implore some tast of the mercy of God and of the righteousnes which is bestowed vpon them And this is the very naturall meaninge of such godly prayers Nether must we thinke that yâ— publicane prayed any otherwise He did not in that sense calâ— himselfe a sinner for that he was minded to abide still in sinnes for he was not so minded that he would still retaine his old purpose to sinne but he was truly and from the hart coÌ„uerted vnto God But our aduersaries faine that they whiche still perseuer in theyr sinnes nether haue in minde to change theyr life do yet notwithstanding some good which pleaseth God But we are taught by the holy scriptures that he which beleueth in God hath eternal life and therefore is iustified but other things are nether good nor yet please God Wherefore seinge that the publicane prayed and with fayth prayed it is moste certayne that he had eternall life nether wanted he iustification But to make What thinges are required to workes which are acceptable vnto God al these things the more planly to be vnderstaÌ„d it shal not be froÌ„ yâ— purpose to declare what things are required vnto a good worke to make it acceptable vnto God First he which doth a good dede must nedes be moued by yâ— spirit of God for otherwise in vs that is in our flesh dwelleth nothing that is good and they which are led by the spirite of God are doubtles the sonnes of God Secondlye it behoueth that fayth be present whereby we may certaynly vnderstand that that worke which we take in hand is of those kindes of things which God willeth and by his law commaundeth to be done For whatsoeuer is not of fayth is sin Nether ought we so to handle the matter that our hart should accuse vs in that thing which we doo Thirdly whatsoeuer we doo must wholy be directed vnto the glory of God that hereunto we chiefly and aboue all things haue a regard that the prayse and glory of God be illustrated by our workes Whither ye eate or whither ye drinke or what soeuer other thing ells ye do doo all things to the glory of God saith Paul Fourthly forasmuch as by reason of the infirmity which is grafted in vs there alwayes wanteth somewhat in our workes yea euen in those which seme to be most vprightly done it is necessary that the grace and mercy of God thorough Christe be wyth vs whereby that defect or want maye be compensed Wherefore Dauid sayth Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgeuen Blessed is the man vnto whoÌ„ the Lord imputeth not his sin And Paul sayth There is now coÌ„demnatioÌ„ to those which are in Christ Iesus Again That which was impossible vnto the Law in asmuch as it was made weake thorough the flesh God sending his sonne c. These testimonies playnly declare that both our workes want of perfection and of theyr dew end and that also it commeth thorough Christ and the mercy of God that that blame mingled with our workes is not imputed vnto vs. Lastly thys also is required that no man glory of that which he vprightly doth but in God only and that he acknowlege that that which he doth he hath of his goodnes and WhereheÌ„ce the definition of a good worke is gathered The vngodlye are farre distant from the conditioÌ„ of good workes not of hys owne strengths For who hath seperated thee sayth Paule to the Cor. What hast thou that thou hast not receaued But if thou haste receaued it why boastest thou as though than haddest not receaued it When all these thinges whiche I haue reckoned are obteyned then the workes without all doubt shall be good and acceptable vnto God The diligent reder may here out of these câ—ditions of a good worke gather the definition thereof Contrariwise if we consider the nature of a man not yet regenerate we shal easely perceaue that those conditions which we haue sayd to be necessary vnto a good work can not be found in theÌ„ For he is vtterly voyde of the spirite of God and of fayth and is so infected with selfe loue so yâ— whatsoeuer he doth he referreth it not vnto God but vnto hys owne commodity Farther forasmuch as he is a stranger from Christ it must nedes be that he is left vnder the Law Wherfore whatsoeuer defect or fault is in his workes which must nedes be much the same can not by any meanes be compensed Finally if he haue done peraduenture any notable or goodly worke he glorieth not in God but in himselfe for he is ignoraunt both of Christe and of the grace of God By these two descriptions of a good worke and acceptable vnto God and of a man that liueth without Christ I thinke it is now manifest that those workes can not be good and acceptable vnto God which procede from an infidel But our aduersaries contend to wrest from vs two most strong places which we vse for the confirmation of this matter The first is that we say that A Metaphore of the good â—â—ell tree an euil trée can not bring forth good fruite The second is That whatsoeuer is not of fayth is sinne Of whiche sentences we will in this place somewhat speake That metaphore of the euill trée which can not bring forth good fruite Christ vsed not only in the. 7. chapiter of Mathevv but also in the selfe same Mathevv the 12. chapiter And thereof he inferred Ye generation of vipers howe can ye speake good things when as ye are euill But before I make open this cauillation I thinke it good to declare how Augustine agaynst Iulianus the Pelagian in his 4. booke and 3. chapiter contended for this selfe same place He setteth forth a godly worke of a man being an infidle namely to cloth a naked man and demaundeth whether this worke may be called sinne Verely vnles this worke be Without fayth to cloth a naked man is sinne of that kinde that pleaseth God I se not what other workes infidells can doo which can be acceptable vnto him And Augustine contendeth and playnly proueth that it is sinne And that lest he should seeme to speake this without reason he sayth that it is therefore sinne for that he which doth that so godly a worke glorieth of hys worke for he doth not by fayth acknowledge ether God or Christ nor thinketh that he hath receaued the same at his handes Farther he sayth that to auoyd the nature of sinne it is not inoughe that a good thinge be done but also that it be well and vprightlye done Shall we then say that an infidell hath done a good worke and wrought vprightly If we graunt not this then must we confesse that he sinned but if we graunt it then must we confesse the fruit to be good notwithstanding an infidell without Christ is an euill tre So shall we graunt that an euill tree can bring forth good fruite which thing yet Christe expressedly denieth Now
should at any time say that he loueth God aboue all thinges when we haue diligently considered the matter we shall playnly finde that vnder that dissembled loue lieth hidden in his hart a most greate hatred of God And where as the Apostle sayth that the affecte of the flesh is not subiecte vnto the Law of God he hath not a respect vnto works moral or ciuill but only as I haue sayd to our corrupt and vitiate nature And herein chiefely is the first table to be considered The first table contayneth the force and vigour of the latter table which requireth a perfect fayth loue worshipping and feare of God in which things coÌ„sisteth the force vigour and as it were the soule of the obedieÌ„ce of the rest of the commaundementes Of those thinges which haue hitherto ben spoken the Apostle inferreth this conclusion that they which are in the flesh caÌ„not please God and therfore they are nether deliuered nor recoÌ„ciled vnto God They whiche are in the flesh are euill trees If the meÌ„ them selues can not please God theyr workes can not be acceptable vnto God We must desire a more aboundaunt spirite that we may the more please God So that this is a certaine token whereby we may know by the effect and aposteriori as they call it who they are that are deliuered from sinne and made pertakers of the benefite of the death of Christ And if they which are in the fleshe can not please God then it followeth that they are euill trées which bringe not forth good fruite Where are then merites of congruity and of works as they call them preparatory For if the men themselues can not please God vndoubtedly theyr workes can not be acceptable vnto God Wherefore miserable is the estate of the wicked which in no wise can please God But it is our partes continually to pray for a more aboundant spirite of Christ that we may more and more please him But ye are not in the flesh but in the spirite bycause the spirite of God dwelleth in you But if any man haue not the spirit of Christ the same is not his And if Christ be in you the body is dead bicause of sinne but the Spirite is life bycause of righteousnes And if the Spirite of hym that raysed vp Iesus from the dead dwell in you he that raysed vp Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortall bodyes bycause that his spirite dwelleth in you Ye are not in the fleshe That which he before spake generally he now perticularly applieth vnto the Romanes and after his accustomed maner discendeth from a generall theme to a perticular Here is agayne in this place a sentence which can not but figuratiuely be interpreted for if we should vnderstaÌ„d Chrisostom saith that figures are necessary in the scriptures Of these wordes of the Lord this is myâ— body simply that we are not in the flesh the truth would shew the contrary Wherefore Chrisostome vpon this place sayth that it is a thing very daungerous alwayes to vnderstand the scriptures according to the proper significations of the words I meruaile therefore what our aduersaries meane so much to iangle and to make such an adoo when we say that these wordes of the Lord This is my body are spoken figuratiuely and that we vnderstaÌ„d them not as though the body of Christ were carnally really and substantially in the bread But that which is shewed forth we teach to be the sacrament of the body of Christ whereby is signifyed that hys body was fastened vnto the Crosse and his bloud shed for vs. And this vndoubtedly is done with greate vtility if we both beleue those things which are set forth and also receaue the sacrameÌ„t with such a faith as behoueth But they say that Christ did not so speake I graunt he did not But if it be sufficient so to answere why doo they not here also say that Paul spake simply and appertly Ye are not in the flesh for other interpretations hath he added none If they say that that may be gathered by those thinges which he before spake so also will we say that this may be gathered as well by the nature of the sacraments whose nature is to signify the thinges whereof they are signes and also by yâ— which is there written namely that these thinges ought to be done in remembraunce of the Lord and that they should shew forth his death and also by many other thinges which are written in the 6. chap of Iohn Farther Chrisostome vpon this place sayth That Paul wheÌ„ he thus writeth doth in no wise deny the nature of the fleshe but exalteth it to a more higher dignity namely that it should rather obey the impulsion of the spirite then lust So we say that when the fathers seme to deny that the nature of the bread abideth in the encharist they deny not the nature of the bread but declare yâ— it is exalted to a higher dignity namely to be a sacrameÌ„t Against transubstaÌ„tiation How folish they are which by these words speake against matrimony of ministers of the body of Christ and now to serue to a spiritual purpose and vse But they yet dote a greâ—t deale more which thinke that this place maketh agaynst the matrimony of ministers of the Church For if it were so he should conclude vniuersally that all Christians ought to liue without wyues For there is no Christian after that he hath beleued in Christ is any more in the fleshe We haue in dede a body fleshe and members meate drinke and matrimonies all which thinges séeme to pertayne vnto yâ— flesh but we haue theÌ„ in God to vse theÌ„ according to the spirite not according to the flesh Neither doth Paul in this place meane any other thing theÌ„ did yâ— Lord in yâ— Gospell wheÌ„ he sayd vnto hys disciples Ye are not of thys world Wherfore Ambrose saith that we haue such a nature framed vnto vs as we felâ— it to be he addeth moreouer That the wise men of the world are in the flesh because they resist fayth and wyll beleue those thynges only which are agreeable to reason This place againe teacheth vs that Ambrose by the name of fleshe vnderstoode reason Ambrose by the name of flesh vnderstandeth reason also What it is to be in the flesh and the higher partes of the soule We say therefore that to be in the fleshe according to the Apostles meaning signifieth nothing els then in all our actions to be ruled and gouerned by the sence and affecte of nature not yet regenerate in Christ Now by this it appeareth that it is proper vnto a Christian to follow those thinges which are of the spirite and to auoyde those thynges which are of the fleshe And this propriety of a Christian lyfe partly moueth vs not to forsake it and is partly a note by which we may be made more certayne of our iustification By what note or maâ—ke we
the difference They by the name of Grace vnderstand those giftes which are geuen vnto them that are iustified namely the habites or qualities which are poured into theÌ„ more ouer good workes and other such like which God worketh in the elect But we forasmuch as we sée that these giftes so long as we liue here are through our corruption vnperfect do deny that we can by them be iustified and that by them by any meanes we are able to satisfy the iudgement of God Wherfore we vnderstande that to be iustified by grace is to be iustified by the only mere and sincere good will of God which he of his only mercy beareth towards vs. We say also that we are iustified by the grace of Christ which his father beareth towards hym For forasmuch as he is most gracious before him he bringeth to passe that he loueth would in him as hys members and brethren adopted by faith But the schoolemen haâ—â— What it is to be iustified by grace and by the grace of Christ The imagination of the Schole men sprang out of the Ethikes of Aristotle fayned vnto themselues that grace is an habite or quality poured into the soule yâ— the foule may more easely rise vp and more redely do good workes Which theyr fayned inuention they can by no meanes confirm by the holy scriptures But they séeme to haue taken it from the philosophers who in the Ethikes teach that the faculties powers of the minde are by an habite strengthned so that they are able to perform those things which before they wer not able or if they were able yet they were not able without great difficulty The self same thing do these meÌ„ iudge of yâ— mynd that forasmuch as of hys owne nature it can not so lift vp it self to be acceptable vnto God and to do yâ— workes which should please him it hath nede of a heauenly and spirituall habite to performe these things And whilest they thus follow their philosophy they depart from the vulgare and receyued sence of this worde grace For when we say that a souldiour is acceptable vnto a kyng or vnto a captaine A similitude we do not say that in the souldiour is grace or fauour but rather in the king or captayne which beareth fauour vnto the souldiour So we in thys case if we would speake plainly or aright should not say that in vs is powred or geueÌ„ grace but rather that we are receiued of GOD into grace or fauour which before were hys enemies But that we may the better fynde out the error of the scholemen we will here sette foorth their definition for they defyne grace to be an habite of goodnes and charity infused of God like vnto his whereby he that hath it is To haue grace of God is to be receiued into fauour of him The definition which the scholemen assigne vnto grace made acceptable vnto God and doth workes that are acceptable vnto him and meritorious When they say that it is an habite infused of God they seperate it from naturall vertues Farther when they make it to be like vnto the goodnes and loue of God they thinke that they bring a reasoÌ„ why they which be adorned with this habite are acceptable vnto God namely because of that similitude And because they can not by the scriptures proue that grace is a thing created in the soule they labour to confirme it with reasons For Thomas sayth that the beneuolence of God can not be idle for God is saide to loue when he geueth any good thing Wherefore he saith that God to do good to some or to loue some is to geue or infuse into them such an habite or quality as we haue now described But this is a very weake argument For we graunt that the loue of God lyeth not idle The loue of God towardes the elect is not idle but filleth vs with benifites and those very manifold But how followeth this argument God geueth very many giftes Ergo he createth or powreth in such an habite Farther this is no small error that they will that by this habite or creature we are made acceptable vnto God For it must nedes follow that seing he hath geuen vs such a gift he therefore loued vs before for the loue of God goeth before all his giftes The vertues in dede which follow may haue some consideration The loue of God towards vs goeth before all his giftes why they should be geuen but yet they can not haue that force to allure God to loue vs for he loued vs euen before he gaue them vnto vs. An other of their reasons is this If they which are conuerted vnto Christ say they haue the holy ghost which before they had not then of necessity it followeth that there happened some mutation But in God there is no mutacion Wherefore we must appoint it to be in our selues namely that we haue such an habite of grace which before we had not But this likewise is of no force for God differreth his aydes God is not chaunged although he do that now which before he did not is as semeth good vnto him and moueth the hartes of men at an appointed time when as before he moued them not which thing yet we doubt but is done without any his change at all For we know that God at an appoynted time created the world which before was not extant and yet we can not say that God is therefore changed Now resteth for vs to confirme by the scriptures that the grace of God signifieth his frée and vndeserued loue secondly that it signifieth also the rewardes It is proued that the grace of God is the fauor which he beareth towardes vs. or giftes which are bestowed vpon the Saintes thirdly that the grace of Christ is that whereby he is of force with the father and by reason of whiche we are loued of the father As concerning the first Paul fayth to the Ephesians that we were elected of God before the foundacions of the world were layde according to his good pleasure to the prayse of the glory of his grace In which place we sée that the cause of our election is that the frée loue and grace of God towardes vs should be commended And in the latter epistle to Timothe he sayth Which hath called vs wyth his holy vocation not by workes but according to his purpose and grace And Peter exhorteth vs to hope in that grace which is offred But it is not lawfull to hope in a thing created And as touching Christ Paul saith vnto the Ephesians that God hath made vs acceptable in hys beloued that is in Christ whome most dearely and especially he loueth And in this epistle he calleth grace eternall life This therefore is the The true definition of Grace true definition of Grace and agréeable vnto the holy scriptures That it is the frée beneuolence of God whereby he counteth vs deare in Christ Iesus and
euerlastinge damnation And Esay sayth of the damnâ—d Theyr fire shall not be quenched and theyr worme shal not dye And to omitte all other testemonies which are infinite Christ himselfe is promised in the Law For he himselfe sayth that Moses wrote of him Paul sayth that he was the end of the Law Farther there are many such other testemonies both in the Gosples and in the Epistles of Paul whiche are all taken out of the old testament Chrisostom sayth moreouer That the elders vsed outward purifications Nether doo we deny but that they were bound to a greate many more and greauouser ceremonies then we are and yet are not we altogether The elders were bounâ— to more ceremonies theÌ„ we are Circumcision the sacrament of regeneration as is baptisme Chrisostom herein erred for that he thoughte that the elders were forbidden onely the outwarde woorke As we are not vtterly without feare so wer not the elders altogether without loue without outward signes For we also haue bread wyne and water as elementes of our sacramentes but one and the selfe same Christe was common both vnto our sacramentes and vnto theyrs For no man can denye but that circumsion was the sacramente of regeneration euen as is also our Baptysme Yea also the verye Schoolemen confesse that orygynall sinne was forgeuen the elders in Circumcision Wherefore sentence oughte not so lightly to haue bene geueÌ„ that they had only outward purifycatioÌ„s But this is a great deale more sorer that he addeth That they restrained their haÌ„ds froÌ„ euill works but we restrayne both yâ— minde and coÌ„science Chrisostome semeth alwayes to be of this minde that the law prohibited onely the outwarde worke and that the Gospell afterward prohibited anger hatred and lust of the mind and considered not that the elders had also this commaundement Thou shalte not lust and that the Prophets euery where required Circumcision of the hart and that in the first commaundement are comprehended faith hope charity and whatsoeuer pertayneth to the spirituall motions of the minde But whereas he saith that they were impelled by feare and we by loue it is true in dede after a sorte but yet not so that they were vtterly without loue and we vtterly without feare But of this matter we wil speake more at large afterward But that is most vntrue of all that he saith that they performed the lawe but we farre passe those thinges which are commaunded in the lawe For as we haue els where proued not euen the regenerate can so frame their workes that they can in all pointes satisfye the lawe of God He addeth moreouer that they could not be corrected and amended but by stoning mayning burning and other such like kinde of punishementes but we are only excommunicated when we deserue to suffer the extreamest punishement that the Church can lay vpon vs. But he should haue remembred that those punishementes which he maketh mencion of were ciuill punishementes which our Christian magestrates also inflict vpon malefactors But they saith he had only in name the honour of adoption and of children but we haue it in very deede Vndoubtedly it can not be denied but that God was in the olde Testament called the father of his people For of theÌ„ he sayth that he had called his first be gotten sonne out of Egipt The elders also were the sonnes of God by adoption And Moses saith in Deutronomy Thou hast forsaken God which begat thee And Malachi in his 2 chapter There is one God and father of vs all And Esay I haue nourished and brought vp children and they haue despised me And doth not Paul say Vnto whome pertaine the testamentes and adoption He spake then of the fathers of the Israelites of whome was Christ according to the fleshe And moreouer I said ye were Goddes and all the children of the highest They also called God their father when they sayd in Esay Thou art our father for Abraham was ignorant of vs and Israell hath not knowen vs. And so great an affection did God the father beare towards them that he saith Can a mother forget her child But although she can yet will not I forget thee And as Chrisostome hath thus written in this place so hath he in other places also many thinges like vnto the same which as I sayd are warely and with iudgemeÌ„t to be red Augustine entreating vpoÌ„ this place saith that here is put a differeÌ„ce of the olde new TestameÌ„t of which the one is set in feare the other in loue He addeth moreouer that it is without controuersye that the spirit of adoption it the holy ghost But the spirit of bondage he thinketh to be that which hath the power of death that is Sathan For so many are held vnder the euill spirite as are destitute of grace and being not regenerate liue vnder the lawe For they are addicted vnto temporall thinges and obey theyr lustes noâ— in dede through the default of the lawe but for that they themselues are strangers from Christ and from God For they can not obserue the lawe of God And therefore they are both wrapped in sinnes and also tossed with continuall furies He also signifieth that of this place there is an other interpretacion as though the spirite here should signifie our minde which is sometimes the seruaunt of lustes and sometimes liueth vnder the liberty of the sonnes of God But this opinion he saith can not stand for that the spirite of adoption is a litle The spirite of adoption is not our mind but a breathing from God afterward plainly sayd to be externe and accidentary namely being breathed in vs by god For so Paul writeth It is the spirit which bereth witnes vnto our spirite that we are the sonnes of God Which wordes plainly declare that there is to be put a difference betwene that spirite which perswadeth and that spirite which is perswaded And if this be true of the spirite of adoption the same opinion also must we haue of the spirite of bondage Wherefore herein Augustine agreeth with Chrisostome that they whome he thinketh to be vnder the spirite of bondage are quite voyde of the spirite of God For those kinde of men he affirmeth not to be regenerate and that they are also straungers from God yea rather addicted vnto the spirit of Sathan of whome we can not vnderstand Chrisostome to speake For out of the lawe and the sacramentes bringeth he a reason why the elders wanted the spirite But Augustine denieth that this came to passe thorough the default of the lawe Wherefore his sentence is more probable then Chrisostomes Howbeit herein I agrée not with Augustine to thinke that by the spirite of bondage is to be vnderstand Sathan For here as I said are to be vnderstand two effectes of the holy ghost The first is when we are touched with the The spirite of adoption and the spirite of feare is the spirit of God knowledge of the lawe and conscience of
plough his fower acres of ground Let them remember that Valerius Publicola after he had excellently executed his coÌ„sulship died so poore that he left not wherwithall to bury himselfe but was buried at the common charge of the citie And Fabritius so little repented him of his pouertie that he despised the gold of Pyrrhus the king These so great and notable actes did thâ—se men only as I said to get the praises of men and to preserue that erthly publike welth But we if we thrust our selues into any dangers haue God himselfe our inheritance and our reward and shal be fellow heires with Christ Before vs as a price or reward is set the kingdome of heauen eternal fellowship with the aungels Wherfore it is manifest that their notable factes farre passed yâ— endes and rewardes which were set before them but the reward which is set before vs infinitely excelleth our workes I graunt in déede their factes are not to be numbred amongst true vertues for they were rather shadowes and images of The Ethnikes were not endued with true vertuâ—s Before God they were glorious sinnes vertues and their workes although they were excellent if we consider them after a ciuile manner yet before God they were nothing els but glorious and shinyng sinnes for they were not either by faith or by the loue of God moued to worke neither also directed they their workes to a iust ende Wherfore Augustine in hys 5. boke de ciuitate Dei and 18. chapter when he had made mencion of these and of other such lyke thinges wisely added Eyther we perceyue these thynges to be in vs or els we feele our selues to be voyde of theÌ„ If at any tyme we do the selfe same thynges there is no cause why we should be puffed vp for they for lesser rewards haue done the lyke But if we know our selues to be so weake and infirme that we dare not enterprise anye suche thynges our myndes ought excedingly to be moued and touched especially seyng we are God regardeth not the greatenes heape of workes What God chiefly regardeth God hath made our lot far better then the Ethnikes found weaker then were euen the Ethnikes Farther those comparisons declare that God hath not a regard vnto the greatnes or heap of works for otherwise he should render vnto them the rewardes which he promiseth vnto vs. But this thing God chiefly regardeth whether we are by faith ioyned together with Christ and whether whatsoeuer we do we direct it to the prayse and glory of his name But the power and facultye to do excellente factes he of his mercye when he iudgeth it opportune aboundantlye ministreth vnto vs. Let vs in the meane tyme geue hym thankes for that he hath made our lot farre better then theyrs For the feruent desire of the creature wayteth for the reuelation of the sonnes of God bicause the creature is subiect vnto vanitie not of hys owne wyll but by reason of hym which hath subdued it vnder hope For the feruent desire c. The excellency of the blessednes to come he hereby coÌ„firmeth for that it is wayted for of euery creature and that not after any coÌ„mon sort but with great anxiety care For so signifieth this worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the etimology wherof hereof coÌ„meth for that when we earnestly looke for any thing we vse to thrust forth the head and to looke about to sée and if we can espy it comming Chrisostome sayth that that worde signifieth a vehement wayting for Ambrose interpretateth it a continuall and often wayting for This reason is grounded vpon the definitioÌ„ of that which is called Summum bonum that is the chiefest goodnes For if that good thing be it as Aristotle hath defined it which all thinges Definition of the chiefe good thing Euery creature wayteth for the reuelation of our glory The creatures for our sake trauaile eueÌ„ to the time of our full redemptioÌ„ desire that vndoubtedly which is of all creatures earnestly waited for must of necessity be the chiefest goodnes And the cause why of all creatures our reuelation is wayted for is for that so long as it is differred euery creature is subiect vnto vanitie This place in dede is some what hard howbeit I thinke this sence to be plaine inough That euery creature is in a greuous estate and vntill the time of our full redemptioÌ„ is with troublesome labours ouerweried For the earth is for our sake subiect vnto the curse â–ª bringeth forth briers thornes to nourish vs ofteÌ„times bringeth forth fruites which still decay and is compelled for our sins to suffer destructions and ruines â–ª The aâ—â—e is made pestilent sometimes it is frosen with cold sometimes enflamed with heate sometymes couered ouer with cloudes and sometymes with rayne All kinde of liuing creatures are brought forth and dye to our helpe and comfort the celestiall orbes are continually moued they go downe they arise they suffer Ecclipses the Moone waneth increaseth in the death of Christe the light of the sunne was darkened and when Christ shall come to iudge as the Euangelistes declare the powers of heauen shall trauaile Farther all creatures are compelled to serue the wicked and to be subiect vnto their abuses which thing Ose the prophet in his 2. chap. declareth The Israelites ascribed the good thinges of this world in which they abounded not vnto the true God as they should haue done but vnto Baal vnto him gaue they thankes and vpon him only did they cal Wherfore God being angry said I wyll take away my corne my wyne and my oyle and wyll set at liberty my wooll and my linnen that they should not couer thy shame By which wordes the prophet declareth that when creatures are takeÌ„ away from the vngodly they are set at liberty that they shuld not be compelled any more to serue the wicked Augustine in his 83. booke of Questions and 67. Question interpretateth this place somewhat otherwise For by euery creature he vnderstandeth men euen as it is also taken in the Gospell For so Christ sayth Preach the Gospell to euery creature And this therfore séemeth most conuenient vnto man for that in In man are comprehended all kindes of thinges We muste not thinke that the Moone Sunne Aungels do properly sighe The aungels are neyther subiect vnto vanity nor vnto corruption The Maniches vngodly and vnaptly fained many thynges touchinge the mourning of creatures Two kindes of men him as in a certaine little world are comprehended all kinde of thinges Although the same Augustine denieth not but that these wordes may also be expounded otherwise But here of this thing he warneth vs to beware that we folishly thinke not that the Sunne Moone and Starres and the aungels that are on high do sigh grone which thing some were not ashamed to affirme We must confesse saith he that the holy Aungels doo seruice vnto vs at the commaundement of God But forasmuch
who do not only deceiue others but also chiefly thēselues That is the true faith which Paul describeth to the Galath which worketh through loue For alwaies of true fayth springeth charity For it is not possible the the true and chiefe good thing being certainly known should not be beloued and earnestly desired He that séeth not the connexion and order of these vertues séeth nothyng for so straightly are they knit together that euen as of true faith of necessity followeth charity so againe on the other side he which wanteth faith must of necessity abhorre God and hate him so far is it of that he can loue him But this is not to be passed ouer the euen the most holiest men so long as they liue here haue a very slender loue towardes God For oftentimes they be drawen backeward by lustes of the flesh and that is the cause why iustification can not be ascribed vnto it For if we should leane vnto our loue forasmuch as it is very weak we should continually stagger But God will haue his promise to be firme and sure But thou wilt obiect that our faith also is weake I graunt it is so and therfore we leane not vnto faith as it is a worke but we haue an eye vnto the mercy of God his promise which by faith we embrace and so our iustification hangeth not of the worke of faith but of his obiect Howbeit in this infirmity of our loue towardes God thys thing haue the godly which the vngodly haue not that as soone as they haue fallen they straightway run vnto God They are sory they repent by y◠meanes prefer Christ only before all thinges so that for his sake they offer themselues to suffer all maner of thinges But the vngodly alwayes sticke in the mire they returne not earnestly vnto God but become euery day worse worse When Paul writeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is we know he meaneth not a slight or slēder knowledge but a firme certaine and sound knowledge For none that is a Christian ought to be in doubt of the last ende of his state The state of the godly is to the better but the state of the vngodly is to destruction We after a sort are as players in a commedie where in although the beginning middle part be troublesome yet it is with a ioyfull pleasaunt ende concluded But the vngodly are as players in a Tragedy which although at the beginning it seme godly and gorgious yet hath it an horrible and lamentable ende This diuersity noted Abraham in the Gospell for vnto the A testimony of Abraham riche man burning in the flames of fire he sayd Remember that thou in thy lyfe tyme receyuedst good thynges but Lazarus euill Wherefore it is no meruayle if thinges do now go otherwise Which are called accordyng to purpose These wordes declare who they be which loue God And he bringeth a reason why vnto them all things turne vnto good for that it is mete and conuenient that all things do seruice vnto the counsell predestination and election of God that whomsoeuer he hath decréed to saue All thinges ought to be seruisable vnto the counsell of predestination him must all creatures whatsoeuer they be of necessity helpe He vseth this word purpose which at other times also in this matter he oftē vseth For in the next chapter he saith That the election mought abyde according to the purpose of God And vnto the Ephe. the 1. chap. Which hath predestinated vs accordyng to purpose and grace by the force wherof he worketh all thynges accordyng to the councell of hys wyll And in the latter to Tim. the first chap. Which hath called vs wyth hys holy calling not according to our works but according to purpose and grace And by these words he semeth to note Two manner of callinges Here is vnderstand a mighty and constant calling a certain distinction of callings For the one is outward which is by the holy scriptures sermons the other inward wherby the mind is moued by y◠instinct of God which in wardcalling also is not of one sort For there is one during but for a time an other of efficacy and abiding The Apostle whē he saith accordyng to purpose defineth callyng and contracteth it to that strong and constant impulsion Chrisostome in this place thinketh that this worde purpose is not to be referred vnto God but vnto the will and counsell of them which are called that the Apostle should not séeme to attribute so much vnto the election of God The Iewes saith he and Ethnikes whē they An error of Chrisostom hard these things made a stirre and demaunded what should let but that they also might be saued Chrisostome séemeth as often as he entreated of the election or predestination of God to haue bene somewhat afeard lest some occasion should be geuen vnto Whereof Chrisostom was afeard men to liue idly and wickedly or to lay the faulte of their wicked actes vpō God although he sometimes goeth plainly inough to worke ascribeth all our good thinges whatsoeuer they be vnto the grace of God And this place he thus goeth about to extenuate as though God in dede calleth and electeth men but yet those only which either already haue or hereafter shall haue a purpose and will to obey but herein he excedingly erreth in that he denieth that this is the purpose of God For the wordes which follow plainly teach that this is wholy to be referred vnto Purpose in this place ought to be referred vnto God predestination For it followeth Whome he foreknew those also hath he predestinated And in the next chapiter it is written According to election that the purpose of God should abide By which wordes we sée y◠predestination dependeth not of our wil but of the purpose Predestination depēdeth not of our wil but of the purpose of God of God Which selfe thing is declared vnto the Ephe. where it is written That we are predestinate accordynge to purpose by the force whereof God woorketh all things accordyng to his counsell and wyll In which place it cannot be denied but that he vnderstādeth the purpose of God and much lesse can that be denied in the first chap. vnto Tim. where it is thus written God hath called vs wyth hys holy calling not by our workes but by his purpose and by grace Which selfe thing Paul teacheth in the first chap. vnto the Ephe. For he sayth That we are predestinate into the adoption of the sonnes of God accordyng to his good pleasure And Christ saith I geue thankes vnto thee O holy father for that thou hast hidden these thynges from the wyse and hast reueled them to infantes because it hath so pleased thee And Paul vseth this word purpose to declare a certaintie for that the thinges which God by his prouidence hath decréed are stable and firme But his minde is to proue that men ought not to
faineth two children to be borne of vngodly parentes and strangers from Christ both of them are cast forthe and set to daunger of death And the one of them in deede dieth but the other being of somewhat more stronger nature is by a Christian by chance comming by preserued and brought to the Church and baptised and is with other of the faythfull made a partaker of Christ Verely touching the saluation of the one childe we haue nothing that we can certainly affirme but of the other if the childe dye we can skarsely put any doubt And if the matter be so we affirme that one of them was elected and the other reiected Wherevnto then had the election of God a regarde Thou canst not say vnto workes foresene when as those thinges which shall neuer come to passe can not be foresene For the prouidence of God prouideth those thinges which shall come to passe and not those thinges which shall not be yea rather he forseeth that those thinges shall not come to passe Wherefore we see that that deuise touching workes foreseene can not in all cases satisfy humane reason Wherefore we must rather beleue Paul who leadeth vs to the highest cause namely to the wyll of God whereunto doubtles we do iniury if we thinke that there is any cause aboue it What shoulde we flye vnto the workes of men when as All men are by nature of one and the selfe same disposition and prones to euill This opinion makâ—th Paul very blockish duâ—â—itted â–ª we all are of one the selfe same nature of one the selfe same propriety and of one and the same disposition For that lompe of Adam wherehence we are deriued is vitiated and corrupted whereunto if peraduenture there be added any thing that is good the same it hath of the mere and only goodnes of God Farther they which so teach seeme to make Paul very blockishe and dull witted which could not see that which these men so easely vnderstand For he of the election of God bryngeth no other cause but the purpose and wyll of God And at the last also he crieth out O the depth of the riches c. But these sharpâ— witted men doo euen easely rid themselues of this greated difficulty euen I say by one pore word Augustine being yet a priest and newly baptised expounding this place although he saw that God could not haue a respect vnto our workes to come as causes of predestination wherby he embraseth vs yet he thought fayth foresene to be the cause of his loue towardes vs. And of this his sentence as touching ether part he bringeth this reason It is certayne that good workes are deriued into vs from the holy ghost for thorough him God worketh all in all and the same God geueth vnto vs the holy ghost Wherefore â–ª good workes sayth he forasmuch as they procede from God caÌ„ not any thing moue to his electioÌ„ or predestinatioÌ„ But he thought that God had a respect vnto our fayth and electeth them whome he foreséeth should beleue for that he thought that fayth is of our selues For although we rede sayth he that God worketh all in all yet we rede not that God beleueth all in all Wherfore Augustine erred whilest he was yet a priesâ— he thought it is of our selues to beleue but to work wel he thought to come of God These thinges wrote he being yet rude following as it should appeare to me the doctrine of his father Ambrose For he vpon this selfe same place teacheth the selfe same thing namely that God electeth them whome he knoweth shall afterward beleue But Augustine when his iudgement was now thorough Augustine reuoked his error age excercise more ripe and of deeper consideratioÌ„ reuoked this sentence as it is euident by his first boke of Retractations the. 33. chapiter in which place he thus writeth of him selfe These things had I not writteÌ„ if that I had vnderstode that Faith is no lesse the gift of God then good workes fayth is no les the gift of God then good workes And that fayth is geuen of God he gathereth by that which is written to the Ephesians in the 6. chapiter Charitye and fayth from God the father and from our Lord Iesus Christ And in the same epistle the 2. chapiter By grace ye are made safe thorough faith that not of your selues For it is the gift of God not of workes lest any man should boast And vnto Timothe I obteyned sayth he mercy that I might be faithfull but he saith not for that I was faith full To this purpose mought be brought a greate many other sentences but for this present I thought these should suffice And as touching the wordes of Paul Purpose electioÌ„ why they are attributed vnto God no man ought to wonder that the Apostle when he speaketh of these things at tributeth vnto God purpose and election For the holy scriptures euery where frame themselues to our infirmity and speake vnto men after the maner of men By those wordes we vnderstand the constancy and immutability of the will of God For euen as men are wont as touching thinges whiche they haue rashly appoynted afterward when they haue better considered the matter to alter them but those thinges which they haue decréed with good consideration and deliberation they will haue to be firme and to continew so also thinke they of God For that cause Paul calleth his will purpose and electioÌ„ An oracle was geuen to Rebecka That the elder of these two brethern should serue the yonger for she had asked counsell of God what the brethern striuinge together in her wombe signified By this oracle we se that it is God which putteth a difference God putteth a difference betwene those yâ— are borne betwene those which are borne when as otherwise by nature they are equall And promises made to this or that stocke and to this or that posterity signifie nothing else but yâ— of that stocke or posterity shall some be elected but who they be it lieth not in vs to iudge We ought rather to haue a respect vnto the effects and whom we se to be called to beleue to geue themselues to good works those Forasmuch as prebestination is a thing hâ—dden vnto what thinges we ought to haue a respect A similitude to count for elect and alwayes in this matter to haue a regard vnto the commaundementes and vnto the promises that is vnto the outward word of God But concerning the hidden counsell of God as touching euery perticular man we haue nothing reueled vnto vs. But Chrisostome semeth to be against this First â—e sayth That there arose greate offence touching the reiection of the Iewes and the election of the Gentiles especially seing that the Gentiles had alwayes bene vncleane but the Iewes had moste playne promises For it is all one sayth he as if the sonne of a king vnto whome the kingdome semeth to be by
be present they are profitable vnto iustification But this is worthy to be laughed at For we haue before most playnly taught that all workes which are doone before iustification are sinnes So far is it of that they can serue any thing vnto iustification And if they should by any meanes profite vnto iustification our glorieng should then not be excluded For we might glory that we had doone those thinges by whose helpe and ayd we were iustified But of this sayth he we can not boast for that they were done by a certayne grace of God preuenting But this is chiefly to be marked that these men attribute a great part of such works vnto frée will And therfore in yâ— be halfe at the least we may glory Neither also shall yâ— be true which the Apostle sayth what hast thou that thou hast receaued And agayne why dost thou boast as though thou hadst not receaued Here some of theÌ„ answer yâ— we can not glory of this liberty of will for that we haue it not of our owne For it is God which hath endued vs with this faculty and gaue vs frée will when he created vs. But this is not sufficient The Pelagians fâ—ed vnto the common grace of creation to take away boasting First for that this were to fly vnto the coÌ„mon grace of creation which thing the Pelagians did and by that meanes should at the lest may be left vnto vs a good vse of frée will of which we might glory For although we haue the same of God by creation yet the right vse thereof is ours namely to assent vnto God when he calleth vs and to apply our selues vnto good workes which of God are set forth vnto vs. And therefore vtterly to take away all glorying it is nedeful yâ— we continually haue this in our mynde which Auguctine hath admonyshed vs of in his booke de spiritu Litera the 24. chapiter That not onely the wyll and election of well doyng is of God because by creatioÌ„ he hath geuen choyce free wyll but also because by the perswasion of thynges sene he hath made vs both to wyll and to beleue and that not onely by the outward preaching of the Gospell but also by inward perswasion For he doth not onely stirre vp the hart but also perswadeth draweth and boweth it to beleue I graunt indéede that it is the office of the will to will and to embrace that which God offreth for we do not will by vnderstanding or by memory but by will And yet for all that I doubt not but that it is God which maketh vs to wil and to follow good things Farther our aduersaries think that although workes concurre vnto iustification yet is that notwithstanding true which the holy scriptures teach namely that we iustified fréely Because say they those workes are geuen of God and are done of grace If this refuge mought helpe then had not Paul done well when he tooke away from ceremoniall works the power of iustifiyng For a Iew might say Our fathers which in the old tyme were circumcised and performed other obseruations of the law did not the same by their owne naturall strengthes but by the grace of God both helping them and stirring them vp thereunto Wherefore if other workes which were commaunded in the lawe coulde profite vnto iustification to merite it as ye speake of congruity why coulde not ceremoniall workes do â–ª the same Neither will this any thing helpe to say that Paul taketh not away from them the power iustifiyng but onely after the comming of Christ For he manifestly speaketh of Abraham which was iustified by fayth and not by circumcision and vseth a testimony of Dauid of whome it is most certayne that he liued vnder the lawe But whereas this man sayth that charity and hope can not be excluded I would gladly know of hym whether the workes of these vertues be iust or no. I know he will graunt that they are iust What will he then answere vnto Paul who vnto Titus sayth Not by the workes of righteousnes which we haue done But I know these meÌ„s fond deuises They answere that such workes also are excluded if they be done by the law and by frée will without grace But what nedeth to exclude that which can A strong reason to proue that faith onely iuâ—tifieth not be For who will either loue God or hope in him without grace Farther in what maner so euer they be done they can not serue to iustification for we are iustified by grace as it playnly appeareth by the holy scriptures But betwene grace and workes is so great contrariety that Paul sayth If of grace then is it not now of workes and if of workes then is it not of grace Neither ought these men to be so much displeased for yâ— we vse this word Only For we necessarily conclude it of that which Paul sayth First that we are iustified by fayth and afterward addeth without workes How aptly we thus conclude I will declare by a similitude in the 6. chapiter of Deutronomy if we follow the truth of the Hebrew it is thus written Thou shalt feare the Lord God and hym thou shalt serue Here as thou séest wanteth this particle Only yet because there followeth Thou shalt not go after straunge Gods The seuenty interpreters haue thus turned that place Thou shalt feare the Lord thy God and hym onely shalt thou worship These men of the first proposition being affirmatiue that God is to be worshipped and of the other beyng negatiue that straunge Gods are not to be worshipped concluded that God onely is to be serued Whose authority should not be of so great waight with me but that Christ himselfe hath cited that place in that sort For thus he rebuked the deuill Depart from me Sathan for it is written thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and hym only shalt thou serue Here we sée that to disproue the worshipping which is geuen vnto a creature this particle only is necessary which although it be not had in the Hebrew yet is it necessarily gathered out of it Now when as we also after this maner reason why should these men so much be offended Let them consider that the best and the most auncieÌ„st Fathers abhorred not from this word It is a thing ridiculous to sée with how colde toyes and poore shifts Smith goeth about to The fathers vsed this worde Onely resist them First he sayth that they ment nothing els but to represse men that they should not waxe insoleÌ„t But let Smith in one word according to his good wisdome aunswere me whether the Fathers spake this truely or falsely If they spake it truely then make they on our side and why doth this man so much impugne it But if falsely this good end nothing helpeth theÌ„ to represse the insolency of men For euen as euill is not to be committed that good may ensew so false doctrine is not to be affirmed to ouerthrow other
not in the sonne hath euerlasting life 19 a Now you are cleane because of my word 80. b That we haue obtained grace for grace 145. a The pore ye shal haue alwaies with you 200. a Beholde I am with you to the end of the world eodem The bread which I will geue is my flesh 201. b To as many as receiued him he gaue them power to be made the sonnes of God 205 That that might be fulfilled which was spoken 325. b I geue you a newe commaundement 283. a Who so euer the father hath geuen me no man can take away 308. b The world cā not hate you 341 All things were made by it 360 This is eternall life that they acknowledge thee the onely true God and whome thou hast sent Iesus Christ 392. a This is the work of God that ye beleue in him whome he hath sent 406 a Howe can ye beleue when ye seke glory at mens hāds 394 Receiue ye the holy ghost c. 361 Are there not .xij. houres in the day 420. b Actes YE men of Athens I shewe vnto you that God whom ye ignorantly worship 181 Beholde God hathe geuen to thee all that sail with thee 41 That the scriptures should be fulfilled 308. a Repent and be baptized euery one of you 364. b By faith purifying their hearts 392. a 1. Corinthians IF I haue all fayth so that I can remoue mountains 393 The temple of God is holy 5 They did all eat the same spirituall meat 81. b They were all baptised in the cloud and in the sea eodem They dranke of the spirituall rocke following them 81. b Your children are holy 133. b The dart of sinne is death 139 The rocke was Christ 199. b I chasten my body and bryng it into bondage 309. b To them that are called bothe Iewes and gentiles Christ the sonne c. 297. b That the beleuers stād by faith 355. a He that standeth let him take take hede that he fal not 〈…〉 d. Diuiding to euery one particularly as pleaseth him 〈…〉 a 2. Corinthians EVen whom the God of this world hath blineded 28. b Ye are the Epistle of Christe wrote by our ministery and written not with ink c. 49. b I know none as touching the fleshe 241. b Not in tables of stone but in fleshy tables 43. b What great care it hath wrought in you yea what clearing of your selues 166. a Therefore we after this know none according to the flesh 241 The God of this worlde hath blinded the heartes of the vnbeleuers 28. b Thou standest by faith 390. b Galathians HOw are ye againe turned to the weake and beggerly elements of the world 82. b He which is circūcised is debter to obserue the whole law 86. a The lawe was put because of transgressors 90. a As it pleased him which seperated me c. 2. b Although it be but a testament of a man yet when it is confirmed no man reiecteth it or addeth any thing to it 62. Curssed is he that abideth not in all the things that are written in the boke of the law 89 I would to God they whych trouble you were cut of 345. a Considering thy self least thou also be tempted 356. b The scripture hath shut vp all things vnder sinne 365. b The ende of the law is Christ 385. b The lawe is our scholemaister vnto Christ 391. a By the law no man is iustified before God 410. a Ephesians BY grace ye are made safe throughe faith and not of our selues 391. a We also were by nature the children of wrath c 102. b Who hath predestinated vs according to purpose 225. a Not of workes leaste any man should glory 376. b By whome we haue accesse by fayth 269. a Phillippians CHriste was in the similitude of men 194. b Taking vpon him the shape of a seruaunt 1. b We are the circumcision 49. b Yea I think al things but losse for the excellent knowledge of Iesus Christ 158. b With fear and trembling work your saluation 384. a Colossians WE are circūcised in Christ by the washing away the synnes of the flesh 81. b In whome ye are circumcysed with circumcision not made with hands 85. a Mortify your members which are vpon the earth 411. b Thessalonians THis is the wil of God your sanctification 269. a 1. Timothe I Obtayned mercy for that I did it ignorantly and of infidelitie 2. b Saue that which is geuen thee to kepe 3. b Vnto the iust man the lawe is not geuen 59. b God wil haue all men to be saued 269. a Adam was not deceiued 100. a Which is the sauior of all men 306. b They that minister well gette vnto them selues a good degree 350. a The elders are worthy double honor 428. b 2. Timothe I Haue from my progenitors worshipped God with a pure conscience 8. a All scripture inspired by God is profitable to teache and to reproue c. 96. b I know whome I haue beleued and I am assured 101. a In my first defence no mā was on my side all men forsooke me God graūt it be not imputed c. 103. a I haue fought a good battaile I haue finished my course c 158. b He which shall purge him selfe shall be a vessel to honor 255. Of whome is Himeneus and Alexander which haue made shipwracke as concernynge faith 404. b Titus THey cōfesse that they know God but in dedees they deny him 396. b Hebrues IN that he sayth now he hath abolished that whiche was before But that which is abolished and waxen olde is euen at hand to vanishe away 82. a Be not wanting to the grace of God 141. a With such sacrifices is god won as by merite 159. b The saints by fayth haue ouercome kingdomes 391. b It is impossible for those which haue once bene illuminated 266 Faith is a substance of thinges to be hoped for 368. b S. Iames. MAn is iustified by works and not of faith only 69. a God tempteth not vnto euil 28 Patiēce hath a perfect work 100 Let no man when he is tempted say that he is tempted of God 269. a Abraham was he not iustifyed by his workes 74. b He that cometh to God ought to beleue c. 399. b 1. Peter CHaritie couereth the multitude of sinnes In the power of God are ye kept to saluation by faith 291 When once the long suffring of God abode in the dayes of Noe. 401. 1 Be ye subiecte for the Lordes sake 427. a S. Ihons epistle HE which is borne of God sinneth not 149. a Perfect loue driueth forth fear 280. b. 383. a God gaue them power to be made the sonnes of God 382. b He that loueth not abydeth in death 397. a Euery one which beleueth that Iesus Christ is born of god 391. b This is the victory that ouercometh the world our fayth eodem We haue an aduocate with the father Iesus Christ 65. a Ther are .iii. things which bear
sede of the word of God doth not streight way bryng forth his fruite haue heard the word of the Lord do not at that tyme bryng forth fruit But after ward beyng both chastised by God and more â—ehemently stirred vp with fruite they repete with themselues those things which otherwise they hard without profite Which selfe thyng happeneth in the sacrament of Baptisme For a man shall fynde an infinite number which haue had it by them a long tyme wyth out any fruite But afterward beyng conuerted vnto God they do not onely much esteeme it Baptisme sometymes is had a long tyme without fruite Whether the papistes haue the promise of the holy ghost but also therby they profite much Here also the Papistes obiect an other doubt vnto vs. The promises of God say they are not made voyde as Paule sayeth thorough our sinnes and vnbeliefe Therfore seing we haue the promise of God that by the holy ghost he wil alwayes be present with vs to gouerne his church he fully performeth the same Wherfore ye do ill in departing froÌ„ our rules and our communion But these men are excedingly deceiued when as the promise of the holy ghost was made vnto the disciples of the Lord and not vnto them First let them proue that they are the disciples of Christ and then will we beleue theÌ„ They which are the disciples of Christ adde nothing vnto his wordes neither appoint any thing contrary to the holy scriptures which thing these meÌ„ vndoubtedly do They cry out that the holy ghost is geuen vnto the church We The church hath the holy gost but not the congregation of the aduersaries of the Gospell graunt that But what maner of church is that church A counsell of bishops or a sinode of mitred prelates The holy ghost hath alwayes bene in the church and hath inspired some good men to cry out against these men when as they or deined their decrees contrary to the worde of God In summe the Apostles meaning is that the performing of the promises of God dependeth not of our merites but of the goodnes of God And as it is manifest by the wordes of Dauid when he sayth Agaynst thee onely haue I sinned We when we praye vnto God We bryng nothing of our owne vnto God but sinnes doe bryng nothyng vnto hym but sinnes Therefore we desire hym to heare vs that he might be iustefied in his sayings Hypocrites wyll be heard for theyr merites good workes sake for they acknowledge not their sinnes But they which vnderstaÌ„d them do therby take great consolation because their trust is that they shal be heard eueÌ„ through the goodnes of God For forasmuch as they see that in themselues all thinges are full of vncleanes they woulde neuer presume to lifte vp eyther theyr eyes or prayers vnto God Farther let vs marke We must speake well of the giftes of God and inueigh against the abuses that the Apostle reuerenceth the gifts of God and onely inueigheth against theÌ„ which abuse them For he saw that it followeth not that if men beinge by God aduaunced vnto great honors and they in the meane time are ingrate towards him that therefore those honors should not be had in estimation The husbande men of the Lords vyneyard were vndoubtedly noughty men But theyr noughtines caused not that the ornamentes of the vineyarde whyche Christ and Esay make mencion of were not wonderfull excellent and profytable Now if our vnrighteousnes commendeth the righteousnes of God what shall we saye Is God vnrighteous whiche bringeth in wrath I speake as a man God forbid Els howe shall God iudge the world For if the verity of God hath more abounded throughe my lie vnto his glorye why am I yet condemned as a sinner And as we are blamed and as some affirme that we saye why do we not euell that good may come thereof whose damnation is iust Novv if our vnrighteousnes commendeth the rightousnes of God what shal vve say Here Paule turneth somewhat from his purpose but it is not a digression strange from the cause which is entreated of He before very much extolled the mercy of God and declared that the promises of God were not made of none effect through the vnbeliefe of menne yea rather that by our sinnes the goodnes of God is more illustrated Hereby he saw there mighte be obiected vnto him as the wisdome of the flesh is alwaies redy to speake ill of the words of God and to wrest them to a corrupt sence both that God is vniust which punisheth our sinnes when as by them he is made more illustrious and also that we without hauing any regarde oughte to committe synne seing God by our wicked actes is more iustefyed and so hath alway the victory and his cause is thereby made the better Commendeth sayth he which in the Greeke is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifyeth also to confyrme and to establish Which thinge very well agree with commendatioÌ„ Which forme of speaking the Apostle afterward vseth Paralâ—gismus accidentis when he fayth that God hath commended vnto vs his loue for that when we were yet sinners he gaue his owne sonne for vs. But in this kinde of obiection is committed a false argument taken of the accident For that it is not the office of sinnes properly and of themselues to illustrate the glory of God Which selfe thinge may also be sayd of that which is writteÌ„ in this selfe same epistle That of the fall of the Iewes followed the saluation of the Gentiles For we must not thinke that theyr fall was the true and proper cause of the saluation of the Gentiles For it came of the determination of God For God had appoynted that the preachinge of the Gospell beinge reiected of the Iewes shoulde be transferred vnto the Ethnickes And they whiche let loose the bridle vnto sinne vnder this pretence for that they would thereby make God to haue the victory iustefy him are muche like vnto them which hauing bene payned with a most greuous sicknes and then being restored to health by the Phisition haue made his arte more famous will agayne endeuour them selues to fall againe into the selfe same kinde of disease that thereby the Phisition maye be the more renowmed or if poore men beggers should determine that therfore they would eyther wante or begge thereby more and more to shew foorth the liberality of riche men That which of it selfe conduceth to the setting forth of the glory of God oughte not to be blame woorthy or filthy Vertues whiche are ioyned with true prayse do of themselues aduaunce the glory of God We ought not to meruayle that our doctrine is sometimes The doctrine of the Apostles was subiect vnto sclaunders oppressed with sclaunders when as we see that this selfe same thing happened vnto the Apostles They preached true things yet the vngodly through theyr sophisticall subtelties inferred of theyr woordes most pernicious
reade in the scriptures was restored strength to beget children Nether is it any meruaile that By fayth we renounce the best part of our selues by y◠worke of faith is aduāced y◠glory of God forasmuch as in it for Gods sake we deny the best part of our selues which is our mynde and reason wherby we ether assent or not assent vnto thinges set forth vnto vs. Wherefore it is manifest that there can nothing more excellent be offred of vs vnto God For this is a wonderfull testification of the power and goodnes of God for his sake to seme to quench in our selues the sense of nature But I wonder at those which so diligently commend workes and so highly extoll chastity sole life and other workes and yet are so colde in setting forth the commendation of fayth when as by it commeth the victory whereby we ouercome both our selues and also the whole world For so Iohn sayth this is the victory which ouercommeth the world euen our fayth Which thing We are not iustified by fayth as it is a worke Faith meriteth not vnto vs iustification Fayth as it is a worke excelleth all other workes Proues that fayth cannot be without good workes The vertues of the vnderstanding are not repugnant to vices I speake not as though I ment that we are iustified by fayth as it is a worke For it is defiled by sundry blottes of our infirmity And Augustine sayth that this sentence is by no meanes to be admitted that fayth meriteth vnto vs iustification For fayth is not sayth he of our selues but as Paul to the Ephesians expressedly testefieth it is the gift of God Howbeit as it is a worke it many wayes excelleth all other workes Nether can it be expressed how far wide the scholemen erre when they imagine that fayth can consist without good workes For by their sentence fayth should not attayne vnto the dignity of prudence which both as the Philosophers write and also they themselues confesse can not be had without the rest of the vertues What maner of thing then shall Theologicall fayth be if it attayne not vnto the perfection of prudence Farther forasmuch as vertue suffreth not vice to be ioyned together with it and they themselues contende that fayth is a vertue how wil they haue true fayth to be in sinners and such as are strangers frō God But they will say that they put fayth to be a vertue of the vnderstanding vnto which kind of vertues vices are not repugnant For that we sée sometimes that the most wickedst men that are haue in them excellent sciences But nether will this any thing helpe them their owne fayned imagination is a let thereunto For they imagine that those thinges which are set forth vnto our vnderstanding are obscure and nothing euident and that we geue not assent vnto them but because the wil cōmaundeth the vnderstanding to geue his assent in that thinge to geue place to the truth of God Wherefore I will demaunde of these men whether the worke of y◠wil wherby it cōmaundeth y◠vnderstāding to geue place to assēt vnto the words of God be good or euell Vndoubtedly whether they wil or no they must The vnderstandinge cannot be commaunded to beleue without charity Fayth depēdeth not of the commaundemē◠of the wyl◠be cōpelled to say it is good But without charity it is not possible that the will should bring the vnderstāding to embrace y◠things that are to be beleued Wherefore these fonde deuises of theirs are repugnaunt the one to the other But we teach no such thing that fayth should depend of the commaundement of the wil For how should it be moued to commaund things that are to be beleued to be receaued as good and worthy of credit except it had first receued it by vnderstanding In dede we confesse that those things which we beleue are obscure and not very euident vnto humane reason But they are made plaine vnto the vnderstanding by the light of the diuine reuelation and illumination of the holy The deuine reuelation maketh those thinges playne which otherwise were obscure ghost Wherfore they are by the iudgment of reason apprehended and admitted with a singular certainty which thinges being so knowen and receaued as it must nedes follow the wil delighteth it selfe in them so earnestly embraseth them that it commaundeth vnto the other faculties of the mind workes agreable vnto that truth whiche the mind hath beleued And by this meanes of faith springeth charity and after it followeth hope For the things which we beleue and ernestly loue with a valiant and patient minde we wayt for which thing pertayneth chiefely vnto hope Nether let any man thinke that this is ether against reason or extinguisheth the nature of mā for that in beleuing we sem◠to renounce humane sence as though this were in vs a madnes as Agrippa the king sayd vnto Paul when he preached the fayth of Christ Much lerning hath driuen thee to madnes The matter is not so but rather by faith is brought to passe Fayth neyther extinguisheth the nature of man nor reason The foundacions of our resurrection that our reasō maketh it selfe subiect vnto the doctrine of God and vnto the reuelation thereof rather then to inferior reasonings and perswasions which being inferiors vnto the holy scriptures man is by them rather exalted then deiected And if a man should say that men in beleuing are madde we will adde farther it is aboue all things done with reason The Apostle maketh mencion that God rayseth to life the dead and that the body of Abraham was dead and also the wombe of Sara By which wordes Chrisostome sayth are layde the foundacions of our resurrectiō which we beleue shal come For if god could do these things then can not he wante ether meanes or power whereby to restore againe to life the deade And vndoubtedlye I am perswaded that this fayth was no small helpe vnto Abraham to moue him to sacrifice his sonne as God had required at his handes For although hee had receaued the promise that he should haue posterity by Isaake yet he saw that although he were slaine yet there was What faith confirmed Abraham to obey God still remayning place for that promise For he beleued y◠God was able to rayse him vp although he were slayne and make him to liue agayne And how commendable the fayth of the patriarch was Paul declareth when he sayth that he had not a regard to his dead body or to the dead wombe of Sara but gaue the glory to God being most assuredly perswaded this that God was able to performe and bring to passe whatsoeuer he had promised Ambrose by an Antithesis or contrary position declareth the excellency of this fayth for he compareth it with the incredulity of Zachary vnto whome when the angel shewed the birth of Iohn Baptist yet he remained still in vnbeliefe and therfore he was reproued of the
time The sonne which is in the bosome of the father he hath declared him For neither the prophets in the old time nether we ourselues could by any other meanes then by Christ haue knowen that this is the will of God that by him he is made mercifull and fauorable vnto vs. Farther there is no mā ignorāt but that there was nede of a sacrifice and price to purge vs from our sinnes Wherfore seing both the death of Christ and the sheding of his bloud hath performed these thinges vndoubtedly they ought not to be kept in silence But here ariseth a doubt by what meanes the Apostle may seme to seioine and to put a sonder these things one from the other namely the forgeuenes of sinnes and iustificatiō and one the other side the faith of the death from the fayth of the resurrection when as it semeth that by the fayth of ech part of his death I say and of his Resurrection is geuen not only remission of sins but also iustification Augustine against Faustus in his 16. boke semeth to geue his interpretacion That our fayth is chiefly directed vnto the resurrection of Christ That Fayth is directed chiefly vnto the resurrection of the Lord. he died euen the Ethnikes also confesse but that he rose againe they vtterly deny And therfore forasmuch as fayth is sayd to be that whereby we are iustified Paul would make menciō of that thing wheron it chiefly cōsisteth And to cōfirme his sentēce he citeth a place out of the 10. chapter to the Romanes If with the mouth thou confesse the lord Iesus Christ and with thy hart beleuest that he was raysed from the dead thou shalt be saued By which wordes it appeareth that saluation and iustificatiō are attributed vnto the fayth of the resurrection of Christ But these things are not so to be taken as Our fayth is directed also vnto the death of the Lord. though our fayth should not also be directed vnto y◠death of y◠Lord. It is true in dede that the Ethnikes confesse that Christ was slayn but they do not beleue that this was done for the sinnes of men but for some offence he had committed or ells wrongfully but we beleue that he was crucified for the saluatiō and redemptiō of mankind wherfore our fayth is exercised as wel in y◠death of Christ In the fayth of the resurrectiō is comprehended the faith of the death Besides the payinge of the price ▪ it was nedefull that the redempcion should be applied vnto vs. as in his Resurrection And that which he bringeth out of the 10. Chapter vnto the Romanies maketh nothing agaynst our sentence For who vnderstandeth not that in the fayth of the Resurrection of Christ is also included that fayth which we haue of his death and crosse wherfore there are yet behynd two other very likely interpretations of which the first is that in very dede by the death of Christ was payd the price of our redemption But that it might be applied vnto vs there nedeth the holy ghost to moue vs to beleue and Christ to geue vnto vs this holy ghost rose againe from death sent abrode his Apostles to preach into all partes of the world now also before the father executeth the office of an intercessor and high priest therefore is he sayd to haue risen agayne to helpe vs that we might obteyne iustification Chrisostome semeth to lene vnto this sentence The second exposition is that the fayth of the death and of the resurrection bringeth iustification but Paule seioyned them aptly to declare the analogy and proportiō betwene them Vnto the death of Christ answereth very wel the forgeuenes of sinnes for by reason of them death was dewe vnto vs. And as Christ as touching this corruptible life died so also ought we when we are iustified to dye vnto sinne Agayne bycause iustification semeth herein to be declared in that we beginne a new life therfore is it referred vnto the resurrection of Christ for that he then semed to haue begonne a celestiall and happy life Paul vsed in a maner the selfe same form of words in this same epistle when he saith wyth the harte we beleeue vnto ryghteousnesse and wyth the mouth is confession made to saluation For the faith of the harte both worketh righteousnes and also bringeth saluation but bycause saluation and instauration are chiefly declared in action therfore he ascribed it to confession But whither of these expositions is the truer nether will I contend nor also now declare Of those things which haue now bene spoken we gather a most swete consolation for therby we doo not only know the waight of sinne but also we vnderstand that God bare a singular good loue towards vs as one which gaue his only begotten son and y◠vnto the death to deliuer vs from sinnes Farther seing Christ is sayd to haue risen from the dead for our iustification we easely se that we are by him called backe to a new life vnto which yet we cā not aspire except we be of him elected The fift Chapter VVHerefore being iustified by fayth we haue peace towardes God through our Lorde Iesus Christ By whome also we haue accesse through fayth vnto this grace wherein we stand and reioyce vnder the hope of the glory of God Nether do we this only but also we reioyce in afflictions knowing that affliction bringeth forth patience and patience experience and experience hope And hope maketh not ashamed because the loue of God is shed abroade into our hartes by the holy ghost which is geuen vnto vs. Wherefore being iustified by faith we haue peace towardes God Here the Apostle beginneth by way of rehersall to conclude that whiche he had before The effectes of fayth and of iustification proued and together therewithall set forth the effectes of faith and of iustification For that vndoubtedly is an absolute or perfect doctrine which sheweth not only the nature of thinges but also declareth the effectes Now then the chiefest effect of iustification is to deliuer vs from the terrors of death and of eternall damnation And this is it which Paul calleth To haue peace towardes God Farther he sheweth that of this peace springeth a certayne reioysing not only for the felicity which we shall obtayne but also euen for afflictions that therefore we are sure of the good will and loue of God towardes vs because we see Christ died for our saluatiō but much more are we confirmed as touching the same by reasō of his life which he now liueth with the father Moreouer he compareth Christ with Adam and sheweth that he hath brought farre greater benefites vnto mankinde then did Adam bring losses Seing we are now iustified by fayth sayth he we haue peace towardes God Sinne had seperated vs from him and God to auenge sinne draue man out of Paradise by meanes wherof we are become miserable and full of calamitye And agayne seing our owne conscience accuseth vs
of wickednes if we want Christ then must we nedes abhorre God and flye from hym as from an auenger and punisher of sinne And this is that hatred of the world which Christ hath shee l Where heÌ„ce commeth the hatred of the world againste the godly What peace here signifieth to be bent agaynst him and agaynst his when he sayd If the worlde hate me it will also hate you And of the Iewes he testefieth That they hated his father But now after that we be thus iustified we haue peace towardes God for that we are perswaded that he leaueth vs and herein consisteth our whole felicitye So Dauid did not without iust cause say that they are blessed whose iniquities are forgeuen and whose sinnes are couered And by the name of peace is here properly signified tranquility of conscience There are some which in stede of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 put 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is we haue rede 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Let vs haue peace As though Paul after that he had forth the doctrine of faith should now entreate of sincerenes of life and should stirre vp the Romanes to mutuall loue and beneuolence one towards an other And Origen semeth to leaue to this sentence But Chrisostome most manifestly leaneth thereunto for he bringeth two maner of expositions The one is that seing we are iustified by fayth there remayneth that contentions be put away and that men liue in peace one towardes an other And they say that therefore Paul spake this because there were some which contended that the law should be holden as necessary vnto saluation but Paul declareth that there is no such nede seing we are iustified by fayth The second exposition is that we should excercise charity and sinne not But this sentence can not stand sauing vpright the scope of this place and wordes of the Apostle For we sée that here by a briefe rehearsall is entreated of the conclusion which is inferred of those thinges which were before spoken Farther the peace which the Apostle speaketh of is not that peace which men haue one towardes an other For he playnly sayth towards God and those thinges which follow we sée are spoken by the indicatiue moode For he sayth By whome we haue accesse vnto this grace wherein we stande But Chrisostome hath herein also erred when he demandeth whether we can be without sinne wheÌ„ as we now haue iustification he maketh answere vnto himselfe that this is an easy matter Because sayth he it was a harder thing that we which were subiecte to so greeuous sinnes shoulde be deliuered from them then that when we are iustified wee shoulde beware of them For sayth he it is a muche greater matter to obtayne those thinges whiche wee haue not then to defende those thinges whyche he haue alreadye obtayned But wee haue before declared that that so long as we lyue here can not be hoped for namely vtterly to want sinne And if any man will contend that this may be done by the power of God we will not be agaynst him For God could adorne a man with so great grace that he should liue vtterly without sin But we speake according to the senteÌ„ce of the scriptures as the thing is indede and as experience teacheth vs alwayes to happen If we say Whether any man can here liue without sinne sayth Iohn we haue no sinne we deceaue our selues and the truth is not in vs. And Ierome agaynst the Pelagians derideth that power which nether is nor hath bene nor euer shall be put in execution Ambrose maketh on our side and manifestly interpreteth this place of the peace of the conscience which we haue towardes God Yea he herein compareth fayth and the law together and saith that fayth excelleth Fayth excelleth the law the law for that it maketh peace which the law could not do Although whether we write it by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or whether by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is whether we reade 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is haue or may haue our expositioÌ„ hath place stil For the Apostle ether sayth that we now alredy haue that peace or els exhorteth vs to haue it and not any more as we were wont before to flye from God But the common receaued reading by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a great deale better He addeth That by Christ we haue accesse vnto grace wherein we stand If by Christ we haue accesse vnto God and vnto his grace then may we inferre of the contrary that without Christ we flye from God To what ende then shall we call vpon Saintes what other reconciliator haue we nede of if by Christ is geuen vnto vs accesse vnto God Because say they our complayntes are not brought vnto Emperors and kinges vnles we be brought in vnto them by Dukes Earles or Lordes But as we haue before declared out of Amhrose this is done because our Princes or men nether do they sée what is done abroade in the streates and in other mens houses Therefore towardes them we haue nede of many mediators Agaynst iâ—uocation of sayntes But God séeth all thinges there is nothing hidden from Christ Wherefore whatsoeuer is attributed vnto any other is taken away from his dignity and grace Others contend that we haue accesse vnto grace by sorrowes contritions teares satisfactions workes of truth But as touching fayth which Paul so oftentymes inculcateth they speake not a word And if a maÌ„ chance to vrge theÌ„ they answere yâ— in all things they vnderstand fayth And so in a thing most wayghty and which is the chiefe poynt of the whole matter they deale fraudulently and dalyenglye But we say with Paul that by Christ and fayth we haue accesse vnto the grace of reconciliation And as for repentance and workes of charity we say that they come as companions which alwayes follow true fayth Thou wilt demaund peraduenture what maner of peace grace that is which we haue when as God vseth gréeuously to punishe those sinnes which he hath alredy remitted and forgeuen vnto his For so we reade that he did to Dauid We answere that those tribulations which God inflicteth vpon the elect after that he hath forgeuen them The afflictâ—ons of the godly haue not the nature of punishments their sinnes if we will speake properly haue not the nature of punishments For they are rather fatherly corrections wherby the saints are the better admonished not to fall agayne into the like sinnes and the church is tought how sore God hateth sinne Wherefore in these punishmentes is not disturbed the peace of the elect nether do they sometymes fly from such scourges And this I speake of the spirite and not of the fleshe This thing only Dauid desireth that the Lord would not correct him in his furye or in his wrath He refused not to be fatherly cha 〈…〉 sed But The
ought to haue bene stirred vp to the workes whiche he did And that he erred he hymselfe testifieth of himself in many places Vnto the Eph. the. 2. cha he sayth And you that wer dead in sins wherin in times past the walked according to the course of this world after the prince that ruleth in the ayre euen the spirite that now worketh in the children of distrust Among whome we also had our conuersation in times past in the lusts of our fleshe in fulfilling the will of the flesh and of affections and we were by nature the children of wrath as well as others But GOD which is rich in mercye thorough hys greate loue wherewith he loued vs euen when we were dead by sinnes hath quickened vs together with Christ And vnto Titus For we also were once fooles disobedient straying out of the way seruing the desires and pleasures in maliciousnes and enuy one of vs hating an other Such a one was Paul before he was conuerted vnto Christ although he mought not vnworthely make great boast of his outward righteousnes And that thou shouldest not say that he was changed and deliuered frō these sinnes when he began earnestly to apply himselfe vnto the doctrine of the lawe wherein he so much profited that he coulde now be neither accused nor slayne of it he hymselfe in the selfe same epistle to Titus auoutcheth that he was Paul affirmeth that he was iustified by Christ only by Christ only iustified and by the benefite of the holy ghost acquited Wherefore before he was come to Christe the knowledge of the lawe coulde do nothing but kill him For thus he sayth but when the bountifulnes and loue of God our Sauiour towardes man appeared not by the workes of righteousnes which we haue done but according to his mercy he saued vs by the washing of regeneration and of the renuing of the holy ghost which he shed on vs most aboundantly through Iesus Christ our Sauiour that being iustified by his grace we might be made heyres according to the hope of eternall life But vnto that which he writeth vnto Timothe that he had from his elders serued God with a pure conscience answere may thus be made That although he had not in him his conscience accusing him yet this acquited him not from sinne For there are many and haue bene many Scribes and Pharises which being instructed with an ill conscience had an ill iudgement of the law of God They which are not well instructed in the lawe ar not sometimes reproued of their conscience whome yet Christ manifestly reproueth Wherefore when as afterward came a more sounder knowledge of the lawe by it by reason of sinne now known were they slayne Farther we must see what it is that Paul goeth about in that place to perswade vnto Timothe he sayth that he geueth thankes vnto God that without ceassing he maketh mencion of him in his prayers and desireth to see him And that he should not think that he spake this after any common maner as though he did it only to flatter him but spake not from the hart he sayth that he had neuer bene accustomed to lye And although his conscience could not reproue hym of lying yet were there a greater many other thinges which the lawe being truely knowen mought reproue in him And that he had not the perfect knowledge of the lawe hereby it is manifest for that he persecuted Christ in hys Paul before his cōuersion knew not the law perfectly church who is the ende of the lawe In which thing he did nothing agaynst his conscience for it was then in no other sort enstructed And therfore he sayth be did it through ignorance and infidelity Neither hath the law of God that power to kill through sinne but when it is perfectly known And these thinges are spoken of Paul when he was yet of the Iewishe religion And how these thinges pertayned vnto him after he knew Christ and how they pertayne to vs shall afterward be declared Howbeit in the meane time these things ought to moue vs to detest the naturall sinne grafted in vs. That sinne might be out of measure sinfull by the commaundement Here the Apostle declareth that he entreateth not only of the knowledge of sinne which is perceaued by the lawe but also of the comming of that wickednes which is wrought by taking an occasion of the law For by y◠figure Hyperbole Why the Apostle vseth the figure Prosopopeia he saith that sinne is made sinfull aboue measure And vnto sinne by a figure he fayneth a person which sinneth deceaueth and slayeth Which he therefore did for that he considered that we are slow and blockishe and vnderstand not the pernicious blot of our originall sinne But because the lattin translatiō hath aboue measure sinfull Ambrose demaundeth whether paraduenture there be any measure of sinne granted by the lawe And he answereth that there is none for the lawe condemneth all sinnes vniuersally although he confesse that there is The law cōdemneth all sinnes a certayne measure as touching the seuerity of God aboue which measure God differreth not his punishements and vengeance As it may be sayd of the Chananites There is with God a certaine measure of sinnes aboue which they are not suffered to escape vnpunished Sodoma Gomorrha and other nations whome God suffered a longe while to escape vnpunished But afterward when they exceded that measure whiche God coulde no longer suffer to excede he vtterly ertinguished and destroyed them Although some say that sinne aboue measure encreased after the law was geuen if it be compared with that tyme wherein the lawe was not For then mought haue bene pretended some ignorance but that ignorance so soone as the lawe was geuen and published was taken away But I would rather expound this by the figure Hyperbole that is vnmeasurably For when lust waxeth of force we fall into all kindes of sinnes But the kindes of sinnes can not be expressed For euen as archers but one only way hit the marke but yet infinite wayes mysse it A similitude so vertue consisting in the middest as a marke we may infinite wayes erre from it but there is but one only way to attaine vnto it That which is in the Greke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may thus be turned in Lattin Peccatum peccator that is sinne a sinner But because that soundeth not so well it may be turned sinne out of measure vicious Aristotle in his 3. of Ethikes sayth that of extreames the one is more vitious and the other lesse The lawe is spirituall but I am carnall being sold vnder sinne Here is rendred a reason why it is not to be imputed vnto the lawe that of the knowledge thereof followeth death For saith he the lawe is spirituall but the propriety of the spirite is to geue life And this thing experience well teacheth vs. For we sée that bodyes do so long liue how long there is in
that it is good nowe he after a sort goeth vp one steppe higher which pertayneth only vnto the Godly For theyr will towardes the lawe is not a colde will but pleasant feruent and The will of the godly towardes the law is not cold The vngodly are not kindled with a true loue to that whiche to good The saints tooke great pleasure of the law of God vehement With great endeuor they contende that they may indéede performe that which in minde they desire But the vngodly although by a naturall light which is not vtterly extinguished in them they haue some knowledge of iustice and vertue yet are they not kindled with a true loue of things good Wherefore yâ— Apostle writeth not these things vnto theÌ„ but vnto the godly which euery moment striue against yâ— lust which is grafted in theÌ„ by nature But how great a plesure yâ— good meÌ„ take of yâ— law of God many places of yâ— scripture testefie Dauid in his 1â—9 psalme sayth Blessed are they which walk in the Law of the Lord and which seke the testemonies thereof And in his 1. psalme Blessed are they which meditate in his Law day and night And in an other place The Law of God sayth he is more precious then gold and precious stones and more swete then hony and the hony combe And other infinite such like testemonies But there is very much difference betwene the godlâ— and men straungers from Christ For the wise men amongst the Ethnikes did Difference betwene the Ethnikes and godly men put the greatest part of theyr felicity herein that they might alwayes remember the notable actes by them done But they greatly reioysed not of the knowledge of the true and perfect righteousnes bycause they perfectlye knew it not But the sayntes contrarywise alwayes cast theyr eyes vpon the Law of God and when in it they se before theyr eies drawen out the portrature of a iust man and the perfect image of God whereunto we are created they can not but wonderfully reioyce But afterward wheÌ„ they turne aside theyr eyes to their works they are excedingly sory for that they se them so much to fayle of the example set before them So paynters when they se an image excellently set forth they A similitude take therein great pleasure But when as hauing enterprised to make such an other they se that they can not attayne to that liuelines and excellency they begin to be sory and to be angry There is noted also in Pecockes the selfe same An other similitude kinde of affection for when they haue erected vp theyr fethers they delighting in the pleasant variety of the colours seme much to reioyce But agayne when they behold theyr deformed and blacke fete streight way theyr courage is deiected and they let downe theyr fethers So the godly delight in the Lawe of God and are inflamed with great loue to his commaundementes but contrariwise they lament and are sory for the filthines which they find to be in al their works Concerning the inward man Sithen Paul calleth the regenerate part of man by this name it can not be doubted but that he speaketh of the whole man For man consisteth not only of the body and of flesh but also of the soule and of that part whiche they commonlye call rationall And this whole man is called both inward outward He is called the Inward man in that he is moued by The whole man is called both inward and outward in diuerse respectes the spirite which worketh in our inwarde partes and of stony hartes maketh fleshy hartes But he is called outward in that he is taken with the delights of this world with riches honors goodly shewes and such like thinges For all these are outward thinges So the Apostle hath now proued the first part which he put forth namely That he would doo good and that he delighted in the law of God concerning the inward man Now he goeth to the other part to declare that he is agaynst his will drawen to other thinges I fele an other Lavv in my members resisting the Lavv of my mind and leding me captiue into the Lavv of sinne vvhtch is in my members This Law which he describeth is the force of sinne and of our naturall corruption He calleth it the Law of members for that before he called this whole euil the body of sinne but a body hath members Farther members in this place signifieth as I haue before admonished all the powers of the minde and all the partes of the body now contaminate with sinne The Apostles minde was to declare that this disease drawen from our birth stayeth not only in some one part of vs but persâ—th thorough out the whole man and thoroughout-all his partes Here we haue sondry Sondrye names of lawes What the law being aâ— large taken signifieth names of Lawes for hece is mencioned The Lawe of God The Lawe of the minde The Law of sinne The Law of the members And this hereof commeth for that the Law is largely taken for all that whiche gouerneth moderateth our actions And bycause our actions procede not all from one greuÌ„d thereof it commeth that there are diuers names of Lawes Although the Law of the mind and the Law of God is one and the same It is called the Law of God bicause by it is expressed the will of God And it is called the Law of the mind for that it raigneth chiefely inwardly and is most knowen in the minde The Law of sinne also and the Law of the members is one and the same It is called the Law of sinne bycause such lust is of it selfe sinne and of it selfe bringeth forth other sinnes and it is called the Lawe of the members for that it vseth all our Why sinne to adorned with the name of law partes strenths and faculties for instrumeÌ„ts Chrisostome warely admonisheth that sinne is not for any his owne dignity adorned with the name of Lawe for that commeth thorough our default for that we obey sinne as a Lawe For so Christ called Mammon Lord and Paul called the bely God Rebeâ—ling 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There is a greate conflict betwene these two Lawes for the Law which is in my members laboureth to lede me away captiue and to make me a bondsclaue vnto the Law of sinne But if the Law of sin and the Law of the memvers be one and the same how is the one sayd to lede away a man captiue vnto the other This is not without greate consideration Lust grafted in vs impelleth vs to actual sinnes sayd For so long as lust grafted in vs which is sinne resisteth the Law of God by which Law the knowledge of the minde is enstructed it impelleth vs to many kindes of sinnes Those are commonly called actuall sinnes whereunto our lust and corrupt oâ—sposition incline vs. But this maketh vs subiect vnto the law of sinne that is vnto death for death as
although they be adorned with goodly and precious garmentes yet haue they no feeling of theÌ„ neither by them do they gather any heate or be defended from corruption So saith he Infidels although they séeme sometymes to liue vprightly yet of their workes they receaue no commodity at all He addeth moreouer euen as it is necessary that a man first be before he can receaue meate to be nourished withall so is it necessary that there be first fayth then yâ— afterward it be nourished by good workes Touching the workes of Cornelius he saith A similitude that they were wonderfull and pleased God the chiefe rewarder of workes All these thinges are spoken both truly and also agréeably vnto our doctrine But afterward he addeth that Cornelius wheÌ„ he wrought those works which ar praysed beleued not in Christ which although it be hardly said yet may it by an interpretatioÌ„ be lenefied to vnderstaÌ„d him as we did August namely yâ— Cornelius beleued not distinctly expressedly wheÌ„ yet he beleued in Christ after yâ— selfe same maner as yâ— elders did of whoÌ„ it is to be douted but yâ— they wer saued by the sauior whoÌ„ they loked should come And this kind of faith was sufficieÌ„t vnto saluatioÌ„ vntil yâ— gosple was published abroad But afterward he addeth yâ— Cornelius could not haue obteined saluatioÌ„ vnles faith had bene offred vnto him which yet may after a sort be admitted so yâ— that saying be taken of the perfect saluatioÌ„ whervnto Christians are called and shall one day come But that which he addeth can by no meanes stand for he sayth that these workes of Cornelius were dead Here now Chrisostome beginneth not to be Chrisostome For howe was it possible that the Chrisostome herin against himselfe workes of Cornelius should be wonderfull and please God the chiefe rewarder if they were dead But if we will know the true opinion of Chrisostome hymself touching this matter let vs se what he writeth vpoÌ„ this history in the. 9. chapiter of the Actes For there he playnly testefieth that Cornelius beleued and Chrisostome vpon the Actes affirmeth that Cornelius be leued before the comming of Peter Of the excellent workes of the Romanes was a godly man and not being content with this he addeth that his life was honest and that he had sound groundes of doctrine Here he affirmeth that he had both fayth and also the fruites of fayth Finally he addeth that he had both fayth and righteousnes and all maner of vertue And thus muche touchinge Chrisostome But they obiect vnto this our sentence the excellent workes and notable enterprises of the Romanes which God recompensed with the reward of a most ample impery And to that purpose they cite Augustine in his 51. booke de Ciuitate Dei the. 15. chapiter For there he sayth that God vnto them vnto whome he would not geue eternall life gaue an earthly glory of a most excelleÌ„t empire which thing vnles he had done there should not haue bene reÌ„dred any reward to good arts yâ— is to vertues wherby they endeuored theÌ„selues to attaine to so greate glory But that we may the better vnderstand thys compensation God gouerneth the world orderly without confusion whereof Augustine speaketh we must remember that God in the gouernment of the world will haue all thinges done by a certayne order and without confusioÌ„ that effects should follow theyr causes and properties should be adioyned vnto thinges whereunto they belonge Fruites are by the heate of the Sonne made ripe witty men by industrye and study attayne vnto good artes After winter commeth the spring agayne after the springe commeth sommer and atter sommer commeth the autum Plants bring forth first leaues afterward flowers and then fruites After this maner doth God prouide for the nature of thinges and for rites and famelies And for that vnles common welthes florishinge in Lawes and vertues shoulde attayne vnto dominion all humane Vnto what vertues is naturally adioyned greate dominion thinges would sone come to nought therefore by the commaundement of God and by a naturall institution it followeth that where florisheth discipline of warre obedience towardes the magestrate obseruation of Lawes seuere iurisoiction modesty of princes abstineÌ„ce fortitude and loue of the couÌ„râ—ey there also followeth a greate empire Whiche yet proueth not that these thinges are not sinnes so far forth as they procede from men without fayth For they are Why the godly workes of the Ethnikes were sinnes not directed vnto the glory of God which ought to be the end of al meÌ„s doings wherefore thys glorye and largenes of dominion for that by the institution of God it followeth morall and ciuill vertues is both taken of ciuill men as the end and fruite of theyr labors and also is called a reward And that these works Augustine teacheth that those workes were sinnes of the Romanes were sinnes Augustine himselfe affirmeth in yâ— selfe same boke de Ciuitate Dei the 12. chapiter For thus he writeth Touching the Romanes for that for honor prayse and glory sake they studied to preserue theyr contrey wherein they sought glory and doubted not to preferre the safety thereof before theyr owne safety for thys one vice sake that is for the loue of prayse and keping vnder the gredy desire of money and many other vices Here the ambitioÌ„ of the Romanes he calleth vice Who then can say that God truly or properly rewardeth sinnes wherefore it remayneth God is not sayd properly to reward sinnes that this rewarding be taken in that sence that we before spake of namely that it followeth by the order of thinges appoynted of God and that of them vpon whome it is bestowed it is counted as a reward and fruite of theyr labors For this kinde of speach the scripture also not seldome vseth of the scribes and hipocrites the Lord sayd Verily I say vnto you they haue receaued theyr reward And Paul touching them which when they knewe God worshiped him not as God but being deliuered vp vnto filthy desires polluted theyr bodies with ignominy and shame They receaued in them selues sayth he theyr reward as it was meete And Ezechiell in his 29. chapiter sayth That God would geue a reward vnto Nabucadnezar for that he had serued him in the ouerthrowing of Tire and for a reward promised vnto him the spoyle and distruction of Egipt And there is no doubt but yâ— the works of hipocrites which couloured theyr faces that they mought seme vnto men to fast and that the superstitious and detestable worshippinges of idolaters and those cruell factes which Nabucadnezar did to satisfy his ambition were sins and that greauous sinnes And yet we reade that all these thinges had theyr reward And that God in appoyntinge of kingdomes had a respect vnto an other Why God by his prouideÌ„ce so transferreth kingdomes from nation to nation end then to pay vnto those men a reward euen Augustine playnly declareth in his 5.
then our aduersaries are brought to yâ— issue yâ— they now openly fight not only agaynst vs but also agaynst Christe vnles peraduenture they will say that an infidel and an aleant from God is a good tree But if they confesse this how do they deny that he pleaseth God wheÌ„ as vnto the good God that which is good can not be but acceptable But he which pleaseth God must nedes without all doubt haue fayth For vnto the Hebrues it is written without fayth it is impossible to please God But these men by this theyr heresy wil obtrude If we consider nature there is no ill tree at all Natures are not to be weighed as they were made of God but by that condition which we haue added vnto them Mercy shewed vnto our neighboure without faith is vnfaithful Mercy is not of it selfe good God dissalowed many woorkes of mercy vnto vs that whiche in that epistle is pronounced to be impossible But a man say they in that he is a man is not an euill tree But Augustine sayth If thou consider only nature then shall there be no where any euill tree For both angel and man wer created of God and receaued good natures But these natures are not to be considered of vs as they wer made of God but according to that coÌ„dition which came afterward vnto theÌ„ A man hauing a good will is called a good trée and a man hauing an euill wil is called an il trée But after the fal of Adam and the first ruine of our kind we say that men are such that they are not moued by a good will but by an euill But to returne to the almes of an infidell whereof we began to speake we may demaund whither thys mercy which is shewed be done with fayth or faythles And forasmuch as it is done without faith it must nedes be faithles Wherfore it can not be without vice and sinne It is not inough for a man to be mercifull vnto his neighbour vnles the same be also done faythfully and rightly For mercy is not of it selfe good For God hath dissalowed many benefites bestowed vp on our neighbours as when the kinge of Israell spared the kinge of Siria and Saul Agag king of Amaleck But fayth whiche worketh thoroughe loue is alwayes good nether can at anye time be euill But forasmuch as mercy is not of yâ— nature therefore is it necessary yâ— there be added an vprightnes wherby it may be done faithfully that it may receaue commendation They crye out that this naturall affection to be mercifull is good Which thing peraduenture we will not deny But they ought to haue considered that men not regenerate abuse The vngodly abuse natural affections this good thing when as they direct it not vnto God which is the only ende of all our actions Neither doubtles doth he commit a light sinne which peruersly abuseth so great a gift of God Farther the same Augustine affirmeth that whatsoeuer good thing can be noted in the worke of an infidell the same is wholy of God Wherefore that our neighbour is holpen and some order of nature kept and ciuill honesty retained it is not had by any other meanes but at Gods hand only But so farre forth as it commeth from an infidell and a man corrupt it is sinne and displeaseth God By these and such like reasons was Pelagius Pelagius putteth certainâ— good men but yet baren brought to that point that he confessed that these men thus by nature liuing honestly are in deede good men but yet barrenly or vnfruitfully Augustine here againe replieth against them saying Such is the nature of barren trees that ether they bring forth no fruit at all or els ill fruit But Pelagius still laboureth They appoint good workes which conduce not to the obtâ—inment of the kingdome to wind himselfe out and sayth that therfore these men are to be called barren for that although those thinges which they do be good yet helpe they nothing to the attainment of the kingdome of heaueÌ„ But in so saying he saith nothing yea he rather hindreth himselfe Doubtles the Scholemen of our time haue euen the like sentence against which yet Augustine all that he may resisteth For he saith By this meanes the Lord shall cut downe and cast into the fire a good tree bringing forth as ye say good fruit What maner of iustice of God is this whiche ye euery where so seuerely defend Of this your sentence do follow many thinges fond and absurd Thus much hetherto out of Augustine But our men boast that they much differ A certaine coloured opinioÌ„ of our aduersaries from Pelagius For we put say they a certaine grace preuenting and knocking whereby may in the hartes of men be included some good treasure whereout they are able to worke some good thing Wherefore they are not trees vtterly A similitude dead for after a sort they bring forth fruite And although that which they bring forth can not budde forth into flowers and into good fruits yet are they bowes and leaues whiche may come and do come out of some sappe of yâ— grace of God whereof no not euen the aleantes from Christe are vtterlye destitute But this selfe thing Pelagius also confessed For he abhorred not from the name of grace when yet notwithstanding by that name as Augustine notably discouereth him he vnderstood what he listed rather then what he ought and a farre other thing then that worde signifieth with the catholike writers in the Church of Christ or in the holy scriptures But these men in their similitude Against the similitude brought haue very small consideration For they remember not that the Lord in the Gospell cursed the trée which had only leaues without fruite and commaunded it to be cut downe and to be cast into the fire But vnto the curse and vnto eternall fire nothing is obnoxious but only sinne But they haue yet another colour whereby to auoyde this place For they say that these trees in dede are euill but not vtterly dead for in them is found some sappe of grace For they put in man a certaine grace knocking and preuenting whereby in the hartes of men not regenerate may be included some good treasure whereout may spring some blossomes froÌ„ a maÌ„ not repeÌ„tant For although they can not bring to perfection that which they bring forth or produce ripe fruite or also flowers yet at the least they bring forth bowes and leaues which verily are a signe of some hidden grace and life It is wonderfull to see how these men delight theÌ„selues in this knocking and preuenting grace Of which grace what is to be thought we haue before declared But they which speak and hold these things are to to much without consideratioÌ„ For they consider not that this their grace is nothing els but a certayne inuiting vnto Christ but yet not of efficacy for men are left together with it vnder the wrath
that by his spirite the iustification of the law might be fulfilled in the elect Neither did he for any other cause take flesh vpon him but to helpe and succor the infirmity of our flesh Of this purpose and councell of God the Apostle here entreateth By this place it manifestly appeareth how one and the selfe same worke One and the selfe same worke is both sin and vetue as it commeth either from vs or from God as it commeth from men is sinne and as it commeth froÌ„ God is good The Iewes sought nothing els in the death of Christ but to exatiate and fulfill their hatred to reiect the worde of God and to repell and put away the chastisements and corrections of the Lord and also to kepe still their dignities and honors These endes forasmuch as they are very wicked the action also could not but be very wycked But God forasmuch as he had a regard to the setting forth of his goodnes and procured the health of mankinde in that he deliuered his sonne vnto the death accomplished a worke of most singuler charity Wherfore if we will speake properly God if we speake properly ought not to be counted the cause of sin God can not be called the cause of sinne although it cannot be denied but that he is the cause of that thing which in vs is sinne for that which in him is praise worthy and procedeth of vertue is oftentimes by vs defiled for that we our selues ar vncleane In that he saith That which was impossible vnto the law he teacheth both that the law is weake and by the contrary that the spirite and faith are strong But that infirmity of the law appeareth not vnles the weakenes of our frée will be throughly known For therof commeth it that the law is weak because it lighteth vpon a corrupt nature For otherwise the law it selfe so far forth as it is written is nether weake nor strong But man is iudged weak so long as he is left vnder the Law and is not holpen by the spirite of grace This place most strongly An argument of iustification that it is not had by workes proueth that iustification is not of workes and that there are no workes preparatory for works which go before iustification either do agrée with the law of God or els they defect or want of it If they agrée with the law theÌ„ of necessity we must graunt that the law is not weak as that which without the spirit and grace may be performed Paul in this place affirmeth that thing to be vnpossible But if such workes faile of the rule of the law â–ª which can not be denied then must we nedes graunt that they are sinnes But by sinnes no man can be iustified Here also are reproued the Pelagians which tooke vpon them to say and teach that a man by The Pelagians are in this place ouâ—râ—hrown the strengthes of nature is able to fulfill the commaundements of the Law For Paul teacheth contrariwise that the law was so weakened by the flesh that it behoued vs to be deliuered by an other helpe But where as he sayth yâ— the law was weakened by yâ— flesh no man ought therfore falsely to suppose yâ— here is condeÌ„ned yâ— substance of the flesh or nature of yâ— body for these things God created good But by flesh he vnderstaÌ„deth yâ— naughtines corruption which by reason of the fall of AdaÌ„ passed through all mankind Which corruption forasmuch as it is still remayning euen in men regenerate they can not vndoubtedly perfectly and fully accomplish the lawe of God vntill they haue vtterly put of this fleshe And as Chrisostome noteth the lawe of God is not by these wordes condemned but rather commended because it commaundeth right and iust thinges but it can not bring them to the ende Wherefore the comming saith he of Christ was necessary which might minister helpe and succour vnto the lawe for the lawe in dede taught vprightly There are two things which the law cannot performe what ought to be done and what ought to be auoyded But besides this there were two other thinges necessary which the lawe could not geue first that those thinges might be forgeuen which are committed against the commaundements thereof an other is that the strengthes of man might be corroborated whereby to performe the commaundementes of the lawe Without these two thinges whatsoeuer the lawe teacheth touching the doing or eschewing of thinges it can not profite but rather serueth to condemnation For he which knoweth the will of his Lord and doth it not is gréeuouslyer punished then he which knoweth not the will of his Lord. Those commentaryes which are ascribed vnto Ierome do vpon this place expressedly affirme that the Apostle here speaketh not of the lawe of ceremonies for he speaketh here of that lawe whereof is written in the 7. chapter of Mathew The thinges which ye wyll that men should do vnto you the same do ye vnto them of which lawe it is straight way sayde Thys is the lawe and the prophetes Wherefore there is no cause why any man shoulde cauell that that whiche Paul saith It was possible vnto the lawe is not to be referred vnto the morall lawe Three thinges are here enquired for but vnto ceremonyes But there are in this place thrée thinges to be obserued first what moued God to geue his sonne secondly what Christ being geuen vnto vs did for vs. Lastly what fruite we obtayne by his worke As touching the first the Apostle saith that this was the purpose of God when he gaue his sonne that the infirmity of the lawe should not be a let to our saluation For he sawe that it was God gaue his sonne that the infirmity of the law should not be a let to our saluation so weake by reason of the infirmity of our fleshe that by the ministery thereof we could not attaine vnto saluation which he had appointed for vs. Which sentence if our aduersaries would consider they should sée that they can neither maynetaine workes of preparation nor yet iustification by workes vnles paraduenture they thinke that this counsell or purpose of God was not necessary And these men vndoubtedly do as much as lieth in theÌ„ to diminishe the benefite of Christ neither acknowledge they the perfect and full loue of the father towardes vs. Paul saith that the lawe without Christ is weake these men say that before we are made pertakers of Christ we be able to worke good workes and to obey the lawe of God And although Paul here teacheth the impossibility of the lawe yet the fathers haue sometimes accursed such as dare say that God hath commaunded Whether God haue commaunded thinges vnpossible thinges vnpossible Although if a man rightly vnderstand our doctrine he shall easely sée that we teach not that the commaundementes of God are vtterly vnpossible but only as touching those which are strangers from Christ For men now regenerate haue
the diuine nature brethern of Christ and childreÌ„ of light and that we also sinne not for he which is borne of God sinneth not and that we loue our neighbors and our enemies that we may resemble our heauenly father who maketh hys sonne to shyne vpon the good the euil sendeth raine vpon the iust the vniust And finally that we be peacemakers for they shall be called the sonnes of God But our adoption is not such that we should thinke that we are borne of the substance of God For We are not the sonnes of God as begotten of hys substaunce that is proper to Iesus Christ only For the word of God is by nature borne of the father which thing yet the Arrians denied For forasmuch as they made the sonne of God a creature they must nedes say that he was not the sonne of God by nature but by adoption Greate vndoubtedlye is our dignitye For we are so highlye exalted that we be not onely called and are the sonnes of Christ called his Apostles bretherne God but also haue Christe to our brother Wherefore Christe when hee was risen agayne sayde vnto the women Goe and tell my brethren And althoughe the elders were not quite voyde of this dignitye yet had they it not so publiquely declared But this was no let at all that many amongest theÌ„ were weake For we also in the Gospel haue many weake ones For Paul saith vnto the Corrinthians that he could not speake vnto them as vnto men spirituall for that they were carnall and therefore he was fayne to féede them with milke Which selfe thing is written vnto the Hebrues And contrariwise they had men strong in fayth of whome we caÌ„ not doubt but that they were in thys The fathers in the olde time attained to the adoption of childreÌ„ adoptioÌ„ most excellent And that so it was at that time also the Apostle testifieth in thys epistle the 9. chapiter for he sayth Vnto whome pertayueth the adoption and the glory and the testament and the geuing of the Law and the worshipping and the promises and vnto whome pertayne the Fathers Here we se that adoption pertayned vnto them also Ambrose vpon this place teacheth that of thys adoption springeth vnto godly men greate security And doubtles forasmuch as this commeth We are more certaine of this adoption then we are of our carnal fathers Alexander the greate vnto vs thorough the spirite whereby we are inwardly moued we ought to be farre more certayne that we are the sonnes of God then the sonnes of thys worlde are certayne that they are the sonnes of them whome they call fathers For oftentimes the mothers deceaue both the husbandes and the children But the spirite of God deceaueth no man Long since flatterers went about to perswade Alexander that he was not the sonne of king Phillip but of Iupiter Afterward when he saw that there came bloud out of a wound which he had geuen him he lawghing sayd that that semed vnto him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is common bloud and not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yâ— is the bloud Gods But we though we suffer many things yea loose our life for Christes sake yet notwithstanding ought to be fully perswaded yâ— we are the sonnes of God For to the end we should not any thing doubt of that matter we haue not only a testimony of the spirite but also euen the sonne Christ hath taught vs to call God father of God hath taught vs to call God Father and to inuocate him by that name And this forme of prayers ought to call vs backe from all kinde of wickednes and from all maner of filthy works and also to put vs in minde not to degenerate from the nobility of so greate a father and that we in no case dishonour hym For it is taken to be a greate reproch vnto fathers to haue wicked childreÌ„ And forasmuch as we can not as we haue sayd attayne vnto this adoption but thorough Christ and his spirite nether the Iewes nor the Turkes nor men straÌ„gers from Christ can call vpon God as vpon theyr father By vvhome vve cry Abba father This selfe same maner of speach the Apostle vsed vnto the Galath For thus he writeth Bycause ye are sonnes God hath sent the spirite of his sonne in which we cry Abba father After this selfe same maner Christ our first begotten brother prayed vnto the father in the garden sayinge Abba father let this cuppe passe away from me Nether is it to be meruayled at that the Apostle ioyned a Greke word and a Syrian word together whiche tounge What is ment by the ioynyng together and repeticion of two tonges was then commonly vsed of the Iewes For first this repeticion serueth to vehemency of speach Farther the Apostle semeth by a certayne mistery to teach that as well the Gentiles as the Iewes shoulde be indifferentlye pertakers of thys adoption in both whiche tounges God should be called vpon by the name of father In the primitiue Church were kept still of the interpreters some Sirian words which were then in vse which we rede sometimes in yâ— holy scriptures as Messias Cephas Talitha Cumy Maranatha Rabby Osianna Alleluia and Amen For those words were theÌ„ most perfectly knoweÌ„ especially wheÌ„ as betwene the Ethnikes the Iewes yâ— were coÌ„uerted vnto Christ was a most straight bond of loue in a maner a perpetual familiarity But we must not thereof gather yâ— in yâ— We must not vâ—eâ— strange tounge in the church The inuocation of the godly is the worke of the holy Ghost How vnto prayers to ascribed our saluation seruice of God should be vsed a straÌ„ge tounge For yâ— the holy ghost hath manifestly forbidden vs. Paul in this place wheÌ„ he maketh mencion of inuocation declareth the worke of the holy ghost which it straight way sheweth forth vpon the children that are adopted and now regenerate And of so greate waight and force is this work that the Apostle doubteth not by the testemony of the Prophet to attribute vnto it saluation For he saith as afterward shal be declared Euery one which calleth vpon the name of the Lord shal be saued Not that our prayers can merite salution for that is apprehended by faith only And therefore that we should not be deceaued he straight way expresseth in what maner he ascribeth saluation vnto them For he saith How shall they call vpon him in whome they haue not beleued Which wordes plainly teach vs that that which is written of prayers is to be attributed vnto faith as vnto their roote But because in this place is mencion Whether the adopted be free from all feare of God Dâ—finition of feare made of feare for the Apostle thus writeth Ye haue not receaued the spirite of bondage agayne vnto feare it shall not be from the purpose briefely to sée whether Paul meaneth that we are deliuered from all kinde of feare or no First
large prosecute the same and chiefely by thys reason for that aduersities helpe forward our saluation And when he had seuerally declared that we are holpen by hope and by the intercessioÌ„ of the spirite and had before taught that all creatures grone with vs now he pronounceth vniuersally that all thinges woorke vnto vs vnto good He sayth not that God prouideth that we should not be vexed with aduersities but teacheth that the nature of them is after a sort inuerted as which of themselues are able to engender nothing else but our destruction but now contrariwise they bring vnto vs commodity saluatioÌ„ But this thing doo they not of theyr owne force but by the election and predestination of God Nether is it to be meruayled at if we attribute vnto God so greate a force For we see that phisitions somtimes doo the like For they oftentimes expell out of yâ— A similitude bodies of men venome or poyson by venemous medicines hemlock although otherwise it be present poyson yet being tempered by that art it is so farre of from hurting that it also expelleth poysen So afflictions in godly men fight not against them but rather fighte againste the remnants of sinne And by these wordes of the Apostle we may inferre of the contrary that vnto those whiche An argument taken from the contrary Examples either loue not or hate God all thinges turne to theyr destruction which thyng we know came to passe in Iudas in others For wheÌ„ he began to hate Christ no good occasions or quickening wordes of the Gosple or power to worke miracles could any thing profite him The Iewes also when they were led about thorough the wildernes and were adorned of God with excellent and manifold giftes yet oftentimes became worse and worse Ambrose thus knitteth together thys sentence with that which went before Although we be enfected with great ignoraunce so that ether we aske those thinges which are not to be asked or els we out of time aske those thinges whiche are to be asked yet oughte not that therefore to be a let vnto vs when as by the benefite of the spirite thorough the mercy of God al thinges worke vnto vs vnto good Howbeit this is to be noted that the verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is worketh together may be taken in the singular nomber and be referred vnto the spirite namelye that the spirite worketh and conuerteth all thinges to good to those which loue God And so this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is All shal be the accusatiue case But the receaued sence is more playne it is a phrase of speach much vsed of the Attike writers to ioyne vnto nownes newter being in the plurall nomber a verbe of the third person singular Augustine Vnto the elect sins also are profitable De correptione gratia so largly taketh this senteÌ„ce the he doubted not to write that vnto holy men sinnes also are profitable Which saying indede although I will not deny but to be true yet wil I not easely graunt that it agréeth with the sentence of Paul For both those thinges which are alredy spoken and whiche shall afterward be spoken pertayne to calamities and afflictions But the same Augustine else where more diligently weighing this place vnderstandeth by The sentence of Paul is to be referred vnto calamities and afflictions Why the burthens of Christians are said to be lighte Paul entrâ—ateth not here of of pleasantnes but of commodity How aduersities profite the godly The contrary endeuor of the Deuill it the whole burtheÌ„ of grieues and tribulatioÌ„s which he sayth is by this meanes made the lighter for that we loue God For he which loueth any man from the hart so for his sake beareth calamities that he is nothing grieued at them Iacob for Rachel serued 14. yeares and that so long space by reason of his loue semed but short And this is it that Christ sayth that his burtheÌ„ is light and his yoke pleasant not that those thinges which the Christians both do and suffer are not hard and difficile but bicause by reason of the loue which they beare vnto God all thinges be they neuer so hard shal be pleasant vnto theÌ„ But Paul here entreateth not of that kinde of good thinge which is light and pleasant but which is profitable vnto the godly vnto saluation And if thou demaund how aduersities are profitable vnto the godly I answere bycause God by theÌ„ auocateth his froÌ„ the delightes and pleasures of thys world and from themselues For such are we thorough the fault of nature and naturall corruption that we can not with out some hurt of ours be driuen vnto those things which are in very dede good On the contrary part the deuil laboureth as much as lieth in him by tribulations and aduersities to draw vs from God which thing he oftentimes bringeth to passe in the vngodly but in the elect the prouidence of God ouercommeth hys malicious purpose Farther by these afflictions calamities sin which perpetually froÌ„ our birth cleaueth fast vnto vs is dayly more more diminished The Apostle saith that this commeth to passe vnto them that loue God for that they are first loued of God For Iohn testifieth that we preuent not the loue of God God in louing preueÌ„teth vs. for no man can loue him vnles he be first loued of him It may peraduenture seme wonderfull why Paul sayd Vnto them that loue and not rather vnto theÌ„ that beleue especially when as at other times he attributeth iustification vnto fayth But this is to be knowen that in this place is not entreated of iustification For he writeth of the suffring of aduersities The cause whereof if thou wilt serch from the bottome then must thou go vnto grace and vnto the holy ghost Of grace and the holy ghost streight way springeth fayth by whiche after we haue embrased the goodnes and promises of God without any delaye springe hope and charitye Wherefore Paul tooke that thinge which is in aduersities next ioyned vnto fortitude For streight way so sone as we loue God for hys Loue is not the chiefest cause that maketh vs paciently to fuâ—â—er aduersities but the â—iest cause Charity distinguisheth the true faith from the false The connexion of faith and charity The most holiest men haue but a slender loue towardes God Why vnto loue can not be ascribed iustification Difference betwene the godly the vngodly sake we patiently beare all aduersities Wherefore he declared not the chiefe and principall cause but the niest And to the ende we should not stay there he streight way adioyned the roote and fouÌ„taine of that good thing For he saith Vnto those which are called according to purpose Farther he therefore maketh mencion of loue to put a difference betwene true faith and a fayned counterfeate and dead faith which is no faith at all For some boast of faith which bere no loue at all vnto God
verity is had a farre other sence By all these things it is manifest how this word purpose ought to be taken And this our saying do those wordes which follow euidently proue Whome he hath foreknowen those also hath he predestinate Paul A gradation by this gradation teacheth that the purpose of God is firme For he holdeth it as certaine that as many as are predestinate shall also come vnto eternall glory Glory the end of predestination Violence is excluded Certainty abideth â–ª which is the end of predestination I like that very well which Chrisostome sayth that herehence is excluded all violence For the election of God bringeth no violence either vnto the predestinate or vnto the reprobate but that in no case taketh away the certainty of predestination For none that is truly a Christian and in déede godly ought to doubt whether he pertayn vnto the election of God or not None that is godly ought to be in doubte whether he be predestinate or no. The argument of Paul touching the certainty of predestination For if we be in doubt touching yâ— matter how can we cal God our father or with what confidence can we pray And as touching this place Paules argument should be weake and perswade nothing if we ought to be in doubt of our saluation Paul admonisheth the Romanes quietly to suffer tribulations for that they should turne vnto them vnto good Neither was he content with an argument taken of the loue which we beare towardes God for that was weake for no man can put confidence in his owne worke And therefore he goeth to predestination for that it is firme and can not be deceaued And it is all one as if he had sayd they which are predestinate of God do not only beleue in hym and loue hym but also vnto them all thinges yea though they be aduersities turne to good Ye are predestinate of God wherefore be of good comfort these calamityes wyll bring vnto you some commodity and will helpe forward your saluation In thys argument if a man should doubt of the minor or second part and should suspect it not to be true what profite then shall the persuasion of Paul bring It should be a They which commaund vs perpetually to doubt do not with efficacy exhort to patience We must not for euery manner of pretence be spoyled of a necessary good thinge Childrens play weake argumeÌ„t and conclude nothing This thing vndoubtedly do they which coÌ„maund vs perpetually to doubt whether we be of the number of the elect or no. But they pretend the endeuour of an holy life namely that men should not begin to liue dissolutely and securely â— losely But they ought not for the retaining still of some perticular good thinge to spoile vs of this most presente and moste necessary good thing This is childrens play which when they will by stealth snatche away any thing from their fellow bid him looke aside to behold some other thyng But we if we will deale wisely and not suffer our selues to be deceiued shall still retain either commodity For first let vs not doubt of the goodnes of God towards vs neither let vs be vncertaine whether we be elected and predestinate Farther beyng nowe certaine of our saluation let vs be more more stirred vp and kindled by so great a benefit of God lest liuing wickedly we be found ingrate towards him we must not so remedy the one part that we forgo the other which is most of all necessary We must not to the ende the security of the flesh should not lead vs away to vices be in doubt of the predestination of God for it is certaine of Paul set forth as certaine vnles we will say that he when he persuadeth these thynges doth but trifle and loose his labour Augustine in his booke De Correp gratia saith If the predestination of God be deceaued they which are predestinate shal perysh but they peryshe not therfore predestination is not deceaued Againe If it sayth he be deceaued God is ouercome of the sinne of man so that that whiche he hath predestinate can not come to passe But the power of God is not ouercome of our sinne Wherfore predestination is not deceaued It is the point of vngodly men and of scorners to say that God is deceiued in his counsels For so dallieth Lucianus in Timone that when the The predestination of God cannot erre from his ende Of what thing consisteth the confidence of saluation It is not our parte to prescribe vnto God the meanes whereby to be led vnto saluation Here is entreated of the foreknowledge which is ioyned with approbation temple of Castor and Pollux was smitten with lightening it erred much for that otherwise it was sent of Iupiter vpon Anaxagoras Wherfore a godly mind ought to be persuaded of two thinges First that the predestination of God cannot erre from his ende appointed Secondly that we assure our selues that we pertayne vnto the number of the predestinate Which thing although it cannot be comprehended by naturall knowledge yet may it be holden by the certainty of hope and of fayth And forasmuch as we heare out of Paul that God himselfe worketh our saluation we ought to permit vnto his wisedome to vse in bringing vs to saluation what instruments please him For it is not our part to prescribe vnto hym whether he ought to lead vs by aduersities or by prosperities so that he bring vs to saluation Farther seyng Paul hath shewed vnto vs so large and certayne a fountaine of our saluation we ought not onely to geue thankes for that so great goodnes but also with all our endeuour to labour that we be not founde ingrate towardes hym Whome he for knew those also hath he predestinate The forknowledge wherof the Apostle here speaketh although it betoken knowledge yet it signifieth not a common and generall knowledge but such a knowledge which is ioyned with fauour and approbation wherby God doth elect certaine and count them for hys This kinde of knowledge is denied vnto the wicked for the Lord will say vnto those folish virgins I know you not Which selfe thing shall also be said vnto the wicked which haue prophecied wrought miracles in the name of Christ not doubtles that God knoweth not either them or their workes but for that he approueth them not neither acknowledgeth them for his Of this knowledge Christ sayth in Iohn I know my shepe Christ in dede knew other men which were not hys shéepe but he embraced them not with a singuler knowledge neither fed he them And Paul to Timothie saith The Lord knoweth who are his And Dauid in the Psalme The Lord knoweth the way of the iust For so great is the perspicuity of the mind of God that it nedeth not for the knowledge of things to wayte vntil they be extant God seâ—th thinges to come as if they were present Here to foreknow extendeth no farther
We are not taught by any parte of thâ—â—anonicall scripture â—hâ—t the â—â—â—â—tes departed do pray for vs. Althoughe the saintes do praye for vs. yet are not they to be inuocated do make intercession for vs we can not proue by any parte of the canonicall scripture Wherefore we ought to haue Christ only for our mediator aduocate neither are thinges vncertaine to be admitted for certaine Although I can easely graunt that the saintes in our countrey with most feruent desires wishe the saluation of the elect Yet dare I not say that they pray for them especially seyng the scripture no where teacheth any such thing And although I should confesse this yet should it not therof follow that we ought to cal vpon saintes departed For we are not certaine out of the worde of God that they can heare our prayers Wherfore they greuously offend both against religion and against Christ himself which appoint vnto themselues saintes for new mediators and aduocates wheÌ„ as there is but one onely mediator betwene God and men namely the man Christ Iesus who now as Paul saith maketh intercession for vs. The same thing doth Iohn testify saying I write vnto you that ye sinne not And if we sinne we haue an aduocate with the father euen Iesus Christ the iust Augustine against the epistle of Parmenianus in the 8. chap. in these wordes noteth that the Apostle excluded not himselfe None so holy but that he hath nede of the intercession of Christ from yâ— rest For he said not ye haue an aduocate but we haue For there is none so holy but yâ— he hath nede of Christ to be his aduocate and mediator Farther he saith not ye haue an intercessor but we haue an aduocate Iesus Christe Augustine in that place reproueth Permenianus for that he had in some places written that Bishops are mediators betwene God and the people which thing he sayth is not It is a thing intollerable that bishops should be mediators betwene God and the people We must not pray vnto Angels to be suffred of the faithfull The same Augustine in his 10. booke of confessions the 42. chapter thus writeth Whome should I haue found which mought reconcile me vnto thee Should I haue gone vnto Aungels But with what prayers With what Sacramentes And he addeth That there were many which would haue bene reconciled by Angels and were miserably deceyued for that an euill Aungell oftentymes transformeth hymselfe into an Aungell of lyght And if it be not lawfull for vs to pray vnto Aungels much les is the same lawfull for vs to doo vnto dead sayntes For here is no les perill to be deceaued then there These things writeth Augustine in that place both godly and soundly who yet in other places was not so circumspect in eschewing the errour of hys tyme. Who shall separate vs from the loue of God shall affliction shal anguishe shall persecution shall hunger â–ª shall nakednes â–ª shall danger shall the sworde As it is written For thy sake are we deliuered to the death all the day long we are counted as sheepe for the slaughter Neuertheles in all these things we are more then conquerors thorough hym that loued vs. For I am persuaded that nether death nor lyfe nor Aungels nor principalities nor powers nor thinges present nor thinges to come nor heigth nor depth nor any other creature shal be able to seperate vs froÌ„ the loue of God which is in Christ Iesus our Lord. Who shall separate vs from the loue of God After that Paul had by so many reasons confirmed the exceding great loue of God towardes vs now by way of interrogacion he crieth out that there is nothing which can interrupt that loue wherewith God loueth vs. Let aâ—cuse vs whosoeuer wil let come aduersities be they neuer so great yet all things shal work vnto vs to good For this is the property of one that loueth continually to do good vnto him whom he loueth Wherfore seing God so loueth vs what soeuer he doth or whatsoeuer he sendeth vpon vs we must beleue that it shall be helthfull vnto vs neither ought any aduersities to perswade vs but that we are continually loued of God Wherfore this is a conclusion of all those thinges which haue bene before entreated of And that which the Apostle â—aith he is most fully persuaded of I would to God we were also persuaded of the same He reckoneth vp those thinges which seme commonly to be most harde and wherby men are oftentimes broken and euen these things he auoucheth hinder not the loue of God towardes vs so far is it of that they can plucke it away from vs. The Apostle the longer abideth in this place for that our flesh humane reason can hardly be perswaded of this thing For oftentymes when we are afflicted we cry My God my God why hast thou forsaken me And that with a farre other manner of affect then Christ pronounced those wordes We cry Howe long Men think aduersities to be tokeÌ„â— of Gods anger Ambrose vnderstandeth these thinges of our loue wylt thou be angry O Lord With many such other like For whatsoeuer aduersity happeneth we thinke the same to be a token of Gods wrath towardes vs wheÌ„ as yet he of a singuler loue suffreth vs so to be afflicted I know that Ambrose Augustine and very many other take loue in this place for that loue wherwith we loue God as though the meaning of Paul should be Seing God hath so loued vs ought not we agayne on the other side most constantly to loue hym And thys sentence is neither vnapte nor impious Howbeit I rather preferre the other for that it séemeth to serue better to the scope of the Apostle for hee in thys place goeth about to perswade vs that we should not be in doubt of the loue of God towardes vs. And therefore he sayth that he foreknewe vs predestinated called iustified and glorified vs gaue hys sonne vnto vs together with hym all thinges and that Christ hym selfe maketh intercession vnto yâ— father for vs. All these thinges pertain vnto yâ— loue which God beareth towardes vs. And a litle afterward the Apostle addeth But in all these thinges we are conquerours through hym which hath loued vs. These words most plainely serue to my sentence wherunto also subscribeth Chrisostom I confesse in dede that of this good will of God towardes vs is stirred vp our loue towardes hym howbeit Paul semeth to entreat of that first loue and not of thys our loue But they which will haue these wordes to be vnderstand of our loue towardes God somewhat do doubt whether the elect they yâ— be in very deede iustified may at any time leese faith charity and other vertues or no. But that semeth Paul to denye for he sayth yâ— there is nothing can plucke vs away from the loue of GOD. For this sence is gathered out of the interrogation which he here putteth But whatsoeuer other
oracle was geuen when they were yet in the wombe neither had yet done either any good or any euill And peysing these thinges he considered that that which the Prophet had spoken more briefely mought be of him not without great profit and edification dilated so also is it profitable for vs to do namely diligently to waigh the places of the scriptures which are sometimes cited of the Apostles The Prophetes were as we haue oftentimes said interpreters of the bokes of The Prophets interpreters of Moses Moses They preached repentance not only agrauating sinnes but also setting forth the promises of the Gospell concerning grace Which thinges Malachy in this place did excellently wel comprehend Farther Paul most thoroughly saw that of the loue of God and of that oracle which was geuen vnto the mother touching the infantes was assigned no cause thorough works or merits These thinges I say mought suffice as touching this place but that there is yet one doubt remayning to be dissolued For Erasmus in hys booke which he wrote de Libero Arbitrio for that he saw that these places which we haue now made mencion of make agaynst hym thus dissolueth them First he sayth yâ— answere was made vnto Rebecka touching thinges temporall that the elder shoulde serue the younger and God may at his free wil pleasure cause that a maÌ„ whether he will or no shall leade a pore life and be a bond maÌ„ whom yet he will not reiect from eternall saluatioÌ„ Farther he addeth that these testimonies as Paul bringeth theÌ„ are repugnaÌ„t the one to the other wheÌ„ yet in their places they are not so repugnant Here doubtles is to be required in this maÌ„ not onely prudeÌ„ce but Paul faithfully alleageth yâ— holy scriptures dalied noâ— in them also plety For it is not mete for a man to thinke that Paul wheÌ„ he layd the first foundations of Christian religioÌ„ did vnfaithfully cite the scriptures or brought those places for testimonies which serued litle to the purpose Paul dalied not in the holy scriptures to make in his writings those testimonies repugnaÌ„t which in theyr owne places are not repugnante for this were as the blasphemous cauiller and vngodly Prophirius did to abuse the simplicity of the vnlerned But if at any time we can not vnderstand how the testimonies which are cited of Paul and of other of the Apostles make to theyr purpose why doo we not rather confesse our owne infirmity of vnderstanding and negligence whereby it commeth to passe that we can not attayne to the exact contemplacion of thinges diuine But whereas he sayth that the oracle was geuen to Rebecka touching Whether the question be vnderstanded touching thinges spirituall or temporall it is all one as touching the scope of Paul thinges temporall it nothing helpeth him for yet still the reason of Paul remayneth strong For forasmuch as he concludeth that a man is made either a Lord or a bondman a rich man or a pore man by these testimonies he inuinciblye proueth that that commeth not thorough any merites or workes of men For thereto only had Paul a respect Put the case that the question were moued why by the election of God one is made a prince an other a subiect one is afflicted an other fortunate here doubtles this is the thinge that is in controuersy whether these thinges are so ordred thorough the vertues and merites of men or thorough the mere goodnes of God Paul leueth no place at al to merites yea rather he sayth that God had decreed that these thinges should come to passe before that they which should doo them were borne and had appoynted that the one should be a Lord and the other a seruaunt before that they coulde ether doo or thinke any thinge Wherefore the question is generally and vniuersally put forth and not only touching the maner of principality or seruitude Wherfore whether those be spirituall or temporall thinges the scope which the Apostle entendeth is vtterly one and the same namely that they come without any our workes or merites If a man should alledge sentences nothing pertayning to the purpose euen amongst the philosophers he should be laughed to skorne how much les then ought we to impute any such thing to Paul But to make thée to vnderstande that those testimonies are moste agreeyng to the matter proposed The oracle before cited applied to the spiritual promise I will declare that in them are contayned not only thinges temporall but also and that chiefely thinges spirituall For forasmuch as God promised that the greater people should serue the lesser the same vnles we will to farre stray out of the way we ought to thinke should therefore come to passe for that the lesser natioÌ„ should be receaued of God into fauor and should become his people For otherwise neither the lesse people could ouercome the greater nor the weaker the stronger It is God only which is the doer thereof and vpholdeth that people whome he hathe decreed to be his And where the people of God are there follow infinite spirituall benefites namely the word of God the heauenly blessing the breathing of the holy ghost remission of sinnes thorough Christ and last of all eternall life Let vs consider the historye it selfe as did Paul and we shall perceaue that in the blessing of Iacob the things which his father Isaake blesseth him withall are chiefely spirituall namely that vnto him should be subiect not only his brethern but also the Gentiles which there is no man but seeth that it was accomplished in his sede and yet not in all his sede but in it onely whiche The blessings of the fathers are to be referred to Christ and to his members was so long time and so carefully waited for which doubtles was Christ whoÌ„ at this day both the Iewes and yâ— Gentils worship Those that blesse thee saith he let them be blessed and those that curse thee let them be cursed And these thinges are agreing vnto Christ onely and vnto the elect For whosoeuer shall worship him shal be rewarded with eternall felicitie and whosoeuer is contumelious either against him or against his members shal be obnoxious vnto the eternall curse and destruction The selfe same thinges also are to be vnderstanded in the oracle of Malachy For if the posteritie of Iacob should be in good case and the posteritie of Esau in yll it is not enquired whether God promiseth thinges spirituall or temporall but whether he would geue those thinges vnto them in consideration of theyr workes and merites or no. But that I am sure thou shalt not finde in that whole prophet Which thinge Paul also dilligeÌ„tly peysed although these thinges are also to be referred vnto spiritual matters For how came it to passe that the pub wealth of the Israelites was preserued that they had a commodious land â—o dwell in and that they were restored from the captiuity of BabiloÌ„ Doubtles by no other meanes but for
that they had God fauorable vnto them And God as touching those whose God he will peculiarly be prouideth for thē not only commodities in this life for he is the God of the whole man and hath no les care ouer the soule then he hath ouer the body that not only in this life but also in this life to come but let vs peise the entent of Malachy He reproueth God prouideth for his not onely things erthly but also eternall the people of ingratitude towardes God God saith he is your father and Lorde Howbeit ye neither loue him nor reuerence him when yet he hath loued you And that loue he proueth by a double benefite of God towards them first for that he loued Iacob and preferred him before Esau when yet notwithstanding they were brethern and twines secondly for that he gaue vnto the one a sertile and plentifull land to inhabite but vnto the other he gaue an vnfruitful and barren land and for that he deliuered the one from theyr captiuity but would haue the captiuity of the other to be perpetuall So the loue of God is proued by the effectes but of that loue is alledged no cause I graunt indede that the posterity of Esau were alwayes wicked men and enemies vnto the people of Israell although by affinity they were ioyned vnto them yet they were alwaies aduersaries and enemies vnto them Some say also that Mahumet came of that natiō although there are others which referre his stock to the Ismalites Farther the earth also The earth is by reason of sinnes made barrē is by reason of sinnes made barren Therfore Dauid sayth That for the sins of the people the earth is turned into a wildernes and is made of God vnfruit full But neither Paul nor the prophet describe these thinges as causes of the loue of God Yea rather if we should fayne any such exposition vnto Malachie his reprehension should somewhat be extenuated For when he vpbraydeth vnto the people ingratitude for that God had loued thē they mought in one word haue made answere Therefore hath he loued vs bycause we deserued it for he foresaw that our workes should be good and for that cause he loued vs. Wherefore much wayght is taken away from this reprehension if we admitte this opinion Many trouble theyr heddes about the hatred and loue of God and say that he neither loueth nor hateth as we vse to doo Which thing in dede I graunt for God loueth with out all maner of troubled affection and loueth perpetually for he is not changed he hateth also without perturbation and for that he is not mutable he perpetually hateth those whom he hateth They say moreouer that these thinges are to be considered by the effectes so that God is sayd to loue him to whome he doth good and to hate him whome he ouerpasseth and leueth in sinnes and for his sinnes which he hath committed afterward greuously punisheth Herein I will not contend with them although in graunting thys God in dede loueth and in dede hateth I also affirme wyth the holy scripture that God truly and in dede loueth and hateth and that thereof followe those effectes which we haue now mencioned And bycause we can not by it selfe vnderstand the force and might of the loue hatred of God therfore we consider thē by the effects namely ether by his gifts or by his punishmēts But the ground of y◠question is whither y◠loue come of our merites or fréely The Apostle excludeth merites other some fayne woorkes Whether God loue or hate in respect of works fore sene foreséene Wherefore it shall not be amisse to recite theyr opinions that we maye see how this is to be vnderstanded that God either hateth or loueth Chrisostome thinketh that God therefore loued Iacob because he was good and reiected Esau because he was euill And if thou saye that they forasmuche as they were not yet horne had done neither good nor euill he maketh aunswere that vnto God if is not needefull to waite for the euent of thinges For he by the most sharpe sighte of his foreknowledge seeth before all eternitie what thinges shal afterward come to passe and he alone knoweth truly who shall be woorthy of his election who vnworthy But here Chrisostome somewhat strayeth from the truth when hee saith God findeth not in men an◠worthines for which they should be elected that God findeth in men any woorthinesse for which they ought to be elected For what thing els is that but not onely to diminishe but also vtterly to take awaye euen the grounde of grace For if of our selues we be worthy to be elected verely the grace of GOD is not geuen vnto vs freely Howbeit he confesseth that the Apostle speaketh not this for if he had made aunswere that Iacob was therefore elected for that he was good and Esau reiected for that he was euil he saith that the Iewes mought straightway haue replied if we be reiected for our wickednes what were the Gentiles whiche are now receaued any better then we This thinge also woulde they vtterly haue denied For the Gentiles were infected with most gréeuous sinnes howbeit he sayth it moughte be graunted that the Gentiles which were nowe called were good for that they had receiued the saith of Christe which the Iewes by all maner of meanes withstoode But Paul would not in such sorte make aunswer but referred the whole matter to the foreknowledge of God against which doubtles saith he none that hath his righte wittes will stande For Paul resolueth not the question into the fore knowledgeof God but into his wil by it God foreseeth who shal be good and who euill But here againe he is far out of the waye For Paul resolueth not the question into the foreknowledge of God but into his will mercy and power For he sayth that it is not of hym that willeth nor of him that rūneth but of God that hath mercy that he hath mercy on whom he will and hardeneth whome he wyll and lastly that the potter maye of one and the selfe same masse or lompe make one vessell to honor and an other to contumely And to the Ephesians he saith that we are elected accordinge to the good pleasure of his will Chrisostome addeth that when it is sayd that the elder shall serue the younger thereby is shewed that the right and dignity of the first birth should nothing profite hym which came first out of the wombe but the vertue which God foresaw before workes Here it is a harde matter to vnderstand what manner a thinge that vertue is whiche should goe before works For what doth he peraduēture thinke y◠these men are borne endued with vertue But there cā no such thing be foūd in the scriptures for they testifie y◠mē are borne the children of wrath obnoxious vnto sinne But as far as we can coniecture A mynde prone to good things is not in
if they should be receaued he saith Grace can no more be grace And thus much touching Chrisostome Now let vs sée what Ieromes minde is touching this matter He in his 10. question to Hedibia The opinioÌ„ of Ierome beginneth doubtles in my iudgement not very souÌ„dly For he saith that this is a most obscure place when as otherwise in the wordes of the Apostle as touching the question there is no ambiguity at all But he and other such like make the thing obscure whilest they labour to eschew more theÌ„ is nedeful the offence of humane We must not pretend any obscurenes in this chapter reason For Paul if a man haue a regard to the grammaticall sence if in any other place then moste of all in this place obserued both in his interrogation and answere and prospiâ—uous placing of his wordes whatsoeuer mought seme requisite And should be not a litle contumelius against the holy ghost if he would of purpose haue so obscured the doctrine concerning the principall ground of our saluation so that we should not be able to vnderstand it For in this place is entreated Here is entreated of the chiefe promise of our saluatioÌ„ of a matter which is of all other of most waight namely to what thing we ought to attribute our saluation and election whether to our workes foresens or to the frée mercy of God Ierome vsing this for his preface turneth himselfe afterward to reproue Origen howbeit he leueth his name vnexpressed For Origen labouring to iustify God as touching the loue of Iacob and hatred of Esau which as yet had done neither good nor euil sayth yâ— that came to passe by reason of those Plato Pithagoras things which their soules had done before they came into their bodies For of those merites it coÌ„meth yâ— meÌ„ in this life are of diuers estates These things Ierome worthely reproueth For they pertain not to Christian piety but to the doctrine of Plato and of Pithagoras For they fayned sondry courses departures returnes of the soules Why do we not rather saith Ierome confesse our own ignorance This sentence as I commend so also se I that it is not alwayes kept of him which spake it For if he would haue bene content with a godly ignorance he had not fained imagined those questions and suppositioÌ„s of Paul which in very déede are none at all But he would not that the Apostle should seme to haue tought these thinges contrary to common sence For when Paul had said Iacob haue I loued but Esau haue I hated and afterward had added What is there iniquity wyth God and had made answere Ieromes discourse vpon this place God forbid proued by testemonies of the scriptures that God tempereth and moderateth his election according to his wil mercy and power Ierome sought to bow and to wrest those thinges which Paul had most simply spoken as if they were importunatly obiected vnto Paul by way of interrogation as though when Paul had answered God forbid the importunate caueler should go on and say If God sayd vnto Moses I wyll haue mercy on whome I wyll haue mercy and wyll shew compassion on whome I wyll shew compassion then shall it not now be neither of hym that wylleth nor of hym that runneth but of God that hath mercy And if he to thys ende raysed vp Pharao to declare in him hys power what could he then do wythall And if we be as clay in the hand of the potter why do we yet complayne Who can resist hys wyll Shall there be nothing remayning of free wyll Let Paul make answere to these impudent obiections what art thou o man which thus reasonest wyth God Euen by thyne owne malepertnes thou mayst sufficiently vnderstand that thou art not as clay in the hand of the potter For the clay complayneth not of hys maker but thou I wyll not say greuously complaynest but also powrest out blasphemy agaynst the creator and callest hym vniust and euen in thys thou declarest that thou hast free wyll when as thou speakest what thou list yea euen agaynst God himselfe And if God woulde by his greate patience long suffer Pharao and declare his mercy towardes others he is not therefore to be accused of thee the faulte is rather to be layde vppon the sinnes of men For euen as by one and the selfe same heate of the sunne clay is made hard and waxe made soft so by one and the selfe same goodnes of God some are made more obstinate and other some returne to health And therefore were the Gentles admitted into saluation for that they receaued the fayth of Christ and the Iewes were for saken and reiected for that they resisted that fayth Wherefore not the men themselues but theyr wylles are elected Wherfore by these thinges it is euident that Ierome also was of that mynde that the election of God dependeth of the wyll and workes of men And toward the An interpretation of an author not named end of this tenth question he sayth that he had red in a certaine author whose name yet he kepeth in silence that the Apostle doth not only not dissolue the question but also maketh it more intricate by testimonies of the scriptures and reproueth the curious inquisitor after this maner O man what art thou forsoth clay in the hand of the potter Wherefore kepe downe this thy malepertnes with eternall silence and be mindfull of the infirmity which is in man As touching This question caÌ„ not so be dissolued to satisfie humane reason Ierome vpon Malachy yâ— dissolution of the question if Ierome meane of that wherin humane wisdome may be satisfied we also do graunt that the question is not dissolued but if he speake of that kind of solution which ought to be sufficient vnto Christian piety and which may be had in this life there is nothing wanting to this dissolution Of the selfe same matter Ierome vpon Malachy expounding the place which we are now in hand with writeth after this maner The loue and hatred of God is either of foreknowledge or of workes For those God loueth whome he seeth to be haters of sinne and those he hateth whome he seeth wyll build vp those thynges which he wyll haue to be ouerthrowen Finally he saith that God is sayde to loue or to hate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 â–ª that is after the maner of men euen as he is sayde to be angry to be sory to reioyce and therefore is he sayd to hate the wicked that we shoulde eschew those thinges whiche we know he hateth I know also that the Rabines of the Hebrues and especially Chimhi when they expound this place of Malachy do runne vnto workes But although in properties phrases of wordes I iudge those men worthy som what to be estemed yet as touching the sence of scripture and doctrine I do not geue much credit vnto them For they are vtterly blinded neither will they
time when he was called Verely he thought vpon nothing ells but how to murther the christiaÌ„s and vtterly to destroy and to ouerthrow Christian religion and yet notwithstanding he was streight way conuerted vnto God and the truth was so set forth vnto him that streight way he embrased it vtterly and wholy changed his minde Wherefore there is no cause why any man should accuse God of iniquity for when he forgeueth and pardoneth he geueth frely of that which is his owne but Why God is not to be accused of iniquity when he punisheth and putteth to paines he by most good right requireth that which is his owne These thinges writeth August as we haue sayd in his boke of questions to Simplicianus the second question But in his epistle to Sixtus which is the 105. in nomber he sayth that God findeth not men mete to be elected but maketh them God in Iocob loued only his mercy He hated Esau for that he would not haue mercy on him Paul wanted not sharpenes of wit Neither loued he any thing ells in Iacob saith he but his owne free mercy And Esau he hated for that he woulde not haue mercye on him Whiche thinges these men sayth he speaking of the Pâ—lagians seking to auoyd say that God had a regard to the workes foresene as though forsoth Paul wanted so greate sharpenes of witte that he would not se that which these witty men saw For theÌ„ doubtles was the time for Paul so to answer wheÌ„ he had obiected vnto him selfe What shall we then say Is there iniquity with God God forbidde He mought streight way euen with one worde after these men haue solued the question yea rather he had had no question at all to solue We must consider what Paul there went aboute what he did and what was his entent His entent was to inculcate the grace of God but they which haue this scope before theyr eyes can not imagine any suche things And in his Enchiridion to Laurentius the 98. chapiter he writeth that if this had bene the entent of Paul he would in no case haue sayd Not of workes yea he would rather haue sayd Of workes foresene he loued Iacob by his free mercy and hated Esau by his iust iudgment Wherefore they which are planted in an holy calling let them acknowledge that vnto them is geueÌ„ grace not dew vnto them and in others that eternally perish let them consider what was dew vnto them Now that I haue thus briefely recited the sentences of the fathers I thinke it good to declare my iudgement What is to loue What is to hate as touching this whole matter First I vnderstand that To loue is nothing els but to will well to a man And to hate is nothing els but to wish ill to a man or not to wyll well vnto him Wherefore God is sayd to loue them vnto whom he willeth eternall saluation that is the chiefe felicitie and those he hateth vnto whom he wylleth it not Nowe this so being the controuersie is whether God wylleth felicitie to the elect by workes foresene or no and how he willeth it not to the reprobate First we wyll speake of loue Nowe loue can not be of workes foresene for Paul sayth Not of workes but of him that calleth And seing The electioÌ„ or predestination of God cannoâ— be of works foreseene that God findeth not good workes in men but of his mercy deriueth them into them how can they be the causes of his loue And in the 11. chapiter of this epistle Paul sayth That the remnantes shall be saued according to the election of grace And if of grace then not of workes And in this place the same Apostle referreth the effects also of the promises of God only to the will and power mercy of God Therfore ought we to presume to go no farther And in the 1. chapiter to the EphesiaÌ„s he sayth That we are predestinated into the adoption of children according to the good We should be iustified by workes foresâ—ne â–ª iâ— we should by them be elected pleasure of the will of God And if we should graunt that men attayne to saluation by workes forsene we could not auoyde but that men should be sayd to be iustified by workes For then of our workes should follow the foreknowledge of God of foreknowledge predestination and of predestination calling and of calling last of all iustification we should consent also with the Pelagians that iustification and merites take theyr beginning of our selues and that God afterward addeth grace mercy and variety of gifts Neither ought we to thinke that the worke of God which is eternall hath his beginning of any thing temporall The eternal worke of God hath not his beginning of a thing temporall The hatred of God is not of workes foresene After the selfe same maner we say that the hatred of God dependeth not of workes foreknown For Paul a like pronouÌ„ced of ech brother Not of workes but of him that calleth And if we should graunt that the hatred of God springeth of ill workes foresene it mought be on the contrary part inferred as sayth Augustine that the loue of God also springeth of good workes forsene And moreouer this reason can not take place in all those that are elected or reiected For many amongest the Iewes and Turkes perish euen in theyr in fancy and are condemned and therefore are nombred amongest those whome God hateth in whome yet he could foresee no euil workes forasmuch as they should neuer haue any yea rather he foreknew that they should worke nothing Neither auayleth that any thing which some say that God saw what they would haue A cauillatioÌ„ confuted done if they should haue liued For by this meanes should not the iustice of God as touching humane reason be defended for the defence whereof yet these men take so great paynes For streight way should come into yâ— mind why these men were reiected for those workes which they neuer did nor euer should haue done But they should haue done them thou wilt say if they had liued Graunt it were so But a conditionall proposition affirmeth nothing And that God followeth not this consideratioÌ„ in his loue or hatred Christ plainly declareth wheÌ„ he saith Wo vnto the Corozaim wo vnto the Bethsaida for if in Tyre and Sidon had bene done the thinges which haue bene done in thee they bad long since repented in sackcloth and ashes Again Wo vnto the Capernaum which art exalted vp to heauen for thou shalt be cast downe euen into hell For if in Sodome had bene done the thinges which haue bene done in thee those cities had yet bene remayning These wordes playnely declare that God hath not a respect vnto that what a man shall do For he gaue miracles vnto God gaue miracles to them that vsed theÌ„ ill but gaue none to theÌ„ that would haue vsed them well them that vsed them ill and gaue not
any to such as would haue vsed theÌ„ wel Further remember that in these wordes it is not sayd that they which had not miracles should if peradueÌ„ture they had haâ— any haue beleued of themselues as though yâ— that lay in their owne nature or fre wil. For that thing would God haue geuen vnto theÌ„ And forasmuch as it is a senteÌ„ce coÌ„ditional there ought not of it to be inferred a proposition categoricall or affirmatiue As wheÌ„ it is sayd If a horse should flye he should haue winges it followeth not thereof that a horse hath winges or that to flye is of the nature of the horse or that the horse Neither election nor reprobation depende of works fore sene The difference betwene election and reprobation could flye if he had winges when as vnto flyeng are required moe things then winges Wherefore herein election and reprobation agrée together that neither of them depâ—ndeth of workes foresene Howebeit they differ two maner of wayes Firste for that although sinnes are not causes of reprobation yet are they causes of eternall damnation wherunto the reprobate are ordeined For they are not condemned but by iuste iudgemente neyther haue they any thing that they can iustlye complayne of the iniustice of God But good workes are neither the beginning of the election of God nor true causes of eternall felicity Neither must we here harken to the scholemen which put in them merite as they vse to speake of condignity For Paul contrariwise teacheth that the suffringes Merite is not to be admitted of this tyme are not condignae that is worthy the glory to come which shal be reueled in vs. The other difference is for that the good workes where vnto we are predestinate to be by them led to felicity are not of our selues but of the predestination of God But sinne is grafted in vs euen from our birth Good workes we haue of God but not sinnes For in iniquityes are we conceaued and in sinnes hath our mother conceaued vs. Howbeit some haue gone aboute to proue that the loue of God dependeth of workes by the 8. chap. of the boke of Prouerbes For there God thus speaketh Those that loue me I loue But of those wordes can not be inferred that which they seke I graunt indede that they are loued of God which loue God but yet it followeth not that therefore God beginneth to loue them because they loue him Yea rather it followeth contrarily that they therefore loue God because God beginneth not therfore to loue vs for that we loue him God loueth them For so Iohn teacheth vs Not that we haue loued God for he hath loued vs first But that we may the plainlier vnderstand both that which I haue alredy spoken and also that which shall afterward be spoken I will declare the signification of fower wordes which are of Paul vsed in this treatise namely the loue of God election predestination and purpose The loue of God is it as we haue sayd whereby he willeth vnto any man felicity Election is whereby he preferreth one before an other PredestinatioÌ„ is whereby he directeth those whome he hath so loued and preferred before others to the ende which he hath appoynted vnto them namely vnto eternall life by apt meanes And The order betwene loue electioÌ„ and predestination these are in such order ioyned together that predestination followeth loue and election For as we haue sayde whom God hath loued hath preferred before others those he directeth to their ende But touching loue and election we must otherwise consider of them in God then we see commonly commeth to passe in men For men when they see a man adorned with excellent giftes him they elect Loue and election are after an other maner of sorte in God then they are in men aboue others and then they wishe well vnto him and to their power seeke to do hym good but God forasmuch as in men he findeth nothyng that is good yet of his mere mercy and singular goodnes he loueth some and decreeth vnto them many good thinges and thereof followeth election For for this cause onely are they preferred before others for that they are loued of God and not for any their owne worthines And as loue is to election so is hatred to reprobation Wherefore I mislike not that which the master of the sentences citeth out of Augustine that predestination is a preparation to glory and reprobation a preparation to eternal punishementes so that those differences which we haue a little before mencioned be added Nowe resteth to declare the fourth worde namely purpose And that we say is nothing els but his good pleasure 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 What the purpose of God is which signification we gather out of the epistle to the Ephesians the 1. chap. where it is thus written which hath predestinated vs to adopt vs into children vnto himselfe thorough Iesus Christe according to the good pleasure of hys wyll And straight way he addeth Predestinate according to his purpose This declareth that Purpose is the generall worde of predestination What is predestination after Augustine purpose and good pleasure are taken for one and the selfe same thing and do pertayne vnto wil. Wherefore the purpose of God is the pleasure of his wil and is taken as the generall worde to define predestination and reprobation For Augustine sayth that predestination is the purpose to haue mercy and reprobation the purpose not to haue mercy And according to this sentence Paul sayth in this chapiter That election mought abide according to purpose But touching all these matters we will hereafter more at large entreate What shall we say then Is there vnrighteousnes with God God forbid For he sayth to Moses I will haue mercy on whome I will haue mercy and will haue compassion on whome I will haue compassion Wherefore it is not of hym that wylleth nor of hym that runneth but of God that sheweth mercy For the scripture sayth vnto Pharao For thys same purpose haue I stirred thee vp that I myght shewe my power in thee and that my name mought be declared thoroughout all the earth Therefore he hath mercy on whome he wyll and whome he wyll he hardeneth Thou wilt say then vnto me why doth he yet complayne â–ª for who can resist his wyll But O man who art thou which pleadest agaynst God shall the thyng formed saye to hym that formed it why hast thou made me thus Hathe not the potter power to make of one and the same lompe one vessell to honour and an other to dishonour VVhat shall we say then Is there iniquity with God God forbid When fleshe and humane wisedome heareth that all things are to be referred vnto the wil of God it beginneth to stirre For it can not abide that and pretendeth reuerence to the name of God when as in very dede it abhorreth mortification neither can abide to subdue all whatsoeuer it hath to the
power of God Wherfore some are so agaynst all talke of predestination that straight way as soone as any mencion is made of it they are gone But this they can not do without great iniury vnto the holy ghost as though he would teach any thing which should either be vnprofitable or hurtful But we ought to geue eare vnto Paul They do â—â— which abhorre from the talke of of predestination â–ª who with much profite reasoneth of it And that we may do this without danger we ought to beware of fonde imaginations neither ought we to adde any thyng to that which the holy scripture hath deliuered vnto vs. If we kepe our selues within these bondes we shal runne into no danger at al. Paul did generally put forth that the hatred and loue of God depende only of his will and not of the workes of men Which sentence he now proueth as touching eche part and that by a double testimony of the scripture But before he bringeth forth those testimonyes he obiecteth vnto himselfe that which vnto humane wisedome mought seme vniust What sayth he shall we say Is there iniquity with God if he do thus as pleaseth hym He maketh answere and curseth such a suspicion saying God forbid But the cause why humane reason is so offended if WhereheÌ„ce springeth the offence of humane reason both predestination and reprobation should depend of the mere will of God commeth of this because that men thinke that thereby iustice distributiue which requireth that vnto like be rendred thinges like should thereby be empaired And forasmuch as all men are in the stocke of Adam of like condition they thinke it not iust that one should be predestinated to eternall saluation and an other reiected to eternall destruction Origen to defend this iustice in God tought that the soules of men haue before they come to this life workes ether good or euill for which they are predestinated eyther to destruction or to felicity Pelagius thought that the iustice of God is to be defended by workes foresene A peruerse carefulnes of men which opinion not only he but also many others of the fathers embraced Neither can I inough meruayle that men were so carefull for the iustice of God when as it can come into no daunger at all For the will of God is the first rule of iustice But these selfe same men haue a remisse and negligent care ouer their own iustice which is not only endangered but also ofteÌ„times violated and broken Paul to answere to this error of mans imagination proueth yâ— the election of God is not as these men imagine deriued of iustice distributiue for that God is by no law bound to geue vnto any man those thynges â–ª which he hath decréed to geue but God of his mere mercy liberality taketh some and adorneth them In the parable which the Lord put forth Vnto euery one of the workemen was geuen a peny for their dayes worke vnto those in dede which had labored all the whole day it was geuen of couenant but vnto others which had bene but an houre in the worke it was geuen of mercy And when those yâ— came first were displeased the good man of the house answered Is it not lawfull for me to do with myne owne what I wyll Verely it was lawfull and especially seing the same pertayned to mere mercy But as touching iustice distributiue DistributioÌ„ comming of iustice is one thing â–ª geuing comming of mercy is an other thyng ElectioÌ„ pertaineth not to iustice but vnto mercy Take vp saith he that which is thine and go thy wayes Wherefore he did put a distinction betwene that distribution which is done of iustice and that geuyng which procedeth of mercy So Paul in thys place teacheth that the election of God pertayneth not as these men imagine vnto iustice but vnto mercy And thys he confirmeth by an oracle of the scripture saying For he sayth to Moses I will haue mercy on whome I will haue mercy will shew compassion on whome I will haue compassion By these words God teacheth that there is no other cause of his mercy which he sheweth towardes some but euen his very mercy Wherfore I somewhat meruaile how Pigghius a manne otherwise as he him selfe thinketh ful of wit amongst his principall reasons wherebye he contendeth that God predestinateth by woorkes foreséene putteth this also for one as though if it were not so the iustice of God wherby he distributeth his giftes could by no meanes consist For how séeth he not that the Apostle obiecteth vnto himself the selfe same thinge and dissolueth the same by no other reason but for that God herein dealeth not with vs by law or by duety but by mercy For this doth the oracle which is here cited most plainely declare But it is woorthy to be laughed at to ascribe vnto Paul that which he by all meanes auoyded to speake To go aboute God is not to be broght into an order to deale with God by law is to séeke to bring God to an order whiche thing as no man can do so is it not mete that any endued with reason should attempt to do it And Paul when he saith What shall we say then Is there iniquity with God by these woordes declareth that he knewe right well what commonlye commeth into the mindes of men when they heare this matter reasoned of This also is to be noted that although Paul could haue excused his doctrine that these absurde thinges followed not of that which he had toughte yet was he moued with a feruente desire of piety to repell this blasphemy and to aunswere God forbid â–ª As though he woulde haue said it is no vpright dealing to thinke any such thinge of God And he addeth a reason for that that can not be vniuste whiche God testifieth of himselfe and acknowledgeth to be his â–ª Now God himselfe sayd vnto Moses I will haue mercy on whome I will haue mercy and will shew compassion on whom I will shew compassion In this sentence are two thinges to be noted first that those good thinges which God The cause of yâ— gifts of God which he geueth vs is not to be sought for without his goodnes hath decreed vnto vs depend onely of his mercy secondly that the cause of them is not to be sought for without the beneuolence of God For he saith vnto Moses that he will shew mercy to whom he will shew mercy Now if God do prescribe these limits vnto our knowledge they ought to be counted to much presumptious which will séeke to go further I before noted that Origen and Ierome to Hedibia thought that these woordes vnto this place O man what art thou which aunswerest vnto God are put vnder the person of the aduersary which is farre straunge from the due order of the text For Paul did put his owne aunswere when he answered his aduersaries God forbid Wherefore it is méete that those thinges which
God should haue sayd that he would permitte him to se at the least his backe partes that not for his merites but only of his mercy But whither of these wayes so euer a man take those wordes so that he referre all thinges to the mercy of God then right well followeth of them that which the Apostle seketh Namely that it is not of him that willeth nor of him that runneth but of God that hath mercy But to speake my iudgement herein first this is to be noted that the Apostle followed the translatioÌ„ of the Seuenty For they thus haue that which is here written 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But in Hebrue it is written Iechannathy atta Scherachan Ierechamthyatha Schereracham â–ª the first worde is Chanan which signifieth to loue or to beare fauour The other word signifieth to haue mercy but chiefely such a mercy as mothers shew vnto theyr children For this word hath an affinity with Rechem which signifieth a wombe or belly wherin mothers beare theyr children Moreouer when he had sayd that he would make that all his good should go before Moses he added that as he went he would proclaime his name Iehoua which thing as it is had in the next chapter he performed And when he had proclaymed Iehoua he added diuers of his names wherby are expressed the properties of the nature of God The summe of those names he here after a sorte comprehendeth when he sayth I wil haue mercye on whome I will haue mercy Neither is there any difference betwene the interpretation of the SeueÌ„ty and the Hebrue verity but that they in the second part of eche member put the verbe in the present tempse wheÌ„ as in the Hebrue one tempse is in eche place put But the sence which we bring agreeth very well with Paul For if the proprieties of God which he vseth toward vs be comprehended in his mercy thereby also is very aptly proued that our election also dependeth of no other thing which thing is vnto vs most profitable For if our saluation lay in our owne handes we should continually hinder How the wil of God touching predestination is reueled vnto vs. Against those which hold thaâ— the mercy of God is equally offred vnto â— men it But how we may iudge of this diuine wil wherby we are elected of God Christe tought vs when he reueled vnto vs the decrees of his father sayinge This is the will of the father that he which seeth the sonne and beleueth in him should haue eternall life This sentence of God whiche Paul citeth out of the booke of Exodus maketh agaynst those which hold that the mercy of God is equallye offred vnto all men For God sayth that he will not haue mercy vpon all men but on those onely on whome he will haue mercye by whiche woordes he declareth that he bestoweth his mercy vpon some certayne men and not vpon all Of this oracle the Apostle inferreth Wherefore it is not of him that willeth nor of him that runneth but of God that sheweth mercy Whereby we vnderstand that all whole is to be attributed vnto God which doctrine humane wisedome can not abide For streight way it thus reasoneth with it selfe Then do we nothing we are nothing but stockes and stones But we teach no such doctrine we affirme in dede that we worke but yet not vnles we be impelled by the spirite of God as Paul teacheth in his epistle in the 8. chapiter They which are led by the spirit of God those sayth he are the children of God And therefore the prophet Ezechiell sayth I will make that ye shall walke in my wayes But the maner how we do any thing being impelled and moued by God we may very wel vnderstand if we compare the 8. chapiter of this epistle with the 4. chapiter to the Galathians For in the 8. chapiter Paul thus writeth â–ª Ye haue not receaued the spirite of bondage agayne vnto feare but ye haue receaued the spirite of the adoption of children by whome we crye Abba father And to the Galathians he sayth For that ye are children God hath sent forth the spirit of his sonne into your hartes cryeng Abba father Seing then that vnto the Galathians he teacheth that the holy ghost prayeth in vs and vnto the Romanes he sayth that we our selues pray we ought thereby to vnderstand that we our selues indede pray but yet being driuen and impelled by the spirite of We are not stockes nor stones God For we are not stockes nor stones For they are not impelled but by violence but we are not against our willes compelled of the spirite of God but are perswaded and whatsoeuer we do we do it willingly Stockes and stones wheÌ„ they are moued neither vnderstand they nor haue they any will but we when we are impelled of God do both vnderstand and will and also geue assent Although that we haue euen these thinges also of the spirite of God Moreouer we confesse that many ciuill and naturall wordes wheÌ„ they passe not our streÌ„gths are subiect vnto our choyce and will althoughe we beleue and preache that How we worke being impelled of God A differeÌ„ce betwene thinges ciuile and betwene those thinges which pertaine to eternall saluation those thinges also God ruleth and gouerneth as semeth besâ— to his most wise prouidence But touching those thinges which are acceptable vnto God and which pertayne to our saluation we can not be moued vnles we be impelled by the spirite of God Augustine in his Encheridion to Laurentius the 32. chapiter writeth many things which serue to the declaration of this conclusion of Paul For he sayth that these thinges make very much agaynst them which hold that the beginning of our saluatioÌ„ commeth of our selues Which thing vâ—rely they teach which will haue predestination to procede of good workes foresene For if it were so theÌ„ contrary to the sentence of Paul it should be of him that willeth and of hym that runneth Augustine in dede confesseth that no man can beleue hope or loue vnles he will but euen this selfe same wil to beleue to hope and to loue he saith commeth not but from God For that is vayne which some say that the will of man is not by it selfe sufficient and therefore nedeth yâ— mercy of God as though a good worke ought to come and to procede both from our will and also from grace For if it were so Paul mought haue sayd that it is not of God that hath Good works are not to be deiâ—ded to make one part oures an other Gods part mercy but of man that willeth and runneth For according to this sentence nether doubtles should the grace of God be sufficient vnles vnto it the will of maÌ„ should ioyne it selfe Which thing forasmuch as no Christian either ought or caÌ„ reseruing piety speake it resteth that Paul therefore said That it is neither of him that willeth nor of him that ruÌ„neth but of God that
God is not tempted with euilles that is he hath not a minde corrupted with prauitie and euill affectes But the deuill and wicked men entise not anye God tempteth not any man by reason of corruption wherwith he is infected when as he is vtterly with out any such corruption man vnto euill but in that they themselues are first corrupte Wherfore Iames dischargeth God from this kinde of tempting which thing we also doo For we affirme not that by vniustice and a corrupt mind he hardeneth any man to sinne They cite also Paul thus writing vnto the Thessalonians This is the wil of God your sanctification But both this place and such other like ought to be vnderstanded of the will of God reueled in the scriptures in the law not of the hiddeÌ„ mighty will of God which will doubtles being one is not in him manifold but he doth not so set forth all things but that he yet retayneth somewhat vnto himselfe secret to be reueled in due tyme. They obiect also that which Paul writeth vnto Timothe God will haue all men to be saued But that place is to be vnderstanded touching all states of men and not of all men perticularly And that sence agréeth right well with the wordes of Paul For Paul in that place had commaunded prayers to be made for magistrates But because the magistrates abhorred from religion and persecuted the doctrine of Christ least any man should therefore thinke that that state is so farre of from saluation that whosoeuer are in it can not be receaued in to grace he added that God will haue all men to be saued yea euen kinges and magistrates But if a man will expound that place of all perticular men then must he vnderstand it of the will reueled which others call the will of the signe For the reuealed will setteth forth the promises of God generally and excepteth no man But if thou wilt contract those words to the will of efficacy onely then must they be vnderstanded of the vniuersality of the elect Neither is that strange from the phrase of the holy scriptures For so we rede That all shall see the saluation of God Agayne All shal be tought of God And hereunto had Augustine a respecte when he thus expounded such places All as many as are saued are saued by the will of God He hath mercy on whome he will and whome he will he hardeneth Eyther of these effectes proceedeth of the will of God But whether God willeth Whether God wil rather haue mercy then hardeÌ„ this more then that I can not simply make answere For on the one side this is certaine that vnto God it is a thing most proper to haue mercy and his nature is of such a goodnes that it communicateth it selfe to a great many And on the other side we see that the greatest part is forsaken For Christ saith Many are called but few are elected Wherfore we must leue the defining of this matter only to the hidden iudgement of God The question before put forth should now sufficientlye be satisfied if mans reason could so be content For wheÌ„ it had obiected vnto Paul who affirmed that the loue and hatred of God consisteth not of workes but onely of him that calleth that that mought séeme to be vniust and against equitie the Apostle made aunswere that God is not bounden or holden by any law or duety of iustice For here is not entreated of iustice but of mercy To which purpose he cited that sentence I will haue mercy on whom I will haue mercy And so he concluded that it is not of him that willeth nor of him that runneth And that it is not of him that willeth nor of him that runneth he declared by the example of Pharao For of him God said To this end haue I raysed thee vp Last of all for a farther confirmatioÌ„ he added that God hath mercy on whoÌ„ he will and whom he will he hardeneth These thinges I say mought séeme to be sufficient But Paul saw that mans hart yet swelleth And therfore he stil obiecteth vnto himselfe Thou wilt say then vnto me why doth he yet complaine For who can resiste his will This word complaine is in Gréeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Wherefore they are somewhat wide which thinke that it signifieth to search out or to require If that word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be taken impersonally the sence then is what complainte is this which I heare euery where and of euery man that some are iust and other some vniust Séeing that God hath mercy on whome he will and whome he will he hardeneth As if he should haue sayd men ought not to complaine thereof wheÌ„ as it wholy lieth in the hands of God But it is much better that that verbe be vnderstanded personally and haue for his nominatiue case this word God For Paul â—traight way answereth That it is not mans part to reason with his maker And yet the Apostle himselfe hath rendred a reason why God made some vessels to honor and some to contumely namely to declare his goodnes and his power Séeing then that here is entreated of God the aduersary obiected And why doth God complaine For who resisteth his will And that God complaineth of men for theyr ill God oftentimes complaineth of men life the scriptures euery where testifie Christe in the Gospell with teares complaineth that the Iewes knew not their visitacion And how often saith he would I haue gathered together thy children as a hen gathereth together her chickens vnder her winges and thou wouldest not And in the first chapter of Esay God thus speaketh I haue brought vp and exalted children and they haue despised me And it were an infinite matter to gather together all such places In these few wordes yâ— Apostle declareth what those thinges are wherewith humane reason is most of all troubled And those are first for that God will haue men to be hardened and made blinde secondly for that his will is so mighty that it can not be ouercome For by these What thinges most of all trouble humane reason What is necessitie Necessitie of three kindes Not euery necessitie is of coÌ„pulsion thinges it séeth that it is constrayned to necessity from which it most of all abhorreth Those things Paul in this place toucheth and first saith Who resisteth his will In which wordes he declareth that God will that which is done in vs. And where he saith who resisteth he declareth the force and power of the will of God Necessity is commonly thus defined namely to be that which cannot be otherwise But necessitye is not simple or of one kinde For there is a certaine necessitie of compulsion which cannot haue place in the will of man For it is not possible that the will should will any thing vnwilling There is an other necessitie comming of a certain inwarde proprietie of nature and suche a necessitie to sinne we affirme to be in
free then y◠other purpose of shewing mercy These thinges being now thus declared we will assigne reasons why we deny that good workes foresene are the causes of predestination The first is because the scriptures no where soteach But of so weighty a matter we ought to affirme nothing without the holy scriptures Howbeit I know that certain haue gone aboute to gather this sentence out of the first epistle to Timothe where it is thus written In a greate house are vessells of gold siluer and wood And if a man shall clense him selfe from these he shal be an honorable vessell of God and mete for euery good worke Hereby they conclude that certayne are therefore destinied to be vessels of honour bycause they haue clensed them selues from the filthines of sinne and frō corrupt doctrine And bicause they are here sayd to haue power to performe this they say that it lieth in euery man to be predestinate of God vnto felicity But these men make no good collection For the sentence of Paul in that place is thus to be taken He had sayd before The foundation standeth firme The Lord knoweth who are his As if he should haue sayd mē may sometims be deceaued for they oftentimes iudge those to be goodly which are most farre from godlines In which wordes he reproued Himeneus and Philetus For a litle before he had spoken of theyr peruerse doctrine For they taught that the resurrection was done alredy wherefore Paul would not that men should be iudged as they appeare to be at the first sight For God hath in this world as it were in a greate house vessells some of golde some of siluer some of woode and some of claye And he knoweth beste whiche of these are honorable and whiche are made vnto contumely But we which know not nor vnderstād the secret of his will can iudge of them but only by the effectes that whosoeuer is cleane from corrupt doctrine and liueth godly the same is a vessell vnto honour Neither doth this place proue that men can clense themselues or make themselues vessels of honor For as Paul hath tought vs in this epistle it is God onely which bringeth this to passe For he as it were a potter hath power of one and the selfe same masse or lompe to make one vessel to honor and an other to contumely Wherefore this place enterpretateth the other And therefore we ought not to gather more of those wordes of Paul then that such clensing is a token whereby we iudge of the worthines or of the vnworthines of the vessels in the Church It is God which knoweth truly what maner of one euery man is and his foundation standeth firme for it can not be deceaued But we can not iudge of others but only by certayne tokens and effects And this is it which Christ admonisheth By their fruites ye shall know them Neither do they rightly vnderstand Man cānot by himselfe make himselfe a vessel of honour Free wil is not proued by propositions hypotheticall the Apostle which by these words If a man keepe himselfe cleane form these thinges teach that it lieth in our will to make our selues vessels of honour For the strengthes of our frée will are not proued by propositions hipotheticall or hauing conditions that we should thus inferre the holy scriptures teach that if ye shall do this or that or if ye shall beleue ye shall haue saluation Wherefore we can of selues beleue or liue holily Suche conclusions are weake for God in another place teacheth that he will make vs able to walke in his wayes Preceptes therefore and exhortations and conditions are to that end added that we should vnderstand what is required at our handes and what maner ones they shal be which pertaine vnto God and shall obtaine eternall life Wherefore we ought not out of these places to gather what our owne strengthes are able to do But it is easy to declare why men that are purged of God are notwithstanding said to purge themselues For God worketh not in men as stockes and stones for stones are moued without sense and will But God when he regenerateth men so cleanseth God maketh the godly clene they are said to make themselues cleane and reneweth thē that they themselues both vnderstand those things which they do and also aboue all things desire and will the same after they haue once receaued a fleshy hart for their stony hart Wherefore after they are once regenerate they are made workers together with God and of their owne accord they bend themselues vnto holynes and vnto purenes of life God by Moses commaunded the Israelites to sanctify themselues And yet in an other place he manifestly testifieth that it is he which sanctifieth the people And Paul vnto the Corrinthians sayth that Christ was made vnto vs wisdome righteousnes redemption and sanctification God also commaundeth vs to beleue and yet the scriptures in an other place testify that faith is the gift of God By all these things therefore it is very manifest how little this place maketh for our aduersaries which way soeuer they turne thēselues Besides al this the scriptures do not only teach y◠predestination is not of works foresene but also plainly teach y◠contrary For Paul as The scripture teacheth that predestination is not of workes foresene we sée in this epistle pronoūceth of those twines before they were borne or had done eyther any good or any euill it was sayd The elder shall serue the yonger also Iacob haue I loued but Esau haue I hated that it should not be of workes but of him that calleth Wherefore he denieth that either the loue or hatred of God commeth of works But they are worthy to be laughed at which after this sort cauill that Paul in déede excludeth works already done but not those which are to be done For they sée not that Paul in this place goeth about to remoue all maner of difference from those two brethern that we might fully vnderstand that they were A cauillatiō ouerthrown vtterly like as touching their persons For when he declared that they were borne of one and the selfe same father and of one and the selfe same mother y◠they were brought forth also both at one burthen his meaning tended to no other end but vnto this by their equality to shew that the election of God is frée so that it laye in him to elect the one and to reiect the other But if there had ben only this differēce left as touching workes foresene then should Paul in vayne haue put so great an equality Wherefore Paul sayth vniuersally not of workes in which words he comprehendeth as well works to be done as works already done And that we mought the more surely vnderstand this he addeth But of him that calleth Wherfore Paul sendeth vs vnto God and not vnto works And if a man diligently consider Vnto what principall pointes the predestination of God
more excellency then the effect especially in that it is such a cause wherfore if workes be the causes of predestinatiō they are also more worthy of more excellency Our works cannot be of more worthines then predestination That which is constant certaine dependeth not of that which is vncertain vnconstant then predestination Moreouer predestinatiō is sure cōstāt infallible How thē shall we appoint y◠it depēdeth of y◠works of frée will which are vncertaine vncōstant may be bowed hither thither if a mā cōsider thē perticulaly For men are a like prone vnto this or y◠kinde of sinne as occasions are offred For otherwise if we will speake generally by reason of the sinne of the firste parentes frée will before regeneration can do nothing els but sinne Wherefore according to the sentence of these men it must néedes follow that the predestination of God which is certaine dependeth of the workes of men which are not onely vncertaine but also are sinnes Neither can they say that they mean of those works which follow regeneration For those as we haue taught spring of Grace and of predestination Neither do these men consider that they to satisfye humane reason We must not so defēd ou◠liberty that we spoile God of his libertie and to auoutch I know not what liberty in men spoyle God of his due power liberty in electing which power and liberty yet the Apostle setteth forth and saith that God hath no les right ouer men then hath the potter ouer the vessels whiche he maketh But after these mens sentence God can not elect but him only whom he knoweth shal behaue himselfe wel neither can he reiect any man but whom he séeth shal be euill But this is to go about to bring God into an order and to make him subiect vnto the lawes of our reason As for Erasmus he in vaine speaketh against this reason For he sayth that it is not absurde to take away from God that power which he himselfe will not haue attributed vnto him namelye to do any thing vniustly For we say that Paul hath in vaine yea rather falsly set foorth this We must geue vnto God that liberty whiche the scripture geueth vnto him liberty of God if he neither haue it nor will that it should be attributed vnto him But how Paul hath proued this libertye in God that place whiche we haue cited most manifestly declareth They also to no purpose obiect vnto vs the iustice of God for here is entreated onely of his mercy Neither can they deny but y◠they by this their sentence do rob God of a greate deale of his loue and good will towardes men For the holy scripture when it would commend vnto vs the fatherly loue of God affirmeth that he gaue his sonne and that vnto the death and that then when we were yet sinners enemies and children of wrath But these men will haue no man to be predestinated which hath not good woorkes foreséene in the minde of God And so euerye man may say with himselfe If I be predestinated the cause thereof dependeth of my selfe But an other which féeleth truely in his harte that he is fréely elected of Loue towards God is kindled of the true feling of predestination God for Christes sake when as he of himselfe was all maner of wayes vnworthy of so greate loue will without all doubt be wonderfullye inflamed to loue God againe It is also profitable vnto vs that our saluation shoulde not depende of our works For we oftentimes wauer and in liuing vprightly are not very constant Doubtles if we should put confidence in our owne workes we should vtterly dispayre But if we beleue that our saluation abideth in God fixed and assured for Christes sake we cannot but be of good comfort Farther if predestination shoulde come vnto vs by our woorkes foreséene the beginning of our saluation should be of our selues against which sentence the scriptures euery where cry out For that were to raise vp an idoll in our selues Moreouer the iustice of God shoulde then The consideration of the election of God ▪ and of the election of man is diuers haue néede of the externe rule of our workes But Christ sayth Ye haue not elected me but I haue elected you Neither is that consideration in God which is in men when they beginne to loue a man or to picke out a frende For men are moued by some excellente giftes wherewith they sée a man adorned But God can finde nothing good in vs which first proceedeth not from him And Ciprian saith as Augustine oftentimes citeth him that we therefore can not glory for that we haue nothinge that is our owne and therefore Augustine concludeth that we oughte not to parte stakes betwene God and vs to geue one parte to him and to kéepe an other vnto Vnto God is all whole to be ascribed our selues touching the obteinement of saluation for all whole is without doubte to be ascribed vnto him The Apostle when he writeth of predestination hath alwaies this ende before him to confirme our confidence and especially in afflictiōs out of which he saith that God will deliuer vs. But if the purpose of God shoulde be referred vnto our workes as vnto causes thereof then could we by no meanes conceaue any such confidence For we oftentimes fall and the righteousnes of our If predestinatiō shold depend of workes i◠woulde make vs not to hope but to dispayre workes is so sclender that it cannot stand before the iudgement seate of God And that the Apostle for this cause chiefly made mencion of predestination we maye vnderstand by the. 8. chapter of this Epistle For when he described the effectes of iustification amongst other things he saith that we by it haue obteined the adoption of sonnes and that we are moued by the spirit of God as the sonnes of God and therfore with a valiant minde we suffer aduersities and for that cause euery creature groneth and earnestly desireth to be at the length deliuered And the spirite it self also maketh intercession for vs. And at the last addeth That vnto them that loue God all thinges worke to good And who they be y◠loue God he straightway declareth Which are called saith he according to purpose These seketh Paul to make secure that they shoulde not thinke that they are hindred when they are excercised with aduersities for that they are foreknowne predestinated called and iustified And that he had a respect vnto this security those thinges declare whiche In which wordes of Paul the aduersaries a◠deceiued follow If God be on our side who shal be against vs Who shall accuse against the elect of God First by this methode is gathered that the aduersaries much erre supposinge that by this place they may inferre that predestination commeth of workes foreséene For Paul before that gradation wrote these wordes To them that loue God all
was not predestinated fréely but because of her humility For she sang For he hath looked vpon the humility of his handmayden Wherfore the selfe same thing ought to take place in others I meruaile doubtles how this man saw not that there is great difference betwene 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vertue which the lattines call modestia that is modesty whereby men haue a lowly and moderate opinion of themselues vnto which vertue is opposite pride 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or arrogancy But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is a vilenes and basenes which commeth vnto men either by reason of pouerty or by reason of base bloud or by reason of such other like things Wherfore the blessed virgen reioysed and with prayses extolled God for that he had exalted her to so great an honor whereas she otherwise was base Mary mēt not that she was elected for any her merite The song of Mary setteth forth the mercy of God and not merites obscure and vnworthy For she was not as this man dreameth a setter forth of her owne merites and vertues to say that she was therefore elected of God for that she had deserued it through her humility And if thou diligently consider the course of that song thou shalt easely sée that she ascribeth all her good things vnto God Thy mercy saith she is from generation to generation And she addeth He hath remembred his mercy Afterward with mercy she ioyneth the promises As he spake saith she vnto Ahraham our father But I meruaile this good man could not sée that the image of our predestination is to be set rather in Christ then in the The image of our predestination appeareth in Christ A place of the first boke of Samuell virgen But Augustine saith that the humanity of Christ was predestinated and taken altogether frely and vtterly without any respect of good workes They obiect also vnto vs the words of the Lord to Samuell For he when he should anoynt one of the sonnes of Isay king ouer Israell and had first brought before him Eliab the eldest the Lord sayd vnto him This is not he whome I haue elected Haue not a regard to the talnes of stature For men see these thinges which appeare outwardly But I behold the hartes Lo saith Pigghius this place teacheth that God is moued by the perfection of the hart and not by outward conditions But in that history is not entreated of the eternall predestination of God whereby he hath elected vs vnto perpetuall felicity there is entreated only of the exalting of a man to a kingdome In committing of iunctions or offices to a mā we must haue a respect vnto the conditiō of the person As touching which thing God hath set forth vnto vs a notable example that when we will commit an office or function vnto a man we haue chiefely a respect vnto the ability and skilfulnes which are required to the execution of that office according to which doctrine Paul also to Timothe setteth forth vnto vs what thinges are to be required in him which should be chosen an elder or a Bishoppe God himselfe also in the old testament hath at large described of what conditions he ought to be whom he would haue to be appointed a king Vnto which sēce Peter also semeth to haue had a consideration who when two were set before him of which the one was to be placed in the roome of Iudas called vpon God the sercher of harts for that he only knew the mind and hart of him whome he would God findeth not a good hart in men but maketh it good An example of Saul haue to be chosen And yet ought we not to thinke that God findeth in men that hart which he hath a respect vnto He rather changeth and maketh mete those whome he will appoint vnto any office as we rede he did in Saul of whome we rede that he was so changed that he became vtterly an other man For whereas before he was simple and rude afterward he was able to prophesie amongst the Prophets Which thing for that it was new and strange gaue an occasion of this prouerb What is Saul also amongst the Prophets Pigghius cauilleth moreouer that of this our doctrine will follow that men will séeke the causes of their damnation not in themselues but in God which is a thing both absurd and wicked But let The cause of our damnation is not to be sought for in God this man consider how this can be inferred of our sentence For we teach that euery man is obnoxious vnto sinne and therefore deserueth damnation Neither euer said we vnto any man that he hath not in himselfe a most iust cause of hys damnation yea we both are and alwayes haue bene perswaders vnto all men that when they will take in hand any thing they seke for counsell no where els but out of the will of God reueled that is out of the holy scripture and not out secrecy of the predestination of God And yet doth it not therefore follow that by this forme of teaching is no vse of the doctrine of predestination For vnto it then chiefely must we haue a respect when we are tossed with aduersities and when through the very force of afflictions we fele that our fayth is weakned This thing taught ▪ Paul in the 8. chapter of this epistle and therefore he added If God be on What is the vse of predestination our side who shall be against vs who shall seperate vs from the loue of God shall tribulation Shall anguishe c. Wherefore this doctrine is not so to be left as though no man can apply it vnto himselfe It must rather diligently be kept till opportunity shall serue to vse it Neither is it a point of arrogancy but of the spirituall wisdome for a man to vse it in his owne behalfe when nede requireth Moreouer Pigghius falsely saith that those thinges which we speake are against the goodnes of God as though it should seme a thing vniust that God should elect vnto himselfe a certaine few and in the meane time ouerhippe infinite others For this mought shew saith he some cruelty in God especially if we say that he is offended before that any thing is committed against him But it is mete saith he that the purpose of God be reasonable and yet of his iustice can no other reasons be geuen but only the workes of them which are predestinated neither can the iustice of God by any other meanes be defended Those things beare in dede a goodly shew but they much conduce not to ouerthrow that which we haue proued For first to entreat of the goodnes of God there is no creature which can seme to be voyde of it For God perpetually bestoweth many good things yea euen vpon the No creature void of the goodnes of God wicked For
Gospell and we must chiefely beware that we geue not them occasion to suspect that we are by hatred enuy desire of vengeance or by some wicked lust moued to We must not flatter them that sinne speake those things which we seme to speake somwhat vehemētly Furthermore on the other side we must beware of the other extremity y◠we flatter not thē y◠sinne making a marchādise of y◠word of God either to win mēs fauour or for lucre sake or for pleasure sake For doubtles the truth as touching doctrine ought neuer to be kept in silēce neither are they which sinne to be spared although troubles should therof arise or that we should therfore suffer greuous things Christ knew right An example of Christ well that by teaching the truth and by reprouing of vices he should at the length be crucified and be also forsaken of his disciples and yet did he not therefore ceasse either from necessary doctrine or from profitable reprehensions Of that that the The autoritie of the Iews was great in the Church Apostle so diligently seketh to auoide the offending of the Iewes we gather that the authority of that nation was great in the primitiue Church for they before other nations beleued the Gospell and the iudgement of them was had in great estimation For the Iewes were studious in the scriptures and most diligent obseruers of the worshipping of God wherefore the offence of them could not be in curred without excéeding great hurt to the Gospell He calleth them bretherne the more to conciliate them vnto him For these are no small degrées of beneuolence to wish well vnto a man to pray for him and to call him by a gentle and louing name Howbeit there is a difference betweene A differēce worthy to be noted the reasō which he vseth in the ninth chapter and betwene that which he vseth in this chapter to proue his loue towardes the Iewes For there he saide that he so feruently loued them that for the redéeminge of theyr destruction he desired to be made accursed but here he writeth that he powreth out prayers for theyr saluatiō Of this difference this is the reason In the. 9. chapter he entreated of election or predestination which is not chaunged by prayers and therfore it had bene in vain there to haue made mencion of them But in this place is entreated of the righteousnes of fayth which faith forasmuch as it is the the gift of God there is no doubt but that by faithfull prayers it may be obteyned for our neighbours He bringeth moreouer an other argumente of his loue towardes the Iewes whereby he excuseth theyr incredulity as much as the nature of the thing suffreth but yet he so excuseth it that thereunto he addeth a most gréeuous accusation I beare them record saith he that they haue the zeale of God but not according to knowledge And yet must we not thinke that all the Iewes had this zeale for in that nation there were a greate many which were manifest wicked filthy liuers But when Paul thus wrote he had a consideration to the sounder sort and vnder this common name ment them onely And to be briefe he vseth the figure Synecdoche whereby an indefinite proposition is by reason of some partes y◠it containeth taken for true This selfe same excuse Peter in the Actes vsed when he said For I know that ye did it thorow ignorance c. Paul nowe attributeth vnto them zele but he reproueth their ignorance as an haynous sinne For séeing that they were by the law and by the scriptures dayly tought they ought not to haue bene ignorant of those thinges Theyr ignoraunce he hereby proueth for What was the ignorance of the Iewes y◠they knew not the difference betwene the righteousnes of God and their owne righteousnes neither saw they that by establishing their owne they fell away frō the true and perfect righteousnes That they had a zeale he therfore saith for that What zeale signifieth they sought to worship God and that diligently but they knew not the manner of true worshipping wherefore their zeale was a blinde zeale And to declare what zeale is we wil first consider the etimology thereof 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is zeale is a Gréeke word deriued of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And this word signifieth to loue but yet vehementlye to loue so that after loue followeth admiration after admiration imitation and thē after that a grief if he may not enioy the thing which he loueth or if others be admitted to enioy the same This is the proper signification of the word Wherfore Definition of zeale we may thus define it Zeale is an affection whiche consisteth in that parte of the minde which lusteth or desireth after which by reason of the vehemēcy followeth grief both because of the fellowship of others and also for the wante of the thinge which is desired But the nature of it is not of one sort For there is a good zeale an euill zeale Of the good zeale Paul spake when he saide I am zelous for you with the A good zel◠an euill zeale of God for I haue betrouthed you that ye should geue your selues a chast virgen vnto one man Christ Also in the first to the Corrinthians Be zealous of the better gracious giftes God himselfe also is affected towards vs with a most perfect zeale as the scripture oftentimes teacheth although affectes are not properly attributed vnto him But of the euill zeale is not at this presente entreated But of it Paul to the Galathians thus writeth that the false Apostles loued them with a zeale that they might glory in theyr flesh and leade them away from Christ into the bondage of the law And in many other places is mencion made of it But the cause whereof The cause of a good euill zele either a good or euill zeale springeth may be thys The manner is a lyke in thys affection as it is in other affections Wherfore euen as boldnes lust and anger are so long time good or euill how long they kéepe themselues within certaine bondes prescribed vnto them by prudence or passe those bondes so also commeth it to passe in zeale But this we ought to know that accordinge to morall doctrine prudence commeth by naturall vse or discipline but in very déede as it is here considered it can not be gathered but out of the holy scriptures by the breathing of the holy gost Wherefore zeale is then good when it is thorow faith brideled by a iust and godly knowledge and it is then euill whē it is not by such knowledge restrayned as a ship when y◠maister or gouerner is present is preserued but he being absent goeth A similitude to wracke Wherfore Paul spake most warely for when he condēneth their zeale he taketh away from them knowledge and by one word that which mought haue bene an excellent vertue he
noted as a vice and that daungerous And as the difference is greate betwene a good and an euill zeale so also the effectes which are of other deriued are much diuers Christ was kindled with a good zele when he draue Effectes of good ◠euill zeale the biers and sellers out of the temple ouerthrowinge theyr tables and chayres With the selfe same zeale was Phinees moued when he thruste thorow the moste filthy whoremongers Contrariwise the effect of an euill zeale we may beholde in Paul who through zeale persecuted y◠church of Christ And in Iohn it is writen y◠y◠the time should be when they shoulde thinke y◠they do God highe seruice which afflict the faithful of Christ Peter also being kindled with an immoderate zeale drue out his sword to kill them which laid hands vpon Christe There is also an other difference For an euill zeale engendreth hatred but a good zeale hath ioyned with it charity For Samuell although with a great zeale he worshipped ▪ God yet a long time he mourned for Saul And nothing is more repugnante vnto euill zeale then charity as vnto a good zeale is chiefly repugnant selfe loue They also are of a contrary affect which are either so blockishe that they are stirred vp with no desire of good thinges or els are so corrupt that they are not afeard to boast of wicked and villanous factes These thinges generally spoken we will now applye vnto the An euill zele of the Iewes Iewes They had a zeale towardes the lawe ceremonies and outward workes for that they excéedingly loued and had in admiration and onelye embraced these thinges wherfore it wonderfully gréeued them to be excluded from them neither could they abide that the Ethnikes shoulde be admitted into the fellowship of true religion Wherfore they were affected with a zeale but yet with an euil zeale for that as Paul saith it wanted knowledge But forasmuche as Paul séemeth to be moued with a desire and good wil towards the Iewes by reason of this zeale there ariseth a question whether anye sinnes may so please vs that of them we shoulde Whether i◠be lawful to take pleasure of sins A distinctiō of sinnes take pleasure or that therfore should be engendred any good will We must put a difference betweene sinnes for there are certayne sinnes enormious and grosse which all men vnderstand to be sinnes and there are other sinnes which although they be condemned before God and are in very déede sinnes for that they are committed of men not regenerate who are as yet euill trées neither directe they their workes vnto God as they ought to do yet are they morally good Wherefore if we meane of grosse sinnes and speake of sinnes as they are of theyr owne nature properly and truely then none that is godly will delight in this kind of sinne For if a man loue God with all his hart of necessity he wil abstaine from al sinnes which are manifestly repugnant vnto the will of God and vnto his law but per accidēs that is by chaunce it is possible that some pleasure may bee taken in them as if we be now deliuered the more greater the wicked actes are whiche we haue cōmitted the more shal we therfore reioyce And if a man haue ben before proud and arrogant after some fal being repētant do behaue himself more modestly he wil somwhat reioyce by reason of his sinne Which thing also happeneth if after faultes comitted be made good lawes and an order appointed that such faults be not afterward committed For we reioyce that such an occasion was offred And because that as Paul saith where sinne hath abounded grace also shall abound and vnto We reioyce in sinnes 〈◊〉 accidens them that loue God all thinges worke to good we will graunt that by a phrase of speach although not proper but per accidens the godly may somtimes take some pleasure of sinnes But if we speake of moral works which are done of them that Good moral workes delight vs althoughe they be sinnes are not regenerate if we consider them simply we can not but reioyce in them For euen as it is a pleasure and that no small pleasure to consider the natures of herbes the proprieties of liuing creatures of precious stones and of the starres so also is it a delight to sée the actes of notable men which actes God would haue to be in the nature of man for the preseruation of common wealthes and of ciuil discipline Who taketh not pleasure when he readeth the honest life and vertuous actes of Socrates Or when he weigheth with himselfe the notable actes done by Scipio Africanus and also when he séeth the things which are in our time done of notable men when yet they are voyde of Christian religion Yea forasmuch as they haue a certaine shew and countenaunce of sounde vertues the godly so much delight in them that they are not seldome moued ernestly to pray for the saluation of those mē thus thinking with themselues If God would vouchsafe to change these men and to draw them vnto Christ they should be a great ornament and A similitude help vnto the Church neither do they easely dispayre of theyr saluation As a skilfull husbandman if paraduenture he sée a ground very ranke with brakes and wedes desireth to buy the same for he thus thinketh That if the noughty herbes were weded out and the brakes with a plowe rooted out that grounde woulde plentifullye bring forthe good corne And so also will he doo if he sée wilde vine trées or wild oliue tréees of their owne accord spring in any place for he will thereby iudge the ground to be méeke both for vine trées and for fat oliue trées if it should be well husbanded Christ also our Sauior when a young man had asked him counsell what he should do to attaine vnto eternall life and he had answered kepe the commaundements and the young man made answere that he had thereunto endeuored himselfe euen from his youth which yet was not true Iesus notwithstanding delighted in that his endeuour such as it was of enquiring touching saluation and of obeying the commaundements of God as much as lay in him For this is the meaning of that which Marke writeth in the 10. chapiter that Christ loued him namely being moued with mercy by reason of his present calamity for that he labouring and going about to attayne vnto the righteousnes of works fell away from it And the Lord also when he had made answere that the greatest commaundement is that we should loue God with all our hart with all our soule and with all our strenthes and that the next commaundement is that we should loue our neighbour as our selues and a certaine scribe had commended this answere of the Lord he sayd vnto him Thou art not farre from the kingdome of heauen although he yet beleued not neither was yet by Christ iustified But the Lord
will not be subiect vnto it but strayght way flee to the custome of their Elders and to the helps of humaine traditioÌ„s There are some also which are moued with a zeale to defeÌ„d sole lyfe of the Ministers of the Church vnto whom if a man do shew that the bed of matrimony ought to be vndefiled in all men as it is sayde vnto the Hebrues and as it is writen vnto the Corinthians It is better to marry then to burne They which caÌ„not lyue continent let them marry Let euery man haue hys own wyfe and euerye woman her owne husband to auoide fornication they wyll not be subiect vnto this knowledge Men will not be subiecte vnto God of the lawes of God but bring forth the Fathers Councels and humane inuentions Whereby it is plaine what is to be iudged of their zeale It is vndoubtedly a very euill zeale and onely leaneth vnto selfe loue and geueth it self â—o his own thinges and nothing regardeth the thinges that pertain vnto God Such are the Monkes which preferre their institutions rules and workes before all other thinges which are commonly done of Christians and much delight in contemning all others in respect of them selues With this blind zeale are the miserable people euery where infected whom the Pastors and prechers ought to succor and helpe in discouering their want of knowledge and setting before them the true knowledge of the scriptures and that of a singular affection We must euen of mercy be moued to fall to prayers and true Christian mercy wherewith they ought thorowlye to be touched in so great a dissipation of Churches which can of no man bee sufficientlye lamented We haue neede of Ieremy to bewayle the calamities of the Churche And from this mercy we must go forward vnto prayers as Paul sayth he dyd and in imploring the ayde of God we ought there to record before God that which is in this place written They haue the zeale of God but not according to knowledge which selfe thing our Sauiour did vpon the crosse when he prayed Father An example of Christ forgeue them for they know not what they do Further seing that we delight in the good moral workes of men not yet regenerate and are sory for that they are not done as they ought to be done we maye thus gather If these men displease God and are condemned which yet of a good entent as they speake doo these so honest things when yet notwithstanding they want true knowledge what shall at the length become of vs which being endued wyth knowledge liue filthily yea euen against our conscience They are able to pretend a zeale but we Misers what excuse shall we make when as wee professe the Gospell Howbeit this is not to bee passed ouer that the Iewes of whom the Apostle speaketh had not if we wyl speake properlye the zeale of God for there hath The Iews had not the zele of God not bene at any time nor euer shal be any true God which wyl haue the law of Moses to be defended against Christ and his Gospell Wherefore they abused the name of God when as they defended not him but rather their owne opinions As the Turkes also although they boast that they worship and cal vpon the true God yet they lye for there is no where such a God which hath not our The turks worship not God Lord Iesus Christ and the holy ghost of one and the same substance with him which forasmuch as they take away froÌ„ the God whoÌ„ they worship they worship theyr owne inuencion for God fight and are zelous for it not for the true God And Paul speaketh according to the accustomed maner of the scriptures which oftentimes nameth thinges not as they are but as they seme to be Seing The scripture oftentymes nameth thinges not as they are but as they seme to be therefore that those men thought that they were moued with the zeale of the true God neyther did they for any other cause enter into these zeales but for that they thought them to be acceptable vnto God therefore Paul sayth that they had the zeale of God when yet they were deceaued For if they had bene kindled with the zeale of the true God they would neuer haue resisted Christe Wherefore in Iohn the lord sayd excellenlye well vnto those which boasted that they would beleue Moses and not him If ye beleued Moses ye would beleue me also for he wrote of me Wherfore Chrisostome in this place very well noteth that Paul Paul deceueth not as Rhetoricians do gratefied the Iewes but yet in wordes only Further let vs consider that the arte vsed of the Apostle farre differeth from that which the Rhetoricians vse They to couer and to extenuate vices adorne them with the name of the vertues nexte vnto those vices defending a couetous man by the name of frugallity a bold and rashe person as valiaÌ„t and so in other vices But Paul bycause he had named an effect which semed to approch nigh vnto vertue to the end he would not deceaue made open the vice thereof in taking awaye from it knowledge And this he proueth adding thys For they being ignoraunt of the righteousnes of God and going aboute to stablish theyr owne righteousnes are not subiect vnto the righteousnes of God Agayne when he maketh mencion of ignoraunce he semeth to gratefie the Iewes And indede he sheweth that they were not so culpable as if wittingly and willingly they had resisted the truth knowen allbeit notwithstanding he most greauously accuseth them It is certayne that ignoraunce signifieth defect What ignoraunce is Difference betwene natural priuations morall or wante of knowledge not indede fully but requireth a subiect or matter apte to know For betwene naturall priuations and morall there is greate differeÌ„ce for in phisicall or naturall priuations the greater the nighnes aptnes is vnto any perfection so much of more valew is the thing counted For for yâ— the drinke or liquor of fruites is more apt to resemble wine therfore of so much the more worthines is it The gold of the Alchumistes is better then yron bicause with a greater aptnes or nighnes it draweth nere vnto true gold But in moral things if a man seme to be more apte to receaue vertues or to attayn vnto knowledge then other are and by his owne default or folly will not take any paynes in them he is more to be accused then others are which are farther of from that commodity Wherefore seing that the Iewes had aboue all other nations geuen vnto them the scriptures the Prophets the Apostles and Christ himselfe for theyr erudition and were taught by ceremonies preaching and miracles the ignoraunce of Christe coulde not but to theyr moste greate rebuke be obiected vnto them Paul in this place maketh a diuision of righteousnesse and the one he maketh proper and theyr owne and the other he maketh to be of God of
but was not altogether reiected And that this benefite was bestowed vpon the fathers the Scripture in many places mencioneth There were other nations which in déede receaued the Gospel but yet kéept it but for a while skarce aboue one age or two It is true that we haue succeded in the place of the Iewes and are made pertakers of the selfesame priuiledges with them yet notwithstanding the Iewes were before vs abode the long tyme before in possession Wherefore if they be nowe broken of we ought more to bee afeard if they for their pride were smitten with blindnes were for their incredulity cut of what is to be thought of vs wild oliue trées and barren vnfruitfull branches Thorough incredulity were they broken of sayth Ambrose not for thy sake but by reason of their owne defaulte whiche thing I meruayle he should write If this Preposition propter that is For do signifie the cause efficient I graunt that our saluation was not the cause of their cutting of They had Our saluatiō was the small cause of the reiection of the Iewes in themselues the sinne of incredulity which GOD minding to punishe in this sort by his iustice reiected them But that our calling was not the finall cause which God in their reiection had a regard vnto I can in no wise deny seing that Paul affirmeth it wherefore I thinke rather we may say that they were broken of from their fruitefull trée both for theyr owne default and for our sakes Be not high minded 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This is which is otherwise sayd 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which vice is opposite vnto the pouerty of the spirite which Christ so commended that he called them which were endewed with it blessed But they are to be laughed at which by this saying of the Apostle labour to defend ignoraunce to feare away men from knowledge Noli altum sapere say they that is Be not ouer wise Whiche exposition how strang it is from the skope of the Apostle I suppose now euery man plainly séeth But to close vp the exposition of this place I thinke that betwéene the degrées whereby we come to saluation the meanes which bring vs hedlong to destruction this order is to bee put As touching them The degrees to saluation and the degrees to destruction which shal be saued first is election or predestination Thereout burst forth grace the spirite and fayth strayght way follow good workes then haue they geuen vnto them perseueraunce and at the last is rendred the crowne of felicitie But vnto destruction the first degrée is the corruption of the lompe of mākind thorough originall sinne that God would not haue mercy thereof followe many sinnes which we by liuing wickedly afterward adde after them followeth blindnes they are infected with incredulity moreouer the harte is hardened and at the last followeth eternall damnation See therfore the bountefulnes seuerity of God Towards thē whiche haue fallen into seuerity but towards thee bountefulnes if thou continue in his bountefulnes or els thou also shalt be cut of And they also if they abide not still in vnbeliefe shal be grafted in For God is able to graft them in agayne For if thou wast cut out of the oliue tree which wast wild by nature and wast grafted contrary to nature into a right oliue tree how much more shall they that are by nature be grafted into their owne oliue tree Se therfore the goodnes and seuerity of God c. This word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Greke the is See some turne Ecce y◠is Behold for in signification it is somtimes all one with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Apostle cōtinueth stil in one the self same matter For this treatise was very necessary to put away the discord which in the primitiue sprang betwene the Gentiles the Iewes He exhorteth thē to set two things before their eyes the goodnes of God his seuerity Goodnes he calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which word signifieth clemency a redines of mind to do a man good to do him pleasure Seueritye he calleth in the Gréeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whiche is then when thinges are done with extremitie and that men are delt with euen according to the rigor of iustice The singuler bountefulnes of God towardes the Gētiles Against the Maniches and Marcionites The scripture euery where inuiteth vs to consider the seuerity an◠goodnes of God Towardes thee saith he goodnes For that was a singuler bountifulnes that when as the Gentils were contaminated with idolatry and mought iustly worthely haue bene left in their infidelity they were yet notwithstanding called adopted and adorned with so many ornamentes and giftes By these woordes are confuted the Manichies Marcionites which affirmed that there are two Gods one good gentle and mercifull the other seuere yea and cruell when yet the Apostle in this place attributeth the selfe same proprieties vnto one and the self same true God It is manifest also that they which are cut of are by the iust seuerity of God broken of and fall away so that they are without excuse Moreouer not onely Paul in this place but also the whole scripture in infinite places in a maner prouoke vs to the consideration of those two thinges And that not without iust cause for in the consideratiō of the goodnes of God we are prouoked vnto faith and vnto loue towards him also to geue him thanks for y◠benefits receiued at his hands But when we consider y◠seueritie iudgements of God it maketh vs to pity those which fall and to be fearefull of our owne estate Chrisostome expounding this sentence See the goodnes It is not saide saith he See thy merites and thy laboures for it commeth all whole of grace from aboue I woulde to GOD he had alwayes spoken after this manner and that he had abode still in that whiche he here teacheth The entent of the Apostle in the consideratiō of the seuerity of God is that we beholding other mens dangers and falles should be made more ware Which selfe thing he in an other place meaneth when he sayth in the first to the Corrinth He which standeth let him take heede that he fall not and vnto the Galathians Considering Two kinds of feare thy self least thou also be tempted Wherfore this is to be known that feare is of two sortes the one is which abateth nothinge of confidence but onely engendreth a greater diligence and bringeth more effectuall endeuors The other is which excéedingly diminisheth yea rather taketh away confidence pulleth away endeuor and bringeth sluggishnes The latter commeth of infidelity the other cōmeth of diligence and of fayth By this kind of feare are the churches moued more and more to apply themselues vnto God and to praye instantlye for their preseruation What prayer is vaine namely that the kingdome of God shoulde not be transferred from them
by the workes of the lawe no fleshe shal be iustified And by fleshe he vnderstandeth a man not yet regenerate I know there haue ben some which by the flesh haue vnderstand the inferior parts of the mynde which are grosse and wrapped with filthy lustes But this sence Paul excludeth when he saith by the workes of the lawe that is by workes commaunded of God in the law which must néedes come of reason and not of the strength of the inferior soule Farther the scripture after the Hebrew phrase by the fleshe vnderstandeth the whole man whiche thing we haue in an other place more aboundantly expressed Afterward to the end he might the The fourth better confirme this sentence he saith that euery mouth might be stopped and that the whole world might be guilty before God Vndoubtedly if men should be iustified by works their mouthes should not be stopped neither should they be guilty before God for they should alwayes haue somewhat to say namely that they are therefore quite from sinnes because they had deserued it by workes but now whē men perceaue the contrary they dare not once open their lippes Farther he saith The fifth But now without the lawe is the righteousnes of God made manifest whiche hath the testimonye bothe of the lawe and of the Prophetes What man would appoint that thing to be the cause of our righteousnes without which righteousnes may be obtayned vndoubtedly no wise man would so doo when as suche is the nature of The sixt causes that without them the effectes can not be brought to passe To the same purpose also serueth that which followeth Where then is thy boasting It is excluded By what lawe By the lawe of workes No but by the lawe of fayth He woulde haue vs know that all iust cause of glory is excluded and taken away from vs for the whole glory of our righteousnes ought to geue place vnto God but if we should be iustified by workes then should it not be so for the glory should be ours and euery man would count himselfe to be therefore iustified because he hath The seuēth liued vertuously and iustly And how certaine and assured this was vnto the Apostle those thinges which follow do declare We thinke therefore that a man is iustified by fayth without workes of the lawe Wherefore shall we then deny that which the Apostle with so great vehemency affirmeth Vndoubtedly it is a thing most impudent so to do Wherefore let vs assent vnto him and not resist so great a testimony The eight of hys But besides these thinges let vs waighe and consider the pithe of Pauls meaning If we should be iustified by workes saith he we should not only haue matter to boast of but the occasion of glorying in God and of publishing his fauour towards vs should be taken away For without doubt it is vnto vs a thing most prayse worthy and glorious to acknowledge that the beneuolence and redy fauour of God towards vs through Christ is so great that he deliuereth vs miserable men from our sinnes and receaueth vs into fauour although we were couered ouer with neuer so great filthines and dragges of sinne If I say we should be should be iustified by workes then vndoubtedly could we not truly boast bragge or glory hereof But let vs go on and heare what the Apostle sayth in the beginning of the 4. The ninth chapiter What shall we say then that our father Abrahā found according to the flesh For if Abraham were iustified by workes he hath whereof to boast but not before God For what sayth the scripture Abraham beleued God and it was imputed vnto him for righteousnes But vnto him which worketh a reward is not imputed according to grace but according to debt Wherefore to the end that so swete a consolation of the loue and beneuolence of God towards vs should not be taken away from vs let vs constantly affirme with the Apostle that we are not iustified by workes And that he might the better persuade vs hereof he vrgeth this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we say signifieth to impute to ascribe vnto a man righteousnes or to count a man for a iust man and setteth it as an Antithesis or contrary vnto merite or debt so that he to whome any thing is imputed deserueth not the same neither receaueth it as a debt But he which obtaineth any thing vnto himselfe as a debt counteth not the same as imputed or ascribed vnto him neither thought Paul it sufficient to haue alleadged the scripture cōcerning Abrahā but also he citeth Dauid Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgeuē whose sins are couered Blessed is the mā vnto whō the Lord hath not imputed sinne By which wordes we do not only gather that the righteousnes by which we are sayd to be iustified sticketh not in our mindes but is imputeth of God that it is such an imputation which consisteth not of works The tenth but of the mere clemency of God Farther the Apostle doth by an other propriety of good workes confirme his sentence namely because workes are signes or seales of the righteousnes already obtayned wherefore he sayth of Abraham And he receaued the signe of circumcision a seale of the righteousnes of fayth which was in vncircumcision c. Wherefore forasmuch as good workes are signes and seales which beare witnes of y◠righteousnes already receaued they can not be the causes thereof Neither haue ceremonies only that property but also euen those workes Morall workes also are seales of righteousnes before obtayned The eleuenth which are called morall when they are pleasant and acceptable before God for they also are signes and tokens of our righteousnes Wherefore Peter exhorteth vs to endeuor our selues to make our vocation sure namely by liuing vprightly and by good workes Yea and the forme also of y◠promise is diligently to be weighed which God made with Abraham for vnto it is not added a condition of the law or of workes And seing God added none with what audacity shall we then presume to do it And Paul saith For not through the lawe was the promise made vnto Ahraham or to his seede that he should be the heyre of the world but through the righteousnes of fayth For if those whiche pertayne vnto the lawe be heyres then is fayth made vayne and the promise is of no force namely because the lawe worketh anger Wherefore if we fulfill not the lawe the promise will take no place and it shal be a thing vayne to beleue that promise which shall neuer be performed which vndoubtedly must néedes vtterly be so if it be geuen vpon thys condition that we should performe the lawe when as no man can perfectly accomplish the law But the Apostle procedeth farther this iudgeth of the most mercifull counsel of God The twelfth Therefore is the inheritaunce geuē by faith that it might bee according to grace to
put out the handwriting that was against vs. In the The 47. 2. to Timothy the i. chapter Who hath called vs with an holy callinge not accordinge to our workes but according to his purpose and grace which is geuen vs through Christ Iesus Here he speaketh of a calling ful of efficacy by which men are iustified and not of the common calling as touching the preaching of the word of God which is set forth vnto all men And forasmuch as this consisteth not as Paul saith of merites or woorkes neither can iustification also come of them Vnto Titus it is written The 48. The goodnes and loue of God our Sauiour towardes vs hath appeared not by the workes of righteousnes which we haue done but according to his mercy hath he saued vs. Also vnto the Hebrues is but one onely sacrifice and one oblation namely the death The 49. of Christ by which sinnes are wiped away and satisfaction made for men Wherfore iustification is not to be loked for of workes and it ought to suffice vs that the good workes which we do after iustification are sacrifices of thankesgeuing and let vs not make them sacrifices propiciatory by which meanes we should do great iniury vnto Christe But settinge a side the Epistles of Paul let vs séeke testimonies also out of other places of the holy scriptures Christe in the vii of Mathew saith Euery good tree bringeth forth good fruites but a noughty tree bringeth foorth euell The 50. fruites And to the end the nature of those which are not regenerate mighte be the better declared he addeth A good tree cannot bring forth euill frutes nether can an euill tree bring forth good fruits Wherfore seing Christ saith y◠that canot so be how dare these men affirme that it may be for they say that by workes men may be iustified Christ vseth the selfe same reason in the 12. chapiter of Mathew Ether The 51. make the tree good and his fruite good or make the tree euil and his fruite euill for by the fruite is the tree knowen O ye generation of vipers how can ye speake good thinges whē as ye your selues are euill for of the aboundance of the hart the mouth speaketh A good man out of the good treasure of the harte bringeth forth good thinges and an euill man out of an euill treasure bringeth forth euill thinges These wordes of Christ do declare that men which are not yet regenerate are euill trees which neither do bring forth good fruite nor can do ▪ and they testify that the wicked cā not speake good thinges and much les can they worke good thinges and that out of an euill treasure of the harte are euer euill thinges to be looked for And seing the matter is so consider I pray you whither they which are alienated frō Christ ought to be called euill or no Vndoubtedly vnles they be euil none of vs y◠cleaneth vnto Christ can be called good Also in Luke the 17. chapiter But which of you hauing a The 52. seruaunt that goeth to plough or fedeth your cattell that will streight way say vnto hym when he commeth from the field Go and fitte downe and sayth not rather vnto him prepare that I may suppe gyrd vp thy selfe and serue me till I haue eaten and dronken and afterward eate thou and drinke thou doth he thanke his seruaunt bycause he hath done those thinges which he hath commaunded him I trow not So likewise ye when ye haue done all those thinges that are commaunded you say We are vnprofitable seruauntes we haue done that which we ought to haue done These words spake Christ vnto his disciples vnto his Apostles I say and which were now cōuerted to saluation who if they worke vnprofitable works what shall we thē iudge of those which haue not yet receaued the fayth of Christ But the Sophisters haue made the world such fooles that they say that workes before iustification do after a sorte merite it and those workes which follow they say are most profitable wherefore they would now haue men after a sort to make accompt with God and with beades to nomber how many prayers they haue said For what other thing ment they by thē then y◠they would by a certayne nomber recite so many Pater nosters or so many Aue Marias thinking by y◠recital to haue God most assuredly boūd The 53. vnto thē In y◠15. of Iohn Christ is compared vnto a vine tree we to the branches therof wherfore he sayth Euen as the branche can not bring forth fruit of it self vnles it abide in the vine no more also cā ye vnles ye abide in me I am the vine ye are the branches he which abideth in me and I in him the same bringeth forth much fruite And whosoeuer shal not abide in me they are cast out of the dores euē as the braunches or cuttings of frō the vine they shal gather thē and cast thē into the fire Now that we haue recited these wordes of the lord how agreeth it that men being straungers from Christ not yet regenerate can worke good works by which they may be iustified when as they are called dry braunches which shal be cast into the fire and it is sayd that they only can bring forth fruite which cleane vnto Christ as braunches cleane to the vine And that we should the better vnderstand the will The 54. of Christ there is added Without me ye can do nothing Which sentence some go aboute to darken saying that nothing can be done without Christ in respect that he is God forasmuch as he is the first cause of all thinges as though the Lord disputed then of the generall conseruation of naturall thinges and of that power whereby God bringeth forth all thinges vniuersally Christ came not into the world to teach this philosophye he vndoubtedly entreated of the fruite of saluation and of eternall life and spake of those whiche should cleane vnto hys doctrine or ells should be strangers from it Moreouer the sonne of God commaunded The 55. that the faythfull should in theyr prayers saye Forgeue vs our trespasses Signifieng thereby y◠the faythfull also haue nede of forgeuenes in those things which they do for our workes are vnperfect neyther are they able to satisfye Wherefore if our workes which we doo after our regeneration nede expiation by the merite of Christ And for as much as we pray for the same how can they be propitiatory Much more les then can we thinke of those workes which are done before regeneration that they should be acceptable and pleasāt vnto God Moreouer no man can iustly say that he is out of the nomber of such when as God hath commaunded all men to pray in that maner and his will is not that any man should make a lye in his prayer Yea and Iohn also writeth If we shall The 56. say that we haue no sinne we deceaue
before that grace And in the 25. chapter We ought to preach and to beleue that by the sinne of the first man free will is so decayed and diminished that no man afterwarde can either loue God as he ought to do or beleue in God or for Gods sake to worke that which is good vnles the grace and mercy of God preuent him Wherfore iust Abell Noe Abraham Isaac Iacob and all the saintes in the olde tyme are in the Epistle vnto the Hebrues sayd by faith to haue done those thinges which are in the holy scriptures mencioned to haue ben done by theÌ„ which faith we haue before taught to come of God And Paul writeth of himself I haue obtained mercy that I might be faithful But he saith not I haue obteyned mercy because I was before faithfull but contrariwise And in the self same chapter This also we plainly confesse and beleue that in euery good worke it is not we our selues that do first begin and afterward are holpen wyth the mercye of God but that he first inspireth in vs both fayth and the loue of hym and that without any of our merites goyng before Wherefore we must without all doubt beleue that both Zacheus and the thiefe and also Cornelius attayned not to beleue by nature but by the gift of the goodnes of God These thinges haue I alleaged out of the Synode of Arausicanum peraduenture more largely then may seme to be conuenient for this place but for this cause haue I the willinglier done it for that I saw that al those things which are there affirmed are confirmed by the holy scriptures and do excedingly muche serue for our purpose Such Councels vndoubtedly gentle Reader are to be harkened vnto which leane vnto the worde of God For whatsoeuer commoditie or discommoditie the church hath the same ought wholy to be ascribed vnto the obseruation or contempte of the worde of God For in the olde and auncient councels how were Arius Eunomius Nestorius Eutiches and other pestiferous heretikes onercome but by the worde of God For without doubt they could neuer by any other engines be ouercome and vanquished And contrariwise when began yâ— church to geue place vnto abuses supersticions but when the word of God was conteÌ„ned And now in our times vnles the word of God had bene sought for and called agayne in a maner out of exile how could we euer haue bene deliuered from the tiranny of the Pope Let these few thinges be a warning vnto vs not rashly to beleue euery councell but let vs receiue those councels only which haue soundly Tridentinum consilium coÌ„firmed the decrées of their doctrine by the scriptures But to make that which I say more manifest I will speake somewhat of the Councell of Trent that by the contrary the truth may yâ— better be vnderstand In that Councel the 5. SessioÌ„ from the 5. chap. vnto the 11. chap. is entreated of iustification There these good holy Fathers namely the hirelinges of the Pope do thus decrée That the beginning of iustification is of grace But what grace they there vnderstaÌ„d they straight way make plaine For thus they say It calleth and it stirreth vp they which are to be iustified are so holpeÌ„ by it that beyng called and stirred vp they geue assent vnto this grace and worke therwith and are made apt to regeneration but this assent and workyng together they affirme as the wordes declare to be done by frée will What more could Pelagius say if he were now on lyue For neither did he also deny grace if thou take it for an admonitioÌ„ calling and stirring vp He also attributed this vnto What is the worke of grace in â—â—stificatioÌ„ frée will that it had power to assent and to obey the commaundements of God But the grace which the holy scriptures set forth vnto vs renueth our vnderstaÌ„ding and will and in stead of a stony hart geueth vs a fleshy hart For it doth not only counsel our reason but also fully persuadeth it and boweth and changeth the will Our men of Trent graunt in dede that God toucheth the hart of man by yâ— illumination of the holy ghost but lest a man himself should do nothing they adde yâ— he receiueth the inspiration as he which may also refuse it Wherfore they fully coÌ„clude yâ— it pertaineth to man to receaue although they confesse that he can not do that vnles he be called and stirred vp by grace But how can the hart of man vnles it be renued by the spirite and grace of God receaue those thinges agaynst which by reason of his nature being yet corrupt and vitiate it resisteth Assuredly though it be neuer so much stirred vp taught and moued yet vnles it be vtterly chaunged it wil continually withst and and resist Wherfore Augustine It is not in our power that those thinges which are set forth vnto vs should please vs. ad Simplicianum writeth very well That it is not in our power that those thynges which are set forth vnto vs should be acceptable and pleasant vnto vs. But we chuse not that thing which is neither acceptable nor pleasant though we haue neuer so many admonishers to stirre vs vp As if there should be offered vnto a sicke man good healthfull meates and very pleasantly dressed yet because they are neither pleasant nor acceptable vnto him he refuseth them though there stand many by and say vnto him that those meates are wholesome and very well dressed The selfe same thing vndoubtedly happeneth vnto a minde not yet regenerate but that as touching the receiuing of the grace of God there can be done no violence vnto the minde but the sicke person may be compelled to take meates that are vnto him vnpleasaunt Wherfore so long as our will and vnderstanding is not changed by the spirite of God it will not admit any healthfull admonitions And euen as a sicke person before he be restored to health neither abideth nor gladly receiueth meates when they are offered him so also the minde of man vnlesse it be chaunged from infidelitie to faith from impietie to godlines as saith the Synode of Arausicanum it neither obeyeth nor geueth place vnto grace which calleth and stirreth it vp which thing yet the good Fathers A place of Zachary declared of Trent affirme But lest they should seme to speake without scriptures they bring forth two testimonies The one out of the first chap. of Zacharie Bee ye conuerted vnto me and I will be conuerted vnto you This say they hath a respecte vnto the man who is commaunded that euen in iustification he shoulde doo somewhat But Ieremy sayth Conuert vs Lord and we shall be conuerted by which word is declared that vnto this conuersion is also required the helpe of God And by this meanes they deuide the whole matter betwene God and man But Augustine many other of the Fathers ascribe the whole acte of our iustification vnto God onely But as touching
nothing and vncircumcision is nothing but onely fayth which worketh thorough loue Of this only dependeth iustification of this faith I say not being dead but liuing and of force And for that cause Paul added which worketh by loue Which yet ought not so to be vnderstand as though fayth should depend of loue or hath of it as they vse to speake his forme but for that when it bursteth forth into act and will shew forth it selfe it must of necessity doo it by loue So the knowledge of a man dependeth not hereof for that he teacheth other men but therin is it most of all declared But if any perfection of these actions of louing and teaching redound vnto fayth and knowledge that commeth of an other cause and not for that that they depend of it or therof haue theyr forme as many Sophisters dreame In the Epistle to the Ephesians the 2. chapter it is thus written By Grace ye are made safe thorough fayth and that not of your selues for it is the gift of God And moreouer in the third Chapiter That according to the riches of his glory he would graunt you that ye may be strengthned with might in the inward man by the spirit that Christ may dwell in your harte by fayth He y◠hath Christ in him the same hath without all doubt righteousnes For of him Paul thus writeth vnto the Corrinthians in the first Epistle and second chapiter Who is made vnto vs wisedome ▪ righteousnes holines redemptiō Here therfore is shewed by what meanes Christ dwelleth in our harts namely by fayth Agayne Paul in the third chapiter to the Phillippians That I might be found saith he in him not hauing mine own righteousnes which is of the law but that which is of the fayth of Iesus Christ Here that righteousnes which is of workes and of the law he calleth his but that which is of fayth and which he most of all desireth he calleth the righteousnes of Iesus Christ Vnto the Hebrues also it is written in the 11. chapter The saynts by fayth haue ouercome kingdomes haue wrought righteousnes and haue obteyned the promises These wordes declare how much is to be attributed vnto fayth for by it the saints are sayd not only to haue possessed outward kingdomes but also to haue excercised the workes of righteousnes namely to haue liued holily and without blame and to haue obteyned the promises of God And Peter in his first epistle and first chapiter In the power of God sayth he are ye kept vnto saluation by fayth In these wordes are signified two principal grounds of our saluation The one is the might and power of God which is wholy necessary for vs to attayne saluation The other is fayth wherby as by an instrument is saluation applied vnto vs. Iohn in his first epistle and 5. chapiter Euery one sayth he which beleueth that Iesus is Christ is borne of God But to be borne of God is nothing els then to be iustified or to be borne agayne in Christ It followeth in the same chapiter This is the victory which ouercommeth the world our fayth By which testimony is declared that the tiranny of the Deuill of sinne of death of hell is by no other thing driuē away from vs but by faith only And toward the end of the selfe same chapiter it is sayd And these things haue I writen vnto you which beleue in the name of the sonne of God that ye might know that ye haue eternall life and that ye should beleue in the name of the sonne of God Now let vs gather also out of y◠Euangelists as much as shall serue for this presēt questiō Mathew in his 8. chap. sayth That Christ excedingly wondred at the faith of y◠Centurian and confessed that he had not found such fayth in Israell And turning vnto him sayd Euen as thou hast beleued so be it vnto thee Here some replye that this history and such other like entreat not of iustificatiō but only of the outward benefits of the body geuen by God But these men ought to consider that sinnes which are in vs are the causes of the griefes and afflictions of the body For only Christ except who vtterly died an innocent all other for as much as they are obnoxious vnto sinne doe suffer no aduersitie without iust desert and although God in inflicting of calamities vpon vs hath not alwayes a regarde hereunto for oftētimes he sendeth aduersities to shewe forth his glory and to the triall of all those that are his yet none whilest he is so vexed can complaine that he is vniustly dealt with for there is none so holy but that he hath in himselfe sinnes which are worthy of suche like or else of greater punishmentes And where the cause is not taken away neither the effect is nor can be taken away Wherfore Christ forasmuch as he deliuered men from diseases of the bodies manifestly declared y◠it was he which should iustify thē from sinnes And that this is true the self same Euangelist teacheth in the. 9. chapter For when he that was sicke of the Palsey was brought vnto Christ to be healed he saith y◠Christ answered Arise my sonne thy sinnes are forgeuen thee At which saying when as the Scribes and Phariseis were offended to the ende they should vnderstand that the cause of euils being taken away euen the euils themselues also are taken away he commaunded him that was sicke of the Palsey to arise and to take vp his bed and to walke Wherfore it manifestly appeareth that Christ by the healings of the body declared that he was he which should forgeue sinnes and euen as those healings were receiued by faith euen so also by the same faith are men iustified and receiue the forgeuenesse of sinnes And in the selfe same .ix. Chapter is declared that Christe answered vnto two blinde men which were very importunate and most earnestly desired to be healed Doe ye beleue that I can doe this for you And when they had made answer that they beleued he sayd Euen as you haue beleued so be it vnto you And when our Sauior was going to the house of the ruler of the sinagoge to raise vp his daughter from death there followed him a woman which had an issue of bloud which woman was endued with so great a faith that she thought thus with her selfe that if she might but touche the hemme of his garment she should straight way be made whole Wherefore Christ answered her be of good confidēce daughter thy faith hath made thee whole But why Christ adioyneth confidence vnto faith we haue before declared in the beginning of this question whē we declared the nature of faith For we taught that that assent wherwith we take holde of the promises of God is so strong so vehement that the rest of the motions of the minde which are agreable vnto it doe of necessitie follow In Luke also is set forth the history of that sinnefull
it is in very déede the body of a man I vtterly deny For death taketh away from the body of a man the proper forme which he had before but it leaueth the generall word so that it can only be called a body So true and iustifying fayth when it is lost ceasseth to be the true and proper fayth it may indéede as touching the generall word be called a certayne cold assent sprong of humane perswasion and not such as commeth of the holy ghost and which hath the selfe same strength and efficacy that it had before Wherefore if on either side be kept the selfe same proportion of the similitude this wonderfull strong buttresse shal make nothing against vs. For as we confesse that a dead body is a body so also do we graunt that a dead fayth is fayth so that by fayth we vnderstand the generall word of fayth and not that liuely and true fayth whereby we are iustified It is paralogismus aequiuocationis that is a false argument comming of diuers significations of a word He addeth moreouer that fayth can not iustify because of his owne nature it True fayth is not a dead fayth is a thing dead and receaueth life of an other thing namely of charity and of good workes These obiections are vayne and triflyng For none that is in hys right wit will graunt that true fayth is a dead thing For the iust man is sayde to liue by his faith And if out of fayth we draw life how can it then vnto any man seme dead But that it taketh life of an other thing we deny not for it hath it partly Frō whēce faith hath life of those things which it beleueth namely of Christ and of the promises of God and partly of the holy ghost by whose breathing it is inspired In this sort we will graunt that it hath life of an other thing but not in that sort that this man wyll namely that it hath it either of charity or of good workes For what man that is well in his wits will euer say that either the stocke of a trée or the branches or A similitude the fruites or the flowers geue life vnto the rootes And fayth is before either hope or charity Therefore of them it receaueth not life for in very déede fayth can not be the matter of these vertues And euen as that faculty or power which they call vegetatiue geueth life vnto the body and receaueth not life of the faculty or powere sensitiue or rational which foloweth so faith geueth life vnto the soule but How fayth is encreased by good workes taketh not that life either of charity or of good works Howbeit I graunt that that life of fayth is made so much the greater ampler as it hath mo better works and more feruenter charity bursting forth out of it and not that it is increased of many and often repeticion of actions as it is sayd of vertues which they cal moral but because God of his grace and mercy multiplieth the talent for that it was not idle and because God by his power bringeth to passe that fayth when it worketh through loue is stronger then it selfe when it is remisse in working But omitting these things let vs returne agayne to Pighius He as much as lieth in hym contendeth that a man can not be iustified by that fayth whiche is in Christ and in the remission of sinnes For that fayth sayth he whereby Abraham was iustified was not applyed vnto these thinges For God promised vnto hym onely a plentifull séede and possession of a countrey And straight way it is added that Abraham beleued God and it was imputed vnto hym for righteousnes In this argument Pighius triumpheth and is violent agaynst the truth and vtterly derideth our sentence But this is nothing ells then to deride Paul himselfe For he by most expresse wordes affirmeth that we are iustified by fayth in Christ and by the remission of sinnes Neyther is there any thing ells in Pighius then a mere madnes and a wicked desire to contēd But let Paul come forth and answere for him selfe what he thought is to be vnderstand by the séede promised vnto Abraham Vndoubtedly in his epistle vnto the Galathiās the third chapiter he calleth that séede Christ Vnto Abraham sayth he were made the promises and vnto his seede He sayth not and vnto the seedes as speaking of many but as is were of one and in thy seede whiche is Christ. And this testament I say was confirmed by God towards Christ Let Pighius now yet beleue Paul that in that seede which was promised vnto Abraham was Christ comprehended and declared neither let him euer from hence forth with such malepertnes and desire of victory take vppon him to say that y◠fayth wherby Abraham was iustified was not fayth in Christe But as touching the remission of sinnes forasmuch as vnto vs is promised the blessing we ought to remember that the chiefe and principall poynt therof herein consisteth that we should be receaued of God into fauour and that our sins should be forgeuen vs. But Pighius goeth on manifestly to oppunge y◠doctrine of the apostle touching y◠iustification of Abraham For he sayth y◠before Abraham was circumcised had a testimony of the scripture that his fayth was imputed vnto him vnto righteousnes he beleued God as it is manifest by the 12. chapiter of Genesis Wherfore sayth he according to this your sentēce he was then iustified neither was his righteousnes differred vntill that history which is had in the 15. chapter It is wonderfull to sée how much he attributeth vnto these his arguments as though by them were takē away from vs al possibility to answer what I besech you letted but that Abraham At what tyme Abraham was iustified mought be iustified at that first time when God spake vnto him first to go out of his countrey and from his kindred For euen in the selfe place at the beginning of the 12. chapiter are had the selfe same promises which are had in the 15. chapter For thus God promised him I will make of thee a great naciō and will blesse thee and will make thy name great and thou shalt be a blessing I wil also blesse those that blesse thee wil curse those that curse thee and in the shall all thee families of the earth be blessed Vndoubtedly in these words is conteyned the promise of Christ and the remission of sinnes And therfore there shal be no absurdity if we say that Abrahā by beleuing of those wordes also was iustified But bycause the scripture in that chapiter did not playnly set forth this therfore Paul with great wisdome hath cited those wordes which are had in the 15. chapter where it is expressedly written that fayth was imputed vnto him vnto righteousnes which sentence was most necessary to confirme the sentence of the Apostle namely that a man is iustified by Why God
abideth in death and therby he concludeth that of loue is had iustification life This is al one as if a man should say he which can not laugh is not a man Ergo by the power of laughing a man obtaineth to be a man But how absurd this is euery man may easely perceiue For to be men we haue it of the soule endued with reason Vnto which soule for as muche as the power of laughing is of necessitie ioyned this proposition which we haue brought is euer true He which can not laughe is not a man So is that most certaine which Iohn saith That he which loueth not abideth in deathe although he haue not life of loue but of faith wherewith loue is of necessity ioyned He citeth also those wordes of Christ If ye had God to your father doubtlesse ye should loue me Therfore sayth he of loue we haue the adoption whereby we are made the childrē of God But here also he vseth the self same forme of reasoning For they which loue not Christ are not the children of God and yet haue we not of loue to be the children of God but of faith out of which loue springeth After the selfe same maner a man mought say if thou wert liberall thou shouldest also be prudent And this in déede is a true proposition And yet it foloweth not that a mā is by liberalitie made prudent Yea much rather of prudence springeth liberalitie To be brief these arguments and such other like conclude nothing else then that iustification can not consist without loue and other christian vertues And yet cā not thereof be rightly gathered that a man is iustified for these vertues sake Pighius addeth moreouer this sentence of Christ If any man loue me he will keepe my commaundementes and I and my father will come to him and make ou◠abiding with him By these words it appeareth saith he that iustification foloweth of loue and the obseruing of the commaundements of God For those being obserued Christ promiseth that he will come with his father and abide with vs. For he thinketh that to receiue and to retaine Christ is nothing ells then to be iustified We confesse that when Christians being now regenerate and iustified doo liue vprightly and by good workes doo shew forth theyr fayth God commeth vnto them and heapeth them vp with greater giftes and a more ample grace For God although otherwise he be euery where yet is expressedly sayd to come vnto them in whome he beginneth to worke new workes And sithen he dayly encreaseth and adorneth his which behaue themselues vprightly and godly and faythfully excercise the talents committed vnto them it is very well sayd that he dayly cōmeth vnto them by reason of new giftes And this is that kind of visiting wherof Christ speaketh in the Gospell of Iohn But if we will know the first accesse of God comming of Christ vnto our hartes to dwell in them Paul teacheth it vs to the Ephesians For thus he writeth That Christ may thorough fayth dwell in your hartes Wherfore this sentence of Christ teacheth not that iustification commeth of loue For iustification goeth before it although not in time yet in order Pighius procedeth and maketh such a distinction of testaments that some he sayth are absolute and fre by which the heyre may streight way enter vpō the inheritance other some are conditionall which make no heyre but vpon certayne conditions And to this latter kind referreth he the testamēt of God And therfore contendeth he y◠except those conditions be performed none can be iustified Here we deny his assumpt namely that the testament of God touching the remission The promise concerning iustification hath not a condition ioyned of sinnes in Christ hath any condition ioyned with it Which thing Paul testifieth in his 3. chapiter to the Galathians when he thus writeth ▪ Brethern I speake accorto the maner of men Though it be but a mans testament yet when it is confirmed no mā doth abrogate it or adde any thing therunto Now to Abraham were made the promises and to his sede he sayd not To the sedes as speaking of many but as of one and in thy sede which is Christ. And this I say that the law whiche began 430. yeares after can not disanul the testament before approued of God towards Christ that it should make the promises of none effect These wordes most manifestly declare that the testament which God made with Abraham was pure and absolute without any condition of y◠law Which thing the words of Genesis declare For God once promised vnto Abraham the blessing Afterward was geuen the law which vnto those promises should adde conditions of precepts so that if men would be iustified and obteyne them they should know that they must performe accomplish all the commaundementes of God But this latter way of iustification although it can by no meanes be accomplished can not let or make voyd the first way But that first way was nothing ells but the Gospell thorough Christ And that men should the more willingly come vnto it there was set forth also the latter way of iustificatiō by works that men when they vnderstode that they were not able to performe them should fly vnto Christ of whome when as being iustified they endeuored themselues to liue vprightly they might fréely receaue the promises set forth in the law Now let vs sée what be those conditions which this man ascribeth vnto the Testament of God In the. 103. Psalme it is written The mercy of the Lord is from generation vnto generation vpon them that feare him and his righteousnesse vpon childrens children vpon those which kepe his testament and are mindfull of his commaundements to doe them Of these words Pighius gathereth that the feare of God the mindefulnes of the Testament of God the endeuor to performe his commaundements are the conditions of the promises of God But here I do not a litle meruail y◠Pighius would affirme that a man is iustified by loue whē as he confesseth that the holy scripture attributeth the same vnto feare But we wil not stick with Pighius y◠he be contrary vnto himselfe But if we wil harken vnto the scriptures in y◠33. Psalme Mercy is promised vnto thē that hope For thus it is written And him that hopeth in God mercy shall compasse about Also in an other place it is written he which beleueth shall not be confounded and he which calleth vpon the name of the Lord shall be made safe But who séeth not that all these vertues are in a man already iustified and that God hath mercy vpon him But here lay all the controuersie vnto which of these vertues chiefly iustification is to be ascribed Vndoubtedly by the testimony of the scriptures the same is to be attributed vnto faith Pighius saith moreouer that in that condition which he alleaged is sayde that they should be mindfull of the commaundements of God
of a sharpe witte at the last this he fayneth That God is not knowen by fayth onely but also by loue But who euer would so say but this man onely Vndoubtedly by loue we know not but by loue we loue But that which is spoken in the booke of wisedome whiche yet with me is not of so great authority Christ himselfe hath most manifestly testified in the Gospel saying This is eternall life that they know thee the onely true God Although of this saying also of our sauior Winchester hath fained a new deuise I know not what namely that to know God is not properly eternall life although it somewhat helpe forwarde thereunto But forasmuch as neither the Fathers nor Paul nor Christ himselfe can satisfy these men there is no hope that we shall any thing preuayle with our reasons They adde moreouer That the fathers say that onely faith iustifieth that is is the principallest thing whereby we are iustified I confesse indéede that only sometime signifieth principall But this sense can not agrée with Pauls purpose This word Only some tymes signifieth principall For if charity be compared with faith charity is excellenter and better as Paul sayth Wherefore if both of them iustify as these men will haue it then shoulde charity haue the chiefest part and not faith And this also is a great let vnto these men which I haue oftentimes spoken of that Paul so ascribeth iustification vnto faith that he sayth without workes But Augustine say they vnto Simplicianus writeth That by fayth we beginne to be iustified Vnto this we may answere two maner of wayes first that that beginning is such that in very déede it hath the very full and whole iustification So that Augustines meaning is that we are iustified so soone as we haue faith Or if this please them not we will say as the truth is indéede that Augustine ment of the righteousnes which cleaueth in vs. They cite also Ambrose vpoÌ„ the 5. chapiter vnto yâ— Galathians In Christ c. For saith he we haue nede of fayth onely in charity to iustification Behold say they vnto iustification we haue no lesse nede of charity then of fayth But they are far deceaued For by those words Ambrose ment nothing els but to make a distinction betwene true faith and a vaine opinion Therfore he sayth that we haue néede of faith only namely which is ioyned with charity But Ierome vppon the 5. chapiter vnto the Galathians sayth That it is charity onely which maketh cleane the hart What other thing els shall we here aunswere but yâ— this his saying if it be vrged roughly simply is false For it is faith also which purifieth the hartes as it is written in the Actes of the Apostles And Paul to Timothe sayth Charity out of a pure hart good conscience c. By which words it is playne tâ—at the hart must of necessity first be pure before charity can come Wherefore we will interprete that sentence by the effect and as touching our knowledge For then is it most certayne that we are regenerate and haue a cleane hart when we be endued with charity After this maner also â—aue we before expounded this Many sinnes are forgeuen her because she hath loued much And by the selfe same meanes also may that saying of Augustine in his booke de natura Gratia the 38. chapiter be aunswered vnto It is the charity of God saith he by which onely he is iust whosoeuer is iust But this séemeth vnto me best to vnderstand such sayinges of the fathers of that righteousnes which cleueth vnto vs. For that consisteth not onely of fayth but also of all vertues and good workes But because amongst all vertues charity is the principallest therefore the fathers sometimes Why our righteousnes is attributed sometymes vnto charity attribute righteousnes vnto it onely And that which our aduersaries haue most vniustly vsurped to expound this word Only for principall or chiefe may in this place most iustly serue vs. For here we entreat not of that iustificatioÌ„ which is had by imputation but of that which we attayne vnto after regeneration Wherefore in this our proposition we exclude not from a man that is iustified hope charitie and other good woorkes but this only we say that they haue not the power or cause or merite of iustifieng And when we say that a man is iustified by fayth only we say nothing ells vndoubtedly but that a man is iustified only by the mercy of God and by the merite of Christ only which we can not apprehend We must not leaue oâ— from vsyng this worde Only by any other instrument then by fayth only Neither must we geue place vnto our aduersaries not to vse this worde Only though they cry out neuer so much that of it springeth great offence and mens mindes are by this persuasion somwhat weakned in the excercise of vertues For by sound doctrine we may easely remedy these discommodities For we alwayes inculcate that it is not true iustification or true fayth which wanteth the fruites of good life But we se the subtle and craftie deuise of these men For if we should say that a man is simply iustified by fayth leauing out this word Only Sreight way they would adde of theyr own that a maÌ„ indede is iustified by faith but yet is he no les iustified by hope and charity and other good woorkes For this selfe same cause the Catholikes in times past would not permit vnto the Arrians this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is of like substance bicause they would A like example streight way haue sayd That the sonne indede by appellation or name is GOD like vnto the father in a maner equall vnto him but yet not of one and the selfe same nature and substance Wherefore they did with tooth and naile defend and kepe still this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is of one and the selfe same substance as a word most apt to expresse the truth of that controuersie which they might also by good right doo and chiefely for that they saw that that word was of necessity concluded out of the holy scriptures out of which also is most euidently concluded thys our word Only and is thought of vs a word most mete to confute the errors of those which would haue iustification to come of workes Moreouer Gardiner bishop of winchester counted this our proposition to be absurd and agaynst it amongst other arguments vsed this and it is to me more then wonderfull how much it is estemed of certayne Papists his parasites The righteousnes sayth he that is geuen vs of God wherby we are iustefied pertayneth to all the faculties of the mind or rather to the wholâ— man Ergo we are not iustified by fayth only For that pertayneth only vnto the higher part of the soule Here gentle reader lest thou shouldest be deceaued lieth hidden a double fallace or disceate For first graunt
publique ministers of yâ— Church which he not without iust cause calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yâ— is frée giftes For all these thinges although it seme they may be gotten by humane art and industry yet by our endeuor we shall neuer bring any thing to passe yâ— way vnles we be holpen by the grace of God whereby those thinges which we doo are made profitable and of efficacy For they which are occupied in these offices without the helpe of God may indede winne prayse of men and commendation of the people but they are not able to aduance the saluation of the soules and the commodities of the Church And as touching this matter oftentimes they haue God fauorable prosperous vnto theÌ„ which yet obey him not with a sincere will But this is excedingly to be lamented that this gouernance of the Church is so miserably decayed that at this day not so much as the names of these functions are any where extaÌ„t They haue put in stede of them Taper cariers Accoluthes and Subdeacons which haue light and trifling effects appoynted to them pertayning to theyr supersticious alters Let loue be without dissimulation hating that wbich is euill and cleauing to that which is good Being affectioned with a brotherly loue to loue one an other In geuing honor go one before an other Not slouthfull to do seruice feruent in spirite seruing the time Reioysing in hope patient in tribulation continuing in prayer communicating to the necessities of the Sayntes geuing your selues to hospitality Let loue be without dissimulation Men are of theyr owne nature very prone to hipocrisie Therefore Paul expressedly prohibiteth it For God as Iohn sayth will not that we should loue in woordes in toung but in dede and in truth And Paul to Timothe writeth Loue ought to come from a pure hart and a good conscience and a fayth vnfayned Origen sayth He which loueth God and those thinges which God willeth that man hath loue without dissimulation But he which loueth not either God and those thinges which God willeth he I say loueth not but only dissembleth and pretendeth loue As if a man see his neighbor fallen into some greuous crime doo not admonishe him or reproue him his loue is conterfeate For he willeth not those thinges towardes his neighbor which God willeth The fauor of his neighbor is more deare to him then the will of God Hating that which is euill and cleuing to that which is good Good and euil in this place may signifie profite and disprofite And so the sence here is he loueth Good signifieth two thinges his neighbour without hipocrisie which hateth all thinges whatsoeuer he seeth shal be discommodious and hurtefull vnto him but those thinges which may by any maner of meanes be profitable or commodious vnto him he both vehemently desireth and as much as he can helpeth forward It may be also that Good and Euill signifie honest and dishonest And so they which loue truly abhorre from wicked and filthy woorkes and as much as they can apply themselues to holy and honest woorkes Which is therefore sayd for that some are so foolish that they thinke they loue theyr neighbours when they consent to them in theyr wicked lusts and great extorcions But this is not that loue which the Apostle describeth when he sayth that we ought to abhorre from wickednes and to embrase as much as lieth in vs that which is honest iust Chrisostome noteth that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is hating The affâ—ct of hatred is not in vaine planted in vs. The Stoikes vniustly reiected affectes is spoken with a vehemency For this preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which Paul signifieth vehemency of speach as in the 8. to the Romanes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth not any common but a great and vehement carefulnes and anguish And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth more then to waite for For it signifieth diligently to wait for And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is redemption not euery kinde of redemption but an absolute redemption Moreouer we sée that the affect of hatred is not in vayne planted in our myndes but to the end we should exercise it vpon vices Wherefore the Stoikes vniustly reiected affects For affects are the matter of vertues And as in an harpe when to the wood pegges of bone and stringes are applied number proportion and measure is brought forth a most swéete harmonye so when to these affectes is added the spirite and grace of God of them spring forth notable and excellent vertues But we are in the fault which abuse those giftes of God and hate those thinges which both are honest and please God and contrariwise the thinges which are filthy and displease him we embrace And so peruerse oftentymes is our iudgement that we call good euill euill good Although the nature of the thinges themselues be not chaunged by our iudgement For thinges that are filthy Thinges are not chaÌ„ged by our iudgement are alwayes filthye although we iudge otherwise of them Wherefore he wisely answered 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is That which is filthy is filthy whether thou so iudgest it or no. And this is to be noted that as the Apostle commaundeth vs to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which word as we haue declared signifieth an hatred with vehemency so willeth he vs not simply and absolutely to cleaue vnto God but addeth the particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to be ioyned together not sclenderly but as it were with a strong and indissoluble bond Being affectioned to loue one an other with a brotherly loue In Greke it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 What Storge signifieth in which woords is declared what maner of affect loue is namely a brotherly affect And it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which woord signifieth an affect not comming of election such as are frendshippes which men enter into one with an other but grafted in by nature and therefore so ioyned to our minds that it can neuer in a maner vtterly be shaken of And forasmuch as of these naturall affections there are sondry sortes or kindes for either they are betwene the pareÌ„ts and the children or betwene the husband and the wife or betwene brethern the Apostle mencioneth that kind which most agréed with his exhortacion which he had begonne namely to geue vs to vnderstand yâ— our loue towardes others ought to be a brotherly loue which is therefore more vehement then are common freÌ„dshippes for yâ— these frendshipâ—â—â—e dissolued euen among honest men when they perceiue yâ— theyr frendes haue fallen away froÌ„ iustice are become wicked corrupt But as touching our parents brethern children it is vndoubtedly a griefe vnto vs if we se theÌ„ behaue them selues otherwise theÌ„ we would they should yet is not therfore yâ— affection of our mind towardes theÌ„ extinguished Moreouer in these affections of loue we seke not yâ— in our louing one should recompense an
moued By the first righteousnes the mind of a sinner is pacified wheÌ„ as he beleueth that thorough Christ his sinnes are forgeueÌ„ and so also is it by the second for that our hart accuseth vs not of any crime of any such crime I say which may plucke vs away from God and may wast the conscience After this in order followeth ioy whereby we alwayes reioyce in the Lord and assuredly hope for perfect good thinges and doo now presently fele the same good thinges to be begoone There is a certayne other peace of the flesh which Christ came not to send vpon the earth And touching the ioy of the flesh Christ sayth in Luke Wo be vnto you which laugh now and pronounceth them to be blessed which mourne This particle in the holy ghost is added for that by him all these thinges are geuen vnto vs. Wherefore it is witten in the 5. chapiter to the Galathians The fruites of the spirite are ioy peace and patience But thou wilt paraduenture say Although the kingdome of God as it is sayd be spirituall yet notwithstanding outward thinges also seme to make somewhat eyther with it or agaynst it For they are commonly commended in the Church which liue temperately and they which geue themselues to dronknes and glottony doo greauously sinne That hereof commeth for that whatsoeuer eyther vprightnes or wickednes is in these thinges the same as Christ sayth commeth out of yâ— hart And when Paul saith yâ— the kingdoÌ„ of God is not meat or drinke he most sharpely reproueth those whose bealy is theyr God These are the things whereof the kingdome of Christ consisteth by which also it is confirmed and aduanced In these thinges let vs excercise our selues and let vs decline from those thinges which are contrary to them namely iniustice brawlinges and sorow of the spirite These stronger sorte are in my iudgemeÌ„t greauously reproued in these woords for that they vniustly reiected theyr weake brethern and for that by those theyr vntimely disputations they troubled the common peace and also for that they in liuing licentiously ouer fréely did by theyr exaÌ„ple fill others with sorow For vvhosoeuer in these thinges serueth Christ is acceptable to God and is approued of men The latine interpreter as it should seme red not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is in these thinges but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is in this For he hath thus turned it Qui enim in hoc that is for he which in this which reading Origen followeth and also Ambrose and eyther of them semeth to referre this sentence to the holy ghost as if he should haue sayd he which thorough the holy ghost serueth Christ If we follow this sentence then much more greauously are these coÌ„tencions and brawlings of the Romanes reproued bycause that they semed hereof to spring for that in In what things coÌ„sisteth the true worshipping of God spirite they serued not Christ but attributed to much vnto carnall thinges But we will follow the Greke reading For by it we are with great fruite taught in what thinges the true and proper woorshipping of God consisteth But in the Papacy all thinges are full of dâ—me and supersticious ceremonies He which after this maner woorshipeth God is acceptable vnto him For he worketh those things which without doubt come not of our selues but of God And men will they or nil they shall be compelled to geue testimony vnto the truth The thinges which are An argument takeÌ„ of contraries here promised are most high and most excellent namely that we shall be gratefull and acceptable both to God and to men wherfore of the contrary we may wel conclude that they which are occupied wholy in outward woorshippings in meat and drinke and afflicting of the body shall neyther be gratefull nor acceptable to men that be of an vpright and true iudgement nor also to God And this is that which Paul writeth to Timothe The excercise of the body hath litle commoditte but piety that is the spirituall woorshipping of God stirred vp by fayth loue wherof spring righteousnes peace and ioye auayleth to all thinges as that which hath promises both of this life and of the life to come And Paul so writeth not of the supersticious excercise of the body for otherwise that is vniuersally condemned in the holy scriptures as it is manifest by the second chapiter to the epistle to the ColossiaÌ„s but he speaketh of that which was of many most highly and singularly estemed and reuerenced as though the whole stay and foundacion of all religion consisted in it only Let vs therefore follow those thinges which concerne peace and mutuall edification Destroy not the worke of God for meate sake All thinges indede are pure but it is euill for the man which eateth with offence It is good neyther to eate flesh nor to drinke wine nor any thing wherby thy brother may stumble or be offeded or be made weake Hast thou fayth haue it with thy selfe before God Blessed is he which iudgeth not himselfe in that thing which he alloweth For he that doubteth is condemned if he eate for that he eateth not of fayth For whatsoeuer is not of fayth is sinne Let vs therfore follow those thinges which concerne peace and mutuall edification He auocateth them from thinges vnprofitable to the end they should geue themselues to the principall and chiefe thinges and very sinnewes of the Church namely to peace and to edification Which he declareth are to be followed not lightly or negligently when he sayth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For peace as Origene saith semeth to be driuen away thorough the default of men and to be taken away froÌ„ theyr doinges But the more it flieth away the more earnestly is it to bee followed after yea though it bâ— to the hinderaunce of our commodities After peace he putteth edification for that no man can abide to be instructed of him whome he thinketh to be his enemy Neyther can men be closed together as liuely stones to the building of the church vnlesse they be ioyned together with the glewe of peace and of charitie Neither destroy the worke of God for meate sake Chrisostome calleth the saluation The saluation of men is yâ— worke of God of men the worke of God This doubtles beséemeth vs not that whereas we are the workemen of God to this ende appoynted to be an helpe to him in aduauncing the Gospel we should through our default ouerthrowe that which God will haue to be established For so shall we be rather the workmen of the deuill and of the fleshe then of God But in my iudgement they nothing stray from the meaning of Paul which by the worke of God vnderstande faith although it be weake or a sparke of Christian pietie kindled in the hearts of our brethren which it is our partes by al maner of meanes to cherish and not to oppresse and to extinguish as the Romaines did and especially séeing that
are committed to a mans charge to be caried are commonly sealed vp that it may the certainlier be knowen that they are all whole and without fraude rendred to theÌ„ which ought to haue theÌ„ which seales if they be vnbroken whole theÌ„ is his fidelity yâ— brought theÌ„ discharged Wherfore Paul by this kind of speachment to signifie his innocency simplicitie vpright dealing touching this mooney For meÌ„ are yâ— willinger redier to bestow theyr goods vpon yâ— poore if they vnderstaÌ„d yâ— they shal Almes is called fruit be administred faythfully He here calleth almes by the name of fruite which he before called a communion or communication and that for many and iust causes First for that after the Gospell is sowed and receaued with a pure and liuely faith straight way is geuen iustification before God Then is it requisite that there followe some fruite both of a pure and perfect life and also loue towardes our neighbours that there may be had some assured signification of our inward righteousnes Moreouer those almes are called friute for that such liberality was fruitefull to those nations which dealt so louingly with the poore saynts Last of all that communion semed to bring to them of Ierusalme some fruite of theyr piety For he which putteth his trust in Christ and professeth him when he is in extreante troubles although he haue a reward in heauen yet here also oftentimes when it semeth good to God he reaâ—eth such fruites Further lest the Romanes should suspect that the time would be very long and vncertayne before Paul would come vnto them therefore when he speaketh these thinges he setteth and appointeth a certayne time So soone sayth he as I haue performed this which I am in hand with I will come vnto you Agayne he maketh meÌ„cion of his iorney into Spaine which although he accomplished not yet ought not Paul therefore to be reproued of an vntruth For this is sufficient to discharge his faith that when he wrâ—t those It is not â— lie except it be done with amind to deceiue letters he purposed the same thing is his mind which he wrote For no mortall man hath the euents of thinges in his owne hand But to the full and perfect nature of a lie as Augustine testifieth is required a will to deceaue And thereof we haue a manifest testimony in the latter to the Corinthians The same thing touching this matter writeth Gelasius in the 22. the 2. question For sayth he so much as his will was then to doo he pronounced that he would in dede performe For I know that when I come I shall come to you with fulnes of the blessing of the Gospell of Christ Chrisostome semeth at the first sight to referre this fullnes of blessing to almes for that Paul many times caled them by that name which Almes are a blessing thing I thinke he did according to the custome of the old scripture wherein a gift or reward is oftentimes called a blessing For Iacob desired Esau to vouchafe to receaue the blessing which he had sent before him And Abigail desired Dauid to receaue the blessing which she brought And Dauid sayd to the elders of Iuda Receaue ye the blessing of the pray of the enemies of the Lord. And so the meaning of this place that Paul hopeth that wheÌ„ he shall come to Rome he shall find layd vp with them a great and plentifull almes for the poore which he here calleth a blessing This sence were apt inough but that this woord of the Gospell is added which is a let thereunto After that Chrisostome had peysed that woord he at the length leneth this way to interpretate blessing for the aboundance of all vertues and good A demonstratiue kinde of speach vsed for a deliberatiue woorkes and they without doubt are a most plentifull blessing of the Gospell namely that they which beleue should shine most brightly with excellent woorks Chrisostome also is of this mind yâ— Paul by a certaine spiritual prudence coÌ„mendeth those things in yâ— Romanes wherunto he chiefly exhorted theÌ„ And this is much vsed amongst yâ— best lerned orators to vse a demoÌ„stratiue kind of spech for a deliberatiue kind But Ambrose expoundeth yâ— aboundance of the blessing of yâ— Gospel to be a confirmation of the dectrine of yâ— Gospel by miracles Origen addeth yâ— this pertaineth to yâ— gift of prophesieng as though Paul should prophesie that he should come to Rome with most excellent gifts This exposition disliketh me not and especially when I consider with my selfe those wordes which were before cited out of the 19. chapiter of the Actes For Luke in that place saith that Paule purposed in spirite to goe to Rome And he might boldly promise vnto himself that he should bring aboundaunce of spirituall giftes who knew assuredly that vnto him was graunted the grace of the Apostleship which he doubted not but that it shold amongst them Wherof coÌ„meth the fruite of preaching be fruitfull And I thinke that no man is ignorant but that the fruit of preaching is sometime muche holpen by the piety of him that preacheth and sometimes by the simple and pure faith of the hearers although in very déede all whole ought to be ascribed to the power force and working of God Also brethren I beseche you for our Lord Iesus Christes sake through the loue of the spirit that ye helpe me in my busines with your prayers to God for me That he wold dâ—liuer me from the vnbeleuers in Iury and that this my ministery which I will doe at Ierusalem may be acceptable to the saintes That I may come to you with ioy by the will of God and may together with you be refreshed The God of peace be with you all Amen I beseche you brethren c. The force of this obsecration or prayer is héereby made plaine for that it is set forth not only through the name of our Lorde Iesus Christ then which there ought to be vnto vs nothing more holy but therewithall The spirit of loue also is mingled the loue of the spirite And this particle throughe the loue of the spirite is all one I thinke as if he had sayd through the spirite of loue For as in Esay is mention made of the spirite of strength of wisedome of fear of counsel c. to geue vs to vnderstande that all the excellent faculties or powers of the minde come from the spirite of God so here is mention made of that gifte of the holy Ghost whose helpe Paul most néeded namely that the Romains should with a feruent loue pray vnto God for him Verely the corrupt affects of our vnclene nature doe so draw and plucke vs one from an other that vnles we be holpen by the bond of the holy Ghost we can not be ioyned together with a true and holy society and if that society want then shall there vtterly be no fruit of mutuall prayer It may
bicause of vnbeliefe they were broken of but thou standest by faith Here is geuen the reason of the fall and destruction of men and on the other side of saluation and constancie namely vnbeliefe faith And of the Iewes which should one day be restored he addeth And if they abide not stil in their vnbeliefe they shal be againe grafted in for God is of might to graft thē in Héere we sée that by departing from vnbelief which consisteth in beleuing Hereby is proued that the restoring of thē that fall cōmeth by faith men that haue fallen are restored This maketh very muche against the error of those which although they after a sort confesse that the first iustification is giuen fréely without any workes going before yet vnto men that haue fallen they graunt not restitution vnto iustification but by satisfactions and many workes preparatory These things haue I gathered out of the Epistle vnto the Romanes now will we in order prosecute the other Epistles In the first Epistle to the Corinthians the first Chapter it is thus written bicause the world in the wisedome of God knew not God by wisedome it pleased God by the folishnesse of preaching to saue them that beleue Bicause the wise men of this world saith the Apostle by their naturall searching out could not take hold of the wisedome of God whereby they might be saued God of his goodnesse hath instituted a contrary way namely the preaching of the Gospell which vnto the flesh séemeth foolishnesse that by it saluation should be geuen vnto men but yet not to all sortes of men but to those only that beléeue Wherfore in the .ij. to the Corinthians the. 1. chapter it is thus written by faith ye stand by which wordes we vnderstand that the foundation wherby we are confirmed and established in the way of saluation is faith Farther Paule to the Galathians the .ij. Chapter where he reproueth Peter for his dissimulation wherby he séemed to lead the Gentiles to obserue the Ceremonies of the Iewes thus speaketh If thou being a Iewe liuest after the maner of the Gentiles and not as doe the Iewes why compellest thou the Gentiles to liue as doe the Iewes For we which are Iewes by nature and not sinners of the Gentiles knowe that a man is not iustified by the workes of the law and we beleue in Christ that we might be iustified by the faith of Christ not by the workes of the law because by the workes of the lawe shall no fleshe be iustified Héere we sée that the Apostles therefore folowed Christ y◠they might be iustified by faith which they could not obtaine by works And afterward the life which I now liue in the flesh I liue by the faith of the sonne of God which is all one as if he should haue said As yet in déede sinne sticketh in my fleshe and in it I cary death about but yet notwithstanding I haue life not through mine owne merite but by the faith of the sonne of God In the .iij. chap. he thus wryteth I would know this of you receiued ye the spirite by the works of the law or by the hearing of faith And straight way he addeth he which ministreth vnto you the spirit in you worketh miracles doth he the same by the works of the law or by the hearing of faith By these words we sée that it is faith and not works wherby we take holde of the gifts of God and he addeth ye know that they which are of faith the same are the children of Abraham and that vndoubtedly for no other cause but because in beleuing they imitate him Wherfore sayth he the scripture foreseeing that God would iustifie the Gentiles by faith shewed before hande glad tidings vnto Abraham saying in thee shall all nations be blessed This blessyng spred not abrode vnto them bicause they had their beginning of the flesh of Abraham but bicause they followed the steppes of his faith Otherwise of Abraham as touching the fleshe came not as farre as we can read any other nations then the Ismaelites Edomites and Israelites Then foloweth the conclusion Therefore they which are of faith shal be blessed with faithfull Abraham But to be blessed in the Hebrew phrase is nothing else then to receiue the gifts of God amōgst which iustification is the principallest Wherefore it followeth That vnto the Gentiles through Christ might come the promise made vnto Abraham that we might receyue the promise of the holy Ghost through faith We sée therefore that the promise of the holy ghost is not taken hold of by workes as many faine it is which thing euen reason sufficiently declareth For seing the Lord as it shall a litle afterward be declared had by promise geuen this blessing vnto Abraham we must se what is referred vnto the promise as a correlatiue Which as we haue sayd cā be nothing ells but fayth for fayth setteth forth vnto it selfe the promises of God as an obiect Paul furthermore addeth that the scripture concludeth all thinges vnder sinne that the promise by the fayth of Iesus Christ should be geuen to them that beleue Thys is the cause why y◠holy scriptures so diligently shew vnto men how they be guilty of sinnes namely that they should be the more stirred vp to embrase y◠promises of God at the least way by fayth when as they haue not good workes by which they may take hold of them And this vnderstand we by that which is afterward written The law is our schoolemaister vnto Christ that we should be iustified by fayth These wordes signifie nothing els but that y◠law therfore sheweth sinnes setteth forth vnto mē their infirmity and stirreth vp theyr lustes wherby sinnes are more and more encreased that they being thus admonished should returne vnto Christ and might from him thorough fayth receaue righteousnes Which thing they vndoubtedly did of whome it is sayd Ye are all the children of God by the fayth of Iesus Christ For what is it to be the sons of God but to haue now obteyned adoption which we obteine only by regeneration or iustification And in the 4. chapiter Brethern sayth he we are after Isaake children of the promise But to be children of the promise is nothing ells but to beleue those thinges which God promiseth wherby we are made his children according as he hath promised we should be For so was Isaake borne vnto Abraham not by the strength of nature but by the benefit of the promise of God In the 5. chapter he writeth We in the spirite looke for the hope of righteousnes by fayth In this place are two thinges touched the sprite of God whereby we are new facioned and renewed vnto saluation and fayth wherby we apprehēd righteousnes Wherfore in this matter of our iustificatiō although there be in our minds many ther workes of the holy ghost yet none of them except fayth helpe to iustification Therfore the Apostle concludeth Circumcision is