Election inferrs thus Yet I will not thence conclude that the right of electing Bishops is to be reduced to the promiscuous Votes of the common people for whether it be better that the Bishop be design'd at the meeting of the whole Church or by the suffrages of a few no right Constitution can be prescribed to all Churches for severall Countries have severall Laws Customes and Institutes If any in whom the right is abuse it by Tyranny they are compelled into order by the Holy Magistrate or the right of designing Ministers may be transferr'd from them to others for it is sufficient that some Elders performe that office of Electing upon command of the King or Magistrate by the advise and Counsell of men who understand what the function of a Bishop is what is the condition of that Church or People over which a Pastor is to be appointed who also can judge of the endowments the learning and manners of every one By this right Justinian as we have said Constituted a manner of Electing somewhat receding from the former usage and the antient Canons by this right after the Nicene Canon were many Bishops elected by the Clergy and the People The Lawes of Charles the Great and other Kings are extant containing divers wayes of Electing so that Bucer said most truly The form of Election is prescribed by pious Princes Let us now consider whether the Highest Power it self may make Election the question is not whether it ought to make it nor whether it be alwayes expedient to doe so but whether if it doe make Election it commit any offence against the Law Divine We say with the excellent Marsilius Patavinus The Law-giver or Prince is not by any Law of God prohibited from the Institution Collation or Distribution of Ecclesiasticall offices Whosoever affirm the contrary doe accuse of impiety innumerable pious Princes of antient and of this age which truly is a point of great temerity when no Divine Law can be produced to prohibit it as hath been abundantly by others and by us in some part demonstrated Although this might suffice for whatever is not circumscrib'd by Divine Law is within the sphere of the Highest Power yet for the desending of our sentence both reasons and examples are in readinesse The first reason is taken hence that all actions even those that naturally belong to others not having causes determined by nature we see are rightly exercised by the H. Power Naturally men choose teachers for their children and give them Guardians sick persons make use of what Physician they please Merchants elect the Curators of their Company Yet in many places Guardianship is appointed by Law alone or the will of the Magistrates Physicians are constituted by publick Order and Informers of Youth too with interdiction of others from the practice of those faculties and to the Commanies of Merchants are fit Curators also appointed by the Highest Power without blame of any any But if this right be competent to the Highest Power over those things which did belong to every one much more over those things that belong unto the People because the power of the people is devolved upon it as all men know that have any knowledge of the Lawes That sometimes there may be just causes why the H. Power should challenge to it self the Election of Pastors no wise man will deny For often errours introduced into the Church against the word of God cannot be rooted out by other means often there is no other way to avoid Schism often the suffrages of the Clergy are disturb'd with factions popular election with seditions whereof are extant many examples even of the purer times Adde in the last place that the times are now and then so boisterous that the King will hardly keep the Crown upon his head except hee have a care the Pastors may be most obedient and faithfull to him Verily all Histories doe witnesse how dearly the German Emperours paid for their abdication of this Imperiall Right That we may come to Examples it hath been shewed afore that before the Mosaicall Law and afterward among the Nations without Judaea Kings themselves enjoyed the Priesthood the Divine Law not then forbidding it at which time there can be no doubt the Priesthood might also have been committed by them to others as we read the Pontifs and Flamens were created by the Kings of Rome But among the Hebrew people after Moses Law no man except of Aarons family could be admitted to the office of a Priest nor to the service of the Temple unlesse he were a Levit. Hence is Jeroboam justly blam'd for choosing Priests who were not Levits for the Law did not allow it nor was it in the King to command Sacrifices to be offered in any place but the accustomed which after David was Jerusalem Other Functions or the places for them the King might assigne to the Priests and Levits So were some Levits appointed by David for preaching others for singing And that there should be Singers with Harps and other Instruments was God's precept by the Prophets as the application of persons to the severall offices is every where attributed to David under the name of King and after David to Solomon and Jehoshaphat the King not the Prophet by name electeth Priests and Levits whom he might send forth to the Cities of Juda to instruct them The very same thing that is here debated For as some Fathers were of opinion the right of blood in the Moisaicall Law is correspondent to the Imposition of hands in the Christian Law As then the Hebrew King may apply certain persons to a certain office and place but only such as were of Aarons family and Levits so the Christian King rightly makes a Presbyter or Bishop of a certain City but of them which are ordain'd or to be ordain'd And so did Nehemia's Lieutenant to the Persian King leave some Levits in the particular Cities others hee called forth unto Jerusalem Yea the High Priest attained not that dignity by Succession but Election of the great Synedry yet confined unto certain families which Election seemeth to have been the regall right when the Kings reigned the most learned of the Hebrews Maimonides hath observed But let us proceed with the Christians Before Constantine no man will wonder that no Christian Pastors were elected by the Emperours when the Emperours either were enemies to the Church or had it in contempt and accounted it not worthy of their care Constantine gave the force of a Law to the Nicene Canon of Election to be made by Bishops other Emperours after him did the like either by renewing the Canon or not abrogating of it And 't is manifest this manner of Election was long in use the Empire being of greater extent than that the Emperours diligence could provide for all the Churches Notwithstanding this it was lawfull for the Emperours if they pleased to Elect by themselves For seeing it
is from the Highest Power that the Canon hath the force of a Law no marvell if the Highest Power upon just causes may recede from that Law either in the whole or in some particular case For Lawes are wont either to be abrogated or temper'd and limited by the Law-givers as afore is shewed Yea there is no need of abrogation or solution of the Law when as the Lawyers agree in this that by the generall words in the Law set down the right of the Highest Power is never conceiv'd to be excluded 'T is true the Examples of Elections made by Bishops prove it is not necessary that Elections be made by the Highest Power the Canons also shew the same Elections are rightly made by Bishops with consent of the Highest Power but neither of these is in question The Question is whether it be also lawfull for the Highest Power to make Election That it is lawfull we have the judgement of the best both among the Emperours and the Bishops In the first Synod of Constantinople Theodosius commanded the names of all that were proposed should be given to him in papers reserving to himself the choyce of one What can be more clear One among all the Bishops propos'd Nectarius the Emperour makes choise of him and persisteth in it against the will of many Bishops who seeing the Emperour would not be remov'd give place and yeild him that reverence which was due unto him in a matter not prohibited by Law Divine Who sees not this was done beside the Canons for according to the Canons the Emperour had no share in the Election but here the Emperour alone electeth that is designs the person The Bishops as also the Clergy and people approve of the Election But 't is one thing to elect another to approve of the Election The Bishops approve because it was their Office after Baptisme to impose hands upon Neitarius as yet a lay man and Catechumen And hert too we observe the Canon was not followed for according to the Canons a Catechumen nor Neophite could not be elected The Clergy also and the people doe approve because to them belong'd the Tryal which how far it differs from Election is shew'd above Many examples we might alleage of Elections not Cunonicall but Imperiall Why the Emperours themselves elected we deny not they had peculiar causes but this pertains not to the question of right but prudence Certainly the Emperours believ'd it to be lawfull for them before they consider'd whether or no it were expedient For of things unlawfull there ought to be no consultation To say the cause hereof was some Divine revelation or inspiration in such an age of the Church is a meer refuge of pertinacious ignorance to say the Domination of the Roman Bishops was the cause of Imperiall elections when as yet that Episcopacy was not turn'd into temporall Dominion is to be quite mistaken in the order of times Nor yet can wee doubt but the more Sanctimony abated in the Clergy and Obedience was slackned in the people the more just cause had the Highest Powers to vindicate Election to themselves In the West that Bishops were most often and for a long time elected by the most Christian Kings of France without any suftrage of the people or Clergy is written in all the French Histories as it were with Sun-beams What was said of the Domination of the Roman Bishops as if he had given occasion to Kings to draw to themselves the Elections besides that it is before answered cannot be applyed to the Bishops of France and to those times when the French Kings did not yet possesse Italy Yea on the contrary because the French Kings used this right in their own kingdome therefore also in Italy did Charls the great assume this to himself that hee might not with lesse power governe Italy than France and Germany For it is most truly observed by Godalstus and others the Decree made in Pope Adrians time pertains only to the Italian Bishops when in other parts the compleat right of Election was in Charls before In vaine also a recourse is had to the wealth of Bishop-pricks the Temporall Jurisdictions annexed to them for even in the times of Charls the Great and much more in the antient and purer times Bishopricks were but poor and slender as is noted by that most searching Antiquary Onuphrius And for Jurisdictions the Bishops in Charls his time had none annexed to their Bishopricks but this came into use at last after the avulsion of Germany from France when the Ottoes were Emperonrs in Germany And the Jurisdictions were so far from being the cause of Imperiall Elections that on the contrary therefore were Jurisdictions granted unto Bishops because the Emperours were most assured of their fidelity being chosen by themselves and thought the custody of Cities might therefore most safely bee committed to them as the same Onuphrius hath observed Some have been deceiv'd by the name of Investiture Because the word is used of Fees especially therefore have they thought all that is sayd of investitures of Bishops to belong to territories and Lands which is a grosse â—rrour for to vest and to invest are old words of German Originall that signify the collation of any right whatsoever and are therefore found in old Authors applyed to all Offices both Civill and Ecclesiasticall It appears by a passage in the life of Romanus Bishop of Rouen about the year 623. that Investiture by the staffe was almost 300. years before Territories were given to Bishops which began under Otto the first Emperour of that name And truly if Investiture had been with respect to Civill Jurisdiction it would have been by the Scepter Sword or Banner as the manner of those times was not by a ring and staffe Wherefore although the most Christian Kings did not challenge to themselves imposition of hands which maketh Presbyters yet these two things they esteemed as their right to joyn this man unto this Church which is signified by the Ring and to conferre upon him Jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall that is judgement concerning Sacred affairs with a certaine publike power which is signified by the staffe For to the King himself also when he was first consecrated together with the Scepter was wont to be given a staffe And by this saith Aimonius the defence of the Churches that is a power to maintaine Religion was deliver'd to him from God for the Offices corresponded to the signs as also a Canon was vested by a Book Many ages after when piety had begotten opulency and the daughter laid a snare for the mother the Emperours almost detruded from their most antient right began to shew the indignity of the thing by this argument among the rest because the Bishops by their munificence possessed Lands and territories But never did the Election of them depend upon this alone being more antient than the same munificence Moreover the accessory cannot have so much force as to draw
humane Counsells are not to be waited for when the Divine suffrages doe lead the way Aurelius our brother an illustrious young man is already approved by our Lord and called by God c. And then Know ye therefore most beloved brethren that He was ordained by me and my Collegues that were present He saith He was wont to consult with the people that they were alwayes to be consulted with he saith not yea by his example he shewes the contrary for He with his Bishops had promoted Aurelius the peoples advise being not required Hee setteth down the cause the people is advised with to give testimony of life and manners but Aurelius had a sufficient testimoniall from his twofold Confession which Cyprian calls a Divine suffrage By the same right Hee declares to his Clergy and people by epistle that Numidicus was to be ascrib'd to the number of the Carthaginian Presbyters and that he had design'd the like honour for Celerinus That in Africa other Bishops also had right of Electing Presbyters the saying of Bishop Aurelius in an African Councill sheweth The Bishop may be one by whom through the Divine grace many Presbyters may be constituted And that the testimonies of the people were not alwaies desired is manifest in the third Carthaginian Councill the words of the Canon are That none be ordained Clerk unlesse he be approved by the testimony either of the Bishops or of the people Wherefore two wayes lead one to the Clergy Popular testimony or Episcopall examination Whence Jerom to Rusticus When you are come to perfect age and either the people or the Prelate of the City shall elect you into the Clergy And in another place Let Bishops hear this who have power to Constitute Presbyters through every City Yea the Laodicean Synod whose Canons were approved by a Councill Oâ—cumenicall rejecteth popular Eclections Upon which place Balsamon notes that the most antient Custome of popular Elections was abrogated by that Canon for the incommodities thence arising as he also notes upon the xxvi of the Canons Apostolicall that Presbyters were of old chosen by suffrages but that custome was long since expired Now let us proceed to the Election of Bishops a thing of so much more moment than the former by how much more care of the Church was imposed on the Bishops than on the meer Presbyters No man denies them to have been chosen by the people that is by the Laity and the Clergy after the Apostles time but this to have been of right immutable no man can affirm For to passe by the examples of them that have been constituted Successors by the deceasing Bishops it is a thing of most easie proof that Bishops were very often chosen either by the Clergy of their City alone or by the Synod of their Comprovinciall Bb. For the right of the Clergy the place of St. Ferom is remarkable At Alexandria from Mark the Evangelest unto Heracles and Dionysius the Bishops the Presbyters alwayes named one to be Bishop chosen out of themselves and placed in a higher degree Naxianzen speaks ambiguously He would Elections were permitted either to the Clergy alone or chiefly to them for so lesse evill would befall the Churches yet withall he shewes this was not observ'd in his time but the suffrages of the richest and most potent men yea the Votes of the people too had the stroke in Elections But the Election made by the Comprovinciall Bishops is approved by the great Nicene Synod without any mention of the people Whereunto agrees the Antiochian adding this If any contradicted such Election the suffrages of the greater part of Bishops should carry it Yet I deny not in many places even in the time of these Synods the people also had their Votes but the custome was not universall It was free untill the Synod of Laodicea was confirmed by an Universall Councill the xii Canon whereof following the Nicene and Antiochian gives the right of Electing to the Comprovinciall Bishops the xiii expresly takes away all Sacerdotall Elections from the multitude Justininian also hath excluded the common people from the Election of Bishops and committed it namely to the Clergy and the prime men of the City By the prime men he means the Magistrates and Officers Among many named the designation of one he committed to the Metrapolitan yet so that if there were a scarcity of able men the Election of one by the Clergy and principall men might stand Notwithstanding this Constitution of Justinian which did not long outlive him soon after there was a return to Synodicall Elections which Balsamon relates were usuall in the East in his time also with this exception that the Metrapolitans were chosen by the Patriarchs the Patriarchs by the Emperours Wherefore we conclude it is neither proved out of the Scripture nor was it believ'd by the antient Church that the Election either of Presbyters or of Bishops did immutably belong unto the people Of this judgementa also they must needs be whosoever have transferred the Election to the Presbytery for were it of Divine and immutable right that the Multitude should Elect the election could not be transferred to the Presbytery more than to any others Neither were the Compromise of any value which we read was often made concerning Election if it be determined by Divine Precept that the common people must choose the Pastor for that sentence What a man doth by another bee seems to doe by himself pertains only to those actions whereof the next efficlent cause is undetermined by Law Certainly the very same thing that wee say was judg'd against Morellius at Geneva that is in that City wherein great honour great right belongs unto the people which Decree the most learned Beza defending That the whole multitude saith he was call'd together and gave their Vote was neither essentiall nor perpetuall In the same place he thinks it sufficient if the common people be allowed to bring in reasons why they are displeas'd at the Election which reasons afterward are lawfully to be examin'd Beza himself commits the Election to the Pastors and Magistrates of the City which is congruent enough to Justinian's Law but is not of right Divine and immutable for how can that be prov'd if Ordination and Confirmation be rightly distinguisht from Election And the antient Church was of another mind permitting to the Bishop the Election of Presbyters and of the Bishop to the Comprovinciall Bishops Wherefore the manner of Election is of the number of those things that are not specially determined by Law Divine but only under generall Rules which command all things to be done in the church for edification in the best order and without confusion But in all things of this nature those generall rules remaining safe wee have demonstrated afore Legislation belongs to the Highest Power Bullinger a man of a very sharp judgement is of the same mind who having alleged many examples of popular
the Primacy that method was alter'd by a Councill providing that merit not seniority should Create a Bishop ordained by the judgement of many Priests to the end an unworthy person might not unadvisedly usurp the place and so become a scandall to many Hee saith the primacy of Timothy among the Presbyters is acknowledged by the Apostle Whereas some learned men would hence set up a certain circular praesidency herein they are opposed by all the antient Monuments that are extant nor doe the words of Ambrose help them for receding is all one with dying or departing And whereas the Courses of the Priests are brought hither to establish this Interpretation any one may see with half an eye how impertinent it is when those Courses make nothing toward presidency which was alwaies in the High-Priest and other Chief of their Classes But the alleged Writer his meaning is that Seniority in age or rather in Function was valued in the making of Bishops Wherein although none of the Antients be on his side yet if wee understand him of certain Churches what hee saith is not incredible For also the Archimandrits or chiese of Hermitages at the Commencement of Monachism were elected according to that Order To believe him of all Churches Jeroms testimony of the Alexandrian Custom will not permit The same Writer concerning Timothy Timothy now Created Bishop he institutes by epistle how he ought to govern the Church Concerning Titus Titus the Apostle Consecrated an Apostle and so admonisheth him to be sollicitous for the well ordering of the Church No other are the judgements concerning Titus Timothy of Epiphanius Eusebius Chrysostom Oecumenius Theodoret Theophilact Primasius as by producing their words hath been demonstrated by others Yea the Oecumenicall Synod of Chalcedon saith After S. Timothy untill now have been made xxvii Bishops all ordained in Ephefus For Antiquity did not believe what of late some with confidence aflirm that they who were Evangelists could not be created Bishops As long as they walked about the Provinces they did the office of Evangelists but when beholding in one place a plentifull harvest they thought fit to cherish it with their longer Presence doubtlesse being presidents to the Presbytery they performed all offices Episcopall Upon which reason Antiquity believed that the Apostles also were truly Bishops of certain Cities namely in those places where they made longer stay or to speak more properly where they sate by which word Luke hath very emphaticully expressed Paul's abode with the Corinthians Besides Timothy and Titus we read of others advanced by the Apostles into the Episcopall throne Concerning Evodius thus to the Antiochians writes Ignatius He first by the Apostles hands was promoted to our presidency What presidency that is is not left doubtfull by Ignatius who every where distinguisheth the Bishop from the Presbyters and preferrs him above them You must doe nothing without the Bishop but be subject to his Presbytery And in another place The reverend Presbytery being dear to God is so fitted to the Bishop as the strings to the Harp And again in another place What is the Bishop but the Prince and the Presbyters but his Counsellours This is that Ignatius who saw Christ in the flesh who lived with the Apostles who next after Evodius was Bishop in the Church of Antioch A question may be made when as their office who were over the Presbyters by a certain perpetuall dignity is so antient and approv'd by Christ himself by what name was that Honour entitled before the common name of Bishops began peculiarly to be ascrib'd unto this Presidence which as Jerom thinks began about the viii year of Nero. The antient Fathers are of opinion that those Princes of the Presbyters were stil'd Apostles And truly there remain in Cyprian and other Authours not a few obscure prints of this locution Yea Paul himself when he saith Hee was nothing lesse than the chiefe of the Apostles seems to intimate there were some other Apostles of lesser mark That the name of Angel was antiently given to him who afterward began to be called Bishop the Apocalyps evinceth For it appears the word was taken as of common use because those Letters are popularly written and the Mystery of the Starrs is explained by the appellation of Angels as being very obvious but the most simple and plain denomination seems to have been that of President for by this name Justin Martyr calls the Bishop in his second Apology Another question may be By what example Episcopall Eminence was brought into the Churches It is certain there were degrees of Priests among the Heathens that the Custom was not new to the Grecians and such as sprang from Greece we learn by the most antient discipline of the Druids One saith Coesar is President to the Druids who hath amongst them the chief Authority And how antient the Emmence of Mother Cities in matters of Religion is we learn out of Thucydides where he speaks of the Corcyreans a Colony of the Corinthians upon which passage the old Scholiast notes It was the Custome to receive High Priests from the Metropolis Strabo names one Priest of the Catti who was we make no doubt the highest and among the Burgundians the greatest Priest is mention'd by Marcellinus This custome God himself approved by the legall Constitution of the Judaical Republick when hee set up One with highest Authority over all the Priests Who although in some acts hee was a Type of Christ yet the whole Institution of this Pontificate is not to be referr'd to this end alone This eminence of one Priest served for Order also as well as the Regall Power which did also in its way adumbrate Christ Although then this example might suffice yet to me the Constitution of the Christian Church seemeth not so much expressed according to the pattern of the Temple at Jerusalem as of the Synagogues For the Synagogues were in many places without any Commanding Power as neither the Church of Christ hath any by it self Adde hereunto that wheresoever the Apostles came they found Synagogues well enough ordered even from the times if the Babylonian dispersion which if they would receive the Faith of Christ as to them the Gospel was Preached before others there was no cause why they should depart from that Government that the experience of many ages did commend nor was it any burden to the Gentiles in such a matter to accommodate themselves to the Jewish institutions Now in every Synagogue it is certaine there was one who by the Greekish Jews was call'd the Ruler of the Synagogue which name occurs frequently both in the Gospell and the Acts and every where the Prince of the Synagogue is designed by it Only one place is excepted where the word being taken in a larger sense in one Synagogue are named more Rulers that is both he who as the Hebrew Masters teach us was the Prince who answers to our Bishop
a Presbyter is ordain'd the Bishop blessing him and holding his hand upon his head let all the Presbyters also that are present hold their hands upon his head by the Bishops hand For the confirmation hereof I dare not bring that of Paul concerning the laying on of hands of the Presbytery because I perceive Jerom Ambrose and other antient and the Prince of all recent writers Calvin interpret Presbytery in that place not the consistory but the Office to which Timothy was promoted And truly whosoever is versed in the Councils and the writings of the Fathers cannot be ignorant Presbytery as Episcopacy and Diaconacy to bee names of Offices And seeing it is certaine that Paul laid hands on Timothy it seemeth neither necessary nor convenient to joyn fellows with him for an Apostolicall act and Collation of miraculous gifts In the meane time I doe not see how this can be refelled even among the Schoolmen Antisiodorensis long since granted it where Bishops are not Ordination may be rightly made by Presbyters For the things that are observed for order sake admit exceptions So in the antient Councill of Carthage it is permitted Presbyters in case of necessity to reconcile penitents and in another place to lay hands on the Baptized Moreover as we have said above it is doubtfull whether Presbyters that neither have Presbyters under them nor a Bishop over them are neerer to Bishops or more Presbyters For of Timothy also Ambrose argues thus He that had not an other above him was a Bishop And we know to take an instance in the Common-wealth many things are lawfull for a Senate having not a King which to a Senate under a Kings Power are unlawfull For a Senate without a King is as it were a King This is our third Assertion The causes were not light why in this age in some places at least for some time Episcopacy was omitted That the causes are temporary Beza himself seems to acknowledge when he saith He is not the man to think the old order were not be restor'd if the ruines of the Church were once repair'd Of these causes the first might be the penury of men sufficient for so grave an Office for if that were a cause just enough while the Church was yong to omit in many places the Episcopall eminence as we heard Epiphanius say why then at the Churches Rise out of the thickest darknesse might not the same cause take place especially in those places where was found not one of the old Bishops that would yield up himself to truth and open his eyes to see the light held forth Another cause of this omission might be the long and inveterate depravation of the Episcopall Office Socrates of old complains some Episcopacies of his time had exceeded the bounds of Sacerdotall purity and were corrupted into Domination Hierax complains in Pelusiot the Dignity of lenity and meeknesse was advanced into Tyranny Nazianzene complains of the ambition of Bishops and for that reason wisheth if not Episcopacy yet at least that perpetuall right of Cities in retaining Episcopall dignity were changed Would to God there were neither Presidency nor preeminence of place nor tyrannicall power that we might all receive our estimate by vertue alone The Fathers of the Ephesin Synod long since professe themselves afraid lest that under the colours of the Sacred Function should commence the pride of secular power And it is easy to find the like sayings in the African Councils But verily never did Ecclesiastical ambition from the Apostles age unto those times advance to such a hight as it hath done since those times to the memory of our Fathers So that now without cutting off the part wherein the cause lyeth the disease seems almost impossible to be cur'd It is true good things are not to be condemn'd because some men abuse them yet the abuse being turn'd into a custome an intermission of the things themselves is not infrequent The Mosaicall Serpent might have remained without Superstition if the thing it self were considered but Ezechiah respecting the grown vice of the people that he might take away the Superstition took away the Serpent I am loth to say that the name and eminence Episcopall by their fault to whom it had fallen had lost all its reverence and was come into the odium of the common people to whom even when they are in errour somewhat sometimes is to be yielded The Romans being evill intreated by the Tarquins took an oath they would no more endure a King at Rome A third cause may be added that in those most infestious times the Preachers of the truth being hated for the truths sake were obliged to acquit themselves not only from the crime of ambition but from all suspition too which when by taking away the Episcopall dignity they sollicitously endeavour'd for all this they escaped not the calumny of their adversaries What reproaches should they not have heard had the change of Doctrine been joyned with the acquisition of preferment I will adde one cause more why in the beginning of the Repurgation Episcopacy was not very necessary God had raised up excellent men of great wit of great learning of great esteeme both among their own and the neighbouring people few indeed in number but such as were able to beare the weight of many businesses Their high reputation amongst all easily supplyed the defect of Episcopacy But if we will with Zanchy-confesse the plaine truth none were indeed more truely Bishops than they whose Authority although this was not their design prevailed even to the overthrow of Bishops Nor is that here to be omitted which we have said already more than once The Ecclesiasticall Government for the most part receives some impression from the Civill In the Roman Empire the Bishops were correspondent to the Dukes the Metropolitans to the Presidents the Patriarchs or Primats to the Vicars or Deputies of the Emperour What marvell is it then if people more accustomed to an Optimacy than Monarchy would have the Church affairs committed rather to the Clergy than the Bishop And these are the causes wherefore I think the Churches may be excus'd which have no Bishops whilst yet they abstaine from a disapprobation of the most Sacred order and withall retaine what Beza judged in no wise to be omitted That was Essentiall saith he which by the perpetuall ordainance of God hath been is and shall be necessary that in the Presbytery some one both in place and dignity the first oversee and governe the action by that right which God hath given him Let us come unto those Assessors whom in many places we see joyned to the Pastors out of the people by an annuall or bienniall Office They call them Presbyters when yet they neither Preach the Gospell to the people nor exhibite the Sacraments Concerning them this is our judgement First we say Those temporary Presbyters are strangers to the Apostolicall and antient Church nor have I seen any that
such labours not vulgar Paul saith he approved himself the Minister of God for explication whereof he addes painfulnesse hunger thirst watchings and all kinds of incommodities Christ in his Epistle to the Bishop of Ephesus having said I know thy works addeth as somewhat greater and thy labour Paul againe oft-times attributes to himself to labour and the same to certaine holy Women which renouncing the world went up and down for the service of the Gospell To these Presbyters then who care for nothing but the Gospel and for its sake expose themselves to all distresses reason it self will dictate somewhat more to be due than to the rest So also Paul to the Thessal ascribeth to rule and to labour unto the same persons We beseech you brethren to know them which labour among you and rule over you in the Lord and admonish you And to esteeme them very highly in love for their works sake All the error of the new Interpreters ariseth hence that they think in the word and Doctrine is to be pronounc'd emphatically when the Emphasis is in labour for explication whereof is added in the word and Doctrine Such another hallucination is theirs who in the words of Paul to the Cor. where he discourses of the Supper Let a man examine himself they urge the word himself when the Emphasis is not there but in the word examine nor is himself put distinctively but declaratively Moreover that clause in the word and Doctrine could not so well be joyned with the first part of the sentence as the second because it hath very fit coherence with labour not so with rule I will give you like forms of speech which no man will charge with unaptnesse Masters that bring up youth are profitable to the Common-wealth they especially that attend this one thing night and day to make their Scholars good proficients both in vertue and learning Physicians who cure the Body are to be had in great esteeme They above therest who with no lesse affection than pains doe their utmost endeavour to preserve or restore our health Compare the thread of Pauls discourse herewith you will see all to be even and square Other places that are wont to be alleged are more frigid and vanish of their own accord Rom. 12. Divers gifts and according to the measure of gifts divers actions are reckoned up but such as doe not yet make divers Functions As the same may be He that giveth and He that sheweth mercy So nothing hinders Him that exhorteth and Him that ruleth to be the same For out of the two places already produced it is manifest that to rule is attributed to Pastors as also to guide Heb. 13.7 Likewise to the Corinth not only divers Functions are enumerated but also many gifts which meet in the same Function As therefore miracles and gifts of healing doe not make divers Functions so neither doe Helps and Governments but all these are aids and ornaments of the Pastorall Office Thus far we have endeavoured to make it appeare that the Adsession we speak of is not by Divine precept The fruit of which determination is that we entertain no worse opinion of the antient Churches than is meet nor of the late reformed who make no use of those Adsessors Now on the other side what we conceive may be said for that Office shall fairly be produced First That Office might lawfully be instituted either by the Highest Power being Christian only the Church where the Highest Power either car'd not for the Church or granted leave to doe it For seeing it hath the Highest inspection over all the actions of Pastors as the Custos of both Tables nor can it execute all things by it self it was lawfull to delegate some who in its name might be among the Presbyters with that right which the Highest Power was pleased to communicate unto them Which by that that shall be handled in the next Chapter shall be made more manifest The Church also is not interdicted by Divine Law to institute Offices making for the conservation of order and for edification and it hath that liberty remaining untill it be circumscribed by some Law of the Highest Power These things need no proof for they shine by their own light and no Divine Law can be shewed to the contrary Secondly Some passages may be found in Holy Scriptures whereby it may appeare this institution is not displeasing unto God I prove it first in respect of the Highest Power by the constitution of the Judaical Synedry wherein with the Priests there sate men chosen out of the people preposed truly to Civill affairs but to Sacred too as hath bin shew'd afore Wherefoâ—â— when out of the new Testament on the contrary part nothing is alleged hence we doe rightly collect that Jurisdiction in Sacred things that is publick judgement and joyned with command may be committed to some of the people with the Pastors especially if the better part be deferred to the Pastors as in Sacred things greater was the Authority of Amariah the Priest then of Zebadiah the Ruler By the same argument is rightly defended the Ecclesiasticall Senate which by the Commission of the Elector Palatine rules the Church affairs with command and consisteth partly of Pastors partly of pious Magistrats In respect of the Church also the same is thus made good It was lawfull for the Corinthian Church even without the Apostles Authority for the Apostle reprehends the Corinthians for not doing that which now he chargeth them to doe to constitute in the Church some to determine private controversies If so much was lawfull to the Church for avoyding of contentions why might not as much be lawfull for avoyding of the mischief of Oligarchy Besides it is oft times expedient that the whole multitude of believers be consulted in the Church affairs as above we have shewed why may not then the Church adjoyn some unto the Pastors who may consider this at what time it is needfull that the Church be consulted It was also lawfull for the Church to make choice of some who might in their name carry and dispose of their mony wherefore seeing the Pastors have inspection over the Deacons the Church may for this purpose joyn some associats to the Pastors Lest any should blame them in their Administration of the Churches benevolence that I may speak with the Apostle Lastly it was lawfull for the Antiochian Church to delegate some out of their Company to be present at the Debate of the Apostles and Presbytery of Jerusalem by whose testimony they might be assured all was there done according to Gods word and without partiality Thirdly Examples in pious Antiquity are not wanting which if not wholy Consonant yet come very near unto this custome On the part of the Highest Powers it is most evident the Emperours appointed Senators and Judges to sit in Synods Inspectors and moderators of their actions Nor
HUGO GROTIUS OF THE AUTHORITY OF THE HIGHEST POWERS About Sacred things OR The Right of the State in the Church Wherein are contained many judicious Discourses pertinent to our Times and of speciall Use for the Order and Peace of all Christian Churches Put into English by C.B.M.A. The Method of every Chapter is added in the margent and collected at the end LONDON Printed by T.W. for Joshua Kirton and are to be sold at his shop in Pauls Church-yard at the signe of the Kings-Armes 1651. Upon the Author and his principall Works He who the Greek wise Sayings did translate With equal Pen to Latium Vindicate From Jew Turk Pagan our Religion's Truth As learned as the Aged in his Youth He who th' Hollandian States Piety Presented unto every impartiall eye Who in the Lawes of Peace and War all Nations Hath well instructed And in 's Annotations On the whole Book of God hath made that light Shine to unprejudiced mindes more bright He that was studious how to reconcile This and that Church in mild Cassanders slile Hath shown what doctrine was Pelagius Who 's older Calvin or Arminius Is ever like himself Here which is much He 's Moderator ' twixt the State and Church And clearly shews you when you may prefer To th' Ancient Bishop the young Presbyter And when that new Invention may please By Elders Lay to give the Pastor ease We'ave set it out with just Care lest we might Wrong th' Author who hath done the State such Right C. B. THE CHAPTERS I. THat Authority about Sacred Things belongs to the Highest Powers II. That this Authority and the Sacred Function are distinct III. Of the Agreement of things Sacred and Secular as to the power over them IV. Objections against the Powers Answered V. Of the Judgement of the Higher Powers in Sacred things VI. The manner of using this Authority rightly VII Concerning Synods or Councils VIII Of Legislation about Sacred things IX Of Jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall X. Of the Election of Pastors XI Concerning Offices not alwayes necessary XII Of Substitution and Delegation To the Illustrious Pair my Lord and my Lady CHANDOS Right Honourable IT is the Great Name of the Author not any worthiness of the Translator that gives this Book a capacity of so high a Dedication The Author born in a low Countrey hath by his excellent works both Divine and Humane raised himself to the just Repute of the most General and the wisest Scholar of his time So that it is become a character of an Ingenuous Student as it was said in the last Age of his Country-man the Great Erasmus to be well versed in the Books of Grotius Out of whose Magazine our best English Writers to their praise have borrowed some of their best furniture The Argument of this Work is worthy the study of Princes and Great Persons From whom certainly God expects a greater care of his Churches Peace and Order To which purpose the Grave Author hath here said some things first of all some with a better Grace than any other and some that although they have been said very well by our own Men yet perhaps will be better taken as the English humour is from the Pen of a stranger The Translator's Designe is partly publick in this scribling Age wherein yet we have need of more good Rooks to Out the many bad ones to cast in his Mite into the Treasury of the Church of England whom as the Moderate Author much honour'd so He professeth himself to be one of her poor Children partly private by this Dedication of it with Himself to your Honours to leave a Gratefull Monument and a lasting Monument he hopes in those Gracious Hands that have supported him in his worst and weakest Times May Your Honours Both live to see the Publick Breaches both of Church and State fairly made up and particularly the Ruines of your Sudely And may Your illustrious Names and Vertues live after you and be increased in your Children So prayeth Right Honourable Of all your Servants the most obliged the most humble BARKSDALE Sudeley Jan. 6. 1651. HUGO GROTIUS Of the Empire or Authority of the Highest Powers about Sacred things or in matters of Religion CHAP. I. That Authority about Sacred things belongs to the Highest Powers BY the Highest Power I understand a Person or a Company that hath Empire or Authority over the People subject to the Empire of God alone taking the word Highest Power not as it is sometimes taken for the Right it self but for Him that hath the Right as it is frequently used both in Greek and Latin To call such a person the chiefe Magistrate is improper for Magistrate is a name the Romans give only to inferiour Powers I said a Person or Company to expresse that not only Kings properly so called which most Writers call Absolute Kings are to be understood in that name but also in an Aristocracy the Senate or States or the Best by whatsoever other name For although there must be Unity in the Highest Power it is not necessary the Person be but One. By Empire or Authority we mean the Right to Command to permit to forbid We say this is subject only to God for therefore it is called the Highest Power because among men it hath none above it That Authority about Sacred things belongs to the Highest Power thus defined we prove First from the Unity of the matter about which it is conversant Paul saith He is the Minister of God a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doth evill Under the name of Evill is comprehended also all that which is committed in Holy things for the Indefinite speech signifies as much as the Universall which Solomon hath expressed A King that sitteth in the throne of Judgement scattereth away ALL evill with his eyes This is confirmed by a Similie for the Authority of a Father is lesse than of the Highest Power yet are Children commanded to obey their Parents in all things Thus doe the antient Fathers also reason when from that of Paul Let every soule be subject to the Higher Powers they infer that the Ministers of Holy things must as well be subject to them as other men although he be an Apostle although an Evangelist although a Prophet saith Chrysostom Whose footsteps Bernard following speaks in these words to an Archbishop If every Soule yours also who hath excepted you from the Universall And truly there can be no reason given why any thing should be excepted For if that which is excepted be subject to no Authority at all which who can prove there will follow confusion among the things exempted whereof God is not the Author or if it be subject to some other Authority not under the Highest Power there must then bee two Highest Powers distinct which is a Contradiction for the Highest hath no equall By this same Argument the Fathers disprove the multitude of Gods because that which is Highest is above
all and can be but One. This is further prov'd by the Effects of Empire or Authority these are Obligation and Coaction now if there were more Commanders in Chiefe than one their Commands might be contrary about the same matter and so impose upon the Subject a contrary obligation or coaction which is against nature And therefore as often as it happens that two Lawes oppose each other by reason of some circumstance the obligation of the one ceaseth This is the reason why the Paternall Empire which is naturall and most antient hath given place to the Civill and is subject to it because that which should be Highest could be but One. Object If any man shall say that Actions are divers some Judiciall some Military some Ecclesiasticall and so in respect of this diversity the highest Authority may be divided among many Answ it will follow according to his saying that the same person being at the same time commanded by one to the Court by another to the Camp by the third to the Church is bound to obey them all at once which is impossible or if not to obey all then there must be some order among them and the inferiour yeeld to the Superiour and then 't will not be true that the highest Authority is divided among them To this purpose are those words of the Divine wisdome No man can can serve two Masters and A kingdome divided cannot stand and that common saying All Power is impatient of a Partner 'T is otherwise in Authorities which are under the Highest for these may belong to Many because they are exercised about divers persons or if about the same persons they are so ordered by the Supreme that they may not clash Which ordination cannot be when many are every one supreme for the ordaining must be Superiour to the ordained Object To that which some object that Kings cannot command some things without the consent of the States We answer Answ where that is so there the supreme Authority is not in the Kings but either in the States or in that Body which the King and States compose Certainly to have the whole Supreme Authority and not be able to command any thing because another may forbid or intercede are altogether inconsistent From this Universality of the matter about which the Highest Power is employed the Art of governing is justly called the Art of arts and Science of sciences because there is no Art no Science which it doth not command and whereof it doth not teach the Use The Universality of the end is correspondent to the Universality of the matter The Apostle Paul saith the Highest Power is Gods Minister for good of every sort For explaning himselfe else-where more distinctly he shewes the Powers are ordained that we may lead a quiet and a peaceable life not only in all honesty but in all godlinesse also This indeed is the true Happinesse of a Common-wealth to love God and be belov'd of God to acknowledge Him their King and themselves his people as Augustin saith well who also saith The King and Rulers are happy if they make their Power serviceable to the divine Majesty for the propagation of his Kingdome and encrease of his Honour Emperours themselves Theodosius and Honorius have professed thus Our Labours of War and Counsells of Peace are all directed to this only end that our people may serve God with true Devotion And this that is so clearly demonstrated in holy Writ was not altogether unseen by those that had only the light of Nature for in Aristotles judgement that is the best Common-wealth which shewes the way to a most vertuous and happy life and as the same Philosopher affirmes that is the most happy way of life which leads most directly to the knowledge and service of God the contrary whereof is most unhappy Now if this be true that the end proposed to the Highest Powers is not only externall Peace but that their People may be most Religious and the things conducing to that end are called Sacred it followes that these things are all included within the Command and Authority of the same Power for the End being granted a Right is granted to all that without which the End cannot be obtained To these Arguments drawn from the very nature of the thing shall be added the most sacred and certain Authority of the Law divine Kings are commanded to Keep all the law of God to serve the Lord to kiss the Son This being spoken to Kings not as Men for so it would not concern them more than other men but as Kings it followes some royall act is required of them that is the use of their Authority in matters of Religion I had rather explane this in S. Augustin's words than my own Herein doe Kings as they are commanded by Him serve God as Kings if in their Dominions they command things good forbid evill not only in respect of humane society but the worship of God also And in another place The King serveth God as a man as a King as a man by a godly life as a King by godly Lawes As Ezechias by destroying the Groves and Temples of the Idols and as Josias served God in the like manner doing those things for the honour of God which only Kings can doe And this is that royall noursing of the Church which by the Prophet God hath promised After the Divine Law follows in its order the Custome of the Church and the Examples of Emperours whose Piety is out of question That all They used their Authority in sacred things will appear in all the particulars that shall be handled In short Socrates the Historian hath told us Ever since the Emperours became Christian the affaires of the Church depended upon them For the Church saith Optatus is in the Common-wealth i.e. in the Roman Empire not the Empire in the Church Constantine in an old Inscription is call'd the Author of faith and religion Basil the Emperour stiling the Church an Universall Ship saith God had placed him at the Sterne to govern it In that antient Epistle of Eleutherius Bishop of Rome speaking of Religion He entitleth the King of Britain God's Vicar in his own Dominion And Charles the Great is nam'd The Rector of true Religion by the Council of Ments That the Churches reformed in our Fathers time after the antient pattern are of the same judgement their Confessions witnesse It belongs to Magistrates not only to be carefull of Civill Polity but to endeavour that the Sacred Ministry be preserved and the kingdome of Christ propagated that the Gospell be purely preached and God served according to his holy Word So the Belgic Let the Magistrate hold fast the word of God and see that nothing be taught contrary to it So the Helvetian This office was enjoyn'd the Heathen Magistrate to take care that the name of God be duly honoured how much more belongs it to the
such a nature that unlesse they be kept under they wil be above you the superstitious multitude do more hearken to their Preachers than their Governours Kings and Emperours have learned this at their cost and the Annals are full of examples One thing more for conclusion the experience of all ages tels us that change in Religion even in Rites and Ceremonies if it be not with consent or manifestly for the better often shakes the Common-wealth and brings it into danger Wherefore unlesse that curiosity be restrained by Lawes the State will often totter For these last reasons there are some even in the Roman Church that submit the Priest though by them otherwise exempted to the Power of the Prince CHAP. II. That the Authority or Rule over Sacred things and the Sacred Function are distinct ARistotle teacheth very well that it is not the part of an Architect as an Architect to set his hand to the worke but to prescribe what every one shall doe as right reason shall direct him and what he shall rightly appoint the workmen must rightly execute So it is the Rulers office not to doe the things commanded but to command them to be done But the Functions under command are of two sorts some are subject both by nature and order as effects proceeding from their cause some only by order In the former way under the Architect are the Overseers of the work in the latter the Carpenter the Smith and other Labourers So also to the Authority of the Highest Power are subject in the former way the offices that have in them Authority and Jurisdiction as the office of Major Governour of a town and the like In the latter way the Function of a Physician Philosopher Husbandman and Merchant Wherefore they fight with their own shadow who take great pains to prove that the Pastors of Churches as suen are not the Vicars or Deputies of the Highest Powers for who knows not that when Physicians neither can without mistake be stiled so But that the same Pastors as they receive some Authority or Jurisdiction beside their Pastorall office in respect of that accession may be called Deputies or Delegates of the Supreme Powers shall be shewed hereafter Wherefore when the Learned Deane of Lichfield proving that Priests are not therefore Superiour to Kings because Kings are commanded to aske Counsell of them uses this example that Kings advise with their Counsellours of State who yet are not their Superiors They misunderstand him who take his meaning to bee that these doe agree in all respects when 't is sufficient for a similitude that there be a correspondence in the drift of the speech otherwise even the Parables in the Gospel will be expos'd to censure Pastors are rightly compar'd to the Civill Officers in respect of the subordination not the emanation of their Office The Civill Officers are both Subjects to the Highest and Deputies the Pastors as such are only Subjects not Deputies The Authority over the Function and the Function it self being distinguished we must enquire Whether that Authority and the holy Function may be united in the same person Whereunto that we apply a fit answer a difference must be made between the Law of Nature and Positive divine Law By the naturall Law the same person may have the highest Authority and the Priesthood too because these have no such opposition but they may meet in one man Nay more set aside the Positive Law and some externall impediments it is in some sort naturall that the same Person be both King and Priest not so naturall as that it cannot be otherwise but as those things are tearmed naturall which are well agreeing unto nature and right reason For seeing Kings whose Dominions are not of the largest may easily joyne some peculiar Function to the care of their Kingdome as we have known Kings to have been Physicians Philosophers Astrologers Poets and very many Commanders in War and seeing no Function is more excellent and whence doe flow down upon the people so many benefits as the Priestly Office it appears that this above all other is most convenient and worthy of a King The consent of Nations doth evince it for in the first times when men were govern'd more by Domesticall than Civill Power the Fathers of families as all confesse did both represent some Image of Kings and performe the Priesthood also Thus Noah after the Floud was past offers sacrifice to God Of Abraham God himself saith He would instruct his Children and Family in the course of a Godly life We read also of the Sacrifices of Job and other Patriarchs After the Fathers decease as the Principality of the Family so the Priesthood too was devolved to the first borne and that custome continued in the posterity of Jacob for as yet they had no Common-wealth constituted untill the Levits that is the Priests and Ministers unto the Priests were surrogated and put in place of the first borne as the divine Law doth expresly tell us But in the meane time in the Country of Canaan there being a kind of Common-wealth we read of Melchisedec King and Priest The like was Moses before the Consecration of Aaron Other Nations of old had the same custome whether by the instinct of nature or the example of their Ancestors In Homer the Hero's that is the Princes Sacrifice and to omit other Nations the first Kings of Rome did so too and after the Kingdome was out there remained yet A King of the Sacred Rites It may be enquired whether those Fathers and Kings while the true worship of God lasted as it is credible it lasted among many of the Fathers for some Ages after the floud received the Priesthood by some speciall Title or challenged it to themselves by their Paternall and Regall Right Very learned men are of opinion that as some probably had the authority of the divine Oracle so others had it not nor is any such thing the Law positive being set aside requir'd to the constitution of a Priest Yea when the men of those times all the world over were bound as far as they knew him to honour God and to give him thanks as the Apostle convinces Rom 1. they were either bound every one to be Priests or to commend the Priesthood to some chosen men But it is the Fathers part to assigne all in the family their severall offices and among the rest the Priesthood as being by the Law of Nature not excepted and the function which he may assigne unto another the same if he be fit for it nature forbids him not to assigne unto himselfe What is faid of the Father let it be understood of the King and the rather because all confesse the free multitude in that first state had a right to choose themselves a Priest Which right of the Multitude is transferred upon the Highest Power For such Election consists of bidding and forbidding because one is licenced to
God the matter and oceasions are by Humane Power withdrawn So Ezechias brake the brasen Serpent so the Emperours shut up the Heathen Temples Fiftly 't is the part of the Highest Power by proposing punishments to draw men to the doing of that which God Commands and deterre them from the contrary as Nebuchadnezar made it death to speak evill of the Hebrews God and the Emperours to offer sacrifice to the God of the Gentiles And in these particulars consisteth as I take it that Office of the Highest Powers which is called by Justinian the preservative of the Divine Lawes meaning such a custody which is also Legislative as Austin speaketh Let the Kings of the earth serve Christ by making Lawes also on behalf of Christ And the same particulars have place in things not Sacred which are likewise defined one way by that Divine Law which the Apostle cals the righteousnesse of God For therefore the Civill Law is said to consist partly of Civill institutions partly of Naturall precepts Concerning which Naturall precepts the Civill Law gives right and liberty to doe them hindrances being remov'd yea commands the same things to be done determines circumstances takes away or streightens the occasions of often transgression Lastly addes a sanction to them by the constitution of punishments which is so manifest that we need spend no more time in this Let us come to those things which by the Divine Law whether written in the hearts of men or in the Holy Bible are not at all determined To determine them either way whether they be Sacred or Profane is the right of the Highest Power Of prophane 't is most known so David of dividing the spoile the Roman Emperouis made constitutions of the solemnities and effects of Contracts and Testaments innumerable other matters Of Sacred things 't is no lesse clear if one I say not diligently read but only look into the Sacred History the Codes of Theodosins and Justinian the Novels the Capitular of Charls the Great Every where examples are so obvious It pertaines hither to institute Offices more for convenience and ornament than for necessity as David did to build or beautify temples as Salomon and Joas or to appoint a Law and manner of building them as Justinian to prescribe the manner of Electing Pastors holding Synods keeping order among Pastors alienation of things dedicate to holy uses all which very many Christian Emperours have done Now if the Highest Power shall exceede the due limits by decreeing and ordeining any thing either in Ecclesiasticall things against the Rules of Faith and Religion prescrib'd by God or in other matters against the perpetuall rule of equity as in both kinds it sometime happons Ecclesiasticall and Civill things doe againe agree in this that as a man cannot be oblig'd to obey men rather than God so if upon refusall force be offer'd there remains the glory of patience no right to oppose force to force So Christ hath caught Peter and Peter us So saith Ambrose Grieve I can weep I can mourn I can any other way to make resistance I cannot I ought not A most holy example of that patience prescrib'd unto us by God is left us by those antient Christians that liv'd under the heavy yoake of the unbelieving Emperours They were men to be feared for their number had they chosen rather to shed others bloud than their own for Tertullian shews how they had filled both the Camp and City That victorious Thebane Legion for Religion sake was contented to lose every tenth man at the Emperours Command and it is memorable that when there was one Christian put to death for tearing the Imperiall edict Commanding Bibles to be burnt Churches to be demolisht and the Christians Crucified the rest of the Christians declared He had justly deserved that punishment So deeply had the voyce of Christ sunk into their minds that forbids to take the sword Every one takes the sword who hath not receiv'd it from God God hath given it to none but the Supreme Powers and to such as they appoint No examples of the old Testament evince the contrary for when we read of the defections of people or Cities from some Kings and the impiety of the Kings set down for the cause therein the divine judgement is described not the deeds of men commended But if the Highest Power that hath undertaken the protection of true Religion be it self therefore opposed by the armes either of forraign or domestick enemies it hath all the right and reason in the world by Arms to defend its own Authority and the lives and fortunes of the Subjects For 't is all one upon the matter whether the opposition be for Religion or any other pretence nor is the Power being Independent more bound to let go the use of Religion than the possession of land at the pleasure of any other whatsoever For He beareth not the Sword in vain It hath been shewed I think sufficiently how the Highest Power hath equall Authority over actions Sacred and Prophane over the externall primarily and in regard of them over the internall also in the second place I say Authority to command and forbid what is commanded already and forbidden by God to determine things left in the midst and permitted to mans liberty and when force is offered under pretence of right to defend it self I say equall Authority over Sacred and Secular actions which Binius also a man of the Roman religion acknowledgeth In generall there is no difference but if we come to particulars 't is confest Authority extendeth not to so many Sacred things because the divine Law hath determined more of them than of the Secular for the secular affaires the Institutes of the Hebrew Common-wealth it is plain oblige not us are almost all circumscrib'd by rules of Nature saving that it may be doubted of some connubiall Lawes whether they be Naturall or out of the Divine pleasure But concerning Sacred matters much is prescribed us in the Gospell and proceeds immediatly from the will of God This being noted I see not any thing more remaining in this question for that a more diligent enquiry and greater care is need-full in things Sacred both because the Law of Nature is more known than the Positive and because errour in Religion is more dangerous this pertains to the question of the Manner to use the Power rightly and changed nothing in the Power it selfe CHAP. IV. The Objections against the Authority of the Highest Fowers about Sacred things are answerd THE right under standing of what is al ready spoken will help any one to answer all that is said against the Authority of the Highest Powers in things Sacted or Ecolefâ—asticall For first that Christ himself not the Highest Powers ordained the Pastorall office that as to the substance of the office Christ also hath set down the rules and that so far as we have before acknowledged Pastors are
ever These actions therefore being done and to be done by Christ himself Life and Death Eternall with the Promise commination and adjudgement of the same being not in the power of meer men it is certaine that in them no man is the associate or Deputy to him But there be other actions call'd intermediate and of these againe some are about the inward some about the outward man Those about the inward man are partly in the man partly concerning him In the man Christ works when by the vertue of his Spirit he illuminats some others by not illuminating he blinds he opens the heart of some others by not opening he hardens sometimes he affordeth greater aydes against temptations sometimes lesse Concerning the man Christ works when he remits or reteins sin yet for the most part in those actions also some signs of them are inwardly Imprinted in the man by Divine Efficacy All those actions exceeding the Power of meer Man are also so peculiar to Christ that he admits no Fellow in them not Vicar Ministers indeed he admits to these actions Pastors Private men and Kings too every ohe in his way But there is a difference between a Vicar and a meer Minister because it is the part of a Vicar to produce actions of like kind with his actions whose place he holds though of lesse perfection and to a meer Minister it perteins not to produce actions of like kind but such as are serviceable to the actions of the principall cause Whence it appears that the same action is properly atributed yet proportionably both to the Prineipall and the Vicegerent for the King truly Governs and gives judgement so doth the Judge also though not with equall Right But to the Principall and the meer Minister the same action cannot be accommodated without a Trope as Pastors are said to save men to remit and reteine their sins There remaine the actions of Christ about the outward man which especially consist in defence and deliverance from enemies and in the ordering and adorning of his Church actions rightly referr'd unto his providence And as the generall providence of God which hath a warchfull eye over all things although by it self it be sufficient for the disposition and execution of them yet for the demonstration of his manifold wisdome He makes use of the Highest Powers as his Deputies to preserve the common society of men whence also they are stiled Gods So that speciall providence of Christ watching over his Church assumes unto it self the same Powers to Patronise the true Faith and to them Christ also imparted his own name These are they that as Nazianzen saith rule together with Christ not by equall fellowship of power far bee from as so impious a thought but by a Vicarious and derived right which is the meaning of that in the Bohemian consession Magistrates have a power common with the Damb Wherefore seding things subordinate doâ— no fight against one another and seeing it doth not mis become the Majesty of Christ to excoutâ— the prinâ—ipall actions of his Kingdome by himself immediatly 〈◊〉 partly by himself pamly by other as â—e 〈◊〉 too the Angels Ministry out of question it follows that the earthy Empire of the Highest Power as it takes care of Sacred things doth not at all oppose or stand against the heavenly and divine Power of Christ And here we must admonish our Opponents that in the place of Christ the King of Kings and Lord of Lords they may not put upon us Presbyteries and Synods nor transferre what is proper to Christ alone to rule over Kings unto them whom both the necessity of order and divine Authority hath subjected to the Imperial Power But because in Scripture and the antient History some Government is attributed partly to Pastors partly to Churches let us see how it comes to passe that the Government of the Highest Power is not overthrown thereby For the right understanding whereof lest in the unlikenesse of things we be deceiv'd by the likenesse of words we must make use of some distinctions Government is either such as may consist with the Liberty of the Governed or such as â—â—dy not consist with it the former agrees to them who govern as Tucitus speaka by authority of persuasion not by pouâ—â—â— of Command as Physicians Lawyers Coun sellours in things not altogether necessary The later Government whereby the Liberty of the Governed is taken away is either Declarative of Law or Constitutive and this later either by right of consent or by vertue of Authority This distinction springs from the manner of introducing an obligation They that govern declaratively doc not oblige properly but occasionally as they give a man notice of that which either brings or encreases an Obligation So the Physician governs his Patient by shewing what is hurtfull what is wholsome which being known the sick is bound to use this avoid that not by any Right which the Physician hath over him but by the Law of Nature which commands every one to have a care of his own life and safety So Philosophers doe govern the Morall and Civill life by shewing what is honest what the safety of the people requires Hither are referâ—â—d the Annunciations which Embassadours or Heralds sent by the Highest Powers make unto the Subjects and as well the suasory which we have memtion'd as the declarative are wont to be comprehended under the one name of Directive regiment from which differs the Constitutive whether it ariseth out of Consent a Command That out of consent hath vertue to oblige all that have consented by the naturall law concerning the keeping of Covenants in those things which were in the right and power of the Covenanters But they that have not consented are not directly bound indirectly they are if three things concurr First that they are a part of the whole Second that the major part of the whole have consented The third that something must be necessarily Constituted for the conservation of the whole or the bettering of it Upon these conditions all and every one are bound not by any Right which the major part hath over them as Superiour but by that Law of Nature which requires every part as a part to be ordered for the good of the whole Which good oftentimes cannot be had without some speciall determination and that determination can be of no effect if it be lawfull for a few to undoe what was done by many Hence it is that the Companions of a journey the partners of one ship or of the same negotiation all Collegues are bound to stand to the decree of the major part in those things only that need some determination and belong to that Community whereof themselves are members But the Imperative regiment obligeth by the intrinsecall force of its own supereminence and the regiments of this kind as hath been said are either Supreme or placed under the Supreme and these again either derived from the Supreme
very few are to be defined the necessary with Anathema the rest without as it was done in the Synode of Orange and there are in the antient Counsell of Carthage these words to the same purpose It remains that we speak our opinion in this controversy judging no man nor separating him from our Communion if he think otherwise But in those first ages it was very available to the keeping of peace in the Catholick Church that no Dogmaticall definitions were wont to be made but in Generall Councils or if any were made in lesser Synods they were not firme untill they were sent to other Churches and approved by common judgement Which custome if the Rulers in the Christian world would now revive they could not doe the Church a greater benefit for in those remedies which Physicians call topicall is little help nor can the unity of the parts be hoped for but from the unity of the whole body I cannot forbeare to praise that excellent Canon of England An. 1571. Let Preachers take heed of Preaching any thing to the people as a necessary point of Faith but what is agreeable to the doctrine of the old or new Testament and which the Catholic Fathers and antient Bishops have collected thence What hath been said of things to be believ'd must be understood also of things by the Divine Law appointed to be done but of these the controversies are not so many In both kinds for the reteining of concord it will be needfull to make the people understand that all things enjoyned are agreeable to Gods word That which Seneca saith against preambles Let the Law command not dispute may have place in things meerly Arbitrary yet in such Laws we see the reason of them given at large by Justinian and others in the Code and Novell Constitutions but in things that are to be perform'd religiously the severity of the Injunction is to be mollifyed by the gentlenesse of persuasion So Plato hath given in precept and Charondas and other Law-givers have shewed us by example And certainly as Governments are made firme by the willingnesse of people in all things so most of all in the businesse of Religion For saith Lactantius Nothing is so voluntary as Religion which without the wils consent is nothing And people that are compell'd by Law to serve God serve not God but the Prince Themistius Here then is required the greatest care and pains that the major part of the people being convinc'd by divine Testimony may know the things commanded to be according to truth and piety I say the major part sor we may rather wish than hope for an universall consent but for the ignorance or malice of a few the care of truth and peace is not to be deserted Yet here must be shewed tendernesse and discretion that they who resist both the Divine and Humane Ordinance may be rather withheld from doing ill than compell'd to doe good as Austin hath long agoe judiciously distinguisht in this matter Now we goe on to the things not determined by Divine Law such as are many things belonging to Church Government to Rites Ceremonies Wherein if the matter be fresh and easy to be wrought it were safest to restore all things to the times next the Apostles and to observe what was then observed with great consent and no lesse benefit of the Church For the most antient Constitutions are the best Yet there must be a respect had to the present things and a respect to the places too Wisely saith Jerom In things neither contrary to Faith nor manners let the customs of our Country be as Canons Apostolicall Austin and others have words of the same sense And variety here is of good use serving for a Testimony of Christian Liberty See the History of Socrates 1.5 c. 22. Verily if in this nature there be any thing that may be better'd yet is tolerable and of long continuance 't is wisdome to let it still continue unlesse the change may be made upon a handsome occasion and with favourable assent The change of a custome saith Augustin doth as much disturbe as prosit But in these things wherein Gods word hath left a liberty the Highest Power shall doe well to content the people So in Secular matters we see that Cities and Companies that have no jurisdiction have leave to make certaine orders for themselves which the Highest Power after examination past upon them approves and ratifies One thing more we will not omit which perteins also to the manner of using the Right we treat of The Highest Power ought to use not only the advise but service of other men and therefore particular affairs lest the multitude of them oppresse the mind of one are to be put off to Courts ordained one above another and the last appeal to be made to the Highest Judgement So in the antient Church under the Christian Emperours there were Presbyteries in Cities there were Synods Metropolitan and Exarchicall and above all the rest Imperiall but of this we shall speak againe hereafter All that we have said here of asking Counsell of contenting the people of inferiour Courts and whatsoever may be added ought not to be esteem'd perpetuall and alwaies profitable for no prudentiall precepts are universall because prudence must have regard to emergent circumstances Times Places Persons make a great alteration here When the matter is clear there is no need of Counsell when dissentions are hot and vehement there is little hope of Consent neither can the proceeding be by degrees when either the matter will not admit delay or the Lower Courts are suspected of injustice by reason of hatred or favour or other impediments of upright dealing In such cases when the ordinary course cannot be observ'd advise must be taken of necessity By the way we must note their errour that distinguish of power absolute and ordinary for they confound the power and the manner of using it As in God the power is one and the same whether he work according to the order appointed by him or beside that order so the power also or the right of the Supreme Governour is the same whether he observe the prescribed order or not but in common accidents it is the part of a wise Ruler to follow the accustomed order and the Positive Laws Laws are made for ordinary cases in cases extraordinary the Highest Power must leave the road and take some unusuall way for cases are infinite order and Law Positive finite and the finite cannot be an adequate Rule of the infinite But although it be the Duty of the Highest Governour in usual affairs to use the ordinary way of Government yet if he doe otherwise he may indeed be said to doe not rightly but not to go beyond his Right The right of the highest Power is not limited by Positive Law for the Right of any man is not limited but by his Superiour and no man is Superiour to
according to the Emperours pleasure This is spoken of generall Synods in the Roman Empire But Constantine called also Topical whereof Eusebius speaks Having speciall care of the Church when discords arose in sundry places The Emperour himself being appointed by God the common Bishop or Overseer commanded the Ministers of God to assemble in Councils After the Acts of the Nicene Councill were confirmed by the same Constantine the generall Law of Synods to be holden twice every year supplyed the place of speciall consent In stead of half-year Synods in some places they had annual Nor was the Assembly at the pleasure of the Bishops but the Governours of Provinces had a charge given them to make the Bishops though they should decline it to meet together in Synods and beside those at set times other Synods also were holden out of order at command of the Highest Power But there are three principall Controversies concerning the Highest Powers right and office about Synods First whether it be lawfull for the Highest Power to command any thing in Sacred affaires without a Synod Second what is lawfull for him and what he ought to doe before the Synod and in the Synod Third what after the Synod For the resolution of the first Question we must conceive whatsoever is said very justly of the exceeding great commodities of Synods belongs to the manner of using the Right of Empire not to the Right it self For if the Highest Power should receive from the Synod any right of Governing it were not then the Highest The Highest being that which is subject unto God alone and under God hath the fullest right of governing Again if the Highest Power without a Synod could not command that which it might command with a Synod then should it receive part of the right of governing from the Synod and then because none can give what he hath not it would follow that somewhat of the Government were in the Synod which the Synod not having by any Humane right must challenge by Divine right whereas the Divine Law denies any such Power to have been given by God unto the Church as hath been shewed above and therefore not to Synods The Right being thus confirmed we make no scruple to affirme That the Highest Power may sometimes rightly order Sacred things without a Synod They that universally hold it unlawfull will never prove what they say but we shall easily For there are extant many examples of the Hebrew Kings that without a Synod gave commands in Sacred matters Whether the Church declare or not even before the Churches declaration the Kings duty is to reform what is amisse and for neglect thereof he must give account to God Eminent among the Christian Emperours is the example of Theodosius He sate as Arbitratour between severall Factions of the Bishops he gives every one the hearing he reads their confessions and after prayers to God for his direction he gives his judgement and pronounceth his sentence for the Truth To omit other examples The Kings and other Highest Powers which in the memory of our fathers have purged their Churches from inveterate errours have done according to the pattern of those antient Kings and Emperours as elsewhere we have shewed True it is and they are commended for their diligence that have observ'd it there were such circumstances in those actions by reason whereof that course was taken and no other could serve the turn And we acknowledge that course to have been extraordinary and more seldome taken but as before we say The manner of doing being divers with regard to times and persons changeth not the right but floweth from it according to the rules of prudence Nor doth any one affirm a Synod is to be omitted without cause but that sometimes there may be causes for the omission of it These causes may be referr'd to two heads either because a Synod is not necessary or because it appears it will be unprofitable That both may be the better understood we must note the Ends of a Synod in a publick Church for of this we speak We have proved already that a Synod is not called as if it had any part of the Government belonging to it The end therefore is that it may give Counsell to the Prince for the advancement of Truth and Piety that is goe before him by a directive Judgement Another end is that by the Synod the Consent of the Church may be setled and made known So although the Apostles severally had both knowledge and authority to define the controversie of Mosaicall Ceremonies it was 01 for the Churches good that it should appear they were all of one mind and that the pious people should be taught to understand the truth rightly and to make unanimous confession of it A third end may be added to the former as Presbyteries in a publick Church so Synods beside their native have an adventions right from Human Law whereby they judge of Causes as other Courts ordained by the Highest Power and so that upon their sentence coaction followes But now of all these ends none is necessary nor is a Synod simply necessary to those ends Counsell is not necessary in things manifest to any one by naturall or supernaturall Light For as Aristotle said well Wee make use of Counsellours in great matters when we distrust our selves as unable without the help of others to discern the Truth Who doubts but the man that denies God or his Providence or his Judgement after this life the man that makes God the proper author of all sins the man that denies the Deity of Christ or the Redemption wrought by him I say who doubts but a man so prophane may be put out of office or out of the Common-wealth by the command of the Highest Power without the advise of many Counsellours Again the Highest Power may have such assurance out of some former Synod that he need not call a new one Therefore a Synod is not necessary to the end sufficient Counsell may be had And as for consent of the Church to be enquir'd or constituted 't is in vain sometimes to take any pains about it when the Church is manifestly divided two wayes the parties and their heat being well night equall as in the Donatists time it happen'd in Africa Sometimes also the consent of the Church may be known without a Synod if there be extant the unanimons writings of almost all the approved Doctors in their Churches Be sides every one in private may either by voice or writing declare his opinion which Austin saith was done in his time and commends it And he that peruseth antient story shall find the Churches affaires more often transacted and consent testified by communication of Letters than by Synods as is observed by Bilson Reynolds and the Magdeburgenses And lastly it may be the Cause in hand is so peculiar to one Church that the consent of others is not needfull Now for the third end
and Authority who is set to keep order amongst men Lastly of another mind were All that have hitherto defended the Protestant cause against the Papists Next concerning the Right and Office of the Highest before and in the Synode it is controverted Whether it be lawfull for the power to designe the persons that shall come unto the Synode or no. It is lawfull we doubt not but to cleare the matter let us proceed in order After that Christ instituted the Church and the Pastorall office it hath been lawfull by the Law of Nature not the immutable Law but by that which hath place untill some other Provision be made for the Church in things concerning the Church or for the Pastors in things concerning the Pastorall office to make choice of them that shall goe to the Synode because no Humane Law no agreement interceding to determine the persons there is not other way By this right the Brethren of Antioch send some of their number with Paul and Barnabas to Ferusalem Likewise the Elders and the Church of Ferusalem together with the Apostles send out of their Company chosen men to Antioch But in all the ages following I find no example of election made by the Church for to the Diocesian Synodes assembled all the Presbyters to the Metroplitan all the Bishops unlesse any were detein'd by great necessty Here then is no election but that the Bishops seeme to have taken with them to the Metropolitan Synods some Presbyters and Deacons at their own pleasure That greater Synods might assemble the Encyclic Letters of the Emperours were sent to the Metropolitans and for the most part the election of their fellow-Bishops was imposed on them to compleat the number which the Emperours had prescribed This appears by the Letters of Theodosius and Valentinian to Cyrill the like whereof were sent to all the Metropolitans as the Acts doe testify Plainly to Cyril is the election there committed which election the Metropolitans made sometimes alone sometimes with the Provinciall Synode of their Bishops Of the suffrages of the Church or people there is no appearance The Metropolitans in case any of them could not be present in Synods themselves sent some Bishop or Presbyter to spply in their names and to keep their places Albeit this were the most frequent manner of election yet by no Law was the Highest Power forbidden to call Synods of Pastors elected by his own discretion This alone is enough to prove a permission but reason doth evince the same if we consider the ends before spoken of for which Synods are assembled For first many Synods are had only for Counsell but naturally it is lawfull for every one to chose his Counsellours so it is in questions of the Law of War of Merchandise and all other affairs between which and the Ecclesiasticall as to meere consultation there is no dissimilitude Synods are also holden for the exercise of Externall Jurisdiction committed to them by the Highest Power but this is also naturall for every one to choose his Delegate In the Synods that are gather'd for procuring of consent the case is somewhat different in these it seems very expedient that the Election be either by the Churches or by the Pastors to the end the acts of the Synod may be more passable for men are wont to like those things best which are done by those persons whose faith and diligence themselves have chosen This therefore belongs not to the Right but to the prudent Use of it and is not perpetuall because it may sometimes happen that the election made by Pastors may be lesse available to concord than if it be made by the Highest Powers Againe in a Synod held for Counsell or Jurisdiction because the Highest powers take not notice of all able men it may be best sometimes to receive them upon the commendation of the Church or Pastors We say then not that the Highest Power ought alwaies to choose the persons but that he alwaies may Our leader in this judgement is Marsilius Patavinus for he saith It pertains to the Authority of a Law-giver to call a generall Councill and to determine fit persons for it by determining he means not only approbation of the persons but election too and herein he is followed by the Learned French Defender of the Protestants cause against the Trent Synod Nor are examples wanting The King of Israel cals unto him what Prophets he willâ— and namely Michaia at the persuasion of Fehosophat The Donatists request a Synod of Constantine to judge between them and other African Bishops by this Petition We beseech you excellent Emperour because you are of a just and Royall extraction whose Father was no persecutour and because Gallia is not infected with this iniquity that your piety would command Judges for us thence to allay the contentions here Not the Churches not the Synod of Gallia but the Emperour names the Judges To the first Synod of C. P. Theodosius admitted also Macedonian Bishops who were not surely chosen by the Churches or Bishops Catholick That other Emperours and Kings used the same Right is very certaine And this very thing did the Protestants desire of the Emperour Charls the Fift and the other Kings that they might have leave to choose pious and learned men and send them to the Synod But here we must observe when the Churches or Bishops choose men for the Synod whether by their Native or Dative Liberty The Supreme Governour hath an undeniable power still over that election For all use of Liberty as above is said is subject to Command and the vertue thereof is this that for just causes some turbulent men or otherwise unfit may be excluded from publick businesse That the time and place were proscribed by the Emperours for the Councill the things also to be done and the manner of doing that Synods were translated at their pleasure or dissolved both others before us and we also have made so plain that I think it will be denyed by none Wherefore let us now rather see what Judgement in the Synod is competent to the Highest Power They phansie to themselves an Adversary over whom they may get an easie victory who take the pains to prove that the Bishops judged not the Emperours alone for who ever did so forget himself as to deny that but this we affirme The Highest Power hath right to Judge together with the Pastors the proofe whereof is needlesse here because above we have made good to the H. Power an Universall right of judging which certainly by the Synod cannot be taken away But whether it be best for the Supreme Governour to expresse himself and how far is another question Let us goe through every end of Synods If a Synod be had for Declarative judgement that is that the Bishops may shew out of the holy Scripture what is true what false what is lawfull what unlawfull here the King being well versed in
the Bible cannot be depriv'd of that which is granted to private men to search the Scriptures to try the spirits But here must be exceeding great Caution lest the Majesty of one bridle the Liberty of many 'T was said of old Casar when will you give your Vote if first of all I shall have one to comply with Yet will it be most profitable that the Supreme Governour not only honour the Assembly with his presence but also order and moderate the actions enquire into the grounds of every sentence and propose objections Which the Emperour Constantine did in the Nicene Synod and Charles the Great in that of Francford But when the Synod in things not determined by Divine Law gives Counsell to the Highest Power what is for the Churches benefit here also it is better to propose the incommodâ—es with the commodities than to deliver judgement openly according to that Rule What should be done debate with many what shall be done determine with a few The royall presence also when the Synod is held chiefly to testifie the Churches Consent is of good effect to curb the boldnesse of turbulent men but the Supreme Governour shall be more assured whether the consent be true and spontaneous if he give no suffrage but he content to reserve the Epicrisis or finall determination to himself And this hath place too in the Synod which by concession of Humane Law doth exercise some Jurisdiction the Supreme Governour may be present and give Sentence if he please but 't is more proper for him that he reserve himself entire for the Epicrisis or Judgement after We have spoken of the Highest Power when it self is present in the Councill but pious Emperours could not alwayes be so by reason of other affaires and then they sent others in their name with Commission either to judge together with the Bishops or only to preserve good order For in the Synod of Chalcedon it is clear enough that the Senators and Judges interposed often and gave their Sentence in defining the very Articles of faith but in that of Ephesus Candidian was not allowed by Theodosius to passe his judgment To the Councill of Tyrus Constantine sent only Dionysius a man of Consular degree to observe all that passed but he went beyond his Power as Ahanasius notes Hee had all the talk and the Bishops observed him in silence Now we come to that Judgement which belongs to the Highest Power after Synod the Greek Fathers call it Epicrisis This is so proper to the Highest Power that it must not be cast off or neglected by Him For if the Synod only give Counsell in things to be done by the Highest Power 't is certain His judgement to whom the Counsell's given ought to follow whether it be led by certain arguments as is necessary in the matter of Faith or in some sort by the Authority of other men For as above some Judgment of the doer must precede every act that it mâ—y be right but absolutely and in all things no man can square his judgement by that of another unlesse it be such a judgement as in infallible but the Judgement of a Synod is not such If some Doctrine be explain'd or some Law Divine 't is not only the Right but the Duty of the Highest Power to see wether the Synod walked according to the Rule of Holy Stripture as Constantine writes of himself to those that met in Tyrus For 't is his part to Govern What if some Synod such as many have been and many may be shall either through ignorance or by conspiracy or because the greater party overswayes the better agree upon some doctrine manifestly repugnant to the Catholic faith derived from the Scripturs Suppose the Arimin the Seleucian both which were greater than the Nicene or suppose the second Nicene Synod Shall the H. Power now command any thing to be done which the Law Divine and his conscience instructed by that Law forbid No man in his right mind will say so But if somewhat be conceived by the Synod which by Divine Law is not determined but partains unto Church-government since all Government whether introduc'd by Nature or by Positive Law is under that Power which among men is Highest it is the part of this Highest to see whether the things conceived will be usefull for the Church for to the last agent belongs also to give the last Judgement Therefore have Synods submitted both their Articles and Canons to Emperours and Kings but with different respect the Articles to be examined by Sacred Writ for the true doe not refuse examination the false even after Synod deserve rejection the Canons to be tryed according to the Rules of prudence and if profitable they received the force of Lawes Concerning the Canons are those words out of the Councils of France if there be any defect let it be supplyed by His prudence if any thing amiss let it be corrected by His judgement Wherefore not only the right of approving as some doe now but of examining taking away adding correcting did the antient Bishops ascribe unto the Highest Powers Nor indeed can any one with reason be said to approve any of those things which are not in his Power to disapprove He is properly said to consent who may also dissent according to that in Seneca If you would know whether I am willing allow me Power to be unwilling and Aristotle Where to doe is in our chayce there is also not to doe This is certain some Canons have been disallowed a great part of the Chapters which in the year 856 the Bishops set forth in Synods was rejected by Carolus Calâ—â—s as we read in his Capitular And Clarolus Magnus made some addition to the Decrees of the Synod holden at Theodons Wee adde saith he this of our aunt Lastly where a Synod hath passed judgement by a Power deriv'd from Humane Law here it is much lesse to be doubted but that His judgement is reserv'd to the Supreme Governour For all Jurisdiction as it flowes from him returns to him again Hither I refer that Judgement of the Ephesine Synod whereby Nestorius was cast out of his Patriarchship The Synod prayes the Emperour that what was done against Nestorius might be of force One may object that where the Supreme Governour was himself present in the Council there at last nothing remalned but to confirm the acts with his Authority But neither can this be granted For when the Supreme Governour judged among others he Judged not as Supreme for he might be Inferiour in the Suffrages Wherefore his finall Judgement must still remain safe unto him I mean his Imperative judgement and that in the freest manner The same is true of the Magistrates if they be present in any Court under their Authority But we must observe that the Supreme Governour exerciseth this Imperative Judgement sometimes wholly by himself sometimes partly by others partly by himself Which appears by
interpreted You shall destroy their altars and break downe their statues and cut down their groves and burn their graven images with fire The command must first be given by the Highest Power and then must execution be done readily by the Subjects Doe thus saith Austin upon the place when you have receiv'd Commission for it The Pagan Temples in the Roman Empire were not shut up before that Law of Constantius extant in both the Codes If any one hath broken Idols and there been slaine the Elibertine Councill forbids him to be receiv'd among the Martyrs because it is not written in the Gospell nor is any such thing found done by the Apostles But the Highest Power hath not only forbidden Idolatrous Assemblies but those too which gave themselves to any evill superstition or errour publickly pernicious or were obstinate breakers of the Churches peace Christian Emperours have excluded Hereticks and Schismacks from all accesse to honours have deprived them of the right to obteine any thing by Will have given away their Churches to the Catholicks All which Austin at large defends against the Donatists For those pâ—â—shments of such inexcusable Delinquents in Religion which left them time of repentance the antient Church approv'd But the paine of Death was so much against the gentlenesse of the old Religion that Idacius and Ithacius were condemned by the Bishops of Gallia for being Authors that certaine Priscillianists should be confuted with the sword and in the East a whole Synod was condemned which had consented to the burning of Bogomilus Yet sometimes also false Religions have gone unpunisht under pious Emperours The Jews whilst they held from the contempt of the Christian Law and from drawing over Christians to their Sect had alwaies free use of their Religion Neither were the Pagan rites prohibited by Constantine at the beginning of his conversion but he advanced Pagans to the Consulship as Prudentius notes to Symathus So Jovinian and Valentinian Princes worthy of all praise terrified not them with threathing edicts that violated the verity and unity of the Christian Law And which is more to be noted the Emperours did not only permit impunity to disagreeing sects but often made Laws to order their Assemblies Constantine and following Empâ—â—urs grant to the chief Rulers of the Jewish Synagogues the same Rights with Christian Bishops So Theodosius forbids any to be received into their Sect against the will of their Primates and forbidding them to be received into their Assemblies that denyed the Resurrection and Judgement or would not acknowledge the Angels to be Gods creature He saith he had reformed the Jewish Nation So the Proconsuls took away the Churches of the Donatists from the Maximianists because they were proved to have been condemned in a Councill of the Donatists Moreover in the true Church the Right and Office of the Highest Powers is not only conversant about the whole body of Religion but the single parts as reason and examples doe evince Reason because it cannot be otherwise but He that hath right upon the whole hath right upon the parts Examples are at hand Ezechias that he might suppresse the adorers superstition took away the Serpent set up by Moses and by the same right against the Decrees of the second Nicene Synod Charles the Great forbad the adoration of Images Honorius and Arcadius repressed by their Edict Pelagius and Calestius the authors of a false opinion and so of late some of the German Princes have purged their Churches otherwise well ordered of the Ubiquitarian Errour For prevention of Schisme Constantine cut off needlesse Questions an example worthy to be imitated by our Rulers for it is most true which Sisinius said to Theodosius By Disputations about Religion contentions only are inflam'd The Emperour Andronicus of excellent knowledge in Divinity threatned the Bishops disputing subtilly upon The Father is greater than I that unlesse they would abstain from such dangerous discourse he would throw them into the river Even true words but not extant in the Bible were for a time forbidden to be used So Heraclius the Emperour prohibited both the single and the double Energy to be ascribed to Christ that this is not to be dislik'd we have the authority of St. Basil for us who saith Many pious men abstained from the words Trinity and Homousion and that also the word Unbegotten is not to be used of the Father because these words are not in Scripture And Meletius of Antioch for a time abstained from questions about Doctrine only delivering what pertained to emendation of manners esteeming this care above the other It is pertinent here which Plato hath in his Lawes That no man should publish any writing unlesse approved first by Judges appointed for the purpose This is also an especiall work of Lawes to compose the manners of the Clergy The blind and the lame David excludeth from the Temple Ezechias and Josias command the Priests to be purified Justinian doth not allow the Bishops to wander up and down to play at Dice to be spectators at Playes And Platina exclames very justly O King Lewis I would you lived in our times Your most holy orders your Censure is now very necessary for the Church To proceed That the Powers also used their Authority in defining things which the Divine Law hath left undefined is most plain The King of Ninive proclam'd a Fast David commands the Ark to be transported Solomon orders all things for the ornament of the Temple and after him Josias who also takes care that the Treasure destin'd for Sacred uses be not alienated Of this kind is the greatest part of Constitutions which appear in Theodosius and Justinian's â—ode and in the Novels and in the French Capitulars as of the age of Bishops Presbyters Deaconesses of the immunity and judgements of the Clergy-men and insinite other things which were tedious to number That in those Lawes are Constituted many things that are not in the Canons both the Reading shewes and Whitaker confesses Therefore also in the Trent Synod the King of France doubted not to declare by his Orators That the most Christian Kings so 't is in the Acts have made many Edicts in matters of Religion after the Example of Constantine Theodosius Valentinian lentinian Justinian and other Christian Emperours That they have made many Ecclesiasticall Lawes and such as the antient Popes not only were not displeased with but some receiv'd into their Decrees and esteem'd the chiefe authors of them Charles the Great and Lewis the Ninth most Christian Kings worthy the name of Saints That the Prelates of France and the whole Order Ecclesiasticall according to the Prescript of those Lawes have piously and Christianly ruled and govern'd the Church of France In the mean time it is most true that the Emperours for the most part in making lawes had respect unto the Canons old or new whence is that saying The Lawes disdain not to
imitate the Sacred Canons For in things not defined by Divine Law the Canons are usefull to the Law-giver two wayes They doe both contain the Counseis of wise men and make the Law more gracious in the subjects eye This as it is not necessary to the right making of a Law so if it may be obtained is very profitable Justinian's Novel is Extant wherein he gives the force of Lawes to the Ecclesiasticall Canons set forth or confirmed by the four Synods the Nicene the first of Constantinople the first of Ephesus and that of Chalcedon Where by the word Confirmed we must understand the Canons of the old Provinciall Councils which being generally receiv'd were therefore contained in the Code of the Catholick Canons Now to that which some Enquire whether the Church hath any Legislative Power the Answer may be given out of our former Treatise By Divine Law it hath none Before the Christian Emperours the Decrees of Synods for the order or the ornament of the Church are not called Lawes but Canons and they have either the force of Counsell only as in those things that rather concern single persons than the whole Church or else they bind by way of Covenant the willing and the unwilling being the fewer by necessity of determination and therefore by the Law of Nature not by any humane Authority This notwithstanding some Legislative Power may be granted by Humane Law to Churches Pastors Presbyters or Synods For if to other Companies and Colleges whose usefulnesse is not to be compared with the Church that Power as we have said above may be granted by the Supreme Governour why not also to the Church especially when no Divine Law is against it But two things must be here observed First this Legislation granted doth not at all diminish the right of the H. Power 't is granted Cumulatively as the Schooles speak not Privatively for the H. Power though it may communicate to another the right of making Lawes generall or speciall yet can it not abdicate the same right from it selfe Next the Lawes made by any such Company may if there be cause be nulled and corrected by the H. Power The reason is two Lawgivers both highest cannot be in one Common-wealth and therefore the Inferiour must obey the Superiour Hence it is that for the most part in the constitutions of Synods we see the assent of the Highest Power expressed in these words At the command of the King By the Decrce of the most glorious Prince the Synod hath Constituted or Decreed It may be objected here That Kings sometimes affirme they are bound by the Canons and forbid to obey their Edicts contrary thereto But this is of the same sense as when they professe to live by their own Lawes and forbid their Rescripts if they are against the Lawes to be observ'd For such professions take not away their Right but declare their will As a clause added in a former Testament derogating from the later makes the later of no value not because the Testator might not make a later Testament but because what is written in it is supposed not approved by his free and perfect Judgement And hence it is that if there be a speciall derogation from the derogating clause as the later Testament is of value so is the later Constitution too But that Canons have been nulled and amended by Emperours and Kings and that Synods ascrib'd that Power to them was prov'd sufficiently when we treated of Synods Yea which is more even those Canons which are found in the Apostles writings were not perpetually observ'd The reason is because they were supposed to contain not so much an exposition of Divine Law as Counsell accommodated to those times Such is the Canon to Timothy That a Neophite be not made a Bishop which was renewed in the Synod of Laodicea Yet in the Election of Nectarius this Canon was layd by by Theodosius and by Valentinian in the Election of Ambrose And such is that Canon That a Widow under sixty be not chosen for a Deaconesse which Theodosius also constituted by a Law Yet Justinian permitted one of fourty to be chosen 'T is not to be forgotten here that the Hebrew Kings excepted some actions from the Divine Law it selfe There was a Law That no unclean person should eat the Passeover Yet Ezechius having poured forth his prayers to God granted an Indulgence to the unclean to cat thereof Again the Law was that the Beasts should be slain by the Priests and yet twice under Ezechias the Levites by reason of the want of Priests were admitted to this office Not that the Kings loosed any one from the bond of Divine Law for that can no man doe but that according to equity the best Interpreter both of Divine and Humane Law they declared the Law Divine in such a Constitution of affaires to lose its obligation according to the mind of God himself For such a Declaration as in private actions and not capable of delay it is wont to be made by private men So David and his companions interpreted the Law which permits the Priests only to eat of the Shew-bread to have no binding force in the case of extreme hunger so in publick actions or in private also that may be delay'd it is to be made by the Highest Power the Defender and Guardian of Divine Law according to the counsell of wise and godly men And hither for conclusion I refer that in the time of the Macchees it was enacted that it should be lawfull to give battell to the Enemy on the Sabbath day CHAP. IX Of Jurisdiction about Sacred things TO Legislation Jurisdiction is coherent with so neer a tye that in the highest degree one cannot be without the other Wherefore if the Supreme Legislation about Sacredthings under God agrees to the Soveraign Power it followes that the Jurisdiction also agrees unto it Jurisdiction is partly Civill partly Criminall 'T was a point of Civill Jurisdiction that the Episcopall Sea of Antioch was abjudged and taken away from Paulus Samosatenus The Criminal from the chiefe part of it is call'd the Sword Hee beareth not the Sword in vain but is an avenger upon all that do evill therefore upon them too that doe evill in matters of Religlon Of this sort was the command of Nebuchodonosor the King that they should be torn in pieces who were contumelious against the true God and that of Josias wherby Idolaters were put to Death Relegation also belongs to Jurisdiction So Solomon confin'd Abiathar the Priest without any Council as the Bishop of Ely well notes t was indeed for treason but he had as good Right to punish him if the offence had been against the Divine Lawes So the Christian Emperours banisht Arius Nestorius and other Heretiques Esdras and his associates received Jurisdiction from Artaxerxes whereby they punished the obstinate Jewes with the publication of their goods and ejection out of the
embrace Communion with John of Constantinople In France the antient usage was by seizing on their Lands and other wayes to compell the Bishops to the Administration of Sacraments And the Princes of Holland have often layd their Commands upon the Pastors to execute Divine service Much more then may the Highest Power challenge this right over such Actions as have their force not by Divine but Canon Law For under the pretext of Canons it sometimes happens that the Canons are violated and 't is possible the Canons themselves may be exorbitant from the Divine prescriptions If either be the Highest Power cannot deny the Plantifs to take knowledge of the case Now concerning those actions which flow from Humane Law and oblige men whether they will or no and draw after them coaction there is much lesse cause of doubt For all Jurisdiction as it flows from the Highest Power reflows unto the same But as it is a part of Jurisdiction noâ— only to Judge but to appoint Judges so belongs it to the Highest Power to doe both Thus Amaâ—â—iah and the other 02 Priests with him are constituted Judges by Jehoshaphat Neither can be shewed more evidently the Jurisdiction of the Supreme in this kind of causes than that all degrees of appealing depend upon his pleasure Otherwise why doe the Pastors of England appeale unto this or that Bishop all the Bishops unto the two Archbishops And there is the same subordination of the consistories Classicall and the Nationall Synods Nor is the last terme of appealing limited by any Law Naturall or Divine Wisely said the King of Britaine in his judgement every Christian King Prince and Common-wealth have it in their Power to prescribe unto their subjects that externall forme of Government in Church affairs which may suit best with the forme of Civill Government And truly of old it was so done by the Christian Emperours Otherwise whence came that so great Prerogative of the Constantinopolitan Church Whence had the Synod of Chalcedon power to abrogate the acts of the second at Ephesus Now as in Civill businesses the judgement is permitted by the Highest Power for the most part to the appointed Courts and at last upon Petition against the greatest of them the matter is referr'd to men most skilfull in the Law or more rarely the Highest Power it self advising with learned Counsell gives finall judgement but very seldome upon suspition of some Court cals forth the cause unto it self so also in these controversies about Sacred things it hath been most usuall by the ordinary Synods and upon appeal from their decree by a certaine Assembly called for the purpose to put an end unto them it hath been lesse usuall yet sometimes usefull for the Emperour himself to judge of the Religion and equity of the former Judges Thus in the case of the Donatists after a double judgement of Bishops Constantine did who although he approved not the appeale yet he refused not the tryall of it But this is somewhat more rare and yet not without right that if a Synod upon probable causes be declined the Highest Power cals the cause before it self and weighing the opinions of most eminent Divines pronounces what is most equitable The Synod of Antioch prohibits him that complains of injury received from a Synod to trouble the Emperour with the hearing of his Case so long as the matter may be rectified by a greater Synod Yet this takes not from the Emperour the Power to heare the cause if it be brought before him Moreover the modesty of the antient Bishops hath attributed Power to Kings not only to examine the right or wrong of Excommunication but to pardon also and abate the punishment thereof for so much as belongs to Positive Law Ivo Carnotensis a Bishop and a stout desender of the Churches right against Kings was not afraid to write unto his fellow-Bishops that he had received a certain person into Communion in contemplation of the Kings favour to him according to the Authority of a Law that saith whosoever the King receiveth into grace and admits unto his Table the Priests and Co gregation must not refuse The Kings of France and the Vindicators of the Regall Right the Judges of the Supreme Courts have often constituted and decreed that publike Magistrates by occasion of that Jurisdiction they exercise are not subject unto those Ecclesiasticall penalties So in the Decrees of Hungary of the year 1551. the Ecclesiasticks are forbidden to send out without the knowledge and permission of his Majestie any sentence of Excommunication against the Nobles of that Kingdome And in an antient Law of the English it is read that none of the Kings Ministers be Excommunicated unlesse the King be first acquainted with it Which I see the Princes of Holland have thought sit to imitate for the same was promulged by Charls the Fift by his edict in the year 1540. Neverthelesse such use of the Keys as is congruent to Divine Law and such injunction of penance as is consentancous to the Laws and Canons the Highest Powers are wont to approve And this is the Imperiall Anathema mentioned in sundry of Justinians Laws We conclude that Christian Powers at this time doe not innovate which will not unlesse upon causes approved by themselves suffer Excommunication being joyned with publick shame to proceed unto effect which by their command inhibit censures manifestly unjust for it is their Duty to save every one from injury and to keep the Church from Tyranny CHAP. X. Of the Election of Pastors REmains that part of Empire which as we have said consisteth in assigning Functions The perpetuall Functions in the Church are two of Presbyters and Deacons Presbyters with all the antients I call them that feed the Church by preaching of the Word by Sacraments by the Keyes which by Divine Law are individuall Deacons which in some sort serve the Presbyters as the Levites did the Priests of old To this order are referr'd the Readers who were in the Synagogues as the Gospel and Philo shew and were retained in the Church as appears by History by the Canons and by the writings of the Fathers In the Gospel he that keeps the Book is call'd the Minister which is even all one with Deacon and the same appellation is given by the Synod of Laodicea to the Deacons of of Inferiour degree which were afterward called Subdeacons But the most laborious part of Deaconship is about the care of the poore Presbyters the antient Latin Church translated Seniors Deacons I think cannot otherwise be stil'd than Ministers although there be some who as their manner is in other things had rather carp at this than acknowledge it to be true I am deceiv'd if Plinius Secundus did not understand both Greek and Latin yet he relating the Institutes of Christians rendring word for word names them Shee-Ministers whom Paul entitles Sheedeacons and the Church afterward Deaconesses Now as the Levites could doe nothing but
the Priests might do the same so is there nothing in the Deacons function which is excepted from the function of the Presbyter because the Deacons were given to the Presbyters as Assistants in lesser matters Before Deacons were ordained one of the Apostles Judus Iscariot was Treasurer of the Lords mony and after him all the Apostles for some time distributed their allowance among the poor untill the contention risen among the Widows and the greatnesse of their other employments enforced them to use the help of others And yet the Institution of Deacons did not so acquit the Presbyters but they had still the poor under their inspection Hence were the Bishops chiefly trusted with the dispensation of the Churches mony and that with so full a Power as to be unaccountable but to use part of it for the necessities of themselved and other men and to deliver part to the Presbyters to be disposed among the poor as appears in the Canons which are entitled Apostolicall and in the Synod of Antioch Unlesse the antient Custome had been so in vain had the Apostle commanded a Bishop to be hospital in vain had the Antiochian Collections been deliver'd to the Presbyters at Hierusalem Now concerning the Constitution of Presbyters whose function is principall 01 and most necessary we must note four things that by many writers are not accurately enough distinguished The first is the faculty it self of preaching of administring the Sacraments and using the Keyes wich we will call the Mandate a second thing is the application of this faculty to a certain person which by the received word we will stile Ordination a third is the application of this person unto a certain place or Congregation which is called Election the fourth is that whereby a certain person in a certain place exerciseth his Ministery under the publick protection and with publick Authority and let us call this if you please Confirmation The first is to be distinguished from the second To illustrate this with a Simile The Husbands power is from God the application of that Power unto a certain person proceeds from consent whereby yet the right it self is not given For if it were given by consent by consent also might Matrimony be dissolved or agreement made that the Husband should not rule over the Wife which is not true The Imperiall Power is not in the Electors therefore they doe not give it yet they doe apply it to a certain person The Power of life and death is not in the people before they joyn together in a Common-wealth for a private man hath no right unto the Sword yet by them it is applied unto a Senate or single person Christ without controversie is He from whom that right of Preaching of exhibiting the Sacraments and of using the Keyes doth arise and receive its vertue He also by his Divine providence as he preserves the Church so procures that the Church may not want Pastors The second differs as much from the third as for a Physician to be Licensed to practice Physick and to be chosen Physician to such a City or for a Lawyer to be admitted to the honour of that Profession and to be made a Syndic of some Corporation These two have been ever distinct and sometimes sepatate The Apostles were truly Presbyters and so they call themselves for the greater Power includes the lesse yet was not their Injunction appropriate to any certain place The Evangelists also were Presbyters but to no place bound And so long after was Pantanus ordained by Demetrius Bishop of Alexandria Frumentius by Athanasius and were sent to preach the Gospell through India Which in our time hath been also done and would it were done more carefully Indeed the 6. Canon of the Synod at Chalcedon forbids Ordination absolutely or without a title but this is not of Divine Law or perpetuall but positive and such as admits exceptions The reason of the Cannon was lest by too great a number of Presbyters the Church shall be burdened or the Order it self grow cheap and vile The London Synod excepteth fellowes of Houses in both Universities and Masters of Art living upon their own means and who are shortly to undertake some cure If the Bishop ordain any other 't is at his own perill to keep them from want untill they are provided for Therefore Election that is assignation of a certain place and Ordination are not alway joyn'd together and when they are they are not the same Which is farther proved because they that are translated from place to place must be chosen again but not again ordained which they must be if either Election and Ordination were the same or Ordination a part of Election Besides it will appear that Election was made by men of sundry sorts but Ordination only by Pastors and antiently by Bishops only Hence Paul writing to the first Bishop of the Ephesians gives him Admonition That be lay hands on no man suddenly And the most antient Canons entituled Apostolical require that a Presbyter be ordained by a Bishop but a Bishop not without two or three Bishops Which Custome if seems came from the Hebrews for the Senators of the Great Synedry could not be ordain'd but by three Priests and that by imposition of hands as is noted by the Talmudists Without question this manner was most holy and for the conservation of sound Doctrine most commodious when none was admitted to teach the people but he first receiv'd Allowance from the approved Doctors of the same Faith Pastors therefore ought to ordain Pastors nor is this their office as they are Pastors of this or that Church but as Ministers of the Church Catholick For saith Cyprian There is but one entire Episcopacy whereof every one is a partaker Hence it hath been alwayes held that the Baptism is of force given by a Presbyter without the limits of his peculiar Charge Nor is it materiall whether the Election precede the Ordinarion or be consequent to it for when it precedes it is a conditionate not plenary Election which the Canons of later times have called Postulation Over this Ordination the Highest Power hath an Imperiall inspection and care Justinians Constitutions are extant of the Ordination of Bishops and Clerks and other Lawes of others which prescribe the age and standing of men to be ordained Lawes of good use and fit to be reviv'd for the prevention of the Churches ruine through the rawnesse and ignorance and inexperience of her Teachers according to that out of the old Poët What lost your state founded on so good Rules The publick charge was given to boyes and fooles The fourth member of our distinction Confirmation differs as much from the third as the Church considered by it self differs from the Church publick T is pertinent here that Ezechiah is read to have Confirmed the Priests that Pastors are defended by Lawes and Armes that some Jurisdiction or Audience is attributed to them
Prophets some Evangelists some Pastors and Doctors not only distinct in Functions but by certaine degrees also For God hath given in the Church first Apostles in the second place Prophets in the third Do ors The very Deaconry by the Apostles instituted is sufficient to prove that Christ had not commanded an equality of Church-men Therefore we set down this first as a thing of undoubted verity Wherein we have Lanchius Chemnitius Hemingius Calvin Melanchthon Bucer all consenting with us yea and Beza too so far as to say That some one chosen by the judgement of the other Presbyters should be and remaine President of the Presbytery cannot nor ought not to be reprehended Secondly we determine That the Episcopacy we speak of hath been received by the Universall Church This appears out of the Universall Councils whose Authority even now among pious men is very Sacred It appears also by comparing Synods either Nationall or Provinciall whereof there is hardly one to be found but it carries in the forehead manifest signs of Episcopall eminence All the Fathers none excepted testify the same Among whom the least friend to Episcopacy is Jerom being himself not a Bishop but a Presbyter His testimony therefore alone sufficeth It was decreed all the world over that one chosen from among the Presbyters should bee set over the rest to whom all the care of the Church should pertaine Yea so universall was this Custome that it was observed oven among the Hereticks which went our of the Catholick Church All these things saith the Author of the Homilies upon Matthew which are proper to Christ in verity have Hereticks also in their Schism Churches Scriptures Bishops and other orders of the Clergy Baptisme Eucharist and all things else Certainly this errour of Aerius was condemned of all the Church that he said A Presbyter ought to be discerned from a Bishop by no difference Jerom himself to him who had written There is no difference between a Bishop and a Presbyter answers 'T is spoken as ignorantly as one would wish you have as the Proverbe is made shipwrack in the Haven Lastly Zanchius also acknowledgeth the consent of the whole Church in this point Our third determination is That Episcopacy had its beginning in the Apostolicall times Witnesse the Catalogues of Bishops in Irenaeus Eusebius Socrates Theodoret and others all which begin from the Apostles age now to derogate faith in an Historicall matter from so great Authors and so consenting together it cannot but be the marke of an irreverent and pertinacious mind It is all one as if you should deny the truth of that which all the Roman Histories deliver That the Consulship began from the expulsion of the Tarquins But let us againe heare Jerom At Alexandria saith he from Mark the Evangelist the Presbyters alwaies elected one from among themselves placed him in a higher degree and call'd him Bishop Marke deceased in the 8. of Nero to whom John the Apostle being yet alive succeeded Anianus to Anianus Abilius to Abilius Cerdo The same Apostle surviving after the death of James Simcon had the Bishoprick of Jerusalem after the death of Peter and Paul Linus Anacletus Clemens Held that of Rome Evodius and Ignatius that of Antioch Surely this Antiquity is not to bee contemn'd whereunto Ignatius himself the coetanean of the Apostles and his next followers Justin Martyr and Irenaeus yield most apparent testimonies which need not bee transcribed We will end this with Cyprian Now saith he through all Provinces and through every City are appointed Bishops Our fourth is this This Episcopacy is approv'd by Divine Law or as Bucer speaks it seemed good unto the Holy Ghost that One among the Presbyters should be charged with a singular care The Divine Apocalyps affords an irrefragable argument to this assertion for Christ himself commands to write unto the seven Angels of the Asian Churches Who by Angels Understand the Churches themselves they manifestly contradict the Holy Scriptures For the Candlesticks are the Churches saith Christ and the stars are the Angels of the seven Churches 'T is a wonder how farre men are transported by the spirit of Contradiction when they dare confound things so openly distinguisht by the Holy Spirit We deny not but every Pastor in a generall signification may be capable of this title of Angel but here 't is manifestly written to One in every Church Was there but one Pastor in every City No sure for even from the time of Paul at Ephesus were many Presbyters ordained to feed the Church of God Why then is the Letter sent to One in every Church if no One had a peculiar and eminent Function Under the name of Angel saith Austin is commended the Governour of the Church The Angels are the Presidents of the Church saith Jerom. If any had rather hear the modern Writers let Bullinger speak The heavenly Epistle is destin'd to the Angell of the Church of Smyrna that is the Pastor Now Histories doe witnesse that Angel or Pastor of the Church of Smyrna Polycarpus was ordained Bishop of the Apostles namely by St John and lived in the Ministery of this Church 86. years What Bullinger relates of Polycarpus is confirmed by Irenaus Tertullian and other Antients who say We have the Churches nourished by John for though Marcion reject his Apocalyps yet the Order of Bishops recounted to its Originall will stand upon John the Author Let Marorat also speak John began with the Church of Ephesus for the celebrity of the place nor doth he addresse himself unto the people but the Prince of the Clergy that is the Bishop Haply Beza's Authority or Rainolds will be more accepted See therefore what favour the Truth found with them Beza To the Angel that is to the President who was in the first place to be admonisht of these things and by Him his other Colleagues and all the Church Rainold In the Church of Ephesus although there were many Presbyters and Pastors for the administration thereof yet One was over those many whom our Saviour calls the Angel of the Church and writes the things to him which others from him might learn Certainly if it be well said by Dio Prusoeus that Kings are the Genii of their Kingdomes and in Holy Scripture Kings are stiled by the name of Angels who sees not that this name is also by an excellent right agreeable to the Prince of Presbyters Christ therefore writing to those Bishops as men Eminent in the Cergy without all question hath approved this eminence of Episcopacy To let passe the Annotations after the second Epistle to Timothy and that to Titus which are found in the most antient Greek Copies Concerning Timothy hear the writer supposed Ambrose whose words are these Timothy created Presbyter by himself the Apostle called Bishop because the prime Presbyters were so entitled of whom One receding the next succeeded but because the following Presbyters began to be found unworthy to hold
joyned 7. Sometimes Lay-men alone 8. The right of Lay-Patrons antient and derived from the Regall 9. Benefices not the Popes Patrimony 10. The Custome of Holland 11. All Patronages subject to the Highest Power 12. Inferior Powers have no command by Divine Right 13. And little is to be given them by the Highest in Sacred things 14. None at all unlesse they be Orthodox THE END An Advertisement to the Stationer SIR IF it be objected as a friend of mine conjectured it might that the work is any way opposite to the present Government speaking so much of Kings and Emperors The answer is That the Judicious Author distinguisheth between Kings absolute and such as are confind or bound up by Laws and cannot act without or against a Parliament See cap. 3. Sect. 8. So that This treatise doth not presume to dispute the States Authority 't is ill disputing with those that command Legions but presupposing that humbly shews them what they may and ought to doe on behalf of the Church And in the very first page you find all the Book is written of the Highest power whether King or Senate And these are the Authors words at the end of 15. Sect. Chap. 11. A Senate without a King is as it were a King This I thought sit to advertise to prevent jealousy Fare you well And remember 't is one of the best pieces of the excellent Grotius Courteous Reader These Books following are to be sold by Joshua Kirton at the Kings Arms in Pauls Church-yard Books of Divinitie and Sermons 1. THe Truth of Christian Religion proved by the Principles and Rules taught and received in the Light of the understanding in an exposition of the Articles of our faith commonly called the Apostles Creed written by a learned Author lately deceased in Folio 1651. 2. A Concordance Axiomaticall containing a Survey of Theologicall Propositions with their Reasons and Uses in holy Scripture by William Knight in fol. 3. Certain Sermons or Homilies appointed to be read in Churches in the time of Queen Elizabeth and now reprinted in folio 4. Compunction or pricking of heart with the time means nature necessity and order of it and of Conversion with motives directions signes and means of cure of the wounded in heart with other consequent or concomitant duties especially self-deniall All of them gathered from Acts 2.37 being the summe of 80. Sermons With a Postscript concerning these times and the sutiableness of this text and Argument to the same and to the calling of the Jewes By R. Jenison Doctor of Divinity in quarto 5. A plain Discovery of the whole Revelation of St. John in two Treatises 1. Searching and proving the Interpretation 2. Applying the same paraphrastically and historically to the text with a Resolution of certain doubts and annexion of certain Oracles of Sibylla by John N pier Lord of Marchiston in quarto 6. The Government and order of the Church of Scotland with an Astertion of the said Government in the points of Ruling Elders and of the Authority of Presoyteries and Synods in quarto 7. A Treatise of Miscelany questions wherein many usefull questions and cases of Conscience are discusted and resolved concerning the Controversies of these times by George Gillespie of Scotland in quarto 8. An Answer to the ten Reasons of Edmund Campian the Jesuit in confidence whereof he â—ftired Disputation to the Ministers of the Church of England in the Controversie of Faith by William Whitaker Doctor of Divinity in quarto 9. Jo. Hen. Alsieduis his discourse of the 1000. Apocalypticall years or the Saints reign on earth a thousand years Englished by W. Burton in quarto 10. Letters concerning Religion between the late Earle of Manchester Lord Privy Seâ—l the Lord Faulkland and Mr. â—aâ—â—er Montaguc in quarto 11. Truth Asserted by the Doctrine and practice of the Apostles seconded by the â—estimony of Synods Fathers and Doctors from the Apostles to this day viz. that Episcopacy is Jure divino by Sir Frantis Wortley in quarto 12. An Answer to the chief Arguments for Anabaptisme by Doctor John Bastwick in quarto 13. Two learned Discourses 1. on Mathew 28.18 19. 2. on 2 Peter 2.13 written by a learned and worthy Gentleman larely decâ—ased in octavo 1651. 14. Popular Errors in generall points concerning the Intelligence of Religion having relation to their causes and reduced into divers Observations by John Dâ—spagne Minister of the French Church in octavo 15. New Observations upon the Creed with the use of the Lords Prayer maintained by John Despagne in octavo 16. The same in French 17. New Observations upon the Commandements by John Despagne 1651. 18. The same in French 19. The Abridgement of a Sermon preached on the Fast day for the good successe of the Treaty between the King and Parliament 1648. by John Despagne 20. The same in French 21. Sermon Funebre de Jean Despagne sur la mort de sa Femme in octavo 22. Advertissement touth out la fraction distribution du prin en la S. cene obmises en plusieurs Eglises Orthodoxes par Jean Despagne in octavo 23. A Monument of Mortality containing 1. A wakening for worldlings 2. Meditations of Consolation 3. Comfortable considerations preparing the sick for an happy change 4. A Mirrour of modesty with a reproof of the strange attired woman and the sacred use of Christian Funerals by M. Day Doctor of Divinity in octavo 24. Plain truths of Divinity collected out of the Sacred Scriptures particularly of the destruction of Antichrist and the time when the comming of Christ to Judgement and his raigning with his Saints for ever upon this earth after the restitution of all things by John Alcock in octavo 25. Herberts carefull Father and pious Child lively represented in teaching and learning a Catechisme made in 1200 Questions and Answers in which the Catholick truth is asserted and above 600 Errors Heresies and points of Popery are briefly consuted in octavo 26. Herberts belief and confession of faith made in 160. Articles in octavo 27. Herberts quadrupartite devotion for the day week month year made in about 700. Meditations and Prayers in octavo 28. Meditations on Christs prayer upon the Crosse Father forgive them for they know not what they doe by Sir John Hayward in octavo 1651. 29. Davids Tears or Meditations on the 6.32 and 130. Psalmes by Sir John Hayward in twelves 30. The Devotions of the dying man that desireth to dye well Written by Samuel Gardiner Doctor of Divinity in twelves 31. A Beautifull Bay-bush to shrowd us from the sharp showres of Sin containing many notable Prayers and Meditations in twelves 32. A Grain of Incense or Supplication for the peace of Jerusalem the Church and State written by John Reading in octavo 33. An Evening Sacrifice or prayer for a family necessary for these calamitous times made by John Reading in octavo 34. Character of true blessedness delivered in a Sermon at the Funerall of Mistris Alice
deceives the unskilfull that they doe not enough discern the daily administration of affaires obvious to their eyes which in an Optimacy is oft committed unto one from the interiour Constitution of the Common-wealth What I have said of Kings I would have to be understood much more of them who both really and in title were not Kings but Princes that is not chiefest but first Whose Principality much differs from Supremacy And again this is to be noted that some Lords and Cities have Supreme Authority though they seeme not to have it being under the Trust and protection of another But seeing to be under protection is not to be in subjection and as the Roman Lawyers note The people ceaseth not to be free that are fairly observant to anothers Majesty these also may be endowed with Supreme Authority who are obliged to another by unequall League or tye of Homage All this I set down to that end lest any one hereafter as I see hath been often done defame good causes by an ill Defence I would more enlarge in this Argument for 't is of great consequence and here to erre is dangerous but that 't is done already with great care by many others and of late by the learned Arnisaeus Upon these premises let us come to demonstrate the parity of Empire over Sacred and other matters As in all things the thoughts are not so eafily ruled as the words so particularly in Religion Lactantius hath truly said Who shall enforce me either to believe what I will not or not to believe what I will And in this sense that of Casiodor is true Religion cannot be Commanded and of Bernard Faith is to be planted by persuasion not obtruded by violence Wherefore also the Emperours Gratian Valentinian and Theodosius said concerning an Heretick Let him think if he will what is hurtfull for himself let him not utter it to the hurt of others And I suppose Constantine had respect hereunto when he call'd himself a Bishop or Overseer of things without because the inward acts taken by themselves are not the matter of Humane power but are Subject to the power of God who by Bishops not Commanding but Ministring moves the minds of men with voices and signs yet so that the still reserves the maine Efficacy to himself alone Notwithstanding inward acts of all sorts taken joyntly with the outward fall under Humane Authority The Cornelian Law lays hold on him who carrys a weapon with purpose to kill a man and Adrian the Emperour saith not only the event in evill deeds but the will is to be consider'd So in Justinians Code concerning the Catholick Faith a Title is extant to wit for the Profession of Faith which the first Law explains All people under our Empire we require to be of such Religion c. Hence came those names of Kings Rectors Authors Defenders of the Faith So also of old the King of Ninive commanded repentance with fasting That things forbidden by God cannot with validity be commanded nor things by him commanded be forbidden by Humane power is no lesse true in other actions than in Sacred in both that of the Apostle hath place We must obey God rather than men which a Disciple of the Apostles Polycarpus hath expressed thus We have learned to render to the Powers ordained by God all the honour we can without hurting our own souls The King of Egypt Commands the Mid-wives to kill the Male-children of the Hebrews They doe not obey The cause is exprest For they feared God who by the dictate of Nature forbids to slay the innocent King Ahab would have Naboth sell him his Vineyard Naboth denyes for the Divine Law given to the Hebrews forbad inheritances to be alienated from the same family Antoninus Caracalla commands Papinian the Lawyer to defend the paricide committed by him Papinian refuses and had rather dye because he knew it was against the Law of Nature and Nations to speak false and Patronize so great a crime By the same right but with more holy affection the Apostles when the Councill charged them not to speak or teach in the name of Jesus aske whether they must not obey God rather than men and justly for they had received a charge from God himself by the mouth of the Lord Jesus in his name to Preach repentance and remission of sin and that beginning at Jerusalem for this also was specified in their Commission What therefore the Divine Command had made necessary for them to be done Humane command could not render unlawfull And in this sense the Authors are to be explain'd who say the Gospel the Ministry the Sacraments are not subject to Humane Power that is to change that which Divine Law hath introduced For first the Preaching of the word of salvation and the exhibition of the Sacraments being commanded by God cannot effectually be forbidden by men Likewise the Noursing of Parents or Children the relieving of the innocent and many other duties are so far exempt from Humane Law that the prohibition of them is of no force or vertue Secondly the forme by God prescrib'd for the Ministry of his word and Sacrament cannot be alter'd by men nor is this proper to things Sacred For also the Forme of Matrimony as it consists in the unity and individuall knot of two persons is by Humane Law immutable Thirdly it belongs not unto Humane Power to make new Articles of Faith or as Justinian speaks to innovate the Faith nor to institute a new worship of God or new Sacraments because the nature of such things will not admit thereof for nothing can be believed or done in order to salvation but what God hath declared such neither can any thing be fit to apply unto us the Divine grace unlesse God hath assign'd it to that use Yet to speak accurately these things which we have rehearsed Sacred and others may be rather said to have something in them of immutable right than simply and altogether exempted from the Rule of the Highest Powers seeing there be very many and very great acts of Authority concerning them which acts are call'd in Scripture the Commandements of the King in the businesse of the Lord. For first it is the proper effect of the Highest Powers that we have liberty and convenience to doe the things which God commandeth being freed from impediments and supplyed with helps So Cyrus and Darius gave leave to the Jews to restaur the Temple and to sacrifice there and gave them moneys too to beare their charges So by the edict of Constantine and Licinius the Christians had open exercise of their Religion Secondly not only by permitting but as before was touched Humane Law by Commanding what Divine Law doth Command superaddes another Obligation Thirdly to the actions Commanded by God the Highest Power prescribes certaine circumstances of place time and manner that they may be done decently and in order Fourthly from actions forbidden by
of Synods the hearing of Causes it depends upon the will of the Highest Power from whose Authority it proceeds although in the ordinary way inferiour Courts are not past by yet if those Courts be liable to some suspition or the businesse will not bear delay the Highest Power may call it from them to himself We conclude therefore that which Whitaker and others have written before and the example of Free Cities that without a Synod preserve their Churches doe confirm A Synod is not at all times necessary nor in every case So far from necessary sometimes that it is not profitable for as the parts are such is the whole I will not here repeat the old complaint almost of all ages that the chiefest distempers of the Church have proceeded from the Priests Nazianzen hath said enough where he also renders the principall causes thereof the Ambition and Pride of Church-men nor doth hee speak of Arian Synods only but of all of his time those especially wherein himself was present Therefore saith he have I withdrawn my self and sought for security of mind in rest and solitude This evill will happen if it appear either that the integrity of judgement is hindred by vehement prejudices which often befalls men not malitious or that factions are so prevalent that a farther branch may rather bee expected from the Synod than any testimony of consent I much wonder what came in some mens minds when they said They that accuse another of impiety may be his Judges also in a Synod and that the Right of refusing which hath place in civill affans cannot be extended to Ecclesiasticall For certainly the common Rules which arise out of naturall equity ought to be of force no lesse in Ecclesiasticall than other judgements and I remember Optatus speaking properly of the Ecclesiasticall saith Judges must be sought which are not of either party because judgement is hindred by affection In the Councill of Chalcedon the Judges charge the Legats of the Roman B. they should put off the Judges person if they would be the accusers of Dioscorus And Athanasius would not come unto the Synods wherein 't was manifest the adverse party raigned Such is often the face of things that a Synod may be hurtfull at the present which if you stay awhile and let the mindes of men come to a calme may be called to good purpose Time shall declare saith the Apostle the work that is the doctrine of every one And If any man be otherwise minded God shall reveale the truth In both places shewing there is often need of time that the Truth may be found out and a right judgement given The contrary may also happen that the present evill cannot endure the delay of a Synod and calls for a more compendions remedy Moreover the same causes for which great Assemblies are suspected by the Highest Power may also have place in Synods for as a very learned man hath said It is not lesse Politicall to assemble Bishops than other Orders of men There is the same fear the same danger unlesse they have put off Humane passions when they became Pastors I might reckon up many examples of unhappy Councils as were under Constantine those of Antioch Caesaria and Tyrus the Bishops of which last as the Emperour in his Letters plainly tells them did nothing else but sow divisions and hatred and disturb the Peace of the world Yet I confesse the Church is not in the best condition when Synods cannot be had and therefore all means is to be used that these Assemblies may be retain'd or after long omission restor'd whereby the Church speaks both to her Members and her Governours with most convenience And yet even then when the Highest Power governs without a present Synod it hath the judgement of the Church in former Synods it hath the perpetuall consent of the most famous Doctors which flourished in every Age and Nation it hath the most learned and religious Divines of the time present both domestick and forraign whose opinions are worthy of an equall regard especially in points of Doctrine which is the common study of them all and in respect whereof they have every one a share in the Universall Episcopacy In making Church-Laws the King saith the Bishop of Ely made use of men fit to be advised with men who in reason are esteemed most under standing most able and judicious to answer in such affairs and saith Burhil He was instructed by Ecclesiasticall Councils or in defect of these by Authors for their Faith and skill in these matters most approved Upon the premises we see there are other causes beside the great corruption of Religion in contemplation whereof Synods may or ought sometimes to be omitted and therefore they were not so often granted by the Christian Emperours as they were desired All are Petitioners to your Grace with sighs and tears saith Leo to Theodosius that you would please to command a Synode in Italy Yet he prevailed not yea in vaine did the Right of calling Synods belong unto the Emperours if upon just cause they could not deny to call them It is certaine the Churches which were sick of the Ubiquitarian errour could not be accounted past all hope yet the Electors and Princes to whom the Laws of Germany commend the care of Religion without a Synode by the Counsell of wisemen expelled this disease out of their Dominions and are praised for it by the same persons who will not acknowledge the Right on which alone that Reformation depends The office of a Prince as Zanchius and others with him note partly consists in this that untill a free Councill may be had which cannot be had at all times He command the dissenting parties to use not their own but the tearms of Scripture and forbeare to condemne each other in publick This also pertains to the Right of ruling before a Synode and therefore without a Synode It doth not follow hence that the liberty of judgeing which by Divine right is due to Divines is taken from them for they may also out of Synods deliver their judgement either before the Highest Powers or if it be needfull before others too and they may render the reasons of their judgement out of the word of God The summe is this Synods we confesse are the most usuall help of Governing the Churches yet we hold such time may fall out that Synods may not be profitable and convenient much lesse necessary And our greatest wonder is the boldnesse of some men that maintaine even when the Powers take on them the protection of the Church whether they will or no Synods may lawfully and rightly be assembled Beza was of another mind who hath said Synods are to be called not without the command and favour of the King Junius was of another mind who said 'T is an unjust and dangerous attempt of the Church to hold a generall Assembly without his knowledge