Free-born Subject Arbitrarily at their pleasure is contrary to the Acts of Parliament both of Magna Charta and the Petition of Right so late in memory which abolish all Imprisonment both of Nobles and Commons without the lawful Judgment of their Peers so likewise is it contrary to all other Fundamental Laws of the Land made for defence of the liberty of the People which is more necessary and more dear than Life as may appear by the Reasons following 1. There is an Act of Parliament made 15. H. 6. cap. 4. That none shall Sue a Subpoena until he find Surety to satisfie the Defendant his Damages if he do not verifie and prove his Bill to be true this Statute had nipt in the Bud the Overflow of all those innumerable Fictions and Falsities which have since followed in the Suggestions of Bills in Chancery for this being made 15. H. 6. there is no mention made in all the Year-Books of any quarrel between the Common-Law-Judges and a Subpoena till 37. H. 6. which is above Twenty Years after so great a Fright had this Act falling from the Supreme Power put amongst the Froggs though now despised as a dead Logg as likewise are all the rest and it is in vain to make more unless the Honour of these is vindicated by the same Authority that made them for Chancellors as if Jura negant sibi nata they were two-great to be bound by Acts of Parliament though they have not the least pretence to colour their Authority against these Three the greatest Acts for Security of the Subjects against false Imprisonments that ever were made in England for there is no Prescription or Custom of any Court can be alledged against an Act of Parliament be it never so old and there is no Pretence to alledg any against the Petition of Right Chancellour hath no Authority to impose a Fine being in so fresh memory and no longer since than 3. Car. 1. they have trampled under soot the Authority of these Supreme Acts and all lawful Judgments on them 1. To lay Fines on the Subject thus Trin. 3. Jac. did Chancellour Egerton impose a Fine on Sir Thomas Themilthorp for not performing his Decree concerning Land of Inheritance and Estreated the same into the Exchequer and upon Process against him the Party appearing pleaded that the Chancellour had no Authority to impose a Fine the Attorney General Petiit advisamentum Curiae concerning the Authority of the Chancellour and on mature advice It was adjudged That he had no Power to Fine in the Case Coke 4th part 84. 2. To Extend according to which pretended Power the said Chancellour Decreed against Waller certain Lands and for not obeying the Decree imposed a Fine and upon Process out of the Court of Chancery extended the Lands that Waller had in Middlesex whereupon Waller brought his Assise in the Court of Common-Pleas where the Opinion of the whole Court agreed in omnibus with the Court of the Exchequer ib. 3. Not only to proceed to Imprison the Subjects on false Suggestions without taking any Surety of the Complainant according to the Statute to verifie his Bill but without so much as taking his Oath of Calumny to his Bill and have further presumed so high as by their Edicts and Orders of Chancery which they have not the least Authority to make to order the Subjects to be Attached and Imprison'd on every Affidavit of any Knight of the Post and no Probation to be admitted to the contrary and if while the Innocent Party is imprison'd being remote from his Home and suffering great Loss and Damage by this his false Imprisonment he shall at length offer to prove the Affidavit false and Knight of the Post perjur'd he shall be discharged but without any Cost for the great Service the Knight of the Post did the Court to Forswear himself against the Prisoner whereby they get some Fees See here a Chancellour in desiance of Three Acts of Parliament without any Sureties without any Oath of Calumny without any Judgment of Peers publisheth in sight of the Sun his abominable Orders to cast into Prison the most Innocent Person on the false Affidavit of every Perjur'd Knight of the Post yea a single Affidavit as appears by the Orders of the Chancellour and Master of the Rolls Printed 1669. Page 67. and yet they pretend Page 65. under the Title of Commitment that they are tender of the Liberty of mens Persons and of their Imprisonments on Affidavits and confess they are often Malitious and made by one mean and ignorant Person yet in the same breath Page 67. as if they soon forgot or understood not what they said in the beginning of their Order they the next leaf conclude That a single Affidavit of such a malitious mean and ignorant Person yea though he is proved afterwards to be Perjured shall be sufficient to Imprison the Innocent Subject and when he again gets out of Gaol if he can let the Innocent Party be indamaged his whole Estate he shall not have a Farthing Cost for the false Imprisonment and observe the depth of the Reason why given by a Chancellour and as the Printed Orders say with advice and assistance of the Master of the Bolls 't is this as appears Page 68. at the top of the leaf viz. IN RESPECT OF THE OATH MADE AGAINST HIM AS AFORESAID that is to say the Oath though false of a Villain Perjured against the Innocent Person for so is the implication of the Order and likewise though they durst not say so in express terms yet so is the implicit Non Obstante notwithstanding any Law of God or Man or Acts of Parliament to the contrary Doth not here a Chancellour assume the Omnipotent Power of the Pope to dispense with the Laws of God and Men and assume a Power of Imprisoning the Subjects above the King and Parliament yea contrary and in contempt of their Laws he doth for the Law of God and Precept of Christ is known to prohibit the Imprisonment of any No Imprisonment ought to be but where the Witnesses and Party are brought Face to Face without two Witnesses at least and without bringing the Witnesses and the Party accused face to face that he may know them and except against their Persons or Testimony if he hath cause which is never done on an Affidavit And the Laws of the Land Magna Charta and Petition of Right utterly prohibit all Imprisonment of the Subject on Affidavits whether they are true or false without bringing the Witnesses and the Party face to face and a Judgment on such Testimony against him by his Peers and if such Evil Precedents be suffer'd to pass without some example of Justice shewn on them all Acts of Parliament which ever have been or shall be for protection of the Liberty of the Subject Forgery Licensed in Chancery thereby to Imprison the Subject falsely will be vain and to no purpose 4. The Chancellour
and no Certificate of Bishops hath power to take that right from them 7. Here the wantonness of Widows is forbidden who are for new Husbands as soon as the old is put in his Grave whereby who are Fathers of their Children is made uncertain 8. Here is no false Fathering of Children on those who are within four Seas 9. Here is no punishing Men twice for one offence once by the Temporal Court and then by the Spiritual Court or contrary punishments by contrary Courts one by the Contentious Court and another by the Penitential Court 10. Here is no Auricular Confession of their Wives or Daughters by Priests in Temples or Chambers and defiling thereby of their Families 11. Here is no punishing of Women for bringing forth Children nor the Murders of so many Infants caused thereby as by the Papist Laws is continually done Yet I conclude though the Law of the Turk is far better than that of the Pope and shall rise in Judgment against such as plant his Canons in their Courts in defiance of the Law of God and Nature I think neither a fit Rule to judge Marriage Legitimation or Succession by CHAP. V. Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession not to be judged by Ecclesiastical Laws THE Question is Whether Marriage Legitimation and Succession ought to be judged by Ecclesiastical Laws No English Lawyer can mention my Lord Coke without great honour but how he came so biass'd as to endeavour to set up Papal and Episcopal Laws under the name of Regal appears not Object 1 It is objected by Coke lib. 5.1 part 40. in Cawdryes Case That the Kingdom of England is an absolute Monarchy and if the King cannot Authorize by his Commission or Writ Ecclesiastical Judges to determin and judg those great and important Causes of Matrimony Divorce and general Bastardy by Certificate of the Bishop who is the Ecclesiastical Witness and Judg both of Fact and Law and by the Canon Laws which by use and custom are now our Ecclesiastical Laws Then he is disabled to be supreme Governour of this Realm in all Spiritual things or Causes as well as Temporal according to the Oath of Supremacy due to him And that he could not then cause Justice to be administred to his Subjects in these so great and important causes of Matrimony Divorce and general Bastardy on which depends the strength of mens Descents and Inheritances This I conceive though not in the same words yet in sence and substance to be the weight of my Lord Coke's Argument whereby he would make use of Marriage as one means amongst his many other to set up an Ecclesiastical Law and Judg over the Temporal Freeholds and Inheritances and other Birth-rights of the Subjects To which is answer'd First As to the words Absolute and Supream I suppose he intended no such absolute Monarchy or Supremacy as is not under the Law of God though it be not so express'd in the form of the Oath of Supremacy For though Regum timendorum in proprios greges Ecclesiastical Laws not needful to the King's Supremacy but hurtful Reges in ipsos imperium est Jovis then I think he doth not intend it to be above the Law of the Land seeing the King himself by his Oath is pleased to oblige himself to his People to govern according to that Law where it is not contrary to the Law of God Then as to the pretended want of Power of doing Justice concerning causes of Free-hold and Inheritance depending on marriage except by Ecclesiastical Laws and Judges that is very strange for how was Justice done in the times of Primitive Christianity for many Hundred Years after Christ when neither Bishops or any other Ecclesiastical Judges ever pretended Jurisdiction todetermin Temporal Right or Propriety but left the same to be judged by the Imperial Laws How was Justice done in the time of Henry the Second when the Jurisdiction of all Matrimonial causes remained in the Temporal Courts Richard the First his Son being the first as Matthew Paris writes whom the Clergy got by his publick Edict to give the Jurisdiction of Power and Gifts by reason of Marriage and of all Matrimonial causes to the Bishops Courts and the same Richard likewise gave them Jurisdiction of all breach of Faith Promises and Oaths whereby if much of the Power so rashly granted had not been by him so speedily resumed they had hookt to themselves the whole Jurisdiction from the King's Courts of all Contracts and Conveyances Bonds and Obligations as well as Marriages concerning Temporal Goods and Inheritances And why cannot general as well as special Bastardy be tryed at Common Law And how likewise are all Rights depending on all Marriages made during the late Civil Wars by pretence of any Ordinance of Parliament made by 12. Car. 2. cap. 33. to be tryed by a Jury and the Common Law and not by Certificate of the Bishop or any Ecclesiastical Judg to the advancement and not prejudice of Justice and a far greater expedition and advantage to the same would it be if by the like Act the Jurisdiction of all Marriages and Legitimations as it was in the time of Henry the Second were again restored to the Common-Law-Courts So likewise anciently Bastardy alledged in an Action of Trespass was triable by Jury but now usurped by Bishops as well in personal as real Actions 4. Edw. 4.35 Object 2 Coke lib. 5.1 part in the same case of Cawdry it is further alledged Circumspectè agatis gives no Jurisdiction of Marriage to Bishops That the Statutes of Circumspectè agatis made 13. Eliz. 1. of Articuli Cleri made 9. E. 2. Anno Domini 1315. of 15. E. 3. Cap. 6. of 31. E. 3. Cap. 11. give Jurisdiction of marriage to Bishops To which is answer'd That in the Statute of Circumspectè agatis there is not a word mention'd of marriage but only by it Jurisdiction is given to the Bishops of Fornication and Adultery which is not Marriage but rather Anti-marriage for Marriage is an Ordinance of God Fornication and Adultery are Ordinances of the Devil and whereas before the Jurisdiction of Fornication and Adultery as acknowledged by Coke lib. 5.1 part 488. was in Leets under the name of Letherwit or more properly Lecherwit yet had Leets never Jurisdiction of Marriage or Divorce neither consequently could Bishops have it from them As for Articuli Cleri and the other Statutes there is not a word in them concerning Marriage nor so much as of Fornication and Adultery the Jurisdiction therefore pretended was never given by any Statute Linwood likewise expounds the words of the Statute of Circumspectè agatis which gives Bishops Jurisdiction of all deadly Sins as Fornication and Adultery and the like Non intelligas de omni peccato mortali sed de tali cujus punitio spectat merè ad forum Ecclesiasticum nam si de ratione cujuslibet peccati mortalis cognosceret Ecclesia sic periret temporalis gladii Jurisdictio
cùm vix esset dare causam quin ratione peccati possit deferri ad Ecclesiam Object 3 Stat. Merton gives them no Jurisdiction It 's alledged That it appears by the Statute of Merton that Henry the Third writ in his time to the Bishop to certifie Marriage and Bastardy First It is to be understood therefore that in the time of Pope Alexander the Third Anno Dom. 1160. which was Anno 6. H. 2. in whose time all Matrimonial Causes beonged to the King's Courts This Constitution was made That Children born before Solemnization of Matrimony where Matrimony followed should be as Legitimate to inherit to their Ancestors as those that were born after Matrimony It is likewise further to be known that King John the Father of Henry the Third who made this Statute of Merton following was by the then Pope Innocent Excommunicated King John Excommunicated as likewise at the same time was the Emperor Otho and the whole Kingdom of England Interdicted and so remained for the space of Six Years Three Months and Fourteen Days during all which time there was no Church open for Marriages or Burials but the poorer People were buried like Dogs in Ditches and where they married God knows Through which King John was driven to such distress by his own Bishops and Barons and the French assisting the Pope against him that he was forced before he could get to be released of this Excommunication to pay the Pope vast Sums of Money and to lay down his Crown and Scepter Mantle Sword and Ring the Ensigns of his Royalty at the feet of Pandolphus the Pope's Legat and submit himself to the Mercy and Judgment of the Church Two Days some write Six it was before the Legat restored him to his Crown which he likewise received again on no better Terms then to hold the Kingdom of England and Lordship of Ireland from the See of Rome at the Annual Tribute of a Thousand Marks Silver and the Excommunication was not to be taken off but deferred till further and full satisfaction was made to the Clergy which was not done till Two Years after The Bishops being hereby arrived at so great an height of their Tyrannical Power over this King The Bishops usurped the exercise of Ecclesistical Laws by force over their Kings As that when the King having obtained absolution had gather'd a great Army to have been revenged on the French King the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury told him 't was against his Oath at his Absolution and the King in a great passion reply'd He would not defer the Business for his pleasure seeing Lay-judgment appertained not to him the Arch-Bishop presumed to threaten his native Soveraign that unless he desisted he would Excommunicate him Note therefore That in the time of H. 3. who was the Eldest Son of King John the Bishops continued to assume the Power of Lay-judments as well in Marriages as they did of shutting up of Churches in which they were made from the Pope to whom they had inforced King John to surrender his Crown and not from the King 's Writ as that Statute of Merton shews rather a proud Renunciation and scorn to answer the King 's Writ concerning Marriage then any use permitted by them to the King of the same unless he would as his Father had done lay down again his Crown to them and have Marriage judg'd according to the Law of the Pope for otherwise they tell him plainly They neither will nor can answer his Writ as appears by the Statute it self the words whereof follow 20 H. 3. Cap. 9. To the King 's Writ of Bastardy Whether one being born before Matrimony may Inherit in like manner as he that is born after Matrimony All the Bishops answer'd That they would not nor could not answer to it because it was directly against the common Order of the Church that is meant the Romish Church And all the Bishops instanted the Lords that they would consent that all such as were born afore Matrimony should be Legitimated as well as they who were born within Matrimony as to the succession of Inheritance for so much as the Church accepteth such for Legitimate And all the Earls and Barons answer'd with one voice That they would not change the Laws of the Realm which hitherto have been used and approved Coke 2 part Inst 97. It is said Though the Bishops are Spiritual Persons yet in case of general Bastardy when the King writes to them to certifie who is lawful Heir to any Lands or other Inheritances they ought to certifie according to the Law and Custom of England and not according to the Roman Canons and Constitutions yet if they do make their Certificate according to the Canon Law No remedy against Bishops making Certificates contrary to the King's Laws General Bastardy uâ—urped by Bishops not given them by Law and not the Law of the Land there appears no Remedy unless such a one as is worse then the Disease Sir Galfred le Scrope Cheif Justice saith Before this Statute of Merton the Party pleaded not general Bastardy but that he was born out of Espousals and the Bishop ought to certifie whether he were born before Espousals or not and according to that Certificate to proceed to Judgment according to the Law of the Land And the Prelates answered That they could not nor would not to this Writ answer and therefore ever since special Bastardy viz. that the Defendant c. was born before Espousals hath been Try'd in the King's Courts and general Bastardy in the Bishops Court and herewith agree out old Books and the constant Opinion of the Judges ever since Coke 2 part Inst 99. It being before granted That the Law of England cannot be changed but by an Act of Parliament and Magna Charta being before made and being a Declaration of the ancient Common Law First That no Freeman was to be put out of his Free-hold or Inheritance but per legale Judicium parium and there being no cause of its own Nature more Temporal or more concerning Succession to Temporal Inheritance then Marriage It was contrary to Magna Charta and the Common Law to judg the Fact of it by any other Judges then Juries and the Law of it by any other Judges then those of Temporal Courts and though the Pope and Bishops in those Superstitious times forced the Kings many times as they did King John to yeild his Crown and the Subjects to yeild their Marriages and other Temporal Rights to their Arbitrary and Saleable Sentence for fear of Excommunication yet doth not this any way prove that the Jurisdiction of Marriage was ever granted them by any Law or Act of Parliament or could be without it were contrary to a known Common Law and Act of Parliament which expressly gave the trial of Temporal Rights and Inheritances to a Legale Judicium parium and not to any Ecclesiastical Judges or Laws Now therefore it being clear they had
no Jurisdiction but by Usurpation of so Temporal a Right as Marriage before this Statute let any who thinks he can see Nine Miles into a Milstone once more look into the Statute of Merton before recited and try whether he can screw out of it any word giving the Bishops either a Jurisdiction of Marriage or general Bastardy or that this Statute ever forged so rude a Romish Tool as the two edged Sword of general and special Bastardy to divide the living Child or tear it in peices between the Bishop and the Temporal Judg or how it was then consistent with a Legale Judicium parium to expose a Child no Alien but the King 's Native Subject to be tried for all he had by a then Foraign Ecclesiastical Law and a Judg a sworn Canonical Subject to a Foraign Pope or that the wisdom of that Parliament intended to coin a Chimera of a Distinction without a difference of general and special Bastardy which neither they themselves understood nor any Lawyers which write to this day give any sensibly Interpretation or agree amongst themselves concerning it or that they who made the Statute to oppose the Bishops Jurisdiction of Marriage should create a Notion of general Bastardy which le Scrope says was not in Esse before to give them a new Jurisdiction which was to change the Laws of England which they positively refuse in the Statute it self to change Object 4 No Similitude of fetching the Laws of Athens to Rome and bringing the Romish Laws to England It is further alledged by Coke lib. 5.1 part 9. That as the Romans fetching divers Laws from Athens yet being approved and allowed by the State there they were called Jus Civile Romanorum And as the Normans borrowing all or most of their Laws from England yet baptized them by the name of the Laws and Customs of Normandy So albeit the Kings of England derived their Ecclesiastical Laws from others yet so many as were approved and allowed hereby and with general consent are aptly and rightly called the King's Ecclesiastical Laws o. England To which is answer'd That there is no similitude between making or changing the Laws of the Athenians which were Foraign Laws to become the Laws of the Romans and the making or changing either the Foraign Papal or native Provincial Canons or Ecclesiastical Laws into the King's Ecclesiastical Laws of England For First The Athenian Laws before they were made Denizons of Rome were not admitted in cumulo but Articulated and every Article examined one by one by the Decem viri or Ten Men as our usurped Ecclesiastical Laws were appointed to have been done by the Statute of 25 Hen. 8.19 by the Two and Thirty Men and likewise in time of Edward the Sixth by others but neither succeeded before the same was received for a Roman Law Secondly Such Athenian Laws as were pickt or garbled from the rest were by the Authority of the Legislative Power of Rome both Senate and People caused to be writ in Twelve Tables and inacted to be the Laws of Rome but in England there was never by Authority any Articulation selecting or garbling of Canon Laws effected nor the same reduced into Tables Written or Printed by any Act of Parliament Ecclesiastical Laws in an unknown Language Thirdly The selected Athenian Laws were written in the Roman Language to be understood by the People before they would be received as Roman Laws but there is no such thing in the Ecclesiastical Laws of the Holy-Church concerning Marriage or any thing else but they all still remain in the Language of the Beast and can be neither call'd the Laws of the Church which by the Scripture are forbidden to be spoke in an unknown tongue as appears 1 Cor. 14.19 It is said In the Church I had rather speak five words with my understanding that by my voice I might teach others also then ten thousand words in an unknown tongue It is as utterly unlawful therefore to make that a Law of the Church or an Ecclesiastical Law of Marriage which is in the unknown Language of Latin as it had been to have made any form of Prayer taken from the Romish Church though the Pater Noster it self the form of Prayer of the Church of England while it was in Latin for the Minister would then have been a Barbarian to the English man and the English-man a Barbarian to him and it is as bad for the poor English-man for his Law-sutes in Latin for a Wife in the Court of Arches and other Ecclesiastical Courts as it would be if his Prayers were again in Latin in the Church For though he pay his Lawyers dear to plead his Cause there he cannot understand for his Money whether they call him and his Wife Rogue and Whore or honest People or whether the Judg by his Sentence will give him his Wife or take her from him but by the implicit Faith of an Interpreter as let any one look on the Sentence of Divorce in Kennes Case Coke lib. 7.42 E. he may understand or not understand the same Ecclesiastical Laws are not the Laws of the Land Fourthly The Athenian Laws were not obtruded on the Romans by Conquest of their Bodies by the Temporal Sword or their Souls by the Spiritual Sword of Excommunication but the Ecclesiastical Laws of Marriage have been obtruded on England ever since the Conquest by the superstitious Terrors or actual force of Excommunication either Papal or Episcopal and never by consent in Parliament The suffering of an oppression therefore is no consent nor an abuse against Law an Use Custom or Law neither can a wicked Oppression Use Custom or Law in name only be turned into a Law of England except by consent in Parliament or other humane Power besides it is by the very before recited Statute of Merton declared That the Laws of the Church are not the Laws of England for when the Bishop quarrel'd that the Law of England as to Marriage was not according to the Law of the Church and would have had them changed into the Law of the Church the Earls and Barons with one voice answer'd We will not change the Laws of England Whereby it 's plain the Laws of England and Laws of the Church are opposite Laws and not the same and this is confessed by Coke himself in the exposition of his Statute of Merton 2 part Inst fol. 98. where he saith Here our Common Laws are aptly and properly called the Laws of England because they are appropriated to this Kingdom of England as most apt and fit for the Government thereof and have no dependence upon any Foraign Law whatsoever no not on the Civil or Canon Law other then in Cases allowed by the Laws of England and therefore he saith the Poet spake truly hereof Et penitus toto divisos orbe Britannos So as the Law of England is proprium quarto modo to the Kingdom of England therefore Foraign Precedents are
not to be objected against us because we are not subject to Foraign Laws Again that custom or use of Civil or Canon-Laws or Precedents doth not make Civil or Canon-Law the Law of England appears by the use of Sentences of Philosophers and Poets and Precedents of Historians all as much used in Courts of Records of Courts of Judicature as the Civil or Canon-Law yet doth not this use or custom make these Sentences of Philosophy and Poets and the like to be the Law of England or obligatory to the People of England unless such Sentences of Philosophers and Poets are selected from the rest and inacted or confirmed by Act of Parliament to be hereafter the Laws of England And they are so far otherwise from being Laws of England that Cardinal Woolsey Mich. 21. H. 8. Coram Rege was Indicted That he intended Antiquissimas Angliae Leges penitus subvertere enervare universumque hoc Regnum Angliae ejusdem Regni populum Legibus imperialibus vulgo dictis Legibus Civilibus earundem Legum Canonibus in perpetuum subjugare subducere c Let any shew a sensible reason why the Bishops and Ecclesiastical Judges who actually bring in the whole heap of Civil and Canon Laws to judge of the Marriages Filiation and Succession of the Subjects and amongst them the new coin'd Law at the Council of Trent made when Forein Jurisdiction was abolish'd and thereby actually deprive him of that invaluable liberty to which every Native Subject is born and is confirmed to him by so many Acts of Parliament And those great Fundamental Acts Magna Charta and the Petition of Right to have his Birth-right tried per legale judicium parium deserve not as high a censure by Parliament as Cardinal Woolsey had who only intended to do the same And if any hath any mind to consult besides the Laws and Precedents against Forein Laws and Precedents Bod. lib. 1. of a Common-wealth fo 107 108. will give him some satisfaction Forein Laws become not the Laws of this Land by being used by Lawyers where he saith It was in most strong Terms judged by a Decree in the Court of Paris in the Case of Philip the Second the French King That be was not bound unto the customs of the Civil Law at such time as they who were next kindred would have redeemed of him the Countrey of Guyens howbeit that many both think and write the Prince to be bound to that Law for that they think that Law to be Common to all Nations and not Common to any City And yet than the which Law the Romans themselves in some Cases thought nothing more unreasonable But our Ancestors would not have even our Subjects bound to the Roman Laws as we see in the Ancient Records that Philip the Fair erecting the Parliament of Paris and Mompelier declared That they should not be bound unto the Roman Laws And in the erection of Universities the Kings have always declared That their purpose was to have the Civil and Canon Laws in them publickly professed and taught to make use thereof at their discretion but not that the Subjects should be any way bound thereto lest they should seem to derogate from the Laws of their own Countrey by advancing the Laws of strangers And for the same cause Alaricus King of the Goths forbad upon pain of death any Man to alledge the Roman Laws contrary to his Decrees and Ordinances which M. Charles du Moulin my Companion and Ornament of all Lawyers mistaking is therefore with him very angry and in reproach calleth him therefore barbarous howbeit that nothing was therein by Alaricus decreed or done but that which every wise Prince would of good right have decreed and done For Subjects will so long both remember and hope for the Government of Strangers as they are Govern'd by their Laws The like Edict there is of King Charles the Fair and an old Decree of the Court of Paris whereby we are expresly forbidden to alledge the Laws of the Romans against the Laws and Customs of our Ancestors Yea the King of Spain also hath upon Capital pain forbidden any Man to alledge the Roman Laws in confirmation of their own Laws as Oldrad writeth And albeit there was nothing in the Laws and Customs of their Country which differ'd from the Roman Laws yet such is the force of that Edict that all men may understand that the Judges in deciding of the Subjects Causes were not bound unto the Roman Laws And therefore much less the Prince himself who thought it a thing dangerous to have his Subjects bound unto strange Laws And worthy he is to be accounted a Traitor that dares to oppose strange Laws and strange Decrees against the Laws of his own Prince In which doings when the Spaniards did too much offend Stephen King of Spain forbad the Roman Laws to be at all taught in Spain as Polycrates writeth Which was more straightly provided for by King Alphonsus the Tenth who commanded the Magistrates and Judges to come unto the Prince himself and as often as there was nothing written in the Laws of their Country concerning the matter in Question Wherein Baldus is mistaken when he writeth the Italians to be bound to the Roman Laws but the French no otherwise than so far as they should seem unto them to agree with Equity and Reason For the one is as little bound as the other howbeit that Italy Spain the Countries of Province Savoy Languedoc and Lyonnois use the Roman Laws more then other People And that Frederick Barbarossa the Emperour caused the Books of the Roman Laws to be published and taught the greatest part whereof have yet no place in Italy and much less in Germany But there is much difference betwixt a Right and a Law for a Right still without command respecteth nothing but that which is good and upright but a Law importeth a Commandment for the Law is nothing else but the Commandment of a Soveraign using of his Soveraign Power Wherefore then as a Soveraign is not bound unto the Laws of the Greeks nor of any other stranger whatsoever he be no more is he bound unto the Roman Laws more then that they are conformable unto the Law of Nature which is the Law whereunto saith Pindarus all Kings and Princes are subject From which we are not to except either the Pope or the Emperour as some pernicious Flaterers do saying That those two viz. the Pope and the Emperour may of Right without cause take unto themselves the Goods of their Subjects Object 5 Forein Laws cannot be baptized with the name of the King's Laws without act of Parliament As to what is mention'd of baptizing Forein Ecclesiastical Laws by the name of the King 's Ecclesiastical Laws of England he seems still to mistake and puts baptizing by the name where it should have been confirmation by the name and that confirmation too to be given not by the Bishops but the
Parliament Besides there is not de facto that name given for the Ecclesiastical Court is kept in the Bishop's name and not in the King's name And the Bishop takes all the profits and not the King Fain he would mend the matter and says That a Leet is kept in the Lord's name and he hath the profits yet it is the King's Court. It might better been said it was once the King 's before he gave it or sold it to the Lord of the Leet as are many Lands not being Ancient Crown-Lands The King purchases but if he sell again such Lands for valuable considerations the propriety as well as the name of such Lands is then in the buyer and not in the King Therefore though he hath set out his Book as baptized both in Latin and English by the name of de jure Regis Ecclesiastico and of the King 's Ecclesiastical Laws yet with due Reverence to the opinion of so great a Father of the Law it may be said there appears none either to baptize or confirm the name nor any God-father to it but himself Neither will the Title of the King 's Temporal Laws set upon Magna Charta which gives that liberty to every Subject of Tryal of his Birth-right per legale judicium parium be consistent with the Title of the King 's Ecclesiastical Laws which take it away and give it to a Trial by Certificate of the Bishop Object 6 It is again by Coke alledged and Precedents cited That Edward the Confessor William the First Henry the First Henry the Third Edward the First Edward the Second and all English Kings have Govern'd and Ruled both the Kingdom and the Holy Church and have given Jurisdiction to Abbots Priors and Bishops and have granted prohibitions when they transcended the bounds of their Jurisdictions and that Reges sacro oleo uncti sunt spiritualis Jurisdictionis capaces but still this is nihil ad rhombum nor pertinent to make good the Name or Title he hath set his Book of the King 's Ecclesiastical Laws For there is a great difference if he had Entitled it de jurisdictione Regis Ecclesiastica for the King's Jurisdiction and the King's Laws are clean divers things And there is a great difference where he grants Jurisdiction to Ecclesiastical Persons and where he grants them by what Laws they shall exercise that Jurisdiction for the King 's of England have Anciently granted Jurisdiction and Commissions to Ecclesiastical persons as Bishops and Priests to be Judges in the King's-Bench Chancery and other Courts yet could they not grant them power to judge by any other Laws than the Laws of England except by Act of Parliament Then as to granting prohibitions where the King had not or could not by Law grant them Jurisdiction proves nothing that any King did or could by Law grant them Jurisdiction of general Bastardy without Act of Parliament or that there was any Law or Act of Parliament which gave them Jurisdiction of general Bastardy because the King's Courts durst not grant prohibitions for general Bastardy For in those superstitious times neither the King nor Judges dar'd provoke their Excommunication and therefore at the making of the Statute of Merton when the contest was between the Ecclesiastical and Secular Power which of them should give the Law to Marriage The Temporal Judges for fear of their Excommunication took only like the Jackal what the Lion refused and left them which they called special Bastardy So quod non capit Christus capit fiscus which is intended of the false Christ for the true Christ took nothing from it but paid tribute to it Besides if many Jurisdictions should judge by other Laws this would be destructive both to the King and Subject Though the King therefore give the Sword he cannot change the Ballance as is in effect confess'd by Coke himself 3 pt Inst fol. 120. in his Exposition of the Statute 27 E. 3. of Praemunire where he saith The right of King and Subjects not triable per alias Leges or aliud Examen then the laws of the Land If Freehold and Inheritance Goods or Chatâ—les Debts or Duties wherein the King and Subjects have a right or property should be judged per aliam legem which he mention'd before to be Civil or Canon Law And other Trial which he makes to be any Trial except by Jury or be drawn ad aliud examen These three mischiefs endeavour'd to be prevented in the said Statute would necessarily follow viz. Disherison of the King and his Crown the Disherison of all his People and the undoing of the Common Law And fol. 121. he farther saith Some have made a question whether since the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction was acknowleged in the Crown an Ecclesiastical Judge holding Plea of a Temporal Matter belonging to the Common Law doth incur the danger of a Praemunire Though hereof is no question at all yet lest any Man might be led into an Error in a Case so dangerous we will clear this point by Reason Precedent and Authority The Reason holdeth still to draw the Matter ad aliud examen c. And he citeth before several Precedents and says The reason of all these Cases is because it drawes matters Triable at Common Law ad aliud examen and to be discussed per aliam legem Peter du Moulin that famous Protestant Divine writes That there was a a Book printed in the former Age entitle The Canons of the Apostles Anti-Christian whereby the Temporal power of the Pope is wholly taken away And the sixth Canon expresly forbids a Bishop to meddle in Civil affairs And in the 84th Canon are these words A Bishop that meddles in War or seeks to obtain these two things that is to say the Empire of Rome and the Sacerdotal Government let him be deposed for the things of Caesar are to be given to Caesar and the things of God to God And that one Arnold who Preached this Doctrine That the Pope had no Jurisdiction nor any thing to do with the Temporal affairs with great applause was in the year 1155 made a Martyr and most cruelly burnt at Rome by the order of Pope Adrian And this agrees with the Testimony of Christ himself Bishops Judg. not only as to Jurisdiction of Marriage and Legitimation but all other matters wherein Temporal propriety comes in question that he refused the Jurisdiction of it as appears Luk. 12.13 And one of the company said unto him Master speak unto my Brother that he divide the inheritance with me And he said unto him Man who made me a Judge or Divider over you It appears therefore the Episcopal Jurisdiction of judging or dividing Temporal goods in the Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Courts came not from Christ but was usurped by Anti-Christ by force of Fire and Faggot and is from him derived to Bishops and Ecclesiastical Courts to the destruction of the rights of Princes and the liberty and propriety of the people
and such of them as have Propriety in Goods and Chattels Tenements and Haereditaments as Bees Ants and Squirrels leaving as they die their Hives and Honey-Hills and Corn-Holes and Nuts to their Descendents to be their Successors The Internal Readers and Witnesses in Man are the Divine faculties of the Soul Sense and Reason one doth Testifie the Fact the other the Law The Internal Judg of the Probation of both is the Conscience The Laws which they read and testifie are written in the Internal Tables of the Heart Christ expresseth the first concerning Marriage in the foresighted Text Matth. 19.5 For this cause shall a man leave Father and Mother and they two shall be one flesh Concerning Filiation the Law of natural affection which is writ in the heart of the Father is mention'd Psal 103.13 As the Father pittieth his Children so the Lord pittieth them that fear him And the Law of natural affection writ in the heart of the Mother is mention'd Isa 49.15 Can a Woman forget her sucking Child that she should not have compassion on the Son of her Womb As to the Law of Aliment written in the heart of the Father it is mention'd Luke 11.11 If a Son shall ask bread of any of you that is a Father will he give him a stone or if he ask a Fish will he give him a Serpent or if he shall ask an Egg will he offer him a Scorpion Lastly as to the Law of Succession written in the heart of the Father whereby all natural Sons succeeded either to the right of Primogeniture or Filial Portions the same runs through all the examples of Jews in Scripture and of Gentiles in Histories This great Law of Nature is acknowledged to be written in the Tables of the Heart by the Scripture it self Rom. 2.14 The Gentiles who have not the Law do by Nature the things contained in the Law these having not the Law are a Law unto themselves which shew the work of the Law written in their Hearts their Conscience also bearing witness and their thoughts mean while accusing or excusing one another So Rom. 1.26 Paul saith Women did sin against Nature Yet was there no Law of Moses nor any Law written by God or Man in Paper and Ink which particularly prohibited them but only that of Nature And that this Law of Nature can neither be changed nor abolished or dispensed with by any humane power is agreed by Philosophers Poets Divines Common and Civil Lawyers and all others except Popes who exalt themselves above God Christ and Nature and all that is called God Lex Naturae neo tolli neo abrogari potest saith Tul. de leg 205. Dionysius when his Mother being an old Woman desired of him he would get her to be married to a young Man He answer'd Kings might overthrow Civil Laws but could not the Laws of Nature Lex humana derivari debet à lege Dei sed eam perfectè persequi non Potest Aquin. Augustin In humanis Legibus nihil est justum nisi ab aeterna lege dirivatur Honesta turpia natura judicanda sunt Tul. de leg 169.6 Hobart's Reports 120. It is acknowledged that all customs and Acts of Parliament against the Laws of Nature are void for Lex naturae est lex legum the Law of Nature is the Law of God and positive Law if contrary or variant from it is the Law of Man Yelverion Justice said When a new Case comes for which there is no positive Law before we do as the Sophonisis and Civilians resort to the Law of Nature which is the reason and ground of all Laws and of that which is most beneficial for the Common-wealth make a Law quod non negatur 8 E. 4. fo 12. Claudius justly reprehends Tribonian That in compiling the Institutes of the Civil Law he omitted the Law of Nature de Ferraiis 552. But the flattering Courtier had he done so knew he must have prefixed another imperatoriam Majestatem and laid other manner of principles then placitum Principis to be the original of right he could not have then divided Title and Jurisdiction with his Master And Jupiter Proclaiming that Deus est imperator in Coelis Imperator est Deus in Terris 'T is well he claims only the Earth for now the Pope claims not only plenitudinem Terrae but Heaven too to sell to his Customers Yet the Civil Law acknowledges the Law of Nature immutable And this point of Marriage and Succession saith Lege duodecim tabularum benè humano generi prospectum est quae unam consonantiam tam in maribus quà m in foeminis Legitimis in eorum successionibus necnon in liberis observandam esse existimavit nullo discrimine in successionibus habito cum natura utrumque corpus ediderit ut maneat suis vicibus immortale alterum alterius auxilio egeat ut uno semoto alterum corrumpatur sed posteritas dum inimica utitur subtilitate non piam induxit differentiam c. Cod. lib. 6. tit 47. l. lege By the Law of the Twelve Tables it is well provided for Mankind that there should be the same rule of Successions for Males and Females and in Children and no difference to be made in their Successions seeing Nature hath brought forth the Bodies of both that they might continue in their course immortal and one need help of another and one taken away the other might be destroyed But later Ages while they use so much subtilty have made an impious difference c. Which is intended between Males and Females in Succession when Lands are Intailed to Heirs Males By which appears what opinion the Civil Law hath of Successions to such Intails to be impious because contrary to the Law of Nature The Civil Law likewise acknowledgeth that Jura Sanguinis nullo jure Civili dirimi possunt and again it follows the Law of Nature in Legitimation Si mulier quinquagenaria partum ediderit an debet hujusmodi soboles suo patri succedere haereditatem â—jus nancisci à Caesariano advocato interrogati sumus sancimus Licet mirabilis hujusmodi partus inveniatur raro contingat nihil tamen eorum quae probabiliter à natura nascuntur esse producta respui sed omne jus quod ex quacunque Lege liberis praestitum est hoc merum atque immutilatum hujusmodi filiis vel filiabus servari in omnibus succâ—ssionibus sive ex testamento sive ab intestata Et summatim non absimiles aliis fiant in quos similes natura efficit Cod. lib. 6. tit 47. si major A question is proposed us by the Advocate of Caesar if a Woman above fifty bring forth a Child whether such Issue shall be Successor to the Father in the whole inheritance And we Decree though it be an admirable Case and rarely happens yet we ought not to reject any thing known to be probably produced by Nature but all the right which by any Law is given to
of Libels and Lampoons It increases unlearned Sects and Heresies who if drawn to Print would either not be able to form their Doctrine in Principles or Positions or if they were they would appear so absurd as would be fit to imploy boys to laugh at rather than Doctors to confute Such were Mahomet's whose Alchoran is not therefore suffered to be Printed or Translated 5. It causes the more dangerous way of spreading Heresies both learned and unlearned to be neglected how to prevent which is the secret creeping into private Houses leading Captive silly Women with whom they walk like the Pestilence in the dark whereas if they appeared in Print or publick Preaching they might be known where they are and opposed 6. It stops the truth of all intelligence which is so invaluable a Treasure and difficult to be got into the Gates of Princes 7. A free Press is the pulse of the Body politic from which is impossible for the wisest State-Physician to discern or prevent the public Distempers unless it is suffer'd to beat free without a Ligature 8. It stops all just causes of complaint and appeal of the Subject to the King and Parliament against Judges and great Officers both Spiritual and Temporal It was my own ill fortune to be prickt Sheriff of a County which enforced me to draw a Petition to be presented to the King and Parliament desiring some remedy against the old Popish Oath continued to be imposed on Sheriffs wherein they swear to destroy the Protestant Religion under the name of Lollary and likewise to be relieved against the extortions of Officers of the Exchequer on Sheriffs which not knowing how otherwise conveniently to Address I appointed the Messenger to get a License to Print which he tryed to do but though there was nothing in it but Humility and Truth as who dare present otherwise to the Legislative Power The Licenser Swore He would not License it for Five Hundred Guinneys whereby it could not be done 9. It stops all presentments by the People to the King and Parliament of public grievances in regard the extent of the Three Kingdoms is great and remote and therefore neither fit nor possible multitudes should come so far to present Petitions in person and if not done in person there are so many Papists and Foreign Agents and their favourers in the way as may and do often intercept from the King's knowledg the humble applications of his Protestant Subjects as is easie to do when perhaps comprised only in one sheet of Paper To avoid therefore the stifling of all just complaints of the Subjects and the ill consequences which have been too often occasioned thereby of presenting Petitions by Tumults and Armies It is far more safe and equal that the Press should be open to the People in all public Addresses to Supream Authority it being many times a sufficient satisfaction to them if they understand that the King and Parliament do but vouchsafe to hear their complaints and desires though they think it not fit to grant them And a Child will often times awe his Enemies from harming him if he do but threaten them he will tell his Father where they know he hath that liberty given him 10. It appears by experience That the Liberty of the Press in Holland and other Foreign States where permitted not only bring no inconveniences but very great benefits and advantages to the People By pretence of giving the King the name of Supremacy they have taken the Thing to themselves The word Supremacy is of so infinite Extent as it can properly be attributed to none but the Divine Power of God and the words Jurisdiction and Government with which it is joyned in the Stat. 1. Eliz. 1. which gives the Form of the Oath of Supremacy are of that Vast Latitude that in their large literal Sense they include all Legislative Judicial and Executive Power amongst men and the Subject matters over which it is exercised are all Divine and Human Rights yea what is more all things Spiritual and Ecclesiastical as well as Temporal circumscribed in nothing to difference it from the Papal Supremacy pretended over Heaven Earth and Hell but the Bounds of her Majesties Dominions within which no wise man ever believed Heaven and Hâ—ll to be contained though the Bishops under pretence of the same Supremacy given her Majesty which the Pope had have in the Royal name exercised the same not only in matters of Marriage Filiation and Succession concerning which I intend here only to contend with them but in all other matters of Oppression of the Consciences and Rights of the Subjects both as to Religion Liberty and Propriety as high as ever the Pope did though never any such Supremacy was intended either by the Statute or Oath to make Canons Judg or Execute but what hath before been or lawfully may be exercised or used so the word lawfully refers to time past as well as future and that neither Pope nor Bishops had ever any lawful Supremacy or Power to make or use Canons or Ecclesiastical Laws concerning Marriage Filiation or Succession but did the same by Usurpation in this Realm is sufficiently proved before against my Lord Coke's Ecclesiastical Law P. 31. and the Form of the Oath makes the Ecclesiastical Supremacy no higher than the Temporal Supremacy which every one knows in all Acts of Legislation is joyntly in the King and Parliament and not singly in either Estate And therefore Bishops can claim to exercise no Supremacy from one unless they have it from both nor of any matter which is not within the Kings Dominions or of any other human Power but only belongs to the Kingdom of God And that Pious Queen her Self who began her Reign with the Statute and Oath of Supremacy soon found the words so general and thereby obscure and the letter wrested to such extremity by Episcopal Expositions that she endeavour'd by a Subsequent Declaration published to have explained and limited according to the true intention but the same not being done by Act of Parliament became not of that Force was desired and left the Bishops more liberty to exercise more Supremacy in the Royal Name by pretence then was in truth intended in the Act or Oath And the subtlety wherewith they glossed their designs appears in the Act it self of which they were the chiefest contrivers For first they begin with a Nolo Episcopare alas as if they intended never to Episcopate or seek for Ecclesiastical Supremacy againâ— for they utterly abolish all Foreign Power which was the Popes and all usurped Power which was their own and annex all Spiritual and Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction to the Crown which includes the Jurisdiction of Marriage Filiation and Succession and many other matters for they knew if any part of the Supremacy had been left at Rome they could never have got it to Canterbury and though the one eased the Burden of the Subject no more than the other but rather by
are totally Ignorant except only to take account of the Money and Gaines 3. They Judg by a Chancellour and Commissaries and not in Person The Causes are First Ignorance whereof they are before proved Guilty The Second Pride that they may be equal to Kings who pream Judg or Legislative Power can delegate Judgment A Bishop must therefore be a Judg Supream or Delegate if he Arrogate to be Supream he ought not to be suffer'd if a Delegate Delegatus non potest Delegare The Third is Sloth to take the Gains and not the Pains of doing Justice The Fourth is Covetousnes that they may have Plurality of Offices and let them to Farm to Deputies all which are most sad Ingredients to compound a Judg of Marriage Filiation and Succession and it is clean contrary to the known Laws for any Judg Delegate to Act by Deputy and not in Person for the Office of a Judg is an Office of Trust and cannot be granted over and neither ought nor can be executed by any Assign Deputy Commissaries or Chancellour but ought to be served in Person besides they Excommunicate by Lay-deputies contrary to their own Pretences that the Power of the Keys belongs only to Persons in pretended Holy Orders 4. They have Pluralities of Offices and more than they are able to serve yet will be Judges besides One good thing is remembred of Becket Arch-Bishop of Canterbury who though he was a Traitor to King Henry the Second yet being first by him made Chancellor of England and after made Arch-Bishop of Canterbury before he would take upon him the Office of Arch-Bishop he of his own accord first surrendred his Office of Chancellor not thinking it fit for one man to have two such great Offices at once but they now make St. Peters Net of so small a Mash that great or small all is Fish that comes to it And first they begin with the Coronation Office already mention'd then the Offices of Legislation in Parliaments of Legislation in Assemblies of Legislation in Synods of Chancellors of State of Negotiators of Intelligencers of Soldiers of Treasurers of Almoners of Temporal Barons of Masters of the Ceremonies of Worship of Visitors of Inquisitors of Confessors of Penancers of Excommunicators of Pardoners of Absolvers of Dispencers of Faculties of Interdictors of Marriages of Liâ—ncers of Marriage of Interdictors of the Press of Licencers of the Press of makers of Ministers of Licencers of Preachers Curates Lecturers Schoolmasters Physicians of Consecrators of Churches of Consecrators of Church-yards of Interdictors of Burial of Interdictors to cast out the Devil by Fasting and Prayers of Licencers to cast out the Devil and many others out of each of which they reap gains yet are not able to serve the least part of them but let them to Farm to their Spunges whom they squeeze into their own See whereas they cannot so much as pretend any Mission from Christ for more than One Office which is of Teaching in Season and out of Season and would they follow that as they ought the same would be sufficient to take up the whole man and leave them little leisure of being Judges of Marriage Filiation and Succession or to execute any other Temporal Office 5. They are Ambidexter and Amphibious Judges in Spirituals and Temporals They cannot deny that Marriage since it was purified by the Protestant Religion from the defilement of being a Romish Sacrament and Filiation Aliment and Succession incident to the same became meer Temporal matters and nothing can be more Temporal in it self or wherein the higest Temporal Rights of Princes and People of Liberty of Person and Propriety of Goods Freehold and Inheritance are more concerned than in them and it being likewise confess'd both by Common and Ecclesiastical Lawyers That the meer Spiritual Judge ought not to judg of Temporal matters neither was there any such Jurisdiction ever pretended to Marriage by the Pope himself but as to a Spiritual Sacrament and in Ordine ad Spiritualia he by it deposed Kings and disposed of the Succession of Kingdoms at his Will and Pleasure Unless therefore a Bishop will affirm That Marriage continues still a Romish Sacrament or that he may like the Pope judg of any Temporal matters in Ordine ad Spiritualia he hath no pretence or colour of Right to be a Judg of Marriage Filiation Aliment or Succession but let the Right be what it will de Facto he hath got a Spiritual Lord and a Temporal Baron into one Doublet and produced from thence a monstrous Ambidextrous Jurisdiction with the Spiritual Sword in one hand and the Temporal in the other neither Divine nor Humane nor Fish nor Flesh but like the Amphibious Crocodile partly with Tears partly with Terror Raving both by Land and Water and Destroying in both the Elements of Spirituals and Temporals 6. They Judg Marriage by pretended Canons and Laws made by Bishops and Synods which are no Laws but are utterly void they not having had in their making the Assent of the Parliament No English-man can deny That to make a Law are required the joint Assent both of King and Parliament and if either is wanting there can be no Law decreed and enacted by any other Convention Ecclesiastical or Lay whether Council or Synod And this is so great a Birth-right of the People That if any House of Commons who are Elected by the People and intrusted by them to be their Delegates to treat with his Majesty or his Successors to enact Laws of Marriage and other Laws concerning the same should consent and agree That an Act of Parliament should be made that the Bishops and a Synod should instead of the House of Commons have full Power and Authority on their Convention by the Kings Writ to treat with the King and by his Royal Assent to make and enact Canons and Laws concerning Marriage Filiation Succession Religion Liberty and Propriety of the People and such Canons and Laws so made should have the force of Acts of Parliaments and the Commons should declare That to ease themselves of the trouble of so often being summon'd from their remote Habitations in the Country and so long Journies to the City and their not being verst in the difficulties of Legislation or any other probable matter of Excuse that they desired to refer the whole care of the Publick Affairs to Bishops and Synods who are Learned men and they should from time to time as often as they saw necessary on Summons make wholesom Canons and Laws for the People and that the House of Commons desired to be excused from the burden of sitting any more and accordingly such an Act should be passed and thereon a Synod be Summon'd and they should make a Book of Canons concerning Marriage Filiation and Succession by the Royal Consent and these should be proclaimed to be Laws and to have the force of Acts of Parliament yet would such Book of Canons be utterly void and of none effect
because in their making there was no Consent of an House of Commons and the House of Commons being but Delegates themselves can not Delegate the Peoples Interest in the Legislative to others for Delegatus non pâ—test delegare it was an Office of Personal Trust reposed in the Persons Elâ—cted to be Members of Parliament to treat with the King and assent to equal Laws in behalf of the People they could not grant over therefore this Office of Trust to Bishops or a Synod or a Council to treat with the King and assent to Laws for the People but every Member of Parliament ought either to refuse to accept of the Election or if he accept to serve in Person All Books of Canons made by Bishops without consent of Parliament void and not by Proxy assign or subdelegate in so great a Trust as to join in making Laws for the Publick Safety and Peace Hence will follow therefore That all Ecclesiastical Canons and Laws of Synods and Councils prohibiting Marriage without Publick Bans or Episcopal Licences and all Canons prohibiting Marriage in time of Advent Septuagesima and Rogation and all Canons prohibiting Marriage within degrees of Consanguinity and Affinity not prohibited by the Moral Law of God and all Canons prohibiting Marriage not made by the Ceremonies of a Priest and Temple and all Canons of the Council of Trent making null and void all Marriages not made before a Priest and two Witnesses are all in themselves utterly void for the House of Commons never assented to their making and all Laws prohibitory of Marriage being before shewn to be contrary to the Moral Law of God and to come from the Devil P. 52. and it being here shewn that they have no consent of Parliament such Books of Canons must in both respects be of necessity null and void as being neither the Laws of God nor Man in England but of the Devil according to which Books of Canons Bishops therefore Judging of Marriage contrary to the Moral Law of God and without any positive Law of Man their Judgment must likewise be void being according to the Law of the Devil and such Persons are no fit Judges who judg according to such Laws 7. They take to themselves the Fines and Penalties of their own Judgments That the Sole and Final Cause why Bishops so eagerly contest for the Jurisdiction of Marriage is Filthy Lucre is shewn before P. 52 53. c. and the same is so great a Pillar of the Kingdom of Anti-Christ that Pope ruin'd where Episcopal Jurisdiction of Marriage is taken away take but away Episcopal Jurisdiction of Maâ—riage the Papal Power is immediately ruin'd in those Provinces wheresoever it is done 1. In regard of the infinite Treasure he heaps hereby which appears before P. 52 53. 2. In regard of the Power he gains hereby over Kings and Princes in assuming to himself the Judgment of Filiations and Successions to Kingdoms 3. By enticing Princes to unlawful Marriages contrary to the Moral Law of God and procuring them to take his Dispensations for thereby such Prince and his Successors will be in great danger as to his Title unless he expose his Interest and Religion to obtain assistance from the See of Rome which made Philip the Second King of Spain who Married Queen Mary so furious to support the Catholick Religion in the Low Countreys by Fire and Sword and to make a Law That none should succeed him in the Government of those Provinces unless he took an Oath to maintain the Catholick Religion there and maintain the Authority of the Church of Rome And this made Queen Mary so cruelly furious against Protestants in England the Title of her Mothers Marriage and her Succession depending on the Popes protection And wheresoever any Prince is promoted by the Popes Canon Laws contrary to the Right of Succession instituted by the Moral Law of God such Prince to defend his Title against the right Heir by the Moral Law of God and his Successors become assured Vassals to the Religion and See of Rome 4. The Pope by procuring and dispensing Marriages of Catholick Ladies with Protestant Princes gains a numerous increase of Catholicks in those Dominions and many times turns the whole Tide to carry Tribute to Tyber But to return to the lesser Rivers the Bishops 't is no small stream of gain flows in to them too by such an unjust Power of Bribing themselves to Injustice by exercising so Arbitrary a Proceeding as to Fine and Commute what they please and putting it in their own Purses which should go to the Publick Treasury 8. They License Dispense and Pardon all Offences against the Law for Money It is to no purpose to make Penal Laws if the Judg hath liberty to License Dispense and Pardon Offences against them and nothing better enables him to do it than to allow a Judg to Fine or Commute and to put the Fine or Commutation Money in his own Purse now the Power of Licensing Dispensing and Pardoning Offences against the Laws of Marriage or any other Law must of necessity so corrupt the Judg as he will protect and increase the Vice he pretends to suppress Hence the Popes Taxa Camerae and the Bishops Courts increase more Fornication and Adultery than aâ—l the loose Women in the Countrey They are therefore no fit Judges of Marriage 9. They cannot be known whether they are Protestants or Papists if Bishops The Laws of Marriage have a very great influence on all Religions and in all Nations but more specially God hath been pleased in England to make the same the chief means and occasion in the time of H. 8. of planting the Protestant it is therefore of very great concern for the Preservation of the same that the Judges of Marriage be Protestants and it cannot be known whether they are so or no if Bishops 1. Because the excess of Riches which the Jurisdiction of Marriage Filtation and Succession especially to Kingdoms carries with it and all other Profits of a Bishoprick joined therewith are so great as may be too much a Temptation to any unless a Saint by Miracle to be of any Religion to obtain them and Christ himself Matth. 19 24. makes this Temptation so difficult to be resisted that he saith It is easier for a Camel to go through the Eye of a Needle than for a rich man to enter into the Kingdom of Heaven yea he makes a Miracle necessary for any to obtain Riches and Heaven together for he saith Verse 26. With men this is impossible but with God all things are possible And Austin in imitation of this confesseth in effect the same difficile imò impossibile est praesentibus futucis bonis frui It is difficult yea impossible to enjoy the good things of this World and of that to come Damasus Bishop of Rome endeâ—vour'd to convert Praetextatus a great Heathen Phâ—losopher to Christianity he answer'd him Make me Bishop of Rome and I will turn
he ought to be punish'd in One Hundred Pounds to the King and Imprisonment one Year without Bail and One Hundred Pounds more to the Knight injured thereby or to any other Person who in his default will Sue for the same and is contrary to the two said standing Acts of Parliament of greater consequence than Magna Charta or the Petition of Right themselves for if there is a Protestant Parliament no doubt they will make and we shall not want Protestant Laws but if once there get in a Papist Parliament both Protestant Laws Religion and Protestants themselves will be all destroyed And as the Sheriff Returns Fictions to Courts so do they send Fictions to him and it is hard for him to know when they speak true and when false as if a Venire Facias be sent him to Return 12 Jurors he must Return 24 which is double the number or he shall be Fined for as they write their words in the Venire by halves so do they as it seems their Meaning by halves yet the poor Sheriff is bound to understand them to his Cost then if they send him a Pone per Vadios Salvos plegios the Sheriff must Return no other Plegii to answer their Fiction than his own Fiction of Plegii John Den and Richard Fen or they will teach the Party to have a false Imprisonment against him Suits are removed when the Plaintiff hath been at all the Cost and trouble and is ready for a Trial on meer vexation and to delay on Suggestion or Fiction of a Cause without any Oath of Calumny Attachments and Arrest of Goods and Persons is used in the City without any Oblatio Libelli or Oath of Calumny on meer Fictions and Suggestions City Law 22. but very wrongfully for a Citizen hath as good Right to Magna Charta as he hath to the Charter of the City and under the name of being free of the City doth not lose the liberty of a Subject to be free from Arrest before Judgment Coke Vind. Law 26. says Abuses of Fictions to Arrest before Judgment This brings to my remembrance how a Gentleman was Arrested for 1500 l. the same day that he was to have been Married without any colourable cause of Action spitefully to hinder his Match and was not able to give Bail but the Party being Non-suit the Gentleman notwithstanding could recover as I remember no more than 7 s. 2 d. Cost yet he lost his Monies and indeed himself by it for I know it was the occasion of his utter Undoing and a man that is Cannibally given may devour the Credit of 500 men Arresting them for 5000 l. a piece never declare yet pay no Cost though Party Arrested had better have paid 500 l. and this is so usual that 't is commonly said I 'le bestow a Bill of Middlesex on such a man to stay him in Town that I may have his company into the Countrey when I go down And I my self was informed by a Sea-Captain who was a Sufferer in such an Arrest That there happen'd to be two Merchants in London each of which designed a Voyage to the same Port of Barbary whether he who could arrive first was assured he should to his great gain obtain the Prime of the Market to which purpose they both strove with all diligence possible which should be foremost at the Spring and it happen'd that he who had his Ship first ready had entertained this Captain of my acquaintance to command her for him and all being ready to set Sail the Captain would needs walk into the City to take his parting Cup and Farewell of his Friends where unexpectedly he was Arrested for 5000 l. though not owing a farthing and the same being a Choak-Bail-Sum he knew he should get none to be Surety for him and thereupon sent to his Merchant to inform him how he was boarded before he could get aboard who being much troubled that his Captain was taken by a Land Pyrat repaired to him and understanding from him that he did not owe the Party at whose Suit he was Arrested a farthing and knowing withal that it was done by the Spite of the other Merchant to stop his Ship from getting before him he gave Bail for his Captain and sent him immediately on the Voiage All which Mischiefs happen because there is no Law to compel to give a Copy of the Declaration and Oath of Calumny before Arrest by which all Fictions are prevented All the Judicial Transactions of Fines and Recoveries are Fictions Fictions of Fines and Recoveries so though we have fled from Land to Sea and back again from Sea to Land we know not where to find Rest for the Sole of our Foot from Fictions We are next come to another horrible cause of their Increase which is that no Averment or Probation to the contrary is admitted against the Sheriff or the Clerk nor the Returns or Records how Records which are nothing but the Scribling of Clerks in false Latine and Court-hand for their Fees come to be of higher Authority than the Scripture it self is strange for it was never denied except against Mahomets Alchoran but Averment and contrary Probation might be brought against the false Copying false Translating or false Printing of any word or Clause in the Scripture or it would be very difficult to overthrow Popery What greater reason is there of so many Forgeries of Clerks but that there is no Averment allowed against their Records nor contrary Probation whereby they may for Money insert what Fictions and Falsities they please Estopples are another mischievous cause and the denial of liberty of Travers as bad or worse than the other Turpia quid referam vanae mendacia Linguae I am weary and ashamed to recite so much reflecting so deeply on the Honourable and necessary Profession of the Law Pudet haec opprobria nobis Et dici potuisse non potuisse refelli But all this may be easily taken away of Fictions and Falsities if so small a matter of Form were but alter'd as to give liberty to Traverse all is false and to cause the Plaintiffs and Defendants to give Copies of their Declarations and Pleas and to give their Oath of Calumny to them for I saw it by experience in Scotland which I must acknowledg and testifie to the Honour of their Form of Judicial Proceedings That I could never for the space of Six Years observe the least Fiction in the same which I can attribute to no other cause than the wise and just Act of Parliament concerning the Oath of Calumny Jac. 1. P. 9. C. 125. and the present Practice accordingly which Act being short I have transcribed That Advocates and Fore-speakers in Temporal Courts sall Sweare THrow the consent of the hail Parliament it is Statute and Ordained That Advocates and Fore-speakers in Temporal Courts and alswa the Parties that they plead for gif they be present in all Causes in the beginning or
for State-Assairs So of the Grisons Yet do the Cantons remain in the nature of several Commonwealths with several Laws and Customs which Union is very imperfect Livy lib. 2. complains of this defect of Union of Councils in Rome and saith Profecto si essent in Republica Magistratus nullum futurum fuisse Romae nisi publicum consilium nunc in mille Curias Concionesque cum alia in Esquiliis alia in Aventino fiant Concilia dispersam dissipatam esse Rempublicam And by this doth Tacitus confess it was that Rome Conquer'd Great Britain Nec aliud adversus validissimas gentes pro nobis utilius quà m quod in commune non consulunt rarus duabus tribusque Civitatibus ad propulsandum commune periculum conventus ita dum singuli pugnant Vniversi vincuntur Neither saith he was there any thing so profitable for us against the most valiant Nations as that they had no Common Council a rare matter it was amongst them to have a Convention of Two or Three Cities against the common danger so while they every one fought single they are all Conquer'd Whereas if Great Britain had been then united under one King and one Parliament of the whole Island they perhaps might have as well said of his second Landing as of his first Territa quaesitis ostendit terga Britannis So doth Justin mention of the States of Greece every one of them had at last their Councils apart and fought single whereby one after another they were all overthrown What hath United the Heptarchy of the Saxons and the mixture of Danes inseparably but the equal Mission of their Representatives to the same Parliament and what did Unite the Noble Remainder of Britains to England but the Statute of 27. H. 8.26 Enacting That all Persons born in Wales should enjoy all Liberties Privileges and Laws as other Subjects in England do and should send their Knights and Burgesses to the same Parliament with them The Glory of a King is the multitude of his People and what more Glorious for a King who hath the Royal English Scotish Irish and British Blood United in him who is the Head than to have the same United in his Parliament who is the Body Let it not offend if I mention here the late Experience of Union of the Three Parliaments in one House by the late Usurper seeing we are commanded to learn Wisdom though from the Serpent and if he under so great disadvantages of Opposition made great Benefit the lawful Prince may make far greater thereby and his Subjects likewise by his Favour participate of the same I cannot deny that it was my Fortune though I never sought it to be chosen for a County and to serve in that great Convention at Westminster Anno 1656. called then a Parliament wherein the Parliaments of England Scotland and Ireland were Convened and United in One with the same facility as they are Convened to sit in Three Places and there being then a War designed against Spain it was wonderful to see with what Expedition and Courage all things were moved towards the Design and what an Endearment it was between the Three Nations to meet be acquainted eat drink and converse together about the Common Concernments Having consider'd so far of the great Benefits of an Union of the Three Parliaments of the Three Kingdoms in One it may not be amiss next to consider the Requisits necessary to perfect the same 1. Whether an Union of Crowns be necessary to perfect an Union of Parliaments and Kingdoms It seems for the Affirmative 1. Because where the Natural Person of a King is One if the Politick Person or Capacity is not made One the one Politick Capacity may be divided against the other in the same Natural Person as on the Succession of King James to Queen Elizabeth the Queen of England had declared War against the King of Spain the King of Scotland was in Peace with them so in the diverse Rights of Two Crowns there was War and Peace at one time between the same Persons the like Doubts may arise Whether the Royal Assent may pass contrary Politicks Acts and Laws in the Parliament of one Nation to what he hath pass'd in the other in reference to the contrary Rights of each Crown Whereas if both are consolidated and made one no contrariety of Acts can happen 2. It is as dangerous to have Two Crowns as Two Marble-Chairs for they may be kept in several places and the more easily may an Usurper happen on the possession of one of them and the Vulgar be deluded to think Possession of those Signs of Supreme Honor to be equal to the Right and besides that a Fatality will follow them 3. Seeing it hath pleased God to make the Head of the Three Kingdoms One men ought to follow his Example and make the Crowns One 4. The continuance of several Crowns is apt to continue a perpetual memory of Hostilities between the Kingdoms 2. Whether an Unity of Protestant Churches is necessary to an Union of Protestant-Kingdoms It seems for the Affirmative Because if Protestant-Churches divide one against another the Kingdoms will be a Prey to the Papist and the Protestant will have none to Unite 3. Whether permission of Protestants to Excommunicate Protestants is consistent with the Unity of Protestant-Churches Neg. If the Pope Excommunicate Protestants it Unites them the firmer but if they Excommunicate one another they denounce War and destroy one another with their own hands and leave the Spoils to be divided by the Pope An Elegy on Protestants in the late Civil Wars Excommunicating Protestants LVgeat in trisidis jam moesta Britannia flammis Et doleat jam fulminibus percussa trisulcis Intonuit falsus nebulosa Tibride Petrus Et Magicis stolidum perterruit Artibus Orbem Piscator Twedae retonat multisque cachinnis Rupibus ingeminans sua fulmina misit ab Altis Becketi Lemures contra hunc torsere minaces A Thamisi gelidas Vulcania tela per auras Heu non Oceanus circum vaga Littora fusus Nec freta compescant tantis ardoribus ignes Risit Romanus Tarpeia Rupe Tyrannus Cumque suis inquit sese immisere Gebennis Pontifices Britonum per mutua vulnera tandem Ne sic deficerent inferno gurgite flammae Ipse super terram viventes igne cremabo Ecce jocum mintrat mus rodens Rana coaxat Et cum limosis ineunt certamina juncis Milvus spemque suam motis circumvolat alis Ipse paludosam sic vellem carpere Ranam Et sic ridiculum vellem discerpere Murem Englished LET Britain mourn who burns in triple Fires And struck with threefold Thunder-bolts expires A Peter false from Tyber in a Cloud By Magick Art did Thunder it aloud The Fisher-man of Tweed with many Mocks Return'd his Thunder double from the Rocks Proud Beckets Ghost ' gainst him from Thames broke forth And with Vulcanian Darts fired the North. What Ocean which her wandring Shores doth drench Or
in these Articles Bishops presumed to be Legislators Judges and Executioners in their own Case for the Bishops make the Article 36. whereby they Constitute themselves Arch-Bishops and Bishops and Article 32. They Declare it lawful for all men to Marry Article 34. They Ridiculously make Traditions of the Church to be Changeable according to Diversity of Countries Times and mens Manners so before they come to their Ceremonial Law they set up their Legend-Law and the Ceremonies must be Founded on what Legends they please and no man must oppose either Tradition or Legend or Ceremonies set up by Common Authority that is by Authority of the Bishops for the House of Commons never Authorized them Rog. Art 34. Prop. 2. p. 196. Then Article 33. they Order Excommunication Delivery to Satan Penance and Absolution Then to compell the Observation of these Articles Anno 1603. They assume the Legislative Power to make Canons and Constitutions Ecclesiastical without the assent of the House of Commons they Order Saying or Singing of Common-Prayer and the Letany with all the Ceremonies prescribed by the Can. 14 15. Copes Surplices and Hoods to be wom in Cathedrals by Can. 17 27. Marriage not to be without Banns or License Can. 62. None to deliver from Satan without the Bishops License Can. 72. And no Minister to Preach Read Lecture or Catechize without Subscription to the 39. Articles Can. 36 37. And then to make clear work they Order That if any affirm any of the Nine and Thirty Articles made by the Arch-Bishops and Bishops to be in any part Erroneous or such as he may not with a good Conscience Subscribe to let him be Excommunicate Ipso facto which is without Summons or Hearing Can. 5. Can. 9. So unless the Protestant-Minister will Popishly acknowledg the Bishop to be Infallible and without Error and that all his Traditions and Ceremonies of Worship of Marriage and the like Ordained by Episcopal Authority are of Divine Right to oblige the Conscience and that he neither can Teach nor Fast nor Pray though to deliver from the Devil without his License Here is a Test wherein the Bishop assumes to be Legislator Judg an Ipso facto Executioner in his own Cause against a Protestant-Minister and not only prohibited to speak Book of 39. Articles and of Canons oblige not the Subjects to Clergy or Lay. but his Conscience to think against it in his own Defence 3. This Subscription to the 39. Articles ought not to be Imposed as a Test because neither the said Book of Articles nor Book of Canons had the Assent of the House of Commons at the time of their Making without whose Actual and Express Assent no Law or Canon or Article can be made to oblige the Subject which is more fully proved before Whether the Positive part of the Oath of Supremacy is a true Test The Form of the Oath 1. Eliz. 1. is as followeth I A. B. do utterly Testifie and Declare in my Conscience That the Kings Highness is the only Supreme Governor of this Realm and of all other his Highness's Dominions and Countries as well in all Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Things or Causes as Temporal and that no Foreign Prince Person Prelate State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preheminence or Authority Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realm and therefore I do utterly Renounce and Forsake all Foreign Jurisdictions Powers Superiorities and Authorities and do promise that from henceforth I shall bear Faith and true Allegiance to the Kings Highness his Heirs and lawful Successors or Vnited and Annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm So help me God and by the Contents of this Book It being granted that no true Test can be which the Conscience of a Protestant weak or strong ignorant or knowing refuseth or is doubtful to take it is manifest that the positive part is refused by a very considerable part of the People and a greater part are doubtful and take it with Reluctancy yet are they such as cannot be doubted to be sincere Protestants in Religion and most Faithful and Loyal Subjects to the King and their Objections seem to be these 1. The words only Supreme Governor are of so infinite and unlimited an Extent in the Letter that there is necessity of limiting them in the intention which intention being Implicit only and not Express may be made so various by Expositors that the same likewise is infinitely ambiguous and unintelligible and that Pious Queen Elizabeth being at her first Entry to the Kingdom as good as under the Wardships of Bishops could not avoid the Forming of this Oath of Supremacy by them on the first Act and Year of her Reign and to impose the same on the Subjects not for her Benefit but their own though after finding the same so general obscure and wrested by false Interpretations she endeavour'd by a subsequent Declaration published to have explained and limited the same according to her true intention and meaning but the same being not done by Act of Parliament proved not sufficient to relieve many doubtful and wounded Consciences amongst the People of which vide more at large before p. 167 168. 2. The words Supreme Governor include both the Legislative Judicial and Executive Power The words only Supreme exclude Parliaments and the word only excludes literally the Parliament from having any Vote in either whereas the known Law of the Land is That no Law can be Enacted to bind the People without the mutual Assent of the King and their lawful Representative in Parliament and that no Contract of Supreme Government can be made without the Assent of two Parties at least and not one only 3. The words only Supreme Governor in all Spiritual things according to the Letter include the Papal Power of Dispensation with the Law of God of Receiving Confessions of Sins Imposing Penance Excommunication Absolution and Pardon of Sins which are Powers only belonging to God in Person and ought not to be Assumed or Exercised by Angels Saints Daemons or Men. 4. The same words include Supreme Power over the Souls and Consciences of men which is a Power belonging only to God in Person and ought not to be Assumed by Angels Saints Daemons or Men. 5. When all this Supremacy in Spiritual things is congested into an Oath and the Flowers inseparable from the Celestial Crown presumptuously attempted to be torn thence and annexed to a Temporal what is the Design and Effect of it but that the Bishop Robs both God and the King of the Supremacy pretended to both but intended to neither for where will the Bishop permit the Temporal Prince to dispense with the Law of God to Receive Confession of Sins to Impose Penance to Excommunicate to give Absolution and Pardon of Sins but he will command him to desist or what is worse with his Temporal Sword to beat the Bush that the Bishop may catch the Bird or with his
Excommunicato Capiendo and Heretico Comburendo to catch and roast the Bird himself for the Bishop to eat it and of the subtlety of the Bishop as to this matter see more before p. 167 168 169. How little incouragement there is therefore for Protestants to take this Oath of Supremacy wherein the Kings name is only abused and made a Stale to draw a Supreme and Arbitrary Power to Bishops both over the King and them and to drein the Royal Treasury into their own Pockets and how untrue a Test such an Oath must be is humbly submitted to Supreme Authority Supremacy granted by Act of Parliament of Marriage and Legitimation to Canterbury yet Sworn to be in the King 6. By the Statute 25. H. 8.21 Power is granted to the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and his Successors by their Discretions to Grant unto the King his Heirs and Successors all such Licenses Dispensations Compositions Faculties Grants Rescripts Delegacies for Causes not contrary to the holy Scriptures and Laws of God as heretofore had been used and accustomed to be held and obtained by his Highness or by any his most Noble Progenitors at the See of Rome and all Children procreated after Marriage by virtue of any such License or Dispensations shall be admitted and reputed Legitimate in all Courts Spiritual and Temporal So this Act of Parliament made in time of Popery translates the Pope from Rome to Canterbury and the Supremacy before used or accustomed by him over the King and his Subjects concerning all the matters mention'd in the Act is placed in the Person of the Arch-Bishop and the Bishops call this a Supremacy in them according to Scripture and the Law of God which is worse and more Papal than to claim it only by Act of Parliament for what more Papal Supremacy can there be than Power to Grant Licenses Dispensations Faculties Compositions Grants Rescripts Delegacies of Marriage Legitimation and all other matters which Popes have formerly granted from Rome to Kings and their Subjects at discretion and this Exceptio is contraria facto for the granting of Licenses by Popes to Kings is contrary to the Law of the Land and is a Power Supreme to the Legislative and Law of the Land so the Grant in the Act is Repugnant to the Exception for 〈◊〉 Licenses or Dispensations are necessary but where there is a standing Law of God or Man to the Licensed or Dispensed with no Composition or Pardon necessary but where there is a standing Law violated or broken no Faculty necessary but where is a standing Law disabling the Party to do what he desires to have a Faâ—ulty for that he may be enabled to do No Rescript is but from a Supreme Prince no Delegacy but from a Superior to an Inferior for the Pope is Superior to his Legate though he be Legatus à Latere and the highest preferment this Popish Act of Parliament allows the King is to be the Arch-Bishop's Legate then the Act having made him Supreme to the Legislative Law and King gives him as high Supremacy over the Judicial Power in all Courts as well Spiritual as Temporal which is Supremacy over the Parliament which is a Court-Temporal This Act therefore doth set up more than Prelacy or Arch-Prelacy at Canterbury for that was there before and the Gyants had piled up Pelion on Ossa already and now they steeple it with Olympus and if they set not on the Gyants head the Triple Crown 't is sure they have the Triple Miter three stories high of Prelacy Arch-Prelacy and Supremacy When the Arch-Bishop got therefore of the Parliament this Act he was something like the Carpenter who begg'd of the Wood only one Helve long enough to turn his Hatchet into an Ax and when he had got that he cut down the whole Wood for he having now got so long a Helve to his Spiritual Hatchet as Supremacy over the Marriage not only of the old Palm Trees and Legitimations of the young at his Discretion that is to say if they give him whatsoever Money he asks for Dispensation and Legitimation this gives him likewise Power to strike both at Root and Branch of all the Royal Protestant-Cedars themselves in the Popish Points of Ceremonial Marriage and Legitimation endeavour'd now to be brought to the true Test of a more Supreme Law and Judg than his the Moral Law of God himself How therefore the Protestant can safely Swear in Conscience the Supremacy to be only in the King when so great a share of it is granted to the Arch-Bishop by the King and Parliament until the same Act of Parliament of 25. H. 8.21 by which 't is done is Repealed I confess my Ignorance and if it be without cause crave Pardon 7. The Party who is to Swear who is the only Supreme Governour must be intended to Swear either who is Supreme De Facto or De Jure if De Facto who hath the Actual Power of the Sword it may happen to be in a time of War when two Armies are in the Field and Inter utrumque Volat Dubiis Victoria pennis It is necessary at such a time that the Swearer unless he will Forswear himself be a Prophet of whom there are not many in this Age amongst such as take the Oath of Supremacy if it be said the Swearer ought to Swear De Jure who hath Right to be only Supreme Governor to this is Answer'd 1. Unless he can Swear to the matter in Fact he cannot Swear to the matter of Law or Right for Ex facio jus Oritur all matter of Law must arise from the matter of Fact therefore the Fact must be first known before the Right can be known which is to be deduced from it 2. The Right when the Oath is required may be as to Succession of the Crown wherein the matter of Fact depending only on Genealogies the Heralds themselves especially after Wars may not be able to make any clear probation of the Descents as Ezra 2.62 and Nehem. 7.64 it is said These sought their Register among those that were reckoned by Genealogie but it was not found therefore were they as Polluted put from the Priest-hood If therefore the Genealogies of Priests who wore themselves the Registers and kept their own Descents as curiously as was possible may be lost much easier may those of the Lay and the Law and Divinity may likewise be so doubtful that it is justly acknowledged by the King and Parliament themselves 25. H. 8.22 That Ambiguities and Doubts touching the Successions of the Crown have been Causes of much Trouble and no perfect and substantial Law hath been made for Remedy of the same and accordingly at the Death of Queen Elizabeth there were no less than Sixteen titles endeavour'd to have been set on foot to the Succession partly by Papists to overthrow the Protestant-Religion partly by others to overthrow the Union between the two Kingdoms in the Person of King James in which the Protestants of
Rule of great incertainty to Judg Heresie Council of Chalceldon The last of the Four was the Council of Chalcedon in Bithynia which was called by the Emperor Martianus about the Year 455. whereat the Emperor was present in Person and 630 Bishops and Reverend Fathers from the greatest part of the World What a work is here who should Judg Heresie yet they never placed the Power of Judgment in the Right hand neither will it be possible to be taken out of the Wrong nor did any of these Emperors nor shall any else dare do it as long as Bishops continue hired with their own Treasure and Revenue and their own Temporal Sword deliver'd into their hands for Rome and Constantinople to Fight for Supremacy over themselves and to Sentence and Judg them and their Subjects as Rome hath done since it obtain'd Supremacy at their pleasure The Bishop of Rome had at this time got a Bishop at Constantinople placed for his purpose who was content to acknowlege the Supremacy of Judging Heresie to be in the Bishop of Rome or any else if he might be Second and enjoy so Fat an Office as to be Bishop of Constantinople but the City differ'd from their Mercenary Bishop who was call'd Anatolius and disdaining in their Religion to bow to Rome set up Eutyches an Abbot or Archimandrite of Constantinople to publish a Doctrine That Christ had no Humane but only a Divine Nature in him To suppress which Opininion Flavianus a former Bishop of Constantinople had moved the Emperor Theodosius the Second to call a Council at Ephesus Anno. 449. wherein Eutyches was Condemn'd by Flavianus yet by the help of Chrysaphius the Eunuch and Endoxia the Empress who favour'd that opinion Theodosius was prevailed with to make another Synod Judg of this Heresie which was again Summon'd by the Emperors Authority at Ephesus and Dioscorus of Alexandria made President at which Synod Eutyches is again cleared and declared Orthodox and Flavianus opposing it was so upon that Three Days after he died and all this being done in the Council of Ephesus Anno 449. in Theodosius's time was again Repealed and Abrogated Anno 455. in Martianus's time at the Council of Chalcedon And Leo the First Bishop of Rome by the help of Anatolius Bishop of Constantinople and his other Pensioners carried the Day for Supremacy of Judgment and Punishment of Heresie and Anatolius and the See of Constantinople was to be only next in Dignity to the Infallible Chair of Rome Considerations on the Judgment of Heresie when assumed by Bishops according to the Four first General Councils if it make them suspect to be Papists and not sit to be Prayed for in Publick 1. Coke says this Parliament 1. Eliz 1. was doubtful what they ought to determine Heresie and Schism and what not which was as much as the Bishops needed to desire that the Layity might be Ignorant and they have Power to keep them so and Heresie a Quaere to be Judged by themselves pro Arbitrario 2. It appears that the Pious Queen the Dawning of the Reformation but newly entring with her she could not suddenly Dispell the Darkness yet hanging over her own Protestant Party nor the Blacker Clouds gathering from Foreign and Native Papists against her nor resist her own Bishops designing to continue those Privileges of Profit translated by from Rome to Canterbury for certainly if the Protestant Party had understood That the Four first Councils had adjudged all those to be Hereticks who would not Worship Images and had been able to have over-Voted the Popish Party and Bishops they would never have given them Power to Judg Heresie according to those Idolatrous Councils for thereby they might Sentence them and all Protestants that were against Images to the Stake 3. The Bible was but little before Translated into English yet to keep it more dark still than if it had continued in Latine they who alledged themselves Protestant-Bishops sent the People to Learn the same of Greek Councils and to Read there the Law of Heresie while they Judged them at home in their latine-Latine-Law and Latine-Courts the mean while 4. They equal Councils with Canonical Scriptures that their Convocations and Provincial Synods may have the same Authority 5. They equal their Convocation with the King and Parliament for the words of the Statute are or Determined to be Heresie by High Court of Parliament of this Realm with the Assent of the Clergy in their Convocation Knowing if the Miter once get equal 't is but one step more to be above the Crown 6. By those words they Constitute to themselves the Power of a Negative in Legislation against the King in Parliament and the two other Estates which makes them a Fourth Estate in the Legislative Power knowing such Fourth Estate like the Fourth Beast in Daniel may easily Devour all the rest 7. They Judg since no Commissioners were made every Bishop in his Diocess a Judg of Heresie Jure Divino and they by their own Popish Canons and the old Popish Acts against Lollards who were the followers of Wickliff and the Primitive Protestants and the Proto-Martyrs of England Judged Protestancy to be Lollary and Heresie and all the Sheriffs of England take an Oath with all their Power to Destroy all Heresies and Errors commonly call'd Lollaries which is Protestancy and to assist the Bishops in the same whensoever by them Required whereby they have the whole Military Power at their Command to Judg and Destroy Protestants as Hereticks 8. They Judg Heresie by their own Ceremonial Laws and Canons whereby they Arrogate a Power above the Moral Law of God by which alone all Heresies and Schisms and all Error and Truth ought to be Judged I conclude therefore That such Bishops if there are any such as Exercise all these ways of Popery many Protestants may happen to suspect them to be Papists for their profit and therefore scruple to join with their Chaplains in their Prayer before Sermon for God to speed them It will not agree with the Consciences of many Protestants to join with the Chaplain in publick Prayer for his Patron 1. Because all Patronages were invented and erected by the Pope and Papal Laws all Patroage came from the Pope and the Strength and Riches of all Popery consists in Patronages or Power of Presentation to Cathedral Collegiat Parochial or other Religious Churches or Houses 2. It is very unjust that any who must pay the Lawyer or Physician his Fees should not have Election of such a one of either as he can Trust and much more as to a Divine Lawyer and Physician of his Soul that any should be Imposed on him whom he cannot Trust and who may perhaps Poison him in the Sacrament it self of which Examples have been already Cited but the Chaplain who Prays for the Patron is obtruded on the Pay of the Parish without their Assent and the Patron many times pays him not a Penny but Sells to him
who ought only to stand to Caesar's Judgment Seat and to be tried per legale judicium parium for the same According to this principle Henry the first Pope Paschal seeking to incroach on the liberty of the Kingdom writes unto him in this manner Netum habeat sanctitas vestra quod me vivente auxiliante deo dignitates usus Regni nostri Angliae non imminuentur si ego quod absit in tanta me dejectione ponerem Optimates mei totus Angliae populus id nullo modo paterentur Let your Holiness know that by God's help while I live the Dignities and Customs of our Kingdom of England shall not be diminished and though I which God forbid should suffer my self to fall into so dejected a condition my Nobles and whole People of England will never suffer it Object 7 It is further objected in behalf of Trial of marriage by Ecclesiastical Laws that by the Statute of 25 H. 8. c. 19. which gives power to the King to appoint 32 persons to examin the Canons and to continue such as they think fit and abridge the rest It is provided That such Canons Constitutions Ordinances and Synodical Provincials being already made which be not contrariant or repugnant to the Laws Statutes and Customs of this Realm nor to the damage or hurt of the King's Prerogative Royal shall now still be used and executed as they were before the making of this Act till such time as they be viewed searched or otherwise order'd and determined by the said 32 persons or the most part of them which Statute is revived 1 Eliz. 1. To which is answer'd That 1. what is contrariant or repugnant to the Law of God is made void without this proviso and the assuming the Jurisdiction of marriage and dividing Inheritances insuing thereby is before proved to be Anti-Christian for Spiritual persons who alledge themselves Successors of Christ and much more therefore the assuming the Legislative power or giving Laws or Canons for the same 2. It is shewen likewise before that the same power of Legislation and Jurisdiction concerning marriage was usurped by Fire and Faggot and Excommunication and therefore their Canons concerning marriage are not intended or if they were yet this proviso cannot Lawfully preserve such usurpations so contrary to the Law of God 3. It is manifest that all Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and Laws and Canons of marriage are contrariant and repugnant to the Laws Statutes and Customs of this Realm as First the Canons then made were That marriage should be a Sacrament and thereby draw to it self Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction which latter Acts of Parliament establishing the Protestant Religion doth thereby abolish the being of marriage a Sacrament and consequently the Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical incident to it as a Sacrament and the Canons which make it so or give any Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction relating to the same 4. All Ecclesiastical Canons of marriage are contrariant and repugnant to Magna Charta and draw the Subject from his liberty propriety and Birth-right ad alias leges aliud examen and aliud judicium then legale judicium parium which Magna Charta of liberties to the Subject hath been confirmed by several Kings succeeding above thirty times Object 8 It is objected Admit there is no Act of Parliament gives Ecclesiastical Courts Jurisdiction of Marriage yet the unwritten Law of Use and Custom which is the Common Law of England and so long toleration gives it To which may be answer'd That by the Canon Laws Malus usus abolendus besides there was never any use of Jurisdiction of marriage in the Ecclesiastical Courts otherwise then in reference to the same as being a Sacrament which being now taken away cessante causa ratione legis cessat lex So likewise where the thing which a Use or Custom concerns is but changed the Use and Custom vanisheth as if by custom a Rate Tith be paid for two Fulling Mills in one House and one of them is changed to a Corn Mill the custom is gone But besides this being malus usus is of it self void and were it never so long used can never grow to have the obligation of the Common Law or to be thereby the Common Law As was well answered by a young Gentleman when complaint was made in Parliament against the wrongful incroachments of the Ecclesiasticks and they alledged for themselves That they had used and accustomed time out of mind to practise what was excepted against He reply'd So have Thieves at Shooter's Hill used time out of mind to Rob there yet the Law allows no such prescription nor doth the forced Toleration of their wickedness by such people as were not able to resist their Robberies oblige Successors to follow their precedents Reasons against Ecclesiastical Laws concerning Marriage 1. Ecclesiastical Laws of Marriage came from the Devils c. The first Reason against Ecclesiastical Laws is in regard of the wicked Authors for all the Laws by which Bishops judge Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession were invented by Daemons Pagan Gods and Goddesses Magicians Aruspices Astrologers South-sayers Priests of Priapus and Venus Jupiter Juno Cybele Flora Diana common Prostitutes Popish Saints Popish Councils Popes or Papists The Canon prohibiting and nulling all Marriage without a Priest in a Temple except by the Pope's good License or Dispensation was made by the Pope and the Council of Trent as appears Ego Concil 147. pt 5. Concil 197. pt 6. as a main Pillar to support their tottering Kingdom against the growing strength of the then Lutheran Protestants All marriage Preists instituted in the Mysteries of Priapus and they took their pious precedents from the old Pagan Priests of Priapus and Venus and they had it from their Damons or Devils That all the ancient Pagan Priests were first initiated in the Mysteries of Priapus before they could be capable to execute the Priests office cannot be denied and is testified by divers Authors and particularly by Cornelius Agrippa de van Sci. p. 738. in these words Sordidissimus Priapus pro Deo habitus hunc coluerunt primi illi Religionum artifices Chaldaei Aegyptii Assyrii Babylonii Arâ—bes Scythae Aethiopes ac perinde tota Africa Asia Europa nec fas erat ullum sacerdotem fieri qui Priapi sacris non erat initiatus Hic est ille Belphegor idolum omnium antiquissimum quod Chamos dictum est à Chamo filio Noe. The filthy Priapus was estemed a God and was worshiped by those first founders of Religion the Chaldeans Egyptians Assyrians Babylonians Arabians Scythians Phoenicians Ethiopians and even all Africa Asia and Europe neither was it lawful for any to be a Priest unless he were first initiated in the Rites of Priapus This is that Belphegor of all other Idols the most ancient which is likewise called Chamos of Cham the Son of Noah Now this was the Law of these Priests for the wicked ends which are after mentioned Dispensation with Incest came
and those Laws which follow them they will on Divorce under the name of Alimony give the Woman more then the Interest of her Portion amounts to which incourages all Women to seek Divorces whereas the form of Divorce amongst the Romans was Res tuas tibi habeto and she was not to have more then she brought with her and the same is the Law of the Jews and all other Nations except such as live under Popish Ecclesiastical Laws And the injustice of our Ecclesiastical Laws to the contrary is not one of the least causes why Divorce and Separations are of late grown so frequent because Women know they shall gain by the Divorce and rob their Husbands of more then ever they brought them Of the Law of Divorcing after Procreation of a Child for precontract or pre copulation without pre procreation Of the Law prohibiting liberty of private Marriage without publick Witnesses Of the Law giving the Jurisdiction of the secret causes of Divorce between Parents and secret uncleanness of Children in their Parents Houses to publick Tribunals Of the Law compelling persons married though mortal Enemies to Co-habitation Of the Law of Divorce à Mensa Thoro. Of the Canon compelling the parties on Divorce for Adultery to give Bonds and Sureties not to marry again during each others life Of the custom of Protestants marrying with Papists Edward the Fourth was as is alledged first verbally contracted to Eleanor Daughter to john Talbot Earl of Shrewsbury married after to Sir Thomas Butler Baron of Sudley after this verbal contract he married Elizabeth the Widow of Sir John Gray she lived his Wife Eighteen Years and Eleven Months and he had issue by her Three Sons and Seven Daughters Elizabeth his eldest Daughter was first promised in marriage to Charles Dauphin of France but married after to King Henry the Seventh Edward the Fourth being dead leaving his two Sons young in the custody of his Brother Richard the Third they were after murdered by him to make his own way to the Crown but first in preparation thereto Dr. Shaw in a Sermon by him Preached at Paul's-Cross took for his Text Spuria vitulamina non agent altas radices And to make short work they were after by Act of Parliament Proclaimed Bastards and not inheritable to the Crown on no other Allegation made but the pre-contracts before mention'd with Eleanor Butler as is recorded in the Parliament Roll. Husband divorces the Wife for cause of precopulation committed by himself Buchanan rerum Scoticarum lib. 11.652 relates That Earl Bothwel aspiring to obtain the marriage of Mary Queen of Scots compelled his Wife to accuse him of pre-copulation with another Woman before he married his Wife Gordonia Bothuelii uxor cogitur in duplici foro litem de Divortio intendere apud judices Regios accusat uxor maritum adulterii quae una justa apud eos erat divortii causa apud judices Papanos lege vetitos tamen ab Archiepiscopo fani Andreae ad hanc litem cognoscendam litem dare accusatur idem ante Matrimonium cùm propinqua uxoris stupri consuetudinem habuisse nulla in Divortio faciendo nec in testibus nec in judicibus fit mora intra enim decimum diem lis suscepta disceptata dijudicata est After he saith one thing thought necessary was ut consuetae servarentur Ceremoniae ut videlicet publice in conventu civium tribus diebus Dominicis nuptiae futurae inter Jacobum Heburnum Mariam Stuartam denuntiarentur ut si quis quid vitii ant impedimenti sciret quo minus legitimè coirent rem ad Ecclesiam deferrent And after he saith Cùm de nuptiis in Ecclesia denunciandis ageretur lector cujus id munus erat constanter recusare collecti Diaconi seniores cùm reluctari non auderent jubent Ecclesiastem nuptias futuras de more edicere is quidem hactenus paruit ut se vitium quidem scire profiteretur ac paratum seu Reginae seu Bothuelio cum vellent judicare is cum in arcem accersitus venisset Regina eum ad Bothuelium remisit qui quanquam nec blanditiis nec minis Ecclesiastem de proposito deduceret nec rem disputationi committere auderet tamen nuptias apparat unus Orcadum Episcopus est inventus qui gratiam aulicam veritati praeferret caeteris reclamantibus causasque proferentibus cur Legitimae non essent nuptiae cum eo qui duas uxores ad huc vivas haberet tertiam ipse suum nuper fassus adulterium demisisset ita indignantibus omnibus bonis vulgo etiam execrante propinquis per literas improbantibus inchoatus publicis Ceremoniis simulatis etiam factas detestantibus tamen Matrimonium celebratur Which fore-mention'd pre-contract alledged against Edward the Fourth was no more just cause to Illegitimate his Children then it was to Murder them nor was his pre-copulation with another Woman confess'd by Earl Bothwel any more just cause to Divorce his Wife then it was to aspire to the Kingdom 32 H. 8. cap. 38. takes notice of the great mischiefs insuing by dissolving by pre-contract Marriage consummate by bodily knowledge and fruit of Children or Child which Statute follows in these words WHereas heretofore the usurped power of the Bishop of Rome 32 H. 8. cap. 38. Of precontract hath always entangled and troubled the meér Iurisdiction and regal power of this Realm of England and also unquieted much the Subjects of the same by his usurped power in them as by making that unlawful which by God's Word is Lawful both in Marriage and other things as hereafter shall appear more at length and till now of late in our Soveraign Lord's time which is otherwise by learning taught than his predecessors in time past long time have beén hath so continued the same whereof yet some sparks be left which hereafter might kindle a greater fire and so remaining his power not to seem utterly extinct Therefore it is thought most convenient to the King's Highness his Lords Spiritual and Temporal with the Commons of this Realm assembled in this present Parliament that two things especially for this time be with diligence provided for whereby many inconvemences have ensued and many more mought ensue and follow As where heretofore divers and many Persons after long continuance together in Matrimony without any allegation of either of the parties or any other at their Marriage why the same Matrimony should not be good just and lawful and after the same Matrimony Solemuized and Consummate by carnal knowledge and also sometimes fruit of Children ensued of the same Marriage upon pretence of former Contract made and not Consummate by carnal Copulation for proof whereof two Witnesses by that Law were only required beén divorced and separate contrary to God's Law and so the true Matrimony both so Solemnized in the face of the Church and Consummate with bodily knowledge and confirmed also with fruit of Children had betweén
them cleérly frustrate and dissolved Further also by reason of other Prohibitions then God's Law admitteth for their lucre by that Court invented the dispensation whereof they always reserved to themselves as in kindred or affinity betweén Cousin-germans and so to the fourth degreé carnal knowledge of any of the same kin or affinity before in such outward degreés which else were lawful and be not prohibited by God's-Law and because they would get money by it keep a reputation of their usurped Iurisdiction whereby not only much discord between lawful married persons hath contrary to God's ordinance arisen much debate and suits at Law with wrongful vexation and great damage of the Innocent party hath been procured and many just Marriages brought in doubt and danger of undoing and also many times undone and lawful Heirs disherited whereof there had never else but for his vain-glorious usurpation beén moved any such question since freédom in them was given us by God's Law which ought to be most sure and certain But that notwithstanding marriages have been brought into such an uncertainty thereby that no marriage could be surely knit and bounden but it should lye in either of the parties power and arbiter casting away the fear of God by means and compasses to prove a pre-contract a kindred and alliance or a carnal knowledge to defeat the same and so under the pretence of these allegations afore rehearsed to live all the days of their lives in detestable adultery to the utter destruction of their own Souls and provocation of the terrible wrath of God upon the places where such abominations were used and suffer'd Be it therefore Enacted by the King our Soveraign Lord the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same That from the first day of the Month July next coming in the year of our Lord God 1540. All and every such Marriages as within this Church of England shall be Contracted betweén lawful Persons as by this Act we declare all Persons to be lawful that be not prohibited by God's Law to marry such Marriages being Contract and Solemnized in the face of the Church and Consummate with Bodily knowledge or fruit of Children or Child being had therein betweén the parties so married shall be by Authority of this present Parliament aforesaid Deémed Iudged and taken to be Lawful Good Iust and Indissolvable notwithstanding any pre-contract or pre-contracts of Matrimony not Consummate with Bodily knowledge which either of the parties so married or both shall have made with any other person or persons before the time of Contracting that Marriage which is Solemnized and Consummate or whereof such fruit is ensued or may ensue as afore and notwithstanding any Dispensation Prescription Law or other thing granted or confirmed by Act or otherwise And that no reservation or prohibition God's Law except shall trouble or impeach any Marriage without the Levitical degrees And that no person of what estate degreé or condition soever he or she be shall after the first day of the Month of July aforesaid be admitted to any of the Spiritual Courts within this the King's Realm or any his Graces other Lands and Dominions to any Process or Plea or Allegation contrary to this aforesaid Act. 1. Here it appears what a necessary stroke this Act gave against the usurped power of Ecclesiastical Laws and Jurisdiction in this and other points of Marriage forbidding any Spiritual Courts within this Realm or any his other Lands and Dominions to admit any Process Plea or Allegation contrary to this Act. And although hereby one of the heads of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction was as is said of the Beasts Rev. 13.3 as it were wounded to death yet so great was the subtilty of the Serpent that the Ecclesiastics soon after by abusing the minority of that most pious though young King Edward the Sixth got all what the wisdom and courage of his Father had Enacted against them repealed by the Son 2 3 Ed. 6. cap. 23. Edward the Sixth abused by Papists in his Minority to repeal his Father's Act of Precontracts And thinking themselves therein not sufficiently secure they again procured the same to be repealed by 1 Eliz. 1. In which repeals I can see nothing but a Papist Plot against them both to revive those Ecclesiastical Laws by their own Authority against themselves which might have yielded most dangerous pretences against their own Legitimations and Marriages and Issue if they had happen'd to have had any For certainly no Marriage or Issue can be secure or certain if any fraudulent person may secretly pre-contract or pre-copulate with any vile person and take Bonds of him or her to release the same upon request and then marry another person Ignorant and Innocent and have Children procreate between them and then cause the party who had the pre-contract or pre-copulation to sue and obtain a Divorce against the Innocent person to be Divorced and Children Bastardized and Disinherited and then to give a release to the party conspiring in the fraud How is it possible to avoid this wickedness if pre-contract or pre-copulation should be allowed a sufficient cause to dissolve Marriage Consummate by the Birth of a Child And how is it possible propriety to be if a distinction be not kept between it and contract and between obligation and possession according to the old Rule of Law Rem Domino vel non Domino vendente duobus in jure est potior traditione prior And the Rule of the Civil Law and fundamental of all Nations who have propriety Obligatio non impedit translationem Dominii sed translatio Dominii praecedens impedit obligationem l. si quidem 1. C. de donat inter virum Notwithstanding all which Reasons preceding and likewise those in the mention'd Act of H. 8. The Ecclesiastics though straining their Wits and Eloquence to the highest in the Act of repeal by Ed. 6. yet cannot alledge the least reason except only this That if pre-contract should not dissolve Marriage the parties might part from one another at the Church door and then the Wedding Dinner would be spoiled which surely may be sufficiently and over satisfied by recompence in value were it a Half-Crown Ordinary But a lost Virginity to an Innocent Woman who was married bona fide and knew nothing of this pre-contract and her Child can never be repaired if the Marriage be dissolved Nulla reparabilis Arte Laesa pudicitia est deperit illa semel Propert. The Act of Repeal of the said most excellent Law of Henry the Eighth against pre-contracts follows 2 3 Ed. 6. cap. 23. 2 3 Ed. 6. cap. 23. WHereas in the 32 year of the Reign of the late King of famous memory King Henry the Eighth Because that many inconveniences had chanced in this Realm by breaking and dissolving of good and lawful Marriages yea whereupon also sometimes Issue and Children had followed under
the colour and pretence of a former Contract made with another the which Contract divers times was but very slenderly proved and often but surmised by the malice of the party who desired to be dissolved from the Marriage which they liked not and to be coupled with another There was an Act made That all and every such Marriages as within the Church of England should be Contracted and Solemnized in the face of the Church and Consummate with Bodily knowledge or fruit of Children or Child being had between the parties so married should be by Authority of the said Parliament Deémed Iudged and taken to be Lawful Good Iust and Indissolvable notwithstanding any pre-contract or pre-contracts of Matrimony not Consummate with Bodily knowledge which either of the Persons so married or both had made with any other Person or Persons before the time of Contracting of that Marriage which is Solemnized or Consummated or whereof such fruit is ensued or may ensue as by the same Act more plainly may appear Since the time of which Act. although the same was Godly meant the unruliness of Men hath ungodlily abused the same and divers inconveniences intolerable in manner to Christian Ears and Eyes followed thereupon Women and Men breaking their own promises and faiths made by the one unto the other so set upon sensuality and pleasure that if after the Contract of Matrimony they might have whom they more favoured and desired they could be contented by lightness of their nature to over-turn all that they had done afore and not afraid in manner even from the very Church-door and Marriage Feast the Man to take another Spouse and the Spouse to take another Husband more for Bodily lust and carnal knowledge then for surety of faith truth or having God in their good remembrance contemning many times also the Commandment of the Ecclesiastical Iudge forbidding the parties having made the Contract to attempt or do any thing in prejudice of the same Be it therefore Enacted by the King's Highness The Lords Spiritual Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled That as concerning pre-contracts the said former Statute shall from the first day of May next coming cease be repealed and of no force or effect and be reduced to the estate and order of the King 's Ecclesiastical Laws of this Realm which immediately before the making of the said Statute in this case were used in this Realm So that from the said first day of May when any cause or contract of Marriage is pretended to have beén made it shall be lawful to the King 's Ecclesiastical Iudge of that place to hear and examine the said Cause And having the said Contract sufficiently and lawfully proved before him to give sentence for Matrimony commanding Solemnization Co-habitation Consummation and Tractation as it becometh Man and Wife to have with inflicting all such pains upon the disobedients and disturbers thereof as in times past before the said Statute the King 's Ecclesiastical Iudges by the Kings Ecclesiastical Laws ought and might have done if the said Statute had never been made Any Clause Article or Sentence in the said Statute to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding Of the Law making private Marriage or carnal knowledge between persons not prohibited by the Law of God to marry Fornication Private Marriage or carnal knowledge is of two sorts the one without publick Witness the other without any Witness at all and both by the Popish Laws because if permitted they would spoil their gains are prohibited and called clandestine Marriages The publick Witnesses are the Priest or Magistrate private Witnesses are any other Marriage without Witness nor clandestine not appointed by Law The Law of England makes all private Marriage and carnal knowledge without publick Witness Fornication The Law of Scotland in some cases relieves though there be a defect and no publick Witness of the Marriage by the Priest as appears in the before cited Author Craig Feud 269. If there appear private Witnesses of Men or Instruments but in all cases likewise where there are neither publick or private Witnesses they leave it to be Fornication That which I here affirm against both is Marriage without Witness not Fornication 1. That carnal knowledge between parties not prohibited by the Law of God to marry is not Fornication nor any other Crime though in the highest secrecy and without any Testimony of Men or Instruments whatsoever 2. That privacy of Marriage being not prohibited nor publication commanded by God all parties ought to have liberty of Conscience to use the one or the other according as suits best with their occasions As to the first there are these reasons That private Marriage without Witness is not Fornication nor any other Crime 1. There is no Law of God prohibiting private Marriage without Witness Where there is therefore no Law there is no transgression Rom. 4.15 2. It is before shewen That for any human Law to prohibit Marriage or Meat where not prohibited by the Law of God the same came from the Devil 1 Tim. cap. 4. v. 1 2 3. And that therefore the Law of the Pope and Council of Trent which nulls all Marriages except made before a Priest in a Temple and two Witnesses came from the Devil and the Priests of Priapus and Venus for filthy lucre to the Priests 3. Isa 45.7 It is said I create evil And Isa 5.20 It is said Wo unto them that call good evil and evil good That put darkness for light and light for darkness Here is therefore a curse pronounced against those who if God created not marriage without Witnesses evil of their own heads call it evil and where God created it to be in darkness and natural modesty of their own heads will have it by Torch-light and the whole Parish of Witnesses 4. All Fornication is Polyandry and Confusio seminum whereby the Child cannot know the Father nor the Father the Child but here is no such thing it is impossible therefore to be Fornication Liberty Conscience to marry with or without Witnesses As to the second Point which I am to maintain That privacy of Marriage without Witnesses being not prohibited by the Law of God nor publication commanded by the same no human power ought to presume to prohibit what Marriage God hath not prohibited but all persons ought to be left liberty of Conscience to marry publickly or privately with or without Witnesses as it suits best with their conveniences and occasions as is the use and practice in all other civil Contracts which men do with or without Witnesses as they think best and were never accused of sin if they had no Witnesses whereon to bring their Action only that Party is justly charged with sin who wilfully breaks his Contracts because there are no Witnesses but God to prove it against him Against these Positions I shall first answer the Objections and then shew further Reasons to confirm the same
Children the same ought to be wholly and intirely performed to such Sons and Daughters in all Successions whether to a Testament or an Intestate And in short that they ought not to be made unlike other Children in Successions whom Nature hath made like Hence it appears that the Civil Law wills the Succession of Children shall be according to the Law of Nature and not according to any Canon Law or Law made by the Priest Natura duce errare nullo modo potest Tul. 1. de leg Cum vero parentibus rediti deinde Magistris traditi sumus tum ita variis imbuimur erroribus ut vanitati veritas opinioni confirmatae natura ipsa cedit 3. Tusc Where nature is our Guide it is impossible to err but when we fall into the hands of Parents and are delivered to Shool-Masters we are then infected with so many Errors that all truth gives place to vanity and Nature it self yields to opinion accustomed To fight against Nature is like Giants to fight against God Cato major Of the Final Causes of Marriage by the Law of God and Nature The Final causes of Marriage which is the Ordinance of God and not of Man are not to fill Priests pockets with money or to satisfie their insatiable Covetousness and Ambition to set their Foot on the Necks of Emperours and Kings in their Legitimations and Successions and thereby to dispose of the Kingdoms of Princes and the Liberty Propriety and Goods of the Subjects at their Arbitrary will and pleasure But the Final causes of Marriage by the Law of God and Nature are three 1. Procreation of Children 2. That Man might have an Help-meet for him there being many necessities especially in time of sickness wherein Man cannot be without the help of a Woman 3. To make his life more pleasant and delightful Tristis sine conjuge lectus As for the first part which is the greatest and chiefest end of Marriage namely procreation of Children without which the World cannot be continued To be the shorter I shall only mention one Poet as follows Providei ille maximus mundi-Parens Cùm tam rapaces cerneret fati minas Vt damna semper sobole repararet nova Excedat agedum rebus humanis Venus Quae supplet ac restituit exhaustum genus Orbis jacebit squalido turpis situ Vacuum sine ullis classibus stabit mare Alesque Coelo deerit silvis fera Solis Aer pervius ventis erit Sen. in Hippol. Fates cruel Threats when the great Parent saw Against his Creatures by as great a Law He then Inacted all those whom it slew Sould by new Births perpetually renew Should Venus lease and should not still restore With fresh Supplies Natures exhausted store On squalid Earth no Beauty would remain No gallant Fleets would dance upon the Main No Deer in Woods no Birds would be in Skie Winds only through sad Air would sighing flie There could be neither King nor Parliament nor People nor Governours nor Governed neither could the Protestant Religion defend it self against Pope or Turk without Marriage for though it be Apocrypha it is truly said Esdras 4.15 Women have born the King and all the People that bear rule by Sea or Land The End of the First Book THE CONTENTS Of the Second Book BY what Judg Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession ought not and ought to be Judged Of the Five Competitors to be Judges of Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession 1. The Bishop 2 The Magistrate 3. The Souldier 4 The Parents 5. The King and Parliament 137 Exceptions against Bishops being Judges in reference to the Legislative ib. Except 1. They assume to be Judges Jure Divino without a Sign of Mission from God which overthrows the Legislative Power of the King and Parliament ib. Of the Sign of Mission required by the Grand Seignior from Sabatai Sevi a counterfeit Jewish Messiah 139 2. They have falsely translated the Scripture in all words relating to Marriage 142 They have falsely translated Ish Isha Zona Kadesh Philiegesh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Husband Wife Harlot Concubine c. 142 No such as word as Concubine in the whole Original Scripture ib. They have falsely translated the Seventh Commandment Lo Tinaph to be Adultery 145 They have falsely translated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be Fornication ib. They have falsely translated the Tenth Commandment in the words Wife Man-Servant Maid-Servant 146 They have falsely translated Mamzer in the Old and Nothus in the New Testament Bastard Wherein are noted the Errors of Coke Skene and Grotius in following Episcopal and other Popish translations ib. Of the absurdity of Common and Ecclesiastical Lawyers who make the Child born without the Ceremonies of a Priest and Temple no Sib Kin or of Blood to the Father who begot or the Mother who bare him 154 155 Further Reasons shewn that they have falsely translated Mamzer in the Old and Nothus in the New Testament Bastard 156 No such word or thing as Bastard in the whole Original Scripture or amongst the Hebrews Greeks or Romans 3. They have corrupted the Press both as to Scripture and Acts of Parliament and interdict Protestants to Print against or answer Papists 162 A Counterfeit Act of Parliament Printed by Bishops against Protestants and the true supprest 163 Mischiefs which follow the Interdiction of the Press to Protestants 164 165 4. By pretence of giving the King the name of Supremacy they have taken the thing to themselves 167 5. By pretence of giving the King Supremacy by the Ceremonies of the Coronation they take it from him to themselves 169 David Anointed and Crowned by his Parliament and not by the Priest 173 6. They assume in all matters concerning Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession to be above Appeal to the Kings Courts 175 Of the abominable Judgement pass'd by the Common Law Judges in Kennes Case Coke lib. 7.42 whereby they gave away the Supremacy of the King's Courts to Bishops and made them in all causes Matrimonial subject to no Appeal ib. Exceptions against Bishops being Judges in reference to the Judicial Power 180 1. They are prohibited by the example of Christ to Judg Marriage Filiation Aliment or Succession ib. 2. They are totally ignorant of the Fact and were never Educated in the Laws by which they pretend to Judg Marriage 181 3. They Judg by a Chancellour and not in Person 4. They have Plurality of Offices and more than they are able to serve yet will be Judges of Marriage besides ib. 5. They are ambidextrous and amphibious Judges 182 6. They Judg Marriage by pretended Canons and Laws made by Bishops without assent of Parliament ib. 183 7. They take to themselves Fines and Penalties of their own Judgments 184 8. They Licence Dispence and Pardon all Crimes within their pretended Jurisdiction for Money 9. They cannot be known whether Protestants or Papists if Bishops 185 10. They Judg by Fictions and not by Truth 11. They Judg
by Ceremonies and not by Circumstances Of the manifold mischiefs from the Judgment of Marriage by the Ceremonies of a Priest and a Temple 192 1. It compels to enter into an indissoluble Obligation before the Parties can know each other whether they are sit for Marriage or no. 193 2. It give the Bishop the Monopoly of all Women and their Goods 196 3. It gives him the Monopoly of Successions both in private Families and Kingdoms 197 4. It gives him power to Judg of Marriage Filiation and Succession by Fictions ib. 5. It causeth in the Rich Excess and Vanity of Apparel Tilting Turneaments Masking Gluttony Riot and Drunkenness 198 6. It undoeth the Poor in their Marriages 199 7. It causeth Immodesty in Brides wanton Songs and Ceremonies promiscuous Dancing and corruption of Youth 200 8. It exposeth to publick view what God hath commanded to be secret 201 9. It causeth Community of Women Community of Children Fornication Adultery Stews Brothels and the dissemination of most contegious and deadly Diseases amongst the people ib. 10. It hath caused Prostitution of Brides to Priests Lords Guests and others 205 11. It hath caused Consecration of Incest Whores Sodomites to attend the Service of the Priests and the Temples ib. 12. It hath caused the Consecration and Adoration of Priapus Baal Peor Venus Adonis Flora and the first defiling of the Virgin World with Whoredom and Idolatry 207 13. It first destroyed in the World the Omnipresential Worship of God 208 Prayers in Temples and Synagogues except amongst persons agreed prohibited by Christ and why A Poem on the Omnipresential Worship of God and therein of Marriages in Temples 223 15. It caused the bloody Sacrifices of Virgins Children and Indian Wives 229 16. It lays punishments on lawful Child births and destroys Millions of Infants 234 17. It caused the Parisian Massacre wherein were an Hundred Thousand Protestants slain 240 Why the Ottoman Emperors Marry not by a Priest or in a Temple and of the bloody Murders ensued of the Sons of Solyman the Magnificent by his breaking the Custom and his being drawn by Roxolana to Marry her by a Priest 245 12. Bishops proceed to Judgment in the unknown Language of Law Latine 254 13. They Judg for Fees where of the inconveniences following maintenance of Judges and Officers by Fees and not by Satary Exceptions against Bishops being Judges in reference to the Executive Power 1. They begin the Suit with Execution 263 2. They Pledg before Summons Summon before Copy Copy before Oath Punish before Contumacy Judg before Hearing and Arrest before Judgment all which preposteration begins with Execution 268 Of the Inconveniences ensue by Quorums or more Judges than one in a Court 276 A Satyr against the cruel Preposterations above mention'd both in Ecclesiastical and Temporal Courts Of Summons to answer before a Copy given of what is required to be answer'd 286 Of giving a Copy before an Oath of no Calumny 288 Of the multitude of Fictions and Falsities ensue in Chancery and Common Law by neglecting the Oath of no Calumny ib. ad 305 Of Judgment before Hearing Part of a Satyr translated out of Seneca p. 685. on the settish Emperor Claudius who used to Sentence before Hearing 305 An enumeration of divers Forms of Judicial Proceeding wherein People are Condemned before Hearing 1. By repelling men from the Truth and merit of the Cause and compelling them to make their allegations in Formalities and Fictions 306 A Dispute between two famous Judges Fitzherbert and Brook 14 H. 8.25 concerning Truth and Good Sentence and Formality and Fiction in Judicial Proceeding 306 2. By compelling to Original Writs at Common Law and not serving the Party with a Copy of the Declaration without them 312 Mischiefs of Original Writs 313 3. By compelling to the Writ of Subpoena in Chancery and not serving the Party with a Copy of the Bill without it Mischiefs of Writs of Subpoena 4 By the Capias ut lagatum and Excommunicato capiendo A Satyr on a Papist and a Protestant Imprison'd one on an Outlawry the other on an Excommunication against Imprisonment before Hearing and Judgment 329 A Digression concerning the danger of the Three Kingdoms Condemning one another without Hearing by reason of the Non-Union of their three Parliaments in one House Of the Fatal Dangers attending a Non-Union and the inestimable Benefits of the contrary 335 Of matters requisite to perfect an Union An Elegy on the ill effects of Excommunication of Protestants by Protestants causing a Disunion in the late unhappy Civil Wars 343 5. By Excommunication it self The Form of the Jewish Excommunication 345 The Form of the Greek Excommunication against Thieves 347 The Form of the Popes Excommunication against Queen Elizabeth All Forms of Excommunication wicked and Anti-Christian 348 Of the strange Cheats and Superstition in Excommunications 352 Of the damnable mischiefs arise to Christian Princes and States by tollerating Popes or Prelates to Excommunicate without a Sign of Mission from God 362 All Excommunication Curses and Deliveries to Satan by Bishops or Priests without a Sign of Mission from God if Malefice follow ought to be punish'd as Witchcraft if not as a Cheat. 381 A Satyr in defiance of all Excommunication without a Sign of Mission from God 388 An Epode on Protestants Excommunicated by Papists Considerations concerning a True and False Test between Papist and Protestant 6. By Bishops condemning Protestants of Heresie by the Four first General Councils The other Exceptions against Judicial Forms and what was intended concerning the other Competitor-Judges I am enforced to break off abruptly by Disturbances at the Press Lib. II. Of the Judg of Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession CHAP. I. Of the Five Competitors to be Judges of Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession 1. The Bishop 2. The Magistrate 3. The Soldiers 4. The Parents 5. The King and Parliament HAving before shewn unanswerable exceptions against the Ecclesiastical Laws by which Bishops pretend to judg I shall now propose exceptions Declinatory of the Authority and Jurisdiction usurped by them and likewise of their Personal disabilities and incapacities to be Judges of the matters in question all which are 1. In reference to the Legislative 2. The Judicial 3. The Executive or Military Power all usurped or abused by them Exceptions against Bishops being Judges in reference to the Legislative They assume to be Judges Jure Divino without a Sign of Mission from God which overthrows the Legislative Power of King and Parliament For they assume to be Angels and Messengers of God Embassadors of Christ and Successors by his last Will and Testament of the whole Power of Judgment given to the Son yet do they shew no sign of Mission from God no letters of Credence from Christ nor any letters of Probat that they were nominated either Executors or Legatees in any such Testament or in the Testament of any Executor or Apostle of Christ or in the Testament of any Executor of such Executors
devour her Child as soon as it is born The People who are Terrae Filii to be the Earth helping the Woman Prelacy being wroth and going to make War with Dissentient Protestants to be the Dragons being wroth with the Woman and going to make War with the Remnant of her Seed which keep the Commandments of God Old Teslament false translated by Bishops in 848 places and have the Testimony of Jesus Christ And that these are not the only false translations which Bishops make of the Scripture appears by the great Linguist Broughton who in his Advertisements of Corruptions affirms to the then Bishops of England That their publick translations of Scriptures is such as that it perverts the Text of the Old Testament in no less then Eight Hundred Forty Eight places and causeth Millions to reject the New Testament and to run into Eternal Flames Sixthly To shew that Coke needs no other to confute him in the signification of Nothus not to be a Child born out of Wedlock but a plece of his own Rhime I shall recite it which is by him set down Manseribus scortum notho Moechus dedit ortum and is a false Verse for No in Notho is short which might happen by some Error of his Scribe but the true Verse is in Calv. Lex whence I suppose he might have it Sed Moecha Nothis dedit ortum which Moecha signifies an Adulteress which she cannot be unless she is a Married Woman therefore it is plain the Rhime it self confutes him that Nothus is not a Child born out of Wedlock but in Wedlock which is unanswerable as to him because ex ore suo though not as to others who are on better reasons unanswerably answer'd before They corrupt the Press both as to Scripture and Law and interdict Protestants to write against Papists or answer them Act of Parliament against Lollards counterfeit by Bishops Coke 3. part 40. saith There was a Statute supposed to be made 5. R. 2. That Commissions should be by the Lord Chancellor made and directed to Sheriffs and others to Arrest such as should be Certified into the Chancery by the Bishops and Prelates Masters of Divinity to be Preachers of Heresies and notorious Errors their Fautors Maintainers and Abetters and to hold them in strong Prison until they will justifie themselves to the Law of the Holy Church By colour of this supposed Act certain Persons that held Images were not to be worship'd c. were holden in strong Prison until they to redeem their vexation miserably yielded before these Masters of Divinity to take an Oath and did swear to worship Images which was against the Moral and Eternal Law of Almighty God We have said by colour of the supposed Statute c. not only in respect of the said Opinion but in respect also that the said supposed Act was in truth never any Act of Parliament though it was Entred in the Rolls of Parliament for that the Commons never gave their consent thereunto And therefore in the next Parliament the Commons prefer'd a Bill reciting the said supposed Act and constantly affirmed that they never assented thereto and therefore desired that the supposed Statute might be aniented and declared void For they protested that it was never their intent to be justified and to bind themselves and their Successors to Prelates more then their Ancestors had done in times past And hereunto the King gave his Royal Assent in these words Ypleist au Roy. And mark well the manner of the penning the Act for seeing the Commons did not assent thereunto the words of the Act are It is Ordained and Assented in this present Parliament That c. And so it was being but by the King and the Lords It is to be known that of ancient time when any Acts of Parliament were made to the end the same might be published and understood especially before the use of Printing came into England the Acts of Parliament were ingrossed into Parchment and bundled up together with a Writ in the King's name under the great Seal to the Sheriff of every County sometime in Latine and sometime in French to command the Sheriff to proclaim the said Statutes within his Bailwick as well within Liberties as without And this was the course of Parliamentary Proceedings before Printing came in use in England and yet it continued after we had the Print till the Reign of H. 7. Now at the Parliament holden in 5. R. 2. John Braibrook Bishop of London being Lord Chancellor of England caused the said Ordinance of the King and Lords to be inserted into the Parliamentary Writ of Proclamation to be proclaimed amongst the Acts of Parliament which Writ I have seen the purclose of which Writ after the recital of the Acts directed to the Sheriff of N. in these words Nos volentes dictas concordias sive ordinationes in omnibus singulis suis Articulis inviolabiter observari tibi praecipimus quod praedictas concordias sive ordinationes in locis infra Balivam tuam ubi melius expedire volueris tam infra libertates quam extra Publice Proclamari teneri facias juxta formam Praenotatam Teste Rege apud Westm 26. Maij. Anno Regni Regis R. 2.5 But in the Parliamentary Proclamation of the Acts passed in Anno 6. R. 2. the said Act of the 6. R. 2. whereby the said supposed Act of 5. R. 2. was declared to be void is omitted and afterwards the said supposed Act of 5. R. 2. was continually Printed and the said Act of 6. R. 2. hath been by the Prelates ever from time to time kept from the Print A Counterfeit Act Printed by Bishops against Protestants What English Protestant can read this without horror what doth he not observe it why 't is that Counterfeit Act of Parliament 5. R. 2.1382 whereby Bishops usurp to be Judges of the Souls and Consciences of Protestants and to put them in strong Prison till they conform and submit to the will of the Bishop 't is that Counterfeit Act whereby they usurp to be Judges of Heresie and to make Protestants Hereticks when they please 't is that Counterfeit Act whereby they have compell'd the Subjects to swear to worship their Idols 't is that Counterfeit Act whereby they have dragged so many Pious Martyrs to the Stake and burnt them filling the whole Land with fiery Furnaces 't is that Counterfeit Act by which the Bishops have usurped Power to destroy Religion Liberty Propriety and Lives of all Protestant Subjects at their pleasure 't is that Counterfeit Act which was never assented to but disclaimed detested abrogated and declared null and void by the House of Commons 6. R. 2. Anno 1383. and hath been yet most presumptuously caused to be printed as a valid Act by the Bishops being Masters of the Press and the true Act of Abrogation 6. R. 2. Whereon all the Subject hath depends most wickedly suppress'd and never Printed Coke 2.
Part. Fol. 584. saith And here is to be observed how the Statute of 35. E. 1. hath been dealt with since the 17th of E. 3. for in an Act that Year a branch of the Statute of 35. E. 1. was recited That forbad any thing should be attempted or brought into the Realm which should tend to blemish the King's Prerogative or in prejudice of his Lords and Commons which is now wholy omitted and Fol. 585. he saith Note in the Roll of Parliament of the Statute of 38. E. 3. Cap. 1. of Provisors there are more sharp and biting words against the Pope then in Print a Mystery often in use but not to be known of all men from which examples it is manifest that this came by the Fraud of the Bishops who before Printing were Masters of the Authentick Copies of the Laws appointed for promulgation and since Printing are Masters of the Press to interdict and publish what they will Accipe nunc horum insidias Crimine ab uno Disce omnes These few Frauds are discover'd in Print against the Interdictors of Printers which discovery they would likewise have interdicted if they had been able for these latter Books of my Lord Coke were prohibited to be Printed and got out in the late time of Troubles but by these it is clear which were only spoken obiter and without any inquisition after them that all they are guilty of are not discover'd and that to give either Spiritual or Temporal Judges Power to interdict the Press is to give them Power to have what Law what Gospel what Text what Translation what Canonical what Apocryphal what Scripture what Act of Parliament what Common Law what Statute what Religion what Justice what Liberty and what Slavery they please Besides which Power of Fraud and Forgery destructive to all Truth these further mischeifs follow all interdictions of the Press but I shall first answer such Objections as are made against the Liberty of it Object 1 First If Liberty of the Press should be permitted Enemies would have it equal with Friends Papists with Protestants Hereticks with Orthodox Secondly They would Print Blasphemy Idolatry Treason Rebellion Vncleanness Calumny Reviling Derision and all manner of Heresie Answ 1 To the First is answer'd 1. That it is impossible to exclude Enemies and Papists from Printing they being possess'd of so many Transmarine Presses whence they can with far greater advantage vent their matters then from any Presses in England 2. Admit they could be excluded yet in prudence they ought not but are more necessary to be admitted then Friends for those whom we use to call Friends are pessimum inimicorum genus Adulantes the worst kind of Enemies Flatterers who flatter and sooth us up in our Vices and destroy us but any truth of our Faults we shall never hear but from Enemies Plutarch therefore calls an Enemy a School-Master which costs us nothing 2. As to the matters of Blasphemy Idolatry or Uncleanness neither Enemy or Friend will so far dishonour themselves or their Cause as to Print them openly for it is against their interest As to Treason or Rebellion who that hath an Enemy doth not desire to know before-hand wherein the strength of his Cause as well as of his Forces lies and to have the War Proclaimed in Print before it begin that he may the better provide against Besides if there were but a Law made that nothing shall be printed without the names of the Author and Printer with their Additions and Designations And that all Crimes against the publick committed by Printing should be punished by Indictment according to Law and all injuries to private persons should be reparable by the parties injured on their Actions according to Damage Who would dare make himself guilty of a publick Crime or private Injury in Print to which he had set his name 3. As to matters of Heresie such as by accident become dangerous to public safety the prudence of the Legislators may where they find cause prohibit them both Press and Pulpit but not in the Thoughts and Consciences of Men As in the end of the Wars of Germany between the Lutherans and Catholicks it was Enacted mutually on both sides on pain of death That no Catholick should Preach against the Lutheran Doctrine or Lutheran against the Catholick but both should enjoy the liberty of their own Consciences to themselves This agreement was here made otherwise those bloody Wars would never have ended without a total destruction of one of the Parties And likewise such a Law were here much more necessary between dissentient Protestants who were Brethren then it was between the Lutherans and Catholicks who were mortal Enemies That no dissentient Protestant should Print or Preach publickly on any point of Ceremonial dissentiency or other matter not necessary to Salvation except in such matters as are particularly allowed by Supream Authority to exclude Popery there being Field-room enough in the Moral Law of God to exercise gifts in Preaching and matters which have the promise of this life and of that to come and no cause for any to complain who have liberty likewise of Conscience to use what Protestant Ceremonies and Form of Worship they will to themselves though they have not power to compel the Consciences of others who are dissentients But if Protestants are tolerated to Print or Preach against one another this is the thing the Papist would have and knows will in the end make them both a prey to himself But though Protestants ought not to preach one against another yet the juncture of Affairs being not at present in great Britain as before mention'd in Germany and an appearance of War Plotted by the Papist rather to begin than end with the Protestant the Bishops ought not to be suffer'd to interdict either Press or Pulpit to the Protestants against them To come at length to the further mischiefs insuing the Interdiction of the Press any Interdiction of the Press except in Cases before mention'd either to Friend or Enemy is a dishonour to the Protestant Religion as if it dared not suffer it self to be disputed or to meet an Enemy in the open field whereas in truth it is not Protestancy but Episcopacy 'T is not the Moral Law which is the Protestant Law but the Ceremonial which is the Popish Law which dares not encounter the shock of an Enemy And 't is Fiction and not Truth Vice and not Vertue which fears either Press or Pasquil 2. The Foreign Presses being impossible to be interdicted to the Papist if the English are interdicted to the Protestant he is thereby silenced and prohibited to answer the Papist let him preach what he pleaseth 3. By Interdiction the profit of the English Protestant Print-houses will be transported to Foreign Papists which will be a great discouragement to so necessary a Trade in England and prejudice to the Protestant Religion and Policy 4. The Interdiction of the Press will multiply the greater evil
the nearness of the Task-masters increased it to blind the people they pretend all to be for the Queen and as if neither Pope nor Prelate should have to do with it they incited the Queen like the Eagle of Divinity to Soar to the height of Spiritual and Ecclesiastical Supremacy to no other intention than when she had taken the Quarry they might take it from her and exercise it themselves to their own profit and not hers for the next Clause in the Act is That the Queen may assign Commissioners to exercise all manner of Spiritual and Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction which they knew would be to Bishops but they abusing this Power they had got in the High Commission Court and other Commissions this Clause or Branch of Assigning Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction by Commission is repealed 17. Car. 1. Cap. 11. 13. Car. 2. Cap. 12. but the annexation to the Crown and Oath of Supremacy still continuing they continue still in the King's Name to exercise all Acts of Supremacy both of Legislation by continuing and making Canons and of Judgment and Execution above all Appeal in all matters concerning Marriage Filiation and Succession or more than they were given Power by any Commissions to do while they continued which makes them who exercise Acts of Supremacy incapable of being Judges Delegate By pretence of giving the King Supremacy by the Ceremonies of Coronation and Unction they take it from him to themselves Coronation is the Investiture of a King in his Kingdom by the Ceremony of Tradition of a Crown or setting it on his Head so is the Investiture of a Bishop by Tradition of a Ring and Staff or Crosyer and of a Soldier in Feudal Tenures by Tradition of a Ring Sword or Spear The Persons who have used to make Traditions of Crowns have been in Kingdoms where the Priest hath the Supremacy of the King as in Pagan Kingdoms by the High Priest and in Christian Kingdoms by the Pope or Bishop and in Germany by both for the King of the Romans is used to receive three Crowns one of Iron another of Silver and another of Gold That of Iron he receives of the Bishop of Coleyn in Aquisgrave that of Silver of the Arch-Bishop of Millayne in Italy in the same City and in the Church of St. Ambrose That of Gold of the Bishop of Rome in the Church of St. Peter at the Altar of St. Maurice Where Note That Gold may be bought too dear and that three Magpies have got by the Bargain Supremacy over the Roman Eagle But in such Kingdoms where the Supremacy hath been in the King above the Priest the Tradition of the Crown hath been by the People or their Representative which we call here a Parliament or one appointed by them in regard a multitude cannot all do it in person It is likewise to be observed That there is a difference between assuming a Kingdom by Conquest and by Contract for he that comes in by Conquest takes the Crown without Tradition from Clergy or Lay whether they will or no or exercises the Power of the Sword to govern at his Will without a Crown as did the old Roman and now do the Ottoman Emperors who are never Crowned but wear Turbans whereby no Foreign Caliphs nor their own Mufti 's can usurp Ecclesiastical Supremacy for whosoever accepts Tradition of a Crown or any other Symbol or token of Investiture lays aside all Titles by Conquest and receives a Kingdom by Contract with the people and takes an Oath to Govern according to the Laws Contracted which Contract if made with Bishops and they have the Power of Tradition of the Crown if we will believe Henry the Second they will impose their own Terms of Supremacy and every thing else which concerns their profit and how Imperious they have been in arrogating to themselves only the Right of Tradition of the Crown I shall only mention one Example in the Reign of Henry the First who after the death of his first Queen Matild married a second called Adelira and when she was to Be Crowned Ralf Arch-Bishop of Canterbury who was to do the Office came to King Henry sitting in his Chair of State asking who had set the Crown on his Head The King answering I have now forgotten it was so long since Well says the Arch-Bishop who ever did it he did me wrong to whom it belonged and as long as you hold it thus I will do no Office at this Coronation Then said the King The insolency of an Arch-Bishop Do what you think good Whereupon the Arch-Bishop took the Crown off the King's Head and after at the intreaty of the people set it on again and then proceeded to Crown the Queen Here appears a great difference between the Tradition of the Crown by a Bishop and by the People for the Bishop arrogates the Right as the Pope by his Spiritual and Ecclesiastical Supremacy and compels the Prince implicity to acknowledg the same by either receiving the Original Tradition or Confirmation of his Crown from him as one that hâ—th power Jure Divino to give it but where it is received from the People or Parliament neither Superiority nor Supremacy is imply'd nor comes in question but only the form of the Contract for Superiors and Inferiors and Equals may all Contract alike and bind themselves alike whether Superior or Inferior without any regard or consideration of the one or the other Then for the Supremacy Spiritual given by Unction by a Bishop they are ever citing their old Popish rule Reges sacro oleo uncti Spiritualis Jurisdictionis sunt capaces Kings anointed with holy Oil are capable of Spiritual Jurisdiction whereby they make an Appearance as if by their Oil they gave Supream Spiritual Jurisdiction whereas in truth they thereby circumvent Princes and make them implicitely acknowledg the Bishop who anoints to be a greater Supream than the Anointed for the Bishop assuming without Miracle or sign of Mission to Consecrate the Oil he thereby prâ—tends he hath Power Jure Divino to Consecrate and Anoint as some Prophets had by Miracle amongst the Jews and then from Christ's Argument Matth. 23.17 19. Anointing safer for Princes by a Lay-hand and with common Oil than with Oil Consecrate Whether is greater the Gold or the Temple which Sanctifieth the Gold the Gift or the Altar which Sanctifieth the Gift infers whether is greater the Temple or Bishop who Consâ—crates the Temple the Oil or Bishop who Consecrates the Oil and whether is a greater Supream the Person Anointed or the Bishop who Anoints and Consecrates the Anâ—inted So it was by pretence of Consecration of Crowns and Oils by which the Pope first and since the Bishop hath usurped Supremacy over Princes and secretly steal the Supremacy of that Spiritual Jurisdiction to themselves which they pretend to give them But where the Tradition of the Crown or Unction is by the People or their Representative the Parliament according to Contract
them durst adventure seeing Bajezet was of a furious Nature and in his Anger dangerous to be spoken with to mediate in their behalf no not Alis Bassa Charadin Bassa's Son whom of all men he favour'd most There was at that time in the Court an Aethiopian Jester who under some Covert pleasant Jest would often times bolt out to the King in his greatest heat what his gravest Councellors durst not speak to him in secret This Jester Alis Bassa requested to devise some means to entreat the angry King in behalf of these Judges promising to give him what he would desire if he could appease the Kings displeasure The Aethiopian without fear undertook the matter and presently put on his Head a rich Hat all wrought over with Gold and accoutred in all other his Cloths suitably presented himself before the King with a great counterfeit Gravity whereat Bajazet marveling asked him the cause why he was so Gay I have a Request unto your Majesty said he and wish to find favour in your sight Bajazet more desirous than before to know the matter asked what his Request was If it stand with your pleasure said the Aethiopian I would fain go as your Ambassador to the Empeperor of Constantinople in hope whereof I have put my self in this readiness To what purpose wouldst thou go said Bajazet To crave of the Emperor some Forty or Fifty of his old grave Monks and Friers to bring with me hither to the Court. And what should they do here said Bajazet I would have them placed said the Jester in the rooms of the old doteing Judges whom you intend as I hear to put to death Why said Bajazet I can place others of my own People who are better in their rooms True said the Aethiopian for Gravity of Look and Countenance and so would the old Monks and Friers serve as well but not so learned in the Laws and Customs of your Kingdom as are those in your displeasure If they are Learned why do they then contrary to their Learning pervert Justice and take Bribes There is a good reason for that too said the Jester What reason said the King That can he that there standeth by tell better than I said the Jester pointing to Alis Bassa who forthwith commanded by Bajazet to give the reason with great Reverence first done shewed that those Judges so in displeasure were not conveniently provided for and were therefore enforced many times for their necessary maintenance to take Rewards where they could get them to the staying of the due course of Justice which Bajazet understanding to be true commanded Alis Bassa to appoint them convenient stipends for their maintenance and forthwith granted their Pardon Whereupon the Bassa set down Order That of every matter in Suit exceeding One Thousand Aspers the Judges should have Twenty Aspers which Fees they yet take to this day Whence may be Observed 1. That to place Judges in Courts to undergo the incessant labours of hearing multitudes of Causes and not to allow them honourable maintenance is the ready way to make men of ordinary Principles Freebooters and to take the Prey for themselves So the meanness of the Salary in Russia being but an Hundred Marks per Annum makes the Judges extream Extortious on the People 2. That those who buy either Judicial or Ministerial places in Judicatories must sell again and the sale of either is contrary to the Law of God and of infinite Damage to the Publick turning the weights of Justice to the false weights of Merchandize as says the Poet Ergo Judicium nihil est nisi publica Merces Quid faciunt leges ubi sola Pecunia Regnat 3. That the Basha when he was appointed to provide the Judges maintenance by stipend providing the same by Fees made them worse then before and gave them a pretence to take Bribes of the People under the name of Fees and there are none more corrupt Judges for Bribery than the Turks to this day and well they may if they take Fees Neither Judg nor Minister to take Fees but Salary It was the Ancient Law of England that none having any Office concerning the Administration of Justice should take any Fee or Reward of any Subject for the doing of his Office Coke 2. part 176. and by the Statute Westm 1. cap. 25. neither Judicial nor Ministerial Officer as Sheriff Escheator Coroner Bailiff Gaoler Clerk of the Market Aulnager nor other inferior Minister or Officer of the King whose Offices do any way concern the Administration or Execution of Justice or the common good of the Subject or the Kings Service but shall be paid of what they receive from the King on pain the Offender against this Act shall pay double Damages of the Plaintiff and shall be otherwise punish'd at the Will of the King Marrying for Fees contrary to the Laws of God and of the Land By which appears that the Episcopal Judging of Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession for Fees and the granting of Licenses of Marriage by Bishops and taking of Fees by a Priest for Banns or Marriage of any Persons in a Temple or elsewhere is wicked abominable and contrary to the Laws of God and Fundamental Laws of the Land and they ought to be punish'd for doing the same and had not Bishops corrupted the true Doctrine of Gods Ordinance of Marriage to obtain Fees and other covetous and ambitious Ends Men had at this day Married according to the Moral Law of God and not the Ceremonial Laws of Priapus and Venus The Inconveniences which ensue Judges and Ministers taking Fees are 1. As Coke saith 2 part 210. When neither Judges or Ministers had any Fees then had they no colour to exact any thing of the Subject who knew they ought to take nothing at all of them they being maintained by Salary from the King but when some Acts of Parliament changing the Rules of the Common Law gave to the Ministers of the King Fees in some particular Cases to be taken of the Subject whereas before all their Office was done without taking now no Office at all is done without taking and a gap being once open'd there was after no bounds to the breach so it causeth Oppression 2. It causeth corruption of Justice for if a Judg take Fees it is from the Plaintiff and Defendant and he will sell Justice to him who gives him the greatest but if he take a Salary he takes it from the Publick and will be for the Publick good and not partial to the Parties 3. The Publick by giving the Salary and receiving the Fees increases the Publick Treasury for the vast Income of Fees far exceeding the Merits of the Judges and Officers it is just the overplus should be applied to discharge Publick Burdens and not to fill private Pockets and what was unequally shared amongst Officers ignorant and idle by way of Fees The English in Scotland turn'd all the Fees of Courts into
Lives by Fictions I hope such Popish Fictions will no longer be suffer'd in Protestant Courts of Justice Coke saith From the taking away of Oaths for the truth of the cause of Essoin by the Statute of Marlebridge cap. 12. there arose after Fourcher per Essoin by several Tenants alternis vicibus and making false Essoins ultra mare all endeavour'd to be taken away by Westm 1. cap. 43. 44. but when a mischief comes by making an ill Law or Statute it is never cleanly cured by after Statutes of Explanation or Limitation without clean repealing again the Statute which causeth the mischief additions of new Patches to old Garments making the Rent but worse Fictions in Essoins The mischief of Fictions of Husband and Wife to be but one Person have been sufficiently shewn P. 66 67. Fictions de Plus petitionibus In the Common-Law Declarations the next Fictions for want of the Oath of Calumny are de Plus Petitionibus Conrad 405. saith Olim triplum condemnabantur qui majorem Summam in libello assignaverant quam reus debebat but in more ancient times I find they forfeited only the Tenth part which with an Oath of Calumny might be now sufficient to restrain the lawless laying of Debt and Damage in their Declarations an Hundred times more than it is which is very mischievous and dangerous to Defendants when Plaintiffs pack and bribe Juries and they happen to misplead make defaults or have other Casualties fallen on them whereby they cannot attend their Suits Dr. Cowell says The Civilians are in no danger de Plus Petitionibus by reason of certain Cautelous Clauses they ordinarily have at the end of every Position or Article of their Libel or Declaration to this effect Et ponit conjunctim divisim de quolibet detali tanta quantitate vel summa qualis quanta per Confessionem partis adversae vel per probationes Legitimas in fine litis apparebit and again in the conclusion of all Non astringens se ad singula probanda sed petens ut quatenus probaverit in praemissis aut eorune aliquo eatenus obtineat But Civilians and Canonists make their Laws like Juglers-knots to tie with one finger and untie with the other they make a great noise of their Oath of Calumny and de Plm Petitionibus and by these secret Clauses in their Libels make it all again to no purpose All the Common Law Writs of Questus est nobis are now grown Fictions and Declarations Licet saepius Requisitus are likewise Fictions whereby men are surprized by Arrests before any Demand made the Inde producit sectam in the end of the Plaintiffs Declaration is now turned a Fiction which was heretofore a legal proof of Witness produced to prove his Declaration for the better Caution against the false Calumnies of Plaintiffs the former Taking of Pledges of the Plaintiff is now turned to a Fiction of Plegii de prosequendo John Doe and Richard Roe the Counter-pledges exacted of the Defendant are now turned to a Fiction John Den and Richard Fen. Courts of Justice compel to Fictions and Falsities It doth not satisfie Courts of Justice to tolerate Fictions and Falsity but they compel to them as the Defendant shall be compell'd to give colour a meer insensible Fiction and Lie he shall be compell'd at Common Law to answer Negatively or Affirmatively as if he were Omniscient and shall not be permitted to say Dubito or Ignoro though Juries of greater number may all say Ignoramus he shall be compell'd to a Plus petitio to avoid a Variance between his Obligation and his Declaration as Bro. Confess 37. If a man Sue an Obligation for Ten Pounds and the Defendant confesseth all except Forty Shillings whereof he sheweth an Acquittance the Plaintiff prays Judgment and says nothing of his Acquittance for if he confess it his Writ should have abated Fictions of Acts made the first day of the Session If an Act of Parliament come before them to judg when it was made they will judg it by Fiction to be made the first day of the Session 33. H. 6.17 the Case was this In the Exchequer-Chamber Fortescue Rehearsed how the Parliament last past made a special Act against John Pilkington Esq for the Rape of a Woman out of N. c. and Rehearsed the effect of the Act and how by the same Process was granted to be made to the Sheriff of E to make certain proclamations in a Ville that the said John ought to appear before the Lords at W. at a certain day c. to answer to the Trespass contained in the said Act c. and if he would not that then he should be attaint of the Trespass and pay a certain Sum to the Party c. and that the Proclamations were accordingly made and returned into Chancery and the said John made no Appearance c. and after the said John was taken and in the Kings-Bench committed to the Marshals-Ward for certain Causes on which a Transcript of the Act and a Mittimus was sent out of the Chancery directed to us c. whereupon the Marshal was charged with him for the same Condemnation contained in the Act and the said Prisoner comes now and alledges by his Councel That the Act of Parliament is not sufficient and therefore prays to be discharged c. for the Bill being directed to the Commons pass'd them well and was endorsed in this Form Let it be delivered to the Lords but whereas the Bill was That the said John should render himself before the Feast of Pentecost next ensuing the Lords endorsed the Bill in this Form The Lords grant that in case he appear not before the Feast of Pentecost which shall be Anno Domini 1452. c. to wit at Pentecost next after the Feast contained in the Bill And therefore the Lords granted a longer day then was granted by the Commons in which Case the Commons ought to have had the Bill deliver'd back again to them and they to have assented to the Grant of the Lords which was not done and therefore such Act of Parliament is void Fortescue It seems we ought to intend no otherwise but that the Act is good for the King hath written to us by his Writ and hath certified unto us That the Bill is confirmed by Authority of Parliament Illingworth Chief Baron This cannot here be intended as you say for the Writ which is made only by a Clerk of the Chancery cannot make an Act of Parliament good if it be vicious in it self c. And afterwards he sent for Kirkby keeper of the Rolls and for Faukes Clerk of the Parliament Fortescue Rehearsed the matter to them both on which Kirkby Sir The course of the Parliament is this c. But if any Bill is particular or other Bill which is first deliver'd to the Commons and pass'd they use to endorse the Bill in this Form Let it be
deliver'd to the Lords and if the King and the Lords agree to the Bill without changing it then they use not to endorse the Bill but the same is deliver'd to the Clerk of the Parliament to be Inrolled and if it be a Common Bill it shall be Inrolled and enacted but if it be a particular Bill it shall not be Inrolled but Filed on a File and it is well enough but if the Party will Sue to have the same Enter'd for his better Security it is well enough it may be Inroll'd and if the Lords will alter the Bill that which may stand with the Grant of the Commons shall not be deliver'd back to them as if they will grant Tonnage and Poundage for Four Years and the Lords grant them only for Two Years this shall not be redeliver'd to the Commons because 't is consistent with their Grant but if Vice Versa the Commons grant for Two Years and the Lords for Four then the same must be redeliver'd to the Commons for their Assent c. Faukes Sir the Case was thus The Bill was put into the Commons after the Feast of Pentecost which was in Parliament time and the intent of the Bill was That the Proclamations should last till the Feast of Pentecost then next ensuing which was Anno 1452. but every Bill of Parliament shall have Relation to the first day of the Session of Parliament though it be put in at the latter end therefore the Lords granted according to the intention of the Bill Prisot Are you certain that the Bill was deliver'd after the Feast of Pentecost which was in Parliament time or not Faukes Truly I do think so c. Markham Do you use to make Inrollment of the Day when you first receive the Bills Faukes No Sir Markham Verily this is a Perilous thing for the Court of Parliament is the Most High Court the King hath and it were well done if every Act and Thing there done which is material and reason of it were Inrolled c. For in this Case if the Bill pass'd the Commons and the Lords in the manner aforesaid before the Feast of Pentecost then the Act is void because of the variance of the Endorsement of the Day by the Lords c. From the Bill c. And it was not redeliver'd to the Commons but it was deliver'd after the Feast of Pentecost then it seems they are agreed for all is one day wherefore this matter cannot determine one way or the other by your Record who are the Clerk c. And now we can give no other credit to what is said but that the Bill was deliver'd the first day of the Parliament c. Fortescue This is an Act of Parliament and we will be well advised before we make void any Act of Parliament and peradventure the matter ought to rest till the next Parliament and then we may be certified by them of the certainty of the matter but however we will be well advised what to do c. This Fiction and the Inconveniences of the same are very well Reformed by an Act of Parliament of Scotland Jac. 6. P. 7. Cap. 121. FOrsameilk as it is understand to the Kingis Majestie and Threé Estaites of Parliament that oftentimes Doubtes and Questions arisis touching the Proclamation of the Actes of Parliament and Publication thereof it being sometime alledged by the Lieges that they are not bound to observe and keép the samin as Laws nor incur ony paines conteined therein quhill the same be Proclaimed at the Mercat Croces of the head Burrowes of all Schires For remeding of quhilkis Doubts in time cumming It is Statute and Ordained be our Soveraine Lord and Estaites of this present Parliament That all Actes and Statutes of Parliament maid at this time and sal happen to be maid at onie time hereafter sall be Published and Proclaimed at the Mercat Croce of Edinburgh only quhilk Publication our Soverain Lord and Estaites foirsaidis decernis and declaris to be al 's ratiable and sufficient as the samin were Published at the head Burrowes of the haill Schires within this Realm And alswa declaris the haill Lieges to be bounden and astricted to the obedience of the saides Actes as Laws Forty Dayes after the Publication of the samin at the saide Mercat Croce of Edinburgh being by-past Fictions of Members of Parliament Resident and Native By the Statute of 1. H. 5. cap. 1. It is Enacted That the Knights of the Shires which from henceforth shall be chosen in every Shire be not chosen unless they be Resident within the Shire where they shall be chosen the day of the date of the Writ of the Summons of the Parliament and that the Knights and Esquires and others which shall be choosers of those Knights of the Shires be also Resident within the same Shires in manner and form as is aforesaid And moreover it is Ordained and Established That the Citizens and Burgesses be chosen of the City and Burrows Men Citizens and Burgesses Resiant dwelling and Freé of the same City and Burrows and no other in any wise And as though this were not sufficient for Excluding Foreigners from Elections It is Enacted further by 23. H. 6.15 That the Knights of Shires for the Parliament hereafter to be chosen shall be notable Knights of the same Counties for the which they shall be chosen or otherwise such notable Esquires and Gentlemen born of the same Counties as shall be able to be Knights So by these two Acts of Parliament it is Enacted None shall be chosen for Knights of Shires but such as are both Residents and Natives of the Shires for which they serve Acts of most high Wisdom and Justice but alas now both Residents and Natives being in practice only turned to Fictions what defence are they to the Subjects in what all they have is concerned the Election of an equal and faithful Representative against the Two Hundred Thousand Pounds discover'd in the Letters of the late Horrible Popish Plotters to pois on all the Elections of Parliament-men through the Kingdom by buying of their Places to Papists and their Adherents Pensioners to Rome and France to sell the most Protestant King Religion and Three Kingdoms for a Spoil to Foreiners and to place such Sheriffs as may in tendency thereto by Fictions of their Returns that the Free-holders Vt major pars totius Comitatus praedict ' tunc ibidem existen ' jurat ' examinat ' Secundum vim formam effectum diversorum statutorum inde edit ' provisorum Eligerunt A. B. milit ' C. D. milit ' infra Comitat ' praedict ' commorantes c. Now if these Knights are not infra Comitat ' praedict ' commorantes Residents of the County and Secundum vim formam effectum Statutorum c. Especially of the 23. H. 6.15 Natives of the County this Return is Fictitious and False and utterly unlawful contrary to the Sheriffs Oath and for which
Courts and only takes in the Rich. 1. Because of the remoteness of sending for Writs the same being the greatest part sent for Hundreds of Miles 2. They are limited to so many short Returns only to multiply unnecessary Fees for Aliases and Pluries that they are extreamly troublesome and costly to the Poor 3. The Forms of them are so ticklish that when got they are easily abated and overthrown for the miss of a word a syllable and often a dash to an half word not made more clericorum and often for false Latine A Writ abates likewise for any default of Form varying from the Register Omission variance in order of words from the order used in Chancery the following matters are likewise good exceptions to abate Writs rasure interlining false Latine yet they never write true Omission of the words Vi Armis or of the words Contra pacem Outlawry Misnaming a Twice naming of the Person Misnaming of the Village or Hamlet Misnaming of Barockshare for Barkshire Misnaming of the Village Misnaming of the Person so variance between the Writ and the Declaration or Count in the least toy is a sufficient Exception to overthrow both Writ Declaration and Count Hastings Hasting as 9. E. 4.42 43. Det by Edward Hastings and Counts that he by the name of Edward Hasting recovered Land in Ancient Demesne and One Thousand Pounds Damages and brings his Action for the Damages by Three Justices against Five the Writ ought to abate 28. Ass 52. A Record removed and a Variance between the Record and the Mittimus and the Certiorari for one was H. Green Just Green and de Green Molineux Moliney and the Writ was Henry de Green the omission of the word De stopt the proceeding of the Justices Trespass the Writ was Molineux the Protection Moliney and therefore disallowed for the Variance 7. H. 6.22 Nuper omitted Trespass against J. N. nuper de D. in the Protection Nuper was omitted therefore Variance 19. H. 48. Audita querela upon an Indenture which was Langa White the Writ was Lang Whaite which put the Party to great Cost to get it to be amended 21. H. 6.7 7. Port. said an Outlawry was reversed for the Variance between Dockwra and Dockawre 21. H. 6.7 Dockwra Dockawre I. In the Obligation the Defendant was named J. M. de M. in the Writ M. was left out and therefore abated 38. E. 3.24 In Mayhem the Writ was Contra pacem Nuper Regis and the Count Contra pacem nunc Regis therefore it abated 8. H. 4.21 2. E. 4.25 Amendment 21. A Dispute is whether Wagam and Vagam are a material Variance Wagam Vagam Count less than the Writ A Judgment given in a Writ of Annuity was reversed because the Writ was That Twenty-six Marks Six Shillings Eight Pence was Arrear of the Yearly Rent of four Marks and in the Count Six Shillings Eight Pence omitted which is a Variance 9. E. 4.51 54. Here the Poor man was punish'd for his Conscience because he desired less in his Count than his Attorney had put into his Writ and it is said there that is not Misprision of the Clerk to be amendable because the Count is made by the Party and not by the Clerk A world of other Abatements of Writs there are too many to trouble at this time the Reader with both as to Variances between the Writ and Count and between the Writ and another Writ between the Writ and Specialty between the Writ and Testament between the Writ Count and Specialty between the Writ and Warrant of Attorney c. And the more Writs are abated and Causes thereby overthrown the more Money the Courts and Clerks get to send out new but the more miserably are the Poor by them oppress'd and it were more merciful in short to deny them Hearing than to cause them to hazard and lose all that little they have and at last not to be Heard This mischief of Writs was first invented by the College of Priests at Rome and were called Formulae Juris which is little Forms or diminutives of Forms the little Forms were those we call Writs the greater Forms whereof the lesser pretended to be as the Contents of the Chapters were what They called Libels and We Bills and Declarations These Formulae though set up by the Priests for their Gain were contrary to the Law of the Twelve Tribes in regard Oblatio Libelli being by that Law to precede Vocatio in jus as before is shewn these Writs or Formulae were useless and the Forms of Libels were sufficient to direct the People themselves Original Writs abolished by Justinian and better than the other which were so rigorous in their punctilios of Formalities Vt cadente Syllaba caderet Causa these Forms therefore of Original Writs of the Priests were totally abolished by Justinian lib. 2. tit 58. De Formulis impetrationibus Actionum Sublatis Juris Formulae aucupatione syllabarum insidiantes cunctorum Actibus radicitus amputentur Dat. X. Calend. Feb. Constantio III. Constante II. A A. COSS. Let Forms of Actions insidiating by hawking at Syllables in all mens Suits be cut up by the Roots Baldus Notes on the place Quia supervacuae Formulae sunt sublatae non oportet Actiones à Pontificibus impetrare sed sufficit eas apertè proponere and very well against this insidiation of Writs in Words and Syllables agrees the expression of Isa 29.21 They make a man an offender for a word and lay a snare for him that reproveth in the gate and turn aside the Just for a thing of nought The like to this of Justinian was done by that famous King James the Fifth the great Justitiar of Scotland where they had formerly their Writs as we have till they were sick of them and able to bear them no longer which was remedied by an Act of Parliament Jac. 5 p. 6. cap. 75. The words of which Act follow ordering a Copy of the Libel to the Person or dwelling House The Ordour of Summounding all Persons in Civil Actions Copy of a Bill or Declaration served in stead of a Writ ITem For eschewing of great Inconvenientes and Fraude done to our Soveraine Lordis Lieges by Summounding of them at theire dwelling places and oft times falslie and gettis never knawledge thereof It is Statute and Ordained That in times cumming quhair ony Officiar or Schireffe in that parte passes at Commande of the Kingis Letters or the Schireffes Stewardes Baronnes or Baillies Precept to Summound ony Partie if they cannot apprehend them Personallie they sall passe to the Ȝett or Dure of the principall dwelling place quhair the Person to be Summonde dwellis and hes their actual Residence for the time and there sall desire to have entresse quhilk gif it be granted they sall first schaw the cause of theire cumming and gif they cannot get the Party Personally they sall schaw their Letters or Precept before
I. the Episcopal Synod to Judg it in one to K. in the other to L. in the other to M. The Persians did better who made but one Judg though 't were an Horse by first Neighing at the Sun-rising to declare his Master Successor to the Crown of Persia than to dispute it with Thousands of Men and Horses vomiting their Votes in Blood How joyfully would Rome Triumph in the Spoils of Self-divided Protestants slaughter'd with their own hands This would be the sad effect of divided Parliaments divided Houses and divided Kingdoms according to what Christ himself deel res Matth. 12.25 Every Kingdom divided against it self is brought to desolation and every City or House divided against it self cannot stand 3. It divides the Head from the Bodies for a Prince cannot be Omnipresâ—nt if he is in Person wiâ—h any One of his Parliaments the other Two are without their Head but if the Three Parliaments are united in one Body then is there one Body and one Head 4. The Head which is separated from any of the Bodies is insensible of the Pains Distempers and Dangers of those Bodies from which it is separated those Members who are Elected as Natives of England to serve in Parliament cannot be but ignorant of the true State of Scotland and Ireland and Scotland and Ireland of one another and both of the true Staâ—e of England but when they sit altogether in one House they can inform one another and his Majesty and give him a full prospect at once of the true State of all his Kingdoms and the Affairs in them Parliaments divided delayed with Nine Negatives 5. Parliaments divided by Hundreds of Miles distance by Land and passage over Sea are most dangerously dilatory in all Affairs of War and all other matters concernâ—ng publick safety for every Vote to raise Money or if it be but to relieve a Garrison must pass Nine Negatives or Nine Affirmatives Three in the Parliament of England Three in the Parliament of Scotland and Three in the Parliament of Ireland before which will be passed and executed Nine Towns may be taken 6. This Dilatory danger of Division of Houses sufficiently appears in the Higher and Lower House though neither divided by Lands nor Seas And how much Time is wasted in fruitless Messages from one to another till the opportunity and what is contended for is lost whereas if they had sate in one House and the Matters to be carried by plurality of Votes there must have been an expeditious Dispatch Coke mentions some Records wherein appears that when there was a necessity of Levying Money for a War the Commons would assent and the Lords refuse Rex accersitis Regni Barombus tractabat cum iisdem de Regni Regimine deque pecuniali subventione sibi ferenda sed proceres regiis votis tum minime paruere Et 18. E. nu 14. The Commons Granted Money but the Lords would Grant none In the time of H. 4. the Commons would have Granted an Aid but Subsidium denegatum fuit Proceribus renitentibus Walsingham saith p. 475. His diebus clerus populus primo quintam decimam postmodum tricesimam bonorum suorum Regni Angliae in subsidium concesserunt So here is no mention made of the Lords which is always done when they give where by it seems they evaded the Subsidy 29. Eliz. The Commons desired the Lords they would join with them in a Contribution or Benevolence to the Queen the Lords gave Answer They would leave the Commons to themselves and they would Rate themselves which they did at the Rate of Two Shillings in the Pound The like 13. E. 3. n. 7. b. 18. E. 3. n. 10.20 E. 3. n. 11.27 E. 3. n. 8.4 R. 2. n. 13. When the House of Commons had offer'd to grant an Aid if the Clergy who had the Third part of the Land would pay the Third part of the Aid the Clergy Answer'd They were not to pay Aid by Parliament but will'd the Commons to do their Duties and they would do their own All which Examples shew That more Houses than one are a great clog in all matters concerning Publick Safety and a far greater are many Parliaments remote one from another 7. There can be no Pledges given of Peace and Unity but by the Union of Parliaments wherein each Nation in One House give themselves as Pledges of Amity one with another 8. There can be no Love without it which is the greatest Bond of Union for Ignoti nulla Cupido how can they be acquainted where they can neither see nor hear one another and how can they Love where they are not acquainted 9. Parliaments United strengthen one another against the common Enemies like the Cable made of many Cords which holds the Ship of the Commonwealth at safe Anchor against all the fury of Winds and Waves and cannot be broken or like the Arrows when bound in a Sheaf invincible when separated easily broken 10. When separated either Parliaments or Houses it is easier for Enemy-Princes to corrupt Members with Money for it is easier for the Shepherd to watch one Fold and secure it against the Wolf than many the corruption likewise is easier of Messengers between Parliament and Parliament and House and House than of the Members who may casily in travelling have opportunity of spreading false News Bruits and Rumors and cause thereby Misunderstanding between the King and his Parliament and People and between every Parliament and House one against another whereas there need no Messengers if only one House of Parliament Secrecy of Union 11. The more Parliaments and Councils there are the less Secrecy there was at Rome but one only Senate and what Livy lib. 48. mires at there was no Privy-Councel for matters of State allowed but all matters of Peace and War were transacted in the Senate prudently enough though Livy hesitate as to the Prudence and the Secrecy of this great numerous Senate was so close that none of the Ambassadors of Greece or Asia could fish out either by Friends or Money amongst so great a number of Senators what Eumenes his business there who had Audience in the Senate was a thing impossible to be done where there is a Senate and a Privy-Councel or a Plurality of Supreme Senates 12. One dissentient Parliament or House standing divided may clog or betray the Defence of the rest it is already mention'd how often Dissension between the Higher House and House of Commons have stopt Military Provision against the common Enemy and how often fell it out in the same man er at Rome That when Recruits and Supplies were to be sent to an Army in the Field Discords were importunately raised between the Senate and the Tribunes of the People whereby the Enemy commonly obtained his Design of Stopping the Raising new Forces against them for the Tribunes of the People sate not in the Senate but were a divided State having a Negative on their Votes but no Vote
with them and were indeed a most imperfect constitution of Defensors of Liberties against Senators permitted to be Hereditary and was no way to be remedied unless the People had taken on them the Election of the Senators as is now done by such Nations as have the Liberty of Parliaments but if Two dissentient Negatives or Houses or Parliaments are joined together in one House where the matter is to be carried by Plurality of Votes there dissentient opinions of the several Members are so far from hurting the Publick as they do the same much Good First by the contrary Dispute of the Question the Truth is the better understood Secondly When two Extremes contend they commonly moderate one another and produce a more temperate Sentence than if the whole Senate were all of the same mind without any Faction so as long as Cato and Caesar made Orations one against the opinions of the other in the Senate it mitigated them to moderation and it was the Contention in the Field and not in the Senate caused so much mischief to the Publick which could not be avoided in such a Senate which was no equal Representative Elected by the People but some Senators so disproportionable in Power as Caesar and Pompey were to the rest Strength of Union 13. Though Confederacy of Foreign Princes ought not to be neglected yet the Confederacy of the Three Parliaments by Union in one House is a far greater assistance than of any Three Foreign Princes Confederated and living in Foreign Palaces and such Three Protestant Parliaments in one House and under one Protestant King are by Gods help of greater Strength and Councel than any Three Catholick Kings and the Pope with them if they should wrongfully confederate against the Protestant Examples of Un on of Parliaments 14. All these and no question more dangers of Disunion and Benefits of the Union of Parliaments were foreseen to the Wisdom of King James of famous memory and how zealously the desire of such an Union was press'd on him by him between England and Scotland appears by the Act 1. Jac. cap. 1 2. And thereby Commissioners of each Nation were appointed to meet and Treat and to reduce their Dâ—ings therein to Writings or Instruments Tripartite every part to be subscribed and sealed by them and one part to be deliver'd to the King the other to the Parliament of England the other to the Parliament of Scotland this was promoted several times in the House and vigorously Seconded by many Noble Protestant-Patriots after which as appears Coke 4th part 347. there started a question amongst the Commissioners whether there could be made a new Kingdom of Great Britain before there was made an Union of Laws which Question was by Command of the King refer'd to all the Judges of England in Trinity Term Anno 2. Jac. who unanimously Resolved Coke being then Attorney General That Anglia had Laws and Scotia had Laws A ridiculous Answer of Judges touching Union of Kingdoms but this new Erected Kingdom of Britannia had no Laws and therefore where the Forms of all Judicial Proceedings of England are Secundum Legem consuetudinem Angliae it could not be alter'd Secundum Legem consuetudinem Britanniae an Answer fitter for Protonotaries than Judges as if no Union were possible to be made of Kingdoms but by Rastall's Book of Entries whereas one word of a Nuper would have salved this horrible objection and but two lines of a Proviso in the Act of Union might have made the Style of their Formality what they would have had it but this unlucky Pedantry of Theirs was a fatal Scourge to Great Britain for in all humane probabilities if there had been then made an Union of Parliament the late Bloody Intestin Wars had never been 3. Jac. cap. 3. A Recital is made of the long and worthy Labours of the Commissioners of England and Scotland and how albeit all things had been by them fully and effectually pursued and accomplished c. Yet for that divers other matters required present Dispatch by the Parliament and the matters concerning the Union might be consider'd as well any other Session therefore the same was defer'd for that time Anno 4. Jac. 1. An Act is made for Repealing certain Acts of Hostility in former Ages made between the two Nations where the Commissioners lost all the Pains they had taken to the discouragement of any other who should thereafter attempt the like so by the Power and Subtlety of the Popish Episcopal Party and Lawyers all whose Interests a Reformation of Laws for Britannia would have crossed the whole business and Attempts of Union have been ever since obstâ—ncted As for Examples In former Histories we find none more free than the Romans to Naturalize their Associates and to make the Natives of the Provinces Citizens of Rome The Grand Seignior takes into his Council the Natives of several Kingdoms yea though Christians when once Educated in his Religion The several States of Greece had not been able to have subsisted against the Persian had they not United themselves in one common Council of State though their Laws and Commonwealths remained several The Netherlands had been never able to have subsisted against the Spaniard had not the Provinces been United in one Staadt-House and Common Council yet is not that Union perfect they remaining still under several Laws and Customs and in the nature of several Commonwealths and therefore not impossible to be again divided as the Grecian States thereby were So were it impâ—ssible for the German Empire to subsist against the Turk were they not United in one Supreme Dyet and Common Councli for a Parliament of Kings in person as the Electors are in Power is better than none at all and better than a Confederacy of Kings by Proxies they remaining in their several Palaces yet in many other respects the Union being of the Prelates and Princes and not of an equal Representative of the People it is liable to perpetual dangers of Civil Wars and the Dividing of one Prince against another who may perhaps as the Captains of Alexander the Great and the Italian Princes in the end set up every one for himself there being nothing to hinder but the Terror of the Neighbouring Turk whereas if the Union were constituted of an Emperor and Parliament equally Elected by the People the Empire were invincible for the Prince were then but one and the Senate but one but this is impossible to be performed except in Protestant Dominions for then must the Pope and Prelates be Cashier'd which no Catholick Prince can or dare attempt How great thanks do we therefore owe to God who hath vouchsafed Protestants so great a Privilege to Unite all their Parliaments if they in blindness and stubborness neglect or resuse not so great a Mercy as perhaps may not again be so easily offer'd The Cantons of the Swiss could not subsist without being United in a Common Council
nane against quhome the Process beis led be received in the Kings Castle or Place or in his Presence nor admitted to Councel or Parliament heard nor answer'd in the Law of Judgment of Fee and Heritage or uther Causes bot ever Eschewed as Cursed unto the time the said Persons cum to amendis and assyith the Party and obteine Absolution in Form of Law And Jac. 6. p. 3. cap. 53. in the Kings Minority an Act was got by the Kirk ' That all Excommunicate Persons not Conforming ' in Forty Days should be denounced Rebels and put to the Horn. The English Commissioners in the said late time of the Troubles had Instructions to take from the then Kirk such Letters of Horning and not to assist any Excommunication with the Temporal Sword which we performed accordingly The King of Spain joined with Tyrone and the Rebels in Ireland against Queen Elizabeth And Don John de Aquila Landing in Ireland with 4000 Spaniards intitled himself Master-General and Captain of the Catholick King in the Wars of God for holding and keeping the Faith in Ireland only on pretence of Excommunication Sextus Quintus the Pope of Rome on the Invasion prepared by Spain against England Anno 1588. sent out his Crusado as if against the Turks and having pass'd Sentence of Excommunication and Deprivation by his Bulls against Queen Elizabeth promising Pardon of Sins Heaven and Eternal Life to all who di'd in the Invasion 1. To grant a Pope or a Bishop Power to Excommunicate Protestant-Subjects is to grant him Power to Excommunicate Protestant-Kings 2. To grant him Power to Excommunicate Protestant-Kings is to grant him Power to Levy Money Raise Soldiers Denounce War and Depose them 3. Of the Dilemma of Danger threatning Princes who seek Security of Goverement from the Excommunication of Popes or Bishops either over a People Religious or Superstitious 4. Of the Impossibility of Security for Princes unless their Subjects are Educated or Instructed to be free from the Superstition of Excommunication and to contemn it 5. Of the Impossibility of obliging Popes or Bishops either by Benefits or Oaths Excommunication is as Proscription made a pretetence of Confiscation without shewing cause The Romans saith Aman. Marcellus proscribed Ptolomy the then King of Cyprus being their Confederate for no fault only they wanted Money in the Treasury who therefore poison'd himself and the Isle became Tributary to the Romans In the like manner do Popes and Bishop fall on the Richest with their Excommunication to fill their empty Purses Pope Gregory the Tenth Commanded Percham Arch-Bishop of Canterbury to pay him Four Thousand Marks within Four Months on pain of Excommunication So Excommunication is a ready way to Levy Money for War Anno 1230. The Pope having Excommunicated the Emperor the Emperor was fain to pay for his Absolution an Hundred and Twenty Thousand Ounces of Gold Plat. Nam Anno 1231. The Emperor for memory of this hard Penny-worth for his Absolution put into a Pool at Helbrand divers Pikes and other Fishes with Brass Rings having Inscriptions of his name and the Year of the Lord one of the Fishes was taken up 267. Years after Ann. Suev Calv. Henry the Second after that Traitor Beckett the then Arch-Bishop of Canterbury had been Slain though not by the Kings Command was enjoined amongst other things this Slavish Penance He walked Three Miles bare-foot on the sharp Stones that he at length had so cut his Feet they marked the ground with Blood every step he went And after this which was worse than Running the Gantilope he Received of the Priests Monks Bishops and Abbots on his naked Flesh so many Jerks with Rods Oh brave Pedants and Pontifical Government for Princes as according to Baronius amounted to at least Fourscore Lashes which doubtless was the Number the Jew administred to the vilest Rogues lest their Brothers should be despised in their Eyes and not heard to have been Exercised in their Eyes and not heard to have been Exercised on the Priests Bishops and Abbots themselves though they kill'd and murder'd many Lay-men without Law or Justice they incur'd only a deprivation and instead of Hanging which they deserved sometimes no more than a suspension Temporary ab Officio In the time of King John Anno 1211. The Pope Excommunicated him and gave the Kingdom of England to the King of France Paris Wend. The Pope Excommunicated Henry the Eighth and gave the Kingdom Primo Occupanti Queen Elizabeth was Excommunicated by Three Popes Pius Quintus Gregory the Thirteenth and Sextus Quintus Anno 1308. The Pope Excommunicateth Andronicus Emperor of the East and setteth up the King of Russia against him Bzou So he dealt alike with the East and Western Emperors Excommunications have brought the Venetians to extreme Straights formerly therefore they are yet no Friends of it Dandalus Duke of Venice was compell'd by Pope Clement the Fifth to Crouch under the Table Chain'd like a Dog before he could obtain Peace for the Venetians The Pope Excommunicated John King of Navar and Granted his Kingdom to the Spaniards Nicephorus Phocas Emperor of the East was Excommunicated by Polyeuchus then Patriarch of Constantinople because he had been God-father to a Child of Theophania Wife to his Predecessor and after his Predecessor's Death Married her Pope Zachary deposed Chilperick the French King and gave the Crown of France to Pepin The two French Kings H. 3. and H. 4. who were Assassinated had great Guards whereby it appears though Princes may secure themselves in Vaults and Caves from Thunderbolts yet can they not against the Bishops of Romes Ignis Fatuus of Excommunication but that to Assault them Per medios ire Satellites Et perrumpere amat saxa potentius Ictu fulmineo Eight Emperors were Excommunicated by Popes who were these Frederick the First Frederick the Second Philip Conrad Otho the Fourth Lewes of Bavaria Henry the Fourth and Henry the Fifth The Emperor Henry the Fourth Fought in Threescore and Two several Battles and had for the most part Victory he was Excommunicated by the Pope and to obtain his Absolution came Three Days together bare-foot to the Gates of the City Canusium where the Pope then was and with much difficulty obtain'd it The Catholick Majesties of Spain cannot secure themselves from Excommunication without Money nor their great Vice-Roys in America for a Rebellion was Raised in Mexico by the Arch-Bishop there Excommunicating the Governors the People by Superstitious Episcopal Education made more afraid of the Counterfeit Power of the Keys than of the true Power of the Sword and will side in Rebellion with the Bishop against the Secular Governor men may talk therefore and believe what they please that the Supremacy of the Temporal Sword is Consistent with the Spiritual of Excommunication but when it comes to Trial amongst a Superstitious People they will be very much deceived and perhaps Ruin'd Bzovius de Pont. Roman 611 612. to maintain the Power That the Popes may depose Kings
withal Threatens a Proceeding against his Person Becket thereupon flies the Realm and appeals to the Pope and procures an Excommunication from the Pope of such Bishops as kept not their Oath of Canonical Obedience to him who was their Arch-Bishop The King of France Intercedes for Becket and the Pope Threatned Excommunication against the King himself if he Restored him not The King out of a Superstitious Fear of his Excommunication as appears by his Receiving afterward the Servile Penance imposed on him for Becket's death Restores Becket again to his See of Canterbury whither again arrived he continued notwithstanding the favour of the Kings Restauration as bad as before in Prosecuting his Excommunications he had got at Rome against such Bishops as sided with the King of which when the Excommunicated Bishops complained to the King and moved thereby his Passion He cried out Shall I never be quiet for this Priest if I had any about me that lov'd me they would find some way or other to Rid me of this trouble Whereupon Four Knights standing by took their Journey to find the Arch-Bishop whom they found at Church on the steps where they strook him on the Head with their Swords and killed him which though in the manner of doing it was no way Justifiable being without lawful Hearing and Trial Yet 't is very manifest that the Arch-Bishop by the Common Law it self without the trouble of an Attainder by Parliament might have been proceeded against Legally by Indictment of High-Treason and he was manifestly Guilty for it was by the Common Law High-Treason to appeal to a Foreign Prince And likewise for any Subject to bring an Excommunication from Rome against another Subject without the Kings Assent was Treason for this was the ready way to give the Pope Power to Raise Rebellions against the King when he pleased Bishops Traitors to King John The Bishops in the time of King John Conspired with the Pope and the French and the Temporal Barons and the Pope laid an Interdiction or Excommunication on the Kingdom for Six Years Three Months and Fourteen Days during which the Church Doors were shut up and there was neither Exercise of Religion Mass Marriage Baptism or Burial allowed in the Church or Church-Yard 'till the King would Surrender his Crown and take the Kingdom from the Pope and hold it Feudatory from him which the King was by the Treachery of his Bishops deserting him compell'd to do and accordingly he took off the Crown from his Head and laid it at the Feet of Pandulphus the Popes Legate the Pope to dispose of it how he pleased which he kept Three or Four Days from him and would not Restore again but on condition agreed That he and his Successors should hold it of the Pope and pay him for it the Yearly Tribute of a Thousand Marks which was a great Sum in those days besides all the other Tributes and Exactions which the Pope then had from the Subjects but this the King was fain to do before the Excommunication would be taken off from him and his Kingdom which being done and be perceiving himself clear from the Pope Resolved to Raise an Army and be Revenged on the French King whose Pensions had set all this on work against him and accordingly had Levied a very great Army having his Fleet all ready at Portsmouth to have Shipt them The Arch-Bishop of Canterbury thereupon told him He broke his Oath to the Pope at his Absolution if he Warr'd against the French King which in truth the Bishops had themselves by their Treason compell'd Him to To whom the King Replied in a great Passion That he would not defer the Business for his pleasure seeing Lay-Judgment belonged not to him The Arch-Bishop Threatned his Native Sovereign he would Excommunicate him unless he desisted and this was in behalf of a Foreign Prince his Enemy So far could French Pensions prevail with Prelats whereby the King to his great loss was enforced to Dissolve and Disband again his Army in the nick of Time when it was ready for Action Henry the Third the Tempest of the Barons-Wars beginning to Threaten him was asked by Robert Bacon a Frier Predicant What Sea-men feared most that they knew best themselves The Frier Replied My Lard I will tell you It is Petrae Rupes alluding to Petrus de Rupibus The name of the then Bishop of Winchester and under him meaning the whole Body of the Bishops Edward the First that wise and valiant Prince disdaining to be Priest-Ridden as his two Predecessors had been to so great danger of their Persons and Kingdoms and taught by their Experience that it was in vain to think of obliging by Benefits or Oath the Power of those who being a Body United and as it were an Army more firmly Banded under their Arch-Bishop than 't was possible to make the Lay-Nobility to be under their King he began first to Lop off from their Ecclesiastical Auxiliaries such Branches of Royal Power as he could do himself without a Parliament and Anno Reg. 6. Deprived many famous Monasteries of England of their Privileges and took from the Abbot and Covent of Westminster the Return of Writs granted them by the Charter of Henry the third And after he got to be Inacted by Parliament the Statute of Mortmaine against the so enormous Increase of their Temporal Possessions which was so detrimental to the Military Service of the Kingdom and in the Statute of Westminster 2. defalked the Jurisdiction of Bishops and Ecclesiastical Judges He left not here but growing more upon them he Required the Moiety of all their Goods as well Spiritual as Temporal for one year and I think their money and moveables could grow no more the next year which he took in one year And at the first one Sr. John Knight stands up amongst them in their assembly and said Reverend Fathers if any here will Contradict the King's Demand in this Business let him stand out in the midest of this Assembly that his person may be known and seen as one Guilty of the Breach of the King's Peace At which speech they all sate mute and though it put them into Extreme grief and perplexity they yet were fain to yield to his demand Dan. Hist Which if he had been possessed with a dastardly fear of Excommunication he had no more dared to do than his Predecessors Yet some say to be able to deal with his own Bishops he was fain to send the Pope a Furnish of gold for his Chamber to have his Connivence Edward the second Anno Regni 17 after the Overthrow he Received by the Treachery of his own in Scotland Bishops Traitors to E. 2. Caused the Bishop of Hereford to be Arrested and Accused of High treason for aiding the Kings Enemies in their Late Rebellion but he Refused to Answer being a Consecrated Bishop without leave of the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury whose Suffragan he was and who he said was
John Stratford Arch-Bishop of Canterbury on whom the King likewise laid the blame of his Wants writes a proud Letter to the King and desired him and his Council without delay to deliver the said Prisoners otherwise he plainly writes That according to his Pastoral Charge he must proceed to the Execution of the Sentence of Excommunication concluding how notwithstanding it was not his Intention to include the King Queen or their Children so far as by Law they might be Excused It was well for the King he was in the head of a brave Army in France for if he had been single as his Father was they who durst Menace him amongst all his Forces in the Field if he had lost the Day as his Father did were as likely to bring him for a French Pension to as miserable a destruction as they brought his Father but by Gods Providence he proved afterward Victorious but first Replied by another Letter to the Arch-Bishop That Relying on his Council he was first put on the Action of the French and that he had promised and assured him he should not want Treasure to perform the work and that notwithstanding by the negligence and malice of the said Arch-Bishop and his Officials those Provisions Granted him by his Subjects in Parliament were in so slender proportion Levyed and with such delays sent over as he was pressed of necessity to his great Grief and Shame to Condescend to the late Truce with the French though extreme Wants charged with mighty Debts forced him to throw himself into the Gulf of the Usurers in such sort as he began to look into the Dealing of his Officers some of which upon apparant notice of their ill Administration of Justice their Corruptions and Oppressions of his Subjects he removed from their Places and others of mean Degree he Committed to Prison and there detained them to the end he might find out by their Examinations the truth of their Proceedings Then he charges the Arch-Bishop with his own Corruption and declares how himself being under Age had through his ill Council made so many Prodigal Donatives prohibited Alienations and excessive Grants and Gifts that thereby his Treasury was utterly Exhausted and his Revenues diminished and how the Arch-Bishop corrupted with Bribes Remitted without reasonable cause great Sums which were due unto him applying to his own Use or Persons ill deserving many Commodities and Revenues which should have been preserved for his necessary Provisions and concluded Unless he desisted from his Rebellious obstinacy he intended in due time and place more openly to proceed against him and the King before the Arch-Bishop Submitted caused a Letter to be sent to the Pope from the Parliament not to make any more Collations of Benefices in England and prohibited them on pain of Death on any that should present or admit them which Resolute slighting of Excommunication both from Arch-Bishop and Pope though in the very time of War with France made the Pride of the Arch-Bishop stoop and with much ado got himself Reconciled to the Kings favour for which the King was bound to thank God and not the Pope or Bishop who gave him that Victory and Success against the French as neither Pope or Arch-Bishop dared to Excommunicate him Against Richard the Second one of the Articles brought against him to have him deposed was That whereas the Realm is immediately holden of God after he had obtained divers Acts for his own particular Ends he obtained Bulls heavy Censures from Rome to observe and perform them contrary to the Honour and ancient Privilege of this Kingdom whereby appears That even in a time of Popery the Assistance of the Pope and Bishops which were included in it was so far from being a Protection to the King that it was Destructive to him much more is the Assistance of Bishops likely to be Destructive rather than a Safety in a time of Protestancy The Bishop likewise Concurr'd with the rest and accused him That he had taken Money Jewels and Plate from them at his going into Ireland Bishops accuse R. 2. for Trifles to Depose him so far were they from seeking to preserve the Kings Life with those Superfluities of theirs where they could keep them and their Bishopricks together that they shewed their Fidelity to their Native King by endeavouring to destroy him For such Trifles divers other Articles were laid against him in behalf of the Bishops by whose doing only the King was utterly undone Truss 46. And not one of all the Bishops in England or Ireland spoke so much as one word to preserve their Native Sovereigns Life but only one namely Thomas Mercks Bishop of Carlisle Dilemma of danger from Excommunication As to the Dilemma a Prince falls under in expecting safety of Government from the Power of Excommunication of Popes or Bishops either the greater part of his Subjects will be Religious or Superstitious if Religious they will so easily see through the Superstition of Consecration and Excommunication as it will rather Irritate and Provoke them as it did in the late unhappy Civil Wars but if Superstitious will the Pope or Bishop make Use of the great Interest and Strength they gain thereby in the People to advance their pretended Spiritual Sword above the Temporal and their own Supremacy above Temporal Kings and Princes which if Resisted by the Princes of such Subjects hazards their being Deposed and losing Kingdoms and Lives together as appears by the Examples before Recited In the same danger is a Prince who Trusts a Temporal Officer whether Treasurer or other with too much Power of Money as Theocritus Anno 518. caused Amantius an Eunuch to give Justin Amantius the General of the Army a great Sum of Money to give the Soldiers to choose Theocritus Emperour but Justin distributed it for himself and so obtained himself the Empire The Western Emperours first raised the Popes to that height as to Excommunicate the Eastern Emperours the succeeding Popes to return their Advancers due thanks Excommunicated after the Western Emperour The French Kings assisted and after raised the Popes to such height that they Excommunicated Deposed and Poisoned the Western Emperour after by the same Power the French King gave them in thanks they Excommunicated and Assassinated the French Kings The Princes of Sicily and Naples had been mighty defendors of the Papacy but when they had made it mightier than themselves the Succeeding Popes took from them their Sovereignty to themselves As to the Impossibility of Safety of Princes amongst Subjects Educated in fear of Excommunication Subjects Educated in fear of Excommunication dangerous to Princes It is to be Noted as well from the Testimony of approved Authors as from the Scripture it self that amongst the Primitive Christians those who are now called Bishops but in the Original word signifie only Overseers were Parochial Bishops or Overseers and not Provincial and that they were the same with Presbyters and differ'd not in
Null all Oaths of allegiance unless they will buy their Crownes of them and pay Tribute There is in our own English History a Manifest Example of the same in that noble King Henry the second who Complaines to his Parliament against the Bishops and the whole Clergy That in their Election of King Stephen his Predecessor who was a Collateral Heir they had imposed on him their own Conditions with all advantages to themselves whereby they Deprived his Mother Maud the Empress and him who was her issue and the right Lineal Heir of the Succession to the Crown And how they dealt with the People as well as with the King appears by the Complaint of the Lay-Nobility to the King at the same time That the Privileges of the Clergy hindred all Execution of Justice that the same could have no Passage through the Kingdom and having Exempted themselves from the Jurisdiction of the Magistrate there had been since the beginning of his Reign above an Hundred Man-slaughters Committed within the Realm of England by Priests and men within Holy Orders Dan. Hist 83. Such were the Fruits of Bishops and persons within Holy Orders and the three fine Knacks of Consecration Ordination and Excommunication wherewith they both Allured and Terrified the Superstitious People And such were the fruits of their pretended Divine Mission with the Olive Branch of Peace for tho Unction and Crowning of Kings who confected their Oyntment of the Ingredients mention'd in Psal 55.21 The words of his mouth were smoother than butter but War was in his heart his words were softer than oyle yet were they drawn swords 1. Of Gods Preservation of John Keysar notwithstanding his Excommunication and Delivery to Satan by an Arch-Bishop of Canterbury 2. Of Delivery to Satan by Bishops and their Prohibition to cast him out again by Fasting and Prayer without the Bishops Licence 3. All Excommunication and delivery to Satan by Bishops without a Sign of Mission from God if Malefice follow ought to be Punished as Witchcraft if not as a Cheat. 4. To grant a Bishop Power of Excommunication is to grant him Power to set up Idolatry to make all Sins equal to Pardon all Sins for Money Coke part 3.42 Ex Mich. 5. E. 4. Rot. 143. Coram Rege Keysar deliver'd to Satan protected by God John Keysar was Excommunicated by the greater Excommunication before Thomas Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and Legate of the Aposto lick See at the Suit of another for a reasonable part of Goods and so Remained Eight Months and the said Keysar openly affirmed That the said Sentence was not to be feared neither did he fear it and albeit the Arch-Bishop or his Commissary hath Excommunicated me yet before God I am not Excommunicated And he said he spoke nothing but the Truth And so it appeared for that the last Harvest standing so Excommunicate he had as great plenty of Wheat and other Grain as any of his Neighbours saying to them in scorn That a man Excommunicate should not have such Plenty of Wheat the Arch Bishop denying these words to be within the Statute of H. 4. concerning Lollards who were the Primitive Protestants and Protomartyrs of England did by his Warrant in writing comprehending the said Cause by Pretext of the said Statute Commit the Body of the said Keysar to the Gaol at Maidstone for that saith he in respect of publishing the said words Dictum Johannem non immerito habemus de Haeresi suspectum by reason whereof the said John Keysar was Imprison'd in Maidstone Gaol and in Prison detained under Custody of the Keeper there untill by his Councel he moved Sir John Markham then Chief-Justice Justice of England and other the Judges of the Kings-Bench to have an Habeas Corpus and thereupon as it ought a Habeas Corpus was granted upon which Writ the Gaoler Returned the Cause and Special Matter and withal according to the Writ had his Body there The Court upon mature Consideration and on Conference with Divines Resolved That upon the said words Keysar was not to be Suspect of Heresie within the said Statute as the Arch-Bishop took it and therefore the Court first Bailed him and after he was deliver'd for that the said Arch-Bishop had no Power by virtue of the said Act to Commit to Prison John Keysar hereby proved the Arch-Bishop to be no Incantor Messium but he thereby proved though he was no Witch yet he was a Cheat. Prohibition to cast out the Devil by Fasting and Prayer In the Book of Canons newly Printed 1673. the Canon 72. contains these words No Minister or Ministers shall without the Licence and Direction of the Bishop of the Diocess first had and obtained under his Hand and Seal attempt upon any pretence whatsoever either of Possession or Obsession by Fasting and Prayer to cast out any Devil or Devils under pain of Imputation of Imposture or Cozenage and Deposition from the Ministery The Bishops in prohibiting to cast out the Devil without their Licence imitate something the Popish Exorcists part of whose Exorcism is according to Mengus Flagell Daemon p. 36. The Exorcist ties a Stole about the Neck of the Party with three knots saying Oh ye Abominable and Rebellious Spirits I Adjure Conjure and Compell you wheresoever you have your Residence in this man by the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost that ye immediately understand the words of my Conjuration and the virtue of it and that ye dare not depart from the Creature of God and Image of Christ without my Licence This is not only Anti-Protestant and the way to bring in all the Popish Magick and Exorcisms into the Church but is Anti-Christian for Christ himself affirms There is no holier or higher way of casting out the Devil than by Fasting and Prayer as appears Matth. 17.14 And when they were come to the multitude there came to him a certain man kneeling down to him and saying Lord have mercy on my Son for he is Lunatick and sore vexed for oft-times he falleth into the fire and oft into the water And I brought him to thy Disciples and they could not cure him And verse 18. And Jesus rebuked the Devil and he departed out of him and the Child was cured from that very hour Then came the Disciples to Jesus apart and said Why could not we cast him out And Jesus said unto them Because of your Vnbelief for verily I say unto you if ye have Faith as a grain of Mustard-seed ye shall say unto this Mountain Remove hence uâ—to yonder place and it shall remove and nothing shall be impossible unto you Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by Prayer and Fasting Christ agian will not suffer the Disciples to prohibit any to cast out the Devil as Mark 9.38 And John answered him saying Master we saw one casting out Devils in thy Name and we forbad him because he followed not us But Jesus said Forbid him not for there is no man that shall
both were so much concern'd and others for their own private Ambition if therefore Parliaments themselves have not or shall not sufficiently clear Ambiguities and Doubts to answer so many pretences How can it be expected that Ignorant people can clear the same upon their Oath or Conscience 3. It is permitted to Grand Juries when it doth not appear to them whether the Bill is true or false to find an Ignoramus and where the people are totally Ignorant both of the Fact and Law of Supremacy why ought they not to be allowed the same Equity according to the Truth to Answer Ignoramus 4. It is against the known Maxim That Only matters of Fact can be Testified by Witnesses and matters of Law or Right cannot be Testified but by the Law it self 8. An Usurper or Idolater may happâ—n to get the Possession of the Crown How then can a Protestant Swear to the Right of the first in Temporals or of the second in Spirituals 9. It doth not appear how a Protestant may Swear That no Foreign Prince or Person ought to have any Power Authority or Preheminence Ecclesiastical within this Realm and that he doth renounce all Foreign Power in regard it may so happen that a Protestant-Prince hath or may be born beyond Sea and be a Foreign Person and yet on failure of a Lineal Heir may happen to be the next right Heir to a Protestant King after his Decease it may seem therefore to cross Gods Providence to Swear to Renounce or Abjure all Foreign Protestant-Power as to the Succession for the Oath puts no distinction between Protestant and Papal Power but Renounces all alike if they are Foreign Persons Of the Mischiefs which ensue a false Test between Protestant and Papist 1. By the same Power is given to the Favourers of Popery to turn the Edg of all the Penal Statutes made and intended against Papists to destroy the Protestants and the Preteritions and Pardons intended the Protestants are wholly apply'd in favour of the Papist the Plagues designed against the Aegyptians are wholly let loose on the Israelites and the Passeover to which were invited the Israelites is made only a Feast for the Papist So did Bishop Bancrost in the time of Queen Elizabeth persecute all Anti-Papist-Protestants under the name of Puritans and Protected all Dominican Priests Seminaries and Papists under pretence of Opposing the Jesuits by pressing the false Tests of Recusancy to Pray in a Temple to Pray after the Common Form to Receive the Sacrament after the Common Form to take the Oath of Supremacy to use all Episcopal Ceremonies in the Worship of God and the utmost Rigor and Penalties of such Recusancy against the Anti-Papist Protestant who hath been the only Counterpoise against the Papist that he hath not over run the Land and giving Protection to Papists against the very same Tests and Penal Laws so furiously Prosecuted against the Anti-Papist Protestant So did the subtle Gundamore give a new Whet to the High-Commission-Court and turn'd the Edg of the same Originally intended against the Papists to be against the Anti-Papist Protestant And since Bishops have been discharged of that Commission yet the same Course of Bancrofts and Gundamores hath been still continued against the Anti-Papist-Protestants as then under the name of Puritans so since under the name of Fanaticks such Protestants have had the Penalties of Recusancy laid on them when Papists have Compounded for Trifles or been absolutely Pardon'd such Protestants have had the Oath of Supremacy forced on them against their Conscience when Papists have neither had Supremacy nor Allegiance required of them nor their Consciences troubled but have remained absolutely unsworn from so much as any Oath of Fidelity unless to Foreign Princes such Protestants have had their Houses utterly Disarmed and not so much left as sufficient to keep out a Thief when Papists have had their Houses full of Arms and not so much as searched such Protestant's Children have been by the Usurped Power of Bishops Certificates made Bastards because not Married with the Ceremonies of the Book of Common Prayer and this they have done by pretence of the Canon of the Council of Trent a Foreign Jurisdiction long since abolish'd by Act of Parliament but such Bishops have never troubled Papist's Marriages made by Priests or Jesuits with Romish Ceremony nor Null'd them or Bastardized their Children such Protestants have been Excommunicated Cursed and given to Satan when a Dog hath not dared against Papists to move his Tongue such Protestants have been Confiscated and cast into Prison when Papists have Triumphed in Liberty and Propriety 2. Many Able Loyal Zealous Protestant-Ministers are hereby Excluded from Preaching and Teaching the Gospel 3. Many able Loyal and Useful Instruments both in Civil and Military Offices who are Protestants are Excluded and the King and Parliament deprived of their Service 4. The Offices and Arms of the Three Kingdoms are ingross'd into the hands of Persons Recommended by Papists An Essay of the Form of a Test whereat it seems no Protestant can scruple I A. B. do utterly Testifie and Declare in my Conscience and in the presence of God and do believe that the Pope or Bishop of Rome or any Bishop on Earth is not the Head of the Catholick Church nor of any National Church of England Scotland or Ireland and that they are not Infallible and that all such Popes and Bishops as pretend to Supremacy either Spiritual or Temporal or Infallibility without a Sign of Mission from God are Hereticks I believe that the Host Consecrated Crucifixes Images Idols Reliques of Saints or Saints themselves ought not to be Worshipt or Prayed to in Publick or Private and that the Mass is Idolatry I believe neither Popes nor Bishops have any Power or Mission from God to Exact Auricular Confession or to Impose Penance or to give Absolution Indulgence or Pardon of Sin or to Redeem from Purgatory or to give or sell Heaven or Paradise or any Place in the same or to Excommunicate Curse or Deliver to Satan And I do therefore utterly Abjure and Renounce all Absolutions Indulgences Pardons of Sins and Redemptions from Purgatory given or to be given by any such said Popes or Bishops or any deriving Authority from them and defie all their Excommunications And I do Promise and Swear to be True and Faithful to our Sovereign Lord the King his Heirs and lawful Successors So help me God Whether any Test of the Conscience ought to be Penal either to Protestant or Papist It seems not 1. Because to Plant Religion by Penalty is to Plant it by the Sword whereof Christ gave neither Precept nor Example but rather a Prohibition Implicit in his Express Command to Peter Matth. 26.52 Then said Jesus unto him Put up again thy Sword into his place for all they that take the Sword shall perish with the Sword Which though it prohibit not lawful Defence to those who have the Power of the Sword which Peter had
not yet it prohibits unlawful Invasions amongst all which that of Conscience is the greatest with a Denunciation of the ill Success shall follow sufficiently verified in the many Examples of Emperors and Princes when they went to make War against such as Defended their Conscience 2. To Plant Religion by the Sword is a Relapse to Popery and we commit that Crime our selves which we impute to be the highest in them 3. Error in Conscience is not in the Power of the Party to Redress it is unjust therefore to Impose a Penalty for what was not in the Parties Power to prevent before or amend after 4. Thoughts ought not to be punish'd by men before they break into External Acts or at least discover themselves by Words or Deeds to External Witnesses 5. Tests Penal are no other than the Romish Inquisition compelling men to accuse themselves Criminally or to commit Perjury to avoid it or to rebell to Defend themselves against it 6. Protection is the more Honourable which is hence given the Consciences of Foreign Protestants against Foreign Papists by how much the more merciful the dealing is of the Native Protestants here towards the Consciences of their Native Papists 7. If a Test is made Penal it ceases to be a Test for men will Swear contrary to their Consciences to avoid the Penalty whereas if no Penalty on Confession they would confess the Truth 8. This will Punish the Innocent together with the Nocent there being many of the poor sort of Papists who Curse the Covetousness of their great Ones who take Bribes Gifts and Pensions to themselves and leave the Inferiors exposed to all the Dangers It is a sufficient Use of a Test therefore if it only Dis-Office the Papist to preserve the Publick Government in Protestant-hands Whether Papists or Protestants ought to be Compell'd to Confession of Faith or any External Form or Ceremonies of Worship against their Conscience by Penalties It seems not 1. Because a Non-Compulsion is not an Approbation Non enim idem est ferre aliquid ferendum probare si quid probandum non est Cic. Fam. Epist L. 9. Ep. 6. Neither is it as much as a Toleration of the Popish Forms of Worship either of Images Idols Crucifixes Crosses Beads Reliques Masses c. But all Acts of Parliament remain in as full force against these Superstitions as before and the Command of Scripture as performable Deut. 12.2 Ye shall utterly destroy all the Places wherein the Nations which ye shall possess served their Gods upon the high Mountains and upon the Hills and under every Green Tree And you shall overthrow their Altars and break their Pillars and burn their Groves with Fire and you shall hew down the Graven Images of their Gods and destroy the Names of them out of that Place But a Non-Compulsion amounts to no more than this That the Penal Acts against Recusancy and Non-Conformity may be laid aside equally as to Papist and Protestant which destroy all Conscience in both 2. Because a Non-Compulsion doth not hinder but advance a Publique free Worship according to such Form and Ceremonies as shall be allowed by the King and Parliament only it frees from Force and takes away the Usurpt Supremacy of the Bishops of Forming Godliness into Gain by restoring it to the Legislative Power of the King and Parliament 3. Recusancy is easier foil'd by giving way than contending and Conformity easier won with Lenity than Rigor Vitia quaedam faciliùs tollit Princeps si patiens eorum est saith Senec. de Clementia Cede repugnanti cedendo Victor abibis Minus placet magis quod suadetur quod dissuadetur placet Plautus Noli Vitia irritare vetando Vidi ego nuper equum contra sua fraena tenacem Ore reluctanti fulminis ire modo Constitit ut primum Laxatas Sensit habenas Fraenaque in Effusa Laxa Jacere juba Ovid. I saw my self an Horse curb'd with a Bit To flie like lightning in despight of it But still he stood as soon as he no Check Felt and the loose Reins cast were on his Neck 4. Chrysostome Hom. 19. in Matth. saith Do the Sheep persecute the Wolf No but the Wolf the Sheep Whence appears that those Protestants who persecute Dissentient Protestants for their Conscience are Wolves in Sheeps Clothing and to be Censur'd far worse than the Papists who do it openly in the Form of a Wolf 5. Thy own Conscience is not Infallible nor Immutable Let him that standeth take heed lest he fall It were a great shame therefore to be over-violent in that from which thy own Conscience or Practice may perhaps eftsoones be Changed 6. Non-Compulsion to discover it self to punishment is the best Right that a Conscience so Innocent as abstains from discovering it self only that it may not thereby offend can crave Tacere liceat nulla Libertas minor à Rege petitur Senec. Oedip. Govetousness the only cause of Compulsion of the Conscience to Confession of Faith or Form of Worship 7. The Final cause of Punishing Consciences which are silent and offend not is only Insatiable Covetousness which can pretend no other cause or colour of taking the Spoils of Innocents Thus Popes and Bishops Rob and Murder the greatest part of Christendome under the name of Hereticks And the Turks the greatest part of the World under the name of Unbelievers and Mahomet after he hath in many places of his Alcoran incited his followers to Fight with Kill and Slay such Unbelievers and take their Goods and Lands from them wherever they can find them he Commandeth them to bring a share of the Spoils to the Prophet meaning himself and saith further Alc. cap. 61. God loveth those who Fight in Rank and File for his Law And what other Doctrine and Practice do Popes and Bishops Preach and Act but the same which shall take the Spoil of the miserable People they get under their Power for no other Crime but their Conscience for this they contend one with another and offer Force to destroy the Conscience it self and Body and Soul with it so they may Seise their Prey of Goods and Lands as Jezabel did of Naboth 1 Kings 21.8 So she wrote Letters in Ahab's name and Sealed them with his Seal and sent the Letters unto the Elders and Nobles that were in his City dwelling with Naboth And she wrote in the Letters saying Proclaim a Fast and set Naboth on high among the People and set two men Sons of Belial before him to bear witness against him saying Thou did'st Blaspheme God and the King And the men of his City even the Elders and the Nobles who were the Inhabitants in his City did as Jezabel had sent unto them They Proclaimed a Fast and set Naboth on high among the People And there came in two men Children of Belial and sate before him and the men of Belial witnessed against him even against Naboth in the presence of the People saying Naboth did Blaspheme God and
Luke 15.10 There is joy in the presence of the Angels of God over one Sinner that Repenteth Nor though they call themselves Shepherd of the Flock are they like the good Shepherd of whom Christ speaketh Matth. 18.12 If a man have an Hundred Sheep and one of them be gone astray doth he not leave the Ninety and Nine and goeth into the Mountains and seeketh that which is gone astray And if so be that he find it Verily I say unto you he rejoiceth more of that Sheep than of the Ninety and Nine which went not astray Nor like Christ who saith John 8.50 I seek not my own Glory Nor like Paul who saith 2 Cor. 12.14 I seek not yours but you And Hebr. 13.14 Here have we no continuing City but we seek one to come Nor like those he saith died in the Faith Hebr. 11.13 Not having received the Promises but having seen them afar off and were persuaded of them and embraced them and confessed that they were strangers and Pilgrims on the Earth For they that say such things declare plainly that they seek a Countrey And truly if they had been mindful of that Countrey from whence they came out they might have had opportunity to have returned But now they desire a better Countrey that is an Heavenly None of which Examples would the Alexandrian or Syadan Bishop nor many others follow nor do they with their Penal Tests Forms and Ceremonies Persecute to Convert but to Pervert and to that end form their Tests Oaths and Ceremonies as contrary to Sense Reason and Conscience as they can possible and as numerous as they are in the 39. Articles that they may have all either under blind obedience and take Arbitrarily from them what they please or if they will not Renounce their Sense Reason and Conscience they may have a pretence to Plunder them of their Goods and a Terrible Disappointment it would be to Bishops and their Chaplains if all Ministers should have turn'd Conformists to their Faith Oaths Subscriptions and Ceremonies for then would all Pluralities have been supplied with single Incumbents Residents on the Places and perhaps the greater part of the Bishopricks and Benefices with men more above Exception than many of the Possessors may be and there might have been many Peters in the Church yet not a Simon found amongst them 9. There ought to be no Compulsion used to Papists to Pray in a Temple because it is already proved to be Prohibited by Christ for any to Pray in a Temple or publick Place except the Parties are agreed 10. It is a Compulsion many times of a doubtful Conscience either to Sin or Damnation as some have doubted Rom. 14.23 or Martyrdom or Hypocrisie to save their Lives or Goods 11. It is as great a mockery of God to force men to play the Hypocrites in Ceremonies or Prayers against their Consciences in a place of Publick Convention as to drive Horses and other Cattle into the Church at the time of Prayer there and as Banks did his Horse make them fall on their Knees and Worship the Cross 12. Compulsion of Papists or Protestants to Forms of Common-Prayer deprives them of the Benefit of being taught the Gospel by Reason that no distinction of the place and time of Prayer and Preaching is made according to the Examples and Precepts of Christ already shewn for all the Common-Prayer being Formed by Popes or Bishops is chopt into so many pieces of Prayers Chapters Lessons Responds Letanies Psalms pieces of Epistles pieces of Gospels c. as Confound both Method and Memory and thereby while the People endeavour to Pray and Learn both at once they can do neither effectually 13. Compulsion to Common-Prayer deprives both Papist Protestant of the Benefit of either Reading or Hearing the Scripture Read 1. Because it is Read in such a mangled immethodical way neither according to the Contexture of the History nor according to the Titles of a Concordance or Polyanthy but both Examples and Precepts broken off confusedly from what preceded or followed them whereby they are made unintelligible and not again joined with such of one another as should mutually expound them and both Prayers and Psalms are Read in such a Canting Note in Cathedrals as they are not intelligible so as there is no human Author Art or Science Read or Taught so confusedly immethodically and Cantingly as the Scripture whereby such as cannot Read themselves never hear the same Read in any Edifying way their whole Lives which is done only on design of gain to make more Dissentient Ministers and fewer of the Trade 2. Those who are able to Read themselves are thereby deprived of the Reading the same at their Homes the Papists by their own Priests being not suffer'd to have an English Bible in their Houses and the Protestants in England being not suffer'd by their Priests to keep themselves at their Houses whereas in Holland many Devout Pious Protestants never go to Churches to hear the Scripture Read but Read the same on Sundays at home at their own Houses and are far more ready and skilful and more Pious in practice of the same than those that do Repair to the Publick Reading neither is there any man Compell'd to Church or Chappel there but may if they desire follow the Precept of Christ to Read or Pray privately in their Closet and the Example of the Primitive Christians amongst whom there was not a Temple or Altar for neer 300 Years after Christ till Constantine corrupted them to set up Cathedrals 3. Many things in the Common-Prayer being offensive to many Consciences I dispute not whether weak or strong or whether they are offences given or taken but being offensive to many such as are offended and who would gladly come to the Church to hear the Scripture Read by it self or Expounded in an Exposition or Lecture or Sermon if the same were done as Christ always used to do it in a Synagogue without Prayer mixt with it the Reasons whereof are sufficiently before shew p. 〈◊〉 but some Consciences scrupling to mix any Prayers with Preaching in a Synagogue contrary to the Precept of Christ others scrupling the Forms of Common-Prayer whether single or mixt they lose the hearing of Scripture Read because they shall be forced to hear such Prayers as offend them Read or mixt with it as long as they are compell'd how can it be expected but the number of Non-Conformists will be far greater than Conformists Nonconformity to the Prayer before Sermon 14. As the mixture of Common-Prayer deprives both Papists and Protestant of the Benefit of hearing the Scripture Read in the Historical Contexture and Order wherein it was left written so the Prayer before Sermon deprives them of the Benefit of hearing the Scripture Expounded either in that Method and Order it was left written or in any other Order or Method appointed by the King and Parliament of such matters as are necessary to Salvation and
Patriarchs and Bishops they dare not Excommunicate an Emperor of such a People who Contemn their Excommunication and would Revenge it on themselves if they should presume to make a vain noise with it Christ commands Wisdom to be learnt of the Serpent and the experience of all Ages witnesseth to whosoever will but consult Histories That there was never any Prince Gentile or Jew Mahumetan or Christian who admitted near his Throne Episcopal or Pontifical Consecration Ordination or Excommunication could that remain He or his Posterity secure or not Ruin'd or Plagued by those Devils Transformed which he Superstitiously or Impudently had Raised against himself or them as may sufficiently appoar by the Examples before Recited Presbyters independent Lastly 9. If Parochial Bishops and Presbyters were Elected by the Congregations or several Parishes these were Independents in the Primitive Christians time and no Prelacy was amongst them for though the Cities or Parishes in greatness might exceed one another in greatness and in Precedence yet the Presbyters Elected were as Independent one of another as Members of Parliament Elected from great and small Shires As to the Impossibility of obliging Bishops by Oath Bishops not to be obliged by Oath It is impossible to oblige those by Oaths who claim to be Judges of Oaths and Perjury as all Bishops do and their Spiritual Courts for how many and easie pretences will they find to Evade and Nullifie them sometimes a Parte Ante Force or Circumvention sometimes matter Ex post Facto that though at first Law yet by new matters since arising the same is became unlawful to be kept So grant a Bishop the Jurisdiction of Perjury he will never Judg himself guilty of it nor any Subject who breaks his Oath of Allegiance to the King in obedience to the Bishop and the rather because he is not bound to shew any Cause or Reason of his Judgment neither as Coke will have it to be question'd in the Kings Courts of what he hath the Jurisdiction 25. H. 8. Cap. 19. The Clergy Promise the King in verho sacerdotii that they will never her ceforth Praesume to attempt alledge claime or put in ure enact promulge or execute any Canons Constitutions Ordinance Provinciall or other or by whatsoever other name they shall be called in the Convocation unless the Kings most Royal assent may be to them had and that his Majesty do give his most Royal assent so it appeares they used to make them before presuming on their Power of Excommunication yet when Queen Mary came in they were as high again as ever notwithstanding their Promises Holy water to wash off Oaths There was a water which Ran in the way Appia dedicated to Mercury wherein the old Pagan Romans did believe if they dipped a Laurell Branch therewith calling on Mercury That they were discharged thereby from any breach of Oath and Perjury they had Committed Alex ab Alexandr Genial Dier The Popes have store of this Holy Water and no doubt can spare some to the Bishops as well as Holy Oyle Guiccuardin Com. de Pol. Relates a then in use Proverb Proprium esse Ecclesiae odisse et timere Caesares Ecclesiastical Lawes and Excommunications therefore made by such Enemies are not likely to be friends to Kings or subjects Bishops are Ecclesiastical Persons Aiming at a supremacy in Judgement of Heresy in Judgement of Oaths in Excommunication all inconsistent with Temporal Supremacy as is their Interest which hath alwayes made them perfidious to Temporal Powers Popes perjured The French King besieged Pope Alexander the Sixth in his Castle of St Angelo from whence after a time he came out swearing to such capitulations as he could obtain and the French King kissing his foot Amongst other Articles he agreed the French King should have his Son Caesar Hostage for the Performance but not long after Caesar making an Escape his Father the Pope contrary to his Oath contracted a League Contrary to the French to their great Prejudice and it was the Custom of that Pope to use most Oaths when he intended most to deceive Pope Julius the second had obliged himself by Oath to have a General Council within two years after his Election to the Popedome but this being not performed Maximillian the Emperour and Lewes the French King Conven'd a Synod at Pisa whither some Cardinals under protection of the French King caused the Pope to be summon'd to make his appearance but the Pope instead thereof Excommunicated them and the French King and call'd an Anti-Synod at Rome to whom he Excuses his Oath and Dies but how he Excused it after he was Dead the Historian doth not mention Anno. 1414. In the Council of Constance convened by Sigismond the Emperour and Pope John the Third Consisting of about a Thousand Bishops and Doctors and Continued four years yet amongst so many Bishops Vix una Fides Bishops perjured for though these declared that the Council was above the Pope yet they Resolved to be as perfidious to Protestants as he and accordingly there ordained That faith ought not to be kept with Hereticks Here they order'd the bones of John Wickliff that famous Primitive Protestant of England to be digged out of his Sepulchre and burnt at this Council likewise was John Hus and Jerome of Prague contrary to the safe conduct and faith given them by the Emperour and Bishops Perfidiously and Cruelly made Martyrs and burnt for the Protestant Religion Here you see were a thousand Bishops yet none kept the Promise of safe conduct Burchard Arch-Bishop of Magdeburg taking some offence at his Citizens besieged them with Armed Power but they Redemed their liberty with a summe of money he thereupon Swearing he would molest them no more yet shortly after he besieged them again but this Perjury was justly met with for in a Sally they took him Prisoner at which time by his humble Demeanor and counterfeit Oaths never to molest them more They Released him but when he was at Liberty getting a Despensation for his Oath from Pope John the 23d he began to molest them again Murthering them whom he had sworn to Maintain But it was Gods will he should be once again caught and cast into Prison and Punished for his wickedness Magdeb. Cent. And did not the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury Becket as well as Burchard Arch-Bishop of Magdeburg as is before mention'd commit as great a Perjury against his native King Henry the second after all the Labour and pains taken with him both by fair and foul meanes to bring him to Agreement assoon as he Recovered home to his House by Retracting his Oath and getting an absolution from the Pope for the same Bishops compell H. 2. to accept the Kingdom on their Terms or not to have it By the Pretended Power of Consecration Ordination and Excommunication Popes and Bishops Pretend a Divine Mission to Anoint and Crown Kings and then again to Excommunicate and Depose them all to