that is none other wise than a kinges sonne shuld do To our purpose Kinges and Princes haue their glorie and their maiestie semelie for their state the Lorde Iesus had glorie semelie for Goddes sonne ¶ THE ONLY BEGOTTEN This word auanceth the Lorde Iesus aboue al creatures and teacheth him to be Goddes natural son We ar also called Goddes sonnes but that is by adoption by fauor by grace not by natural generation By natural generation God hath one only sonne who of his goodnes mercie hath made vs partakers of that that he is by nature This word only begotten ought wel to be weighed For it teacheth the Lorde Iesus to be of the same substance that the father is of and and therefore verie God and aequal to the father For these thinges hange together folow one another For our Euāgelist teacheth in the .5 chap. that whan the lorde Iesus saied God was his father he mēt patera idion his awne father that is his natural father therefore shewed him selfe aequal to God For it foloweth in dede that if God be his awne father that is to saie his father by natural generation he must nedes be aequal to God his father For in the Godhead there is nothinge greater or smaller He that is of Goddes substāce must nedes be God And he that is God must nedes be infinite aboue al measure greatnes So to be Goddes ōly begottē sonne God to be his awne father bothe which wordes this Euāgelist hath of the lorde Iesus ovthroweth al that maie be diuised by anie rauīge braine against his tru natural godhead Yet the Arrians lille out theyr blasphemous tounges stil francticly allege the scriptures for them For first thei iangle that it is writtē in this gospel the father is greater thā I. Wherevnto first I saye that one place of this gospel is not to be expouned agaīst the hole purpose of the boke which is to teach that the lorde Iesus is Goddes natural sonne aequal to God And sith the Euangelist hath this worde aequal plainly and expressely thei shew themselues mad that wold make him to encoūtre agaīst himselfe Secōdly I saie that in that place the lorde Iesus compareth not his substance with the fathers substāce but compareth his present hūble state with the glorious state that he shulde haue after his ascēsion And therefore al the godlie old fathers welnigh haue taught those wordes to be spoken of his mānes nature which shuld be forth with aduaūced to immortal incorruptible glorie by the power of the father Some greke writers in dede admitte that the father is greater thē the sonne not bicause he hath greater power or that there is anie differēce in their substāce essence but in that he is the father and begetteth the sonne and is not begottē of the sonne therefore he maie be saide greater The meaninge also of those wordes the father is greater than I maie be this The ende why I trauaile with you is not that you shuld staie in me and loke no farther but to bringe you to the father as to the last marcke that with me you maie see him as he is Whose glorie is more dere to me thā is myn awne glorie therefore I seke it more thā myne awne I thincke that I haue not accomplished myne office vntil I haue brought you to him But our Arriās sith they be ouer the shoues sticke not blindly to presse forwarde to goe ouer the bootes to For thei rūne to this place writtē to the Cor. chap. 15. Whā al thinges shal be made subiecte to him thā shal the sonne also him selfe be assubiected to him who hath assubiected al thinges to him But what if we aūswere that that also is spokē touchinge his mānes nature For the same autor S. Paule in the .2 to the Philip. teacheth that touchinge his diuine nature he thought it no robberie to be aequal with God Naie saie they for than he shuld not haue saide shal be assubiected for that nature is al readie subiecte Wil they graūt than that the lorde Iesus hath a nature that is not now subiecte to God but shal be hereafter If they wil graūt that thā wil I saie that what so euer is not now subiecte to God in the lorde Iesus shal nev be subiecte to God For that that is once aequal to God shal euer be aequal to God How than is it saide that his mānes nature shal be assubiected if it be al readie assubiected I aunswere bicause we shal thā know it which now we beleue only For as S. Augustine proueth in the holie scripture thinges are saide to be don whā they beginne to be knowē of vs. As whan we saie halowed be thy name Goddes name of it selfe is holie but we desire that it maie be so knowen to vs. For fuller vndrestandinge of that place of Sainct Paule ye shal considre that al power is giuen to Christ in that he is clothed with mānes nature For God hath exalted him in the same nature wherein he was humbled The scripture than witnesseth that Christ hath ful dominion and raigneth ouer heauen and erth God in dede is our gouernor but it is in the face of Christes mānes nature Now Christ shal surrēdre the kingdom that was giuen vnto him that we maie cleaue perfectly to God Howbeit he shal not by that meanes vtterly giue vp his kingdō where of as the scripture teacheth there is no ende but he shal as it were conueie it from his manhod to his godhead For thā we shal haue an opē entree free accesse to the diuine maiestie where now our weaknes wil not suffre vs to approche Christ thā shal this waie be subiected to the father for thā the veale shal be taken awaie the office of his mediation shal some waie cease we shal se God face to face raignīge in his glorie without anie coueringe meane And where sainte Paule saieth that God maie be al in al some thincke he speaketh so bicause we shal haue than without anie meane manie cōmodities which god now ministreth vnto vs by creatures For mainteināce of our life we shal than haue no nede of bread drincke c. nether for aedifyinge shal we haue nede of the sacramentes of the church nor the outwarde worde of the scripture nor ecclesiastical offices For God by him selue shal be al in al. Other teache the meanīge of those wordes to be that the flesh shal couet no more against the spirite but God shal possesse euerie parte of vs and reigne in vs fully and perfectly which thinge in this life is only begonne Here I wil leaue the Arrians stickinge in the mire wil returne to S. Iohā FVL of grace and veritee Bicause that afterwarde he setteth grace veritee against the law there be that thinke that his meaninge is here that the Apostles acknowleged him to be Goddes sonne by this that he
and inestimable beautie Assuredly this can neuer be thought vpō this can neuer be wondred at inough ¶ AS RECEAVED They receaue him that acknowlege him to be Goddes son and that he became man in mannes nature died for the purgation and satisfaction of their sinnes breifely to receaue here signifieth to beleue as S. Iohan maketh the exposition him selfe in the wordes folowinge HE GAVE them power The idols men wringe this place to the maintenāce of free wil. For they vnderstande that choise hereby is giuen vs to be the children of God if we wil or to refuse the same But S. Iohan declareth forthwith in the wordes folowinge that Goddes children are not made by the wil of the flesh but whan they be begotten of God Goddes begettinge maketh vs Gōddes children and we ar not left to our choise with a power whereby to make our selues Goddes childrē but we ar Goddes children al readie whan he hath begottē vs. For he begetteth perfectly he begetteth not mōsters halfe childrē or a lūpe of matter where of childrē maie be made afterwarde And the greke worde that S. Io. vseth is not dynamis which signifieth power but exousia which signifieth dignitee auctoritee Here riseth a question if Goddes chosen were by predestination his childrē before the beginninge of the world how agreeth it that thā they ar made his childrē whā thei beleue For they were his children before beinge his chosen predestinate It is true that God made those his childrē that euer shulde be his childrē in his purpose thorough free electiō before the worlde was made But this thei fele nat vntil God by his holie spirite kendle faith in them and assure them of that that they were before And here also I wil giue you an other thinge to note S. Iohan saieth that as manie as beleue ar Goddes sonnes But none ar now Goddes sonnes that were not euer Goddes sonnes in his infallible purpose that is none ar Goddes sonnes but his chosen So thei that beleue in dede ar Goddes chosen therefore can neuer perishe For God can nether bē deceaued in his choosinge nor is a chaūgelinge to altre the thinge that he hath once purposed Nether hangeth he vpon mannes behauior suspendinge his determinatiō but al his purposes ar stablished to gether sure certaine thei stāde fast for euer beinge ōce for al decreed You wil graūte perchaūce that Goddes election is sure infallible but yet you can not be so one persuaded that al that beleue ar Goddes chosen For Simō Magus beleued and in the parable of the sower the lorde speaketh of some which haue faith for a time I aūswere that those such had neuer the faith of Goddes children But how shal we know wil you saie that we haue the faith of goddes childrē seīge there is another faith besides which maie begile vs. I aūswere that whā we haue such faith as brīgeth forth a felīge of the swetenes of goddes mercie in Christ Ies an vnfained loue towardes God we haue the faith of Goddes Children And ar and ar sealed vp by Goddes spirite and haue the sure and infallible ernest of euerlastinge life IN HIS NAME It is more liuelie and more ample and of greater maiestie whan it is said to them that beleue in his name than if it had ben saide to them that beleue in him The scole men in dede putte a difference betwene credere deum credere deo credere in deum Credere deum with them is to beleue that there is a God Credere deo is to beleue Goddes saiynges Credere in deum is to trust in God and to loue him And therefore S. Augustine saieth that to beleue in God is in beleuinge to loue him and in louinge to trust in him But the scripture obserueth not this distinction For in the 14. of Exod. we haue that whan the Israhelites saw the Aegyptiās ouerthrowen by Goddes power thei beleued BAIHOVA ou be Mosheh abdo i. in Iehoua and in Moses his seruant And againe in the .19 God saieth to Moses I wil cōme doūne to the in a thicke cloud that the people maye heare me speakinge with the and beleue ' BECHA that is in the c. But is neuer saide that anie beleued in the name of a mā For name to the hebrues signifieth power as whan S. Paule saieth that God gaue the lorde Iesus a name aboue al names he meaneth plaīly power aboue al power So to beleue in the name of Iesus importeth necessarely that he is God WHICHE neyther of bloude Some thincke that this is a figure called in greke pleonasmos wherby manye woordes are heaped together to signify one thīg For they saie that these wordes of bloudes of the wil of the flesh of the wil of mā signifie one thing namely carnal natiuitye generation so thei teache that mē beget carnall childrē onely God begetteth spiritual childrē And in deede mās generation makethe vs not Goddes childrē we muste be regēdred by God to be his childrē Other thincke that he numbreth vp by partes al that is excellēt in mā where in he maie seeme to haue some affiaunce to atteyne to the dignitie of Goddes sonne And that so he teacheth that by no auncitrie no priuilege of bloude by no holines of fore fathers nor anie maner of strēgth or faculte in mankinde mā atcheueth the place of Goddes sōnes Bothe expositiō is tēde to this end that we are not made holie by anie force of nature but by the grace and mercie of God regeneratinge and newe begettinge vs and that is plainely S. Iohās meaninge The wil of mā S. Iohā vsethe for the wil of anie mā for so the hebreus vse the word ish mā for euerie mā BEGOTTEN God begetteth vs whā accordinge to his aeternal purpose electiō he puttethe his spirite into vs and by his force plāteth faith in our hartes to embrace his worde reneweth our mindes frameth thē againe vnto true holines righteousnes God graūt that we maie al feele that we ar begotten of God that considering the high dignitie where vnto we are called we occupie not ourselues vnsemely in vile offices but trauaile al the daies of oure lyfe in suche thinges as aduaunce the glorie of our heauenlie father Amen ⧠The Fift READING VVith verie few but the same most pithie semelie apte wordes the Euāgelist hath declared vnto vs the diuine nature of the Lorde Iesus his power shewed forth sette abrode to the sight af al men by his most wondreful worckes For by this Godhead diuine nature of the Lorde Iesus bothe al thinges were first made of nothinge and now also al thinges ar preserued cōtinued in their state that they returne not to nothinge By it al thinges liue moue haue their beinge By it mā wherein he excelleth other liuinge creatures is furnished with the light of reason vndrestandinge which though thorough mānes faute it be
Abraham was I am Was before me The old latine trāslatiō out of the greke had factus est was made before me which caused much superfluous talke amōge mē vaine tormētinge of wittes how the lord cold be said to be made before Iohā For his mānes nature was not made before Io. And his diuine nature was neuer made The ambiguitee doubtful significatiō of the word deceaued both the interpreter them For genesthai signifieth to be made also to be And in the later significatiō it is vsed in this verie chap. egene to anthropos c. there was a mā sent For we cā not saie there was a mā made sent Was before In matters of religion we haue great regarde what mē before vs haue thought Wherein this is our faute that we extende not our sight far inough For we loke to them in dede that were befote vs but we loke not to him that was before them that were before vs yea that was before al. S. Cyprian reprouinge this shortnes of our sight saieth that we ought not to loke what mē before vs thought good to do but what he did that is before al. It shal be good therefore for vs to know what religion the lorde Iesus taught commended who was before our holie bisshoppes 15. hūdred yeres For he was my first The worde for rendreth a cause why a thinge is don Io Bap. thā sheweth a reason why he saide that the lord Iesus was before him bicause saieth he he was my first that is to saie my prince my head my autor my maker And that in dede proueth sufficiētly that he was before him The latine translation hath quia prior me erat bicause he was before me But than it shuld haue ben accordinge to the grammatical rules of speech in the comparatiue degree not protos mou in the positiue More ouer Io. shuld so seme to proue the same by the same which we vse not to doe Of his fulnes Here we haue the foūtaine hedspringe of al the graces giftes that euer anie mā hath had heretofore were he nev so good holie or shal haue hereafter Out of this wel of liuinge waters which neuer faileth is neuer dried vp or drawē out al the saintes prophetes from the beginninge drue al the knowlege goodnes holines al the spiritual motiōs vertues excellēt qualities that euer thei had thēselues or stirred vp in other Out of the same welle floweth vnto vs shal flowe hereafter vnto the ende of the world what so euer is good and vertuous what so euer pertaineth to the attainment of true felicitee and of a blisful life For he hath not only these thinges but is ful of them For as S Paule writeth to the Col. in him dwelleth al the fulnes of the Godhead somaticos bodily that is to saie substātially not in image not in shadow but in bodie in substāce in dede We lerne thā by this sentēce of Io. Bap. that no knowlege no goodnes no holines no maner of vertue is to be sought anie where saue in the lorde Iesus And more ouer that we nede not feare left we shal want anie spiritual thīge if we resorte to him seinge that he hath the fulnes of the spirite Lastly that al mē what so euer thei be ar voide of grace and godlines by nature sith al receaue out of the fulnes of Goddes sonne We al saieth Io. Bap. nombrīge him selfe amōge the rest And if Io. Bap. receaued his holines out of the fulnes of the lord Iesus gotte it not by his natural strēghth godlie preparatiōs as the great idoles mē vainly iāgle I maie boldly pronounce that neuer anie man had or cā haue anie true vertue holines but by the gift of the lord Ies that nothīge maie be lest to anie where of to bost For if thei haue receaued out of the fulnes of another why shuld they bost as though thei had not borowed al of another but had possessed some what of thēselues Wherefore these wordes of Io. Bap. beate doune what so euer idle heades haue builded raised vp to aduāce mānes strēghth mānes merites And here we maie not passe ouer that this place also proueth the Lord Iesus to be verie god For who is the foūtaine of al knowlege goodnes holines spiritual graces in al ages in al mē but God only But as we must know hereby that he is God so we must know that he possesseth not these thinges to this ende that he maie haue no maner of want but to sende them forth to the vse of mē For he kepeth not his treasures to him selfe enuiously or niggeshly but ioieth to distribute them and to sende them abrode Nether is he a merchaunt mā to make sale of them but giueth them frely as we ar taught in Esaie O al ye that thirst cōme to the waters euen he that hath no monei comme bye for no moneie for no price wine milke To buyie for no moneie is a verie easie buyinge yea it is no buyinge but a free receauinge Sith thā the lorde Iesus possesseth the fulnes of al spititual riches possesseth the same not to himselfe only but also to our vse more ouer calleth vs frely to enioie his goodes my counsel shal be that you resorte not for aide cōforte and purchasinge of Goddes grace to Marie or Iohā to Petre or to Paule but to him who possesseth al good thinges not by borowinge but by nature not in parte but fully not to his awne vse only but to the vse of mē in this world cheifely proprely of Goddes chosen For he hath also manie good thinges which he giueth euē to the reprobate as beautie strenghth of bodie eloquēce knowlege of liberal sciēces wordlie riches c. But he hath certaine special iuels which he giueth only to his chosen namely tru faith true righteousnes holines true ioifulnes patiēce constātie in afflictions true peace quietnes of consciēce Grace for grace This sentence is sondrie wise expouned I wil first shew you S. Augustines minde These be his wordes vpon this place Thā brethern al we haue receaued out of his fulnes out of the fulnes of his mercie haue we receaued what Remissiō of sinnes that we might be iustified by faith And what more ouer Grace for grace that is to wit for this grace whereby we liue of faith we shal receaue another grace namely euerlastinge life But what els is it saue grace For if I shal saie that this is due to me I assigne some what to my selfe as to whom it is due But God crouneth the giftes of his mercie in vs. Thus ye see S. Augustines meaninge to wit that al Goddes good giftes and in the ende euerlastinge life is not a recompēse of our merites but commeth of the free liberalitee of God bicause it pleaseth him so to rewarde his former graces to croune