43. Iam. 4. parl 1. c. 4. parl 5. c. 53. Iam. 5. paul 〈◊〉 c. 119. Against Working Gaming playing haunting of Taverines Aâ—châ—uses and using any sorvile worke on the SABOTH-DAY Iam. 4. parl 6. c. 83. Iam 6. parl 6 c. 70â— parl â—4 c. 148 against Apostacy Idolatry Masse the Pope Semeniary Priests Iesuites uncommunicants Popery as Iam. 8. parl 1. c. â— 3 5. parl 3. c. 1. 45 46. 55. parl 4. c. 7 8. 35 parlâ— 7. c. 106. parl 10. c. 24 27. parl 12. c. 1 20. parl 13. c. 60. parl 14. c. 193. parl 16. c. 17 18. parl 19. c. 1. Against Adultery Mat parl 5 c. 10. parl 9. c. 74. Iam. 6. parl 2. c. 14. parl 7. c. 105 with sundry others which you may finde mentioned and recired in the 5 and 6 Acts of the second Parliament of King Charles at the Sessions holden at Edinburgh the eleventh day of Iune 1640 Regiam Majestatâ—â— to which for brevity 〈◊〉 referre the Reader I shall conclude with the Ecclesiasticall Acts made in the severall Sessions of the second Parliament of King Charles held at Edinburgh in the yeare 1640 and 1642 where in the presens government of the Church of Scotland together with their profession of Faith nationall Covenant and all Ecclesiasticall matters whatsoever were fully settled and ratified In the first Session of this Parliament I finde these ensuing Ecclesiasticall 〈◊〉 enacted Act. 4. 〈◊〉 the Ratification of the ACTS OF THE ASSEMBLY which are recited in and ratified approved perpetually confirmed by this law Act. 5. Anent the Ratification of the Covenant and of the Assemblies Supplication Act of Councels and Act of Assymbly concerning the Covinant and confession of Faith formerly made and subscribed sundry times here in recited and confirmed In which Act sundry lawes formerly made against Popish Idolatry superstitious Doctrine Papists Seminary priests Iesuits Papisticall Ceremonies Masse the Popes iurisdiction the reformation of the Church and maintenace of Gods true religion are recapitulated confirmed Acts 6. Rescissory repealing divers former Acts concerning Archbishops Bishops with other Prelates their unjust jurisdiction and authority Acts 7. For planting of Kirks unprovided with Ministers through the Patrons default Acts 8. Anent admission of Ministers to Kirkes which belong to Bishopricks Acts 9. discharging the going of Salt-pans and Milnes upon the Sabbath day Acts 10. discharging Salmon fishing upon the Sabbath day Acts 11. Against Papists Acts 12. discharging the Zule vacancy or Christmas Act 13. discharging Monday market in Edinburgh and elsewhere as occasioning great prophanation of the Sunday and distracting men from Gods publike worship and Service Acts 14. For taking order with the abuse committed on the Sabbath day c. Acts 15. Directing Letters of horning against excommunicated persons to which I might adde Acts 16. 29 30. 32. 37 38 having relation to the Church and defence of Religion And Session second of this Parliament 1641. Acts 8. 9 10 11 for abolishing the Monuments of Idolatry 12. Anent Non-communicants and excommunicate persons all printed besides sundry other Acts unprinted are an abundant Evidence both of the Scottish English Parliaments undoubted right jurisdiction and authority in all matter of Religion Discipline and Church-government maugre all inconsiderable late privateopinions to the contrary by whomsoever broached Section 4. Containing certain Corollaries from the premised Sections against the Inpugners of Parliaments and Princes Legislative Power and Authority in matters of Church-government Discipline Religion Together with a compleat Answer to Master Iohn Goodwins pretended Authorities my deare Brother Burtons and others Arguments to the contrary in Iustificaetion of their Independent way in some late Publications the substance whereof is here clearely refuted and this point among others cleared That just humane Civill or Ecclesiasticall Lawes binde the conscience in point of obedience And that there is no exact set forme of Church government universally prescribed in Scripture to all Churches IN the precedent Sections I have according to my solemne Covenant and Protestation abundantly cleared the ancient unquestionable Iurisdiction and Legislative Authority of our Kings and Parliaments in all matters of Religion Church-government Discipline by multitudes of expresse Presidents in all Ages and Authorities of all kindes I shall in the next place Dissipate all those empty clouds of objections which endeavour to obscure this clear-shining Verity by deducing some Corollaries from the premises and then refuting the principle late objections against the same The first Corollary is this That Bishop Laudes desperate Positions in his Anti-Parliamentary paper of Hopes and Feares about calling a Parliament An. 1627. That Church-businesse is not fit for Parliaments That the Parliament House one or both can be no competent Iudge in any point of Doctrine That the Papists insult over us by this meanes and call it Parliamentary Religion That the King suffers by this as much or more than the Church For in the Statute of submission of the Clergie the King and the Convocation are Judges of all Ecclesiasticall Causes An. 25 H. 8. c. 19. And why should the Parliament take this from either That he should have little hope of good successe in Parliament till they leave medling with the Church Are all dangerous false Positions exceeding derogatory and destructive to the indubitable ancient Rights priviledges and power of our Parliaments constantly exercised and enjoyed without dispute even in the darkest times of Popery and highest Ruffe of Pope of Prelates and ever since the Reformation admitted without any opposition but by Popish Priests and Iesuits as the forequoted passages of Bishop Jewell and Bishop Bilson withall the premises manifest Secondly That Master John Goodwins late printed passages against the Ecclesiastical jurisdiction of Parliaments seconded in substance by some other Independents viz. That the generality and promiscuous multitude of the world who have a right of nominating persons to Parliamentary trust and power are but a SECVLAR ROOT
civill Magistrates as you have plentifully done even with some colour of reason as well as insanire cum ratione which is all I shall answer to your reasons Fourthly Hee writes Let Master Prynne Or any other evict mee of any wilfull or unwilfull violation of the priviledges of Parliament and I shall bee as willing as willingnesse it selfe can make me to further such a conviction and no man shall be more ready then I to crave their pardon or undergoe their Justice nay I shall repent my selfe and abhor my errour in dust and ashes Certainely this your promised late Repentance which is yet contingent and improbable after so many publike offronts and oppositions against the power and proceedings of Parliament will bee a very poore recompence and satisfaction for all your former misdemeanors and scandalls to the Parliament yet late repentance being better then none at all I shall now challenge you to make good this your promise since your owne Conscience and judgment cannot but informe you I have written enough in the former Sections to evict and convince you and all the world besides that you have not only violated but denyed oppugned those priviledges of Parliament in Ecclesiasticall affaires which our owne Parliaments in all ages and Parliamentary Assemblies in all other Kingdomes have unquestionably exercised enjoyed without any such publique opposition as you have made against them And if you now make not good your promise few or none will ever credit you hereafter 5ly For the Authors you cite to justifie yourselfe they are miserably wrested and mistaken for the most part The first you quote is Master Edwards who maintaines point blancke against you throughout his Treatise a Legislative and coerceive power in Parliaments and civil Majestrates even in Church-affaires and matters of Religion in the very pages you quote and else where Therefore you palpably abuse the Author and Reader in quoting him to the contrary who is so point-blancke against you For the passage you quote out of his Page 256. The Parliament interposeth no Authority to determine what government shall be whence you inferre p. 7. Therefore his opinion appeares to be either that the Parliament hath No authority or at least intends not to make use of it in determining a government It was written only with reference to that present time the Parliament having at that time when he writ during the Assemblies debate and consultation interposed no Authority to determine what government shall be yet before that it had declared the old prelaticall Lordly government to be abolished and called an Assembly to advise with about a New But to inferre from thence as you doe Therefore his opinion is either that the Parliament hath no Authority or at least intends not to make use of it in determining a Government Is an inference quite contrary to the next ensuing words and pages to the whole scope of the Authors Booke Humbly submitted to the Honourable houses of Parliament contrary to his expresse words p. 138. 281. to all his reasons against Toleration of your Way and to the Parliaments intent in calling the Assembly to assist them in determining and setling a Church-government agreable to Gods word Be ashamed therefore of this grosse perversion of your first Authors passages diametrally contrary to this meaning Your Passages out of Master Hayward Bishop Iewell Master Fox Mr. Calvin Iacobus Acontius Junius Peter Martyr and Gulielmus Appolonius make nothing at all against the Legislative Authority of Parliaments in matters of Religion and Church government and have no aâ—â—inity with your Passages words most of them Bishop Iewel especially as I have already proved vindicating propugning the very ecclesiastical power of Parliaments which you oppugne Indeed some of their words seeme to diminish the Coercive power of Majestratâ—s enforcing of mens consciences in matters of Religion which I shal answer in due place and manifest how you abuse the Authors herein as well as Mr. Edwards not hitherto answered by any of your party but how they militat against the jurisdiction of Parliaments in making Lawes touching Religion discipline and Church-government I am yet to seeke For the Passages he aleageth out of the Divines of Scotland That the Prince or Majestrate may not make or publish any Ecclesiasticall Law without the free assent of the Clergy c. That he may not by HIMSELFE define or direct such matters nor make any Lawes therein That the King hath not a Nomotheticke Legislative Power in matters ecclesiasticall in a constitute Church That the ordinary power of the King is not to make Ecclesiasticall Lawes c. I Answer 1. That their only meaning if I mistake not in these passages is that the Prince or chiefe civill Majestrate of HIMSELFE without a Parliament or without the assistance and consent of his Nobles Commons Clergy cannot legally make any ecclesiasticall Lawes to obliege his people upon which reason our Brethren of Scotl. rejected the late New service booke and Canons and our selves the late Canons c Oath which Canterbury wold have obtruded on us because they were made and prescribed only by the Kings Authority and the Prelates or Convocations not the Parliaments upon which very reason the Parliaments of both Kingdomes have respectively adjudged both one and other illegall But that the King or supreame temporall Majestrates assisted by a Parliament and Orthdox Divines may not make binding ecclesiasticall Lawes or that their or our Parliaments have not a reall Legislative power in any matters ecclesiastike the only point controversed is directly contrary both to the constant Doctrine and Practise of our Brethren and their Church used ever since the Reformation to the proceedings of their last Parliaments and generall Assemblies as I have formerly manifested You may therefore blush at this your perverting of their meaning as if they held that the Parliaments of England or Scotland had no power to make Ecclesiasticall Lawes for Religion or Church gouernment when as their Bookes Actions addresses to our present Parliament their presence assistance in our Assembly proclaimes the contrary And the very publique Confession of faith professed and subscribed in their Church Anno 1560 Chap. 14 since confirmed by severall Acts of Parliament doth the like But admit all those Authors really as not one of them is in verity opposite to the Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction and Legislative power of Parliaments yet the unanimous practise and resolution of all Christian Realmes Synods Parliaments in all ages contrary to their private novell opinions is sufficient infinitly to overbalance them in the Judgements of all prudent men And thus much for Mr. Goodwins Innocencies tryumph as to the present point I shall next apply my selfe to Answer such Objections as my deare Brother Master Henry Burton hath lately made against the premises in his Vindication to my 12. Queeres touching Church-Government my Independency examined His first and principall Objection is this
ends of the World shall turne unto the Lord and all the kindreds of the Nations shall worship before him for THE KINGDOME is the Lords and he is the Governour among the NATIONS That ALL NATIONS shall serve and worship before him That he shall have DOMINION from sea to sea and from the Rivers to the ends of the earth That all DOMINIONS shall serve and obey him That the KINGDOMES of the earth shall sing unto the Lord c. All pregnant proofs of Nationall Churches which should serve and obey Christ But that Independent particular Congregations of visible Saints and they only should be Christs Kingdom Republick and Governed immediately by him rests yet on my Brothers part to make proofe of when he is able Thirdly I shall request my Brothers to satisfie me others by that Texts he can make good these Paradoxes of his That those who will not submit to his Independent Church-government Covenant become members of such Churches have no interest in the Covenant Sacraments or Seal of the Covenant or right to any Church-Communion That they are not within the Covenant visibly and therefore their Children not visibly to bee baptized That they professe not Christ to be their King and are afraid or ashamed to be in Covenant with Christ as their King c. Do not these uncharitable Paradoxes good Brother un-Church un-Saint all Christians and reformed Churches whatsoever which submit not to your new way excluding both them and their Children from the Covenant and Seales of Grace and all Church-communion at least in and among your Congregations as professed enemies to the Kingdome and Soveraignty of Christ Is not this the very language Doctrine of the Antichristian Church of Rome who vaunts herself the onely true Church of Christ out of which there is no salvation un-Churching all Churches and un-Saincting all Christians but their owne professed members as haeretickes Schismaticks and enemies to Christ yea is it not an higher strain of spirituall pride and uncharitable Behaviour against your brethren then ever the Donatists or Nouatians broached I beseech you deare Brother in the bowels of Christ to consider and recant these harsh passages which you can never justifie before God or men and have given great offence to many who cordially affect you These generall questions being demanded I shall next addresse my selfe to a more particular answer of the premised Objection by reducing it into these Logical arguments which wil best detect the fallacies imbecillities of it The first is this Christ is the only immediate supreame King Head Ruler and Governour of every particular Church Ergo no Kings Parliaments Councels Synode or any human Power can make any Lawes Rules Canons for the setling of Religion or reforming Governing well ordering of any particular Churches of Christ This is the summe of all my Brothers Passages I answer that this is a meere Independent Argument which will introduce a world of absurdities if admitted as I shall cleare by these following Instances 1. The Scripture is expresse That God himselfe is King yea a great King over all the earth That Christ is the ONLY Potentate the King of Kings and Lord of Lords yea a great King over all Gods That all the Kingdomes and Nations of the earth are the Lords and that he giveth them to whomsoever he willâ— That his kingdome ruleth over all That his is the greatnes the Kingdom the power and the glory and the Majesty that all that is in the Heaven and in the Earth are his that he is exalted as head over all and raigneth over all That he is Lord and King of all as well of their bodies estates as soules and consciences Ergo By my Brothers forme of Arguing No Kings Parliaments Potentates Rulers Kingdoms Republikes ought to make any Lawes for the government of their Realmes publikes Nations Corporations or the ordering of mens persons or temporall estates but God and Christ alone and all particular Kingdomes Societies States Corporations Families are and ought to be immediatly subject to no King Majestrat Parliament or human power whatsoever even in temporall things but only to God and Christ 2ly God is more frequently stiled in Scripture The Lord of HOSTS and God of BATTLE then he is called the only King of his Church a Title you can hardly show me in direct termes in sacred writ Yea his power and providence principally appeares in mannnaging and disposing all occurrences and particulars concerning Hosts Armies Battles as your Brother Burroughs in his Glorious name of the Lord of Hosts hath largely manifested Ergo by this Logicke No King Parliament Generall Captaine or Councell of Warre may or ought to make or prescribe any Martiall Lawes for the regulating governing mustering Marshaling or disciplyning of their Hosts but God alone 3ly Christ is our only Soveraigne Lord Master Father Ergo no Landlord Master Father ought to prescribe any Lawes Rules orders for the better Government of their Tenants servants families Children but Christ alone by your argumentation 4ly Christ is the chiefe Shepherd Bishop Prophet Teacher and Instructor of his Church Ergo none ought by your reasoning to seed teach or instruct the Church and people of God but Christ alone We must have no Ministers teaching Elders Pastors Teachers to instruct Vs henceforth who are but men and not Christ himselfe 5ly Christ is the only Mediator Advocate Intercessor for his Church and people Ergo none ought by their Prayers and intercessions to soltcite the throne of Grace for the peace prosperity reformation and deliverance of Christs Churches and people but Christ alone Ministers must not pray for their people nor Saints one for another noreither of them for the whole Church of God if your Argumentation be solid 6ly If this argument stand firme then marke the inevitable consequences of it Independent Subjects will argue with their Princes Majestrates Superiors thus Christ is our only King Head Lord. Therefore we must not be subject to any Lawes and commands what soever but only to the lawes and precepts of Christ Wives Children servants will reason thus Christ is our onely Head Husband King Lord Father Master Therefore we will not we ought not to be subject to any of the Lawes Orders precepts of our Husbands Parents Ministers but only to the immediate Rules Laws edicts of Christ himselfe Mutinous or Independent Souldiers will thus argue with their Generalls and Commanders Christ is our only Captaine Generall and our Lord of Hosts Ergo we will be commanded conducted ordered by none but Christ not by any other Captain or Generall whatsoever Nay people and every member of your Independent Congregations upon any discontent wil thus dispute with their Ministers Ruling Elders Congregations Christ is our only head King lawgiver Judg. Therefore neither Councels Synods nor any Independent Ministers or Congregations may prescribe any Laws covenants Orders or directions to us or exercise any jurisdiction
eclesiasticall over us or passe any censures upon us but only Christ himselfe Brother if such Antimonarchicall Antiparliamentall and Anarchicall Logicke and Divinity be ever taught and beleeved in the world which cutts asunder the nerues and dissolves the very foundation of all Governments and Relations whatsoever whether naturall civill or Ecclesiasticall what an horrible confusion will be immediatly produced to the utter distruction of all Kingdomes Republiques Churches Families Societies Corporations in the World let all prudent men Judge Yet this is the dangerous Logicke this the Foundation stone whereon your whole Independent fabrick is built the absurdities and ill consequences whereof I trust all will now at last discerne Secondly I answer That though Christ be the only King and supream Law-giver of his Church yet it followes not thence that therfore no Parliament or humane power may or can make Lawes to order or governe the Churches and people of God by but onely Christ For Brother your selfe will grant 1. That Parliaments Kings and Synods may and ought to make Lawes to supposse and punish all manner of Idolatry superstition Impietie prophanenesses corruptions Heresies Doctrines Opinions and exorbitances whatsoever in their Churches Ministers people that are contrary to the Word of God the Lawes Doctrine Government of Christ or tending to the depravation disturbance or prejudice of the Church and Gospell Secondly they may publish Lawes and Canons to settle and establish the true Confession of the Christian saith the sincere Ordinances of God and such a true worship Church-Government and Discipline which is most consonant to his Word throughout all Churches in their respective jurisdictions yea compell Ministers to doe their duties and people diligently to repaire to all the Ordinances of God to sanctifie the Lords day and to observe extraordinary dayes of humiliation and thanksgiving upon extraordinary occasions Thirdly They may enact Lawes and Ordinances to settle the places and times of publike Worship and all necessary circumstances w ch concern the same not peremptorily determined in the Scriptures concerning Church assemblies Fourthly They may enact Laws for the maintenance of Ministers of all necessary Church Officers and for prayer preaching reading the Word administring receaving the Lords Supper concerning ordination Mariage siging fasting excommunication agreeable to the Word of God This I presume all will grant and my Brother will not deny which is all I contend for Therfore Christs being the only King Head Ruler and Lawgiver of his Church is no impediment to Kings Parliaments by advise of Synods to enact such Lawes as these and so the Argument a meere Independent Nonsequitur Thirdly Christ is the King Lord Head and Lawgiver of every private Christian or Member of a Congregation as well as of every particular or of the whole Catholik Church and so by your determination he is subject to no other jurisdiction then that of Christ his Spirit and Word Yet I hope you will grant that every Independent Congregation hath a true jurisdiction and power over every particular member of it yea a legislative power to prescribe a speciall covenant and such Ecclesiasticall Rules Orders as the whole Congregation shall thinke meet to which they must submit under paine of excommunication suspension Non-communion and denying baptisme to their Infants as you plainly intimate pag. 44. 45 46 62 63. Therefore these titles and Prerogatives of Christ doe not deprive particular Churches of the power of prescribing covenants Orders Rules and Canons to their Members much lesse then whole Synods Councells Parliaments of farre greater wisdom power Authority then particular Churches And if private Churches may thus oblige their Members then much more may Parliaments Councells all particular Churches within their jurisdictions And so much in answer of this grand argument The second is this Christ is the full and sole King raigning in the heart and conscience of every true Beleever He only is King over every mans Conscience so as no man nor power on earth may sit with him in this his Throne Therefore no Parliament Councell nor human power may prescribe Laws for the Government or ordering of the Church for then of necessity man should be Lord over the Conscience which is the highest presumption against the most high I answer That this argument is grounded upon a very sandy foundation and upon this controversed question both among Divines and Casuists Whether Ecclesiasticall or Civill human Laws made and ratified by the supreame civill Magistrates Parliament bind necessarily oblige us to obedience in point of conscience in case they be not contrary to Gods Word for if they be all grant they do not bind to obedience in point of Conscience My Brother here holds the Negative as an indisputable Maxime That these Laws bind not the conscience in point of Obedience to them A very dangerous false unsound Position tending to meere Anarchy and contempt of all humane Lawes and lawfull Authority in Church or State And for my own part I clearely hold the Affirmative to be an undoubted truth This question is largly debated and held affirmatively by learned Paraeus Explicatio Dubiorum in c. 13. ad Romanos Dubium 7. pag. 1413. to 1446. by Musculus Peter Martyr Marlorat and Doctor Willet in their Commentaries on Rom. 13 with other Protestants on this Text by Ursinus in Exposit secundi Praecepti p. 299. by Theodoret Ambrose Beda Anselme and generally most ancient and modern Commentators on that Text by Alexander Alensis Summa Theologiae Pars. 2. qu 120. Artic 2. 3 4. with whom all other Shoolemen generally concurre Paulus Windek Canonum Legum Consensus Dissensus cap. 4. p. 12. Stapleton in Antid p. 783. Bellarmine l. 3. c. 9. De Laicis Pererius Disp 2. Num. 8. by Saint Augustine in Epist 54. ad Macedonium and in Tit. Psal 70. by Saint Bernard Tract de Praecepto Dispensat With infinite others Indeed Master Calvin Instit lib. 3. c. 9. Sect. 15. 18. and lib. 4. c. 10. Sect. 3. 4 5. Beza in Notis ad Rom. 13. Sibrandus De Pontif Romano l. 8. c. 7. and some others seemingly hold the contrary yet not generally of all but of some particular humane Lawes I shall briefly lay downe the truth of the affirmative part out of Pareus and Doctor Willet in these insuing Propositions and then propound the Affirmative and answer the Negative arguments in their Order to vindicate this truth now most opposed when it is most necessary both to be discovered and obeyed The Propositions are these That all just Civill Ecclesiasticall or Oeconomicall Laws and Ordinances made by the King and Parliament or by lawfull Magistrates Parents Masters Tutors Superiors which concerne the duties of the first or second Table do bind the Conscience of themselves and that simply both in generall and particular That all good Laws made for the determining of any necessary circumstances of Gods Worship or necessary and profitable for
in the Old and New Testament at hainous sinâ— and capitall offences punishable in some cases with imprisonment banishment confiscation of goods and death it selfe And on the contrary chearful obedience to them is not only commanded but commended by God Himselfe in by and for whom they rule and command as the marginall Scriptures fully manifest Therefore undoubtedly they binde the Conscience And so all Parliaments Law-givers ever held and believed else they would never take care or pains to enact or publish Lawes Finally Princes Magistrates and Parliaments may and oft-times do prescribe solemn Oathes and Covenants to their people to observe both Gods just Laws and their own to as is clear by the Marginall Texts by 28 H. 8. c. 10. 1 Eliz. c. 1. 3 Jac. c. 4. which prescribe an oath of abjuration of the Popes Authority the oathes of Supremacy and Allegiance with infinite other Acts enjoyning sundry other oathes and by the late Protestation Vow and Nationall Covenant made and imposed upon all by the present Parliament Now these oaths and Covenants do without all controversie binde the Conscience to observance and obedience in the highest degree Therefore questionlesse these their oaths Laws Covenants binde the Conscience els we might with safe Conscience refuse and violate them at pleasure which none dares affirme they may who hath any sparkle of Conscience remaining in him I shall now propound and answer the principall contrary Objections which are these 1. It is contrary to Christian liberty and a plaine tyranny that humane Lawes should obliege the Conscience Christ having freed us from all humane Ceremonies Lawes obligations and the Scripture enjoyning us to stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free and not to be again entangled with the yoake of Bondage Not to be the servants of men Not to be subject to Ordinances as touch not tast not handle not which all are to perish with the using after the commandements and Doctrines of men If therefore humane Lawes should binde the Conscience Christian liberty would be destroyed and tyranny over consciences introduced 1. Answer 1. That it is no wayes repugnant to but very consistent with Christian liberty to be obliged to obey al honest just necessary Lawes all decent and convenient things which may advance Gods glory worship the peace wee le or prosperity of Church State our own felicity and are consonant not repugnant to Gods Law Neither do the objected scriptures extend to such Lawes or Edicts at these 2. That Christian liberty which Christ hath purchased for us is not an exemption or freedome from the obedience of humane Laws but from the dominion and power of sinne the yoake and bondage of the Ceremonial Law abolished by Christs death from the exact performance and condemning power of the morall Law not from obedience to it and from placeing inherent holines oâ— any matter of Religion worship conscientiousnes in things meerely indifferent in themselves as Mr. Calvin with others who write Deliberitate christiana with most Commentators on the Galathians resolve yet Magistrates may command such things to be done or not done for 〈◊〉 order peace and other publicke ends so as they place no inherent holinesse religion or worship in them and Christians are bound to obey them therein without infringement of their Christian Liberty Thirdly As to the Texts objected The first of them is meant of the Ceremoniall Law and morrall to so farre forth as to seeke justification by it or to be under the rigour and condemning power of it Not of just humane Laws The next is intended onely ofâ— men-pleasers who flatter men in their lusts pleasures errors or obey their unjust commands repugnant to the will of God not of obeying the just Lawes or precepts of Kings Parliaments Magistrates Parents Masters and other superiors for then there shall be no servants no subjection or obedience at all to superiors in this world and this Text should repeale the 5. Commandement with all other precepts of obedience given to subjects wives children servants if thus expounded For that of the Colossians 2. 20 21 22. it appeares by verse 14 15 16 17 c. that it is spoken onely of the Ceremoniall Law and of that Ceremonial holynes or intrinsicall uncleannes which some did put between meats and drinkâ—s which were indifferent in themselves as is most cleare by comparing it with Acts 10. 10. to 16. Rom. 14. 2 3 to 23. 2 Cor. 8. 1 Tim. 4. 3 4 5. Therefore it makes nothing against the Ecclesiasticall or Civill Lawes of Princes and Parliaments who may command abstinence from flesh and such particular things creatures at certaine times for lawfull civill ends which we are obliged to obey though not out of any religious or superstitious respect as if the creature it selfe were unlawfull at such times by any divine precept or in its owne nature our Statutes and Homylies concerning Fishdayes define The second Objection is this That the civill power is temporall and the end of civill Lawes externall or temporall peace and order Therefore they binde not the Conscience I Answer That the end of Ecclesiasticall Lawes is not meerly temporall but spirituall and Ecclesiasticall Therefore the objection is not solid 2ly Admit the power he but temporall inregard of the object or end yet internall and outward obedience to those Laws is the principall thing intended in them which none can with safe conscience deny where the Laws are just necessary The third is That Magistrates Parliaments and their Lawes have nothing to do with mens consciences which they cannot judge or discerne but onely with thâ—â— outward actions Therefore they cannot binde the conscience I answer that though Majestrats have nothing to do with nor can judg of mens consciences or opinions simply considered in themselves concealed yet they have to do withal their external actions flowing from regulated by their consciences and opinions Therefore they may binde the conscience as it is Practicall punish Atheists Heritickes Papists Idolaters when they openly appear to be such 2ly The very Law Of God hindes the conscience to obey all iust commands of higher powers therefore such commands even by vertue of Gods owne precept oblige the conscience to internall obedience as wel as the body to externall The 4th is That Princes and temporall Majestrates cannot inflict inward and spirituall but only temporall and externall punishments Therefore they cannot binde the conscience I Answer that men may binde and deliver others over to such punishments as they cannot immediatly inflict The Church may deliver men over even for ecclesiasticall offences to the secular power which they cannot exercise and to temporall punishment which they cannot inflict yea they may deliuer aâ— they hold men ever unto Sathan and to the judgement of God at the last day which they cannot actually execute Majestrates doe frequently punish the
then Heresie or hereticall Doctrin by such extravagant inferences and incoherent Arguments for fear you dishonour both your Master and your self 3. Though Christ hath left no absolute exact forme of Church-Government in Scripture for all Churches and Ages yet he hath left his Word to be a light to the feete and a Lanthorne to the pathes of all his Saints and Churches and said downe such generall Presidents rules and directions therein as may serve for ordering directing and regulating of all Churches herein yea he hath given us some more particular rules for some things which concerne the Government of his Churches The Scripture hath generall Rules for our faith life manners thoughts words actions apparell eating drinking praying preaching receiving the Sacrament c. applicable to all particular cases and occurrences concerning them though not particular punctuall rules for deciding all those cases of conscience and controversies that frequently arise concerning them yet Christ is not unfaithfull because he hath left his Church sufficient rules and meanes of salvation in generall or particular to bring it safe to heaven 4 The providing of godly and faithfull Ministers Magistrates and Governours of the Church to put good Laws Disciplin and Government in execution is a great part of Christs charge and care as well as providing his Word and a Government for his Church Will you charge Christ then with negligence and leaving his Church to six and seven because every Minister of Christ hath not the selfe-same measure of gifts and endowments to discharge his Ministery or because some Ministers are more negligent in their places then others and some sheep are left oft-times without a Shepheard or committed to a Iudas a Thiefe or to Wolveâ— false Teachers Seducers which teare and devoure instead of feeding them or because he set not up and maintained this forme of Church Government you now contend for as his and none else beside in all Churches for so many hundred yeares together but reserved this honour in this latter age to some of you or rather to the Anabaptists and Brownists your Predecessors herein to advance it Brother you may easily discerne by this where your owne pretended inconveniences and inferences will drive you at the last if you rely upon them I beseech you therefore as a loving Brother to forbeare them for the future 4. Whereas you object We should have a mad world of it if Civill States Magistrates Kings and Parliaments should set up such a Government 〈◊〉 they conceived to be agreeable to Gods Word and the good Lawes and Customes of their Realmes I answer 1. That it is your own position that every particular man and Church ought to walke according to the rule of their own consciences and judgement not anothers Christ only being Lord of their consciences If then a whole Kingdome Parliament Church or Realme shall conceive and be perswaded in their consciences that such and such a Church Government is most consonant to Gods Word most suiteable to their condition and therefore shall upon solemne debate after much seeking of God by Prayer and Fasting make choise of this government before another as by electing a Presbyteriall rejecting an Independent way What madnesse or inconvenience meer slavery tyranny humane invâ—ntions superstitions or corruption will this introduce Shall they be Hereticks presently for such a choise as you define them Shall private men have more liberty of choise or conscience then whole Nations Synods Parliaments or more wisedome temper knowledge discretion conscience then they Indeed I have read of one Parliament stiled the Mad and another the unlearned because there were no Lawyers in it and no doubt both Parliaments Councells Synods generall Assemblies may and doe sometimes erre and that grosly as well as private persons or congregations But doubtlesse all reasonable men will and must acknowledge that two are better then one a whole Court of Iustice lesse liable to errour and corruption then a particulâ—r Judge a whole Parliament then a Committee an whole Synod then a private Conventicle or congregation Then tell me in sober sadnesse good Brother whether your Independent Assertion That every particular Minister hath power to gather and set up a Church of his owne Independent from any other and to choose such a Discipline Government to themselves as they CONCEIVE to be most suiteable to Gods Word though in truth it be not so but a meer CONCEITE as I feare your New way is That particular Christians have power to unite themselves into a Church and elect a Minister and Government of their owne choise most agreeable as they thinke to the Word And that every Sect and Person ought to have free liberty of conscience in the exercise of what they beleeve Or my Position be likely est to produce more madnesse in the world or mischiefes in the Church Certainely it will be a madder world and Church too indeed when every private Minister and Christian may follow their owne opinions fancies crochets waies every Sectary set up his owne congregation sect and vent his owne erronious schismaticall Opinions without control when every man shall have priviledge to doe What seemes right in his owne eyes as if there were no King in Israel no Parliament in England when every Anabaptist Enthusiast or brainsick Melancholico shall not only build Churches in the ayre different from all others but set them up openly in our Cities Counties Kingdomes without impediment in contempt of Lawes Parliaments all Civill or Ecclesiasticall Authority as too many I feare doe now and I hope the High Court of Parliament will remedy it in due time because they deem their owne fancies Gospel their owne Juventions Christs Oracles Certainly the world and Church will both be mad in good earnest when such a licentiousnesse shall be proclaimed under the Notion of Christian Liberty every mans own private way christned with the Name of Christs Kingdom c. though it hath small affinity with it The God of peace order of his infinite mercie preserve us safe from this Maniaca Insania this deadly madnesse into which we are running and hath already desperately seized upon the Braines and hearts of many My Brothers sixth Objection is this That Parliaments Councells Synods are not now infallible but subject unto errour many of them having erred and that grosly in former and late times That neither Parliament nor Assembly can now say as that Synod Act. 15. 28. It seemeth good to us and to the Holy Ghost they being not endued with an infallible spirit Therefore they can make no binding Determinations Lawes Canons Decrees in any Ecclesiasticall matters to oblige any particular Churches or christians Good Brother writes he for all your punctuall quotations of that Scripture Acts 15. you doe not all this while tell us that which is the maine of all which we finde in the 28. verse IT SEEMED GOOD TO THE HOLY
GHOST and Vs to lay upon you no other burthen then these necessary things Now Brother we challenge you to shew us ANY PARLIAMENT COVNCELL SYNOD EVER SINCE THE APOSTLES that could or can say thus It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and Vs to determine controversies of Religion to make and impose Lawes to bind all men c. Shew this to us at this time and we will obey But if you cannot AS YOV NEVER CAN never let any man presse upon us that Scripture that Synod WHICH HATH NO PARALELL in the whole world and so is NO PRESIDENT PATTERNE FOR ANY COVNCELL SYNOD PARLIAMENT Thus my Brother Burton concludes hence with abundance of confidence But sweet Brother let not him who putteth on his harnesse boast as he that puts it off receive your Answer first and then be as vainly confident as you will 〈◊〉 your obtuse Argument afterwards which I shall thus retort upon you First I suppose you will grant That the Apostles Preached as well a writ and determined by an infallible spirit and by the Holy Ghosts Divine inspiration when as neither your self nor any other Independent nor Presbiterialâ— Minister can infallibly thus Preach write or determine at this day Ergo Brother by your Argument neither you nor any other Minister must henceforth Preach unto nor determine any Controversies of Religion or Church-government at this day being not guided by any infallible Spirit and because you may possibly erre and cannot say as the Apostles did it seemes good to the Holy Ghost and to us and then Brother of what value are all your Sermons Books and confident asseverations of the Divinity of your Independent way your Disciples and congregation may make wast paper of them instead of reading them as the Oracles of God a some ignorants perchance esteem them 2. Christ and his Apostle when they ordained Elders and laid their hands upon them did usually give them the holy Ghost and gift of tongues who fel upon the parties ordained and those to whom they Preached and to those whom they Baptized as the marginall texts assure us which no Ministers nor Elders can do now Ergo no Ministers may or can now ordain any Ministers by imposition of hands nor baptize any children or men nor preach the Gospel to any because they cannot give them the gifts of Tongues nor cause the Holy Ghost to fall upon them as Christ and the Apostles did 3. Moses gave no civill nor judiciall Laws to the Israelites under the Law but such as he received immediately from God by an infallible Spirit Ergo Kings and Parliaments at this day can make no civill temporall Lawes to governe their people by because they receive them not immediately from God by an infallible spirit 4. Christ sent none to Preach the Gospel or administer the Sacraments but such whom himself immediatly called ordained furnished miraculously with gifts of tongues and with the Holy Ghost A priviledge peculier to the Apostles and some few others in their daies not communicable to any ordinary Ministers and made Elders and Bishops by the Holy Ghost Ergo No Ministers but such who are thus immediately enabled endued and ordained by the Holy Ghost may or ought to preach the Gospel And then where are all your Independent Ministers and Lay-preachers I hope Brother by this time you most renounce your Argument as absurd or else your Preaching Church Ministery at least your writings will be little valued which now you see are not infallible 2. A possibility of erring or some actuall errours in Councells Synods Parliaments are no good grounds of rejecting all their determinations Lawes Edicts but only such as are apparently erronious and repugnant to the Scripture Such indeed you may disobey but to all others you must submit even in point of conscience as I have formerly proved If you deny this then marke the consequence of your deniall Ministers may and sometimes actually doe erre both in their preaching and writing and I doubt Brother it is or may be your own case Ergo people must neither obey nor believe any thing they preach or write but contemne all Parliaments Princes Magistrates Elders Parents Masters Tutors of all sorts may and oft-times actually doe swerve from truth and Iustice in some of their Lawes Orders Precepts commands and Iudgements Ergo their subjects wives children husbands schollars pupills must receive no Lawes Orders Commands or instructions from them nor yet obey them in any thing which they shall prescribe Brother you may as rationally argue in many things we offend all Ergo we must not endeavour to doe any thing that is good Or conclude in many things and in making Lawes we erre all Therefore we must obey no humane Ecclesiasticall or civill Laws in which we can discern no apparent error Brother will you drink no wine at all as the Apostle gives Timothy advise to do because some have dranke poyson in it and you perchance may doe so to Or shall none adventure to marry a good wife or husband because so many have met with bad Answer me these questions and then you need no other answer to what you object but your own reply to them 3. Admit Synods Councells Parliaments have sometimes erred out of humane frailty yet this is a most certaine truth that they are not so apt or prone to erre having more helpes meanes assistances to keep them from erring when they are met together in the Name and feare of God as private men or Conventiâ—les of persons lesse learned lesse experienced they being more able to discover and bolt out truthes by debate then they This is the ground why Solomon concludes That two are better then onâ— that in the multitude of Councellors there is safety why the greatest points of Religion and State have in all ages been debated resolved not in Conclaves Conventicles Chambers Closets but in generall or nationall Councellâ— Assemblies Parliaments as the most effectuall meanes to discover suppresse errours heresies and resolve doubts for which we have an unanswerable pregnant president in the Old Testament 2 Chron. 30. 1. to the end where King Hezechiah with all the Princes and Congregation of Israel and Iudah assembled in full Parliament at Ierusalem upon solemn debate resolved AND ESTABLISHED A DECREE to keep the Passeover in the second moneth because they could not keepe it in the first the Priests and people being not sufficiently sanctified And another in the New in the Chapter objected Acts 15. where the Apostles themselves assemble a full Synod to debate and resolve the great contrâ—versie raised in the Church concerning the necessity of Circumcision This then being an indubitable Verity it is most certaine that Parliaments Generall or Nationall Synods and Councells are the fittest of all others to make Lawes and Canons for all civill and Ecclesiasticall matters in State or Church because they are least subject to errour And therefore there is great
TRVTH TRIVMPHING OVER FALSHOOD ANTIQVITY Over NOVELTY OR The First Part of A just and seasonable Vindication of the undoubted Ecclesiasticall Iurisdiction Right Legislative Coercive Power of Christian Emperors Kings Magistrates Parliaments in all matters of Religion Church-Government Discipline Ceremonies Manners Summoning of Presiding Moderating in Councells Synods and ratifying their Canons Determinations Decrees As likewise of Lay-mens right both to sit and vote in Councells here proved to be anciently and in truth none other but Parliaments especially in England both by Scripture Texts Presidents of all sorts and the constant uninterrupted Practices Examples of the most eminent Emperors Princes Councells Parliaments Churches and Christian States especially of our owne in all ages since their embracing the Gospell In Refutation of M r. Iohn Goodwins Innocencies Triumph My deare brother Burtons Vindication of Churches commonly called Independent And of all Anti-Monarchicall Anti-Parliamentall Anti-Synodicall and Anarchicall Paradoxes of Papists Prelates Anabaptists Arminians Socinians Brownists or Independents Whose old and new Objections to the contrary are here fully answered By William Prynne of Lincolnes Inne Esquire Jer. 6. 16. Thus saith the Lord Stand yee in the wayes and see and aske for the OLD PATHES where is the GOOD WAY and walk therein and yee shall find rest for your soules But they said Wee will not walke therein Luk. 5. 39. No man also having drunk OLD WINE straightway desireth NEW for he saith THE OLD IS BETTER Tertul. de Praescrip adver Haeres Ex ipso ordine manifestatur id esse Dominicum Verum quod sit priùs traditum id autem Extraneum Falsum quod sit posterius immissum Decem. 3. 1644. It is Ordered by the Committee of the House of Commons concerning Printing that this Book entituled Truth Triumphing over Falshood Antiquity over Novelty be printed by Mich. Sparke Senior John White London Printed by John Dawson and are to be sold by Michael Sparke Senior 1645. TO THE HIGH COVRT OF PARLIAMENT Right Honourable HAving had the Honour through Gods assistance to be a meane though cordiall Instrument of Vindicating The Soveraigne Power of Parliaments and Kingdomes in all Civill or Military affaires which concerne the State in Foure severall Volumes against all Opposites whatsoeever which they have for the most part satisfied or put to silence I expected a Quietus est from all other Controversies concerning the Iurisdiction of Parliaments especially in Ecclesiasticall matters which most imagined had been put to eternall silence when our Lordly Prelates lost their Votes and Session in Parliament by a publike Law But alas I know not by what evill Genius and Pythagorean Metempsychosis the Anti-Parliamentary Soules formerly dwelling in our defunct Prelates earthly Tabernacles are transmigrated into and revived in a New-Generation of men started up of late among us commonly known by the Name of INDEPENDENTS who though for the most part really cordiall in their Affections Actions to the Parliament and Church of England for which and for their piety they are to bee highly honoured yet some of them are of late become extremely derogatory and destructive unto both in their Anarchicall and Anti-Parliamentary Positions For which and for their late gathering of Independent Churches contrary to Your Parliamentary Injunctions they are to be justly blamed as great disturbers of our publike Peace and Vnity It is the observation of learned Voetius and Vedelius That the Arminians in the Netherlands for the advancing of their owne Faction and more facill accomplishment of their private ill Designes did before the Synod of Dort and in the beginning thereof exceedingly cry up the Power of the Civill Magistrate and States of Holland in Ecclesiasticall matters both by Writing and Preaching ascribing to them the highest Jurisdiction and Power of giving ultimate Judgement in all Controversies of Faith and Ecclesiasticall matters arising in the Church as a Prerogative belonging immediately under Christ to them alone And thereupon they appealed to the States from the Ecclesiasticall Classes as the proper Iudges of the Controversies they had raised in the Belgick Churches But at last after the Synod of Dort had determined against their Arminian Errors and the States established their Determinations prohibiting the Preaching or Printing of any Arminian Tenets with the private Independent Congregations and Conventicles of the Arminian Party they presently altered both their opinions and practice crying downe the Authority of the States and Civill Magistrate as fast as they had cryed it up both in their Apologies and Sermons contracting yea denying them that very power which before they had so liberally measured â—ut unto them affirming that the States had no power at all over their private Congregations that it was not any right or part of their Office to obliege men by their authorities to the Decrees of Synods however agreeable to the word of God and that they ought not to use any coactive Power or Authority in such cases to obliege them to conformity This Practice of the Arminians was by M r Thomas Edwards by way of prediction applied to the Independents in these very tearmes And it may be feared however these Apologists NOW to ingratiate themselves and being let alone in their Church-way say they give more to the Magistrates than the Presbyteriall and that they professe to submit and to be most willing to have recourse to the Magistrates Iudgement and Cognizance and Examination of Ecclesiasticall Causes yet when they shall come once to be crossed and the Parliament by the advice of the Assembly to settle the Government of the Church and by their Authority to bind them to things agreeable to the word wee shall see then what they will say of the Magistrates Power There are too many speeches already since the Assembly out of their feare how they may goe which have fallen from many Independents THAT PROGNOSTICATE THEY WILL DOE BY THE PARLIAMENT AS THE REMONSTRANTS DID AFTER THE SYNOD OF DORT BY THE STATES Which Prognostication hath fallen out accordingly For since that time our Independents having felt the Pulses of the Assembly and Parliament bearing but very gently by way of debate against their Anarchicall and Anomolous New-Way derived from their good friends the German Anabaptists and Separatists and supported only with their Arguments as I am fully able to demonstrate they have not only in Presse and Pulpit cryed up their Way as the Onely Way Kingdome and Scepter of Christ and denyed all opposition in word deed or thought against it as a direct FIGHTING AGAINST GOD and promoted it publikely and privately with all their Industry Policy Power setting up New Independent Congregations in every corner but even with open mouth pen hand contrary to their former Solemne Vowes Covenants Protestations which I feare they have over-much forgotten cryed downe and fought against the very Ecclesiasticall Power and Legislative Authority of the High Court of Parliament it self and Supreme Temporall Magistrates proclaiming
second at Rheemes the third at Towers the fourth at Cavailon the fift at Arelat The third Councell at Aquesgran was summoned providentissimo et jussu salutifero of King Pipin as were the two former by the wholsom command and most provident direction of his Father Lewis The Councels of Meaux and Medardum by the consent and command of Charles the son of Lewis The Councell of Valentia by the Emperor Lotharius his command ex jussione praefati Principis reverendissimi trium provinciarum Episcopi in unum collecti residissent The Synod of Ticinum and the Councell of Wormes An. 868. were congregated by the Emperor Lewis the second The Synod of Colen Anno 887. by Charles the third his consent The Councell of Ments Anno 888. and of Triburby Arnulphus the Emperor The Councel of Ferrara by John Paleologus The Provinciall Synod of Augusta Anno 1548. by the Emperor Charles the fift Cui hanc Synodorum congregandarum facultatem veluti olim Constantino Imperatori totius â—â—re orbis acceptam ferunt saith Otho the Popes own Legate To these I might accumulate the Synod at Tholetum Anno 525. congregated by the command of Richard King of the Wisi-Gothes The Synod at Rome Anno 773. cited thither by Charles the great to whom Pope Adrian and that whole Synod consisting of 154. religious Bishops and Abbots gave the right of chusing the Pope and ordaining the Apostolicall See with sundry others yea most of the Councels that I have met with in Surius Binius Crab Merlin Photius Carranza Syrmond Bochellus Spelman Cresconius Fulgentius Ferrandus and other collectors of Councels and Synods have bin alwaies usually called by Emperors and Christian Princes That being most true which the Code of the Liberties of the French Church affirmes That most christian Kings in allages have been accustomed according to the state of things hapning in their Realmes to call Synods and provinciall or Nationall Councels for the ordering of Ecclesiasticall affaires as the forecited presidents with infinite other testifie the forequoted Councels Fathers Popes Historians together with St. Hierom and Pope Gregory the great resolve Most false impudently arrogant then are the assertions of Pope Marcellus Iulius Pelagius Gregory and Symmacus if Gratian misreports not their positions as likewise of Gratian the Canonists Iesuits and Popish Parasites who all sticke not to publish without shame or feare That the power of calling generall nationall and provinciall Councels belongs properly to the Apostolicall See of Rome That regularly no Synod ought to be called without the Popes authority That it is no Councell but a Conventicle which is summoned without his authority And that all Councels without his authority presence in person or by his Legates and ratification are meerly voyd and invalid Parodoxes which all the premises and the constant practise of all ages places sufficiently confute yea and some learned Papists to Nicolaus Cufanus determines the quite contrary in these very termes The authority of a Councell doth not so depend of him by whom it was summoned that unles it be summoned by the Pope it can be no Councell for so we should avoyd all the first eight generall Councels For wee read they were summoned by Emperors not by Popes And the Pope of Rome like other Patriarcks received the Emperors Majesties sacred commandements to come or send to Councels If the Pope be negligent or if hee say nay the Emperour may by his own authority summon Councels by way of command to stay the wavering State of the Church Hence we have one conclusion that in generall Councels and making Lawes the Bishop of Rome hath no such power as certain flatterers give him Thus this learned Cardinall Aeneas Sylvius afterwards Pope Pius the second is as point-blanck as he From these authorities writes he they thinke themselves wonderfully armed who deny that Councels can be kept without the Popes consent whose judgement if it should stand as they woul have it would draw the ruine of the Church with it For what remedy shall there be if a criminous Pope should disturbe the Church if he should destroy soules if he should pervert the people with his ill example if finally he should teach things contrary to faith and should fill his subjects with haereticall Doctrines Should we suffer all things to go to ruine with him But I whiles I read over ancient Histories while I consider the Acts of the Apostles do not verily finde this custome that Popes onely should call Councels Neither afterwards in the time of Constantine the great and of other Emperors when Councels should be called there was no great account made of the Popes consent Durandus De Concilio celebrando Parisiis 1545. Tit. 1 2. Franciscus Zabarella Cardinall of Florence de Schismate Concilio p. 542 543 544 Theodoricus a Niem de Schismate c. 3. 5. 7. p. 154. confesse and teach that it belongs to the Emperors to call Councels The Code of the Liberties of the French Church saith directly Although generall Councels ought not to be called or kept without the Pope nor any thing to be decreed and concluded in them but by his authority by the Ecclesiastical rule made by Popes themselves yet notwithstanding in the French Church it hath been ever resolved that the Pope is not thought to bee above a generall Councell but is bound to keep its Decrees Statutes Precepts no lesse than the people of the Church which is the Spouse of our Lord Iesus Christ and which is especially presented by the Councel Yea William Ranchin a famous French Lawyer though a Papist in his Review of the Councell of Trent l. 1. c. 8. l. 3. c. 1. to 14. and l. 4. c. 1 2 c. not only avers but copiously and irrefragably manifests by pregnant evidences that Generall Nationall Provinciall Councels Synods in all Christian Nations Kingdoms Republikes have alwayes been constantly summoned by Emperors Kings and christian Princes and that neither the Pope nor any Prelates or Ecclesiasticall persons whatsoever have any lawfull power or authority to call them unlesse it be by the speciall licence and authority of Kings and Emperours first obtained The like is maintained and proved at large by Marsilius patavinus Defensoris Pacis pars 2. c. 21. to 27. Rabanus Maurus de Universo l 5. c. 7. Ioannis Marius de Schismate et Conciliis pars 2. c. 1. to 19. p. 507 508. by Carolus Molinaeus in his learned praeface to his Commentary on the Edict of King Henry the second of France Contra parvas Datas et Abusus Curiae Romanae p. 14. to 27. by the resolutions of divers French Councels Synods and Edicts of Parliament cited by Laurentius Bochellus Decreta Eccles Gal. l. 5. Tit. 20. cap. 17. 19 20 21. 29. 33 34 35. 38 39. 41. 43 44 45 46. by the Code of the Liberty of the French Church
there quoted resolving in these positive termes Soliti sunt ab omni aeuo Reges Christianissimi pro ratione rerum quae in Regno suo accidunt habere Synodos aut Concilia Provincialia aut Nationalia in quibus inter alia ad statum Regni pertinontia agitur etiam de Rebus ordinem Disciplinam Ecclesiarum Regni sui spectantibus Unde Regulae innumerae Capitula Leges Ordinationes Pragmaticae Sanctiones eorum Nominibus inscriptae prodierunt Yea their Franciscus Victoria holds that at this day in certain cases a generall Councell may be called against the Popes minde by the Emperor and Christian Princes whether hee will or no. But although some Parasites of the Popes universall Monarchy endeavour to entitle him to this prerogative royall of Christian Princes to summon Synods and Councels contrary to the Resolutions of these and infinite other Popish Authors and the practise of most popish Realmes yet none of them entitle any other Bishops or Prelates to it but the Pope alone unlesse it be by some speciall derivation from the Pope as his Legate so that Bishops cannot claime this power by any immediate inherent right but by a dirivative power onely either from the Pope or Christian Princes and from the Pope no English Prelates Ministers can or dare derive it Thirdly to proceed to our own English Synods and Councels wee shall finde that the right of summoning them and of our Convocations hath alwayes beene an indubitable Prerogative of our Christian Kings or Parliaments which I shall manifest First by presidents Secondly by Parliamentory resolutions Thirdly by the Doctrine Articles and Writers of our Church Fourthly by the determination of King James King Charles and our late Convocations To begin first with Presidents both before and since the Conquest The great Synod held at verolam Anno 446 to suppresse the Pelagian heresie with another great Councell after that Anno 449 to like purpose and the Councell of Wales Anno 465 were summoned by the Kings and Peoples joint assents who together with the Clergie were present and voted in them The Synod of Worcester and at Augustines Oke under Augustine the first Arch-bishop of Canterbury Anno 603. was called Ethelberti Regis ope auxilio by the assistance or summons of King Ethelbert adjutorio usus Edelberti Regis write some So was the Councell held at Canterbury Anno 605 in which both the Clergy and people were present The Synod of Streneshalch An. 664. under Oswy King of Northumberland and Alchfrid his Son who weee present at it was summoned by their appointment to decide the controversie concerning the time of Easter and other differences Anno 693 King Alfrick Synodum Episcoporum convocari fecit caused a Synod of Bishops to be called together Anno 694 a great Councell was summoned to meet at Becanceld by King Withred who sate President therein praecepit convocari concilium who likewise assembled and sate President in the grand Councell of Berghamsted Anno 697. About the yeare 714 there was a great Councell of the Bishops Princes Nobles Earles and of all the wise-men Elders and people of the Realme under King Ina per praeceptum Regis Ina by the precept of this King An. 724 the Synod of Northumberland was conveened authoritate gratia Osredi by the authority and favour of King Osred The famous Councell of Clovesho about the yeare 748 was assembled Ethelbaldi regis Merciorum auxilio who sate President therein and in a former Councell there held Anno 742. The Councell of Calchuth An. 787 was congregated by Offa King of Mercians and Kenulfe King of West-Saxons who together with their Bishops and Elders of the Land senioribus terrae were present at it The Councell of Clyffe An. 800 was convented by King Cenulfe his authoritie and assent A Synod was assembled by King Edward the elder about the yeare 905 Rex praedictam Synodum congregavit write the marginall Authors An. 948. a Councell and Parliament was summoned at London per regium edictum by Aedred his royall edict the King and his Nobles as well as the Bishops being present at it The Councell of Enham An. 1009. ab Ethelredo rege edictum was called by King Ethelred The Councell of Winchester An. 1070. was summoned and celebrated by the procurement of William the Conquerour Rege procurante so was the Synod at Westminster An. 1075. Rex tandem Williesmus de negotiis agere constituens Ecclesiasticis An. 1075. apud Westmonâ—sterium Synodum coegit This being the undoubted right of Kings in those dayes caused Archbishop Anselme though a great stickler for the Popes and Prelates supremacie An. 1093. to move King William Rufus to command Councels to be revived after the ancient manner Jube ait si placet Concilia ex antiquo usu renovari quae perperam acta sunt in medium revocari who after held a Councell at Westminster An. 1102. by King Henry 1. his assent ipso annuente The Councell at Westminster held by the Popes â—echerous Legate John de Crema An. 1125. was assembled Regis licencia by the Kings owne licence and the Councell of London An. 1129. summoned by this King The Councell at Oxford against the Publicans was called by King Henry the second his Writ Rex Episcopale praecepit concilium congregari writes Neubrigensis So the Synod of Cassels in Ireland for setling and reforming that Church was congregated by King Henry the second his authoritie and command The Councell held by Hugo Cardinalis the Popes Legat at London under the same King An. 1176. was favore regio adjutus called by the Kings favour and assistance The Councell of London under Otho the Popes Legate An. 1237. was summoned by King Henry the third his authoritie and consent And all Synods Councels Convocations from that time till this present have ever been summoned by the Kings speciall Writs for the most part as is evident by Matthew Parkers Antiquitates Ecclesiae Britannicae and by these ensuing ancient Presidents following remaining upon Record Breve pro Convocat ' habenda apud Lincoln Anno Dom. 1321. Ed. Reg. 16. Convocatio inchoata vigore brevis regii die Lunae proxim post fastum S. Sabiani Sebastiani An. Dom. 1369. Alia inchoat ' eodem An. 21. die Januarii Convocat ' inchoat ' vigore brevis die Lunae proxim ' post festum Pent ' An. 1376. Convocat ' inchoat ' vigore brevis die Lunae 9. die Novembris An. 1377. Convocat ' inchoat ' 7. Maii An. Dom. 1382. quoad process contra Haereticos Convocat ' inchoat ' 18. Novemb. An. Dom. 1382. continuat ' ad 6. diem Janu. prox ' sequènt ' Convocat ' inchoat ' 2 Decemb. An. 1383. contin ' ad 4. diem ejusdem mensis Convocat ' inchoat ' 20. Maii An. Dom. 1384. contin ' ad festum Pent ' sequent Convocat
' inchoat ' 1. Decem. 1384. contin ' ad diem Lunae prox ' post festum corp ' Christi Convocat ' inchoat ' 6. Novem. 1385. contin ' ad 7. diem Decem. An. praedict Convocat ' inchoat ' 5. Novem. 1386. contin ' ad 3. diem Decem. An. praedict Convocat ' inchoat ' 26. Febr. 1387. contin ' ad 4. diem Martii sequent Convocat ' inchoat ' 17. Octob. 1388. contin ' ad 22. diem Octob. praedict Convocat ' inchoat ' 17. Apr. 1391. contin ' ad 21. diem Apr. praedict Convocat ' inchoat ' 5. die Febr. 1394. contin ' ad 18. diem ejusdem mensis Convocat ' inchoat ' 6. Maii An. Dom. 1460. contin ' ad 15. diem Julii An. praedict Convocat ' inchoat ' 6. Julii An. Dom. 1463. contin ' ad 18. diem Julii praedict Convocat ' inchoat ' 21. Martii 1480. contin ' ad 15. diem Novem. 1481. Convocat ' inchoat ' 13. Febr. 1486. contin ' ad 27. diem Febr. praedict Convocat ' inchoat ' 14. Iaâ—â—ar 1487. contin ' ad 27. diem Febr. praedict The Presidents since these being more obvious and infinite I pretermit Indeed I finde some Convocations and Synods summoned without any speciall Writs yet extant which perchance are lost however though they were summoned without speciall Writs yet it was alwayes by the Kings licence priviâ—â— and assistance first obtained or by former adjournments and not by virtue of any summons from the Pope Arch-bishop of Canterbury or any other Prelates without or against the Kings command as some of the ensuing Presidents manifest in direct termes Convocatio inchoata absque brevi mense Julii An. Dom. 1295. Convocatio inchoata absque brevi die alia dominica qua cantabatur officium laetare eodem Anno. Convocat ' inchoat ' absque brevi die S. Hillarii An. Dom. 1297. Alia absque brevi pro defensione Ecclesiae cont ' Scotos die S. Edmundi Regis eodem Anno. Convocat ' inchoat ' ad instantiam Regis regressi à Flandriae inchoat ' festo Nativ ' S. Johannis Baptistae An. Dom. 1298. Convocat ' Concilii provincialis absque brevi inchoat ' 16. Maii An. Dom. 1356. Convocat ' Cleri Provinciae Cant ' ad supplicationem dom Reg. inchoat ' die Mercurii proxim ' post dominicam qua cantatur officium misericordia Domini in Ecclesia S. Brigittae Londin An. Dom. 1356. Convocat ' inchoat ' absque brevi die Jovis prox post festum S. Georgii Martyris 24. April An. Dom. 1371. Convocat ' inchoat ' absque brevi 1. die Decemb. An. Dom. 1373. Convocat ' inchoat ' absque brevi 8. Febr. An. 1576. Convocat ' inchoat ' absque brevi 5. Novemb. An. Dom. 1377. Convocat ' inchoat ' absque brevi 9. Maii. 1379. Convocat ' inchoat ' absque brevi die Sabbat proxim ' post festum Purificationis S. Mariae Virginis An. Dom. 1379. Convocat ' inchoat ' absque brevi 1. Decemb. An. Dom. 1380. Since this time I finde no Synod Councell or Convocation ever summoned or assembled but by the Kings speciall Writs yet extant among our Records the particularizing whereof being superfluous I shall here omit Secondly our Acts of Parliament expresly resolve that our Convocations Synods Councels ought to be summoned onely by the Kings Writ Hence the Statute of 8. H. 6. c. 1. recites That all the Clergie are to be called to the Convocation by the Kings Writ and thereupon enacts That they and their servants shall for ever hereafter fully use and enjoy such liberties and defence in comming going and tarrying as the great men and Commonalty of England called to the Kings Parliament doe enjoy Hence the whole Clergie of England in their submission in Parliament 25. H. 8. c. 19. 27. H. 8. c. 15. made this acknowledgment Whereas the Kings humble and obedient subjects the Clergie of the Realme of England have acknowledged according to truth THAT THE CONVOCATION OF THE SAME CLERGY IS ALWAYES HATH BEEN AND OUGHT TO BE ASSEMBLED ONLY BY THE KINGS WRIT c. And thereupon these Statutes among other things enact according to this submission and Petition of the said Clergie that they ne any of them from henceforth should make promulge or execute any new Canons c. in their Convocations in times comming which ALWAYES SHALL BE ASSEMBLED BY AUTHORITY OF THE KINGS WRIT c. A cleare confession and resolution that Councels Synods and Convocations here in England alwaies have been are and for ever hereafter ought to be called and summoned not by the Popes or Prelates authority and citations but by the Kings royall authoritie and Writ Hence the English Clergie in most Bills of their Subsidies since as in 27. Eliz. c. 28. 29. Eliz. The Act of one Subsidie granted by the Clergie 31. Eliz. c. 14. 35. Eliz. c. 12. 39. Eliz. c. 26. 43. Eliz. c. 17. 3. Jacobi c. 25. 7. Jacobi c. 22. 21. Jacobi c. 32. 1. Caroli c. 1. 3. Caroli c. 6. have inserted this clause in the prologue of their Subsidies Vestrae serenissimae regiae Majestati or sublimitati per praesens publicum instrumentum sive has literas nostras testimoniales significamus notum facimus quod Praelati Clerus nostrae Cantuariensis Provinciae IN SACRA SYNODO PROVINCIALI SIVE CONVOCATIONE VIGORE ET AVTORITATE BREVIS REGII VESTRI IN EA PARTE NOBIS DIRECTI in domo capitulari ECCLESIAE VESTRAE CATHEDRALIS divi Pauli London vicesimo quarto die mensis Novembris Anno Dom. c. inchoata celebrata to testifie that their Synods Convocations are and ought to be summoned and held only by virtue and authoritie of the Kings Royall Writ and why not then their Visitations being in truth Convocations and Synods Thirdly the whole Church of England in the 39. Articles of Religion ratified by Parliament and all Clergy-mens subscriptions to them as also by our present Soveraigns Declaration prefixt before them Anno 1628. Artic. 21. and the whole Church of Ireland in their Articles of Religion Anno 1615. Artic. 76. unanimously resolve as an Article of Religion not to be questioned That generall Councels and by the selfe-same reason Nationall and Provinciall may not be gathered together by Popes Prelates or any other persons without the Commandement or will of Princes Therefore the sole right of summoning them belongs not to Popes or Prelates but to Princes and other supreme temporall Magistrates And as these Articles so the learned Writers of our Church as incomparable Bishop Jewell in the defence of the Apologie of the Church of England part 1. c. 9. Divis 1. p 52 54. part 6. c. 12. Divis 2. p. 58â— to 592. Reply to Master Hardings answer Artic. 4. Divis 19. and 26. p. 193. 212 213 214. Bishop Alley in his poore mans Library Tom. 2. Miscellanea Praelect 1. f. 18 19 20. Bishop Bilson in his true difference between Christian subjection unchristian rebellion passim Doctor William Whittakers
Controversia 3 de Conciâ—â—s Quaest 2. p. 577. to 585. Doctor Willets Synopsis Papismi Controversi 3. Concerning generall Councels Quaestion 2. Doctor John White his way to the true Church sect 29. n. 28. p. 111. Master Rogers his Analysis on the 21. Article Proposition 1. with sundry others whom I pretermit subscribe and justifie this truth against all Romish opposites And if these be not sufficient all the Reformed Churches in their several confessions registred in the Harmony of confessions cited by Master Rogers in his Analysis of the 21 Article with the whole Classe of their learned Writers unanimously resolve That the power of calling Councels Convocations Synods belongs not to Popes or Prelates but only to Christian Emperors Kings Princes and other chief temporall Magistrates which our late famous King James in the last place in his Letters Patents prefixed before the Canons and Ecclesiasticall Constitutions made in Convocation Anno 1603. ratifies to the full affirming that the Synod and Convocation at that time held was and ought to bee summoned and called only by vertue of his royall Writ The like is affirmed by our present Soveraigne King Charles in his Declaration before the 39. Articles and in his Patents Commissions licenses for making the last new Canons 1640. and resolved in the first Canon thereof From this 1. Proposition thus plentifully ratified by uncontrolable Presidents and publike Authorities of whole Synods Parliaments States in all ages which infinitely over-ballance the inconsiderable rash opinions of any private men I shall deduce these Consectaries 1. That the chiefest care of defending propagating the true Religion suppressing errors haeresies schismes vices and enacting Laws Canons for this end for the Churches peace Government and advancement of Gods true Worship belongs to Christian Princes or supreme temporall Magistrates and is an essentiall part of their duty because the right and trust of calling Synods Councels upon all such occasions is thus originally vested in them 2. That Synods Councels are very useful necessary profitable to the Churches of Christ if rightly ordered else God himself all Christian kingdoms states Churches would not have invested Kings supream civill Magistrates with such a power of convening them nor all Christian Kings Emperors but made so frequent use of this their power not onely without opposition but even with publike approbation yea such hath been the necessity and expediency of Synods and Councels in all Christian Churches in all ages That the generall Councell of Nice An. 363 the Councell of Antioch Can. 20. the first Councell of Constantinople Can. 3. the Councel of Africke Can. 18. the Councell of Chalcedon Can. 19. the third Councell of Toledo under King Reccaredus An. 600. cap. 18. the fourth Councell of Toledo under King Sisenandus An. 6â—1 the Greeke Synods collected by Martin Bishop of Bracara cap. 18. the second Councell of Arelat Can. 2. the third at the same place Can. 1. and the fourth Can. 37. the second Synod of Towers Can. 1. the fifth Councell of Orleans cap. 11. the Councell of Hereford under King Egfred An. 670. the sixth Councell of Constantinople Can. 8. the Councell of Antricum Can. 7. the Councell of Mascon Can. 20. the Synod of Soissons under King Childeric the Councell under King Pepin at the Pallace of Vernis An. 755. cap. 4. the Councell of Paris under Lewis and Lothaire An. 829. the Councell of Meaux An. 845. cap. 32. yea the great Councell of Basill An. 1331. with sundry other Councels Decree that a Synod or Councell shall be kept twice or thrice or at the least once every yeare at a certaine time and place in every Province That all Bishops and others unlesse hindered by sicknesse or other inevitable occasions should be present at it and not depart from it till all businesses were ended and the Councell determined under paine of Excommunication that none should interrupt not keep back any necessary members from them Therefore certainly they are both expedient and necessary for the Church not uselesse antichristian diabolicall and pernicious to the Church as some Papists Arminians Socinians hertofore and Independents now scandalously ignorantly if not maliciously deeme them Sect. 2. THat Bishops and Clergie-men when assembled in Councels Synods and Convocations by Christian Princes and Magistrates have alwayes been limited and directed by them not onely for the time and place of their meeting but likewise for the manner and matter of their debates and proceedings having no power liberty to debate or determine any thing but what was first prescribed them by their summoners or by their speciall Licence first obtained With a touch of Princes and Laymens presiding judging voting in Synods and Councels Secondly As Bishops and Clergy-men cannot summon Councels or Convocations not yet assembled together in them but by the Princes and supreme temporall Magistrates authority who alwayes appointed both the time and place of their meeting continuance and dissolution as all ages Authors attest so when they are lawfully met in Councels they cannot debate determine any points of faith nor yet frame any Ecclesiasticall Canons Lawes Constitutions in them but by the Princes or Magistrates licence direction that summoned them who have always both abroad and at home prescribed them either in generall or speciall termes what things they should debate treat of and conclude in their Synods confining them to such particulars for the determination and ordering whereof they were convened as well as to the time and place of their assembling This is evident by sundry Presidents The first famous generall Councell of Nice and the Bishops therein assembled were thus licensed and limited by Constantine the great who fate President in it as Eusebius with others manifest at large The Bishops assembled by him in the Synod of Tyrus were limited likewise by him how to proceed and what to treat of as appears by his letters to them wherein after he had exhorted them to peace and unity he chargeth them not to delay but to define the present controversies with al earnest endeavour within those fitting bounds he there prescribed telling them That he had sent Dionysius the Consull to admonish them of all things they were to do and who ought to be present at their Synod Maximè vero ut idem animadversor sit custos conservandae aequalitatis ordinis but especially that he should be an observer and keeper of that aequability and order which he had prescribed to be observed in that Synod The Bishops assembled by Constantius his Edict in the Councell of Ariminum most humbly requested his Majesty of his gracious favour and wonted clemency to grant them license and lawfull favour firmely to persevere in those things which their ancestors had decreed and that nothing might be diminished or added unto the old and ancient decrees In the Councell held at Seleucia summoned by Constantius precept it was commanded by this
it as he thought meet as the beginning and end of every action of that Councell manifests Praesidente eodem piissimo Christo dilecto magno Imperatore Constantino Constantinus piissimus Imperator dixit sufficit c. being frequent in it and many of his temporall Lords and Officers sate there as Iudges with him The seventh generall Idolatrous Councell of Nice was likewise regulated directed by the Letters of Constantine and Irene by Petronius the Proconsul Theophilus an Earle of the Emperours retinue and by Iohn his royall Porter and treasurer of his Army with other Senators who sate as chiefe Moderators in that Councell The eighth generall Councell was prescribed and directed how to proceed and what to treat of by the Emperour Basilius who caused his Princes Nobles to sit in that Councell as principall directors whose judgement the Popes Legates themselves in that Councell demanded himselfe sitting sometimes in person therein as chiefe President As all these generall Councels were thus regulated and directed by those Emperours that summoned them and debated concluded nothing but by their speciall license and direction so all other forecited Nationall and Provinciall Councels were likewise limited and directed by those Emperours and Kings that called them as the fore-alleaged quotations evidence at large to such as will peruse them many of these Emperours or their temporall deputies sitting personally in them as chiefe Presidents and Moderators The Bishops in the first Councell of Orleance Anno 500 write thus to King Clodoveus who summoned them Al the Priests which ye have summoned to the Councell and commanded to meet together to treat of necessary things secundum vestrae voluntatis consultationem ET TITULOS QVOS DEDISTIS according to the consultation of your pleasure and the Titles You have given us to consult of we have deferred those things which seeme meet to us so as if those things which we have concluded may likewise be approved to be right by your judgment the consent of so great a King and of a greater Lord may by his sentence and authority confirme the sentence of so many Clergy-men to be observed Lo here the King prescribes this Councell particularly in writing what Articles they should treat of In the severall Councell of Basil Florence Lateran Constans Sennes and Trent summoned by the Popes usurped authority the Emperours Kings Dukes and Princes who sent any Bishops to those Councels had their Embassadours and Agents though Lay-men present at them swaying and directing them as they thought meet though in some of them the Popes faction bare the greatest stroke as the severall Acts of these Councels testifie some of which made choice of those Princes for their Protectors against the Popes Tyrannie and usurpations which they limited decreeing a Councell to be above the Pope and he to be bound by its determinations as well as others some Popes being accused convented and deprived by them though they summoned them or rather were enforced to call them by the Emperours and other Princes against their wills To conclude with forraigne presidents the late famous Synod of Dort Anno 1618. was summoned by the Estates of the Netherlands who enacted certaine Lawes and prescribed Articles to the Synod according to which they should proceed appointing likewise divers Lay-men to sit in that Councel as their Delegates commanding and enjoining them and every of them in their name and in their authority to open the Synod and in all and singular Sessions and Actions to be present in their name so to compose and order all things with their prudence counsell and moderation which belonged to their inspection and care according to those speciall instructions they had given them and the Articles they had framed for the ordering and holding of that Synod which had power to treat of order or determine nothing but what they had commission and licence from the States In few words the famous Lawyer William Ranchin though a Papist resolves and proves at large in his Review of the Councell of Trent l. 3. c. 10. That it belongs to Emperours and Kings to prescribe not onely the place time beginning and ending but the very forme of Councels proceedings both in respect of persons matters to be debated and all other circumstances As for Lay-mens presence presidencie and Votes in Councels to give a little satisfaction herein in this Section it is evident by the fore-cited Texts in the old Testament and by Presidents in the New as Acts 6. 1. to 8. c. 15. 4. 9. 22. to 30. c. 16 4. c. 21. 22. That Lay-men were not onely present but had Votes and consents in the first Apostolicall Councels In the Councell of Ephesus Candidianus a Noble-man was appointed by the Emperour to hold the Fathers there assembled to the points proposed and to keepe every man in order giving the chief directions therein In the French Synod under Childerick and Charleman Anno 742. In the Synod of Soissons Anno 744. of Wormes Anno 787. of Meaux Anno 845. of Pistis Anno 863. of Tribur under King Arnulph of Paris under Philip Augustus An. 1179 and 1184. of Vezelay under Lawes the young of Paris under Philip the faire called against Boniface the 8. of Bourges under Charles the seventh which made the pragmatick sanction of Toledo 6. 8. 12. of Rome under Otho the first of Wormes under Henry the third in the Councell held in the South part of England An. 903. under King Edward and Raymond in the Councell of London under King Stephen An. 1150. these severall Kings together with their Barons Nobles and other Lay-men were present in all these Synods Councells as well as Clergie-men or Prelates and gave consenting confirming Votes to things debated concluded in them these Synods being in truth meere Parliaments as I shall hereafter manifest In the Councell of Constance there were present not onely the Emperour but divers Embassadours Nobles and Lay-men of great quality and condition to wit 24 Dukes 140 Earles divers Delegates of Cities and Corporations divers learned Lawyers and Burgesses of Vniversities who were not debarred from voices and power of deliberating therein In the first Councell of pisa there were present to the number of 400 Lay-men of note delegates of Cities Vniversities States Princes and Doctors of Law who not only deposed two Anti-popes and elected a third true Pope but likewise treated of points of Divinity and made many good ordinances for the Church of God In the second Councell of Pisa there were many such Delegates Doctors of Law and Lay-men well skilled in divine and humane matters In the first Councell of Nice there were present writes Socrates many very learned Lay-men and well skilled in disputation who puzzled great Philosophers in matters of dispute In the generall Councell at Reimes holden by Pope Eugenius the third there were a great company of Nobles as well as Bishops
such Canons Orders Ordinances and Constitutions as they shall thinke necessary fit and convenient for the honour and service of Almighty God and quiet of the Church and the better government therof c. And our present Soveraign King Charles in his Declaration printed before the 39. Articles of the Church of England made by the advise of so many of the Bishops as might conveniently be called twice printed by his speciall command An. 1628. resolves in these very words this point of his royall Prorogative derived from his Predecessors That We are supreame Governour of the Church of England and that If any difference arise about the externall policie concerning Iniunctions Canons or other Constitutions whatsoever thereto belonging the Clergy in their Convocation not the Bishops in their Consistories Visitations or high Commissions is to order and settle them having first obtained leave under Our broad Seale so to do and We approving their said Ordinances and Constitutions provided that none be made contrary to the Lawes and Customes of the Land What power our Kings have excercised in Convocations to direct and limit them in all their proceedings determinations Canons in former ages especially since 25. Hen. 8. c. 19. will appeare First by the forme of our Kings Writs for summoning a Convocation of which I shall give you onely one late president agreeing in forme and substance with all former Writs of this kinde CAROLVS Dei gratia Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Rex fidei defensor c. Reverendissimo in Christo Patri ac fideli Conciliariâ— Nostro Gulielmo eadem gratia Cantur A chiepis totius Angliae Primati Metropolitano salutem Quibusdam arduis urgentibus negotiis Nos securitatem defensionem Ecclesiae Anglicanae ac pacem tranquilitatem bonum publicum Defensionem regni Nostri subditorum Nostrorum ejusdem concernentibus Vobis in fide dilectione quibus Nobis tenemini rogando mandamus quatenus remissis debito intuitu attentis ponderatis universos singulos Episcopos vestrae Provinciae ac Decanos Ecclesiarum Cathedralium nec non Archidiaconos Capitula Collegia totumque Cleâ—um cujuslibet diocesios ejusdem Provinciae ad comparendum coram vobis in Ecclesia Catholica sancti Pauli London decimoquarto die Aprilis proximè futuro vel alibi prout melius expedire videritis cum omni celeritate accommoda modo debito convocari facias ad tractandum consentiendum concludendum super premissis aliis quae tibi clarius exponentur tunc ibidem ex parte Nostra Et hoc sicut Nos Statum Regni Nostri ac honorem utilitatem Ecclesiae praedictae diligitis nulla tenus omittatis Teste meipso apud Westmonast vicesimo die Februarii Anno regni Nostri quintodecimo Secondly by the forme of the Kings royall License commonly granted to the Convocation before they may or can debate of any thing particularly the forme whereof you may discerne in this subjoyned directed to the last Convocation 1640. CHARLES By the Grace of God King of England Scotland France and Ireland Defender of the Faith c. To all to whom these presents shall come greeting Whereas in and by one Act of Parliament made at Westminster in the five and twentieth year of the Raigne of King Henry the Eighth reciting That whereas the Kings humble and obedient Subjects the Clergie of this Realme of England had not onely knowledged according to the truth that the Convocation of the same Clergie were alwayes had bin and ought to bee assembled by the Kings Writ but also submitting themselves to the Kings Majesty had promised in verbo Sacerdotii that they would never from thenceforth presume to attempt alledge claime or put in uâ—e or enact promulge or execute any new Canons Constitutions Ordinances provinciall or other or by whatsoever other name they should bee called in the Convocation unlesse the said Kings most Royall assent and license might to them be had to make promulge and execute the same and that the said King did give his most Royall assent and authority in that behalfe It was therefore enacted by the authority of the sayd Parliament according to the said submission and Petition of the said Clergie amongst other things that they nor any of them from thenceforth should enact promulge or execute any such Canons Constitutions or Ordinances provinciall by whatsoever name or names they might be called in their Convocations in time comming which alwayes shall bee assembled by authority of the Kings Writ unlesse the same Clergie might have the Kings most Royall assent and license to make promulge and execute such Canons Constitutions and Ordinances provinciall or Synodall upon pain of every one of the said Clergie doing contrary to the said Act and being thereof convict to suffer imprisonment and make fine at the Kings will c. Know ye that We for divers urgent and waighty causes and considerations Vs thereunto especially moving of Our especiall Grace certaine knowledge and meere motion have by vertue of Our Prerogative Royall and supream authority in Causes Ecclesiasticall given and granted and by these presents do give and grant full free and lawfull liberty license power and authority unto the most Reverend Father in God William Lord Arch-Bishop of Canâ—terbury Primate of all England and Metropolitan President of this Convocation for the Province of Canterbury and to the rest of the Bishops of the same Province and to all Deans of Cathedrall Churches Archdeacons Chapters and Colledges and the whole Clergy of every severall Diocesse within the said Province that they or the greater number of them wherof the said President of the said Convocation to be alwayes one shall and may from time to time during our will and pleasure propose conferre treat debate consider consult and agree upon the exposition or alteration of any Canon or Canons now in force and of and upon such other new Canons Orders Ordinances and Constitutions as they the said Lord Arch-bishop of Canterbury President of the said Convocation and the rest of the said Bishops and other the Clergie of the same Province or the greater number of them wherof the sayd Lord Arch-bishop of Canterbury President of the said Convocation to be one shall thinke necessary fit and convenient for the honor and service of Almighty God the good and quiet of the Church and the better government thereof to be from time to time observed performed fulfilled and kept as well by the sayd Lord Arch-bishop of Canterbury the Bishops and their successors and the rest of the whole Clergy of the sayd Province of Canterbury in their severall callings offices Functions Ministeries degrees and administrations as also by all and every Deane of the Arches and other Iudges of the sayd Arch-bishops Courts Guardians of Spiritualties Chancellors Deans and Chapters Archdeacons Commissaries Officialls Registers and all and every other Ecclesiasticall Officers and their inferiour ministers whatsoever of the same Province
by Parliament only THirdly As Bishops and Clergy-men have no power at all to summon Councells Synods or Convocations nor yet to treat or conclude of any Ecclesiasticall Canons or Constitutions in them c. without the speciall licences of Kings under their Great Seals authorizing them so I shall next manifest that when Councells or Synods have by vertue of their license agreed on and composed any such Articles Canons Constitutions Orders Ceremonies c. they cannot print publish promulge impose execute or put them in ure nor are they of any binding force or authority till they are approved ratified confirmed by Kings and Christian Princes Subscriptions Imperiall Edicts Patents Acts of State and Parliament and that most ancient Councells Synods were but Parliaments wherein Kings Nobles and Lay-men were present as well as Clergy-men This I shall manifest by some Presidents both abroad and at home in all ages To begin with Scripture Testimonies When all the whole Congregation of Israel assembled by the summons of Joshua had in their Convocation at Shechem made a Covenant Ordinance and Statute that they would serve the Lord and obey his voyce Joshua being then their chiefe Governour confirmed the same by writing it in the Book of the Law of God and erecting a great stone in the place for a witnesse thereof When the Princes and all the Congregation in Jerusalem assembled by King Hezechiah had took counsell together and concluded to keep the Passeover in the second Moneth because they could not doe it on the first the King established their Decree by his Proclamation and Letters When the Jewes upon Mordecai his Letter to them had in a publike Convocation ordained and took upon them and their seed to keep the feast of Purim throughout every generation family province and city in remembrance of their great deliverance from Hamans conspiracy against them Queene Esther and Mordecai wrote with all authority and confirmed this Feast and Decree by their Letters the Decree of Esther Yea we read that when the Presidents Governours Princes Counsellours and Captains of King Darius to entrap Daniel moved him to establish a royall Statute and make a firme Decree that whosoever should aske a petition of any god or man for thirty dayes save of the King hee should bee cast into the Lyons denne they brought this Decree to Darius to establish and signe that it should not bee changed requesting him to signe it who did it accordingly else it had not been obligatory And wee likewise find in Scripture that when as the King of Nineveh and his great men upon Jonah his preaching had made a Decree for a publike Fast the King confirmed and published it to bee observed by his Proclamation To come to Councells under Christian Princes and Emperours The first famous Synod of Nice with the Constitutions Canons and Decrees therein compiled were confirmed by the Imperiall Edicts of Constantine the Great who sate President in it Edictum quod quidem pondus habebat autoritatem cum hac Epistola Imperator in singulas misit Civitates writes Eusebius Who records further of him That hee confirmed and consigned by his authority the Canons made by Bishops in publike Councells that so it might not bee lawfull for the Princes of other Nations to abrogate the things which were decreed by them Which had been invalid without his Imperiall confirmation The Councell kept at Rome under Pope Sylvester was confirmed by the subscription of Constantine and Helena his mother The second generall Councell of Constantinople after they had finished their Decrees and Canons sent them with this Epistle to Theodosius the Elder desiring him to ratifie them In the beginning verily of our writing to your Piety wee give thanks to God who hath constituted the government of your Majesty for the common peace of the Churches and the CONFIRMATION of the true Faith But giving God due thanks wee likewise referre to your Majesty those necessary things which are acted in the sacred Councell to wit that from the time wee assembled at Constantinople by your Majesties command wee have first of all renued our mutuall concord between us and after this we have prescribed and pronounced as it were certaine Conclusions or Canons in which we have confirmed and approved the faith of the Fathers assembled at Nice and have rejected with extreme execration and detestation the preverse heresies and wicked opinions which have sprung up against it Moreover also for the right setling and ordering of the state and discipline of the Churches wee have enacted and prescribed certaine Canons all which wee have annexed to this our Writing Wee therefore beseech your Clemency VT PER LITERAS TVAE PIET ATIS RATVM ESSE IVBEAS CONFIRMES QVE CONCILII DECRETVM that by your Majesties Letters you would command the Decree of the Councell to bee ratified and confirme the same and as you have honoured the Church with those Letters by which you have called us together so you would likewise CORROBORATE WITH YOVR DECREE AND SEALE THE SVMME AND CONCLVSION OF THOSE THINGS WHICH ARE DECREED And hereupon writes Nicephorus CONSTITVTIONE QVO QVE IMPERATOR SANXIT the Emperour enacted by his Constitution that the authority of the Nicene Creed should bee firme and perpetuall and that all Churches in all places should bee committed to those who professed one Divinity of the Father Son and holy Ghost in the subsistence of three Persons of the same honour and glory And likewise made a Law that those who abhered from the profession of this faith should not keep any Ecclesiasticall assemblies nor should not presume thenceforth to preach concerning the Faith nor have power to elect or consecrate any one that they should bee banished out of the City and Country fined and have no communion with other Citizens c. Which Edicts of his are Registred verbatim by Justinian The Synod of Ancyra sent Legates to Constantius informing him that Eudoxius did study to deprave the Faith requesting him TO CONFIRME THOSE THINGS which were decreed at Sardice Syrnium and in other Synods So the Catholike Bishops in the Councell of Ariminum write to the same Constantius beseeching him to heare their Orators who should declare unto him the Sentence of that their Councell in writing and not to permit any innovation or change but to suffer them to rest in those things which were lawfully defined and decreed by their Ancestors and that nothing might be added to or detracted from their Constitutions but that they all might remaine untouched and intire as they were preserved by the piety of his Father till that time The Councell of Africk Can. 25. to 32 34 42 51 59 60. and the Bishops therein assembled make divers petitions and requests to the Emperor Honorius and the temporall Judges and Magistrates to reforme Idolatry suppresse the Donatists and reform many abuses by them complained of by their Lawes and
succedentium temporum regni sortitus fuerit apicem non ante conscendat regiam sedem quà m inter reliqua conditionum sacramenta pollicitus fuerit hanc se Catholicam non permissurum eos violare fidem c. In the eighth Councell of Toledo King Recessuinthus who called it entred into the Synod in person and made an elegant pious Oration to the Prelates and Nobles assembled in it after which hee exhibited a Roll of those things and Canons which hee desired to be publikely ratified in that Councell written in his Royall name comprising therein the confession of his faith and ratifying the Faith and Constitutions of the foure first generall Councells which hee thus subscribed In nomine Domini Flavius Recessuinthus Rex hanc fidei bonae voluntatis meae deliberationem manu mea subscripsi The twelfth Canon of this Councell concernes State businesses and all those Canons were published and ratified in the Kings name as these words at the end of the twelfth Canon evidence Hujus quoque sententiae fortitudine vel vigore decreti nostri seriem quam in serenissimi Domini nostri Recessuinthi Regis EDIDIMVS NOMINE pro rebus à divae memoriae Patre suo quolibet titulo conquisitis decernimus omnino constare c. Yea divers Earles and Nobles subscribed their names in ratification of the Canons of this Councell as well as Bishops as Odoacer Osilo Adulphus Babilo Ataculphus Ellae Paulus Euuntius Rucchila Afrila Venedmus Faudila Euredus Cunsredus Froila with other Earles This Councell published a Decree in the Kings name concerning the right of the Crowne and State Government which manifests it to be a kind of Parliament compacted as well of the Temporalty as the Clergy and King Recessuinthus himselfe promulgated a Law therein in ratification of that decree of theirs both which are at large recorded by Surius The ninth and tenth Councells of Toledo were called and confirmed by the same Recessuinthus for whom the Prelates in these Councells oft-times give thanks to God doing all things by his direction assent and in his name Opitulante miseratione divina gloriosissimi Recessuinthi Principis inhoerente voluntate religiosa The eleventh Councell of Toledo was ratified by KingVvambanus Cujus hortatu aggregandi nobis facultas data est oportuna corrigendis praeparata est disciplina Iste est ergo tenor fidei nostrae qui à capite copiosè profluxit à membris probatus gloriosè emicuit saith the Prologue of the Bishops assembled in that Councell and the sixteenth Canon of it Constantinus Pogonatus as hee called the sixth generall Councell of Constantinople by his writs so hee sate President therein with divers of his Nobles Princes Senators ordered swayed directed all things in it ratifying the Acts and Decrees thereof both by his Subscription and Imperiall Lawes Hence wee so often read in that Councell these and the like passages Praesidente eodem piissimo Christo amabili Imperatore Constantino Piissimus Imperator Constantinus dixit sancta Synodus dixit Quod nunc à vestra serenitate piè jussum est fiat Constantinus piissimus Imperator sancta Synodus dixerunt Constantinus piissimus Imperator dixit Sufficiunt quae hodierna die relicta sunt reliqua verò in sequenti secretario religantur Meminit vestra pietas haec sancta Synodus Residentibus quoque gloriosissimis Patriciis Consulibus ex latere venerandissimi piissimi Christi amatoris Imperatoris nostri Constantini Gloriosissimi Judices dixerunt Diversis vicibus in praesentia piissimi nostri Domini magni Imperatoric cuncti nostri Concilii interrogatus fuit Gloriosi Judices dixerunt Sufficiunt quae hodierna die acta sunt Releguntur ista c. Subscriptio piissimi Christo dilecti Constantini Imperatoris legimus subscripsimus Constantinus piissimus Imperator dixit Edicat sanctum universale Concilium si cum consensu omnium Episcoporum promulgata est definitio quae ad praesens relicta est Sanctum Concilium exclamavit Omnes ità credimus Vna fides Omnes idipsum sentimus Omnes consentientes amplectentes subscripsimus Orthodoxe omnia credimus Multos annos Imperatori c. Sancta Synodus exclamavit Multos annos Imperatori Christo dilecto Imperatori multos annos Pium Christianum Imperatorem Domine conserva ORTHODOXAM FIDEM TV CONFIRMASTI Aeterna memoria Imperatori aeternum permaneat vestrum Imperium At the end of the 18 th Action of this Councell follow two Imperiall Edicts of Constantine Pogonatus ratifying the Actions and Determinations thereof under severe penalties in the later of which he saith thus of his owne Subscription and Ratification of that Synod In qua Imperium nostrum subscripsit per pia dicta nostra COMPROBAVIT EAM Pope Leo the second in his Epistle to this pious Emperor highly approved and applauded this his piety zeale and princely care for advancing Religion suppressing heresies and schismes and for his Acts and proceedings in this generall Councell testifying his assent thereto as to a generall Councell worthy to bee ranked with those other famous generall Councells held before it exhorting the whole Church of God securely to rejoyce that God had raised her up such a Defender and Benefactor cujus studio orthodoxa fides recollecto splendore toto orbe irradiat fideles omnes gratiam referentes exultant infideles moeror atque dejectio comprimit confundit Ecclesiae Christi de cunctis oppressionibus liberatae respirant donis Imperialibus confoventur principali praesidio muniuntur So farre were Popes in those dayes from carping at Emperors proceedings in matters of Religion and their Presidentship and presence in generall Councells Neither did this Constantine onely but likewise Justinian the second his sonne and Successor in the Empire confirme the Decrees and Canons of this generall Synod viz. those Canons in Trullus with his Imperiall Edict causing all his Nobles Senate Bishops Captaines Souldiers and others to subscribe it as himselfe records in his Letter to Pope John In nomine Domini Dei Salvatoris nostri Jesu Christi Imperator Caesar Flavius Justinianus fidelis in Jesu Christo pacificus pius perpetum petuus Augustus c. Magnum studium magnam sollicitudinem nos habentes pro stabilitate immaculatae Christianorum fidei c. Quia Synodalia gesta eorumque definitionem quam instituere noscitur sanctum sextum Concilium quod congregatum est in tempore sancta memoriae nostri Patris in hanc à Deo conservandam regiam urbem apud quosdam nostros Judices remiserunt Neque omnino praevidimus alterum aliquem apud se detinere ea sine nostra piissima Serenitate eo quod Nos copiosos misericordia noster Deus custodes constituit immaculatae Christianorum fidei sed mox adduximus nostros Patres sanctissimos ac beatissimos Patriarchas sacratissimum Senatum verum etiam
Deo amabiles Motropolitas Episcopos qui hîc in regia urbe commorantur dcinceps Militantes incolas sancti Palatii necnon ex Collegiis popularibus ab excubitoribus insuper etiam quosdam de Christo dilectis exercitibus tam ab à Deo conservando Imperiali obsequio quamque ab Orientali Thraciano similiter ab Armeniano etiam ab exercitu Italiae deinde ex Cabarisnianis Septensianâ—s seu de Sardinia atque de Africano exercitu qui ad nostram pietatem ingressi sunt jussimus praefatas Synodaelium gestorum chartas in medium adduci CORAM SVPRADICTIS OMNIBVS LECTIONEM EORVM FIERI OMNESQVE DILIGENTER AVDIENTES SIGNARE IPSAS FECIMVS quorum auditorum universitas in nostris manibus eas praebuit chartas ut debeamus nos tenendo inviolatas conservare ipsas ut non licentia fuerit in quolibet tempore his qui timorem Dei nolunt habere aliquid corrumpere aut submutare ab his quae inserta sunt in praenominatis Synodalibus gestis quas totas chart as benè definitas in temporibus sanctae memoriae nostrae Patris ex probabilibus sanctis Patribus qui propriae linguae manuum fidem apud Dominum nostrum Jesum Christum verumque Deum existentem confirmasse dignoscitur consitentes eam docuisse nos speramus clementissimum nostrum Deum quia usque dum noster spiritus statutus est ex Deo esse in nobis ipsas chartas illibatas incommutabiles semper conservabimus These Canons which were compiled by his command in that Synod after his Fathers decease the Bishops sent unto him to peruse and ratifie as appears by the last clause of their Oration to the Emperor prefixed before them by way of a Preface Propterea ergo tuae pietatis jussu in hac Dei observatrice imperante urbe congressi sacros Canones conscripsimus Quamobrèm tuam Pietatem rogamus eas quae prius in hac Dei observatrice Civitate à congregatis sub bonae memoriae Imperatore nostro Patribus editae sunt voces tibi adducentes ut quemadmodum Ecclesiae scriptis Ecclesiam bonorasti sic eorum quae per viros pios synceros decreta sunt finem obsignes The resolution therefore of this generall Synod was That they could make no Canons but by the Emperors license and command nor promulge any but such as hee should first approve and confirme The 12. and 13. Councells of Toledo assembled by King Eringius were in verity nought else but Parliaments for first the temporall Governours Nobles and Magistrates of all Spaine were present in them Praesto sunt religiosi provinciarum Rectores clarissimorum ordinum totius Hispaniae Duces illustres aulae regiae viri quos interesse huic sancto Concilio delegit nostra Sublimitas clarissimi nostri Palatij Seniores sublimiumque virorum Nobilitas saith the Kings Instructions in both Councells and these had decisive voyces Secondly the King in those Councells made two severall Speeches to them both and gave to them severall writings concerning such things as hee desired to have enacted commanding both the Nobles Senators Captaines Courtiers and Councells as well as the Prelates in those two Councells to draw those Scrolls hee gave them into severall Heads Lawes and Canons expunging every thing that was absurd and correcting all things contrary to justice both in those Scrolls and in his Lawes prescribing them in generall Heads what Lawes to make but referring the particular forming and penning of them to them Thirdly In those Councells hee desires them to rectifie and confirme the Lawes hee delivered them in Writing many of which are meerly of State affaires and temporall matters concerning the Kings title to the Crowne and the like and when those Councells had made Lawes Canons and Constitutions according to his directions in writing hee then confirmed them both by his Royall Subscription and Edicts in this manner In nomine Domini Havius Eringius Rex magna salus populi gentisque nostri ac regni conquiritur si haec Synodalium decreta gestorum sicut pie devotionis nostrae studio acta sunt ita inconvulsibilis legis nostrae valido oraculo confirmentur ut quod sercuissimo Celsitudinis nostrae jussu venerandis Patribus clarissimis Palatij nostri Senioribus discreta titulorum exaratione est edictum praesentis hujus legis nostrae edicto ab aemulis defendatur Est enim haec ipsa definitio Canonum sub isto notata ordine titulorum Then follow the Acts Canons and Constitutions of the Councells made by the Kings direction and assent as most of the Canons and the two Scrolls delivered by him to these two Councells manifest with the Subscriptions of the Bishops and Nobles and then the Kings Edict of confirmation which recites them proceeds thus Quibus omnibus Synodalibus gestis decretis atque peractis debitam reverentiam honoris impendimus patulum autoritatis nostrae vigorem his innectare properamus Ideo praemissas has constitutiones Synodicas à praesenti die vel tempore id est ab octavo Calendas February anno primo regni nostri nullus audeat contemnere nullus etiam praeterire nemo earundem constitutionum audeat jura convellere nullus temerator haec decreta subvertere Nemo illicitator vel contemptor vigorem his institutionibus subtrahat sed generaliter per cunctas regni nostri provincias haec Canonum instituta nostrae gloriae temporibus acta autoritatis debitae fastigio praepollebunt irrevocabili judiciorum exercitio prout constituta sunt celebria habebuntur Si quis autem haec instituta contemnat contemptorum se noverit damnari sententia id est ut juxta voluntatem nestrae gloriae excommunicatus à coetu nostro resiliat insuper partem decimam facultatis suae sisci partibus sociandam amittat Quod si nihil habuerit facultatis unde praedictam compositionem exsolvere possit absque alia infamia sui quinquaginta oportebit eum ictibus verberari ut semper infamis permaneat Edita Lex in confirmatione Concilij Toletani sub die octavo Calendas Februarij anno felicitèr primo regni gloriae nostrae In nomine Domini Flavius Eringius Rex hoc legis nostrae Edictum in CONFIRMATIONE HVJVS CONCILII PROMVLGATVM SVBSCRIPSI The Passages and Canons of both these Councells duly considered will manifest That the Councells of Spaine and others in those dayes were nought else but Parliaments consisting as well of temporall Lords Great men Councellors Magistrates as of Bishops That Princes then could not make Ecclesiasticall Canons and Constitutions to bind their Subjects but in Parliament and that the Bishops alone could not then make any such Canons or Lawes but in Parliament with the concurrent consent and direction of the temporall Lords and Governours the Kings license for that purpose first gained nor yet promulge them without the Kings Letters Patents first obtained
caeteri quique tam Ecclesiastici quam EX LAICALI ORDINE QVI ADFVERVNT VIRI MANV PROPRIA FIRMAVERVNT That not long before in the Synod of Meaux divers Canons there recited were decreed by the King the Clergy and Nobles Nuper ab eodem devotissimo Principe unà cum sacro Ecclesiastico Ordine ET ILLVSTRIVM VIRORVM NOBILITATE DECRETA SVNT These two Councells were in nature of Parliaments the King and his Nobles being present having voyces in them and subscribing them as well as the Prelates In the 2 5 12 26 to 44. 76 to 83 88 89. Canons of the Synod of Melden wee find nothing but Supplications and Petitions to the King to decree and ratifie the things comprised in them Petimus suggerendum est ut Regia magnificentia liberiorem libertatem Episcopis ad suum peragendum in corum parochiis ministerium quà m hactenus habuissent tribuat Vt Principes juxta decreta Canonum per singulas provincias saltem bis aut semel in anno à Metropolitanis Dioeoesanis Episcopis SYNODICE CONVENIRI CONCEDANT Therefore they cannot doe it without their license Vt Regia Majestas observare praecipiat c. Vt jus Ecclesiasticum legem Canonicam nobis ita conservetis sicut Antecessores vestri Vt Praecepta quae Avus Pater vester Ecclesiis nobis commissis fecerunt firmaverunt stabilia conservaverunt ETIAM VOS CONFIRMASTIS ET de caetero RATA CONSERVETIS And they thus submit their Constitutions to the King cap. 80. Haec vestrae Christianae Devotioni verbis scriptis protulimus Vt autem Capitula quae Domino Mediatore communiter decrevistis ET MANV PROPRIA CONFIRMASTIS nunc observatores VOS VERBIS PROMISISTIS ut opere plentièr conservetis adimpleatis nunc etiam admonemus Et Capitula Patris vestri fine rèfragatione de caetero conserventur ac Capitulis vestrae Religioni ab exiguitatis nostrae ministerio oblatis HOC DIPLOMA SI COMPLACET ADNECTATVR All which are so many Synodall resolutions that Canons made in Councells without Princes speciall ratifications by their Subscriptions and Charters are no wayes obligatory In the Synod of Medardum under Charles the sonne of Lodovick who summoned and sate President in it this King humbly and prudently propounded many things to bee defined and discussed therein himselfe sitting there in person among the Bishops there being Lay-men likewise present in it The Canons in this Synod were made by this Kings direction and assent and confirmed by his and the others voyces and Subscriptions All which these Passages of that Synod evidence Ipse quoque Rex adesse dignatus est ut non solùm devotione Ecclesiae se filium esse ostenderet verum etiam sicubi opus esset protectorem Regia potestate monstraret Cum itaque Praesules diversarum Ecclesiarum PIO REGE MVLTA humiliter prudenter PROPONENTE tractassent potiùs quaedam quà m diffinivissent c. Parte Cleri quae praesens erat AC LAICORVM bonum ei testimonium perhibente c. Statuit sancta Synodus ANNVENTE PIO PRINCIPE ut idonei Legati dirigerentur qui singulorum locorum statum solertissimè perscrutarentur quae ipsi per se non valerent corrigere judicio proximè futuri Concilij ET POTESTATI REGIAE REVELARENT Obtentum est etiam à devotissimo Principe ut incesti quilibet alij perditi examen Episcoporum refugientes per Judices publicos ad corum praesentiam deducantur nè alterius illicebram peccandi nutriat impunitas vitiorum Postremo praefixum est ab omnibus generaliter custodiendum NE VILLAE RES ECCLESIASTICAE ABSQVE REGIS COHIBENTIA COMMVTENTVR A strong Canon in the behalfe of the Kings Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction Et sic cunctis secundum regulam Ecclesiasticam canonicè diligentèr patratis decretum judicatum est à sancta venerabili Synodo ASSENTIENTE ET FAVENTE Christianissimo gloriosissimo REGE DOMINO CAROLO haec omnia GESTIS INSERI in conspectu Synodali relegi ET RATA OMNIA JVDICATA CVNCTORVM MANIBVS ET SVBSCRIPTIONI CANONICA PERPETVO inconvulsae inviolabiliter permansura FIRMARI The Councell of Valens Anno 855. summoned by the Mandate of Lotharius the Emperor cap. 23. thus prayes his confirmation of the Canons therein compiled Quod judicium nostrum tà m necessarium publicae disciplinae Ecclesiasticae defensioni omnino suppliciter postulamus EJVSDEM PII PRINCIPIS AVTORITATE MVNIRI Under which they annex the Edict of Constantine for the confirmation of the Judgements and Constitutions of Bishops In the Synod of Ticinum or Pauy under Lodovick the second this King sent both by word of mouth and writing an Exhortation and Monition to the Synod that was publikely related and read in it which the Synod drawing up into Canons humbly desired him to ratifie and to correct sundry abuses which they complained of Which the King PRAESENTIBVS OPTIMATIBVS SVIS in the presence of his Nobles ratified both by word of mouth and Royall Sanctions beginning with a Statuimus Sancimus and concluding thus Haec olim saepe inculcata ET AVGVSTALI SANCTIONE NOSTRA PROMVLGATA quia ex parte in aliquibus videntur neglecta hactenus acriori ulcisci debuerant examine c. This Synod being in truth a Parliament as the relation of it manifests The Councell of Pistis Anno 863. under King Charles the Bald is thus prefaced Carolus gratia Dei Rex Episcopi Abbates quoque COMITES ac caeteri in Christo renati FIDELES ex diversis Provinciis c. convenimus Which proves that Nobles and other Lay-men were present at it Besides it makes mention that the Constitutions of the Councell of Valens were made with the consent of that Councell by the Kings Precept and by him commanded to bee proclaimed and kept by his Subjects and to bee read and ratified in this Councell the Constitutions whereof are made in the Kings and published in the Kings and Councells names who both subscribed and ratified them as this close of the Acts of that Councell witnesseth Vt autem haec quae observanda supra scripsimus ac praenominavimus nunc de caetero certiùs expressiùs à Nobis atque à Successoribus inconvulsa serventum PROPRIIS MANIBVS HIS SVBSCRIBERE COMMVNI CONSENSV DECREVIMVS ea conditione servatà ut omnis in cunctis Ordinibus Lex Juris debiti honor ab omnibus obedienter fideliter cooperante Domino conservetur Post haec omnia relicta collaudata COMMVNI CONSENSV DECREVIMVS c. The Councell of Wormes Anno 868. assembled by the command of King Lodovick applaudes this Princes great devotion and care for Religion in these termes Cujus tanta erga Deum devotio extat ut non solùm in rebus humanis VERVM ETIAM IN CAVSIS DIVINIS MAXIMAM SEMPER SOLLICITVDINEM GERAT The Acts of which Councell were approved by him The eighth
generall Councell of Constantinople was confirmed by the Subscriptions of the Emperors Basilius Constantine and Leo whose Princes and Nobles were present and sate as chiefe Directors and Judges in it And at the close of the Councell Basilius himselfe there present demanded of the Synod if they all consented to the Acts and Decrees of this Councell and whether any of them did stick or doubt of any of them whereto they replyed Omnibus placent quae lecta sunt Omnes eisdem ipsis concordamus omnes ita praedicamus omnes concinentes consentientes prompte subscribimus After which they all subscribed and then the Emperors in the last place subscribed in this manner Basilius Constantinus Leo perpetni Augusti in Christo Deo sideles Principes Romanorum magni Imperatores sanctam hanc universalem Synodum SVSCIPIENTES ET OMNIBVS QVAE AB IPSIS DEFINITA ET SCRIPTA SVNT CONCORD ANTES SVBSCRIPSIMVS MANV PROPRIA In the Councell of Friburg Anno 895. Arnulphus the Emperor sate chiefe President In which were present not onely Bishops and Abbats but likewise all the Princes and Nobles of the Empire with innumerable troops of Clergy-men and Lay-men who all confirmed the Acts and Decrees thereof with their Subscriptions Haec Subscriptio sacro-sanctae venerabili professione condigna responsione innumerabilium circumstantium Presbyterorum ac Diaconorum necnon NOBILIVM LAICORVM CONFIRMATA ET LAVDABILITER APPROBATA as Surius relates it In the great Councell of Constance the King of Romanes in his Imperiall Robes sate as President accompanied with his Nobles with the Ambassadors and Orators of all Nations who had voyces in that Councell and confirmed the Acts and Sessions thereof both with their Suffrages and Subscriptions Yea Sigismund King of Romanes upon the Petition of the Councell by his Letters Patents and Proclamations under his Seale tooke upon him the patronage and protection of the whole Councell and their Actions and justified and ratified all their Proceedings as the Fourteenth Session manifests and sundry Passages in that Councell prove at large In the Councell of Basil not onely divers Ambassadors and Nobles were present but likewise Sigismund King of Romanes Hungary and Bohemia tooke the said Councell into his Protection against Pope Eugenius the Fourth the Councell likewise protecting him and vacating all the Proces and Proceedings of the Pope against him and William Duke of Bavaria another of their Protectors Yea the Decrees of this Councell were made Assistente Domine Imperatore in habitu Imperiali by the assistance of the Emperor who sate in that Councell in his Imperiall Robes and confirmed the Acts and Decrees thereof with his golden Bulls and Edicts In this Councell many Epistles of the Emperor and other great Princes both ordering and ratifying their Proceedings and Decrees which were read publikely yea the Determinations and Constitutions both of the Councels of Constance and Basil were ratified by King Lewes of France by Act of Parliament 25. Januarij Anno 1475. and after that by another Act of Parliament at Paris 25. Junij Anno 1512. and by them enjoyned to bee strictly observed both which Acts are recorded at large by Bochellus where hee who listeth may peruse them In the Councell of Ferrara Joannes Palaeologus Emperor of Constantinople sate as chiefe President and divers Nobles with him yea hee swayed and directed most things in it and most that spake therein directed their Speeches to him as every Page almost of the Acts of that Councell and every Session manifest speaking and disputing Impetrata priùs ab Imperatore facultate dicendi Imperatoris jussu Si Serenissimo Imperatori placuerit ea nunc libenter aggrediar Imperator Serenissime vobis dico Mitissimi Imperatoris jussu Orationem nostram prosequemur Imperator Quisnam est Autor hujus voluminis And. Hermeus Imper. Estne rationi congruum â—t in Synodo historiae innitantur And. Ad cognoscendum res gestas Serenissime Imperator Historia uti debemus Imp. Historiam illam in nostra Religione debemus suscipere quam majores nostri probaverunt aliam verò minimè And. De Romanorum aut Graecorum aut Regum bello Historia Mitissime Imperator in Synodo nequaquam uti debemus c. Sed ut lubet Humanissime Imperator omissis his unde digressi sumus revertamur Imper. Dicat Cardinalis Imperator jussit ut dissertores electi negocium prosequerentur Ephesius Imperatoris jussu longam Orationem habuit Consentiente Imperatore c. This Councell being adjourned to Florence Julius the Cardinall there began it with this Oration Quoniam Imperator Mitissime c. after which followes a large Dialogue in open Councell between him and the Emperor in the close whereof Imperatorem rogarunt c. Cui quidem sententiae Imperator acquiescens voluit ut statim disputatores ipsos seligerent c. In the 22. Session of this Councell the Emperor oft times speakes Haec ad propositum nequaquam spectare videntur c. Vt tibi Pater Ephesius morem gereret huic questioni P. R. respondit Verum in posterum ne verbum quidem de ea faciet quandoquidem non tot de causis huc convenimus De proposita Questione necesse est in praesentia disputare de hac verò forsan alias Ita quoque Nobis videtur De hac Questione suo loco videbimus Session 23. John the Popes Disputant saith Superiori Sessione Imperatoris Serenissimi jussu convenimus Non ego sed Serenissimus Imperator tibi legem imponere potest saith hee to Marcus The Emperor in this Session spake oft and gave the rule of the Synod and commanded another Session to be held Jussit ut iterum Sessio haberetur And in the last Session hee orders all and rules the Rost among his Greciaus brings them to a unity with the Westerne Churches concerning the point of the Procession of the Holy Ghost both from the Father and the Sonne hee informes them that hee being by Gods grace their Emperor after the custome of his Predecessors would rest satisfied with the Determination of this Councell and what it or the major part of it should conclude hee would to the uttermost of his Imperiall power ratifie and defend But saith hee I will not bee constrained by the Latines to adde any thing to our Sacred Creed or to change any of the Ceremonies of our Church And when the Greeks and Latines had accorded and drawn up Letters of union both in Greek and Latine to which both parties should subscribe this Emperor first of all for his party subscribed in this manner Ego Joannes Palaeologus fidelis in Christo Rex Imperator Romanorum subscripsi And five Letters of Union being thus subscribed by him and the whole Synod they were further ratified by the Popes and Emperors Seales In the first Session of this great Councell of Ferrara the Pope would have placed the Emperor with his
Henry the first summoned another Councell about Easter ad Curiam suam apud Londoniam cunctis Majoribus Regni having assembled to his Court at London not only his Archbishops and Bishops but all the great men of his Kingdome to suppresse the Marriages of Priests contrary to the Canons of the Councell of London Anno 1102. For the extirpation of which evill the King Regali authoritate atque potentia fultos roboravit by his royall Authority and power ratified those Canons and thereupon Anselmo Archbishop of Canterbury Thomas elect Archbishop of Yorke and all the Bishops of England Decreed in the presence of the said Glorious King Henry Assensu omnium Baronum suorum with the assent of all his Barons that Priests and Deacons should live chastly and keepe no Women in their Houses but those who were of their neare kindred as the Councell of Nice had defined this Canon being ratified both by the King and Peeres in Parliament to make it obligatory In these three Councells under Archbishop Anselme a great stickler for the Popes and Clergies Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction we see the King and great men of the Realme were present and ratified the Decrees and Canons therein concluded to make them valid and binding Anno 1114 King Henry the first commanded all the Bishops and Nobles of the Kingdome to meete together at his Court whereupon a rumour was spred over all the Land that the Archbishop of Canterbury was about to celebrate a generall Councell in presence of the Popes Legate and that he would promulge some new things worthy so great a Councell for the reformation of Christian Religion in every order On the sixteenth of October they all met together in the Kings Pallace at Westminster where the multitude which assembled together at last perceived that the tumour of celebrating a Councell and of the reformation of Christianity was nothing so There Anselme in the behalfe of the Pope brought a letter directed from him to the King and Bishops wherein hee taxeth the King for conferring Bishopricks claiming that right as belonging to Peters See for determining Ecclesiasticall matters and the affaires of Bishops without his or his Legats privity which belong only to the Apostolike Sea for stopping appeales to Rome as also for calling and keeping Synodall Councells without his privity when as it was unanimously ratified in the great councell of Nice consisting of 318 Bishops that no Councells ought to be summoned or kept without the privity of the Bishop of Rome and for translating Bishops without his consent Which letters much offending the Kings mind he sent his Nuntioes by common consent to Rome to give the Pope an answer and justifie his proceedings herein as warranted by his Royall Prerogative The same yeare upon the thirteenth of Aprill there was an Assembly held at Salisbury of the Bishops Abbots and great men of all England the Kings Writ compelling them to appeare there where the King appointed William his sonne lawfully begotten to be heire to the Crowne to which all the Nobles condescended and presently tooke an oath of Allegeance to him to be his men But the Bishops and Abbotts swore only and gave their faith that if he survived his Father they would forthwith conferre both the Kingdome and Crowne of the Kingdome on him without any controversie or exception In August following one Anselm the Archbish of Canterburyes kinsman came from Rome to King Henry being then in Normandie bringing the Popes Letters which authorized him to exercise the Office of the Popes Legate here in England which in a short time being knowne in the Kingdome of England the Bishops Abbots and Nobles admiring at it assembled together at London about it and certaine other things the Queen being present to discusse the matter Communi Concilio in a common Councell whereupon they all accorded to send the Archbishop of Canterbury whom it most concerned to the King to acquaint him with the ancient custome of the Kingdome and the liberty thereof and if he thought fit that he should goe likewise to Rome to annihilate This Novelty Who comming accordingly to the King found Anselme there expecting his passage into England to exercise his Legatine office there But King Henry the first not suffering any prejudice to happen to the ancient Customes of England kept him from entring into England that not without presidents For in the first yeare of this Kings Raigne Guido Archbishop of Vienna came into England having as he said the power Legatine of all England by the precept and authoritie of the Apostolicall See which being heard of throughout England was admired by all men all knowing that it was a thing unheard of in Britaine that any man except the Archbishop of Canterbury should take upon him to supply the Popes Apostolicall turnes Wherefore as he came so he returned being received as a Legate by no man nor exercising the Office of a Legate in any thing After this one Peter having obtained from the Pope a power Legatine over England Ireland France and the Iland of the Orcades at the same hereof all England was astonished the King sent the Bishop of Saint Davids and another Clergie man beyond Sea to conduct him to him enjoyning them that after his entrance into England they should not suffer him to enter into any Churches or Monasteries to lodge or eate Being brought to the King and honourably received by him having declared the cause of his comming the King answered him that hee had now no leasure to minde so great a businesse and that his Legatine power could not be established and ratified but by the connivance and assent of the Bishops Abbots Nobles and the Assembly of the whole Kingdome in Parliament moreover hee affirmed that he could not by any meanes willingly loose any of the Customes of his Country granted him by the Apostolicall See so long 〈…〉 lived whereof this was one of the chiefest and greatest that hee made the kingdome of England free from all Legatine power Whereunto Peter affented and promised to doe his endeavour to have this priviledge preserved and augmented And so being gratified with rich presents Ille qui Legati officio fungi in toto Britania venerat nimirum ab omni officio tali cum ingenti Pompa vâ—a qua venerat extra Angliam a Rege missus est writes Eadmerus of him by way of derision So little jurisdiction had the Popes Legates here in England in those dayes who became an intollerable vexation oppression to it in succeeding Ages in the Reignes of King John Henry the third and others In the Councell of Westminster under Iohn de Crema the Popes lecherous Legate Ann. 1125. there were 17. Canons made ab omnibus confirmata and confirmed by all there present to wit by 20. Bishops 40. Abbots Cuminumera Cleri Populi multitudine with an innumerable multitude of the Clergie and people who were present at it as the Continuer
Cremensis on Victors part and by Gulielmus Papiensis on Alexanders side In conspectu Regum Praesulum coram universa quae convenerat multitudine cleri et opuli In the presence of the Kings and Prelats and before all the multitude of the Clergy and People there assembled where Papiensis pleaded Alexanders cause so well and answered retorted what ever the opposite partie had alleaged soe substantially Vt neuter ulterius Princeps cunctaretur repudiata parte Octaviani Dominum Alexandrum recipere et cum Regnis sibi subditis ei de caetero in ijs quae Dei sunt tanquam Patri parere The forenamed Schismatickes therefore departing with confusion and shame Our Princes and Prelates Principes et Pontifices having solemnly pronounced a sentence of excommunication against the Schismatickes dissolved the Synod Loe here both the Emperor the Kings of England and France with their Nobles as well as Prelates present in a severall Councells directing and determining this great controversie in them who was Peters rightfull successor ratefying and receiving him for Pope whom they conceived in their indifferent Judgments to have the best title yea the Laity had here their voyces as well as the Clergy consented to the decrees of both Councells So when there was a former Schisme between Clement Vrban concerning the Title of the Papacie VVilliam Rufus enquiring who had the best right commanded Vrban to be reputed Apostolicall and true Pope throughout his Dominions eique vice beati Petri IN CHRISTIANA RELIGIONE not in any temporall affaires obedire claiming this as a part of his prerogative royall that none should acknowledge or receive any man for Pope or Peters successor within his Kingdome but by his election and authority and him whom he should declare to be the man accounting him no lesse then a Traitor that should deprive him of this right which his Ancestors claimed and enjoyed An. 1170. at the request of King Hen the 2d two Cardinalls Albert and Theodine were sent into France from Rome who having called a great Assembly of Ecclesiasticall persons and Noblemen within the Teritorries of the King of England they solemnly admitted the King to purge himselfe before them of the murther of Thomas Becket Archbishop of Canterbury which purgation the King there made and submitted himselfe naked to Ecclesiasticall discipline Anno 1175. Richard Archbishop of Canterbury kept a great Councell at Westminster to which almost all the Bishops and Abbots of the Province of Canterbury came Et coram pranominatis Regibus and before King Henry the second and King Henry his Sonne and the Bishops and Abbots Richard Archbishop of Canterbury standing in an high place promulged certaine Decrees Canons concerning Clergy-men the Eucharist Tythes recorded by Hoveden to be firmely and inviolably observed by all his Provincials so that both the Kings assented to them though they were but Collections of some Decrees out of former Councels In the same yeare King Henry the Father called another Councell at Windesore eight dayes after Michaelmas Praesentibus Rege Filio the King and his Sonne being present Richard Archbishop of Canterbury with the Bishops of England and Laurence Archbishop of Dublin Praesentibus etiam Comitibus Baronibus Angliae the Carles and Barons of England being also present In which Councell being a meer Parliament there was a generall Concord made between King Henry the second and Rodericke King of Conact in Ireland and the King in that Councell gave the Bishoprick of Waterford to one Augustine an Irishman whom he sent to Donatus Archbishop of Cassels to be Consecrated Anno 1176. King Henry the second assembled and held a great Councell at Nottingham concerning the Statutes of his Kingdome and before the King his Sonne and the Archbishops Bishops Earles and Barons of his Kingdom communi omnium Concilio by the common Councell of them all he divided his Kingdome into sixe parts through each of which he appointed three Iustices Itinerant whom he caused to swear upon the holy Evangelists that they should bona fide and without any sinister intention keep and cause the people of his Kingdom inviolably to observe the Articles of Assize there renued and confirmed recorded at large by Hoveden To this Councell by the Kings command came William King of Scots with all his Bishops whom the King commanded by the fealty and Oath of Allegiance they had taken to him to do the same subjection to the Church of England which they ought to do and were went to do in the times of his Predecessors To whom they answered that they never had made any subjection or homage to the Church of England nor ought so to do To which Roger Archbishop of York replyed That the Bishop of Glascow and of Candida Casa or Whitterne had in the time of his Predecessors been subject to the See of Yorke and for proofe hereof he shewed divers priviledges of the Bishops of Rome which made it appeare To which Jocelin Bishop of Glascow answered That the Church of Glascow was a speciall Daughter of the Church of Rome and exempt from all Archiepiscopall and Episcopall jurisdiction and if the Church of Yorke had any jurisdiction over the Church of Glascow at any time it appeared that he deserved not to have any dominion over it for time to come And because Richard Archbishop of Canterbury endeavoured that the Church of Scotland should be subject to the Church of Canterbury such was his ambition then he so crossed the King of England That he permitted the Bishops of Scotland to return home without making any subjection of themselves to the Church of England as they had formerly done Anno 1176. Hugo Cardinalis Hoveden stiles him Hugozun the Popes Legate by the Kings permission and asistance called a generall Councell at London in the midst of Lent where the Archbishops of Canterbury and York and all the Bishops and Abbots of England with a great number of Clergie-men assembling together the Cardinall sate on an high throne in the Chappell of the infirme Monkes of Westminster and the Bishops and Abbots with him every one in his place according to his order and dignity But there arose a contention between the Archbishops of Canterbury and Yorke which of them should sit at the right hand of the Cardinall And when as the Archbishop of Yorke would sit there the Bishop of Canterburies servants rushed violently upon him threw him down upon the ground trampled on him with their feet and brake his Miter whereupon the Councel was dispersed and the Cardinall flying to hide himselfe out of their sight was so hindered that he held no Councel Both sides made appeales to the Pope and complained to the King of the injuries done unto them So Hoveden Gulielmus Nubrigensis relates the story in these words When the Cardinall assisted by the Kings favour had called together the Ecclesiasticall persons of both Provinces of
Canterbury and Yorke to London to celebrate a Councell of all England there on the day appointed for the beginning of his Councell when all having taken their Robes and ensignes were about to go in Procession to it there fell out a vehement contention between the Archbishops themselves about the priority of place in the Councell For that rule of the Apostle in honour preferring one another was so abrogated by the Bishops of our time that neglecting their Pastorall diligence and care Bishops by how much the more stubbornly by so much also the more vainly contend about Praecedencie and almost all Episcopall Controversie is wholy conversant about the praerogative of their honours In conclusion Yorke comming soonest praeoccupied the first seate alleadging that the same belonged to him by the ancient decree of Saint Gregory by which it is known to bee enacted that of the Metropolitans of England he should be accounted the chiefe who was first ordained But Canterbury having made a solemne complaint of the preoccupying of his place as if he suffered prejudice refused the second seate Whereupon his subjects or Clerkes of his Province contending more fiercely for him presently the simple contention of words grew into a brauling Yorke the adverse party being stronger was thrust with ignominy from the place he had so early taken who exhibited his torne Myter to the Legate as a signe of the injury offered to him and cited Canterbury to the Apostolicall See The Metropolitans therefore thus contending and things thus disturbed the Councell was not celebrated but dissipated and they who had assembled as called forth to a Councell returned to their own homes Matthew Parker in his Antiquitates Ecclesiae Britannicae out of Gervasins and Radulphus de Duceto relates the story in these words A Legate called Flugonius came into England from the Pope at King Henry the seconds request that hee might both separate Queene Eleaner from him by a Divorce and comprimise the Controversie between the Archbishops of Canterbury and Yorke touching the precedency which had continued for many successions of Bishops and been oft times determined but never finally ended till the Statute of 31 Hen. 8. cap. 10. such was the pride and ambition of these Arch-Prelates whose more than civill contentions for superiority our Historians have at large recorded to their infamy This Legate assembled a Councell at Westminster in the Church of the infirme Monkes whither the Clergie of both Provinces plentifully assembled and when the day of beginning the Councell was come the Legate sitting on an high Throne gave the right hand to the Archbishop of Canterbury But Yorke hoping that the King would bee more propitious to him than to Canterbury refused the left hand and striving most impudently with his breech to sit between the Legate and Canterbury at last sate downe in the lap of his Primate He had scarcee touched Canterbury with his breech with which he strove to get the second place but he was shamefully reprehended both by many Bishops and also by many Clerkes and Laymen The Archbishop of Canterburies servants provoked with the indignity of this wicked fact and the vehemencie of the just reproofe pulling York out of their Lords bosome and throwing him down on the ground trampled him under their feet and his Archiepiscopall Robes being most shamefully pulled off and torne they buffeted him with their fists But Canterbury when as he could not call away nor hold off his servants enraged with so great anger departed out of the Councell that at least hee might draw them away with him by his departure The servants following their Master left Yorke lying prostrate on the ground environed with his torne Garments At last Yorke fetching many deep and frequent sighes ariseth halfe dead and goeth all bloody to the King who with his son was present in the Councell the thing for which I principally relate the storie and makes his complaint against Canterbury The King having received Yorks relation only was at first in censed against Canterbury but afterwards the truth of his owne rashnesse and impudency being manifested he dismissed Yorke who departed from the King with disgrace the most reviling him with clamors go go said they thou betrayer of Saint Thomas thy hands doe yet stinke with blood But he poore wretch did now welter in his owne not Thomas his blood Hugocius among these tumults perplexed with feare having pronounced a blessing sodainly dissolved so unluckie a Councell and appealled Canterbury to the Pope as guilty of this battery Yorke also did the like At last Canterbury least he should be overwhelmed with appeales on both sides submitted himselfe and his servants to the Popes protection by appealing both the Legate and Yorke to Rome so all equally appealed But the next day Canterbury who knew the manner of the Pontificians pacified the Legate with gifts and they thus reconciled remitted their Appeales on both sides Afterwards the Archbishop of Cant. and Geoffry of Ely were againe accused by the Bishop of York before the King that in the Councell of Westminster they had laid violent hands on him which when they had denyed and purged themselves upon Oath they were reconciled by the Kings command and by him a truce for five yeares was made between Canterbury and Yorke who promised betweene themselves upon Oath that they would firmely stand to the Arbiterment of the Bishops of Normandy and France as well concerning this battery as all other controversies depending between them And so this fray and Councell ended wherein you see the King Prince and Laymen were present it being in truth a Parliament accompanied with a Convocation Anno 1226. there was a Synod held at London under Otho the Popes Legate where the King with the Clergy Magnatibus Regni and the great men of the Kingdome assembled with many Bishops Priests Laâ—corum Turbis and Troops of Laymen when they were all assembled Otho read the Popes letters to them before them all in which the Pope alleaged that it was a most ancient scandall and reproach to the Church of Rome that she was branded for coveteousnesse the roote of all evill and in this especially that no men could expedite any businesse in the Court of Rome unlesse by disbursing great summes of money and giving store of gifts but because the poverty of the Church of Rome was the cause of this scandall and infamy her naturall sons ought to relieve the want of their Mother for unlesse we should receive gifts from you and other good and honest men we should want necessaries to supply our lives which would be altogether incongruous to the Roman dignity Therefore utterly to roote out this scandall by the Councell of our Brethren the Cardinalls of the holy Church of Rome we have provided a certaine forme to which if you will consent you may free your Mother from scandall and obtaine Justice in the Court of Rome without giving any bribes Now the forme provided is this First of
all we desire two Prebends to be given us by all Cathedrall Churches and out of Abbies where the Monkes and Abbots have divers portions of each one Monkes intire allowance one from the Covent another from the Abbott which demand Otho urged the Bishops and Prelates to grant on the foresaid grounds Who consulting together hereupon returned this their common Answere by Iohn Archdeacon of Bedford That those things he had propounded to them did specially concerne the King of England and generally all the Patrons of Churches Archbishops Suffragans and Prelates of England since therefore the King was then absent by reason of his infirmitie and some Archbishops Bishops and other Prelates were absent likewise that in their absence they neither could nor ought to give any Answer And upon these words uttered came Iohn Lord Marshall of England and other Messengers from the King strictly commanding all what held Baronies of the King in Capite that that they should not obliege their lay Fee to the Church of Rome whereby he might be deprived of the services due unto him And so all returned to their owne home The same yeare there was another Councell assembled at Westminster under Stephen Langhton Archbishop of Canterbury about the same matter To which the King conferring a part with some of the Nobles and Bishops gave this Answer that these things concern all Christendom because we are placed in the remotest parts of the world when we shall see what other Kingdomes will say to these exactions and shall have an example from them the Pope shall finde us more ready to obey him And so this Councell brake up By both which presidents it is evident that Councells in those dayes were no other but Parliaments the King Nobles and Commons being present in them and that the Clergy alone could treat or conclude of nothing but by their concurring assents Anno 1231. There was a great Synod of Abbotts Priors Archdeacons with almost the whole Nobility Masters and Clerks of the Realme assembled at Saint Albans by the Popes Command to celebrate a divorse betweene the Countesse of Essex and her Husband if there were cause This divorse was but an Ecclesiasticall matteâ— as the Canonists deemed it yet both King Nobles and Commons as well as Abbots and Clergy-men were present at it and called to it by the Popes command In the yeare of our Lord 1236. there was a Councell of all the great men Prelates and Clergie of the Realme summoned to meet at London by King Henry the third under Othe the Popes Legate which being assembled together at Paules the second day thereof the King sent John Earle of Lincolne Iohn the son of Jeffery and William de Reele a Canon of Paules to inhibit the Legate in the behalfe of the King and Kingdome that he should not there Attempt or decree any thing against his Royall Crowne and dignity William Reele remained there to see this inhibition observed the others departed The next day folowing the Legate supported with divine assistance astantis concilij Suffragits et consensu and by the suffrages and consent of the Councel there present to conserve and reforme the State Ecclesiasticall in the parts of England besides other Canonicall institutions promulged certaine Canons digested into Chapters and Articles which Edmond Archbishop of Canterbury with divers others who departed from the Councell with little joy resolved to nullifie and revoke as not confirmed by the King the Lords and Commons for ought appeares which Otho understanding writ to the Pope to ratifie them who accordingly did it by his decretall Epistle Anno 1288. John Peckam Archbishop of Canterbury held a Provinciall Councell at Redding in which he made five Constitutions purposing to draw the conusance of Patronages of Churches anciently belonging to the Kings Court to the Ecclesiasticall to rescinde all Royall Prohibitions in suites depending in the Ecclesiasticall Court for goods and Chattels and to inhibitu that Ecclesiasticall Judges should be thenceforth prohibited to proceed in them But the King hearing of this designe sent certain selected messengers both to the Archbishop and the whole Councell commanding them with threats to resist whence it came to passe that the Archbishop wholy receeded from his presumption and the Councell being dissolved all the Prelates returned frustrate of their hope 31. An. 1296. Robert Winchelsee Archbishop of Canterbury held a Provinciall Councell at London where the Clergy to disapoint the King of his Subsidies and Tenths decreed among other things Ne quid inconsulto Papa Regibus a Clero solveretur That nothing should be payed to Kings without the Popes privity and consent A right loyall Constitution worthy Prelates The King having then called a Parliament to re-inburse his monyes spent in the Scottish Wars had a large Subsidie granted him by the Commons and Burgesses But the Clergy neither offered nor granted him any thing by reason of this their Constitution for confirmation whereof the Archbishop had gotten the Popes Bull The King being moved therewith proroged the Parliament to London commanding the Clergy to be there on the first day of Saint Hilary to give him a better answer The King in the mean time commanded all the Clergy mens Barnes which were full of corne to be sealed up with publike Seales which whiles his Officers were executing the Archbishop commanded the Popes decree to be published in Cathedrall Churches inhibiting under pain of Excommunication that no Tribute or ayd should be payd to the King or to any secular Prince out of Ecclesiasticall livings or revenues an high straine of Papall usurpation and presumption and when he and his Suffragans met in Pauls they resolved to stand to their former Constitution and to grant the King nothing Such dutifull good Subjects were these lordly Prelates Whereupon the King sending messengers to them to demand a supply from them they all returne him this answer It is sufficiently known that under God the Lord of all we have two Lords a spirituall the Pope our Lord and a temporall the King our Soveraigne and though we are bound to obey both yet we ought to obey our spirituall Lord more than our temporall And therefore we intend to send a Legate to the Pope that his leave first obtained wee may give the King what he desires of us The King receiving this answer tooke it very disdainfully that he should be thus mocked in his own Kingdome by the Pope and his Clergie and thereupon thrust the Clergie out of the Parliament and held a Councell with his Barons and Commons alone and presently put all the Clergie out of his protection that none of them should have power to sue any man in any of his Courts but might be sued there by any of his subjects upon which all the Clergie but the Archbishop were content to offer the King the fith part of their Ecclesiasticall goods and the Archbishop persisting in his obstinacy had all
his temporalities goods Chattels seised into the Kings hands Who yet would not yeeld but pronounced them all excommunicate who disobeyed the former constitution which being made onely by the Clergy and not ratified by King and Parliament was held but a meere idle nullity and audacious disobedient attempt obliging neither King nor subject Anno 1418. A Provinciall Synod was held at London under Henry Chichely Archbishop of Canterbury Where upon the motion of Robert Guilbert President of Merton Colledge in Oxford and of Thomas Kington it was decreed That the Patrons of Ecclesiasticall benefices when they fell voyd should conferre them upon such who were Graduates in the Universities having a respect of their degree and profession according to the value of the living This Constitution being propounded in the Congregation in the University to be there ratified the Masters of Arts Monks and Professors who exceeded the Regents of the University in multitude rejected and refused it but K. Henry the fifth being addicted to learning An. 1420. writ to the Synod then assembled at London wherein the Chancellors both of Oxford and Cambridge petitioned that it might be received though the Maisters of Art had refused to receive it to passe the Decree which some Friars there opposed Judge in Parliamento postea confirmavit and he afterwards confirmed the same in Parliament Loe here a Constitution first made in a Synod or Convocation rejected in both Vniversities because not then confirmed by the King in Parliament to make it binding and efficatious for future times a most pregnant evidence for proofe of that I now contend for To cite more presidents of this nature in former ages would be more tedious than necessary in so plaine a case I shall therefore passe from Councels and Synods to direct Acts of Parliament touching Religion and Church affaires As high as we have any Acts of Parliament since the Conquest remaining on Record We finde all Ecclesiasticall matters and Church affaires setled and ratified by speciall Acts of Parliament only not by the Clergies Canons The great Charter of England first granted by King Henry the first ratified afterwards at Runing-Mead by King John revived by King Henry the third in the ninth yeare of his Raigne confirmed frequently by him afterwards by King Edward the first in the 28th yeare of his Raigne yea by all or most of his successors in speciall Acts of Parliament by the Petition of Right 3. Caroli begins thus Know yee that we to the honour of Almighty God and for the salvation of the Soules of our Progenitors and Successors Kings of England to the advancement of holy Church c. First We have granted to God and by this our present Charter have confirmed for Vs and our Heires for ever more that the Church of England shall be free and have all her rights and liberties inviolable And that all her elections shall bee free c. An. 1164. In February there was a Parliament held at Clarindon by King Henry the 2d his command who was there present where all the Archbishops Bishops Abbotts Priors Earles Barons Nobles and great men of the Realm made a Recognition or Recerd of part of the Customes and Liberties of the Kings Ancestors to wit of King Henry the first and others which ought to be observed and kept by all men in the Realm by reason of the dissention and discords frequently emerging betweene the Clergy and the Kings Iustices and great men of the Realme the substance whereof was conteined in these 16. Chapters recorded by Matthew Paris 1. That if any controversie concerning the advowson and presentation of Churches should arise betweene Laymen or betweene Laymen and Clergie men it should bee heard and determined in the Court of our Lord the King 2. That the Churches of the Fee of our Lord the King could not bee given in perpetuity or appropiated without his grant or concession 3. That Clergiemen accused of any thing being summoned by the Kings Iustice should come into the Kings Court to answer the same there that so the Kings Court might determine what was to bee answered there and what fit to be answered in the Ecclesiasticall Court that so the Iustice might send into the Court of holy Church to see how the matter shall there be handled And if the Clarke shall be convict or confesse the crime that the Church from thenceforth ought not to protect him 4. That it shall not be lawfull to the Archbishops Bishops and persons of the Realme to goe out of the Realme without the Licence of our Lord the King and if they shall goe thence if it shall please the King they shall give him security that neither in going nor in returning nor in staying they shall procure hurt or dammage to our Lord the King or the Realme 5. That excommunicate persons ought not to give a pledge to remaine vadium ad remanentiam nor to take an Oath but onely to give a surety or pledge of standing to the judgment of the Church where they are absolved 6. That Laymen ought not to be accused but by lawfull accusers witnesses in the presence of the Bishop that the Arch-Deacon may not lose his right nor any thing that he ought to have from thence And if those who are accused shall be such that no man will or dares to accuse the Sheriffe being required by the Bishop shall sweare twelve lawfull men of the Vicenage or Town before the Bishop that they shall manifest the truth concerning such according to their Consciences 7. No man who holds of the King in Capite nor any of his Dominicall Ministers or house-hold servants shall be excommunicated nor the Lands of any one of them put under interdict unlesse our Lord the King if he bee within the Realme be first acquainted therewith or his Iustice if he shall be forth of the Realme the reason then rendred was lest the King should at unawares Kisse or admit to his Councell such an excommunicate person resorting to him that so he may doe right concerning him and see that what appertaineth to the Kings Court shall be there determined and that what belongeth to the Ecclesiasticall Court may bee sent unto it that it may bethere descided 8. Concerning appeales if they shall happen they ought to proceed from the Arch-Deacon to the Bishop from the Bishop to the Archbishop and if the Archbishop shall faile in exhibiting Iustice they may appeale to our Lord the K. in the last place and that by his precept the controversie may be ended in the Arch-Bishops Court so that there ought to bee no further proceeding without the assent of our Lord the King 10. If any be cited by the Arch-Deacon or Bishop for any offence for which he ought to answer to them and will not appeare upon their citations it shall bee lawfull for them to put him under interdict but they ought not to excommunicate him till he be convented before the
have else-where manifested In King Henry the 3. his Raign I finde these severall printed Acts of Parliament made concerning the Church Bishops Abbots Clergymen and Ecclesiasticall affaires which you may peruse at pleasure 9. H. 3. c. 1. 5. 18. 31. 33. 36 37. The Charter of the Forrest 9. H. 3. c. 4. 11. 16. 20. H. 3. c. 9. 51. H. 3. c. 10. 12. 28. besides those Recorded by Matthew Paris In King Edward the first his Raigne there were these Acts to like purpose 3 E. 1. which begins with this Prologue Because our Soveragine Lord the King had given power to redresse the State of the Realme c. for the common profit of holy Church and of the Realme And because the State of holy Church hath ever been kept c. c. 1 2. 46. 4 E. 1. c. 6. 7 E. 1. the Statute of Morâ—main 13. E. 1. c. 5. 19. 29. 31 32 33. 41 42 43. 48. Circumspecte agatis 13 E. 1. commonly called a Statute though 19 E. 3. Fitz. Iurisdiction 28. it be adjudged none The Statute upon the Writ of Consultation 24 Ed. 1. The confirmation of the Charters of the Liberties of England 25 E. 3. c. 4. 6. The Statute concerning certain Liberties granted to the Commons The Statute of Carlisle 25. E. 1. See Cookes 5. Report of the Kings Ecclesiasticall Law f. 13. 34. E. 1. c. 6. In King Edward the seconds dayes I meet with the Statute of Aâ—ticuli Cleri 19 E. 2. which wholly concernes the Clergy their Courts Tythes Rights The Statute de Prerogativa Regis c. 1. 8. 10. 14 15. and Articles against the Kings Prohibition In King Edward the third his Regency I finde very many Statutes concerning the Clergie and all kinde of Church affaires as namely 1 E. 3. Stat 2. c. 10 11. 4 E. 3. c. 6. 5 E. 3. c. 2. 9 E. 3. Stat. 2. c. 1. 14 E. 3. stat 1. c. 1. 17. and stat 3 made for the Clergy the Prologue and c. 1 2 3 4 5. 15 E. 3. stat 1. c. 1. 6. Parl. 3. c. 6. 18 E. 3. stat 3. for the Clergie c. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7. 23 E. 3. c. 8. 25 E. 3. stat 3 for the Clergie c. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. 25 E. 3. stat 6. of Provisions 27 E. 3. stat 1. c. 1. of Provisions 28 E. 3. c. 14. 31 E. 3. stat 1. c. 4. 11. 13 14. 36 E. 3. c. 8 concerning Priests Salaries c. 38 E. 3. stat 2. against provisors and Appeales to Rome c. 1 2 3 4 5. 45 E. 3. c. 3. 50 E. 3. c. 1. 4 5. To which I shall adde only this observation That the prologues to the statutes of 1 E. 3. stat 2. 2 E. 3 stat 3. 28 E. 3. 38 E. 3. stat 1. and 50 E. 3. with others begin thus To the honour of God and of HOLY CHVRCH and redresse of the oppressions of the people c. these ensuing Acts were made granted to testifie that even in those dayes our Parliaments first began with matters of God and the Church and settled them by Lawes as there was occasion and then proceeded to temporall matters and grievances the very Statute of Magna Charta having the same prologue wherein you may discerne this method pursued and in most subsequent Parliaments I shall adde to these printed Acts 6 E. 3. num 5. prohibiting Bishops to meddle in matters of the peace 45 E. 3. num 15. removing Bishops from all temporall Offices 50 E. 3. num 99. 103. complaining against popish Cardinals 40 E. 3. num 7 8. a notable Record against the Popes claime to the Kingdome of England by vertue of K. Johns grant 17 E. 3. num 59 60. 18 E. 3. num 59 60. 38 E. 3. num 7. 50 E. 3. num 85. 87 88. complaining against yea restraining the Popes exactions and usurpations as the cause of all plagues 50 E. 3. num 46 47. complaining against the Canons of the Clergy and 47 E. 3. num 24. against Ordinaries incroaching upon the civill Iurisdiction To proceed to King Richard the second the Statutes in the first yeare of his Raigne have this Preface Richard by the Grace of God c. Know that to the honour of God and reverence of holy Church for to nourish peace unity and concord in all the parts of the Realme c. We have ordained and established certain Statutes c. First it is agreed and established that holy Church shall haue and enjoy all her rights liberties and franchises wholly and without blemish c. The confirmation of Magna Charta with other temporall Laws next follow then c. 13 14 15. three Lawes for paying of Tythes and freeing Clergymen from arrests during their exercising of divine Service The second Parliament in â— Rich. 2. hath the like prologue To the honour of God and holy Church cap. 1 confirmes the franchises liberties of the Church 3. R. 2. C. 1 doth the like c. 3. is a Statute against Provisions from Rome to avoyd Nonresidency to provide for instruction of the people by preaching and reforme many abuses in the Church occasioned by provisions made at the complaints clamors and divers Petitions of the Kings Leige people delivered in divers Parliaments to reforme these abuses 5. R. 2. cap. 1. hath the like preface c. 1. confirmes the Churches liberties 5. R. 32. Parl. 2. c. 5. Is a Statute made at the Clergies motion to suppresse haresies and Errors contrary to the Christian faith and to imprison haeretickes and erronious Preachers till they justifie themselves according to the Law and reason of holy Church 6 Rich. 2. Stat. 1. hath the like prologue and c. 1. Ordaines and accords that our holy Mother the Church of England have all her Liberties whole and unhurt and the same fully enjoy and use 7 Rich. 2. hath the same prologue c. 8. the like confirmation of the Churches priviledges and c. 12. prohibits Provisions from Rome 8 Rich. 2. hath the like preface and enacts in the first chapter That holy Church have all her liberties 9. R. 2. c 4. 5. concerns Ordinaries Priors dative and perpetuall and Preists 10. R. 2. c. 1. saves pontificall dignity and priviledge of holy Church and cleares all in all things aforesaid 11. R. 2. c. 3. declares that Bishops ought not to be present or voting in Parliament in matters of blood 1. 2. R. 2. c. 1. confirmes the Churches liberties Chap. 7. exempts pilgrimes from the punishments of Vagrants and c. 15. prohibits Provisions from any forraign power 13. R. 2. recites That the acts therein passed were to the honour of God and holy Church c. and c. 13. prohibits hunting on holy-dayes and Priests to keepe Dogs who have not livings to a certaine value c. 18 concernes the Bishop and Deane of Lincolne and c. 29. Pilgrimes 13. R. 2. Parl. 2. c. 23. provides for the election of Bishops and all other ecclesiasticall
dignities elective and prohibits provisions usurpations citations and Bulls of the Pope and Court of Rome under paine of a Praemunire banishment abjuration Imprisonment Fine and ransome 14. R. c. 2. Limits the exchanges of monyes to the Court of Rome 15. R. 2. c. 2. 6. concernes forcible entries into Benefices Offices of holy Church mortuaties to Religious persons Popes Bulls consecrations of Church-yeards and Appropriations of Churches and Almes 16. R. 2. c. 5 provides for presentations to Churches against the Popes usurpations Translations excommunications Bulls and Jurisdiction under paine of a Praemunire 21. R. 2 it prefaced To the honour of God and holy Church and c. 1. confirmes the Churches Liberties In King Henry the 4th his Parliaments I finde that the Prologues of the Statutes in 1. â— 4. 7. 9. and 13. H. 4. begin thus To the honour of God and reverence of holy Church c. and the first Chapter in each of them is That holy Church have and enjoy all her rights liberties and Franchises entirely and without imbleamishing Then follow temporall Lawes 2. H. 4. c. 3. 4. prohibits provisions of exemption from regular or ordinary obedience granted to any religious persons from Reme Buls of exemption from payment of Tithes granted to the Religious of the Order of Cysteaux under paine of a Pâ—amunire and Cap. 15. provides for the suppression of Sectaries hereticall Preachers Conventicles heriticall Bookes Schooles and preservation of the Catholique faith enacting that Heritickes shall be imprisoned abjured and in case of relapse or obstinacy burned 4. H. 4. c. 2. 3. confirme all the Statutes formerly made in favour of the Church and Clergy and for preservation of their liberties Cap. 12. concernes appropriations of Churches Vicaridges Ordinaries the Bishop and Archdeacon of Ely and other Religious persons cap. 14. prohibits working or wages on holy-dayes Cap. 17. enacts that none shall enter into Religion unlesse he be foureteene yeares of age without the Parents consent Cap. 22. concernes presentations to Benefices 5. H. 4. c. 11. 12. concerne Tithes Chalices and ornaments of holy Church 6. H. 4. c. 1. prohibits provisions and the payment of first fruits or exacted fees to Rome under forfeiture of all their estates who offend herein 7. H. 4. c. 6. inhibits Religious persons under paine of a Praemunire to procure any exemption from payment of Tithes or any provisions from the Pope 9. H. 4. c. 8. forbids provisions and translations from the Pope under paine of a Praemunire and makes all elections of Archbishops Bishops Abbots Prebends Deans to be free without any interruption from the Pope or King 11. H. 4. c. 4 Prohibits unlawful games on Sundayes and other holy dayes 1. H. 5. c. 7. 8. prohibits the conferring of Ecclesiasticall living upon Aliens and orders their benefices and the lands of Priors aliens to be seised in times of Warre 2. H. 5. c. 1. provides for Ordinaries visitations of Hospitalls and reformation of them after the lawes of the holy Church Cap. 3. grants a prohibition to spirituall Courts where they deny a Copy of the Lible Chap. 7. for the preservation of the Christian faith the Law of God and holy Church with in this Realme and the punishment of Heresies and Hereticks enacts that Hereticks shall be apprehended and imprisoned by Sheriffs and upon conviction of Heresy forseit their Lands and goods and be burned 2. H. 5. Parl. 2. c. 2. limits the wages of Curates and Parish Priests 3. H. 5. c. 1. enacts that holy Church have all her liberties and franchsies C. 3. concerns Abbots and Priors C. 4. inhibits provisions from Rome under a Premiarie C. 8. concernes Probate of Wills and râ—gulates exorbitant fees for procuring them C. 6. forbids the promotions of Irishmen to Beneficies or Ecclesiasticall dignities 9. H. 5. c. 9. limits the manner of collecting Dismes by Archbishops Bishops and their Agents 2. H. 6. c. 1 confirmes the Churches liberties 6. H 6. c. 3. prohibits worke on and wages for holy dayes 8. H. 6. begins thus To the Laud and honor of Almighty God and of the holy Mother the Church Ch. 1. provides for the priviledges of the Convocation 10. H. 6. c. 11. limits how Bastardy shall be tryed between the Common and Canon Law which differ therein 15. H. 6. c. 7. concernes Abbots and Priots 27. H. 6. c. 5. prohibits Faires and Merkets upon Sundayes and principle holy dayes as a great prophanation of them 28. H. 6. begins To the honour of God and of holy Church 33. H. 6. c. 6. concerns the exemption of the Abbot of Founteynes and other Abbots and Priors from Vexations sutes 1. Ed. 4. is prefaced To the honour of God and of holy Church C. 1. containes in it many particulars concerning Bishops Abbots and Clergymen 3. E. 4. hath the same prefaced and 12. E. 4. c. 7 prescribes excommunication 4. times a yeare to be denounced against the infringers of Magna Charta as other Acts formerly did King Richard the 3d. prefaceth the Acts of his first Parliament in his 1. yeare thus To the honour of God and of holy Church c. 14. limits the maner of collecting the Clergies Dismes King Henry the 7th begins his Statutes in the 1. yeare of his Reigne To the honour of God and his holy Church and Cap. 4. enables Archbishops Bishops and other Ordinaries to imprison Priests Clerkes and Religious persons for incontinency which they could not doe before The Statutes of 2. 4. 11. 12. 17. H. 7. as their Prologues attest were made to the worship of God and holy Church and for the common good of this Realme The Statutes of An. 1. 3. 4. all or most Parliaments in the Regine of King Henry the 8th are prefaced To the honour of God and holy Church and for the Common Weale and profit of this Realme In the Parliament of 21. H. 8. C-3 4. 13. there were Statutes made concerning Probat of VViâ—s taking of mortuaries by Priests or others against Pluralities of Benefices and taking of farmes by spirituall men All of Ecclesiasticall Cognisance 22. H. 8. c. 15. containes the Kings generall pardon to his spirituall Subjects who were fallen into a Praemunire by submitting to Cardinall Wolsies power Legatine 23. H. 8. c. 1. abridgeth the power of Ordinaries and takes away the benefit of Clergy in some cases ch 9. enacts That no man shall be cited into any ecclesiasticall Court out of the Diocesse wherein he dwells unlesse in certaine causes ch 10. settles the Law concerning feofements and assurances to the use of any Parish-Church or Chapell 24 H. 8. ch 12. takes away all Appeales to Rome and excellently sets forth the Kings supremacy as well in and over Ecclesiasticall causes and persons as temporall as you may read at large in the Act it selfe denying exploding the authority of the Pope and Sea of Rome 25. H. 8. c. 14. conteines a Law for the punishment of HERESY and
Articles of Religion and enjoyning subscription thereunto under penalties losse of Benefices and other Ecclesiasticall penalties Limiting likewise the age of such who are to be made Ministers ch 17. Concerning the Leases of Benefices and Ecclesiasticall livings with Cure 18. Eliz. c. 6. Concerning the taking away of Clergy c. 23 Eliz. c. 1. To retain the Queens Majesties subjects in their due obedience made against Jesuits Semenary Priests and others receiving Orders from Rome and the harbourers of them under capitall penalties 27. Eliz. c. 2. Against Jesuits Seminary Priests and such other disobedient persons 29. Eliz. c. 6. Concerning Recusants 31. Eliz. c. 1. Against Symony 35 Eliz. c. 1. Against Seperatists and Schismaticks refusing conformity to our Church Service and Liturgie who are lyable to imprisonment fines and other penalties for it by the Law ch 2. For restraining Popish Recusants to some certaine plate of abode 29 Eliz. c. 8. For confirmation of the Deprivation of divers Bishops and Deanes in the beginning of the Queens Raigne ch 22. Concerning the Bishop of Norwich are plentifull evidences of what I plead for In King James his Raigne I finde many Acts of Parliament asserting the Kings and Parliaments Ecclesiasticall jurisdictions as 1 Jacobi c. 1â— Concerning the Kings Title to the Crowne ch 2. Concerning Archbishopricks and Bishopricks ch 5. For the due execution of the Statutes against Jesuites Seminary Priests Recusants ch 12. Against second marriages till former wives or husbands bee dead ch 31. For building a new Church in Melcombe Regis to be the Parish Church of Radepoll and for making the Church of Radepoll a Chappell to it 3 Jacobi c. 3. for a publick thanksgiving to Almighty God every yeare on the fift day of November for the deliverance from the hellish Gunpowder treason ch 4. For the better discovering and suppressing of Popish Recusants which prescribes a new oath of Allegiance ch 5. To prevent and avoyd danger which may grow by Popish Recusants which likewise prohibits the Importations of any Popish Books Agnus Dei Crucifixes c. ch 20. To restraine abuses of Players 21. Jacobi ch 17. Against Usury ch 20. To prevent and reforme prophane swearing and cursing The Statutes in King Charles his Raigne are punctuall evidences of the Soveraign Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction of our Kings Parliaments in all which we find not onely severall Committees appointed concerning Religion frequent in all Queene Elizabeths and King James their Parliaments but also sundry Statutes concerning Religion and Church-matters as namely 1 Carols c. 1. For punishing divers abuses committed on the Lords day 3 Caroli c. 1. For further reformation of divers abuses on the Lords day ch 2. To restraine the passing or sending of any to be Popishly bred beyond the Seas But the severall Acts Ordinances and Proceedings of this present Parliament concerning all matters of Religion Church government and Ecclesiasticall affaires are presidents beyond all exception The Acts already passed For suppressing the High-Commission disabling any Clergy-man to meddle with any temporall offices or to be Justices of Peace The taking away of Bishops Votes and their sitting in the House of Peers The severall Acts Votes Ordinances which have passed both House for abolishing all new Canons Plaralities Non-residence punishing of scandalous Ministers Sanctifying the Lords day Keeping of Monethly and other Fasts Celebrating speciall dayes of thanksgiving for sundry Discoveries Victories Prohibiting the printing of erroneous books Suppressing Antinomians Socinians Anabaptists and other Sectaries Abolishing all Innovations Superstitions Idolatreus pictures Images Altars Copes Tapers Royals c. Payment of Tythes Probate of Wills Ordination of Ministers and above all their nominating and convening an Assembly of conscientious pious reverend learned orthodox Divines to assist them in reforming all errors and corruptions in Doctrine Worship Government Discipline and establishing such a pure Worship and Church-government in our Realme as shal be most agreeable to Gods Word wherein they have made a large progresse already the Directory for Worship being now finished and we expect a full accomplishment of this much desired Worke ere long All these with infinite other particulars are a most satisfactory and unanswerable evidence of the Parliaments jurisdiction and Legislative power in all matters of Religion Worship Government Discipline and other Ecclesiasticall things or proceedings whatsoever none of which have ever been settled among us in any age in a legall and obligatory way but onely in and by Parliaments I shall close up these 〈◊〉 Domestick authorities with the Ordinance of both Houses of Parliament concerning the present Assembly of Divines wherein all may clearly discerne the jurisdiction of our Parliaments in all Church affaires matters of Religion and over the Assembly it selfe together with the Instructions or Ruled prescribed to the Assembly which they have punctually observed and submitted to not yet in print An Ordinance of the Lords and Commons in Parliament for the calling of an Assembly of learned and godly Divines and others to be consulted with by the Parliament for the setling of the Government and Liturgy of the Church of England and for vindicating and clearing of the Doctrine of the said Church from false uspertions and interpretations WHereas amongst the infinite blessings of Almighty God upon this Nation none is or can be more deate unto us then the purity of our Religion and for that as yet many things remaine in the Lyturgy Discipline and Government of the Church which doe necessarily require a further and more perfect reformation then as yet hath been attained And whereas it hath been declared and resolved by the Lords and Commons assmbled in Parliament that the present Church-Government by Archbishops Bishops their Chancellors Commissaries Deanes Deanes and Chapters Archdeacons and other Ecclesiasticall Officers depending upon the Hierarchy is evill and justly offensive and buâ—thensome to the Kingdome a great impediment to reformation and growth of Religion and very prejudicial to the state and government of this Kingdome and that therefore they are resolved that the same shall be taken away and that such a Government shall be setled in the Church as may be most agreeable to Gods holy Word and most apt to procure and preserve the peace of the Church at home and neerer agreement with the Church of Scotland and other reformed Churches abroad and for the better effecting hereof and for the vindicating and clearing of the doctrine of the Church of England from all false calumnies and aspersions It is thought fit and necessary to call an Assembly of learned godly and judicious Divines who together with some members of both the Houses of Parliament are to consult and advise of such matters and things touching the premises as shall be proposed unto them by both or either of the Houses of Parliament and to give their advice and counsell therein to both or either of the said Houses when and as often as they shall be thereunto requited Be it therefore ordained by
Lipsiae 1584. together with the severall Confession of all the Protestant Churches in Germany and elsewhere recorded in the Harmony of Confessions which were made published established by the severall Protestant States to Diets or Parliaments by common consent of the Nobles Magistrates Senates Ministers of those Churches not by the Clergy alone are a sufficient demonstration of their Ecclesiasticall legislative power and jurisdiction in all matters of Faith Discipline and Government In few words I dare averre that there is never a forraigne Christian Empire Kingdome or Republike in the world whether Protestant or Popish but hath in their Parliaments Diers Senates made sundry Lawes concerning matters of Faith Government Discipline Clergiemen and all Ecclesiasticall affaires yea for the establishment of that Religion Church Government and Discipline in present use among them as their severall Laws and Constitutions will abundantly manifest to any who have vacancy to peruse them I shall close up this Section with some presidents of the Parliaments of Ireland and Scotland which have most affinity to the Parliaments of England Among the printed Statutes of Ireland collected by Master Belton I mèet with these ensuing Ecclesiasticall Lawes made in the Parliaments of Ireland 36. H. 6. c. 1. That Beneficed persons shall keep Residence 7. E. 4. c. 2. 3. That none shall purchase Benefices from Rome and that pardons made to such as purchase them thence shall be voyde 10. H. 7. c. 5. Against provisors from Rome 25. H. 8. c. 2. For uniting the Personage of Cantrim to the Priory of Saint Peters 28. H. 8. c. 5. That the King shall be supreame head of the Church of Ireland ch 8. and 26. For payment of first-fruits ch 13. Against the Authority of the Bishops of Rome and chap. 14. 17 18 23. For other Ecclesiasticall matters 33. H. 8. c. 6. Conconcerning Mariages cha 12. For Tithes chap. 14. For erecting of Vicaridges 33. H. 8. Parl. 2. chap. 5. For suppressing religious houses 2. Eliz chap. 1. For restoring to the Crowne the ancient Iurisdiction and the State Ecclesiasticall and abolishing all forraigne power repugnant to the same cha 2. For the uniformity of Common prayer and service in the Church chap. 3. Concerning first fruits and Personages impropriate c. 4. For the conferring and consecrating of Archbishops and Bishops 11. Eliz. c. 6. and 13. Eliz. c. 6. with diverse others since For Scotland I finde many Ecclesiasticall Lawes concerning the Church Church-men and all matters of Religion made in Parliament and intermixed with their temporall Acts. To omit the Ecclesiasticall Lawes of King Keneth mixed with his Temporal enacted about the Yeare of our Lord 844. In the Statutes of K. William of Scotland made about the Yeare of our Lord 1170 chap 32. Is For maintaining the true Religion and the Rights and liberties of haly Kirke chapter 34. Of the honesty of Clarkes King Robert the first in his Parliament holden at Scone with his Bishops Abbots Priors Eaâ—iâ—s Barons and other Noblemen of his Realme to the honour of God and haly Kirke with common advise and consent of all the Prelates and Freeholders foresaide and haile community in the 13. Yeare of his Raigne to wit Anno 1319 made a law chapter 〈◊〉 For the freedome of the Kirke and Kirkmen and maintenance of true Religion And the second Parliament of this King chapter 1. Is of Donation of Lands made to Religious persons and chapter 14. Concernes Nunnes Among the Statutes of King David the 2. the 12th chapter is of Pilgranners and chapter 42. For freedome of holy Kirke Not to mention all the statutes made in the Parliaments of Scotland in times of Popery for advancing the Popes Authority Masse Prelacy with sundry Doctrines and Ceremonies abolished by subsequent Acts in times of Reformation I shall only give you a briefe account of some of their Acts of Parliament since beginning of reformation in that Kingdome I finde in Master John Knox his History of the reformation of the Church of Scotland lib. 3 pag 56 57. in the London edition â—644 That in a Parliament held in Scotland Anno 1543. there began question of the abolishing of certaine tyrannicall Acts made before at the devotion of the Prelates for the maintaining of their Kingdome of darknesse to wit That under paine of Haeresy none should read any part of the Scripture in the vulgar Tongue neither yet any Tractate or exposition of any place of Scripture which Act after great debate in Parliament betweene the Nobility Commons and Clergie was wholly repealed and this Act of Parliament enacted That it should be lawfull to every man to use the benefit of the Translations which then they had of the Old and New Testament together with the benefis of other Treatises containing wholsome doctrine untill such time at the Prelates and other Church-men should give and set forth unto them a translation more correct And so by Act of Parliament it was made free to all men and women to reade the Scriptures in their vulgar tongue and all Acts to the contrary abolished This was no small victory of Christ Jesus against the conjured enemies of his Verity In the yeare 155â— of the Protestants in Scotland petitioned both the Queene Regent and likewise the Lords Barons Burgesses assembled there in Parliament for repeale of severall Lawes formerly made against Heritickes for prayers in their vulgar Tongue frequent preaching or interpretation of the Scriptures due administration of the Sacraments of Baptisme and the Lords Supper Reformation of the Church Prelates and ecclesiasticall estate their lives Courts and proceedings And likewise entered a formall Protestation in the Parliament House After this in the yeare 1560. The Protestant Barrons Gentlemen Burgesses and others of the Realme presented a large supplication to the Nobility 〈◊〉 States of Parliament then assembled wherein they desired the abolition of Idolatry and such false Doctrin as wâ—e condemned by Gods word by Act of that Parliament and punishment to be appointed for the transgression that the abuses and prosanations of the Sacraments of Jesus Christ and of the true Discipline of the Church might be reformed That the Popes usurped ecclesiasticall Authority might be abolished and the Popish Clergy removed c. Which application being read in the Audience of the whole Assembly the Batons Ministers other Petitioners were thereupon commanded to draw into plaine and severall heads the summe of that Doctrine which they would maintaine and desire the present Parliament to establish as wholsome true and only necessary to be beleived and to be received within the Realme which they willingly accepted and within foure dayes presented a large Confession of the faith professed and beleived by the Protestants within the Realme of Scotland consisting of 25. Articles which were read in face of Parliament and after ratified by the three States of this Realme at Edinburgh the 17. of Iuly 1560. and by the whole body of the Parliament which
That every particular Church now consisting of visible Saints is under Christ as the SOLE Head King Governour Law-giver of it and so is subject to no other jurisdiction then that of Christ his Spirit his Word We hold that every particular Church is under Christs Government as the SOLE Head King Lord Governour thereof That it is a spirituall House whose only builder and Governour is Christ and not man A spirituall Kingdome whose only King is Christ and not man A spirituall Republique whose only Law-giver is Christ and not man A spirituall Corporation whose only head is Christ and not man That no man nor power on earth hath a Kingly power over this Kingdome That no earthly Law-givers may give Lawes to this Kingdome or Republique That no man may claime or exercise a head-ship over this body That no man can or ought to take the Government of this Communion of Saints That men may not appoint limit constitute what Congregations of all sorts they please to be Churches of Christ as Nations and Parishes That Christ is King over every mans conscience so that no power on earth may sit with him in this his Thror c. yea so as no human power not Law may intermeddle to prescribe rules for the Government or formes of this Church of Christ That the Children of those Parents who will not thus acknowledge Christ to be their only King and Law-giver and are ashamed or afraid to be thus in Covenant with Christ in the Independents way as their King are not to be baptized such Parents not being within the Covenant A very hard and uncharitable censure of all Churches Persons who are not Independent That Christ is the ONLY Potentate Law-giver Lord King Governour over Churches and not men Not Councells or Senates That this is Christs Royall Prerogative which is incommunicable to ANY or All the powers on earth That Christ hath not delegated his Kingly Office to any Princes Magistrates PARLIAMENTS to set up any forme of Worship of Church-Government who have no authority to make Lawes to rule or binde any particular Churches and if they make any such they shall be apt to transgresse them but yet men must take heed how they punish them for that transgression with any enseresciderdum or Club-law This is the summe and oft repeted Argument of my deare Brothers Booke To give a satisfactory Answer to this Objection I shall first demand of my dear Brother what he meanes by this frequently incultated assertion That every particular Church is under Christ as the only Head King Lawgiver Lord and Governour thereof c. and that none ought to have any power rule or Jurisdiction in the Church but Christ alone If he intends that he is the only immediate HEAD KING Law-giver and Governour as he clearely doth I desire some solid scripture proofes for it since he produceth none to evince it the rather because it is quite contrary to sundry expres Texts which stile Kings Majestrates Ministers Heigher powers Rulers Overseers Fathers Nursing Fathers Pastors of over their Churches people flocks who are ever enjoyned to obey submit unto them yea Rulers of the Templ Congregation Church Rulers Chife Rulers of the Synagogu â—ay sometimes Gods sitting upon Gods throne to whom men must yeeld obedience for the Lords sake as to Gods Christs Vicegerents and Embassadours Yea Brother your selfe informe us out of Scripture pag. 51. That the members of Christs body are Superiour and inferiour as Pastors Teachers Teaching and RVLING Elders Helps GOVERNMENTS Bishops or OVERSEERS c. If Christ then be the onely Head King Ruler Shephard Governour of his Church and none else in that sense you object what will become of these Pastors Ruling-Elders Governours Overseers which you averre Christ hath fixed in his Churches What will become of those Independent Ministers who take upon them like absolute kings Popes Lawgivers to erect gather new Chruches of their own forming and prescribe both Lawes Rules Covenants to them which Christ never made Brother you must expunge the 1 Tim. 5. 17 Let the Elders that RULE well be counted worthy of double honour Rom. 13. 1. Let every soule BEE SVBIECT to the HIGHER POWERS c. even for CONSCIENCE SAKE Tit. 3. 1. Put them in minde to be subject to Principalities and Powers to obey Magistrates c. Heb. 12. 17. Obey them that have THE RULE OVER YOU and SVBMIT your selves for they watch for your soules as they that must give an account c. Remember Salute all them that have the RVLE OVER YOV Acts 20. 28. Take heed to the floke over which the Holy Ghost hath made you OVERSEERS or Bishops to feed the Church of God which he hath purchased with his bloud Rom. 12. 8. HE that RVLETH let him do it with diligence 2 Chron. 9. 8. Blessed be the Lord thy God who delighted in thee to set thee VPON HIS THRONE to BE KING FOR THE LORD THY GOD c. with infinite other Texts yea the very names of Kings Princes Governours Elders Rulers Magistrates Overseers Bishops Teachers Fathers Pastors Masters c. out of the Bible and all Christian States Churches if you will make Christ alone the only immediate King Ruler Governour Lawgiver of his Church in the sence you here object it and that no person nor humane power whatsoever hath or ought to have any rule power or jurisdiction in or over the Churches people of God But if you meane no more but that Christ is the onely supreame Head King Lord Governour Lawgiver Pastor and Ruler of his Church and that all other Kings Princes Magistrates Rulers Pastors Ministers Governours are subordinate unto him as to the King of Kings Lord of Lords and chiefe Shepheard of his flockâ— your proposition is true but your conclusion miserably false that therfore there are no subordinate Kings Magistrates Rulers Pastors Governours Lawgivers under him to rule governe order instruct direct his Churches and people which the forequoted Texts your owne experience reason and the whole world will contradict Secondly I shall demand of my Brother how he proves all his forementioned Paradoxes concerning Christ and the Church in the sense he propounds them Or that his own or other Independent Churches lately gathered erected by no other but by men and consederated by a new Covenant framed by men not Christ to be built governed ordered onely by Christ and not men to be the spirituall Kingdome of Christ c. whole onely King Governour Head is Christ and not man Or in what Text he can shew me any particular Independent Church stiled Christs spirituall Kingdom and Republike I find it prophesied Revl 11. 15. That when the seventh Angel foundeth The KINGDOMES of this World which must be meant of Nationall Churches which you deny not of Particular Congregations which are no such Kingdoms shall become the Kingdomes of the Lord and of his Christ That all the
breach of Gods Laws with temporall punishments yet by this Gods Lawes become not temporall and unobligatory to the conscience So God on the other side may and doth 〈◊〉 the violation of just humane Lawes with spirituall and eternall punishments Majestrates being but his Vicegerents Deputies and the contempt of their just Lawes a contempt of God himselfe Therefore the Argument holds not The 5th Objection is this that the conscience only respects God therefore nothing can binde it but Gods owne Law which is spirituall I Answer That the conscience respects as well men as God Act. 24. 16 therefore the just Lawes of men as I have proved as well as of God 2ly The conscience looks upon the just Laws and precepts of men not meerly as human Lawes but as proceeding from the Ministers and Vicegerents of God himselfe whom they represent and whom God himselfe frequently enjoynes us to obey The 6th Is this No one man and by consequence not all mens consciences in the world may or can Iudge another mans conscience who standeth or falleth 〈◊〉 his owne Master Rom. 14. 4. 16. Ergo they cannot make Lawes to binde the conscience I Answer first that this text speakes only of privat Christians Judging one another in things indifferent as meates holy dayes c. when and where there is neither law of God nor man inhibiting the free use or refusall of them at the whole Chapter manifests Therefore it makes nothing against necessary ecclesiasticalâ— Laws Canons obliging men to obedience even in point of conscience 2ly The Apostle expresly concludes in this very Chap. v. 14. to 23. That in case of giving scandal and offence to weak Brethren we ought to abstaine from the very use of lawful indifferent things even out of conscience of the scandall hurt don thereby not simply of the things themselves though there be no law of God or man restraining or altering the indifferency or lawfulnes thereof that without any impeachment of Christian liberty Therefore when necessary or convenient things meerly indifferent in their nature are enjoyned by Superiors just Laws or inconvenient indifferent things prohibited for the publick good or peace they ought much more to be submitted to without impeachment of christian liberty out of Conscience of the Law and scandall which would follow the volation thereof and in obedience to the generall Law of God which commands obedience to such Lawes The 7. Objection is this There is one Lawgiver which is able to save and to destroy to wit Godâ— who art thou that judgest another Iam. 4. 12. Ergo none can make laws to bind the conscience but God I answer 1. that there is but one supream absolut Lawgiver which is God Is 33. 2. wch excluds not subordinat ones 2ly The Apostle saith not that there is ONLY one law-giver that can save and destroy neither will the words infallibly conclude there is but one such since humane law-givers can make Lawes to save or destroy the lives bodyes and Estates of men as appeares by Scripture and the Lawes of all Nations though not their Soules as they are meare humane Lawes but only collaterally as the wilful contempts and violations of them are sins breaches of the very law of God prescribing obedience to those Lawes in which sence they may secondarily destroy the very soules of men Thirdly This Text takes not away the power of making necessary tempâ—rall or Ecclesiasticall Laws for then no such Lawes could possibly be made by any But the meaning of the Apostle is this That onely God the Supreame Law-giver is able by his Law to make any indifferent lawfull thing necessary or unlawfull in it selfe in point of Religion or conscience and to change the meere indifferency of it into a thing simply good or evil and not humane Law-givers Therefore we should not judge or condemne one another in the use or neglect of those things which God himselfe hath left indifferent where there is no circumstance of scandall or contempt of humane Lawes to engage us to use or not to use them But it reacheth not to such humane Lawes Civill or Ecclesiasticall which command or prohibit things agreeable to the rules of Gods Word or things necessary and expedient for Order Decency Peace avoyding of scandall and other mischiefes which Lawes as Doctor Willet himselfe who makes this objection affirmes do binde the conscience notwithstanding this objected Text. And thus much for my Brothers first generall Objection His second is this That the Scripture holds forth and Christ in the New-Testament presoribes and layes down unto us but ONLY ONE and that a most compleat and exact forme of Church government and Discipline which ought not to be altered or varied from in the least title being a part of the Gospel and must be BUT ONE and THE SAME in all Nations Churches in all ages throughout the World precisely observed by all Churches without the least variation That the Independent way alone is this divine unalterable Evangelicall platforme Therefore nor King nor Parliament though assisted with a Synod of most pious and learned orthodox Divines justly may or can of right make any Ecclesiasticall binding Lawes for the government or Discipline of the Churches of Christ within their Jurisdictions it being indeed a meere adding to the Word of God prohibited under a curse Deut. 4. 2. c. 12. 22. Prov. 30. 6. Rev. 22. 18 19. Thus my deare Brother and other Independents Argue with more confidence than evidence of Scripture To which I answer first That though Christ and his Apostles have instituted in the Gospel all necessary Church-Officers as Evangelical Bishops Elders Ministers Deacons Pastors Teachers c. and likewise given some general rules for the Government and Discipline of his Church yet he hath neither instituted nor prescribed any such unalterable compleat exact forme of Church-government and Discipline in all ages and Churches in the New Testament as is pretended by many not evidenced by any My reasons are these First Because no such exact and punctuall platforme is or can be clearly demonstrated to us nor discovered by us in the Scripture upon most diligent scrutiny Quod non lego non credo hath alwayes been reputed a solid Argument in matters of Divinity and divine institutions The Apostle Heb. 7. 13. 14. argues thus negatively even in the point of Christs Priesthood because Moses spake nothing of the Tribe of Iudah concerning Priesthood And God himselfe argues thus Deut. 9. 12. 15. Ye saw no manner of similitude therefore ye shall make no likenesse or image of me I may safely argue negatively in like sort The Scripture speaks nothing of such an exact universall Platforme and we see no image or similitude of it in the Gospel Therefore there is no such Secondly Independents have been frequently pressed to shew us any such exactform of Church-government instituted and generally prescribed to all ages
severall Iurisdictions to submission and reall obedience especially when just and agreeable to Gods Word or at least to passive whiles in force where unjust or contrary to the Word Hence the publike Laws Ordinances Edicts of Parliaments and general Assemblies of the Estates have in all Kingdomes Ages without the least dispute oblieged regulated all Corporations Societies Persons within their severall jurisdictions because they are the Representative Body and supreame power of those Realms where all are virtually present and consenting when all or the major part at least assent Hence the whole World have ever held the determioations Creeds Canons Decrees of Oeumenicall Nationall or Provinciall Councels ratified by Emperors Kings and Parliaments obligatory in point of jurisdiction to all Churches persons within their jurisdictions And in truth the chiefe end use of Parliaments Councels Synods approved by God and the higher powers ordained by him is not to advise admonish perswade debate or deliver their opinions of doubts errors mischiefes for this every private man hath power to do and containes no stampe of jurisdistion Power or Authority in it But authoritatively to prescribe Lawes Canons Rules and determinations oblieging otherrs to obedience under paine of exemplary censures and penalties Sixthly It cannot be gainsayd but every man and woman in the world considered meerly as such or as single persons stript of all their naturall civill or Ecclesiasticall relations are of equall Authority and have no jurisdiction power or superiority at all one over another no more than fellow servants fellow Citizens or neighbors out of office have over one another yet look upon the selfe-same persons as they stand cloathed with their severall Relations as members of a family Corporation City Kingdome Church and their very relations make them subordinate and lyable to sundry superiour jurisdictions not only by way of counsell but command Thus children servants wives Pulpits are by a naturall relation established by a Morall Law and sundry divine Precepts subject to all the just Lawes Orders commands of their Parents Masters Husbands not onely by way of Counsell or advise which they may obey or reject at pleasure but of Iurisdiction and Authority so farre as to be enforced to obedience and justly punished for disobedience or neglect according to the quality of the offence and contempt Thus inferiours of all sorts in a politicke relation onely as subjects to their Princes to all subordinate Magistrates Officers in their respective places of power Kingdomes to their Parliaments Cities to their Majors Aldermen and Common-Councell Companies to their Masters Wardens and Assistants Souldiers to their Generals Commanders of all Rankes Schollars to their Tutors Colledges to their Rectors mariners to their Masters both by the Law of God Nature Nations Dictat of common reason are subject to all just orders Mandates of these their superiours to which they must yeeld obedienceâ— under paine of such punishments as are answerable to their contempt and disobedience The same rule and reason holds as firmely in all Ecclesiasticall Relations Take severall private Christians as Christians or severall Parishes or Congregations as they are such and it is certain one of them hath no Iurisdiction nor power at all over another in any Ecclesiasticall matters either to prescribe Lawes to or inflict censures upon one another but only a power to exhort admonish reprove advise or assist one another in a brotherly way But yet looke upon the selfe-same particular persons Churches as Members of a Parochiall or Nationall Church and then in this Relation they are and ought to be subject to the just rules precepts Canons Orders of the Ministers and whole Congregation of which they are Actuall Members even in point of conscience and every particular Church must and ought readily to submit to the just Canons Constitutions Orders determinations Ecclesiasticall Censures of the whole Representative Nationall or Provinciall Church Councell â—ynod ratified by Authority of Parliament in a Regular way under paine of Obâ—inacy Contempt Disobedience and exemplary punishment there being the selfe-same reason and equity for severall combined Churches in a Councel Synod Presbytery to have a coeâ—cive power over every particular Church within their limits as for any particular Congregation to claim or exerise a jurisdiction in point of direction or correction over any or every particular member of it Our Independents no doubt will grant that if two or three severall Congregations unite themselves into one Church they do by vertue of this union become all lyable to the Iurisdiction Canons Orders Determinations Censures of that one Church and those who whiles divided had no authority nor power but onely of their owne members have by this union a Iurisdiction over the Members of all these Churches thus eonjoyned into one As it is with several persons united into one Corporation Society Church or when severall powers Or jurisdictions meet and joyne together in one as the Parliaments Commissioners Armies of two Provinces Kingdome in one Parliament Councel Army the Lords Commons Knights and Burgesses of every County Citty Town and Burrough in both Realmes in one Parliament they have by this their union the whole power and authority of both united Kingdomes Armies Parliaments and a joynt Iurisdiction over both which they had not before whiles seperated even as a Major or King hath when as severall Cities Townes Villages Kingdoms as our ancient Saxon Heptarchy are all conjoyned into one City Realm and therby subordinated to one new Iurisdiction If this then must be yeelded to me it will inevitably follow by the selfe-same reason that severall particular Churches being united together in one Synod Councell Assembly Parliament or Presbytery even for this very end and purpose to prescribe such generall Canons erect such a uniforme Church-government and Discipline for the publicke peace and benefit of the Church as shall equally binde all Churches victually present and combined in it must have a lawfull Iuridicall Legislative power in them to make such Laws Canons as shall binde all particular Congregations not onely as advises or brotherly counsels but as vigorous Lawes which subject the particular persons or Churches who transgresse or contemne them to condigne punishment as the reasons Scriptures formerly alleaged to prove that humane Lawes obliege the conscience in point of obedience abundantly demonstrate These uncontrolable verities never yet so much as doubted in any Age till this clearely discover the falsity and vanity of my Brothers objection to which I will give this further direct answer 1. I deny that every particular Church or Congregation in a Christian State where there are many adjacent Churches under the selfe same Civill Government is an absolute compleat independent Body City or Republike of it selfe as is objected to all intents and purposes without dependency on or relation or subordination to any other True it is that in some respects so far as concerns its own private interest it is a compleate body having a Minister
for their ratification The Canons of the Synod of France under Charlemain An. 742. were ratified by his Edict and set forth by him in his owne name being compiled by him in Parliament as it seemes his Nobles being present CONSILIO Sacerdotum ET OPTIMATVM MEORVM with the counsell of his Priests and Nobles The Constitutions and Canons of the Synod of Soyssons made by Prince Pepin Consensu Concilio Episcoporum sive Sacerdotum Comitum seu Optimatum Francorum with the consent and counsell of the Bishops or Priests and of the Nobles or Great men of France were published by him in his owne name with his Royall confirmation in writing which concludes thus Si quis contra hoc decretum quod 23. Episcopi cum aliis Sacerdotibus vel servis Dei unà cum consensu Principis Pepini vel OPTIMATVM FRANCORUM CONSILIO CONSTITVERVNT transgredi vel legem irrumpere voluerit vel despexit judicandus sit ab ipso Principe vel Episcopis vel Comitibus componat secundum quod in lege scriptum est unusquisque juxta ordinem suum This Synod being no other but a Parliament the temporall Lords having voyces in it as well as Bishops The Councell held at the Palace of Vernis under the same King Pepin Cap. 6. decreed by his consent That there should bee two Synods kept every yeare the first of them in March Wheresoever the King should command and in his presence The King therefore was then President in their Synods both to order them and to controll correct or confirme their Canons as hee thought meet In the second Councell of Nice assembled by the Edict of Constantine and Irene his Mother Petronius the glorious Proconsul Theophylact an Earle imployed in the Emperors service John the Kings Chamberlaine and Treasurer of his Army with other magnificent and illustrious Senators sate as chiefe Auditors and Directors The Emperor and his Mother likewise directed the Councell both what to treat of what to read and how to proceed and ratified the Decrees of that Idolatrous Councell the Synod craving their Imperiall assistance for the defence of truth the suppression of heresies schismes reformation of abuses and setling the peace of the Church by their publike Lawes and Edicts yea they desire their Majesties to incline their eares to their most humble supplications Ipsasque sacratissimas Imagines in pristino gradu constituere ut omnes Christiani in universo mundo exultent magno laetantur gaudio Pope Adrian himselfe making this request unto them in his Epistles Supplicatory acknowledging the right both of summoning ordering and confirming Councells to bee in them not in himselfe Charles the Great and his Nobles were present in the Synod of Frankford summoned by his Writ and Edict yea Charles late President in it Congregatis nobis in unum charitatis conventu praecipiente ET PRAESIDENTE piissimo gloriosissimo Domino nostro Carolo Rege write the Fathers of that Synod to the Prelates of Spaine to whom Charles in this Synod writ an Epistle and a profession of his faith exhorting them to reforme their Errors and embrace the Truth The Canons of the Synod of Theodon were ratified by the Imperiall Edict of Charles the Great Ludovicus Pius ET IMPERATORES ET PENE OMNES GALLIAE PRINCIPES SVBSCRIPSERVNT singuli singulas facientes cruces The Emperors and almost all the Princes of France subscribing the Decrees of that Synod after all persons in it had three severall times consented to them by crying out a Placet and Te Deum being sung by the Clergy after this subscription the Synod dissolved which was no other but a Parliament those Emperors and their Nobles being present and having the chiefe voyces in it The fourth Synod of Arles under the same Charles having drawn up 26. Canons submits them to his Royall censure to correct disapprove or ratifie them at his pleasure Haec igitur sub brevitate quae emendatione digna perspeximus quà m brevissimè adnotavimus Domino Imperatori praesentanda decrevimus poscentes ejus Clementiam ut si quid hîc minus est ejus prudentia suppleatur si quid secus quà m se ratio habeat ejus judicio emendetur si quid rationabilitèr taxatum est ejus adjutorio divina opitulante clementia perficiatur A memorable Submission All being nothing without his Royall confirmation The Synod of Towers summoned by the same Emperor was commanded by him both what Constitutions to make what things to consult of which they thus expresse and submit to his censure in the Prologue and close of their Canons Quantum piissimi Imperatoris nostri excellens animus divinae sapientiae fulgore sit irradiatus ad gubernandum rerum praesentium statum ipsius Imperij sibi à Deo dati liquidò testantur negocia quae tanta sunt industria administrata quantaque prudentia ordinata qui sapiens ac intelligens est facile perspicere potest eô praecipuè quod hic toto animo invigilat investigando quae ad pietatem veram Religionem pertinent quorum fructus hominem in bono beatitudinis collocat His igitur intentus pios ac religiosos Dei Sacerdotes Ecclesiae gubernacula in regno sibi divina largitate collato tenentes saluberrimis exhortationibus admonuit ut operam darent actionibus eminerent quibus se bene operando sibi commissos verbis exemplis instruendo regerent Dissinitum itaque de locis tempore quando ubi coadunari opus fuerit quod A TANTO PRINCIPE NOBIS INIVNCTVM EST ad statuta loca convenimus siquidem urbe Turonis congregati Episcopi Abbates venerabilis Clerus pro parvitate nostra pauca quae ad tantum opus pertinere animadvertimus quae secundùm Canonicam regulam emendatione indigent distinctè per capitula adnotavimus SERENISSIMO IMPERATORI NOSTRO OSTENDENDA Primò omnium admonuimus generalitèr cunctos qui nostro conventui interfuêre ut obedientes sunt Domino excellentissimo Imperatori nostro fidem quam ei promissam habent inviolabilitèr conservare studeant orationes quoque assiduas intentè fundere pro ejus incolumitate ac stabilitate omnes se velle secundùm nostram admonitionem unanimitèr professi sunt c. And then they close up all their Canons with this Epilogue Haec nos in conventu nostro ità ventilavimus sed quomodo deinceps piissimo Principi nostro DE HIS AGENDVM PLACEBIT NOS FIDELES IJVS FAMVLI LIBENTI ANIMO AD NVTVM ET VOLVNT ATEM EIVS PARATI SVMVS The second Councell of Cavaillon under the same Charles thus preface their Canons which they submit to his correction and approbation Auxiliante Domino nostro Jesâ—â— Christo atque imperante ferenissimo atque inclito Augusto Carolo convenimus Episcopi Abbates totius Galliae Lugdunensis in urbem Cabilonensem de quibusdam rebus in quibus nobis emendatione
chiefe Officer of the King in that parish that he may admonish him to appeare to give satisfaction And if the Officer of the King shall faile therein he shall be in the Kings mercy and from thenceforth the Bishop may with Ecclesiasticall Iustice curbe the party accused 11. Archbishops Bishops and all persons of the Realme who hold of the King in Capite may haue their possessions of the King as a Barony and shall answer for them to the Justices and Ministers of the King and shall follow and doe all Royall Customes and like other Barons ought to bee present in judgments of the Kings Court with the Barrons untill it proceed to diminution of Members or unto death 12. When an Archbishopricke Bishopricke or Abbey or Priory shall become voyde in the Kings Dominion it ought to be in his hands and he shall receive all the rents and issues thereof as the Dominicall rents And what shall come to the Church is to bee disposed of Our Lord the King ought to commend the best persons to the Church and the election ought to be made in the Kings owne Chappel by assent of the King himself and advise of such persons of the Realme which he shall call unto him to do these things and there the person elected shall do his homage and fealty to the King as to his Liege Lord of life and members and of terrene honour saving his Order before he shall be Consecrated 13. If any of the Nobles of the Realme shall deny to do Iustice to any Archbishop or Bishop or Archdeacon concerning him or his our Lord the King ought to do them Iustice And if peradventure any shall deny to our Lord the King his right the Archbishops Bishops and Archdeacons ought to admonish him that he may satisfie the King 14. The Church or Churchyard ought not to detain the Chattels of those who are in forfeiture of the King against the Iustice of the King because they are the Kings owne whether they bee found within or without the Church 15. Pleas of Debts which shal be due either by interposition of an oath or without oath are in the Iustice of the King that is triable in the Kings temporall Courts 16. The Sonnes of Peasants or Villanies ought not to bee ordained Priests without assent of the Lord in whose land they are knowne to bee borne To this Recognition or Record of the Customs and Liberties of the Realm the Archbishops Bishops Abbots Priors Clergy with all the Earles Barons and Nobles swore and firmly promised viva voce in the word of truth that they would keep and observe it to our Lord the King and to his Heirs bona fide and without male engin for ever His itaque gestis potestas Laica in res personas Ecclesiasticas omnia pro libitu Ecclesiastico jure contempto tacentibus aut vix murmur antibus Episcopis potius quam resistentibus usurpabat writes Matthew Paris Whereupon Thomas Becket then Archbishop of Canterbury repenting of his oath to observe them humbled and afflicted himselfe exceedingly with fasting and corporall pennace yea he suspended himself from the office of the Altar untill the Pope absolved him from his pretended offence and oath which he readily obtained After which Becket resusing to conforme himselfe to the King and these Lawes he had sworne to departs secretly without the Kings license into Flanders and from thence repaired to Pope Alexander at Sennes who curteously entertained him and refused the demands of the Kings Embassadours to do him justice against Becket or to confirme these Lawes and ancient Customs of the Realm Whereupon the King sent this ensuing Writ to every Sheriffe of England Praecipio tibi quod si aliquis Clericus vel Laicus in Baliva tua Romanam curiam appellaverit eum capias firmiter teneas donec voluntatem meam praecipiam omnes reditus Clericorum Archiepiscopi possessiones saiseas in manum meam Et omnium Clericorum qui cum Archiepiscopo sunt Patres Matres Fratres Sorores Nepotes Neptes pones per salvos plegios catalla eorum donec voluntatem meam inde praecipiam Et hoc Breve tecum afferas cum summonitus fueris Gilberto quoque que Londonensi Episcopo scripsit in haec verba Nosti quam malè Thomas Cantuariensis Archiepiscopus operatus est adversum mo regnum meum quam malè recesserit Et ideo mando tibi quod Clerici sui qui detraxerunt honori meo regni qui circaâ—psum fuerunt post fugam suam non percipiant aliquid de reditibus suis quos habuerunt in Episcopatu tuo nisi per me nec habeant aliquod auxilium vel consilium aâ—te Item Justitiariis suis significavit per literas sub hac forma Si quis inventus fuerit ferens literas Domini Papae vel mandatum aut Thomae Archiepiscopt continens interdictum Christianitatis in Anglia capiatur retinetur donec inde voluntatem meam praecipiam Item nullus Clericus Monachus Canonicus vel conversus vel alicujus religionis transfretare permittatur nisi habeat Literas de reditu suo Justitiarii vel nostras Si quis aliter inventus fuerit capiatur retineatur Nullus appellet ad Papam neque ad Thomam Archiepiscopum neque aliquod placitum ex eorum mandato teneatur neque aliquod mandatum eorum in Anglia recipiatur si quis tenuexit vel receperit vel tractaverit capiatur retineatur Si Episcopi Abbates Clerici vel Laici sententiam interdicti tenuerunt sine dilatione a terra eijciantur tota eorum Cognatio Ita quod nihil de catallis suis secum ferant sed catalla eorum possessiones in manu nostra saisiantur Omnes Clerici qui reditus habent in Anglia sint summoniti per omnes comitatus ut infra tres Menses praecise ad reditus suos sicut diligunt eos amant in Angliam redeant Et si ad terminum praefixum non venerint reditus eorum in manu nostra saisiantur Episcopt Londoniensis Norioensis summoneantur quod sint eoram Justiciariis Nostris ad rectum faciendum quod contra Statuta Regni interdixerunt terram Hugonis Comitis in ipsum sententiam Anathematis intulerunt Denarii beati Petri colligantur serventur quousque inde vobis Dominus Rex voluntatem suam praeceperit Ecclesiam praeterea Cantuariensem omnia bona Archiepiscopi Rex et suorum consiscari praecepit Et quod in nullius historiae legitur serie totam ejus congnationem exilio ascriptam addixit sine delectu conditionis sexus aut aetatis Et cum Ecclesia Catholica oret pro haereticis schismatieis perfidis Judaeis prohibitum est a Rege ne quis Archiepiscopum orationum suffragiis adjuvaret Such Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction did the King then exercise To what an unfortunate end this opposition brought this Archbishop Becket our Historians at large record and I