Selected quad for the lemma: parliament_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
parliament_n	burgess_n	king_n	knight_n	3,853	5	7.2952	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A46779	Severall papers lately vvritten and published by Iudge Ienkins, prisoner in the Tower viz. 1. His vindication. 2. The armies indempnity [sic]: with a declaration, shewing, how every subject ought to be tryed for treasons, felonies, and all other capitall crimes. 3. Lex terræ. 4. A cordiall for the good people of London. 5. A discourse touching the incoveniences of a long continued Parliament. 6. An apologie for the army.; Severall papers lately written and published by Judge Jenkins, prisoner in the Tower.	Jenkins, David, 1582-1663.	1647 (1647)	Wing J608; ESTC R217036	64,480	98

doe upon the knees of our hearts ag●ze constant Faith Loyalty and Obedience to the King and his Royall progeny in this high Court of Parliament where all the body of the Realme is eyther in person or by representation We doe acknowledge that the true and sincere Religion of the Church is continued and established by the King And doe recognize as we are bound by the Law of God and Man the Realme of England and the Imperiall Crowne thereof doth belong to him by inherent byrth-right and lawfull and undoubted succession and submit our selves and our posterities for ever untill the last drop of our blood be spent to his rule and beseech the king to accept the same as the first fruits of our Loyalty and Faith to his Majesty and his posteritie for ever and for that this Act is not compleat nor perfect without his Majesties assent the same is humbly desired This proves that the Houses are not above the King that Kings have not their Titles to the Crowne by the two Houses but by inherent byrth-right and that there can bee no Statute without his expresse assent and destroyes the chymera of the Kings virtuall being in the Houses To promise obedience to the Pope or any other State Prince or Potentate 3 Jac. cap. 4 other then the King his Heires and Successors is Treason and therefore those persons who call the Houses the Estates offend this Lawe Such Bills as his Majesty is bound in Conscience and Justice to passe K. Charles Collection of Ordinances fo 727. 1 pars ib. fol. 728. are no Law without his assent To designe the ruine of the Kings person or of Monarchy is a monstrous and injurious charge Vbi Lex non distinguit ibid fol. 865. non est distinguendum all the aforesaid Acts and Lawes doe evidently prove the Militia to belong to the king that the king is not virtnally in the two Houses that the king is not considerable separately in relation to his politique capacity that the king is not a person trusted with a power but that it is his inherent byrth-right from God Nature and Lawe and that hee hath not his power from the people These Lawes have none of those distinctions of naturall and politique abstractum concretum power and person in Caesars time this Island had kings and ever since which is almost 17 hundred yeeres agoe No King can be named in any time made in this kingdom by the people A parliament never made king for they were kings before the Parliaments are summoned by the kings Writs which for Knights Citizens and Burgesses begins thus viz. Rex vic Wilis Saltem Quia Nos de avisamento assensu consilij nri pro quibus arduis urgentib negetiis nos statum defensionem Regninri Aug. Eccles Anglic. concernentibus quoddam Parliamentum urum apud B. teneri ordinavimus ibid cum Prelatis Magnatib proceribus dicti Regni uri Colloqui habere tractatum ipsi Vicecomiti precipimus firmiter injungendo qd facta Proclamatione in prox Comitatu tuo post receptionem ejusd Brevis dues Milites gladiis cinctos c. eligi facias ad faciendum consentiendum hiis quae tunc ibidem de Communi Concilio nro Angl faventi De● contigerit ordinari super Negotiis antedictis ita quod pro defectis potestatis hujusmodi seu propter improvidam electionem Milium Civium Burgensium pred dicta negotia ura infecta non remanerent The King is Principium caput finis Parliamenti the body makes not the head 4 pars Instit fol. 3 4. nor that which is posterior that which is prior concilium non est Preceptum conciliarij non sunt Praeceptores for Counsell to compell a consent hath not beene heard of to this time in any age and the house of Commons by the writt are not called ad concilium the Writts to the twelve Judges Kings Councell twelve Masters of the Chancery are concilium impensuri and so of the Peeres The writts for the Cominalty Ad faciendum consentiendum Which shewes what power the representative body hath they have not power to give an oath neither do they claime it The Oath of the Justices 18 of E. 3. among Statutes of that yeere The King at all times when there is no parliament in Parliament is assisted with the advice of the Judges of the Lawe 12 in number for England at least hath 2 Sergeants when fewest an Attorny and Solicitor twelve Masters of the Chancery his Councell of State consisting of some great Prelates and other great Personages versed in State affaires when they are fewest to the number of twelve All these persons are alwaies of great substance which is not preserved but by the keeping of the Lawe The Prelates versed in divine Lawe the other Grandees in affaires of State managery of Government The Judges Kings Sergeants Attorny Sollicitor and Masters of the Chancery versed in the Lawe and Customes of the Realme All sworn to serve the King and his people justly truly the King is also sworn to observe the Laws and the Judges have in their Oath a clause That they shall do common right to the Kings people according to the established Laws not withstanding any command of the King to the contrary under the Great Seale or otherwise The people are safe by the Lawes in force without any new The Law finding the Kings of this Realme assisted with so many great men of Conscience Honour and skill in the rule of Common-wealth knowledge of the Lawes and bound by the high and holy bond of an Oath upon the Evangelists settles among other powers upon the King a power to refuse any Bill agreed upon by both Houses and power to pardon all offences to passe any Graunts in his Minority there are many great persons living hold many a thousand pound a yeare by Patents from Edward the sixt passed when he was but ten yeares of age not to be bound to any Law to his prejudice whereby he doth not binde himselfe power of warre and peace coyning of Money making all Officers c. The Lawe for the reasons aforesaid hath approved these powers to be unquestionable in the King and all Kings have enjoyed them till 3. Nov. 1640. It will bee said notwithstanding all this fence about the Lawes the Lawes have beene violated and therefore the said powers must not hold the two Houses will remedy this The answere to this is evident There is no time past nor time present nor will there bee time to come so long as men mannage the Lawe but the Lawes will be broken more or lesse as appeares by the story of every age All the pretended violations of this time were remedied by Acts to which the King consented before his departure 10. Jan. 1641. being then driven away by Tumults And the Houses for a yeere and almost three Moneths From 3. Nov. 1640 to 10

Spencers did either that the King may be removed for misdemeanours or reformed per aspertè or that the Subject is bound to govern in ayde of him we only say that his power is distinguishable from his person and when he himself makes a distinction betwixt them commanding one thing by his Legall Writs Courts and Officers and commanding another thing extrajudically by word of mouth Letters or Ministers we are to obey his power rather then his person 5. We take not from the King all power of pardoning Delinquents we only say it is not proper to him quarto modo For if the King pardon him which hath murthered my sonne his pardon shall not cut me off from my appeale and 't is more unreasonable that the Kings pardon should make a whole State which hath suffered remedilesse then any private man So if the King should deny indemnity to these which in the furie of Warre have done thing● unjustifiable by the Lawes of Peace and thereby keep the wounds of the State from being bound up 't is equitable that an Act of Indemnity should be made forcible another may And if this will not hold yet this is no good consequence the King is absolute in point of pardons therefore he is absol●●e in all things else and the Parliament hath no power to discharge Delinquencies therefore it hath no power in other matters 6. The Parliament hath declared the King to be in no condition to govern but this must not be interpreted rigidly and without distinction for if the King with his sword drawn in his hand and pursuing the Parliament and their adherents as Rebels be not fit for all Acts of Government yet 't is not hereby insinuated that he is divested of the habit or right of governing If he be unqualified now he is not unqualified for the future if he may not doe things destructive to the Parliament he is not barred from returning to the Parliament or doing justice to the Parliament This is a frivolous cavil and subturfuge 7. We sweare that the King is our supreme Governour over all persons and in all Causes but we doe not sweare that he is above all Law nor above the safety of his people which is the end of the Law and indeed Paramount to the Law it selfe If he be above all Law or liable to no restraint of our Law then we are no freer then the French or the Turks and if he be above the prime and of Law common fafety then we are not so free as the French or Turks For if the totall subversion of the French or the Turk were attempted they might by Gods Law imprinted in the Book of Nature justifie a self-defence but we must remedilesty perish when the King pleases to command our threats Besides how atchieved the King of England such a Supremacie above all Law and the community it selfe for whose behoofe Law was made If Gods donation be pleaded which is not speciall to him or different from what other Kings may pretend to● then to what purpose serve our Laws nay to what purpose serve the Laws of other Countries for by this generall donation all Nations are condemned to all servitude as well as we If the Law of this Land be appealed to what Books hath Mr Ienkins read where hath he found on t that Lex Regia whereby the people of England have given away from themselves all right in themselves Some of our Books tell us that we are more free then the French that the King cannot oppresse us in our our persons or estates by imprisonment denying justice or laying Taxes without our consents other Books tell us that the safety of the people is the supreme Law and that the King hath both God and the Law for his Superiour But all this is nothing to learned Mr Ienkins 8. We admit that no Acts of Parliament are compleat or formally binding without the Kings assent yet this is still to be denyed that therefore without this assent particularly exprest the two Houses can doe nothing nor have any virtuall power at all no not to examine Mr Ienkins nor to doe any other thing of like nature though in order to publick justice and safety I have done and wish Mr Ienkins would call in and lick up againe his black infamous execrable reproaches so filthily vomited out against the Parliament To the first I Was examined by a Committee appointed by the House of Commons I say and said that the House of Commons have no power to examine me for that it is no Court every Court hath power to examine upon Oath this power the House of Commons never claimed The Court of Pie-powders Court-Baron Hundred Court 5 H. 4. c. 3. 3 H. 6.46 1 H 6.43 35 H. 6.5 County Court and every other Court of Record or not of Record hath power to examine upon oath and an examination without Oath is a communication only examination in Law is upon Oath There is no Court without a power of tryall the House of Commons have no power to try any offence Sir Anthony Maynes case Cook 5. pars Reports Lit. 2. lib. Sect. 194.6 H. 4.1 nor ever practised it by Bill Inditement Information Plaint or Originall to deduce it to tryal nor to try it by Verdict Demurrer or Examination of Witnesses upon Oath without which there can be no condemnation or judgement and that which can attaine to no reasonable end the Law rejects as a thing inutile and uselesse Sapiens incipit a fine The Writ Whereby they are called gives them power A● faciendum consentiendum to what to such things Que ibidem de communi Consilie ordinari contigerint 4 pars instit fol. 4. 9. viz. in the Parliament This makes nothing at all for a Court for the House of Commons that consilium which that Writ intends is cleared partly by the Writ for chusing Knights c. For the King by that Writ is said to resolve to consult and treat with the Prelates and Peeres of the Kingdome for and touching the great concernments of the Common-wealth for the King never sits in the House of Commons and this also is made evident by the Writs to the Prelates Peeres Iudges and to his Councell at Law the words in their Writ are To appear and attend the Parliament consilium impensuri the one doth consulere the other facere consentire The House of Lords where the King sits in person 7. H. 6.28 1 H. 7.20 13. E. 3. ca. 5. 4 pars instit pag. 21. assisted by his Lords Judges Serjeants Atturney Sollicitor Masters of the Cnancery is a Court of Record to many purposes set down in the Books of Law and the Statutes of the Land and that Court is only in the House of Lords where the Kings sits A Court must either be by the Kings Patent Statute Law or by the Common Law which is common and constant usage the House of Commons hath no Patent to be a

Impossibility The death of His Majesty whose life God prolong dissolves it necessarily For the Writ of summons is Carolus Rex in hoc individuo and Carolus Rex is in this particular Habiturus colloquium tractatum cum Prelatis proceribus c. 2 H. 5. Cooke Title Parliam 3. pars King Charles being to have Conference and Treaty with his Prelates and Peeres Carolus Rex cannot have Colloquium tractatum Conference and Treaty when he is deceased and therefore it is impossible for any Parliament to continue as long as they please as for a Parliament to make a dead man alive For Repugnancie That which is but for a time cannot be affirmed to have continuance for ever it is repugnant The end of the Act of 17. Caroli Regis which is to continue at pleasure is in the said Act expressed to be to raise credit for money for these three purposes First for reliefe of his Majesties Army and people in the North. Secondly for preventing the iminent danger of the Kingdome Thirdly for supply of other His Majesties present and urgent occasions These ends are ended the reliefe of that Army the iminent danger supposed was sixe yeares agoe the supply of His Majestie hath beene a supply against him take away the end the meanes thereto are to no purpose take away the cause the effect ceaseth and therefore the three ends of this Act being determined it agreeth with Law and Reason the Act should end Sir Anthony Mayns case 5. pars 1. H. 4.6 Littl. cap. Villen the Law rejects things unprofitable and uselesse A perpetuall Parliament besides that it incites men to selfe-ends destructive of the publique of which the whole Kingdome hath had sufficient experience wil be a constant charge to the Kingdome for that every County and Borough who send Members to the Parliament are by the Law to pay wages to their Parliament men which to many Counties will amount above some Subsidies Yearely There are many poore Borough-Townes in each County of this Kingdome who being to maintaine two Burgesses in Parliament will be quickly begger'd if the Parliament have no end for all which reasons it is cleare that such long continuance of Parliaments will instead of a remedy which is and ought to be the proper and true end of Parliaments become an insufferable grievance and oppression to all the People of the Land The Writ of Summons this Parliament is the basis and foundation of the Parliament If the Foundation be destroyed the Parliament falls The Assembly of Parliament if for three purposes Rex est habiturus colloquium et tractatum cum praelatis magnatibus et proceribus super arduis negotijs concernentibus 1. Nos 2 Defensionem regni nostri 3. Defensionem Ecclesiae Anglicanae This Parliament hath overthrowne this Foundation in all 3 parts 1. Nos the King they have chased him away and imprisoned him they have voted no prelats and a number of other Lords about 40. in the City must not come to the House and about 40 more are out of Towne the colloquium et tractatus are made void therby For the King cannot consult and treat there with men removed from thence 2. Defensionem regni nostri that is gone they have made it their Kingdome not His for they have usurped all His Soveraigntie 3. Defensionem Ecclesiae Anglicanae that is gone that Ecclesia Anglicana trust be understood necessarily that Church that at the test of the Writ was Ecclesia Anglicana they have destroyed that too So now these men would be called a Parliament having abated quashed and made nothing of the Writ whereby they were Summoned and Assembled If the Writ be made void all the processe is void also that House must needs fall where the Foundation is overthrowne Sublato fundamento opus cadit the Foundation being taken away the worke falls is both a maxime in Law and Reason For some yeares past there is no crime from Treason to Trespasse but they are guilty of all Treason Felonies Robberies trespasses are contra pacem coronam et dignitatem Regis against the Peace Crowne and Dignitie of the King as appeares by all Indictments in all Ages Pax Regis the Kings Peace Corona Regis the Kings Crowne Dignitas Regis the Kings Dignitie are all trod under foot and made nothing Pax Regis the Peace of the King is become a Warre against the King His Dignitie put into prison and the Crowne put upon their owne heads All the Judges of England have resolved Nevills ease 7. part 34. 2. Jacobi that Noblemen committing Treason have forfeited their Office and Dignitie their Officei●s to councell the King in time of Peace to defend him in time of Warre and therefore those men against the duty and end of their Dignitie taking not onely Councell but Armes also to destroy Him and being thereof attaint by due course of Law by a racite condition annexed to the estate of their Dignitie have forfeited the same they are the words of the Law and therefore they have made themselves incapable to be Members of the upper House The Oppressions of the People Briberies Extortions Monopolies ought to be inquired after by the House of Commons and complained of to the King and Lords what have they done The House of Commons cannot by the Law commit any man to prison who is not of the said House for Treason Murder or Felony or any thing but for the disturbance of the publique Peace by the priviledge of the whole body They have no power by the Writ which the King issueth to elect and returne Members of that House so to doe For the Writ for them is onely ad faciendum et consentiendum to those things whereof His Majestie shall consult and treat with his Prelates and Nobles et de communi consilio Regni shall be there ordained as appeares by the Writ Here is no separate power given over the Kings people to them but onely ad faciendum et consentiendum 4 Pars. institut 23.24.25 and in all times this hath beene expounded and restrained to that which concerned their owne Members in Relation to the publique Service as he is a Member of the corporate body of the Parliament wherof the King is the Head But that the House of Commons have committed any man for Treason Murder or Felony or for any offence that had no relation to a Member of the House of Commons as it is against Law and Reason so no instance can be given till this Parliament 19 H. 6.43 22. E. 4.22 5 H. 4. cap. 8. 3 H. 6.46 All Questions and trials where witnesse are examined the examination is upon oath by the Law by all our Bookes Statutes every dayes practice Examination without an Oath is but a loose discourse therefore the House of Commons not claiming power to give an Oath have no power to examine any man No man shall bee imprisoned by the King or His Councell unlesse it be