shall live and if need bee shall dye being faithfully obedient to the commandements which dying were but to be made alive by death we certainely know both children and women and servants to have beene no lesse than excellent oftentimes their parents and husbands and masters being set against it They ought therefore which would leade an holy life not to be of a lesse cheerefull and ready minde when they see some to chase them from it But it is meete much more that they contend and strive stoutly that they fall not off as conquered from the best and most necessary counsels for I doe not thinke it may admit any compare whether it be better to be received into the fellowship of the Almighty or to choose the darkenesse of divels Things which are done of us for others sake we will alwayes doe endeavoring to have an eye to them for whose sake they seeme to bee done taking the measure to be that which is acceptable to them but things which are done rather for our owne sake than for others shall be done by us with equall study whether they seeme or seeme not to please any man Secondly it is neither of my ability nor beseeming a worke of this nature to alledge all that might be cited here to this purpose this shall suffice to shew either your wilfull blindnesse or daring presumption upon your great reading It is very dangerous to oppose the truth and to trust unto your oppositions of Sciences falsely so called no man ever attempted it but God polluted him in his gifts in a just judgement In this Treatise it may bee seene and in this particular passage For Clemens Alexandrinus f Cle. Alex. stâ—o 4. Iustine g Iustin. Apel. 2. Augustine h Aug. in Psal 118. Coâ—â—io 31. and almost all the ancients which published Apologies for Christians testifie that among other causes why the Gentiles persecuted the Christians this was one that they withdrew themselves from obedience to their superiours under pretence of Religion Now this was only in matter of the publike worship of the true God wherein else did their disobedience as they called it consist They worshipped the true God on his day and refused communion with Idolaters on their daies dedicated to their idoles but this you could not see You know moreover that the histories of the first three hundred yeeres are of little weight for their brevity imperfection and the iniquity of those times through rage of persecutors and malice of falsifying Heretikes and Seducers Therefore your bold and large assertion herein is of little worth Thirdly had you remembred that there is the same proportion in matter of obedience in one sort of inferiours as in another you might soone have knowne what servants did in those times towards their masters for all Antiquity teacheth that it is perversenesse to call that obedience wherein the obedience to God is forgone to obey man and that the superior of any sort is to bee obeyed in whatever he commandeth that is not contrary to Gods Command not otherwise Thus taught Hierome Ambrose Augustine Fabian i Decret 11. q. 3. c. 92 93. to 101. Basil k Basil reg 7. ex brevi 114. 203. 204. de instit Mona c. 14. 16. Bernard l Bern. Epi. 7. li. de praecept dispensat c. 12. and the like But Saint Austine m Serm. 6. De verbis Dom. Ep 166. in Psal 124. chiefely is most notable in this point both for his lively expressions and instances and for his reasoning from humane things to divine where obedience is denied to the inferiour magistrate when it is contrary to the superiour Fourthly I am sure godly superiors will never thanke you for this doctrine which cannot will to bee obeyed of inferiors if they command ought against Gods Law and reason Heathen Princes have refused such an obedience and desired the contrary Antiochus the third wrote to the cities that if he should command by letters any thing repugnant to the lawes they would not care for it but take it as if it were written he not knowing of it Antigonus king of the Macedonians answered a Flatterer who said All things were honest and just for kings to doe They are so onely to kings of Barbarians but to us those things onely are honest which are honest and just which are just Pericles answere is knowne n 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that a man ought to doe for his friends but yet onely as farre as he may not goe against God Fifthly the Papists can see where the light did put out your eyes they teach o Possevinus lib. 3. de stud cas Consc c. 23. tom 1. p. 147. that the father and mother of the houshold which have servants and maids sonnes and daughters and doe not see that they obey the precepts of the Decalogue or which is worse hinder them from the observation thereof and worke them so hard on the Eves that on the Festivals and Lords dayes they are by necessity of their owne in a manner compelled to worke or that give them not time to be present at the Assemblies without promise of amendment they shall by no meanes be absolved of the Confessour Molina p Molin de inst tract 2. disp 38. Col. 200. 201. saith that the power of the master over the servant reacheth not to his life and much lesse to his spirituall salvation as if hee might command him or exact of him any thing that might fight against his spirituall safety The Magistrate in this case is to vindicate the servant if the master shall impose on the servants a necessitie of sinning the Bishops may deliver them from servitude And Antoninus affirmeth in such case q Antoninus 3. par titulo 3. ca. 6. §. 7. the servant may lawfully flee from his master if being admonished hee will not leave off Wee know it is better to suffer hard usage than to flee but see what master Breerwood might have knowne to have set his heart at a stand in his so forward and eager proceeding CHAP. XXXIIII Breerwood Pag. 53 54. ANd therefore Sir to draw to an end for I grow wearie and have already both dulled my penne and my selfe I would advise you in the Name of Iesus Christ whose Minister you are and whose worke you have in hand to examine this doctrine of yours what foundation it may have in the Word of God and what effect in the Church of God lest the foundation happily be your owne phantasie not Gods Word and the effect prove the poysoning not the nourishing of the Church I know Sir you are not the first that set this doctrine abroach nor the onely man that drawes of the vessell although few as I am told draw so freely as you But I would advise you Sir in the Name of God to beware betimes and draw not too deepe It is all nought it relisheth already with them that
Master Breerwoods doctrine is like the waters of Marah and Meribah page 181. That the fruites of this doctrine can be no other but disturbance and sedition by fiue consequences that follow vpon it pag. 181. 182. CHAP. XXXV Answereth Master Breerwoods prouocation and adiuration to a polemicke discourse pag. 183. CHAP. XXXVI Sheweth the true relation of the occasion of the controuersie betwixt Master Breerwood and Master Byfield That Master Byfield did not indeed giue any such aduice to John Breerwood That this pretended scruple did not make John Breerwood disobedient to his Master who would not vrge him nor did it occasion his hard vsage nor tend to his ruine his Master being deceiued with his false pretences desired the more to inioy him THE SECOND PART CONTAINES A BRIEFE SVRVEY OF Master BREERVVOODS Reply and Sheweth THAT Master Byfields declining of the controuersie with Master Breerwood could not impeach his Knowledge Zeale or Charity pag. 193. 194. 195. That Master Breerwood opposeth Gods Sabbath pag. 195. 196. That the Commandement concerning the Rest and Sanctification of the Sabbath was giuen to Adam pag. 197. Diuers distinctions vsed by Master Breerwood against this truth answered pag. 197. 198. 199. 200. The true sence of the words of the text Genesis 2. verse 2 3. pag. 202. Authorities to confirme that exposition pag. 203. 204. 205. 206. 207. The Commandement concerning the Sabbath was one of the ten perpetuall words from the beginning pag. 208 209. That place in the 56. of Esay 4 5. must be vnderstood of the Christian Sabbath pag. 210. No mysticall Sabbath spoken of in the Scripture pag. 210. The Sabbath translated by the authority of Christ pag. 211 212. That place in Matthew 24. 20. meant of the Christian Sabbath prooued at large pag. 213 214. That the Ceremonies of the old Law were deadly at the time of the siege of Jerusalem pag. 215. That the old Sabbath was not obserued in the East Churches 300. yeeres after our Sauiours death as Master Breerwood affirmeth pag. 216. The sufficiency of Master Byfields Reasons not to answere the Treatise at that time sent to him by Master Breerwood pag. 218 to 222. A letter of Master Breerwoods in which hee promiseth that this controuersie betweene him and Master Byfield shall neuer be made publique pag. 223 c. FINIS ⧠A TABLE OF THE ABSVRD AND GROSSE POsitions that lye scattered in this Treatise of the Sabbath written by Master BREERWOOD 1 THe seruant as touching bodily labour is meerely subiect to his Masters power pag. 11. 2. The seruant as touching bodily seruice incident to mankinde is in like degree of subiection to his Master as is the Oxe and Asse pag. 11. 3. Children are meerely vnder their Parents power as the Cattell are vnder their owners pag. 13. 4. Seruants are vnder their Masters power for seruice onely pag. 14. 5. A seruant cannot justly performe any labour which his Master forbids nor omit any which his Master commands pag. 14. 6. If the fourth Commandement * be giuen to seruants they cannot keepe it Their calling carrieth a necessity of breaking the Law as this Author would haue it as they are the seruants of men pag. 17. 7. The compassion and goodnesse of God is such that it agreeth not therewith to giue to man such a Commandement which through the wickednesse of other men he cannot keepe without an inconuenience and mischiefe that is without sharpe punishment pag. 17. 8. Sinne essentially is nothing else but the inordinate and vnruly election or resolution of the will varying from the Scripture or Gods Law pag. 19. 9. Outward vnlawfull actions are not sinne properly pag. 19. 10. Actions are no whit further sinfull then they are voluntary pag. 20. 11. The guilt of sinne is the forme of sinne pag. 12. 12. The eie beholding vanity the tongue loose to blaspheme slander and lie and the hand stretched out to shead blood sinne not pag. 20. 13. To worke on the Lords day is certainely no breach of any diuine Commandement pag. 37. 14. The designement of the first day of the weeke to be Sabbath is but ceremoniall pag. 42. 15. Gods resting from Creation was his Sabbath and his resting in himselfe the sanctification thereof other institution or sanctification of the Sabbath in Paradise will neuer bee prooued out of the place in Gen. 2. 2. pag. 63 64. 16. The Sabbath for the morall part of it I keepe his owne phrase became in the wildernesse on Sinai one of the ten perpetuall words not before pag. 67. 17. By the Iudiciall law of Moses it was death for a man in case of necessity or danger to depart from the place of his residence on the Sabbath further then a Sabbath-dayes iourney pag. 73. FINIS THE PREFACE BEfore I touch upon this Antisabbato-Dominicall Pamphlet to grapple with it it is requisite briefly to skan the title and sentences of Scripture prefixed and to propose the case or question controverted First the Booke is intituled A learned Treatise of the Sabaoth What the Treatise affords shall bee seene anon God willing the Title savours of little learning wherein for Sabbath is written Sabaoth which signifieth hostes as in a Esay 1. 9. Esay Vnlesse the Lord of Sabaoth had left us a remnant What hostes bringeth in this Treatise What the hostes of flies of which Saint Austine speaketh b Serm. de temp 95. Consideremus ergo cur ibi decem praecepta hic decemplagae memorentur ideo sine dubio quia in illis erant vulnera inâ—stis medicamenta Attendite tertiam plagam huic tertio praecepts contrariam Cyniphesnati sunt in terra Aegyptide lino muscae minutissimae inquiretissimae inordinate volantes in oculos irruenâ—â—s non permittentes hominem quirescere dum abiguntur iâ—erum irruunt dum expulsae suerint iterum redeunt Quales istae sunt muscae tolâ—s sunt homines inquieti qui Sabbaâ—â—m spiritalitèr observares id est bonis operibus studere lectioni vel orationi insistâ—re nolâ—nt Who comparing the ten Precepts and ten Plagues of Egypt together as the diseases and the medicines doth paralell the plague of flies to the Commandement of the Sabbath and thus applyeth it Such as â—â—e saith he these Dog-flies or Lice as our Translation readeth it Exod. 8. 16. such are unquiet men which will not spiritually observe the Sabbath that is which will not study good workes nor insist in reading and prayer Hold yee the Precept beware of the Plague These are hostes under the command of that Don-Beelzebub c The Lord of Flies I would haue imputed this to the Printers oversight if either the Errata had mentioned it or the whole Treatise in any one place had given the tâ—ue Orthography Well but be it so the Treatise plyed to this Discourse and therefore how prophanely abused to Gods high dishonour appeareth by setting other places to them and applying them to the matter in hand Take them thus The first
15. God doth prescribe which hath not the reason and nature of a benefit simply but of a duty and office that is from the Empire of God And afterwards explaining himselfe he addeth I say simply a benefit for God requires no duty of his creature which is not in the thing it selfe a benefit but that is simply a benefit in which no nature of a duty towards God doth shew it selfe Now follow this Rule and who sees not that this precept Thy servant shall doe no worke on the Sabbath hath in it chiefly the nature of office and duty the servant oweth to God as well as the master even the observation of the Sabbath to God though in a second place here is a matter of fatherly indulgence God graciously tendring the servants as he doth also the very bruite beast for whose ease he mercifully provides that day Now Master Publisher if you have any mind to put questions you shall have leave if you please to aske as many more CHAP. 4. Breerwood Pag. 7. NOw that that clause of the Commandement touching servants was not given to the sevants themselves but to their masters in whose power and disposition they are the text and tenour of the commandement doth clearly import for marke it well and answere me to whom is this speech directed Neither thy sonne nor thy daughter shall doe any worke on the Sabaoth day is it not to the Parents For can this manner of speech thy sonne thy daughter be rightly directed to any other than the parent and is not by the same reason the clause that next followeth neither shall thy man servant nor thy maid-servant doe any worke on the Sabaoth day directed to the Masters of such servants Seeing that phrase of speech thy man-servant thy maidservant cannot rightly bee used to any other It is therefore as cleare as the Sunne even to meane understandings if they will give but meane attendance to the tenour of Gods commandements rather than the fond interpretations and depravations of men that that clause of the commandement touching servants cessation from working on the Sabaoth is not given to servants themselves but to their masters concerning them Answer First this proofe is sufficiently overthrowne by all the former arguments yet I adde This precept is directed to the parents restraining the use of their power to interrupt and injoyning the use of their power to preserve the sanctification of the day and to the sonne and daughter also not to worke at the houshold worke for saith God g Levit. 23. 3. The seventh day is the Sabbath of rest and holy convocation yee shall doe no worke therein it is the Sabbath of the Lord in all your dwellings Who are these charged in the word yee Who but yee that stand bound to come to the holy convocations yee that constitute families therefore yee children as well as yee parents Secondly and to free all that subscribe to this truth from feare of so much as any private interpretation and to cast it bee commanded nor intreated licence would serve their turne but to the masters whose desire of gaine by the servants labour might stand betwixt the Sabaoth and the servants rest and to make an end with the Text with the last words of it what is it that the Lord for these reasons commanded was it barely to keepe and observe the Sabaoth as it is in the vulgar English Latine and Greeke translations No they are all short it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to make a day of rest Deut. 5. 15. Now to make it to bee so importeth not onely to observe it himselfe but to cause others also to observe it which is evidently the property of masters and governours wherefore seeing both the commandement touching servants rest from labour on the Sabaoth day and reasons added by Moses to perswade that point and draw their mindes to obsequiousnesse are evidently directed to the Masters and not neither of both to the servants themselves I take it out of all question as cleare as the Sunshine at midday that if servants by their masters command doe any worke on the Sabaoth the sinne is not theirs who as touching their bodily labour are meerely subject to their Masters power but it is their masters sinne For their sinne it is that transgresse the law they transgresse the law who are obliged by it they are obliged by it to whom it was given and imposed and given it was as I have plentifully proved onely to Masters Answer First your first way of confirming your exposition was by instance then you goe on to proofes from texts whereof the first taken out of the commandement was taken off in the former Chapter this is your second proofe built on the text in Deu. 5. And here because you flaunt it out in many words and in many of them glance at things as if they made to your purpose besides the maine of your argument I thus reply first to your reason drawne from the text secondly to some chiefe passages in the venting of it The substance of the reasoning is this in briefe Moses applyeth the precept of servants rest to the masters that were slaves in Egypt but now ransomed and set in the estate of freemen that they should allow their servants rest and make the Sabbath a resting day therefore the commandement thou shalt not doe any worke is given onely to the masters It is applyed to the masters therefore given to them were a right consequence but therefore to them onely is fallacious for more is in the consequent than was in the Antecedent and if you put the word only into the Antecedent then both the propositions are false For in Levit. 19. 3. as above was specified Moses applyeth it to children And the argument is yet unsolid for it stands thus Moses applieth it in his expositions onely to masters therefore it was given onely to masters for applications are according to severall occasions but not alwaies extended to the utmost breadth of the precept and yet in all this Moses fidelitie no way impeached inasmuch as he faithfully applieth where it most needeth as occasion serveth keeping the bounds of truth These consequents from this place as you expound it may be gathered therefore that reason binds not servants or this therefore the master sinnes most ungratefully that will disturbe his servants rest or this therefore it is given chiefly to the masters as those that must not onely keepe but make a Sabbath all which wee yeeld but the mind that once is big of a new fancy maketh all that it feedeth upon nourish that fancy Secondly the truth is the Lord by Moses pleades in those words the reason of the right that hee hath to command thy servant rest who is his freeman by vertue of that redemption the servant as well as the master called into the liberty of his holy people as appeareth in the Preface to the Decalogue Exod. 20. and in Exod.
juris sut nor operum suorum domini as Lawyers speake they are but their masters living instruments 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Aristotle tearmeth them they have no right or power to dispose of themselves they cannot play and worke at their owne pleasure for this is the condition of freemen not of servants but are meerely and intirely for bodily labour and service under the power and commandement of their masters and under their power for service onely in such sort as they can neither justly performe any labour which their masters forbid nor omit any which their Masters command but are under their inforcement and punishment also if they disobey This I say is the property and obligation of a servant and that by the law of nations which alloweth and ever hath done Masters over their servants as the law of nature doth Parents over their children not only a directive but a corrective and coactive power So then I pray you tell me whether the commandement touching the Sabaoth was not of common reason rather to be imposed on them which were at liberty and had power to obey it than on them which were utterly void and destitute of that power and liberty Whether in such a case it were not more reasonable to enjoyne the masters that they should not command than injoyne the servants not to obey for the poore servants if their masters command them could not chuse but worke the law of nations bound them unto it which had put them under their masters power and inforcement but the masters might forbeare to command there was no law that bound them to that or injoyned them to exact ought of their servants Answer First here begin your reasons the first whereof is taken from the equitie and wisedome of God and it stands thus in briefe It was more equity and wisedome to impose the commandement on masters for their servants and children rather than on the children and servants themselves who are under their masters power and inforcement Therfore what You leave us to gather up the conclusion for you may bee ashamed indeed of the consequence which is this Therefore it is against Gods wisedome and equitie to impose it on servants and children also it is more wisedome and equity to doe the one you say is it therefore against wisedome and equitie to doe the other also If the first be more equall and wise the second joyned to the first is of equitie and wisedome and no rashnesse nor iniquitie as you lavishly terme it It is given to masters for their servants you say and rightly is it therefore not intended to oblige servants also Wee grant it is more equity and wisedome to impose it chiefly on masters that they insnare not the servants and that they provide that the worship of God and his religion may bee kept a foot in the family and all attend on God in the assemblies insomuch that God will require of them and the Church also those that are under their charge and not chiefly on the servants who have no authority over others but are under the authority of another but this hindreth not the imposing hereof on the servant also who shall answer for his owne soule to God and cannot bee excused by the command of his master Secondly but in your discourse divers things suffer exception as most unsound as First that they are meerely under their masters power this confuted before in Chap. 5. Secondly that they are under their power for service onely which is most false for in this fourth Commandement they are put under their power directive and coactive for duties of Religion And this your position overthrowes the power of Princes over their subjects in matters of Religion A wicked doctrine Thirdly that they cannot justly performe any labour their masters forbid They may in case the masters life or livelihood be in manifest hazzard by obeying the masters prohibition as in Abigaïls case o 1 Sam. 25. 18 19. They may lift their neighbor out of a pit or save him from some imminent danger or losse though the master should forbid it Fourthly that they may not omit any labour which their masters command They may omit the labour which will manifestly creeple them and ought to doe it by vertue of the sixth Commandement Thou shalt not kill And so that phrase of yours in pag. 9. l. 7. overset with sixe dayes toyle if spoken as a thing lawfull on the masters part to overset his servant is sinfull Againe they may omit the labour that is against the commandement of an higher power as Thomas Aquinas sheweth in his Summes 22a. q. 104. art 5. Fiftly that servants are vtterly void of power and liberty to obey the commandement of God in resting on the Sabbath when their master bids them worke This is manifestly false for First if they are not void of liberty to refuse workes that will creeple them on any day then much lesse are they not void of liberty to refuse such workes on that day They are not void of liberty to refuse such uncessant imployments as will not give them leave to take breath in as much as that will kill them Now to worke the seventh day too is to have no time to take breath as the phrase is in Exod. 23. 12. That the sonne of thy hand-maid and the stranger may take breath And so in the other cases forementioned Secondly they have power to refuse a thing unlawfull but the servants worke that day is a thing unlawfull for it is forbidden as your selfe acknowledges Thirdly they are here for this day restored to freedom by this that the Lord commands the master not to work them Fourthly they have no power to sell themselves from Gods solemne worship and service and such a bargaine is void if it were made ipso facto nor did ever the Law of nations so bind the servant to his master and make him so to be his masters Fifthly if the master bid the servant do any thing which is either contrary to piety or repugnant to a servants duty he is not bound to obey p Si herus jubeat servum aliquid facere quod aut pietati contrarium aut à servili officio alienum sit non tenetur parere quia dominus non debuit talia imperare rectè igitur Hieronymê° hanc exceptionem apposuit per omnia nimirum inquit ille in quibus dominus carnis Domino spiritus contraria non imperat Davenant in Col. c. 3. v. 2â— because the master ought not to command such things Rightly therefore S. Hierom annexed this exception to the Apostles In all things to wit saith hee in which the master according to the flesh doth not command things contrary to the master of our spirit Now these commands of the master are of this nature and where the master ought not to command the servant is not bound to obey the master here you confesse ought not to command then the servant is
19. 4 5 6. bond and free indifferently entertained into the priviledge and honour of the Covenant and into the band of it and the reason the master hath both to obey and yeeld up his servant for that day to Gods commanding and appointing and also to use his authoritie for God in seeing that his servant keepe the Sabbath but in other respects both master and servant to rejoyce alike in the great worke of their redemption Thirdly but let us examine more narrowly some of the speciall passages Moses addeth in vers 14. that thy manservant and maid-servant may rest as well as thou it is to this Thou therefore to whom this charge is directed c. Which thou that in those words thou and thy sonne That makes nothing to the exemption of the servant as thy servant from the obligation of the first thou which is this thou shalt doe no manner of worke for thy servant is one contained under this thou as well as thou art that art the master Or if it bee meant of this first thou that were absonant from the very context It being meant of the latter thou we must ask what you meane when you say it is to this thou to whom this charge is directed Mean you by charge the charge to make the servants rest That you say afterwards were needlesse they need but licence and neither command nor intreat Or meane you the charge to give them leave to rest nay that is against your owne reading the master is to make a day of rest and your owne interpretation to make it to be so importeth not onely to observe it himselfe but to cause others also to observe it Or by charge meane you the command Thy servant shall doe manner of worke and this is directed to this thou namely the master of the servant Well bee it so And what will follow thence Why surely this Thou master must know that God commands thy servant to rest and thee to make him keepe the Sabbath day but not this Thou art commanded to rest but thy servant is not commanded to rest but may worke if thou biddest him the sinne and perill is thine only What new Divinitie and Logick is this We see then here is some motion in but no promotion of your cause Nay because the command is given that the servant may rest as well as the master and that all might be free to attend on Gods service that day alike therefore it cannot be that the servant should remaine bound to the commands of the master for servile worke on that day For as master Calvin well observes i Calvin in quartum praeceptum Tenendum est propriè spectatum fuisse unum Dei cultum Scimus enim totum Abrahae genus sic fuisse Deo sacrum ut serviessent quaedam accessio unde circumcisio illis communis fuit We must hold this that the alone worship of God was properly looked unto but wee know saith hee the whole off-spring of Abraham was so sacred to God that this that they were servants was a certaine accession whence also circumcision was common to them all If the commandement of rest had been directly and immediately given to servants Doth your owne conscience know and force out this acknowledgement that it is given to them though not directly and immediately Would not servants overset wearied with six daies toile be of themselves glad to rest on the seventh These interrogations are brought in to set on the proofe that the commandement of rest was not given at all to servants but how ill they conclude may bee seene by these certaine truths That the servant if not religious which God lookes not to find but by his word to make us such had rather oft times worke for his master than bee imployed in the duties of sanctification for a part much more for all the day for they are more irkesome to flesh and blood than handy worke True that question might take more place if it were rest alone that were aymed at and not rest for an higher end That the master if covetous and prophane will not stand upon pleasing or displeasing God in requiring such unlawfull worke but respect his gaine more than all and to the utmost call for the servants worke that day when the servant in the Court of God and man can have no redresse yea out of irreligious petulancy he will most exact worke then Againe that the toyled servant will be oft ready to worke for himselfe as in mending his clothes or the like now the master is charged to remember the condition of his slavery that hee may not dare to overset his sâ—rvant with worke in the sixe dayes but every way make a Sabbath day Hath it any other but to declare c. Yes it declares Gods just title over their servants to command them that day and their unequall and wicked carriage if they should offer to plead their covenant to evert Gods covenant Which reason could not bee intended nor directed to them that still remained in servitude No not at all intended nor could be This redemption prooved them Gods servants and not theirs nor any mans to use them as slaves to use them as servants on the Sabbaths as we read in Levit 25. vers 39 41 42. Thou shalt not compell him to serve as a bond-servant he shall returne in the yeere of Iubile for they are my servants which I brought out of the Land of Egypt And in vers 53. 55. The stranger meaning to whom the poore Iew was sold shall not rule with rigour over him he shall goe out in the yeere of Iubile for unto me the children of Israel are servants they are my servants whom I brought forth out of the Land of Egypt I am the Lord your God Here the servant saw that God put no difference betweene bond and free and that the Sabbath made master and servant equall in respect of freedome for attendance on God k Cessatiâ—nem indixit ut fulgeret ubique Sabbathi Sanctitas at que ita ad ejus observantiam terrae conspectu magis animarentur filii Israël Calvin com in 4. praeceptum in Lev. c. 25. Those Sabbaths of yeeres had all respect to engrave on them the respect of this Sabbath Heere no slavery but liberty for Gods service which is perfect freedome may passe upon the redeemed and therefore their servitude did not make the Redemption void to them But such an Expositor as you are would leave them slaves because servants and slaves without intermission even on the Lords Sabbath to drudgerie and not the Lords servants when yet they were the Redeemed of the Lord equally as their masters were Thus you derogate from the breadth of the coÌ„mandement and the reasons and clip the wings of Scripture while you take that precept to belong onely to masters and the master enjoyed no further than to make a rest for his servant when the text saith Hee shall make a
Sabbath day And the whole reason applied to the Sabbaths rest for servants sounds no lesse than this Remember when thou wast in Egypt the Egyptians made thee a slave and mard the Sabbath day now I have set thee free thou shalt free thy servant that day and make the Sabbath day Moses reasons are evidently directed to the masters not to the servants therefore the servant working at the masters command sinneth not What reasoning is this the master is by arguments peâ—swaded to make a day of rest therefore the servant must worke if the master bid him or therefore hee is not commanded to make a holy rest to his servant Who as touching bodily labour are meerely subject to their masters power This meerely in this place must needes exclude Gods power over the servant that he may not lawfully command him in any thing that respects the use of bodily labour but onely his master which wicked ground laid it will follow that the Lord may not command the master to let his servant rest but onely intreat or perswade but the Lord speakes pro imperio as a Lord and Emperor thy servant shall rest This meerely takes in all time so that the master may require their worke and not allow them any time for solemne worship now it is certaine that no man hath power to sell himselfe to any in such a manner no more than he hath to sell himselfe from God and to the divell for take away time from solemne worship and that falls to the ground nothing can bee done in an instant take away solemne worship and you are without God Ier. 10. 25 and without him under the power of Satan Act. 26. 18. This meerely in a word taketh away all bounds maketh the servants bondage and the masters power infinite Now Plato saith well l Servitus libertas infinita nullisque cancellis circumscripta summum est malum quod si modo quodaÌ„modo definiatur summum bonum Optimo illa modo constat servitus quae Deo paret Plat. tom 3. Epist 8. Servitude and liberty that is infinite and circumscribed with nolimitte is the chiefest evill but if some way it be defined by measure it is a chief good that servitude stands in the best forme which obeyeth God And Doct. Ames m Ames de conscientia lib. 5. c. 23. worthily in his Cases of Conscience it is the generall office of masters neither to exercise nor to imagine it is permitted them any absolute empire over their servants but a limited dominion the account whereof they must render to God as the common master of themselves and their servants Ephes 6. 9. Col. 4. 1. CHAP. VI. Breerwood Pag 11. OR if notwithstanding all these evidences you will still contend that the prohibition touching bodily labour on the Sabaoth is directly imposed on the servants themselves see whether you bring not the Oxe and the Asse and other cattle also under the obligation of this commandement whose worke is immediatly after that of servants prohibited and precisely under the same forme of words whose labours yet on the Sabaoth I hope you will not say to be in them sins and transgressions of Gods law Answer First No we doe not it is imposed on servants yet not on oxe or asse for the servant is forbidden labour because hee can labour without thee and so hee is capable properly of commandement to rest but the Oxe is not forbidden labour but to bee laboured and wrought for hee cannot worke without thee and is not capable of the commandement The servant is therefore forbidden labour even in his masters worke that hee might bee vacant to holy duties n Otio non otioso Zanch. in 4. praecep not so the Oxe The servant is forbidden to bee wrought by his master because now hee must acknowledge another master in whose service he is this day commanded to worke with whom there is no respect of persons and this end the servants obedience to his masters unlawfull commandement of worke that day would crosse no man can serve two masters Moreover doth God take care for Oxen No doubt it was written for the servants sake that he might not attend to guide the Oxes labour and that mercy due to the Oxe might call for more to man Zanchy is expresse that the commandement was given to the servant hee saith o Neminem vult excludi a sanctificatione Sabbati quia tam servi quam domini tam silii quà m parentes tam advenae quám indigenae obstricti Deo sunt natique â—d ejâ—s cultum De jumentis alia est ratio non enim jubentur quiâ—scere à laboribus ut possint vacare cultui divino sicut homines Id. ibid. God would have no man excluded from the sanctification of the Sabbath because aswell servants as masters sonnes as parents strangers as home-borne are bound to God and borne to his worship touching beasts there is another reason c. Secondly the Oxe is forbidden to bee wrought that they might have no snare to draw them to worke and may a servant worke at his masters command how great a snare would this bee to the master who naturally and such a master as will require his servant to worke on that day is not far from his pure naturals loveth profit more than his soule and feares a penny losse where he thinks it might bee gained more than the breach of a precept that God threatens with the curse and hell Hee will bee ready not onely to say with Rebecca p Gen. 27. 13. On me be the curse my sonne only doe as Ibid but in another tone Sirrah the sinne and curse is mine go you about your worke you shall not answer for my faults how comes on you this new religion now therefore I conclude against you thus he that forbade the strangers worke and the cattels that all examples and occasions might be remooved that might entise to evill it cannot bee that hee would leave sonne daughter man and maid in the family free to the master that they should and must obey him in his unlawfull commands Thirdly and to requite you out of the Text. In the same forme of words that the Oxe and Asse is prohibited the stranger within the gate of another is also forbidden work and is it not given to the stranger q It is partly understood of the strangers within the Covenant those saith Zanchy without controversie were commanded so to sanctifie the Sabbath even as other Iewes Zanch. in â— praecep aswell as of yet I hope you wil not say it is given to the oxe If you say it is not given to the stranger I vrge you thus The stranger is there meant partly of the stranger which being a Iew is with thee for the time as a guest r Dr. Williams of the Church l. 2 c. 8. and can this that he is a guest free him from the bond of this Law or if the Iew within whose
his master d Iob 31. 13 14. It fights with that common honour both master and servant are equally estated in by creation e Vers 15. Did not hee that made the master in the wombe make him And did not one fashion them in the wombe It fights with the eternall Law in the fifth Commandement in which the master of the servant is required that he be to his servant in his manners a brother in his office a father f 2 King 5. 13. things incompatible to bruite beasts and man Command 5. 2 King 5. Thirdly and howsoever the condition of a slave was harder than that of an ordinary servant or one hired yet our question hath been all this while of Iewish servants and so of Christian servants now the Iew in service might not bee used as a slave or bond-servant but as an hired servant as in Levit. 25. 39 40. The Iew that was a servant was still a brother in Religion and so to be used in his service and labour not so the oxe Fourthly for the duty of subjects to their superiours to cleare the whole matter these grounds I lay downe First subjects are bound to obey their superiours onely in those things in which themselves are subjected to their superiors in which the superiors themselves are not contrary respect guiltinesse hath somewhat of good in it and is of God and in this regard God can separate guilt from sinne But partly it followeth sinne as that which floweth from out of sinne and is the desert and merit of punishment and so it participates of the nature of sinne and is quid vitiosum a thing vitious and in this respect it cannot bee separated from sinne This double consideration of guiltinesse is intimated in Rom. 1. 32. We know the judgement of God that they which commit such things are worthy of death This is the nature of guiltinesse but the forme of sinne can no way bee separated from sinne and yet the sinne be sinne that were a contradiction The forme of sinne is in no respect good that were likewise a contradiction Thirdly besides this you say first there are two things in every sinne the act and guilt as the matter and forme yet in the same breath you tell of three things in every sin the Act the Anomy or unlawfulnesse and the Guilt This for the application of your Schoole-termes Fourthly hence you say it appeareth manifestly that his is the guiltinesse whose the transgression is and his the transgression to whom the law was prescribed as a Rule and that is the masters c. what coherence is here because guiltinesse is in your stile the forme of sinne therefore his is the guiltinesse whose is the transgression Is guiltinesse and transgression all one and is not transgression the forme of sinne This is then in your owne sense as much as to say his is the sinne whose is the sinne A faire conclusion but no marvaile you were thus puzled here for your reasoning should thus have runne from your owne grounds The Act wherewith the commandement of the Sabbath is violated is the servants therefore the guilt is the servants for whoso violates the Law hee is guilty and thus not only the master that commands the worke but the servant that doth the work violating the command of God is guilty What followeth in this section of yours hath been partly answered already and followeth to bee answered below in its more proper place CHAP. IX Breerwood Pag. 12 13. But you will reply perhaps that the comandement touching servants rest on the Sabaoth is given to their Masters indeede but not only to them but to their servants also No such matter for if it be let that appeare and set downe the clause wherein it is manifestly expressed or necessarily implied that servants are forbidden all labour on the Sabaoth day as servants I say touching matter of service or labour imposed on them by their Masters for that in those workes which servants doe on the Sabaoth day of themselves and not as proceeding from their Masters injunction but from their owne election it is no question but they transgresse the commandement but those workes they doe not as servants that is at anothers command but as in the condition of their service or favour of their Masters they retaine some degree of liberty and have some disposition of themselves permitted unto them so in that respect fall into the clause of free men viz. the first clause of the commandement Thou shalt doe no worke but to servants as servants in case they bee commanded to worke which is our question there is no clause of the commandement imposed Answer First this indeed is our just exception against your doctrine that the commandement though given chiefely to masters in those words of specification authorising and appointing them not onely to cease their labour by themselves or any under them but to cause them to cease and to cause them to sanctifie the day for outward conformity yet is given also to and imposed on sonne and daughter man and maide and when you aske for the expresse or implied precept reaching them as servants you have the same expressely in that clause thy servant shall not worke and in that other Thou shalt doe no worke as hath been hitherto abundantly and unanswerably prooved and is of plaine light to manifest it selfe Therefore when you call the first clause of the comandement thou shalt doe no worke the clause of freemen thereby implying that the latter is of bondmen ding the losse of things according to that in Deut. 22. Thou shalt bring home thy brothers erring oxe and therefore a corporall worke pertaining to preserve the health of ones owne body doth not violate the Sabbath as to eate and such like whereby the health of the body is preserved So the Iewes fought Macchab. 2. Elias travelled fleeing from Iezabel and the Disciples pluckt the eares of Corne on the Sabbath c. This Schooleman saith that the bodily workes whereby man serveth man of all other bodily labours are forbidden this day and to the other the servant as well as the freeman is bound freely to apply himselfe And that these workes of servants doe contrary the observance of the Sabbath and hinder the application of the man that serves to divine things CHAP. X. Breerwood Pag. 13 14. WHereby may easily and clearely bee discerned the difference betwixt the equity and wisdome of Almighty God in the constitution of the Law of the Sabaoth obliging Parents and Masters and owners for the children and servants and cattell that are merely under their powers and the rashnesse and iniquity of wretched men interpreting the law as immediatly and directly obliging the children and servants themselves for good Sir consider it well and tell me whether it be more equall to impose the law of ceasing from worke to the servants themselves or to their masters in whose power they are Servants are not homines
briefly all those which while they are performed as by the Servants of men they that doe then are not impeached for being the servants of God That is to say the workes of labour but not the workes of sinne for to the first they are obliged by the law of nations but the second are forbidden them by the Law of God not nakedly forbidden as their labour on the Sabaoth is but directly and immediatly forbidden them for it i◠cleare that all the other commandements being indifferently imposed without either specification or exception of any person whatsoever respect not any more one than another and therefore hold all men under an equall obligation and so was it altogether convenient because they are no lesse the secret lawes of nature than the revealed Lawes of God and no lesse written with the finger of God in the fleshly tables of the heart than in the tables of stone all of them forbidding those things that by their property and nature or as the Schoolemen say exsuogenere are evill but the commandement that forbiddeth servile workes on the Sabaoth is of a different sort first because the servant is touching the matter which it forbiddeth labour wholly subject to another mans command secondly because the commandement forbiddeth not the servant to worke but onely forbiddeth the Master his servants worke thirdly because the thing it selfe namely servants labour is not evill materially and exsuogenere as the matters of the other negative commandements are but only circumstantially because it s done upon such a day for idolatry blasphemy dishonouring of Parents murther adultery theft false testimony coveting of that is other mens which are the matter of other commandements are evill in their owne nature and therefore forbidden because they are evill in their owne nature But to labour on the Sabaoth is not by nature evill but therefore evill because it is forbidden So that the native ilnesse in the other causeth the prohibition but the prohibition in this causeth the evill for laboring on the seventh day if God had not forbiddē it had not bin evil at al no more than to labour on the sixt as not being interdicted by any law of nature as the matters of all the other commandements are for although the secret instinct of nature teacheth all men that sometime is to bee withdrawne from their bodily labours and to be dedicated to the honour of God which even the prophanest Gentiles amidst all the blind superstition and darkenesse wherewith they were covered in some sort did appointing set times to be spent in sacrifice and devotion to their idols which they tooke for their Gods yet to observe one day in the number of seven as a certaine day of that number and namely the seventh in the ranke or a whole day by the revolution of the Sunne and with that severe exactnesse of restraining all worke as was injoyned to the Iewes is but meerely ceremoniall brought in by positive Law and is not of the law of nature For had that forme of keeping Sabaoth bin a law of nature then had it obliged the Gentiles as well as the Iewes seeing they participate both equall in the Exod. 31. 13. Ezek. 20. 12. 30. same nature yet it did not so but was given to the Israelites to bee a speciall marke of their separation from the Gentiles and of their particular participation to God neither shall wee finde either in the writings of Heathen men whereof some were in their kinde very religious that any of them had ever any sense of it or in the records of Moses that it was ever observed by any of the holy Patriarchs before it was pronounced in mount Sinai But if it had beene a law of nature her selfe and so had obliged all the Patriarchs and as large as nature her selfe and so obliged all the Gentiles and had it not beene as durable as nature too and so obliged us Christians also Certainely it had for if that precise vacation and sanctification of the Sabaoth day had consisted by the law of nature then must it have beene by the decree of all Divines immutable and consequently right grievous should the sinne of Christians be which now prophane that day with ordinary labours and chiefly theirs which first translated the celebration of that day being the seventh to the first day of the weeke who yet are certainly supposed to be none other than the Apostles of our Saviour To turne to the point and clearely to determine it the master only is accountable unto God for the servants worke done on the Sabaoth but for what worke Namely for all the workes of labour but not for the workes of sin and how for the workes of labour Namely if hee doe them not absolutely of his owne election but respectively as of obedience to his masters command for touching labours servants are directly obliged to their masters But touching sinnes themselves are obliged immediatly to God Therefore those they may doe because their master commands them these they may not doe although commanded because God forbids them The servants then may not in any case sinne at the commandement of any Master on earth because hee hath received immediatly a direct commandement to the contrary from his Master in heaven For it is better to obey God than man And there is no proportion betwixt the duties which they owe as servants to their masters according to the flesh which they owe as Children to the father of spirits or betwixt the obligation wherein they stand to men who have power but over their bodies in limited cases and that for a season And that infinite obligation wherein they stand to him that is both creator and preserver and redeemer and ludge of body and soule sinne therefore they may not if their Masters command them because God hath forbidden them nor only forbidden I say but forbidden it them but labour they may if their masters command them because God hath no way forbidden them that God hath indeede forbidden the Masters exacting that worke on the Sabaoth but hee hath not forbiddē the servants execution of that work if it be demanded or exacted he hath restrained the master from commanding it but hee hath not restrained the servants from obeying if it bee commanded for although I acknowledge the servants worke on the Sabaoth to imply sinne yet I say it is not the servants fault And albeit I confesse the commandement of God be transgressed and God disobeyed by such workes on the Sabaoth yet it is not the servant that transgresseth the commandement it is not he that disobeyeth God For the question is not the passive sense whether God bee displeased with these workes but of the active who displeaseth him The thing is confessed but the person is questioned Confessed that is that there is sinne committed in that worke but questioned whose sinne it is For worke having relation both to the Master and to the servant to the Masters commanding and to
the servants executing I affirme that were given more to servants than to others and crosseth your former words where you say their labour is forbidden for if they labour is it not their labour and so on the contrary Or to the words directly and immediately you yeeld then that servants labour is forbidden indirectly and immediately The truth is that which is nakedly forbidden is directly forbidden and that which is immediately forbidden is sinfull to be done though mediately mediately or immediately takes not away the edge of the precept or power of the commander Thirdly you say The other commandements were imposed without specification or exception of any person whatsoever and therefore hold all men under an equall obligation but this not so Answ What arguing is this This commandement is with specification and the servant is specified and his worke of service to his master on the Sabbath specified and prohibited therefore it bindeth him not it is not his sinne Nay the specification maketh it the more his sinne and God provided by this enumeration of the persons as all have and will agree unlesse any should use your false glasse that this rest might by no meanes be violated Master Attersoll * Vpon Numb chap. 28. vers 11 12 13. p. 1142. saw in this enumeration not a freeing of the servants and subjects from the obligation because a charge is laid on the Governours to see that others keepe the day but a reason to perswade the inferiour the more chearefully to keepe it thus he saith The charge is laid on Governours that inferiours might yeeld chearefully to Gods will considering how strait a charge God hath given to all Governours And that he meant by Gods will the commandement here imposed upon and binding servants from doing their masters worke though commanded is apparant by his words in the same place which runne thus Many fathers urge their children many masters command their servants to goe about their owne businesse and send them from place to place at that time when they should attend to the holy Commandement of the Lord whereas both of them might well and lawfully reply to their fathers and masters and say with Christ our Saviour Luk. 2. 49. Wist yee not that I must be about my Fathers businesse That word exception is venemous as if some persons were excepted by that specification of persons in the fourth Commandement these are cankred words and evill that will quickly corrupt good manners Therefore Christian Reader I give thee this note as an Antidote and that it may be the more strong to expell poyson know that the specification of persons in a precept negative cannot be an exception of those parties from under that precept if specified in the prohibition not excepted And for the equall obligation that holds all men alike under the other Commandements it is the same also in this for if you say the commandement more obligeth Governours I answer It doth so in respect of their politicall observing of the command as they are Governours and so ought to see this Law kept and not violated and thus they are bound more and otherwise than other men to every of the other nine Commandements For the Magistrate is the keeper or preserver of both m Custos utriusque tabulae Tables of the Law But in respect of their personall observance hereof it is equally charged on them as on the servant and subject and so it is also in the rest of the precepts Fourthly you say this commandement is of a different sort from others therefore it otherwise obligeth and you give three things to shew this difference first the nature of it secondly the matter prohibited thirdly the command it selfe First for the nature of this Law you say It is a Law ingraven in the Tables of stone but not on the Tables of mens heart nor any Law of nature You make this distinction that there are revealed Lawes in the Decalogue which are not the secret Lawes of Nature the Lawes ingraven in stone by the singer of God were not all of them the Lawes of Nature Against this I presse you with reasons authorities and of the other Commandements in the nature and property of the things as you say and so you give three instances two of them have been already answered namely that the labour of the servant is wholly subject to another mans command and that the commandement only forbiddeth the master his servants worke The third difference which now we will God willing scanne is this That the thing forbidden viz. servile worke and so the servants worke is not evill materially and ex suo genere as the matter of other commandements is nor evill of its owne nature but onely because it is prohibited and therefore you hold it is no Law of nature Here first consider how farre wide this is to your scope and the question in hand for what if the matter prohibited be evill but onely by prohibition would not that prohibition make it sinfull of lawfull and that to the servant I le give you an instance in a precept ceremoniall God commanded that no leaven should be in their houses during the Feast of unleavened bread suppose the master should command his servant to make in those dayes leavened bread if the servant did it the servant sinned as well as his master Secondly the proposition it selfe is faulty for the matter of the second Commandement is not evill materially any more than the matter of the fourth to make an image or likenesse of any thing in heaven earth or sea is not evill but onely circumstantially as to make it to bow to it If you say to make it to bow to it is the matter of the Commandement as indeed it is then I say to worke on the Sabbath is the matter of this Commandement and as to make an image to bow to it is evill materially and of its owne nature so to spend the Sabbath I say not that seventh day but the Sabbath the consecrated time of Gods worship in our labour is evill materially And therefore the masters command cannot excuse the servants worke that day And now hence I further reason against you thus Though the second Commandement forbid to make images which is not evill in it selfe but onely with this circumstance added to make them to bow to them yet he that maketh them for another that he knoweth will worship them breaketh the second Commandement therefore in this Commandement the servant that worketh at his masters commandement whom he knoweth to abuse his labour in this kind breaketh this Commandement Now by your Rule the servant commanded to make an image which he knoweth his master would abuse to worship it ought to make it because to make a likenesse or image is not simply evill Thirdly when you hold that the Law of Nature is of those things only that are evill by their property and nature this passage received thrusts out the second
his masters authority though not obey his unlawfull commands and be so farre from resisting that he must suffer patiently the hard usage of an evill master and endure stripes rather than offend God in all committing his cause to him that judgeth righteously And for the servants more full direction in this thing one case of Conscience I would here briefely decide which is this what workes may servants doe on the Sabbath and in what are they under their masters command and bound to obey them Answ To conceive hereof plainely There are foure sorts of workes lawfull on the Sabbath First workes of holinesse Secondly workes of mercy Thirdly workes that are in their nature servile yet doe directly respect the present worship of God as out travell to the places of Gods worship for these workes become now holy workes and are not ours but Gods workes Fourthly workes of common honesty that is workes that make to the comely decent and orderly performance of Gods worship and our carriage and behaviour therein Such are the tolling of a bell for the calling of the Assembly the comely and modest dresse of the body provided that it be not vaine curious nor aske much time but be thrust into the narrowest roome that may bee The spreading of our Table so that state be not taken up and all things bee prepared before as much as may bee with the like By workes of mercy I meane not onely the necessarie labours in the helpe of the sicke and of women in travell and of beasts out of a pit with the like but also all those that are called workes of necessity which I rather call workes of mercy because they are therefore necessary as they tend to the preservation of things not from feared or suspected but eminent and imminent and present danger and the worke it selfe must be done in mercy not in covetousnesse or other respects Now of this sort are these workes labour in provision of convenient foode tendance of cattell fight for defence of our country being assailed riding of postes on the affaires of the state in causes of present and imminent danger In all these the master hath power to command and so hath the superiour over him that is under his charge and the servant is bound to obey The master may command him the workes of mercy and the workes servile that directly looke to the worship of God or to goe with him to the Sermon though many miles off if it cannot bee had neerer hand and as the master may take his horse and ride thither his servant going on foote so may hee command his servant for this purpose to saddle his horse as in 2 King 4. 22 23. The question of the Shunamites husband sheweth who to his wife desiring one of the Asses to bee made ready and a servant to be sent her that she might go to the man of God saith on this wise Wherefore wilt thougo to him to day it is neither now moone nor Sabbath It was then their custome so to doe on the Sabbath and new moone In like manner the master may injoyne the servant such workes as tend to necessary provision of foode and tending of children in the family c. Yet here againe some things seeme to fight with the sanctification of the day First if the master shall strictly stand upon his state and distance for if the familie-necessities in respect of young children should necessarily require the presence of some constantly at home the master may not keepe his servant hereby constantly from the publike worship but rather sometimes change turnes with him Much lesse may he desire such unnecessary superfluities as may cause absence from the Assemblies for this is to feede thy carcase on the life blood of the soules of thy servants Deale in all plainenesse of heart and know thou hast to deale with God The servant must be sure the worke is unlawfull before he offer to withdraw his obedience but thou maist sinne in that worke in which thy servant sinneth not because thou art bound to search more into the nature of thy necessities Secondly if the master set not his businesse in so wise and discreet an order that without all unnecessary hinderances hee and all his houshold may sanctifie the day and keepe it holy Thirdly if the master remember not that he is a God and that both by communication of name and power to provide for and see to the servants and his housholds rest and therein respect that mercy which God would have shewen to servants yea to cattell on that day CHAP. XVIII Breerwood Pag. 30 31 32. Object BVt yet one scruple remaineth because every person that did any Exod. 31. 14 15. worke on the Sabaoth day was by the law to be cut off from his people and to dye the death every person therefore the Servant as well as the master Sol. I answere that the judiciall commandement is to be understood of the same persons to whom the morall commandement was given the commandement touching punishment of them to whom the commandement touching the offence was imposed but I proved before that the morall commandement was not imposed to servants as servants but to them that were at liberty All they therefore that did any worke on the Sabaoth were to dye the death by the judiciall law they I say that did it not they that were made to doe it which were as well passive as active in doing of it namely they that did it of election as free that might abstaine from worke and would not not they that did it of injunction and necessitie as servants that would abstaine from worke and might not whose condition was such that they would not worke by their masters direction might be made to worke by their masters compulsion for a hard case it were if poore servants to whom no commandement to cease from worke was given by God and yet might be compelled to worke by men should dye for it if they did so worke It is therefore to be understood of them that worke willingly of themselves or as authors cause others to worke as masters doe their servants not of them who onely as ministers and against their wills are set to worke And rather because the worke of the servant that I say which he doth by the commandement of his master to whom for matter of labour he is meerely subordinate even reason and equity will interpret the masters worke And certainely that God accounteth it so the declaration of that Precept in another place doth make manifest Six daies thou shalt doe thy worke and the seventh day thou shalt rest that Exod. 23 12. thine Oxe and thinâ— Asse and thy Sonne and thy Maide c. may be refreshed for is it not manifest that the servants worke is accounted the masters seeing the rest from the masters worke is the refreshing of the servants the master therefore who by the morall law was commanded that his servants should
not worke on the Sabaoth was by the judiciall to be punished with death if the servant did worke that day by his commandement Answer First that place is to be understood of the presumptuous offender as appeareth in Numb 15. 35 36. with that in vers 30 31. The soule that doth ought presumptuously reproacheth the Lord and shall be cut off For if the sinne were of ignorance infirmity and errour he was bound to bring a sinne-offring vers 27 28. thus the Iewes understand that place in Exodus Now the servants worke at the masters command will not come under a wilfull and presumptuous sinne yet that law sheweth this truth that men for breach of Sabbath shall be punished according to the nature of their offence so shall he that forgoeth Gods to doe his masters worke This is the true Answere you meerly trifle and therefore the force of the objection lieth still upon you and your Answere falls like an untimely fruite or rotten nut And your hard cases for they seeme full of pitty and yet would have a servant to be in the condition of a beast are meer conceits And for that phrase of yours saying The servants may be compelled to work by men speaking there of such worke as the fourth commandement hath forbidden doth contradict your former Tenet expressely who say that the master may not command his servant to worke may he not command him and may he yet compell him Good stuffe I promise you Secondly in this place also seeing you offer to our thoughts Gods judiciall Law and so his judiciary proceeding I urge you with the just hand of Gods yengeance that lighteth oftentimes on children and servants working at the command of their parents and masters on that day God punisheth none but those that offend lesse or more But this ungodlinesse he hath punished from heaven And all wise Christians will esteeme more of one Demonstration of Gods wrath than of two hundered sophisticated Rhetoricall Demonstrations of any Disputer in the world At Kimstat a towne in France m Iob. siâ—col l. 3. De mirac there lived in the yeere 1559. a certaine covetous woman who was so greedy of gaine that shee would not frequent the Church her selfe nor suffer any of her family to doe it but continually toyled a bout drving and pilling of flaxe and doing other houshold businesses neither would she bee reclaimed by her neighbours who admonished and disswaded her from such unseasonable workes One Sabbath day as they were thus busily occupied fire seemed to issue out of the flaxe without doing any hurt The next Sabbath it tooke fire indeed but was quickly extinct Yet this wretch continued obstinate in her prophanenesse even the third Sabbath when the flax againe taking fire could not bee quenched till it burnt her and two of her children to death for though they were recovered out of the fire alive yet the next day they all three died and that which was much to be wondred at a young infant in the cradle was taken out of the midst of the flame without any hurt God we see tooke vengeance on the children that wrought at the mothers commandement Are there not strange punishments for the workers of iniquitie n Iob 31. 3. Above fifty persons were consumed in the fire which burnt the towne of Fevertone in Devonshire in the yeere 1598. where 400. dwelling houses were all at once on fire and consumed for their horrible prophanation of the Lords day Can any thinke that of those fifty none were children and servants whose worke that day had been usually abused Here also Christian Reader I thought it my part to lay before thy more serious consideration these notable and late examples of Gods wrath from heaven against mens ungodlinesse on the Sabbath day Blackesmith by trade he is yet alive the Lord give him an heart to repent and all the Towne to learne by that hand of God this woman was with her yong childe in her armes within her owne gate looking on them and so it was that while she looked on one of the greatest ropes failed and broke and the Pole fell downe upon the pale that parteth their gate and the streete and the upper end of it with the fall lapped over and strucke the childe on the head in the mothers armes and killed it It was the edge of the weather-cocke that hit the childe on the head marke it well and cleft the skull and it dyed the next day It is time for thee Lord to worke for men have made voide thy Law Psal 119. 126. The Lord is known by the judgement which he executeth The wicked is snared in the worke of his owne hands Higgaion Selah Psal 9. 16. That place in Exo. 23. 12. which commeth in on the left side is abusively rendred by you when you read that thy son and thy maide may be refreshed whereas it is thus in the text the sonne of thine handmaid and when you say it is manifest that the servants worke is accounted the masters seeing the rest from the masters worke is the refreshing of the servant is it not as manifest that it is the servants when the rest is his refreshing For by another rest I am not refreshed if I worke and what if in some respects it may be called the masters worke is it therefore no sinne in the servant to doe it This is a begging of the question and a shame in a professed Disputant CHAP. XIX Breerwood Pag. 32 33 34. ANd thus have I proved my assertion namely that the commandement of the Sabaoth was not given nor fit to be given to the servants themselves but to their governours both by arguments of reason which is the rule of men and authoritie of Scriptures which is the rule of Christians and cannot finde any thing materiall in either of both that may reprove it but yet if I should admit which I doubt you will never prove that the commandement was directly given to servants themselves as servants and that they might lawfully disobey their masters touching those workes whereby the precept of the Sabaoth might bee transgressed yet have I another exception against your doctrine namely for condemning every light worke such as inviting of guests or fetching of wine from a neighbours house or giving a horse provender for these are the very instances which bred the question for transgression of Gods commandements forbidden on the Sabaoth no it is not the commandements importeth no such thing for it is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is every worke but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is there forbidden that is every servile worke for such the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 properly doth import and servile worke by the interpretation of the best Divines is accounted either that which is attended with the toyle of the body or at least intended and directed to lucre and gaine of riches with some care of the minde such as mens ordinary worke is wont to
wrongfully for he is to be obedient to his lawfull commands that day and to his unjust corrections for the Lords sake which will breake the heart of any Master and winne him but your course would take away the very practice of religion in the servant for where is religion if the publike worship be gone Nor will this deprive them of their service but make them in higher esteeme as Ioseph was and the famous courtier Daniel for refusing to obey the king decree when Parasites shall bee loathed and cast out Yet if this should not alwaies be the Spirit of glory and of God will rest upon him that suffers in these cases If this bee the blasphemie wee must avoide we all are undone while we are saith Tertullian y let his name be blasphemed in the observation and Tertul. de Idolat ca. 14. not the exorbitation of discipline so long as we are proved not reproved this malediction of preserved discipline is the benediction of Gods Name This would propagate the Gospell as in Daniels case is to be seene and in the case of the three children This is absolute meekenesse obedience humilitie and patience and such servants for their vertue and the profit that commeth to their masters by their faithfull service in the times and seasons due and their unfained respect even when they receive wrong shall carry in the eyes of the vilest high respects and praise but if your course were held that the servant should neglect the assemblies to doe his masters worke on that day we speake of workes unlawfull to be done on the Sabbath and should carry an heart to God while his feete and hands carried him to his masters worke which is all one as if one should sweare with his tongue and thinke to keepe his heart unsworne then where is the solemne worship of God And that gone where is Religion And that gone what vertue And that gone what profitable service Masters that respect but their owne lucre can conne you little thankes for this doctrine Besides this were the scandall and defamation of the Gospell for ever that whereas all Religions teach the followers thereof a time for pietie with all attendance of body and soule for that time this Christian Religion should teach that the servant hath no time at all nor doth God require it of him but the contrary if his master will but bid him worke This can be no seminarie of disturbance or contumacie for he is subject to his masters power for correction so as not to resist in wrongfull sufferings but yours sheweth it manifestly while it leaveth a man in anothers hands against two such principles that when they have beene by tyrannie prest to goe against them rebellion hath ever followed The principles are these First God must bee solemnely and publikely worshipped and that on some times weekly in which hee is to bee attended upon without avocations Secondly that Nature sheweth the preservation of it selfe Now to go about to blot out sense of God religion to keepe men to taskes of insupportable burdens which nature breaketh under while it beares them this is the ready way to overturne all This alienates not masters from their Christian servants let the experience of all ages shew it In this nation the servants that make conscience of the Sabbath are sought after by all sober and wise masters that onely are wise for the world for these are those that will not be night-walkers nor drunkards nor filchers with the like I know none but choose such and greatly affect them and for their fidelity otherwise and industry give them great liberties for Gods worship True I have heard of some of our Gentry that will by no meanes have such a servant especially to waite on their persons or to be their Clerkes but one may easily smell the reason it is not for any matter of Sabbaths labour or rest but first there is a divellish principle amongst them that it is for their reputation to have their men such as will make the servant of their neighbour-Gentleman Answer First that the subjection due to men in respect of obedience to execute their commands extendeth only so farre as it may not diminish the empire of God hath been sufficiently proved but you call for antiquity to beare out the servant in refusing his masters commands of servile worke on the Lords day I shewed you before out of Chrysostome what he taught were the bounds which a servant might not passe namely the commandements of God if the master command ought against them he may by no meanes execute his masters command Tertullian b Tertul. lib. de Idolat c. 17. saith that if a servant doe but by some word helpe the sacrifice he shall be accounted a minister of the sinne of idolatry he speakes of them as attending on their masters and that the place Give to Casar the things that are Caesars binds no subject to keepe the daies consecrated to idoles nor to set up lights at their doores or Laurell branches on their doore posts And then saith further c Ibid. ca. 15. it is well added and to God the things that are Gods Vnto which lay but that which went before in Chapter 14. d Ibid. cap. 14. where hee saith the Ethnickes have every festivall day yeerely once the Christian hath his on the eight day lay these together I say according to the true meaning of that Author and it is cleare that the servant might not for his masters command keepe a day in honour to an idoll nor any way be minister of that sinne nor might he neglect the day consecrated in honour to God for his master Clemens Alexandrinus e Clemens Alex. stromat l. 4. hath these words Discipline is necessary to all sorts of men and vertue since all tend to felicity And after quotation of the texts in Ephes 5. Col. 3. and 4. He concludeth out of these Therefore it is manifest to us what the unitie that is of faith is and is shewed also who is perfect wherefore the servant and the woman shall professe philosophy be any against it and exceedingly resisting although punishment hang â—ver their heads from their masters and husbands The free man also though the tyrant threaten death to him though he be led to judgement and drawne to utmost torments and runne the hazzard of all his goods and fortunes shall by no meanes abstaine from piety and the true worship of God nor shall ever dissent from it the woman likewise which dwelleth with an evill husband and the sonne if he have an evill father or the servant that hath an evill master pursuing vertue with a valiant and generous mind But as it is comely and honest for the man to dye both for vertue and for liberty and for himselfe so also is it for the woman for this is not proper to the nature of males but of good folkes Therefore both old and young both woman and servant