Jerusalem is the mother of us all 3. She is described with breasts to declare how she nurseth her new born babes with the milk of the Word But how and by whom doth the Church conceive bring forth and breed up her children Her head is indued with variety of gifts for teaching discerning and governing that is the seat of wisdom and government the body is the region of subjection To conclude the key of authority is in God the key of excellency is in Christ the key of ministry is in the Church fundamentally in the Presbyterie for execution A primo omnia per ordinem omnia ad finem omnis perfectio rerum omnium quies ordo est perfectionis sola inevitabilis via Isaacus a Telia I understand by the keys in the Text the official or stewardlike power of administring the word and prayer the seals and censures in the Church Election is an act of essential authority directly and primarily of derived authority secondarily and consequenter In case the Presbyterie doth censure the Church by vertue of derived authority and the Church the Presbyterie by vertue of essential authority other Churches must judge which cause is just by the rule of Christ in the Word Presbyters are not subject to the common members in censures of superiority In Israel the Elders or magistrates were primitively elected by a Democratical power and yet were not subject to a Democratical power being once elected A power in the people to set up and depose their Magistrates in way of authority constituteth a Democracy The fraternity hath a defensive power to non-communicate with their Elders or power of a defensive excommunication with reference to their Elders One Church hath a co-ordinate power of defence Jus est vel rectorium vel aequatorium in relation to another Church not offensive power In an Aristocracy or Monarchy the people have a defensive power to repel injury not an offensive power The Elders of the Church have power of order to act in all Churches upon the intreaty or consent either of Elders or the Churches themselves 1. Pro. 3. It is natural to all bodies to act for their mutual edification 2. The seals and such like administrations have a common relation to admit members to dispence censures hath a particular relation to a particular Church but the word and seals have a common and general relation to all Churches equally 3. There is a sacred-aptitude though no indeleble Character imprinted on Elders else they are not accomodated to administer holy things especially such things as are holy by institution This ministerial aptitude or fitnesse hath relation to holy things in all Churches there is nothing wanting to execution but orderly permission 4. The ground of dividing the Church into particular Churches doth warrant this power We are many Temples or Churches for edification sake If there had been many Temples in Judea what could have hindred the Priests from ministring as occasion required in any of them 5. We allow communion of Members why not of Ministers As Ministers depend on their particular Church for Authority to dispense holy things so Members depend on their particular Church for Authority to partake of holy things As it is a priviledge to partake so it is grounded upon Authority a Member may challenge communion And it is a priviledge also to dispense holy things though dependent on Authority 6. The Churches do mutually allow and ratifie one anothers acts One Church admitteth Members for all Churches and one Church electeth Officers for all Churches one gate of Jerusalem admitteth into the whole City Rev. 21. One Elder hath a general relation to the universal Church as well as a special relation to his particular Church To say no more it is sufficient that such a power of Elders tendeth to the edification of the Churches while nothing can be produced in oppositum The Apostle doth implicitely command us to do all things which are for edification confideratis considerandus when he commandeth us to do all things in such a maner as may be for edification 1 Cor. 14. What hath been said for the Unity of the Church doth shew that there is no ataxis or disorder in this communion of Elders There was no question in Primitive days concerning the power of Eldere in respect of Ordination Administration of the Seals and Preaching of the Word in all Churches It is commonly known that Anicatus permitted Polycarpus to administer the Sacrament in his Church See Magdebar Centariatores Concerning the Power of Synods and Councels or Churches Assembled CHurches have no power to invent Instituted mediums of Worship Pro. 1. or to make Laws concerning means of Worship which are not natural or to Institute mediums of Worship which are not contained in the first Commandment A Papist asked a Protestant What if our holy Mother the Church determine it The Protestant answered the Papist What if our heavenly Father determine otherwise 1. To make any thing holy for signification or operation which God hath not or more holy then God hath made it by Nature or Institution is so far Idolatrous or Superstitious and is Imagery forbid in the second Commandment 2. The Prophets and Apostles were charged to teach only what God had commanded and they professed they could do no more Deut. 4. Matth. 28. 3. Exod. 30. 1 Cor. 14.37 The Lord Christ condemned and opposed the Traditions of men both by Practise and Doctrine Matth. 15. 4. Our Saviour hath taken upon himself to Institute all holy Times Offices and Ordinances He is sufficiently wise and faithful we derogate from him in adding to his Institution 5. Kings themselves who are most independent and absolute have been corrected by God for taking upon them such a power 1 Chron. 13. 6. Circumstances which are natural means of Worship may be superstitiously abused by excess in using of them even remote means of Worship Quatenûs non expedit non licet as Canonical hours c. So far as any thing is excessively used in Gods Worship it grows unnatural and becomes an Image of mans invention We are to avoid appearances of Superstition as well as of other sins whether they are appearances in the opinion of men or in the nature of the things themselves in respect of their neer Neighborhood unto that which is evil Appearances of Superstition may be opposite to goodness when they are not contrary to truth Excessive use of remote circumstances in Worship whispers unto the weak that they are substantial means of Worship Invented means of Worship are unsuitable unto the nature of God who is a Spirit a Spirit hath no shadows to Christ who is not hid now in the vail of legal Ordinances to the great light of the Gospel the Word and the Church the shadows are longest when the Sun is lowest John 4. Phil. 3.3 we are called to Worship God in the Spirit It is a patching of that vail which
meet to request assistance for exhortation together with prayer and blessing as also for the satisfaction of other Churches concerning the faith and order of such a Church But for a Fast of constitution for a concourse of Churches and their messengers and solemnities in way of covenant unto the rearing of particular Churches I finde no Apostolical direction or footstep of primitive practice A feast of dedication may seem as sutable as a fast for constitution Apostles and such like were present and did something in separating the brethren but for explicite covenanting pro modo forma I finde nothing Explicite covenanting and searching of the conscience may be a dispensation too violent and compulsory in respect of the facility of Gods grace in point of acceptance The Ordinances of the covenant of grace are sutable to the grace of the covenant The Elders of the cities of refuge did not expostulate with such as fled before the avenger of blood in way of any explicite covenant or exquisite examination Josh 20. The Eunuch did not promise by any covenant explicite what he would be he onely shewed what he did believe or what he was Excesse of complements in solemnities formalities punctualities is unsutable to the simplicity and spirituality of the Gospel and also fully forbidden in the second commandment Calvin in his commentary on Rom. 14.3 4. maketh Knowledge a sufficient testimony that a man is received of God When thou seest a man saith he illuminated with the knowledge of God Satis testimonii habes quod a Deo assumptus sit And he addeth that we ought to hope well of any one in quo cernimus aliquid Dei Confessions of Faith have been deemed sufficient for mutual communion of Churches either by writing or word of mouth Concerning the Power of the Church THe body of members women and such as are unmeet to govern Pro. 1. excepted hath all power originally and essentially The body of members is the immediate subject of the Keys 1. Every being be it never so subordinate hath a defensive power and the Church or body of members is a seat and society of Authority and therefore hath power both offensive and defensive within it self Those churches Acts 14.23 had no proper Officers when they were called churches and there is no intimation that their Officers made them churches Officers are not the like and soul of churches 2. Else the church shall be left destitute of necessary supports for its subsistence times may come in which no Elders are to be obtained for many particular churches Such as are wholly subject have a defensive power according to the law of Nature David and Elisha thought it lawful to defend themselves Israel defended Jonuthan 3. 2 Kings 6.32 3. It is natural that the Whole should have Soveraignty over its parts especially when parts are equal or pares If all members in the body had an eye all should give direction according to the order of nature 4. The church hath relation of a Spouse unto Christ and it is meet that the Spouse should have power some way or other in absence of the Husband 5. The church hath power to give the Keys therefore it hath power to act the Keys 6. Those which have power in other Societies to elect their Governours have power also to act themselves yea to reserve to themselves what power they please in respect of those that are elected And if the church be a church in propriety when it hath no Officers then it hath an offensive power over such as are within and a defensive power towards those without as all Beings have which are sui juris Object The church may have the Keys to give yet not to act A messenger may carry a commission and yet have no power to open or execute the commission Answ The Arguments from the constitution of the church do prove that the church hath power to act as well as it can until it be furnished with Officers 2. The churches power of election is forcible of it self unlesse there be something against the proportion of the churches power as compared with other Societies 3. The church is not onely the conduit but the onely ordinary fountain of power upon earth 4. The members have all of them gifts for edification 1 Cor. 12.5 In Israel the whole body did act as well as elect though when they had Magistrates they could onely exercise a defensive power in interposing with or against their Magistrates and that onely for demonstrable causes not scandalously circumstantiated The memberâ— may act in the way of charity and of natural Office the Elders onely in way of Stewardship or instituted Office the people by a natural law the officers by a positive law The members have gifts and therefore may act as a potentia ad actum valet argumentum The people may give that which it hath onely virtually and act that which it hath formally or in potentia proxima Object There is not the same reason for supernatural Societies as for natural for the power of supernatural Societies as for the power of natural Societies Answ Supernatural Societies are as perfect as natural Societies and therefore if natural Societies have power within themselves for their subsistence the church must have the like Object The church cannot administer the Seals without Officers Answ The church hath power to act all Ordinances that are essential to its primary and natural integrality that are necessary to its being or first being though without Officers it cannot dispense some Ordinances as are necessary to its well-being or secondary being and essential to its secondary integrality The church hath not an organick integrity but it hath an essential integrity before it hath Officers The people have power to elect and authorize their own Officers Pro. 2. 1. The people did something in the election of Matthias Act. 1. the members elected Deacons Acts 6. 2. The Officers have no constant and ordinary mean of calling but from the church and body of members they do not receive their Office immediately from Christ and they cannot receive it immediately always from other Elders The power of Officers is dependent on the church not the power of the church on the Officers The church is greater then its Officers in respect of priority fontality finality stability and dignity Master Parker hath abundantly demonstrated this assertion in his Ecclesiastical Policie and that from principles maintained by Gerson a Papist 3. It was a continued custome from the Apostles days that the people did elect their Officers consuetudo est bona juris interpres Calvin hath demonstrated this point from Cyprian Calvin is for some consent Cal. Instit l. 4. c. 3. Sect. 5. Beza Epist 83. p. 365. Beza for an implicite consent The election of the people gives the Keys at least incompleatly when they have Elders because their consent is necessary together with the consent of the Elders The Elders have
Levites as a Sacrifice to God Exod. 29.13 not to our moral separating of Officers under the Gospel That act of Imposition doth rather import somthing of Election then of Ordination as we may shew in another question Calvins opinion is that Ordination ought to be administred by Elders praesse etium electioni debere alios pastores Doctor Ames granteth to Bellar. Instit lib. 4. cap. 3. that it is the doctrine of the reformed church that Ordination is an act of the Elders except in case of a general Apostacie Bellar. Ener de vocations Clericorum Election is an essential application of authority in the way of Jurisdiction Ordination is a circumstantial application of authority sutable to the power of Order and Office Election is an act of essential Jurisdiction Ordination is proper to official power and jurisdiction The least Ordinances in point of exemption are proper to the Officers as the greatest persons in respect of executive power The Keys of natural power of of general Office are in the members the Keys of instituted power or of Office in special in the Elders I might distinguish thus The Keys of natural power are in the body of members the Keys of Office in the Elders Concerning the Officers of the Church A Bishop and Presbyter are the same in point of power Pro. 1. both of Order and Jurisdiction both intensively and extensively 1. The Lording or Magistratical power is prohibited all Presbyters for what is allowed in Magistrates is disallowed in Ministers Luke 22.25 26. The Apostle Peter interpreteth the words of our Savour 1 Pet. 5.3 2. All Elders or Presbyters of Churches are equally styled Bishops in Scripture Acts 20. Phil. 3. Tit. 1. 1 Tim. 3. And those which have wholly the same Titles have the same Office 3. All Presbyters have equally the flock of Christ with them Act. 20. Cyprian might have said of Presbyters and Bishops together what he said of Bishops in his own sense Episcopatus est unus cujus pars in sclidum tenetur a singulis The Apostle made many Bishops in one Congregation but not one Bishop for many Congregations The Word of God is far from allowing teaching Elders to be onely ruling Bishops to rule by themselves and teach by others Personal qualifications must be personally executed and teaching Elders are the excelling Bishops The office of Bishops is a Ministery not onely a dignity therefore he that hath the title must do the work 1 Tim. 5.17 4. The Office of Diocesans is both formally and efficiently Antichristian Grant a Primate of England and why not of the whole world Gregory justly called John of Constantinople The forerunner of Antichrist 5. In other Orders there was no precedency instituted by the Lord Christ No Arch-Apostle no Arch-Evangelist no Arch-Presbyter or Arch-Bishop In the Temple the High-priest was a type of Christ the sons of the High priest were types of Presbyters and they were equal in the matter of their Office This Proposition according to Jeromes assertion had place of great authority amongst the Papists themselves until the Councel of Trent It hath been witnessed unto by the Fathers anciently The invented Orders of the Papists have been some of the plagues of the Antichristian Egypt The praedicant Orders of Antichrist are like to the clamorous Froggs the mendicant Friars or manducant Friars as Buchanan hath it are like to the creeping Lice the plague of Egypt of the Church and of the world This Proposition is abundantly elaborated by many Some Theologes opposed the superiority of Bishops as maintained to be Jure divino in the Councel of Trent the Cardinals opposed it also though for their own sakes It is an extraordinary judgement of God that so many Christian Princes and Kingdoms do suffer the Papal bondage all this while Nome populus as one said diutius ex conditione esse potest cujus eum poeniteat Object Timothy and Titus are made Diocesan Bishops by the Postscripts of those Epistles which are written to them Answ The Postscripts are proved to be Apocrypha by Beza and others When Paul saloteth the Elders of Ephesus Act. 20 he owneth Archbishop there but equally saluteth them all Besides Timoshy his course was ambulatory and he is called an Evangelist 2 Tim. 1.4 â— Titus was in the same rank with Timothy As for the Angels of the seven Churches in the Revelation they were Angels but of so many Congregations and do represent all the Elders of those Churches No Diocesan can be made to appear in the three next centuries after the Lord Christ The Angels are not called Archangels The seven stars the four beasts are all the Elders of all the Churches not onely seven or four The two Witnesses Revel 11 do represent all the witnesses of Truth The singular is frequently read for the plural All Bishops or Presbyters are both Pastors and Teachers Pro. 2. Pastors and Teachers are not distinct Officers 1. All the Priests under the High-priest all the fons of Aaron had the same Function or Office in the Temple There was not one a teaching Priest another an exhorting Priest a third a ruling Priest as if one Presbyter should be a teaching Bishop another an exhorting Bishop a third a ruling Bishop 2. The Apostle assigneth the title of Pastor and Teacher to the same Office Ephes 4. Some are Apostles some Prophets Jer. 5.15 some Evangelists some according to the Apostle Pastors and Teachers which is as much as both Pastors and Teachers It is supposed by some that the Apostle used and for some as if the copulative and were disjunctive in this place and the meaning of the Apostle this Some Pastors some Teachers But the Apostle doth not speak after such a manner as to insinuate any such interpretation he doth not so much as say And Pastors and Teachers onely Some Pastors and Teachers There is no parallel in all the Scripture which will prove that and loth stand for some 3. Pastors do not any where denote such as had the gift of exhortation most eminently but rather such as had the gift or office of Government both in the Old and New Testament 4. Teachers are properly before Pastors in order as they are taken for exhorters exhortations are dependent applications of Doctrines The Apostle placeth teaching before exhorting 2 Tim. 13.16 Tit. 1.9 5. All Bishops are called both to teach and exhort Tit. 1.9 Every Bishop saith the Apostle must exhort with wholesome doctrine 6. Pastors are sometimes described onely by the administration of teaching Go make disciples teaching them Matth. 28.19 20. A Bishop must be apt to teach 1 Tim. 3. The distinct gifts of teaching and exhorting do denominate some teachers and some exhorters rather then some Pastors and some Teachers 7. The Office of Bishops or Presbyters is made sometimes to consist onely in feeding as if all were Pastors Paul biddeth all the Elders feed the flock of Christ Acts 20. Peter speaketh in like manner 1
Priests office to take down the tent and tabernacle and accordingly it is onely the Elders office to preach ordinarily the doctrine of the Gospel the doctrine of humiliation and mortification to make way for the Churches progresse in the wildernesse Object The Princes are sent to teach 2 Chron. 17.7 Answ Piscator supposeth that the Princes did onely promove the Levites in teaching The Hebrew word doth signifie to make to learn whether by ones self or others 2. Magistrates have power to teach in the Common-wealth ordinarily though not as Prophets in the Church We may shut up all The Church is the golden Candlestick but the spirit of the Elders is the shining and burning light therein and the two Olive-branches thereof Zech. 4.2 Ezek. 7.20 The Church is the hangings of the Temple The Elders are the pillars on which the hangings did depend Concerning the Power of the Presbyterie THe Presbyterie is to govern with great condescendencie Prop. 1. and to labour for the consent of the Church in cases of moment Magistrates themselves are called Pastors and Fathers partly because they ought to be mild as Causabon and others have observed in the execution of their power Pastors should carry lambs in their bosomes Isa 40. Magistratical Soveraignty of spirit Luke 22. 1 Pet 5. is intolerable in Ministers of the Church It is better to be the Bride then the Bridegrooms friend Abrahams servant must intreat Rebeckah with kindnesse with bracelets and jewels and carry her to his master with honour The Priests were charged to take down the Tabernacle and the Levites to bear it with great respect and the Tabernacle was a type of the Church Our Solomon will have his mother to be set at his right hand in a chair of State Rev. 3. 4. 20. The four and twenty Elders have all thrones and crowns as Christians Cyprian ad Clâ—rum nihil sine vestro consilio plebi consensu Lib. 3. Ep. 10. l 4. Ep 5. l. 3. Ep. 22. l. â— Ep. 10. l. 5. Ep. 7. though not as Ecclesiastick Governours Cyprian seemeth sometimes to tender thus much respect to the common members or body of the Church as when he saith Vobis praesentibus judicautibus but not a word of suffrage in antiquity except in point of Election And Cyprian is bold to write after this manner hortor mando as to subjects The Apostle is bold to threaten the rod to the Corinthians Shall I come unto you with a rod 1 Cor. 4 21. The more authority is conferred upon Elders the more humble have they need to be Caesari cui omnia licent propter hoc minus licet I suppose the power of Jurisdiction doth originally and essentially reside in the body of members Elders have their power either by Election or Ordination because there is no other ordinary mean of vocation Election is necessary even from the people because they are to subject themselves or withdraw according as Elders preach for Christ or against Christ and therefore the peoples election doth incompleatly at least give the keys We affirm that the power of Presbyters doth not essentially depend on Ordination but on Election The people have power to act yea even to administer the Seals virtually and mediately and give power by Election to the Elders Election is now answerable to the hereditary vocation under the Law and the Ceremonial Ordination was but circumstantial to the hereditary right of the Leviâ—es Election in all Societies doth substantially or essentially derive power and correspondeth to an hereditary derivation of power * Ep. 65. p. 285. 67. p. 289. 13. p 365. Beza is onely for an implicite consent of the people and that onely in Election The French Synods have condemned Morellius his Democracie and established the next Proposition The commom members are not to govern by suffrage and co-ordinate authority together with their Elders Pro. 2. Prudence and brotherly love require an endeavour in the Elders for the procuring of consent from all Confessus seniorum est judicium Reclesiae Calv. Instis l. 4 c. 12. Sect 3. but consent is not absolutely necessary The consent of the people is not authoritative but consultative in respect of the Elders Praeter electionem ministrorum plebis nullas esse partes in Ecclesiastico regimine censemus so Chamier 1. Arg. 1. If the Presbytery be not invested with the power of Jurisdiction then the Presbytery serves but for order Cyprian by himself or his 〈◊〉 by it self either in consult a plâ—â—e did binde and loose censure and absolve the lapset though he speaks of the consensus plebis at such times Presbyters are but Prolocutors every members is essentially and substantially a Governour as well as an Elder 2. Arg. 2. If the Elders are not to baptize and administer the Seals but at the appointment of the Church in particular then they have not compleat power of order because they have not compleat power to execute their proper acts which belong to the power of order 3. The ministerial Keys or the Keys of execution were given to Peter as an Apostle Matth. 16.18 19. They may be given to Peter before he was an Apostle quoad promissionem after he was an Apostle quoad confirmationem when he was made an Apostle Arg. 3. quoad constitutionem 1. Peter is here made oeconomus Ecclesiae the keys of the Kingdom are given to Peter and kingdom includes the Church Peter is evidently distinguished from the Church therefore he doth not represent the Church On this rock saith the Lord Christ will I build my Church and unto thee will I give the keys he doth not say Vnto it as meaning the Church out Vnto thee meaning Peter and distinguishing Peter from the Church Object If it be objected that the Keys are not given to the Church here mentioned because it is the universal Church Answ I reply 1. The universal Church may as well be made the subject as the object of the Keys as it is the object in particular visible Churches so it may be the subject also 2. It may as well be made the subject of the Keys as of the visible Officers 1 Cor. 12.28 3. Is it probable that Poteâ— should represent any other Church then that which is expressed in the Text 4. I suppose it hath been already proved that there is an universal visible Church Secondly Peters confession argueth that this promise was made unto Peters person in way of reward 3. Peter is made a principal stone of the Church a secondary foundation a master-builder The doctrine of the Apostles is called a foundation of the Church Eph. 2.20 Rev. 11. the twelve Apostles are twelve sundamental stones of New Jerusalem Peter was named so with reference to his Ministery One and the same rule is not sutable to Peter as an Apostolical stone and as a Christian stone also Christ is the Rock Peter a stone
for Civil Peace Though a Prince hath not all the means to make a good man which a Priest hath yet he hath some and is to improve them for the making of his Subjects good men Spiritually as well as Civilly and he that is integrè bonus this est bonus vir in respect of all vertues in both Tables Else why is it the duty of Magistrates to Instruct Pray provide by Laws c. for the preservation and promotion of Religion 3. Mr. Porker lib. 1. cap. 34. Such ends were primary ends of Magistracy in Adâ—â—s only we must remember that axiome Fiâ—oâ—s leges non eadere sub legens 4. The Priesthood it self is naturally a branch of Magistracy it remained in the Patriarchs till God severed one from the other and God did not give all Spiritual power to Aaron when he distinguished the Priesthood much remined still in Moses 5. The Oecumenical power of a Master of a Family is not Ecclesirstical yet he hath Spiritual power to Teach Pray Bless command as he is a Pater-sansllias 6. Else a Magistrate is a Magistrate must subordinate the first Table to the second the glory of God to the Temporal good of men God to man Religion to civllity 7. A Magistrate when he Prays blesseth or commandeth all to seek the God of Israel as he his Castes utriusque tabula is not supposed to use any of these means in the first place for the Temporal prosperity of the Common-wealth Must a Magistrate as a Magistrate pray only for Corn Wine and Oyl or may he serve God only for Corn Wine and Oyl and bless only with the dew of Heaven and satness of the Earth A Physitian indeed 〈◊〉 Physitian doth only heal and intend to heal the natural man because he hath only natural mediums but a Magistrate hath Spiritual mediums as he is a Magistrate A Magistrate as a man may make a Temporal being his first and last and only end but as a Magistrate he intends both Temporals and Spirituals A Christian as a man may be for the world but as a Christian he is for the Lord. A Magistrates Office is Spiritual though the Magistrates person be Prophane and Heathenish Concerning the extent of Magistratical or Princely Power in making of Laws or Power of Iurisdiction in the CHURCH MAgistrates have power to declare the express Laws of Christ with Authority Pro. 1. and also the implicite Laws of Christ though not expressed 1. This is requisite to the perfection of Magistracy otherwise it hath not compleat power to procure its ends Somtimes there is need of present action somtimes the Churches do degenerate the Ship may perish while the Mariners are consulting 2. Magistrates have coactive power over such as are not Members to compel them to the outward acts of Religion why not over Members and Churches in like maner 3. Magistrates have Spiritual power enough Isa 49. as it hath been demonstrated 4. The Church is subordinate to Magistrates they owe but fatherly respect to the Church in Magistratical acts 5. The Magistrates in Israel were acknowledged to have such power and so to be protectors of Religion and Piety as well as of Civility The Priests and Levites were subject to the Kings Solomon could deprive Abiathar of the Priesthood Magistrates therefore may circumstantiate Church-meetings Lectures command Fasting days 2 Chron. 19.11 24.6 29. 30 31. and Thanksgiving days Synods Councels c. they ought to maintain their fatherly relation at least their fatherly relation bespeaks this power The Kings of Israel took care for the ordering of all things in the house of God disposing of the Ark while it abode in Tents commanded Feasts and Fasts and the Priests and Levites were very subordinate Magistrates power is directive Spiritually not Ecclesiastically even in acts of their office Obj. Magistrates have a directive power in Churches externally though not intrinsceally The policy of Israel was mixt this may be objected Ans Their Ecclesiastical power was distinguished from the Magistratical the Priests and Levites had their proper acts both in respect of order and Jurisdiction also 2. What the Kings of Israel could do as Magistrates in Israel that is permitted now in Magistrates by the Laws of Christ Extraordinary Magistrates such as Moses and David could indeed do many things which were proper to Ecclesiastical power they were great Prophets But the ordinary power of the King or the Prince or of the Priest was then distinguished as now the power of the Magistrate and of the Church Vot estis in Ecclesia ego extra-Ecclesiam Episcopus So Constantine Pro. 2. Magistrates are to allow the Church of Christ to circumstantiate its own archnatural mediums and circumstances in respect of decency and order within its self 1. The Church best knows what is expedient and therefore is most fit Ecclesiastical disputes are not so proper to the cognizance of Magistrates 2. It is necessary for the subsistance of Churches to have such power 3. The Apostles exercised this power Acts 15. and declared this power to the Corinth 1.14 4. Magistrates are subordinate to the Churches in respect of all Church power 5. The Church is an honorable and independent society under the Lord Christ is Priviledges are purchased by the blood of Christ 6. Magistrates are to consult and give counsel with and to the Church in acts of another nature before they command Hezekiah was a Royal president to Magistrates in this point 2 Chron. 30. Rom. 14.1 What Bilson saith serves this purpose Commissio est à Christo permissio à Magistratis Magistradies must tolerate some things which the Church may not the Church must tolerate that which Magistrates may not Non curat Lex de minimis Magistrates may not make unlimited Laws touching things good in their general nature because such things may be unexpedient in circumstances That which Gods Law doth absolutely prohibite is alwayes evil in its particular nature The matter of Gods Law ought to be the compasse of mens Law Magistratus non est dominus sed author legis Suarez defines a Law to be commune praceptum justum sufficientur promulgatum There may be somtimes Causa paenae ubi non est culpa in the civil State In things indifferent as when one thing compared with another is no better then another a Law may alter the case yet Magistrates ought to provide for the majesty and efficacy of Laws by the paucity and necessity of them and even in matters indifferent Ratio legis is necessary as well as voluntas Legistatoris Magistrates must punish an offence as reflecting upon the Civil State when they might tolerate it as an offence to the Church Quest What if Magistrates take too much upon them Ans They are to be obeyed passively 2. There must be a forbearance in respect of acting until due means of information be used 3. After due means of information there must not be
Christ the matter or object of Peters confession is the Rocâ—â—â— not the Confession it self The doctrine of the Apostles is a secondary foundation Ephes 2. and Christ in the doctrine of the Gospel is the fundamental Rock The Confession is not the Rock because the Rock is an antecedent to the Church but faith or confession is a concomitant That which is revealed to Peter is Christ in the doctrine or matter of confession and upon this is the Church to be built The foundation is homogeneous to the first essentials of the building visible confession is an accident to the Church as mystical 5. The Apostles had the power of the keys immediately from Christ and where if not in such explicite passages as these are 6. Let one place be found where one of the Apostles alone is brought in as representing the common members I cannot finde Peter or any one of the Apostles so much as to represent the other Apostles when our Saviour speaks to them When Peter speaks in the name of all the Apostles Joh. 6. and Matth. 19.28 Christ speaks to all in the plural number not to Peter onely It is questionable whether Peter did intend to speak in the name of all in this place and it is as questionable whether our Saviour intended all directly in speaking to Peter 7. What is there in that Text to argue that Peter is here representative both as a member in common and also as an Apostle Apostolical power and Church-power cannot be conveyed in the same expressions tum quoad praedicatum subjectum * If Christ had said Thou art Peter both a common member an Apostle and unto thee will I give the keys then there had been reason to have conceived that the keys had contained both Church-power and Apostolical power but the Text doth not so speak Augustine seemeth sometimes to apprehend that Peter did represent all Christians but Doctor Reynolds hath observed that he affirmeth that Peter received the Apostolical Office here Personam omnium Apostolorum gerentem in Johan Tractat. 118. It is evident that Augustine did not make the body of members the subject of executive power Object Peter doth at least represent the Apostles and their successors Answ 1. The Keys may be given onely to Peter directly here because they were in Peter wholly and the other Apostles were not spoken unto All power of execution is virtually in every Apostle One Apostle hath as much power in case there be but one as all together One Elder hath not a divided power where there are more then one to constitute a Presbyterie Arg. 4. 2. The Keys were given to all the Apostles by consequence though not in the way of representation 3. If Peter did now receive the Keys Apostolical then he could not represent the common Presbyters The same rule in the same expressions cannot confer such a different power as the power of common elders and the power Apostolical the Text and the parallels do not admit of any such representation The Apostles could not possibly represent the Church Matth. 18. They are distinguished from the Church which they are sent to gather The Church gathered is the object of the Ministery of those that are sent They are to teach them after that they have baptized The Apostles could not possibly represent the Church Matth. 18. They are distinguished from the Church which they are sent to gather The Church gathered is the object of the Ministery of those that are sene They are to teach them after that they have baptized them 2. They have power of office or actual power to baptize 3. They are bid Ga up and down to teach all Nations This place is thus far parallel to Matth. 16 and confirmeth the interpretavion precedent But our Saviour here intendeth this commission even to the successors of the Apostles I am with you saith he to the end of the World In all congruity our Saviour understands by you such as you are such as are indued with authority to teach and baptize as well as you onely the commission is to be interpreted quoad materiam subjectam and therefore the Apostolical commission is not exactly quadrato to the common Elders The promise of Christs presence tended to the encouragement of the Apostles and their successors in the work of the Ministery about which they were now sent and that power which is given to the Apostles here is given to all Elders as far as Scripture may permit 5. Elders have as full power to baptize as to teach Arg. 5. according to this Text and by consequence they have full power to admit members Full power to baptize upon making a disciple without any intervening act of the Church doth argue full power to admit because admission is not a consequent of Baptism 6. If all members young and old children and men Arg. 6. if thousands together must judge and govern upon conscience together with the Presbyterie 1. It must needs interrupt the work 2. It is work enough a double labour for the Elders to instruct the Church how to judge There is more time spent in informing the Church then in determining the case The members will make the keys flite about their Blders ears if they have them Must Elders hold the hands of the common members as the master teacheth Scholars to write and act onely by them 3. Pride is an epidemical discase in Democratical Government Who is sufficient to hold the reins of authority Where there are no standing Magistrates in the Common-wealth and in the Church no Governours at all or none but Governours the off-spring is like to be an Iehabed 4. Confusion and disorder is inevitable Turba ruunt The Church ought to be a patern of punctual order A Democracie is called by Plato Nundiâ—ae populares 5. As Church-work must needs be too long a doing by so many when it is casie so it must needs be done too soon by such as are precipitant when it is difficult Some are conscientious and scrupulous others unseasoned ignoran youthful This is a Pedocracy as well as a Democracy The seat of Government is the seat of Wisedom 7. Arg. 7. It is naturally in the power of the Presbyterie to admonish the whole church to suspend the whole church in respect of the seals 1 Thes 5.12 It is intoletable that many whole churches should convene and act â—onâ—â—nctim especially for all offences Arg. 8. otherwise they might be active in administring to those which are known to be unworthy This power containeth more then a negative reference to their elders The church and its elders are not co-ordinate societies in respect of ordinary execution In Israel there was Soveraignty in the Magistrates or Princes Amongst the Romans Imperium was in magistratu Majestas in populo 8. It is granted that Elders have full power in respect of some acts of jurisdiction elders may send to or speak to one another for a
members What do the elders then serve for 6. The promise to two or three doth somewhat declare what church is here meant The former words What you shall bind c. seem to be referred to the Apostles then present these words Where two or three are gathered together in my name c. seem to be referred to ordinary elders which were to follow And these two or three elders may justly be supposed to be an ordinary Presbyterie and they are proportionate to the two or three elders which constituted Presbyteries in the lesser cities of Israel The two or three here intended are not the same with the two or three witnesses before mentioned 1. Such a private proceeding doth not constantly admit of prayer 2. Christs presence in the midst of them argueth a more solemn assembly then that of the witnesses 3. So solemn a promise intimateth some great difficulty in the act to which it is applyed 4. Our Saviour hath manifest reference to such as did bind and loose in the words going before 5. It is spoken in conformity to a church then erected and to the proceedings then accustomed The intent of the promise argueth a greater latitude then is competible to that particular case of conviction I might now charge the multitude of Incerpreters both ancient and modern but it is done already by others It is most probable that the Synedrion of Elders was called the Congregation because there was wont to be an assembly of people present in the place and at the time of Judicature we call the Presbyterie the representative church upon another consideration A second general answer may be this the church is sometimes destitute of Elders and then a Church properly so taken is to be repaired unto immediatly And our Saviour may lay down the rule so as that it may serve for all times and all conditions of the Church Object The Apostle bids the whole church of Corinth to excommunicate the incestuous person and also all the Thessalonians to mark a brother that walketh disorderly and to withdraw from him 1 Cor. 5. Answ 1. Women have no judicial power though the Apostle writes to all therefore other members may not have judicial power though the Apostle writes to all Such speeches must be interpreted quoad materiam subjectam And if women notwithstanding this place of the Apostle must be denied judicial and co-ordinate authority or power or consent because other texts do so require why should not other common members also not withstanding this place of the Apostle be denied the like authority power or consent if other texts do require it If there be any authority in Councels and Synods then the consent of the major part of members shall not be necessary in many great acts which concern all because it is impossible for all churches to convene in their particular persons The Apostle wrote to the elders as well as to the members Rom. 12 8. 1 Peter 5.1 1 Corinthians 1.11 and therefore it is to be supposed that the elders were especially if not wholy respecter by the Apostle in such instructions and commandements 1 Corinthians 14. All are exhorted to see that all things be done decently and in order but this is especially if not onely in point of immediate execution the elders care and office Elders are not onely the members orators or such as we call moderators and prolocutors to govern the actions and not the persons of the assembly Morellius his phantasme as one calleth it who writes strongly for the power of members hath been generally condemned especially by French churches in their Synods Though common members were not equal agents with the elders in excommunications and yet the Apostle doth not here undertake to declare in what order they should concurr 2. The church of Corinth was now to obey the Apostles sentence and did but put the Apostles sentence with due and effectual solemnities in execution The spirit of the Apostle doth denote his Apostolical spirit both of direction and correction To direct with judicial authority is to command with coactive power The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 argueth more then a doctrinal determination What spirit should be present at the instant of excommunication but his spirit of Apostolical inspection or authority Spirit here is to be interpreted quoad materiam subjectam truth is the Church of Corinth according to the original is not made the nominative case to the act of delivering up to Sathan only it is required that it be done when the church is gathered together The Apostle then did excommunicate virtually and praeceptivè Cartw. reply p. 67. the church of Corinth obedientialiter Mr. Cartwright and others do consent to this assertion 3. It is apparent that the Apostles were wont to write so much to the whole church because the common members had special need to be instructed and incited to the performance of their duty and in particular to the submitting of themselves to their elders 4. We grant that the common members have something to do in many church acts and especially in excommunications they are to put the sentence of the elders in execution in declining from the parties censured What the Apostle attributes unto the whole church any where is abundantly exhausted and satisfied in the Churches doing of execution Moses applieth the phrase of casting out or putting away the evil one to the peoples doing of execution Deut. 17.7 See Ainsworth on the place Moses frequently applies the act of judging killing c. to all Israel though they did what they did chiefly by their Magistrates Deut. 13.5.9 c. We do farther grant that the common members have a sudordinate power of judgement though not a co-ordinate power A brother is under a power judicial of the body of members but the body of members are under the judicial power of the elders themselves 1 Thes 5.12 Heb. 13.17 The Saints are brought in as judging the world 1 Cor. 6.3 and they have a judicial power over the sinful world but it is subordinate and they must judge dependently under Christ The woman is brought in prophesying and praying in the Congregation but she must prophesie and pray in the church by no power formally but onely by participation Joshua giveth the sentence against Achan and all Israel stoneth him with stones and burneth him with fire thus all Israel must stone and burn the Achans of the Church with the judgements of God denounced against them in Gods fiery law by the ministery The Priests must blesse and curse at the entrance into Canaan and all Israel are to say Amen Deut. 27.14 The living creatures Ezek. 1. and Rev. 4. are to cry holy holy holy and the Elders fall down and worship and say Amen The Saints shall judge the world under Christ and yet have not cause to expect so much as a consultative power together with Christ All in Israel were to observe a due distance by measure from the Priests and
in every Citie and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth not exclude villages as it appeareth by Matth. 10.10 Cenchrea was but answerable to a village and yet it is said to have a Church Rom. 16. One Province contained many Churches 1 Cor. 16.1 19. Gal. 1.2 21. Rev. 1.2 The Churches of Galatia were Churches of one Province not one Provincial Church 4. There was no ordinary Officers instituted by Christ for any other then congregational Churches The Elders of every congregation have the same power both intensive and extensive there are no Archbishops or Archdeacons instituted by the Lord. 5. All congregations have the same Titles the same Power the same Ordinances compleatly Nature giveth the same name to similar parts every drop of water is water it hath the same name and the same nature Paris in parem non est pocestus The lamb of the Passeover was to be eaten onely by so many together as might enjoy a festival communion together at one Table Exod. 2. Ancient Canons did prohibite the ordaining of a Presbyter to more then one Title but as the Church did degenerate there came in Non-residence Pluralities Commendaes universal and perpetual Commendaes for term of life or for term of life a distinction of Benefices compatible an incompatible and Canons all these were added to Diocesan Episcopacie and Prelacie The Church in respect of its integrality Pro. 3. may consist but of two or three Noah and his wife and children were a Church Abrahem and Sarah were fundamentally the whole Church of the Jews Adam and Eve were actually the whole Church upon earth The Churches indeed in the Apostles time seem to be somewhat grown before they erected Presbyters yet they were Churches when they were not so numerous and there was the lesse need of ordinary Presbyters because there were extraordintry Two or three cannot be a compleat Church organically Those two or three in Matth. 18. do refer to the Presbytery as may be proved hereafter The family or domestick Churches preceding the Levitical Priesthood do correspond to the congregational Churches constituted by the coming of Jesus Christ and the state of the Church then in point of unity and universality doth confirm the unity and universality of the Church at present The Masters of families with their fathers were Priests in their childrens family as well as in their own houses Melchizedek by vertue of a natural precedency in age as may be supposed was a Priest to Abrahams family as well as in his own Adam if sin had not degraded him had been naturally a Priest for ever unto the whole world If Officers and Discipline strictly taken are not necessary to the being of a Church then a number of Seven or such a number as may afford Officers and exercise Discipline according to the rule Matth. 18 is not necessary And suppose such qualifications in members as are necessary to Officers unnecessary in members to the being of a Church it will follow that such a number as is necessary to the constituting of Officers is unnecessary to the being of a Church Concerning the Form of the Church EXplicite and particular covenants are not necessary to the constitution of Churches Pro. 1. Heb. 10. Acts 19.9 1. Christians fell into fellowship without any such form in Primitive days The Ordinances brotherly relation cohabitation were natural motives the directions and exhortations of the Apostles and Elders did concur Acts 19.9 Paul is said to separate the brethren in Ephesus 2. Elders were ordained without any explicite covenants both before and since the time of the Gospel we read of a charge but not one syllable of a covenant Now if Officers were ordained without any covenant May not members by proportion be admitted without any explicite covenant 3. One ground may be the unity of the Church in general we must not so close with a particular Church which is but a part of the Church as to break relations with the whole Church universal in confining members strictly to one particular Church 4. Another ground may be this Fellowship in a particular Church is conditional and transient and a duty of no greater moment then many other which are not to be instanced in unto admission 5. In the Acts there is no appearance of explicite covenanting with the Church in particular or general There was an explicite profession of faith and repentance and a cleaving unto the Lord Acts 2.8 No shew of covenanting to cleave to each other in Church-fellowship no shew I say of any such explicite covenanting Christians counted themselves next brethren one and the same houshold and were exhorted to maintain the unity of the Spirit as one body at one table as much as might be for edification The mystical Church in the Temple was represented by twelve cakes on the table called The bread of faces because all Saints sit there together face to face feeding on the Lord Jesus in way of communion The visible Church or Church of the outward court is also called to one and the same table mystical as far as all may sit together 6. We finde no explicite covenanting in Israel but with God and Israels covenanting with God was solemnized and attended as occasion did urge in collapsed times There is not any evidence of their covenanting conjoyntly with God at their first constitution there may be granted an explicite covenant of reformation but not of constitution of confirmation or reformation not of admission Object It is recorded in Neh. 10.29 that they clave to their brethren Answ It is explicated in the same verse how they clave to their brethren namely to covenant with God They did not covenant to cleave to their brethren but they clave to their brethren to covenant with God Besides some duties that concerned the House of God and the Officers of the House of God are there particularized but Church-fellowship is made no part of the covenant For an explicite covenant of reformation we have Nehemiah Hezekiah Jehoiada c. authentick examples but for an explicite covenant of constitution we have authentick examples to the contrary the Apostles themselves such as it must needs be presumption in us to oppose In the Old Testament it is usual to speak of a covenant of conversion and reformation but neither in the Old or New can we finde an explicite covenant of constitution of Churches and admission of members A people professing faith a resolution to embrace the Ordinances of the Lord Jesus Christ together is a Church before there be any explicite covenanting together there is an implicite covenant in such a profession Pro. 2. When a company of Christians are called to dwell together where there is no foundation of a Church there is need of some explicite conjunction or consent Such are to make known their desire and faith to one another either by testimony or by their profession And where Elders of some neighbouring Church may be procured it is