Protestants and Papists yet wee crave leave to expresse what in it doth not fully satisfie us Foure things in it seeme defective to us 1. That any key of the kingdome of heaven should be left without power For here in this distribution the key of knowledge is contradistinguished from a key of power 2. There is a reall defect in omitting an integrall part of the keys which is that key of power or liberty which belongeth to the Church it self But no marvell though the Popish Clergie omitted it who have oppressed all Church-libertie and Protestant Churches having recovered the libertie of preaching the Gospel and ministery of the Sacraments have been well satisfied therewith so as some of them have looked no farther nor so much as discerned their defect of Church-power or liberty due unto them in point of discipline and others finding themselves wronged in withholding a key or power which belongs to them have wrested to themselves an undue power which belongs not to them the key of authority 3. There is another defect in the Distribution in dividing the key of order from the key of Jurisdiction of purpose to make way for the power of Chancellours and Commissaries in foro exteriori who though they want the key of order having never entred into holy orders as they are called or at most into the order of Deacons onely whereof our Lord spake nothing touching Jurisdiction yet they have been invested with Jurisdiction yea and more then ministeriall authoritie even above those Elders who labour in word and doctrine By this sacrilegious breach of order which hath been as it were the breaking of the Files and Ranks in an Armie Satan hath routed and ruined a great part of the libertie and puritie of Churches and of all the Ordinances of Christ in them 4. A fourth defect but yet the least which we observe in this distribution is that order is appropriated to the Officers of the Church onely For though wee be far from allowing that sacrilegious usurpation of the Ministers office which we heare of to our griefe to be practised in some places that private Christians ordinarily take upon them to preach the Gospel publickly and to minister Sacraments Yet we put a difference between Office and Order Office we looke at as peculiar to those who are set apart for some peculiar function in the Church who are either Elders or Deacons But order speaking of Church-order properly taken is common to all the members of the Church whether Officers or private brethren There is an order as well in them that are subject as in them that rule There is a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as well 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The maid in Athenaeus is said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as well as her Mistresse Yet if any man be willing to make office and order aequipollent we will not contend about words so there be no erroneous apprehension wrapt into the matter To come therefore to such a distribution of the keyes as is more suitable to Scripture phrase For it becomes true Israelites rather to speak the language of Canaan then the language of Ashdod When Paul beheld and rejoyced to behold how the Church of Colosse had received the Lord Iesus and walked in him he summeth up all their Church estate to wit their beautie and power in these two Faith and order Col. 2.5 6. There is therefore a key of Faith and a key of Order The key of Faith is the same which the Lord Iesus calleth the key of knowledge Luke 11.52 and which he complaineth the Lawyers had taken away Now that key of knowledge Christ speaketh of was such that if it had not been taken away they that had it had power by it to enter into the kingdom of heaven themselves and it may be to open the doore to others to enter also Now such a knowledge whereby a man hath power to enter into heaven is onely faith which is often therefore called knowledge as Isa 53.11 By the knowledge of him shall my righteous servant justifie many that is by the faith of Christ And Ioh. 17.3 This is eternall life to know thee that is to beleeve on thee This key therefore the key of knowledge saving knowledge or which is all one the key of faith is common to all beleevers A faithfull soul knowing the Scriptures and Christ in them receiveth Christ and entreth through him into the kingdom of heaven both here and hereafter Here he entreth into a state of grace through faith * Heb. 4.3 and by the profession of his faith he entreth also into the fellowship of the Church which is the kingdom of heaven upon earth and by the same faith as he beleeveth to justification so he maketh confession to salvation which is perfected in the kingdom of glory Rom. 10.10 The key of Order is the power whereby every member of the Church walketh orderly himself according to his place in the Church and helpeth his brethren to walk orderly also It was that which the Apostles and Elders called upon Paul so to carrie himself before the Jews in the Temple that he might make it appear to all men that he walked orderly Act. 21.18.24 Orderly to wit according to the orders of the Iewish Church with whom he then conversed And it was the commandment which Paul gave to the whole Church of Thessalonica and to all the members of it to withdraw themselves from every brother that walketh disorderly 2 Thes 3.6 This their withdrawing from him that walked disorderly was the exercise of their key of order And it was a like exercise of the same key of order when he requireth the Brethren to warne the unruly which is in the originall the same word to admonish the disorderly 1 Thes 5.14 And this key of order to wit order understood in this sense is common to all the members of the Church whether Elders or brethren Furthermore of Order there be two keyes a key of power or interest And the key of Authority or Rule The first of these is termed in the Scriptures Liberty So distinguishing it from that part of Rule and Authority in the officers of the Church We speak not here of that spirituall liberty whether of impunitie whereby the children of God are set free by the blood of Christ from Satan hell bondage of sin curse of the Morall Law and service of the Ceremoniall Law nor of immunitie whereby we have power to be called the sons of God to come boldly unto the throne of grace in prayer and as heirs of glory to look for our inheritance in light but of that externall libertie or interest which Christ also hath purchased for his people as libertie to enter into the fellowship of his Church libertie to chuse and call well gifted men to office in that his Church libertie to partake in Sacraments or seals of the Covenant of the Churchs libertie and interest to joyn with
officers in the due censure of offenders and the like This libertie and the acts thereof are often exemplified in the Acts of the Apostles and the Apostle Paul calleth it expresly by the name of libertie Brethren saith he you have been called unto LIBERTY onely use not your liberty as an occasion to the flesh but by love serve one another Galath 5.13 that the Apostle by that libertie meaneth Church libertie or power in ordering Church affaires will evidently appeare if we consult with the context rather then with Commenters For the Apostle having spent the former part of the Epistle partly in the confirmation of his calling partly in disputation against justification by the works of the Law to the end of v. 8. of Chap. 5. in the ninth Verse he descendeth not to exhort unto bonos more 's in generall as usually Commenters take it but to instruct in Church Discipline in which he giveth three or foure directions to the tenth v. of Chap. 6. 1 Touching the censure of those corrupt Teachers who had perverted and troubled them with that corrupt Doctrine of justification by works Chap. 5. ver 9. to the end of the Chapter 2. Touching the gentle admonition and restoring of a brother fallen by infirmitie Chap. 6. ver 1. to 5. 3. Touching the maintenance of their Ministers ver 6 7 8. and beneficence to others ver 9 10. Touching the first the censure of their corrupt teachers 1 He layeth for the ground of it that which himself gave for the ground of the excommunication of the incestuous Corinth 1 Cor. 5.6 A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump vers 9. 2 He presumeth the Church will be of the same mind with him and concur in the censure of him that troubled them with corrupt doctrine v. 10. from fellowship with which corrupt doctrine he cleareth himself v. 11. 3 He proceedeth to declare what censure he wisheth might be dispensed against him and the rest of those corrupt teachers I would saith he they were even cut off that trouble you cut off to wit by excommunication ver 12. Now lest it should be objected by the brethren of the Church But what power have we to cut them off The Apostle answereth they have a power and libertie to wit to joyn with the sounder part of the Presbyterie in casting them out or cutting them off For brethren saith he you are called unto liberty If it should be further objected Yea but give the people this power and libertie in some cases either to cast off their teachers or to cut them off the people will soon take advantage to abuse this libertie unto much carnall licentiousnesse The Apostle preventeth that with a word of wholsome counsell Brethren saith he you have been called unto libertie onely use not your libertie as an occasion to the flesh but by love serve one another v. 13. and thereupon seasonably pursueth this counsell with a caveat to beware of abusing this liberty to carnall contention an usuall disease of popular liberty and withall dehorteth them from all other fruits of the flesh to the end of the Chapter Evident therefore it is that there is a key of power or libertie given to the Church to the Brethren with the Elders as to open a doore of entrance to the Ministers calling so to shut the doore of entrance against them in some cases as when through corrupt and pernicious doctrine they turn from Shepherds to become ravenous wolves Having spoken then of that first key of order namely the key of power in a more large sense or liberty in the Church there remaineth the other key of order which is the key of Authority or of Rule in a more strict sense which is in the Elders of the Church Authoritie is a morall power in a superiour order or state binding or releasing an inferious in point of subjection This key when it was promised to Peter Matth. 16.19 and given to him with the rest of the Apostles Ioh. 20.23 they thereby had power to bind and loose and it is the same Authority which is given to their successours the Elders whereby they are called to feed and rule the Church of God as the Apostles had done before them Act. 20.28 And indeed by opening and applying the Law the spirit of bondage accompanying the same they bind sinners under the curse and their consciences under guilt of sin and fear of wrath and shut the kingdom of heaven against them And by opening and applying the Gospel the Spirit of Adoption accompanying the same they remit sin and loose the consciences of beleeving repenting souls from guilt of sin and open to them the doores of heaven By vertue of this key as they preach with all authoritie not onely the doctrine of the Law but also the Covenant of the Gospel so they administer the seals thereof Baptisme and the Lords Supper By virtue also of this key they with the Church do bind an obstinate offender under excommunication Matth. 18.17 18. and release and forgive him upon his repentance 2 Cor. 2.7 This Distribution of the keyes and so of spirituall power in the things of Christs kingdom we have received from the Scripture But if any men out of love to Antiquitie do rather affect to keep to the terms of the former more ancient Distribution as there be who are as loath to change Antiquos terminos verborum as agrorum we would not stick upon the words rightly explained out of desire both to judge and speak the same things with fellow-brethren Onely then let them allow some spirituall power to the key of knowledge though not Church-power And in Church power let them put in as well a key of liberty that is a power and priviledge of interest as a key of Authoritie And by their key of order as they do understand the key of office so let them not divide from it the key of jurisdiction for Christ hath given no jurisdiction but to whom he hath given office and so we willingly consent with them CHAP. III. Of the subject of the power of the keyes to whom they are committed and first of the key of knowledge and Order AS the keyes of the kingdom of heaven be divers so are the subjects to whom they are committed divers as in the naturall body diversitie of functions belongeth to diversity of members 1. The key of knowledge or which is all one the key of Faith belongeth to all the faithfull whether joyned to any particular Church or no. As in the primitive times men of grown yeers were first called and converted to the faith before they were received into the Church And even now an Indian or Pagan may not be received into the Church till he have first received the faith and have made profession of it before the Lord and the Church which argueth that the key of knowledge is given not onely to the Church but to some before they enter into the Church And yet to Christians for
the Churches sake that they who receive this grace of faith by it may receive Christ and his benefits and therewith may receive also this priviledge to find an open doore set before them to enter into the fellowship of the Church 2. The key of order speaking as we do of Church order as Paul doth Col. 2.5 belongeth to all such who are in Church order whether Elders or Brethren For though Elders be in a superiour order by reason of their office yet the brethren over whom the Elders are made Overseers and Rulers they stand also in an order even in orderly subjection according to the order of the Gospel It is true every faithful soul that hath received a key of knowledge is bound to watch over his neighbours soul as his own and to admonish him of his sin unlesse he be a scorner but this he doth Non ratione ordinis sed intuitu charitatis not by vertue of a state of order which he is in till in Church fellowship but as of common Christian love and charitie But every faithfull Christian who standeth in Church order is bound to do the same as well respectu ordinis as intuitu charitatis by virtue of that royall Law not onely of love but of Church order Matth. 18.15 16 17. whereby if his brother who offended him do not hearken to his conviction and admonition he is then according to order to proceed further taking one or two with him and if the offender refuse to hear them also then he is by order to tell the Church and afterwards walk towards him as God shall direct the Church to order it CHAP. IIII. Of the subject to whom the key of Church priviledge power or Liberty is given THis key is given to the Brethren of the Church for so saith the Apostle in Gal. 5.13 in the place quoted and opened before Brethren you have been called to liberty And indeed as it is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of a Common-wealth the right and due establishment and ballancing of the liberties or priviledges of the people which is in a true sense may be called a power and the authority of the Magistrate so it is the safety of Church estate the right and due settling and ordering of the holy power of the priviledges and liberties of the Brethren and the ministeriall authority of the Elders The Gospel alloweth no Church authority or rule properly so called to the Brethren but reserveth that wholly to the Elders and yet preventeth the tyrannie and oligarchy and exorbitancy of the Elders by the large and firm establishment of the liberties of the Brethren which ariseth to a power in them Bucers axiome is here notable Potestaspenes omnem Ecclesiamest Authoritas ministerii penes Presbyteros Episcopos In Mat. 16.19 where Potestas or power being contradistinguished from Authoritas Authority is nothing else but a liberty or priviledge The liberties of the Brethren or of the Church consisting of them are many and great 1. The Church of Brethren hath the power priviledges and liberty to choose their officers In the choyce of an Apostle in to the place of Judas the people went as far as humane vote and suffrage could go Out of 120. persons v. 15. they chose out and presented two out of which two because an Apostle was to be designed immediately by God God by lot chose one And yet this one so chosen of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 communibus omnium fuffragiis inter duodecim Apostolos allectus est v. 26. was counted amongst the Apostles by the common suffrages of them all And this place Cyprian presseth amongst others to confirm the power that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or priviledge or liberty of the people in choosing or refusing their Ministers Plebs Christiana saith he vel maxime potestatem habet vel dignos sacerdotes eligendi ves indignos recusandi Epistol 4. lib. 1. The like or greater liberty is generally approved by the best of our Divines studious of Reformation from Act. 14.23 They ordained them Elders chosen by lifting up of hands The same power is cleerly expressed in the choyce of Deacons Act. 6.3.5 6. The Apostles did not choose the Deacons but called the multitude together and said unto them Brethren looke you out seven men amongst you whom we may appoint over this businesse And the saying pleased the whole multitude and they chose Stephen c. 2. It is a priviledge or a liberty the Church hath received to send forth one or more of their Elders as the publike service of Christ and of the Church may require Thus Epaphroditus was a Messenger or Apostle of the Church of Philippi unto Paul Phil. 2.25 3. The Brethren of the Church have power and liberty of propounding any just exception against such as offer themselves to be admitted unto their communion or unto the seales of it Hence Saul when hee offered himself to the communion of the Church at Jerusalem was not at first admitted thereto upon an exception taken against him by the Disciples till that exception was removed Act. 9.26 27. and Peter did not admit the family of Cornelius to Baptisme till he had inquired of the Brethren if any of them had any exception against it Act. 10.47 4. As the Brethren have a power of order and the priviledge to expostulate with their Brethren in case of private scandals according to the rule Mat. 18.15 16. So in case of publike scandall the whole Church of Brethren have power and priviledge to joyn with the Elders in inquiring hearing judging of publike scandals so as to binde notorious offenders and impenitents under censure and to forgive the repentant For when Christ commandeth a brother in case that offence cannot be healed privately then to tell the Church Mat. 18.17 it necessarily implyeth that the Church must heare him and inquire into the offence complained of and judge of the offence as they find it upon inquiry When the Brethren that were of the circumcision expostulated with Peter about his communion with Cornelius and his uncircumcised family Peter did not reject them and their complaint against him as transgressing the bounds of their just power and priviledge but readily addressed himself to give satisfaction to them all Act. 1 1 2 to 18. The Brethren of the Church of Corinth being gathered together with their Elders in the name of the Lord Jesus and with his power did deliver the incestuous person to Satan 1 Cor. 5.4 5. And Paul reproveth them all Brethren as well as Elders that they had no sooner put him away from amongst them v. 2. and expresly he alloweth to them all power to judge them that are within v. 22. Yea and from thence argueth in all the Saints even in the meanest of the Saints and ability to judge between brethren in the things of this life as those that have received such a spirit of discerning from Christ by which they shall one day
Elders with them or direct them where to procure such to come unto them The like course is wont to be taken when sundry Christians coming over from one countrey to another such as are come over first and are themselves full of company direct those that come after them and assist them in like sort in the combination of themselves into Church order according to the rule of the Gospel Though the Apostles be dead whose office it was to plant gather and multiply Churches yet the work is not dead but the same power of the keyes is left with the Churches in common and with each particular church for her part according to their measure to propagate and inlarge the kingdome of Christ as God shall give opportunity throughout all generations CHAP. V. Of the subject to whom the key of Authority is committed THe key of Authoritie or Rule is committed to the Elders of the Church and so the act of Rule is made the proper act of their office The Elders that rule well c. 1 Tim. 5.17 Heb. 13.7.17 The speciall acts of this rule are many The first and principall is that which the Elders who labour in the Word and Doctrine are chiefly to attend unto that is the preaching of the Word with all Authoritie and that which is annexed thereto the administration of the Sacraments or seals Speak rebuke and exhort saith Paul to Titus with all authoritie Tit. 2.15 And that the administration of the seals is annexed thereto is plain from Matth. 28.19 20. Go saith Christ to the Apostles make Disciples and baptize them c. If it be objected private members may all of them prophecie publiquely 1 Cor. 14 31. and therefore also baptize and so this act of Authority is not peculiar to preaching Elders Ans 1. The place in the Corinths doth not speak of ordinarie private members but of men furnished with extraordinary gifts Kings at the time of their first Coronation give many extraordinary large gifts which they do not daily poure out in like sort in their ordinary government Christ soon after his ascenfion poured out a larger measure of his spirit then in times succeeding The members of the Church of Corinth as of many other in those primitive times were inriched with all knowledge and in all utterance I Cor. 1.5 And the same persons that had the gift of prophesie in the Church of Corinth had also the gift of tongues which put upon the Apostle a necessitie to take them off from their frequent speaking with tongues by preferring prophesie before it 1 Cor. 14.2 to 24. So that though all they might prophesie as having extraordinary gifts for it yet the like libertie is not allowed to them that want the like gifts In the Church of Israel none besides the Priests and Levites did ordinarily prophesie either in the Temple or in the Synagogues unlesse they were either furnished with extraordinatie gifts of prophesie as the Prophets of Israel or were set apart and trained up to prepare for such a calling as the sons of the Prophets When Amos was forbidden by the high Priest of Bethel to prophesie at Bethel Amos doth not alledge nor plead the libertie of any Israelite to prophesie in the holy Assemblies but alledgeth onely his extraordinarie calling Amos 7.14 15. It appeareth also that the sons of the Prophets that is men set apart and trained up to prepare for that calling were allowed the like libertie 1 Sam. 19.20 Answ 2. But neither the sons of the Prophets nor the Prophets themselves were wont to offer sacrifices in Israel except Samuel and Eliah by speciall direction nor did the extraordinarie Prophets in Corinth take upon them to administer Sacraments If any reply That if the Prophets in the Church at Corinth had been endued with extraordinarie gists of prophefie they had not been subject to the judgement of the Prophets which these are directed to be 1 Cor. 14.22 Ans It followeth not For the people of God were to examine all prophesies by the Law and testimonie and not to receive them but according to that rule Psal 8.20 Yea and Paul himself referreth all his Doctrine to the Law and Prophets Act. 26.22 And the Bereans are commended for examining Pauls doctrine according to the Scriptures Act. 17.11 12. 2. A second act of Authoritie common to the Elders is they have power as any weighty occasion shall require to call the Church together as the Apostles called the Church together for the election of Deacons Act. 6.2 And in like sort are the Priests of the old Testament stirred up to call a solemne Assembly to gather the Elders and all the inhabitants of the land to sanctifie a Fast Joel 1.13 14. 3. It is an act of their power to examine if Apostles then any others whether officers or members before they be received of the Church Rev. 2.2 A fourth act of their rule is the Ordination of officers whom the people have chosen whether Elders or Deacons 1 Tim. 4.14 Act. 6.6 5. It is an act of the key of Authoritie that the Elders open the doores of speech and silence in the Assembly They were the Rulers of the Synagogue who sent to Paul and Barnabas to open their mouthes in a word of exhortation Act. 13.15 and it is the same power which calleth men to speak to put men to silence when they speak amisse And yet when the Elders themselves do lie under offence or under suspition of it the Brethren have liberty to require satisfaction in a modest manner concerning any publick breach of rule as hath been mentioned above out of Act. 11.2 3 c. 6. It belongeth to the Elders to prepare matters beforehand which are to be transacted by themselves or others in the face of the Congregation as the Apostles and Elders being met at the house of Iames gave direction to Paul how to carry himself that he might prevent the offence of the Church when he should appear before them Act. 21.18 Hence when the offence of a brother is according to the rule in Matth. 18.17 to be brought to the Church they are beforehand to consider and enquire whether the offence be really given or no whether duely proved and orderly proceeded in by the Brethren according to rule and not duly satisfied by the offender lest themselves and the Church be openly cumbred with unnecessary and tedious agitations but that all things transacted before the Church be carried along with most expedition and best edification In which respect they have power to reject causlesse and disorderly complaints as well as to propound and handle just complaints before the Congregation 7. In the handling of an offence before the Church the Elders have authoritie both Jus dicere and Sententiam serre When the offence appeareth truly scandalous the Elders have power from God to informe the Church what the Law or Rule and will of Christ is for the censure of such an offence And when the
Church discerns the same and hath no just exception against it but condescendeth thereto it is a further act of the Elders power to give sentence against the offender Both these acts of power in the Ministers of the Gospel are foretold by Ezekiel Chap. 44.23 24. They shall teach my people the difference between holy and prophane and cause them to discerne between the uncleane and the cleane And in controversie they shall stand in judgement and they shall judge it according to my judgement c. 8. The Elders have power to dismisse the Church with a blessing in the name of the Lord Num. 6.23 to 26. Heb. 7.7 9. The Elders have received power to charge any of the people in private that none of them live either inordinately without a calling or idlely in their calling or scandalously in any sort 2 Thes 3.6 ver 8 10 11 12. The Apostles command argueth a power in the Elders to charge these duties upon the people effectually 10. What power belongeth to the Elders in a Synod is more fitly to be spoken to in the Chapter of Synods 11. In case the Church should fall away to blasphemy against Christ and obstinate rejection and persecution of the way of grace and either no Synod to be hoped for or no helpe by a Synod the Elders have power to withdraw or separate the Disciples from them and to carry away the Ordinances with them and therewithall sadly to denounce the just judgement of God against them Act. 19.9 Exod. 33.7 Mark 6.11 Luk. 10 11. Act. 13.46 Obj. But if Elders have all this power to exercise all these acts of Rule partly over the private members partly over the whole Church how are they then called the servants of the Church 2 Cor. 4.5 Answ The Elders to be both servants and Rulers of the Church may both of them stand well together For their rule is not lordly as if they ruled of themselves or for themselves but stewardly and ministeriall as ruling the Church from Christ and also from their call and withall ruling the Church for Christ and for the Church even for their spirituall everlasting good A Queene may call her servants her mariners to pilot and conduct her over the Sea to such an Haven yet they being called by her to such an office shee must not rule them in steering their course but must submit her selfe to be ruled by them till they have brought her to her desired Haven So is the case between the Church and her Elders CHAP. VI. Of the Power and Authoritie given to Synods SYnods wee acknowledge being rightly ordered as an Ordinance of Christ Of their Assembly wee find three just causes in Scripture 1. When a Church wanting light or peace at home desireth the counsell and helpe of other Churches few or moe Thus the Church of Antioch being annoyed with corrupt teachers who darkned the light of the truth and bred no small dissension amongst them in the Church they sent Paul and Barnabas and other messengers unto the Apostles and Elders at Hierusalem for the establishment of Truth and Peace In joyning the Elders to the Apostles and that doubtlesse by the advise of Paul and Barnabas it argueth that they sent not to the Apostles as extraordinary and infallible and authenticall Oracles of God for then what need the advise and helpe of Elders but as wise and holy guides of the Church who might not onely relieve them by some wise counsell and holy order but also set a Precedent to succeeding ages how errours and dissensions in Churches might be removed and healed And the course which the Apostles and Elders tooke for clearing the matter was not by publishing the counsell of God with Apostolick authoritie from immediate revelation but by searching out the truth in an ordinary way of free disputation Act. 15. v. 7. which is as fit a course for imitation in after ages as it was seasonable for practice then 2. Just consequence from Scripture giveth us another ground for the assembly of many churches or of their messengers into a Synod when any church lyeth under scandall through corruption in doctrine and practice and will not be healed by more private advertisements of their own members or of their neighbour Ministers or Brethren For there is a brotherly communion as between the members of the same church so between the churches We have a little sister saith one church to another Cant. 8.8 therefore churches have a brotherly communion amongst themselves Look then as one brother being offended with another and not able to heal him by the mouth of two or three brethren privately it behooveth him to carry it to the whole church so by proportion if one church see matter of offence in another and be not able to heal it in a more private way it will hehove them to procure the Assembly of many churches that the offence may be orderly heard and judged and removed 3. It may so fall out that the state of all the churches in the countrey may be corrupted and beginning to discern their corruption may desire the concurse and counsell of one another for a speedy and safe and generall reformation And then so meeting and conferring together may renew their covenant with God and conclude and determine upon a course that may tend to the publike healing and salvation of them all This was a frequent practice in the old Testament in the time of Asa 2 Cron. 15.10 to 15. in the time of Hezekiah 2 Chron. 29.4 to 19. In the time of Josiah 2 Chron. 34.29 to 33. and in the time of Ezra Ezra 10.1 to 5. These and the like examples were not peculiar to the Israelites as one intire nationall church For in that respect they appealed from every Synagogue and Court in Israel to the nationall high Priest and Court at Jerusalem as being all of them subordinate thereunto and therefore that precedent is usually waved by our best Divines as not appliable to Christian churches but these examples hold forth no superiority in one church or court over another but all of them in an equall manner give advice in common and take one common course for redresse of all And therefore such examples are fit precedents for churches of equall power within themselves to assemble togegether and take order with one accord for the reformation of them all Now a Synod being assembled three questions arise about their power 1. What is that power they have received 2. How far the fraternity concurreth with the Presbyterie in it the brotherhood with the Eldership 3. Whether the power they have recieved reacheth to the injoyning of things both in their nature and in their use indifferent For the first we dare not say that their power reacheth no farther then giving counsell for such as their ends be for which according to God they do assemble such is the power given them of God as may attain those ends As they meet to minister light
given to a particular Church of Brethren as such primo per se then it would be found in every particular Church of Brethren For a Quatenus adomnia valet consequentia Obj. 4. But it is an usuall tenent in many of our best Divines that the government of the Church is mixt of a Monarchy an Aristocracie and a Democracy In regard of Christ the head the government of the Church is soveraigne and monarchicall In regard of the Rule by the Presbytery it is stewardly and Aristocraticall in regard of the peoples power in elections and censures it is Democraticall which argueth the people have some stock of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 power and authority in the government of the Church Answ In a large sense Authority after a sort may be acknowledged in the people As 1. when a man acteth by counsell according to his own discerning freely he is then said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dominus sui actus So the people in all the acts of liberty which they put forth are Domini sui actus Lords of their own action 2. The people by their acts of liberty as in election of officers and concurrency in censure of offenders and in the Determination and Promulgation of Synodall acts they have a great stroke or power in the ordering of Church affairs which may be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or potestas a POWER which many times goeth under the name of rule or authoritie but in proper speech it is rather a priviledge or liberty then authoritie as hath been opened above in Chap. 3. For no act of the peoples power or liberty doth properly bind unlesse the authoritie of the Presbytery concur with it 3. A third argument whereby it may appear that the Elders of a particular Church are the first subject of authoritie in that Church is taken from the like removall of other subjects from whence they might be thought to derive their authoritie as was used before to prove the Church of Brethren was the first subject of their own libertie in their own Congregation The Elders of Churches are never found in Scripture to derive their authority which they exercise in their own congregation either from the Elders of other Churches or from any Synod of Churches All particular Churches and all the Elders of them are of equall power each of them respectively in their own Congregations None of them call others their Rabbies or Masters or Fathers in respect of any authoritie over them but all of them own and acknowledge one another as fellow Brethren Matth. 23.8 9 10. And though in a Synod they have received power from Christ and from his presence in the Synod to exercise Authoritie in imposing burthens such as the holy Ghost layeth upon all Churches whose Elders are present with them Act. 15.28 for the Apostles were Elders in all Churches yet the Elders of every particular Church when they walk with the brethren of their own Church in light and peace they need not to derive from the Synod any power to impose the same or the like burthens upon their owne Churches For they have received a power and charge from Christ to teach and command with all authoritie the whole counsell of God unto their people And the people discerning the light of the truth delivered and walking in peace with their Elders they readily yeeld obedience to their Over-seers in whatsoever they see and hear by them commended to them from the Lord. 3. Now we come to the third branch of the third Proposition which was this That the Church of a particular congregation Elders and Brethren walking and joyning together in truth and peace are the first subject of all Church-power needfull to be exercised within themselves whether in the election or ordination of officers or in the censure of offenders in their own body The truth hereof may appear by these Arguments 1 In point of ordination From the compleat integritie of a Ministers calling oven to the satisfaction of his own and the peoples conscience when both the Brethren and the Elders of the particular Church whereto he is called have put forth the power which belongeth to them about him As when the Brethren of the Church have chosen him to office and the Presbyterie of the Church have laied their hands upon him and both of them in their severall acts have due respect to the inward ministeriall gifts whereunto God hath furnished him he may then look at himself as called by the holy Ghost to exercise his talents in that office amongst them and the people may and ought to receive him as sent of God to them What defect may be found in such a call when the Brethren exercise their lawfull libertie and the Elders their lawfull authority in his ordination and nothing more is required to the compleat integritie of a Ministers calling If it be said there wanted imposition of hands by the Bishop who succeedeth in the place of Timothy and Titus whom the Apostle Paul left the one in Ephesus the other in Crete to ordain Elders in many Churches Tit. 1.5 Ans Touching ordination by Timothy and Titus and upon pretence of them by Bishops enough hath been said by many godly learned heretofore especially of later times The summe cometh to these conclusions 1 That Timothy and Titus did not ordain Elders in many Churches as Bishops but as Evangelists Timothy is expresly termed an Evangelist 2 Tim. 4.5 And Titus is as clearly decyphered to be an Evangelist as Timothy by the characters of an Evangelist which either Scripture holdeth forth or Eusebius noteth in his Ecclesiast histor lib. 3. cap. 37. Gr. cap. 31. Lat. Not to be limited to a certain Church but to follow the Apostles finishing their work in planting and watering Churches where they came They did indeed ordain officers where they wanted and exercised jurisdiction as the Apostles did in severall Churches yet with the rest of the Presbyterie and in the presence of the whole Church 1 Tim. 5. But for the continuance of this office of an Evangelist in the Church there is no direction in the Epistles either to Timothy or Titus or any where else in Scripture 2. Conclusion Those Bishops whose callings or offices in the Church are set forth in those Epistles to be continued they are altogether Synonyma with Presbyters Tit. 1.5 7. 1 Tim. 3.1 to 7. 3. Conclus We read of many Bishops to one Church Phil. 1.1 Act. 14.23 and Chap. 20.17 28. Tit. 1.5.7 but not of many Churches much lesse all the Churches in a large Diocesse to one Bishop 4. Conclus There is no transcendent proper work cut out or reserved for such a transcendent officer as a Diocesan Bishop throughout the New Testament The transcendent acts reserved to him by the Advocates of Episcopacie are Ordination and Iurisdiction Now both these are acts of Rule And Paul to Timothy acknowledgeth no Rulers in the Church above Pastors and Teachers who labour in
word and doctrine but rather Pastors and Teachers above them The Elders saith he that rule well are worthy of double honour but especially they that labour in word and doctrine 1. Tim. 5.17 5 Conclus When after the Apostles times one of the Pastors by way of eminencie was called Bishop for order sake yet for many yeers he did no act of power but 1 With consent of the Presbyterie 2 With consent and in the presence of the people As is noted out of Eusebius Ecclesiast Histor lib. 6. ca. 43. Gr. ca. 35. Lat. Cyprian Epist lib. 3. Epist 10. lib. 1. Epist 3. Casanb adversus Baronium exercitat 15. num 28. When it is alledged out of Hiereme to confirm the same that in the primitive times Communi Presbyterorum consilie Ecelesiae gubernabantur It is a weak and poore evasion to put it off with observing that he saith Communi Presbyterorum consilie not authoritate For 1. No authoritie is due to Presbyters over the Bishop or Pastor no more then to the Pastor over them They are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fellow-Elders and coequall in authoritie And 2. when Hiereme saith The Churches were governed by the common counsell but all with it else it might be said the Bishop governed the Churches with the common counsell of Presbyters to wit asked but not followed And that would imply a contradiction to Hieronus testimonie to say the Churches were governed by the sole authoritie of Bishops and yet not without asking the common counsell of the Presbyters For in asking their counsell and not following it the Bishop should order and govern the Churches against their counsell Now that the Churches were governed by the common counsell of Presbyters and against the common counsell of Presbyters are flat contradictories 2. For a second Argument to prove that the Brethren of the Church of a particular congregation walking with their Elders in truth and peace are the first subject of all that Church power which is needfull to be exercised in their own body It is taken From their indispensable and independent power in Church censures The censure that is ratified in heaven cannot be dispensed withall nor reversed by any power on earth Now the censure that is administred by the Church of a particular congregation is ratified in Heaven For so saith the Lord Iesus touching the power of Church censures Matth. 18 17 18. If the offender refuse to hear the Church let him be to thee as a heathen and a Publican Verily I say unto you Whatsoever ye shall bind onearth shall be bound in Heaven and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven Against this Argument from this Text many objections are wont to be made but none that will hold Object 1. By Church in Mat. 18.17 is not meant the Christian Church for it was not yet extant nor could the Apostles then have understood Christ if he had so meant but the Jewish church and so he delivereth their censure in a Jewish phrase to account a man as an Heathen and a Publican Answ 1. The Christian Church though it was not then extant yet the Apostles knew as well what he meant by Church in Mat. 18.17 as they understood what he meant by building his Church upon the Rock in Mat. 16.18 It was enough the Apostles looked for a Church which Christ would gather and build upon the confession of Peters faith and being built should be indued with heavenly power in their censures which they more fully understood afterwards when having received the Holy Ghost they came to put these things in practice Answ 2. The allusion in the Church-censure to the Jewish custome in accounting a man as an Heathen and Publican doth not argue that Christ directeth his Disciples to complain of scandals to the Jewish Synagogues but only directeth them how to walk towards obstinate offenders excommunicate by the Christian church to wit to walk towards them as the Jews walk towards Heathens to wit denying to them religious communion and as towards Publicans with-holding from them familiar civill communion for so the Iews said to Christs Disciples Why eateth your Master with Publicans and Sinners Answ 3. It is not credible that Christ would send his Disciples to make complaint of their offences to the Iewish Synagogues For first Is it likely he would send his Lambs and Sheep for right and healing unto Wolves and Tigres Both their Sanhedrim and most of their Synogogues were no better And if here and there some Elders of their Synagogues were better affected yet how may it appear that so it was where any of themselves dwelt And if that might appear too yet had not the Iews already agreed That if any man did confesse Christ he should be cast out of the Synagogues Joh. 9.22 Object 2. Against the argument from this Text it is objected That by the Church is meant the Bishop or his Commissary Answ 1. One man is not the Church If it be said one man may represent a church the reply is ready one man cannot represent the Church unlesse he be sent forth by the Church but so is neither the Bishop nor his Commissary They not for them but they come unsent for like water into a Ship chiefly for the terror of the servants of Christ and for the incouragement of the prophane And though some of Christs servants have found some favour from some few of Bishops men of more learning and ingenuity yet those Bishops have found the lesse favour themselves from their fellow-Bishops Answ 2. The Bishop ordinarily is no member of the Church of that congregation where the offence is committed and what is his satisfaction to the removall of the offence given to the Church Answ 3. The new Testament acknowledgeth no such ruler in the Church as claimeth honour above the Elders that labour in word and Doctrine 1 Tim. 5.17 Object 3. To tell the Church is to tell the Presbyterie of the Church Answ 1. We deny not The offence is to be told to the Presbyterie yet not to them as the Church but as the guides of the church who if upon hearing the cause and examining the witnesses they finde it ripe for publike censure they are then to propound it to the Church and to try and cleer the state of the cause before the church that so the church discerning fully the nature and quality of the offence may consent to the judgement and sentence of the Elders against it to the confusion of the offender and the publike edification of them all who hearing and fearing will learn to beware of the like wickednesse Answ 2. The Church is never put for the Presbyterie alone throughout the new Testament though sometime it be put expresly for the Fraternity alone as they are distinguished from the Elders and Officers Act. 15.22 and therefore Tell the Church cannot be meant Tell the Presbyterie alone Object In the old Testament the Congregation is often put for the
the particulars to whom any portion of power can be supposed to be committed That look what ever power or right any of the possessours and subjects thereof may have they have it each alike immediatly that is in respect of a mediation of delegation or dependance on each other from Christ and so are each the first subjects of that power that is allotted to them And for the particular subjects themselves hee follows that division in the handling of them which the Controversie it self hath made unto his hands To wit 1. What power each single Congregation which is indowed with a Charter to be a body-politique to Christ hath granted to it to exercise within it self And 2. What measure or rather kinde of power Christ hath placed in Neighbour-Churches without it and in association with it For the first As hee supposeth each Congregation such as to have the priviledge of injoying a Presbyterie or company of more or lesse Elders proper unto it self so being thus Presbyterated hee asserteth this incorporate body or society to be the first and primary subject of a compleat and entire power within it self over it's own members yea and the sole native subject of the power of Ordination and Excommunication which is the highest Censure And whereas this corporation consisteth both of Elders and Brethren for as for women and children there is a speciall exception by a Statute-law of Christ against their injoyment of any part of this publique power His scopeis to demonstrate a distinct and severall share and interest of power in matters of common concernment vouchsafed to each of these and dispersed among both by Charter from the Lord as in some of our towns corporate to a company of Aldermen the Rulers and a Common-Councell a body of the people there useth to be the like He giving unto the Elders or Presbytery a binding power of Rule and Authority proper and peculiar unto them and unto the Brethren distinct and apart an interest of power and priviledge to concurre with them and that such affaires should not be transacted but with the joynt agreement of both though out of a different right so that as a Church of Brethren only could not proceed to any publique censures without they have Elders over them so nor in the Church have the Elders power to censure without the concurrence of the people and likewise so as each alone hath not power of Excommunicating the whole of either though together they have power over any particular person or persons in each And because these particular Congregations both Elders and People may disagree and miscarry and abuse this power committed to them He therefore secondly asserteth an association or communion of Churches sending their Elders and Messengers into a Synod so hee purposely chooseth to stile those Assemblies of Elders which the Reformed Churches do call Classes or Presbyteries that so hee might distinguish them from those Presbyteries of Congregations before mentioned And acknowledgeth that it is an Ordinance of Christ unto whom Christ hath in relation to rectifying Mal-administrations and healing dissentions in particular Congregations and the like cases committed a due and just measure of power suited and proportioned to those ends and furnished them not only with ability to give counsell and advice but further upon such occasions with a Ministeriall power and authority to determine declare and injoyn such things as may tend to the reducing such Congregations to right order and peace Onely in his bounding and defining this power he affirms it to be First for the kinde and quality of it but a dogmaticall or doctrinall power though stamped with authority Ministeriall as an Ordinance of Christ whether in judging of controversies of faith when they disturb the peace of particular Congregations and which themselves finde too difficult for them or in decerning matters of fact and what censures they doe deserve but not armed with authority and power of Excommunicating or delivering unto Satan either the Congregations or the Members of them But they in such cases having declared and judged the nature of the offence and admonished the peccant Churches and decerned what they ought to do with their offending members they are to leave the formall act of this censure to that authority which can only execute it placed by Christ in those Churches themselves which if they deny to do or persist in their miscarriage then to determine to withdraw communion from them And also for the extent of this power in such Assemblies and Association of Churches he limits and confines that also unto cases and with cautions which will appear in the Discourse to wit That they should not intrench or impair the priviledge of intire Jurisdiction committed unto each Congregation as a liberty purchased them by Christs blood but to leave them free to the exercise and use thereof untill they abuse that power or are unable to manage it and in that case only to assist guide and direct them and not take on them to administer it for them but with them and by them As for our selves we are yet neither afraid nor ashamed to make profession in the midst of all the high waves on both sides dashing on us that the substance of this brief Extract from the Authors larger Discourse is That very Middle-way which in our Apologie we did in the generall intimate and intend between that which is called Brownisme and the Presbyteriall-government as it is practised whereof the one doth in effect put the chief if not the whole of the rule and government into the hands of the people and drowns the Elders votes who are but a few in the major part of theirs And the other taking the chief and the principall parts of that rule which we conceive is the due of each Congregation the Elders and Brethren into this Jurisdiction of a common Presbyterie of severall Congregations doth thereby in like manner swallow up not only the interests of the people but even the votes of the Elders of that Congregation concerned in the major part thereof Neither let it seeme arrogance in us but a testimony rather to the truth further to Remonstrate that this very Boundary platforme and disposement of Church power as here it is we speake for the substance of it set out and stated as also that the tenure and exercise thereof in all these subjects should be immediate from Christ unto them all is now new unto our thoughts yea it is no other than what our owne apprehensions have beene moulded unto long since And this many of our friends and some that are of a differing opinion having knowne our private judgements long as likewise our owne Notes and transcripts written long agoe can testifie besides many publike professions since as occasion hath beene offered Insomuch as when we first read this of this learned Author knowing what hath been the more generall current both of the practice and judgement of our Brethren for the Congregationall way
circumstances thereof yea and in these cases of the ordinary conversation of the person offending We need not inlarge in the application of this Although a greater Assembly of Elders are to be reverenced as more wise and able than a few Elders with their single Congregations and accordingly may have an higher doctrinall power a power properly and peculiarly suited to their Abilities in cases of difficulty to determine and direct Congregations in their way yet Christ hath not betrusted them with that power Hee hath done the Congregations because they are abstracted from the people And so one Tribe of men concerned in all the forementioned respects is wanting which Christ would have personally concurring not by delegation or representation alone not to the execution only but even to the legall sentence also of cutting men off as in the former paralell and instance may bee observed Yea and the higher and the greater the association of the Presbyteries are the further are they removed from the people and although you might have thereby a greater helpe in that Juridicall knowledge of the Rule to be proceeded by yet they are in a further distance and disinabled therby from that Precise practique knowledge of the Fact and frame of spirit in the person transgressing And Cases may be as truely difficult and hard to bee decided from obscuritie and want of light into the Circumstantiation of the Fact and person in which it was committed and by him obstinately persisted in as of the Law it self Other considerations of like weight might here be added if not for the proofe which we do not here intend yet the clearing of this particular As also to demonstrate that that other way of proceeding by withdrawing communion is most sutable to the relation that by Christs endowment all Churches stand in one towards another yea and wherein the least being a body to Christ doth stand unto all But we should too much exceed the bounds of an Epistle and too long detayne the Reader from the fruitfull and pregnant labours of the worthy Authour The God of peace and truth sanctifie all the truths in it to all those holy ends and through his grace much more which the holy and peaceable spirit of the Author did intend THO GOODVVIN PHILIP NYE Of the Keys of the Kingdome of HEAVEN and the Power thereof according to the WORD of GOD c. CHAP. I. What the Keyes of the Kingdome of Heaven be and what their Power THe Keyes of the Kingdom of Heaven are promised by the Lord Jesus the head and King of his Church unto Peter Mat. 16.19 To thee saith Christ will I give the keyes of the Kingdom of Heaven and whatsoever thou shalt binde on earth shall be bound in Heaven and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in Heaven The words being Allegoricall are therfore somewhat obscure and holding forth honor power in the Church are therefore controversall Prov. 15.1 For where there is no honour nor pride to pursue it there is no contention It will not therefore be amisse for opening of the Doctrine of the Power of the keyes somewhat to open the words of this Text whereon that power is built Five words require a little clearing 1. What is here meant by the Kingdome of Heaven 2. What are the keys of this kingdom and the giving of them 3. What are the acts of these Keyes which are said to be binding and loosing 4. What is the object of these acts to be bound or loosed here put under a generall name Whatsoever 5. Who is the subject recipient of this power or to whom is this power given To thee will I give the Keyes c. 1. For the first By the Kingdome of Heaven is here meant both the Kingdome of Grace which is the Church and the Kingdome of Glory which is in the highest heavens For Christ giving to Peter the keys of the kingdome of Heaven conveyeth therewith not only this power to binde on earth that is in the Church on earth for he gave him no power at all to binde in the world The kingdome of Christ is not of this world but he gives him also this priviledge That what he bound on earth should be bound in heaven And heaven being distinguished from the Church on earth must needs be meant the kingdome of Glory 2. For the second What the keys of the kingdom of heaven be The keys of the kingdom are the Ordinances which Christ hath instituted to be administred in his Church as the preaching of the Word which is the opening and applying of it also the administring of the Seals and censures For by the opening and applying of these both the gates of the Church here and of heaven hereafter are opened or shut to the sons of men And the giving of these keyes implyeth that Christ investeth those to whom he giveth them with a power to open and shut the gates of both And this power lyeth partly in their spirituall calling whether it be their office or their place and order in the Church and partly in the concurse and co-operation of the Spirit of Christ accompanying the right dispensation of these keyes that is of these Ordinances according to his will Moreover these keys are neither Sword nor Scepter No Sword for they convey not civill power of bodily life and death nor Scepter for they convey not Soveraigne or Legislative power over the Church but stewardly and ministeriall As the key of the House of David was given to Hilkiah Isa 22.22 who succeeded Shebna in his office and his office was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 over the house v. 15. and the same word over the house is translated steward in the house Gen. 43.19 3. Touching the third thing what are the acts of these keys The acts of these keys are said here to be binding and loosing which are not the proper acts of materiall keys for their acts be opening and shutting which argueth the keys here spoken of be not materiall keys but metaphoricall and y t being keys they have a power also of opening and shutting for Christ who hath the soveraigne power of these keys hee is said to have the key of David to open and no man to shut to shut and no man to open Rev. 3.7 which implyeth that these keys of Christs Kingdome have such a power of opening and shutting as that they do thereby binde and loose retain and remit in opening they loose and remit in shutting they binde and retain which will more appeare in opening the fourth point 4. The fourth point then is What is the subject to be bound and loosed The Text in Mat. 16.9 saith whatsoever which reacheth not so far as the Papists would stretch it to whatsoever oathes or covenants or contracts or counsels or lawes as if whatsoever oathes of allegiance covenants of lease or marriage c. the Pope ratifieth or dissolveth on earth should be ratified or dissolved in heaven No this
and peace to such churches as through want of light and peace lye in error or doubt at least and variance so they have power by the grace of Christ not only to give light and counsell in matter of Truth and Practice but also to command and enjoyn the things to be believed and done The expresse words of the Synodall letter imply no lesse It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and unto us to lay upon you no other burthen Act. 15.27 This burthen therefore to observe those necessary things which they speak of they had power to impose It is an act of the binding power of the keys to bind burthens And this binding power ariseth not only materially from the weight of the matters imposed which are necessary necessitate praecepti from the word but also formally from the authority of the Synod which being an Ordinance of Christ bindeth the more for the Synods sake As a truth of the Gospel taught by a Minister of the Gospel it bindeth to faith an obedience not only because it is Gospel but also because it is taught by a Minister for his callings sake seeing Christ hath said Who so receiveth you receiveth me And seeing also a Synod sometime meeteth to convince and admonish an offending church or Presbyterie they have power therefore if they cannot heal the offenders to determine to withdraw communion from them And further seeing they meet likewise sometimes for generall reformation they have power to decree and publish such Ordinances as may conduce according to God unto such reformation Examples whereof wee read Neh. 10.32 to 39. 2 Chron. 15.12 13. For the second question How far the Fraternity or the Brethren of the church may concurre with the Elders in exercising the power of the Synod The Answer is The power which they have received is a power of liberty As 1. They have liberty to dispute their doubts modestly and Christanly amongst the Elders For in that Synod at Jerusalem as there was much disputation Act. 15.7 so the multitude had a part in the Disputation v. 12. For after Peters speech it is said the whole multitude kept silence and silence from what to wit from the speech last in hand amongst them and that was from Disputation 2. The Brethren of the church had liberty to joyn with the Apostles and Elders in approving of the sentence of James and determining the same as the common sentence of them all 3. They had liberty to joyn with the Apostles and Elders in choosing and sending messengers and in writing Synodall Letters in the names of all for the publishing of the sentence of the Synod Both these points are expressed in the Text v. 22.23 to 29. Then pleased it the Apostles and Elders with the whole Church to send chosen men and to write Letters by them See the whole church distinguished from the Apostles and Elders and those whom he called the whole Church v. 22. he calleth the Brethren v. 23. The Apostles and Elders and Brethren c. But though it may not be denyed that the Brethren of the church present in the Synod had all this power of liberty to joyn with the Apostles and Elders in all these acts of the Synod yet the authority of the Decrees lay chiefly if not only in the Apostles and Elders And therefore it is said Act. 16.4 That Paul and Silas delivered to the Churches for to keep the Decrees that were ordained of the Apostles and Elders So then it will be most safe to preserve to the Church of Brethren their due liberties and to reserve to the Elders their due authority If it be said The Elders assembled in a Synod have no authority to determine or conclude any act that shall binde the Churches but according to the instructions which before they have received from the Churches Answ Wee do not so apprehend it For what need Churches send to a Synod for light and direction in ways of truth and peace if they be resolved afore-hand how far they will go It is true if the Elders of Churches shall conclude in a Synod any thing prejujudiciall to the truth and peace of the Gospel they may justly expostulate with them at their return and refuse such sanctions as the Lord hath not sancited But if the Elders be gathered in the name of Christ in a Synod and proceed according to the rule the word or Christ they may consider and conclude sundry points expedient for the estate of their Churches which the Churches were either ignorant or doubtfull of before As for the third Question whether the Synod have power to injoyn such things as are both in their nature and their use indifferent We should answer it negatively and our reasons be 1. From the pattern of that precedent of Synods Act. 15.28 They laid upon the Churches no other burthen but those necessary things necessary though not all of them in their own nature yet for present use to avoid the offence both of Jew and Gentile of the Jew by eating things strangled and blood of the Gentile and Jew both by eating things sacrificed to Idols as Paul expoundeth that Article of the Synod 1 Cor. 8.10 11 12. and Chap. 10.28 This ea ing with offence was a murther of a weak brothers soule and a sin against Christ 1 Cor. 8.11 12. and therefore necessary to be forborn necessiâ—ate praecepti by the necessity of Gods Commandement 2. A second reason may be from the latitude of the Apostolicall commission which was given to them Mat. 28.19 20. where the Apâ—stles are commanded to teach the people to observe all things which Christ had commanded If then the Apostles teach the people to observe more then Christ hath commanded they go beyond the bounds of their commission and a larger commission then that given to the Apostles nor Elders nor Synods nor churches can challenge If it be said Christ speaketh only of teaching such things which he had commanded as necessary to salvation Answ If the Apostles or their successors should hereupon usurpe an authority to teach the people things indifferent they must plead this their authority from some other commission given them elsewhere for in this place there is no foot step for any such power That much urged and much abused place in 1 Cor. 14.40 will not reach it For though Paul requiring in that place all the duties of Gods worship whether Prayer or Prophesying or Psalmes or Tongues c. that they should be performed decently and orderly he thereby forbiddeth any performance thereof undecently as for men with long hayre and women to speak in open assemblies especially to pray with their hair loose about them And though he forbiddeth also men speaking two or three at once which to do were not order but confusion yet he doth not at all neither himself injoyn nor allow the Church of Corinth to injoyn such things as decent whose want or whose contrary is not undecent nor such orders whose want or
another And yet Paul went up to Ierusalem to confer with Peter Iames and Iohn lest he should run in vain in the course of his ministery Galat. 2.2 And though in conference the chief Apostles added nothing to Paul ver 6. yet when they perceived the Gospel of the uncircumcision was committed to Paul and Barnabas as that of the circumcision to Peter Iames and Iohn they gave unto one another the right hand of fellowship ver 9. Now then it will follow by just proportion that if the Apostles who are each of them independent one of another had need to consult and confer together about the work of their ministery to procure the freer passage to their calling and to their doctrine then surely Churches and Elders of Churches though independent one of another had need to communicate their courses and proceedings in such cases one with another to procure the freer passage to the same And if the Apostles giving right hand of fellowship one to another did mutually strengthen their hands in the work of the ministery then the Elders of Churches giving right hand of fellowship to one another in their ordination or upon any fit occasion cannot but much encourage and strengthen the hearts and hands of one another in the Lords work Again something might be added if not for confirmation yet for illustration of this point by comparing the dimensions of the new Ierusalem which is a perfect platform of a pure Church as it shall be constituted in the Iewish Church state at their last conversion The dimensions of this Church as they are described by Ezekiel Chap. 48.30 are according to Iunius twelve furlongs which after the measure of the Sanctuarie which is double to the common is about three miles in length and as much in breadth But the dimensions of the same Church of the Iews in Revel 21.16 is said to be twelve thousand furlongs Now how can these two dimensions of the same Church stand together which are so farre discrepant one from another For there be a thousand times twelve furlongs in twelve thousand furlongs The fittest and fairest reconciliation seemeth plainly to be this that Ezekiel speaketh of the dimensions of any ordinarie Iewish Church of one particular congregation But Iohn speaketh of the dimensions of many particular Iewish Churches combining together in some cases even to the communion of a thousand Churches Not that the Church of the Iews will be constituted in a Nationall and Diocesan frame with Nationall officers and Diocesan Bishops or the like but that sometimes a thousand of them will be gathered into a Synod and all of them will have such mutuall care and yeeld such mutuall brotherly help and communion one to another as if they were all but one body If any man say Theologia symbolica or parabolica non est argumentativa that arguments from such parables and mysticall resemblances in Scripture are not valid let him enjoy his owne apprehension and if he can yeeld a better interpretation of the place let him wave this collection Neverthelesse if there were no argumentative power in parables why did the Lord Iesus so much delight in that kind of teaching and why did Iohn and Daniel and Ezekiel deliver a great part of their prophesies in parables if we must take them for riddles and not for documents nor arguments Surely if they serve not for argument they serve not for document But furthermore touching this great work of communion and consociation of Churches give us leave to adde this caution A Caution To see that this consociation of Churches be not perverted either to the oppression or diminution of the just libertie and authoritie of each particular Church within it self who being well supplied with a faithfull and expert Presbyterie of their own do walk in their integritie according to the truth and peace of the Gospel Let Synods have their just authoritie in all Churches how pure soever in determining such 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as are requisite for the edification of all Christs Churches according to God But in the election and ordination of Officers and censure of offenders let it suffice the Churches consociate to assist one another with their counsell and right hand of fellowship when they see a particular Church to use their libertie and power aright But let them not put forth the power of their communitie either to take such Church acts out of their hands or to hinder them in their lawfull course unlesse they see them through ignorance or weaknesse to abuse their libertie and authoritie in the Gospel All the liberties of Churches were purchased to them by the precious blood of the Lord Iesus and therefore neither may the Churches give them away nor many Churches take them out of the hands of one They may indeed prevent the abuse of their liberties and direct in the lawfull use of them but not take them away though themselves should be willing The Lord Iesus having given equall power to all the Apostles it was not lawfull for eleven of them to forbid the twelfth to do any act of his office without their intervention Neither was it lawfull for the nine who were of inferiour gifts to commit the guidance and command of all their Apostolick administrations unto Peter Iames and Iohn who seemed to be pillars And that not onely because they were all one as well as another immediately guided by the holy Ghost but because they were all equall in office and everie one to give account for himself unto God It is the like case in some measure of particular churches yea there is moreover a three-fold further inconvenience which seemeth to us to attend the translation of the power of particular churches in these ordinary admninistraons into the hands of a Synod of Presbyters commonly called a Classis 1. The promise of Binding and Loosing in way of Discipline which Christ gave to every particular church as hath been shewed is by this means not received nor injoyned nor practised by themselves immediately but by their Deputies or Over-seers 2. The same promise which was not given to Synods in acts of that nature as hath been shewed in the Chapter of Synods but in acts of another kinde is hereby received and injoyned and practised by them and by them onely which ought not to be And which is a third inconvenience The practice of this power of the keys only by a Synod of Presbyters still keepeth the Church as under nonage as if they were not grown up to the full fruition of the just liberty of their riper yeers in the dayes of the Gospel For a mother to bear her young daughter in her arms and not to suffer it to go on its own feet whilest it is in the infancie is kindly and comely but when the Damosell is grown up to riper yeers for the mother still to bear her in her arms for fear of stumbling it were an uncecessary burthen to the mother and a reproach to the Virgin Such is the case here The community of churches according to the Hebrew phrase is as the Mother each particular church is as the Daughter In the old Testament while the Church was in her nonage it was not unseasonable to leave the whole guidance and bearing thereof in the hands of their Tutors and Governours the Priests and Levites and in the community of the nationall courts But now in the dayes of the new Testament when the churches are grown up or should be grown at least to more maturity it were meet more to give the Church liberty to stand alone and to walk upon her own legs and yet in any such part of her way as may be more hard to hit right upon as in her Elections and Ordinances and Censures of eminent persons in office it is a safe and holy and faithfull office of the vigilancy of the community of churches to be present with them and helpfull to them in the Lord. And at all times when a particular church shall wander out of the way whether out of the way of truth or of peace the community of churches may by no meanes be excused from reforming them again into their right way according to the authority which the Lord hath given them for the publike edification of all the severall churches within their Covenant Soli Christo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This is licensed and entred according to Order FINIS