Selected quad for the lemma: nature_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
nature_n	ghost_n	holy_a	son_n	19,127	5	5.9468	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A55567	A sanctuary for the tempted: being a discourse on Christ's friendly admonition to Peter Wherein the fall and rising of Peter, is at large considered: the craft, potency, and malice of Satan (that arch-enemy of our salvation) discovered: his various wiles. stratagems and machinations invalidated: several choice and excellent Gospel-truths handled, and cleared (from the calumnies and objections of gainsayers.) ... Delivered in sundry sermons, at first; and now, published for the benefit of God's church in general. To which is added, four sermons, preach'd upon sacramental occasions. By Thomas Powel, preacher of the Gospel, and one, whom Satan hath winnowed.	Powell, Thomas.	1679 (1679)	Wing P3075; ESTC R30536	152,491	435

admittere potest Impius sibi hoe persuadere conatur aut sibi aliter tamen sentienti convicto satis imponere satagit Non esse Numen verum hoc ipsum nequit 2. Impius dicit in corde suo id est ita secum tacite loquutus est Impius Non est Deus vel Utinam non esset Deus In corde dicere nihil aliud significat quam tacite secum contendere quasi murmurando quippiam proferre Nisi enim ea Phrasis ita acciperetur non potuisset Esaui cogitatio si tantum cordis fuisset non oris citra peculiarem Revelationem Rebeccae innotuisse 3. Impius dicit in corde suo non est Deus id est Deus non est Objectum cogitatio●…um ejus neque circa Divina solicitus est prophanis ●…ntentus praesertim cum ita vivat ac si non esset Deus ac nullo sensu aut reverentia Numinis tangeretur Pauli Voe●…ii Theolog. Naturalis Reformata c. 2. * The Insivibility of God brought as an Argument by Satan against his Existence ‖ Deus est quicquid vides Deus est quicquid non vides † The Foundations of all Religion lie in Two things That there is a God who Rules the World and That the Souls of Men are capable of subsisting after Death So that if these things be not supposed as most agreeable to Human Reason we cannot imagine upon what Grounds Mankind should embrace any way of Religion at all For if there be not a God whom I am to serve if I have not a Soul of an Immortal Nature there can be no sufficient Obligation to Religion nor Motive inducing to it Doctor Prideaux in his Eighth Lecture De Salute Ethnicorum and Doctor Stillingfleet's Origines Sacrae Caput est primum Divinae legis ipsum Deum nosse Lactantius * The Trinity cavilled at and brought as an Argument by Satan to prove that God is not ‖ Esquire Leigh's Treatise of Divinity The Mystery of the Trinity after a sort shaddowed out by Four Resemblances See Bishop Usher his Body of Divinity A Person is a distinct Subsistence of the whole God-head Nam plura infinita esse nequeunt quia sic forent plura summa prima Aug. In this Mystery there is Alius Alius Another and Another but not Aliud Aliud Another thing and Another thing The Doctrine of the Trinity is That there are Three Persons in one and the same Substance Nature and Essence What a Person in this Sense is I have shewed you already God the Father is the First Person God the Son is the Second Person God the Holy Spirit is the Third Person All these are Co-equal Co-eternal and Co-essential for though they are Distinguished yet not in their Natures and Being but in their Names Orders and Actions And that there is a Unity in Trinity viz. Three Persons yet One in Substance Nature and Essence we must believe let Reason suggest what it will though th●… same may be illustrated by Reason as above because Scripture which is Infallible doth so declare 1. See the Old-Testament where the Trinity speaketh in the Plural Number And God said Let us make Man in our Image after our Likeness Gen. 1. 26. Isa. 6. 3. The Angels i●… respect of the Three Persons do cry three times Holy Holy Holy And so in the New-Testament this Doctrine is mighty clear as Matth. 3. 16 17. where the Father the First Person of the Trinity is Heard and Seen so that there is one The Holy Ghost in the Shape of a Dove is Seen and not Heard there is another And then Jesus Christ in his Assumed Nature is both Seen and Heard So that this is good Qui nescis Trinitatem ito ad Jordanem More-over we are Baptized in the Name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost Matth. 28. 19. Lastly the 2 Cor. 13. 14. The Grace of our Lord Iesus Christ and the Love of God and the Communion of the Holy Ghost be with you All. Those Scriptures may suffice to prove That there are Three Persons in the Divine Essence And now that these Three are One I prove from those two Places in Scripture The one is in the Old-Testament and the other is in the New Deut. 6. 4. Hearken O Israel the Lord our God is One Lord In the Hebrew thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Jehovah Elohenu Jehovah Echad It signifies thus much That the First Jehovah is God the Father the Second Word Elohenu our God is God the Son the Third Word Jehovah is God the Holy Ghost and the Fourth Word Echad that is One is to shew the Unity of Essence in the Plurality of Persons The Jews did own the Doctrine of the Trinity though now they deny it for their Antient Rabbies did prove the Trinity out of the Old-Testament and Rabbi Simeon the Son of Johai alledged this same afore-mentioned place for the Proof thereof And many other Passages might be taken out of the Writings of the Antient Rabbies to confirm this Truth but this is already performed by Galatinus in his Books De Arcanis Catholicae Veritatis The Place in the New-Testament is this which may serve for all 1 Joh. 5. 7. For there are Three that bear Record in Heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Ghost and these Three are One. To conclude Singula sunt in singulis omnia in singulis singula in Omnibus Unum omnia Aug. lib. 6. De Trin. Cap. ult O Deus est indivisè Unus in Trinitate inconfusè Trinus in Unitate Iustin. Who can saith Mr. Watson in his late Treatise of Self-Denyal with the Plum-line of Reason fathom the Trinity which is Puteus profundus a Deep Well * 'T is here to be noted That Satan labours to argue from the Wonderfulness of God's Attribute his Non-Existence or at leastwise that God is not so Wonderful as he is Revealed in Scripture to be and that you should not conceive of God aright † God is Truth it self and that he is Eternal is as True as himself Eternity is a Being without Limitation of Time Time is the Continuance of Things past present and to come All Time hath a Beginning a Vicissitude and an End or may have but God's Essence is bounded by none of these Hedges ‖ God's Immutability cavilled at * Christ's Incarnation cavilled at † Deus est Immutabilis mutans omnia nunquam novus nunquam vetus Aug. * Deus poenitere dicitur quando mutat factum Pet. Mar. † Deus mutat opera non mutat consilium Aug. Repentance in God is only to signify unto us his high Displeasure because when we Repent we are highly displeased at a thing ‖ Deus mutat sententiam sed non Decretum saith Profound Bradwardine in his Book De Causa Dei * God's Ubiquity cavilled at † Empedocles the Philosopher said well That God is a Circle whose Centre is every where ‖ Nusquam est Deus Ubique est