Abraham is iustified so euery sonne of Abraham to wit euery beleeuer is iustified namely by faith and not by workes Now was not beleeuing Abraham a regenerate person Did he not bring forth many fruits of faith many good workes of charity piety mercy hospitality obedience humility and the like yet none of these come within the account of his iustification in the sight of God For to him that worketh not but beleeueth on him that iustifieth the vngodly his faith is counted for righteousnesse Therefore though the Pontificians would neuer so faine foist and croud in by head and shoulders their workes comming after faith whereby they may be iustified yet they are all thrust out by the Apostle as those workers were shut out of Heauen by Christ Mat. 7. 22. 23. except they could either bring the Text within the compasse of their Index expurgatorius as they haue done the glosse and sentences of Fathers in the like kind or proue Abraham an vnregenerate person or force the Apostle to say that though Abraham were not iustified by workes but by faith yet Abraham was iustified first by faith and then by workes Yea but say they although Paul make no mention of Abrahams iustification by workes yet Iames another Apostle saith plainly Was not Abraham our father iustified by works when he had offered Isaac his sonne vpon the Altar Therefore Abraham was iustified not onely by faith but by works also Therefore to loose this Gordian knot wherein the Pontificians so much triumph wee will vse no other sword not Alexanders but the sword of the Spirit which is the Word of God to cut it asunder At the first sight Paul and Iames seeme to be at great oddes the one ascribing iustification to faith without workes the other to faith and workes In both the Pontificians vnderstand one and the same iustification in kinde but to differ only in degree or order as Pauls iustification to be the first and that of Iames the second but both iustifying in the sight of God But we shall finde it far otherwise namely that these two Apostles doe speak of two different iustifications differing not in degree or order but in kinde and quality So that Paul speakes of that iustification whereby a man stands iust in the presence of God which is attributed to faith and not to workes at all and Iames of another iustification namely of a testification of a mans faith declaring a man to be a true beleeuer by good workes which are the proper fruits and effects of sauing and iustifying faith For if Iames should-vnderstand by being iustified by faith and workes together such a iustification as makes a man iust in the sight of God then he should directly crosse his fellow-Apostle who shuts out all workes from hauing any thing to doe in our iustification in Gods sight For Paul saith Rom 4. 2. If Abraham were iustified by workes he hath whereof to glory but not before God But Iames saith Abraham was iustified by workes therefore this iustification of Abraham by workes was not that iustification which makes a man to reioyce before God to wit the iustification by faith which Paul directly opposeth to iustification by workes Rom. 4. Now that Iames speaketh of iustification by workes and not by faith onely as vnderstanding a testification and demonstration of sound and sauing faith is euident by the whole passage of his second Chapter where the Apostle exhorting to workes of mercy and charity and meeting with false professors that turned the grace of God into wantonnesse professing they had faith but made no conscience of a Christian conuersation to testifie the truth and life of their faith by good workes hereupon he inferreth ver 14. What doth it profit my brethren though a man say hee hath faith and haue no workes can the faith saue him No that faith which is without workes is dead and cannot saue a man Yea such a faith is no better than that of Diuels Well yet thou saist thou hast faith But there is as well a dead faith as a liuing faith a faith common with Diuels as a faith proper to beleeuers a sauing faith as a deceiuing faith Shew mee therefore whether thou hast that-liuing sauing faith of true beleeuers or no. It is not enough to say thou hast this faith vnlesse thou canst proue it It is one thing to say it another to haue it Now the proofe of it is by the fruits of it to wit good workes as the tree is knowne by the fruits For the liuing sauing Faith is not an idle but an operatiue working Faith it is a Faith euer working by loue Therefore as the man saith to his Neighbour vers 18. Thou hast Faith and I haue workes shew me thy Faith without thy workes and I will shew thee my faith by my workes In which words the Apostle puts a plaine difference betweene a dead and a liuing faith which yet we are not able to iudge of or to discerne one from another but by good workes and so speakes here of no other iustification by workes but only such as is declaratiue or demonstratiue in the sight of men as it is said here Shew me thy Faith by thy workes So that wee see here how it is the Apostles drift to discouer the true sauing liuing Faith from a false counterfeit and dead faith which notwithstanding vaine professors so much glory of Hereupon the Apostle instanceth the Faith of Abraham and Rahab which was proued to bee a liuing and sauing Faith by the fruits and effects of it Note the Apostles Context seriously and with iudgement In the 20. vers Wilt thou know O vaine man that Faith without workes is dead Was not Abraham our father iustified by workes when hee had offered Isaac his sonne vpon the Altar Seest thou how Faith wrought with his workes and by workes was Faith made perfect And the Scripture was fulfilled which saith Abraham beleeued God and it was imputed vnto him for righteousnesse and he was called the friend of God Ye see then how that by workes a man is iustified and not by Faith onely First Faith without workes is dead But Abraham was iustified by Faith But by what Faith Was it a liuing and sauing Faith that Abraham had Yes How doth that appeare By his workes euen by the workes of Faith which gaue testimony to his Faith that it was a liuing sauing and iustifying Faith for by workes his Faith was made perfect not that his workes added any being of perfection to his Faith but by way of demonstration and testimony onely As we haue the like phrase in Matth. 21. 16. Out of the mouth of babes and sucklings thou hast perfited praise not that Gods praise and glory receiued any addition of perfection by the mouth of those babes but onely in respect of the promulgation and declaration of his praise So here As also the Apostle inferreth in the next words vers 23. Thus the Scripture
erant ad vtendum venerati sunt ad colendum They are become inexcusable who of Gods gifts haue made Gods to themselues and those things which were created to bee vsed they adore them as an Idoll Onely Christ is that sacred and mysticall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that fish in whom is found our tribute-money to satisfie the Maiesty of God This money must bee stamped no where but in Gods owne Mint as the pure siluer Oare of it is no where found but in Gods owne Mynes the holy Scriptures no other Image or Superscription must be vpon it but that of Iesus Christ and none may tender or offer it vp to God but onely Christ. 1. Tim. 2. 6. There is one God and one Mediator betweene God and man the man Christ Iesus who gaue himselfe a ransome for all This pure ransome more pure more precious than gold will endure no mixture no allay of any other mettals much lesse of any drosse But inherent righteousnesse in vs though dipped in Christs bloud as hauing receiued a tincture from it as they say if wee offer it to God for currant payment hee will easily perceiue it counterfeit coine of our owne mynting of our owne inuenting no better than Alcumy little siluer but much drosse in it euen the drosse of humane inuention and corruption which if it bee brought to Gods touch turnes colour if put in the Skale of the Sanctuary is found too light if cast into the Test of Gods fiery iustice it is blown all away in smoke As Esay saith Thy siluer is become drosse thy wine mixt with water And as Ieremy saith Reprobate siluer shall men call them because the Lord hath reiected them Our inherent righteousnesse call it Christs merits or what you will is at the best but as Piscis in arido The fish while it is in the sea liueth moueth is full of strength and agility but vpon the dry land it straight loseth all his vigour motion and life it selfe and quickly putrefieth euen so the merits and righteousnesse of Christ being in him as in their proper element are most liuely and vigorous strong and auaileable to satisfie Gods iustice and to plunge all our sinnes into the deepe bottome of the bottomlesse deepe of his mercies by that sweete smelling sacrifice of himselfe once offered but take any part of these merits of Christ out of him and put them into our dry and parched sandy soules and they become of no life of no validity to make the least satisfaction for the least sinnes yea in this respect they stinke in the nostrils of God Our soules are but broken Cisternes to contain this pure water of life God could neuer yet finde any thing in vs in vs I say but onely faith whereby to iustifie vs and this faith not as a worke of ours iustifying vs but as an instrument applying Christ by whom in whom and for whom wee are iustified If God iustifie vs for righteousnesse inherent or dwelling in vs then God should bee said to iustifie the godly but the Scripture saith otherwise That God iustifieth the vngodly Rom. 4. 5. Now to him that worketh not but beleeueth on him that iustifieth the vngodly his faith is counted for righteousnesse where faith being opposed to working cannot be said to iustifie as it is a work A notable testimony to proue that our iustification is not from within vs but from without vs not in vs but on vs not of him that worketh but of him that beleeueth in him that iustifieth Whom the godly Nay but the vngodly As Augustine saith Tu Domine benedicis iustum sed eum prius iustificas impium Thou Lord doest blesse the iust but first he being vngodly thou iustifiest him As if hee had said Being first vngodly thou diddest iustifie him and then being iust thou Lord doest blesse him How then comes this forraine righteousnesse vpon an vngodly man The Apostle sheweth His faith is counted for righteousnesse How His faith layes hold on Christ who is the Lord our righteousnesse being made vnto vs of God wisedome and righteousnesse and sanctification and redemption that according as it is written He that glorieth let him glory in the Lord. But will the Pontifician say Doe you call the graces of Christ in vs counterfeit coyne drosse reprobate siluer c. Yes if ye reckon it for pay to satisfie Gods iustice withall in this sense in vs it is meere counterfeit drosse reprobate siluer coyned in the Mint of Satans forgeries It is but as the Sunne-beame vpon a dung-hill raysing vp a stinking vapour in stead of a sweete odour in Gods nostrils But the graces of God in vs flowing from our head Christ Iesus in whom wee are first iustified by faith are the matter of our sanctification and the consequent fruits and effects of our iustification Thus they are a Well of liuing waters springing vp in vs vnto eternall life Thus they are a garden of spices yea of costly Spicknard yeelding a fragrant smell while the Sunne of righteousnesse shines vpon them Thus are they more pure and precious than gold yea than much fine gold Thus are they so many precious stones to paue our way that leades to the Kingdome of Heauen Yea thus so many peerelesse Pearles which adorne our Crowne of grace here and shall much more gloriously imbellish and beautifie our Crowne of glory hereafter Thus all our good works and words and thoughts are precious euen in Gods sight through Christ. They will stand before his mercy seate but they dare not stand before the Tribunall of his strict and seuere iustice They dare come before God as a proofe of our faith and obedience but not as a price of our sinne and disobedience And at the best cause we haue to pray Gods mercy for them but in no case to pay his iustice with them Now there be many reasons why inherent righteousnesse is no formall cause of our iustification in the sight of God First because it is a meere humane inuention It hath no warrant in Gods Word and consequently no warrant at all Will the Pontificians herein as they are willing in other things stand to the iudgement of their father Aristotle Hee saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 All things are better determined according to the Law than according to mans will for it is no sure rule Tertullian said of an errour of Hermogenes about the creation of the world of a pre-existent matter Scriptum esse doceat Hermogenis officina Si non est scriptum timeat Let the shop of Hermogenes shew this to be written If it be not written let him feare Now iustification is a fundamentall doctrine that cannot stand but vpon the Scriptures Iustification is by faith and faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God The word is neare thee euen in thy mouth and in thy heart that is the word of faith which we preach for with the heart man beleeueth to
Hauing made knowne vnto vs the mysterie of his will according to his good pleasure which he had purposed in himselfe And vers 11. In whom also wee haue obtained an inheritance being predestinated according to the purpose of him who worketh all things after the counsell of his owne will Whereupon Augustine hauing to this very purpose recited the same Scripture at large saith Quis haec audâ—at diligenter intelligenter audeat de hac quam defendimus tam clara veritate dubitare Who can heare these things diligently and intelligently and dare doubt of this so cleare a truth which we defend Now Gods will is the prime absolute and independent cause of his decree and act of predestinating vs to saluation Yea voluntas Dei saith Augustine est prima summa causa omnium corporalium spiritualiumque motionum Nihil enim fit visibiliter sensibilâ—ter quod non de inâ—isibili intelligibili summi Imperatoris â—ula aut inbeatur aut permittatur secundum ineffabilem iustitiam praemiorum atque poenarum gratiarum retributionum in ista totius creaturae amplissima quadam vniuersaque republica The will of God is the prime and supreme cause of all both corporall and spirituall motions For nothing is done visibly and sensibly which is not from the inuisible and intelligible Court of the supreme Emperour eyther commanded or permitted according to the vnutterable iustice of rewards and punishments of fauours and retributions in this kinde of spacious and vniuersall republique of the whole creature And Ludouicus Viues noteth vpon St. Augustines words Qui voluntatem Dei spectant certissimam originem è quae vniuersa profiscuntâ—r spectant Idque quoniam aliud non â—it in mundo quam quodea vult They which looke vpon Gods will doe looke vpon a most certaine cause or fountaine from whence all things do flow And that because there is no other thing in the world than what his wil willeth This is according to that of the Apostle saying That God worketh all things after the counsell of his own will The will of God then is the prime supreme cause of all And this will is in himselfe and of himselfe alone it depends not vpon any thing out of himselfe â—â— vpon the creature or the actions of men fore-seene but it is in himselfe and not without himselfe as Ephes. 1. 9. Hauing made knowne vnto vs the mysterie of his will according to his good pleasure which hee had purposed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in himselfe Now this absolute independent will of God is as wee see set out by sundry attributes as The Purpose of his will the Counsell of his will the good Pleasure of his will vers 5. 9. 11. By the Purpose of his will is set out Gods immutable determination by the Counsell of his will Gods vnsearchable wisedome and by the good Pleasure of his will his vnspeakable goodnesse mercie and free grace in the worke of ordaining man vnto saluation So that the Counsell and Purpose and good Pleasure of Gods will in appointing vs vnto saluation was not suggested into the minde and disposition of God by the meanes of any eyther faith or workes in vs which God fore-saw we would haue but our faith and other good fruits of it are therefore in vs because God according to the Counsell Purpose and good Pleasure of his owne will did appoint vs vnto saluation As Augustine saith excellently to this purpose Fiunt electi non qui eliguntur quia crediderunt sed qui eliguntur vs credant Hanc enim vocationem Dominus ipse satis aperit vbi dicit Non vos me elegistis sed ego elegi vos Nam si propterea electi erant quoniam crediderant ipsi â—um prius vtique elegerant credendo in eum vt eligi mererentur Aufert autem hoc omnino qui dicit Non vos me elegistis sed ego vos elegi Et ipsi quidem procul dubio elegerunt eum quando crediderunt in eum vnde non ob aliud dicit Non vos me elegistis sed ego vos elegi nisi quia non elegerunt â—um vt eligeret eos sed vt eligerent eum elegit eos quia misericordia eius praeuenit eos secundum gratiam non secundum debitum Elegit ergo eos de mundo cum hic ageret in carne sed iam electos in seipso ante mundi constitutionem Haec est immobilis veritas praedestinationis gratiae They are elect not who are elected because they beleeued but who are elected that they might beleeue For this calling the Lord himselfe also doth sufficiently declare where he saith You haue not chosen mee but I haue chosen you For if they had been therefore elected because they had beleeued then they had chosen him first by beleeuing in him that they might merit to be chosen but he doth altogether take away this who saith You haue not chosen me but I haue chosen you And indeed they certainly choose him when they beleeue in him whereupon for no other cause he saith You haue not chosen mee but I haue chosen you but because they chose not him that he might choose them but that they might choose him he chose them because his mercy preuented them according to grace not according to debt Therefore he chose them out of the world when hee liued here in the flesh but being already chosen in himselfe before the foundation of the world This is that vnmoueable verity of predestination and grace And a little after Elegit ergo Deus fideles sed vt sint non quia iam erant God therefore elected the faithfull but that they might be faithfull not because they were â—lready faithfull And alledging that of St. Iames Iames 2. Hath not God chosen the poore in this world that they might be rich in faith and heires of the Kingdome which he hath promised to them that loue him He thereupon concludes Eligendo ergo facit diuites in fide sicut haeredes regni Therefore by electing them he maketh them rich in faith as also heires of the Kingdome And before in the 16. Chapter Ad hanc vocationem electionis propositi Dei qui pertinent omnes sunt docâ—biles Dei nec potesteorum quisquam dicere credidi vt sic vocarer praeuenit eum quippe misericordia Dei quia sic vocatus est vt crederet Whosoeuer doe appertaine to this vocation namely of Gods election and purpose they are all taught of God nor can any of them say I beleeued that therfore I should be so called sith the mercy of God preuented him because he is so called that he might beleeue And lib. de Patientia Christus non iustos sed iustificandos elegit Christ did not chuse those that were already iust but those who were to be iustified Thus wee see this holy man following the word of Christ concludes the Purpose Counsell and good Pleasure of
Gods will to be the prime originall absolute independent cause of mans saluation As hee saith elsewhere Praedestinatio est praeparatio gratiae gratia autem est ipsa donatio seu praedestinationis effectus Predestination is the preparation of grace and grace is the gift it selfe or the effect of predestination And in his Enchiridion Vnum ex paruulis eligendi â—lterum relinquendi causa vna erat Dei voluntas cuius enim vult miseretur Deus quem vult obdurat Miseretur scilicet magna bonitate obdurat nulla iniquitate vt nec liberatus de suis meritis glorietur nec damnatus nisi de suis meritis conqueratur Sola enim gratia redemptos discerit à perditis quos in vnam perditionis concreuer at massam ab origine ducta causa communis Et nisi per indebitam misericordiam nemo liberatur nisi per debitum iudicium nemo damnatur There was one and the same cause of electing the one and leauing the other of the children to wit Iacob and Esau euen the will of God for God hath mercy vpon whom he will and whom he will he hardeneth Hee sheweth mercy out of his great bounty hee hardeneth without any iniustice that neyther hee that is freed might glory of his owne merits nor hee that is condemned might complaine but of his owne demerits For it is onely grace which separateth the redeemed from the condemned whom the common cause deriued from the originall had confounded altogether in one masse of perdition And but by vndue and vndeserued mercy none is deliuered and but by due and deserued iudgement none is condemned Thus this holy man So that whatsoeuer exceptions or obiections cauils or calumnies eyther the malicious or ignorant enemies of this truth take vp against it as blaming God for an accepter of persons in preferring one wicked man before another being all naught without exception or difference in Adams corrupt loynes they doe but shoote their arrowes against the Sunne or as that famous Naturalist Aristotle who would desperately drowne himselfe in that Septemfluous Sea of Euripus for spight that hee could not finde out a reason for the ebbing and flowing of it Or it is as the Apostle vseth a familiar comparison as if the Pot should expostulate with the Potter and demand a reason why he made it such and such The reason of Gods will is a mysterie as the Apostle sheweth the effects whereof are made knowne vnto vs but the prime cause locked vp in Gods owne brest To prye into this Arcanum or secret what is it but with the Bethshemites to peepe into Gods Arke and so to perish by a fearfull plague Can Emperours and Commanders in any Armie haue their wils presently obeyed and put in execution without demanding a reason of them nay can that great mysterie of iniquity impose vpon their disciples blinde obedience vnto their most damnable and diabolicall designes proceeding from that Dragons will which animateth the Beast a reason whereof to demand were as dangerous to the party demanding as hee by the execution of the command might proue dangerous to others and cannot God haue his will absolute and free to himselfe though it be most iust wise and perfectly good but the vilest and â—aâ—est of men dare affront it and eyther call God to an account for a reason why hee so willeth or else they must conclude that their owne wils for the goodnesse of them must bee the reason and cause mouing God so to will Yet if they will needes haue a reason of this supreme will of God whereof wee speake let them know God so willeth because it is his good pleasure If that will not satisfie thee because I relate it heare the Apostle He hauing said Hee hath mercy on whom hee will and whom hee will hee hardeneth and thou replying Why then doth God yet complaine for who hath resisted his will But O man saith he who ari thâ—iâ— that replyest against God Whereupon St. Augustine saith Talibus dicamus cum Apostolo non enim melius illo 〈◊〉 possumus quid dicamus O homâ— tu quis es qui responde as Deo Quaerimus namque meritum obdurationis inuenimus Merito namque peccati vniuersa massa damnata est nec obdurat Deus impertiendo malitiam sed non impertiendo misericordiam Quaerimus autem meritum misericordiae non inuenimus quia nullum est ne gratia 〈◊〉 sâ—nâ—n gratis donatur sed meritis redditur To such replyers let vs say with the Apostle for we cannot finde what to say better O man who art thou that replyest against God for wee enquire for the merit of obduration and wee finde it For by the merit of sinne the whole masse is condemned nor doth God harden by inâ—using of malice but by not imparting of mercy But wee enquire for the merit of mercy and we find it not because it is not at all lest grace be made voide if it be not giuen of gratuity but rendred of dutie And to conclude this point with S. Augustine in a word â—onâ—icitur itaque gratiam Dei non secundum merita accipientium dari sed secundum placitum voluntatis eius in laudem gloriam ipsius gratiae eius vt qui gloriatur â—â—llo modo in seipso sed in Domino glorietur qui hominibus dat quibus vult quoniam misericors est quod si non det iustus est non dat quibus non vult vt notas faciat diuitias gloriae suae in vasa misericordiae Dando enim quibusdam quòd non merentur profectò gratuitam per hoc veram suam gratiam esse voluit Non omnibus dando quid omnes merentur ostendit Bonus in beneficio certorum iustus in suppliciâ— caeterorum We conclude therefore that the grace of God is giuen not according to the merits of the receiuers but according to the good pleasure of his will vnto the praise and glory of his grace that he that glorieth should by no means glory in himselfe but in the Lord which giueth to men to whom he will because he is mercifull which if hee doe not giue he is iust and he giueth not to whom he will not that hee may make knowne the riches of his glory vpon the vessels of mercy For by giuing to some that which they merit not it is that he would haue his grace to be free and so to be grace indeed And by not giuing to all he sheweth what all doe deserue So he is good in pardoning some iust in punishing the rest Like vnto a creditor who hauing sundry debtors deepely and indifferently engaged vnto him it is in his free power and choice which of them hee will freely acquite and of which hee will iustly require his owne Now to shut vp this point of the definition which is that whereon all the rest depends we finde in the Scriptures that there is no one part of the gracious
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 perceiueth not receiueth not this gift it is farre aboue out of his reach He may say Who shall fetch Christ from aboue that I may haue him within my reach What reach The Deuill had him within his reach when he carryed him vp to a high mountaine But thou wilt say God reacheth out Christ vnto thee in his Word The Word is neare thee True But where is thy hand to put forth to receiue him Thy hand must bee a liuely faith for to beleeue in Christ is to receiue him as Gods gift But faith also is the speciall gift of God Therefore saith the Apostle By grace are ye saued through faith and not of your selues it is the gift of God Now herein doth the glory of Gods grace shine forth and gloriously display it selfe that he hath not only in his rich mercy prouided vs the means of saluation making tender of it vnto vs in his Word but hee effectually also giueth it vnto vs giuing vs a minde and meanes to receiue it As St. Iohn saith Hee hath giuen vs a minde to know him that is true And Christ No man can come vnto mee except the Father which hath sent mee draw him And againe No man knoweth the Father but the Sonne and he to whom the Sonne will reueale him And Matth. 16. 17. Peter hauing confessed Christ to be the Sonne of the liuing God Christ answered him Blessed art thou Simon Bar-Iona for flesh and bloud hath not reuealed this vnto thee but my Father which is in Heauen As the Apostle also 1. Cor. 12. 3. No man can say that Iesus is Christ but by the holy Ghost that is No man can truly acknowledge him to be his Christ but by the holy Ghost Otherwise the very Deuill seeing his miracles feeling his power euen ouer them confessed saying I know who thou art the holy one of God and Thou art Christ the Sonne of God Yet the Deuill did not this by the holy Ghost nor was it by any power of Gods grace But herein stands that grace of God first in choosing vs freely of his meere loue and mercy not fore-seeing vs to be good but finding vs to be euill shut vp in vnbeleese that he might haue mercy vpon vs. Secondly not only in prouiding and offering meanes of grace but also in effectuall giuing and bestowing grace vpon all those whom he hath chosen giuing them grace to receiue grace that of his fulnesse we might all receiue and grace for grace as it followeth in the definition Now as God out of his meere loue grace and fauour did from all eternity elect and appoint a certaine number of men fallen in Adam vnto saluation So for the effecting of this his eternall purpose in time hee did also appoint the meanes whereby hee would bring those vnto the end of their saluation The meanes is twofold First the only absolute meanes which is Iesus Christ Secondly an inferiour and conditionall means whereby we are made capable to receiue Christ with all his benefits First then Christ is that only all-sufficient and absolute meanes whereby God would effectually worke saluation vnto vs vpon and to whom the eye of his grace principally and immediately reflecteth in his electing of vs. So Eph. 1. 4. He chose vs in him and Ephes. 3. 11. according to the eternall purpose which he purposed in Christ Iesus our Lord. Now there is no other name vnder Heauen giuen among men whereby we must be saued neyther is there saluation in any other And other foundation can no man lay than that which is laid Iesus Christ 1. Cor. 3. 11. Iesus Christ God-man is the Centre in whom all the lines of Gods loue and mercy to mankinde doe meete Thus are wee chosen in him before the foundation of the world Ephes. 1. 4. Thus are we blessed with all spirituall blessings in heauenly places in Christ ver 3. Thus are wee predestinated vnto the adoption of children by Iesus Christ vers ◠Thus hath God made vs accepted in the Beloued to wit Iesus Christ in whom the Father is well pleased vers 6. Thus haue we redemption through his bloud euen the forgiuenesse of sinnes according to the riches of his grace vers 7. Thus in the dispensation of the fulnesse of time God doth gather in one all things in Christ both which are in heauen and which are in earth euen In him vers 10. Thus in him we haue obtained an inheritance to which wee are predestinated vers 11. Thus in him beleeuing we are sealed with the holy Spirit of promise Now in that God did of his meere grace elect vs vnto saluation therein appeareth the wonderfull mercy and loue of God towards vs in that hee made choice of his owne Sonne to bee the onely soueraigne meanes of this our saluation therein appeareth also the infinite wisedome of God to seale vp and to reueale vnto vs his incomprehensible loue Thus is Christ called the power of God and the wisedome of God In him are hid all the treasures of Gods wisdome This is that deepnesse of the riches of the wisdome knowledge of God wherein the Apostles admiration was swallowed vp and where with the blessed Angels themselues were transported with rauishment Luke 2. 13 14. This wisedome of God in Christ God-man all the Deuils could not for all their subtilty comprehend neyther can all the wisedome of flesh and bloud conceiue it it is foolishnesse to the Gentile and a stumbling blocke to the Iow Who can conceiue that the Sonne of God could suffer and dye Yet this did Iesus Christ in that Hypostaticall vnion of his two natures Who can conceiue that a man should fully satisfie the iustice of God for the sinnes of the world And yet this did the man Iesus Christ that one Mediator betweene God and Man the Man Iesus Christ saith the Apostle 1. Tim. 2. 5. Nothing but the precious bloud of God could reconcile vs to God in appeasing his iustice towards vs nothing but the bloud of God could purchase for vs the fauour of God and eternall life So that in Iesus Christ is reuealed vnto vs 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the manifold wisedome of God as the Apostle speaketh Ephes. 3. 10. In him alone and none but him is the Father well pleased with vs. So is Christ the only soueraigne absolute meanes in whom as wee are elected so we are also saued Yet to the end that all the elect might be made effectually partakers of the loue and fauour of God in Christ the wisedome of God hath also ordained subordinate conditionall and ordinary meanes whereby we should receiue Christ for ours These meanes are the Word of God preached whereby faith is begotten in vs through the operation of Gods Spirit and the holy Sacraments administred whereby our faith in Christ is sealed and confirmed in vs. By this faith it is that we lay hold vpon Christ wherby he is made ours and we
in the state of grace hee is for all that faith of his a meere naturall man still And therefore that faith which they speake of going before iustification is not freed from the imputation of sin whereas that sauing faith whereof St. Augustine speaketh is that which doth actually not dispose vnto but possesse a man of the state of grace which is the verie state of iustification as we shall see in the due place hereafter Therefore Popish preparation vnto iustification is nothing else but meere Pelagianisme both Pelagians and Pontificians ioyntly holding that all workes done without or before iustification are no sins CHAP. III. The Catholicke faith touching preparation to iustification THe Romish faith concerning such preparatorie workes to iustification the Catholicke faith of Christs Church doth renounce and disclaime as hereticall and antichristian for these reasons First because the holy Scriptures teach no such thing but the cleane contrarie The Scriptures teach no merit of Congruitie they teach not that free will being stirred vp and helped by I wot not what first grace a man is thereby disposed to receiue iustification but the flat contrary Ioh. 1. 12. As many as receiue Christ and such are they as beleeue in him are made the Sonnes of God But doth not this grace come by some disposition in mans nature as by his free will assisted and so cooperating with the grace of God for the attaining of iustification No such thing For verse 13 Christ teacheth that those Sonnes of God are borne not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man but of God Where note a direct opposition betweene Gods grace and mans will in the worke of Regeneration or Iustification mans will being by a negatiue vtterly excluded from any copartnership with God Not of the will of man but of God So Titus 3. 5. Not by workes of righteousnesse which we haue done but according to his mercie he saued vs c. Where all humane workes going before Iustification all merits of congruitie are excluded from disposing a man to receiue iustification for not by the workes of righteousnesse which wee haue done but according to his mercie hee saueth vs. And Rom. 4. 5. To him that worketh not but beleeueth on him that iustifieth the vngodly his Faith is counted for righteousnesse Note God iustifieth the vngodly therefore not the righteous not the meritorious by Congruitie vnlesse vngodlinesse and sinne can merit iustification at Gods hand as St. Augustine said of Adams sinne Foelix culpa quâ— talem meruit Redemptorem It was a happie sinne that merited such a Redeemer Whereas besides some places of Scripture which they peruert to their purpose they obiect the examples of the Eunuch Acts 8. and of Cornelius Acts 10. by which they would proue their workes of Congruitie as Vega alledgeth them Vega may remember what he said in another place before where hee produceth St. Augustines authoritie to proue that these two were true beleeuers before the Apostles came and preached vnto them which also Vega himselfe subscribeth vnto confessing that these two had grace and faith before sauing onely the difference is in the acception of grace and faith wherein the Pontifician egregiously equiuocateth the true nature whereof wee shall hereafter discouer But say that neither the Eunuch nor Cornelius before they were instructed by the Apostles had the grace of iustification doth it therefore follow that those workes of theirs did by Congruity merit iustification at Gods hands or that they were thereby prepared to iustification Why did not then Esau's teares merit the blessing ex congruo or why did not Ahab's repentance merit by Congruity not onely a repriuall of punishment but an absolute pardon of his sinne for they did quantum in se fuit as much as in them lay Or else according to Romes doctrine God must be vniust or at least wanting in his natiue goodnesse For further cleering of this point come we to the ancient Fathers to whom also this doctrine of merit of Congruity and of Condignity was altogether vnknowne This Vega himselfe is forced to confesse where making this obiection Why did the Fathers saith hee no where vse this distinction of merit of Congruity and Condignity to which he answereth If all things which neuer were in vse among the Fathers are to be condemned we shall be forced to condemne many things which all Catholickes now receiue And the Philosopher should haue said in vaine Scientias fieri per additamenta that Sciences are brought to passe by addition But he addeth Neither are we to grant that this distinction of merit of Congruity and Condignity was altogether vnknowne to the Fathers They acknowledged the things although they vsed not the termes saith Vega seâ—ing they diuersly vsed the word of Merit as either strictly or largely whereof we shall speake more largely hereafter In the meane time let vs see what workes of preparation the ancient Fathers taught or inioyned as necessarie to dispose a man to iustification by way of merit taken in the largest sense as Vega at least would haue it But before we come to set downe the ancient doctrine of the Church concerning this point I must premonish the Reader seriously to note this one thing in the Fathers That when they speake of grace and faith whereby a man is iustified they meane nothing else but sauing grace and iustifying faith not now preparing a man vnto but actually placing and possessing him in the state of iustification and saluation They meane nothing lesse than any such first grace preparatory and euen common to wicked men which neuer come to partake of the second grace as the Romanists doe teach The Fathers admit of no such meane betweene sauing grace and faith and betweene sauing faith and iustification betweene any first second grace as differing in kinde but vnderstand one sauing effectuall grace Indeede St. Augustine speaketh of a first and second grace but by the first he meaneth that of iustification by the second that of sanctification differing no more but as the roote and the branch the tree and the fruit Or St. Augustine acknowledgeth no other first grace but that which is giuen to the elect in this life saying Coronat in nobis Deus dona misericordiae suae sed si in ea gratia quam primam accepimus perseueranter ambulemus God crowneth the gifts of his mercie in vs but if in that first grace which we haue receiued we walke with perseuerance Ambrose saith He that dare preach that the grace of God is giuen according to mens merits preacheth against the Catholike faith Therefore this doctrine of merit of congruity was no Catholicke doctrine in Saint Ambrose his dayes nor doth he meane any other grace but that of iustification All the preparation this holy man alloweth is where he saith Duce Deo venitur ad Deum by God leading vs we come vnto God And St.
thine owne workes to robbe God of his glorie and thy selfe of all grace puffing vp thy selfe with pride in steade thereof But leaue we these puddles of errour and come we to the Chryst all fountaines of Christs truth CHAP. VII The Catholike Faith of the Doctrine of Faith as the sole immediate Instrument to apprehend and apply the righteousnesse of Christ imputed to vs to our Iustification as beeing the effectuall meane of our vnion with him HAuing seene what credit Faith carryeth among the Pontificians in the work of Iustification which at the best is allowed no more but eyther to dispose and make a man the more apt that also with the helpe of other disposing graces to receiue Iustification which notwithstanding for all his Faith he may faile and come short of or else to come in for a share but must be content with the least share or none at all among other graces as Charity Penance Martyrdome and such like all which take place of Faith in Iustification Let vs now come to take an estimate of Faith according to the standard of Catholike Doctrine weighing it in the most vnpartiall ballance of the Sanctuary Nor doe we purpose in this place to speake particularly and punctually of the propertie and kinde of Faith whereby a man is said to be iustified as referring that to the more proper place but wee will content our selues so to speake of faith here in generall as the only immediate instrumentall cause in vs whereby we come to bee made righteous in the sight of God For as our Iustification is by the Imputation of Christ and his righteousnesse vnto vs so the only instrumentall meane comming betweene to apply and effectually to worke this imputation of Christ to vs is the act of beleeuing which is the property of Faith As Augustine saith Fidelis est à fide fides à credendo A beleeuer hath his name of Faith and Faith of beleeuing As the Apostle saith With the heart man beleeueth to righteousnesse Faith is the hand of the soule which applyes the sacrifice of Christ for sinne It is the hand that puts on the Robe of the righteousnesse of Christ our elder brother vpon vs by the sweete smell whereof God being well pleased bestoweth the blessing of heauen and earth vpon vs of grace and glorie and all Yea faith hath another singular propertie that it is as it were the ligament or sinew which fasteneth and vniteth euery faithfull member to the head Christ Iesus from the influence of whose fulnesse we receiue and grace for grace And the Councell of Trent seemeth to professe as much though with limitation and restriction to her owne reserued sense saying Nam sides nisi ad eam spes accedat charitas neque vnit perfectè cum Christo neque corporis eius viuum membrum efficit For Faith say they vnlesse hope and charitie bee added vnto it doth neither perfectly vnite with Christ nor make a liuing member of his body The Councell neede not here equiuocate for the matter as if she did admit of our spirituall vnion with Christ by Faith indeed but such a Faith as hath hope and charitie ioyned with it whereas in truth her meaning is that not Faith so much as Hope and Charitie doe vnite vs to Christ sith Hope and Charitie make the vnion perfect which faith doth not Yea Charity and Penance as her intimous Vega saith doe more closely vnite vs to Christ than Faith doth But we shall discusse and discouer this mysterie more cleerely when we come to speak of the kinde of Faith required in Iustification In the mean time suffice it vs that we haue the Councels confession That Faith at least with the helpe of Hope and Charitie doth vnite vs to Christ. And though Vega preferre Charitie and Penance before Faith in this worke of vniting with Christ yet thereby hee doth not altogether exclude Faith Faith therefore according to the Pontificians confession hath at least a share though the least according to their allowance in working our vnion with Christ. But the Catholicke beliefe ascribeth this worke of vnion with Christ primarily yea and solely to Faith namely as the immediate and onely instrument of Gods spirit in vs. Now our iustification by the imputation of Christs righteousnesse stands in our vnion with Christ. This is confessed of all That whatsoeuer we receiue from Christ it is by vertue of our mysticall vnion with him And faith it is that worketh this vnion not Faith as Pontificians teach before it bee formed by Charity To which Faith only Vega ascribeth a certaine vnion with Christ Comparamus enim nobis Spiritum sanctum iustitiam facimusque vt Christus inhabitet in nobis per Fidem informem aut saltem per fidem vt prius est natura quà m formetur For saith he wee get vnto our selues the holy Ghost and righteousnesse and doe cause Christ to dwell in vs by Faith vnformed or at least by Faith as it is by nature before it bee formed So that by this doctrine a dead Faith or that which differeth not from the Faith of Diuels doth cause our vnion with Christ or Christ to dwell in vs. But let vs see how Vega cleereth this doctrine from this imputation A little after in his second question of faith and workes taking vpon him as he is very venterous to answer an argument brought to proue that Paul excludes no beleeuer from saluation where he saith The righteousnesse of God by the Faith of Iesus Christ vnto all and vpon all that beleeue To this place saith Vega many commonly say that Paul said not Vnto all and vpon all that beleeue him but in him which is onely proper to those that haue charitie and by loue tend vnto him Aliud enim inquiunt est credere Deo quod est ei fidem adhibere aliud credere Deum quod est credere Deum esse aliud credere in Deum quod est credendo amare credendo diligere credendo in eum ire eius membris incorporari For it is one thing say they to beleeue God that is to giue credit vnto him another thing to beleeue God that is to beleeue that God is and another to beleeue in God that is by beleeuing to loue him by beleeuing to affect him by beleeuing to goe into him and to bee incorporate into his members They are the words of St. Augustine vsed by him very frequently throughout his workes and by name in his nine and twentieth Tract vpon Iohn which Vega quoteth Well how doth Vega auoyde this Argument concerning Faith in Christ bringing saluation vpon all that beleeue Nihil valet hoc refugium commune Non enim habetur grace â—i neque in eum sed absolute dicitur In omnes super omnes qui credunt This common refuge saith hee is nothing worth For it is said absolutely Vnto all and vpon all that beleeue the Greeke hath not him or in him Note
circumcised to whom circumcision was a signe of regeneration and of Gods Couenant of grace and a seale of faith and Esay puts himselfe in the number Was Esay now vnregenerate And in the name of himselfe and the whole Church of the Iewes hee renounceth all inherent righteousnesse as filthy rags in no sort to bee patched and pieced to that garment of saluation to that robe of righteousnesse namely Christs righteousnesse imputed and put vpon vs by the hand of faith wherein Esay and all the faithfull reioyce as hee saith Esa. 61. 10. I will greatly reioyce in the Lord my soule shall be ioyfull in my God for he hath clothed me with the garments of saluation he hath couered me with the robe of righteousnesse as a Bridegroome decketh himselfe with ornaments and as a Bride adorneth her selfe with her Iewels And in the 43. of Esay vers 25. 26. there is a flat opposition betweene Gods mercy and our workes in iustification I euen I am hee that blotteth out thy transgressions for mine owne sake and will not remember thy sins But may not our workes come in as sharers with Gods mercies What workes The Prophet addeth in Gods person Put me in remembrance let vs pleade together declare thou that thou mayst be iustified If God pleade with vs in iudgement we haue no euidence of any workes in vs whereby to be iustified in his sight But our workes and obedience to Gods lawes are called our righteousnesse As Matth. 5. 20. Except your righteousnesse exceede the righteousnesse of the Scribes and Pharisees yee cannot enter into the Kingdome of God I answer this place may well be vnderstood of Euangelicall righteousnesse opposite to that legall righteousnesse of the Scribes and Pharisees and so Christ points vs to the righteousnesse of faith in him But admit our workes be called our righteousnesse what then doth it follow that this is our righteousnesse to iustifie vs in the sight of God Nothing lesse For Moses saith speaking of obedience to Gods commandements Deut. 9. Speake not thou in thy heart after that thou art come to possesse that good Land saying For my righteousnesse the Lord hath brought me in to possesse this Land No saith Moses vnderstand that the Lord thy God giueth thee not this good Land to possesse it for thy righteousnesse Now the Land of Canaan was a type of Gods Kingdome which wee cannot come to possesse by our own inherent righteousnesse Whereupon St Ambrose in his enarration vpon the 43. Psalme but according to our accompt 44. v. 3. They got not the Land in possession by their owne sword c. saith Patres nostri vtpote proximi haredes Patriarcharum plantati in terra repromissionis non suis â—oâ— meritis vindicabant Our fathers to wit the next successours and heires of the Patriarches beeing planted in the Land of promise did not claime this as due to their merits Ideo nec Moses eos induxit ne Legis hoc existimetur esse sed gratiâ— Lex enim merita examinat gratia fidem spectat Therefore saith he neither did Moses bring them in thither that it might not be reckoned as the worke of the Law but of Grace for the Law examineth workes or merits but Grace respecteth faith Therefore as not Moses but Iosua or Iesus for so was his Name was appointed to bring the children of Israel into the possession of Canaan the Land of promise which importeth also the Land of mercy or of grace So not the Law giuen by Moses but Iesus Christ by whom came grace and truth hee our true Ioshua bringeth his people into the possession of grace and glory Ergo qui non in brachio suo hoc est in sua operatione praesumit sed in Dei gratia credens quod non facta sua vnumquemque iustificant sed fides prompta dicit Domino Tu es ipse Rex meus Deus meus qui mandas salutes Iacob Therefore saith holy Ambrose he that presumeth not in his owne arme that is in his workes but in the grace of God beleeuing that not a mans workes but his prompt and cleare faith doth iustifie him this man saith vnto the Lord Thou art my King and my God that commandest saluation for Iacob True it is that the same Father in another place saith Sola fides non sufficit operari per dilectionem c. Sole faith is not sufficient it is necessary that faith worke by loue and conuerse worthy of God And a little after Festinemus c. Let vs hasten to enter into that rest because faith is not sufficient but a life beseeming faith must be added and great care vsed that faith bee not idle For it is necessary for euery one that would possesse Heauen to adorne his faith with good workes So he True a most pious and Christian speech but in all this he saith not that faith alone is not sufficient to iustifie vs in the sight of God and so to bring vs to the possession of Heauen for then hee should contradict himselfe elsewhere where hee saith Sublatis omnibus operibus legis sola fides posita est ad salutem All the workes of the law being remoued onely faith takes place in our saluation Marke he saith Sola fides onely faith And againe the same Father saith elsewhere Non operibus iustificamur sed fidâ— quoniam carnalis infirmitas operibus impedimento est sed fidei claritas factorum obumbrat errorem quae meretur veniam delictorum We are not iustified saith he by workes but by faith because the infirmity of the flesh is an impediment to workes but the glory of faith doth couer the errour of our workes which faith obtaineth remission of sinnes And againe Infirmitas excludit à venia fides excusat à culpa Our infirmity excludeth vs from pardon and faith excuseth vs from blame And setting downe his peremptory iudgement grounded vpon Scripture he saith Arbitramur secundum Apostolum iustificari hominem per fidem sine operibus legis Iustificetur ergo ex fide Dauid qui per legem peccatum agnouit sed peccati veniam ex fide credidit Wee definitiuely conclude saith hee according to the Apostle that a man is iustified by faith without the workes of the law Therefore let Dauid be iustified by faith who by the law acknowledged his sinne and by faith beleeued the pardon of his sinne And againe elsewhere Deus clementia bonitatis suae semper homini procurans vt quod sine lege peccatum erat in lege posset deleri hoc decreuit vt solam fidem poneret per quam omnium peccata abolerentur That is God by the clemency of his goodnesse alwayes prouiding for man that both sinne committed without law and in the law might be blotted out hath made this decree to appoint sole faith whereby all mens sinnes might be abolished Now compare these iudicious sayings of this holy man with that hee said
thy self-loue the loue of yaine glory the loue of thine own felicity more than of the glory of God a thousand secret corruptions lurking in the secret corners of thy selfe-deceiuing heart Nay besides this thou canst not number vp so many good dueties which thou hast done as this all-seeing Iudge can number and set before thee greater and weightier duties which thou hast altogether omitted And more than that too this Iudge can muster vp vnto thee whole Legioâ—s of sins which thou hast committed the least whereof all the men in the world with all their merits their arrogant works of supererogation the fained treasure of the Church with Masses and Dirges and whatsoeuer else man or Angel can deuise cannot possibly appease the wrath and satisfie the iustice of this Iudge for For if all the Creatures in the world could satisfie Gods iustice for one sinne wherefore dyed the innocent Lambe and the only Sonne of God Well thâ—n in this case what wilt thou doe whither wilt thou flye where wilt thou seeke reliefe for thy perplexed spirit where comfort for thine appalled conscience where a sanctuary for thy soule now pursued with the hue and cry of diuiâ—â— iustice and reuenge of hell and Satan of the guilt of thy tormenting conscience for sinne Thy good workes and merits They cry guilty before Gods throne of many imperfections defects corruptions If thy actuall transgressions which are many if thy totall omissions of dueties which thou oughtest to haue done should bee silent yet euen thy best actions which thou bringest to pleade for thee would and must tell the truth and become a full grand Iurie to bring-in the verdict of thy condemnation And then thou shalt be found such as the Gospell hath doomed who pleading their great workes before the Iudge receiued this sentence I know you not depart from mee yee workers of iniquitie Dost thou not thinke it safest now to bee of thy Brother or thy Father Bellarmines minde who howsoeuer as a member of the Papall State he writ mainely against the truth of iustification yet one time speaking his conscience and vttering his priuate iudgement said Propter incertitudinem propriae iustitiae periculum inanis gloriae tutissimum est fiduciam in sola Dei misericordia benignitate reponere Because of the vncertainty of our owne righteousnesse and the perill of vaine glory it is most safe to repose our confidence in the only mercy and fauour of God Only herein be vnlike this Brother or Father of thine For this sentence of his standing in his workes shall rise vp in iudgement against him at the latter day for all his lyes spoken through hypocrisie but let it teach thee so to renounce all thy supposed merits as reposing thy selfe in the only mercies of God and merits of Christ thou mayst flying from Babylon finde mercy and saluation in the great day of the Lord Iesus Let me hereunto adde a passage or two one out of Augustine his Manual which Booke though it bee fathered vpon some other Author yet the chiefe matter of it is confessed to bee collected out of Augustines Workes In omnibus aduersitatibus non inâ—eniâ— tâ—m efficax remedium quà m vulner a Christi in illis dormio securâ—s requiesco intrepidus Christus mortuus esh pro nobis Nihil tam ad mortem amarum quod morte Christi non sanetâ—r Tâ—ta spes mea est in morte Domini mei Mors eius meritum meum refugium meum sâ—luâ— vita resurrectio mea meritum meum miseratio Domini Non sum meriti inops quamdiâ— ille miserationum Dominus non defuerit Et misericordiae Domini multâ— multus ego sum in meritis Quanto ille potentior est ad saluandum tanto ego securier Peccaut peccatum grande multorum sum mihi conscius delictorum nec sic despero quia vbi abundauâ—runt delicta superabundauit gratia In all aduersities saith hee I find not a more effectuall remedy than the wounds of Christ in them I sleepe securely in them I rest without feare Christ dyed for vs. There is nothing in death so bitter which cannot be cured with the death of Christ. All my hope is in the death of my Lord. His death is my demerit my refuge my saluation life and resurrection my merit is the Lords mercy I want no merit so long as the Lord of mercies is not wanting And while the Lord is rich in mercies I am rich in merits The more able he is to saue the more am I secure I haue committed some haynous sin and am guilty of many trespasses yet I despaire not because where sins haue abounded there grace hath also superabounded And in the 23. Chapter Inter brachia Saluatoris mei viuere volo mori â—upio Betweene the armes of my Sauiour it is both my will to liue and my wish to dye Another passage to this purpose I finde in Gregory in the conclusion of that singular worke of his Morals where speaking of mans good workes and good intentions concludeth thus Si de his diuinitus districtè disâ—ntimur quis inter ista remanet salutis locus quando mala nostra pura mala sunt bona quae nos habere credimus pura bona esse nequaquam possunt If saith he we be strictly-sifted by God concerning these things what place would bee left for saluation in them seeing that both our euill actions are simply euill and the good things which we beleeue we haue cannot be simply good Which place of Gregory beeing alledged by Luther to proue none can bee certaine that hee doth not alwaies mortally sinne although Iohn Bishop of Rochester would haue Gregory to meane not all workes but only such as we vainely boast of as Sixtus Senensis relateth Yet Gregories meaning is easily discouered by the title or contents prefixed to the said Chapter in these words Quod Sâ—nctus Grâ—gorius in his quae iam recta intentione protulit vanae gloriae vel laudis humanae fauorem subrepsisse sibi formidat pro recompensatione operis postâ—lat orationem loctoris that is That St. Gregory in those things which he did with a right intention feareth lest some affectation of vaine glory or humane applause might haue crept in vpon him and for a recompence of his worke desireth the Readers prayers And it is plaine also by the whole tenure of that Chapter that Gregory durst not trust his best workes vpon the tryall of Gods strict iudgement seeing that a mans best intentions are subiect to bee tainted with secret pride and vaine glory And the said Bishop of Rochester may seeme too sharpe in his censure the sequell whereof tends to a flat condemnation of Gregories best intentions as if he had beene directly conscious of pride in them whereas Gregory onely feareth least some such corruption might haue secretly stollen in vpon him And to confirme this and put it out of all
heart after other gods and his heart was not perfect with the Lord his God as was the heart of Dauid his father And in the 6. vers Salomon did euill in the sight of the Lord and went not fully after the Lord as did Dauid his father Whence note first that it is said When Salomon was old Indeede old age when it comes to dotage is dangerous and very slippery but to dote vpon women yea many women wiues and concubines so many hundred of them and those also strange women of a strange Religion alas poore old Salomon how were his affections distracted and his thoughts euen pulled asunder as it were by so many Furies as there were fancies in his womens heads Well by this meanes the byas of his affections wheeling about his women as so many Mistresses caused his heart to decline from his direct course tending towards the maine marke which was God But this declination it was no flat Apostacy for now the worst was that he went not fully after the Lord his God his heart was not perfect with the Lord his God as was the heart of Dauid his father His former single heart began now to double his vpright heart began now in victa aetate in his verging or stooping old age to grow crooked Yet for all this he kept him vpon his feete he still stood in the state of grace although with much staggering and though his left foote failed him yet his right foote remained firme though the left foote of his affection went after his strange women and so was drawne with them after their strange gods yet he had the right foot of his affection vpright to God-wards Which I speake not to excuse or mitigate his sinne for it was most fearefull and lamentable and to bee bewayled with sad repentance and a floud of teares But taking Gods Word for my warrant I affirme that though Salomons fall was fearfull yet it was not totall his heart had not quite forsaken his God Againe as Salomons fall was not totall so neyther was it finall For we haue his Ecclesiastes as an eternall monument of his intire repentance and conuersion from vanity to God And as an infallible token of a true penitent he stiles himselfe the Preacher He layes aside his royall Crowne diuests himselfe of all his Princely titles and ornaments and in stead thereof takes on him the humble but holy stile of a Preacher not onely to preach repentance vnto others but to perswade them by the strongest argument of his owne practice and the best euidence of his owne experience And the Wisedome of God shewes it selfe admirable in making choice of Salomon to be the Pen-man of that excellent Book of Ecclesiastes euery line whereof hee that runnes may reade in the face of wise Salomons owne experience in which mirrour euery naturall man may cleerly see his owne full proportion Salomon had no more strange wiues and concubines than the world hath minions of strange vanities which euery carnall man according to the variety of his fancy as his Idoll-Goddesse adoreth Now God in his mercy willing to admonish the vaine world and to reclaime vaine men from their sundry Idol-pleasures and withall the more strongly to allure them in his wisdome makes speciall choice of Salomon to be his Preacher Why so Salomon was the wisest man that euer was from the first Adam before the second Adam Christ and so of all men in the world could giue the exactest iudgement and truest censure of the nature of all things vnder the Sun Besides his incomparable wisdome he had a most aboundant experimentall knowledge of all earthly things whatsoeuer might seeme excellent in the eye and iudgement of flesh and bloud yea hee was most industrious and studious eagerly searching into the depth and height and all the dimensions of worldly excellency till I might see saith he what was that good for the sonnes of men which they should doe vnder the Heauen all the dayes of their life Wouldst thou then know thou worlds doting Louer what the true nature of the world and of all that is in the world as the lust of the flesh the lust of the eye and the pride of life is Hearken to the Preacher yea aske Salomon the wisest of men Aske him in any kinde he will resolue thee as he did the Queene of Sheba and other Princes that came to heare his wisedome whom he resolued in all their questions Trauaile not to any of the Philosophers to enquire of them wherein thy Summum bonum consisteth for when they haue told thee all they can thou wilt come as farre short of giuing them credit as they will doe in giuing thee true counsell If they tell thee that riches pleasures and honours are all vaine things and no felicity to be found in them thou wilt but laugh at them as men at least experimentally ignorant of the nature of those things whereof they neuer had the vse and possession Aske Diogenes of honour hee prefers his Tubbe before Great Alexanders Triumphes and tramples on Plato's pompous pride with a greater pride of pouerty And in a word thou wilt answer them all with ignoti nulla cupido they therefore despise these thing because they neuer tasted the sweetnesse that is in them at least in the worlds apprehension But come to Salomon who not onely knew the nature of these things better than all those Heathen wise men but also made it his study yea and his practice too to know them by an infallible experience and his iudgement will be found to bee aboue all exception And what is his iudgement of all these things what profit or what pleasure or what contentment found he in any or in all of them This is his definitiue sentence of them All is vanity and vexation of spirit Thou hadst better farre to beleeue him than goe about to trye Hee stands as a Sea-marke to warâ—e all wordly Merchants yea the greatest Princes and Potentates of the earth to beware of those Rockes and Sheâ—â—eâ— and Syrtes whereon himselfe suffered wofull shipwracke But yet if vnheedily thou hast fallen vpon the same Rockes behold also Salomon standing as an example of penitency to all men For as hee teacheth all men to eschue the deceiptfull pleasures profits and preferments of the world so he iâ—â—â—teth them to follow with him the true and souereigne good concluding his Booke thus Let vs heare the end of all Feare God and keepe his Commandements for this is whole man for God will bring euery worke to iudgement with euery secret thing whether it be good or euill A noble precedent of a penitent soule not onely to repent himselfe but to become a royall Preacher of repentance to others So did his father Dauid Psal. 51. where repenting of his sinne and hauing pleaded for Gods mercy and fauour to the â—a vers then as a speciall fruit of his reconciliation with God hee saith Then will I teach transgressors
cannot be saued Yes say these selfe-wise carnall Vniuersalists if we were but in as much hope of Gods fauour as wee may be of a prize in a Lottery we would hazzard all we haue skin for skin and all to saue our life Yea or if it were in our owne power so to vse the meanes prescribed and the conditions imposed as that thereby we might be saued notwithstanding wee knew that God had determined to saue but a few of many wee should bee willing to vse our best endeauour in hope of the Kings fauour But the case betweene God and man is otherwise We are indeede all of vs fallen into a Premunire and haue forfeited our whole estates liues and liberties for our Rebellion But we heare that though the King of his speciall grace haue purposed to pardon and to preferre a certaine small number in comparison of the rest but withall that this pardon must be procured by such meanes as no one of all his subiects is in himselfe of ability and power to vse and put in practice vnlesse the King also giue vnto him a speciall strength to doe that which the King requireth therefore what should I trouble my selfe for the matter I know the worst of it and seeing it is not in my power to helpe my selfe let the King doe what he will If I be one of those whom he hath purposed to pardon what should I need to take care any further But if not what neede I bestow labour in vaine Yea but withall obserue though the grace and the meanes and the power of right vsing the meanes be of the King because he will haue all the glory of working that which all mans strength and wit could neuer haue accomplished yet the King to his former decree hath added another clause that notwithstanding the Kings purpose and decree which may not be altered notwithstanding the right vse of the meanes of procuring his pardon depend vpon him alone yet the King hath peremptorily commanded all his subiects none excepted that if any shall dare to contemne or neglect those meanes which hee hath prescribed for the good of those whom they chiefly concerne that man shall not onely not be pardoned for his former rebellion but bee bound ouer to a further condemnation to suffer greater torments and tortures than otherwise he should haue done Tell mee now in this case what subiect would be so foolehardy as openly to contemne and reiect the commandement of the King and not rather to doe the best that lyeth in him to obserue those things which he commandeth seeing that of endeauour may come much good but of contempt certaine condemnation Euen thus stands the case betweene God and vs we haue all sinned and forfeited our estates with God He of his mercy hath purposed to saue a certaine number of vs condemned persons he hath withall prescribed the meanes whereby he will saue that speciall number yet the meanes are such as though in their owne nature they bee gentle and easie for Christs yoake is easie and his burthen light yet in regard of our impotency it is in Gods power onely to enable vs to vse the meanes aright Now though God giue his speciall grace strength to none but those whom he hath appointed to saue yet for as much as we are ignorant who those be whom he hath ordained to saue and euery man may as well thinke himselfe to bee of the number as any other and seeing though hee cannot of himselfe so much as will that which is truly good but God worketh in vs both to will to do euen of his good pleasure yet because God hath commanded all men indifferently to receiue and entertaine his commandements and conditions which wilfully to refuse despise and oppugne heapeth vpon a man further condemnation which was the miserable case of Corasin Bethsaida and Ierusalem with her contemning oppugning Iewes and because God hath reserued this secret number to himselfe both how many they be and who they be whom he hath purposed to saue none knowing himselfe to be of the number till hee be actually and effectually called and haue receiued the white stone the marke of his election with the new name of the Sonne of God in it which no man knoweth but he that hath it nor any being so wicked but he may proue to be one of the number of Gods elect and so to be effectually called in due time and because for any man to iudge himselfe while he liueth in this world to bee of the number of the reprobate is a desperate iudgement yea a preiudice of Gods purpose and grace and a rash presumption as daring to prye into Gods secrets and to determine that as certaine which God hath left vncertaine therefore for a man to cauill at this truth of God and thereupon to frame friuolous and foolish unreasonable reasons to resist and contemne Gods ordinance what is it but to heape vpon himselfe greater and greater condemnation God will not in the meane time haue his truth dissembled his glory diminished his mercy despised and his iustice disparaged Let no man dare to say Why doth he yet complaine Who art thou vaine man that pleadest against God take thou heede thou giuest not God further occasion to complaine of thee Shall thy politicke or rather braine-sicke reasons be wiser than Gods wisedome God hath willed it so And his will is aboue all humane reason And Gods will is nothing but diuine reason yea wisedome it selfe But yet as a man to answer thy reasons with reasons Thou deniest the certainty of election at least thou wouldst not haue it published and preached Why What 's thy reason for it Because it makes men carelesse of the meanes It is false it is not Gods good will and pleasure which he hath published but it is thine owne peruerse and corrupt will that makes thee carelesse and contemptuous But by this reason of thine which thou canst sub-diuide into manie branches but all growing from the same carnall roote to satisfie thine owne foolish reason in desiring to haue this glorious truth of God dissembled or suppressed thou wouldst destroy two precious things infinitely more deare than a thousand worlds The first is the glory of God which is so nothing much manifested as in this act of his concerning his good pleasure in the disposing of mankind It is that summary doctrine of Gods glory So that to suppresse or supplant this truth is to strip God of his excellent glory It is the saying of a iudicious and learned Diuine Viciatur adulteratur Religio simulac minimum aliquid detrahitur ex Dei gloria Religion comes then to be corrupted and adulterated when once Gods glory suffereth the least detriment or diminution No say they wee doe not take away Gods glory for we acknowledge his preuenting grace Iust so did those aduersaries in Augustines time with whom he had to deale of whom he saith A Pelagianoru◠porrò haeretica
conclusion he saith peremptorily Non fides sed poenitentiâ— primas partes tenet in reconciliatione peccatoris Not faith but penance hath the chiefe place in the reconciliation of a sinner For saith hee Penance is the immediate cause or immediate disposition and as it seemeth sufficient with Gods grace to our iustification yea it perfecteth and consummateth our iustification But Faith is not such a neer disposition to iustification and it remaineth in sinners and our iustification is but as it were initiated by it It is euident therefore that the most potent cause of our iustification is penance and therefore that we are iustified it is to be imputed to it and not to faith So he Nay such is the Pontifician hatred against Faith that Vega Trents Interpreter denyes euen Faith that is formed by grace and charity as they say to bee sufficient to iustification As he saith Quamuis eo ipso quod aliquis per fidem iustificetur fiat fides illius formata tamen non sequitur quod per eam vt formatam acquiratur iustitia Et ideo neque debent loca quae â—ribuunt iustitiam fidei restringi ad fidem formatam Although a mans iustification by Faith implyeth that his Faith is formed to wit a true Faith yet it followeth not that by it as it is formed righteousnesse is obtained And therefore neyther those places which attribute righteousnesse to Faith ought to bee restrained to true Faith or Faith that is formed Such a hard conceit haue the Pontificians of Faith formed or vnformed But now forasmuch as the Scriptures doe euery where ascribe so much to faith in the point of iustification how doe they answer the Scriptures in this point Surely Vega according to his rare dexteritie vndertakes that taske too c produceth fiue reasons why the Apostle hath done most prudently oftner to attribute iustification to faith than to any other vertue The first is Because faith is the foundation and fountaine the prime cause and roote of our saluation which saith he St. Augustine hath shewed in his Booke of the Predestination of Saints alledging Cornelius for an example whose Prayer and Ames-deeds were done in faith that by them saith Vega he might be brought to the Faith of Christ. Now note here I pray you a notable tricke of legier-demain in this Tridentine Champion who was of one spirit with that Councell For doth he giue these titles to faith calling it with the Councell the fountaine and foundation the roote and originall of our saluation for any good will hee beares faith or that herein he preferres it before other graces Nothing lesse For a little before hee had giuen faith such a blow and that with Aristotles philosophicall fist as that hee hath made this very foundation to stagger againe Plus enim quam omniâ— c. For saith he this is of more weight than all that are brought for the commendation of faith towards God that we are more straitly vnited to him by our louing of him and by sorrow for offending of him and a purpose to our vtmost endeauour to please him for the time to come then we are vnited by faith Which being the formost in our iustification it comes hindmost and furthest off from perfection according to that axiome in Philosophy Priora generatione posteriora perfectione The first in generation the last in perfection But passe wee to his second reason which is much like the former Because saith he all our workes which concurre to iustification haue their meritorious force from faith and faith from none else besides Thirdly Therefore is our saluation fitly attributed to faith because there is no stronger cause to moue a sinner to those things which on his part are requisite to his iustification Fourthly It was conuenient that the Apostles in their Epistles and Sermons should commonly impute and attribute our iustification vnto faith Indeede Vega's copie hath sanctification haply mis-printed sauing that they confound iustification and sanctification together But why so commonly impute iustification to Faith namely because forsooth the Apostles had to doe with sundry sects and therefore were so to attemper their exhortations as to draw them from their sect to the Christian Faith Nor is it lawfull saith Vega hence to inferre that there are no other things better than those which are more often commended So by this reason we are to vnderstand that the doctrine of iustification by Faith so often commended and preached by the Apostles in their Epistles was not therefore so much and so often pressed and preached as if it were the best doctrine but that other doctrines according to Vega's estimate might be better but as if the Apostles only temporized with those times and persons with whom they had to doe As if it appertained not to all Abrahams seede by promise to whose Faith righteousnesse was imputed nor was it written saith the Apostle for him onely that it was imputed to him but for vs also to whom it shall be imputed if we beleeue on him that raised vp Iesus our Lord from the dead Therefore it is by Faith that it might bee by grace to the end the promise might bee sure to all the seede both Iewes and Gentiles which walke in the steps of that Faith of our Father Abraham O Vega be not so impiously iniurious yea sacrilegious to rob vs of the inheritance of our Faith vnder a colour as if iustification by Faith had beene a temporary purchase and merchandize for those Apostolicall times and as if now the intaile were quite cut off from Abrahams race Or if yee Pontificians will bee such malignant enemies to iustifying Faith whereby Abraham and all his seede are and shall bee iustified to the worlds end then confesse your selues to bee quite cut off from being Abrahams seede His fift reason why iustification is most commonly ascribed to faith is because Faith is that only disposition to which among all our workes it might principally bee attributed without perill of our pride and the iniurie and derogation of Gods grace For seeing faith is the gift of God and a kinde of testimony of Gods grace towards vs in as much as it is attributed to our faith it is attributed to the grace and mercy of God and not to our strength that no flesh shall glory in his presence But why then Vega do you teach the doctrine of iustification another way and the onely way to puffe men vp with pride and so to empty them of all grace As Bernard saith Non est quo gratia intret vbi iam meritum occupauit Grace findes no way to enter where merit hath already taken vp the roome And againe Deest gratiae quicquid meritis deputas That is detracted from grace whatsoeuer is imputed to merits Dost thou commend the admirable wisedome of God in teaching man to ascribe the iustification of Faith to the mercy and glory of God and yet dost thou adde iustification of