with the appurtenances according to the Extent aforesaid to the said Edward should be delivered and c. And hereupon the sheriff is commanded that he remove the same Hum. from the possession of the mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances and the moyety of the same Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances according to the Extent aforesaid without delay he should cause to be delivered And in asmuch c. the sheriff make to appeare here 15. Hill at which day here came the said Edward by his Attorney aforesaid and the sheriff of the said County of Stafford to wit R. M. Esquire now returneth that he by vertue of the writ aforesaid to him directed the 20 day of January An. c. 10. came to the mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances And the same Humphery P from the possession of the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances removed And the moyety of the same mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to wit one Close called the Mills of the yearly in all issues besides reprises 8 l. and so recite such premisses as are expressed in the Writ by the first Inquisition unto beyond reprizes 4 l. being the equall and just moyety of the whole Mannor and of all the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to the same Edward B. made to be delivered according to the extent aforesaid in the Inquisition aforesaid above made as by the said Writ it was commanded to him c. Entry of a Sci. fac against the Conusee in a statute merch brought by the conusor to have back the possession of lands extended for that he is satisfied M. 47. E. 3. fo 11 Pl. 9. fit Sci. fac 96. T. 17. E. 3. fo 43. Pl. 38. T 19 Jac. rot 2159. Brownlow London ss It was commanded the sheriffs that they should take the body of Thomas Leake of L. in the County of Nottingham Gent. if he were a Lay-man and in the prison of the Lord the King under their custody should safely keep untill unto G. Woodnot of S in the same County Gent. of four hundred pounds which the same Thomas the thirtieth day of October Anno Regni c. 4. before I. R. then Mayor of the City of Lincolne and Leonard Carr Clark deputed to take the Recognizance of Debts within the City acknowledged himselfe to owe to the said George and which to him at the Feast c. then next following he ought to have paid and the same to him hitherto he hath not payd as it is said and insomuch as shall be executed of that precept of the Lord the King they should make knowne to the Justices of the said Lord the King at Westminster in Cr. S Trinitatis An. Rs. c. 18 And the same sheriff to the Justices of the Lord the King at Westminster at that day retorned H. 17. Jac. rot 293 â— L. a. R. and F. the like Scire fac upon a promise that the conusee is satisfied pro fluxum temporis That the said Thomas was not found in their bayliwick Therefore it was commanded to the sheriff of B. that all the goods and Chattles of the same Thomas and all his Lands and Tenements whereof the same Thomas at the day of the acknowledgment of the debt aforesaid or at any time afterwards was seised unto those hands soever they have came unlesse they descend to some heir being within age by hereditary descent you cause to be delivered to the said George by resonable price and extent to hold to him the goods and Chattles aforesaid as his proper goods and Chattels And to hold the Lands and Tenements aforesaid as his Free Tenements to him and his assignes according to the Forme of the statute thereof provided untill the Debt aforesaid together with reasonable Damages costs charges as in labours suits delayes and expences he had therein levied T 39 Eliz rot 1711. the Defendant after judgment and before execution makes a Feoffment in fee to I S who enfensss J N and then the lands are extended the second Feoffee bring the moneys into the Court and prayeth restitution the Plaintiff warned comes and receives the money and restitution was awarded and in asmuch as the said sheriff had executed the said precept of the said Lord the King he should make appeare to the Justices of the said Lord the King at Westm from the day of the holy Trinity in three weeks An. R. c. 18. At which day Humphery Foster Baronet sheriff of the County of Berke then returned to the justices of the Lord the said King at Westm a certaine Inquisition before him at Winsor in the County aforesaid the first day of Iuly then last past taken by which it was then found that the said Thomas after the Recognizance of the Debt aforesaid and at the time of taking of that Inquisition was seised in his Demesn as of Fee and right of and in the Mannor of W. otherwise E. W. and also of the Scite and Mansion house of the same mannor of W. otherwise E. W. And so recite the whole Inquisition verbatim unto the issues besides reprises of 50 l. which said mannor and Scite and of the mannor aforesaid with all their appurtenances the sheriff aforesaid the first day of July delivered by the extent aforesaid to the said George to hold to him and his assignes as his Free Tenement untill the Debt aforesaid together with the reasonable and necessary Damages costs and charges should be levyed thereof as by the same writ and returne thereof in the same Court of the Lord the King here of Record remayning manifestly appeareth And although after the taking of the Inquisition aforesaid the said George was satisfied of his Debt Damages costs necessary and resonable charges Neverthelesse the same G. possession of the Mannor Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances yet holdeth as by the information of the said Th. the King understandeth The Lord the King willing to do in this behalfe what is just and consonant to reason doth command the sheriffs of London that by honest and lawfull men of their bayliwick they should make knowne to the said George W. that he should be here at Westminster in Crastino S. Trinitatis to shew if any thing c. Testat Sci Fac awarded wherefore the same George whereas to him of his Debt Damages Costs and resonable and necessary charges it hath been satisfied possession of the mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances he ought or can hold At which day the sheriff returne to the Justices of the Lord the King here that the said G. hath nothing in their bayliwick whereby they could make knowne to him neither was found in the same whereas it was Testified in the same Court of of the Lord the King here that he hath sufficient in the County of Nott. whereby the same sheriff can make knowne to him whereupon it was commanded to the
AN EXACT BOOK OF ENTRIES Of the most Select JUDICIALL VVRITS USED IN THE COMMON-LAW Translated from the Originall Manuscript which was Collected by the Hands of that Eminent CLERK ROBERT MOYLE Esq Late one of the Prothonotaries of the Court of COMMON-BENCH A Work of much Industry as may appeare by the Authors great Paines in quoting of Book-Cases Opinions of Judges number Rolls and many other Requisites for the confirmation of every Entry whereof none have been ever published before Printed now for the use and benefit of all but aimed most especially for such as are most conversant in the Common-Law By J. H. Gent. With a perfect Table in which may be found the Principall matters therein contained LONDON Printed for Robert Crofts at the Crown in Chancery-Lane under Sergeants-Inne 1658. To the READER Courteous Reader KNOVVLEDGE is a thing desirable for it self because it doth enrich the mind of man but then it calls for the most esteem when 't is lodged with such as do employ it for Publick advantage It hath been the happiness of the Studients of the Law in this later Age to receive such aides from the ingenious Communication of those who went before them That the ancient Dust is not onely now wiped off from those old Records and Presidents which lay secured in Scriniis sacris but the Rolls themselves transmitted by Copy into every mans Study and an access hereby provided to them easie and familiar This present Work is a great example both of the diligence and industry of the Author in collecting the severall select formes of Entries of Judiciall Writs used in the Common-Law Though the Work be Posthumous yet it is so just a Translation of the Originall Manuscript that if the Worthy Prothonotary were now surviving he would not be ashamed to own it wherefore thou hast no reason to be ashamed to use it Farewell J. H. AN EXACT Booke of the most select Judiciall WRITS Used in the Common LAW Abatement HILL 39. Eliz. Rot. 506. ss Abatement pleaded to a Sci. fac in debt against an Admistrator for that there were two Administrators who administred and but one of them is named in the Sci. fac A Scire facias in Debt against an Administrator upon a judgement against the Intestate the Administrator appeareth and hereupon the same W. the Administrator sayth that the sayd S. ought not to have execution against him for the debt and damages aforesayd of the goods and chattells aforesayd because he sayth that the sayd Intestate at E. in the County of N. within the Arch-Deanry of N. dyed intestate after whose death and before the day of purchasing of the sayd Writ of Scire facias to wit 5. February Anno c. at L. in the County of N. the Administration of the goods and chattells which were of the sayd E. at the time of his death c. by C.L. Doctor of Lawes c. was committed to one M. Relict of the sayd T. and to the sayd W. Which sayd M. and W. adminâ—stred all the goods and chattells which were of the sayd T. at the time of his death as Administrators of those goods and chattells by virtue of the Administration aforesayd to wit at G. which sayd M. is yet surviving and in full life to wit at G. aforesayd And this he is ready to verifie whereupon for that the same M. is not named in the sayd Writ of Scire facias the same W. prayeth Judgement of that Writ c. Admission Admission to a fine after commitment to the Fleet upon a Cepi corpus returned upon a Capias pro fine for the King tam pro fine as for the execution at the suit of the party Satisfaction given to the party Admitted for six shillings eight pence paid into the hands of one of the Prothonotaries Audia elongat returned in a retorn habend the defendant appears and pleads non cul and afterwards the plaintiff prayes to be admitted to his fine and gives security and the Justices assâ—sse the fine T 12. H. 8. Rot. 159 Afterwards to wit the fourth day of July Anno c. came here into the Court the Defendant in his own person by the Sheriffs of London by virtue of a Writ of the sayd Lord the King De capias pro fine of the sayd Lord the King taken and by occasion as well of the sayd Fine as by occasion of the execution of the Judgement aforesayd at the prayer of the Plaintiff was committed to the prison of the Lord the King of the Fleet sayth that hee is ready here in Court to satisfie the Plaintiff of his damages aforesayd and brought the mony here into the Court which sayd mony the sayd Plaintiff here in Court doth receive of the same Defendant Therefore the sayd Defendant be quiet for the sayd Damages and hereupon the same Defendant prayeth to be admitted to a Fine with the Lord the King to be made by occasion of the premisses and he is admitted c. for six shillings and eight pence which the sayd Defendant in the Court of the King here by the command of the Justices here payd to John Jenour one of the Prothoâ—otaries of the Court here for divers reparations to be made here in Court and the sayd Defendant go thereof without day c. P 4. H. 8. Rot. 159. ss It was commanded the Sheriff whereas T. I. in the Court of the King here had been summoned to answer T.R. of a plea wherefore he had taken the Cattell of the same R. C. and had unjustly detained them against Sureties and Pledges the same T. R. in the same Court of the King here had made default for which it was considered in the sayd Court of the King here that the sayd T. I. should go therefore without day c. And that the sayd T.R. and his Pledges to prosecute should be in mercy and that the sayd T. I. should have returne of the Cattell aforesayd and the King commanded the sayd Sheriff that without delay he returne to the sayd T. I. the cattell aforesayd and should not redeliver them at the complaint of the sayd T.R. without the Writ of the sayd Lord the King which should make expresse mention of the Judgment aforesayd And in as much c. he should make knowne here at this day to wit 15. Pas And now here at this day commeth the sayd T.R. in his proper person and the Sheriff now returneth that the cattell whereof mention is made in the sayd Writ are eloyned to places to him unknown by the sayd T. R. so that he could not have view of them and therefore hee could not make returne of the sayd Cattell to the sayd T.I. as to him it was commanded whereupon the sayd T.R. as to the eloynment of the Cattell aforesayd saith that he is in no wise thereof guilty As to the contempt not guilty And of this he putteth himself upon the Country c. But that costs labour and expences
the behalfe of the said W. it is testified that the same administrators have sold divers goods and chattles which were of the said Richard at the time of his death And the monies for those goods and Chattles have converted to their own uses And that the residue of the goods and chattles of the said Richard by the administrators aforesaid are eloyned with the in intention that the said execution should not be made thereof Therefore the same sheriffs to wit W. C. and R. L. in mercy And are Fined by the Justices here at 20 s. And the Lord the King not willing that those things which in the Court here are rightly Acted and adjudged should by subtil Art and unfaithfull ingeny be infringed Commandeth the same shriffs that the said 40 l. of the goods and Chattles which were of the said Rich. at the time of his death being in the hands of the said Administraâ— if they can thereof levy them otherwise so much thereof as is deficient as the goods and Chattles aforesaid by the same Administrators sold or cloyned do amount unto as by the Inquisition in this behalfe to be taken or any other way wherein you can be better certified you cause to be made of the proper lands and Chattles of the said administrators and that you have those moneies thereof made here in Octob. Pur. beat Mariae to render to the said William for his debt aforesaid c. Entry of a Fâ—â— facâ— for damages in replevin the Sheriff returneth fieri fecit and bringeth not the monie into Coâ—uâ— nor paid it to the party A Sci fac is awarded to the Coroners against the Sheriff because the Plaintiff cannot have an execution against him for the moniâ—â— by him levied in forme aforesaid T 19. Jac Rot. 3313. Brownlow Buck. ss It was commanded the sheriff that of the Lands and Chattles of Anthony Chester Baron in his Bayliwick he should cause to be made 16 l. pounde which to Wil. Carpenter Gent. in the Court of the Lord the King here were adjudged for his damages which he sustained by occasion of the taking and unjustly detayning of the goods and chattles of the said W. by the same Anthony and T in a certaine place called Ozier Cob otherwise the Ozier Holm in the County aforesaid and that he should have those monies here to wit in Cro S. Trin. to render to the said William for his debt and damages whereof he is convicted And now here at this day came the said William by T. S. his attorny and the sheriff to wit H. Lee Knight and Barronet now here retorneth that by vertue of the said writ to him directed of the goods and Chattles of the said Anthony in his Bayliwick he causeth to be made those monyes which said moneys he hath here ready at the same day As by the said writ it was commanded him c. And because the same sheriff the monies aforesaid here at this day hath not ready to render to the said William for his damagas aforesaid in Form as aforesaid according to the command of that Writ Scâ— fac awarded â—oron against the Sheriff to him in Forme aforesaid directed nor hath hitherto payed the damages aforesaid to the said William nor otherwise contented Therefore the same sheriff to wit the same Henry Lee in mercy and is Fined by the Justices here at 40 s. And it is commanded to the Coroners of the county aforesaid that by honest c. they make known to the said Henry Lee sherâ—ff of the County aforesaid that he be here in Cro. Anim. to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same William execution against them fâ—r the said 16 l. by the said Henry in Form aforesaid levyed ought not to have of the proper goodslands and Chattles of the same Henry if c. IN this Case I conceive a doubt Nota quere for the Presidents are dubious in what County this Scire fac ought to issue whether out of the County where the return of the Fi. fac was made to wit in the county of Buch. or in the County where the record of the returne of the Fi. Fac. remaineth to wit in the County of M And Justice J then Serjeant and counsel with the pla and Brownlow Prothonotary agree that it ought to be awarded in the county where the action lyeth and so it was made H 16. Jac rot 2255. the like Sci fac and afterwards the matter was agreed 9. E. 4. fo 50. Br. Sci Fac. 134. A Sci. Fac. issued to the new sheriff by which it appeared that the Sci. Fac. issued in the county where the return was made And Br. retorne de Briefe 55. See H. 9. E. 4. Rot. 349. A. distringas nuper vic to render the monies by him levied awarded But by the said book of 9. E. 4. fo 50. it appeareth by Littleton that the Justices are advised upon the returne of the Fi. feci to award a Sci. fac and not a Distringas because upon the Distringas petit issues are retorned whereby the Plaintiffe is a long time delayed M 13. H 7. Rot. 307. Foringer of an attorney Midd. ss Be it remembred that the 8 day of November that same Term one Rowland Brigg one of the attornies of the Bench here present here in Court was solemnly called by the Court here to appeare and answer unto certaine matters Offences objections and impositions by him done as it is said and against him in the Court here imposed and objected Therefore the said R for his contumacy is forejudged from exercising his office of an attorney of this Court untill c. An attorney for iudged the Court for forgery of a writ committed sent to the courâ—s of the Queen the Exchequer and her Court to be loked upon For iudged of the Clerk of the Jurat for non attendance in his Office H 31. Eliz. Rot. 1720. A speciall entry of the imprisonment and Forejudging of an attorney of the Common Bench for Forging of a Supers de non molestando And note that he was committed to the Fleet and sworn that he would not afterwards prosecute as an attorney of the same court and was put out of the Barr of the same Court and sent by the Warden of the Fleet and sent up to the Queens Court to be looked upon there and afterwards in the Court of the Exchequer to be looked upon there M 9. Edw. 4. Rot. 328. Copleg Be it Remembred that Iohn Cheker who was admitted to the Office of Clerk of the Jurat and writs of Dedimus potestatem of this Court and was sworne well and faithfully to exercise and occupy the same to which said Office aforesaid of the said Iohn doth belong to receive Writs of Dedimus Potestatem of acknowledgment of Fines levyed to make writs of Nisi Prius and other Jurats out of the Court issuing from the exercise and attendance of the same Office for a long
here at that day retorned a certaine extent taken before R. T. Bayliffe of the liberty of the honorable Epi. Wigor of O. at N. on Saturday such and year c. by vertue of the retorne of a certain writ of the Lord the Kingâ— to him by him thereof directed by which it was found that the same Bayliff by vertue of the retorne of the writ of the Lord the King aforesaid delivered to the same R. and I. the moyety of all the Lands and Tenements which the same I. had in his Bayliwick to wit the third part of one Messuage and 40. acres of Land with the appurtenances in N. which said third part is worth by the yeare 4 d. and the said 40. acres of land are worth by the yeare 5 s. to hold to them and their assignes as their Free Tenement untill the said 68 s. should be thereof levied and although the same R. and I. 10 s. 8 d Tender of the residue of monies by the defendant Refusall by the Plaintiffs to accept it out of the tenements aforesaid have now leyyed as by that extent it manifestly appeareth and the same I. H. the whole residue of the said 68 s. to wit 49 s. 4 d. is ready to pay notwithstanding the same R. and. I. have hitherto refused to receive that money as by the information of the same I. H. there the King is given to know Therefore the Bayliff is commanded that by honest c. he make known to the said R. and I. that they should be here at this day to wit in Octo. Mich. to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same R. and I. ought not to be satisfied with the same 49 s. 8 d. and the Tenements aforesaid to them before delivered they ought not to be redelivered to the said I H. if to them it seemed expedient and now here came aswell the same I. H. in his proper person as the same R. and I. by R. W. their attorney Monie brought into Court and the sheriff retorneth that he made known to the same R. and I. of being here at this day in Forme aforesaid by R. B. c. honest c and hereupon I. H. bringeth here into court 8 s. 8 d. ready to render the same R. and I. if c. and prayeth delivery of the Tenements aforesaid Satisfaction c. whereupon it is requested of the same R and I. if they have or know any thing to say for themselves The monies are paid in Court to the Plaintiff and the Court awarded a redeliverance to be awarded to the Plaintiff wherefore they ought not to be satisfied with the money and to redeliver the Tenements aforesaid to the said I. H. who say that not and hereupon the said 53 s 8 d. is delivered to the said R. I. And it is considered by the Court that the said I. and H. shall have delivery of the Tenements aforesaid first delivered to the same R. and I. out of the hands of the same R. and I and that they goe thereof without day c. SEe 21. E. 3. f. 1 Plaintiffe 1. A Scire Facias awarded in Aide 21. E. fo 20. Pl. 21. ss IT was commanded the sheriff whereas I. C. Gent. lately it the Court of the Lady Eliz. late Queen of England here to wit in Easter in the 36. Entry of a Sci fac by an administrator against an executor H. 2 Jac. rot 1613. yeare of her Reigne before E. A. Knight and his associats then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the common Bench here by the consideration of the same Court recovered against R. W. late of c. aswell a certaine debt of 200 l. as 6 l. which to the said I in the same Court were adjudged for his damages which he had by occasion of the said debt whereof he is convicted as by the record and proceedings thereof in the court of the Lord the King here remaining manifestly appeareth execution notwithstanding of the said judgment yet resteth undon And aswell the said I as the said R. W. are dead as by the information of R. C. Gent. administrator of the goods Chattles which were of the said I. C. at the time of his death the King understandeth And because c. that by honest c. It be made knowne to P. R. executor of the Testament of the said W. that he should be here at this day to wit in Cr. Ascen Dom. to shew if any thing c. wherefore the debt and damages aforesaid of the goods and chattles which were of the said W. at the time of his death in the hands of the said P. R. to be administred ought not to be made to the same I. according to the Form of the recovery aforesaid if The Plaintiff shewes the Letters of administration and prayes execution c And now here at this day came aswell the said R. by H. H. his attorney by the said P. premonished by A. B his attorney and the Sheriff now retorneth that he made knowne to the said P. of being here at this day by G. D. and D. E. honest c. to shew in Form aforesaid c. And hereupon the same R. saith that the said I. C. died intestat and that the administrators of all the goods and Chattles which were of the said at the time of his death by I by Divine providence c. was committed And he bringeth here into the Court the Letters Administratory of the said Arch-Bishop which the Commission of the Administration aforesaid in forme aforesaid testifie c. and prayeth Execution against the said P. of the Debt and Damages aforesaid of the goods and chattells which were of the said I. C. being in the hands of the said P at the time of his death to be administred to him to be adjudged c. AND the said P. saith Defendant confesseth assets to 40 s. and traâ—erseth that any other goods of the Intestate besides c. came into his hands c. T 19 Jac rot 2892. That the said R Execution against him of the Dâ—bt and Damages aforesaid of the goods and chattells which were of the said W at the time of his death in the hands of the said P to be administred ought not to have because he protesting saith that the said W after the judgment aforesaid against him in Forme aforesaid had at L aforesaid dyed intestate and that diverse goods and chattells which were of the said W at the time of his death to the value af Forty shillings after the death of the said W. into the hands and possession of the said P. came and that the same P. the said forty shillings about the Funerall of the said W. after the death of the said W. expended without this that any other goods or chattells which were of the said W. at the time of h s death besides the goods and chattells to the value of forty shillings ever
of an Extent upon a statute Merchant by an executor 34 F Fieri Facias Entry of a testat Fi. fac de bonis propriis after a Devastavit returned 45 Entry of a Fi. Fac where parcell of the money is returned levied and a Fi fac awarded for the residue ib. Entry of a Fi Fac. where the sheriff retorned nihil habet a Fi Fa awarded to the ordinary de bonis ecclesiasticis 64 Entry of a Fi Fac. de bonis testatoris the sheriff retorned that part is levied de bonis testatoris and as to the residue a devastavit by the executor execution awarded de bonis propriis ib. Entry of a speciall Fi. Fac de bonis propriis Entry of a Fire Fac. for damages in replevy Fi Fac retorned but the money not brougth into the court a Scire Fac. is awarded to the Coroners c because the plaintiff is without remedy against the sheriff ib. In this entry precedents must vary Foringer Entry of a Forenger against an Attorney 49 Entry of a Foringer and commitment of an Attorney forging a writ de non molestando 50 Entry of a Foringer of the Clerk of the Jurat for not attending his Office ib. Entry of a Poringer of a Cryer of the court for his not attendance causa pro absentia non ostensâ— 51 Entry of a Foringer and severall punishments against an attorney for forging of a writ of Sup. to reverse an utlawry ib. Entry of a Foringer of a Philizer of the Vpper Bench for non attendance in his office in person 53 Fine Entry of the quashing of a Fine upon the execution and inspection of the infant acknowledged upon a Dedi Potestatem 54 Breve de Gardiano Admittendo Entry of a writ de Gardiano Admittendo in a writ of partition H Habeas Corpus ENtry of a Habeas corpus in debt where the sheriff retorned that he was not taken c. and a Distringas Nup. Uic awarded 55 Entry of a Habeas Corpus upon Privilidg with the Recognizance 56 Entry of an Amerciament for not Retorning a Habeas Corpus 58 An entry thereupon is broguht to the Bar by Habeas Corpus and charged with 20 l. debt by an Originall and processe of utlawry is awarded because he would not appear to the writ 59 The like where the Prisoner is remitted to prison ib. Entry of a Habeas Corpus of a Prisoner committed for causes Ecclesiasticall and inlarged without bail ib. Entry of a Habeas Corpus cum causa the sheriff returntd that he was detayned vertute warrantii whereupon he is committed 60 Entry of a Corpus cum causa of an attorney committed by a warrant from the High Commssioner who was discharged 61 I Inquiry Entry of a writ of Inquiry directed to the Justices of Assize to inquire of better issues 61 Entry of a writ of inquiry directed to the Justices of Assize to inquire of what issues the sheriff could answer 62 Entry of a writ to inquire de quantis exitibus 63 Entry of a writ to inquire awarded de novo where the sheriff retorned that he could not execute the old writ 64. Entry of the like writ against an Attorney in covenant broken ib. Entry of a writ to inquire of Damages for Fees for suing forth a writ of Covenant 65 L Liberari Facias ENtry of a writ of Liberari Fac. to the Conusee of lands extended upon statute merchant 67 M Mittimus ENtry of a Mittimus of a record removed out of another court by a Certiorare and sent to the Justices of the Bench. 69 N Ne Exeat Regnum ENtry of Ne Exeat Regnum and surety found 70 Nusance ENtry of a writ of Nusance to demolish a foundation laid ad nocumentum of a society of the Law 70 O Originall ENtry of an Originall directed to the Justices sued out by a Lord in Parliament 71 P ENtry of a generall Pardon to an utlawry after judgment for that it appeareth by record both debt and damages are satisfied 73 Entry of a speciall Pardon after satisfaction of the judgement where the defendant upon a Cepi Corpus being committed pleads the pardon and satisfaction and is set at liberty 73 Pardon and Release of demands pleaded in discharge of an Ex post cap. and a Scire facias awarded ib. Partition Entry of a Writ de partitione facienda and partition made 73 Plur. Replegiâ—â—e Entry of a writ of Plur. Replegiare properly claimed by the defendant a Writ of Proprietate probanda awarded c. 75 Entry of a Plur. Replegiare in homine repleg the sheriff returns he is inlarged a Capias in Withernam awarded of the body of the Avowant 78 Entry of a Plur. Repleg 67. Dyet this case reported 79 Pone Entry of a Pone and the sheriffs returned thereupon adjudged void for that he named not the Cattle in specie 80 Priviledg Entry of a writ of Supersedias for the servant of the Chief Clerk of the upper Bench And a counter part that the Defendant is Farmer to the said Chief Clerke of divers lands c. And traversed that he was is Clerk Demurrer 81 Entry of a Writ of Priviledge for one of the Six Clerks of the Chancery 83 Entry of the like writ for a Chancery Clerk ib. Entry of the like writ of the Ptothonotaries Clerk 84 Entry of the like for one of the Masters of Chancery ib. Entry of the like for the servant of the Keeper of the Rolls ib. Entry of an Attachment of priviledg against an attorney ib. Procedendo Entry of a Procedendo awarded in a plea of Lands to be removed out of an inferiour court by Recordare 85 Entry of a Procedendo Rege inconsulto ib. Entry of a procedendo upon a speciall return made upon a Habeas Corpus about the custome of London touching Apprentizes and their Indentures ib. Prohibition Entry of a Prohibition to the court of Stannaries 86 Entry of a Prohibition sine causa procedente to the Bpp. of W. for excomunicating one for serving a warrant of peace upon his Chaplin 87 Entry of the like out of the court of Request against the Corporation of Myners ib. Q Quare impedit Entry of a Quare impedit where the plaintiffs have a writ to the Bpp. upon the Bishops plea of the death of the Patron 87 R Ravishment de Gard. ENtry of the Writ brought by the Ki. The Kings attorney waives issue and the defendant erat sine die salvo jure Regali 88 Retorn Recordi Entry upon the returne of the Record sent to be tryed before the Judg at Lanc. after tryall in the Bench. 88 Entry of judgment after issue tryed in the Common Pallat Lanc. upon a mittimus of the Record there 89 Entry of a Resum against an heire sued within age after full age and it is awarded against him and c. ib. Remissio Recordi Entry where the record was remitted to the Judg at Lanc. upon a forreigne voucher 90 Entry where the record