Selected quad for the lemma: parliament_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
parliament_n	assent_n	king_n	royal_a	3,228	5	8.0365	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A90228	An arrow against all tyrants and tyrany, shot from the prison of New-gate into the prerogative bowels of the arbitrary House of Lords, and all other usurpers and tyrants whatsoever. wherein the originall rise, extent, and end of magisteriall power, the naturall and nationall rights, freedomes and properties of mankind are discovered, and undeniably maintained; ... the late Presbyterian ordinance (invented and contrived by the diviners, and by the motion of Mr. Bacon and Mr. Taet read in the House of Commons) examined, refuted, and exploaded, as most inhumaine, tyranicall and barbarous. / By Richard Overton prerogative archer to the arbitrary House of Lords, their prisoner in New-gate, ... sent by way of a letter from him, to Mr Henry Martin, a Member of the House of Commons. Imprimatur rectat justitia.	Overton, Richard, fl. 1646.	1646 (1646)	Wing O622; Thomason E356_14; ESTC R201139	14,134	20

him as a Peer of the Land Yet notwithstanding all this the Earles Barons and Peers being over swaid by the King did award and adjudge as judges of Parliament by the assent of the King in the said Parliament that the said Simon as a traitor enemy of the Realm should behanged drawn and execution accordingly was done But as by the said Roll appeareth it was by full Parliament condemned and adjudged as illegall and as a precident not to be drawn into example the words of the said Roll are these viz And it is assented and agreed by our Lord the King and all the Grandees in full Parliament that albeit the said Peers as judges in full Parliament took upon them in presence of our Lord the King to make and give the said Judgement by the assent of the King upon some of them that were not their Peers to wit Commoners by reason of the murther of the Leige Lord and destruction of him which was so neer of the blood royall and the Kings Father that therefore the said Peers which now are or the Peers which shall be for the time to come be not bound or charged to give judgement upon others then upon their Peers nor shall doe it but of that for ever be discharged and acquit and that the aforesaid Judgement now given be not drawn into example or consequent for the time to come by which the said Peers may be charged hereafter to Judge others then their Peers being against the Law of the Land if any such case happen which God defend Agreeth with the Record William Collet But notwithstanding all this our Lords in Parliament take upon them as Judges in Parliament to passe judgement and sentence even of themselves upon the Commoners which are not their Peeres and that to fining imprisonment c. And this doth not only content them but they even send ●orth their armed men and beset invade assault their houses and persons in a warlike manner and take what plunder they please before so much as any of their pretended illegall warrants be shewed as was lately upon the eleventh of August 1646. perpetrated against mee and mine which was more then the King himselfe by his legall Prerogative ever could doe for neither by verball commands or commissions under the Great Seale of England he could ever give any lawfull authority to any Generall Captaine or person whatsoever without legall tri●ll and conviction forceibly to assault rob spoile or imprison any of the free Commoners of England and in case any free Commoner by such his illegall Commissions Orders or warrants before they be lawfully convicted should be assaulted spoiled plundered imprisoned c. in such cases his agents and ministers ought to be proceeded against resisted apprehended indicted and condemned notwithstanding such commissions as Trespassers Theeves Burglarers Felons Murderers both by Statute and common Law as is enacted and resolvd by Magna Charta cap. 29. 15. Eliz 3. stat 1. cap. 1 2 3 42 Eliz 5. cap. 1 3. 28. Eliz. 1. Artic. sup chartas cap. 2. 4. Eliz. 3. cap 4 5. Eliz. 3 cap. 2. 24 Eliz. 3. cap. 1. 2. Rich. 2. cap. 7. 5. Rich. 2. cap. 5. 1. Hen. 5. cap. 6. 11. Hen. 2. cap. 1. to 6. 24. Hen. 8. cap. 5. 21. Jacob. cap 3. And if the King himselfe have not this Arbitrary power much lesse may his Peeres or Companions the Lords over the free Commons of England And therefore notwithstanding such illegall censures and warrants either of King or of Lords no legall conviction being made the persons invaded and assaulted by such open force of Armes may lawfully arme themselves fortifie their Houses which are their Castles in the judgement of the Law against them yea disarme beat wound represse and kill them in their just necessary defence of their own persons houses goods wives and families and not be guilty of the least offence as is expresly resolved by the Statute of 21. Edw. de malefactoribus in parcis by 24. Hen. 8. cap. 5. 11. Hen. 6. 16. 14. Hen. 6. 24. 35. Hen. 6. 12. E. 4. 6. And therefore Sir as even by nature and by the Law of the Land I was bound I denyed subjection to these Lords and their arbit●●ry creatures thus by open force invading and assaulting my house person c. no legall conviction preceding or warrant then showen but and if they had brought and shewen a thousand such warrants they had all been illegall antimagisteriall void in this case for they have no legal power in that kind no more then the King but such their actions are utterly condemned and expresly forbidden by the Law Why therefore should you of the Representative Body sit still and suffer these Lords thus to devour both us and our Lawes Be awakned arise and consider their oppressions and encroachments and stop their Lord-ships in their ambitious carere for they do not cease only here but they soar higher higher now they are become arrogators to themselves of the natural Soveraignity the Represented have conveyed and issued to their proper Representors even challenge to themselves the tittle of the Supreamest Court of Judecature in the Land as was claimed by the Lord Hounsden when I was before them which you may see more at large in a printed letter published under my name intitled A Defiance c. which challenge of his I think I may be bold to assert was a most illegall Anti-parliamentary audacious presumpsion and might better be pleaded and challenged by the King singly then by all those Lords in a distinction from the Commons but it is more then may be granted to the King himselfe for the Parliament whole Kingdom whom it represents is truly and properly the highest Supream power of all others yea above the King himselfe And therefore much more above the Lords for they can question Cancell disanull and utterly revoake the Kings own Royall Charters Writs Commissions Pattents c. Though ratified with the Great Seale even agianst his personal wil as is evident by their late abrogation of sundry Patents Cōmissions writs Charters Lone Shipmony c. yea the body Representative have power to enlarge or retract the very prerogative of the King as the Statute de praerog Reg. and the Parliament Roll of 1. Hen. 4. num 18. doth evidence and therefore their power is larger and higher then the Kings and if above the Kings much more above the Lords who are subordinate to the King and if the Kings Writs Charters c. which intrench upon the weale of the People may be abrogated nul'd and made voide by the Parliament the Representateve body of the Land and his very prerogatives bounded restrained limited by them much more may the Orders Warrants Commitments c. of the Lords with their usurped prerogatives over the commons and People of England be restrained nul'd and made void by them and therefore these Lord● must needs be inferiour to them Further