Imprimatur J. BERKENHEAD 1660. AN EXACT and most IMPARTIAL ACCOMPT OF The Indictment Arraignment Trial and Judgment according to Law of Twenty Nine REGICIDES THE Murtherers Of His Late SACRED MAJESTY Of Most Glorious Memory Begun at Hicks-Hall on Tuesday the 9th of October 1660. And Continued at the Sessions-House in the Old-Bayley until Friday the nineteenth of the same Moneth Together with a SUMMARY of the Dark and Horrid Decrees of those Caballists Preparatory to that Hellish Fact Exposed to view for the Reader 's Satisfaction 〈◊〉 Information of Posterity London Printed for R. Scot T. Basset R. Chisâ—ell and J. Wright 1679. A SUMMARY by way of Premise of the dark Proceedings of the Cabal at WESTMINSTER Preparatory to the Murther of His late Sacred Majesty Taken out of their own Journal-Book THe Commons Resolved That no further Addresses be made to the King by themselves nor by any other without leave of both Houses And those that do to incur the Penalty of High-Treason And Declare They will receive no more Messages from Him And Enjoyn That no Person whatsoever receive or bring any Message from Him to Both or either Houses or to any other Person 15. Jan. 1647. The Lords concurred to these Votes 17. August 1648. The Commons concur with the Lords That these Votes for Non-Addresses be Revoked 20. November 1648 The Army present their Remonstrance to the Parliament for bringing Delinquents to Justice 24. November 1648. The Treaty at the Isle of Wight Voted to continue till the twenty seventh of November 1. December 1648. Master Hollis presents an Account of the Treaty with the King And the same day information was brought them of the King 's being removed from Carisbrook to Hurst Castle 5. December 1648. The King's Answer to the Propositions Voted a Ground for the House to proceed upon for Settlement of the Peace of the Kingdom 6. December 1648. The Members were secured by Colonel Pride 7. December 1648. The House of Commons appointed a day of Humiliation Peters Caryl and Marshal to perform the Duty The several Votes For Revoking the Votes for Non Addresses to the King For a Treaty to be had with Him That His Answers to the Propositions were a Ground for Peace Voted Dishonourable and Destructive 23. December 1648. A Committee was appointed to consider how to proceed in a way of Justice against the King and other Capital Offenders 28. December 1648. An Ordinance for Trial of the King was read 1. January 1648. Declared and adjudged by the Commons That by the Fundamental Laws It is Treason in the King of England for the time being to levy War against the Parliament and Kingdom 2. Jan. 1648. The Lords disagreed to this Vote and cast it out and the Ordinance for Tryal of the King Nemine contradicente 3. Jan. 1648. The same Vote was again put to the question in the House of Commons and carried in the Affirmative 4. Jan. 1648. Master Garland presents a new Ordinance for erecting an High Court of Justice for Tryal of the King which was read the first second and third time assented to and passed the same day And Ordered no Copy to be delivered Same day Resolved That the People are under God the Original of all just Powers That themselves being Chosen by and Representing the People have the Supreme Power in the Nation That whatsoever is Enacted or Declared for Law by the Commons in Parliament hath the force of a Law and the People concluded thereby though Consent of King and Peers be not had thereunto 6 Jan. 1648. The Commissioners for Tryal of the King are Ordered to meet on Monday then next at two of the Clock in the Painted-Chamber Their days of sitting were 8 10 12 13 15 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 of January 1648. Painted-Chamber Monday 8 January They chose Ask Dorislaus Steel and Cook to be their Councel and other Officers And sent out their Precept under their Hands and Seals for Proclaiming their Court in Westminster-hall to be held in the Painted-Chamber on the tenth Which Precept is all of Ireton's Hand-writing Journal of the Court fol. 6. And Tuesday the 19th The Commissioners Ordered That the Proclamation be made in Cheap-side and at the Old-Exchange And appointed a Committee to consider of the matter of Government of making a new Great Seal and not using the name of a Single Person Wednesday the tenth They chose Bradshaw who was absent for their President and Say pro tempore who gave Garland thanks for his Pains about the business of the Court Fol. 72. And appointed their Councel to prepare and prosecute their Charge And a Committee to consider for carrying on the Tryal Whereof Millington Garland and Martin were three Friday the twelve Waller and Harrison are desired to attend the General to appoint Guards to attend the Court. And Titchbourn and Roe with others to prepare for the Solemnity of the Tryal and to appoint Workmen c. Fol. 16. The Charge to be brought in on Monday And Waller Scot Titchbourn Harrison and others to consider of the place for Tryal and Report the next day Saturday the thirteenth Upon Garland's Report Ordered The Tryal be where the Courts of King's Bench and Chancery sate in Westminster-Hall fol. 20. Monday the Fifteenth The Councel brought in a Draught of the Charge And a Committee appointed to advise therein and compare the Evidence therewith fol. 21. And they and others to consider the manner of bringing the King to his Tryal And that day Titchbourn delivered a Petition to the Commons in the name of the Commons in London in Common-Council differing from the Lord Major and Aldermen The Substance was for bringing the King to Justice Which was Ordered to be Registred in the Books of Common-Councel Wednesday the 17th The Charge recommitted to the Committee Fol. 24. Thursday the 18th Tichbourn excused the absence of Mr. Steel and nothing then else done Fol. 29. Friday the 19th Upon Millington's Report of the Charge and Form of words for exhibiting it Ordered That the Attorney or in his absence the Solicitor exhibit it Fol. 30. And Waller Harrison and others to appoint thirty to wait upon the King and twenty upon the President Saturday the 20th Forenoon Ordered That Mildmay deliver the Sword of State to Humphreys to bear before the President The Solicitor presents the Charge engrossed which being read and signed by him was returned to him to be exhibited And then Adjourned to Westminster-Hall Westminster-Hall Saturday the 20th Afternoon The King was brought in by Thomlinson attended by Hacke and two and thirty Partisans And Cook then exhibited the Charge And the King not owning their Authority was remanded And they Adjourned till Monday Painted-Chamber Monday the 22d Forenoon They approved of what their President had done on Saturday and Resolved That the King should not be suffered to question their Jurisdiction Fol. 50. Westminster-Hall Same day Afternoon Cook prayed That the King
these Sacred Persons that the Sons of Violence should never approach to hurt them For My Lord the very Thoughts of such an Attempt hath ever been presented by all Laws in all Ages and all Nations of the World as a most unpardonable Treason My Lord This is that that brought the two Eunuchs in the Persian-Court to their just Destruction Voluerunt insurgere saies the Text and yet that was enough to Attain them And so My Lord it was by the Roman Laws too as Tacitus observes Qui deliberant desciverunt To Doubt or Hesitate in a Point of Allegiance is direct Treason and Apostasie And upon this Ground it is that the Statute upon which your Lordships are now to proceed hath these express Words If a man doth Compass or Imagine the Death of the King c. Kings who are God's Vicegerents upon Earth have thus far a kind of Resemblance of the Divine Majesty that their Subjects stand accountable to Them for the very Thoughts of their Hearts Not that any Man can know the Heart save God alone but because when the Wicked Heart breaks out into any open Expressions by which it may be judged 't is the Thoughts of the Heart which makes the Treason the Overt-Act is but the Evidence of it My Lords This Care and Caution is not so to be understood as if it were the Single Interest of One Royal Person only The Law doth wisely judge and foresee that upon the Life of the King depends the Laws and Liberties the Estates and Properties the Wealth and Peace the Religion and in Sum the Glory of the Nation My Lords This Judgment of the Law ha's been verified by a sad Experience for when that Blessed King whose Blood we are now making Inquisition for was untimely taken away Religion and Justice both lay buried in the same Grave with Him and there they had slept still if the miraculous Return of Our Gracious Sovereign had not given them a new Resurrection My Lords My Lord Coke in his Comment upon this Statute ha's one Conceit which is somewhat strange I am sure it is very new he seems to think that it would have added to the Perfection of this Law if there had been a time limited for the Party to be accused But certainly the work of this Day has quite consuted that Imagination For here is a Treason that has so long out-faced the Law and the Justice of this Kingdom that if there had been any time of Limitation in the Statute there would have been no Time nor Place left for Punishment And if this Treason had but once grown up to an Impunity it might perhaps have drawn the Guilt of that Innocent Blood and with it the Vengeance due to it upon the whole Nation The Scope of this Iudictment is for the Compassing the Death of the King the rest of the Indictment as the Vsurping Authority over the King's Person the Assembling Sitting Judging and Killing of the King are but so many several Overt-Acts to prove the Intention of the Heart We are not bound under favour to prove every one of these against every particular Person who is Indicted for he that is in at one is guilty in Law of all rest as much as if he had struck the Fatal Stroke it self Nay under favour if we can prove any other Overt-Act besides what is lai'd in the Indictment as the encouraging of the Souldiers to cry out Justice Justice or Preaching to them to go in this Work as Godly and Religious or any other act of all that Catalogue of Villanies for which the Story will be for ever Infamous this may be given in Evidence to prove the Compassing and Imagining the King's Death The conclusion of this Indictment alledges the Fact done to be to the great Displeasure of Almighty God and to the great Disgrace of the People of England A Truth so clear and known that it can neither be heightned by any Aggravation or lessend by any Excuse As for the Fact it self with the Manner of it I shall not need to open it at large for these things were not done in a Corner every true English Heart still keeps within it self a bleeding Register of this Story only my Lords in the way to our Evidence with your Lordships favour this I think may be fit to be said First for the year 1648. for that was the Fatal year of this King and beyond that year we shall not now enquire I say whatsoever in the Year 1648. could have been done by a Parliament to save the Life of a King was done in this Case They opened the way to a Treaty in spight of the Army and while these Sons of Zerviah who were too hard for them were engaged in Service in the Remoter Parts they hastened the Treaty as much as was possible the Debater upon His Majestie 's Concessions were Voted a good ground for Peace notwithstanding the Remonstrances of the Army still flew about their Ears and notwithstanding the Oppositions of a fearful and unbelieving Party of the House-of Commons whom the Army had frighted into an Awful and a Slavish Dependance upon them And when nothing else could be done for Him they were so true to the Obligations they lay under that they resolved to fall with Him and did so For the Army who saw the Treaty proceed so fast made as great hast to break it They seize upon the blessed Person of our Sacred King by Force and bring Him to London and here they force the Parliament shut out some Members imprison others and then called this wretched little Company which was left a Parliament By this and before they had taken upon them the Boldness to dissolve the House of Peers they pass a Law and Erect forsooth an High Court of Justice as they call it a Shambles of Justice appoint Judges Advocates Officers and Ministers sit upon the Life of the King Now they Speak out and Expound their own Declarations and tell us what that was which before they had demanded in obscure Terms when they called for Justice against all Delinquents Now they speak plainly what they mean and call this blessed King this glorious Saint the grand Delinquent Haec Acies victum factura Nocentem est My Lords When they had thus proceeded to appoint their Judges Officers and Court then they call this Person their onely Liege Lord and Soveraign to the Bar and by a formal Pegeantry of Justice proceed to Sit upon Him Arraign Try Sentence Condemn and Kill I had almost said Crucifie Him whom they could not but know to be their King And all this against the clearest Light the sharpest Checks and most through Convictions of Conscience that ever men resisted And yet in this moment of time such was the Majesty and Innocene of our Gracious Soveraign that the People followed Him with Tears in their Eyes and Acclamations in their Mouths God save the King even then when the Souldiers were ready to fire upon
instrumental in taking away the Kings life that is being any way instrumental Truly whether it be not instrumental to exhibit a Charge against him or complain of his delayes to ask Justice against him in the name of the people to do all this and desire that the Charge might be taken pro Confesso if this be not instrumental I know-nothing else Sentencing and signing Some signed the Sentence some the instrument for death the next degree of being Instrumental the highest degree of that is to accuse him to deliver in the Charge against him in the name of the people do it again and again be angry at the delayes The next thing is this that you did not do this falso or malitiose but for your Fee and that though there might be avaritia there was not malitia in it it was done by your Profession you were not Magisterial in it you thought the consequences that did follow would not follow If a man does but intend to beat a man and he dye upon it you know in Law it is all one You must understand there is a malice in the Law If a man beat one in the Streets and kill him though not maliciously in him but it is so in Law That you desire to have the benefit of the Kings Declaration that you did put in your petition proving the same that you were a prisoner before that the Commons in behalf of themselves and the people of England they craved the benefit of it which was granted excepting such as should be by Parliament exceptd and that the King should mention a Free Parliament for this it hath been fully answered to you and clearly by Mr. Sollicitor that you are not at all concerned in the Kings Declaration at Breda For first it is nothing in Law it binds in honour and we have given the same directions yesterday upon the like occasion that is that the Kings Declaration binds him in honour and in Conscience but it does not bind him in point of Law unless there were a pardon granted by the Broad Seal the thing is cleared to you what Parliament the King meant by it they were sitting at that time had acknowledged their dutie and allegiance to their King they went ad ultimum potentiae for a free and absolute Parliament whilst the King was absent though the King was away yet notwithstanding the King Declared whom he meant he directed one of those Declarations to our Speaker of the house of Commons and another to the Speaker of our Peers in this case it was loquendum ut vulgus it was owned by him as having the name of a Parliament it was done with great wisdom and prudence and so as it could be no otherwise they that were loyal subjects acting in the Kings absence he consenting to it the King owning that Authority so he was obliged in honour no further than his own meaning and words but there is another Clause in the act excludes all these persons The next thing is this you say the Statute of 25 Edward 3. and it is very true you say if it be any semblable Treason we were not to judge upon that unless they were the Treasons in the Act and it is most true now you would urge but this that this is but a semblable Treason but you are indicted for the compassing and imagining the Death of the King if these Acts did not tend to the compassing and imagining the Kings death I know not what does I am satisfied you are convicted in your conscience The next thing for you have said as much as any man can in such a Cause it is pity you have not a better you say though it was a Tyrannical Court as it is called but such a Court it was and there were Officers you say it had figuram judicii that aggravates the fact to you to your profession There is a difference between a standing Court and that which is but named to be a Court this was but one of a day or two's growth before and you know by whom by some that pretended to be only the Commons your knowledge can tell you that there was never an Act made by the Commons assembled in Parliament alone and you may find it in my Lord Cook that an Act by the Lords and Commons alone was naught as appeared by the Records Sir James Ormond was attainted of Treason the Act was a private Act by the King and Commons alone the Lords were forgot when the Judges came to try it it was void and another in Henry the 6. time you know this was no Court at all you know by a printed Authority that where a settled Court a true Court if that Court meddle with that which is not in their cognizance it is purely void the Minister that obeys them is punishable if it be Treasonable matter it is Treason if murder it is murder so in the Case of Martialsea and in the Common Pleas if a man shall begin an Appeal of death which is of a criminal nature and ought to be in the Kings Bench if they proceed in it it is void if this Court should condemn the party convicted he be executed it is murder in the Executioner the Court had no power over such things you speak of a Court. First it was not a Court Secondly no Court whatsoever could have any power over a King in a coercive way as to his person The last thing that you have said for your self is this that admitting there was nothing to be construed of an Act or an Order yet there was a difference it was an Act de facto that you urged rightly upon the Statute of 11 Hen. 7. which was denied to some God forbid it should be denied you if a man serve the King in the War he shall not be punished let the fact be what it will King Henry the 7. took care for him that was King de facto that his Subjects might be encouraged to follow him to preserve them whatever the event of the King was Mr. Cook you say to have the equity of that Act that here was an authority de facto these persons had gotten the supream power and therefore what you did under them you do desire the equity of that Act for that clearly the intent and meaning of that Act is against you it was to preserve the King de facto how much more to preserve the King de jure he was owned by these men and you as King you charged him as King and he was sentenced as King That that King Henry the 7. did was to take care of the King de facto against the King de jure it was for a King and Kingly Government it was not for an Antimonarchical Government you proceeded against your own King and as your King called him in your charge Charles Stewart King of England I think there is no colour you should have any benefit of the Letter or of the
perceive by this Commission that hath been read that we are authorized by the King's Majesty to hear and determine all Treasons Felonies and other Offences within this County But because this Commission is upon a special occasion the Execrable Murther of the blessed King that is now a Saint in Heaven King Charls the first we shall not trouble you with the Heads of a long Charge The ground of this Commission was and is from the Act of Oblivion and Indempnity You shall find in that Act there is an Exception of several persons who for their Execrable Treasons in sentencing to Death and signing the Warrant for the taking away the Life of our said Sovereign are left to be proceeded against as Traytors according to the Laws of England and are out of that Act wholly excepted and fore-prized Gentlemen You see these Persons are to be proceeded with according to the Laws of the Land and I shall speak nothing to you but what are the words of the Laws By the Statute of the twenty fifth of Edward the third a Statute or Declaration of Treason it is made High-Treason to compass and imagine the Death of the King It was the ancient Laws of the Nation In no Case else Imagination or Compassing without an Actual Effect of it was punishable by our Law Nihil officit Conatus nisi sequatur Effectus that was the old Rule of Law But in the case of the King His Life was so pretious that the Intent was Treason by the Common Law and Declared Treason by this Statute The reason of it is this In the case of the Death of the King the Head of the Commonwealth that 's cut off and what a Trunk an inanimate Lump the Body is when the Head is gone you all know For the Life of a single man there 's the Life of the Offendor there 's some Recompence Life for Life But for the Death of the King what Recompence can be made This Compassing and Imagining the cutting off the Head of the King is known by some Overt-Act Treason it is in the wicked Imagination though not Treason Apparent but when this Poison swells out of the Heart and breaks forth into Action in that case it 's High-Treason Then what is an Imagination or Compassing of the King's Death Truly it is any thing which shews what the Imagination is Words in many cases are Evidences of this Imagination they are Evidences of the Heart Secondly As Words so if a man if two men do conspire to Levy War against the King and by the way what I say of the King is as well of the King dead as living for if a Treason be committed in the Life of one King it is a Treason and punishable in the Time of the Successor Then I say in case not only of Words but if they conspire to Levy War against the King there 's another Branch of this Statute the Levying of War is Treason But if men shall go and consult together and this is to kill the King to put Him to Death this Consultation is clearly an Overt-Act to prove this Imagination or Compassing of the King's Death But what will you say then if men do not only go about to conspire and consult but take upon them to Judge Condemn nay put to Death the King Certainly this is so much beyond the Imagination and Compassing as 't is not only laying the Cockatrice's Egg but brooding upon it till it hath brought forth a Serpent I must deliver to you for plain and true Law That no Authority no single person no community of persons not the people Collectively or Representatively have any coercive power over the King of England And I do not speak mine own Sence but the words of the Laws unto you It was the Treason of the Spencers in King Edward the Second's Time in Calvin's case second Report The Spencers had an opinion that all Homage and Allegiance was due to the King by reason of the Crown as they called it And thereupon say the Books and Records they drew out this execrable Inference among others That if the King did not demean himself according to Right because he could not be reformed by Law he might per aspertee that is by sharp Imprisonment but this was adjudged horrid Treason by two Acts of Parliament Gentlemen Let me tell you what our Law-books say for there 's the Ground out of which and the Statutes together we must draw all our Conclusions for matter of Government How do they Stile the King They call Him The Lieutenant of God and many other expressions in the Book of Primo Henrici Septimi Says that Book there The King is immediate from God and hath no Superior The Statutes say That the Crown of England is immediately subject to God and to no other Power The King says our Books He is not only Caput Populi the Head of the People but Caput Reipublicae the Head of the Commonwealth The three Estates And truly thus our Statutes speak very fully Common Experience tells you when we speak of the King and so the Statutes of Edward the Third we call the King Our Sovereign Lord the King Sovereign that is Supreme And when the Lords and Commons in Parliament apply themselves to the King they use this Expression Your Lords and Commons your faithful Subjects humbly beseech I do not speak any Words of my own but the Words of the Laws Look upon the Statute primo Jacobi there 's a Recognition that the Crown of England was lawfully descended on the King and His Progeny The Statute it self was read to which it is desired the Reader will be referred These are the Words of the Act. And this is not the first precedent for you shall find it primo Eli. cap. 3. They do acknowledge the Imperial Crown lawfully descended on the Queen the same Recognition with this Before that because we shall shew you we go upon Grounds of Law in what we say Stat. 24. Hen. 8. cap. 12. Whereas by sundry old authentick Histories and Chronicles it is manifestly declared and expressed that this Realm of England is an Empire and so hath been accepted in the world governed by one Supreme Head and King having the Dignity and Royal Estate of the Imperial Crown of the same c. 25 Hen. 8. c. 21. there it is the people speaking of themselves That they do recognize no Superiour under God but only the King's Grace Gentlemen You see if the King be immediate under God he derives his Authority from no body else if the King have an Imperial Power if the King be Head of the Commonwealth Head of the body Politick if the body Politick own him obedience truly I think it is an undenied consequence He must needs be Superiour over them Gentlemen This is no new thing to talk of an Emperour or an Imperial Crown Do not mistake me all this while It is one thing to have an Imperial Crown and another
themselves an Authority to make Laws which was never heard before Authority to make Laws What Laws a Law for an High Court of Justice a Law for lives to sentence mens lives And whose Life the Life of their Sovereign upon such a King who as to them had not only redressed long before at the beginning of the Parliament all Grievances that were and were imaginable taken away the Star-Chnmber High-Commission-Court and about Shipping such a King and after such Concessions that He had made in the Isle of Wight when He had granted so much that was more than the People would have desired When these few Commons not onely without but excluding the rest of the Commons not onely without but excluding the rest but rejecting the Lords too that then sat when these few Commons shall take upon them this Authority and by colour of this their King Soveraign Liege Lord shall be sentenced put to Death and that put to Death even as their King and sentenced as their King put to Death as their King and this before His own Door even before that Place where He used in Royal Majesty to hear Embassadors to have His Honourable Entertainments that this King shall be thus put to Death at Noon-day it is such an Aggravation of Villany that truly I cannot tell what to say No story that ever was I do not think any Romance any Fabulous Tragedy can produce the like Gentlemen If any Person shall now come and shroud himself under this pretended Authority or such a pretended Authority you must know that this is so far from an Excuse that it is an Height of Aggravation The Court of Common-Pleas is the Common Shop for Justice in that Court an appeal is brought for Murther which ought to have been in the King's Bench the Court gives Judgment the Party is condemned and executed in this Case it is Murther in them that executed because they had no lawful Authority I speak this to you to shew you that no man can shroud himself by colour of any such false or pretended Authority I have but one thing more to add to you upon this head and that is which I should have said at first If two or more do compass or Imagine the King's Death if some of them go on so far as to Consullation if others of them go further they sentence and execute put to Death in this Case they are all Guilty the first Consultation was Treason I have no more to add but one Particular a few Words As you will have Bills presented against those for Compassing Imagining Adjudging the King so possibly you may have Bils presented against some of those for Levying War against the King Levying of War which is another Branch of the State of 25th of Edward the Third It was but Declarative of the Common Law it was no new Law By that Law it was treason to Levy War against the King But to levy War against the Kings Authority you must know is Treason too If men will take up Armes upon any Publick pretence if it be to expulse Aliens if but to pull out Privy Councellours if it be but against any Particular Laws to reform Religion to pull down Enclosures in all these cases If Persons have assembled themselves in a Warlike manner to do any of these Acts this is Treason and within that Branch of Levying War against the King This was adjudged in the late Kings Time in Berstead's case Queen Elizabeth's Henry the Eighth's former Times King Jame's Time much more 〈◊〉 men will go not onely to Levy War against the King but against the Laws all the Laws subvert all the Laws to set up new Laws Models of their own If any of these cases come to be presented to you you know what the Laws are To conclude you are now to enquire of Blood of Royal Blood of Sacred Blood Blood like that of the Saints under the Altar crying Quousque Domine How long Lord c. This Blood crys for Vengeance and it will not be appeased without a Bloody Sacrifice Remember but this and I have done I shall not press you upon your Oaths you are Persons of Honour you all know the Obligation of an Oath This I will say that he that conceals or favours the guilt of Blood takes it upon himself wilfully knowingly takes it upon himself And we know that when the Jews said Let his blood be on us and our seed it continued to them and their Posterity to this day God save the King Amen Amen His Lordships Speech being ended Thomas Lee of the Middle-Temple London Gentleman was called to give in the Names of his Witnesses The names of the Witnesses then and there sworn follow William Clark Esq James Nutley Esq Mr. George Masterson Clerk George Farringdon Hercules Huncks Dr. William King Martin Foster John Baker Stephen Kirk Richard Nunnelly John Powel John Throckmorton John Blackwel Ralph Hardwick Thomas Walkley Gentleman Holland Simpson Benjamin Francis Colonel Matthew Thomlinson Griffith Bodurdo Esq Samuel Boardman Robert Carr Esq Richard Young Sir Purbock Temple John Rushworth Esq John Gerrard John Hearn Mr. Coitmore Mr. Cunningham Mr. Clench Willinm Jessop Esq Edward Austin Darnel Esq Mr. Brown Thomas Tongue John Bowler Mr. Sharp Mr. Lee. Robert Ewer John King Edward Folley Mr. Gouge Anthony Mildmay Esq The Grand Jury returned the Indictment Billa Vera. Court adjourned to the Old-Bailey 10th of October The 10. of October 1660. SIR John Robinson Knight Lieutenant of his Majesties Tower of London according to his Warrant received delivered to Mr. Sheriff the Prisoners hereafter named who were in several Coaches with a strong Guard of Horse and Foot conveyed to Newgate and about nine of the Clock in the Morning delivered to the Keepers of that Prison and thence brought to the Sessions-house in the Old-Baily London where the Commissioners of Oyer and Terminer were in Court assembled and where their Indictment was publickly read by Edward Shelton Esq Clerk of the Crown Sessions-House in the Old-Baily 10. October 1660. THE Court being Assembled and Silence commanded the Commission of Oyer and Terminer was again read After which Sir Hardress Waller Collonel Thomas Harrison and Mr. William Heveningham were brought to the Bar and commanded to hold up their Hands which Sir Hardress Waller and Mr. Heveningham did but Harrison being commanded to hold up his Hand answered I am here and said My Lord if you please I will speak a Word Court Hold up your hand and you shall be heard in duetime Mr. Harrison the course is That you must hold up your hand first And then he held up his hand The Indictment was read purporting That He together with others not having the fear of God before his Eyes and being instigated by the Devil did Maliciously Treasonably and Feloniously contrary to his due Allegiance and bounden Duty sit upon and condemn our late Soveraign Lord King Charles the First of ever Blessed Memory and also did upon
Terrours of that Presence of God that was with his Servants in those days However it seemeth good to him to suffer this Turn to come on us and are Witnesses that the things were not done in a Corner I have desired as in the sight of him that searcheth all hearts whilest this hath been done to wait and receive from him Convictions upon my own Conscience though I have sought it with Tears many a time and Prayers over and over to that God to whom you and all Nations are less than a Drop of water of the Bucket and to this moment I have received rather Assurance of it and that the things that have been done as astonishing on one hand I do believe e're it be long it will be made known from Heaven There was more from God than men are aware of I do profess that I would not offer of my self the least Injury to the poorest Man or Woman that goes upon the Earth That I have humbly to offer is this to your Lordships You know what a Contest hath been in these Nations for many years Divers of those that sit upon the Bench were formerly as Active Court Pray Mr. Harrison do not thus Reflect on the Court This is not to the Business Mr. Harrison I followed not my own Judgment I did what I did as out of Conscience to the Lord. For when I found those that were as the Apple of mine Eye to turn aside I did loath them and suffered Imprisonment many years Rather then to turn as many did that did put their Hands to this Plough I chose rather to be separated from Wife and Family than to have Compliance with them though it was said Sit at my Right Hand and such kind of Expressions Thus I have given a little poor Testimony that I have not been doing things in a Corner or from my self May be I might be a little mistaken but I did it all according to the best of my understanding desiring to make the Revealed Will of God in his Holy Scriptures as a guide to me I humbly conceive That what was done was done in the name of the Parliament of England that what was done was done by their Power and Authority and I do humbly conceive it is my Duty to offer unto you in the beginning that this Court or any Court below the High Court of Parliament hath no Jurisdiction of their Actions Here are many Learned in the Law and to shorten the Work I desire I may have the help of Councel Learned in the Laws that may in this matter give me a little assistance to offer those Grounds that the Law of the Land doth offer I say what was done was done by the Authority of the Parliament which was then the Supreme Authority and that those that have Acted under them are not to be questioned by any Power less than them And for that I conceive there is much out of the Laws to be shewed to you and many Presidents also in the Case Much is to be offered to you in that according to the Laws of the Nations that was a due Parliament Those Commissions were issued forth and what was done was done by their Power And whereas it hath been said we did Assume and Usurp an Authority I say this was done rather in the Fear of the Lord. Court Away with him Know where you are Sir You are in the Assembly of Christians Will you make God the Author of your Treasons and Murthers Take heed where you are Christians must not hear this We will allow you to say for your own Defence what you can And we have with a great deal of Patience suffered you to sally out wherein you have not gone about so much for Extenuation of your Crimes as to Justifie them to fall upon others and to Blaspheme God and commit a new Treason For your having of Councel This is the reason for allowing of Councel when a man would Plead any thing because he would Plead it in Formality Councel is allowed But you must first say in what the Matter shall be and then you shall have the Court's Answer Lord Finch Though my Lords here have been pleased to give you a great Latitude this must not be suffered that you should run into these damnable Excursions to make God the Author of this damnable Treason Committed Mr. Harrison I have two things to offer to you to say for my Defence in Matter of Law One is That this that hath been done was done by a Parliament of England by the Commons of England assembled in Parliament and that being so whatever was done by their Commands or their Authority is not questionable by your Lordships as being as I humbly conceive a Power Inferiour to that of an High Court of Parliament That 's one A second is this That what therefore any did in obedience to that Power and Authority they are not to be questioned for it otherwise we are in a most miserable Condition bound to obey them that are in Authority and yet to be punished if obeyed We are not to Judg what is lawful or what is unlawful My Lords Upon these two Points I do desire that those that are Learned in the Laws may speak too on my behalf It concerns all my Countreymen There are Cases alike to this you know in King Richard the Second's Time wherein some Question had been of what had been done by a Parliament and what followed upon it I need not urge in it I hope it will seem good to you that Councel may be assigned for it concerns all my Countreymen Councel You are mistaken if you appeal to your Countreymen They will cry you Out and shame you Mr. Harrison May be so my Lords some will but I am sure others will not Mr. Sollicitor Gen. These two Points my Lords are but one and they are a new Treason at the Bar for which he deserves to dy if there were no other Indictment It is the Malice of his heart to the Dignity and Crown of England I say this is not matter for which Councel can be assigned Councel cannot put into Form that which is not Matter Pleadable it self It is so far from being true that this was the Act of the Supreme Parliament of the People of England that there was nothing received with more Heart-bleeding than this Bloody Business But that the World may not be abused by the Insinuations of a man who acts as if he had a Spirit and in truth is possessed I will say That the Lords and Commons are not a Parliament That the King and Lords cannot do any thing without the Commons Nor the King and Commons without the Lords Nor the Lords and Commons without the King especially against the King If they do they must answer it with their Head for the King is not accountable to any Coercive Power And for the Prisoner to Justifie his Act as if it were the Act of the Commons of England
he is very much to be reproved Shall he pretend that one House nay the eighth part of a House for so it was can Condemn a King when both Houses cannot condemn one man in spight of the King I desire my Lords it may pass with a due Reproach and a Sentence upon it Lord Chief Baron It is true your Questions are but one Point You pretend the Parliament's Authority and when you come to speak of it you say the Commons of England They were but one House of Parliament The Parliament what is that It is the King the Lords the Commons I would fain know of you where ever you read by the light you say you have in your Conscience that the Commons of England were a Parliament of England that the Commons in Parliament used a Legislative power alone Do you call that a Parliament that sate when the House was Purged as they call it and was so much under the Awe of the Army who were then but forty or forty five at most Then you say It was done by Authority of them You must know where there is such an Authority which indeed is no Authority he that confirms such an Authority he Commits a double offence therefore consider what your Plea is If your Plea were doubtfull we should and ought and would our selves be of Councel for you That which you speak concerning Conviction of your own Conscience remember that it is said in Scripture that they shall think they did God good service when they slay you as it is in St. John He hath a great deal of Charity that thinks that what you did was out of a Conscientious Principle It was against the Light of noon-day and common practice You make your self a Sollicitor in the Business Let us blacken him as much as we can I have not touched at all upon the Evidence I will not urge it now I say you justifie it upon Convictions of Conscience and pretend it upon Authority A thing never known or seen under the Sun that the Commons nay a few Commons alone should take upon them and call themselves the Parliament of England We have been cheated enough by Names and Words there is no colour for what you say I do think and hope my Brethren will speak to this Case that none of us do own that Convention whatsoever it be to be the Parliament of England There was another aggravation at this Time that this Pretended Authority usurped that Power the Lords were then sitting You had not taken this usurped Power to dissolve these Lords No you did this Act in dispight of the Lords you had sent up an Ordinance to the Lords and they rejected it and thereupon these Members took it upon themselves Amongst those there were some Negatives and those Members were under the Awe and Power of your Forces at that time What you Plead the Court are of Opinion tends to the subversion of the Laws for you to usurp Power over the People without their Consents to call this the People We never knew the like before But the Parliament of England was the King Lords and Commons For you to speak of this Power and Justifie this Power is an Aggravation adding one Sin and Treason to another We shall tell you that neither both Houses of Parliament if they had been there not any single Person Community not the People either Collectively or Representatively had any colour to have any Coercive Power over their King And this Plea which you have spoken of it ought to be over-ruled and not to stand good Mr. Annesley I do the more willingly speak to this Business because I was one of those that should have made up that Parliament that this Prisoner pretends to I was one of that Corrupt Majority as they called it that were put out of the House He cannot forget that at that time there were Guards upon both Houses of Parliament to attend them that were of their own appointment and that those Guards were forcibly removed by the Prisoner at the Bar and his Fellows and other Guards put there who instead of being a Defence unto them when those Commons stood at the Door were by them threatned Yet the Lords and Commons of England in Parliament Assembled a full House of Commons did resolve notwithstanding what was aforesaid that the Treaty in the Isle of Wight was a Ground for Peace Afterwards the Major part of the House of Commons having resolved on this sent it up to the Lords that very day when they were Adjourned there were Forces drawn down to the House of Commons Door and none suffered to come into the House but those that they pleased All those that had a mind for Peace that minded their Duty and Trust and Allegiance to their King were seized on by this Gentleman and his Fellows When this was done what did he and those Fellows do They sate and put a check upon all that should come in None must come in but those that would renounce their Allegiance and Duty to their King and the People for whom they served and then declared against that Vote which had been passed upon Debate of twelve or fourteen hours and then to call this an House of Commons nay the Supreme Authority of the Nation he knows is against the Laws of the Land For the House of Commons alone cannot so much as give an Oath It hath not power of Judicature of Life and Death this he knows well to be according to the Laws of England He knows that no Authority less then an Act of Parliament can make a Law and he knows an Act of Parliament must be passed by the King Lords and Commons I wonder much to hear a Justification in this kind by one that knows the Laws of England so well There will none of the Court allow that that was a Parliament The Majority of that House did all disavow it These things have been already discoursed of I shall onely say that he knowing the Laws so well I hope he shall suffer for trangression thereof Mr. Hollis You do very well know that this that you did this horrid detestable Act which you Committed could never be perfected by you till you had broken the Parliament That House of Commons which you say gave you Authority you know what your self made of it when you pulled out the Speaker Therefore do not make the Parliament to be the Author of your black Crimes It was innocent of it You know your self what Esteem you had of it when you broke and tore it in sunder when you scattered and made them hide themselves to preserve them from your Fury and Violence Do not make the Parliament to be the Authour of your Crimes The Parliament are the three Estates It must not be admitted that one House part of the Parliament should be called the Supreme Authority You know what that Rump that you left did what Laws they made Did you go home to advise
with your Countrey that chose you for that Place You know that no Act of Parliament is binding but what is Acted by King Lords and Commons And now as you would make God the Author of your Offence so likewise you would make the People guilty of your Opinion But your Plea is over-ruled To which the Court assented Mr. Harrison I was mistaken a little Whereas it was said the Points were one I do humhly conceive they were not so I say what was done was done in Obedience to the Authority If it were but an Order of the House of Commons thus under a Force yet this Court is not Judge of that Force I say if it was done by one Estate of Parliament it is not to be questioned Court It was not done by one Estate They were but a Part nay but an eighth Part. Denz Hollis It was not an House of Commons They kept up a Company by the power of the Sword Do not abuse the People in saying It was done by the Supreme Power Councel My Lord if it were an House of Commons neither House of Commons nor House of Lords nor House of Lords and Commons together no Authority upon Earth can give Authority for Murthering the King This that he alledgeth is Treason my Lord this that is said is a clear Evidence of that which is charged there is only this more in it he hath done it and if he were to do it again he would do it Lord Chief Baron It is clear as the Noon-day that this was not the House of Commons Suppose it had been an House of Commons and full and suppose which far be it from me to suppose they should have agreed upon such a Murtherous Act for the House of Commons to do such an Act it was void in it self nay any Authority without the House of Lords and King is void You plead to the Jurisdiction of the Court whether we should Judge it or no. Yes I tell you and proper too We shall not speak what Power we have The Judges have Power after Laws are made to go upon the Interpretation of them We are not to judge of those things that the Parliament do But when the Parliament is purged as you call it for the Commons alone to Act for you to say that this is the Authority of Parliament it is that which every man will say Intrenches highly upon his Liberty and Priviledge And what you have said to your Justification what doth it tend to but as much as this I did it justifie it and would do it again which is a new Treason The greatest Right that ever the House of Commons did claim is but over the Commons Do they claim a particular Right over the Lords Nay over the King Make it out if you can but it cannot possibly be made out What you have said doth aggravate your Crimes It is such an approvement of your Treason that all Evidences come short of it King Lords and Commons is the Ground of the english-English-Law Without that no Act of Parliament binds Justice Mallet I have been a Parliament-Man as long as any man here present and I did never know or hear that the House of Commons and Jurisdiction over any saving their own Members which is as much as I will say concerning the Parliament I have heard a Story of a Mute that was born Mute whose Father was slain by a Stranger a man unknown After twenty years or thereabouts this Mute-man fortuned to see the Murtherer of his Father and these were his Words Oh! here is he that slew my Father Sir The King is the Father of the Country Pater Patria so saith Sir Edward Coke He is Caput Reipublicae the Head of the Common-wealth Sir What have you done Here you have cut off the Head of the whole Common-Wealth and taken away Him that was our Father the Governour of the whole Countrey This you shall find Printed and Published in a Book of the greatest Lawyer Sir Edward Coke I shall not need my Lord to say more of this Business I do hold the Prisoner's Plea vain and unreasonable and to be rejected Justice Hide I shall not trouble you with many Words I am sorry that any man should have the Face and Boldness to deliver such words as you have You and all must know That the King is above the Two Houses They must propose their Laws to him The Laws are made by Him and not by Them by their consenting but they are His Laws That which you speak as to the Jurisdiction you are here Indicted for High Treason for you to come to talk of Justification of this by Pretence of Authority your Plea is naught illegal and wicked and ought not to be allowed As to having of Councel the Court understand what you are upon Councel is not to be allowed in that Case and therefore your Plea must be over-ruled Mr. Justice Twisden I shall agree with that which many have already said onely this You have eased the Jury you have confessed the Fact I am of the same Opinion that you can have no Councel therefore I over-rule your Plea if it had been put in never so good Form and Manner Earl of Manchester I beseech you my Lords let us go some other way to work Sir William Wild. That which is before us is Whether it be a matter of Law or Fact For the matter of Law your Lordships have declared what it is his Justification is as high a Treason as the former For matter of Fact he hath confessed it I beseech you My Lord direct the Jury for their Verdict This Gentleman hath forgot their Barbarousness they would not hear their King Court No Councel can be allowed to Justifie a Treason that this is a Treason you are Indicted by an Act of the 25th of Edw. 3d. That which you speak of the House of Commons is but part of the House of Commons they never did nor had any power to make a Law but by King Lords and Commons and therefore your Plea is naught and all the Court here is of the same opinion if they were not they would say so therefore what you have said is over-ruled by the Court. Have you any thing else to offer Mr. Harrison Notwithstanding the Judgment of so many Learned ones that the Kings of England are no ways accountable to the Parliament The Lords and Commons in the beginning of this War having declared the King's beginning War upon them the God of Gods Court Do you render your self so desperate that you care not what Language you let fall It must not be suffered Mr. Harrison I would not willingly speak to offend any man but I know God is no Respecter of Persons His setting up his Standard against the People Court Truly Mr. Harrison this must not be suffered this doth not at all belong to you Mr. Harrison Vnder Favour this doth belong to me I would have abhorred to have brought him to Account
of the Lord and did weigh the things After that when the Bill was brought into the house my name was put in there with several others so I came to be in and what I did was upon these two Accounts First in obedience as I told you to the Lord which was the chief thing And in obedience to that which was then the Supreme Authority of this Nation and therefore I shall mention these grounds very briefly because indeed the things that are controverted here at this time they have been controverted in the Face of the whole world in several Nations and the Lord hath given an answer upon solemn Appeals to these things I shall therefore mention them very briefly because they have been so publique The Declarations and Remonstrances that have passed between the King and Parliament concerning the beginning of the Wars L. Chief Baron Mr. Ca. I would be very loth to interrupt you But I see what course is taken and the peoples eyes are upon you You seek delays and against the course of Prisoners you say you will confess but you do confess the Fact after you have spent the time And all the Witnesses are heard for this that you speak of now you go about to justifie as in the fear of the Lord or any thing of that nature that we cannot allow of but we do allow you to speak and give the heads of what you will say as to the matter of Fact but to hear you make discourses and debates which are a justification of a horrid and notorious Treason we cannot hear it we ought not to hear the maintaining of open Treason cannot hear you to speak that upon your opening which is Treason We are willing that you open the Heads what you have to say we are upon our consciences and to appear before God for what we do and so are you too but remember the Devil sometimes appears in the habit of an Angel of light If you will couch your matter in a few words the Court affords you liberty which is indeed beyond the strict Rules of Law Ca. You say you sit here by the Laws of the Land and are sworn to maintain the Laws We ought not that we should plead to this Indictment for what we did was by an Act of Parliament Court Pray Sir this must not be let fall without reproof or rather punishment Ca. I believe there is no Precedent for it Court Sir We know the act of Parliament as well as you and most of the standers by You go upon a false ground there was no such Act of the Supreme Authority as you pretend to these are but Phantasms of your own brain and must not be suffered these things have been controverted and decided many a time again and again Ca. I desire to have time to speak how it was begun and carried on or else how shall I be able to make my defence or to tell you what are the Heads I wil insist upon I shall declare the grounds upon which the Parliament did proceed L. Chief Baron Mr. Carew If that be your ground the Parliament did it the House of Commons did it I have something to offer not to interrupt you to the then Commons Ca. In my humble opinion for the maintaining of this It was by Authority the supreme Authority by which it was done L. Chief Baron Did you sign this Warrant for the summoning and warning of that Court And did you sign the Warrant for executing the late King Ca. I desire I may go on with my defence L. Chief Baron We would not have you be mistaken You seem to confess the act and now you justifie it you cannot speak any thing for your justification till you confess the fact Ca. I shall speak to that in its time L. Chief Baron You must speak to that first that is matter of Fact whereupon the Jury are to go Ca. There is matter of Law Court You must speak to matter of Fact first Ca. I say this is that I was about to say That the Supreme Authority Court You must speak to the Fact first Whether you did compass c. the Kings death or not that is the first ground if you did not there is an end of the business It is proved against you that you did it if you come to justifie it it must be when you have first agreed the matter of Fact Ca. I desire I may have liberty to proceed either for matter of Fact or Law as I list Court No no you must first speak to the Fact you may be after heard You know in all cases they must begin with the Fact either denying or extenuating For matter of Law in this case must arise from the fact Ca. But I humbly conceive there is a matter of Law in this case and it is matter of Law that is above the jurisdiction of this inferior Court Mr. Sol. Finch I pray that he may be held to the issue Guilty or Not Guilty If he deny the Fact let us relie upon our Evidence and he upon his he cannot come to Law till he hath confessed the Fact The question is Whether you did or not there is the Fact if you have any thing to justifie that follows Ca. I was upon that and going on to shew the reasons and grounds of it Court First you must confess it if you will shew the reasons why you did it Ca. I told you there was some things I did Coun. What are those some Ca. I do acknowledg that I was there at the Court. Coun. Did you sign the Warrants for summoning that Court and for Execution of the King Ca. Yes I did sign them both Coun. Then say what you will L. Chief Baron Now go on Ca. In the Year 1640. there was a Parliament called according to the Laws and constitutions of this Nation and after that there was some difference between the King and the Parliament the two Houses of Parliament Lords and Commons and thereupon the King did withdraw from the two Houses of Parliament as appears by their own Declaration The great Remonstrance printed in 1642. and thereupon the Lords and Commons did declare L. Chief Baron Mr. Carew The Court are of opinion not to suffer you to go on in this they say it tends not only to justifie your Act but you cast in Bones here to make some difference You talk of the Lords and Commons you have nothing to do with that business your authority that you pretend to was an Act of Parliament as they called themselves and that where there was but 46 Commons in the House and but 26 Voted it Ca. I say that the Lords and Commons by their Declaration Mr. J. Foster Hold your hand a while Sir not so fast you go to raise up those differences which I hope are asleep new Troubles to revive those things which by the grace of God are extinct you are not to be suffered in this it is not the singling
out of a few persons that makes a Parliament We see as before so still it is your course to blow the Trumpet of Sedition Did you ever hear or can you produce instances of an Act of Parliament made by the House of Commons alone though this was not the House of Commons as you heard before Ca. Neither was there ever such a War or such a precedent Court Nor we hope never will be Pray remember you were returned to serve in the House what was that Writ that summon'd your appearance You had no manner of ground in the world to go that way that you did Coun. We pray that the Prisoner at the Bar give us pationce a little to repeat that to him which your Lordships have been so often troubled with declaring this is not the first or second time that in this publique Assembly it hath been said That neither the Lords nor the Commons jointly nor severally have any power at all to proceed upon the Person of the King That it is not in their power to condemn any man in England without the good pleasure of the King much less the King himself and that this is the great Liberty of the people of England that it should be so and it was the first breach and invasion of our Liberty that that first Parliament made and which you justifie in the name of the Lord. In this case to throw us upon Debates of the War and to talk here of the causes and reasons of that quarrel which ended in such a Tragedie For this person to come here with this confidence and to justifie it but that he knows he cannot be in a worse condition one would wonder it should fall from any man that hath any regard of himself it is all one to them that perish whether they fall by one sin or multitudes He makes no scruple to multiply Treasons I do beseech your Lordship he may not offer as he hath begun but that the Jury may proceed Court All the Court are of the same opinion not to hear any thing like the former Discourses Ca. I desire I may be heard I have not compassed the Death of the late King contrived the death of the King what I did I did by Authority Court This is not to be heard You have heard what hath bin said to you There could be no such Authority neither was nor could be but you would by a wyre-lace bring it in by this You have confessed the Fact which must be left to the Jury L. Ansley I think you were present in the House of Commons when that Vote passed for agreement with the King in the Treaty at the Isle of Wight You know the King having condescended to most of the desires of This Parliament there was a debate in the House and a conclusion that they were grounds for peace You know the Lords and Commons did resolve to agree with their King when that was done that would not satisfie you and other Members of the House Then you go and contrive new ways you contrive a new fashioned Parliament the driving away many Members by power which you could not do by the Law of the Land Nay the Parliament had Declared against that which you pretend is by Authority is no Authority for a few of you set up an Arbitrary Parliament of a few of your selves when you had driven away the rest This kind of Parliament gives you the Authority you pretend to You were saying that the Parliament was called at first the Lords and Commons by the King according to the ancient Constitutions of the Laws Did such a Parliament give you such Authority as you pretend to and Act of Parliament as you call it which was but an Order of some of the Commons and but a few of them you can have no manner of Justification and therefore your Plea must be over-ruled as yesterday it was in the like Case You are indicted upon a cleer Act of Parliament of 25. Edw. 3. and you defend your self upon pretence of an Act of Parliament which hath been over-ruled as no Act. Ca. I am a stranger to many of these things which you have offered and this is strange You give evidence sitting as a Judge L. Ch. Bar. You are mistaken it is not Evidence he shews you what Authority that was an Authority of 26 Members How is this Evidence Mr. Carew if you have any thing more of Fact go on If you have nothing but according to this kind of discourse I am commanded to direct the Jury Ca. I am very willing to leave it with the Lord if you will stop me that I cannot open the true nature of those things that did give me ground of satisfaction in my Conscience that I did it from the Lord. Mr. Sol. I do pray for the honour of God and our King That he may not be suffered to go on in this manner You have been suffered to speak you have said but little only Sedition You pretend a Conscience and the fear of the Lord when all the world knows you did it against the Law of the Lord your own Conscience the light of Nature and the Laws of the Land against the Oaths you have taken of Allegiance and Supremacy Ca. Gentlemen of the Jury I say I shall leave it with you This Authority I speak of is right which was the supreme Power it is well known what they were Coun. It is so indeed many have known what they were L. Ch. Bar. Mr. Carew You have been heard what and beyond what was fit to say in your own defence that which you have said the heads of it you see the whole Court hath over-ruled To suffer you to expatiate against God and the King by Blasphemy is not to be endured it is suffering poison to go about to infect people but they know now too well the old saying In Nomine Domini In the Name of the Lord all mischiefs have been done that hath been an old Rule I must now give directions to the Jury L. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury Ca. I have desired to speak the words of truth and soberness but have been hindered L. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury You see the Prisoner here at the Bar hath been Indicted of Treason and this was for Compassing and Imagining the Death of our Soveraign Lord K. Charles the First of blessed Memory The Indictment sets forth several overt-Acts to prove this Imagination for otherwise it is secret in the heart the Fact it self the Treason it self is the Imagination of the heart The overt-Acts that are laid down in the Indictment to prove this That they did consult and meet together how to put the King to death That they did sit upon him And thirdly That they did sentence him to death and afterwards he died You heard what is proved against the Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar by several Witnesses His own Confession That he signed the Warrant for Summoning and
business and to make people gaze upon you without any Ground Axt. I am upon my life I hope you will hear me patiently L. ch Bar. God forbid but we should Axt. I do desire to assert my Authority if any thing was done upon the House of Lords and Commons I do not come here to justifie their Actions I was not concerned in it My next Plea is this that if a House of Commons can be charged Guilty of High Treason as a community the distributive Body must needs be Guilty Court If there should have been 20 or 40 men come out of the House of Commons and should Murther a man they must answer for that it is not the community that can do such an Act of Treason these persons that you call a House of Commons there was but 26 of them and these must be the people this is the state of the case and when you have thrust out thrice the number of those remaining only those can serve your turn L. Annesly Mr. Axtell I am very sorry to see you in that place and it troubles me as much to hear you vent that for an Authority which you know your self was no Authority you would now for your defence for life and it is reason you should make as full a defence for life as you can you would shelter your self under that Authority which I am sorry I must say were one of the greatest Violators of you cannot forget how near a close of this bloody war by the mercy of God this Nation was when the Army interposed whose Trade it was to live by War when they had felt so much of the sweet of War they would not suffer the people to enjoy peace though the Lords and Representatives in Parliament had agreed to it A Treaty was begun terms of peace propounded and agreed to this you cannot forget and will have no need of Notes or Books to help your Memory when the people Groaned under the miseries of War and thirsted after Peace then came up the Army who were servants to the Parliament till that time taking upon them the Authority you cannot forget that your self was one of the number that came to offer accusations against the majority of the Commons House calling them Rotten Members the House of Lords was not then suffered to sit they would not joyn in that Ordinance that was preparing for the Tryal of the King when the Lords had refused they were no longer fit to be Lords neither then comes in a new Authority which we never heard of before a remnant of the House of Commons joyning with the Army that had driven away the greatest part of the House of Commons for in all Assemblies and Courts the major part must determine or no determination after this course was taken then is an Act set on foot they take upon them by Votes of their own to be the Parliament of England that the supreme power of the Nation is in the Representatives of the people who were they those few only that remained almost all the Cities Counties and Burroughs of England had none left to represent them they were driven away by Force then was this Act of Parliament such an Act as was never heard of before set on foot and passed as an Act by a few of the House of Commons if you can plead this for your defence this is the Act that you must shelter under But you know the Lords and Commons had Unanimously resolved for peace and so agree with the King if this Act will be any defence you may plead it to the full and this is all you have to say therefore go upon no Forreign matter Axt. If it please your Lordship that worthy Lord that spoke last is pleased to say that I was one of the persons that did accuse some of those Members of Parliament truly my Lord I never did come to the Commons Bar but once presenting a petition and for my hand either in charging any of the Members or Secluding any of them I never had any hand in that matter this is all to that part Next I Humbly conceive here I must ground my bottome and if I perish I perish by a Judgement in a Parliament My Commission that did Authorize me to obey my General was given me when the Lords and Commons sate in Parliament I had no other Commission then this my Lord Fairfax commanded the Army after the Kings Death by the like Commission I did but my duty in going to my Regiment the General saith go to such a place stay there if I refuse by the law of War I Dye if I obey I am in danger likewise I say my Commission was given me by the Lords and Commons and therefore I hope my Lord that what I have said and offered in that particular is not Truthless but of Weight Court The Effect of your Commission is only to make you an Officer Axtell My Commission bears date the 27th of March 1648. Ten months before the Kings Death we had no other Commissions therefore I humbly conceive the question will be this in point of law and I humbly desire it may be Truly and Fairly stated by your Lordship and these Honourable Jugdes that whether a man being guided by the Judgment of the Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament and having declared their Judgments and Exposition of that Statute of the 25th of Edward the Third and Acting only by that Judgment of Parliament and under their Authority can be questioned for Treason That my Lord is a question that I do humbly think is a point in law and that you will please fairly and truly to state it whether I am within the compass of that Statute whereupon I am indicted Councel My Lord We do not charge him with any thing that he did Act under the colour of his Commission or with any thing he did before that but that which we charge him with are rhe Acts that he did at the Tryal of the King shew us your Commission from the Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament for Tryal and Execution of the King you say something we do not charge him for any thing done by Vertue of that Commission but with those violent Acts that he did in encouraging the Souldiers to cry Justice Justice Execution Execution and all those other Violent Actions of his own malicious heart against the King We humbly beseech you he may answer to that which is the charge against him and that is the Compassing and Imagining the Death of the late King and his declaring that by those overt-acts that we have proved My Lords we desire that the Prisoner at the Bar may remember that he is not Indicted for levying War against the King if so then that Sir which you offer might be given as a Plea and we should have spoken to it but you are Indicted for Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King and that which we have given in Evidence
what degree or quality whatsoever who within Four days after the publishing hereof shall lay hold upon this our grace and favour excepting only such persons as shall hereafter be excepted by Parliament that is a Parliament called by his own Writ You know this Parliament L. Ch. Bar. Mr. Axtell I would not interrupt you to that but this very Objection was made by one of the Prisoners before this answer was given First the King's Declaration is not a Pardon in point of Law it must be under the Broad-Seal but God forbid but it should bind in honour You instanced in the word Parliament what was meant by the word Parliament you must know this the exigency of the Times were such that there were many Noble Persons that took the advantage to Assemble themselves together to reinstate the King they did that which was just and lawful according to the exigency of the Times This Declaration he sent to the two Houses he called them His Two Houses so that it appears clearly and manifestly they were then sitting they being accepted by the King and owned by Him and they did sit in way of Convention according as a Parliament and his Majesty sent his Letter to them and these are the persons that have thought fit to except you out of that Act. Axtell My Lord may I speak to that any further L. Ch. Car. If you do it will be over-ruled Axt. I submit with submission to the providence of God I did apply to Sir Harbottle Grimston for the Mercy and Favour of his Majesty according to his Declaration and here is Sir Harbottle's own hand for a Certificate L. Ch. Bar. That is allowed you that you did claim that benefit within the time but you may remember that it was referred to those two Houses of Parliament they were to consider who was fit for the Pardon and you are by them Excepted out by Name Your question now is no more but whether guilty or not guilty and these are but extravagant Discourses that you say otherwise and rather do you harm then good Axtell I hope you will pardon me my Lord I hope I have spoken to clear the Point The Fact charged by your Lordships and before the Jury and I hope the Lord will give the Jury a Memory of it and a right Understanding in what I have said for my own Defence My Lord the next thing I have to offer is this to Expound that Act of Parliament that it was the intention of his Majesty and Parliament that all should be excepted but those guilty of Councelling Signing or Sentencing Truly my Lord I humbly conceive I being none of those am not guilty of Treason I shall only speak one word to my Jury That they will remember what I have said that there is but two things two Witnesses as to Justice and Execution that it relates to no person but in General and then I do not own the things but possibly they might hear such words I taking of them up upon a rebound reproved the Souldiers for the other that I should send one for the Executioner he heard so and that I should name who was the Executioner I would not have that person or any other to suffer for that L. Ch. Bar. That is not at all pressed upon you not as to any Charge Axtell I thank your Lordship I am very ignorant L. Ch. Bar. Have you done Sir Axtell I leave the matter to the Jury in whose hands I and my little Ones and Family are left I only say this to you Remember your Ancestors Remember your Posterity I never heard it before that words were Treason In Queen Maries time Throckmorton was acquitted for words by the Jury Gentlemen of the Jury I leave my Case my Life my All in your Hands L. Ch. Bar. Gentlemen of the Jury There hath been several things offered by the Prisoner at the Bar as near as my Memory will give me leave in so long a Discourse I shall repeat all things which he saith for himself and which are said against him There are some things that he seems to utter as tending to matter of Law and something meerly of Fact proper only for you of the Jury For matter of Law he hath urged several things for himself not by way of justification of the Fact I must do him that right but in excuse of himself and I hope his conscience hath so wrought upon him that he is of opinion the Fact was a horrid Fact which was so indeed For that which he hath said for himself First he doth alledge to have his Commission from the Lord Fairfax My Lord Fairfax had his Commission from the two Houses of Parliament and this Gentlemans was in March the beginning of the year 1648. he saith what he did was in obedience to his superiors as a Soldier that he never consulted or advised about any thing of the Tryal or execution of his Majesty For this point it hath already been spoken to Gentlemen for that which hath been spoken to at large heretofore I must repeat it here that he may know it That no Person whatsoever no Community not the people either collectively or representatively have any coercive Power over the King neither the Lord Fairfax his General not he nor any other person could be excused for this horrid Fact of bringing the King to Trial No person as I said before nor Community have any such power The Law-books which he hath lately seen and truly he hath imployed his time well in that the Law-books tell us that whereas the two Spenceers had broached a damnable and detestable principle that the homage was only due to the King in respect to his Crown that if he did not demean himself according to such and such rules his Subjects might rule him per aspertee by asperity and sharpness but this was condemned by two Acts of Parliament they both appear in my L. Cooke in Calvins case I do not go to repeat all the evidence that might clear this truth I say had there been any such thing but it hath been told him there was no such thing in Fact My Lord Fairfax's Commission was for the preservation of the King as well as for the liberties of the People The 11. of Rich. 2. Robert de Vere and others for levying a War was punished but this Gent. was not charged for levying of War If either of the Houses of Parliament should command such a thing as tends to the death of the King it would be void in it self Something he let fall of the Parliament not being dissolved My Masters for that you have heard some of my Lords declare how and in what manner this was an Authority of Parliament but it was clearly nothing at all this Gentlemen goes by Vertue of a Power from the Lord Fairfax The next thing he urges in point of Law was this he comes by way of Dilemma saith he either I must obey my General or dye
be directed to answer and if he refused That the matter of the Charge be taken pro confesso And the King not owning their Authority was remanded Fol. 58. Westminster-Hall Tuesday the 23d Afternoon The King not owning their Authority was remanded and the Court Adjourned to the Painted-Chamber And there Resolved They would examine Witnesses Fol. 61. Painted-Chamber Wednesday the 24th was spent in examining their Witnesses Fol. 66. Painted-Chamber Thursday the 25th Afternoon They examined more Witnesses They Resolved to proceed to Sentence of Condemnation against the King And that this Condemnation be for being Tyrant Traytor and Murtherer and Publick Enemy to the Commonwealth And that the Condemnation extend to Death Fol. 68. And Ordered That a Sentence grounded upon these Votes be prepared by Scot Marten Harrison and others Painted-Chamber Friday the 26 th The draught of the Sentence Reported and agreed And Resolved That the King be brought the next day to Westminster-Hall to receive it Fol 96. Painted-Chamber Saturday the 27 th Fore-noon The Sentence being engrossed Resolved The same should be the Sentence which should be read and published in Westminster-Hall the same day That the President should not permit the King to speak after Sentence That after the Sentence read he should declare it to be the Sence and Judgment of the Court. That the Commissioners should thereupon signifie their Consent by standing up And the same day the Commons Ordered the Clerk to bring in the Records of that Judgment to the House Journal of the House Westminster-Hall the same Day After-noon The King being brought in and not owning their Authority the Sentence was read And upon the Declaration of the President That it was the Judgment of the Court they stood up and Owned it and Adjourned to the Painted-Chamber And there appointed Waller and others to consider of the Time and Place for Execution Painted-Chamber Monday the 29 th Upon the report of the Committee Ordered A Warrant be drawn for executing the King in the open Street before White-Hall the next day directed to Hacker and others which was done accordingly Fol. 116. 31. January 1648. Ordered by the Commons That the Lord Grey out of Haberdashers-Hall to difpose of 100 l. for the Service of the Common-wealth 2. February 1648. They Ordered in the first place to take into Consideration and Debate the House of Lords for settlement of the Government 6. February 1648. The House being seventy three And the Question put Whether that House should take the Advice of the House of Lords in the exercise of the Legislative Power The House was divided and it carried in the Negative by fifteen Voices And then Resolved That the House of Peers was useless and dangerous and ought to be abolished And Ordered an Act to be brought in for that purpose 7. February 1648. The Declared That the Office of a King in this Nation and to have Power thereof in a Single Person was unnecessary burthensom and dangerous to the Liberty Safety and publick interest of the People and therefore ought to be abolished 9. February 1648. They Ordered The Narrative of the Proceeding and Records for Tryal of the King to be forthwith brought into this House 16. February 1648. They Ordered That the Clerk of that High Court of Justice be desired to bring in those Proceedings to their House the next Day March 1648. Sir Arthur Hasilrig Reports from the Committee that Charls and James Stewart Sons of the late King should dye without Mercy wheresoever they should be found 12. December 1650. Mr. Say Reported the Proceedings of their High-Court against the King contained in a Book entituled A Journal c. which was read at large by their Clerk He likewise presented from that Court the Act for Tryal of the King and the Precept for holding the Court. The Charge was exhibited the twentieth And The Sentence Read the twenty seventh of January 1648. And thereupon they Declared That the Persons entrusted in that great Service had discharged their Trust with great Courage and Fidelity That the Parliament was well satisfied in that Accompt of the Particulars and Proceedings And Ordered That the same Records do remain among the Records of Parliament That those Proceedings be Engrossed in a Roll and Recorded among the Parliament-Rolls for transmitting the Memory thereof to Posterity And Resolved That their Commissioners for their Great Seal issue a Certiorari to their Clerk to transmit those Proceedings into the Chancery there to be on Record And that the same be sent by Mittimus from thence to other Courts at Westminster and Custos Rotulorum of the Counties to be Recorded In the County Middlesex The Proceedings at Hicks Hall Tuesday the 9th of October 1660. in order to the Tryal of the pretended Judges of his late Sacred Majesty THe Court being sate the Commission of Oyer and Terminer under the Great Seal of England was first read It was directed to the Lords and others hereafter named viz. Thomas Aleyn Knight and Baronet Lord Mayor of the City of London The Lord Chancellor of England The Earl of South-hampton Lord Treasurer of England The Duke of Somerset The Duke of Albemarle The Marquess of Ormond Steward of his Majesties Houshold The Earl of Lindsey Great Chamberlain of England The Earl of Manchester Chamberlain of his Majesties Houshold The Earl of Dorset The Earl of Berkshire The Earl of Sandwich Viscount Say and Seal The Lord Roberts The Lord Finch Denzil Hollis Esquire Sir Frederick Cornwallis Knight and Baronet Treasurer of His Majesties Houshold Sir Charles Barkly Knight Comptrouler of His Majesties Houshold Mr. Secretary Nicholas Mr. Secretary Morris Sir Anthony Ashley-Cooper Arthur Annesley Esquire The Lord Chief Baron Mr. Justice Foster Mr. Justice Mallet Mr. Justice Hide Mr. Baron Atkins Mr. Justice Twisden Mr. Justice Tyrrel Mr. Baron Turner Sir Harbottle Grimston Knight and Baronet Sir William Wild Knight and Baronet Recorder of London Mr. Serjeant Brown Mr. Serjeant Hale John Howel Esquire Sir Geoffry Palmer His Majestie 's Attorny General Sir Heneage Finch His Majestie 's Solicitor General Sir Edward Turner Attorney to His Highness the Duke of York Wadham Windham Esquire Edward Shelton Esquire Clerk of the Crown The Grand Jury Sworn were Sir William Darcy Baronet Foreman Sir Robert Bolles Baronet Sir Edward Ford Knight Sir Thomas Prestwick Sir William Coney Knight Sir Charles Sidley Baronet Sir Lewis Kirk Knight Sir Henry Littleton Baronet Sir Ralph Bovey Baronet Edward Chard Esquire Robert Giggon Esquire John Fotherly Esquire Charles Gibbons Esquire Thomas Geree Esquire Richard Cox Esquire Robert Bladwell Esquire Henry Mustian Esquire John Markham Esquire Edward Buckley Gent. Francis Bourchier Gent. Edward Lole Hart Cryer After Proclamation for silence was made it pleased Sir Orlando-Bridgman Lord Chief Baron of His Majestie 's High Court of Exchequer to speak to the Jury as followeth The Lord Chief Baron's Speech Gentlemen YOu are the Grand Inquest for the Body of this County of Middlesex You may
thing to govern absolutely Gentlemen The Imperial Crown is a Word that is significative you shall find in all Statutes primo Eliz. and the first of King James nay even in the Act of Judicial proceedings of this Parliament it is called an Imperial Crown They that take the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy they swear that they will to their power assist and defend all Jurisdictions Priviledges Preheminences and Authorities granted or belonging to the King His Heirs and Successors or annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm What is an Imperial Crown It is that which as to the Coercive part is subject to no man under God The King of Poland has a Crown But what is it At his Coronation it is conditioned with the people That if he shall not Govern them according to such Rules they shall be freed from their Homage and Allegiance But the Crown of England is and always was an Imperial Crown and so sworn Gentlemen As I told you even now the Imperial Crown is a Word significative that Crown which as to the Coercive part is not subject-to any Humane Tribunal or Judicature whatsoever And truly that this is such an Imperial Crown though I have cited Authorities ancient enough you may find them much more ancient I remember in the Story of William Rufus you shall find it in Matthew Paris and Eadmerus some Question was about Investiture of Bishops and the like the King writes His Letter That c. God forbid I should intend any absolute Government by this It is one thing to have an Absolute Monarchy another thing to have that Government Absolutely without Laws as to any coercive power over the Person of the King for as to Things and Actions they will fall under another consideration as I will tell you by and by Gentlemen Since this is so consider the Oath of Supremacy which most men have taken or should take All men that enter into the Parliament-House they are expresly enjoyned by Statute to take the Oath of Supremacy What says that Oath We swear that The King is the only Supreme Governour within this Realm and Dominions He is Supreme and the onely Supreme and truly if he be Supreme there is neither Major nor Superior I urge this the more lest any Person by any Misconstruction or inference which they might make from something that hath been Acted by the Higher Powers they might draw some dangerous Inferences or Consequences to colour or shadow over those Murtherous and Traiterous Acts which afterwards they committed They had no Authority But as I told you though I do set forth this and declare this to you to let you know that the King was immediately subject to God and so was not punishable by any Perfon yet let me tell you there is that excellent Temperament in our Laws that for all this the King cannot rule but by His Laws It preserves the King and his Person and the peoples Rights There are three things touching which the Law is conversant Personae Res Actiones Persons Things and Actions For the Person of the King He is the Supreme Head He is not punishable by any coercive Power the Laws provide for that The King can do no wrong it is a Rule of Law it is in our Law-books very frequent 22d of Edward the Fourth Lord Coke and many others If he can do no Wrong He cannot be punished for any wrong The King He hath the infirmities and weakness of a man but he cannot do any injury at least not considerable in Person He must do it by Ministers Agents Instruments Now the Law though it provide for the King yet if any of his Ministers do wrong though by his command they are punishable The King cannot arrest a man as he cannot be arrested Himself but if He arrest me by another Man I have remedy against this man though not against the King and so He cannot take away my Estate This as to the Person of the King He is not to be touched Touch not mine Anointed I come to Things If the King claim a Right the King must sue according to His Laws the King is subject to the Laws in that case His Possessions shall be tried by Juries If He will try a man for His Fathers Death you see he will try them by the Laws The Law is the Rule and Square of His actions and by which He Himself-is judged Then for Actions that is such Actions whereby Rights and Titles are prosecuted or recovered the King cannot judge in Person betwixt man and man He does it by his Judges and upon Oath and so in all cases whatsoever If the King will have his Right it must be brought before His Judges Though this is an Absolute Monarchy yet this is so far from infringing the Peoples Rights that the People as to their Properties Liberties and Lives have as great a priviledge as the King It is not the sharing of Government that is for the Libertie and Benefit of the People but it is how they may have their Lives and Liberties and Estates safely secured under Government And you know when the Fatness of the Olive was laid aside and we were Governed by Brambles these Brambles they did not only tear the Skin but tore the Flesh to the very Bone Gentlemen I have done in this Particular to let you see that the Supreme Power being in the King the King is immediately under God owing his Power to none but God It is true blessed be God we have as great Liberties as any People have in Christendom in the World but let us own them where they are due We have them by the Concessions of Our Princes Our Princes have granted them and the King now He in them hath granted them likewise Gentlmen I have been a little too long in this and yet I cannot say it is too long because it may clear misunderstanding so many Poisonous Opinions having gone abroad To come a little nearer If we consider suppose there were the Highest Authority but when we shall consider this horrid Murther truly I cannot almost speak of it but Vox faucibus haeret When we shall consider that a few Members of the House of Commons those that had taken the Oath of Supremacy and those that had taken the Oath of Allegiance that was to defend the King and His Heirs against all Conspiracies and Attempts whatsoever against His and their Persons Their Crowns and Dignities not onely against the Pope's Sentence as some would pretend but as otherwise against all Attempts and Conspiracies not onely against His Person Crown and Royal Dignity nor Pope's Sentence nor onely in order to the Profession of Religion but absolutely or otherwise that is whatsoever Attempts by any power Authority or Pretence whatsoever I say when a few Members of the House of Commons not an eighth part of them having taken these Oaths shall assume upon themselves an Authority an Authority what to do shall assume to
Harrison Will you give me your Advice Court We do give you Advice The Advice is there is no other Plea but guilty or Not guilty You shall be heard when you have put your self upon your Trial. Clerk Are you guilty or Not guilty Tho. Harrison You do deny me Councel then I do plead Not guilty Clerk You plead Not guilty Is this your Plea Th. Harrison Yes Clerk How will you be tried Th. Harrison I will be tryed according to the Laws of the Lord Clerk Whether by God and the Countrey Lord chief Baron Now I must tell you if you do not put your self upon your Countrey you have said nothing Clerk How will you be tried Th. Harrison It is to put my self upon what you please to put me upon Court If you understand you are not every man you are versed in Proceedings of Law you know you must put your self upon the Trial of God and your Countrey if you do not it is as good as if you had said nothing Th. Harrison You have been misinformed of me Court You have pleaded Not guilty That which remains is you must be tried by God and the Countrey otherwise we must record your standing Mute Clerk How will you be Tried Th. Harrison I will be tried according to the ordinary course Clerk Whether by God and the Countrey You must speak the Words Th. Harrison They are vain words Court We have given you a great deal of Liberty and Scope which is not usual It is the course and proceedings of Law if you will be tried you must put your self upon God and the Countrey Clerk How will you be tried Th. Harrison I do offer my self to be tried in your own way by God and my Countrey Clerk God send you a good deliverance Clerk William Heveningham hold up your hand How sayest thou Art thou Guilty of the Treason whereof thou standest indicted and art now arrraigned or Not guilty Will. Heveningham Not guilty Clerk How will you be tried Will. Heveningham By God and the Countrey Clerk God send you a good deliverance Sir Hard. Waller then presented his Petition to the Court directed To the King's Majesty and the Parliament which was received but not at this Court read And then the three Persons aforesaid were dismissed Clerk Bring to the Bar Isaac Pennington Esq Henry Marten Esque Gilbert Millington Gentleman Robert Tichbourn Esq Owen Roe Esq and Robert Lilburn Gentleman Who were called and appeared at the Bar and being commanded severally held up their hands The Indictment was read again as to the former Persons Clerk Isaac Pennington Hold up thy hand How sayest thou Art thou guilty of the Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and art now Arraigned or Not guilty Isaac Pennington Not guilty my Lord. Clerk How will you be tryed Isaac Pennington By God and the Countrey Clerk God send you a good deliverance Clerk Henry Marten How sayest thou Art thou guilty of the Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and art now Arraigned or Not guilty Hen. Marten I desire the benefit of the Act of Oblivion Clerk Are you guilty or Not guilty Court You are to understand the Law is this the same to you and every one You are to plead Guilty or Not guilty If you will demand the benefit of the Act of Oblivion it is a confession of being Guilty Hen. Marten I humbly conceive the Act of Indempnity Court You must plead Guilty or Not guilty Hen. Marten If I plead I lose the benefit of that Act. Court You are totally excepted out of the Act. Hen. Marten If it were so I would plead My name is not in that Act. Court Henry Martin is there Mr. Sollicitor Gen. Surely he hath been kept close Prisoner indeed if he hath not seen the Act of Indemnity Shew it him Mr. Shelton opening the Act. Court How is it written Clerk It is Henry Martin And then the Act was shewed to the said Mr. Marten Hen. Marten Henry Martin My name is not so it is Harry Marten Court The difference of the Sound is very little You are known by that Name of Martin Hen. Marten I humbly conceive all Penal Statutes ought to be understood Literally Clerk Are you Guilty or Not guilty Hen. Marten I am not Henry Martin Clerk Are you guilty or Not guilty Court Be advised The effect of this Plea will be Judgment Here Mr Sollicitor Gen. cited somewhat Parallel to this in a Case formerly of Baxter where the Name was Bagster with an S and adjudged all one being of the same sound Clerk Are you guilty or Not guilty Hen. Marten My Lord I desire Council There will arise Matter of Law as well as Fact Court You are Indicted for Treason for a Malicious Trayterous compassing and Imagining the King's Death If you have any thing of Justification plead Not guilty and you shall be heard for if it be Justifiable it is not Treason The Rule is Either you must plead Guilty and so confess or Not guilty and put your self upon your Trial there is no Medium Hen. Marten May I give any thing in Evidence before Verdict Court Yes upon your Trial you may give any thing in Evidence that the Law warrants to be lawful Evidence Clerk Are you Guilty or Not guilty Court Understand one thing because I would not have you mistaken you cannot give in Evidence the Misnomer but any thing to the matter of Fact Hen. Marten I submit and plead Not guilty Clerk How will you be tried Hen. Marten By God and the Countrey Clerk God send you a good deliverance Clerk Gilbert Millington Hold up your hand How saiest thou Art thou Guilty of the Treason whereof thou standest indicted and art now arraigned or Not guilty Gilb. Millington My Lord I am an ancient man and deaf I humbly crave your Lordships pardon to hear me a few words I will promise it shall be pertinent enough Mr. Sol. Gen. Impertinent enough he means Court You must plead either Guilty and so confess it or Not guilty and then you shall be heard any thing for your justification Clerk And you Guilty or Not guilty Gilb. Millington I desire I may Court There is nothing you can say but Guilty or Not guilty All other Discourses turn upon your self Clerk And you Guilty or Not guilty Gilb. Millington You might enlighten me in some scruples Does my pause trouble you much I should not be long Court Your particelar case cannot differ from others Clerk Are you Guilty or Not guilty Gilb. Millington There are some things in the Indictment that I can say Not Guilty to There are others that I must deal ingenuously and confess them Clerk Are you Guilty in Manner and Form as you are indicted or Not guilty Gilb. Millington Not guilty Clerk How will you be tried Gilb. Millington By God and the Countrey Clerk God send you a good deliverance Clerk Robert Tichbourn Hold up your hand How saiest thou Art thou Guilty of the Treason whereof thou standest indicted
Clerk George Fleetwood Hold up thy hand What saiest thou Art thou guilty of this horrid Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and art now Arraigned or Not guilty George Fleetwood My Lord I came in upon his Majestie 's Proclamation Clerk Art thou Guilty or Not guilty George Fleetwood I must Confess I am Guilty And thereupon he delivered a Petition in to the Court which he said was directed To his Majesty and the Parliament and the Court did receive it accordingly Clerk Set him aside Clerk Simon Meyn Hold up thy hand What saiest thou Art thou guilty of this horrid Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and art now Arraigned or Not guilty Sim. Meyn Not guilty I come in upon His Majestie 's Proclamation my Lord. Clerk How wilt thou be Tried Sim. Meyn By God and the Countrey Clerk God send thee a good Deliverance Clerk James Temple Hold up thy hand What saiest thou Art thou guilty of this horrid Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and art now Arraigned or Not guilty James Temple Not guilty Clerk How wilt thou be Tried James Temple By God and the Countrey Clerk God send thee a good Deliverance Clerk Peter Temple Hold up your hand How saiest thou Art thou guilty of the Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and for which thou art now Arraigned or Not guilty Peter Temple Not guilty Clerk How wilt thou be Tried Peter Temple By God and the Countrey Clerk God send thee a good Deliverance Clerk Thomas Wait Hold up your Hand How saiest thou Art thou guilty of the Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and for which thou art Arraigned or Not Guilty Th Wait. I desire to be heard a word or two Court There is a Rule of Law which is set to us and you that in all these Cases you are to plead Guilty or Not guilty When you have Pleaded if Not Guilty you may speak what you will in its proper time Clerk Are you Guilty or Not guilty Th. Wait. I pray let me be heard a word I am very unwilling to spend time knowing you have a great deal of Business I am very unwilling to deprive my self of my Native Right I shall speak nothing but that which is Truth Court Do not Preface then but speak what you would say Th. Wait. My Lord my Case is different from the rest Court Whatsoever the Case he you have no Plea to us but guilty or Not guilty We can go no other way The Law sets our your Plea Th. Wait. My Lord I would speak one word There was a Great Peer of this Nation Indicted at Northampton within these two years for killing a man The Judges there Court You must Plead guilty or Not guiley Pray who are you that should take this upon you more then all the rest You must go the ordinary way guilty or Not guilty Are you guilty or Not guilty We do not intend to prevent any thing you have to say but it must be proper Clerk Are you guilty or Not guilty Th. Wait. I cannot say I am Guilty Court How then Th. Wait. I am Not guilty Clerk How wilt thou be Tried Th. Wait. By God and the Countrey Clerk Good send thee a good Deliverance Clerk Hugh Peters Hold up thy hand How saiest thou Art thou guilty of the Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and for which thou art now Arraigned or Not guilty Hugh Peters I would not for ten thousand Worlds say I am Guilty I am Not guilty Clerk How will you be Tried Hugh Peters By the Word of God Here the People laughed Court You must say By God and the Countrey Tell him you that stand by him what he should say if he doth not know Clerk How will you be Tried Hugh Peters By God and the Countrey Clerk God send thee a good Deliverance Clerk Dan. Axtel Hold up thy hand What saiest thou Art thou guilty of the Treason whereof thou standest Indicted and for which thou art now Arraigned or Not guilty Dan. Axtel May it please your Lordship I desire to have the freedom of an English-man that which is my Right by Law and inheritance I have something to offer in point of Law Clerk Art thou Guilty or Not guilty Dan. Axtel My Lords give me leave to speak For the Matter of the Indictment I conceive is upon the King's Death that there is a Commission of Oyer and Terminer for you to sit But in regard it was in pursuance of an Act of Parliament I conceive no Inferiour Court ought to judge of it I desire Councel it being of great and eminent Concernment in Law That ever any Judges or any Inferiour Court should judge of the Powers and Priviledges of a Parliament and I pray that Councel may be assigned me Clerk Are you Guilty or Not guilty Dan. Axtel If the Court over-rule me and I shall not have my Liberty as an English-man Court The Course of Law is this No man can Justifie Treason If the matter which you have to say be Justifiable it is not Treason if Treason it is not Justifiable Therefore you must go to the ordinary course of the Law You must Plead Guilty or Not guilty Dan. Axtel I can produce many Precedents Cour Are you Guilty or Not guilty The Language is put into your Mouth You have no other words to express your self by at this time but Guilty or Not guilty Dan Axtel Judg Heath had Councel assigned him upon the same Case Court That is very strange the same case What was it for killing a King Dan. Axtel If the Court will over-rule me I cannot help it Mr. Solicitour Gen. It may be this Gentleman may be deceived by a Mistake It may be he knows not the Law which your Lordships may be pleased to acquaint him with That to stand Mute in High-Treason is all one as to Confess the Fact and will have the same Sentence and Condemnation upon them as if they had Confessed it Lord Chief Baron Then I 'le tell you the Law He that doth refuse to put himself upon his Legal Trial of God and the Countrey is a Mute in Law and therefore you must Plead Guilty or Not guilty Let his Language be what it will he is a Mute in Law Dan. Axtel I do not refuse it Court Then say Dan. Axtel I am Not guilty Clerk How wilt thou be Tried Dan. Axtel By twelve lawful men according to the Constitutions of the Law Court That is by God and the Countrey Dan. Axtel That is not lawful God is not locally here Clerk How wilt thou be Tried You must say By God and the Countrey Dan. Axtel By God and the Countrey Clerk God send you a good Deliverance Lord Chief Baron Mr. Axtel have you your Papers again Dan. Axtel Yes my Lord. Lord Chief Baron When your Indictment is read the second time when you come to your Trial you may take what Notes you please The Court then Adjourned to the same Place till the next morning seven of the Clock
to pronounce Judgment against his Soveraign In this he rested not but he among them set his Hand and Seal to that bloody Roll or Warrant for putting him to death which accordingly was done and to these several open acts we shall call out Witnesses and so proceed M. Masterson M. Clark and M. Kirk sworn Coun. M. Masterson look upon the prisoner did you see him sit in that they called the High Court of Justice Lord Chief Baron Mr. Carew if you will have pen ink and paper you may have it pray call for it Carew I have no need of it Coun. Mr. Masterson did you see c. Ma. My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I was present at that Assembly which they called the High Court of Justice for Tryal of the King upon the 22 23 and 27th days of Jan. 1648. and there I saw the King stand a Prisoner at the Bar. I saw this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar sit upon the Bench in that Court as one of his Majesties Judges particularly upon the 27th day of Jan. which was the day of Sentence I saw him sitting there Coun. Mr. Clark You hear the Question Do you remember that you saw the Prisoner at the Bar sitting in that which they called the High Court of Justice Mr. Clark I remember I saw the Prisoner at the Bar sitting in that which they called the High Court of Justice for the Trial of the late King and particularly I took notice upon the 23. and 27th of Jan. 1648. that he was present Coun. What was done upon that 27th day Mr. Clark The 27th day the late King was sentenced to death Jury What is your Name Sir Coun. His Name is William Clark Coun. Mr. Kirk What say you to the former Question touching the Prisoner his being at that which they called the High Court of Justice Mr. Kirk My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I was present at the Tryal of his late Majesty of blessed memory I saw that Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar several days there particularly the day of the Sentence which was the 27th day of Jan. 1648. when the Sentence was passed he rose up assenting to it Then the Warrant for summoning that pretended Court was shewed to Mr. Kirk Coun. Do you believe that Hand to be the Hand of Mr. Jo. Carew Prisoner at the Bar Kirk My Lords I do believe it to be his Hand I have seen his Hand to several Orders and being very well acquainted with his Hand-writing I believe it to be his Hand as much as any Man can possibly know another man's Hand Then the Warrant for Execution of the King was likewise shewn him Coun. Is that the Hand also of the Prisoner at the Bar Kirk It is the same Hand my Lord. Court Was Mr. Carew a Member of the Long Parliament K. Yes My Lord. Coun. Had you occasion to be acquainted with his hand K. My Lord I have seen him set his hand several times to Orders and other Papers Mr. Farrington sworn Coun. Do you know the Warrants being shewn him those hands to be the writing of the Prisoner at the Bar Far. My Lords really I believe these are his hands Court Are you acquainted with his hand Far. Yes My Lord and I do believe these to be his hand-writing I did not see him write them but so far as possibly a man can know anothers writing I do believe these to be his Court If you will ask to see them you may see them Mr. Carew Ca. Please you to go on Here they were both read Coun. May it please your Lordships we shall not need to trouble the Jury any further we have proved that the Prisoner did sign that Warrant for summoning that Court of Injustice that he sate there and sentenced the King to death among other and that he signed the Warrant for execution L. Chief Baron M. Carew you have heard the evidence you may please to speak what you think fit for your self Ca. My Lords the crimes that are here laid to my charge in this Indictment are Treason and Murther L. Chief Baron I would not have you to be mis-informed it is Treason onely but it carries the other in with it Murther Ca. Because you say it carries the other inclusively L. Chief Baron It doth the charge is the compassing and imagining the death of the King the other is but evidence Ca. Then the thing that I stand upon before the Lord and before you all I say before the Lord before whom we must all stand and give an account of this action which is a very great and weighty one And whereas it is charged there for I shall not trouble you with many words as to the particulars or as to the proofs but I shall ingeniously acknowledg what the truth is and how far I can believe it and therefore I say as to the beginning of what was charg'd by the Council and according to the course of the Indictment that what was done in those things that it was not having the fear of God before mine eyes but being moved by the Devil and that it was done with a Trayterous Malicious and Devilish heart and all those things mentioned in the Indictment As for that I can say in the presence of the Lord who is the searcher of all hearts that what I did was in his fear and I did it in obedience to his holy and righteous Laws Here the people hum'd L. Chief Bar. Go on he stands for his Life let him have liberty Ca. It is part of my charge not to have the fear of God c. I did such and such things I hope I may have liberty L. Chief Bar. Go on you shall not be interrupted Ca. I say that I did it in the fear of the Lord and I will begin with that and confess ingeniously the truth of it When this came into question there was an Ordinance brought in to try the King where my name was not as one of the Judges There was another afterwards an Act which I shall mention upon what ground by and by what that was and that Act was brought in and committed and names brought in and my Name was not brought in and so afterwards my name was put in and seeing it I did strike it out After the Committee was up I told them I did desire to be excused in such a business I have told you how wherein and the ground that I did it which I shall leave with the Lord in whose hand your and my breath and all our breaths are and therefore when it was so I did because of the weight of it as being a very great and special thing and so I was very unwilling because of there being enow which I thought had more experience every way for so great a concernment as that was to be imployed rather then I yet being satisfied with that Authority that did it This is to shew you how that I had the fear
writing The Warrant shewn him Mr. Nutley I do verily believe it is Coun. Have you been acquainted with the writing of his name Mr. N. I have seen him write his name and do verily believe it to be his hand Coun. Clerk read the Warrant He read it accordingly Coun. That which remains of our Evidence is to prove his boasting of this villany We shall desire you to hear Sir Theophilus Biddolph Sir Theo. Biddolph sworn Coun. Pray tell my Lords and the Jury what you have heard the Prisoner say touching this business of putting the King to death Sir Th. Bid. I did hear him confess that he did sit as one of the Judges of the late King and that he was so far from repenting of the Act that he did desire when he dyed That a Tomb-stone might be laid over him with this Inscription Here lyes Thomas Scot who adjudged to death the late King Coun. Where did he say this Sir T. B. In the Parliament House Coll. Copley Esq sworn Coun. Pray Mr. Copley tell my Lords what you know of this business Mr. Cop. My Lord I was one of the Secluded Members when we were called to sit in the House again the Prisoner at the Bar Mr. Thomas Scot I think it was the last day we sate there being some speaking of the horridness of the Fact he made a long Harangue about that horrid Act and he said He hoped he should never repent of it and desired that when he dyed it might be written upon his Tomb-stone Here lies Thomas Scot who adjudged to death the late King Coun. We have done with our Evidence Court Sir Theophilus Biddolph When was it you heard him speak those words Sir T. B. To my best remembrance it was in Richards Parliament it was about January or February was twelve months Coun. Were not you a Member for the City of London in that Parliament Sir T. B. Yes Coun. Mr. Copley When was it that heard it Mr. Cop. It was in April last Mr. Soll. Gen. It was a settled perswasion of his heart and he thought it fit to be gloried in The Lord Mayor Elect sworn Coun. Pray my Lord tell my Lords what you know concerning the Prisoner at the Bar. Lord M. Elect. My Lords I was one of those Secluded members that were returned again a little before the coming in of His Majesty Upon the last day of our sitting Mr. Scot seeing the House must break said Their heads must be laid to the Block if there were a new Parliament For said you looking on Mr. Scot I confess I had a hand in putting the King to death and I desire all the world may take notice of it and I desire when I dye it may be written on my Tomb I do not repent of any thing I have done if it were to do I could do it again Mr. Soll. Gen. Do it again He follows his blows home William Lenthall Esq sworn Coun. Mr. Lenthall pray be pleased to tell my Lords and the Jury what you do remember of any discourse of Mr. Tho. Scot the Prisoner at the Bar tending to the glorying in this Act or any thing in Justification of that Act. Mr. Lenth My Lords the last day it was the last instant of time We were resolving of breaking the House there was some opposition in it not very much The general consent of the House was to dissolve it I must confess at that time I did hear Mr. Scot much justifie that Act of the death of the King which truly I was much offended at I confess to you upon my Oath touching his Speech of the Inscription upon his Tomb I did not hear that Justifying the death of the King he made a long Harangue about and he â—â—e at the upper end of the Gallery but these words Of â—â—ving it written upon his Tomb and to have all the world take â—â—â—ice of it I do not remember Coun. My Lords my Lord Mayor Elect omitted something pray let him speak to it Lo. Ma. Elect. My Lords the Conclusion of his Speech ended thus Being it is your pleasure to have it so the House Dissolved I know not how to hinder it but when that is done I know not where to hide this hated HEAD of mine Coun. We desire to hear what the Prisoner will say for himself Scot. I have no certainty from the Witnesses that I was there but in a wandring way they know not where I sate nor my posture Mr. Baker sworn Coun. We do not call this Witness as material for we must insist upon it quite through that after 12. years time it is not possible a Witness should remember where every particular person sate Pray hear this Witness Mr. Baker I do perfectly remember That Mr. Scot sate two rows above Mr. Bradshaw on his left hand in that which they called the High Court of Justice Scot. As to the Warrant you speak of I know not what it signifies I desire to know what the nature of it is Coun. The Warrant hath been read it is not produced against him as a Record for then it needed not be proved but it is produced against him as an evidence in writing under his own hand that he was consenting to the death of the King Scot. They may very much mistake my hand You speak of words that I should utter in Parliament I do humbly insist upon it That I am not to answer nor they alledge any thing of that nature It is a high breach of Priviledge Coun. There is no priviledge of Parliament for treason First some of the words were spoken in Richards Parliament that you do not own to be a Parliam then another thing a known rule in Law there is no priviledge of Parliament for treason Scot. I have heard the Rule but do not so well understand it of that spoken in Richards Parliament it will be a nice thing for me to distinguish between that and another Parliament but this I think That Convention of the people onght to have the Priviledge of the Parliament as well as any other I humbly conceive it was testimony ought not to be given to you Whatever I say in Parliament the Priviledge extends to no more than this that I may be lawfully secured till the Parliament hath been acquainted with it but not finally concluded till the Parliament have heard it Lo. Ch. Bar. You are Indicted for Compassing and Imagining the death of the King I would have you understand That in case a man should commit an Act of Treason be it in what place soever there is no place of Sanctuary for Treason In case of Felony if a man be Indicted for Felony in the Parliament House during the time of Parliament this is not to be tryed in Parliament but according to the Rule of Common Law So in case of Treason the House of Commons in Parliament doth not try Treasons That distinction which you make is nothing Scot. I humbly conceive there is
such a Priviledge that no man shall ever be called to account for any thing spoken in Parliament if he be not called to account by the House before any other Member be suffered to speak Lord Ch. Bar. That is the House will not determine but that doth not extend to your Case you are not charged here criminally for speaking those words that have been testified against you but for Compassing and Imagining the Kings death of which there are other Evidences and this but an Evidence to prove that Scot. My Lord I never did say these words with that aggravation which is put upon them I have a great deal of hard measure as to say I hope I shall never repent I take God to witness I have often because it was spoken well of by some and ill by others I have by prayers and tears often sought the Lord that if there were iniquity in it he would shew it me I do affirm I did not say so Mr. Baker My Lord I omitted something which was this I had occasion to speak with Mr. Scot whilest Richard's Parliament was sitting and among other discourse insisting upon some things that Richard had done saith he I have cut off one Tyrants head and I hope to cut off another Scot. My Lord This is but a single witness Mr. Soll. Gen. I suppose he meant Rich. for he was a Tyrant Lord Ch. Bar. Speak on Mr. Scot whatever you have to say Sc. If that he laid aside as an impertinency I have the less to say L. Ch. Bar. The next thing you have to do is to answer to the fact whether you did it or did it not Scot. I say this Whatever I did be it more or less I did it by he Command and Authority of a Parliamentary Power I did sit as one of the Judges of the King and that doth justifie me whatever the nature of the fact was Lo. Ch. Bar. We have had these things alledged before us again and again The Court are clearly satisfied in themselves that this act could not be done by any Parliamentary power whatsoever I must tell you what hath been delivered that there is no power on earth that hath any coercive power over the King neither single Persons nor a Community neither the people Collectively nor Representatively In the next place that which you offer to be done as by Authority of Parliament it was done by a few members of the House of Commons there were but 46 there at that time and of these 46 not above 26 that voted it at that time the House of Lords was sitting who had rejected it and without them there was no Parliament there was a force upon the Parliament there was excluded seven parts of eight Supposing you were a full House of Commons and that without exception there was not Authority enough and it is known to you no man better that there never was a House of Commons before this time that this foul Act was made for erecting that High Court of Justice as you call'd it assumed that Authority of making a Law you cannot pretend to act by Authority of Parliament and because you would excuse it you did it by Authority of Parliament whether it were good or no If a man do that which is unlawful by an unlawful Authority the assuming to do it by that Authority is an Aggravation not an Extenuation of the Fact It was over-ruled I think my Lords will tell you That they do not allow of that Authority at all either to be for Justification or Plea Scot. My Lords I humbly pray leave to say that without offence to the Court every person whereof I honour This Court hath not Cognizance to Declare whether it were a Parliament or no. Lo. Ch. Bar. That was objected too and we must aquaint you That first of all it is no Derogation to Parliaments That what is a Statute or not a Statute should be adjudged by the Common Laws We have often brought it into question whether such and such a thing was an Act of Parliament or not any man may pretend to an Authority of Parliament If forty men should meet at Shooters Hill as the Little Convention did at Westminster and say We do declare our selves a Parliament of England because they do so shall not this be judged what is a Statute and what not It is every days practise we do judge upon it the Fact is so known to every body they did assume to themselves a Royal Authority it hath been over-ruled already it hath been the mistake of many the vulgar acceptation of the word Parliament A Parliament consists of the King Lords and Commons it is not the House of Commons alone and so it is not by Authority of Parliament It is not unless it be by that Authority which makes up the Parliament You cannot give one instance That ever the House of Commons did assume the Kings Authority Scot. I can many where there was nothing but a House of Commons Court When was that Scot. In the Saxons time Court You say it was in the Saxons time you do not come to any time within 600 years you speak of those times wherein things were obscure Scot. I know not but that it might be as lawful for them to make Laws as this late Parliament being called by the Keepers of the Liberties of England My Lords I have no seditious design but to submit to the providence of God Court This is notorious to every man This we have already heard and over-ruled L. Finch That that I hope is this That Mr. Scot will contradict that which he hath said before that is That he hopes he should not repent I hope he doth desire to repent Mr. Scot for this we must over-rule it as we have done before there is nothing at all to be pleaded to the Jurisdiction and this point hath been determined before Scot. The Parliament informer times consisted not so much of King Lords and Commons but King and Parliament In the beginning of the Parliament in 1641. the Bishops were one of the three Estates if it be not properly to be called a Parliament a legislative Power though it be not a Parliament it is binding If two Estates may take away the third if the second do not continue to execuâ—â— their trust he that is in occupancy may have a title to the whole I do affirm I have a Parliamentary Authority a legislative power to justifie me Lo. Ch. Bar. Mr. Scot what you speak concerning the Lords Spiritual is nothing to your Case be it either one way of other it was done by an Act of Parliament with consent of the King Lords and Commons though you will bring it down to make these Commons have a legislative Power I told you it was over-ruled before We have suffered you to expatiate into that which was a thing not intended by many of my Lords that you should have any such power to expatiate into that which is
demand that wicked Judgment before the Court pronounced it and he was the man that did against his own Conscience after he had acknowledged that he was a wise and gracious King yet says he That he must dye and Monarchy with him there in truth was the Treason and the cause of that fatal blow that fell upon the King This was his part to carry on how he did it as a wicked Counsellor we shall prove to you and the wages and reward of the Iniquity that he did receive James Nutley Sworn Councel Pray tell the Circumstances of the Prisoners Proceedings at Westminster Hall when he did exhibite a Charge against the King Mr. Nutley My Lords the first day of bringing his Majesty to his Tryal was Saturday Jan. 20. 1648. Before they sate in publick they that were of the Committee of that which they called the High Court of Justice did meet in the Painted Chamber which was in the forenoon of that day Being there I did observe that there was one Price a Scrivener that was writing of a Charge I stood at a great distance and saw him write and I saw this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar near thereabouts where it was writing I think it was at the Court of Wards This charge afterwards a Parchment writing I did see in the hands of this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar. A very little after that they called their names they did adjourn from the Painted Chamber into Westminster Hall the great Hall The Method that they observed the first thing was to call the Commissioners by name in the Act the pretended Act for trying the King was read that is when the Court was sat the Commissioners were called by their names and as I remember they stood up as their names were called The next thing was reading the Act for the trying of his late Majesty After that was read then this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar presented the Parchment Writing which was called the Impeachment or Charge against his Majesty Mr. Bradshaw was then President of that Court and so called Lord President he commanded that the Prisoner should be sent for saying Serjeant Dendy send for your Prisoner thereupon the King was brought up as a Prisoner and put within a Bar And when the Court was silenced and settled this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar did deliver the Charge the Impeachment to the Court and it was read The King was demanded to plead to it presently Here I should first tell you that upon the Kings first coming in there was a kind of a Speech made by Mr. Bradshaw to the King in this manner I â—hink I shall repeat the very words Charles Stuart King of England the Commons of England assembled in Parliament taking notice of the effusion of blood in the Land which is fixed on you as the Author of it and whereof you are guilty have resolved to bring you to a tryal and Judgment and for this cause this Tribunal is erected There was little reverence given to his Majesty then which I was troubled at he added this further That there was a charge to be exhibited against him by the Solicitor General I think this Gentleman was so called at that time and he called to him to exhibit the Charge and this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar did deliver an Impeachment a Parchment writing which was called a Charge against the King at that time which was received and read against him Coun. Did you ever see the Charge which was now shewn to Mr. Nutley Mr. Nut. My Lords I do believe that this is the very Charge I am confident it is the same writing I have often seen him write and by the Character of his hand this is the same Council Go on with your story Mr. Nut. My Lords immediately upon the delivery of this Charge of Impeachment which was delivered in the Kings presence after it was read the King was demanded to give an answer to it His Majesty desired to speak something before he did answer to the pretended Impeachment for so his Majesty was pleased to call it He did use words to this purpose saith he I do wonder for what cause you do convene me here before you he looked about him saith he I see no Lords here where are the Lords upon this Mr. Bradshaw the President for so he was called did interrupt his Majesty and told him Sir saith he you must attend the business of the Court to that purpose you are brought hither and you must give a positive answer to the Charge saith the King you will hear me to speak I have something to say before I answer after much ado he was permitted to go on in the discourse he was in so far as they pleased His Majesty said I was in the Isle of Wight and there I was treated with by divers honourable persons Lords and Commons a treaty of peace between me and my people the treaty was so far proceeded in that it was near a perfection truly saith he I must needs say they treated with me honourably and uprightly and when the business was come almost to an end then saith he was I hurried away from them hither I know not by what Authority now I desire to know by what Authority I was called to this place that is the first question I shall ask you before I answer the charge It was told him by Mr. Bradshaw the President that the Authority that called him hither was a lawful Authority he asked him what Authority it was the second time it was answered him by the President that it was the Authority of the Commons of England assembled in Parliament which he affirmed then to be the Supream Authority of this Nation the King said I do not acknowledge its Authority Authority if taken in the best sense it must be of necessity understood to be lawful therefore I cannot assent to that I am under a Power but not under an Authority and there are many unlawful Powers a Power that is on the high way I think I am under a Power but not under an Authority you cannot judge me by the Laws of the land nor the meanest Subject I wonder you will take the boldness to impeach me your lawful King To this purpose his Majesty was pleased to express himself at that time with more words to that purpose The King went on to further discourse concerning the Jurisdiction of the Court Bradshaw the President was pleased to interrupt him and told him several times that he trifled out the Courts time and they ought not to indure to have their Jurisdiction so much as questioned Court Pray go on Mr. Nutly This Gentleman at the Bar I did hear him demand the Kings answer several times a positive answer was required of the King the K. often desired to be heard and he interrupted him again and again several times and at length it was pray'd that the charge that was exhibited against him
might be taken pro confesso Court By whom Nutly By the Prisoner at the Bar if so be that he would not answer This my Lord is the substance of what I have to say against him Council Mr. Nutly pray what discourse have you had at any time with the Prisoner at the Bar concerning this impeachment Nutly Truly my Lord I knew the Gentleman well I was well acquainted with him and for the satisfaction of my own conscience for I was very tender in the business and sorry he was ingaged in it I went to him and did desire him to desist I had discourse with him for I was then a young Student in the Temple and had a little knowledge in the Laws I desired him to consider the dangerous consequences of such a proceeding I may say I did it with tears in my eyes for I had a very good respect to the Gentleman for his profession sake being learned therein truly my Lord he did answer me thus I acknowlegde it is a very base business but they put it upon me I cannot avoid it you see they put it upon me I had some discourse with him concerning the oath of Allegiance truly he was satisfied that this oath was against the business in question I saw he was troubled at it Council Can ye speak of the manner of calling for Judgement against the King Nutly That I have already answered to it was several times done the King was brought several times to the Bar and at every time he was brought he was pressed to answer whether Guilty or Not guilty Court By whom Nutly By the Sollicitor then the Prisoner now at the Bar. My Lord I remember his Majesty was pleased when he saw he could not be heard to the discourse that he did intend to make of the whole business saith the King if you will needs press me to an answer I must demur to your Jurisdiction my Lord the answer that was given to that was this Mr. Bradshaw there then President did say Sir saith he if you demur to the Jurisdiction of this Court I must let you know that the Court doth over-rule your demurrer this was said my Lord and Judgement was pressed very often Court By whom Nutly By the prisoner at the Bar. Cook My Lord may I ask him a question Court Yes Cook The first question is whether the Parchment was delivered by me unto the Court or brought into the Court by Mr. Broughton the Clerk Mr. Nutly I do encline to believe my Lord That it was brought into the Court and delivered by some hand or other to the Prisoner at the Bar I do beleive it was for I do remember it was written by one Price I was told that was his name that may be true I believe it was brought into the Court and delivered to the Prisoner now at the Bar. Council But did he exhibit it Nutly Yes my Lords Cook Did you see me set my hand to that Parchment N. No my Lords but I believe it to be his hand Cook Another Question whether Mr. Nutly did hear me say concerning the opinions of those Gentlemen what they intended to do in that business Nut. My Lords I do remember that I had often conference with the Gentleman at the Bar. I desired him to desist from the business considering the dangerous consequences of it truly my Lord I do well remember that he did say he did hope they did not intend to take away the Kings life said I if they go about any such thing do you use your utmost endeavour to preserve his life saith he I did labour to that purpose but they tell me they only intend to bring him to submit to the Parliament Cook It is said that I demanded Judgement of his life Mr. Nutly I demand of you whether I used the words of Judgement against his life but only I demanded their Judgement Nut. My Lords for that I cannot remember possibly to a syllable but Judgement was demanded Court By whom N. By this person Cook I said the judgment of the Court not against him I meant judgement for his acquital Court Did you ever hear him desire the Court that the Charge might be taken pro confesso N. That I have said my Lord it was urged by the Prisoner at the Bar against his Majesty That if he would not plead to the Charge that then the matter charged in it might be taken pro confesso But my Lord if you please to give me leave to add this one word more my Lord I did hear him say at that time he shewed me a paper that contained an order of the Court that did direct the very words that he should use when he came to deliver the Charge whether those words were in the order I do not know Cook Whether was I not directed by those Gentlemen the very words I should speak Court We are satisfied in that he saith by an order that you shewed him you were so directed If you have any thing more ask it him Mr. Farrington sworn Mr. Sol. Gen. Pray tell my Lords and the Jury what was the carriage of the Prisoner at the Bar at Westminster at the place they called the High Court of Justice Farringt My Lord I was present about the 20th of Jan. 1648. at that which they called the High Court of Justice and Mr. Bradshaw sat then as President so much as I remember concerning the Prisoner at the Bar I shall acquaint your Lorship This Gentleman at the Bar after the reading of the Commission and directions by the President to bring his Majesty the prisoner they called him to the Bar the King being brought after silence made and some speeches made by the President this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar having then a Parchment in his hand the substance of it was for levying War against the Kingdom he prayed that it might be read and accepted as a Charge in behalf of the good people of England It was accordingly read and afterwards being demanded to answer after his Majesty having given several reasons as to the Jurisdiction of the Court four days every day the Prisoner at the Bar demanded the judgement of the Court. And if his Majesty would not answer to the charge it might be taken pro confesso Coun. Do you know his hand if you see it Farring I have not seen his hand a long time Then the Impeachment was shewn to the witness Far. Truly Sir this is like his hand Coun. Do you believe it Far. It is very like it I do not know positively Coun. Did you hear the words pro confesso Far. Yes my Lord several times after the first day Coun. Did he interrupt the King in his discourse as to say these words that the Charge might be taken pro confesso Far. I do remember one day there was some interruption between the King and him the King laying his Cane upon his shoulder desiring him to forbear Cock You cannot say that
I interrupted his Majesty Far. I remember that the King laid his Cane upon your shoulders Cook Whether did I the first or the last day demand judgement or that any thing might be taken pro confesso Far. The first day no but after the first day he did several days you did the last day Griffith Bodurdo Esq sworn Coun. Sir you have heard the question give an accompt to my Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury of the carriage of the Prisoner at the Bar towards his Majesty during the time of the Tryal Mr. Bod. My Lord I was all the time that the King was brought there before the Court as a Prisoner I was present all the day having a conveniency out of my house into a Gallery that was some part of it over that Court I do remember that the Prisoner at the Bar whom I never saw before that time did exhibit a charge the first day against the Prisoner at the Bar which was the King in these very terms The Prisoner at the Bar the charge I heard it read then I have not seen it since the substance was this That for levying war against the Parliament and people of England and namely at such and such a place killing of the people of England I think Naseby and Keinton field was named in it and divers other places were named in the Charge and the Conclusion was that he had done those things as a Tyrant Traitor Murtherer and a publick and implacable enemy of the Commonwealth But this Prisoner at the Bar did exhibit the Charge and the King did then as you have heard he did plead to the Jurisdiction of the Court The King would fain have been heard but I think they did adjourn for that time The next day he pleaded the same thing I remember the answer that was several times given twice given by Bradshaw to the King thus that the Court did assert their own Jurisdiction The second and third day I do not remember any day after the first but that the prisoner at the Bar did demand judgement for the Kings not pleading and did several times make complaints to the Court of the Kings delays that he intended delays and nothing else Cook Pray my Lord one Question whether my Lord before he heard me speak of demanding judgement against the King whether he did not hear Mr. Bradshaw several times say that the Court owned their Authority and that the matter would be taken pro confesso Mr. Bodurdo I did hear the Prisoner at the Bar desire of the Court that it might be so and I heard the Prisoner tell the King that it must be so Joseph Herne sworn Coun. Mr. Herne tell my Lords what you know of the prisoners carriage at the High Court of Justice as they called it Mr. Herne Upon Saturday the 20th of Jan. 1648. it was the first day His Majesty was convened before them I could not come near the Court only I saw him at a distance I heard nothing but the acclamations of the people crying out God save your Majesty what was done in the Court I know nothing of On Munday I was there and had a conveniency to see and hear what was acted and so His Majesty being come to the Seat appointed for him the prisoner at the Bar being called upon by the then President Bra. he demanded of him what he had to ask of the Court He was then talking with Dorislaus and semeed not to mind the business of the Court His Majesty sitting near takes his stick and thrusts the Prisoner at the Bar upon his shoulder and the Prisoner looking back with a great deal of indignation turned about I did hear Bradshaw speaking to him in these words Mr. Sol. have you any thing to demand of the Court whereupon the prisoner at the Bar did use these or the like words May it please your Lordships I have formerly in the name of the Commons assembled in Parliament and the good people of England exhibited a Charge of High Treason and other high crimes against Charles Stuart the prisoner at the Bar flinging his head back in this manner to him He had there further to require of the Court that he might be demanded to make positive answer by confession or denial if not that the Court would take it pro confesso and proceed according to Justice this was on the first day I was in the Court The President Bradshaw told His Majesty that he heard what was craved in the name of the Commons assembled in Parliament and the good people of England against him by the now Prisoner at the Bar. The King stood up but Bradshaw prevented him in what he had to say telling of him that the Court had given him time to that day to know when he would plead to the Charge His Majesty proceeded to object against the Jurisdiction and said he did demur to the Jurisdiction of the Court upon which the President answered him If you demur to the Jurisdiction of the Court you must know that the Court hath over-ruled your demurrer and you must plead to your Charge guilty or not guilty upon that the King asked their authority and desired he might give reasons against it he was denyed it by the President the President at last was content to tell him that though he was not satisfied with their authority they were and he must but to satisfie him he told him in short they sat there by the supream authority of the Nation the Commons assembled in Parliament by whom his Anceston ever were and to whom he was accomptable then the King stood up by your favour shew me one President Bradshaw 〈◊〉 down in an angry manner Sir saith he we sit not here to answer your Questions plead to your Charge guilty or not guilty Clerk do your duty whereupon Broughton stood up and asked what he had to say whether guilty or not guilty and President Bradshaw said that if he would not plead they must record his contempt His Majesty turned about to the people and said then remember that the King of England suffers being not permitted to give his reasons for the liberty of the people with that a great shout came from the people crying God save the King but there was an awe upon them that they could not express themselves as they would have done I believe Coun. What did Cook say to the Judgement did you hear him press for Judgement Mr. H. Yes I heard these words from the Prisoner at the Bar That if the K. would not plead his Charge might be taken 〈◊〉 Conf. and that the Court might proceed according to Justice Cook One question more whether he often heard me speak those words that it might be taken pro Confesso and to proceed according to Justice Mr. Hern. You desired he might be held to his Plea confession or denial that he might not be suffered to use any words to the Jurisdiction of the Court. Cook Whether he
heard the Charge read Hern. I did not hear the Charge read I was not there the first day I heard you confess you had exhibited a Charge of high Treason against the Prisoner at the Bar which was then the King's Majestie Cook Whether I did not in the Charge conclude that all proceedings might be according to Justice Court Read the Title and last Article of that Charge which was accordingly read and follows in haec verba The Title of the Charge The Charge of the Commons of England against Charles Sewart KING of England of High Treason and other Crimes exhibited to the High Court of Justice The last Clause in the Charge And the said Iohn Cook by protestation saving on the behalf of the people of Eng. the liberty of exhibiting at any time hereafter any other Charge against the said Char. Stew. and also of replying to the answers which the said Char. Stew. shall make to the premisses or any of them or any other charge that shall be so exhibited doth for the said Treasons and Crimes on the behalf of the said people of England impeach the said Charles Stewart as a Tyrant Traytor Murderer publick and implacable enemy to the Commonwealth of England and prayeth that the said Charles Stewart King of England may be put to answer all and every the premisses that such proceedings examinations tryals sentences and judgement may be hereupon had as shall be agreeable to Justice Court Mr. Cook will you have any Witnesses examined touching the question you last asked Cook No be pleased to go on Mr. Baker Sworn Mr. Bak. My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury I was at the High Court of Justice as they called it the first second and third daies not to trouble you with the proceedings of of Bradshaw I will tell you what I observed of this Gentleman I have the notes that I took there and pray that I may read them to help my memory which was granted and then proceeded in this manner That day my Lord Mr. Cook told the Court that he charged the Prisoner at the Bar meaning the KING with Treason and high misdemeanors and desired that the Charge might be read the Charge was this That he had upheld a Tyrannical Government c. and for that cause was adjudged to be a Tyrant c. and did then press that the prisoner might give an answer to that and that very earnestly The second day my Lord he told the Court that he did the last day exhibit a Charged High Treason against the Prisoner at the Bar meaning the King and that he did desire he might make answer to it and he told them also that instead of making an answer to the Court the King had delayed the Court but desired the K. might make a positive answer or otherwise that it might be taken pro confesso The third day my Lord he came and told the Court as before that the King had delayed then and then he charged him with the Highest Treasons and Crimes that ever were acted upon the Theatre of England and then pressed that Judgement might be given against him and another expression was that it was not so much He but the Innocent and precious bloud that was shed that did crie for Judgment against the Prisoner at the Bar this my Lord in substance there were other passages Cook Whether before this time he had not heard some thing of an Act or Order proclaimed at Westminster whether there was any other word in effect used in that charge more than in the Proclamation Mr. Baker I did hear of the Proclamation and Charge and the substance of it I have given an accompt of it and I did hear you press upon it very much the Proclamation I heard of it that it was made forthe summoning of the Court but I did not hear the Proclamation made Cook That that was called the Act of the Commons for Trying of the King Mr. Baker I did hear of the Act but did not take notice of it Mr. George Masterson Sworn Counc Mr. Masterson pray inform my Lords and the Jury what you know touching the carriage of the Prisoner at the Bar at the Tryal of his late Majesty Mr. Masterson My Lords and you Gentlemen of the Jury I was present in that they called the High Court of Justice upon the 22 23. and 27. days of January in the year 1648. I shall wave those circumstances which you have heard and many of which I well remember and what I heard likewise between the King who was then a Prisoner and the then President Bradshaw but concerning the Prisoner at the Bar this I very well remember that upon Munday I heard him say he had exhibited a Charge of High Treason against the Prisoner then the King and demanded how that he might plead to his charge I do very well remember that after some passages between the King and the Court the Prisoner at the Bar desired the King might plead to his Charge or else it might be taken pro Confesso I remember upon the last day the day of that fatal Sentence I heard the Prisoner at the Bar demand in the name of the Commons assembled in Parliament and all the good people of England Judgement upon the Prisoner at the Bar pointing to the King this is all Mr. Burden sworn Councel Do you know who did examine the witnesses against the King and were you examined and by whom Burden By Judge Cook for so he was called in Ireland Councel Did he examine you as a witness against the King did he give you an Oath Burden Yes my Lord and many others Cook This is a new thing I never heard of this before where was it that I examined him I had no power Council No we know that but you were active Court Where was it Cook Whether there were not any others with me in the Room and where it was Burden It was at Westminster-hall within the High Court of Justice Cook Who was there besides me Burden I cannot tell Axtel he was there and I am sure Cook was there Councel Mr. Burden Pray tell my L. the Jury what questions you were examined upon and what they tended to Burden He examined me and gave me my Oath there was eight or nine of us we had been in the Kings Army in former times this Gentleman Col. Axtel brought us in commanded us out of our Company I was in his Company and this Gentleman himself gave us our Oaths he asked us where we saw the King in action I did reply to him and told him I saw him in the Field with his Army he asked me many other questions that I could not tell him he asked me whether I did see the King at Nottingham set up his Standard and I was never at Nottingham in my life these were the questions Mr. Starkey Sworn Court Pray inform my Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury what passed between you and the Prisoner at
the Bar concerning the Trial of his late Majesty Mr. Starkey My Lords this Gentleman now Prisoner and my self have been acquainted a great while being of the same Society of Grayes-Inne and truly my Lord I confess I owe all my knowledge in the Laws to that Gentleman when 〈◊〉 came first he was accused for debt and was pleased to do me and several other Gentlemen now and then the favour to reason the Law with us and assist us in the beginning of the long Parliament that is to give you an accompt of his being indebted he did desire I would do my endeavour to get his Protection Near the time of the Kings Trial there was a Gentleman with my self one Samuel Palmer of Grays-Inne which frequented his Company had several nights the opportunity of understanding the affairs at Westmin and truly he himself did seem to us to count that a very ridiculous Council I remember what he said one night I think they are all mad which was within two or three days before the Kings tryal and instanced how a Fellow cryed out to the Lord Fairfax that if he did not consent to the proceedings he would kill Christ and him After that I did not think he did go to this Council for imployment but out of curiosity when the King came to Tryal we heard that Mr. Cook was the person that was Solicitor and Acted that part that you have heard of and that during that Tryal whether the second or third day I cannot say that certainly Mr. Cook came to Grays-Inne that evening about Ten or Eleven of the clock at might only upon some particular occasion as he said I being walking in the Court in the walk before my Chamber with another Gentleman I did see him pass out of a house to go back again I thought it was he called after him Mr. Cook said I upon that he turned back and met me I took him by the hand said I I hear you are up to the ears in this business no saith he I am serving the people truly said I I believe there is a thousand to one will not give you thanks said I I hear you charge the King for the levying war against the Parliament how can you rationally do this when you have pulled out the Parliament to make way to his Trial he answered me you will see strange things and you must wait upon God I did ask him but first he said this of himself said he he was as gracious and wise a Prince as any was in the world which made me reflect upon him again and asked how he could press those things as I have heard what answer he made to that I cannot tell I did by the way inquire what he thought concerning the King whether he must suffer or no he told me he must die and Monarchy must die with him Cook Whether was this after or before the Sentence Mr. Starkey It was before the Sentence for it was either the second or third Trial or rather in some interim of time before the Sentence for there was an adjournment for a day or two but I am sure it was before the Sentence Court Mr. Cook they have concluded their Evidence plead for your self what you think fitting Cook My Lord I have been a Prisoner three months I humbly desire to acknowledge his Majesties and his Councils favour that I was not put into a Jeremy's Prison but in the Tower and not in Irons I give your Lordships humble thanks for that and truly considering the nature of the Charge had it been in some other Kingdom they would have served us as Iohn Baptist in prison I thank you that I have a fair Trial with the Judges of the Law who are upon their Oaths to do equal right and justice between our Soveraign Lord the King and every Prisoner concerning matters of life and death and likewise those Noble Lords that though they are not put upon their Oaths but upon their honour if they know any Law to preserve my life I trust they will rather save than destroy My Lords I do therefore say as Paul said my plea is much of that nature against the Law and against Caesar I hope I have not offended at all and so I have pleaded not guilty The learned Council have examined several witnesses against me and I humbly conceive that the matter will rest in a very narrow compass the substance of the Charge so far as my memory will serve doth rest in these three things the other being but matter of form That I with others should propound consult contrive and imagine the Death of the late King Secondly That to the perfecting and bringing about this wicked and horrid conspiracy that I with others did assume a Power and Authority as I remember power I am sure then to kill and murther the King thirdly That there was a person unknown that did cut off the Kings head and that we were abetting aiding assisting countenancing and procuring the person or words to that effect against the form of the Statutes and so forth I hâ—ve twelve poor words to offer for my self in this business wherein if I do not answer every thing that hath been particularly objected I hope you will give me leave afterwards to offer it First I humbly propound this that if it was not made appear to your Lordships that I did ever propound consult advise contrive attempt or any way plot or counsel the death of His Majestie then I hope I cannot be found guilty within the Statute of 25. Edward the third for the naked truth Mr. Nutly hath in a great part spoke to I was appointed upon the tenth of January 1648. for to give my advice concerning a Charge there having been upon the ninth a Proclamation for the Trial and upon the tenth Mr. Steel Dr. Dorislaus and Mr. Ask and my self were appointed and ordered to be of Council to draw up a Charge Here I have the order attested by Mr. Jessop and pray it may be read Court They do admit the thing that you were so assigned Cook Then I humbly conceive that that cannot be said to be done maliciously or advisedly or with any wicked intention in me which I was required and commanded to do Acting only within my Sphere and Element as a Counsellour no otherwise The next thing is this my L. that by Law words will not amount unto Treason we usually say that words may declare an Heretick but not a Traytor there were some Statutes formerly 1 Ed. 6. were words are made Treason but they are all repealed by 1 Mariae that nothing shall be Treason but what is expressed in 25 Ed. 3. this Objection will seem to lye that these were words put in writing and that I humbly conceive to be the greatest matter objected to which I answer 1. Whether there be any full certain clear proof that that is my hand to the Charge I must leave to you two or three
Treason and my Lord had this been in times of peace and had His Majesty been no Prisoner now he was under the power of an Army this had been great Treason but he being a Prisoner not by my means for I was no sword-man what can a man that knows himself innocent being a Prisoner desire more than a speedy Tryal so that making the Tryal more speedy cannot be said to be done trayterously A Tryal doth follow imprisonment as naturally and necessarily as the shadow doth the body If any man shall desire and be instrumental in bringing him to a Tryal which might acquit rather than condemn him and so humbly pray proceedings according to Justice this will have I hope a better name than Treason I am much beholding to His Majesty and this honourable Parli for the penning of the Act of Indempnity which I hope my L. you will give me leave to take notice of Court Open as much as you will of it Cook My Lords the words that I would make use of are in the beginning Treason Murder and other Felonies that are spoken of they are said to be counselled commanded acted or done in the preamble which is as the Key to open the mind and meaning of the Law-makers it is said that all persons shall be pardoned for all excepting such as shall be named and in such manner as they shall be excepted and then it comes provided that this Act shall not extend to pardon such and such persons and by name I am one and it is said all which persons for their execrable Treason in Sentencing to death or signing the Instrument for the horrid murther or being instrumental in taking away the precious life of our late Soveraign Lord Charles the First of glorious memory are left to be proceeded against as Traytors to his late Majesty according to the Laws of England and are out of the said Act wholly excepted and foreprized There is not any thing offered against me upon the two 1st great words which are Sentencing and signing that which I have to do to endeavour to clear my self is this being instrumental in taking away the life of his said Majesty first I humbly offer this to the Juries consideration That where the Parliament doth begin to fix the treasonable part there I hope and no otherwise this honourabe Court will fix it if it had been the Intention that Counsellors advisers and such as spoke their minds sometimes in the business you know that was Epidemical many words were spoken which cannot be justified whether naturally it would not have followed that all such persons for their counselling advising or being instrumental are left to be proceeded against as Traytors I hope you will take that into consideration concerning the words or being instrumental observe it is not said or being any otherwaies instrumental but Sentencing signing or being instrumental if therefore the word Instrumental be not of a general comprehensive nature then all this evidence which hath been given in against me being before the Sentencing and signing will fall to the ground that this is the legal genuine and Grammatical sense cannot be any otherwise than as particular as if it were the Sentencer signer Executioner which if it had been so nothing of the Evidence would have reached me My argument is this such a use is to be made of an Act of Parliament that no word may be frustrate and insignificant but if this Interpretation shall be put upon it sentencing signing or being any way instrumental then the words Sentencing and Signing need not have been if Instrumental will carry the words Sentencing and signing then these words will carry no force atall especially my Lord when there is no need of any retrospect at all if it be so I know not how far it may look back there is no necessity of putting any comprehensive generality upon this word instrumental but that the plain natural sense will be this That those that did sentence and Sign and those that were instrumental in taking away his life that is those that did abet and comfort that person unknown or justifie or countenance him which is after the Sentencing and not before in the legal sense Next I conceive that a Councellor cannot be said to do any thing vi armis It is said that by force and Arms I did abet c. it is Rhetorical to say that words may be as Swords but legal it is not unless there be something vi armis in the Grammatical sense instrumental in taking away the Kings life it is not said instrumental in order to take away the K. life or instrumental in advising to take away the K. life but instrumental in taking away the K. life My Lord The next thing is that there cannot be any thing to be said to be done by me first not falso because in that sense it must have the operation of mendacity that there must be a lie told in it I did nothing but what I was required to do to set down such and such words I did not invent nor contrive them I heard nothing of it till the tenth day of Jan. My Lord for malitiose that I did not any thing maliciously I hope it will appear in this what I then spoke it was for my Fee it may be called avaritia but not malitia for the Law will imply a malice but when there is no other express ground or reason why the thing was done but here was an express ground to speak for my Fee I hope the Jury will take that into consideration Then Secondly I was not Judicial in the Case I was not Magisterial as any Officer but ministerial As touching examining of witnesses it is a great mistake the Court had power to give an Oath I might be there but I had no power to give an Oath but whether I might ask any question I do not remember but that I should give an Oath that is a falsity then my Lord for proditorie I hope there is nothing at all that appears to the Jury so that there was no malice nor trayterous intention in the thing There are some matters of Law which I desire your Lordships will give me leave to speak to and that your Lordships will be of Counsel with me I would offer something concerning his Majesties gracious Declaration from Breda to the Parliament I was then in Ireland I did put in a Petition to the honourable Commissioners before any exception was that I might have the benefit of that Declaration I did lay hold of it My Lords there are two things in that Declaration that I would offer His Majesty saith that for the restoring of the Kings Peers and people of the Kingdom to their just rights and liberties He will grant a free and general Pardon to all excepting such as shall be by Parliament excepted and within three or four lines after it is said a free Parliament though I do not in the
least question the Legality of this Parliament yet my Lords to this particular purpose whether the Parliament that was to except ought not to be a Parliament that was to be called accoring to his Majesties Writ according to the Laws of the Kingdom I humbly conceive it will bear that though His Majesty is pleased to confirm this yet it is not such a Parliament that was to except that I offer to your Lordships My Lords that that I would humbly make hold to put for my self because it is the priviledge of one in my condition is this There is my Lord many Lords the Earl of Essex the Earl of Southampton and others that were adjudged in the 44 of Eliz. 3. institutes they did trayterously and maliciously conspire to take her Majesty Prisoner and to remove her Counsellours from her which were found guilty and suffered accordingly the reason is That because thereby if it had been done they had despoiled her Maje of her Regal Government the case is instant in Philip who was a nominative King that it was not Treason to have attempted any thing against him My Lords his Majesty being a Prisoner without any hand of mine I giving advice according to what was dictated to me to bring him to that tryal whereby he might have been acquitted and so set at liberty I hope that will not be said as instrumental My Lords I humbly shall offer but two words 1. to honourable Court then to the Jury the words of 25 E. 3. and so the exposition of the learned Judges have been from time to time that there shll be no semblable Treasons made by presumptions or strains of wit but those Treasons specified there It is said if a Husband do kill his Wife or a Wife kill her Husband a Master should kill his Servant or the Servant should kill his Master that that shall be petty Treason a Child did kill his Father though that was looked upon as a great sin yet the Judges do not presume that to be Treason because it was not in the very words this being an extraordinary Case to write a thing after another doth not appear there was a malicious heart in him that did write There hath been the Act of Parlia that doth call these Courts Tyrannical and Unlawful Courts but my Lords a Tyrannical and Unlawful Court is a Court de facto though not de jure if a Court be not a just and lawful Court it cannot be said but that it is a Court we say a Thief is a true man though morally he is not so this was a Court Officers attending on them some said they had Authority therefore for one to come and act within his Sphere not to act out of that nor to do any thing but what he had a prescript form appointed him I hope that will not be found to be within the letter of the Law I have been told how true I cannot tell that there have been some votes in the honourable Parliament that those that did only counsel or advise those were not to be looked upon as Traytors I have been told so that those that did only speak as Councel for their Fee who were not the contrivers of it the Parliament did not intend they should be left to be proceeded against Court That Letter that was sent from the Commons to the King at Breda they speak first of the violation that was put upon the Parliament and of the base horrid Murther of his late Majesty It is said that the Parliament I conceive they meant of the remaining part they were not guilty but some few ambitious bloody guilty persons who contrived the same and others misled by them Cook The other matter of Law is this I say that I do hope that though that order which I was about to produce concering my acting that if it may not in a legal sense any way be said to be an Act of the Parliament and Commons yet it may be said to be such an order to bear out those that did Act according to it because there was then no other authory de facto otherwise it were not lawful for any man to exercise his profession during such a Power I hope Councellors might then exercise their profession aswel as others My Lord though I should suffer my self in this case I should be loth the honourable profession of the Law should I think I was in my Sphere acting as a Counsellor Now Gentlemen of the Jury that which I have to say to you is an evidence concerning matter of life it must be so clear that every one that hears it may understand it It is called an evidence because it is evident it is one reason why Prisoners for their lives are not allowed Counsel for matter of fact because the evidence is and ought to be so clear and plain that every one should be satisfied both Jury and standers by and it is a proper word to say the Prisoner is convicted that is as much as his mouth is stopped and therefore I say truly as I hope I may speak it to you without offence as Jeremy in another Case when some of the people would have had them put him to death as for me behold I am in your hand do with me as seemeth good and meet unto you 26. Jer. 14 15. ver saith he But know ye for certain that if ye put me to death ye shall surely bring innocent blood upon your selves I hope you will not willingly be Guilty of any such thing I must leave it to your consciences whether you believe that I had an hand in the K. Death when I did write but only that which others did dictate unto me and when I spoke only for my Fee and this I would be bold to say though the argument is not so directly confessed that humane Justice I do first say as this my principle and opinion is that as every man ought to pay his moral debts so all political debts there is a debt due to human Justice so political if the Lord should have suffered me to have been drunk and kill'd a man for which I ought to have died in stead of speaking for my self I would have rather intreated the Jury to have found me Guilty I think these things ought to be answered political debts when I was in Ireland and had opportunity of going away if I thought I had been Guilty I might have done it my name is put into his Majesties Proclamation It is true I was a prisoner three or four months before so that I could not render my self to what end should that Proclamation mention my name it was laid I obscured my self but I did not humane Justice doth never punish so much for expiation as for prevention The judgements of the learned Aquinas Grotius and Amesius and many others that if a man doth kill a man commit any thing worthy of death though he doth repent never so much yet that others may
be deterred from committing such Acts the Magistrate is bound to put him to death But where there is not such a thing there it is different though it is said the land is defiled that is where there is danger that the like may be committed again now all things are setled there is no danger at all now there can never come such a case as this again I say my Lord what I acted I did as a Counsellor I had no malitious intention in it Mr. Nutley bare testimony so far that I told him there was not intention of putting his Majesty to death I only did say that I desired them to do Justice and I hope what was done was their Act not mine and so I leave my self to your Lordships Court Silence commanded Mr. Sol. G. My Lords this Gentleman who is the prisoner at the Bar requires such an evidence of the Fact as may be evident he saith so evident as may be as clear as the Sun I think that evidence is not to seek but if he must never be convicted till he be so far convinced as to be speechless I believe we may stay long enough nevertheless if he be willing as he saith he is to pay his debts to political Justice we shall quickly give him the total sum That which he hath said hath been like a Lawyer the best that his Case will bear but withal it is a great aggravation to his Crime that he that knew the Law so well should so much transgress it He began Words do not make treason he mistakes his Charge is not for words Gentlemen his Charge is for compassing and imagining the Death of the King and the evidence of that Charge is meeting in that Assembly and the part that he bore in that Assembly And yet my Lords he will be much mistaken too under favour and with submission to your Lordships Judgement and those that hear him if they think that in all Cases it is a general rule that words are no Treason for when a man shall proceed to declare the imagination of his heart as to exhort and perswade men to effect that wicked thing The killing of the K. certainly there cannot be a greater overt act than these words nor a clearer evidence of such an imagination for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks My L. to say that the demanding of Justice is not Treason though injustice do follow is a very weak gloss upon a wicked action The Subject matter was a Charge of High Treason against the King the conclusion of the Charge was a Protestation by which he saved to himself a Liberty to put in a new Charge if that was not sufficient upon the whole he desires that the King as a Traytor may be brought to Justice Judge you now Gentlemen upon the nature of this demand whether this were such a demand of Justice as might end in acquital Whether he that presses that this Charge may be taken pro Confesso did mean that when the Court had recorded it they should acquit him when they had done My Lords to say there are four Actors in this Case the Witness or accuser the Judge the Jury and the Executioner and that he is none of them and therefore in this Case he cannot be a Traytor still my Lord that is to beg the question for if he be one of them that did Assemble in the place and were any instrument of that Assembly he hath thereby given an evidence of an Overtact of his wicked heart when all is done this poor gloss amounts but to this I am none of those four Ranks that is there were others worse than my self and therefore I am none at all My Lord the thing that he hath mainly insisted upon is the Act of Indempnity my Lord he doth observe that his name is excepted in that Act That he doth hope that it is so pen'd as by the favour of the Parl. It may reach his Case he hath argued very much upon it and he speaks as if he did believe it himself But surely there is no colour for that interpretation that he should step out of this proviso by the very Act of Indempnity that was made on purpose to bring him in by-Name the words are provided that this Act nor any thing therein contained shall extend to Pardon or give any benefit to John Cook c. All which persons for their execrable Treasons in Sentencing to Death or signing the Instrument for the horrid Murder or being instrumental in taking away the precious Life of our late Sovereign Lord King Charles the First of glorious Memory are left to be proceeded against as Traytors c. First my Lord this general and clear answer I conceive is to be given that the Prisoner at the Bar being by Name excepted out of the Act of Indemnity by the proviso mentioned in it although the subsequent lines that follow be the reasons why the Parlim do except yet if he be within the very words of the Exception whether he be in the reasons that moved them to that exception is not material if he could distinguish that he was not instrumental in that sense to which he labours to restrain this Proviso he can but say this the Parliament was mistaken in their reason but not in their conclusion but he is directly within the exception and the reason of it too for the word instrumental goes as far as far can be and he is properly literally in the strict notion of the word an instrument of the death of the King The King could never have been brought to death if not to the Bar never had been sentenced if he had not been impeached that impeachment could never have been taken pro Confesso nor the impeachment it self delivered if he had not delivered the one and pressed the other He that brought the Axe from the Tower was not more instrumental than he and besides a Lawyer as he of great understanding and of good parts he knows very well there are no accessaries in Treason but he that Acts any part in so wicked a Conspiracy let him begin at what end he will he stands responsible for the utmost consequence of it and in effect the very penning of this proviso is an express Judgement of Parliament that he was instrumental but that is not to be pressed The next thing he doth insist upon is the Declaration of his Majesty that he sent from Breda which he saith he laid hold upon here lies the weight of his answer The King writes his Letter to the Parliament now sitting that he doth purpose for the quieting of the hearts of men that may be in doubt to pardon all persons all crimes of what nature soever either against himself or Royal Father excepting those which shall be byAct of Parliament excepted and my Lord he doth say and modestly presses that he doth conceive the meaning of that is to pardon all persons what
crimes soever they have committed Except such as by a Free Parliament shall be excepted a legal Parliament called by the Writ of the King which this Parliament is not To that I give these answers First my Lord I do say that this letter of our gracious Soveraign from Breda in it self undoubtedly is no Pardon in Law for Treason that cannot be without the Broad Seal Next a Pardon under the Great Seal in such a form of words as this is would not be a Pardon for Treason for that must not be pardoned by implication but by positive words so in the Case of Sir Walter Raleigh a Commission directed to our well be loved Subject would not pardon the Treason of which he was condemned In the next place this Letter at the most is but a pardon in honour which must always be taken according to the meaning And that the Kings Honour may for ever be sacred I say this Letter doth no way help the Prisoner at the Bar. First it is plain by the very Superscription of this Letter 〈◊〉 which the Declaration was inclosed that it is directed to the Speaker of Our House of Commons in Parliament assembled which cannot possibly be expounded of any other Parliament than that which was then sitting to whose Speaker it was written Secondly the Letter it self says we have left it to you to provide for security and Indempnity and again if there be a â—â—ying sin for which the Nation may be involved in infamy 〈◊〉 cannot doubt but you will be as solicitous to vindicate as we can be And then in this very letter encloseth that declaration upon the penning of which the prisoner so much relies Now lay all together and it is clear the Parliament meant by the Declaration must be the same Parliament which was meant by the Letter and that was this very Parliament whom the King intended to trust both with Indempnity and with the vindication of his Fathers death and to be the dispensers both of mercy and Justice in this particular Another thing is this This very Parliament as the Prisoner observes they did go to the King according to His gracious letter and in the behalf of all the good people of England they did lay hold of the Kings mercy in His letter and Declaration and prayed that this claim by their Speaker in the behalf of all the rest of the Commons of England might be effectual to all purposes and for all persons other than those that should be by themselves afterward excepted according to their requests His Majesty accepts their Petition and makes Proclamation that his Pardon should extend to all but such as they should except what can be more clear and evident than that this is the Parliament which the K. did mean to be the very Parliament to which the Letter should have reference till the Act of Oblivion was passed again the late transactions of these twelve years past had involved so many persons that we could scarce find a man his he had need of mercy nay this very Parliament to which the Letter was written had need of Indempnity and it is probable in the nature of the thing or can it be understood by any man that the King writing to this Parliament and offering them pardon and Indempnity should mean such a pardon and Indempnity as future Parliament to be called by his own Writ should be willing to afford them Whose hearts would have been satisfied with so contingent a security My Lords upon the whole matter by what the King hath said in this Letter and by what the Parlim hath done in pursuance thereof and by what the King hath proclaimed it is to my understanding as clear as the noon day that the honour of the King is not concerned at all in the exemption of the prisoner at the Bar and for the Cases of my Lord of Essex and Southampton which he hath cited they make against him they were condemned because they endeavoured to imprison the Queen and to remove her Councellours of which very fact the Prisoner is in Law guilty too and then the case of King Philip the Husband of Queen Mary makes nothing for him neither unless he will speak out and tell us plainly that because by a former violence the King was made a prisoner he became but like a titular King as King Philip. In the next place he saith my Case is out of the Law I acted as a Councellour in my own particular for my Fee it was avaritia but not malitia nor falso malitiose or Proditorie But he must know that no man hath or can have a lawful calling to pursue the life of his King and the Law implies malice for malitiose and proditorie are not only words of course but of truth too in this case else it were as much as to say that no Councel can be guilty of High Treason than which nothing can be more absurd My Lord for that which he said last for I must omit some things and give him leave to take the advantage of it to stand upon it that the place was a Court such a one it was that he was not answerable for the constitution of it if it were not in a legal sense it was such an order as might bear him out that is with modesty and good manners to justifie High Treason it is not with such insolency as some others before him did it but it amounts to that That an order of a few persons that first made themselves a Parliament and then made a Court of Justice had Officers and met together and perfected so great a Treason I say that this Order to bear him out is impossible He that is a Lawyer he must accompt to the Laws for what he hath done if the authority were not lawful he cannot but know that this which he calls the Parliam was so far from a legal Authority that it was one part of the Treason that he did assist such an Assembly Gentlemen of the Jury this is your own Case here is a charge that is exhibited by the prisoner at the Bar as he saith in the name of all the people of England Look to it for you are some of them if you own it then it may be true what he hath said but I hope you meet here to tell this Nation and all the world that the people of England had no hand in that charge do but consider how that this prisoner at the Bar had hunted the life of the King how he did fish out and examine evidence whether the King set up his Standard at Nottingham was at such a place and such a place to what end is all this but with design of blood Were these things to be produced against the King and then Judgement to be demanded that he may be saved Is it not plainly proved to you by Witnesses how he did exhibit the Charge press it aggravate it desired it might be taken pro
begin with that first we are upon our Oaths the Witnesses that are against you I took notice of them you have had a great deal of Liberty which you have made use of civilly but Sir for the fact I think it is a great deal more full than as you have answered First The first witness produced against you was Mr. Nutley I shall speak only the material parts that concern your Charge He swears expresly that he saw Price a Scrivener writing a Charge in the Court of Wards that he saw his Charge in your hands He saw afterwards when the King of blessed memory was brought as a Prisoner that there you delivered the Charge in there is more than words you delivered that Charge in that alone is an overt act then if ther were nothing else in that Case that a man in a paper should call the King Traytor Tyrant Murtherer and implacable enemy as there the words are and he deliver this paper and this be read if this be not an overt act of imagining and compassing the Kings death I do not know what an overt act is and he gives further evidence if I mistake take free liberty to interrupt me Cook Sir they were not my words but their words that commanded me Lo. Chief Baron This I say that this very thing alone such a paper approved by you delivering this paper to an Assembly requiring it may be read this is an overt act to prove the imagination of your heart for the Death of the King the reason is if the King should be a Tyrant a Traytor c. it stirs up hatred in the people and the consequences of that hatred is the death of the Prince The next thing that Mr. Nutley said was this He said that you demanded positively Judgement against him against the blessed King then Prisoner at the Bar. I remember you said that you did demand Judgement but that you did not demand Judgement against the King take it so whether you did or not though you shall find in some other Witnesses that I shall repeat that you said Judgement against the King the consequence will be the same who could you demand Judgement against but the King he was the Prisoner because he did demand a further hearing by the Parliament you urged that his Charge might be taken pro Confesso then it must needs be Judgement against the K. it is effectively and implicitely the same He went further and that was that being your friend acquaintance acknowledging your parts as a Lawyer which truly I do very much know my self and do know this Gentleman to be a man of very great parts in his profession he had familiar acquaintaince with you he told you what a base business it was and you did your self acknowledge it said the Prisoner to M. Nutley himself it is a base business but they put it upon me He did discourse further to him of the Oaths of Allegiance Supremacy which he knew very well no man better this Gentleman he very ingenuously confessed it saying I confess it is so they put me upon it I cannot avoid it but then excuses it I am the servant of the people Afterwards he pressed the K. to answer positively whether guilty or not guilty the pressing of the K. to answer what was it in effect but to hasten Judgement and that was to hasten his death so that that is the substance of Mr. Nutley's testimony that he pressed Judgment Judgement was demanded by the Prisoner now at the Bar it is not only demanded but pressed and all the current of the witnesses at several days are to this purpose it is true that I may repeat the whole for you and against you that this Gentleman the Prisoner at the Bar when Mr. Nutley did urge this to him said he hoped they did not intend to take away the Kings life I verily believe they do not intend to take away the Kings life I hope they do not But Mr. Cook it is no excuse to say you hope or you believe they will not c. How far it may be in such a crime something in extenuation in foro Coeli but not in foro Civili you opened it your self that if a man should go about to take the K. Prisoner it is Treason the Law adjudged that to be Treason when you knew they would condemn him as a Tyrant Murtherer c. you must easily believe what would follow such a condemnation Truly death that is no colour of excuse in foro Civili Farrington swears to the same purpose that he saw you having a Parchment in your hands delivering it in prayed it might be read as a Charge of the People you did not speak I deliver this in as from those that deliver'd it to me that was not in the paper that you said of your self My brethren will tell you all this is an apparent point of the imagination of your heart at that time he swears the same thing that you did desire it might be taken pro Confesso Master Bodurdo is the third he swears the same thing too that you exhibited a charge of High Treason against the Prisoner then at the Bar tells you the substance of it he saith that all but the first day you demanded Judgement for not pleading to the Charge he adds that you complained of the delaies I am sure that was not dictated to you that could not be thought that you should desire Judgement for the Prisoner It is very true which you say for your self in that that you did not demand it first till it was demanded by the Court Master Bodurdo tells you and so it was granted the first day that Bradshaw onely said it but afterwards that you alwaies demanded it The next was Master Herne he swears the same words again that you did in the Name of the Commons assembled in Parliament and the People of England exhibit a Charge c. These are your own words if you did exhibit a Charge against the King to exhibit a Charge of High Treason the very thing followed If it were so there was death so certainly there cannot be a greater expression of the imagination of a mans heart than that is it is true you asked then a question and that was whether that that you concluded was not that you desired them to proceed according to Justice it is true the words of the Charge are so but before you come to conclusion you charge him as a Traytor Tyrant c. Communis Hostis after you had given that Charge you demanded Justice those that spit in his face they demanded Justice every one knew what belonged to that Justice Then Baker he swears positively that you did exhibit the Charge in this manner he said this that you said you had exhibited a Charge of High Treason c. and that the King sought delays there is your insisting upon it he sayes further that you said these words
that you did desire Judgement should be given against him and not so much you as the blood that had been shed that cryed for Judgement truly whether that was a Judgement that you intended for acquital that must be left to the Jury You asked because I will repeat it in order as my memory will give me leave whether there was any other words in the charge than was in the Proclamation Mr. Cook Whether there was any other words or no that differed in the Proclamation as it was a great sin and foul fact in the Proclamation so it was as foul in the Charge Master Masterson swears the same too he heard you say the second day you had delivered a charge the day before against the King and that he had delayed his answer you desired he might plead guilty or not guilty the last day that you did in the names of the Commons Assembled in Parliament and the people of England demand Judgement against the King and then another swears those words Judgement against the Prisoner at the Bar which was the King Burden swears you examined him as a Witness against the King in what place he was with the King It seems he was in the King's Army he swears you gave him an Oath it is testimony fit to be believed but however if you did not give the Oath by what you say your self you may be by and asked him the question Master Starkey he tells you that during the Tryal and before the Sentence that you being an old acquaintance of his in Grayes-Inn speaking with him he spake like a friend to you I hear you are up to the ears in this business and whereas you talk of the people there is a thousand for one against it that you should tell him again You will see strange things but you must wait upon God these words of waiting upon God are words of that nature people do use them now adaies when they would do some horrid impiety which hath been the sin of too many it is but a canting language that is the best term I can give it you told him then He must die this was before the Sentence that is to be observed Gentlemen of the Jury you say you did not know of the Sentence you said He must die and Monarchy with him you must here know that some of those persons that sate upon him said the King was a gracious and wise King and as Mr. Cook did say and they were the best words they spoke and I think he thinks so in his conscience but in conclusion He must die and Monarchy must die with him others said they did not hate King Charles but they hated Monarchy and Government but Monarchy was the thing that they would behead I think I have done with the Evidence that was given against you the Indictment it self was read the Overt acts was the meeting propounding consulting about it It appears he was in the Chamber about the Charge that he did propound it he delivered the Charge it appears withal that he demanded Judgement he desired the King might answer or that it might be taken pro confesso these are overt acts to declare the imagination of his heart The answer of Mr. Cook I will repeat it as clearly as I can because nothing shall go to the extenuating of the fact but it shall be spoken Mr. Cook in your answer your defence that you make you set forth the heads of this Indictment and you set them forth very truly the heads are the aggravations of the Indictment the Indictment was the compassing and imagining the death of the King you said it was upon these grounds that you did propound abet and consult the death of the King that you with others did assume power and authority to kill the King that thereupon a person unknown in a Frock did accordingly kill the King You say to the first part if it did not appear that you did advise the death of the King that you were not guilty for that Sir as I told you before taking them either complexly or singly if any of the particulars reached to one of these acts it was enough but it reaches to all you required Judgement against the King as a Traytor and that with a reason and certainly death must follow you say you were appointed to give your advice you had a Proclamation first for Tryal of the King you had the Order of Jan. 10. whereby you were appointed to give your advice if it were so it will be no excuse at all the Proclama gives you no warrant at all he that obeys so wicked a Proclamation it will not save him it appears you were privy to this before the Proclamation if you were not at all when such a thing as this is such a Proclamation and Act and such a manner of Tryal as I believe though you have read very much you never heard of such a thing in our Law or foreign Nations That you thereupon should take upon you to be of Council against the King it aggravates the fact other men may be impudent ignorant but you that were a learned Lawyer your being of Council doth aggravate the thing You say Secondly by Law words will not amount to Treason for that I would not have that go for Law by no means though it be not your Case for you are not indicted for words but words are Treason and Indictments are often for it but the difference is this The Indictment is not for words but compassing and Imagining the death of the King words are evidences of the compassing imagining the Kings death It is the greatest evidence of the imagination of the heart Words do not make a Treason that is if it be by inference or consequence but reductively but if it be immediately I shall say to a man go kill the King by theat which is an absolute immediate necessary consequence to say this is not Treason I would not have that go for Law your Case is not for words but for delivering a Charge the ground that you speak of words may make a Heretick but not a Traytor it was a witty saying but you have no sufficient authority for it these are words put in writing we all know if a man put his words in writing if a man speak Treasonable words and put them in writing they have been several times adjudged Treason and so in my Lord Cook 's 3. Institutes the Case of Williams of the Temple there was a Book of Treason in his own Study of his making and he was indicted for it words put in writing is an express evidence of the imagination of the heart you say it was dictated to you but when words are written in a Charge and your name to it which I had almost forgotten that 's more than words the Witnesses swear the likeness of your hand they do but swear the likeness of your hand no man can swear
equitie of the Act. They had not all the Authority at that time they were a few of the people that did it they had some part of the Army with them the Lords were not dissolved then when they had adjourned some time they did sit afterwards so that all the particulars you alledge are against you The last thing was this you say that it having pleased God to restore the King Judgement should be given for example for terrour to others that this could not be drawn into example again why because by the blessing of God peace was restored no probability that if your life was spared that it would be drawn again into example this is the weakest thing you have urged you must know the reason there are two things there is the punishment and example punishment goes to the prisoner but example to the documents of all others God knows what such things may be in after ages if there should be impunity for them it would rather make men impudent and confident afterwards if you have any more to say I will hear you if not I must conclude to the Jury You hear the evidence is clear for compassing and imagining the Death of the King you have heard what he has said and what he hath done he has within and examined Witnesses against the King that he was by at the drawing of the charge where it was drawn you hear he exhibited this charge in the name of the Commons assembled in Parliament and the good people of England and what this charge is it is high Treason and other high misdemeanors you find that he does complain of delays dosagain and again speak of this Charge desire it may be taken pro confesso in the close of all it was not so much he as innocent blood that demanded Justice this was more than was dictated to him You have heard the Witnesses he was perswaded to forbear acknowledged the King to be a gracious and wise King The Oaths alledged against him and you have heard his excuse I have nothing to say more I shall be very willing to hear you further I have not absolutely directed the Jury Cook I do humbly acknowledge your patience in hearing me and that your Lordships have truly and justly stated both proofs and my answer If your Lordships are pleased to lay aside these Acts or Orders or Authority whereby I did at that time truly conscientiously act and did think that it would bear me out if you lay aside that and look upon it as so many men got together without authority and aswell those that were instrumental though not sentencers or signers and that clause in the Act I confess I humbly make bold to say I have not received satisfaction in my judgment those very words of not so much I as the innocent blood cries for justice were dictated to me there was nothing at all left to me because his Majesty did not plead there was no Tryal that which I did was according to the best though it may be according to the weakest part of my judgment I have no new matter L. Ch. Bar. You have said no new matter unless it be worse than before for now you warrant that Authority Cook Do not mistake me my Lord I mean so far as to excuse me in the point of High Treason L. C. B. We delivered our opinions as to that formerly we were of opinion that the acting by colour of that pretended authority was so far from any extenuation that it was an aggravation of the thing the meeting by that authoty was Treason and in them that acted under them and approving of it the making of that trayterous pretended Act making the Proclamation sitting upon it they were all so many Treasons That was the reason why that was urged against you assuming upon you the power that was you approving of their power by acting under them so that there is nothing more to be said Gentlemen of the Jury you have heard the indictment was for compassing and imagining the death of the King you have heard the several Overt acts repeated and whether these are guilty of Treason to deliver in a charge against the K. such a one as that was in these words as against a Traytor Tyrant Murderer and implacable enemy to the Commonwealth in these very words to desire Judgement against the Prisoner then the King at the Bar angry at delayes to desire that the Charge might be taken pro confesso to have it expresly again again to demand Judgement if these be not Overt acts of compassing and imagining the Death of the King that which hath been said by the Witnesses it must be left to you I think you need not go from the Bar. Jury went together Silence is commanded Clerk Are you agreed of your Verdict Jury Yes Clerk Who shall speak for you Jury The Fore-man Clerk John Cook hold up thy hand look upon the Prisoner at the Bar how say you is he guilty of the Treason in manner form as he stands indicted or not guilty Fore-man Guilty Clerk Look to him Keeper Clerk What Goods and Chattells Jury None that we know of The Tryal of Hugh Peters the same 13. of October and at the same Bar. Clerk of the Crown SET Hugh Peters to the Bar he was brought accordingly H. P. Hold up thy hand thou standest indicted c. If you will challenge any of the Jury you must challenge them when they come to the book before they are sworn L. Ch. Bar. Mr. Peters You may challenge to the number of 35 peremptiorily but beyond that you cannot without good cause shewn and you may have Pen Ink and Paper Peters My Lord I shall challenge none Jury sworn 12. Sir Jer. Whitch James Hally Christo Abdy Nich. Rainton Rich. Cheyney Jo. Smith Rich. Abell George Terry Charl. Pickern Jo. Nichol. Fran. Dorrington Anthony Hall Cler. Hugh Peters hold up thy hand Look on the Prisoner you that are sworn c. Sir Ed. Turner to the Jury You have often heard repeated to you that the substantial part of the charge is the compassing and imagining the death of the King and all the rest will be but evidence to prove that imagination against the Prisoner at the Bar whom we will prove to be a principal actor in this sad Tragedy and next to him whom God hath taken away and reserved to his own Judgment and we shall endeavour to prove That he was a chief Conspirator with Cromwell at serveral times and in several places and that it was designed by them We shall prove that he was the principal person to procure the Souldiery to cry out Justice Justice or assist or desire those for the taking away the life of the King He did make use of his profession wherein he should have been the Minister of peace to make himself a Trumpeter of war of Treason and Sedition in the Kingdom He preached many Sermons to the Souldiery in direct
terms for taking away the King comparing the K. to Barabbas He was instrumental when the Proclamation for the High Court of Justice as they called it was proclaimed directing where it should be proclaimed and in what place When the King was brought upon the stage that mock-work he was the person that stirred up the Souldiery below to cry for Justice we shall shew you as he preached at several times upon several occasions still he was in the Pulpit to promote this business the next day after he was brought to tryal he commends it you shall hear all out of the mouth of the Prisoner therefore I say no more call the witnesses Dr. William Young sworn Council Tell my Lords and Jury what the Prisoner at the Bar has declared to you concerning the contrivance of bringing the King to Tryal Dr. Young My L. and Gentlemen of the Jury It was near about and that the Prisoner may remember the moneth of July 1648. since we came first acquainted when he went over to Ireland it was about the Siege of Pembroke Castle but afterwards in the year 1649. we renewed our acquaintance he went over into Ireland with that Usurper the late Protector as he was called after the Town of Wexford was taken coming over he fell sick of the flux and said he received it by infection praying over Captain Horton Coming into Milford that Captain sends a summons to me to come on board that was to fetch this prisoner at the Bar who was sick I found him there groveling upon the deck and sick he was indeed with much difficulty we got him on shore within a very few dayes to the best of my remembrance five days I perfected his cure We became very familiar I observed in him that he had some secret thoughts that I could not well discover neither well understand whereupon I thought it might tend to my security that I should so much sympathize with him to get within him to know his intentions After some weeks for he continued with me ten weeks or near thereabouts some few days rather over than under we grew so familiar that at last I found he began to inlarge his heart to me Many times I should hear him rail most insufferably against the Blood Royal not only against our Martyred King but against his Royal off-spring still as we continued our acquaintance he became more and more open to me so we would sit up discoursing till about twelve or one of the clock at night very often about these unhappy wars late in England At last my Lord I found him that he began to tell me how he came into England and upon what account he came out of New England I shall desire that in regard his discourses were various that I may deliver them orderly they were delivered to me within the compass of ten weeks but the days and weeks I cannot remember First he told me discoursing of New England and the Clergy there and much of the Clergy here in England and of the business here of reformation he told me that for the driving on of this interest of this Reformation he was imployed out of New England for the stirring up of this war and driving of it on this I shall my Lord speak to in the first place and that upon the oath I have taken and secondly he was pleased at another time to acquaint me and that by way of complement complaining then against the Parliament saying that sometime after he was come into Engl. he was sent over into Ireland by the Parliament to receive further instructions to drive on the design to extirpate Monarchy saith he I did dispend a great deal of my own money yet never had that satisfaction from them which they promised me that was they promised me 2 or 3000 l. for my journey and yet they have given me no more but only a small pittance of land out of my Lord of Worcesters estate in Worcester-shire I have seen his letters directed to his kinsman here in London as I take it his name was Parker advising him for the settling of this land and selling it Thirdly my Lord I have observed that by way of vilification of the Monarchical Government I have found him jocundarily scoffing at it and would ordinarily quibble in this manner saying this Common-wealth will never be at peace till 150. be put down I asked him what this 150. was he told me three L's and afterwards interpreted the meaning to be the Lords the Levites and the Lawyers with that said I we shall be like Switzers Tinkers and Traytors Now my Lord we are come to the last particular we discoursing thus frequently and withal he was then a Colonel and had a Commission under that Usurper Oliver and brought over his Commission for raising of Souldiers to foment that War in Ireland that it was so I appeal to the dictates of his own Conscience and whether he did not press me very importunately to accept of a Commission of Major or a Captain he did issue forth two Commissions under his own hand one of them to bring over from Devon-shire two foot Companies unto Cork My Lord because we were militarily affected amongst the discourses of our unhappy wars I know not how it came from him it being near eleven years since and I have had many sufferings incumbent on me so that I may fail in some particulars but in general thus it was we were discoursing concerning our Martyr'd King as then we call'd him and of his Imprisonment in Holmeby-House which I wondered at thus we discourst he told me the story how they had used him at Holmeby and at last came up to this when he was taken away from Holmeby House the Parliament had then a design to have secured O. Cromwel and my self being then in London saith he we having intelligence of it escaped out of London and rode hard for it and as we rode to Ware we made a halt and advised how we should settle this Kingdome in peace and dispose of the King the result was this They should bring him to justice Try him for his life and cut off his Head whether this was the expression of Cromwel I cannot tell but to the utmost of my remembrance and I am mistaken if it was not the advice of Mr. Peters to Cromwel and I believe it because his former relations of his instructions out of Ireland did tend to that effect Mr. Soll. Gen. I will ask you this question we will not press you particularly upon your memory whether Cromwel or Peters said the words do you remember he confessed to you they were agreed upon that matter Young They did consult and agree upon it Peters My Lord I desire to speak a Word his voice being so low he was brought to the second Bar. I am the bolder to speak to your Lordships at this time a word and it is high time to satisfie my conscience if these things were true
keep up our Army seven years longer we need not care for the King and all his posterity Peters My Lord I must deny abundance of this the King commanded me to ride before him that the Bishop of London might come to him L. Ch. B. But this was three weeks after The next witness against you is one Proctor he saith that day as the other witness did he saw you riding just before the Kings Coach and because he did his duty the Souldiers threw him horse and all into a ditch The next witness is one Hardwick he saith that when the Proclamation was read he saw you in Westminster-Hall and that you said they had done as good as nothing unless it was proclaimed in Cheapside and at the old Exchange this you said to some of the Officers there Peters My Lord I cannot acknowledge it L. Ch. Bar. The next witness against you is Simson he swears he saw you in consultation with Oliver Cromwel and take Sir William Brereton by the hand and come to Bradshaws and this during the time of the Kings Tryal he saith further that one day when the King was at his Tryal you commanded Colonel Stubbers to bid his Souldiers cry out Justice Justice which they cryed and afterwards some of the Souldiers spit upon the King Peters I do believe that he that swore that cannot say I was there L. Ch. Bar. Another witness is one Richardson who saw you the first day in the Court and he said further that you commended Bradshaw and another to wit Cook for their carriage in the tryal of the King That you held up your hands and said this is a most glorious beginning of the work Peters Whereabouts in the Court Richards In the body of the Court called then the High Court of Justice Peters My Lord I do not know that ever I was in the body of the Court. L. Ch. Bar. The next witness is Sir Jeremy Whitchcot he saith he heard you often speak scurrilously of the King and making a Narrative of Cromwels escape you said there was a meeting and there we resolved to set aside the King remember what the other witness said we agreed and here we resolved you said I cannot but reverence the High Court of Justice it doth resemble the judging of the world at the last day by the Saints so it was the Saints that sate there I would have preached before the wretch but the poor wretch would not hear me you often call'd him Tyrant I cannot possibly remember the place things or words that are alledged Then you have another witness Nonnelly he saith he came with a warrant to Oliver Cromwel for some money and that he should say go and see the beheading of the King at Whitehall he saith there he met with you though you said you were not there that day going to the Banquetting house that you spoke to Tench and whispered in his ear and that Tench went and knockt Staples on the Scaffold he meeting Tench said what are you a Hangman saith Tench this day will be a happy day he saith after all this Hugh Peters was upon the Scaffold and that he went out with the Hangman Peters I do profess to your Lordships before Angels and men that I did not stir out of my Chamber that day L. Ch. B. The Council doth not put relyance upon that because of what your witness saith though his evidence is not at all satisfactory The next is Clough and he swears this that he saw you in the Painted Chamber with the Council of Officers and there you desired them to call on God for a blessing upon their business and there you said O Lord what a mercy it is to see this great City fall down before us and what a stir is there to bring this great man to tryal without whose blood he will turn us all into blood if he reign again and this was about a month before the King was murthered L. Ch. Bar. You hear it Mr. Peters Peters Some part I did but it is impossible for me to bear down many witnesses indeed my Lord I say this they are marvellous uncharitable and speak many false things L. Ch. Bar. The next is this the testimony concerning several Sermons of yours and let me tell you the Pulpit ought not to be a place where men with impunity may speak any thing what they list of Sedition and Treason Peters I am of the same judgement my self my Lord. L. Ch. Bar. And there was a solemn day to seek God then you preached at St. Margarets Church this was Mr. Bever in he came and heard you talk much of Barab and our Saviour there you fell upon this speaking of the K. it is a sad thing that it should now be a question whether we should crucifie our Saviour Jesus Christ or that great Barabbas speaking of the King you call'd him Traytor Tyrant Murtherer of his subjects and the like you went on in a way of a story these Citizens for a little Trading they will have Christ crucified and the great Barabbas at Windsor released and said you the Clergy the Assembly they are all for crucifying Christ and releasing Barabbas you made that expression O Jesus what shall we do the King was a Prisoner then at Windsor you made your application to the Parliament that was then present you told them the people did expect Justice from them you must not prefer the great Tyrant and Traytor naming the King to these poor hearts the Redcoats standing by Peters I must profess against most of that Lord Chief Baron There is the same by others It is further proved by the Order that you were appointed to preach Peters I do not deny I preached but not these things Lord Chief Bar. The next thing is this there was one Mr. Chase this was during the tryal he saith you preached at Whitehall upon this Text the 149. Psalm to bind their Kings in chains and their Nobles in fetters of iron you had two or three other verses more then you made a discourse of a Major and a Bishops man the Bishops man being drunk the Major committed him to prison the Bishop being angry asked by what authority the Major said there was an Act of Parliament for it he did not find that either the Bishop or his man was excepted you applyed that to the King said you I will shew you an act of the Bible Whosoever sheds mans blood by man shall his blood be shed this doth not except the King Prince Prince Rupert Prince Maurice or any of that rabble Peters It is false Lord Chief Baron You said further This is the day that I and many other Saints of God have prayed for these many years and Oliver Cromwel laughed at that time The next witness was Tongue he heard you preach and he swears the same with the former that you applauded the souldiers and that you hoped to see such another day following as the day before and
of Injustice that was Erected for Tryal of the late King it had all the formalities of a Court to put in Execution that bloody Act they had their President their Council their Chaplain and their Guards some of their Judges have been already Tryed one of their Council and their Chaplain Now my Lord we come to the Guards and this Gentleman at the Bar that is now the Prisoner He was Commander of that Black Guard that cruel and bloody Guard The Indictment is That he did Imagin and compass the Death of the King there be several overt acts that are mentioned in the Indictment as Evidences of that Imagination as the consultation to bring him to Tryal the Actual bringing him to Tryal and the Bloody Execution upon the Scaffold Our Evidence shall be this That during the time of the Tryal the Prisoner at the Bar did Command the Souldiers in Westminster-Hall himself did keep the Entrance into the Court and when Bradshaw did speak to the King and told him he trifled away time and required his answer to the charge exhibited in the Name of the Commons of England Assembled in Parliament and the good People of England that a Noble person in the Gallery there cryed out it was a Lye saying that above half the Commons disowned it saying where are these good people it is a lye Oliver Cromwel is a Traytor this bloodly Fellow commanded the Souldiers to shoot her he did several times command and encourage the Souldiers to cry out Justice justice and the last day of that horrid Tryal called by them the day of Judgement he likewise commanded them to cry out Execution Execution and when some of them would not do it he had the Valour to Beat them My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury if we prove any of these particulars to demonstrate unto you that he was Guilty of compassing and imagining the King's Death it is equal as if we had proved he did Actually cut off the King's head Mr. Bodurdoe Mr. Nutly Mr. Harrington Sir Purback Temple Mr. Sympson Mr. Baker Mr. Huncks and Mr. Jeoner Sworn Coun. Mr. Symp. tell my Lords and the Jury who had the command of the Souldiers during the Tryal of the King in Westminster-Hall Sym. My Lords as I said before in the Case of Mr. Peters Col. Stubberd and Col. Axtel had the command of the Souldiers below Stairs near that which was called the High Court of Justice Axtell I desire to know his Name my Lord Sym. My Name is Holland Sympson Coun. Did you see him there commanding the Souldiers Sym. There was a kind of a Hubbub in the Court there was a Lady they said it was the Lady Fairfax who at the Exhibiting of the Charge against the King said to be in the Name of the Commons and people of England She spoke out aloud and said it was a lye that not half not a quarter of the people Oliver Comwell is a Rogue and a Traytor they called for a Guard this Gentleman he was called and brought up some Musqueteers and commanded his Souldiers to Present and give Fire against the Lady and commanded her to Unmask Axtell What Lady was it I desire to know Sim. She went by the name of the Lady Fairfax I know not whether it was so or no it was the common report it was she Cl. Mr. H. pray tell my Lord what you know of the Prisoner at the Bar. Huncks My Lord to say positively any thing of the man touching his command I cannot but only that morning the King Dyed he came into the Door of the Room where Colonel Phayre Colonel Hacker Cromwell and my self were Ireton and Harrison lying in bed together in the same Room and then he stood at the Door half in and half out I refusing to Sign an Order for Executing the King as Cromwell ordered me and some little cross Language having passed saith the Prisoner at the Bar Colonel Huncks Iam ashamed of you the Ship is now coming into the Harbour and will you strike Sayle before we come to Anchor This I appeal to your self but for crying out Knock them down Shoot them I know not who it was the Officers cryed Justice and some of the Souldiers but I profess I know not who it was particularly but they cryed Justice and then I fell a trembling for I was afraid of the King but these were the words he used to me will you strike sayle c. Axtell My Lord I desire to ask him a question L. Ch. Bar. Ask him what you will Axtell If I am not in the right I hope your Lordships will direct me L. Ch. Bar. Go on Axtell Col. Huncks where was it Huncks In a little Room in White hall where Ireton and Harrison lay in bed together Axtell Do you know whereabouts Huncks I think I can go to the Room I appeal to your own conscience before all this people Axtell By your favour Sir the Room I perceive you know not and truly Sir My Lord if you please to give me leave because he appeals to my conscience I do appeal to the Great God before whom it may be I may be Arraigned to give an account of all my Words thoughts and Actions I do not remember that ever I had any converse with this man there or met him there or any of that company there that day he was a stranger to me but I wish that you to save your self being in the Warrant for Execution do not make others a Peace-Offiring to save your self the Lord that knows my heart I appeal to him I appeal to your own conscience because you appeal to my conscience I never met you nor saw you there Huncks Have you done then give me leave you say you do not know me I appeal to the same God when Cromwell took upon him to have the Crown have not I said What have you got by being Jehu-like Lord strike me dead here if it be not true Axtell I will not reflect upon him but because he hath appealed to my conscience therefore I speak it it is known Notoriously how Jehu-like you were when you were one of the chief Guards of his Majesty one of the Fourty Halberteers that did oppose every person then for the King had I had time and had not been a close Prisoner as I was there were Witnesses enough Council This after our Evidence is more proper Huncks Spare me not Col. Axtell L. Ch. Bar. Take the Old and Antient course let the Witnesses that are produced for the King be all heard then give your answer to all of them together Axtell My Memory is not very good L. Ch. Bar. You have Pen Ink and Paper L. Ch. Bar. Mr. Axtell is this all that you desire to speak to Col. Huncks Axtell Yes my Lord. L. Ch. Bar. Have you any other Questions Council My Lord we have a few words he Objects as if Col. Huncks were under a danger he is pardoned Axtell I desire to ask
him upon what account these words were spoke Huncks My Lord it was this Cromwell having a Commission which I think I heard read here Colonel Hacker was reading of it My Lord Cromwell he comes to me and by Vertue of that Commission he would have me to write a Warrant for Executing the King I refusing to write that Warrant upon this which he speaks of that standing at the Door if God bless me I will search all the Doors at Whitehall but I will find it out I not doing it I said why should it be offered to me sayes Cromwell thou art a peevish Fellow Cromwell fell a writing assoon as ever he had done that writing he gave Hacker the pen what Hacker writes I know not and upon my refusing this prisoner at the Bar said Col. Huncks I am now ashamed of you The Ship is now coming into the Harbour and will you now strike Sayle before you cast Anchor Council You observe the course of this evidence there was a Warrant or Commission directed to three persons Hacker Huncks and Phaire for Execution of the King Cromwell demanded of this Gentleman Col. Huncks that he should sign a Warrant by Vertue of that other Warrant and this Gentleman refusing it the Prisoner objects this that he to save himself doth witness this against the Prisoner Gentlemen he did refuse the thing have you any thing to ask Col. Huncks Axtell He says Col. Phaire and Hacker were there I do not doubt but they will be so conscientious to vindicate me from all this Charge L. Ch. Bar. If it be any thing that tends to your defence that you will be heard afterwards but have you any Questions to ask Col. Huncks Axtell No more I know nothing of it if I were to dye at this Bar presently Council Sir Purback Temple pray tell my Lords and the Jury your knowledge of the carriage of this Gentleman touching the Tryal of his Late Majesty Sir P. Tem. My Lord being present and engaged by some persons of Honour Servants of his late Majesty to be present when that horrid Murther was acting before this Court of Justice as they called it I was present at all the Tryals of the King and very near him I heard the King demand from Bradshaw by what Authority and Commission they proceeded thus strangely to Try him Then I heard the Lady Fairfax and one Mrs. Nelson my Sister after the exhibiting of the charge in the Name of the Commons Assembled in Parliament and the good people of this Kingdom against Charles Stuart King of England I say I heard the said Lady cry out from a Gallery over the Court Not half the people it is false where are they or their Consents Oliver Cromwell is a Traitor Upon which I heard the Prisoner at the Bar cry out Down with the Whores shoot them which made me take the further notice of him seeing him in Westminster-Hall commanding the Souldiers there I saw him the most activest person there and during the time that the King was urging to be heard he was then laughing entertaining his Souldiers scoffing aloud whilst some of the Souldiers by his suffering and I believe procurement did fire powder in the palms of their hands that they did not onely offend his Majesties smell but enforced him to rise up out of his Chair and with his hand to turn away the smoke and after this he turned about to the people and smiled upon them and those Souldiers that so rudely treated him Then turning himself to Bradshaw said to him and the Court There are some sitting here fixing his Eyes upon some persons near Bradshaw that well knew that if I would have Forfeited or Betrayed the Liberties and Rights of the People I need not have come hither or words to this effect But their Liberties and Rights are dearer and nearer to me than my three Kingdoms nay than my life it self Therefore I desire you to hear me and remember that I am your lawful King that have done you many Acts of Grace and Favour After which this person Mr. Axtell Prisoner at the Bar commanded his Souldiers to cry out Justice which the Souldiers not readily obeying of him I saw him beat four or five of them with his Cane until they cried out with himself Justice Justice Execution Execution which made me turn to a Noble Lord by whom I then stood and said Pray my Lord take notice there is not above 4 or 5 that cry out Justice Justice I heard also of their spitting in the Kings Face and I think no bodies sufferings have been so like those of our Saviour Christ Jesus as his Majesties were After this this persons crying Justice Justice Execution Execution a second time the Court proceeded to pass a Sentence the which his Majesty pressed hard against and told him Sir before you pass that ugly Sentence which I very well understand you are intended to do I desire you to hear me hear me hear me passionately and not affectionately expressing it which they denying the King and the notice of Justice Justice Execution Execution being repeated they proceeded and read that ugly Sentence of Death after which his Majesty was immediately hurried away from the Bar into a common Cedan where he was carried by two common Porters which Cedan I followed to the middle of King's Street where I saw the two Porters in reverence go bare till the Souldiers under the Command of the Prisoner at the Bar beat them and would not suffer them to go bare when they carried him After this the people cried out What do you carry the King in a common Cedan as they carry such as have the Plague God deliver your Majesty out of such Enemies hands In which Street I was forced to leave the sight of his Majesty occasioned by the injuries and hurts I received in my person from the Souldiers under Axtel's command they carrying him through the Streets shouting in triumph A short time after I received an importuate command from a Lady of great Honour a Servant of his Majesties that I would endeavour to find out where the body of the Martyr'd King was and to give her an account where it then was Applying my self to Whitehall after two or threescore Intreaties I was denyed but understanding that money would do it I gave the persons then under the command of Mr. Axtell that then kept it to shew it me half a piece who in a scoffing manner took me by the hand said If thou thinkest there is any sanctity or holiness in it look here where I saw the Head of that blessed martyr'd King lie in a Coffin with his Body which smiled as perfectly as if it had been alive this is the sad account of the martyr'd King and this sad horrid Prisoner Mr. Axtell Axtell My Lord may I ask that Gentleman some Questions L. ch Bar. Yes yes Axtell My Lord He seems to say that I bid the Souldiers cry out for Justice he doth
Whitehall there were some Cavaliers then in the Regiment it was my fortune I came into your Company I wish I never had you commanded more besides my self to be a Witness against the King and Justice Cook took my Examination you brought me in you commanded the Guards that time at Whitehall when the King was upon his Tryal Axtell What more Burden And you commanded Elisha Axtell with a file of Souldiers to take a Boat and go down to the common Hangman that liv'd beyond the Tower to execute the King he is now Shepards Serjeant in Ireland Axtell My Lord I desire to ask him a question he was pleased to say I desired him to be a Witness Bur. Yes Axtell Where was it Burden In the Court at Whitehall Axtell My Lord I have seen the printed List of Witnesses against the King and in that list you shall find no such Name Burden I have been a Prisoner in Dublin by your means Axtell My Lord I hope you will take notice of that Councel Burden do you remember any of his commands to Web to draw up in the Banqueting-house Bur. He commanded Web to draw up in the Banqueting-house during the time of Execution his own company I was one of his own company then Coun. In order to what Bur. For Execution Axtell My Lord is Web here Bur. He is in Dublin Axt. I wish he were here Edward Cook sworn Cook And it please your Honour my Lord the last day of the Tryal of his Majesty I came into Westminster-hall coming where the Court was I did see Col. Axtell the Prisoner at the Bar there with some Musquetiers Coun. What day was this Cook The last day of his Majesties Tryal L. ch Bar. Go on Sir Cook Standing there a little while his Majesty came guarded with some Halberteers when he came by the Souldiers that stood with Col. Axtell his Majesty bowed and afterwards put off his Hat and went up to the Court I could not know what Bradshaw said to him I stood below I heard him say he was brought by the consent of the Commons and people of England there stood a Lady above in a Gallery crying out it is a lye where are the people or their consents Cromwel is a Traytor whereupon Col. Axtell standing by saith he what Drab is that that disturbs the Court come down or I will fetch you down Mr. Nelson sworn Coun. Tell my Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury touching the Discourse between you and the Prisoner at the Bar in Dublin Nelson My Lords and Gentlemen of the Jury upon a Discourse with the prisoner at the Bar in Dublin 5 or 6 years since upon the platform in that Castle we discoursed of the late Kings having had several reports I desired to know of him who it was that Executed the King thinking he might inform me he was pleased to tell me this saith he the persons that were imployed in that service you know them as well as I do truly Sir not I said I I saw them in Vizards but not their Visage as I know of yes saith he you do know them it is true saith he my self and others were imployed in that affair in order to the Execution but there were several persons came and offered themselves out of a kind of Zeal to do the thing but we did not think it proper to imploy persons whom we did not know but we made choice of a couple of Stout persons pray let me hear their Names said I saith he it was Heulet and Walker I desired to know their reward Truly saith he I do not know whether 30 l. a piece or between them I said it was a small reward for a work of that Nature truly saith he that was all Axt. You named one man I did not hear the other named Nelson I named Heulet and Walker we was one that managed the Execution he told me so and it pleased you Sir Axtell He is pleased to say that in Ireland there was such conference was any body by Nelson No Sir Axt. Did I name any body to you Nel. You named those two persons Axt. Certainly I must invent them then for I had no more knowledg of them then any one here Nel. You told me you were one of them that had the managing of that Affair Councel My Lord we have done with our Evidence those particulars that were first opened to you have rendred the prisoner much a blacker person then we thought we leave him to his defence Axt. May it please your Lordships in the first place because I am ignorant in the Laws I desire to know upon what Statute this indictment is grounded L. ch B. It is grounded upon the statute of the 25th of Edward the Third Axt. My Lords I must acknowledg my ignorance of the Laws being a thing I never studied nor have the knowledg of but I have heard it is the duty of your Lordships and the Judges to be of Counsel for the Prisoner in things wherein he is ignorant in matters of law to make his just defence and therefore my Lord the Indictment it self being matter of law if your Lordships please not to grant me Counsel to speak to matrers of law I humbly pray that your Lordships will be pleased that for want of knowledg formalities punctilloes and niceties of the Law I might not undo my self I have heard by a learned Judg that though the Judg be of Counsel to the King yet by his Oath he is also to be Counsellor to the Prisoner and stands as a Mediator between the King and Prisoner and therefore my Lord I shall beg that humble favour that wherein I shall fall short to make the best improvement of my Plea in matter of law that your Lordships will help me and not take advantages against me as to the niceties formalities and punctilloes of the Law and my Lord this is a resemblance of that Great day where Christ will be Judg and will judg the secrets of all hearts and of all words and of all persons and by him all Actions are weighed knows all our hearts whether there be malice or how it stands in the frame of each heart before him in this place and therefore I hope there will be nothing by prejudging or any thing by precluding to be so black a person as it seemed to be said against me My Lords I must shorten the time and come to speak as to the Authority L. Ch. Bar. As to what Sir Axt. I speak as to the Authority by which or under which I acted I humbly conceive my Lord under favour that I am not within the compass of that Statute of the 25th of Edward the Third for that questionless must intend private persons Counselling Compassing or Imagining the death of the King But you know my Lords the War was first stated by the Lords and Commons the Parliament of England and by vertue of their Authority was forced to be raised and they pretended
by law that the right of the Militia was in them and your Lordships will remember in several Declarations and Acts that was mutually exchanged between his Majesty and Parliament and my Lord that was the Authority the Lords and Commons assembled in Parliament raised a Force and made the Earl of Essex Ceneral and after him the Earl of Manchester of the Eastern Association and after that Sir Tho. Fairfax Lord General of the Forces by this Authority I acted and this Authority I humbly conceive to be legal because this Parliament was called by the Kings Writ chosen by the People and passed a Bill they should not be dissolved without their own consents that the Parliament was in being when the Tryal was and a question whether yet legally Dissolved In the fourth place they were not only owned and obeyed at home but abroad to be the chief Authority of the Nation and also owned by Foreign States and Kingdoms sent Ambassadors to that purpose under them did all the Judges of the Land Act who ought to be the Eye of the Land and the very light of the People to Guide them in their right Actions and I remember the Judges upon Tryal I have read it of High Treason Judg Thorp Nicholas and Jermin have declared it publickly That it was a lawful justifiable thing by the Law of the Land to obey the Parliament of England My Lord it further appears as to their Authority over the People of this Nation petitioning them as the supreme and lawful Authority and My Lords as I have heard it hath been objected that the Houses of Lords and Commons could make no Act. Truly my Lord if you will not allow them to be Acts though they intitle them so call them so and obeyed as so by the Judges Ministers and Officers of State and by all other persons in the Nation yet I hope they cannot be denied to be Orders of Parliament and were they no more but Orders yet were they sufficient as I humbly couceive to bear out such as acted thereby And my Lord the Parliament thus constituted and having made their Generals he by their Authority did constitute and appoint me to be an Inferior Officer in the Army serving them in the quarters of the Parliament and under and within their power and what I have done my Lord it hath been done only as a Souldier deriving my power from the General he had his power from the Fountain to wit the Lords and Commons and my Lord this being done as hath been said by several that I was there and had command at Westminster-Hall truly my Lord if the Parliament command the General and the General the inferiour Officers I am bound by my Commission according to the Laws and Customs of War to be where the Regiment is I came not thither voluntarily but by command of the General who had a Commission as I said before from the Parliament I was no Counsellor no Contriver I was no Parliament-man none of the Judges none that Sentenced Signed none that had any hand in the Execution onely that which is charged is that I was an Officer in the Army if that be so great a crime I conceive I am no more guilty than the Earl of Essex Fairfax or the Lord of Manchester Judg Mallet You are not charged as you were an Officer of the Army Axtell My Lords That is the main thing they do insist upon my Lord I am no more guilty than his Excellency the Lord General Monck who Acted by the same Authority and all the People in the three Nations and my Lord I do humbly suppose if the Authority had been only an Authority in Fact and not Right yet those that Acted under them ought not to be questioned but if the Authority commanded whatsoever offence they committed especially that that guided me was no less than the declared Judgment of the Lords and Commons sitting in Parliament they declared that was their right as to the Militia and having explained several Statutes of Henry the 7th wherein the King having enterchanged Declarations with the Parliament the Parliament comes to make an Explanation on that Statute and my Lord it is in Folio 280. wherein they do positively expound it and declare it as their allowed Judgment To clear up all scruples to all that should take up Arms for them saith the Parliament there as to the Statute of 11. of Henry the 7th Chapter the first which is printed at large comes there to explain it in general and comes here Folio 281. and gives this Judgment It is not say they agreeable to Reason or Conscience that any ones duty should be known if the Judgment of the High Court of Parliament be not a Rule or Guide to them In the next place this is the next Guidance Rule and Judgment of Parliament upon the Exposition of this Statute and as they have said in several places was it not too much to take up your Lordships time they are the proper Judges and Expounders of the Laws The High Court of Parliament have taken upon them to expound the Law and said that we Lawyers will give the meaning of the Text contrary to what they have expounded the meaning under their hands in the same Declaration his Majesty is pleased to quit that Statute upon which I stand Indicted the 25th of Edward the Third where they do my Lord expound that very Statute in the Declaration made in 1643. Folio 722. I come to the declared Judgment wherein they did positively say that the persons that do Act under their Authority ought not to be questioned as persons Guilty Folio 727. that is the Exposition that the Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament doth make upon the statute Councel My Lord this is an Argumentation of Discourse in justification of his proceedings we desire to know what he will answer as to the Plea Axtell My Lords I have this further to say that if a House of Commons Assembled in Parliament may be Guilty of Treason for the truth is if I Acted Treason that Acted under the Authority of the Lords and Commons in Parliament and of the Commons in Parliament then doubtless they must begin the Treason if the House of Commons who are the collective body and Representation of the Nation all the people of England who chose them are guilty too and then where will there be a Jury to try this concerning the Commons alone I have been over ruled L. ch Bar. If you have any thing to say to the Lords and Commons answer to your charge your charge is nothing of the Lords and Commons but what you Acted when the house was broke and Forced Coun. You cannot but know that there is nothing charged against you for which you can so much as pretend an Authority of the Lords and Commons you know before you could do this Horrid Murther you were the persons that destroyed the Lords and Commons both indeed you Ravel in a
were the subsequent overtacts to prove the same Axtell I hope you will not think it much to give me some more freedom for my own defence for life My Lord I must needs say though there was a force on the Parliament I am not to justifie it I was no Lawyer no Statesman no Councellor but a Souldier and if the General who had a Commission from the Lords and Commons and that some years before and after the King's Death be not guilty of Treason what I did was by command from my General and though I am charged with being in Arms in Westminster-hall and at such and such a place yet it was not a Voluntary Act for I was bound to obey my General I do humbly pray that I may have your Lordships Judgment in this point I must say it was from the sense of their exposition of the Law and of the Statutes and from the Authority that every one took up Arms for and served them and obeyed either the one General or the other I say it was under this very Authority and this must needs acquit me from all the guilt that is laid upon me L. ch Bar. You put your self upon the Judgment of the Court upon this which you call a point in Law First it is manifest that there is no excuse at all for Treason no man by his Commission can warrant the doing of an Act which is Treason you must take notice of the Authority whether it be good or no your Commission was not to put the King to Death but on the contrary to preserve the Kings life The Lords and Commons what they did we do not meddle with the Reason and Ground of what they did was the preservation of the Kings Person as well as the maintenance of the Laws and Liberties of this Nation they made Protestations Declarations and Oaths for the preservation of the King's Person and you could not but take notice of those things Now whereas you go about to shroud your self under the Lord Fairfax he had no such Power and therefore you can challenge no more then he had and to what you say concerning the Judgment of the Parliament there will be a great deal of difference between a particular Case and a Declaration of Lords and Commons there is nothing you have said that hath any thing of Force and God forbid you should make use of it But I must tell you you could not but notoriously know all those Transactions that were in the Army what the Army had done that they came up with Swords in their Hands and turn'd out whom they would you saw what the Lords and Commons had done that the Treaty was ready for his Birth And then you come up with your Mermidons with Force and Arms and Exclude the greatest part of the Members and then the Lords were laid aside it is true the Lords were not wholly dissolved but they would not suffer them to Sit nor Act at all and this was apparent to the Nation If men under colour and pretence of such things Namely that a few persons for so they were but an Eighth part of the House of Commons permitted to remain and of that Eighth part which was but 46 in the whole there were but 26 that Voted that Act which you say you obeyed but you say you obeyed the General you were not to obey the General in this Case for the Facts that you have committed are not charged as Acts of War you are not charged for bringing the Souldiers in but for those Violent Actions that you were guilty of there you made the Souldiers cry out Justice Justice Execution Execution you sent officiously for a Hang-man to come down to you your Commission gave you no power for this the Death of the King you know how it was designed you know the Act for the bringing in of that Commission as they call'd it to sit in justice was after the House of Commons was reduced to a very small Number and some of those dissenting too what you did Act under that Authority if you can justifie it in the Name of God say so but do not Engage the Nation in those things which they abhorred and by the mercy of God are laid asleep Mr. Justice Foster You begin at the wrong End you ought as all men ought to do First to answer the matter of Fact and not to put in these long dilatory Pleas till you have answered the matter of Fact whether those things charged on you be true or not then if you have any thing further to say for your self by way of excuse it will be the time to speak and not before Axt. May it please your Lordships I humbly conceive I am upon that method to the first part of the witness they accuse me for commanding my Souldiers in Westminster-hall then I must prove my Authority which I have been about to do and declared the Judgment of Parliament L. ch B. The Court have heard you with a great deal of patience and that which is not at all to the business Axtell I only refer this as to the Authority I humbly conceive you will give me leave to insist upon this and how far I may improve it for my own defence here is the Commission by which my Lord Fairfax acted and that after the King's Death and I acted by the same Authority he did I had not been at Westminster-hall but on the command of the General Court Doth that Commission Authorize you to cry Justice Justice and to look up and down to get Witnesses against the King is that in your Commission Axt. I am to serve and obey all my Superior Officers that is my Commission if I do not I die by the Law of War Court You are to obey them in their just commands all unjust commands are invalid If our Superiors should command us to undue and irregular things much more if to the committing of Treason we are in each Case to make use of our passive not active Obedience Axt. Under Favour it is not proved that I did either Compass or Imagine the King's Death that is matter of Fact Court Let us try that Axt. My Lord I did nothing but as a meer Souldier I had Authority from the General I would leave this before your Lordships and the Jury that what I have done hath been by Authority of the Genetal L. Hollis Sir a word to you If you could satisfie the Court that you had received a Commission from the General to do those things with which you stand charged it were something then were it proper for you to plead it and the Court to judg Pray take this along with you the General gave you no such command what you are charged with in the Indictment is for Compassing and Imagining the Death of the King and that by such and such overt acts as making your Souldiers cry out Justice and Execution for being active and forward in sending for the
Executioner and such other Acts prove these are in your Commission and you say something I am sure you cannot be ignorant that That very Authority that you do now urge to give life and power to your Actions that you destroyed it laid it in the dust acted contrary to it several ways when the Parliament protested against fetching the King from Holmby as they did when they went on proceeding in the way of peace then came you up to the Bar I think you your self and charged some of the Members first 11 as rotten Members and these Men were forced away this you know your General had no Commission to do and this you know was a Violation of that Power that gave our General the Commission After that when the Treaty was brought on in the Isle of Wight when there was great hopes of peace then you knew the King was hurried thence by Force which the Parliament protested against After that when both the House of Commons and Lords came to consider of one particular that passed they resolved that it was sufficient ground to proceed on for the settlement of peace then did you fall upon these Houses and tear them in pieces and throwing out above 200 suffering only about 40 to remain and they were glad to send for one Member out of Prison to make up a House That which you say of the Supreme Authority and that by Vertue of which you did Act it shews that you did not at all go by any Authority but you followed your own Lusts and therefore do not few these Fig-leaves together which will stand you in no stead if you would apply your self to answer that which you were charged with it were something Axt. I do desire to have no more interruptions then is me◠〈◊〉 making my own Defence My Lord here are many things by way of motive urged to the Jury which is not within the Charge I desire I may have that fair play that nothing may be urg'd but what is in the charge L. Ch. Bar. You give the occasion Mr. Axtell keep to the matter and you shall not be interrupted Lord Hollis I shall be very sorry to urge any thing against you which doth not necessarily follow for what you say touching your Authority I shall shew you have no Authority Axtell My Lord I have the same Commission as the General what I did was not of mine own head I had a Command As for all that hath been charged against me I shall say this I was none of the Court I did not fetch the King from the Isle of Wight nor advised compassed or imagined his Death or sentenced him to Death or signed the Warrant for his Execution or Executed Him I am none of them My Lords and therefore whoever did make any breach upon the House of Commons they were Grandees persons of a greater Quality I was an inferior Officer I was never at the House Bar but upon presenting one Petition to the Parliament from the Army I shall now come to speak to the Evidence which hath been given particularly against me and the first my Lord is Mr. Simpson he saith I had the Commands of the Guards at Westminster-Hall My Lords I have told you already shewn you by what Authority I came thither and that I ought not to refuse if I had according to the laws of War I must have suffer'd death and that is all as to Mr. Sympson only that a Lady he knows not who spake something there L. Ch. Bar. He saith he heard you bid the Souldiers give fire against the Lady Axt. My Lord I must say if there was any Lady that did speak who she was I know no more than the least child here but my Lord to silence a Lady I suppose is no Treason If a Lady will talk impertinently it is no Treason to bid her hold her tongue L. Ch. Bar. A Lady was speaking pertinently enough when she heard Bradshaw say to the King such a Charge is exhibited a charge of High Treason against Him in the Name of the Commons assembled in Parliament and the good People of England she said That was a lye not half nor a quarter of the people of England That Oliver Cromwel was a Traytor Then you took upon you to command Souldiers to fire at her and accordingly they levelled the muzles of their Musquets towards her Axtell My Lord as to that particular concerning Oliver Cromwell or any other words concerning the Court I understand them not but if any interruption was made to preserve the peace to desire a Woman to hold her tongue is no Treason To the next particular wherein Col. Huncks saith at a door at a certain lodging where Ireton and Harrison were in Bed together he saith that upon his refusal to sign the Warrant for executing the King I said to him Col. Huncks I am ashamed of you the Ship is now coming into Harbour and will you strike Sayle before we come to Anchor truly my Lord I think all that amounts to nothing if it were so which I deny it for to bring the Ship into Harbor what is that there is no person named Fact named nor Design named and I appeal to my conscience I remember not the time place person or words and I can call for Col. Phayre and Col. Hacker who were there for I desire things may appear right I desire they two persons may be called for their Evidence in that point L. ch Bar. They both are in the same condition Col. Hacker in the prison behind you Col. Phayre in the Tower Mr. Axtell you know the strength of one Affirmative witness I saw such a man and heard such a man say c. is more then if twenty should witness they stood by but did not see him or hear him speak Axt. My Lord he saith only this I saw you at the door going unto Ireton's chamber and said will you strike Sayl c. Truly my Lord he doth not say what or how or any thing I meant there must be according to Sir Edward Cook 's 7th Book of his Institutes that Oracle of the Law he saith That Evidence ought to he as clear as the Sun at noon day All that you can say is this it must be a wide Inference a large Inference I conceive there is nothing in these two witnesses and if the two Prisoners were here they would clear me in this L. ch Bar. If by Law you could have had them you should but I fear if they could be admitted they would not be to your advantage Axtell Then my Lord in the next place Col. Temple is pleased to say that the Lady Fairfax saying something against the Court which in truth as I said before I know not who it was or what the words were he saith I bid Fire against them I did nothing but what I was commanded upon pain of Death to preserve peace and in pursuance of that command from the superior
honest and humble Confession and shall give no evidence against him to aggravate the Matter L. Ch. B. Your Petition is accepted and shall be read Robert Titchburne My Lord when I first pleaded to the Indictment it was Not Guilty in manner and form as I stood Indicted My Lord it was not then in my Heart either to deny or justify any tittle of the matter of Fact My Lord The Matter that I was led into by ignorance my Conscience leads me to acknowledg But my Lord if I should have said Guilty in manner and form as I stood Indicted I was fearful I should have charged my own Conscience as then knowingly and maliciously to act it My Lord it was my unhappiness to be call'd to so sad a Work when I had so few years over my head A Person neither bred up in the Laws nor in Parliaments where Laws are made I can say with a clear Conscience I had no more enmity in my heart to his Majesty than I had to my Wife that lay in my bosom My Lord I shall deny nothing After I was summoned I think truly I was at most of the Meetings and I do not say this that I did not intend to say it before but preserving that Salvo to my own Conscience That I did not maliciously and knowingly do it I think I am bound in Conscience to own it As I do not deny but I was there so truly I do believe I did sign the Instrument And had I known that then which I do now I do not mean my Lord my Afflictions and Sufferings it is not my Sufferings make me acknowledg I would have chosen a red hot Oven to gone into as soon as that Meeting I bless God I do this neither out of fear nor hopes of favour though the penalty that may attend this acknowledgment may be grievous My Lord I do acknowledg the Matter of Fact and do solemnly profess I was led into it for want of years I do not justify either the Act or the Person I was so unhappy then as to be ignorant and I hope shall not now since I have more light justify that which I was ignorant of I am sure my Heart was without malice if I had been only asked in matter of Fact at first I should have said the same I have seen a little The Great God before whom we all stand hath shewn his tender mercy to Persons upon repentance Paul tells us Though a Blasphemer and a Persecuter of Christ it being done ignorantly upon repentance he found mercy My Lord Mercy I have found and I do not doubt but mercy I shall find My Lord I came in upon the Proclamation and now I am here I have in truth given your Lordship a clear and full account what ever that Law shall pronounce because I was ignorant yet I hope there will be room found for that Mercy and Grace that I think was intended by the Proclamation and I hope by the Parliament of England I shall say no more but in pleading of that humbly beg that your Lordships will be instrumental to the King and Parliament on that behalf Counsel We shall give no evidence against the Prisoner he says he did it ignorantly and I hope and do believe he is penitent and as far as the Parliament thinks fit to shew mercy I shall be very glad Owen Rowe I have not much to say I never had any ability therefore my Lord it was never my intent upon my Plea as was said before to deny any thing I have done for I was clearly convinced that I ought to confess it before and I do confess against my self that I did sit there several times and to the best of my remembrance I did sign and seal the Warrant for his Execution and truly my Lord it was never in my heart to contrive a Plot of this nature How I came there I do not know I was very unfit for such a Business and I confess I did it ignorantly not understanding the Law so was carried away hidden in the Business not understanding what I did therefore my Lord I humbly intreat this honourable Court that you will consider of it and look upon me as one that out of ignorance did it and if I had known of my Act I would rather have been torn in pieces with a thousand Horses When I heard of the Declaration and gracious Pardon of his Majesty I confess I went to my Lord Mayors laid hold of it and I thought my life as secure as it is now in my own hands But I do wholly cast my self upon the King's Mercy and as I have heard he is a gracious King full of lenity and mercy so I hope I shall find it I was never against Government it is a blessed thing that we have it I hope all the Nations will be happy under it I shall submit to his Majesty and Government I can say no more I was not brought up a Scholar but was a Tradesman and was meerly ignorant when I went on in that Business I do humbly intreat your Lordships that you would as tenderly as may be present my case to the King whom I rest upon and leave all to your Lordships wisdom and discretion to do what you will concerning me Counsel We accept his Confession and do hope he is penitent before God as well as before the World Robert Lilburn Be pleased to give me leave to speak a few words I shall be ingenuous before your Lordships I shall not wilfully nor obstinately deny the Matter of Fact But my Lord I must and I can with a very good Conscience say That what I did I did it very innocently without any intention of Murder nor was I ever Plotter or Contriver in that Murder I never read in the Law nor understood the Case throughly What-ever I have done I have done ignorantly L. Ch. B. Because you shall not be mistaken in your words God forbid that we should carp at your words the word Innocent hath a double acceptation Innocent in respect of Malice and Innocent in respect of the Fact Lilburn The truth is my Lord I was for the withdrawing of the Court when the King made the motion to have it withdrawn and upon the day my Lord that the King was put to death I was so sensible of it that I went to my Chamber and mourn'd and would if it had been in my power have preserved his life My Lord I was not at all any disturber of the Government I never interrupted the Parliament at all I had no hand in those things neither in 1648 nor at any other time I shall humbly beg the favour of the King that he would be pleased to grant me his Pardon according to his Declaration which I laid hold on and rendred my self according to the Proclamation Counsel We shall say nothing against him Henry Smith My Lord I shall not desire to spend your Lordships time what I have done
a sentence that he did conjure them to withdraw once again and to consider of it if it were but half an hour or saith he if that be too much for you I will withdraw My Lord here I can make my appeal to him that must judg me when you have done with me I had not a murderous nor a trayterous thought against him but Sir I confess such deep passions did fall upon me that truly my self I was not I remember the persons betwen whom I sate as it fell out were one Mr. Cawly and Col. Walton these two I sate betwixt these were the very words I speak to them Have we hearts of stone are we men they laboured to appease me they told me I would ruine both my self and them said I if I die for it I must do it Cromwel sate just the seat below me the hearing of me make some stir whispering he looked up to me and asked me if I were my self what I meant to do that I could not be quiet Sir said I No I cannot be quiet upon that I started up in the very nick when the President commanded the Clerk to read the Sentence I stepping up and as loud as I could speak spoke to this effect these words or to the like purpose My Lord said I I am not satisfied to give my consent to this Sentence but have Reasons to offer to you against it and I desire the Court may adjourn to hear me presently he stept up and looked at me Nay saith he if any one of the Court be unsatisfied the Court must adjourn Sir accordingly they did adjourn into the inner Court of Wards when they came there I was called upon by Cromwel to give an account why I had put this trouble and disturbance upon the Court I did speak Sir to this effect it is long ago the very words I think I cannot speak but to this effect I did speak My Lord I should have been exceeding glad if the Court had been pleased to condescend to this gracious Expression but it is not too late for me I desire not his Death but his Life and that the Nations may be setled in Peace The King now is pleased to offer That if he might but speak with his Parliament he would offer to them such things as should be satisfactory to us all So said I what would you have Your pretence of bringing him to these Proceedings was That after such a long and bloody War his Majesty would not condescend to such Concessions as might secure the Parliaments Party but now you hear him that he will give every one of us satisfaction I told them sadly told them I think I may truly say more sadly then than at this time that if they should go precipitantly on and give Judgment upon him before they had acquainted the Parliament with what the King was pleased to offer we should never be able answer it the rather my Lord and that I did press with all the little understanding that I had if they did but consider the last concluded Order that the Parliament made after the passing of the Act for Trial that which was so called I say there was this Order that shut up all That upon any Emergency that could not at that time be thought on in the House the Court should immediately acquaint the House with it My Lord I did infer as strongly as I could to them That if this were not Emergent I could not tell what was The King denied the Jurisdiction of the Court and yet with all vehemency desired to speak with his Parliament were not these Emergencies if not I knew not what were Emergences My Lords Besides this there was another thing I did press that I thought was of greater consequence than this as to the satisfaction of every Man 's particular Conscience that admitting if it might be admitted that the King was liable to his Subjects that they might call him to an account and might condemn him I beg your pardon that I take the boldness to make such admissions but if such a thing might be admitted certainly it did exceedingly become those Judges that were to give such a Sentence not against a common Person but against the greatest to be very well satisfied in Matter of Fact to a full Evidence before them that such and such things that were said were true I do acknowledg this that to the best of my apprehension I wish it had been so to others there was a great shortness in this I do humbly affirm this That not one Member of the Court did hear one Witness Viva Voce I did press That if the Court did give Judgment against the King without a fair Examination I said it was such a thing as no Judg at any Assizes would do against a common Person what I had was from Peters and from some private Whispers from one of them that is gone and hath received his Sentence and Doom Cromwel did answer with a great deal of storm He told the President that now he saw what great reason the Gentleman had to put such a trouble and disturbance upon them saith he Sure he doth not know that he hath to do with the hardest hearted Man that lives upon the Earth however it is not fit that the Court should be hindred from their Duty by one peevish Man he said the bottom was known that he would fain save his old Master and desired the Court without any more ado would go and do their Duty Another that spoke to me in answer was one that hath been before you and hath rereived his Sentence but is not dead and I desire I may not name his Name his answer was to what I have said That some Men were either Scepticks or Infidels After this I did go into the Speaker's Chamber and there I did ease my mind and heart with tears God only knows I have an unhappy memory I have slipt many thinâ—s Lord Chief Baron Remember your self by Papers if you have any no man will hinder you Downes I have no papers but my Lord for the truth of this I have said there are some witnesses that will make the substance the effect of this appear Lord Chief Baron Mr. Downes there is one particular before you come to the witnesses that after all these Convictions you signed the Warrant you deny it the Council will prove it Downes I did never hope or think that any thing I can say should be so satisfactory to you but things might be retorted upon me and perhaps what I thought might be for extenuating my Crime my fall out to my disadvantage I understand you do proceed upon three particulars either signing the first Warrant for constituting the Court To my remembrance I know not of it if my hand was to it I have forgot Counsel Your hand is not to that but we mean your hand is to the Warrant for execution pray shew it him It was shewn him Downes My Lord
how to reconcile that which hath been said before with this that comes after I leave it to you I am totally at a loss When those times were how impetuous the Soldiers how not a man that durst either disown them or speak against them I was threatned with my very life by the threats of one that hath received his reward I was induced to it Certainly my Lord it doth argue that there was not malice predommant Love and Hatred cannot be at the same time in one person Design my Lord what should be my design a poor ordinary mean man Surely my Lord I could not design any great matters or places I knew my self unfit I humbly beg you would give me leave to tell you a little what I got Mr. Sol. Gen. By your favour my Lord the Prisoners at the Bar may say what they will by way of extenuation but we expect that when they enter upon these Discourses they will save your Lordships time and ours by a publick confession and evidence of sorrow We cannot spend so long time to hear these long Discourses we will rather prove it against every man singly Downes I will trouble you no further I do acknowledge all I humbly submit and beg your favour and leave my self eupon my Countrymen the Jury and beg the King's mercy specially Pray spare me one word that you would hear but a Witness or two unto that business Counsel He doth confess he sate and signed we beleive he is sorrowful and against his Conscience he did sign and that he did it out of a fear and from a threat that he was over-awed so was the Hangman too but after he had apprehended this sorrow and declared his Judgment upon the fact he signed the Warrant Downes My Lord I do humbly beg his Majesties mercy I came in upon the Proclamation Vincent Potter My Lord my condition requires ease for my Body he had a fit of the Stone upon him at that same time I pray that the passing the Sentence for execution may be suspended L. Ch. B. The Execution must be suspended for you are within that Qualification Potter I desire only this I am not in a condition to declare what I know and would speak I am mighty ful of pain if I am under that Qualification let me rest under that Counsel Do you confess the Indictment or will you put us to prove it Potter I am one that came in L. Ch. B. It is thus with you whether or no did you sit sign or act in this High Court of Justice against the King Potter I will deny nothing I confess the fact but did not contrive it I am full of pain Lord Chief Baron According to the demerit of the Case in Law you must receive Judgment here but no execution of that Judgment shall be until the King by advice and consent of Lords and Commons shall order the execution of it you are to be tried now Do you confess you signed the Warrant for execution of the King Potter I do confess it my Lord. Counsel We do accept it Potter I beseech you let me go to ease my self Lord Chief Baron Officer set a Chair for him which was done Mr Potter sit down Aug. Garland May it please your Lordship I came here this day intending to have waved my plea and referred my self to this honourable Court to be recommended to the Kings mercy and the Parliament But hearing of some scandal upâ—â— me more then ever I did hear till within these few dayes I shall desire your favour in hearing of my Trial. Mr. Sol. Gen. My Lord he saith well for if he had confessed the Indictment we should not have accepted it Call the Witnesses Garland I do confess this I sate and at the day of Sentence signed the Warrant for Execution Mr. Sol. Gen. And we will prove that he spat in the Kings face Gar. I pray let me hear that Otherwise I would not have put you to any trouble at all Clench sworn Counsel Do you know the prisoner at the Bar Augustine Garland Clench I know him very well Counsel Tell my Lords and the Jury how you saw him behave himself to our Sovereign Lord the King when he was at the Bar. Clench I was that day at Westminstar-hall when the King had sentence they hurried the King down this Mr. Garland came down stairs by them towards the bottome of the stairs he spit in his face at a little distance Couns Do you believe he did it on purpose upon your oath Clench I suppose he did it somewhat suspiciously in that way I did see the King put his hand in his left pocket but I do not know whether the king wiped it off Mr. Sol. Gen. The King wiped it off but he will never wipe it off so long as he lives He hath confessed that he sate that he sentenced and that he signed We say he contrived it at the beginning and at last bid defiance to the King I shall desire he may be remembred in another place Garland I do not know that I was near him at that time I do not remember this passage I am afraid he is an Indigent person If I was guilty of this inhumanity I desire no favour from God Almighty L. Ch. B. I will tell you this doth not at all concern the Jury but this Circumstance possibly may be considered in another place Gar. I refer my self whether you be satisfied that I did such an Inhumane act I submit that to you I dare appeal to all these Gentlemen here looking upon the prisoners or any other whether they ever heard of it nor I was never accused for such a thing till a few dayes since but I wave my plea and refer my self to the Court Now my Lord this is the truth of my Case there is that honorable Gentleman the Speaker of the House of Commons knows I lived in Essex in the beginning of these troubles and I was inforced to forsake my habitation I came from thence to London where I have behaved my self fairly in my way Afterwards in 1648 I was chosen a member into the Parliament in June 1648 I came in a Member of the Parliament My Lord after the division of the House by the insolency of the Soldiery some came to me and desired me that I would go to the House I was then at my Chamber at Lincolns-Inne I forbore a Week and more said I I do not expect to be admitted for they look upon me as another person said they If you will go you shall have no contradiction I went and went in when I was in the first business that came was the business of Tryal of the King and it was put on me to be Chair-man for bringing in this Act for Tryal I did not know how to contradict that power or authority be it what it will but I must obey I fear my ruine will follow it in that respect my Lord when I came there I
was forced to run through out what they had imposed upon me Having seen me I could not shrink from them for fear of my own destruction and thereupon I did go in and did that which I have confessed to your Lordships not out of any malignity to his Majesty I had never any disrespect to him in my life My Lord I did not know which way to be safe in any thing without Doors was misery within Doors was mischief I do appeal to all that had any thing to do with me that I never did any wrong to any that was of the Kings party but helped them as I was able My Lord when the Government was thus tossed and turned and tumbled and I know not what and the secluded Members came into the House I knew not what to do in that case neither Assoon as this Parliament had declared the Treaty which was the eighth of May the ninth of May I appeared before the right honourable the Lord Mayor of London and did claim the benefit of his Majesties gracious Declaration and to become a Loyal Subject as in my heart I alwayes was and my Lord Mayor being there I hope he will testifie that assoon as I heard of the Proclamation I rendered my self according to the Proclamation My Lord this hath been the carriage of me being alwayes under fear and force I refer my self to your Lordships Symon Meyne When I was last here my Lord that I did then speak Not guilty was not as to the matter of fact but my Conscience telling of me that I had no malice or ill intention to his Majesty that was the reason For Matter of fact I shall acknowledge what I have done and lye at his Majesties feet for mercy I am an ignorant weak man in the Law I will confess the fact Couns Did you sign the Warrant for summoning that Court and did you sign the Warrant for Execution of the King Meyne I did sit in Court Counsel Did you sign the Warrant for Execution Meyne My Lord I knew not of the King 's bringing up I never was at any Committee Counsel We do not ask you that Look upon the Warrant and see if your hand and seal be not to it Meyne My Lord it is my hand Counsel Then my Lord we have done Meyne My Lord I acknowledge it is my hand By what importunity it my be known to some here I was very unwilling to it I was told What fear was there when forty were there before and twenty was of the Quorum I was thereupon drawn in to set my hand to it My Lord I never plotted nor contrived the business There was a Gentleman that told me if I did offer to speak in the House pluckt me down by the Coat and he told me I should besequestred as a Delinquent the name of this person I shall omit saith he you will rather lose your estate then take away the King's life I leave it with you James Temple At the last time I pleaded to the Indictment Not guilty but I shall now desire to see my hand and if it be my hand I must confess all circumstances must follow The Warrants being shewn him I do accknowledge it is my hand to both I never did consult concerning the Court. Counsel There are some worse then he but he is bad enough James Temple I refer my self to the King and Parliament and presented a Petition which was received by the Court. Peter Temple When I was here the last time I pleaded Not guilty the reason was because there are divers things in the Indictment that my Conscience tells me I am not guilty of for I had not a malicious or trayterous heart against the King To save your Lordships time I will confess what I am guilty of I was in the Court sate there if I see my hand I shall confess it Counsel Were you there when Sentence was given Temple Yes Sir Counsel Shew him the Warrants which being shewed him I acknowledge they are my hand and refer it to your Lordships Counsel Mr. Wayte you heard the Charge read against you what say you to it Thomas Waite Truly my Lord when I was here last I pleaded not guilty I humbly desired then your Lordships to hear me a word or two You promised me then I should be heard I shall desire to speak for my self Lord Chief Baron God forbid but you should Mr. Sol. G. By your Lordships favour we must speak first if he will confess the fact he my speak what he will Did you sit in the Court Waite Yes Counsel The day of Sentence Waite Yes Counsel Is your hand to the Warrant for Execution Waite I know not pray let me see it It was shewen him My Lord I confess it is like my hand but I do not remember it Counsel If you do not acknowledge it it will be proved Waite Truly my Lord I do beleive it is my hand Counsel Then the Jury will not doubt it Waite But I desire to be heard I am loath to trouble you much I will tell you how I was brought into this business My Lord I was a Member of that House that erected this Court when the Treaty was in the Isle of Wight Immediately after the Army came up I was utterly against that Act in the House When the Army came up to purge the House I was much troubled at it I desired to know the Charge they had against them Two or three dayes after I did move and there were other Gentlemen that did move to know what Charge there was They sent word we should have a Charge in due time we sent and none came but said we should have it in due time I went to those worthy Gent. to see them in prison and seeing nothing would be done I took my leave and made account to see them no more and went down into the Country to Leicester-shire I was sent for up several times I would not come with threats upon pain of Sequestration My Lords there were Petitions going up and down in the Country for bringing the King to that business which was against my conscience I went to Rutlandshire I heard there were some things working there I used my interest and I thank God I stopt it I came then to London when all these things were destroyed I came to London the day before the Sentence was given I went to the House thought nothing some were sent to the Tower and I was sent for to the House and my name was in the Act unknown to me but one sent a Note in my Lord Gray's Name that he would speak with me I went to him and I said my Lord what would you do with me saith he I did not send for you Thereupon Cromwel and Ireton laid hold on me said they We sent for you you are one of the High Court No said I not I my Judgement is against it they carried me to the Court. When the King desired to
speak with his Parliament I rising up one told me I must not be heard for the President was to give Judgement and said there was an order that none should speak in Court Mr. Downes did move and they did adjourn the Court and I was glad I got out Cromwell laughed and smiled and jeared in the Court of Wards I hope your Lordship will be pleased to consider I was no Contriver no Soldier that put the force upon the House that erected the Court None of the Law-makers or did any thing maliciously against the King My Lord I was looked upon with an evil eye for regarding the King's friends in the Country Gray he told me the King would not die I hope he will not said I. The next day on Monday I went to the House they were labouring to get hands for his Execution at the Door I refused and went into the House saith Cromwell those that are gone in shall set their hands I will have their hands now That night I went to the Lord Grays and he said I am afraid they will put him to death I said so also My Lord I have been a great sufferer I was drawn in trapan'd into it since being a friend to the Kings friends I am almost ruined in my estate I beseech your Lordships make the best interpretation I hope you will believe I was no Contriver I humbly lay hold upon the Kings mercy and favour I came in upon the Proclamation I pray that this Honourable Court will prefer my Petition to the King and both Houses of Parliament which the Court then received William Heveningham My Lord in 1648. we were under a force under the tyranny of an Army they were our Masters for a malicious and a traiterous heart I had not I do absolutely deny the signing the Warrant for summoning the Court and also that Warrant for execution of the King at the time of sealing I had that Courage and Boldness that I protested against it Counsel We do not question him for that but for sitting in the high Court of Justice and that upon the day of the sentence do you deny that Heveningham My Lord I cannot say positively Counsel If you deny the matter of fact it must be proved Heveningham I cannot say positively but it may be I might Counsel Either say positively you did or else let the Witnesses be call'd Heveningham Truly my Lord I think I did but my after-actions Lord Chief Baron Mr. Heveningham that shall be considered Counsel My Lord to sit upon the day of Sentence was high Treason in it self and is an evidence of Compassing and Imagining the Kings death Hev I shall lay hold of the Declaration I came in upon the Proclamation I pray your Lordships to interceed for me to the King and both Houses of Parliament I pray the mercy of this Court L. C. B. You of the Jury they have all confessed and therefore you may go together Simon Meyne My Lords I have forgot my Petition it is at my lodging I desire I may send it at night John Downes and Peter Temple prayed the like favour L. Ch. B. Do send them they shall be received The Jury having consulted together a certain time they went to their places Clerk Gentlemen are you agreed of your verdict Jury Yes Clerk Who shall say for you Jury Our Fore-man Clerk John Downes hold up thy hand Look upon the prisoner how say you is he guilty of High Treason whereof he stands indicted and hath been arraigned or not guilty Forem Guilty Clerk Look to him Keeper What Goods and Chattels c. Forem None to our knowledge And the like verdicts at the same time passed in the same manner against Vincent Potter Augustine Garland Symon Meyne James Temple Peter Temple Thomas Waite and William Heveningham Potter I hope I may be freed from Irons I am in pain and a man of bulk L. Ch. B. We can give no order in it we must leave it to the Sheriff Potter I begg it of you my Lord. L. Ch. B. We must leave it to the Sheriff Mr. Heveningham You must withdraw from the Bar. Clerk Officer bring down VValler Fleetwood Hacker Axtel Hulet Penington Marten Millington Titchborne Roe Lilburne Smith and Harvey and set them to the Bar which was done accordingly Clerk Hardress VValler hold up thy hand thou hast been Indicted and found guilty of High Treason what canst thou say why judgment should not pass on thee to dy according to Law VValler My Lords I am now it seems Convicted by Law and so adjudged Your Lordships the other day on my desire told me I might have liberty to speak upon my trial I must now beg the like upon a condemned person L. Ch. B. You are Convicted not Condemned Waller My Lords I was the first that pleaded Guilty I bless God that he gave me a heart to do it I find most peace in the doing of it and since there is nothing left but hopes of Mercy I humbly submit it to your Lordships to hear me in this sad condition that that may make me seem more capable of mercy I have my Lords been so unhappy to have been transplanted out of my Country these thirty years I have been but once these eleven years in England this must needs make me a stranger L. Ch. B. I must not hinder you because it is for mercy that you plead but consider with your self whether it will not be better to give it in a Petition I leave it to you we can do nothing in point of Mercy but Judgment Waller Onely this My Lord whether I am not the more capable of your mercy L. Ch. B. That you may understand it the Act of Indempnity of Parliament hath excepted you yet upon some qualifications we are to proceed according to Law that is to go to Conviction and Judgment The Act sayes that after Judgment there shall be no execution but that it shall be suspended till a further Act of Parliament to be passed for that purpose so that in the mean time we are to proceed no further then Judgment That which concerns Mercy is referred to another place If you please to say any thing to satisfie us or to go by way of Petition it must be left to you but what you say for mercy is nothing to us Waller I humbly thank your Lordships for this clear and noble dealing and withall I would beg that these people that are witnesses of my shame and guilt may know that it was a force and temptation upon me I shall not insist much I have said that I did plead guilty which was most safe to my own Conscience yet I should make it appear that I did appear more to preserve the King from Tryal and Sentence then any other Lord Finch Sir Hardress Waller I have heard of late of your sorrow which I was glad to hear of because you are my kinsman both by your Father and Mothers side and also my
the name of Daniel Axtel of Westminster in the County of Middlesex Gentleman I think none knew me to live there and inhabit there Lord Chief Baron I would not interrupt you this is past you should have made your exception to that as Master Matten did before concerning his name that should have been first done you have appeared and pleaded to that name and it was late of Westminster Axtell My Lord I have this to speak in arrest of Judgment that the Indictment being grounded upon that statute of the twenty fifth of Edward the third it is either mistaken or not pursued my Lords I did yesterday give you the Judgment of the Lords and Commons concerning the statute in relation to my case I say the Statute was mistaken or not pursued Lord chief Baron That was offered before Sir as to the matter of it Axtell My Lord I think not I am mistaken if it were Lord Chief Baron Then open it Axtell My Lord I do not find in that statute that words are an overt act words only L. Ch. B. This was over-ruled The things that you objected were these That there is not any overt act that is laid that could be applicable to your case if it were not particularly applicable you are found guilty by the Jury it would be nothing But there is an overt act you were present at the Court beating the Souldiers sending for an Executioner but for words if one man should say here is the King go and kill him this is Treason but you were guilty in all according to Law You being there and doing this you were not guilty onely of the words but of all that was done there is none but Principals in Treason What we say and do to you we well know we must answer before God Almighty for it Axtell I have but one word more truly I do appeal to God before whom I shall have another tryall I do not find my self guilty either of consulting contriving or having a hand in the death of the King I am innocent and I pray God that my innocent blood Lord Chief Baron Pray Sir Axtell May not cry Lord Chief Baron You are now to speak in arrest of Judgment Axtell I have no more I pray your Lordships favour and mercy to me William Hulet alias Howlet hold up thy hand thou art in the same condition what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c. Hulet Truly my Lord I have little further to say If you had been pleased to give me further time I should have cleared my self I call God above to witness upon this account that I am as clear as any man I submit to the mercy of the Court. L. Ch. B. For that I do but cannot positively say it that at your request notwithstanding the Judgment will pass against you there may be some time till his Majesties pleasure be known before any execution will be upon that Judgment against you in the mean time we must proceed according to Law and Justice Proclamation for silence whilst Judgment is giving The Lord Chief Barons speech before the Sentence pronounced against the aforenamed Prisoners found guilty YOu that are Prisoners at the Bar you stand here in several Capacities yet all of you persons convicted of the detestable and execrable murder of our Soveraign Lord King Charles the first of blessed memory Mistake me not I do not say that you are all of you guilty of executing the fact but in Law and in conscience pro tanto though not pro toto you are guilty of it in that you prepared the way and means to it in that you brought his head to the block though you did not cut it off You are here in three sorts and I must apply my words accordingly and truely I do it with as much sorrow of heart as you have many of you being persons of liberal education great parts I say you are of three sorts There are some of you that though the Judgment of death is to pass against you by his Majesties grace and favour and the mercy under him of the two houses of Parliament Execution is to be suspended untill another Act of Parliament shall pass to that purpose that is all of you but three for those three the one of them that was last called William Heveningham he is in another capacity too for I presume some time will be given to him to consider of something relating to him before any order will be given for his execution there are two others of you and that is Dan. Axtel and Francis Hacker and for you as it yet stands before us there is no mercy there is no room for it but though you be in these several Classes yet what I shall say will concern you all because I do not know how it may fall with you none of us know how soon we may come to our deaths some probably sooner then others all must come to it you are now before the Tribunal of man but that is for Judgment for your offence here but there is another Judgment hereafter and a Tribunal before which both you and we must stand every man here and we must receive according to our work those that have done ignorantly by a serious and unfeigned repentance God Almighty may shew mercy unto them He hath reserved mercy even for the greatest offenders Saint Paul himself when he presecuted Christ ignorantly upon his repentance he found mercy those of you that are not yet convicted in your consciences of the foulness of this horrid fact look into your Consciences a little more and see if it be not a great Judgment for your former offence that you should be given over to a reprobate sense let me tell you a seared Conscience a bold confidence not upon good grounds is so far from securing the Conscience it may stifle perhaps the mouth of Conscience but it will rise up more in Judgment against you Here you have made your defence and I do not blame you for it life is precious but remember the thoughts of your hearts are open whether you did it ignorantly covetously or to get the Government into your own hands that I am not able to search into God and you only know that give me leave to say something perhaps I have repeated it by parts before God is my witness what I speak I speak from mine own Conscience and that is this Gentlemen because I saw it stuck with some of you that is that whatsoever the case was that by the Laws of these Nations the fundamental Laws there could not be any coercive power over your King I speak it again because I would as near as I could speak the whole truth and would not mislead any man in such a case remember that no power no person no Community or body of men not the people either collectively or representatively have any coercive power over the person of the King by the fundamental Laws for that
Gentlemen I shall begin to shew you that which all of you might remember that is your oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy and to add to this that obligation which all this whole Nation did oblige themselves to by the Parliament without question then rightly represented and in being the first of K. James whereby to shew you that not only persons but the Body politick of the Nations not only the single Members but the Members in both houses of Parliament were loyal and obedient subjects to the King their head even to yeeld a natural and humble Obedience and Allegiance I told you the Act of the 1. of K. James when K. James came first into Engl. We the Lords and Com. representing the whole People of the Nation the very words of the Act are so primo Jacobi Chapter the first Representing the whole Body of the Nation do acknowledge an humble natural Leige Obedience to the King as Supreme his Heirs and Successors And in the name of themselves and all the people humbly submit themselves untill the last drop of their bloud be spent in defence of the King and his Royall posterity and therefore they did oblige themselves and all the People of England as far as they could represent them the words are more full then I can express them and indeed it is so dark I cannot read them They did acknowledg to be bound to him and his Imperial Crown Remember these were not words of Complement you shall find that they all of them and so did so many of you as were Members of Parliament yea all of you before you came into the House of Commons did take the Oath of Allegiance which was made after this Recognition the third and fourth of King James or otherwise were not to be Members What was that Oath of Allegiance that you took it was That you should defend the King his Person that is in 3 Jacobi Chapter the fourth his Crown and Dignity What was it Not only against the Pope's Power to depose but the words are or otherwise look into the Act and reflect upon your Conscience and you shall find that all did swear to defend the King his Crown and Dignity and there it is called Imperial Crown I would have you lay this to heart and see how far you have kept this Oath Gentlemen In the Oath of Supremacy which you all took therein you did further acknowledg that the King was the only Supream Governour of this Realm Mark the words I will repeat them that you may lay it to heart you that have more time to apply it to your Fact and you that have less time for ought I know you have reason to consider what I have to say you sware then That the King by the Oath of Supremacy which all of you have taken or ought to have taken if any of you have not taken it yet notwithstanding you are not absolved from the obligation of it but most of you did take it there you sware that the King is the only Supream Governor of this Realm and you sware there that you would defend all Jurisdictions Priviledges Preeminencies and Authorities granted or belonging to the King's Highness His Heirs and Successors or united and annexed unto the Imperial Crown of this Realm For the first If the King be Supream then there is no co-ordination Non habet majorem non habet parem that word Imperial Crown is at least in nine or ten several Statutes it is the very word in this Act that was made lately in pursuance of former Acts concerning Judicial Proceedings And so in the time of King Charles they acknowledged him to be their Leige Sovereign I say that word Supream and so the word Imperial Crown is in the first of Queen Elizabeth the third and the eighth of Elizabeth the twenty fourth of Henry the Eighth Chap. 12. there it is said this Kingdom is an Imperial Crown subject to none but God Almighty Before these times you shall find in the sixteenth of Richard the Second the Statute of Praemunire the Crown of England subject to God alone I will go higher William Rufus some of you are Historians and you shall find the same in Eadmerus and also in Matthew Paris shortly after William Rufus his Time when he wrote to the Pope he challenged and had the same liberty in this Kingdom of England as the Emperor had in his Empire mistake me not I speak only as to the Person of the King I do not meddle of Rights between the King and Subjects or Subject and Subject you see in this Case concerning the Death of his Majesty's dear Father and our Blessed Sovereign of happy memory he doth not judg himself but according to Law that which I assert is as to the Person of the King which was the priviledg of Emperors as to their Personal Priviledges if he had offended and committed an Offence he was only accountable to God himself I will come back to what I have said You swore to be faithful to the King as Supreme The King of Poland hath a Crown but at his Oath of Coronation it is conditioned with the People That if he shall not govern according to such and such Rules they shall be freed from their Homage and Allegiance But it differs with our King for he was a King before Oath The King takes his Oath but not upon any condition this I shew you to let you see that we have no coercive Power against the King The King of England was anointed with Oil at his Coronation which was to shew that Absolute Power I do not say of Government but of being accountable to God for what he did The Law saith The King doth no injury to any Man not but that the King may have the imbecilities and infirmities of other Men but the King in his single Person can do no wrong but if the King command a Man to beat me or to disseize me of my Land I have my remedy against the Man though not against the King The Law in all Cases preserves the Person of the King to be untouched but what is done by his Ministers unlawfully there is a remedy against his Ministers for it but in this Case when you come to the Person of the King what do our Law Books say he is they call it Caput Reipublicae salus Populi the Leiutenant of God and let me tell you there was never such a blow given to the Church of England and the Protestant Religion There was a Case and that of the Spencers you shall find in the 7th Report of the Lord Cook in Calvin's Case that Homage is due to the King in his Politick Capacity and then they made this damnable Inference That therefore if the King did not demean himself as he ought that he should be reformed pure aspertee by asperity sharpness or Imprisonment but these were condemned by two Acts of Parliament in Print that they could not do that even
in that Case one was called the Banishment of Hugh Spencer and the other is in 1. Edward 3. upon the Roll. My Masters In the first of Henry the Seventh you shall find it in the printed seven Books he saith That as to the Regality of his Crown he is immediately subject unto God Mark the Doctrine of the Church of England Gentlemen I do not know with what Spirit of Equivocation any Man can take that Oath of Supremacy You shall find in the Articles of the Church of England the last but one or two it is that Article which sets forth the Doctrine of the Church of England they say That the Queen and so the King hath the Supreme Power in this Realm and hath the chief Government over all the Estates of the Realm the very words are so this was shortly after making the Act the Articles were in 1552 and she came in 1558 or 1559 it is to shew you the King hath the chief Government over all the Estates within the Nation and if you look upon it you shall find it was not only the Judgment of the Church but of the Parliament at the same time They did confirm this Article so far that they appointed that no Man should take or be capable of a Living but those that had taken that Oath God forgive those Ministers that went against it The Queen and the Church were willing that these should be put into Latin that all the World might see the Confession of the Church of England and of the People of England you may reade it in Cambden I have told you how and wherein the chief Power consisted not in respect the King could do what he would no the Emperors themselves did not challenge that but this they challenge by it That they were not accountable to Man for what they did No Man ought to touch the Person of the King I press it to you in point of Conscience you see in the Scripture in Psalm 51. the Psalm of Mercy whereby we ask pardon of God for our great Offences I think none of you in this condition but will join in this you know the Adultery and Murder that David committed this penitential Psalm was made for that What doth he say Against thee thee only have I sinned c. tibi soli peccavi Domine not because he had not sinned against Man for 't is plain he had sinned both against Bathsheba and Vriah too But because he was not liable to the Tribunal of Man he was not bound nor accountable to any Man upon Earth And now my Masters I beseech you consider that some of you for ought I know suddenly and some of you for ought I know not long after all of us we do not know how soon must come to make a right account to God of what we have done After this Life you enter into an Eternity an Eternity of Happiness or of Woe God Almighty is merciful to those that are truly penitent the Thief upon the Cross and to all that are of a penitent heart You are Persons of education do not you go on in an obstinate perverse course for shame of Men even this shame which you now have and which you may have when you come to die a sanctified use may be made of it you pay to God some part of that punishment which you owe to him for your sins I have no more to say but the next thing I have to do is to give the Sentence the Judgment which truly I do with as unwilling a heart as you do receive it You Prisoners at the Bar the Judgment of the Court is this and the Court doth award that c. And the Lord have mercy on your Souls Court adjourned till Friday morning seven a Clock Friday Octob. 19. 1660. Set William Heveningham to the Bar. Serjeant Keeling May it please your Lordships the Prisoner at the Bar William Heveningham hath been indicted of High-Treason for compassing and imagining the Death of the late King of blessed memory he has been tried the Jury has found him guilty I do humbly move your Lordships in the behalf of the King that you will proceed to Judgment Clerk William Heveningham hold up thy hand what canst thou say for thy self why Judgment c. Heveningham My Lords I have nothing more to say than I said formerly only I plead the benefit of the Proclamation and cast my self upon the Mercy of our most gracious Sovereign and desire your Lordships to be Mediators on my behalf Lord Ch. Baron By the Act of Indempnity of which you claim the Benefit and we ought to take notice of it we are to proceed to Judgment but no Execution of this Judgment is to be until by another Act of Parliament by consent of the King it shall be ordered And therefore I need not speak any more of that or any Exhortation to prepare your self for Death our work is only to give Judgment The Judgment of the Court is this and the Court doth award that you the Prisoner at the Bar be led back to c. And the Lord have mercy upon your Soul THus having given the Reader a most impartial view of every Passage occurring in this so solemn and legal Indictment Arraignment Trial and Condemnation of these twenty nine black Regicides with their several Pleas and Defences in their own words It may be also some additinal satisfaction to let the Reader know the time and manner of the Death of such of them who were according to the Sentence Executed For their last Discourses and Prayers as they were made in a Croud and therefore not possible to be taken exactly so it was thought fit rather to say nothing than give an untrue account thereof chusing rather to appear lame than to be supported with imperfect assistances ON Saturday the 13th of October 1660 betwixt nine and ten of the clock in the Morning Mr. Tho. Harrison or Major General Harrison according to this Sentence was upon a Hurdle drawn from Newgate to the place called Charing-Cross where within certain Rails lately there made a Gibbet was erected and he hanged with his face looking towards the Banqueting-house at Whitehall the place where our late Sovereign of eternal memory was sacrificed being half dead he was cut down by the common Executioner his Privy Members cut off before his Eyes his Bowels burned his Head severed from his Body and his Body divided into Quarters which were returned back to Newgate upon the same Hurdle that carried it His Head is since set on a Pole on the top of the South-East end of Westminster-Hall looking towards London The Quarters of his Body are in like manner exposed upon some of the City Gates Monday following being the sixteenth of October abouâ— the same hour Mr. John Carew was carried in like manner to the same place of Execution where having suffered like pains his Quarters were also returned to Newgate on the same Hurdle which carried him His Majesty was pleased to give upon intercession made by his Friends his Body to be buried Tuesday following being the sixteenth of October Master John Cook and Mr. Hugh Peters were about the same hour 〈◊〉 on two Hurdles to the same place and executed in the same manner and their Quarters returned in like manner to the place whence they came The Head of John Cook is since set on a Pole on the North-East end of Westminster-Hall on the left of Mr. Harrison's looking towards London and the Head of Mr. Peters on London-Bridg Their Quarters are exposed in like manner upon the tops of some of the City Gates Wednesday October 17 about the hour of nine in the 〈◊〉 Mr. Thomas Scot and Mr. Gregory Clemenâ— were â—ought â—n several Hurdles and about one hour after Master Adriâ—n Scroop and Mr. John Jones together in one Hurdle were carried to the same place and suffered the same death and were returned and disposed of in like manner Mr. Francis Hacker and Mr. Daniel Axtel were on Friday the 19th of October about the same time of the morning drawn on one Hurdle from Newgate to Tiburn and there both Hanged Mr. Axtel was Quartered and returned back and disposed as the former but the Body of Mr. Hacker was by his Majesties great favour given entire to his Friends and buried FINIS 3. Jan. 1647.