by whom he hoped to attaine all blessednesse Againe His Offring being of the fattest this implied his high respect of this sacred Mistery by beliefe of truth for by Faith saith the Text Abell offred unto God a more acceptable Sacrifice then Cain by which hee obtained witnesse that he was righteous God testifying of his guift Heb. 11.4 As concerning Cain it is also implyed what was well in his sacrificing as first the thing which he brought hee brought it to offer Secondly he offered it not to Idoles but to Iehovah and this was well and because the Text relates his offering with no further commendations it implies that no more good could be spoken of it according to truth So much for hat was well Againe this was not well that his love to this mystery according to truth in the second Adam brought him not to offer for the Text implies that processe of time brought him to this businesse Gen. 4.3 Againe because the Text saith he brought the fruits of the ground to offer to Jehovah this implies his too high respect of things Terrestriall consequently his profanenesse to this Supernaturall Mystery in the promised seed and in a word all his Religion at the best was but to be conversant about the object of Iustification and no way consonant to faith in that object For saith Moses be was not only wroth but very wroth because God gave no respect to his offering which as before I noted implyed Cains too high esteeme of his Earthly offering brought unto God but hee whose heart is so lâ—fted up his minde is not good nor upright in him Hab. 2.4 Againe his heart was so fall'n as appeares by his countenance because his personall operations were rejected this implyed hee came not to be accepted in Gods guift of Christs righteous operations as imputed but in his owne supposed righteousnesse wherefore his owne sinne lay uppon him in his attracted habit guilt and punishment for he that beleeveth not the wrath of God abides upon him But on the contrary that if hee did well he should be accepted God makes it further apparant by removing all personaâ—l respects from Abell for as concerning him saith God to Caine unto thee shall be his desire subject and thou shalt rule over him implying two things First whereas thou art the first borne and so a figure of the first borne of every Creature in this respect Abells desire shall be subject unto thee in love and reverence to that mystery Secondly as hee is thy younger Brother so thou art his protector supporter and instructer in which respects thou shalt still rule over him for I looke not to his person more then to thine but with respect to his submitting unto mee in the fulnesse of my mercy and if thou dost well shalt thou not be accepted if thou dost not well sinne lies at the doore but Cain remissely harkened to this reproofe and gracious incouragement for in the next place Moses saith Cain talked with his Brother but tells not what talke it was yet implicitly points it was some hatefull speeches because it ended in his blood for saith the text It came to passe when they were in the field that Cain rose up against his Brother and slew him From whence Saint Iohn rightly affirmes that Cain was of that evill one as implying Cains amity with Satan in the Spirit of concision cutting from his soule the foresaid infused enmity derived in his naturall conception therefore he wâ—s of that evill one lifted up in the Spirit of Satan against Gods way of salvation by Christs righteousnesse imputed for saith Saint John hee slâ—w his Brother because his owne works were evill and his Brothers righteous 1 Joh. 2.12 And for this God comes against Cain for saith Moses Iehovah saith unto Cain where is Abell thy Brother Cain answered in the Spirit of a lyer and murtherer saying I know not am I my Brothers keeper but God charg'd the Fact upon him saying what hast thou done the voyce of thy Brothers blood cryeth unto mee from the earth wherefore God turned the flaming Sword of his wrath which turned every way against Cain by pronouncing this sentence saying now thou art accursed from the earth which opened her mouth to receive thy Brothers bloud from thy hand when thou tillest the ground it shall not from henceforth yeeld to thee her strength a fugitive and Vagabond shalt thou be in the earth To which Cain replies for saith Moses Cain said unto JEHOVAH my iniquity is greater then can be forgiven and so my punishment is greater then I can beare because it shall never be removed ver 12.13 Againe he bids God behold or consider what was his punishment for saith hee thou hast driven mee out from the face of the Earth and from thy face shall I be hid and shall be a Fugitive and Vagabond in the Earth for it shall come to passe that every one that findeth mee shall slay mee To which God answereth him to this effect So that one the same person individually considered may at one time be the subject of Gods unfained or entire grace and mercy in Iesus Châ—â—st and another time the subject of his consuming and everlasting wrath as for my precedent sentence it is now unrevocable for thou who didst refusâ— acceptance and pardon of sinne and life eternall upon my interrogative affirmation if thou wouldest but applie thy selfe to mee in my mercy to thee But thou instead of circumcising the seed of the Serpent hast cut off from thee by custome in sinne my infused principle of Amity towards mee from thy Spirit and joyned to Satan mine adversary against mee in my salvation so freely tendred and fully intended unto thee For thou hast slaine thy Brother only because he submitted unto me in my guift of righteousnesse imputed for his salvation therefore as I told thee if thou didst not well sinne should lie at the dore so thy guilt and punishment now shall rest irrevocably upon thee to all eternity only this will I doe for thee in this worlds contentments for a time I will assure thy abode therefore saith God whosoever slayeth Cain vengeance shall be taken on him seven fold and Jehovah set a marke upon Cain lest any finding him should k ll him Thus when the noble Spirit of man departs froÌ„ Gods presence of grace it setleth its abode in â—erâ—estâ—iall conâ—entments sutable to the corporall body or corruptible part of man but they that sowe to the flesh of the flesh shall â—eape corruption Whereupon Cain went out from the presence of Jehovah and dwelt in the Land of Nod on the East side of Eden and his posterity on Earth began to spring out and multiply hee built a City and called it by the name of his Sonne Enoch And so now I discend from this Modell of Gods impartiall proceedings in these two as to the whole masse of mankinde And Cain thus remaining under wrath Abell being translated
by the roots appeares in the 12 Chapt. Is it so that when Christ did thus powre out his Spirit upon all flesh that yet at this time be denyed the spirit of Faith to his Nationall Spouse to the most part for their proud Apostasie to their ensuing rejection Hence observe how rightly the Lord of glory returned the same upon them But I said unto you that yee also have seene mee and beleeve not All that the Father * But at this time the Father giveth me the Gentiles to gather by the word of truth to salvation but of you but few for your call is not given to be at this time but in the future as Rom. 11.25 26 27. giveth mee shall come unto mee but not most of you at this time of grace for that 's implyed Iohn 6.35 36 37 38 39 40. Is it so that when Christ came personally into the world he then found Iewes and Gentiles generally both dead in sinnes and trespasses to him as the object of justification to their life and glory yea even his Nationall Spouse generally Hence observe how rightly spake the Lord Jesus Christ to his proud Apostate Spouse saying none can come to mee unlesse the Father which sent me draw him meaning his extraordinary mercy Ioh. 6.44 Is it so that Christ his righteousnesse as imputed by the Fathers gift and conveyed from Kingdome to Kingdome by the word of truth was and is the only object of life and glory and the removall of mans misery which submitted by beliefe of truth to receive that gift of righteousnesse in that sacred object Then hence observe how rightly spake the Lord Jesus Christ of himselfe saying I am the way and the truth and the life no man can come unto the Father but by mee Joh. 14.6 Againe is it so that this extraordinary calling of the Gentiles to righteousnesse life and glory being dead in sinnes and trespasses by their precedent Apostacie that even the second Adams satisfactory righteousnesse obtained as upon Adams fall so at this time also that this world should be mans day of grace againe as a day of grace to receive in it the gift of eternall glory the world of Gentiles being under wrath Then hence observe that from this ground Saint Paul in the 5 of the Rom. rightly brings in Christs imputative righteousnesse as opposed not only to our unrighteousnesse and misery in Adams transgression but also interminglingly opposing it against all mens own personall sinnes against the grace of God in Christ that whereas sinne in both respects had abounded so Gods grace by his gift of Christs righteousnesse did superabound as appeareth from the 8. verse to the end of that Chapter Againe is it so that at the height of Israels Apostacie and at the brink of their rejection from Christ that then God thus extraordinarily brought in the Gentiles to be his Spouse which were not his people Hence observe how rightly Christ in his life time Ioh. 10.16 opposed the certainty of the Gentiles for life and glory to his Apostate Spouse the Iewes then to bee extinguished ver 26. and in the three next verses grounding the stable felicity of the Church of the Gentiles only on his free gift and his Fathers power opposing it to all contrary powers whatsoever for although the Church of the Iewes became totally separated from Christ as now they stand yet so shall never the Church of the Gentiles nor yet the Iewes when they are againe ingrafted into Christs visible Church as was before Prophecied by * For by this word those days is not only meant the first extraordinary light of grace and truth divulged in the Gospell by the Apostles Ministery but this Prophecy also extends to those dayes of that extraordinary call of the Iewes mentioned Rom. 11.25 26 27. when also shall come in the fulnesse of the Gentiles Ieremiah and the Author to the Hebrewes Ierem. 31.33 32 40. Heb. 8.8.10 CHAP. X. Opening what in the calling of the Gentiles was ordinary to continue untill time shall be no more and that Gods proceedings therein is without respect of persons to all alâ—ke THe second Adam and Saviour of the world was not only a Priest in the dayes of his flesh after the order of Aron Heb. 10. by offering his body of flesh and blood so putting an end to that fleshly or bloody Sacrificing Priest-hood in which respect the Apostles in manifold regards referres things to the * The Apostle attributes so much to Christs blood death to leade us by sense to the more firm faith in his blood death as it was the expiration of his worke as the faithful and true witnesse for Gods truth against Satans lies to regaine Gods glory by the salvation of the world blood of Christ and often reiterates the same but also in his Militant Church he was and is a Priest for ever after the order of Melchizedeck till time shall be no more that is as Melchizedeck Shem I meane descending from the old world did not only in the Apostacie of the new world at Abel abide in the Faith of the first ten Fathers but also in the time of the Apostasie of his own Family remained durably constant in the oracle of life not only King of Salem that is of peace but Priest also of the most high God after the power of an endlesse life for he continued receiving as appeares in Abrahams Tythes the homage of the Sacrifice of praise for God and to God likewise in Gods stead returning comforts and blessings from God upon man Gen. 14.18 Heb 7.7 Likewise so did Christ abide constant by tradition discending in his spirit on men from the beginning of the old world figuratively by the promised seed of the woman through all occurrents or times of the worlds Apostasie remayned figuratively in the ten Fathers not only King of peace as Milchizedeck but also the Priest of the most high God receiving the Sacrifice of praise to God and for God by man believing truth and returning from God blessings upon them not only by his acceptable satisfactory righteousnesse imputed the ground of all acceptation but also in the oracle of life divulging it by his Ambassadors to the world and the imbreathings of his Spirit into the Spirit of man as sometime reproving the world of sinne as to Cain and the old world in the ten Fathers and in the Ministry of Noah sometimes receiving in good part the Sacrifices of the praise of his grace as in Abell his offering by beliefe of truth sometimes pouring out his blessings of consolation as in Noah his Sacrifice he smelt a savor of rest and comfortably renewed his gracious Covenant c. Sometimes in gracious incouragements to submit to this mercy as he did to Cain and sometimes enlivening the Spirit of man dead in sinnes and trespasses as to these Gentiles we see so raising these dead bones to live in his sight Therefore to continue this
is the object of Justification Or thirdly in the state of rejection from the first as was Cain before he came to Faith or from the second as are some of the Saints for their apostasie from Christs owne testimony by his doctrine to his peculiar Apostles Iudas being absent and Pauls testimony of himselfe and other Saints and of Christs nationall Spouse by Gods testimony Ezech. 18. and as wee see by wofull experience this sixteene hundred yeeres and more Againe I having precedently defined what is the perfection of justifying faith I will now define what is the perfection of the man in whom it is or thus what man is a righteous man Man in his first estate was righteous because his intentions and operations was an exact perfection of degrees according to natures most right rules in the estate of creation as Chap. 1. But now in this fourth estate of man The definition of a righteous man hee is a righteous man who in any degree doth by a right beliefe submit so as that he receives Gods gift of Christs righteousnesse imputed to eternall life by salvation desireably endeavouring to conforme to that righteousnesse in some degree to sanctification I say in the perfection of parts (a) When the Apostle saith we speake wisdome to them that are perfect he meanes man in the perfection of Faith and not perfect in righteousnesse of inherent holinesse for the perfections of Christs righteousnesse is not attainable by men nor Angels in the perfections of degrees So that a righteous man in this life stands as an imperfect member united by faith in love to a head perfect in righteous workes or righteousnesse CHAP. XII Answering Objections made against severall points precedently delivered in this Treatise FIrst it will be objected Solomons backsliding was totall yet not finall though hee did all that the wicked man doth Question because against so great light of heavenly Object 1 wisedome hee turned his minde into darknesse by sensuall delights and Idolatrous abominations consequently hee crucified Christ to himselfe and yet his fall was not finall for hee returned to God in the object of Faith Salomâ—n under the Law of Moses of a believer went the farthest out from God of any that ever returned to God againe Answ by Faith in the object of Justification therefore the Scripture speakes but implicitly of his repentance as if his name had beene blotted out of the booke of life to teach others not to be high minded but feare Againe his fall was not totall because God extraordinarily reserved some virtuall seed of beliefe in him to the object of Justification and therefore his backsliding was not totall nor internally doing all which the wicked man doth for as long as the least degree of that seed remaines that man is in Christ the object of Faith and that God did reserve a seed is cleare by his speciall and particular promise made to David in Salomons behalfe saying if hee commit iniquity I will chastice him with rods of men and with the stripes of the children of men but my mercy shall not depart away from him And the ground of this extraordinary mercy by promise was this because Salomon as sitting King on Sion hill the promised sonne of David hee so was in those dayes a remarkeable figure of Christ the Sonne of Davids eternall throne therefore God extraordinarily reserved in Salomon a light of beliefe virtually to Christs righteousnesse as imputed to the * If for the glory of Gods grace then not for love to Salomons person more then to any other mans person for Gods love to all mens persons is one and the same as appeares in the grounds of Gods love in his gift of Christ to the world pag. 40 41. glory of his owne grace in Salomons eternall salvation therefore his fall was neither totall nor finall Secondly it will be objected Saint Peter did all that the wicked man doth extinguishing greater light in himselfe Object 2 then ever did Salomon for he was an Apostle and saw the great workes of Christ and heard his sacred doctrine as dropping from his sacred lips and hee cursed himselfe he knew not the Lord of glory and sware he knew him not against his owne knowledge so consequently hee did all the wicked man doth crucifying Christ to himselfe totally and yet was renewed by repentance therefore his fall was not finall although totall The Lord said Simon Simon behold Satan hath desired to winnow you that hee may sift you as wheat but I have prayed for thee that thy faith faile not Luke 22.32 as if he should say Answ by reason of your rashnesse and remissenesse to my gracious admonishments Satan hath much desired to take an advantage against you totally to extinguish thy faith and love to me but my request to my Father hath beene more then ordinary for thee that thou mightest not perish from mee therefore in time of neede Christs words of precedent admonishment was remembred to Peters soule for his returne to him in the object of Faith Luke 22. 61. and the ground of this extraordinary mercy was two-fold First because he being a believer therefore as Christ is the Saviour of all men so especially of Peter in this his backsliding more then to Iudas who was not a believer for saith the Text hee is the Saviour of all men but especially of them that believe Secondly not onely a believer but a believing Apostle set apart to publish the Gospell to the world therefore more to Christ then an ordinary believer and therefore Christs Prayer was for him more then ordinary and therefore it was that his fall was neither totall nor finall for whensoever it is totall it is finall and in some twice dead and pluckt up by the roots and so none can be but those which have beene right believers for to be twice dead implyeth to be twice alive the first life is the precedent infusion of amity to God and enmity to Satan or if it be renewed and this is a life preceding faith flowing from the universall grace of the Covenant of life and glory as before is proved The second life is the life of justifying Faith I meane man rightly united by believing to Christ the object of life and when he dies to the later he dies to the former also and therfore twice dead and never lives to God againe in Jesus Christ Iude vers 12. And for the close of the point here observe that as Manasses and Paul were the onely two in sacred Scriptures that by their apostasie from Gods universall grace in Christ went the furthest distance out from God before Faith that ever were received to mercy whence Paul rightly saith That Christ shewed all long suffering and patience towards him himselfe being the chiefe of sinners meaning in this particular respect So on the contrary Salomon and Peter after true faith in Christ the object of life were the onely two men mentioned in Scriptures which
is explained in pag. 32. Or how was the worke of a perfect rest in Christ by Faith and in fruition by hope finished from the foundation of the world as the Author to the Hebrewes affirmes Hebr. 4.3 and as is explained pag. 25. To the second part of the Objection true it is by Adams default hee was as is described pag. 30. dead in sinne farre more deepe then I suppose you meane for man being dead in sins and trespasses against the universall grace of God in Christ is farre different from that in Adams fall as to be twice dead and pluckt up by the roote is different from them both as in the prosecution of the sixth point will clearely appeare To the third part of the Objection true it is mortality seized upon his body but it is also as true that by mercy in the blood of the Lambe mans body came but thus to be mortall for this mortality doth but at most separate the soule from the body which is but the shadow of that death intended in the Covenant for us in the fall of Adam as is described pag. 21. 22. 23. and as will more appeare by the death of the second Adam in the eighth Chapter following Object 4. Your observation is refuted Rom. 5.12.13 c. Are all Infants that die saved if not what is the cause of their condemnation Answ To the first part Rom. 5.12.13 the Apostle to the praise of Gods universall grace parallelling the first Adam to the second Adam hee there layes downe a double Argument the first that although by Adams sinne sinne entred into the world that is originally as the cause of all mens perishing when they were dependant on him in the Covenant for afterwards hee was as are all men Christ only excepted but a private man cap. 5. So that Adams sinne as now it is is but the occasion of mans sinne by his owne default to his eternall destruction and their owne sinne is the onely cause thereof as committed against Christ and the ground thereof is exprest by the Apostle in the 18. verse following Secondly it is further implyed in these two verses that that mans sinnes now so committed that is against Christ to whom all power is given and to whom all stand related for good and evill that the prevalency of their sinne against him doth increase the prevalency of the shadow of death unto them namely the frequency of the separation of the soule from the body and also of death in the substance namely mans separation from God his chiefest good in this relation and united to the contrary evill and by his owne remissenesse being ignorant of all yet then God in mercy to the promise added the Law to reveale to reckon or impute mans sinne unto him that he might see how hee runne on his owne misery wherefore in the 20. verse rightly saith the Apostle The Law entred that the offence as the spring of misery might abound that where sinne abounded grace might much more abound that as sinne had raigned unto death even so might grace raigne through righteousnesse unto eternall life by Iesus Christ verse 21. Therefore my observation is confirmed by the Apostle in these verses and not refuted See these verses further explained in cap. 9. to the second part of the objection yes all Infants are saved and therefore I can shew you what once was the cause of their condemnation namely Adams one offence when he was a publike person and the signe of it now onely remaines in their nature to meet and dispose them as fit subjects successively to receive salvation in the universall grace of God by Iesus Christ as saved creatures namely the poyson of the Serpent as reduced but to a seed the foresaid infusion flowing from the estate they are now in namely Gods universall mercy in the promised seede imputed righteousnesse as is further described pag. 36. 37. Object 5. If Adam fell the ninth houre of the sixth day Pag. 25. how did God in the end of that day see all his workes to be very good Answ I demand of you how he did see all his works the sixth day very good in the end of that day seeing it is not mentioned so in the Text and Moses saith expresly that on the seventh day God ended his workes which he had made and therefore it remaines for you to prove that God said so according to your inference at the end of the sixth day and in what sense Moses meanes that God ended his worke on the seventh day see pag. 34. Object 6. The exposition of the particle Put Pag. 28. savours of Semipelagianisme so doth the phrase of internall disposition infused universally Answ If that exposition which tends to demonstrate God onely in Christ Iesus an unversall good to man and that it pleased the Father that in him all fulnesse should dwell and so in all things Christ must have the preheminence to communicate even the least good to man as a meanes to his chiefest good and all restored by Christ then surely if this doctrine savour of Semipelagianisme it becomes you and I to be not onely halfe or almost but altogether Pelagians And that this doth so demonstrate God in Christ besides the maine scope of this whole Treatise see in cap. 6. cap. 12. in my answer to the tenth Objection cap. 12. the which doth most clearely prove the point Object 7. The last clause is false Pag. 30. Answ It is not so untill you have proved it so Object 8. The universall election is false Pag. ibid. Pag. 31. Object 9. Men perish for Adams transgression and their owne Answer to both Objections Both these Objections are answered in my answer to the 21. and 22. pages precedently Object 10. That justification without Faith Pag. 33. is against the current of Scripture Ans That this text nominates justification I am sure is true Rom. 5.18 and that the Apostle relates this justification without relation to mans receptive instrument of beliefe is as true for here the Apostle relates this justification to man as meerely passive when God was found of us that sought him not even when wee as Adam received this imputation to life and glory when God came to seeke and to save that which was lost not imputing out sinne to Adam according to the justice of the Covenant Therefore this justification as opposed to the ordinary reception of it by mans instrument of beliefe called justifying * Mans beliefe receiving this justification is therefore called justifying faith Faith was extraordinary and therefore although not according to the current of Scriptures yet according to the Scripture as for example that light which was before the Sunne was made in an ordinary course to communicate light unto the world was true light so this truth is truth though not according to the current of Scriptures in an ordinary course But as for this justification as related to mans receptive
Covenant in Christ which God renewed with Abraham is here distinguished into its parts Abraham get thee from thy Country and from thy Kindred and from thy Fathers House to a Land that I will shew thee and then at that time saith God to him I will make of thee a great Nation In which words in Abrahams Loynes God did now predestinate the Iewes unborne to Grace and Glory in Iesus Christ Againe secondly saith God to Abraham Thou shalt be a blessing and I will blesse them that blesse thee and curse them that curse thee In these words in Abrahams Loynes is implyed the glorious exaltation of Christ the second Adam and saviour of the world as proceeding therein without respect of persons Againe thirdly saith God to Abraham In thee shall all the Families of the Earth be blessed In these words is comprehended the Gentiles Predestination to Grace and glory in Jesus Christ for to him restrictively were all these promises made as witnesseth Saint Paul for saith hee To Abraham and his seed were the Promises made yet said hee God said not unto (a) Yet Christ and right beleevers is th s most pâ—oper seed câ—nsidered in his most peculiar mysticall body for Christ is coÌ„siderable in divers respects seeds as of many that is to all the Off-spring of Abraham in the flesh but as of one and to thy seed which is Christ Gal. 3.16 Therefore at this time all mankinde was Predestinate to Grace and glory in Iesus Christ without difference as upon the immediate fall of Adam (b) For from the time that God promised Christ to Adam till the Gospell was unveiled this mistery lay as hid Col 1.26 Eph 2.7 when this righteousnesse came upon all men to justification of life so now in this predestination to be Vessells of mercy being by their own (c) Therefore it must needs follow that when we were enemies to him God communicated his love and mercy upon man out of love to the glory and praise of his grace by the second Adam Christ Iesus Apostacie Vessells fitted to destruction wherefore when these Gentiles were called to the reception of this grace in the object of Justification rightly doth Saint Paul then say God made knowne the riches of glory on the vessells of mercy whom he had afore prepared unto glory even us whom he hath called not only of the Iewes but also of the Gentiles Rom. 9.23 29. Also when the Apostle called these Gentiles according to Gods purpose about 18-hundred yeares after this Predestination he then saith those whom he did foreknow them he also did predestinate to be conform'd to the Image of his Sonne that he might be the first borne among many brethren And in the next verse hee tells the Gentiles God now accordingly had effected it for he saith moreover whom hee did predestinate them also hee called and whom he called them also he justified and whom hee justified them he also glorified Rom. 8.29 30. And from this ground the Apostle rightly concludes that this promise of God to Abraham contained the Summe of the Gospell concerning the Gentiles for saith hee the Scriptures All these Texts referrs Predestination not to any decree before Abrahams time foreseeing that God would justifie the Heathen through Faith Preached before the Gospell unto Abraham saying In thee shall all Nations be blessed Gal. 3.8 Againe to proceed from this generall ground to a particular proceeding in this universall mercy and to begin where God begins that is at the Restauration of Shems Family to glory And because this glory is restored to this Family from one mans Loynes onely namely Abraham this directs us to two things First that the precedent Apostates of Shems Family were cut off by God from Christ therfore he would ra sâ— the Iewes as a new generation but from this one mans loynes of Shem Off-spring to enjoy this mercy Secondly it implies that mans deepest misery is Gods most proper object of mercy therefore from this Sonne of Terah of Shems Appostate Family he now promises to make not onely a Nation but also a Nation great and glorious and from this ground of Free Grace in future times when this Nation was a great People and famous but ungratefull to God for this honour God then tells thy birth and thy Natâ—vity is of the Land of Canaan that is an Idolatrous brood for saith God God would have them to coÌ„sider what they were when hee predestinated them to this glory in the promised seed with Abraham thy Father was an Amorite and thy Mother a Hittite c. as Josua 24 from the 2. ver to the 6. and Ezekiel 16. from the 3. to the 15. to the 15. yet in the mercy of this promised seed God gave to the Son of this Idolatrous brood three things First hee gave him a Land Secondly from his own Loynes a Nation great and glorious to inherit that Land Thirdly The seed from his own Bowells in whom that Nation was to be heires intail'd to that Land for ever To the first point Gen. 12.7 Moses saith Iehovah appeared unto Abraham and said unto him unto thy seed will I give this Land Cap. 13.14 Iehovah said unto Abraham lift up now thine eyes and looke from this place where thou art Northward and Southward and Eastward and Westward for all the Land which thou seest to thee will I give it and to thy seed for ever Chap. 15.18 Iehovah made a Covenant with Abraham saying Vnto thy seed have I given this Land from the River of Egypt unto the great River Euphrates c. Againe to the second point namely the gift of a great and glorious Nation from his own Loynes to inherit this Land as Chap. 13.16 I will make thy seed as the dust of the Earth So that if a man can number the dust of the earth then shall thy seed also be numbred likewise Chap. 15. and 5. he brought him forth abroad and said looke up now towards Heaven and tell the Starres if thou be able to number them and he said unto him so shall thy seed be Againe to the third point namely the guift of the seed in whom this glorious and great Nation should be heires intail'd to this promised land forever for when Abraham had thought that he should be Childlesse and therefore determin'd to make Eleazar his heire to what God had given him then Gen 15.3 behold the word of Iehovah came to him saying this shall not be thine heire but he that shall come forth of thine owne bowells shall be thine Heire and accordingly from him did spring this numberlesse Nation to inherit this Promised Land in the right of the seed promised precedently to Adam and now renewed to be the Sonne of Abraham after the flesh by promise 430 yeares before the Law as it is Gal. 3.16 17 Gen. 13.15 the Land was not in-tail'd by promise in the Plurall to seedes but to thy seed for ever meaning in Christ as
it in their hearts and so although the Heaâ—hen had not the Law yet by some meanes they might come to know the Law and so the Law became written in their hearts Suppose some did so come to know the Law Answ yet it makes nothing to the purpose for it is one thing to have the Law of Christ in the Theory in some mens minds as it is in the divels and another thing to have the spirit of man inclined universally to worship the divine Majesty and to implore the same in time of need with hope of mercy yea so farre that if this be improved in man having not the Law it will neverthelesse terminate in the true circumcision of the heart as is plainly proved in the 7. Chap. of this Treatise Againe as for the divels and men so farre forth as they adhere to him their consciences may accuse them of evill but that the consciences of divels can excuse them in any respect of uprightnesse to God-ward as did the consciences of these Heathen excuse as well as accuse Rom. 2. but not so in divels by any testimony of Scriptures therefore the spirits of all mankind were meetly disposed by the foresaid infusion and the serpents nature as reduced but to a seed to receive mercy from the throne of grace in Jesus Christ But it wil be objected this disposition came not by Christ Object 12 in the foresaid infusion but it is the remainder of the Law left in the fall of Adam hereditarily descending in the nature of man This contradicts the former because it grants some good dispositions naturally inclining mankinde to God which is not in divels Againe Answ this implyes the justice of God was not universally full in the fall of Adam therefore man lost not the Law totally and eternally consequently not all holinesse and righteousnesse consequently some power internally remaines by which he may returne to God in the Covenant as it was in the first Adam for no power is in it selfe of no use proper to it's end therefore not this Againe it implyes the fall of Adam was not so irrecoverably deepe as to need the second Adam to be a person infinite in power by it to raise us from that vast misery consequently the restauration of the world may rather be attributed to the dignity of Christs Person then to the absolute necessity of his person so dignified in power to make good his Fathers truth against all the lies of Satan to the full satisfaction of divine Justice in the improvement of his personall operations as in the 8. Chapter is proved Againe it eclypseth the glory of Gods grace and mercy by Christ Jesus because it referres this internall inclination of the Law written not to Gods universall mercy in the gift of the promised seed when none but the Image of Satan by his lies was written in mans heart by Satans malice and mans owne remissenesse and by divine Justice totally and eternally so to remaine And in a word because this brings man to turne his eyes to looke upon his left and remaining abilities so that all he hath before faith is not received from Gods mercy in Christ but from his owne store and so by pride to fall from grace Therefore this internall disposition was infused by Gods universall grace in the promised seed And to conclude as this opinion on the one side lessens the glory of Gods Justice in the fall of Adam and also the glory of Gods grace by the second Adam the restorer of all so also it continues an intermingled confusion in the body of Divinity Object 13 to the furtherance of the mysteries of iniquity Againe it will be objected although by Moses God doth expresse the planted and inclosed garden of Eden was made with every tree good for food and pleasant to sight and different from the perfections of the created globe and made in the midst thereof to grow two trees and named the one the tree of Life the other the tree of Knowledge of good evil Likewise threatned Adam with certaine death if hee did eate of the fruit forbidden him yet because God did not in plainnesse of speech expresse that by these two things he prefigured to Adam that by his worke in the Covenant God intended to raise the world from it's naturall perfections to a supernaturall perfection and man to the glory of Angels or to an evill equivalently contrary therefore we are not to believe any such thing was then intended by God to Adam as a publike person by Covenant Answ It doth not follow by any just consequence if wee carefully examine Gods proceedings in manifesting to mankind the transcendent glory of Heaven for as to Adam in the garden before the fall he did not in plainnes of speech expresse the same so never after till the fulnesse of time for till then God at sundry times and in divers manners spake in times past unto the Fathers hath in these last dayes spoken unto us by his Son in open face and plainnesse of speech but never before Heb. 1.2 3 2 Cor. 3.12.18 But to proceed to a particular answer for proofe of the point and first as God did not by Moses in plainnes of speech declare what he meant to Adam before the fall by those figures so neither after the fall by Moses to the world was Christ the second Adam in plainnesse of speech exprest to be the first borne of every creature from the dead fall of Adam opening the wombe of all perfection but in figures as by Cain as the first borne and by the Law of the first borne of mankind and the Law of the first borne of beasts and the Law of the first fruits of vegetables as growing in the terrestriall Canaan Exod. 13.2 Exod. 22.29 30. Neither was it ever in plainnesse of speech made knowne by Moses nor the Prophets that the whole creation travelleth till now with man believing truth from the bondage of corruption to be partaker of the glorious libertie of the sâ—nnes of of God but onely figured as by a Law for the land to rest as well as for mans rest and in the number of seven as pointing at perfection as pag. 35. 36. Neither was it by Moses not the Prophets made knowne to the world in plainnesse of speech that Christ as God-man should second the first Adam in the worke of the restauration of the world but inclusively in the promised seed of the Woman to breake the serpents head and also as the seed of Abraham and David c. Neither as by Moses in plainnesse of speech did God expresse that the garden of Eden was the figure of Angels glory to Adam so neither did hee expresse by plainnesse of speech to Israel that the Land of Canaan was to them a figure of the heavenly Canaan but by the agreement of the Type with the Antitype as is implyed Esay 51.3 yet the Apostle concludes that God denyed them rest in the Land of