Selected quad for the lemma: love_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
love_n	hate_v	lord_n	love_v	5,673	5	6.6468	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A59963	A hind let loose, or, An historical representation of the testimonies of the Church of Scotland for the interest of Christ with the true state thereof in all its periods : together with a vindication of the present testimonie, against the Popish, prelatical, & malignant enemies of that church ... : wherein several controversies of greatest consequence are enquired into, and in some measure cleared, concerning hearing of the curats, owning of the present tyrannie, taking of ensnaring oaths & bonds, frequenting of field meetings, defensive resistence of tyrannical violence ... / by a lover of true liberty.	Shields, Alexander, 1660?-1700.	1687 (1687)	Wing S3431; ESTC R24531	567,672	774

oune them as Magistrates The least deference we can pay to Magistrates is subjection as it is required in these words Let every soul be subject to the higher Powers and submit your selves to every Ordinance of man for the Lords sake But this cannot be given to Tyrants Usurpers Ergo no deference can be paid to them at all and consequently they cannot be ouned That this subjection which is required to the higher Powers cannot be ouned to Tyrants will be apparent if we consider 1. The Subjection required is orderly subjection to an orderly power that we be regularly under him that is regularly above But Usurpation Tyranny is not an Orderly Power orderly placed above us Therefore we cannot be ordely under it This is gathered from the Original Language where the powers to be subjected to are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ordained of God and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Ordinance of God and he that resisteth the Power is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Counter-ordered or contrary to his orderly duty So the duty is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be subject They are all words coming from one root which signifies to Order So that subjection is to be placed in order under another relative to an Orderly Superiority But to occupy the seat of dignity unauthorized is an Ataxie a breaking of order and bringing the Common-wealth quite out of order Whereby it may appear that in relation to an Arbitrary Government there can be properly no 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 no orderly subjection 2. The thing it self must import that relative duty which the fifth Command requires not only a passive stooping endurance or a ●eigned Counterfeit submission but a real Active duty including obedience to Lawful Commands and not only so but support maintinance and that both to the acts of his administration and to his standing keeping his station assisting him with all our abilities both humane Christian And not only as to the external acts of duties but the inward motions of the heart as consent Love Reverence Honour and all sincere fealty Allegiance But can a subjection of this extent be payed to a Tyrant or Usurper Can we support those we are bound to suppress Shall we love the ungodly and help those that hate the Lord Can we consent that we our posterity should be slaves Can we honour them who are vile and the vilest of men how high soever they be exalted 3. The ground of this subjection is for conscience sake not for wrath that is so far so long as one is constrained by fear to avoid a greater evil to stoop to him but out of conscience of duty both that of Piety to God who ordained Magistracy and that of equity to him who is His Minister for good and under pain of damnation if we break this orderly subjection Rom. 13. 2 5. But can it be imagined that all this is due to a Tyrant Usurper Can it be out of conscience because he is the Lords Minister for good the contrary is clear that he is the Devils drudge serving his Interest Is resistance to Tyrants a damnable sin I hope to prove it to be a duty 4. If subjection to Tyrants Usurpers will inveigle us in their snares and involve us in their sin judgment then it is not to be ouned to them But the former is true Therefore the Latter In the foregoing head I drew an Argument for withdrawing from disouning the Prelatick Ministers from the hazard of partaking in their sin and of being obnoxious to their judgment because people are often punished for their Pastors sins Aaron his sons polluting themselves would have brought wrath upon all the people L●v. 10. 6. because the Teachers had transgressed against the Lord therefore was Iacob given to the Curse Israel to reproaches Isai 43. 27 28. and all these Miseries Lamented by the Church were inflicted for the sins of her Prophets and the iniquites of her Priests Lam. 4. 13. the reason was because they ouned them followed them countenanced them complyed with them or connived at them or did not hinder or else disoune them The same Argument will evince the necessity of withdrawing our subjection from disouning Usurping Tyrannical Rulers when we cannot hinder their wickedness nor give any other Testimony against them to avert the wrath of the Lord. If the defections of Ministers will bring on the whole Nation desolating judgments then much more have we reason to fear it when both Magistrates Ministers are involved in and jointly carrying on and carressing encouraging each other in promoting a woful Apostasie from God when the heads of the house of Iacob Princes of the house of Israeel abhor judgement pervert all equity the heads Judge for reward and the Priests teach for hire and the Prophets divine for money and yet lean upon the Lord and say Is not the Lord among us none evil can come upon us Then we can expect nothing but that Zion for their sake shall be plowed as a field Ierusalem become heaps and the Mountain of the house as the high places of the forest Mich. 3. 9 11 12. Certain it is that subjects have smarted sore for the sins of their Rulers for Sauls sin in breaking Covenant with the Gibeonites the Land suffered three years famine 2 Sam. 21. 1. and the wrath of the Lord could not be appeased till seven of his sons were hanged up unto the Lord. What then shall appease the wrath of God for the unp●ralelled breach of Covenant with God in our day For Davids sin of numbering the people 70000 men died by the Pestilence 2 Sam. 24. 5. For Ieroboams sin of Idolatry who made Israel to sin the Lord threatens to give Israel up because of the sins of Ieroboam 1 King. 14. 16. only they escaped this Judgment who withdrew themselves and fell into Iudah For Ahabs sin of letting go a man whom the Lord had appointed to utter destruction the Lord threatens him thy life shall go for his life and thy people for his people 1 King. 20. 42. Because Manasseh King of Iudah did many abominations therefore the Lord threatened to bring such evil upon Ierusalem Iudah that whosoever heard it his ears should tingle c. 2 King. 21. 11 12. and not withstanding of his repentance and the Reformation in the dayes of Iosiah notwithstanding the Lord turned not from the fierceness of His great wrath wherewith His anger was kindled against Iudah because of all the provocations that Manasseh had provoked Him withall 2 King. 23. 26. which was accomplished by the hands of the Chaldeans in Iehojakims time Surely at the Commandment of the Lord came this upon Iudah to remove them out of His sight for the sins of Manasseh according to all that he did and also for the innocent blood which he shed ... which the Lord would not pardon 2 King. 24. 3 4. And Ieremiah