with his Presbytery But the Bishops themselves were judged by the Synod Moreover when the world began to be filled with Churches and the Metropolitanes themselves stood in need of particular Government over themselves for although they grew in number Patriarches yet all were not according to their places either prudent or vigilant for in all orders of men Note those of worth are but few the Fathers did commend the care of whole Provinces together unto certain Bishops of the chief Cities which persons they afterward called Patriarchs Thus far Bucer there And after noting the abuse of these powers and the usurpation of them by the Bishops of Rome whom hee calleth Antichrist which I note to evidence that a man may be full for Episcopacy yea and Archiepiscopacy and yet be as full against Popery which some should mark hee subjoyns what is very considerable in these times viz. At quia omnino necesse est ut singuli Clerici suos habeant proprios Custodes Curatores instaurenda est ut Episcoporum ita et Archidiaconorum aliorumque omnium quibuscunque censeantur nominibus quibus portio aliqua commissa est custodiendi gubernandique Cleri authoritas potestas sed vigilantia animadversio ne quis omnino sit in hoc ordine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But because saith hee it is altogether necessary that every Minister and Clergy man should have their proper Guardians and Governours both the Authority of Bishops Bishops and of Archdeacons Archdeacons and of all * As Metropolitanes c. other officers by what names soever they be called unto whom any part of the power of guarding and governing the Ministry is committed ought to be restored As also watchfulness and observation least any man whatsoever of this profession be without government and not under rule Thus far hee With whose testimony not onely for his learning and piety both which were eminent in him but also for his reference to this Church as having been one of the reformers of it I close these Allegations and Witnesses Vide Bucer Script Anglican Onely adding this That had the Reformed Churches beyond the Seas observed this counsel of these their own learned men they had not given that advantage to the adversary by making a Schism in Government from the whole Universal Church scandalizing it also Nor had they given occasion to those who out of true or pretended imitation of them have brought Scotland and by it England the glory and refuge of the Reformed Churches and by both Ireland into those horrid confusions which have fallen upon them upon that quarrel as is noted by (a) Icon. Basilic Medit. 17. one who well knew and is not denyed by (b) Ministeâ—s Reasons for Reformation 1660. in the Preface others who had no small activity in blowing those fires some coals whereof they have still retained and by them attempted to kindle new flames as is noted by (c) Kings Declaration Oct. 5. 1660. pag. 7. another Authentique Author And for those our Brethren who had destroyed this Government among us it is to be feared it may be in many of them upon the like ground that the Rabbin saith the Jew the body of them D. Kimchi in Isa 53.9 for so hee expoundeth that Prophecy which the Chaldee Version applies to the Messiah as wee do was slaughtered in the captivity whilst hee explains those word with the rich in his death Hee saith it was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But Which sentence because it is in Rhyme wee may thus render The Wether had no fault but that His fleece was good and hee was fat Mark 12.7 According to this Come let us kill him and the Inheritance shall bee ours As it hath appeared since SECT III. Exceptions against the Government and Discipline THe Brethren the Authors of the former Tract Reasons of the necessity of Reformation p. 40. except also against the Government and Jurisdiction of the Bishops First That it is not by Divine Right in this Nation but that the Church of England is founded in the estate of Prelacy within the Realm of England by Law and authority of Parliament onely Where first we accept of their Concession Prelacy Episcopacy established by Law in England 25. Edw. 3. Anno 1350. then our Church Government by Episcopacy is established by Law in this Nation Now if they have this office by Law they must also have a power for the Execution of it as a Prelacy that is a superiour order of men to govern in Ecclesiastical Affairs which is their jurisdiction and power to exercise Discipline But the Brethren reply Object that this is taken away by the Act of 17th Carol. I. 11. wherein their sitting in Parliament is removed and the power of the King to authorize Commissioners for Causes Ecclesiastical which was granted by an Act 1. Eliz. cap. 1. Reas neces ref Pag. 51. And that there is not any branch or clause in that whole Act that gives more or other jurisdiction to Bishops or any other Ecclesiastical persons whatsoever But Answer unto this is given elsewhere in this Treatise therefore I leave it here and come to that which is more material viz. The Divine Right at least by consequent of that function Which having evidenced so plentifully before out of both Ancient and Modern Testimonies and those of some the greater Lights of the Reformed Churches And replyed to the Objections on the contrary And particularly because the Brethren do not here oppose it I shall need to say the less Onely take a verdict from one whom some of the Brethrens opinion cite as a witness which is St. Cyprian Which will at once carry with it both the Divine Right and also the inseparable adjunct of it though not a sole yet a superiour jurisdiction For that of sole jurisdiction seems a needless quarrel seeing the Bishop doth neither exercise any part of it alone but with others assistance and without which assistance hee cannot orderly administer it And the Church declares her self whilst shee appointeth in the ordering of Priests and consecrating of Bishops one of the greatest Acts pertaining to Government that there shall be other also assistant to the Bishop in Imposition of hands Though in that lesser point of Confirmation of Children and ordering of Deacons it is not so appointed though not excluding it But as I said Cyprian hath these words Neque enim aliunde haereses abortae sunt Cypr. lib. 1. Ep. 3. Vide in eand sentent ips lib. 3. Ep. 1. aut nata sunt Schismata quà m inde quod Sacerdoti Dei non obtemperatur Nec Unus in Ecclesia ad tempus Sacerdos ad tempus Judex vice Christi cogitatur Cui si secundum Magisteria divina obtemperaret fraternitas Universa nemo adversum Sacerdotum Collegium quicquam moveret Let not the Reader nauseate this once or twice
repetition of this Testimony Non Crambe bis cocta haec bis repetita placebunt In Musick streins often repeatâ—d are In mental harmony why is' t a jarr nemo post divinum judicium post populi suffragium post Coepiscoporum consensum judicem se non jam Episcopi sed Dei faceret Nemo dissidio unitatis Christi Ecclesiam scinderet c. For from no other root saith hee either Heresies spring or Schisms do arise than from this That Obedience is not given to the Priest or Minister of God so hee calls the Bishop by way of eminency as the words following declare And that it is not considered that there is for the time but One Priest and but ONE JUDGE in Christs stead To whom if the WHOLE Church according as the Scripture hath appointed were obedient no man would move any thing against the Colledge of Ministers no man after Gods sentence the peoples suffrage election or approbation after the consent of the other Bishops would make himself Judge not now of the Bishop but of God himself In which Testimony onely by the way noting that populi suffragium must be according to Calvins observation not properly an Election though in a large sense it may be called so according to that of the former Author elsewhere Quum ipsa plebs maxime habeat potestatem L. 1. Ep. 4. vel eligendi dignos Sacerdotes vel indignos recusandi That the people have chief right either to chuse good Ministers or of refusing those that are bad But either a signification of their desire whom they would have or else an approbation of the Election made by the Bishops and confirmed by the Magistrate So Calvin Instit lib. 4. cap. 4. s 12. Cap. 13. Laodic Concil Est quidem illud fateor optimâ ratione sancitum in Laodicensi concilio ne turbis electio permitteretur primum soli Clerici eligebant offerebant Magistratui tum ad multitudinem res deferebatur Aut si à multitudine incipiebatur tantum id fiebat ut sciretur quem potissimum expeteret It is saith hee I confess excellently decreed in the Councel of Laodicea that the election of Ministers should not be permitted to the people But first the Clergy did chuse then they presented him to the Magistrate and lastly hee was propounded to the people c. But this occasionally onely to prevent mistaking As to the former Testimony of Cyprian out of it wee learne First That the eminency of one Minister above the rest in Government is of Divine Institution Post Judicum divinum Secondly That hee being chosen hath a sole superiour power of judgement in the Church to whom all must be obedient I say not hee hath a sole power absolutely but a sole superiour power over all within his Diocess and Jurisdiction by this Testimony whatsoever is to be said of the thing it self according to the Word of God And indeed the liberty or advantage that Civil Laws give of exercising Episcopal Authority doth not imply they have no other The Church hath taught us they may concur Will you such as be unquiet disobedient and criminous within your Diocess Book of Consecrat Q. At the consecrat of a Bishop correct and punish according to such Authority as yee have by Gods Word and as to you shall be committed by the Ordinance of this Realm 〈…〉 Ecclesiastical whether in order or degree which at present wee dispute not be according to Scripture as before hath been shewn Government and Jurisdiction cannot bee separated from it although the Laws should not confer any yea forbid it seeing the Church cannot subsist without Government which cannot be exercised regularly without Bishops Cypr. lib. 8. Ep. 3 The same Cyprian and in the same Epistle now cited shewing it to be the design of Satan in setting men to oppose godly Bishops that so hee may destroy Discipline and by that the Church it self saith Apparet quis impugnet non scilicet Christus qui Sacerdotes aut constituit aut protegit sed ille qui Christi adversarius Ecclesiae ejus inimicus Ob hoc Ecclesiae praepositum sua infestatione persequitur ut Gubernatore sublato atrocius atque violentius circa Ecclesiae naufragia grassetur Who it is and upon what design that opposeth Episcopacy It appears saith hee who opposeth the Bishop to be sure not Christ who either appointeth or protecteth Bishops But hee who is Christs adversary and his Churches enemy for this end persecutes and infests the Church Ruler that the Pylot being taken off hee might with greater cruelty and violence make spoil and shipwrack of the Church Thus far Cyprian And this here for the Right of this office in humane and divine SUBSECT II. THe next is whether it bee a distinct Order from or a superiour Degree above the Presbytery or ordinary Ministry Whether Episcopacy be a different order Necess Ref. p. 42. Touching the judgement of the Church of England in which point there need not be any great controversie if men that have little else to defend themselves were not too captious of words Of which sort of controversies the Apostle giveth warning viz. 2 Tim. 2.14 That wee should not strive about words without profit Answ 1 The Preface to the Book of Ordination of Ministers saith Preface to the Book of Ordination It is evident to all men diligently reading holy Scripture and Ancient Authors that from the Apostles time there have been THESE ORDERS of Ministers in Christs Church Bishops Priests and Deacons which offices were evermore had in such reverent estimation that no man by his own private authority might presume to execute any of them Where it is plain that saying these Orders and then naming three it is as much as if it had said These three Orders which is the Exception the Brethren have against it And because it calleth them presently Offices But that altereth not what it said before for every order is an office and every office is in some order Again they evidently prevaricate for whereas they say that the passage Almighty God which hast appointed divers orders of Ministers in the Church or in thy Church is in one prayer at the consecration namely of a Bishop It must be noted that it is three times in the book viz. At the ordering of a Deacen of a Priest and consecrating of a Bishop Now applying this word in prayer divers orders of Ministers to every one of those offices Can any man in his conscience doubt but that they took them for several orders who compiled the book and which being confirmed by Parliament and Convocation 8. Eliz. cap. 1. is the judgement of the Church of England in this point although it doth not every time it mentions the Bishop name order but sometime Office and Ministry That the book calls the inauguration of a Bishop Consecration of Bishops not an ordering but a Consecration doth not overthrow what
they said in the Preface and in the Prayer in both which the book speaks of them as of several orders as wee saw but now for that word of Consecration is used for honours sake onely as being the separation of a person to a more eminent order If the Brethren could make advantage of it they might by the same Logomachy prove that Bishops Priests and Deacons are consecrated also for the Title of the Book saies The form and manner of consecrating Bishops Priests and Deacons Ergo Priests and Deacons are consecrated as well it may bee said as that Bishops are consecrated therefore not ordered This for the judgement of the Church of England and of the Articles whereof the book of Ordination is a branch unto which the Brethren as it seems have also subscribed Artic. 36. For revolting from which Can. 38. they have merited the censures of the Church but that they say those Canons have now no powder but there may bee some in making If Linwood and Anshelme say Linwood constitut Anshelm in Phâ—l 1. that Episcopacy is not an order distinct from Presbyters wee are to note that these and many streams like have but one head which when it issued out this was a little troubled it is St. Hierom whom in this they follow and whose words they use Who being provoaked by John Bishop of Hierusalem Ad Evagr. Tom 2. in Ep. ad Tit. 1. took occasion warmly to make that a general note which hee had but from a few particular instances and the latitude of the word Bishop in Scripture That because there was not at that time any one so constituted at Ephesus Act. 22. when Paul left that Church therefore there was not one afterward when John wrote his Revelation and Christ sent the message to the Angel especially of that Church To say that Angel was the company of the Ministers Apoc 2. is to beg the question not to answer the proof Also because there was none one while more specially designed by Paul at Philippi or at least spoken to therefore there was none at Colosse when as the Apostle directs his speech to bee delivered to Archippus To say there was no other Minister there is to avoid what can not by such evasion be escaped Ephesus had a Bishop or call him what you will a superiour Governour to all the Ministers 1 Tim. 1. when Timothy was there and so had the Isle of Crete when Titus governed it Tit. 1. When the Apostle admonisheth the Hebrews to obey them that have the Rule over them Heb. 13. Act. 15. Gal. 2. 1 Cor. 3 5. 2 Cor. 3.6 Eph. 6.21 Rom. 13.4 cap. 15.8 doth it exclude the government of James or of Peter to whom Paul applyed himself as the pillars and rectors of that Church A speech uttered to many doth not shut out the precedency of some one among them The word Deacon is sometime applyed to the Apostles themselves and to the Evangelists And to the Magistrate Luk. 19.44 1 Pet. 2.12 and to â—hr st himself So the word Episcopacy sometimes signiâ—ies viâ—itation in general in the Scripture sometimes the offiâ—e of A ostleship Act. 1.20 And his Bishoprick let ano her take â—nâ— sometimes the office of a Bishop or Pastor or Presbyter 1 Tim. 3. Hee that desireth the office of a Bishop But this latitude of the Word in Scripture impedeth not but that the thing now understood thereby may be in Scripâ—ure distinct from that of Presbyter and is in all those plaâ—es and persons where and who had jurisdiction over other Ministers as the Apostles the Evangelists and others such as Timothy and Titus were But that Hieron even when hee disputes upon the Word was not so clear against the thing Ep. ad Evagr. in ipso fine appeâ—rs in that hee saith Presbyter Episcopus aliud aetatis aliud dignitatis est nomen Unde ad â—imotheum de ordinatione Episcopi Diaconi dicitur de Presbyteris omnino reticetur quia in Episcopo Presbyter continetur Et ut sciamus traditiones Apâ—stolicas sumptas de Veteri Testamento Qâ—od Aaron silii ejus atque Levitae in Templo fuerunt hoc sibi Episcopi Presbyteri Diaconi vendicent in Ecclesia The name saith hee of Presbyter and Bishops the one is a title of years the other of dignity Whence it is that in the Epistle to Timothy there is mention made of the ordination of a Bishop and a Deacon by the way note Consecration an Ordination that Antiquity doth name the consecration of a Bishop ordination which the Brethren deny but there is no mention there of the ordination of a Presbyter because that in a Bishop a Presbyter is also contained And that wee may understand the postolical traditions taken out of the Old Testament Hieron judgement of Epâ—scopacy whilst he dâ—sputes against it look what Aaron and his Sons and the Levites were in the Temple Let the Bishops and he Presbyters and the Deacons challenge unto themselves in the Church where first we have as much distinction yeelded as was betwixt Aaron and his Sons and the Levites between the Bishops and Presbyters and Deacons Secondly That this distinction is Apostolical and grounded on the equity of the orders of the Ministery in the Old Testament so that it is agreeable unto Scripture both in the Old and New Testament Thirdly That the word Bishop is used for Presbyter sometimes because it comprehends it But hee doth not say it is comprehended also of it SUBSECT II. Answ 2 BUt wee may quit this controversie about the distinction of the orders of Episcopacy and Presbytery for the question is of the power which of men in the same degree is not alwaies the same When the same Father saith in the same Epistle Quid enim facit exceptâ ordinatione Ep. ad Evagr. Episcopus quod non facit Presbyter What doth a Bishop excepting Ordination which a Presbyter doth not and where elsewhere hee saith That imposition of hands or confirmation of the Baptized was proper to the Bishops though hee qualifie it by saying that it was done ad honorem potius Sacerdotis quam ad legis necessitatem ' for the honour of the Priesthood for so by way of excellency hee often as also other of that time call Episcopacy as we saw above out of Cyprian rather than by necessity of the institution ' And when in the former Epistle and elsewhere hee saith Ad Evagr. in Tâ—t cap. 1. In toto orbe decretum est ut unus de Presbyteris electus superponeretur caeteris ad quem omnis Ecclesiae cura pertineret Schismatum semina tollâ—rentur That it was decreed through the whole world that one should be elected out of the Presbyters and set over the rest unto whom the whole care of the Church should belong and the seeds of Schism taken away Also Ecclesiae
Presbyter and Bishop as the Brethren do and that of Paul made him an Evangelist is to make him twice ordained which is not once proved and therefore may as easily be denied This for that they produce out of the Gospel To what they say from Law viz. That the Statute 13. Eliz. 12. binding all men not ordained by the Ordination book to subscribe the Articles before the feast of the nativity then coming and the Brethren thence inferring that the Law did not intend to binde all to this form of Ordination It is easie to see that the Statute refers to those then not ordained by it but by other order or in other places but is no cloak for any since What in the fifth place they add that this affixing the right of Ordination unto Bishops doth unchurch all the Protestant Churches is a cast of their office which is to calumniate For that is law and order in one place which is confusion or Schism in another The Apostles Rule 2 Thes 3. Reformed Churches That every man meddle with his own business may bee in some sense applicable to Churches also Wee know our own duty wee hope charitably they would do theirs had they the liberty wee have or the light They condemn not us wee despise not them but give them the right hand of fellowship and when occasion serves wee declare that wee are with them and they with us one bread and one body SECT IV. Of the book of Ordination SUBSECT I. Bishops imposition of hands on Deacons NExt that they may mark out iniquity and accomplish a diligent search for it and that so the nakedness of their Father and Mother if any were might in no part be covered with the veil of charity or modesty but exposed to the contempt and scorn of those in Gath and Askelon They fall upon the book of Ordination But what Book sure such as is written sententiis vivis The book of Ordination as the Jesuite spake of Savanarola upon the Psalms So composed for strength of Doctrine and piety of expression that there is no religious heart can think but that they were guided in it by the very Spirit of God and which did the Brethren conscionably peruse they would finde as wee say other fish to fry and instead of quarrelling with it fall down and ask God forgiveness for their breach of what they promised when they were ordained by it But to the particulars Omitting their quarrel to the three orders and the word Priest answered before Come wee to their exception against the ordering of Deacons which is P. 45. that the imposition of the hands of the Bishop alone upon them is contrary to Acts the sixth where 't is said that They and not one of them onely laid their hands on them But if it be of necessity that at the ordaining of the Deacon there must be the hands of all the Apostles or Ministers present Then more should be required thereunto than to the making of a Minister or a Bishop for that was done by Pauls hand as himself witnesseth in Timothy or at least it will follow that one Apostle 2 Timothy 2. if the rest were present had not power to make a Deacon Secondly Is it any way probable that all the Twelve laid their hands upon every one May not rather Calvins opinion above cited hee admitted viz. ' that one onely did it in the name of the rest Thirdly How will it follow that if all the Apostles laid on hands that therefore every Minister present with the Bishop must do so too unless they can shew that every private Minister doth come as neer the dignity of an Apostle as a Bishop doth who is a Governour of the Church Fourthly It is well noted in the Articles that some superstitions in the Church though there it speaks in another case have grown Artic. 25. of the Sacrament partly of the corrupt following of the Apostles The Apostles and not one onely might lay on hands because there were several to bee ordained And many occasions did admonish them of expedition Again Their Deacons were not in all points as ours which are admitted into the order of the Ministry Why the sole imposition of the Bishops hands is used in Deacons which because an inferiour one to represent the distinction of it and the dignity of the other viz. The Ministry usually so called or Priesthood it was thought convenient to impose the sole hand of the Bishop in the one But for more solemnity not more efficacies sake to adjoyn other Ministers to the Bishop in the other SUBSECT II. Apostles choose Deacons THey except secondly against that passage in the Except 2 prayer where it is said that God did inspire his Apostles to chuse into this order St. Stephen c. whereas they say Act. 6. the Text saith it was the multitude Now the Brethren say it was by order from the Apostles And it hindreth not but that the Apostles might chuse with them or if not their approbation is their chusing after the multitude had made theirs Where the Brethren say that to say the Apostles chose them directly ' crosseth the Text they give us a taste of their learning and of their Logick With them it seems Except 3 subordinata simul vera are contradictoria and Jonathan and David mortal enemies SUBSECT III. Receive the Holy Ghost BUt that which most offendeth say they is N. 3. Receive the Holy Ghost that in the very act of ordaining Priests or Ministers the Bishop takes upon him to give that which none but God himself hath power to bestow where it saith Receive the Holy Ghost c. which be the words of Christ himself to his Apostles without any warrant from him to bee used by any other Because in other ministrations where the words of Institution in Baptism in the administration of the Lords Supper c. are first rehearsed and then at the Act of ministring a prayer is used not a Magisterial use of the very words of Christ himself in the first institution For answer Answ First the Bishop is not to be laden with this odium alone if any were just but the rest of the Ministers also that impose hands with him the Bishop for orders sake being but their mouth But to the matter First To the thing it self next to their exceptions against it To the former Wee must first remember that the Holy Ghost is Christs Vicar upon earth in the Government of the Church in general Joh. 14. chap. 15. chap. 16. and therefore sent by him for that purpose And particularly assumeth to himself the calling of the Ministry As separate unto mee saith the Holy Ghost Barnabas and Saul for the work that I have appointed them Act. 13.2 And take heed unto your selves and unto the flock over which the Holy Ghost hath made you over-seers Act. 20. saith the Apostle to the Ministers of Ephesus Whence it
sure that it is not there in any point condemned of Heresie unless it be of the ANABAPTISTS as it is here And I do not think but there be some as well there as in England and it is like enough that SUCH do finde fault with it Who are offended with the Liturgy Dr. Martin Nay even of Mr. Cox himself and other that were Preachers in King Edwards time they have disproved your * This Book established 5 6. Edw. 6. was re-established 1. Eliz. with two or three alterations and is that we now use as was proved above The Alterations are in the Act prefixed before the Service-Book second Book in divers points and have now made a third Book how say you which of these three Books will you allow now Careless Forsooth I say still as I have written that the second Book is good and godly and IN ALL POINTS agreeing to the Word of God and I am sure that neither Master Cox nor any other of our godly Preachers that be fled unto Frankford have condemned that Book IN ANY POINT as repugnant to the Word of God though perchance they have altered something therein according to the usage of that Country where now they are And I have not denied in my Articles but the Church of Christ hath power and authority to enlarge or diminish any thing in the same GOOD BOOK so far forth as it is agreeable to the Scriptures D. Martin But what authority have you or how durst you bee so bold to make an Article of the Faith concerning that Book to be beleeved of all men under pain of damnation Carelesse Ah Master Doctor have I bound any man to beleeve that Article under pain of damnation as you do charge mee I am sure there is no such word in all my Articles I have there written what I hold and beleeve my self as I am bound to do in conscience And now I will add thus much more That the same Book which is so consonant and agreeable to the Word of God ☞ Nore in the fear of God and consider being set forth by Common Authority both of the Kings Majesty that is dead and the whole Parliament House ought not to be despised by mee or any other private man under pain of Gods high displeasure and DAMNATION except they repent 2. Concerning Monarchy and that of this Nation * The Testimony of Mr. Sam. Ward sometime the famous Preacher of Ipswitch the Author of several elegant and useful pieces Hoc enim mihi ratum indubitatum semper fuit hoc semper cum Politicis Theologis gravissimis sensi palum apud omnes professus sum Monarchiam haereditariam sub qua mihi vitales auras feliciter haurine bonis omnimodis frui piè tranquillè degere contigit esse omnium quotquot extant aut excogitari possunt regiminum formae longè multumque praestantissimam utilissimam laudatissimam Cui me ex animo favere ille novit qui perscrutatur renes meos c. i. e. This hath alwaies been with mee a certain and undoubted maxime In his Preface to King Charls the first prefixed before his Treatise in Latine of the Load-stone dedicated unto him intituled Magnetis Reductorium this alwaies with the best States-men and Divines I have ever concluded and openly among all men professed viz. That a Monarchical Government hereditary under which providence hath so ordered that I have drawn my vital breath enjoyed many comforts have had the opportunity to live godly and quietly is of all Governments which are or can be divised by many degrees the best the most beneficial and most commendable to which that I am from my heart a well-wisher hee knows that searches my reins and my heart said that Author Dr. Sanderson the now Right Reverend Bishop of Lincoln in his late treatise intituled Episcopacy not prejudicial to Regal Power as established by Law in the Postscript Lastly Concerning the Divine Right of Episcopacy Though from one in that function yet because it derives it higher and founds it somewhat deeper more solidly and also briefer than is usually done deserves more special notice His words are My opinion is that Episcopal Government is not to bee derived meerly from Apostolical practice or Institution But that it is originally founded in the person and office of the Messias our Blessed Lord JESUS CHRIST who being sent by his heavenly Father to bee the great Apostle Heb. 3.1 Bishop and Pastor 1 Pet. 2.25 of his Church and annointed to that office immediately after his Baptism by JOHN with power and the Holy Ghost Act. 10.37 8. descending then upon him in a bodily shape Luke 3.22 did afterward before his ascension into Heaven send and impower his holy Apostles giving them the Holy Ghost likewise as his Father had given him John 20.21 to execute the same Apostolical Episcopal and Pastoral office for the ordering and governing of his Church until his coming again and so the same office to continue in them and their Successors unto the end of the world Mat. 28.18 20. This I take to be so clear from these and other like Texts of Scripture that if they shall bee diligently compared together both between themselves and with the following practice of all the Churches of Christ as well in the Apostles times as in the purest and Primitive times nearest thereunto there will bee left little cause why any man should doubt thereof Thus that Reverend Author II. Certain other Examples of Retractations In the next place other Instances of Retractations and repentings Beda prefat in Retract suas in Actor Apostol Tom. 6. Cujus Augustini industriam nobis quoque pro modulo nostro placuit imitari Nunc in idem volumen Actor Apostolic brevem Retractationis libellum condamus studio maximè vel addendi quae minus dicta vel emendandi quae socus quam placuit dicta videbantur The ingenuity and industry of St. Austin in his Retractations it is my purpose in my small measure to imitate also Now therefore let us compile a brief Treatise of Retractations with this intent especially either of adding those things which were not sufficiently expressed or of amending those that were expressed otherwise than did seem convenient saith venerable Bede Again For my part saith another though a late Author yet one of good note Good Reader Mr. Whately in his Bride-Bush in his advertisement to the Reader I account it no shame to confess and revoke an errour and will therefore do it plainly and without circumstance Then hee closes with this honest and Austin-like expression viz. From him that had rather confess his own error than make thee erre for company The like whereunto wee heard above out of that Father And Dr. Bishop Brownriggs sentence concerning Retractations Related by Dr. Gauden the now very Rev. Bishop of Excester his successon Brownrigge the late most worthy Bishop of Excester would say that Hee
Repentance and return 1 Pet. 3. I am obliged to render VVithall for the honour of those that went before us and have setled the things that here I plead for it is not amisse to shew 1 Cor. 7. that they had also the Spirit of God Besides it is requisite to Evidence that those that have not hearts to love this Church and Kingdom yet to hate them they have no Cause Add hereunto 'T is not perhaps impossible that some Eye by Gods direction may fall on these Lines who may thereby not only with a more steddy foot walk himself in the good and the old Paths Jer. 6.16 which I point at but may be of Influence also to cause others to do it likewise and not to suffer them to stumble in their ways from the ancient ones Jer. 17.15 to walk in paths in a way not cast up Lastly there is nothing new under the Sun Eccles 1.9 that which hath been may be again to the prevention whereof I have endevoured to contribute somewhat in this Treatise After some Recovery purging is most requisite Nam quae in Morbis relinquuntur post crisin Hipp. l. 2 Aph. 13. recidivas facere consueverunt Dreggs of Diseases if not digested or expelled do cause Relapses Especially in such distempers as are malignant Of which sort if any are Schisme and Sedition Fare thou well Septemb. 27. Anno Dom. 1661. The Contents of this Treatise The Chapters Sections and Pages are referred to as they are here Printed which sometimes but not often are amiss LIB I. Of the Civil Controversie CHAP. I. 1. OF the Right of Retractations allowable unto all men 2. Evidenced from the General Causes of Error 3. and of some great Examples of them Ancient and Modern CHAP. II. How far only the Author declined how he behaved himself therein and what awakened him unto Recovery pag. 15. CHAP. III. What the Author doth Retract both in General and in Particular 1. The War 2. Independency p. 24. CHAP. IV. Causes of the Authors falling and first the Negative p. 28. CHAP. V. The Causes positive And first in General p. 39. to 58. CHAP. VI. Causes particular to each Controversie And first of the VVar. SECT I. Cause general and privative Not obeying the Spirit of God p. 56. SECT II. Particular Motives to the VVar with their Refutation p. 58. to 83. CHAP. VII Reply to certain general Grounds for the VVar being the chief heads of a Book Entituled Scripture and Reason pleaded for Defensive Arms. p. 90. to 106. The Contents of the Second Book Of the Church Controversie CHAP. I. Of Independency SECT I. THe Occasion of the Authors lapse into it p. 109. SECT II. Causes 1. Privative viz. not obeying the particular Word of God p. 112. SECT III. Causes Positive p. 113. SECT IV. The Contents of Independency p. 114. CHAP. II. Of the Grounds of Separation And first in generall p. 119. CHAP. III. Particular Exceptions against the matter of the Premisses 1. Against the Articles or Doctrine p. 174. CHAP. IV. Of Worship and the Directory thereof the Common-Prayer-Book SECT I. Of Worship 1. In it self p. 195. 2. In the Ceremonies p. 196. SECT II. Objections particular against the matter of our Worship p. 204. SECT III. Exceptions against the Body of the Common-Prayer-Book SECT IV. A Vindication of the Compilers of the Liturgy in this particular p. 231. SECT VI. Exceptions against the Ceremonies pag. 270. CHAP. VI. Of the Assemblies their matter and mixture SECT I. The means in the Church of England of preserving them from Corruption p. 266. this number and some following are to be looked for in the 6. Chap. of the Second Book p. 269. SECT II. Causes Constitutive of the Church of England p. 270. SECT III. Apostolical Churches vitiated but no separation p. 273. SECT IV. The Primitive Churches also p. 275. SECT V. The Reformed Churches p. 280. CHAP. VII Of Discipline CHAP. VIII Of Government 1. By the Ministery in general and 2. by Episcopacy in particular Sect. 1. The Conditions requisite to the constitution of a Ministery p. 301. Sect. 2. Of Episcopacy It s Right and Title p. 304. Sect. 3. Exceptions against the former Government and Discipline 1. Episcopacy established by Law in Engl. p. 325. Subsect 2. Whether Episcopacy be a different order from Presbytery ibid. Subsect 3. The Question not of order but of Power p. 332. Subsect 4. Whether Ordination in the N. Testament without a Bishop p. 334. Sect. 4. Of the Book of Ordination Subsect 1. Bishops Imposition of hands upon Deacons p. 338. Subsect 2. Apostles choose Deacons ibid. Subsect 3. That phrase Receive the Holy Ghost defended p. 339. Subsect 4. Consecration of Bishops and Archbishops p. 346. Subs 5. Episcopal Jurisdiction p. 349. Sect. 6. The Close of the Church Controversie CHAP. IX The Proof and Trial of these Retractations CHAP. X. The Conclusion 1 A Petition p. 367. The Elder Son ibid. 2. An Admonition of Zanchy p. 368. 3. The Prediction of his late Majesty p. 370. CHAP. XI Additionals The Scope and Protestation of the AUTHOR Containing also an Explication of the FRONTISPIECE MY ayme is to perform by way of Retractation some small service Principi Patriae to the King and to my Country My allegeance to the one and engagement to the other and my lapsing in both so much obliging me Now a] Psal 20. the Kings honour is great in Gods Salvation And b] Psal 144. blessed are the people who have the Lord for their God But c] Amos 3. how can two walk together unless they be aggreed We d] 1 Joh. 3.5 must be like him if we would see him as he is Now God is a righteous God Psal 11. his countenance will behold onely the thing that is JUST This was the end of our Redemption viz. e] Tit. 2. to deliver us from the practise of all iniquity that we might live a godly righteous and sober life Now the the onely rule of this righteousness and justice is the f] Tit. 1. will of God Which will is revealed either generally in the Scripture and in the Law of Nature or particularly in the constitutions of every Nation which contradict not the former Hence g] Dâ— Sibbis Souls conflict cap. 17. what is agreeable to Law is agreeable to Conscience said once the Lawyers Casuist Hence also h] Ro. 13.1 he that resists the Laws of particular Nations resists the Ordinance of God and he be he head or tail branch or rush as the i] Isa 3. Prophet phraseth it shall receive to himself damnation k] Eccles 10. He that brakes this hedge a serpent shall bite him he that removeth these foundation stones they shall fall upon him Laws therefore being the sacred impress of the will of God and the observance of them the obligement and security both of Majestrate and Subjects of Prince and People my onely scope is the
House of Peers carried for them by far the major part of Lords Yet after five repulses contrary to all order and custom it was by tumultuary instigation obtruded again and by a few carried when most of the Peers were forced to absent themselves In like manner was the Bill against root and branch brought on by tumultuary clamours and schismatical terrors Bill against Episcopacy which could never pass till both Houses were sufficiently thinned and over-awed To which partiality while in all reason justice and religion my conscience forbids me by consenting to make up their Votes to Acts of Parliament I must now be urged with an Army and constrained either to hazard my own A cause of the War defence of Episcopacy and my Kingdoms ruine by my defence or prostrate my conscience to the blind obedience of those men whose zealous superstition thinks or pretends they cannot do God and the Church a greater service than utterly to destroy that Primitive Apostolical and antiently Vniversal government of the Church by Bishops And the King hath the like complaint * Kings declaration to all his loving subjects Aug. 12. 1642. p. 8. print Cambr. else-where So that we see what was the mind and affection the scope and intent of the King and the two Houses as then when that Act passed touching Episcopacy Whence it will follow that as they had no intention nor ever consented to the Bill for it to destroy the office so neither did the Commons think that it was so by that Act of taking away their votes or by recalling of the former clause of 1 Eliz. 1. touching Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction for then they would not have prepared another Act for it which never passed the Houses whilst full nor the Kings assent afterward and so is no Law It remaineth therefore that the intention of the Parliament in the repealing of that clause was onely in reference unto the High-commission Court or other excentrical from the legal jurisdiction of Bishops and raised onely by the Kings prerogative yet of use whilst established but removed not for its unprofitableness as to prevent some greater inconvenience It was their jurisdiction in those cases and upon such special commission from the King that there ceased not their ordinary legal and per se Episcopal power of government in this Church * By Act of this present Parliament for restoring Episcopal jurisdiction As hath been of late more authentically evidenced Answ 4 even before this was printed As for the Ordinance that especially at that time as it could at no time cannot countervene a setled Law Neither have the Houses power to declare any thing against Law as we heard above Lord Cant. speech ubi suprà For close therefore I repeat that suit of his and do humbly in the Churches name desire of his Majesty that it may be resolved not onely by all the Reverend Judges of England A supplication to his Majesty and the two Houses of Parliament but by his Majejesty and both Houses of Parliament and then published by them that the Doctrine and Articles of Religion the Liturgy and Worship the Discipline and Government are not against or besides the Laws of this Realm That so the Church-Governors may go on cheerfully in their duty and the peoples minds be quieted by this assurance that neither the Laws nor their Liberties are infringed as Subjects thereby SECT VII Of the Obligation of the League and Covenant AGain it is objected that there is an engagement for the Reformation of the Doctrine Worship Assemblies Discipline and Government in the solemn League and Covenant therefore they are not to be adhered unto Subsect 1. That the Covenant obligeth not OMitting the elaborate and excellent pains of the University of Oxford in this argument Reasons of the University of Oxford concerning the Covenant 1647. Duplies of the professors of Aberdeen to the Brethr. concerning the Covenant 1638. Dr. Lesly Bish of Down in his Visitation speech Lond. 1638. 1. Argument Because it is opposite to after other Oaths c. Gal. 3.14 18. as also that of the Professors of Aberdeen in Scotland And of the Bishop of Down in Ireland the testimony of the three Kingdoms against it I shall propound only four Arguments to evince first the nullity of its obligation and then from thence collect what it binds yet unto The Arguments touching the former are First from the nature and order of this Oath The second from the power imposing of it The third from the matter of the oath it self The last from the scope and end of its framing and imposing First from the nature and order of this Oath When there are two oaths touching the same things and they contradictory one to another if the former be lawful and obliging the latter cannot be so too but void and null ipso facto Hence it is that our Apostle proveth the invalidity of the Ceremonial Law and Covenant being different from and in some sort opposite to the Covenant of Grace because it was made four hundred years after and so could not make the other void So this Oath and Covenant whereof we now speak being contradictory as shall be seen and is evident of it self to former lawful Oaths and Engagements confirmed by the Laws of the Kingdome as the Oath of Allegiance Supremacy Canonical Obedience Subscriptions to the three Articles and Protestations cannot make those former of none effect and is therefore void being taken as it was unlawful to take it unless the Obligation of the former Oaths and Engagements had been by the same or superiour power relaxed As was done by Hermannus Archbishop of Cullen to his subjects Sleid. Com. l. 18 Ad Ann. 1547. when he was no longer able to protect them Which was not our case Our former Oaths and Engagements were agreeable to Law and Equity both in their matter and authority injoyning them This contradictory to them and by an inferiour power yea by such a power as had not authority to do it which brings me to the second Argument 2. Arg. Because it was in posed by unsufficient power in opposition to the lawful authority namely taken from the power or rather the impotency of the imposers as to this act It is proved above that in the Government the King is Supreme by the Laws But if he were but equal yet in a coordinate power if when one desires to do his duty and is well able thereunto the other shall exclude him and act in opposition not only to him but also to the Laws established by all and impose upon the Subjects who are not obliged but as it proceeds from all to submit and to accept of such impositions if voluntarily is a threefold iniquity and injustice First Unto the person excluded against his will and right Secondly Against the liberty of the Subject who is not liable to injunctions proceeding from some but all Thirdly Against the priviledge
which wee saw above Lastly Though hee dislike the appropriation of the name and the largeness of power and the extent of their limits in that place of his Comment upon Phil. 1.1 which was published Anno Dom. 1548. yet hee grants the thing as was noted And in his Letter to the King of Poland written long after viz. Ann. 1554. Hee represents with appearance of Approbation the practice of Antiquity in these words Vetus quidem Ecclesia Patriarchas instituit singulis etiam Provinciis quosdam attribuit primatus ut hoc Concordiae vinculo melius inter se devincti manerent Episcopi Quemadmodum si hâ—d e illustrissimo Poloniae Regno unus praeesset Archiepiscopus non qui dominaretur in reliquos vel jus ab illis ereptum sibi arrogaret sed qui ordinis causâ in Synodis primum teneret locum sanctam inter Collegas suos fratres foveret unitatem Essent deinde vel Provinciales vel Urbanis Episcopi qui peculiariter ordini conservando intenti forent Sicuti hoc natura dictat unum ex singulis Collegiis eligendum cui praecipua cura incumbat sed aliud est moderatum gerere honorem quatenus scilicet hominis facultas se extendit quà m totum orbem terrarum immenso imperio complecti The Ancient Church indeed saith he did constitute Patriarchs and did appoint unto every Province a Primate or Archbishop that by this bond of concord the Bishops might the better remain united Even as if now there should be one Archbishop over all the famous Kingdom of Poland not indeed one who should Lord it over the rest or arrogate to himself the Right which belongs to them but who for Orders sake should occupy the chief place in Synods and should preserve holy unity among his Brethren and Colleagues Then either provincial Bishops or those that should be in every City who should especially be intent to preserve Order even as Nature doth dictate this That out of all Societies there should be one chosen unto whom the chief care should belong But it is one thing to bear moderate honour and so far as a mans ability may extend to govern and another thing to grasp the whole World in a boundless Government as the Pope doth against whom he there disputeth Thus far Calvin Wherein we see he would not dislike this Government by Patriarchs Archbishops and Bishops Epist ad Cranmer Ann. 1551. And in his Letter to Archbishop Cranmer he saith Reverende Domine vehementer laudo ut mature apud se religionem Angli constituant in quam rem praecipuae tuae sunt partes Vides quid iste locus postulet vel magis quid pro muneris quod tibi injunxit ratione abs te suo jure exigit Deus summa est in te autoritas Reverend Lord saith he I do very much commend That the English do establish Religion betimes among them in which affair your part is chief You see what your place requires or rather what according to the duty of your office which he hath put upon you God Almighty by a special title doth require of you Thus he In the same Epistle which I note by the way and the rather because many of the Adversaries to this Government are touched by him he notes one cause of the imperfection of the Reformation Calvin of Impropriators as then in England Vnum tamen apertum obstaculum esse intelligo quod praedae expositi sunt Ecclesiae reditus Malum intollerabile That is One main Obstacle I understand to be That the Revenues of the Church â—re exposed to Rapine He means by being given unto private men And of this sort are a great number of Adversaries to Episcopacy But to return In the close of that Epistle he thus expresseth himself Vale clarissime praesul mihi reverende Domine Farewel most excellent Prelate and my reverend Lord. Whereby you see he was averse neither from the thing though with some mincing nor the title of Bishop and Archbishop I have done with this worthy man Come we to his Successor Beza who professedly wrote against Episcopacy Bezâ— de grad minister Evangel adâ— Seraviam yet even in that Tractate grants as much upon the matter as we have need of First he makes good an useful ground in this and some other Controversies Nempe quod perpetuum invariabile sit Cap 23. p. 148. quicquid Dominus instituit falso nititur principio That what the Lord instituted is not alway unchangeable as he proves by the Apostolical Function Miracles prohibited meats for a time which are ceased And then defines what is essential in Episcopacy and perpetual what mutable Essentiale fuit in eo episcopatu de quo hîc agimus Cap. eod p. 153. quòd ex Dei ordinatione perpetuâ necesse fuit est erit ut in Presbyterio quispiam loco dignitate primus actioni gubernandae praesit cum eo quod ipsi divinitus attributum est jure accidentale autem fuit quod Presbyteri in hac 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 alii aliis per viceâ— initio succedebant â—ssâ—ntials of Epâ—â—copacy This was essential saith he in this Episcopacy of which we are speaking That by Gods Ordinance perpetual it was necessary is and shall be that in the Presbytery some one both in place and dignity chief should be President for the governing of action with that power that is given unto him of God Thus he 1. Here is Primacy 2. Government 3. Power or Right Now the controversie betwixt him and Seravia is what that power is But in the third place speaking of the Episcopacy we are now discoursing of he saith Cap. eod p. 144. Absit autem ut hunc ordinem et si Apostolicâ merè divinâ dispositione non constitutum tamen ut temerè aut superbe invectum reprehendam cujus potius magnum usum fuisse quandiu boni sancti Episcopi Ecclesiis praefuerunt quis inficiari possit fruantur igitur illo qui volent poterunt mihi tamen religio fuerit non explicare quid hic requiram God forbid saith he that I should condemn this Order although not of Apostolical and mere divine Institution as if it were brought in rashly or proudly whereof rather that there was great use so long as the Bishops were good and holy men who can deny Let them therefore enjoy it Note that will and can But yet I make conscience to declare what I think defective in it Thus he And whereas he doth in another place call that Episcopacy which was by course and successive Cap. eod p. 142. divine and Apostolical Episcopacy and the other humane yet he saith it is not simply humane but comparatively to the other Priorem quidem ordinem ut qui initio ac proinde Apostolis ipsis autoribus vel saltem approbatoribus vignerit divinum posteriorem vero humanum non simpliciter tamen sed comparate
other Presbyters ought to establish nothing c Neither do they in England for all is transacted in a Synod chosen freely by all the Ministers of the Nation and confirmed also by the Magistrate and Laity in the Parliament Bucer in Eph. 4. Zanch. â—bservat in confess suam cap. 25. Aphor. 10 11. Again the same Author in Ephes 4. quoted by Zanchy in the place now cited as his Patron in the defence of Episcopacy where having ennumerated seven parts of teaching and applied them to the Ministry of the Word viz. 1. Reading 2. Interpretation 3. Observation of Doctrine 4. Exhortation Reproof Consolation 5. Caetechising 6. Conference or Disputation 7. And lastly Inspection how men profit together with praise or rebuke reward or punishment hee adds Cum itaque adeo multiplicem operam requirat Ministerium docendi plures etiam Ministrorum Ordines sunt huic Ministerio deputati hee speaks of the Primitive Church ac primi omnium Lectores c. Seeing saith hee the Ministry of teaching requires so many performances there are also several Orders of Ministers appointed to this office and first of all Readers Which work having highly praised hee saith of the English Church De legendis scripturis gratia Domino probe constitutum est in Ecclesia Anglicana si idonei modo constituerentur Lectores That concerning reading of Scripture praise be to God it is well ordered in the Church of England if so be fit men were chosen for that office Which I note by the way that whereas this grave Author and all the Primitive Church made so high reckoning of publick reading by our late Deformers it hath been almost laid aside And God must be heard but in few because themselves had things of more consequence to communicate and that beyond either measure for time or modesty for the peoples patience or wisdome considering their weakness I excuse not my self forgetting that nulli magis vacuos Lectores demittunt Praefat. ad notaâ— de Dieu in Vet. Test quà m qui nimia copia obruunt and that of my Host in Chaucer to the Parson before his Sermon Beeth ' fructuous and that in little space And to do well soe God give you his grace Therefore as * Sam. Ward Happiness of pâ—actice in the close another hath it and an elegant Preacher Brevis Praedicatio longa ruminatio actio perpetua But to return to our Author Speaking de Disciplina Clericali of the Discipline of the Ministry hee saith Tertia Disciplinae Clericalis pars est Subjectio peculiaris qua Clerici Gradus Ministerii inferioris se subjiciunt illis qui sunt in ordine Ministerio superiore Hanc Disciplinae partem docuit Dominus nos exemplo suo cum vult suos sic committi invicem cohaerere ut membra in corpore subjicit sane unumquemque suorum aliis à quibus tanquam à membris amplioris ac latius patentis virtutis efficaciae custodiatur moveatur regatur Idem praecipit Spiritus S. Subjicimini invicem in timore Dei Eph. 2.21 Ista itaque considerantes sancti olim patres eum in clero ordinem descripserunt ut caeteri omnes Clerici à Presbyterio singulari cura custodirentur Gubernarentur Inter Presbyteros vero Episcopos ut consul inter Senatores Reipubl ita hic primam cum totius Ecclesiae tam singulariter ordinis Clericalis Universi curam gereret atque custodiam constituerunt sancti patres ut Episcopi cujusque provinciae convenirent una cum Presbyteris bis in anno deque Christi Doctrina atque Disciplina inquirerent Ut hae vero Synodi recte ordine administrarentur voluerunt illis praeesse convocandis moderandis Metropolitas Episcopos cujusque Metropolis His Metropolitanis Episcopis injunxerunt curâ—m quandam solicitudinem omnium Ecclesiarum nihil judicii illis concessum erat quod sua propria autoritate exercerent in Ecclesiis quae ipsae suos haberent Episcopos Omne enim in plebem in clerum udicium erat penes suum cujusque Ecclesiae Episcopum Presbyterium Episcopos autem judicabit Synodus Considerentur quae Cyprianus ad Steph. Roman de Martiano Episcopo Arelatensi lib. 3. Epist 13. tum illa q. scripsit in Epist 3. lib. 1. de destributa cuique Episcoporum certâ gregis portione quae praefatus est in concil Carthaginensi ut scripsit ad Quirinum Porro ubi orbis Ecclesiis refertus fuit ac ipsi quoque Metropolitani sua singulari cura opus haberent Nec enim prout caeperant esse plurimi ita omnes pro suo loco vel sapiebant vel vigilabant pauci enim semper in omnibus hominum ordinibus praestantes Episcopis quibusdam primarum Ecclesiarum aliquot provinciarum cura demandata est quos postea vocaverunt Patriarchas c. That is to say The third part of Discipline Ministerial Subjection of inferiour degrees in the Ministry is special Subjection whereby the degrees of the Ministry of inferiour order do submit themselves to those that are in a superiour Order and Ministry This part of Discipline our Lord taught us by his own example namely among his Disciple for seeing hee will have all his so to cleave together The ground of it as the members of one body hee hath therefore subjected every one of his to others by whom as by members of more ample power and activity they may be kept moved and governed And the same doth the Holy Ghost command Submit your selves one to another in the fear of God Primative Ch. practice Eph. 5.21 These things therefore being considered by the holy ancient Fathers they appoint this order amongst the Clergy viz. that all those of inferiour order as those hee named before Readers Chanters Deacons c. should by special charge be governed by the Presbytery Presbytery and cared for But among the Presbyters or Ministers themselves the Bishop as a Consul among the Senators of a Common Wealth Episcopâ—cy so hee should have the chief charge and custody care and government both of the whole Church and also more specially of all the Clergy Universally And the holy Fathers decreed that the Bishops of each Province should with their Ministers or Presbyters meet twice in the year at least Synâ—ds and consider of Christs Doctrine and Discipline or Government Now that these convocations might bee administred the more orderly they appointed for the calling and moderating of them Metropolitanes Metropolitanes that is the Bishops of every Metropolis or chief City To these Metropolitanes they injoyned a certain inspection and care of all Churches to wit within their several Provinces But they gave unto them no jurisdiction which they should execute in those Churches that had Bishops of their own Jurisdiction of the Bishops For all the jurisdiction both over the people and over the Ministry did belong to the Bishop of each Diocess
be read at the consecration of a Bishop Pag. 46. that was read at the Ordination of Priests therefore they infer that the compilers of the book never dreampt of a distinction of orders between Bishops and Presbyters Surely the Brethren are somewhat confident Answ that their readers are very easie either to be perswaded or to be deluded For may not the same Scripture contain matters common to both and peculiar more specially to one of those orders When they have expressed themselves sufficiently before must the appointing of a chapter that containeth precepts for both joyntly yet for the one more eminently argue they meant thereby to confute themselves The next exception is That there is no warrant Except 2 in Scripture for Archbishops Not indeed for the very word as there is not for many other things Answ as for the Trinity Justification by Faith onely Baptism of Infants Women coming to the Lords Supper But for the thing there is The Evangelists as Timothy and Titus had power over other Ministers And the Apostles had power over them If the state of the Church then needed such Superintendents over Bishops and the state of the Church now have the same use and exigency of them There is warrant in Scripture And so there is in Law and Reason viz. to constitute such officers in the Church as well as in the Common-Wealth as whereby the government of it may bee the more conveniently managed The commendation of the wisdome of the Church in this institution of Archbishops wee heard above out of Bucer and Zanchy And may further out of Calvin Calv. Instit. l. 4. c. 4. s 4. Quod autem singulae Provinciae unum habebant inter Episcopos Archiepiscopum Quod item in Nicaena Synodo constituti sunt Patriarchae qui essent ordine dignitate Archiepiscopis superiores id ad disciplinae conservationem pertinebat Si rem omisso vocabulo intuemur reperiemus veteres Episcopos non aliam regendae Ecclesiae formam voluisse fingere ab eâ quam Deus verbo suo prescripsit Now that saith he every province had among their Bishops one Archbishop Archbishops and Patriarchs approved by Calvin and that in the councel of Nice there were ordained Patriarchs which should be in order and dignity superiour unto Archbishops this was done for the preservation of Discipline and Government But if wee will omitting contention about the Word consider the thing it self wee shall finde that the ancient Bishops intended not to frame any form of Church-Government which was in kinde different from that which God had appointed in his Word Thus far hee Go to now yee that pretend to be followers of Calvin and see whether Archbishops yea Patriarchs have not warrant from the Word of God The Brethrens third Exception is against the Except 3 consecration of an Archbishop but upon the former ground that it is but a humane creature Consecration of Archbishops which ground is confuted But if hee were Answ yet consecration may be requisite as a solemn separation of a person to an office in the Church of so much influence of so much consequence As though Kings themselves bee in some sense 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an humane creation 1 Pet. 2. though by Gods secret appointment yet no man ever quarrelled with their solemn inauguration by prayer other ceremonies suppose them such as are not superstitious into their office That they say our Church seeth no necessity of the consecration of an Archbishop Inst. because it appointeth the same form for both Answ is to stumble at the same undutiful stone to indeavour to make the Church contradict it self To appoint a consecration for an Archbishop and yet to make it a thing of no necessity That it hath not appointed a different form for this is to let the Brethren and all men understand that they did not count this a different order but degree onely in the same order and therefore the same form of consecration might serve for both Because the Church would not multiply services without necessity To the last Exception which they infer from Except 4 the former viz. That seeing the Archbishop is but of the Churches constitution Oath of common obedience therefore they see no reason why he should receive an oath of Canonical obedience from the Bishop But of the Antecedent wee saw above Answ as to the consequent it is untruly gathered For though an Archbishop bee but of Ecclesiastical constitution what hindereth but that having so great an influence upon the Church the welfare whereof doth so much consist in the obedience of the several Governours thereof unto their Superiours and this by men in place so hardly oftentimes performed without more solemn obligation of conscience what impedeth either in Religion or Reason that for the securing the peace of the Church and the exercise of Government an oath may not be exacted of an inferiour degree But that here 's the cramp it argues too much inferiority and subjection unto the Archbishop of a Bishop with whom the Brethren do count themselves equal who are men 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and such as cannot bear the yoak especially having now as Caesar once so long ruled that to obey they knew not how But they should remember that a levelling spirit is as dangerous in the Church as in the Common-Wealth and tends to Anarchy and no Government at all What made Diodate else at Geneva come so rarely to the consistory but this that hee said Young men perked up and every one having an equal power there was no place for gravity in the Government which hee expressed to one I know to this effect And thus I have done with their Exceptions against Episcopacy the Government and the solemn initiation thereunto its consecration SECT V. Episcopal Jurisdiction THeir next is against its Right of Jurisdiction Against Episcop Jurisdiction And Except 3 first of sole Jurisdiction Or the exercise of Government alone Where first their assertion not onely that Bishops have not the onely power of Government but also that all Presbyters have a share therein Next their proof of it First to their assertion First Because my scope is onely to vindicate Answ so far as I am able The Doctrine Worship and Government of the Church as agreeable to the Scripture and as received publickly established and practised in this Nation if any do break this fense let the Serpent bite him Eccles 10.8 if hee remove these stones let them fall upon him if hee willingly violate these holy and sacred bonds of Law how weak a Patron soever I am hee shall have no advocate of mee Next the Terms perhaps would bee explained For sole Jurisdiction may bee taken either for sole Right of Government Sole Jurisdiction so that no man else hath any thing to do to govern but himself or by delegation from him or else for the sole Right of the exserting exercise and putting
that power into executâ—on Now in the former sense neither the Scripture so far as I understand nor the Church of England hath asserted such power in any Ecclesiastical persons since the Apostles who onely under Christ had a power 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and autocratical Or thirdly For an eminent degree of power in Government so as that some acts thereof do solely belong unto him to perform regularly and in common order Now in this sense omitting the name as Zanchy said above and keeping our eye upon the thing it self seeing both the Scripture and the Church of England as also the practice of the whole Church through the world formerly and the most learned men of the reformed Churches of late all which have been evidenced above have constituted an order or degree of persons who of right had and ought to have the Regiment and Government over other Ministers as is plain not onely by the Apostles but also by the Evangelists Timothy and Titus as also by the perpetual necessity of the Church I must needs refer unto that fore-quoted sentence of Cyprian to this purpose and add here another of like effect out of him Haec sunt enim initia haereticorum ortus atque conatus Schismaticorum malè cogitantium Cypr. l. 3. Ep. 1. ut sibi placeant ut praepositum superbo tumore contemnant Sic de Ecclesiâ receditur sic altare prophanum foris collocatur sic contra pacem Christi ordinationem atque unitatem Dei rebellatur These are saith hee the beginnings of Hereticks the rise and struglings of ill minded Schismaticks to please themselves and with proud stomach to despise the Bishop for so this word must here be meant thence men depart from the Church thence the prophane altar of separation is placed elsewhere thence against the peace of Christ and against the Ordinance and unity appointed by God rebellion is raised Fourthly Sole Jurisdiction may be taken for exercising those Acts that of right belong to him to do wholly of his own head without ingagement to consult and advise with any or else for the sole power of acting but upon ingagement of taking with him the Judgement and opinion though not the governing power of others also Hence the Apostle in the former sense admonisheth that the Bishop as well as any other Minister and Elder Tit. 1.7 must not be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one that in the Government of the Church goeth upon his own head And in the latter sense is it that Cyprian than whom no man was more for the priviledge Episcopal and for entire obedience thereunto yet saith Cypr. l. 3. Ep. 10 Ad id vero quod scripserunt mihi compresbyteri nostri solus rescribere nil potui cum a primordio Episcopatus mei statuerim nihil sine consilio vestro sine consensu plebis mea privatim sententia gerere Unto that saith hee that my fellow Presbyters wrote unto mee I can alone return no answer for I determined from my first entrance into my office privately and of my own head without your counsel that are the Ministers and without the consent of the people to do nothing For the true understanding of which sentence and other like as also for a resolution of the question it self a few things must be severally and distinctly noted First That hee doth not in this overthrow what several times hee said before L. 1. Ep. 3. l. 3. Ep. 1. touching the obedience due from the whole Church to the Bishop but onely signifies that hee thinks it his duty to advise with them as theirs to be obedient unto him Secondly That this course of use then is not so necessary now when as all the motions and actings of the Bishop are laid forth and determined and hee obliged to operate and govern onely by them by the Laws and Canons which was not so fully done in that Fathers time Thirdly That this order is not observed therefore by those who are most Antiepiscopal not by the Brethren or Presbyters neither here nor beyond the Seas who do not call the people to all consultations but onely Presbyters either sacred or civil Lastly That this practice of Cyprian is ad amussim and exactly performed by the Bishops of England For The Bishops in the Church of England do nothing but by the advise of their Brethren and of the people First seeing they arrogate no power but what the Scripture the Canons of the Church and the Laws of the Land do allow and secondly that by these all whatsoever materially they do is already prescribed to them And in the third place those powers in Scripture Canons of the Church and Laws of the Nation are approved and confirmed both by their Brethren the Ministery in Convocation and by the people in the Parliament by their delegates it follows truly and really that the Bishops in England act nothing but in effect according to that Fathers example by the counsel of the Ministry and consent of the people Thus much for their assertion Brethrens proof As to their proof It is from Antiquity from the book of Ordination from the Common-prayer-book and from the Law First For Antiquity P. 47. they say in Cyprians time there were in Rome a number of the Clergy Answ who acted with the Bishop By this argument wee may infer strange consequences For the Parliament acts with the King So Acts run the Kings most excellent Majesty with the advice of the Lords and Commons c. And the Counsel acts with the King for that is common in proclamations The King by the advice of the Privy Counsel The question is not with whom the Bishops act as who hath the primary Power The Justices on the Bench act with the Judge but can they declare Law give the charge and pronounce sentence Wee heard above what Cyprians judgement was of the power of the Bishop what also out of tenderness and indulgence and to avoid offence and for better light not for more jurisdiction hee condescended unto also Next Proof 2 for that out of the book of Ordination that because it is asked the Minister to bee ordained whether hee will obey his Ordinary and other chief Ministers c. therefore there are other Ministers that have the power of jurisdiction As if this did not refer unto the Archbishop Answ or other officers of the Bishops To which because they cannot answer they object a place out of the Liturgy which shall bee spoken to in its time P. 48. The other place in the book of Ordination That because it is asked the Priest to be ordained if hee will administer the Doctrine Object and Sacraments and Discipline of Christ as the Lord hath commanded and as this Realm hath received the same therefore they say it was the intention of the Church to admit all Presbyters to have a share in Ecclesiastical jurisdiction That is It was the intention of the Church Answ to
But all this so as that no Article of the Confession no point of Doctrine no part of Worship is altered And yet the Brethren have raised such a hue and cry as if the later Bishops yea and Princes not excepting Queen Elizabeth had a design to corrupt the Articles to poison the Worship to impose unestablished things upon the conscience and liberty of the Subject and to punish men for disobedience thereunto As if all Religion were pessundated and Omnia in pejus ruere retro subâ—apsa referri All goes to ruine Thames to Tyber flows Th' Assembly to a Convocation grows As if as Pauls by the Brethrens fautors so the whole Church were like to be an Augaean Stable Well spake Tertullian of their fathers Prescript adv Heres non longè ab initio Scripturas obtendunt hac suâ audacia statim quosdam movent in ipso verò congressu firmos quidem fatigant infirmos capiunt medios cum scrupulo dimittunt They pretend Scripture saith he and by this their confidence they presently move some In disputation they trouble those that are strong they take the weak and send away the middle sort with doubting I conclude that notwithstanding the exceptions of the Brethren the Common-prayer-book as well as the Articles Act for uniformity of Com. prayer is established by Act of Parliament And that therefore If any manner of Parson Vicar or other whatsoever Minister shall preach declare or speak any thing in the derogation or depraving of the said faid Book or any thing therein contained or any part thereof and shall be thereof lawfully convicted shall forfeit c. I have done with the second Head of Objections viz. The establishing of the Liturgy and Worship Subsect 3. Discipline established Object I Come to that against the third the Discipline which they say is not established neither The discipline not establish'd They instance in the Episcopal Courts and Canons the first whereof is Jurisdiction Now the Bishops are of age Answ let them speak for themselves One of them Arch-bishop Whitgift against T. Cartwright Bishops Courts Lord Cant. speech at the censure of Dr. Bastwick c. in the Preface and the greatest in his time doth acknowledge That they exercise their jurisdiction in their Courts by vertue of the Laws and Commissions Royal onely The next in the same rank goes farther and upon occasion of such calumny makes it his suit unto the King and I do humbly in the Churches name desire your Majesty that it may be resolved by all the reverend Judges of England and then published by your Majesty that our keeping Courts and issuing Process in our own names and the like exceptions * Namely by T. Cartwright and others formerly taken and now renewed are not against the Laws of this Realm as 't is most certain they are not Thus far he What can indifferent men desire more then an appeal to all the legal Interpreters the Judges of that Law which they are said to violate and to the supreme Judge and spring-head thereof the King This for their Courts The Canons of the Church K. James As for the Canons Because the King-craft of that Prince which did confirm them as himself calls it is herein question'd as if he understood not what did touch his own prerogative and the Laws for he by his Authority under the Broad Seal confirmed those Canons I shall not take upon me the vindicatâ—on of so great a Person seeing he hath a Grandson and Successor our present Soveraign to do it for him at whose feet and the Laws I shall let that lie the rather because that point is like very shortly to be determined by publick authority So much for Discipline Subsect 4. Of Government Episcopal THe last is Government Episcopal namely and here 25 Edw. 3. Ann. 1350. Necessity of Reform p. 40. illis adhaeret aqua Themselves acknowledge and cite the Act saying That whereas the holy Church of England was FOVNDED in the estate of PRELACY within the said Realm of England by the said Grandfather Edw. 1. and his Progenitors and the Earls and other Nobles of his said Realm and their Ancestors to inform them and the people in the Law of God c. This then is granted to be according to the constitutions of this Nation Legal which is moreover known to all by this That all Acts of Parliament since that foundation have given the precedency of Baronship unto the Bishops the form usually being The Kings Majesty with the assent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal Object doth enact c. Nay but though Episcopacy was established by Law 17 Car. cap. 1. Office of Episcopacy ceased yet it is not so now For the Act of 17 Car. 1.11 repeating the clause of the Act of 1 Eliz. 1. which instals the Queen and her Successors with power of Ecclesiastical jurisdiction the onely ground of the Bishops authority and jurisdiction Reasons for necessity of Reform p. 51 52 53. and repealing that clause did besides the taking away their Votes in Parliament take also away their power authority and jurisdiction and so the very office it self of Episcopacy whereupon the Ordinance of Lords and Commons makes all their grants void since 17 Car. 1. because then their Office expired Answ 1 For answer first in general That it was neither in the purpose nor to speak as the thing is in the power with due observance be it uttered of either Parliament or Prince to take away the powers which are essential and unseparable from the Crown and Office of a King which we see of right to have belonged and with praise to have been executed not onely in the Scripture both by Jewish and Heathenish Princes as by Nebuchadnezzar by Cyrus Dan. 3.29 Ezr. 6. Jon. 2. by Darius by the King of Ninive c. as well as by David Jehosophat Hezekiah and Josiah but also in the primitive Church by Constantine and Answ 2 others after him Besides we may not conceive the Parliament intended to countervene an express Article of the Confession of this Church Artic. 37. of the Civil Magistrate which having named the Queens Majesty saith Unto whom the chief government of all estates of this Realm whether they be Ecclesiastical or Civil in all causes doth appertain That prerogative which we see to have been given always to all godly Princes in holy Scripture by God himself And in particular that it was not the Answ 3 purpose of the King or the two Houses as then they were to take away the office and ordinary jurisdiction of Episcopacy appears evidently in that the King he asserts it to be a main cause of the war Ei kâ—â— Basilic Med. 9. and of his own calamity for that he would not consent thereunto How oft saith the King was the business of the Bishops injoying their antient places Bishops Votes in Parliam and undoubted privileges in the