Selected quad for the lemma: mercy_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
mercy_n	good_a	grace_n	work_n	6,662	5	5.6625	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A11516	The historie of the Councel of Trent Conteining eight bookes. In which (besides the ordinarie actes of the Councell) are declared many notable occurrences, which happened in Christendome, during the space of fourtie yeeres and more. And, particularly, the practises of the Court of Rome, to hinder the reformation of their errors, and to maintaine their greatnesse. Written in Italian by Pietro Soaue Polano, and faithfully translated into English by Nathanael Brent.; Historia del Concilio tridentino. English	Sarpi, Paolo, 1552-1623.; Brent, Nathaniel, Sir, 1573?-1652.	1629 (1629)	STC 21762; ESTC S116697	1,096,909	905

the people when the Friars and Pardoners had authoritie to preach against their wills It is well knowen that the innouation in Germany sprang from the Sermons of Fryar Iohn Techel and of Friar Martin Luther among the Suisses from the Sermons of Friar Samson of Milan And the residing Bishop was able to doe nothing but fight with disaduantage against these who were armed with priuiledges The Bishop is not able to make the Clergie liue honestly for that besides the generall exemption of all the Regulars euery Chapter hath one and there bee few particular Priests that want it The Bishop cannot prouide that fit men bee promoted to that charge for the licences to promote and the faculties which the titular Bishops enioy who suffer him not to vse so much as the ministery of the Pontificals And it may be said in one word that the Bishops doe not reside because they haue nothing to doe or rather that they may not make greater inconueniences to arise which would happen by their concurrence and contention with priuiledged men Hee concluded that as he thought it fit to restore residency so they ought to treat how to restore the Episcopall authoritie The Bishops that spake after this Prelate followed his opinion that it was necessary to commaund residency and to remooue the exemptions which do hinder it And the Legats were enforced to cōsent that both should be considered of and that euery one speake his opinion of them and that some Fathers should be deputed to frame the Decree that it might be examined The deputies for collecting the Articles of iustification hauing receiued The Deputies for collecting the Articles dissent about the manner of proceeding the extracts of the propositions noted by euery one to be censured were not all of one opinion One part desired that foure or sixe fundamental Articles of the new doctrine might bee chosen and condemned as was done in the matter of originall sinne alleadging that it was fit to follow the stile begun and the example of the ancient Councels which hauing declared the principall Article condemned the heresie neuer descending to particular propositions but condemning the bookes of the heretiques in that vniuersall they comprehended all the pernitious doctrine and so the honour of the Councell required But the other part aymed to put vnder censure all the propositions which might receiue a bad construction that those might be condemned which in reason did deserue it saying that it was the office of a Pastor to discerne intirely the wholesome grasse from the hurtfull and not to suffer the flocke to taste of this And if the example of ancient Councels ought to be imitated they should imitate that of Ephesus which made so many and so famous Anathematismes against the doctrine of Nestorius that they did containe whatsoeuer the heretique had saide and the Councels of Africa which descend to the condemnation of all the propositions of the sectes The first opinion did vndoubtedly propose a more easie way and would 25. Articles concerning iustification haue pleased whosoeuer desired a speedie ende of the Councell and left a chinke open for agreement which future times might produce Yet the second was embraced which said it was good to examine all the propositions of the Lutheran doctrine to censure and condemne that which after mature deliberation should seeme necessarie and conuenient And 25. Articles were framed 1. Faith without workes is sufficient to saluation and alone doth iustifie 2. Iustifying faith is a sure trust by which one beleeueth that his sinnes are remitted for CHRIST and those that are iustified are bound to beleeue certainely that their sinnes are remitted 3. By faith onely wee are able to appeare before God who neither regardeth nor hath need of our workes faith onely making vs pure and worthy to receiue the Eucharist beleeuing that in it wee shall receiue grace 4. Those that doe honest things without the holy Ghost do sinne for that they do them with awicked heart and it is sinne to keepe the Commandements of God without faith 5. The best repentance is a new life and the repentance of the life past is not necessary neither doth the repentance of actuall sinnes dispose vs to receiue grace 6. No disposition is necessary to iustification neither doth faith iustifie because it disposeth vs but because it is a meanes or instrument by which the promise and grace of God is laid hold on and receiued 7. The feare of hell helpeth not in gaining of iustice yea hurteth and is sinne and maketh the sinners worse 8. Contrition which ariseth from the discussion calling to minde and detestation of sinnes weighing the grieuousnesse multitude and filthinesse of them or the losse of eternall happinesse and gaine of perpetuall damnation maketh a man an hypocrite and a greater sinner 9. The feares by which sinners are terrified either internally by God or externally by Preachers are sinnes vntill they are ouercome by faith 10. The doctrine of the dispositions destroyeth that of faith and taketh consolation from the consciences 11. Onely faith is necessary and other things are neither commanded nor forbid neither is sinne any thing but incredulity 12. Hee that hath faith is free from the precepts of the Law and hath no neede of workes to bee saued for faith giueth all abundantly and alone fulfilleth all the Commandements and no worke of a faithfull man is so bad as may accuse or condemne him 13. A man baptized cannot lose saluation by reason of any sinne whatsoeuer except hee will not beleeue and no sinne but infidelity separateth vs from the grace of God 14 Faith and workes are contrary and workes cannot be taught without shipwracke of faith 15. Externall workes of the second Table are hypocrisie 16. The iustified are set free from guilt and punishment and satisfaction neither in this life nor after death is necessary and therefore there is no Purgatory or satisfaction which is part of Penance 17. The iustified though they haue the grace of God cannot fulfill the Law or auoide sinnes though mortall 18. Obedience vnto the law in the iustified is weake and vnpure in it selfe not acceptable to God but accepted for the faith of the person reconciled who beleeueth that the remainders of sinne are forgiuen him 19. The iust sinneth in euery good worke and no worke maketh the sinne veniall 20. All the works of men yea of the most sanctified are sinne the workes of the iust are veniall by the mercie of God but in the rigor of his iudgement are mortall 21. Though the iust ought to doubt that his workes bee sinnes yet hee ought withall to be assured that they are not imputed 22. Grace and iustice are nothing but the will of God neither haue the iustified any inherent iustice in them and their sinnes are not abolished but onely remitted and not imputed 23. Our iustice is nothing but the imputation of the iustice of CHRIST and the iust haue neede of a continuall

vocation are truely preparatory and euer gaue the first place to God Notwithstanding there was a contention betweene the Dominicans themselues For Soto defended that although a man cannot obtaine grace without the speciall preuenting assistance of God yet the will may euer some way resist and refuse it and when it doth receiue it it is because it giueth assent and doth will so and if our assent were not required there would bee no cause why all should not be conuerted For according to the Apocalyps GOD standeth alwayes at the gate and knocketh and it is a saying of the Fathers now made common that God giueth grace to euery one that will haue it and the Scripture doeth alwayes require this consent in vs and to say otherwise were to take away the libertie of the will and to say that God vseth violence Friar Aloisius Catanea said to the contrary that God worketh two sorts of preuenting grace in the minde according to the doctrine of Saint Thomas the one sufficient the other effectuall to the first the will may consent or resist but not to the second because it implieth cōtradiction that efficacity can be resisted For proofe hee alledged places of Saint Iohn Saint Paul and very cleere expositions of Saint Austine Hee answered that it ariseth hence that all are not conuerted because all are not effectually preuented That the feare of ouerthrowing free-will is remooued by Saint Thomas that things are violently mooued by a contrary cause but neuer by their owne and God being the cause of the will to say it is mooued by God is to say it is mooued by it selfe And hee condemned yea mocked the Lutherans manner of speech that the will followeth as a dead or vnreasonable creature for beeing reasonable by nature mooued by its owne cause which is God it is mooued as reasonable and followeth as reasonable And likewise that God conuerteth though men will not and spurne at him For it is a contradiction that the effect should spurne against the cause That it may happen that God may effectually conuert one that before hath spurned against sufficient preuention but afterwards cannot because a gentlenesse in the will moued must needes follow the efficacie of the diuine motion Soto said that euery diuine inspiration was onely sufficient and that that whereunto free-will hath assented obtaineth efficiency by that consent without which it is vneffectuall not by the defect of it selfe but of the man This opinion hee defended very fearefully because it was opposed that the distinction of the reprobate from the elect would proceede from man contrary to the perpetuall Catholique sence that the vessels of mercy are distinguished by grace from the vessels of wrath That Gods election would be for workes foreseene and not for his good pleasure That the doctrine of the Fathers and of the African and French Councels against the Pelagians hath alwayes published that God maketh vs to will which is to say that hee maketh vs consent Therefore giuing consent to vs it ought to bee attributed to the diuine power or else he that is saued would no more be obliged to God then he that is damned if God should vse them both alike But notwithstanding all these reasons the contrary opinion had the generall applause though many confessed that the reasons of Catanea were not resolued and were displeased that Soto did not speake freely but said that the will consenteth in a certaine maner so that it may in a certaine maner resist as though there were a certaine maner of meane betweene this affirmation and negation The free speech of Catanea and the other Dominicans did trouble them also who knew not how to distinguish that opinion which attributeth iustification to consent from the Pelagian and therefore they wished them to take heede of leaping beyond the marke by a too great desire to condemne Luther that obiection beeing esteemed aboue all that by this meanes the diuine election or predestination would bee for workes foreseene which no Diuine did admit This drew them to speake also of Predestination Therefore it was determined by reason of the connexion to draw Articles Articles concerning Predestination drawen out of the writings of the Zuinglians in this subiect also from the doctrine of the Protestants In the bookes of Luther in the Augustan confession and in the Apologies and Colloquies there was nothing found that deserued censure but much in the writings of the Zuinglians whence these following Articles were drawen 1. For Predestination and reprobation that man doth nothing but all is in the will of GOD. 2. The Predestinated cannot be condemned nor the Reprobate saued 3. The elect and predestinated onely are truly iustified 4. The iustified are bound by faith to beleeue they are in the number of the Predestinated 5. The iustified cannot fall from grace 6. Those that are called and are not in the number of the Predestinated doe neuer recelue grace 7. The iustified is bound to beleeue by faith that hee ought to perseuere in iustice vntill the end 8. The iustified is bound to beleeue for certaine that in case he fall from grace he shall receiue it againe In examining the first of these Articles the opinions were diuers The The discussion of the Articles most esteemed Diuines amongst them thought it to be Catholique and the contrary hereticall because the good Schoole Writers Saint Thomas Scotus and the rest do so thinke that is that GOD before the creation out of the masse of mankind hath elected by his onely and meere mercy some for glory for whom he hath prepared effectually the meanes to obtaine it which is called to predestinate That their number is certaine and determined neither can there be any added The others not predestinated cannot complaine for that GOD hath prepared for them sufficient assistance for this though indeed none but the elect shall be saued For the most principall reason they alleadged that Saint Paul to the Romans hauing made Iacob a paterne of the predestinated and Esau of the Reprobate he produceth the decree of GOD pronounced before they were borne not for their workes but for his owne good pleasure To this they ioyned the example of the same Apostle that as the Potter of the same lumpe of clay maketh one vessell to honour another to dishonour so GOD of the same masse of men chuseth and leaueth whom he listeth For proofe whereof S. Paul bringeth the place where GOD saith to Moses I will shew mercy on whom I will shew mercy and I will shew pitty on whom I will shew pitie And the same Apostle concludeth that it is not of him that willeth or of him that runneth but of God who sheweth mercy adding after that God sheweth mercy on whom hee will and hardeneth whom he will They sayd further that for this cause the counsell of the diuine predestination and reprobation is called by the same Apostle the height and depth of wisedome vnsearchable and incomprehensible They added

first pleased them all The Legates accompanied with the Prelates went to the Church with the vsuall ceremonies on Thursday the thirteenth of Ianuary and held the Session where Andreas Cornarus Archbishop of Spalato sang Masse Thomas Stella Bishop of Salpi did preach and the Decrees of faith and reformation were read The first conteined sixteene heads with their prohemes and thirty three anathematismes After it had forbid to beleeue preach or teach otherwise then was constituted and expressed in that Decree it declared in substance 1. That neither Gentiles by naturall meanes nor Iewes by the letter of Moyses hath been able to free themselues from sinne 2. Whereupon GOD sent his Sonne to redeeme the one and the other 3. Who though he died for all yet those onely enioy the benefit vnto whom his merit is communicated 4. That the iustification of the wicked is nothing but a translation from the state of the sonne of Adam into the state of the adopted sonne of God by IESV CHRIST which after the publication of the Gospel is not done without Baptisme or the vow thereof 5. That the beginning of iustification in men of age proceedeth from preuenting grace which inuiteth to dispose themselues consenting and cooperating with it freely which they doe willingly and might refuse 6. The manner of the preparation is first to beleeue willingly the diuine reuelations and promises and knowing ones selfe to bee a sinner to turne from the feare of Gods Iustice to his mercie to hope for pardon from him and therefore to begin to loue him and hate sinne and finally purposing to bee baptized to begin a new life and keepe the commandements of God 7. That iustification followeth this preparation which is not onely a remission of sinnes but sanctification also and hath 5. causes the finall the glory of God and eternall life the efficient God the meritory CHRIST the instrumentall the Sacraments and the formall iustice giuen by God receiued according to the good pleasure of the holy Ghost and according to the disposition of the receiuer receiuing together with remission of sinnes faith hope and charitie 8. That when Saint Paul saith that man is iustified by faith and gratis it ought to be vnderstood because faith is the beginning and the things that precede iustification are not meritorious of grace 9. That sinnes are not pardoned to him that vaunteth and reposeth himselfe onely in the confidence and certainty of the remission Neither ought it to be said that onely faith doth iustifie but euery one as hee should not doubt of the mercie of God the merits of CHRIST and efficacie of the Sacraments so in regard of his owne indisposition he may doubt because he cannot know by certainty of infallible faith that he hath obtained grace 10. That the iust are more iustified by obseruing the Commandements of God and the Church 11. That it cannot be said that the Commandements of God are impossible to the iust who though he fall into veniall sinnes yet ceaseth not to be so that no man ought to relie on faith onely nor say that the iust sinneth in euery good action or committeth sinne if he do any thing for reward 12. That no man should presume hee is predestinated beleeuing that the iustified can sinne no more or sinning can promise himselfe repentance 13. That no man can promise to himselfe absolute certaintie to perseuere vntill the end but should put his hope in the assistance of God who will continue if man faile not 14. That those that are fallen into sinne may againe receiue grace beeing stirred vp from aboue to recouer it by repentance which differeth from baptisme because it containeth not only contrition but sacramental confession Priestly absolution at the least in vow and satisfaction besides for the temporall punishment which is not alwayes remitted altogether as in baptisme 15. That the grace of God is lost not onely by infidelity but by any mortall sinne though faith bee not lost by it 16. It proposeth to the iust the exercise of good workes by which eternall life is gained as grace promised by the mercie of God and a reward due to good workes by the diuine promise And it concludeth that this doctrine doth not establish any iustice of our owne refusing the iustice of God but the same is said to bee ours because it is in vs and of GOD being infused by him for the merit of CHRIST In fine to make euery one vnderstand not only the doctrine to be followed but that also which is to be auoided it addeth Canons against him that saith 1. That a man may bee iustified without grace by the strength of humane nature and doctrine of the Law 2. That grace is giuen to liue well with greater facilitie and to merit eternall life as if free The Canons will can doe it but with difficultie 3. That a man may beleeue loue hope or repent as he ought without the preuention or assistance of the holy Spirit 4. That free will excited by GOD doeth not cooperate to dispose vs to grace nor can dissent though it would 5. That after the sinne of Adam free will is lost 6. That it is not in the power of man to doe ill but as well bad as good workes are done not onely by Gods permission but by his owne proper working 7 That all workes done before iustification are sinnes and that a man sinneth the more by how much the more hee laboureth to dispose himselfe vnto grace 8. That the feare of hell which maketh vs abstaine from sin and to flie to the mercy of GOD is sin 9. That the wicked is iustified by faith onely without preparation proceeding from the motion of his will 10. That man is iustified without the iustice by which CHRIST did merit for vs or is formally iust by that 11. That he is iustified onely by the imputation of the iustice of CHRIST or onely by remission of sinnes without inherent grace and charitie or that the grace of iustification is onely the fauour of GOD. 12. That iustifying faith is nothing but confidence in the mercy of GOD who remitteth sinnes for CHRIST 13. That for remission of sinnes it is necessary to beleeue they are remitted not doubting of ones own indisposition 14. That man is absolued and iustified because he doeth firmely beleeue it 15. That he is bound by faith to beleeue that hee is in the number of the predestinated 16. That one may be certaine he hath the gift of perseuerance without speciall reuelation 17. That onely that the predestinated obtaine grace 18. That the Commandements of God are impossible to the iust 19. That there is no other Euangelicall precept but of faith 20. That the iust and perfect man is not bound to obserue the Commandements of God and the Church or that the Gospel is a promise without condition of obseruing the Commandements 21. That CHRIST is giuen for a redeemer not for a law-maker 22. That the iustified may