the Congregation That by Baptism we are admitted into the Church I think is without doubt for if persons baptized be not members of the visible Church then the seal of the Covenant is administred to those that are and remain oâ—â— of the Church and so were no initial seal which were absurd to say M. Ball in his Catechism hath this passage Baptism is a Sacrament of our ingrafting into Christ communion with him and entrance into the Church for which he citeth Mat 28.19 Act. 8.38 And afterwards explains himself It doth saith he solemnly signifie and seal their ingrafting into Christ and confirm that they are acknowledged members of the Church and entred into it And that we are thereby admitted members not of a particular Congregation but the Church-Catholike appears because we are baptized into one body 1 Cor. 12.13 And this appears further because he that is baptized in one Congregation is baptized all over the world and is not to be re-baptized but is taken as a member of the Church whereever he becomes See before Chap. 6. Now that baptizing is an act of office appears Joh. 1.33 He that sent me to baptize And Go teach all Nations and baptize them c. Mat. 28. was the substance of the Apostles Commission And though Paul 1 Cor. 1.17 saith Christ sent me not to baptize but to preach the Gospel yet that is meant not principally for he was sent also to baptize else he might not have done it which we reade he did And that by an act of this office we are baptized into the Church-Catholike appears because John Baptist baptized all Jerusalem Judea and all the region round about Iordan And the Disciples of Christ made and baptized more Disciples then Iohn and that without any relation to any particular Congregations which had it been necessary or had baptism been ordained in reference to particular Congregations they could have combined them into So Peter caused Cornelius and his friends to be baptized Act. 10.48 but no mention is made of any Congregation into which they were baptized And Philip baptized the Eunuch but not into any particular Congregation Into what Congregation did Ananias baptize Paul Act. 9.18 Or how can it appear that Ananias was an Evangelist or any extraordinary Officer he is called a Disciple at Damascus it is probable he was one of the Elders there but that Paul was ever a fixed member of any particular Congregation it appears not That which is answered to this is that they which administred Baptism so indefinitely were extraordinary general Officers which are now ceased But this salves it not for if the immediate right to Baptism c. comes to the receiver by being a member of a particular instituted Congregation as M. Norton and M. A. and M. S. in Def. Ch. 4. pag. 73. tels us then John Baptist Christs Disciples Philip and Ananias though he had been an Evangelist administred it to such as had no actual and immediate right to receive it Indeed the answer implyeth a more large actual extensive power in the administrers either to have constituted new Churches or to administer in any constituted Churches but it gives not them power to administer any Ordinance of God to such as had no right thereto nor power to the receivers to receive it without actual right in an undue order It gives them not jus in re who had in themselves only jus ad rem as their distinction is And the proof brought p. 76. out of Act. 5.14 is as I conceive mistaken Their words are these Beleevers were added first they were beleevers standing in that spiritual relation to Christ and his whole body and then added to the Church by visible combination But it is not said they were added to the Church but added to the Lord and it were incongruous to gather thence that they were first beleevers and after that were added to the Lord by a second act seeing their adding to the Lord was by beleeving and that which added them to the Lord the head and King added them to the body and Kingdom And whereas they say that Justification and Adoption c. flow immediatly from internal union with Christ but instituted Ordinances and Priviledges mediatly and in such an order as Christ hath in wisedom ordained and the nature of visible government and Ordinances of Christ necessarily require pag. 76. If they mean by it being members of particular Congregations then would I know whether hearing the word publikely preached or read or joyning in publike singing or in keeping a day of publike thanksgiving or fasting or making rows or taking oaths which are instituted Ordinances may not be permitted to any but such as are members of particular Congregations The Apostles carried about one with them whom they called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Minister Act. 13.5 who was no Apostle and he baptized for them into the Church-Catholike and when a sufficient number were converted and baptized then followed the particular relation of a particular Congregation by ordaining Officers to take the particular care over them So Tychicus Col. 4.7 is called a beloved brother and faithful Minister and fellow-servant in the Lord. And Eph. 6.21 he hath the same stile given him Certainly he could not be a peculiar Minister to both those distant Churches and haply he was so to neither of them if we may give any credit to Dorotheus who saith he was Bishop of Chalcedon in Bithynia Apollos baptized at Corinth 1 Cor. 3.4 and yet was no Apostle but a Minister and steward of the mysteries of God as well as they 1 Cor. 4.1 Hence is that distinction of Iunius in his Animadversions on Bellarm. c. 7. nor 7. Alia est electio sive vocatio communis quâ vir bonus pius doctus aptus absolutè eligitur ad ministerium verbi 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 alia particularis sive singularis quâ ad ministerium singulariter huic vel illi Ecclesiae praeficiendus eligitur 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And the Scripture alwaies calling the beleevers in one city one Church even Ierusalem though there were many thousands yea myriads i. e. many ten thousands of beleeving Jews therein as Iames tels Paul Act. 21.20 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which were all probably of Ierusalem as appears first because they were not such as could bear any witnesse against Paul but by hearsay they are informed of thee But the Jews disperst amongst the Gentiles having seen and heard Paul could have testified of their own knowledge and would not be blinded with Pauls present conformity And secondly because they only or Ierusalem could receive satisfaction by Pauls conformity to the Law at Ierusalem at that time and not the others Also the holy Ghost calling the Elders of those cities the Elders of the Church in communi it leaveth it uncertain to me whether the several Elders were fixed over the particular Congregations or taught and ruled in communi as the Ministers do now in
loins And by the same reason when a part of a National Church shall joyn in particular consociation and community in a City or Province or Classis they may receive denomination from thence the one containing a greater part of the Church Catholike the other a lesse For the Church Catholike being a similar body retains the name Church in what parts parcels or quantities soever it be divided into for convenient community until it be brought in minimum quod sic as the Philosophers say i. e. into the least parts that can enjoy publike communion in Ordinances which is a particular Congregation The division of the Church Catholike into particular Congregations seemeth to me to be no further of divine institution then as it fitly serveth for order and edification by cohabitation for enjoyment of Gods Ordinances together publikely as the Jewish Church was divided by Synagogues for their constant enjoyment of word praier and discipline which they could not constantly enjoy as a National Church by their National worship thrice in the year and the same reason will by proportion carry it for Classical Provincial and National divisions for community of a greater part of the Church Gersom Bucerus in dissert de Gub. Eccles p. 11. hath this description of a particular Church Nos particularem Ecclesiam intelligimus quem libet credentium caetum in unam vocationem divinam Evangelij praedicatione sacrarumque Institutionum observatione adunatum ac uni presbyterio subjunctum sacros verò conventus uno aut pluribus locis agitantem Nam paraeciarum in quibus convenitur numerus accidentaria res est nihil ad Ecclesia particularis essentiam pertinens Now this seemeth to me to be a description of a Presbyterial or Classical Church and so not to divide the Church Catholike into any lesse parts for the enjoyment of all the usual publike Ordinances then a Presbyterial Classical Church and so though it be a description of a particular Church indeed yet not of the least particular Church M. Cotton a reverend Minister in N. E. in his Catechism tels us that a visible Church is a mystical body whereof Christ is the head the Members Saints called out of the world and united together into one Congregation by an holy Covenant to worship the Lord and to edifie one another in all his holy Ordinances But with due respect to so grave and worthy a man much of this description seems to me to belong to an invisible Church and not to a visible First because the matter thereof is the mystical body of Christ consisting only of Saints called not only from Idols but out of the world and therefore truly godly but much of the world is in the visible Church Secondly Every Congregation though it be in some sense of the mystical body of Christ yet is not the or a mysticall body of Christ for Christ hath but one mystical body it behooveth therefore a particular Church to be defined with reference to the rest of the body and not to the head only it being but a part of the body It would seem strange to define the little toe to be a body made up of flesh bloud and bone of such a figure enformed by the head without declaring the reference of it to the rest of the body Or a Corporation in England to be a body politick whereof the King is the head or Soveraign without mentioning its reference to the rest of the Kingdom whereof it is but a part and so the King the head or governour thereof but secondarily it being a part of that Kingdom whereof he was Soveraign It is true the Apostle saith the head of every man is Christ. 1 Cor. 11.3 i. e. they are of the body of Christ So it may be said of every Congregation Christ is the head thereof and that it is of his body or kingdom visible Ecclesiastical but then we must adde that which the Apostle doth of the Church of Corinth 1 Cor. 12.27 Now ye are the body of Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. members of a part rendred in the old English Translation Members for the part in the new Members in particular On which words saith Beza in his large notes upon the place Nam omnes Ecclesiae per orbem dispersae diversa sunt unius corporis membra And the English Annotations upon the Bible paraphrase it thus That is members of this Church of Corinth which is but a part of the Catholike Christian Church for all the faithfull wheresoever they are make the whole body you Corinthians are not the whole body but members only neither all the members but a part only of them Paraeus renders it partiatim Peter Martyr Vosestis pars membrorum Thirdly I dare not make a particular explicite holy covenant to be the form of a particular Church as this definition seemeth to do because I finde no mention of any such Covenant besides the general imposed on Churches nor example or warrant for it in all the Scriptures and therefore cannot account it an Ordinance of God but a prudential humane device to keep the members together which in some places and cases may haply be of good use so it be not urged as an Ordinance of God and so it be not used to inthral any and abridge them of liberty of removal into other places and Congregations for their convenience or urged as the form of a Church I deny not but mutual consent of persons within such a vicinity to joyn together constantly in the Ordinances of God under the inspection of such and such officers is requisite to a particular Congregation But it is the general preceding Covenant sealed by baptism and not this that makes them of the body of Christ they must be conceived to be of the visible body of Christ before they can be fit members to constitute a particular Congregation neither is it this particular Covenant that giveth right to the Ordinances of God but the general and therefore they must be judged to have right thereto before they be admitted as members of the Congregation Only this mutual joyning together and choice of such and such a Pastor or Teacher or ruling Elders giveth such Officers a call to take immediate inspection over them and administer the Ordinances of God belonging to their offices unto them to which they had right before their particular consociation which is but an accidentary thing and may many waies be dissolved and yet they not lose their right to Gods Ordinances by that dissolution Such a consent joyning and call of or submitting to a Presbytery giveth to those Elders right of exercising of their offices over or towards them rather then over others and to them to expect or require the Ordinances of God from those particular Officers rather then from others Fourthly For the enjoyment of all the Ordinances of God in one Congregation it seemeth to me very incovenient for some of the Ordinances and altogether impossible for others
a quovis impio nec pio videri potest saith Whitaker And if the word Church be taken in that sense it is most certainly true it must needs be invisible But there is also an external communion as hath been shewed before which the visible members have both with Christ and one with another which is visible and makes the enjoyers thereof visible one to another and to all others also viz. their praying one with another and for another and their hearing the Word and receiving the Lords-Supper together as occasion is offered and their receiving all those as visible members of the visible mystical Kingdom and body of Christ that are admitted in any part of the Church by baptism and the avoiding of such as are any where excommunicated and the receiving again into communion those that are any where absolved So that there is an external visible Kingdom of Christ as well as an internal and invisible and the elect are of the visible Kingdom as well as of the invisible they are as Ezechiels wheels a wheel in the midst of a wheel It is true which reverend M. Hooker puts me in minde of that these 4. Questions between the Pontificians and our Divines are distinct Vtrum Ecclesia sit visibilis Vtrum Ecclesia visibilis potest deficere An sit semper frequenâ— gloriosa Vtrum Ecclesia opus habet visibili monarchâ summo Judice But they are rather marshalled so by our Divines in their answers then distinguished by themselves for they often confound visible conspicuous glorious manifest specious splendid magnifical and flourishing together yet the Church is visible when latent under persecutions and is deprived of the other properties for all the members even then are not invisible members of Christ Cameron granteth that these properties may betide the visible Church but not alwaies and so say some of the Papists also and that when they do betide the Church they rather shew Quid sit Ecclesia quam quae sit that it cannot be discerned which is the true Church by these accidents of perpetual clarity Cameron de Conspic Eccl. The Pontificians notion of the Church Catholike is very absurd for they hold the name Church-Catholike to belong to one Church viz. the Church of Rome and that being the Church-Catholike and comprizing the universality of the Church in it self all that will be members of the Church-Catholike must submit unto them and be members of that Of which Tylen in Synâ—â—g saith well Orbem urbi includunt And the necessity which they make that this one visible Church should be under one visible universal head on earth viz. the Pope as Christs vicar general is as absurd and therefore they are worthily confuted by our Divines But to deny an external Kingdome or Church of Christ upon earth or to deny the visibility or perceptibility of it or the unity of it or the univesality of it under the Gospel is as I conceive as absurd on the other side To the particulars I shall speak more fully in following Chapters I finde reverend M. Hooker in his Survey of Church-Discipline par 1. pag. 3. acknowledging Christ a political head by his especial guidance in means and dispensations of his Ordinances as well as a mystical by spiritual influence and the Church a political body as well as a mystical The political body or Church-visible saith he results out of that relation which is betwixt the professors of the faith when by voluntary consent they yeeld outward subjection to that government of Christ which in his word he hath prescribed and as an external head exerciseth by his Word Spirit and Discipline by his Ordinances and Officers over them who have yeelded themselves subjects to his headship and supream authority And pag. 25. The visible Church is truly stiled and judged by Scripture light to be the visible body of Christ over whom he is a head by political government and guidance which he lends thereunto 1 Cor. 12.12 And that it is a visible politick body appears quite through the whole Chapter but especially ver 27 28. Because in that Church God set Orders and Officers Some Apostles Teachers Helpers Governments The like to this Eph. 4.12.13 Again p. 16. The Church is the visible Kingdom in which Christ reigns by the scepter of his word and Ordinances and execution of Discipline The testimony cited out of Ames by me was this Congregationes ille particulares sunt quasi partes simulares Ecclesiae Catholica atque adeò nomen naturam ejus participanâ— And further he saith Illi qui proâ—essione â—â—ntum sunt fideles dum remaâ—ene in illa societâ—â—â— sunt membra illius Ecclesia sicut etiam Ecclesia Catholice quo ad statum exterâ—â—m Ames medul l. 1. c. 22. Sect. 11. And in his Bellarminus euerâ—atus he saith Nos fotemur Ecclesiam militantem visibilem esse quo ad formam accidentalem exteruam insuit partibus singulatim conjunctim c. Here I am taxed by M. Ellis vind p 53. for citing this authour for me who is known to be against me But I answer I dealt candidly with D. Ames acknowledging him to be against a Church-Catholike visible in some sense and yet not against it in some other sense 〈◊〉 expresse words declare Neither doth he reject iâ— terminis an universal visible Church in my sense as M. Ellis affirme but my position stands good for ought that I finde in D. Aâ—â—â— though I 〈◊〉 consent to his judgement in all things But let M. Ellis observe that Ames doth not hold the Church which is mystically one to be a genus or one generically sed quasi species specialissima vel Individuum quia nullas habet species propriè dictas Dicitur igitur Catâ—olica non ut 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 genus aut generale aliquid significat sed ut denotat aliquid significat sed ut denotut aliquid integraliter universale ut quum dicimus Orbis universus quia complectitur fideles omnium gentium omnium locorum omnium temporum Med. l. 1. c. 31. n. 18 19. Again cap. 32. n. 5. he saith Ecclesia particularis respectu communis illius naturae qua in omnibus particularibus Ecclesijâ— reperitur est species Ecclesiae in genere sed respectu Ecclesia Catholicae quae habet rationem integri est membrum ex aggregatione variorum membrorum singularium compositum atque respectu ipsorum est etiam integrum Which is as much as in this part of the question I contended for viz. that the Church-Catholike in regard of the external and accidental form is an integral and not a genus But M. Ellis makes the Church-Catholike one only in regard of the internal essential form and not in regard of any external form wherein he expresly crosseth Ames And therefore I retort it upon him again that he citeth a man for him which is expresly against him The external form is that which is visible and if the
Congregational Church for there can be no appeals to that it being the lowest Church that can be The particular Synagogues were rather Types of the Congregational Churches for they are called by the same name Jam. 1.2 And the Ministers under the Gospel are called by the same names that the indefinite Officers of the Jewish Church were viz. Priests and Levites Isa 66.21 which place is spoken of the time under the Gospel And if it be granted that the Ministers of the Gospel be given to the whole Church as the Priests and Levites were indefinitely to the whole Church of the Jews notwithstanding any particular relation to the particular Synagogues and places they resided in and taught or judged in it is as much as I contend for And if by mystical he meaneth the elect only or entitively only it could not be a type of the Church-Catholike so for the Jewish Church was visible and organical His second proof is from Mat. 18. Tell the Church which saith he was a particular Congregation which was endued with entire power even to excommunication Whatsoever ye shall binde c. Answ This was not the Institution neither was there any donation of the keys but a supposal of the keys in the particular Churches which is a thing confessed by all and this power was also in the Jewish Synagogues But this is not spoken exclusively that this power is no where else If the rulers of the Synagogue had power to excommunicate to which it is like Christ alluded in that speech then much more the Sanedrim or highest Court and so I conceive it is in the Church of the New Testament If the least combination of Elders have this power given them for matters that concern that Congregation only then much more a greater company and combination for matters that concern a greater part of the Church under their combination and for matters of greater moment then can be transacted by the smaller company But the donation of the keys was to the Apostles together and they were general Officers and stood in relation to no particular Church and therefore the keys come to the particular Congregation or Ministry there as to parts of the whole company of Organs yet immediatly and not by commission from any Catholike Court. His third proof is because the first execution of the greatest act of entire power was exercised in a particular Church without consulting with the universal Church though the Apostles were then surviving 1 Cor. 5. Answ For ought that I know the Church of Corinth was a Classical Church and not a meer Congregational one for there were Churches in it 1 Cor. 14.34 Besides the probability that Cenchrea was a member thereof But Sir who requires the consulting with the Church-Catholike in admitting or ejecting members Or did the particular Synagogues consult with the Sanedrim or the whole Church of the Jews when they excommunicated any man Surely they had work enough to do then His fourth proof or argument is Because entire power was committed to particular men viz. the Apostles severally and to all jointly and therefore not to one visible governing Church Vind. p. 23. Answ By this argument it appears the power is given not to the Congregation but to the Ministers whose representatives the Apostles were in receiving the keys severally and jointly which is as much as the Presbyterians require viz. that the Ministers have power to exercise their ordinary power jointly together upon a call as well as severally in their particular Congregations as the Apostles did their extraordinary Their receiving the keys together signifyed their representation of the Ministers not multiplyed only as M. Ellis would evade it but conjoyned His fifth argument is from the reproofs given by Christ to the 7. several Churches in the Revelation and not to the combination of them though near one another Answ For ought appears they might be all Presbyterial Churches and not Congregational only The Church of Ephesus was one and that was of more Congregations then one as hath been shewed before But how doth this prove these Churches were nor or might not actually have been in combination if civil authority would have permited Were not the Elders of the several Churches worthy of blame for not doing their duty in their several Churches Or will combinations of Congregations now in Classes or Provinces free their Ministers from blame in neglecting their duâ—â—es in their particular Congregations A Classis or Synod is not to be blamed for the faults in a particular Congregation which ought to be censured in the particular and not there neither indeed can be except they had been brought before them The several Churches there had their several faults and therefore though the Epistle is written to the seven yet it was needful the reproofs should be applied to rhem severally And yet some think that the whole Epistle was writeen and sent to all the 7. Churches from Rev. 1.4 11. His second sort of Arguments are from the matter and members of the Church Sect. 9. and he makes it necessary that the whole Church should be gathered together into one place as the Jewish Church was and Corporations in their hals and Kingdoms in their Parliaments And this he saith I deny against all experience and reason Vind. p. 24. Answ This hath been answered before among the Objections I adde further that though usually it is so that there are some general meetings in worldly polities that are several actual governments yet it is not alwaies so as hath been shewed and where it is so it is a fruit and effect and token of liberty but ariseth not meerly from unity because there have been polities that had them not for this Kingdom was one a good while before there were any Parliaments and after they were granted they were but occasional and so there may be occasional meetings in general Councels only the vastnes of the Church and diversity of civil governments and governours render them very difficult in our daies But he saith that such an oneness as is in regard of kinde and nature in all the Churches and in relation to the same head and in order to and dependance upon one rule or Law the word of God is no actual or real onenesse but in imagination and conceit Ans It is not actual indeed but habitual as hath been said many times over yet it is real as well as the four monarchies were real monarchies and not in imagination only and conciet He might as well make the head of the Church and the Laws of the Church and the Covenant of grace and the seals of the Covenant to be but imaginary and in conceit as the Church-Catholike for they are the bonds of the unity and real visible bonds make not an imaginary integral but a real And where I pray is this onenesse denyed by the brethren as you alledge Vin. p. 24. The enlargement and confirmation of this argument A non existentiâ
the Evangelical Church was Go teach all Nations and baptize them in the name of the Father Son and holy Ghost Mat. 28. And this was before any divisions or subdivisions were appointed and they were secondarily brought in for order and convenient administration of Ordinances and communication of members and transaction of businesse and they being similar parts of the whole receive their particular distinctions from external accidental and adventitious particularities as the places where they exist the particular Officers set over them their purity or impurity eminency or obscurity multitude or paucity zeal or remisnesse antiquity or late constitution c. They all retain the general essential form and difference from heathens and among themselves as parts of a similar body are distinguished but by accidental differences And that promise that the gates of hell shall never prevail against the Church is primarily given to the Church-Catholike visible have 〈◊〉 For that in heaven is not assailed by the gates of hell but only that on earth And though it may seem to be applicable to the invisible only yet to those as visible for so they are assailed by persecutions and heresies Again He that beleeveth and is baptized shall be saved Mar. 16. This doth primarily belong to the Church Catholike and that a visible Church because capable of Baptism and though it be applicable to every member of any particular Congregation yet not as being a member of that particular society or confederation but as being in the general Covenant and so a member of the Church Catholike to which that promise was made Yea look over all the promises in the New Testament and you shall finde them under in general without the least respect or reference to the particular confederations or Congregations wherein the beleevers lived In any similar body as water the accidents doe not primarily pertain to this or that particular drop and secondarily to the whole but first to the whole and secondarily to this or that drop So the promises and priviledges of the Church do not primarily belong to this or that particular Church and secondarily to the Catholike but first to the Catholike and secondarily to this or that particular Congregation or person as being a member thereof The Laws also are given to the whole Church primarily as the Laws of England are to the whole Kingdom primarily and to the particular divisionâ— secondarily and all are bound to obedience not as Suffolk or Essex men but as Subjects of this Kingdom So the Laws of Christ binde every particular Church but not because in such a particular Covenant or confederation but because Subjects of Christs visible Kingdom The like may be said of the priviledges of the Church Two main priviledges of the Church are federal holinesse of the children of visible beleevers and right to the Ordinances on for â—â—llcclesia Now neither of both these betide any primarily as a member of a particular Congregation but as a member of the Church-Catholike For federal or covenant-holinesse whereby the children of visible beleevers are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it betideth no mans children because the parents are of this or that or any Congregation but because of the Church-Catholike yea though but entitive if under the seal of Baptism This I prove thus That which should have been though the particular relation to a particular Congregation had never been and which continueth when the particular relation ceaseth that is not a proper priviledge of that relation but such is federal-holinesse in regard of relation to any particular Congregation Therefore c. Suppose those baptized by John Baptist or by Christs Disciples before there were any particular distinctions should have had any children or the Eunuch if he were an Eunuck by office only and not in body baptized by Philip who went immediatly home into his own countrey or Cornelius and his friends baptized in Peters command should not their children 〈◊〉 Suppose â— Church dissolved by war the Minister and people slaiâ—â—ick dying by some raging pestilence and some women left with childe and haply they carried away captive should not their children be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because the particular relation is extinct Do not those women remain members of the Church But they cease to remain members of that particular Church or Integral for that inceased Therefore of the Church-Catholike or of none Are thereto he accounted without in the Apostles sense Are visible be leevest not yet joined in church-Church-order or fellowship by a particular Covenant to be accounted without Or is a Congregation deprived of Elders by death land in that interval 〈◊〉 of Word Sacraments and discipline to be accounted 〈…〉 joyning of a company of private Christians together without Officers before they be organized that gives them their right primarily to the Ordinances I fear too 〈…〉 to that particular conjunction and covenient 〈…〉 weight laid upon it which is a very accidental 〈…〉 to Ordinances and enters not into it 〈…〉 and extinguishible without the least impeaching of the right to Ordinances If the reason whereupon the Apostle saith the Church of Corinth was not to judge them that were without was because they were not within the Church of Corinth and so not under their particular 〈…〉 or judgement this holdeth true of them that be of another society or Congregation desiring to be admitted to the Sacrament as well as of such as are no set members desires to be received to the Lords Supper And so all 〈…〉 of 〈◊〉 society are without unto another See M. 〈…〉 But by fornicators of this world whom the Apostle pointeth into by the title of being without 1 Cor. 10.11 he means such as had not received the Covenant of grace such as 〈…〉 the Common-wealth of Israel strangers from the 〈…〉 of promise having no hope and without God in the world 〈◊〉 And 〈◊〉 right to the Ordinances it ariseth from the general Covenant 〈…〉 priviledge primarily belonging to visible beleevers though in no particular consociation the admission into the particular Congregation only affords an opportunity because thereby a particular Minister hath taken the charge of him and must administer the Ordinances to him which any other Minister may do upon occasion For Baptism it cannot be a priviledge of the particular Covenant for if a Pagan be converted he must be baptized before he can be admitted a member of the particular Congregation and this must be by some Minister Therefore baptism is a priviledge of the Church-Entitive and a Minister can yea and must sometimes exert his power of office not only beyond his own Congregation even into others but beyond the Church organical into the Church-Entitive to set Christs seal there And for the children of visible beleevers though born never so farre from the place where the particular Minister liveth which hath the actual care of his parents be it by sea or by land any Minister may administer Baptism to them because they are
extraordinary Officers yet with habitual power of office And although Bishop Pastor Elder and Minister doe carry a reference to some particular place wherein by the polity of the Church such Officers are set yet have they a more general relation extending to the whole Church-Catholike as hath been shewed before Paul an Apostle cals himself a Teacher and Preacher 2 Tim. 1.11 Peter also and John the Apostles call themselves Presbyters 1 Pet. 5.1 2 Ep. Joh. 1. and 3 Ep. Joh. 1. We finde also Ministers are in Scripture spoken of under a general notion They are called Ministers of the word Luk. 1.2 and Ministers of God 2 Cor. 6.4 and Ministers of Christ 1 Cor. 4.1 and Ministers of the New Testament 2 Cor. 3.6 and Ministers of the Gospel 1 Thes 3.2 and Ministers of the Lord Ephes 6.21 Where the Ministerial Office is set down by the reference thereof to the Authour that employeth them and the subject about which they are employed and not the object persons unto whom they ministred They are not called Ministers of the people as if they carried their keys and were their stewards but their Teachers Rulers Pastours Overseers Fathers or Ministers for them Col. 1.7 Indeed the Apostle saith they are your servants for Christs sake 2 Cor. 4.5 As the Gentlemen that serve a Noble man serve the meanest that are invited to his table but therein they do service to their Lord. And the Angels themselves by whose names Ministers are called in 2. and 3. of Revelation they are ministring spirits sent out for the good of the Elect but it is in subjection and obedience to God and not to them And if a Minister of this or that Congregation be not a Minister of the Church-Catholike visible then he is no Minister out of his own Congregation and therefore cannot preach or administer any Sacrament as a Minister out of his own Congregation yea if any members of another Congregation should come and hear a Minister preach in his own Congregation he could not preach to them nor they hear him as a Minister but only as a gifted brother And though he may pray and beseech his own flock as an Ambassadour of Christ to be reconciled unto God 2 Cor. 5.20 yet he cannot say so to any other except he be an Ambassadour in office unto others also And if he be a Minister to one member besides his own Congregation then is he so indefinitely to all by the same reason But if he deliver the word as a Minister to his own Congregation only then the same word which is delivered at the same time by the same man is delivered by vertue of the Ministerial office to some and to others ex officio charitatis generali only as a gifted brother And if this be granted which is absurd yet a greater absurdity will follow viz. that if he administer the Lords Supper to any members of another Congregation he must do that also as a gifted brother and as a private person whereas a private person out of office hath nothing to doe to administer the seals of the Covenant as is confessed by all except a few Anabaptists of late on purpose as I conceive to avoid this argument And yet this communion of members of other Congregations is frequent among our brethren for Congregational Churches Neither can this be answered that it is done by vertue of commnion of Churches except there be a communion of offices and Officers and so every Minister be an indefinite habitual Officer and a Minister of the Church-Catholike And if a Minister hath an indefinite office and can administer the seals of the Covenant to strangers in his own Congregation in his own meeting-house then any where else in any other meeting-house for no man will say his Ministerial office is circumscribed by or tyed unto the fabrick of his own meeting-house or any especial influence or authority afforded him in the execution of his Ministerial function by the presence of his own Congregation He whose office is limited within and stands wholly in relation to a particular place is out of office when he is out of that place as a Mayor of a Corporation and a Constable of a Parish but so is not a Minister he is no private man as soon as he is out of his meeting-house or the limits of his Congregation And though indeed he be more peculiarly their Pastour or Bishop one that hath the oversight of them in the Lord in a more immediate especial manner actually yet this extends to all places whereever he or they shall come by occasion though never so far from their dwellings but so is not a Mayor or Constable And besides this particular relation he hath an indefinite office he is a Minister in general to all others and may exert his power of office to them as God giveth occasion and they give him a call without taking a new especial relation to them but so cannot a Mayor or Constable though they were entreated to use their office out of their limits because they are onely particular Officers See this more fully in Chap. 6. Sect. 4. and 5. Suppose a Ministers flock by mortality or the sword should be dissolved extinct and cease indeed he ceaseth to be their Pastor because the correlative faileth but he ceaseth not to be a Minister of the Gospel A King or Mayor haply cease to be so any longer if his Kingdom or Corporation should sink or be swallowed up because there is no Catholike Kingdom or Corporation whereof they were Officers but the office of the Minister ceaseth not because he was an Officer of the Church-Catholike which correlative sinketh not but still his power in actu primo to dispense all the Ordinances of Christ which a single Officer can perform remaineth only his call ad actum secundum sive exercitum pro hic nunc which is appointed by the polity of the Church for order ceaseth because they are cut off that gave him a call thereto An Objection against this I finde made by those two Reverend Ministers M. A. and M. S. in their Defence p. 208. It is to this purpose If Ordination of a Minister be an indeleble character like Baptism and ceaseth not when his particular relation to a Congregation ceaseth why then should not a ruling-Elder or Deacon remain an Elder or Deacon in the Church though their particular relations cease Answ 1. If you please to cast your eye back to the answer of an Objection of M. Hookers that is like to this Ch. 2. Sect. 4. it may afford some light to the answering of this Objection to which I referre you being loth to repeat the same again 2. I premise also that for ought I can finde both ruling-Elders and Deacons should continue in their offices as long as they lived if the Congregations or Presbyterial Churches which chose them be not dissolved or if they be not ejected by censure 3. I deny not but that
if that holy men of God M. Hooker were alive I doubt not but he would passe the same judgement upon this Book which he did upon the former The truth is The Question is full of difficulty and intricacy the path in which he walks is an untrodden path and the pains which he hath taken in the compiling of this work and the learning which he hath discovered herein is so great as I am very confident That whosoever reades the Book will commend the Authour and his abilities though he should not in every thing resent his opinion The Scope of the Book is to contend for the extents and rights of Christs political Kingdom in his Church upon earth and to demonstrate the unity of it and thereby to lay a foundation of unity between particular Churches which is as necessary for the preservation of them as purity and verity For a Church divided against it self cannot stand Sad it is to consider That whereas Jesus Christ hath left two waies for the uniting of Christians in faith and love the devil should make use of both of them to disunite and divide us The first is The Sacrament of the Lords Supper which was instituted to be a Feast of Love and a Band of Vnion between Christians but by Satans cunning it hath proved an apple of strife and of great contention not only between the Papists and the Protestants the Lutherans and the Calvinists but between us also and our dissenting brethren The second is The Government of the Church which was ordained by Christ to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and as a golden chain to link them together in purity verity and unity to heal breaches and to make us minde the same things and to be perfectly joyned together in the same minde and in the same judgement But by the devils policy whose property it is to bring evil out of good it is become the great bone of contention and a middle wall of partition between Christians and Christians This is a lamentation and shall be for a lamentation But my comfort is That Jesus Christ came into the world to remove the wall of partition that was between Jew and Gentile and to make both one and he is not only a foundation 〈…〉 his people to build their faith and hope upon but also a corner stone to unite beleevers one to another He it is that will shortly remove all these Wals of partition between brethren and will become not only our Redeemer but our Peace-maker For he hath praied for all those that should beleeve in him That they may be one as thou Father art in me Joh. 17.21 22 and I in thee that they also may be one with us that the â—â—â—â—ld may beleeve that thou hast sent me And the glory which thou hast given me I have given them that they may be one even as we are one This Praier will in due time be fulfilled together with those three soul-comforting Prophecies concerning the times of the New Testament Ier. 32.39 Zeph. 3.9 Zach. 14.9 In the mean time it is our duty to study unity as well as purity To this the Apostle exhorts us with great earnestnesse and affection 1 Cor. 1.10 Phil. 2.1.2 3. Eph. 4.3 4 5 6. This the present times call for with a loud voice And this shall be the care and praier of Your unworthy servant in the work of the Ministry EDMUND CALAMY Errata PAge 10. line 16. for priatively reade privatively p. 14. l. 36. for vale e quantums valeat quantum p. 1â— l. 24. for Foance r. France p. 18. l. 5. for Catechism r. Doctrine of the Church correct the like fault p. 7. l. 10. p. 18. l. 37. put a â—â—ddlepoint after these words Members for your part p. 29. l. 5. blot 〈…〉 â—at aliquid significat p 545 l. 34. for or r. for p. 59. l. 31. for visibly r. visible p. 7â— l. 5. blot out not p. 73. l. 32. blot out there p. 74. l. 11. is consisted r. consisteth p. 87. l. 13. for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 r. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 p 91. l 4. for for a particular r. of a particular p. 103. l. 34. for set p. 107. l. 18. for chough r. though p. 127. l. 5. for it r. is l. 16. for integrals r. integral p. 136. l. 17. for as well as r. as well as p. 144. l. 20. for to what r. in what p 163. l. 31. for presbyterio r. presbyterio p. 168. l. 5. for no more it is r. no more then it is p. 176. l. 6. for pâ—stors r. pastors p. 191. l. 16. for and Israel r. in Israel p. 194. l. 1â— for diutâ—s r. diuitâ—s p. 201. l. 14. for good r. goods p. 231. l. 1. for Christ r. Christian p. 238. l. 13. for primally r. primarily p. 260. l. 2. for folds r. fields p. 262. l. 5. for two men r. two women This Leaf being forgotten to be inserted in the former part of this Thesis it was thought fit to adde it here M. Norton a reverend Minister in N. E. in his Treatise of the Doctrine of Godlinesse printed since his answer to Apollonius defineth the Church-Catholike to be the number of the elect and redeemed whom God hath called out of the world unto a supernatural estate and communion of grace and glory with himself in Jesus Christ And affirms that there is but one Catholike Church because there is but one faith And then comes to distinguish this Catholike Church in respect of its adjuncts into invisible and visible And then defines a visible Church to be a similar part of the Catholike Church consisting of a competent number knit together by way of visible Covenant to exercise an holy communion with God in Christ and so one with another according to the order of the Gospel And then distinguisheth this visible Church into pure and impure impure into 3. branches viz. Simply erring Schismatical Heretical And then makes the matter of this visible Church to be Saints i. e. visible beleevers From whence we have these concessions 1. That there is a Church-Catholike which is but one 2. That this Church Catholike is visible yea let me adde further out of his answer to Apollonius Politica visibilitas est adjunctum respectu Ecclesiae Catholicae pag. 87. i. e. political visibility is an adjunct in respect of the Church-Catholike 3. That this Church-Catholike is an integral 4. That the particular Churches are similar parts of that integral 5. That these particular Churches consist of visible beleevers which as himself in his answer to Apollonius confesseth are not all Saints in truth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but many of them only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in appearance 6. That some of these visible Churches may be impure not only simply erring but schismatical yea heretical But saving my honourable respect to so worthy a man I cannot see how these things are consistent with his definition of the Church-Catholike for how can the
futurus quem praedixerant prophetae priore adventu Christi inchoatus c. Polani Syntag. l. 7. c. 7. Statuimus Ecclesiam quandam vniversalem externam per totum orbem dispersam nobis in sacris literis describi quae visibili quadam politia unicum Ecclesiasticum Organicum corpus constituit sub quo omnes Ecclesiae particulares Classicales Provinciales Nationales tanquam partes totius continentur Apollon p. 29. Vbicunque quandocunque fuerint homines Apostolicâ fide informati Christianam Electorum rem-publicam constituunt etiam fi dispersi in omnes orbis partes Sic Antoninus Philosophus civem Romanum dixit esse quicunque Romanis legibus viveret Ita quicunque Christiani◠legibus moribusque vivis ubicunque sit nihil interest civis est Christianus ad publicum de regendâ civitate Dei consilium adhibendus ut Ecclesiae Catholicae disciplina Catholica sit Ram de Eccles Against these testimonies M. E. saith pag. 5. that I bring the description of the visible Church out of several Authours none of which except Apollonius and Ramus take it in my sense Ans They all imply a Church Catholike and that to be visible and this Church Catholike visible to be one which is all I brought them for And whereas he seeks to blast Apollonius because he was pre-engaged I answer It is more then I know he is still alive and may answer for himself And against Pet. Ramus he alledgeth a clause out of Beza's ep before Aristotles Organ But I could cite much more in his commendation out of others but I write not to commend men valere quantum valere potest I am sure I have cause to blesse God for him Sometimes saith Bifield Church signifieth a company of men in one city or Province that did outwardly professe the true religion 1 Cor. 11.18 22. And so usually in the writings of Divines the company throughout the world so professing is called the visible Church Bifield on Art 9. Catholike in the most evident sense agreeth to the Church now under the Gospel since the partition wall between Jews and Gentiles was broken down and yet in some sense it may agree to the Church from the beginning Idem For particular Churches either single or combined either National Provincial Classical or Congregational it is not belonging to this question to discusse the Queries about them and therefore I shall only set down some descriptions of them positively as they are usually taken by others and give you my present apprehensions of them A National Church is where all the visible publike What a National Church is religious Assemblies of a Nation being parts of the Church Catholike living under one politick civil government are by the profossion of the same faith and communion in the same worship and government united into one body Ecclesiastick or Ecclesiastical Re-publike Two things as I conceive are required to make a National Church First National agreement in the same faith and worship Secondly National union in one Ecclesiastical body in the same community of Ecclesiastical government The Churches in Foance and the Netherlands have the same faith and worship and kinde of government but they are not in the same National community thereof See Apollonius consid cap. 3. Assert 2. Asserimus Ecclesiam visibilem in sacra Scriptura descriptam non tantum fuisse Parochialem seu particularem sed esse etiam Ecclesiam quandam Nationalem unius gentis aut regni quae constat ex diversis multis Ecclesijs Parochialibus uno regimine Ecclesiastico junctis mutuâ quadam communione societate Ecclesiasticâ visibili inter se devinctis See clear proofs for National Churches under the Gospel Isa 55.5 Thou shalt call a Nation which thou knewest not and Nations which knew not thee shall run unto thee It is spoken of Christ under the Gospel And there is set down both Gods call of a Nation and a Nations answer to that call And these two things are sufficient to make a Church Also Isa 19.24 25. In that day shall Israel be a third with Egypt and with Assyria even a blessing in the midst of the land whom the Lord of hosts shall blesse saying Blessed be Egypt my people and Assyria the work of my hands and Israel mine inheritance It is a prophecy of the times under the Gospel where Aegypt and Assyria are promised to be called in to be Churches as well as Israel and are preferred in order before Israel however it is clear those three Nations are owned and blessed by God as three sister Churches Also Psa 72.11 17. All Kings shall fall down before him all Nations shall serve him All Nations shall call him blessed i. e. Christ Mat. 21.43 The kingdom of God shall be taken from you and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof Rom. 10.19 I will provoke you to jealousie by them that are no people and by a foolish Nation will I anger you i. e. God choosing the Gentile Nations and giving them the priviledges of the Jews it should anger the Jews and provoke them to jealousie Isa 65.1 I said behold me behold me to a nation that was not called by my name The Commission of the Apostles was to go teach and baptize all Nations not Congregations only i. e. some of all Nations if they received the Christian faith and the whole Nations if the whole received it Mic. 4.2 Many Nations shall come and say Let us go up to the mountain of the Lord and he will teach us his waies and we will walk in his paths Isa 52.15 He shall sprinkle many Nations i. e. with his grace Jer. 4.2 The Nations shall blesse themselves in him and in him shall they glory And Rom. 4.17 Abraham is said to be a father of many Nations in a spiritual sense as well as a carnal In thee shall all the Nations of the earth be blessed He is said to be the father of us all Rev. 11.15 The kingdoms of this world are become the kingdoms of our Lord and of his Christ The Ecclesiastical polities in converted kingdoms are said to be commensurable to the civil Rev. 21.24 The Nations of them that are saved shall walk in the light of it i. e. of the new Jerusalem Zac. 2.11 Many Nations shall be joyned unto the Lord in that day and shall be my people Whereby we see the current of the Scripture runs that God not only would convert Congregations out of several Nations but the whole Nations which also he performed and many whole Nations joyned themselves to the Lord and made Christian Kingdoms or Common-wealths though they proceeded not from the loins of one man as the Israelites did which some make the ground of the National Church of the Jews yet we know there were proselytes of all Nations that were members of that Church and had right to all the Ordinances as well as the Israelites and servants that came not out of Abrahams
he speaks as well of in particular Church as of the general And to avoid the dirt of this Fort or Aâ—bâ—â—â—â—â— is he taâ—â— it viz. 1 Cor. 12.28 He brings in two significations of the word Apostle which worth alone saith he is the ground of the Objection And saith if we take the word for such Officers as were sent out with commission from any Church upon special occasion which is the literal signification of the word and is so taken 1 Cor. 8.23 of Barnabas and Phil. 2.25 of Epapbroditum so the Argument hence were voided Answ But there is not the least probability that the Apostle in setting down the Officers of the Church both extraordinary and ordinary should set down occasional messengers first before Prophets and Teachers And in Ephes 4.11 keeping the same Order should preferre them before Prophets Evangelists Pastours and Teachers And leave out in both places the highest office in the Church viz. Apostleship especially considering that the Apostle there doth not set down the Officers â—aptim promiscously but addeth an ordinal numeral with them first Apostles secundarily Prophets But again If it be taken properly in that he applieth his speech particularly though not exclusively to the Corinthians ye are the body of Christ to wit ye are a particular body and members in particular and so Chap. 3.21 22. All are yours whether Paul or Apollos or Cephar or life or death all are yours and ye Corinthians Christs Where all are the whole Churches and each Churches in particular as their occasions require each in their order He might also have said and each particular member So that the sense is saith he he hath given or set in the Church i. e. in this Church of Corinth and so in that of Ephesus c. Some Apostles c. as their need shall require yet not therefore making them one external society among themselves As some general Officers make not England and Scotland one Kingdom Answ M Ellis goes upon a mistake in all his book The Presbyterians say not that the Church-Catholike visible is one external constant actual society but habitual or in actu primo or constantly and actually in actu secundo sive exercite the regiment is exercised in the particular Churches or vicinities yet hath the whole Church or some great parts of it some common interests that may require to be handled in Synods and Councels by their combined or delegated Officers occasionally and those Officers therein act not as private men but as Officers and may exert their indefinite habitual power annexed to their office for the good of the whole or of so great a part of the Church-Catholike as did delegate them And as for the parallelling Apostles and Prophets in this case with life and death it is not equal for God did not set life and death as Officers in the Church but they are general accidents to the whole world over-ruled by God for the good of his people All things work together for the good of them that love him But in that he grants the word Church to extend to Corinthians and Ephesians c. he must grant it to comprehend all the Churches as well as them and that they all are one Church habitually having then some general Officers over them viz. Apostles Prophets Evangelists and Teachers and the same Apostle the same Prophet and the same Teacher if need required in any of them But fearing he could not keep that battery he retreats to a fourth and saith that though by Church were meant the Church-Catholike visible yet it follows not that because it was so then and in respect of the Apostles that therefore it was to be so to the end of the world and in it self pag. 37. Answ it is true it was not Christs minde that the extraordinary office of Apostleship should continue there were to be no more such men of extraordinary gifts and divine immediate mission of an infallible spirit that had actual regiment over the Churches of the whole world without any delegation from others but by immediate commission from Christ But how comes that which was an integrum in the Apostles daies to be now sublimated into it genus and lose the integrality and so prove a second notion existing only in intellectu nostro Did it cease to be one body as soon as the Apostles were all dead seeing the same doctrine worship laws discipline enrowlment by baptism confirmation and communion in the Lords Supper continued still and the liberty of all the members of the whole Church to communicate in these in any place of the world where they become though but occasionally continue still And by the same reason the habitual power in actu primo which the Officers have to dispense the Ordinances of God may be drawn forth in any part of the Church in actum secundum upon an occasion and call according to their measure which the Apostles had habitually and actually every where both in actu primo secundo extraordinarily Yea but saith he the Churches were not one in themselves but one in the Apostles and that by accident as England and Scotland were one in the King because he governed both Israel and Judah in David the whole world one in Nebuchadnezzar But they are not therefore one considered in themselves Vind. p. 37. Answ I grant the Church was but accidentally and temporarily one in regard of the Apostles but integrally one in it self It was not one because that they were set over it but it was one in it self integrally because Christ is set over it and therefore they by commission from Christ were set over it extraordinarily for the present good and necessity thereof An Empire being made one under one Emperour hath imperial laws and constitutions which being divided under divers governours it loseth again and ceaseth to be an Empire but the Church hath the same laws under the same head that it had then and ever shall have The world was one Empire under Darius by imperial laws not because the three Presidents were set over it neither did it cease to be so by their death or ceasing So c. But fifthly saith he though we grant that while the Apostles were living there was one body of Officers over the whole Church and so in respect of them the Church might be said to be one governed body yet it was never one governing body for whilest the Apostles lived the universal governing power was committed to the Apostles only and not with them to any other Officers or Churches no not to all the Churches together but they with their Officers were all in subjection to them Answ I acknowledge the Church-Catholike was never one governing body although M. Ellis is pleased to set down that expression in capital letters in the frontispiece of his book and upon the top of every page and in divers other places as the opinion of the Presbyterians But where doth he finde any such expression in
execution there if guilty So all Church-administrations are by the same laws and upon the same command and persons of any Church in the world may hear sing pray and communicate any where indefinitely upon occasion though constantly the particular members only enjoy those particular administrations from those particular Officers I answer further that the Church-Catholike may act visibly by their delegates as a Kingdom in a Parliament in a general Councel if they can convene though their power were wholly consultatory and suasory as some pleade but it is more All their debates arguings pro con all their advice and decrees are visible therefore the whole whose delegates they are is visible also The invisible Church as invisible send none 8. If it be our duty to joyn our selves visibly to the Church-Catholike then it is visible But we ought to joyn our selves to the Church-Catholike Therefore c. The Assumption none will deny As soon as the 3000. were converted by Peter they were added to the Church Christians may not stand alone independently Now that must be a visible Church that we must joyn unto for the invisible is within the visible and cannot be known God commands no impossibilities It is true indeed we must joyn to some particular Congregation as a forreigner coming over into England to inhabit being naturalized must dwell in some particular Town but to that Congregation as a member of the whole wherein we may enjoy the general priviledges of subjects of Christ first and the particular priviledges of that Congregation secondarily There is no particular command to joyn to this or that particular Congregation but the whole necessity compelleth to choose one Our particular joyning to this or that Congregation is not in obedience to the command for then had we joyned to another we had broken a command therefore that is arbitrary and limited by civil habitation necessarily 9. If the accidents of the whole Church be visible then so is the whole Church But there be visible accidents of the whole Church Therefore c. An invisible subject hath not visible accidents But so hath the whole Church as beauty strength order amplitude which may encrease or decrease and these are accidents of the whole arising and resulting from all the parts conjoyned and made up of the beauty strength order and amplitude of all the parts Also there may be general visible opposition against the whole Church not because in particular confederation but the general These persecutors are visible their actions are visibly managed by attachments prisons fire and faggot their effects visible fines imprisonments confiscation banishment and death and therefore the object hereof the whole Church must needs be visible also And all this meerly because they belong to Christ and have given up their names to him And because they will not visibly run to the same excesse of riot or worship the same Idols that they do 10. If the parts of the whole Church be visible so is the whole But the parts of the whole Church are visible Therefore c. By parts I mean not the particular persons only but particular Congregations Now none deny the particular Churches to be visible neither our brethren for Congregational Churches nor yet the separation And Gerard though he will not grant the Church Catholike to be visible yet saith Ecclesias particulares visibiles esse concedimus The consequence will necessarily follow for the visibility of the whole results out of the visibility of the parts An innumerable number of visible parts cannot make an invisible whole Against this M. Ellis vind 59. alledgeth that it is too lax a medium in so weighty a subject as this is Sect. 4. There is saith he great difference between natural and metaphysical or civil and politick bodies For in a natural body all whose parts and members are actually and naturally joyned together the whole is visible because the parts are visible but in a metaphysical body or totum or whole that is in Generals that are by the reason of man drawn from particulars the case is far otherwise Peter James and John are visible but manhood which is the universal agreeing to them all is not visible This being the same with my first Objection I set down in my Thesis one answer shall serve for both Answ M. Ellis knows I took not the Church-Catholike for a Genus but an Integral But let it be supposed a Genus for argument sake or as M. Hooker cals it Totum genericum existens which is something fairer then M. Ellis's grant for by M. Ellis's reasoning the Church-Catholike should be a Genus drawn by the reason of man and so existing only in intellectu nostro I say suppose the Church-Catholike to be a Genus and the particular Churches Species yet this is not sufficient to make the Church-Catholike to be invisible Will any man say that Animal est substantia invisibilis because it existeth only in homine bruto Indeed animality in the abstract is invisible but not animal in concreto so Ecclesietas as I may say is invisible but Ecclesia is visible Visibility is an accident belonging primarily to a higher Genus then animal viz. Corpus celoratum and though every Individual animal is visible as John and James yet not quà John or James but as coloured bodies and if a higher Genus be visible which is nearer Ens and further from Individuals then much more animal So in this case the Church-Catholike is a society of men and that M. Ellis denyeth not now every society of men is visible and therefore the Church which is a species of society must needs be so also for the visibility doth not betide it because it is a particular Congregation but because it is a society of men which is a higher Genus I mean this in a logical consideration Then he proceeds to deny a civil body or Corporation if great as an Empire Kingdom or large city to be seen in it self but in the parts Answ Here he confounds visibile and visum uno intuitu and by this reasoning he should deny the visibility of the world or any particular man for all his parts cannot be seen uno intuitu Attamen insaniat qui neget se videre hominem saith Cameron Yea the sun it self should not be visible by this reasoning because we can see but the surface of it He could not be ignorant that I did not mean that the Church-Catholike was actually seen uno intuitu And whereas I had said the whole is visible because the parts are so He saith it is untrue even in the smallest bodies but where the parts are actually united together not where they are thousands of miles asunder Answ It is true indeed in natural and artificial bodies whose being or integrality consisteth in a corporeal continuity or contiguity of parts for if that continuity or contiguity ceaseth the integral also ceaseth except in potentiâ But in political bodies joyned
suasive that is no more then a few private men may do yea one man or woman may counsel advise and perswade By M. Ellis's opinion Councels and Synods being void of all authority are but as a company of private Christians met together to advise one with another how to act in their own Congregations where only saith he they are in office it may be an act of those that are in office but not as Officers so that in that act they are to be considered as private members who by such consultation take or give private advice how to act as officers where they are Officers Which is no otherwise then if in these times of trouble and danger a company of peti-constables should meet occasionally or by appointment together at a market-town and there consult together how to act most commodiously and uniformly in their several Parishes in the pressing of Souldiers or gathering Assessements or a company of Mayors of several Corparations should meet by appointment at London and there advise together how to order their several Corporations So that a Synod whether Provincial National or Oecumenical can have no power to summon any heretick or scandalous person and if any such should voluntarily come before them or be brought before them by the civil Magistrate that should before their faces blaspheme the whole Trinity or be convicted of Sodomy yea though any of their own members should curse God himself or be convicted of a present act of whoredom or of sorcery they have no power to censure him Ecclesiastically but fraternally admonish him and send him back to his own Congregation to be censured and they themselves only go thither as witnesses against him because they are there by this opinion out of office and all censures belong to the particular Elderships as particular But suppose now this heretick or scandalous person being departed haply from the Congregation where formerly he lived or that Congregation being dissolved be a fixed member of no Congregation as ten thousands of visible Christians i. e. that have received the doctrine of Christ and are under the seal of Baptism may be if particular Churches consist only of such as can give evidence of the work of true grace in themselves shall he remain an entitive member of Christs visible kingdom a gangreened limb a rebel and traitour under the name and notion of a subject and infect the rest of the body and there be no remedy Sect. 4. But as the subject matters that Synods have to deal with are of three sorts so their power and the acts of it which they put forth are of three 〈◊〉 likewise First they are to act in reference to matters of faith i. e. doctrines to be beleeved and embraced and of divine worship i. e. duties of worship to be performed unto God not to coin or frame or adde any new articles of faith or new acts of worship or alter any that God hath instituted but to explain prove and apply those Articles of faith and rules of worship laid down in the word and to confute and declare against the contrary errours heresies and corruptions and the power they exert herein is called dogmatical Secondly they are to act in reference to external order and polity in matters prudential and circumstantial which are determinable by the true light of nature right reason and general rules in the Scripture ◠to set things in order that all things may be done uniformly decently and in order and the power they exert herein is called diatactical Thirdly they are to act in reference to errour heresie schism obstinacy contempt and scandal and to represse them and to censure such persons as are guilty of any of them and are referred over to them and the power they exert herein is called critical This is none other power then the particular Elderships in their several Congregations or Classes may exert in their sphear and precincts with submission to the superiour assemblies and all must be according to the word of God As in the natural body God hath set several senses to act upon the several sensible objects visible audible tactile c. and several faculties in reference to truth and falshood good and evil to discern and embrace the one and avoid the other so in the body Ecclesiastical hath he set several powers in the organs thereof to act diversly according to the occurrent objects and incidents in the Church both in the particular Congregations for the good of them and in greater parts of the body for the good of them and in the whole if convenible for the good of that but because remote parts cannot meet personally and generally in all their Officers therefore that trouble and confusion is avoided by delegation of particular elected choice officers and is but occasionally and pro tempore A ground and pattern of a Synod is laid down Act. 15. and 16. which is acknowledged to be a Synod and warrant for a Synod by reverend M. Cotton in his keys of the kingdom of heaven cha 6. And is called an Oecumenical Councel by Chamier in Panstrat Tom. 2. lib. 10. cap. 8. sect 2. and Whitak cont qu. 6. And generally by our Protestant Divines And is abundantly proved and explained by the London Ministers in their Jus Divinum par 2. chap 14. and 15. to which I referre the reader for satisfaction The occasion of that Synod was an errour broached at Antioch and neighbour-Churches to enforce the observation of the ceremonial Law by all Christians and this was promoted by lying as if they were sent by the Apostles and Elders at Ierusalem to preach this doctrine Hereby the Churches were much troubled and in danger to be subverted in their souls This could not be suppressed by the disputes of Barnabas and Paul hereupon the Elders of Antioch decreed and ordained 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that Paul and Barnabas and some others should go up to the Apostles and Elders at Ierusalem about this question and they submitted to this order there was an authoritative mission and probably members were also sent from Syria and Cilicia for they were involved in the same danger by the same persons Act. 15.23 24 41. But if there were delegates but from two Churches it will justifie delegates from ten or twenty And as the Church of Antioch did not send Paul and Barnabas as extraordinary and infallible and authentical Oracles of God as M. Cotton noteth for then what need the advice and help of Elders that were below them being but ordinary and particular Officers of Ierusalem But as wise and holy guides of the Church who might not only relieve them by some wise counsel and holy order but also set a precedent to succeeding ages how errours and dissentions in Churches might be removed and healed And with Paul and Barnabas they joyned others messengers in the same commission So when this Synod was met the Apostles acted not by their Apostolical infallible transcendent
us and ever will And it is observable that this thing was not learned by Moses in the pattern shewed him in the Mount but was taught by the light of nature to Iethro and by him was given in advice to Moses Exo. 18.22 and afterward was approved by God as being according to right reason and a thing common to all societies as societies not Ecclesiastical only and not a positive law only but dictated by the light of nature right reason and necessity and therefore is practised in all ages nations armies and societies though not in every particular circumstance And therefore except it were forbidden or some other way instituted to avoid those difficulties and dangers that will arise it ought to be in use also in the Church under the Gospel as well as summoning convening in fitting times and places and a moderatour or chair-man and silence obedience and respect and due order in proceedings according to allegation and probation which are things common to all Judicatories as Judicatories And surely God would not have Christians under the Gospel under a more grievous yoke and irremediable inconveniences then the Jewish Church that if any of them be oppressed by the ignorance or ill will of their Elders they should have no relief Sect. 6. Obj. If their be appeals from one Presbytery to another that is higher then must there be two kindes of Presbyteries and two kindes of Presbyters but the Scripture speaks but of one and giveth no rules for any Presbyteries but one Indeed in Universities the same men may be heads of the Colleges respectively and heads of the Universitie also but there are differing and distinguishing names relations and Statutes but it is not so for Elders of particular Congregations to be Elders of Classes and Synods c. Answ The Church is but one visible political Kingdom of Christ made up by the collection and aggregation of all visible beleevers who are called into an unity of Covenant and laws and way and all the Ministers and Officers of the Church are given to the whole primarily for the gathering and edifying of it and they are all to teach and rule and perform all their administrations respectively with reference to and the best advantage of the whole And they did serve the whole as one actually when they were convenible but their number encreasing they divided into several companies for their better ordering edification and encrease and therefore the instance is not parallel for the office of the Ministers is first to the whole and the Charter and Statutes of the whole and of every particular Church are but one and therefore the Ministers though they ordinarily act in their particular Congregations as it were in their particular Colleges being called by them to take the immediate constant particular inspection of them yet can they exercise their general office when and wheresoever they have a call thereunto Now this call is not that which giveth them their office but is proximum fundamentum exercitij only Neither is the particular Congregation the adequate correlate to an Elder for it doth not mutu◠ponere tollere but the Church-Catholike only But of this see more in the 2d question S. 4. But against this M. Ellis vind 40. brings an Objection which he ushers in with a Let it be observed by all sorts By this means saith he the power being given not to any one Church but to the whole Church as one body and not to the members with the Officers but to the Officers only there is derived a very transcendent power and authority upon every particular Minister more then any Parliament man hath yea more then a King who is limited to his dominion But I answer that the Presbyterians acknowledge that power of government is given immediatly to every Congregational Eldership or at least to such a College of Elders as may frequently and constantly meet and rule in common as they did at Jerusalem and it is not derived unto them by any superiour authority on earth by way of descention except by a Ministerial investment by Ordination And this power is to be constantly exerted for the actual Ecclesiastical regiment of that Congregation or those Congregations over whom those Elders are set in the Lord yet with reference to the rest of the body whereof they are but a parcel and they may stand in need of the help of more Elders then their own upon occasion It is true government is not given to the members with the Officers but to the Officers only not to the body of the Congregation as the subject of it either in whole or in part as they are private members distinct from the Officers much lesse are they the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or first receptacle thereof And for the inference hence of such a transcendent power and authority upon every particular Minister more then a Parliament man or a King I suppose M. Ellis is not ignorant that the office of every particular Minister in his Congregation giveth him authority to do more in administring Gods Ordinances as authoritative preaching and administring the seals of the Covenant and the Officers in administring spiritual censures then a Parliament man or a King can do Remember Vzziahs example And yet in all civil affairs they are as dutiful subjects as any else and as much subject to civil authority Because the Priests and Levites were in the matters of God set over all Israel will it therefore follow that the meanest Levite was greater then the Nobles Princes and Kings of Israel Indeed the meanest Priest might offer sacrifice which the King could not do but this was no disparagement to the Nobles or to the King No more it is to them that the meanest Physician may administer physick virtute officij and the meanest Pilot guide the Ship which the greatest Princes may not doe The office and power and honour that belong thereto is of another kinde then Parliaments and Kings it is not civil but spiritual You know Gods Ministers have power to baptize Parliament men Nobles and Kings and their children and to give them the Lords Supper and to teach admonish reprove and from God to threaten and denounce judgements against them even eternal destruction if they go on in sinful courses They do doctrinally binde and loose Princes and their whole Kingdoms and the whole world as occasion serveth And can any man say that the greatest men are by their greatnesse free from Church-censures if they be notoriously vile and yet none can impose them but Ecclesiastical Officers Suppose divers Parliament men or Noble men yea a King himself were members of a Congregational Independent Church would not the Officers of that Congregation account it their duty to administer all Gods Ordinances to them as occasion requires yea the Ordinances of discipline and censures if there be just cause Sir would you now be willing to have a retortion of your own kinde with a Let it be
both Priests and Levites were to be Teachers and Judges and Israel and they had 48. Cities with their suburbs given unto them but they might not at their pleasure exercise this power and dwell where they listed and minister in what they pleased or offer sacrifice promiscuously when they listed or be Teachers and Judges where and when they listed but according to appointment and assignation and according to their courses and as they had a call to exert their power So it is with the Ministers of the Gospel They are vested with an office to dispense Gods Ordinances of worship and discipline but they may not execute this office but as they have an especial call thereunto no more then require maintenance which also belongs to their office except from those that call them to exercise their office among them There are houses and gleabs and maintenance allotted by the law of the land for the Ministry but every Minister may not carve for himself where and what he pleaseth The particular exerting of the office and reception of maintenance in and from particular Congregations is not quà Minister indefinitely and habitually but quà Romanus Alexandrinus Londinensis Gippovicensâ—s The whole Church in reference to Christ the King thereof is indeed an actual politie but in reference to the ordinary Officers whose office though habitually it be indefinite yet is actually drawn forth into exercise by a particular or special call and evocation it may be stiled an habitual polity Sect. 4. Now let us see how M. Ellis's Prejudices Probabilities and Demonstrations will lie against this habitual integrality of the Church-Catholike visible and against the habitual indefinitenesse of the Ministers office First he objecteth the novelty of this opinion And indeed well he may as he hath stated it for he was the first that hatched it in his own brains But that the Church is one habitually and that the particular Churches bear the relation of members to the whole and of fellow members one to another and that Ministers are Ministers beyond the limits of their particular Congregations and can upon occasion administer the Ordinances of God to more persons then those of their own Congregation authoritatively upon which hinge hangeth the whole question this is no novel opinion For the first execution of the Evangelical Ministerial office in teaching and baptizing by John Baptist and by the Apostles before they had their general commission and the preaching of the 70. was without any respect to any particular Congregations for there were none set up And when they were set up the Apostles send faithful teachers to the several Churches whom they commended also to them exhorting them to receive respect and obey them as Timothy and Apollos 1 Cor. 16.10 11 12. Phil. 2.19 23. And the many places whether Timothy and Titus travelled and where they preached and exercised their office is abundantly set down in the Scriptures and gathered out by Sâ—â—â—ct ymnuus and M. Prinâ—e in his unbishoping of Timothy and Titus The Apostle also sent Tychicus a faithful Minister to the Ephesians Eph 6.21 and under the same notion of a faithful Minister he sends him also to the Colossians Col. 7.8 as is further noted in the second question And lest this should be said to he done as he was an Evangelist though we finde him not expresly called an Evangelist yet it is clear that there were many that preached the Gospel in the Apostles daies in more places then one authoritatively The brethren that John writes of in his 3d Epist ment forth and were helpers to the truth taking nothing of the Gentileâ— were Ministers which might have taken maintenance but did not that they might spread the Gospel It appears also even by the false Teachers that crept into Galatia and Corinth in Pauls absence and those that went from Jerusalem to Antinch and bred the broil there and those that preached the Gospel of envy and strife Phil. 2. â—5 who certainly were no Evangelists neither do I allow of their false doctrine yet it proveth that it was ordinary for Ministers to preach to more Congregations then one And it is very probable that those dispersed which went up and down preaching Act. 8.4 were officers as one hath lately shewed for what should the Apostles doe at Jerusalem if there were no private Christians there and it is likely that the heat of the persecution fell most upon the officers and therefore they were generally scattered abroad except the Apostles And in the after ages of the Church there was nothing more frequent then for Ministers to act out of their own Congregations We finde indeed provision made by Canons for the ordering of Ministers in the exercise of their function in other places then their own but no prohibition to exclude them from it As first that they must have leave to do what they did which was a wise provision against such as creep into other Churches without a call It was provided in Conc. Nic. Can. 17. Caranza That no Bishop should ordain any that belong to another Bishop Cum non habeat consensum Episcopi ipsius a quo recessit clericus And Conc. Constinop Can. 2. secundum Zonaram 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Non vocati Episcopi ultra Diocesim ne transeant ad ordinationem vel aliquam aliam administrationem Ecclesiasticam There is not taken away from them power of exercising of any of those things in other Dioceses when they were called by others to help therein Nullus Episcopus ex alia provincia audeat ad aliam transgredi ad promotionem ministerij aliquos in Ecclesijs ordinare nisi literis regatus adveniat Conc. Antioch Can. 13. Caranz Nisi fortè cum consilio voluntatâ— regionis Episcopi Can. 22. Yea the Councel of Sardice provideth that if a Bishop in a Province where there have been more Bishops did neglect to ordain more Bishops then might the Bishops of the neighbouring Province being desired by the people of that Province come ex vicinâ provincia ordinent Episcopum Conc. Saâ—d Can. 2. secund Isidor sed Can. â— secund Caranz Secondly No Bishop ought to sollicite an Ecclesiastical Officer of another Diocese into his own and ordain him there Conc. Sardic Can. â—8 Caraâ—â—12 2 Thirdly When Presbyters travelled abroad they could not be admitted to officiate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Absque literis commendatitijs proprij Episcopi nusquam ullo modo ministrare Conc. Chalced. Can. 13. secundum Zonaâ—â—â— 1â— sec Caranz Then if they came commended by their bishop they might perform any Ecclesiastical duty Vide Concilij septimi canon â—0 apud Zonaram Fourthly They were not permitted to stay too long abroad Non multo tempore in alicua civitâ—te residere Definire ergo tempus quâ—a non recipi Episcopum inhumanum est si diutùs resideat perâ—ciosum est Conc. Sard. Can. 14. Car. Per multa tempora nititur immorâ—â—ri Con. Antioch Can. 3. Fifthly
When they were abroad if they were recalled they were to return to their own charge Conc. Antioch Can 3. Many other provisions were made directing how Ministers were to carry themselves when they were abroad but none of those provisions of them off from officiating abroad only they regulate them in their carriage to prevent disorders Many examples antiquity affords us of the dispensing of Ordinances of worship ordination and discipline beyond the limits of the Ministers 〈◊〉 particular charge 〈◊〉 of Alexandria was famous this way Tantum studij in Scripturâ— propaganda posuisse serunt ut praeconem Evangelij Gentibus Orianâ—â—libus Indis sese conferret 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is said also that there were many Evangelists and faithful messengers prepared to promote and plant the heavenly word after the guiâ—e of the Apostles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Euseb lib. 5. cap. 9 10. Auiciâ—us Bishop of Rome granted leave to Polycarpus Bishop of 〈◊〉 for the reâ—erence that he owed him to administer the Lorde Supper in his Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Euseb lib. 5. cap. 24. So Nicephorus relates â— 4. cap. 39. And the Centurists Century 2. cap. 10. Anicetus Pius Hyginus Telesphorus and Xystus Bishops of Rome gave the Eucharist to the Bishops of other Churches that resorted to them though differing from them about Easter Euseb ibid. Athanasius consecrated Frumentius Bishop at Alexandria and sent him into India and there he converted many to the faith and builded many Churches Socrates lib. 1. cap. 15. Athanasius travelling from Jerusalem by Peleusium the ready way to Alexandria preached in every city where he came and exhorted them to eschew the Arians and in divers of the Churches he ordained Ministers though it were in other Bishops Provinces 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Socr. lib. 2. cap. 19. 24. Basil Bishop of Caesarea in Cappadocia fearing that the Doctrine of Arius would creep into the Provinces of Pontus went into those parts and instructed men in his doctrine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and confirmed the wavering Socrat. l. 4. c. 21 25. Gregory Bishop of Nazianzum did the like in many cities and often went to Constantinople for that end Ibid. Paulus Bishop of Emisa came to Alexandria in the daies of Cyril Bishop there and there he preached a famous Sermon And Cyril writes of him in an Epistle to John Bishop of Antioch that he laboured there in preaching beyond his strength that he might overcome the envy of the devil and joyn together in love the scattered members 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Evagr. lib. 1. cap. 6. Epiphanius Bish of Cyprus came to Constantinople where John Chrysostome was Bishop and in a Church not far from the wals of the City he celebrated the communion and made a Deacon without the leave of Chrysostome And though Chrysostome reproves him for it yet only for the breach of an Ecclesiastical canon Multa contra canones agis Epiphani primùm quod ministros Ecclesia ordinas in Ecclesijs quae sunt in meâ Diocesi Soc. l. 1. c. 13. Moses a Saracâ—â— by birth an eminent man being much desired by Mavia the Queen of the Saracens to be their Bishop was sent to Alexandria to be ordained and though he refused to be ordained by Lucius the Arian Bishop yet certain exiled Bishops ordained him in a mountain Socrat. l. 4. c. 29. Theodorit l. 4. c. 21. Origen being sent for by the Churches of Achaia as he was upon his journey to Athens he went through Palestina and was ordained to be a Presbyter by Alexander Bishop of Jerusalem and Theoctistus Bishop of Caesarea though he was a man of Alexandria and went to officiate in Achaia Histor Magd. Câ—n. 3. c. 10. cited also by M. Pat. Symson History of the Church pag. 268. Yea the dividing of Dioceses and the same we may say of Parishes which are the bounds of particular Congregations was but an humane prudential act And therefore in the Councel of Nice they pleaded no higher ground for it but Mos antiquus obtinuit c. And in the Councel of Constantinople consisting of 250. Bishops it was forbidden by canon that Bishops should leave their own Diocese and intermeddle with forreign Churches for until that time by reason of the great heat and storm of persecution it was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 indifferently used Socrat. lib. 5. cap. 8. And what frequent use the Church anciently made of Syâ—â—â—â— and Councel and how authoritatively they acted M. Ellis cannot be ignorant whole Volumes might be written of this subject And thereâ—â—re Reverend M. Cotton in Keys chap. 6. handling the Question Whether a Synod hath power of Ordination and excommunication though his judgement seemeth to inclinâ— to the negative yet saith we will not take upon us hastily to censure the many notable precedents of ancient and latest Synods whâ— have put forth acts of power in both these 〈◊〉 Thâ— refoâ—â—â— of all arguments this of novelty might well 〈…〉 may most justly be retorted upon the contrary 〈◊〉 〈…〉 answers M. Ellis giveth against the antiquity of Synoâ—◠〈…〉 â—â—ndling of things of common concernment doth not conclude them one Corporation no more then the common Treaties of Nations in things of joint concernment vind p. 10. But this common concernment arose from the unity of the head body charter and Laws and the mutual relation of members and therefore that parallel holdeth not 2. Saith he this it is certain was at some distance of time after the discipline of the Churches were corrupt and declined to worldly policy vind p. 11. Ans Surely this is not so of all For the first convention Act. 1. about the installing of a new Apostle and that before the Church was divided into particular Churches and for a thing that concerned the whole Church a meeting which our Divines usually account a Synod yea a general Councel though not in all formalities where there was a joint exercise of the key of order this I say was before the corruption of discipline or declining to worldly policy And that Synod Act. 15. where decrees were made and imposed on the Churches and that by Elders of divers Churches as well as Apostles and concerning things indifferent in their own nature some of them though necessary in regard of that present time that Synod was not lyable to this exception Nor those two Synods in Asia where John the Apostle sate President mentioned by M. Patrick Symson in his first Century of Councels pag. 482. out of Euseb lib. 3. cap. 20. mentioned also by the Magdeburg Centurists 3. It might be saith he by decree and judgement only not by actual execution Or 4. Each Church might act its own power though in union with others as so many several and distinct Churches united and Elders congregated and so they might excommunicate from their own heap or Congregation only Ans The history of the Councels doth abundantly confute this for they acted as one body jointly for all the Churches they
the Deacons office may cease at the dissolution of the Church that chose them because the subject of their office viz. contributions cease with the contributers and so it may be said of the ruling Elders also because the particular object of their office ceaseth and yet both of them while they are in their offices may extend the execution of their offices beyond the particular Church that chose them to a greater part of the Church and possibly to the whole 4. There is a great difference between the Minister of the word and the ruling-Elder the first hath two keys viz. of doctrine and discipline the other hath but one viz. of discipline The superiour order is conceived to comprehend the power of the inferiour and so the Apostles had all the power of the inferiour even of Deacons the like may be said of the rest 5. The key of discipline cannot be exercised but in a combination and therefore must cease when that ceaseth which must be at the dissolution of the particular Church whether Congregational or Presbyterial which chose them but the key of doctrine with which the Minister of the word is invested may be exercised by a single person out of combination and therefore that ceaseth not at such dissolution Indeed the exercise of his key of discipline is suspended by such dissolution yet is reserved in him habitually in actu primo because it is annexed to if not comprehended under his key of doctrine And if there can be any use made of that position of dispensing Ordinances to other Churches mediantibus candelabris it is more proper to this key then the other because his particular relation to the particular Church lets him into the particular combination and so into a greater upon occasion of a call 6. And for ought I know this might be the reason why the Apostle changed the manner of speech from the concrete to the abstract 1 Cor. 12.28 from teachers to helps governments to intimate that they that have those offices cease to be Officers when they cease to be helps or to be emploied in government but the others are affixed indelebly unto their persons and may be exercised more at large in the Church and out of it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and singly without actual combination Suppose a part of a County wherein a Justice of peace formerly dwelt and executed his office should sink yet if he be preserved he remaineth still in his office and may execute it in any other place in the County where he shall dwell because his office stood in reference to the whole County though he exercised it actually but in one place So is the Ministers office as a Minister of the Gospel general though they take but particular divisions and parcels of the Church to feed and watch over actually and particularly and do not ordinarily stretch themselves within anothers particular line and limits without a call by permittance or entreaty or combination And that a Minister is a Minister of the Church Catholike visible appears thus He that can ministerially admit or eject a member into or out of the Church-Catholike visible is a Minister and Officer of the Church-Catholike visible But every Minister by Baptism or Excommunication admitteth or ejecteth members into or out of the Church-Catholike visible Therefore c. This Argument I finde more fully laid down by Apollonius Pastor ut Pastor exercet multos actus ministeriales non tantum erga Ecclesiam suam particularem cui ordinario ministerio est affixus sed erga Ecclesias alias particulares Provinciales Nationales imò erga Ecclesiam universalem Nam per Baptismum membra in Ecclesiam universalem admittir per excommunicationem membra non tantum ex sua particulari sed etiam Provinciali Nationali Vniversali Ecclesia eijcit Matth. 18.18 19. Ex â—ffiâ—â—â—o pastorali preces Deo offert pro omnibus alijs Ecclesijs labo antibus verbum Dei in alia Ecclesia particulari praedicare potest non tantum virtute ratione donorum sed cum pastorali authoritate ita ut verbo suo liget solvat peccatores vomittat retineat peccata ut legatus mâ—ssus a Deo obsecreâ— homines ut reconcilientur Deo Of excommunication I spake before proving that it ejecteth a man from communion with the whole Church-Catholike visible This M Ellis saith is not formally but virtually done But I answer then it will follow that by Baptism they are not formally admitted into the Church-Catholike but virtually But into what Church were they baptized that were baptized by John Baptist and the Apostles before particular Congregations were constituted And now they are constituted it cannot be said they are formally baptized into them for haply the person baptized in a particular Congregation will never be a member thereof but of some other Our brethren hold that it is entring into their particular Covenant that makes them actually members of their Congregation and that the children of their own Church-members are by baptism but incompleat members of that Congregation Our brethren will not say I suppose that those persons that go from hence to them being already baptized are heathens and without though they have lost their particular membership Surely they account them subjects of Christ and under his seal why else doe they admit any of them members of their Congregations into which they may admit only Christs Subjects and set no new seal of Baptism upon them And as Baptism admitteth primally formally and antecedenter into the Church-Catholike and secondarily and consequenter into that particular Congregation so the same order is in ejection by excommunication If a finger were added to a mans hand the primary consideration is that there is a limb given to that man such a man we say hath recovered his sight or hearing though it be seated in the eye or ear And if a hand could be conceived to cut nip or sear off a gangreened finger it would not be conceived as an act of the hand only but as an act of the man and the man would be said to loose a limb primarily and the secondary consideration is that the particular hand hath lost a finger When D. Cranmer burnt off his right hand it was not the act of the arm only but of the whole man primarily And if this be so of members that are fixed and have their particular place and office in the body and cannot be removed and set any where else then much more of the members of the Church which were members of the Church-Entitive before they received their particular membership in any Congregation and may be removed from one Congregation to another as oft as occasion or conveniency serveth But because excommunication is an act of many 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Cor. 2.6 I will therefore insist more particularly upon Baptism which is an act of a single Pastor or Minister though passed with the knowledge and consent of
or ought to be a member of the particular Church wherein and among whom he dwelleth 10. The being in the general Covenant gives right to the Ordinances and not any particular Covenant neither do we finde any mention in Scripture of any particular Covenant either urged or used at admission of members into a particular Congregation or at the constitution thereof 11. The invisible members of the Church which have internal communion with Christ are also visible members and have external communion in external Ordinances 12. The departure of a member from a particular Congregation and removal to another for convenience or by necessity is no sin but departing from the Church-Catholike and ceasing to be a member thereof is a sin Sect. 8. I know it is not usual to make uses and applications to Theses of this nature and should I enter thereinto I might drown my self in sorrow to bewail the rents not in Christs seamlesse coat but in his body the Church which Christ preferred in some regards before his natural body for he assumed his natural body for their sakes and was willing to be crucified for their sakes The divisions of the Church are of three sorts in judgement in affection and in way or practice For judgement First come the Romists and they rend away the second commandment then come the Antisabbatarians and they rend away the fourth though placed in the heart of the Decalogue and so extraordinarily fenced by God and a memento set before it and so many arguments after it then come the Antinomians and they pluck away the whole Law from us denying it both punitive coactive and directive power and so render it wholly dead and uselesse to Christians then come the Socinians and they quench the Deity of Christ and the holy Ghost and deny our redemption by the bloud of Christ and so consequently would deprive us of the benefit of the New Testament then come the Anabaptists and they deny and deride our Baptism and render us and our children no better then heathens then come the Separatists and they would pluck up our Church by the roots and call us Rome Aegypt Sodom Babylon and so consequently call their mother whore for if they have had any conversion they had it in the bosome of our Church Of whom that is too true which the Psalmist saith Psa 50.20 Thou sittest and speakest against thy brother and hast slandered thine own mothers son Then come the Antiscripturists and they cashier both Old and New Testament And then come the Ante-Trinitarians and they blaspheme rhe whole Trinity And then come the Familists and they leave the sure rule of the word and trust to Satanical delusions and revelations Yea there be others of our honoured and beloved brethren whom I forbear to name among the former who though they acknowledge us true Churches yet deny us to be one Church and would have us rent into a thousand pieces and parcels and these to stand as so many entire compleat bodies without any coordination as so meny Spouses of Christ as so many Queens appointing their own orders and Officers with liberty to censure both Officers and members within themselves by the votes of the whole body and not to be except arbitrarily Not endeavouring with us to reform our Churches but to gather Churches out of our Churches by gathering our best members out of our Churches and uniting them into several bodies by a particular Covenant though distant far in habitation But if the cream of our Congregations be fleeted off our wheat transplanted by it self into other mens folds who sowed it not our fattest sheep gathered into mens folds it will be very sad for Gods Ministers to have none but the tares and goats and lees and dregs of men left them to look after Others would wrest the keys of the Church out of the hands of the Church-Officers and hang them at the girdle of the civil Magistrate but seeing God made civil and Ecclesiastical Officers differing in kinde the one entrusted with a civil Magistracy the other with an Ecclesiastical Ministry as it is an usurpation for the Church-Officers as such to claim the power of the Magistrate so I fear it will prove but sacriledge for the civil Magistrate as such to claim the power of the Ministry If 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was so great a fault I fear 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 will be as great Others there are who plead for liberty of judgement conscience and practice that every one may hold and hold forth what opinions he please and be of what religion and sect he pleaserh because judgement and conscience cannot be forced but must be left to God only as they say and thereby they would make England another Amsterdam of all sects and religions and some flown so high already as to name that City for an example and pattern of the model they would have in England but I must clear our brethren in New-England from this and commend them for banishing the Familists c. from amongst them who would otherwise have utterly overthrown the peace and truth in their Churches Yea generally men cover new opinions and account it their glory to differ from others in judgement and he is no body that hath none but old truths and so men under the colour of new light and new truths rake up a multitude of old errors Secondly Our divisions are in heart and affections for difference in judgement causeth alienation of affections and great thoughts of heart so that if there prove once a clashing and crossing in opinions though they were never so neer allied or well acquainted and familiar yet then they grow strange and fall out and oppose and censure each other deeply then they are superstitious or Antichristian or enemies to Christs kingly office and hence come so many invectives in Pulpit and Presse Thirdly Our divisions and differences are in way for as mens judgements differ so do their waies Some are for one way of worship some for another some for one way of discipline some another some for one way of constituting Churches some another some are for gathering of new Churches out of old and yet let the oâ—d ones stand as mock-Churches when they have gleaned all that are good out of them they would take all the golden and silver vessels vessels of honour and leave none but of wood and stone vessels of dishonour And some are for separation wholly and so turn all the rest over to Antechrist yea some so violent as that they would pluck down our very meeting-houses tropically called Churches which they deride by the name of Steeple-houses And all are in waies of contention so that we are like Sampsons foxes tyed together by the tayls with firebrands between them to burn up the standing corn I shall conclude with an earnest desire of and exhortation to unity and peace The unity of the Church should be a strong motive to unity in judgement heart and way
Middleburgh and Strasburgh and other places yet because it maketh most for edification and order to have them fixed I shall think they were until the contrary shall be proved but however they ruled in common in the exercise of discipline which is the Ordinance which our brethren are most unwilling to grant should be exercised out of the particular Congregation Sect. 5. Seventhly That Church to which every Christian first bears relation and which relation continueth last and cannot be broken by him without sin is the first Church but such is the Church-Catholike visible Therefore c. The major is undenyable The minor appears because none can be admitted into a particular Congregation except he be judged first of the Church-Catholike and that not meerly Entitive but under the seal of the Covenant administred by some Officer and so stands bound to submit himself to all Christs Ordinances and Officers by one of which he receives his admission So again though he change his habitation never so often bear relation to never so many particular Congregations one after another yet in all those the general relation holdeth stil he is still a baptized visible member of the Church-Catholike and therefore to be received whereever he cometh into any particular Congregation Yea in the interim after his breaking off from one Congregation and placing in another he retains the general relation and baptism and is not an heathen or infidel he is not one without in the Apostles phrase Yea suppose a man should be a Traveller Merchant or Factor and setled in no particular Congregation yet being a Christian he is a member of the Church-Catholike yea and if he breach any errours or live inordinately he shall be accountable to the Church where he for the present resides or such crimes are committed and be liable to their censure as being a member of the Church-Catholike And this appears because the Church of Ephesus is commended Rev. 2.2 for trying strangers that came among them under the notion of Apostles and found them lyars and so would not receive them And our brethren undertake to inflict the sentence of Non-communion for so they call it a sentence of Non-communion denounced Apollog Nar. pag. 18. and 19. against strangers yea whole Churches but how it will stand with some other principles of theirs I know nor if it be a sentence denounced it is a censure and so an act of discipline exercised against those out of their particular confederation which in my apprehension is but changing an old warranted censure of the Church into a new and doubtful one but both seem to agree in the general nature of a sentence or censure Surely hereticks and false teachers are not to be left to the Magistrate only but to be referred to Ecclesiastical trial for those things come not under the cognizance of the civil Magistrate properly or he may be an heathen and will not regard an heretick nor can judge of him Act. 18.15 And if every kingdom will try murther treason or any foul crime committed in the same though by a stranger or alien because the crimes are against their laws and sovereign though their Laws pertain not to the countrey where the forreigner was born and dwelleth then much more shall every Church try those members of the Church-Catholike residing among them for their crimes or false doctrines seeing they have all the same sovereign head the same Laws and are all one habitual body Again It is no sinne for a man to remove from one Congregation to another as oft as occasion or conveniency require but for a man to remove out of the Church-Catholike either Entitive by disclaiming the doctrine and faith of Christ or organical by refusing to joyn to any Christian society or to be under and submit unto any Church-discipline is a great sinne and apostacy No man is accounted a schismatick for removing from one Congregation to another but he that shall separate himself from all Church-communion and shall rend himself from the Church-Catholike he is a schismatick he is an Apostate And therefore the several sects though they pretend because of wants or blemishes to rend from the Church of England or Scotland c. yet not from the Church-Catholike by no means because they know that were a sin Eightly That Church from which the particular Churches spring and to which they are as an additament and encrease that is the prime Church but that is the Church-Catholike Therefore c. The major is clear of it self The minor appears because they are the instrument to convert the rest and bring them into the same kingdom of Christ with themselves Act. 2.47 God added to the Church daily such as should be saved That little handful to which the Catholike charter was first given leavened the whole world and brought them in as an addition to themselves They were to be witnesses in Jerusalem and then in Iudaea and to the ends of the earth Act. 1.8 For the Law shall go forth of Zion and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem Isa 2.3 The Lord shall send the red of his strength out of Zion Psal 110.2 It was with the Church then as was said of the river of Eden Gen. 2.10 A river went out of Eden to water the garden and from thence it was parted into four heads So the water of life flowed from Zion into the four quarters of the world As there is no creek but hath its rise from and continuity with the Main and receives influence from it so there is no particular Church but hath his first rise and ministerial influence from the Church-Catholike and received the Gospel and priviledges of it from thence ministerially God cals no Evangelical Churches by inspiration only but by the ministry of those that are members of the Church-Catholike or some part of it God would not have Cornelius instructed by an Angel though he could have done it but by Peter a Minister of the Church-Evangelical and likewise the Eunuch by Philip. So that the Church-Catholike is as the Sea and particular Churches as so many creeks or arms receiving a tincture and season of her waters The Church-Catholike is as the tree Christ as the root the particular Churches as branches as Cyprian makes the comparison Shee is the mother and they as daughters born of her and receiving from her ministerially both nature and priviledges Gal. 4.26 Paul indeed was called extraordinarily from heaven by Christ himself the head of the Church and not by an Angel that he might be or some conceive a type of the second call of the Jews who as some hold shall be so called as he was by the appearing of the sign of the Son of man and therefore that Church is said to come down from God out of heaven Rev. 21.2 10. And the ground of this type they take from 1 Tim. 1.16 For this cause I obtained mercy that in me first Iesus Christ might shew forth all