Selected quad for the lemma: money_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
money_n creditor_n good_n sell_v 1,795 5 10.5105 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A90627 Novemb. 1. 1654. Katherine Pettus, plaintiffe, Margaret Bancroft, defendant in chancery Pettus, Katherine. 1654 (1654) Wing P1913; Thomason 669.f.19[30]; ESTC R40086 1,440 1

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Novemb. ●… 1654. Katherine Pettus Plaintiffe In Chancery Margaret Bancroft Defendent In Chancery THe Plaintiffe a poore Widow oppressed in an extraordinary manner by the power of the Defendent and her friends in this suit in Chancery now of 23. yeares continuance wherein the Plaintiffe sueth for an Orphans portion against the Defendent the Widow and Executrix of Mr. Thomas Bancroft the Executor that raised his whole Estate by his Executorship The Plaintiffe through this Suit is above 2000. l. in debt and some of her Creditors are ready to perish for want of their Moneys is brought to sue in forma Pavperis hath sold and pawned all the Goods and meanes shee had any waies for her subsistence and hath been and is forced to take up money at Brokage after 20 40 and 60. l. in the hundred and hath nothing left to live upon but is supported upon Almes and Charity her whole Estate for her self her Fatherless children and Creditors being in and upon this Suit The Orphans portion is by vertue of and according to the Orders of Court Cast up and Certified by a Master of Chancery to amount unto 6720. l. upon the first of March 1651. and after 6. l per Cent. since commeth now unto 7795. l. yet the Master hath taxed but 100. l. for the Plaintiffes Costs whereas the Plaintiffe and her late Husband the Orphan have spent in this suit neere 2000. l. if not ●ull so much The sa●d Thomas Bancroft the Executor above 18. yeares agoe at his Death and within three weekes before his death when this Suit had continued above Foure yeares against him left to the Defendent his Wife and their Children being onely three Daughters whereof the two elder were richly Married before and hee had given them answerable Portions a personall Estate of above 5000. l. and a reall Estate of 300 l. a yeare Lands of inheritance or thereabouts All which hee raised and bought after hee had possessed himself of the Testators estate and this Orphans-portion The Defendent Margaret Bancroft after shee had stood out all processe of Contempt in Chancery and obscured her self for almost Seven yeares together was by the Plaintiffes procurement with much trouble searching and charges to the Plaintiffe arrested by a Serjeant at Armes upon the 6th day of July 1648. and was Committed to the Fleet where after she had been about a yeare Imprisoned she removed her self from thence by a Habeas-corpus unto the Prison of the Viper-Bench where shee st●ll remaineth obstinatly refusing to make satisfaction to the Plaintiffe And the Estate o● the said Thomas Bancroft is so fraudulently passed away by himself and the Defendent si●ce the b●ginning of this Suit for the use of the Defendent and their Children that the poore Plaintiff can get no fruit nor benefit of her Suit though shee hath an Ordinance of Parliament of the 8th of August 1643. That shee should receive the fruit and benefit of her Suit by the Ordinance and Authority of both Houses of Parliament The Plaintiffe humbly representeth this short part of her Case to the Honourable Committee that is to bring in a Bill for the Relief of Creditors and poore Prisone●s most humbly praying That in the said Bill there may bee some speciall provision made for such like Cases And that the words in the late Act for the Relief of Creditors and poor Prisoners But a settlement or Graunt made by such Prisoners of their Estates or any part thereof or made by any other Person for whose debt the said Prisoner is Imprisoned of his or her Estate reall or personall or any part thereof to any of their Children or Heyres apparent vpon Marriage or otherwise after a Debt contracted is not to be accompted a Purchase or Conveighance to bee allowed further then to cause restitution of the Money which was really payed to and received by such Prisoner or other person vpon such Conveighance or Graunt may bee put into the said Bill and like Act to bee made which Words will save much trouble in the proof of fraudulent Deeds which the leaving out thereof in the late Ordinances would have put unto And that there may bee Understanding upright and impartiall Judges