Selected quad for the lemma: master_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
master_n	father_n	king_n	servant_n	3,226	4	6.7708	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A12211	A friendly advertisement to the pretended Catholickes of Ireland declaring, for their satisfaction; that both the Kings supremacie, and the faith whereof his Majestie is the defender, are consonant to the doctrine delivered in the holy Scriptures, and writings of the ancient fathers. And consequently, that the lawes and statutes enacted in that behalfe, are dutifully to be observed by all his Majesties subjects within that kingdome. By Christopher Sibthorp, Knight, one of his Maiesties iustices of his court of chiefe place in Ireland. In the end whereof, is added an epistle written to the author, by the Reverend Father in God, Iames Vssher Bishop of Meath: wherein it is further manifested, that the religion anciently professed in Ireland is, for substance, the same with that, which at this day is by publick authoritie established therein.	Sibthorp, Christopher, Sir, d. 1632.; Ussher, James, 1581-1656.	1622 (1622)	STC 22522; ESTC S102408	494,750	610

c. for God vvill have all men to be saved But the meaning of these words is evident that he will have of all sorts and degrees of men that shall be saved even Kings and Princes aswell as of anie other sort for of them you see hee specially speaketh And so doth S. Augustine and Gregorie also expound those words And indeede what other sence all circumstances of the Text being well considered can be set upon them For to set this sence upon them namely that God will have all to bee saved in a generalitie without any exception were directly contrarie to the rest of the Scriptures which witnesse directly that God will have some to bee damned Yea if God would have all to be saved in a generality what should or can hinder but that all without exception should be saved accordingly For who was ever able to resist his will or to hinder the execution thereof that it should not come to passe Howbeit they say That God would and men will not and that this is the reason why some are damned because themselves will not be saved But what is this else but to make Gods will subiect to mens will and to be as it were a waiting servant and attendant upon their pleasures so that hee shall will their salvation when they will it themselves and shal also nill it when they nill it which beside that it maketh Gods will as variable and mutable as mens wills a thing dishonourable unto him and untrue it maketh also mens salvation and damnation to consist in their owne power and pleasures which is as absurd as if you should say it is in the power and will of the lumpe of Clay to choose of what sort and fashion it shall bee and to what use it shall bee applied and what part thereof shall bee a vessell to honour and what to dishonour For a Potter hath not more full or more absolute power over the Clay and the Pots which hee maketh thereout then God hath over all Men and Angells and over all other his creatures to doe ordaine and dispose of them and everie of them at his owne most free and uncontrollable pleasure as the Scriptures doe clearely testifie often using and as it were delighting themselves with this comparison resemblance It is true that no father hath such an high and absolute power over his Children nor King over his Subiects nor Master over his Servants the reason is apparant because these be not the makers of their Children nor of their Subiects nor of their Servants but God was the maker of them all as of all things else and therefore as touching this point the cases be not like And yet if Children offend it is in the power and pleasure of the father to correct which of them hee will or if Subiects offend the King may punish or pardon whom soever of them he pleaseth and if Servants offend it is also in the power and pleasure of the Master to punish or to spare whom he list Doth it not then consist much more in the will and pleasure of God the Creator and maker of all men especially after that all mankind was fallen in the transgression of Adam to choose or refuse whom hee pleased If then you doe but observe this comparison and similitude of the Potter which the Scripture so often useth or some such like wherein there is a Maker considered with such power and authoritie as he hath over the thing made by him being the worke of his owne hands This matter will then bee so plaine and evident unto you as that even by light and force of reason you will be compelled to confesse that the thing made is ever subiect to the will ordering and disposing of him that is the maker and not the maker to the will of the thing made And even this doth also S. Paul himselfe acknowledg and teach in this verie particular matter and thereupon he further saith expresly of God that He hath mercie upon whomsoever he will and whomsoever he will he hardeneth And againe hee saith that God spake thus I vvill have mercie on whomsoever my pleasure is to have mercie and I vvill have compassion on whomsoever my pleasure is to have compassion So then saith he againe it is not in him that vvilleth nor in him that runneth but in God that shevveth mercie By all which is most manifest that this great matter concerning the salvation and damnation of men consisteth not in the will and pleasure of men but in the will and pleasure of God and in his ordering and disposing Would you have this matter yet further declared then call to your remembrance what is written of Esau namlie that he would have inherited the blessing and yet was reiected for he found no place to repentance though he sought the blessing with teares Here you see that Esau would faine have inherited and fought it even with teares and yet was reiected and had this speciall grace of a true repentance not yeelded unto him Againe did not wicked Balaam desire to die the death of the righteous and that his last end might be like his Moreover did not the foolish Virgins aswell as the wise desire to enter in unto the Wedding and say Lord Lord open to us and yet were excluded Againe doth not Christ Iesus himselfe say to some Yee shall se●ke mee and yet yee shall dye in your sinnes and whether I goe thither can yee not come And againe doth he not say thus Strive to enter in at the straite gate for manie I say unto you shall seeke to enter in and shall not be able You see then that manie and sundrie persons would attaine to the everlasting felicitie of Gods people and to a most blessed happinesse and salvation and yet cannot because God will not as having otherwise ordayned of them And so againe witnesseth S. Paul saying thus Israel hath not obtained that he sought but the Election hath obtained it and the rest have beene hardened Againe Yee beleeve not saith Christ to some because yee are not of my sheepe And againe it is written Crediderunt quotquot erant ordinati ad vitam aeternam Onely so many beleeved as vvere ordained to eternall life And therefore also is this faith called fides Electorum Dei the faith of Gods Elect as being proper peculiar unto them Againe it is written of some people that To them it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdome of heaven but to others it is not given Yea and Christ Iesus himselfe speaketh thus unto God his Father saying I give thee thankes O Father Lord of heaven and earth because thou hast hid th●se things from the vvise and men of understanding and hast opened them unto Babes It is so O Father because such vvas thy good pleasure Againe it is written of some that The Gospel and vvord of God preached

remaineth an husband and consequently whatsoever others doe his wife that oweth him special duetie and respect is not to withdraw her duetie and obedience but is still to performe it unto him as to her husband If the Master be excommunicate and that others therefore doe withdraw their companie from him yet is not his servant to withdraw his duetie and service from him for notwithstanding excommunication hee still is and remaineth a Master to his servant and consequently notwithstanding excommunication he is still of all his servants to be obeyed as a Master In like sort if a King be excommunicate and that therefore other Kings and Princes and such as owe him no subiection doe withdraw themselves from him yet may not his owne subiects withdraw their subiection duetie and obedience inasmuch as notwithstanding excommunication hee still is and remaineth a King to his subiects and consequently is of them still to be honoured and obeyed as their King But so as the Pope may serve his owne turne and erect and stablish to himselfe a Throne and Kingdome upon earth above all Kings Princes and Emperors of the world which is the chiefe or onely marke he shot at what careth hee what or whom or how he doth abuse be they Kings or subiects or whosoever Yea it is too well knowne to the world that some of his Cardinals Priests and Iesuites have been so monstrous as to perswade subiects to lay violent hands upon and to murther their owne Soveraignes accounting it forsooth to be a matter meritorious to commit such abominable and lothsome villanie in their pretended Catholicke but indeed most divellish and Antichristian cause If anie make doubt hereof let Parry Ballard Babington and sundrie others executed in the late Queene ELIZABETHS dayes be witnesses hereof And let also that late most execrable plot and intention of theirs to blow up the Parliament house in England and all that should be in it with Gunpowder likewise beare witnesse hereof to all posterities How then can such a Religion which under colour of being Catholike and under pretence of a Catholike cause when neverthelesse it is nothing so but the cleane contrarie alloweth warranteth commandeth and commendeth rebellion treason and murther of Christian Protestant Kings and Princes and their people as a matter good and meritorious be but most detestable and damnable And what can the Pope being the approver allower and chiefe in this businesse and for whose sake all this is done be but the Grand Antichrist Where also you may further understand that the Popish Priests Iesuites and the rest of that order being as they are no Ministers of Christ but of Antichrist can therefore give to none of you anie absolution or remission of your sinnes but doe rather augment enlarge and increase your sinnes so much the more as they must needs by such your unlawfull resorting to them So that hereafter ye shal doe well to forbeare and leave off your Eare-Christ or Auricular Confession to them which hath also no commandement or institution from Christ but is onely an humane devise whereunto none is necessarily tied Which thing is so cleere that their owne Canon Law affirmeth that It vvas taken up onely by a certaine Tradition and not by any au●horitie of the Old or New Testament Panormitan likewise saith That opinion of the Canon Law greatly pleaseth him because he findeth no manifest authoritie that ever God or Christ commanded us to confesse our sinnes to a Priest And Rhenanus and Erasmus also affirme that Christ ordeined it not M●ctarius Bishop of Constantinople upon an accident that fell out at Confession put it cleane downe in his Church and the Bishops of the East did the like in theirs Which those godly ancient Bishops would never have done nor lawfully could have done if it had beene Gods owne ordinance and institution As for the confession of sinnes which they made that came to be baptised of S. Iohn Baptist it was voluntarie and publike and no private or auricular confession and so was also their confession voluntarie and publike and not secret or auricular which is mentioned in Acts 19. It is true that S. Iames saith Confesse your faults one to another and pray one for another that yee may be healed But this no more tyeth you to confesse your faults or sinnes to a Priest then to another man yea it no more tieth you if yee well observe the words to confesse your sinnes to a Priest then ●t t●eth a Priest to confesse his sinnes to you for by these words Christian● bee charged to confesse their sinnes one to another as they be likewise there charged to pray one for another I grant that in the ancient Church such as were publike offenders did for those their open and publike offences publike pennance by publike and open confession of them in the Congregation with sorrow for the same and asking forgivenesse first of God then of the Church or congregation which they had so offended After which publike confession and pennance and satisfaction so made to the Church or Congregation where the offence was committed they were againe reconciled and received absolution by a publike pronouncing of it upon that their repentance declared Which kinde of publike confession and open pennance and absolution thereupon is also observed in the reformed Protestant churches But this no way serveth to prove your private secret and auricular confession yea it rather maketh against it because this was publike Yet if anie thinke that a private confession to a Minister of Christ is sometime and in some cases convenient and meet to be used the Protestants in their learned and godly workes against the Papists have told you that they doe not dislike it but well allow and commend it so often as burthen of conscience oppresseth anie man for anie sinne by him committed to utter those his griefes and confesse his sinnes which wound him so sore either to anie faithfull Minister of Christ or to anie other skilfull godly and discreet Christian whosoever thereby to receive helpe remedie and consolation Caietan himselfe though hee like well with us of a voluntarie confession which is not forced or commanded yet expressely denieth this Popish manner of Auricular Confession to be of Christs institution And indeed the Ministers of Christ may verie well pronounce absolution or forgivenesse of sinnes upon a free and voluntarie confession though they binde not men by a law of necessitie at certaine times of the yeare to make such a confession unto them as is used and urged in the Papacie after a tyrannical manner This Christian moderate and allowable course doe the Protestant Ministers hold in their receiving of anie Confessions as also they forgive not sinnes absolutely and at pleasure but onely as is before said ministerially and declaratively and with a limitation viz. so as they have a right and lively faith and a true repentance to whom they pronounce their absolution But to proceede and

Secondly I must crave leave to say that I find not Popery how subtill or sophisticall soever it be to be of anie such puissance but that a man of meane learning armed with the strength of the divine Scriptures may easily ruinate and overturne it Thirdly those that oppugne the Religion His Majesties Supremacie what doe they else but oppugne therewithall as they must needs at least inclusively the Lawes and Statutes of the Kingdome whereby they are both established And what reason then can bee shewed why hee that is a Lawyer by profession may not defend and maintaine the Lawes and Statutes of the Realme in those two great points especially wherein they be so unjustly and causelessely oppugned But when I consider my selfe further to be a servant though unworthy to his most excellent Majestie and that in so high and eminent a Court as His Maiesties Bench is beside my profession the duetie of my place also tyeth mee to defend his Maiesties Supremacie as being a thing properly app●rtayning to his verie Crowne and Regall dignitie And doth not moreover the Oath of Supremacy to His Majestie which I have taken necessarily binde mee hereunto Yea even for this verie cause that I am a subiect to his Maiestie though there were no other reason doe I hold my selfe in duetie tyed to my power to uphold and maintain that his Regall Supremacie For if everie good childe will maintaine the right and Authoritie of his Father and everie good servant the right and Authoritie of his Lord and Master ought not everie good subiect to maintaine the right and Authoritie of his Soveraigne Lord and King And as touching the Religion if there were no other reason but this that I am a Christian by profession though no professed Divine doe I hold it for that verie cause not onely well beseeming mee but my duetie likewise according to such measure of knowledge and abilitie as God hath given mee to defend and maintaine the true and Christian Religion I professe against that which is untruly called the Christian and Catholike and is indeed the false erroneous and Antichristian For whereas some have a conceit that not Lay men at all but Clergie men only and such as be of the Ecclesiastical Ministerie should meddle with the Scriptures and matters of Religion it appeareth to be a verie vaine conceit and an untrue opinion because S. Paul directly requireth even of Lay Christians as well as of others that the Word of Christ should Dwell in them and that not poorely or in a small or slender measure but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is richly plentifully or abundantly Whereupon Primasius saith that Hence wee learne that the Lay people ought to have the knowledge of the Scriptures and to teach one another not onely sufficiently but also abundantly And therefore are they further expressely charged to admonish exhort and edifie one another yea to contend and not onely to contend but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 earnestly to contend for that faith which was once given unto the Saints And doth not God himselfe also command thus Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thy heart but Thou shalt in anie wise rebuke thy neighbour and not suffer sinne to be upon him Agreeably wherunto would not S. Iames likewise have all Christians to labour the conversion of such as be in error and goe astray telling them for their better encouragement in this matter that if any doe erre from the truth and another convert him let such a one know that he which converteth a sinner from the error of his way shall save a soule from death and cover a multitude of sinnes You see then what duties in respect of the good of others as well as of himselfe be required even of a lay person in matters concerning God and his religion And indeede verie strange it were if lay Christians should be tyed in charitie to take care of mens bodies and yet should in no sort be permitted to have anie care or to shew anie Christian charitie or affection in respect of their soules and the good and safetie of them It is true that no man may take upon him the office and function of Bishops Pastors or other Ministers of the Word without a lawfull calling or ordination first had and obtayned but although a lay man may not therfore preach minister the sacraments nor do anie such acts as be proper and peculiar to those that be Ecclesiasticall Ministers yet in such things as be not proper and peculiar unto them but be acts and duties common with them to other Christians a Lay man may lawfully intermeddle It is likewise true that the knowledge of Gods Word and consequently of Divinitie doth in a more exact and more plentiful and fuller maner and measure and chiefly belong to those that be professed Divines and of the Ecclesiasticall Ministery but thereupon it followeth not that therefore it belongeth onely to them As also although those of the Ecclesiasticall Ministery are to teach and instruct the Lay people out of the Scriptures and that the Lay people are to learne what they rightly teach from thence yet neither doth it thereupon follow nor is that anie argument or impediment but that the Lay people may neverthelesse reade and get knowledge in the Scriptures and thereout learne what good they can also even by their owne industry diligence and endevour We reade of Aquila and Priscilla his wife that they were by their Trade Tentmakers and that Apollos was a man eloquent and mightie in the Scripture● yet so skilfull learned expert were those two name●ly not onely Aquila but Priscilla also his wife in the Word of God as that they tooke unto them the same Apollos and expounded unto him The Way of God more perfectly All men know that Kings Princes and such like civill Magistrates be none of that Order of the Ecclesiasticall Ministery and yet of them it is specially required that they reade the Scriptures Book of God and that they be verie diligent and conversant in it For God expressely requireth of a King that When hee shall sit upon the Throne of his Kingdome He get him the Book of his Law and chargeth him to reade therein all the Dayes of his Life that he may learne to feare the Lord his God and to Keepe All his Words and ordinances not turning from them eyther to the right hand or to the left That so he may prolong his Dayes in his Kingdome Hee and his Sonnes after him And to Iosuah a civill Magi●●●ate hee likewise giveth this charge and commandement saying Let not This Booke of the Law depart out of thy mouth but Meditate therein Day and Night that thou maist Observe and Doe according to All that is written therein for then shalt thou make thy Way prosperous and then shalt thou have good successe Was not the Treasurer to Candace Queene of the Ethiopians also a Lay man and not

by making lawes for Christ but they may also command and externally compell their subiects if they stubbornly be Re●●sants and wilfull to become obedient in that behalfe For so did the godly and religious Kings of Iudah as for example King Asa King Manasseth and king Iosiah The Donatists were the first that denied this authoritie of Kings in matters Ecclesiasticall Against whom therefore S. Augustine disputeth at large in sundry places VVhy doe the Donatists saith he acknowledge the force of the laws to be iustly executed against other malefactors and deny the same to be done against heretickes and schismaticks seeing that by the authoritie of the Apostle they be alike reckoned with the same fruits of iniquity yea if a King should not regard such things why then saith he doth he beare the sword Againe hee saith Mirantur quia commoventur potestates Christianae adversus detestandos dissipatores Ecclesiae Si non ergo moverentur quo modo redderent rationem de Imperio su● Deo They marvaile that these Christian Powers be moved against the detestable wasters of the Church If they should not be moved against such how should they render an account to God of their rule or governement Thinkest thou saith he to Vincentius that no man ought to be forced to righteousnesse vvhen as thou readest that the Master said unto his servant Compell all that you finde to come in c. Where is now saith he to Bonifacius that vvhich these Donatists harpe at so much viz. That it is free for a man to beleeve or not to beleeve what violence did Christ use whom did hee compell Behold Paul for an example Let them marke in him first Christ compelling and afterward teaching first striking and then comforting Let them not mislike that they be forced but examine whereto they be sorted And cyting that part of the second Psalme Be vvise ye kings understand yee that iudge the earth Serve the Lord in feare hee saith thus How doe kings serve the Lord in feare but when they forbid and punish vvith a religious severitie those things which be done against the commandements of God As Ezechias did serve him by destroying the groves and Temples builded against the precept of God As Iosiah did in like maner As the king of Nineveh also did forcing the vvhole City to please God As Nebuchadnezar likewise did restraining all his subiects from blaspheming God with a dreadfull law 3 As for the reason of Gaudentius that the peace of Christ invited such as were willing but forced no man unwilling the same S. Augustine again answereth it speaketh on this manner VVhere you thinke saith he that none must be forced to truth against their wils you be deceived not knowing the Scriptures nor the power of God vvhich maketh them willing afterward vvhich were unwilling at the first Did the Ninivites repent against their will because they did it at the compulsion of their king VVhat needed the kings expresse commandement that all should humbly submit themselves to God but that there were some amongst them vvhich never vvould have regarded nor beleeved Gods message had they not beene terrified by the kings Edict This princely power and authoritie giveth many men occasion to be saved vvhich though they vvere violently brought to the feast of the great Housholder yet being once compelled to come in they finde there good cause to reioyce that they did enter though at first against their wills And when Petilian also obiected that no man ought to be forced by lawes to godlinesse S. Augustine still answereth and saith Preposterous vvere discipline to revenge your ill living but vvhen you first contemne the doctrine that teacheth you to live vvell And even those that make lawes to bridle your headinesse are they not they that beare the sword as Paul speaketh not in vaine being Gods ministers and executors of wrath on him that doth ill Yea S. Augustine teacheth further directly that it is the office dutie of Kings and Princes to compell their subiects although not to faith yet to the outward meanes of faith which is comming to the Churches and assemblies of Gods people there to heare the word of God read and preached and to doe other Christian dueties there used For howsoever it be granted that God only worketh faith in mens soules and not Men nor the power of Kings yet thereupon it followeth not but that Kings may neverthelesse command and compell them to external obedience and cause them to present their bodies in those Churches and assemblies where the ordinarie meanes of faith and salvation is to be had And as for Gods inward working upon their soules and his blessing upon that outward meanes when they be in those Assemblies Kings and Princes doe and must leave those things unto God alone as being things not included within their power to give nor within the power of anie earthly creature whosoever Some of the Donatists in ancient time rather then they would be forced from their fancies were so wilful unnaturall and impious as that they slew themselves yet did this nothing hinder the Church of God but that Donatists for all that were compelled by vertue of Princes lawes to their due obedience without anie respect or regard had to such their wicked and desperate doings I vvas once so minded saith S. Augustine that I thought no man ought to be forced to Christian unity but that vvee should deale by perswasion strive by disputing and conquer by reasoning lest they proved dissembling Catholickes vvhom we know to be professed Heretickes But afterward as himselfe sheweth he altered this opinion upon better advisement teaching That as it is fit that men that be in error touching Religion should be admonished instructed and dealt withall by perswasion so if they neglect scorne or contemne admonitions and instructions or doe grow wilfull stubborne perverse and obstinate upon no ground of reason they are iustly worthie to be punished according to the lawes For what a vaine idle thing is it for anie to say It is against their conscience to come to our Churches there to heare Gods word read and preached to pray unto God with us to thanke him for all his benefites to be present and partakers of his Sacraments and of other godly and religious exercises there used and yet can shew no reason at all for this their doing A blinde conscience such as this and every other is that hath not anie good reason to shew for it selfe is to be corrected and reformed and not to be followed And therfore doth S. Augustine yet further say expresly touching this matter That it is enioyned Kings from God ut in Regno suo bona iubeant mala prohibeant non solum quae ad humanam societatem pertinent verum etiam quae ad Divinam Religionem that in their Kingdomes they should command good

likewise doth the Church and people of God in Daniels time disclaime all merite and conceite of inherent righteousnes in themselves as appeareth by their praier which they make unto God saying VVee do not present our supplications before thee for our ovvne righteousnesse but for thy great tender mercies O Lord heare O Lord forgive O Lord consider and doe it That holy man Iob likewise speaketh to the same effect If man saith hee dispute vvith God hee cannot answer him one thing of a Thousand And againe he saith If I vvould Iustifie my selfe mine owne mouth shall condemne mee and If I vvould be perfect hee shall Iudge mee vvicked But now although the Protestants doe thus rightly teach Iustification by Faith onely and not by Workes or by anie Inherent righteousnesse in men therewithall condemne the doctrine of mens merits most justly yet doe they confesse that there is a reward in Scripture promised to them that doe good workes But Reward and Merit doe differ and be not all one For it is a Reward not of merit or desert of mens behalfe but of meere grace favour and bountie in God farre above the merits and deserts of anie men and performed given and bestowed for Gods promise sake and for the merits onely and mediation of Iesus Christ. There is Merces ex gratia a Reward counted by favour aswell as ex debito of Debt or Due desert as S. Paul himselfe distinguisheth even in this verie case Yea Saint Paul saith againe that though Christ paid a price and ransome for us yet in respect of our selves vve are Iustificati gratis Iustified frankely and freely without our paying or performing anie thing toward it or in that behalfe What could be spoken more plainely or more forcibly to quell the swelling pride of men and to dash all conceit of their merit at GODS hand It is true which is written in the Epistle to the Hebrewes where it is said thus To doe good and to to Distribute forgett not for vvith such sacrifices God is vvell pleased The Papists translate it for maintenance of their meritts that with such Hosts or Sacrifices God is promerited for so is their Latin Translation Promeretur Deus Which word in Latin as it is not used passively as the Rhemists in their English have translated it so neither is that Latin translation which they follow right in that point being not answerable to the originall in Greeke according whereunto the ancient Fathers would have all translations to be reformed and framed as before is declared for the Greek word in that Text is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth as our Translation hath it is wel pleased or is delighted but it importeth no such thing as matter of merit in it And therefore you must hereby learne to take heed of your false translations Yea the Parable in the Gospel of the Servant that did the commandement of his Maister plainlie and purposelie sheweth that we deserue no thankes or recompence at Gods hand for anie duetie or obedience we performe to him For saith Christ doth the Maister thanke that servant because hee did that vvhich vvas commanded him I trow not So likewise yee vvhen yee have done all those things that are commanded you yet say VVe are unprofitable servants vvee have done no more but that vvhich was our duety to doe It is here then verie manifest that no men by anie duetie or obedience they performe to God can possiblie merit or deserve anie benefite at Gods hand much lesse Eternall Heavenlie happinesse And yet you have a conceit that so long as yee acknowledge those vertues and good workes to come not from your selves but from God from his gift ye may repose confidence in them matter of merit but what is this if yee well consider it but plaine Pharisaisme for all that For did not the Pharisee in the Gospel say O God I thanke thee c. acknowledging therein the vertues and workes which he had to come from God and to be of his gift and therefore gave him thankes and yet for reposing confidence therein for being proud of Gods gifts he is disliked and reproved Bernard saith Meritum meum miseratio Domini The merit I relye upon is the Lords mercy Againe he saith Non est quo gratia intret ubi meritum occupavit There is no place for grace to enter vvhere merit hath taken possession Againe he sheweth That men can by no manner of meanes possiblie deserve or merit eternall life and salvation And so teacheth Anselmus likewise and Cusanus Yea both wee and yee be so farre from meriting and deserving salvaon that contrariwise wee all in respect of our owne merits must confesse that we deserve damnation For yee for your parts aswell as wee cannot denie but yee sometimes sinne and goe astray and if you did sinne but once in all your life time yet were that sufficient in the sentence of Gods Law and the severitie of his Iustice to make you subiect to his curse and to throw you down to hell and eternall torments Never therefore sooth nor flatter your selves with that your distinction of some Veniall and some deadlie sinnes For although it be true that some sinnes be greater then other some are and that all sinnes be in respect of Gods mercie veniall that is remissible and may be forgiven except the sinne against the Holie Ghost of which it is directlie said that it shall never be forgiven yet is it also as true that everie sinne even the least that can be named is in his owne nature deadlie and maketh a breach and transgression of Gods Law and consequently deserveth his curse and condemnation for so have S. Paul and S. Iames before instructed us whereunto the rest of the Scriptures doe accord So that even those which you call small and veniall sinnes if they should be laid to your charge and should not be forgiven you through Christ the Saviour and Redeemer they be of weight sufficient to presse you downe to hell there to be everlastinglie tormented And yet it is true that in respect of the quantitie and qualitie of sinnes committed by reprobates and according to the difference of them shall be the diversitie of their punishments in hell some being there to be tormented more and some lesse Doe ye not then all this while perceive in what a wofull and damnable estate they all be that stand upon their owne deservings merits and workes and looke to bee Iustified before Gods tribunall by a righteousnesse inherent in their owne persons and not by the righteousnesse onlie of Iesus Christ apprehended and applied by faith Well therefore did S. Bernard say that Assignata est homini aliena Iustitia quia caruit sua There is assigned to a man another mans righteousnesse because he vvanted his owne Pigghius likewise speaketh teaching that we are Iustified by the righteousnesse of

avoide from themselves herein the note and brand of those old Heretickes But they say that their Clergie men Monkes Nunnes and the rest of their religious orders be Votaries and have vowed continencie and therefore it is not lawfull for them to marrie because of their Vowes But I demand What if they bee not able to keepe this vow but that notwithstanding their Vowes Praiers Fastings and other meanes by them used they still burne in lust For in these cases concerning marriage or single life Everie one hath his proper gift of God● one after this manner and another after that as S. Paul himselfe directlie teacheth and affirmeth So that Continencie from Marriage is a gift not common to all but proper to some as here appeareth and therefore every one that Fasteth or that Prayeth or laboureth after it doth not alwaies attaine unto it yea Christ Iesus himselfe expresly telleth us that All doe not receive it but they onely to whom it is given It must therefore first of all bee confessed that it was a verie presumptuous rash and unadvised Vow which such men and women make as at the time of their Vow-making neither were nor could bee assured of that speciall gift nor yet afterward have it given them from God For which they are therefore to repent And secondly their vow thus appeaing to bee rash and unadvised and such as they finde themselves not able to keepe it were much better for them to marrie then continually to burne in Lust and so to fall possibly into fornication or adulterie or other more lewd and abhominable sinnes For it is the expresse rule of S. Paul that It is better to marrie then to burne Yea Marriage was instituted of God for this verie end to prevent and● void fornication and adulterie and all other uncleannesse For so S. Paul againe saith and requireth that to Avoid fornication every man should have his owne wife and everie woman her owne husband And againe hee saith that Marriage is honourable amongst all men and the Bed undefiled but VVhoremongers and Adulterers God will iudge And therefore if such persons as have made vowes in this case finde themselves not able to keepe them and thereupon doe afterward Marry S. Augustine himselfe condemneth not their Marriage Non quia ipsae Nuptiae vel talium c. Not that the Marriage it selfe even of such persons saith hee is iudged to bee condemned Yea hee further speaketh thus They which say that the marriage of such persons is no Marriage but rather Adulteries seeme to mee saith hee not to conside● throughly and diligently what they say Yea it was indeede the direct heresie of those old Heretickes called Apostolici not to permit such to marrie as had made the vow of chastitie and were not able to keepe it And 〈◊〉 is further declared to bee contrarie to the Doctrine of the Catholicke Church which as Epiphanius also there testifieth iudged it was better for such to marry openlie then to burne privilie Whilest therefore they suffer not such to marrie as have made a vowe of Continency and bee not able to keepe it what doe they else but contrarie to the doctrine of the Catholicke church ioyne with those old heretickes called Apostolici and consequently cannot herein avoide the same Antichristian note and brand imposed upon them But now if a man should further expostulate the matter with them what good or sufficient reason can they shew why Bishops Pastors and Ministers of the Church may not aswell bee allowed to bee married persons as the Priests in the old Testament For it cannot bee denied but the Priests in the old Testament did Marrie If you say that Bishops and Ministers should bee holie men beside that marriage hindereth not holinesse in them that have not the gift of Continency yea it rather helpeth holinesse making them to live honest and holy lives who otherwise burning in lust were likely to live verie impurelie and unholily might not likewise the same obiection bee made touching those Priests of the old Testament in whom holinesse was aswell required as in the Ministers of the new Testament Yea if marriage were against holinesse or did hurt or hinder it God would never have allowed it to anie kind of people For even of Lay people aswell as of Ecclesiastical Ministers doth God require sanctitie or holinesse saying thus unto them As hee which called you is holy even so bee yee also holie in all manner of conversation because it is vvritten bee yee holy for I am holy It is therefore a verie prophane speech of Papists or of anie whosoever that say that Marriage is a prophanation of holie orders or that in his owne nature it prophaneth anie Christian of what sort soever it being a sacred and holie Institution and appointed of God as a remedie against sinne and to preserve men in honestie goodnesse and sanctitie Yea some of the Apostles themselves were married men as S. Peter otherwise called Cephas and some of the rest and even those Apostles also that were unmarried had the freedome and libertie neverthelesse to have beene married notwithstanding the sacred function of the Apostleship For so S. Paul witnesseth of himselfe and Barnabas that it was lawfull and free for them if they had beene so disposed to have taken wives and to have led them about with them as they travelled in the execution of the office of their Apostleshippe Have wee not power saith hee to lead about a Sister A VVife asvvell as other Apostles and the brethren of the Lord and Cephas The Rhemists hereunto answer that the words in the Text 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 should not bee translated a Sister a Wife but a Woman a Sister and say that the Apostle meaneth plainly the devout women that after the manner of Ievvry did serve the Preacher of necessaries of which sort manie followed Christ and sustained him and his of their substance But first they transpose and misplace the words in that text For the words be not as they in their Translation suppose 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a VVoman a Sister but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a Sister a VVife For no man of understanding would translate it a Sister a VVoman because the word Sister implieth a woman of it selfe And therefore this latter word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 must of necessitie signifie a VVife For to translate it otherwise namely a Sister a VVoman were to make the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to bee superfluously added and to no purpose Besides the word used in the text of leading about declareth that they were Wives and not other Women For it is a word importing authoritie in it as of the husband over his wife or of the master over his servant or such like Neither had the Apostles any such command or authority over other women Wee reade indeed of certaine women that followed our Saviour Christ but wee read not that

say that in the manuscript books which I have met withall here in S. Brendans own countrey one whereof was transcribed for the use of the Friars minors of Kilkenny about the yeare of our Lord 1350. there is not the least footstep thereof to be seene And this is a thing verie observable in the ancienter lives of our Saints such I meane as have beene written before the time of Satans loosing beyond which we doe not now looke that the prayers and oblations for the dead mentioned therein are expressely noted to have been made for them whose soules were supposed at the same instant to have rested in blisse So Adamnanus reporteth that S. Colme called by the Irish both in Bedes and our dayes Colum-kille caused all things to be prepared for the sacred ministerie of the Eucharist when he had seene the soule of S. Brendan received by the holy Angells and that hee did the like when Columbanus Bishop of Leinster departed this life for I must to day saith S. Colme there although I be unworthy celebrate the holy mysteries of the Eucharist for the reverence of that soule which this night carried beyond the starry firmament betwixt the holy quires of Angells ascended into Paradise Whereby it appeareth that an honourable commemoration of the dead was herein intended and a sacrifice of thanksgiving for their salvation rather then of propitiation for their sinnes In Bede also wee finde mention of the like obsequies celebrated by S. Cuthbert for one Hadwaldus after he had seene his soule carried by the hands of Angells unto the joyes of the kingdome of heaven So Gallus and Magnus as Walafridus Strabus relateth in the life of the one and Theodorus Campidonensis or whosoever else was author of the life of the other said Masse which what it was in those dayes wee shall afterward heare and were instant in prayers for the commemoration of abbat Columbanus their countreyman frequenting the memory of that great Father with holy prayers and healthfull sacrifices Where that speech of Gallus unto his deacon Magnus or Magnoaldus is worthie of speciall consideration After this nights watch I understood by a vision that my master and father Columbanus is to day departed out of the miseries of this life unto the joyes of Paradise For his rest therefore I ought to offer the sacrifice of salvation In like maner also when Gallus himselfe died Iohn Bishop of Constance prayed to the Lord for his rest and offered healthfull sacrifices for him although he were certainly perswaded that hee had attained the blessing of everlasting life as may be seene in Walafridus And when Magnus afterwards was in his death-bed he is said to have used these words unto Tozzo Bishop of Ausborough that came to visite him Doe not weepe reverend Prelate because thou beholdest me labouring in so manie stormes of worldly troubles because I beleeve in the mercie of God that my soule shall rejoyce in the freedome of immortalitie yet I beseech thee that thou wilt not cease to helpe me a sinner and my soule with thy holy prayers Then followeth that at the time of his departure this voice was heard Come Magnus come receive the crowne vvhich the Lord hath prepared for thee and that thereupon Tozzo said unto Theodorus the supposed writer of this historie Let us cease weeping brother because wee ought rather to rejoyce having heard this signe of the receiving of his soule unto immortalitie than to make lamentation but let us goe to the Church and be carefull to offer healthfull sacrifices to the Lord for so deare a friend I dispute not of the credite of these particular passages it is sufficient that the authors from whom wee have received them lived within the compasse of those times whereof we now doe treate For thereby it is plaine enough and if it be not it shall elsewhere be made yet more plaine that in those elder dayes it was an usuall thing to make prayers and oblations for the rest of those soules which were not doubted to have beene in glorie and consequently that neyther the Commemoration nor the Praying for the dead nor the Requiem Masses of that age have anie necessarie relation to the beleefe of Purgatory The lesson therefore which Claudius teacheth us here out of S. Hierome is verie good that while wee are in this present world we may be able to helpe one another eyther by our prayers or by our counsailes but when vvee shall come before the judgement seat of Christ neyther Iob nor Daniel nor Noah can intreate for any one but every one must beare his owne burden and the advise which the no lesse learned then godly abbat Columbanus giveth us is verie safe not to pitch upon uncertainties hereafter but now to trust in God and follow the precepts of Christ while our life doth yet remaine and while the times wherin we may obtayne salvation are certaine Vive Deo fidens saith he Christi praecepta sequēdo Dum modò vita manet dum tempora certa salutis Touching the worship of God that I may now come to that point Sedulius delivereth this generall rule that to adore any other beside the Father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost is the crime of impietie and that all that the soule oweth unto God if it bestow it upon any beside God it committeth adultery More particularly in the matter of Images he reproveth the wise men of the heathen for thinking that they had found out a way how the invisible God might be worshipped by a visible image with whom also accordeth Claudius that God is to be knowen neyther in mettle nor in stone and for Oathes there is a Canon ascribed to S. Patrick wherein it is determined that no creature is to be swor●e by but onely the Creator As for the forme of the Liturgie or publick service of God which the same S. Patrick brought into this countrey it is said that he received it from Germanus and Lupus and that it originally descended from S. Marke the Evangelist for so have I seene it set down in an ancient fragment written wellnigh 900. yeares since remayning now in the Library of Sir Robert Cotton my worthy friend who can never sufficiently be commended for his extraordinarie care in preserving all rare monuments of this kinde Yea S. Hieroms authoritie is there vouched for proofe hereof Beatus Hieronymus adfirmat quòd ipsum cursum qui dicitur praesente tempore Scottorum beatus Marcus decantavit which being not now to be found in anie of S. Hieroms workes the truth thereof I leave unto the credite of the reporter But whatsoever Liturgie was used here at first this is sure that in the succeeding ages no one generall forme of divine service was retayned but diverse rites and maners of celebrations were observed in diverse parts of this kingdome untill the Romane use was brought in at last by