Selected quad for the lemma: parliament_n
Text snippets containing the quad
|
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
|
A53246
|
The Oglin of traytors including the illegal tryall of His Late Maiesty : with a catalogue of their names that sat as judges and consented to the judgment : with His Majesties reasons against their usurped power and his late speech : to which is now added the severall depositions of the pretended witnesses as it is printed in the French coppy : with the whole proceedings against Colonel J. Penruddock of Compton in Wilts and his speech before he dyed : as also the speech of the resolved gentleman, Mr. Hugo Grove of Chissenbury, Esquire, who was beheaded the same day, not before printed.
|
|
1660
(1660)
|
Wing O188; ESTC R28744
|
59,070
|
192
|
and a half from the Camp marching in battaile aray at the head of his Army about an houre and half before the said battaile was fought and that the same day he saw afterwards many bodies dead upon the place Giles Grice of Wellington in Shropshire Gentleman DId depose that he saw the King at the head of his Army at Cropredie Bridge with his sword drawn in his hand the same day that there was a battail fought against Sr. William Waller's Army which was on a Friday 1644. about July as much as he could call to minde That he saw him also at the head of his Army the same summer nigh Lietchfield at the same time that the Earle of Essex was there with his Army Also that he saw the King at the head of his men in the second fight at Newbery And that he saw him Arm'd back and brest at the head of his Army at Naseby The same did testifie that he saw him at the head of his Army at the taking of Leicester at the same time that an assault was given and after enter'd the place on horseback after it was taken and that he saw many men kill'd on both sides and many houses were pillaged in the said Town John Vinson of Damorham in Wiltshire Gentleman affirmed THat he saw the King at the head of his Army at the first Newbery battaile about September 1643. and many people dead on both sides The same hath also deposed that he saw the King at the head of his Army armed Capape with his sword drawn in his hand in the second fight at Newberry about Octob. 1644. at what time he saw him draw up the Regiment of Horse of Colonel Tho. Howard to a Charge and that he heard him make a speech to that Regiment saying that they were to make good to him that day that his Crown was at the point of his Sword and if he lost that Battail he lost his honour and his Crown for ever and that after he saw great number of dead men killd in that fight on both sides The same also testified that he saw the King in the battail at Naseby in Northamptonshire about June 1645. being armed with his Head-piece on his word drawn in his hand where perceiving his people in flight he himself made the horse to rally and staid them at what time he also saw many dead bodies on both sides George Seeley of London Shoomaker deposed THat he saw the King at the siege of Glocester at the head of a Brigade of horse and that he saw him at the first fight of Newberry about September 1643 being at the head of a Regiment of horse and that many were killed on both sides in this fight To which he added that he also saw the King in the midst of his Army in the second Newberry fight about November 1644. John Moor of Cork in Ireland Gentleman did depose THat in the Battel at Newberry second fight in the same month he saw the King in the middle of his horse with his sword drawn that afterwards he saw many killed on both sides in this fight and that he saw him enter on horse-back in the head of a Brigade of horse into Leicester the same day that it was taken by his men about June 1645. he also added that he saw the King in the midst of a Regiment of horse at Copredibridge before Leicester fight and saw the fields covered with dead men killed in that fight where the King was in person that he saw him also at the head of a Regiment of horse in Naseby fight about June 1645. and that there was also many killed and wounded Thomas Grees of Boyset in Northamptonshire Labourer did testifie THat he saw the King at the first Newbury fight in Bark-shire September 1643 and that he there saw many dead bodies having himself received orders amongst others to stop the Parliaments forces till their dead men were taken away that he also saw the King marching with his Army towards Naseby field immediatly before the fight about June 1645. and that his Army being routed he saw him make a retreat with a Brigado of horse and that a great number were killed on both sides in this fight Thomas Rollins of Hanslop in Euekingham-shire Gentleman did depose THat he saw the King nigh Foy in Cornwall about July 1644. at the head of a brigade of horse and that he saw some Parliament-souldiers pilledged nigh the Kings person contrary to the Articles agreed upon on both sides Thomas Read of Maidstone in Kent Gentleman AFfirmed upon Oath that presently after the Parliaments Army had rendred it self in Cornwall upon composition he saw the King at the head of a guard of horse between Lestithiel and Foy about the end of August or the beginning of September 1644. James Grosby of Dublin in Ireland did depose THat at the first Newbury fight about harvest time 16â—3 he saw the King coming on horseback from Newbury accompanied with abundance of great Lords and Noble men and going towards the place where his forces were engaged to the Parliaments Army Samuel Burden of Lyneham in Wiltshire Gentleman testified THat he was at Nottingham about August 1642. at what time he saw the great Standard displayd upon one of the Towers of the Castle and that the next day he saw the King whilst his Standard as they call it was displayd moreover that he saw the King at the head of his Army near Copredy-bridge in a stubble field being in pursuit of Sir William Wallers forces who was routed about July 1644. and that be saw at that time great numbers of dead men in the field he testified farther that towards November following he saw the King in the last Newberry fight galloping up and down from Regiment to Regiment whilst his Army was engaged with that of the Parliament and that he saw afterwards great numbers of men killed fighting on both sides Michael Potts of Sharpeton in Northamberland Vintner deposed THat he saw the King at the head of of his Army in a field about a mile and an half distant from Newberry upon a plain the day before the fight which was about harvest time 1643. and that he saw the King in the field nigh a peice of great Canon during the fight that he also saw him at the head of his Army in the second Newberry fight about Michaelmass 1644. after which he saw great number of men kild on both sides Adding moreover that he did also see him at the head of his Forces nigh Copredy bridge and afterwards the same year towards harvest nigh Lestithiel in Cornwall at what time the Earle of Essex was there with his Army The NAMES of the said Pretended JUDGES who gave Sentence against the Late KING Jan. 27. 1648. JOhn Bradshaw Lord President Oliver Cromwell Henry Ireton Sir Hardress Waller Valentine Walton Thomas Harison Edward Whaley Thomas Pride Isaac Ewer Lord Grey of Grooby William Lord Mounson Sir John Danvers
into your heart that you had as effectually endeavoured and studied the peace of the Kingdome as in words you seem to pretend but as the other day it was represented to you that actions must expound intentions Your actions have been clean contrary and truly Sir it doth appear very plainly to the Court that you have gone upon very erroneous principles This Kingdom hath felt it to their smart and it will be no comfort to you to think of it for Sir you have been heard to let fall such language as if you had not been subject to the Law or that the Law had not been your Superiour The Court is very sensible of it I hope so are all the understanding people of England That the Law is your Superiour you ought to have ruled according to the law you ought to have done so and your pretence hath been that you have done so But Sir the question is who shall be the expositors of the Law whether you and your party out of the Courts of Justice shall take upon you to expound the Law Or whether the Courts of Justice shall be the expounders themselves Nay this Sovereign and high Court of Justice the Parliament of England who may well be obliged to be the highest expounders of the Law since they are the Sole makers of it Sir for you to set your selfe with your single judgement or for those who adhere unto you to set themselves against the highest Court of Justice there is no Law for it Sir as the Law is your superior so truly there is something that is Superiour to the Law which is the Parent or Author of the Law and that is the people of England For as they are those who at first as other Countries have done did chuse unto themselves this form of Government that Justice might be administred and the peace preserved so they gave Laws unto their Governors according to which they were to govern and if those Laws should have proved inconvenient or prejudicial to the publick they had power in them reserved to themselves to alter as they should finde cause It is very true what some of your side have alleadged Rex non habet parem in regno This Court will affirm the same in some sense that whilest King you have not your Peer for you are major singulis but they will aver again that you are minor universis and the same Author tels you that in exhibitione juris you have no power but they are quasi minimus This we know to be Law Rex haebt superiorem Deum legem etiam Curiam and so sayes the same Author and he makes bold to proceed further Debent ei fraenum ponere they ought to bridle him We know very well the stories of old we cannot be ignorant of those Wars that were called the Barons Wars when the Noblity of the Land did stand out for the Liberty and the property of the Subject and would not suffer the Kings that did invade their Liberties to play the Tryants but did call them to an account for it and did fraenum ponere But Sir If the Nobility of the Land do forbear to do their duty now and are not so mindfull of their own Honour and the Kingdomes good as the Barons of England of old have been certainly the Commons of England will not be unmindefull of what is requisite for their preservation and their safety Justitiae fruendi causa Reges constituti sunt By this we learn that the end of having Kings or Governours is for their enjoying of Justice that is the end Now Sir If the King will go contrary to that end or if any Governour will go contrary to the end of his government he must understand that he is but an Officer in trust and that he ought to discharge that trust and order is to be taken for the animadversion and punishment of such an offending Governour Sir This is not a Law of yesterday since the time of the division betwixt you and the Parliament but it is a Law of old And we know very well both the Authors and the Authorities that acquaint us what the Law was in that point on the election of Kings when they took their Oath to be true unto the people and if they did not observe it there were those remedies instituted which are called Parliaments The Parliaments were they that were to adjudge the very words of the Authors the plainness and wrongs done by the King and Queen or by their Children such wrongs eespecially when the people could have no where else a remedy Sir this is the Case of the people of Eugland they could not have their remedy else where but in Parliament Sir Parliaments were instituted for that intent it was their main end that the grievances of the people might be redressed and truly if the Kings of England had been rightly mindefull of themselves they were never more in Majestie or State than in the time of the Parliament but how forgetfull some have been Histories have informed us and we our selves have a miserable a lamentable and a sad experence of it Sir by the old Laws of England I speake these things the rather to you because you were pleased to affirme the other day that you had as much knowledge in the Law as most Gentlemen of England It is very well Sir and truly Sir it is very sit for the Gentlemen of England to understand the Laws under which they must live and by which they must be governed And then Sir the Scripture sayes they that know their Ma-Masters will and do it not you know what follows the Law is your Master the acts of Parliament the Parliaments were anciently to be kept twice in the year as we find in our old Author that the Subject upon any occasion might have a remedie and a redress for his grievance Afterwards by severall Acts of Parliament in the dayes of your predecessor Edward the third they were to be but once a year What the Intermission of Parliaments in your times hath produced is very well known and the sad consequences of it as also what in the interim instead of Parliaments there hath been by you by a high and arbitrary hand introduced upon the people But when God by his Providence had so far brought it about that you could no longer decline the calling of a Parliament a Parliament was called where it may appear what your ends were against your ancient and Native Kingdom of Scotl but this Parliament of Engl. not serving your turn against them you were pleased to dissolve it Not long after another great necessitie occasioned the calling of this Parliament and what your designes and indeavours all along have been for the crushing and confounding of it hath been most notorious to the whole Kingdom And truly Sir in that you did strike at all it had been a sure way to have brought about that which this Charge doth lay upon you