Selected quad for the lemma: order_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
order_n aaron_n according_a power_n 66 3 4.5901 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A01033 A treatise tending to cleare the doctrine of iustification. Written by Io. Forbes, pastour of the English Church at Middelburgh, for the instruction of his flocke: and now published by some of them for the good of others Forbes, John, 1568?-1634. 1616 (1616) STC 11136; ESTC S102456 151,671 206

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

it then that it be the bloud of a man or yet of a iust man For no man that is nothing more but a man can possibly redeeme his brother or give his ransome to God that he may live still for ever So precious is the redemption of their soules and the continuance for ever sayeth the Prophet Psalm 49. For the bloud of no flesh can be able to satisfie the infinite iustice of God For he that liveth not for ever can never be the cause of eternall life vnto others and he that is not eternall can never bring in eternall righteousnes and no righteousnes but that which is eternall can possibly procure eternall life For all being infinit that is the iustice that wee have transgressed infinit our guiltines in trasgressing infinite the punishment of our guiltines infinite as being the iust recompence of the transgression of an infinit iustice proceeding from the iust iudgement of an infinit God it is impossible that a finit creature can performe it seeing he should never be able to loose the sorrowes of death Therefore it is required that the bloude should be the bloud of him who is eternall to the end that hee should not be holden of death eternally Act. chap. 2. vers 24. and that his bloud might be of an infinite value and that our righteousnes might be eternall and make vs eternally righteous therefore is it saide by the Apostle that God hath purchased his Church with his owne bloud Act. chap. 20. 28. thus it is required in the bloud that iustifieth vs before God that it bee not onely the bloud of a man and of a iust man but also that it bee the bloud of him who is God blessed for ever and all these considerations are necessarilie requisit in the bloud vnto our iustification thereby And as in the bloud so in the shedding of it divers things are required in it to the same end Which that wee may the more cleerely perceyve we are first to consider that the shedding of bloud must needes be by way of oblation and sacrifice Therefore Christ is saide to have offered vp him selfe a sacrifice of a sweet smelling favour vnto God Ephe. chap. 5. vers 2. and also he is said to have bin made manifest once to put awy sinnes by the sacrificing of him selfe Heb. chapt 9. vers 26. and therefore also saith the Apostle that Christ our Passeover is sacrificed for vs 1. Cor. chap. 5. ver 7. Now the things requisite in the offering of this sacrifice are partlie to be considered in the nature of the sacrifice it selfe and partly in those thinges which are necessarilie required for the offering of a sacrifice Touching the sacrifice it selfe besides that it must bee by bloud because without shedding of bloud there is no remission it must needes be but one and of such nature as never needeth to be repeated For the sacrifices that are oft repeated can never sanctifie the commers therevnto And therefore it is said That we are sanctified by the offering of the body of Iesus Christ once Heb. chap. 10. ver 10. And againe in that same Chap. verse 12. it is said But hee having offered by one sacrifice for sinne sitteth for ever at the right hand of God Of which it is manifest that this sacrifice alone without anie other thing ioyned therewith and without anie iterating of it contrarie to the blasphemous doctrine of the papistes must needs make vs eternally righteous according to which it is said by the Apostle That Christ is entered into heaven not that hee should offer him selfe often because then it behooved him to die often But as it is appointed that men once die and thereafter commeth the iudgement even so Christ also being once offered to take away the sinnes of many hee shall appeare the second tyme without sinne c And this point is most cleerlie set downe Heb. cha 10. ver 14. where it is said For by one offering he hath consecrated for evermore those which are sanctified Wherevpon it must followe seeing by one offering hee hath obtayned vs eternal remission according to the promise of God in his covenant and their finnes and their iniquities I will never remēber anie more that there remayneth no more sacrifices for sinne For according to the saying of the Apostle VVhere remission of sinnes is there is no more sacrifice for sinne Heb. chap. 10. vers 18. The thinges that are required for the offering of a propitiatorie sacrifice for sinne are especially three The first is a Priest For none but a consecrate Priest appointed by God and not by man might ever offer sacrifice for sinne vnto God The second is the Altar vpon which it must bee offered The third is the Tabernacle or Sanctuarie wherein it must be offered The thinges to be considered in the Priest concerne partly the nature of the Priesthood it selfe and partly the actions to be performed by the Priest Touching the nature of the Priesthood The first thing to be considered is that no man can take this office to him selfe but he who is called of God Heb. cap. 5. ver 4. 5. The second thing to be considered is that it must not bee according to the order of Aaron but according to the order of Melchisedeck For there is no perfection by the Levitical Priesthood Hebr. chap. 7. ver 11. and this that he must bee according to the order of Melchisedeck comprehendeth vnder it these particular pointes First that he is not made a Priest by the Lawe but according to the power of endlesse life For as we have saide if his Priesthood had bene after the Lawe it could never have made vs perfect For the Lawe made nothing perfect Hebr. chap. 7. ver 19. And of this ground followeth other two consequences The first is that seeing hee is made a Priest after the power of endlesse life none save hee alone can ever enioye this Priesthood For as sayeth the Apostle Amongest the Leviticall Priestes many were made Priestes because ther were not suffered to endure by reason of death but Christ because hee endureth for ever hath a Priesthood which can not passe from him to an other Hebr chap. 7. ver 23. 24. The seconde consequence is as saveth the Apostle Hebr. chap. 7. ver 25. That hee is able perfectly to save those that come to God by him seeing hee ever liveth to make intercession for them The third thing to bee considered in the nature of the Priest is as sayeth the same Apostle That he bee without sinne because such a High Priest it became vs to have as is holy harmeles vndefyled and seperate from sinners Hebr. chapt 7. 26. Which also was expreslie commanded in the Lawe Levit. chap. 21. where it is saide VVho soever of the seede of Aaron hath any blemish hee shall not come neare to offer the sacrifices of the Lorde neither shall he presse to offer the bread of his God neither shall he goe in vnto the vayle
of the Testament which God hath appointed vnto you Exo. 24. 8. Heb. 9. 20. Nowe it is playne that Iesus Christ in his bloud is our peace and reconciliation with God For no bloud save his bloud alone can purge vs from our iniquities and iustifie vs. And there is no Mediator betwixt God and vs save hee alone For as sayeth the Apostle 1 Timoth. chap. 1. vers 5. There is but one Mediator betwixt God and Man even Iesus Christ the Man Whereby it is playne that none can make a firme and stable covenant of peace betwixt God and vs but hee alone neither can he make this covenant sure by any other meane except his death and blood shedd because no other thing in heaven or earth can purge vs and obtaine remission of sinnes and iustifie vs. Therefore is it said 1 Pet. chap. 3. vers 18. That Christ once suffered for sinnes the iust for the vniust that he might bring vs to God Vpon which respect it is that by him we are said to have accesse to the Father Ephes 2. 18. and 3. 12. Now vpon all these grounds we have to gather of what covenant Christ is Mediator that is whether of the covenant of workes or of the covenant of grace or which is all one thing whether of the covenant of the Law or of the Gospell For God hath never made any other covenant of Peace with man then these two So that in one of these two must consist both our Iustification and Peace with God and of which soever of these covenants hee is Mediator and which of them soever hee hath confirmed by his death in that only must consist our righteousnes and peace But it is manifest by the Scriptures that he is not Mediator of the old but of the new Testam as is cleere by the Apostle Heb. 9. 15. where he sayeth For this cause is hee also the Mediator of the newe Testament And againe Heb. 12. 24. and vnto Iesus the Mediator of the new Testament And this is confirmed by the same Apostle Heb. 7. from the nature of his Priest-hood For as the Apostle there witnesseth in the 12. verse where the Priest-hood is changed of necessitie the Law also must be changed Therefore it must follow that Christ beeing a Priest not after the order of Aaron vnder the which the Law was given but after the order of Melchisedech that he cannot possiblie bee the Mediator of the old Testament that is of the covenant of the Law and therefore in that same chap. ver 22. it is said that Iesus is the Mediator of a better Testament then the Law Herevpon followeth this conclusion that it is not only a vaine opinion but also an impossible that any flesh can ever be iustified by the workes of the Lawe For no covenant whereof Christ is not the Mediator and which hee hath never confirmed by his death can ever possibly serve to our Iustification but of the covenant of workes or of the law Iesus is no wise Mediator neither hath hee died and shed his bloud to confirme it Therefore by the covenant of workes no flesh shall ever bee iustified and have accesse vnto God CHAPTER XXIII NOW for the second and third opinion the discussing of them is coincident with the points following and especially in the next point which concerneth the 4. opinion that is that only Christ is the matter of our righteousnes Whereof now we are to speake which beeing sufficiently cleered is enough to overthrow all other opinions whatsoever Now to make it manifest that in Christ alone is the matter of our righteousnes wee are first to divide this point in two and secondly to set downe the confirmations of both The two partes wherein this point is to be divided be these First that nothing in heaven or in earth in man or without man is the matter of mans righteousnes before God except only Christ The second is touching that wherein in particular Christ is our righteousnes Now for the confirmation of the first point we have these six grounds shortly to be considered First nothing can be our righteousnes but that only which is made by God righteousnes vnto vs. For he is only righteous and the only Author of all righteousnes For as there is no man righteous so there is no man that can make any thing to be righteousnes either to himselfe or to others And therefore wee are to consider what it is that God the Creator and ordayner of all the righteousnes of men hath ordayned and made righteousnes to vs. Nowe in all the trueth of God nothing is ever said to bee made of God vnto vs righteousnes except Iesus Christ alone Neither is there any thing whatsoever that is called our righteousnes whereby wee are iustified by God except Christ alone and his obedience Wherevpon it must follow that he only must be the matter of our righteousnes Therefore is it said by the Apostle 1 Cor. 1. 30. that hee is made of God vnto vs Wisdome Righteousnes Sanctification and Redemption And in the Prophete Ierem. 23 6. This name is given him of God as the name by the which the children of God shall call him while it is said And this is the name whereby they shall call him The Lord our righteousnes And againe chapter 33. vers 16. And hee that shall call her is the Lord ou● righteousnes Secondly that only must be our righteousnes which only is all in all things and only filleth all in all things For he that is vnto vs all in all things must needes be our only righteousnes and hee that filleth vs all in all things must needes fill vs likewise in righteousnes Now Christ only in the Scriptures of God hath both these attributed vnto him The first is shewen cleerly Collos 3. 11. And the second is cleerly shewen Eph. 1. 23. Therefore is it that the Apostle Peter Act. chap. 4. vers 12. sayeth That there is not salvation in any other For among men there is given none other name vnder heaven whereby we must be saved And for this same cause doth the Apostle say That we are made the righteousnes of God in him 2 Corinth chap. 5. vers 21. As likewise that in him wee are made perfect or complete Col. chap. 2. vers 10. Therefore also doeth the Apostle blesse God the Father for blessing vs with all spirituall blessinges in Christ Ephes chap. 1. vers 3. And if with all blessinges then also vndoubtedly with righteous in him except wee will denie righteousnes to bee one of the spirituall blessinges of God Therefore the Scripture admitteth nothing to bee ioyned with him neyther hath the Father ordayned any thing to have parte or place with him in the matter of our righteousnes For it hath pleased the Father that in him all fulnes should dwell and that out of his fulnes wee should receyve what soever grace wee receyve from God And this is a parte of that preheminence which Christ