the straunger vpoÌ„ the way We had well hoped that he should haue ryseÌ„ againe the third day Luke 24. An other opinion is which thinketh that it is one onely argument taken of the sendyng of the holy ghost For none but onely God can geue the holy ghost The sending also of the holy ghost is no small token of the deuine nature of Christ for by it we are made companions of the diuine nature and partakers of the minde of God And thus they frame the wordes that Christ was declared to be the sonne of God in power that is to say to be therby mighty because he sent vpon hys the spirite of sanctification and that from the resurrection of the dead that is after he was raysed vp from the helles For although before also he had geuen the spirit vnto such as beleued yet because it was not done so largely and so aboundaÌ„tly therefore as Iohn also testifieth the spirit was not yet geueÌ„ And Iohn 7. so this argument is taken of the effusion of the holy ghost which effusion although as touching miracles it be not at this day extant yet it so indureth that without it the Church can not consist For regeneration hath no place without the holy ghost I leue to speake of this that some take the resurrectioÌ„ of the dead as touching those which were raysed vp at the death resurrectioÌ„ of Christ wheÌ„ the graues were opened because this agréeth not well with those thinges which afterward shal be spoken But me thinketh that here are touched three principall argumentes wherby Christ is proued to be the sonne of God One is of the Three arguments of the deuinity of Christ miracles and that is signified by this particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is in power For 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with Paule signifieth the working of miracles An other argument is of the resurrection whereby he was raysed from the dead and liueth for euer and wherby we also shall ryse agayne with hym The third argument is of the sending of the holy ghost and these thrée thinges were done according to the order and course of tyme. For Christ whilest he liued wrought very many miracles after his death he was raysed agayne from the dead and after his resurrection sent the holy ghost By whom we haue receaued grace and Apostleship He had before sayd Paule called by Christ vnto the Apostleship what grace is What is the difference betweene the loue of God and the loue of meÌ„ that he was called but he added not by whom Here he expressedly sayth he receaued this of Christ Grace signifieth in the holy scripture cheifely that beâ—enolence fauor wherwith God loueth vs. Wherefore we are wont to call those gracious which are loued of many are also acceptable vnto many But this is the difference they whom we call gracious haue some thing in them whereby they allure men to loue them whether the same be beauty or vertue or any such like thing For men are not moued to loue a man who hath not in him some thing that is worthy to be loued But we can not so say of God because he before all thinges loueth vs and wheÌ„ he hath loued he geueth vnto vs his gyftes whereby he maketh vs both acceptable and worthy of loue And if we should affirme otherwise God should not be counted the author of all thinges For by that meanes we should put some thing to be in vs before we were loued of him which should allure him to loue vs and so of a creature we should make a creator The definition of grace in affirming that we haue something which depeÌ„deth not of God Wherefore grace signifieth the liberall fauour and good will of God which he fréely beareth vnto vs for Christes sake And this may be taken eyther generally so that it is afterward contracted by adding thys namely the office of an Apostle or els it signifieth in this place a gift and faculty fréely geueÌ„ vnto Paule which faculty is straytway expressed when he addeth And Apostleship to the obedience of fayth He addeth the ende whereunto The ende of the Apostleship the faculty of the Apostleship pertayneth namely to obey fayth And this may be done two maner of wayes either in receauing faith for it forasmuch as it is a firme assent which is geuen vnto the wordes of god may be called obedience as Paule wrote vnto the Corrinthyans that he had spirituall armors Obedience of sayth wherewith he would make captiue all vnderstaÌ„ding vnto the obedience of god Or els it may be vnderstand of a good life and holynes of maners which follow fayth whyles we expresse the might of our fayth by honest actions For his name We execute not the office of an Apostle for our owne gayne or glory but for the name that is for the glory and prayse of Christ Iesu in al nacions And in that he addeth in all nacions he sheweth that the office of the Apostles was not contract to certayne limites but that they should throughout the whole world preach the word committed vnto them and found Churches and bringe disciples vnto Christ In which ye also are the called of Iesus Christ Although ye be Lordes ouer all yet neuertheles ye are in the number of other nacions He calleth them the called of Christ because without calling they had not come vnto him Neyther Called is not here a participle but a now â—e vsed he the participle which hath the signification of tyme and that to the ende he would wish them constancye and stability in the purpose which they had taken in hand as though they had not a temporall calling but a firme constant And in that he so often vseth the name of calling he sufficiently declareth what maner of thing our conuersation is when we embrace Christ It is vndoubtedly voluntary and not compelled nor violent We are perswaded when we are with efficacy called by the inward word of God Here is the ende of the pareÌ„thesis which began at these words which he had before promised by his prophetes Now commeth the second part of the salutation of the epistle wherein are expressed the men whom he saluteth when he sayth Whome he seluteth The Church of Rome consisted of many nacions To all which are at Rome the beloued of God Sainctes by calling He saluteth all the Romaines because at Rome the church consisted not only of towne borne men but also of an innumerable company of straungers which were partlye Iewes and partly Grecians Therfore Paul maketh the salutacion common vnto theÌ„ all so the they beleue in Christ To the beloued of God he sayth which worde ought to admonish that beleuers to loue one an other for how can I not loue him whome I beleue is loued of God He rightly calleth them the beloued of God not those which loue God because it is he which loueth vs first And
was like a sheepe led to the death yet he opened not his mouth But in all these thinges vve are conquerors 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is we are notably ouercome This particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in this place nothing pertayneth vnto workes of supererogation For Paul ment nothing ells but that so much strength are geuen vs of God that in this battayle we a greate way ouercome all our enemies The deuills practise is this by these aduersities to wrest from vs our confidence and loue towardes God But that is by this meanes rather encreased For tribulation worketh patience patience worketh experience experience hope â–ª And hope confoundeth not But by what strengths we attayne vnto this victorye Paul streight way declareth sayeng Thorough him vvhich loued vs. Before we loued him And he hath geuen vnto vs his spirite Thorugh whome we obteine this excellente victory otherwise of our selues we are farre vnequall for so greate a battayle It is God as Chrisostome wisely noteth whome we haue to our fellow souldier in this battail We haue God to our fellow souldiour in our torments and by that meanes obteyne we so notable a victory Nether doo we only ouercome troubles whatsoeuer they be but also those which persecute vs though they seme neuer so great and mighty which thing how it happened in the Apostles Luke playnly describeth in the Actes When Peter and Iohn had wrought a miracle so manifest that it could not be denied the high priestes and Scribes being ouercome with the greatenes of the thing knew not what counsell to take What sayd they shall we do with these men As if they should haue sayd Here are playnly ouercome all our practises here our power is able to doo nothing here the more we striue the more and the manifestlier are we ouercome The same thing happened vnto Iulianus the Apostata as it is written in the Ecclesiasticall history He had begon by al maner of meanes to torment and vexe the ChristiaÌ„s but his cruelty and outrageousnes was ouercome with theyr patience Which thinge one of his rulers perceauing priuilye admonished him to cease lest he should both nothing at all profit and also make himselfe a laughing stocke to al men Thys power of God bringeth to passe that by those selfe same thinges which are agaynst the victory we to the greate admiration of all men obteyne the notabler victory For who can beleue that he which is ouercome can ouercome That one slayne burnt torne in peces can in the battayle get the victory These things nature reason and the world vnderstand not wherefore they are to be ascribed vnto God only in whose haÌ„ds forasmuch as the euentes of things are set they depend not of certayne and appoynted instrumentes but of the purpose and counsell of God whereunto those thinges which seme to resist are most of all seruisable Some seme thus to vnderstand this place as though therefore we obteyne so notable a victory for that we are by the greatnes of the benefits of God pricked forward to suffer all things be they neuer so hard And the greatnes of of the giftes of God is by this meanes chiefely knowen if it be compared How the greatnes of benifites is best known with those thinges whiche agayne on the other side we repaye He which died for vs saith Ambrose gaue his life for euill seruauntes why should we then make it so great a matter when we being vnprofitable seruauntes suffer death for a good Lorde And moreouer his death was wonderfull profitable vnto vs all when as coÌ„trariwise our death nothing at all profiteth him And so after this interpretacioÌ„ we must not read That vve by him vvhich hath loued vs are more then conquerors but for him Which reding yâ— Latine translatioÌ„ followeth But in Greke is red 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Whiche preposition ioyned with a genetiue case doth not or very rarely signify For. Wherfore it is more apt to say by him or thorough him as we expounded it at the beginning And so doth Basilius to Amphilochia De spiritu sancto the 8. chap. rede it In which place he at large declareth what this preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth when it is attributed vnto Christ It maketh him not sayth he lesse then the father but maketh hym to be a mediator betwene vs and the father as by whome is deriued into vs from the father whatsoeuer giftes or graces we haue and by whome â–ª hath accesse vnto the father whosoeuer commeth vnto him For the electes and sayntes are taken of Christe and being now reconciled are offred vnto God the father And in the declaratioÌ„ of these thinges he alledgeth those wordes which we are nowe in hand with and interpretaâ—eth them so as we haue sayd For I am perswaded that nether death nor life Chrisostome thinketh yâ— Paul hitherto hath entereated of that loue wherwith God loueth vs but here turneth his speach to our loue and obeysance towardes God as though he would say that the loue of God is so kindled in the hartes of the godly that no creature Why Paul most constantly loued Christ can plucke him away from God And he rendreth a reason why Paul so cleued vnto Christ that be could not be pulled away froÌ„ him Bycause sayth he he loued Christ himselfe and not those giftes which Christ geueth So long as the foundation of amâ—ty abideth so long it also constantly endureth And therefore are those amities commended What manner of amities are to be commended which are gounded not vpon a vayne and mutable consideration but vpon a firme and sure consideration wherefore forasmuch as Paul sought Christ himself which alwayes abideth the same and immutable therefore his loue towards him abode firme and constant wherfore it had ben vnto him to fal away from Christe more griefe theÌ„ hell fire and on the other side to cleue fast vnto him more pleasaÌ„ter theÌ„ any kingdoÌ„e Howbeit I thinke this to be most true yâ— Paul stil coÌ„tinueth in yâ— which he had begon namely to coÌ„meÌ„d the singuler loue of God towardes vs that we might assuredly know yâ— all things though they be neuer so much against vs shall turne vnto vs to good seing we are so entirely loued of God But whether of these interpretacioÌ„s we follow I thinke it skilleth not much for either of them is both godly and also not vnaptly fitteth with the wordes and entent of Paul Howbeit I thought it good to declare what I thinke to be moste agreable 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith the Apostle that is I am fullye persuaded If thou séeke a reason thereof hee geeueth a reason demonstratiue whiche is For that God hath foreknowne vs and predestinate vs. And these are causes of the loue of God towardes vs. This declareth he by the effect for that the Reasons of causes and effectes that we are loued of God most louyng father hath geueÌ„ his sonne for our sakes and together
Moses semed by theyr sorceries to raise vp new creatures But I thinke that this exposition Iannes and Mambres is more simple to saye that Paul in this clause would finishe the induction which he had begon For when we vse an induction and haue gathered together many perticuler thinges we adde at the last that all other things are in the same sort to finish vp the reason which otherwise should be vnperfect So Paul whē by an Antithesis he had in a maner reckoned vp all thinges added to shut vp the reason And if there be any other creature besides these yet can not it seperate vs frō the loue of God Which is in Christ Iesus our Lord. This is added that we should not think that we are for our owne sakes loued of God For of our selues we are odious vnto hym seing that we are contaminated with originall sinne which we haue contracted frō Adam and also by many other sinnes which we moreouer commit And that there was nothing which could plucke away Paul from the loue of God Chrisostome hereby coniectureth for that for Gods honor sake he refused not to be cast into hel fire And this he addeth That it is the property of a wise mā neuer to seke to depart frō his father although he be sō what sharply chastised of him For he which cleueth A similitude vnto God is couered with his loue beneuolēce is lyke a square stone which whiche way so euer it fall falleth right By this reasoning of Paul we may easely gather y◠The church shall neuer fall away from God the Church shal neuer vtterly fall away frō God neither shall there euer come any euils of so great might that they can vtterly ouerthrow it Which thing Christ in other wordes promised vnto Peter saying The gates of hell shall not preuayle agaynst it For it is as it were a certayne moste strong rocke whiche although it be striken with waues and floudes yet can not be moued out of this place For the church pertayneth to predestination and hath to hys protection the loue of God Wherfore no creature is able to preuayle against it The ninth Chapter I Speake the truth in Christ I lye not my conscience bering me witnes in the holy Ghost that I haue great heauines and continuall sorrowe in my hart For I would wish with my self to be seperate from Christ for my brethren that are my kinsmen according to the flesh which are the Israelites to whom pertaineth the adoption and the glorye and the couenantes and the geuing of the lawe and the worshippinge and the promises Of whom ar the fathers and of whō concerning the flesh Christ came who is God ouer all blessed for euer Amen The beginning of this chapter is after diuers maners annexed to those thinges which haue bene before spoken For Chrisostome as we haue declared thinketh that Paules meaning is earnestly to shew how firmly he was knit vnto the loue of God namely that for Gods sake he was ready with gladnes to suffer euen to perish But others thinke that this new speache of the Apostle doth hereof arise because before he said that those whom God had chosen could by no violence be seperated from his loue Wherefore it might seme wonderfull how the nation of the Hebrues could be reiected from God which onely nation God before all other nations had chosen Wherefore say they the Apostle straight way added that not al the Iewes did pertayne vnto the election of God and that their fall was not against the decrees of God But in my iudgement the Apostle séemeth in a maner to begin a new matter to entreate of For hetherto he hath proued that iustification commeth not of humaine wisdome nor philosophie nor also of our workes nor by the obseruation of the law but onelye by the faith of Christ But there remayned two other thinges of great weyght which it behoued him to discusse to make plaine For by these two things men were exceedingly moued so that if the Apostle had not throughly answered vnto them he might seme to haue spent his labour in vayne The one of them was that the promise of saluation was made vnto the posteritie of Abraham and vnto the seede of Israell But now for as much as that kinde of men receaue not the fayth in Christ of necessitie it followeth either that the promise of God is vayne or if the Iewes be saued then may iustificatiō be without faith in Christ The second was there was neuer at any time in any nation so great righteousnes so great an endeuour of pietie so diligent an obseruation of the law as was amongest the Iewes And it were absurd if we should say that God would not embrace such kinde of righteousnes which excelled the vprightnes of all nations These are two such thinges that of them no man can doubt namelye that the promises of God are firme and that an vpright iustice is acceptable vnto God Vnto these thinges Paule answereth in these three chapiters following First he sayth that the promises were made vnto the elect of God and he addeth that the externall people of Israell were not in very dede that people vnto whom were A distinctiō of the people of Israell made the promises as pertayning to the whole number which thing he proueth by testimonies of the scriptures Wherefore though the Iewes were blinded sayth he it followeth not thereof that the promises of God are vaine Afterward he maketh a distinction of righteousnes so that one is outward which A distinctiō of righteousnes consisteth in rites and workes and an other inwarde which consisteth in spirite and in fayth The first righteousnes sayth he God nothing regardeth but the latter is it wherein onely he is delighted and which he continuallye embraceth and of that were the Iewes voyde And therefore God nothing esteemed theyr outward righteousnes These things are entreated of in the .ix. and .x. chapters But in the .xi. least the Iewes should thinke them selues vtterlye reiected Paule addeth that of that people there remained some remnaunts which in successe of time should be brought vnto Christ But as touching the .ix. chapter the Apostle keepeth this order First forasmuch as it shoulde be verye bytter vnto the The Methode of the 9. chapter Iewes to heare that the promises of God shoulde not pertayne to their stocke and that they them selues should not be counted of the nomber of the elect Paul sheweth that he could not consider these thinges with himselfe but wyth great griefe and that he was ready to redeme this calamitie euen with his owne eternall destruction by which woordes he playnlye declareth that he speaketh not these thinges agaynst his own nation of hatred towardes them Then draweth he nere to the very matter and confesseth that the promises of God are firme but they pertayne not to the carnall propagation Which thing he proueth by a most manifest example of
depth of the wisedome of the riches c. The twellth chapiter Thys controuersy being thus taken vp he beginneth hys twelueth chapiter wyth an obsecration wherein he requireth vs to offer our bodyes a sacrifice most acceptable to God and to approue the wyll of God and to haue a care that we agree on with an other forasmuch as we are one body and one an others members He commendeth also vnto vs the loue of our enemyes In the thirtenth chapiter he willeth vs to be subiect vnto the Magiestrates to The thirtenth chap. The fourtene chap. loue our neighbours to liue iustly and to put on Christ In the fourtenth chapiter he commendeth vnto vs those that are weake in fayth that we should louingly beare wyth them and that we should as much as is possible see that concord be kept euen towards those which haue but small knowledge that we should beare with them and to take hede that through our default they be not offended And on the other syde he commaundeth the weake ones not rashly to iudge the stronger sort In the fiuetenth chapiter he exhorteth to this selfe same thing by an example of The fiftene chapiter Christ who bare vpon hym our contumelies and punishments and communicated hymselfe not only to the Iewes but also to the Gentiles He wisheth vnto the Romanes the holyghost and rendreth vnto them a reason why he wrote those letters vnto theÌ„ he promiseth vnto them hys commyng desireth them to pray for hym that he myght be deliuered from the vnbeleuers amongst the Iewes which sought hys destruction In the sixtenth chapiter being also the last he commendeth vnto the Romanes The sixtene chapter Phebe an holy woman by whome he had sent vnto them these letters He most curteously saluteth a great many and admonisheth them to beware of those which vse doctrine for the commodity of their belly and for filthy gayne sake This is a briefe The readers ought not to be offeÌ„ded with Pauls maner of speakyng Augustine in his boke de doctrina Christiana attributetheÌ„ vnto Paul a certayne eloquence and manifest summe of this whole epistle which being set forth vnto vs we shall the more redely interprete euery thing particularly But still there are many which therfore abhorre from the reading of Pauls epistles for that he semeth to speake so rudely and barbarously that he filleth the readers with tediousnes neither can men easely come to the sence of them Vnto these men we answere that Pauls phrase of speach if we beleue Augustine in hys fourth booke de doctrina Christiana is not vtterly wythout iust order of speaking Not that he sought after eloquence but for that eloquence followed his wisedome For he is iudged to speake aptly which taketh vpon hym to entreat of thynges most excellent and speaketh all those thinges which are necessary neither entreateth of them otherwise then behoueth Chrisostome in hys tourth booke de Sacerdotio is of the same myde with Augustine where he maketh a distinction of eloquence that one is deceatfull whereat men Chris 〈…〉 are amased when they see that thinges of no force are extolled and things high are plucked downe This eloquence vseth coloures and deceat Thys eloquence finde we not in Paul There is an other eloquence which is of much force to establishe doctrines and most constantly to defend the truth and with this chiefly was the Apostle endewed Wherefore let vs not in him require the pleasant spech of Isocrates the high stile of Demostenes the excellent dignity of Plato or the reuereÌ„d maiesty of Theucidides but a bare and simple oration which coÌ„tayneth the knowledge of thinges most chiefe and most strongly confirmeth that which it taketh in hand They which are slouthful and sluggish pretend at theyr pleasure the vn skilfullnes of Paul namely lest doctrine should be required at theyr hands wheÌ„ as Paul as they thinke without it gouerned the Church But let these men take Paul 〈…〉 able to 〈…〉 his audi 〈…〉 ry a lonâ— reason hede and consider how they deny that Paul was endewed with sharpnes of wit and vehemency of speach when as in the Actes of the Apostles the 9. chapiter it is written that in the Sinagoges he confounded the Iewes and vtterly vanquished them in his disputacions And in the 17. chapiter it is written that he so taught that he coÌ„tinued his preaching euen beyond midnight as when Eutichus The eloquence or Paul brauâ— aâ— ad 〈…〉 to men a young man being ouercome with slepe fel out of a window into a parler How was it possible that he should so long time retayne his auditory if he spake so barbarously or vnaptly as these men imagine he did It is manifest by the selfe same chapiter that he delt at Athenes with the Stoykes and Epicures there is none which is in his right wittes which will not wonder at his preaching which is described that he had there He was also of the men of Licaouia taken for Mercury by reason of his eloquence of speach And if thou say these thinges indede are true for that such giftes were brethed into him by the holy ghost let it be so as thou sayst therefore his phrase of speach is not to be reproued as a thing euery way vnapt and barbarons And yet doth it not thereof follow that therto he added no endeuor at al to speake aptly He was very diligeÌ„t in reding and writing which is hereby proued for that being at Rome and being there a He did 〈…〉 to some â—duâ—try in speakyng writyng prisoner he desired Timothe to cause to be sent vnto him a sachell with bookes and parchment For although he were a captiue yet he would not want the benefit of studieng And the same Paul writeth to Timothe to gene himselfe to reading Which thing if thou doo sayth he thou shalt saue thy selfe and those also which heare thee Doubtles he would not haue exhorted his scholler to those thinges which he himselfe would not do By all these thinges it is manifest that Paul wrote not without diligence and vigilant studie Yea he not without greate fruite attained vnto thre principal poynts pertayning to eloquence namely to Thre principal pointâ— of true eloquence deliuer good and holy doctrine and to confirme the same honestly and holily to engender delectacion by aclene and pure kind of speach and lastly to how the harts of the hearers which way he will Agaynst these thinges Origen continually complayneth that Paul hath often Origene darke and vnorderly speaches and imperfect and mained sentences and other such like kindes of defects Ierome is diuers for somtimes he taketh away from Ierome him the strength and art of Rethoricke and sometime he attributeth it vnto him and especially vpon the sixth chapiter to the Balathians he writeth that Paul in dede in his owne toung was very skillful but in a strange toung he was not able to bring forth depe
wyth the admiration of that art that they litle geue hede to the matter and wisedome which is set forth vnder the ornaments of Rethoricke Moreouer thys is to be added that Paul was the Apostle of hym that was crucified and preached Christ crucified vnto whom were not meat the ornaments and goodly shewes of words least the power of the crosse should be abolished For thys was to be taken hede of that it should not be ascribed to humane wisedome that men were drawen vnto Christ Neyther wil I casely graunt that Paul had no care at all in the placing of hys words and sentences when as hys words are euery where sharpe neyther can there lightly be found more vehement wordes so that Ierome who sometymes accuseth the negligent speach of the Apostle confesseth that when he readeth hym he heareth not wordes but thunders and Paul had without Ierome Why he vseth Hebrue phrases doubt vsed thys way greater diligence if he had knowen that the same should more haue conduced to saluation And whereas it was obiected that the Apostle so spake Greke that a man might casely know that he was an Hebrew it is not to be wondred at for as much as the Church at that tyme consisted both of the Hebrewes and of the Ethnikes which church for that it dayly vsed the scriptures turned into the Greke tonge it had learned so to speake of thynges diuine that it did not much disagree from the Hebrew maner and phrases of speach wherefore Paul is not to be reproued for vsing towards the Church of Christ such a kynd of speach which was both Greke and also sauored somewhat of the naturall tonge wherein the oracles of God were set forth The Apostle say they findeth fault wyth hys vnskilfulnes of speach he semeth indeed to do so but if a man more diligently weigh the thyng Whether Paul foun◠fault wyth his vnskilfulnes he shall see that Paul when he sayd Although vnskifull in speach yet not vnskilfull in knowledge spake thus by way of graunting not that he acknowledgeth great faults in the speach breathed into hym by the holy ghost but he defendeth hymselfe from false Apostles which sayd that hys epistles were of great wayght and strong but hys phrase of speach when he was present was but weake Amitte sayth he that I am but of small force as touching my phrase of speach wyll they also take away frō me the knowledge of things doubtles although he semed to those which were strangers frō Christ to speake foolishnes yet notwithstāding they which belonged to Christ indged those things which he spake to be most high wisedome as they were in very deede And when we affirme that the writings of Paul want not eloquence which yet he sought not after but it folowed hym in speaking yet meane Good arres are not to be contemned of those which prepare themselues to the ministery we in no wyse to feare away men from y◠study of good artes Yea rather we geue thē counsell that they most diligently apply thēselues vnto them that afterward whē they come to teach Christ earnestly they may help them euen when they thinke not of them For thys is not to be suffred in a preacher of the Gospel that when he writeth or speaketh he should addict hys mynde to the preceptes of these artes but if he be instructed wyth them it shall be free for the holyghost to vse them when he shall thynke good This only ought to be the worke of the preacher to set forth Christ and hys word And if he be well learned the force of good artes wyll follow hym whether he wyll or no. But if preachers shall eyther in wryting or speaking labour for finesse ornaments of Rhetoricke they shall waxe colde as touchyng matter For the mynde of man is not able at one tyme with a singular sharpenes to applye it selfe to two thinges Therefore we sometymes see preachers well learned in arts deale very coldly contrary wyse such as are not so well learned handle theyr matters wyth greater vehemency But if that measure be kept which I haue set forth an vntruth though it be garnished and fensed wyth good artes shall take no place and the truth though it be vnarmed and weake and without any ornament shal be made manifest These artes are placed in the midst therefore we may make them to do Christ seruice and to loose them from the bondage of the deuill so that as Origen sayd The heathen woman haue her nailes payred her heare cutte and her garment chaunged By all those thynges we gather that the phrase of speach of Paul is not of that nature that it ought to feare vs away from the reading of these epistles But let vs on the other side consider what pricketh vs forward wyth singular diligence to read thys epistle to the Romaynes In it is set forth the controuersy of iustification a matter of great wayght and such as not only at that tyme very much Why this epistle is most diligently to be red vexed the Church of Christ but also in our tyme vexeth it and doubtles it is of that sort that there is nothyng more mete whereby to impell men vnto Christ And besides that the thinges which are here written are dedicated to the people of Rome whose empire extended farre euen throughout the whole world wherfore it much made to the saluation of the whole world what kind of religion they should receaue For the nations vnder them commonly wyth great endeuor imitated In teaching the Romanes he instructed the whole worlds the orders rules maners and religion of their Princes Wherefore when he taught the Romanes he in a maner instructed the whole world of which thyng the deuill was not ignorant For he left no stone vnturned to infect that citie with corrupt doctrine To the accomplishing of this he instigated false Apostles and wicked preachers which with the preposterous ceremonies of Moses obscured the glory of Christ Neyther is it of small force to the setting forth of the worthines of thys epistle that Paul himselfe both was and was borne a citizen of Rome Wherefore he was bound and that by no small bond of loue to fauor these men best next to the Hebrews Paul loued the Romanes best next to the Hebrues In what thyng al mē agre and in what they disagree How the excellenter sort of men thought they should attayne to blessednes What was the opinion of the common people The people of the Hebrues as a meane betwene both Paul ouerthroweth all those thinges Now let vs come nerer to the matter It is certayne that all men desire the extreame and chiefe good thing but they are deceaued for that they somtimes place it in the riches plesures and good things of this world But agaynst these mē there nedeth no long disputacion for they are sufficiently confuted euen of y◠philosophers and of them that are but meanely learned
not in the sonne hath euerlasting life 19 a Now you are cleane because of my word 80. b That we haue obtained grace for grace 145. a The pore ye shal haue alwaies with you 200. a Beholde I am with you to the end of the world eodem The bread which I will geue is my flesh 201. b To as many as receiued him he gaue them power to be made the sonnes of God 205 That that might be fulfilled which was spoken 325. b I geue you a newe commaundement 283. a Who so euer the father hath geuen me no man can take away 308. b The world cā not hate you 341 All things were made by it 360 This is eternall life that they acknowledge thee the onely true God and whome thou hast sent Iesus Christ 392. a This is the work of God that ye beleue in him whome he hath sent 406 a Howe can ye beleue when ye seke glory at mens hāds 394 Receiue ye the holy ghost c. 361 Are there not .xij. houres in the day 420. b Actes YE men of Athens I shewe vnto you that God whom ye ignorantly worship 181 Beholde God hathe geuen to thee all that sail with thee 41 That the scriptures should be fulfilled 308. a Repent and be baptized euery one of you 364. b By faith purifying their hearts 392. a 1. Corinthians IF I haue all fayth so that I can remoue mountains 393 The temple of God is holy 5 They did all eat the same spirituall meat 81. b They were all baptised in the cloud and in the sea eodem They dranke of the spirituall rocke following them 81. b Your children are holy 133. b The dart of sinne is death 139 The rocke was Christ 199. b I chasten my body and bryng it into bondage 309. b To them that are called bothe Iewes and gentiles Christ the sonne c. 297. b That the beleuers stād by faith 355. a He that standeth let him take take hede that he fal not 〈…〉 d. Diuiding to euery one particularly as pleaseth him 〈…〉 a 2. Corinthians EVen whom the God of this world hath blineded 28. b Ye are the Epistle of Christe wrote by our ministery and written not with ink c. 49. b I know none as touching the fleshe 241. b Not in tables of stone but in fleshy tables 43. b What great care it hath wrought in you yea what clearing of your selues 166. a Therefore we after this know none according to the flesh 241 The God of this worlde hath blinded the heartes of the vnbeleuers 28. b Thou standest by faith 390. b Galathians HOw are ye againe turned to the weake and beggerly elements of the world 82. b He which is circūcised is debter to obserue the whole law 86. a The lawe was put because of transgressors 90. a As it pleased him which seperated me c. 2. b Although it be but a testament of a man yet when it is confirmed no man reiecteth it or addeth any thing to it 62. Curssed is he that abideth not in all the things that are written in the boke of the law 89 I would to God they whych trouble you were cut of 345. a Considering thy self least thou also be tempted 356. b The scripture hath shut vp all things vnder sinne 365. b The ende of the law is Christ 385. b The lawe is our scholemaister vnto Christ 391. a By the law no man is iustified before God 410. a Ephesians BY grace ye are made safe throughe faith and not of our selues 391. a We also were by nature the children of wrath c 102. b Who hath predestinated vs according to purpose 225. a Not of workes leaste any man should glory 376. b By whome we haue accesse by fayth 269. a Phillippians CHriste was in the similitude of men 194. b Taking vpon him the shape of a seruaunt 1. b We are the circumcision 49. b Yea I think al things but losse for the excellent knowledge of Iesus Christ 158. b With fear and trembling work your saluation 384. a Colossians WE are circūcised in Christ by the washing away the synnes of the flesh 81. b In whome ye are circumcysed with circumcision not made with hands 85. a Mortify your members which are vpon the earth 411. b Thessalonians THis is the wil of God your sanctification 269. a 1. Timothe I Obtayned mercy for that I did it ignorantly and of infidelitie 2. b Saue that which is geuen thee to kepe 3. b Vnto the iust man the lawe is not geuen 59. b God wil haue all men to be saued 269. a Adam was not deceiued 100. a Which is the sauior of all men 306. b They that minister well gette vnto them selues a good degree 350. a The elders are worthy double honor 428. b 2. Timothe I Haue from my progenitors worshipped God with a pure conscience 8. a All scripture inspired by God is profitable to teache and to reproue c. 96. b I know whome I haue beleued and I am assured 101. a In my first defence no mā was on my side all men forsooke me God graūt it be not imputed c. 103. a I haue fought a good battaile I haue finished my course c 158. b He which shall purge him selfe shall be a vessel to honor 255. Of whome is Himeneus and Alexander which haue made shipwracke as concernynge faith 404. b Titus THey cōfesse that they know God but in dedees they deny him 396. b Hebrues IN that he sayth now he hath abolished that whiche was before But that which is abolished and waxen olde is euen at hand to vanishe away 82. a Be not wanting to the grace of God 141. a With such sacrifices is god won as by merite 159. b The saints by fayth haue ouercome kingdomes 391. b It is impossible for those which haue once bene illuminated 266 Faith is a substance of thinges to be hoped for 368. b S. Iames. MAn is iustified by works and not of faith only 69. a God tempteth not vnto euil 28 Patiēce hath a perfect work 100 Let no man when he is tempted say that he is tempted of God 269. a Abraham was he not iustifyed by his workes 74. b He that cometh to God ought to beleue c. 399. b 1. Peter CHaritie couereth the multitude of sinnes In the power of God are ye kept to saluation by faith 291 When once the long suffring of God abode in the dayes of Noe. 401. 1 Be ye subiecte for the Lordes sake 427. a S. Ihons epistle HE which is borne of God sinneth not 149. a Perfect loue driueth forth fear 280. b. 383. a God gaue them power to be made the sonnes of God 382. b He that loueth not abydeth in death 397. a Euery one which beleueth that Iesus Christ is born of god 391. b This is the victory that ouercometh the world our fayth eodem We haue an aduocate with the father Iesus Christ 65. a Ther are .iii. things which bear
witnes bloude water and the spirite 79. b Herein is charity perfect in vs that in the day of iudgment we haue confidence 383. a Iude. ANd Enoch the seuenthe frō Adam prophesied of such saying beholde the Lorde commeth c. 403. a Apocalips CHrist shal raigne a thousand yeares with his saints 88 Behold I stand at the dore and knock And if any man open vnto me I will enter in and sup with him 384. a Take vengaunce vpon the earth for our bloud 345. b Vntill he put his enemies vnder his feete 360. b Holde faste that thou hast least an other receiue thy crowne 347. b ⧠Common places Of Iustification 367 Of Predestination 285 ⧠The first Chapter PAule the seruaunt of Iesus Christ called to the office of an Apostle put aparte to preach the Gospell of God which he before had promised by his Prophets in the holy Scriptures of hys son which was begotten of the seede of Dauid as touching the fleshe and declared to bee the sonne of God with power according to the spirite of sanctification in that Iesus Christ our Lord rose agayne frō the dead by whō we haue receaued grace and the office of an Apostle to be obedyent to fayth amonge all nations in hys name of the number of whome ye also are the called of Iesus Christ To all you which are at Rome the beloued of God called Sainctes grace and peace to you from God the father and from the Lord Iesus Christ As touchynge the saluation fyrste we muste note who it is that wryteth Three things to be considered in this salutation it secondlye to whome it is written lastly what maner of good thinges hee which saluteth wisheth vnto them It is Paule which saluteth the Romanes are they whom he saluteth and the good things which he wisheth thē are grace and peace indeede the chiefest thinges which of men can bee attayned vnto Rhethoriciās precepts concernyng Prohemes are here obserued Rhetoricians vse in theyr Prohemes to gette vnto them selues authoritie diligent hearing and beneuolence which thinge the holy Ghoste here fullye performeth For whilest that Paule doth adorne him selfe with these titles he winneth vnto him selfe authoritie and he also when he maketh mencion what are the thynges that hee will entreate of maketh the mindes of the readers attentiue And in wyshing vnto them such excellent good thinges and opening hys great loue towardes them he obteyneth theyr good will For by that meanes are they drawen to loue agayne such a man which so well wisheth vnto them Why he is so lōg in his salutation If any man thinke that thys salutation is more full of wordes then nedeth they must remember that Paul was greuously accused of false Apostles that he had fallen from the lawe and agreed not with the other Disciples of the Lorde and that hee was not to be counted for an Apostle which had not bene conuersant with the Lorde in the fleshe as the other Apostles were To all these false accusations it was necessary to aunswere euen in hys Proheme that he might haue the better eare geuen vnto hym As touching hys name I will nothing speake for I know that the elders dyd not rashlye geue names But because the holy Scripture testifieth not for what cause he was eyther called Saule in the Iewishe religion or Paule after hys conuersion I will omitte coniectures neither will Paule claimeth vnto himself thre titles The propriety of a seruaunt I stand about thys thing In hys superscription hee setteth forth three titles wherby he beautifieth hys name the fyrst is The seruaunt of Iesus Christ and that name is common vnto all the faythfull And the propertie of a seruant is thys not to bee hys owne man but to doe the busines of hys maister Wherfore if we be the seruauntes of Christ thys is required of vs that what soeuer we liue breath and thinke be directed vnto Christ And in these wordes are false Apostles reproued which sought their owne thinges to satisfie the bellye and to increase their gaine and they wanne not men to Christ but rather to Moyses or to them selues For as much as to be the seruauntes of Christ is as we haue sayde a thing cōmon vnto vs all let vs diligently consider the Metaphore wherby we are so called namely because we ought so to obey God as seruauntes do their maisters But we are farre of frō performing it For seruaūtes do spēd the Note wherein the most part of men differeth from the seruice of God least parte of the daye about theyr own busines and all the rest of the tyme they are occupyed about their maisters affayres But we do farre otherwise We are a very short space or an houre of our time occupied about things pertaining to God but al the rest of the time that is graūted vs we spēd about thinges humaine and earthly A seruaunt hath nothyng of hys owne nor proper vnto hym selfe but we doo priuatly possesse many thynges whiche we will neither bestowe for Gods sake nor for Christes sake Seruauntes when they are beaten and strikē do humbly desire pardō and forgeuenes of their masters but we in aduersities resiste God murmure agaynst hym and blaspheme hys name Seruauntes do receaue onely meate and drinke and apparell and therewith are content but we neuer come to any ende or measure of heapyng vp of wealth and riches Seruaunts when they heare the threatnynges of their maisters do tremble frō top to toe but we are nothyng moued with the threatnynges of the Prophetes Apostles and holy Scriptures Seruauntes wil neither haue talke nor familiarity nor yet shewe any signes of amitye vnto their maisters enemyes but we are continually in fellowshyp with the deuill the fleshe and the world Wherfore We ought to serue God more then seruauntes ought to serue their maisters we are farre from that seruice whiche we owe vnto God whom yet we ought much more both to obey and to serue then our seruauntes ought to obey and serue vs. For God besides that hē both fedeth and nourisheth vs hath also brought vs forth hath geuē vs euē our being Farther what soeuer seruaunts do towardes vs all that is to our commoditie and nothyng helpeth them but we contrarywise when we serue God do bryng no profite or commoditie vnto him For thoughe we lyue iustly he is therby made neuer a whit the better or more blessed thē he was before Also we geue litle or nothyng vnto our seruaūts but God hath for vs geuen forth his onely sonne and together with hym hath geuen vs all thinges We promise vnto our seruantes a very small rewarde but God hath promised vnto vs the same felicity whiche Christ him selfe hath the fruition of Whereby appeareth how much more we are bounde to serue hym then are our seruauntes bounde vnto vs. But in that we haue sayd that this vocation is common to all to be the seruauntes of Christ it semeth not very
therfore he geueth vs charity and other most noble vertues He addeth Called Sainctes by which worde he admonisheth them of their state past If they be called to holynes for as much as there caÌ„ be no motioÌ„ but where limites are apointed therfore they mought well conclude that they were called from vncleanes and Why the Romanes were called holy vnpurenes to holynes Neither say thou All they which were at Rome ought not to be called holy for that there were many there whiche were not absolute and not yet perfecte for these thynges let not For Paule first had a regarde vnto the better sort and in theyr name and prayse beautified the whole church For certayne preregatiues of singular members do redounde vnto the other members Further the Apostle had a consideracion wherevnto they were called namely to be made holy He sawe that they were called to the communion Augustine of Sainctes whereof they also tooke theyr name And Augustine in his 6. booke against Iulianus admonisheth vs not to thinke that this woord holynes signifieth This word holynes signifieth not perfection perfection And he citeth a place of Paul in the first epistle to the Cor. where he sayeth The Temple of God is holy which Temple ye be And no man is ignorant but that the Corinthians were infected with many vices And if we wil serche out the strenght of the significacion of the worde Sancti that is Sainctes or holy as the same Augustine teacheth in his booke de Symbolo fide it cometh of this Whence this word holynes is deriued worde Sanctio that is to constitute For that is called holy whiche is constant and firme and appoynted to abyde but nothing more letteth vs to abyde for euer then doth sinne for it is sayd that the reward of sinne is death Therfore it cometh to passe that holynes consisteth chiefely in the forgeuenes remission of sinnes FroÌ„ which seÌ„tence that disagreeth not which Paul hath in the first to the Cor. when he sayeth after he had rehearsed a cathaloge of enormious sinnes And these thinges were yee sometymes but nowe yee are washed yee are sanctified But the forgeuenes of sinnes is had by the holy ghost If that we shal call any thynge holy by reason of preparatioÌ„ they mought truly be called holy which haue beleued in Christ because that by the grace and spirite of Christe they are prepared to glory and highe purenes of lyfe to come Ambrose semeth Ambrose to searche out who are they which are called the beloued of God and called Sainctes And he aunswereth that these are they which thinke well of Christ If thou wilt agayne demaund what those are he aunswereth That those thinke What those be that thinke well of Christ well of Christ which thinke that we ought to put our confidence in hym only and that in hym is perfect saluation And of it may be concluded as of contraries that they thynke not well of Christ which trust in theyr owne strengthes or workes which thinge such as doo are not to be nombred amonge the called Sainctes and beloued of God as Ambrose now speaketh of them The called he nameth Sainctes because men of theyr owne nature are not able to attayne Holynes is not the cause of calling vnto holynes vnles they be led by the celestiall might of the holy Ghost And this is not to be left vnspokeÌ„ of that men are not therfore called of god because they are holy but that they are therefore holy because they are called Paul doth not rashely vse this kind of speach because the Iewes for that they had theyr original The Iewes claymed holynes vnto themselues only froÌ„ the holy Patriarches Prophetes boasted that all holynes consisted in theyr stocke only as thoughe other nacions were so wicked that it shoulde be counted an vnlawfull thing to communicate with them this proprietye of holynes But now yt is manifest that through the grace of Christ it is brought to passe that as well the Gentiles as the Iewes haue obtained the prerogatiue of holynes in an equall balance so that they haue the fayth of Christ Here we see also that Paule in placing of these two wordes obserued a iust order For fyrst he setteth to the beloued of God before called Saintes because that holynes A tâ—imâ— placing of wordes breaketh forth of no other thing then of that charity and loue wherewith God loueth vs. And he might haue set forth the Romanes with other most ample titles namely that they had the dominion ouer the whole world ruled ouer all But passing ouer these things he speaketh only of yâ— things that are of more value chiefly because it was not expedieÌ„t to flatter yâ— Gentiles more then yâ— Iewes and especially because there was risen no smale discord betwene both nacions Wherefore he ouerskippeth those titles which were proper vnto the Romanes he toucheth the coÌ„mon prayses of all such as beleue that they which were of the Gentiles and they which were of the circumcisioÌ„ might in that church be the better vnited together betweene them selues But we may not therfore be afrayd It is lawfull to call Princes by their titles both to salute and also to call Princes by their proper titles For in so doing we both admonishe our selues what we owe vnto theÌ„ and also we put theÌ„ in minde of theyr duety For Paule also when in the actes of the Apostles he made an oration to Agryppa was not afraid to call him by the title of a king Hetherto we haue expounded the second parte of the salutation that is what they were whom Paule saluteth Now let vs see what good thinges he wisheth vnto them Grace saith he to you and peace c. By the name of peace he vnderstandeth What peace signifieth with the Hebreues after the maner of the Hebrues the increase of all good thinges For as the Ethnikes say 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is grace salutem that is health so the Hebrues say Schalom that is peace And in the olde testament this salutatioÌ„ is ofteÌ„ vsed Yea and Christ also comming vnto the Apostles sayd Peace be with you And he commaunded Luke 24. the Apostles that into what house soeuer they entred they should say Peace be vnto this house To this salutacion commoÌ„ly vsed among the Hebrues Math. 10. Paule addeth this word grace which word is not often found in the olde testament Grace is ioyned with peace added vnto salutations But Paule herein nothing offendeth For it aunswereth vnto his vocation for he was a preacher of grace and in the meane tyme admonisheth them to whom he writeth that peace is not to be looked for that is the heape of all good thinges from our owne strengthe and merites but from the grace of God He sheweth the roote and putteth it fyrst from whence other good thinges are powred vppon vs that we may haue the childe together
he haue transgressed his commaundement And if he had beleued him when he threatened death vnto him he would not haue bene so vnaduised to comitte that which was the cause of death And he also if he had loued his neighbour as he was bounde to do woulde not by his transgression haue throwen all his whole posterity into death And if he would haue delt iustly he would in no case haue taken away an other mans fruite which pertayned vnto him These thinges hath Tertullian excellently well noted of the law geuen in paradise vnto the first man and woman And he also affirmeth that after this law succeded that lawe which is called the lawe of nature I will not speake that Noe The law of nature The law geuen vnto Noe. receaued some preceptes which were common vnto all mankind And if God would afterward by Moses more plainly expresse the lawes which he had before geuen there is no cause why the Iewes should contemne the Gētles as though they were left without the lawe For it is most manifest that whē Christ came he did set forth a most perfect explication of the doctrine which was then set abrode amongest all men of all lawes whereby playnly appeareth how fowly The rashnes of the Iewes the Hebrues are deceaued which are so rauished with the loue of theyr owne stocke that they will rather haue God to want of his glory that he should not be the God of all mē nor his prouidēce reach vnto all mē then they will confesse that they alone are not the people whom God hath a care ouer loueth In this Why God is sayd to be the God of some place let vs note that the Apostle bringeth a reasō why God is chiefly called the God of some namely because he iustifieth them For straightway he addeth VVho shall iustify circumcision of fayth and vncircumcision by fayth What is vnderstand by circumcision and vncircumcision we haue elswhere declared they at to be vnderstand by the figure Metonomia so that by the signe Metonomia we must vnderstand those thinges which are by it signified These prepositions of and by in this place signifie one and the selfe same thing They serue to amplifie the matter as in an other place Paule sayd of God All thinges were made of hym and by hym The difference of these prepositions bred sometymes a greeuous contencion betwene the Grekes and the Lattines The Lattines sayd that the holy ghost proceded not only of the father but also of the son On the cōtrary A contenciō of the Grekes the lattines toching the holy ghost the Grekes affirmed that he proceded of the father but by the sonne not of the sonne But after they had long tyme contended they saw that their contencion was only about wordes By these thinges which haue now bene spoken we euidently see that as touching iustification the Gentles are made equall with the Iewes which is a very great comfort vnto vs. Neyther ought we to be any thyng moued that Paule here vseth a verbe of the future tense when he faith Shall iustifye For although in the olde time very many both of the Iewes and of the Gentiles were so iustified yet because that rarely happened and amongst fewe it was counted as not done if we haue a respect vnto the generall benefite which happened after the comming of Christ Neyther is the emphasis or strength of this sentence following to be passed ouer For it is one God vvho shall iustifye c. For thereby is signified that euen as there is but one God so also to iustifye men he will vse but one waye namely By fayth Those thinges which are here spoken ought much to moue vs not to contemne our neighbours For whē we shall cōsider with out selues One God vseth one way to iustefy al men A reason why we◠ought to loue our neighbors An error sprong of the wordes of Paule Woorkes that goe before iustification are excluded not those that follow Why Peter sayd that in Paul are certaine hard thing s. Iames semeth tobe agaynst Paule Conciliation A place of Augustine declared that our God is their God also we cā not but embrace them with a great loue honor beneuolence Neither ought we to flatter our selues touching singular benefites which we haue receaued forasmuch as the holy scriptures do admonishe vs that many are fyrst which shal be last and contrary many last which thalbe fyrst And Augustine in hys booke of 83. questions in hys 66. question admonisheth that this sentence of Paule which is now proued namely that man is iustified without workes of the lawe was peruersly vnderstand of many which thought that men when they beleued and were iustified had no more any nede to liue holily iustly not weighing that Paule here speaketh of works that go before iustificatiō not of those which follow it This indede is true that there go no works before which are the causes why we should be iustified But after we haue once obteined righteousnes it is necessary that good works follow And hereof he saith it came that Peter said that in the epistles of Paul are certaine harde thinges which men would peruerte accordyng to their owne lust Iames also semeth to haue bene led so farre that in a maner he wrote thinges contrary vnto Paule namely That a man is iustified by workes who also required the we should declare our faith by workes Wherunto also Iohn Iudas in their epistles seme to tend But all these things are wel inough neither ar they any thyng repugnant one to the other For Paul speaketh of workes that are done before iustificatiō but Iames speaketh of those workes which ought to follow it These things haue I brought out of the place of Augustine before cited and out of hys booke of faith and workes the 14. chap. Who yet in the 66. question which we haue nowe alleaged hath a certain sentence which must be warely and aptly vnderstanded otherwise it should not be true For he sayth That it is impossible that we shoulde by workes goyng before obteyne iustification but afterward sayth he it is necessarye that they follow so that we remayne in life And if a man beginne to beleue in the last houre of his lyfe whē he shall streight way die he hath nether good works going before nor good workes followyng after but there followeth him onely a righteousnes of fayth and by it he is saued Augustine semeth by those wordes to affirme that it is possible that true fayth which iustifieth may be had without works which in very dede is false For when a manne at the extremitie of death beleeueth it is not possible but that he loueth God and his neighbour and calleth vpon him and is sory for those thinges which he hath before wickedly committed Wherfore these kindes of good workes which at the least haue place in the mynde follow his faith But I
Wherefore besides the holy Scriptures there is nothing that shoulde be beleued For it can not be constant and firme And whatsoeuer is not of fayth is sinne For if the conscience doo not by fayth beleue that that which we doo pleaseth God or also if it suspect that it is not acceptable before him and yet in the meane time we do the selfe same thing vndoubtedly that which we do is sinne And so doth Basilius in his Moralls the 80. sum in a maner towards the end of the boke interpretate that place which we haue alleadged Wherfore we ought not ether to add any thing vnto the word of God or to take any thynge from it as in which only are contained the promises Otherwise both our faith and our cōscience should haue no certainty whervnto to lean And this certainty Two principal points whereupon dependeth the certainty of the promises wherof we speake dependeth of two principal pointes Of which the fyrst is that it be plaine by the word of God then which can nothing be more firme or constant But some man will say God by the prophet Ionas sayd it should come to passe that the city of Niniue shoulde be destroyed and that after 40. dayes And by Esay the Prophet he shewed vnto Ezechias the king that he should dye which thinges yet came not to passe as they were fortold Yea also the lord him selfe in Ieremy the 18. chapter thus speaketh If I shall speake of any kingdome or nation to roote it out and to destroye it and they in the meane time repent them I also will repent me And on the other seede if I shall speake to plante and to build any kingdome or nation and they in the meane tyme behaue themselues wickedly I will not performe these thinges which I haue spokē But we answeare that the promise whereof Paul here Paule speaketh not of such a promise as is annexed with a condition That which consisteth freely is not conditionally speaketh dependeth not of any condition as doo a greate many promises of the law vnto which pertayne these threatnings which are now alledged yea the Apostle himselfe sufficiently expresseth of what kind of promises he speaketh whē he sayth By fayth that it should be of grace For if it consist frealy thē hangeth it not of any condition or supposition and by this means the promise can in no case be made frustrate This may the easier be vnderstand by a similitude If a phisition should by taking of any medicine promise health but yet vpon this condition that he would haue for his paynes infinite summes of money that the A similitude sicke persō should obserue a very hard diet a poore man mought easely answere that that promise of health is vayne both for that he hath not the money to pay and also for that being weake he is not able to obserue the diet which is prescribed him But contrariwyse if a man promise a medicine which he will geue freely nether requireth any worke of the sicke person but only that he woulde drinke or some other way receaue his medicine this promise is easely made firme So vndoubtedly standeth the case here the promise is offred vnto vs and that freely For only is of vs required that by fayth we receaue it And this is the first principall poynte whereupon dependeth the certaynty of the promise namely for that the promise consisteth of the word of God and is offred freely The other principall poynt is the nature of fayth For fayth is an Fayth is not an vncertayne or doubtfull assent Of the certainety of saluation We must not doubt of perseuerance The testimony of the spirite is firme assent not vncertayne or doubtfull but fixed and constant as the Apostle wyll afterward more at large declare when he discourseth the example of Abraham By these two principall poyntes it is manifest how wickedly they deale which teach mē continually to doubt of the promise of saluation For if as the holy scriptures teach vs we ought to hope and such is the nature of hope not to confound we may manifestly inferre that we ought not to doubt of our saluation There are which pretend that their doubt hereof springeth for that they are vncertayne whether they shall perseuer vnto the ende or no. But these men should consider that we ought alwayes to pray for perseuerance For as saith Ciprian whome also Augustine followeth In all the thinges which we aske in the Lordes prayer is included perseuerance And as Iames teacheth we must aske without doubting Wherefore it is manifest that we must by no meanes doubt of preseuerance and especially seing we haue in our harts the holy ghost alwayes They which beleue that their sinnes are a let vnto the promes are easely driuen into desperation They which are not sure of theyr saluation can nether haue peace nor tranquility of consciēce What thinges are to be taken heede of as touching certainty of saluation Sinne that wasteth the conscience We are neuer so assured but that there ariseth some doubt These thinges are not repugnant in a man to be certaine yet somewhat to doubt bearing an excellent testemony vnto vs thereof For as Paul sayth in this epistle It is the spirite which beareth witnes vnto our spirite that we are the sonnes of God And he which hath not the spirite of Christe is not hys And Paul writeth of himselfe that he is sure that nether life nor death nor principalities nor powers can plucke hym from the loue of God namely from that loue wherewith God loued him But that is friuoulous which some alleadge namely that Paul speaketh these thinges of himselfe only and that by a certayne peculiar and assured reuelation For when we come to that place we will declare that those thinges pertayne to all men vniuersally Other say that sinnes feare vs away from the assured confidence of our saluation But so long as we are in this life we can not be without sinnes For Iohn sayth If we say we haue no sinne we deceaue our selues and the truth is not in vs. Wherefore so to teach is nothing els but to driue men to desperation Finally forasmuch as Paul saith that we being iustified freely haue peace towardes God it manifestly declareth that the faythfull are certayn of theyr saluation otherwise there can be no tranquillity peace in the conscience Howbeit there are certayne thinges to be taken hede of that we be not dangerously deceaued in this certaynty For first we ought to know◠that it springeth not of any righteousnes which is in our mindes and farther that they which are most assured do not for all that want trembling and feare but are sore afrayd of falles and of offending of God Neither can that certaynty which we speake of haue ioyned with it that kinde of sinne which as Augustine speaketh wasteth away the conscience And we must chiefely beware that this certaynly be not applied
sort hope But we deny that it is such a hope as is ours which we haue in this life Bicause as we haue before declared out of the woordes of the Apostle our hope hath ioyned with it as companions sighing and sorrowe which thinges vndoubtedly in the eternall felicity which the blessed haue fruition of in heauen can haue no place Farther our hope cleaueth fast vnto fayth which engendereth an vnperfect and an obscure knowledge For as Paul sayth vnto the Corrint We se now by a glasse in a ridle we know but by a part But the saints in heauē know most perfectly most clearly Moreouer forasmuch as fayth hath chiefely a respect vnto the last chiefe good thing there ought not to be ascribed vnto the blessed which now hold possesse that good thing such a hope as is ours For the true proper hope cā haue Hope is in life as an anker no place in eternall felicity It is only so longe as we liue here geuen vnto vs as an anker for so the epistle which is written vnto the Hebrues calleth it For so long as we are tossed with the waues and tempests of this world vnles our minde be confirmed and stablished by the anker of hope our shippe will easely dashe agaynst the sandes and rockes Chrisostome calleth it a golden chayne let downe from heauen which chayne if we take holde of we shal be drawen vp Hope is in a chaine into heauen Wherefore we must diligently prouide that this hope be dayly more and more confirmed in vs which thinge shal then chiefely come to passe if as Paul straight way declareth we diligently wayght the singular benefites of God Which benefites forasmuch as they are most playnly contayned in the Hope is confirmed by the consideration of Gods benefites holy scriptues by reading of them our hope shal be very much cōfirmed Which thing Paul most clearely taught in this epistle when he sayd Whatsoeuer thinges are written are written for our learning that through patience and consolation of the scriptures we should haue hope Which selfe same thing Dauid also sayth They hope in thee which haue knowen thy name Wherefore seing the nature and nam◠of God is no where better vnderstand then in the holy scriptures it followeth that by thē we ought to confirm our hope which thing if we diligently obserue our mynde shall not be discouraged when God as oftentymes his maner is permitteth our doinges to come euen to shame which thing we sée happened in God semeth sometimes to forsake his Christ our sauior For he was so vtterly forsaken of God that he was put vpon the crosse and died a most ignominious death betwéene two thieues Dauid also was brought to that poynt that not only being expelled out of the kingdome of Israell he was fayne to wander in desert places but also was in a maner fast holden and closed in the handes of Saule The selfe same thing we sée very oftentymes to haue happened in other of the Saints that they were iudged in a maner to haue bene deceaued and to haue fallen from their hope But the spirite of Christ geueth strength that men are able in the middest of their calamityes to reioyce and to say These thinges shoulde haue no power in vs if it were not geuen thē frō aboue Which sētence Christ layd agaynst Pilate when he boasted of his power The 42. Psalme also hath excellently wel tought vs how we ought to comfort our selues and with a good hope to erect our mynde For thus it is written Why art thou deiected oh my soule Why art thou Why God spoyleth his of outward helpes so discouraged Hope in God for I will yet make my confession vnto him My health is in his countenance Nether doth God for any other cause commonly depriue his of outward helpes and aydes of this world but to gather together their dispersed hope not to suffer it to leane vnto too many aydes And these sondry and manifolde aydes he changeth for one principall ayde and the same most firme to the ende we should wholy depend of him By this difference of a firme hope Christians much differ from Epicures and Ethnikes For if there come any great calamity vnto them straight way they exclame and cry out If there The Ethnikes howe they are destitute of hope be a God that hath a care ouer these thinges If there be a God that séeth these thinges So they call not vpon God but being in dispayre vtterly discourage themselues But contrariwise godly men most constantly crye vnto God nether doubt they but that their prayers reach vp euen vnto heauē and that God hath a care both ouer them and all theirs But because humane wisedome continually wrastleth and faineth that it doubteth not indede of the power of God but only doubteth of hys will therefore let vs sée how of this thinge Paul hath made vs certayne Because the loue of God is shed abroade into our hartes by the holy ghost which is geuen vnto vs. These wordes signify all one as if he had sayd hereby thou mayst gather that thy hope shall not be made frustrate for that God loueth thee Which loue the holy ghost hereby perswadeth thée of for that the only sonne of God was for thy sake deliuered vnto the death Wherefore now oughest thou not any more to be in doubt of the will of God It is geuen vnto the fréely and that as it is afterward sayd when thou wast an enemy weake wicked and a sinner All which things declare that God loued thee not meanely but most aboundantly Nether hath he only geuen thee these thinges but also hath geuen thee the holy ghost that thou mightest throughly féele them And this is done in regeneration for there whilest by fayth thou takest holde that Christ died for thee thou art borne agayne and made partaker of the nature of God For euen as the spirite of man maketh a man so the spirit of God By the holy Ghost we are adopted by adoption maketh vs the children of God whiche spirite if it were geuen vs as sayth Chrisostome euen now from the beginning before we lauboured vndoubtedly many more thinges shall be geuen vnto vs seing that we go aboute continually to frame our selues to the will of God Now we take holde of the roote and fountayne of all good thinges From this spirite commeth that glorious resurrection as we are taught by this epistle For he which raysed vp Christ Of the holy Ghost is the resurrection from the dead sayth Paul shall rayse vp also your mortall bodies because of his spirite which dwelleth in you Nether is this life which we liue in Christ coūted to come from any els where then from the holy ghost For the wisedome of the flesh saith Paul is enmity agaynst God But the wisedome of the spirite is life and peace God would that we should in this life haue a pledge and
ernest peny and a triall of the saluation to come And therefore in those which are in Christ he hath engrauen and emprinted his spirite Nether nede we sayth Ambrose forasmuch as we are so deare vnto God to be aferd that we should of him be deceaued And Paul hath not without a cause made mencion of the holy ghost For he it is which beareth witnes vnto our spirite that we are the sonnes of God and by him we chiefely acknowledge the thinges that are geuē vs of God For as it is written in the first to the Corrinthians we haue not receaued the spirite of this world but the spirit which is God to know the thinges which are geuen vs of God But because we can not by certayne demonstracions or by experience of the sence teach vnto the infidels this loue of God whereof the holy ghost maketh vs assured therefore it is A similitude sayd to be powred into our hartes For we are in this life like strangers which although at home they come of a noble parentage and are rich yet so long as they are abiding amōgst strange nations they are not had in estimation But yet they knowing their owne nobility reioyce in their hart and passe not vpon the vayne opinions that other men haue of them So we hauing the loue of God shed abroade into our hartes when we are as fooles miserable men derided of the wicked are nothing at all moued with their iudgement being fully contented with our state and condition Augustine somewhat otherwise expoundeth this place For he thought that by loue is to be vnderstand that loue wherwith we loue God which exposition in my iudgement can haue no place For we haue not therefore our hope vnshaken because we loue God but because we are loued of God Farther the scope of Paul is to confirme our hope by the benefit of the death of Christ which maketh vs assured not of our loue towards God but contrariwise of Gods loue towardes vs. Wherefore he concludeth his argument with these wordes And God hath set forth his loue to wardes vs. c. Although we also gladly acknowledge with Augustine that the hope of godly men is somewhat confirmed for that they now feele by the holy ghost that they are inflamed with the loue of God when they vnderstand that for their sake the sonne of God was of hym deliuered vnto the death And that our loue is deriued of that loue of God wherewith he embraseth vs it is playne and manifest Our loue springeth of the loue of God but as touching the sence of the Apostle the former exposition is more naturall For Christ when we were yet weake according to the consideration of the time died for the vngodly For a man will scarce dye for a righteous man For for a good man it may be that one dare dye But God setteth forth his loue towardes vs seing that while we were yet sinners Christ died for vs. Much more then being now iustified by his blood we shal be saued frō wrath thorough him For if whē we wer enemies we wer recōciled vnto God by the death of his sonne much more being reconciled we shal be saued by his life And not only this but we also reioyce in God through our Lord Iesus Christ by whome we haue now receaued the attonement For Christ when we were yet weake c. Now he expresseth the reasō wherby we may knowe that God loueth vs namely for that he gaue his sonne for vs whē we were yet weake sinners vngodly enemies Wherfore we manifestly gather that y◠hope cā not confound vs wherby we haue full confidence y◠seing we are now regenerate and reconciled vnto God we shal at the length obteine eternall felicity For if he vouchased to geue so much for enemies and sinners sakes vndoubtedly he wil geue much more vnto his frindes and childrē Wherfore The Methode of Paules reason Paul first setteth forth the benefite bestowed vpon mākind the sonne of God I say which was geuē vnto the death Secondly he maketh a comparisō wherby is excedingly confirmed the hope of the faythfull Last of all he sheweth that we doo not only hope but also excedingly reioyce of this loue of God towards vs. As touching the first part he doth not coldly or sclēderly declare how much good God hath bestowed vpon vs when he gaue his sonne for our saluatiō but with greate amplificatiō he setteth forth the matter namely that his sonne was not geuen for all men but for those which were vtterly vnworthy of all mercy For before we wer by the benefite of God made pertakers of this redemption we could by no helpe or force of our owne helpe our selues And therfore Christ is sayd to be geuen for weake ones which wholy neded all maner of helpe And those selfe same being wicked and vngodly refused the helpe offred vnto them And when they were sinners these euells dayly encreased more and more For both the infirmity was encreased and the remedy grew the more in hatred by reason of theyr impiety which more and more encresed This also helped therevnto for that men were now declared to be open enemies And it was a greate matter to vndoo and make voide those thinges which were once decreed This is the meaning of these wordes vveake vngodly sinners and enemies For a righteous man and for a good man Seing that all men are loth to dye thereby is manifest how greate was the loue of Christ towards vs which would dye for such as once were we as hath now bene declared For the righteous Some hereby haue vnderstand a iust cause For they whiche haue deserued death canne skarslye bee perswaded too take theyr death patient For the Good That is they more willingly dye for that which is profitable and plesant as the parentes for theyr children the husbands for their wiues merchants for theyr merchandise Origen bringeth an example of the Martirs which suffer death for Christs sake who is in very dede good Others make mēcion of the Decians Curtians Codrians and the bretherne called Phileni which of theyr owne accorde gaue theyr liues for theyr countrey For all these semed to haue bene moued to geue themselues to the death both for that which is iust for that which is profitable For it was a thing iust that they should be so kind vnto theyr countrey in the defence thereof to be willinge to shedde theyr liues Farther also by theyr death they semed to preserue those who were vnto them most deare Vndoubtedly for my part I thinke with Chrisostome that by these woords Iust and Good are simply to be vnderstand good men and iust men although Ierome to Algasia in his 7. question taketh Iust and good substātiuely for a thing iust and good But why Paul sayd Scarce for a iust man and addeth peraduenture for a good man I thinke this to be the cause for that they which seemed sometimes to
dye for others which thing yet very rarely happened the thyng They which seme to dye for others dye for their owne sake being well considered may be sayd to haue died for their owne sake and not for any other mans sake Either for y◠they would winne glory or els for that they saw that all thinges went against them and not being able to abide that they chose rather to die But how farre the Decians and Curtians and suche other like were distant from the pure loue of Christ may be declared by many argumēts The death of the Curtians and of the Decians far inferior to the death of Christ For first they were not of that dignity that they should be compared with Christ wherfore their life which they gaue was not of like valew Farther woulde they or nilde they they should at one time or other haue died and peraduenture euen the selfe same tyme when the host was like to haue bene vanquished of the enemies But when death hangeth ouer mens heds it commonly maketh them the more fierce and bold as we read of Solon for he when he had raysed vp the citizens against the Tyranne Pisistratus beyng demaunded what thyng made him so bold alone aboue others to take vpon him such an enterprise answered his olde age For when he saw that he should within a while afterwarde dye he easely perswaded himself willingly to dye for his country sake but Christ not beyng obnoxious to death and yet for our sakes geuing himself vnto the death declared himselfe a much greater loue towards vs then they did towards their country Farther they died for their coūtry which was swete vnto thē for their wiues for their children for their lawes but Christ would be slain for weake persōs for sinners for enemies Before thē was set glory for whē they in such sort died they were an admiratiō to all mē wer publikely highly cōmended praised but Christ died a most vile death so y◠also he was reckened amongest thieues when as otherwise he was of all men the most innocentest Last of all they when they died had no consideration of God but Christ whatsoeuer he did did it of an obedience toward the eternall God his father Wherefore whether we looke vpon our selues or vpon Christ which suffred we can fynde no cause of his death but the meare loue of God towardes vs for we were so miserable and paste grace that we coulde by no merite of ours allure God to loue vs. Further Christ was so perfect and so heaped vp with all maner of felicity that he had no nede of that death thereby to attayne the more commodity What a pure loue is And that is counted a singular and pure loue which nether followeth his owne commodities nor is after a sort violently drawen of the worthynes of the thing it selfe And herein vndoubtedly Christ hath excellently well resembled his father and declared himselfe to be the sonne of God For he rayneth vpon the iust the vniust graunteth life doth good to men that are contumelious agaynst How much Christ excelled the Philosophers him and as Iohn sayth loued vs first Some of the Ethnike philosophers thought that they had done a very great acte when they were not moued with iniuries and for that cause they were counted like vnto God but Christ farre excelled thē For he was not only not agaynst wicked ones his enemies but also loued them and so loued them that he gaue his life for them Wherefore forasmuch as God is constant nether will easely chaunge hys will and seing that he hath geuen vnto vs so much vndoubtedly he will afterward geue greater thinges and seing that he hath once begonne to be beneficiall vnto vs he will not ceasse of vntill he haue adorned vs with all maner of benefites He hath God is hetherto foūr faythfull in his promises bene found faithfull in many promises he promised to take vpon him humane fleshe he tooke it to preach the Gospell he preached it To dye for our saluation he died To rise agayne from the dead he rose agayne To ascende vp into heauen he ascended vp To geue the holy ghost he gaue it To cal the Gentles he hath called them What is now behynde but the last resurrection and euerlasting glory to be rēdred vnto the faythfull Vndoubtedly if he haue faythfully performed all other thinges he will not in this one thing which is remaining breake hys fayth There were two thinges to be done saith Chrisostome which semed very hard namely that sinners should be iustified and that the Lord should dye for thē And forasmuch as both these things are now done the thinges which are remayning shall vndoubtedly be performed And Ambrose saith that the thinges which are remaining to be done are now made very easy And where as Paul sayth According to the time It may be referred vnto the death of Christ which happened not at euery tyme but at a tyme certayne opportune and appointed of God For if all thinges haue their appoynted tyme much more is the same to be affirmed of the death of Christ Wherfore Paul saith y◠he was geuen whē now was come the fulnes of time And Christ many times said either that his houre was now come or that it was not yet come That particle also may be added to that which is sayd that we were weake namely as the consideration of the tyme required For when we were strangers from Christ we lyued a weake life which yet is not so to be taken as though the consideration of the tyme coulde excuse that infirmitye For tyme vndoubtedly brought not that infirmity vnto vs for men were rather made weake by their owne transgression Although Ambrose vnderstand those wordes According to the tyme of the three dayes wherein Christ lay deade in the sepulchre But it skilleth not much which of these three interpretations a man followe But chiefely by these wordes of the Apostle we ought to consider what estate they are in which are not yet regenerate nor made partakers of the death of Christ For Paul pronounceth them to be weake sinners enemies and wicked men Where then ran What is the estate of those that are not regenerate Against workes preparatory these workes of preparation haue place for which our aduersaries make so muche ado But these men dreame I know not of what middle state wherein men lyue not altogether godly nor vtterly vngodly Amongest which kinde of men they recken Cornelius the Centurion whose almes were gratefull and acceptable and his prayers heard of the Lord when as yet he beleued not in Christ But as touchyng him if as these mē say he were not yet a pertaker of the death of Christ nor by any means regenerate vndoubtedly by the testimony of Paul he was both an enemy of God and an vngodly person and therfore neither he himself nor his works could be acceptable vnto God
Wherfore we must say that when he prayed and gaue almes he was not vtterly a stranger from Christ although he were not yet so fully instructed of Christ as mought be sufficient vnto Christian religion But we which ar now by the grace and benefite of God brought vnto this knowledge ought to geue thankes vnto God for his great loue and to lead our life in all innocencie and puritie And this is to do that which the time requireth lest that be vpbraided vnto our ingratitude which Christ reproued in the Pharisies Namely that they obserued the face of heauen but yet knew not the tyme of their visitation So Paul interpreteth that place of Esay Behold now the acceptable tyme behold now the day of saluation And that which Paul here writeth the selfe same in a maner repeteth he in the viij chapiter where he thus speaketh If God be on our side who shall be against vs Seyng he hath not spared hys owne sonne but hath deliuered hym for vs all howe hathe he not together with him geuen vs all thinges Who shall accuse the elect of God It is God which iustifieth who shall condemne It is Christ whiche died yea and which rose agayne and sitteth at the right hand of the father and maketh intercession for vs. These thinges serue wonderfully to the confirmation of our hope as in due place we shall declare And God setteth forth his loue towardes vs. It is rightly said that GOD Nothyng more deare then children did then set forth his loue towardes vs when he deliuered his sonne vnto the death of the crosse for our sakes For there is nothing to mē more dere or that they more esteme then their children and therfore we rede that wicked mothers when they would testifie vnto their adulterous louers their most feruent loue and faythe of their perpetuall vse and company slue their owne children for that they saw they had no other more assured argument wherby to testifie their good will towardes them So God when for our sakes he deliuered his sonne vnto the death and that vnto a most shamefull death gaue vnto vs a most sure token of his exceding great loue towards vs. That he created the world for our sakes was in dede a great sign of his good will towardes vs although in it rather shyned forth his power and deuine might and wisedome For it is the part of liberall and frée harted Lordes to geue and to bestow many things vpon their subiects Howbeit Lordes wil neuer go so farre that they will endaunger themselues for their seruantes sake Wherefore when God gaue his sonne vnto the death for our sakes therin as Paul sayth Why God hath shewed so great loue towardes vs. he most of all did set forth his loue towards vs. Which thing he therefore did to stir vs vp to loue him againe God had commaunded vs in his law that we should loue him with all our hart with all our soule and with all our strengthes and that we might the willinglier performe this he would first declare his good will towardes vs that it might appere that he loued cared for vs more then for himself For he would dye euen for our sakes which death yet we so contemne that we will suffer nothyng for it nor restraine our selues from any commodities of the body or delightes of the flesh His will was that all men should be in good case and one aloue in the meane tyme to suffer but we desire to be in good case our selues alone although all other in the meane time perish But it is not possible that there should be in vs so great a contēpt both of our owne saluatiō also of the saluatiō of other men but that either we beleue not so great a benefite of God or els we do not earnestly inough weigh if There was neuer wower that with so great a desire and seruent loue maried his spouse as Christ hath maried vnto himselfe his churche Neither hath any man at any tyme maried a wife so vnlike and vnworthy for The church an vnlike spouse for Christ hym to ioyne with all as Christ hath done the Church For in what estate she was before Christ met with her Ezecbiell describeth in 6. chapter where he sayth that she lay vpon the nether was her nauell string cut of nether was she washed with water nor poudred with salt and there was no eye whiche hadde compassion on her Paul also both here and likewise in many other places at large declareth in what estate we were before we came vnto Christ Vnto the Ephesians he doth not only say that we were by nature the children of wrath but also he addeth ye were once darknes but now ye are light in the Lord. Vnto Titus he saith We were as fooles not obediente but wādring out of the way geuing our selues to sundry lustes liuing in malice and enuy hatefull and seking to displease one an other In the first to the Corrinthyans when he had reckened a beaderoll of most haynous sinnes he sayth these thinges vndoubtedly were ye sometimes but ye are washed but ye are sanctified Wherefore we haue the sonne of God geuē vnto vs as a pledge of the loue of God He placed not in his stede an Angell or an Archangell although he mought so haue done He vouchsafed to come himselfe and to suffer a most bitter death vpon the crosse It behoued that for our redemption there What was required in the price of our redemtion Why the death of Christ was so acceptable vnto the father should be some such good thing offred vnto God which mought ether equally or els more please God then all the sinnes of the worlde had displeased hym This thing hath Christ offred for vs. And if a man demaunde why the death of Christ was so acceptable vnto God there can no other reason be geuen but his vnmeasurable charity and loue God coulde indede haue ben contented with any other thing But his will was rather to haue this thing not by the affliction and punishementes of Christ to feede his eyes or mynde for that had bene the poynt of a cruell father nether for that he foresaw the great loue and modesty in his sonne although these thinges were in Christ most singular and of very great force with the father but as indede I iudge for y◠he saw that by this only meanes his loue towardes vs mought be most perfectly declared and also to set forth an example of a most holy life for men to follow For if thou demaunde Whether i◠were of necessity that Christ should dye whether it were of necessity that the sonne of God should in such sorte dye I answere that here is to be put no necessity of compulsion for there is nothing in God that is by violēce nether also was there any necessity of nature For although there are in the deuine nature many thinges of necessity as is that it be
excellent estate or condition but also as it is written vnto the Hebrues Do tread vnder foote the sonne of God and do pollute his blood which was shed for them By this place also we are taught to loue our enemies not after the common maner as when men say yâ— they wishe wel vnto theyr enemy it is inough they thinke if they hate him not but yet in the meane time they will take no paynes ether to bring him to amendment or to saluation And which is more haynous they are not onely not beneficyall towardes theyr enemies but also through theyr sluggishnes they suffer theyr weake bretherne to perish they winke at theyr sinnes nether vse they any admonitions or reprehensions that they might be amended There are besides infinite other instructions which The loue of God most plentifully teacheth vs many thinges the loue of God teacheth vs. For we haue no booke stuffed with more plentifull doctrine then the death of Christ whiche if we diligentlye examine we shall be tought in a maner al dueties necessary vnto saluation Lastlye is to be noted that these thinges which Paul in this place meÌ„cioneth are had although indede more briefly yet fully inoughe in the 6. chapter of the Gospell of Iohn So God loued the world that he gaue his only begotten sonnes that euery one that beleueth in him should not perish Here also we heare that through the loue of God the sonne was deliuered for vs. And whereas Paule sayth enemies vveake vngodly sinners the same hath the Euangelist signified by this one word vvorld And whereas Paul sayth That thorough him vve are iustified recoÌ„ciled and shal be saued from vvrath that hath the Euangelist expressed in these wordes That he vvhich beleueth in him should not perishe And not only this but vve also reioyce in God through our Lord Iesus Christ by vvhome vve haue novv obtayned the reconciliation This was the third part which the Apostle vsed in making mencion of the benefite of Christ after that he had both layd him forth before vs and also by amplification as it was mete commended him vnto vs. Wherefore Paul sayth that so great is the gift of God that thereof we excedingly reioyce We are not only sayth he certayne that we shall be saued but also we reioyce not in our selues but in God not through our workes but through Iesus Christ by whome we haue obtayned reconciliation When he sayth that we reioyce of this benefite of God he priuely reproueth those which counted it a thinge full of shame to professe Christian religion or to wayte for saluation at the handes of a man crucified and put to a most shamefull death Herein sayth Paul is nothing vile or whereof we should be ashamed yea rather all thinges are most honorable and full of great dignity For here we can looke vpon nothing which testefieth not Reioysinge is opposed to filthines shame vnto vs the singular loue of God towards vs. This sentence of Paul agréeth very well with these words of Ieremy in the 9. chapter Let not the wise man reioyce in his wisedome nor the mighty man in his might nor the rich man in his riches but he which reioyseth let him reioyce in this that he knoweth and vnderstandeth me which What our reioysing is worke mercy righteousnes and iudgement and loue these thinges in the earth The prophet meaneth the selfe same thing that Paul doth namely that no man should reioyce ether for the good thinges of the mynde or of the body or of fortune but only let him reioyce of this that he knoweth the Lord. And the vnmeasurable loue of God can by no other thing be better or clearlyer vnderstand then by the death of Christ This is our fayth this is the chiefest knowledge that we can haue of the goodnes of God Hereby we vnderstand that God hath wrought By the death of Christ is God chiefly knowne mercy when he would by this meanes redeme vs to haue wrought iudgemeÌ„t and righteousnes wheÌ„ as he would not suffer our sinnes to escape vnpunished but hath so seuerely auenged them in Christ But because our fayth ought not to be idle but to repay agayne the selfe same thinges that we haue receaued of Christ therefore the Prophet addeth that God both loueth and requireth the selfe same thinges in the earth that is in vs. VVe reioyce sayth Paul and also the prophete in the knowledge fayth of so great a gift bestowed vpoÌ„ vs by God But they reioyce not which coldly weigh these thinges but they which feale them inwardly in the mynde and so feele them that they are ernestly affected This is to reioyce in the Lord and not in our owne workes Wherefore that which Paul before sayd that the elect reioyce in tribulations herehence dependeth for we Why we reioyce in afflictions do not reioyce of the afflictions as they are of themselues but for that we feele by them that God loueth vs. Last of all our glory herein consisteth that we haue gotten God himselfe to loue vs and to be our father then which felicitye could nothing haue happened vnto vs more to be desired Nether is this to be passed ouer that Ambrose hath noted vpon this place that we ought not only to geue thankes vnto God for the saluation and security which we haue receaued but also that we reioyce in God through Iesus Christ By which words Ambrose avoucheth the security of saluation we gather that he asserteth the security of saluation as well as we to the ende our reioysing mought be concerning such thinges as we haue now assuredly in our hands Farther also hereby it most euidently appeareth that those words of the Apostle which he before spake That the loue of God is shed abroade into our hartes are to be vnderstand of that loue wherewith God loueth vs. For of that loue this sure token we haue in that God hath geuen his son vnto vs. Farther the Apostle entending to make vs certayne of our saluation and to confirme vs in our hope coulde take no argument at all of our loue towardes God for our loue is alwayes mayned and vnperfect And therefore if a mans hope were doubtfull and vncertayne and should by this meanes be confirmed and willed to be of good cheare for that he beareth a loue towardes God he mought answere straight way that he for that cause most of all doubteth for that he seeth his loue to be weake and colde and that he loueth not God so much as he ought to do and by that occasion he can not attayne to so greate a rewarde Wherefore Paul hath appoynted an other way and confirmeth our hope by the gift of God And he thought it not sufficient simply thus to say but excellently amplifieth it by the contraries and opposites Out of this fountayne are to be Wherâ—heÌ„ce are to be sought consolations in afflictions sought consolations for the afflicted when by reason of
First that it is not vtterly vnprofitable no not euen without regeneration for it may serue to some ciuile discipline The office of the law For if mē do the outward workes of the law in such sort as they may although vnto them which doo them they are sinnes yet by thē may be obserued a ciuile order For where there is no obseruation of these thinges all thinges are confoūded iniuries are committed filthy lust rāgeth abrode the wrath of God is kindled so that he suffreth not publike welthes being in such maner corrupt verye long to continew There is also an other worke of the lawe which is inwarde which pertayneth vnto the conscience that it should perpetually accuse vrge scourge and condemne it And by this meanes God as we haue sayd bringeth a man at the length to iustification Which iustification being obteyned nether then doth the law lye idle but is like a glasse wherein the regenerate do behold After regeneration the law is not idle what fruites they ought to bring forth how much they ought dayly to profite what they haue to geue thankes for and how muche they want of the iust instauration to y◠end to obtaine it they may the more ernestly call vpon God The law also putteth before theyr eyes y◠marke wherevnto they ought to leuel in al theyr actions Vnto which although they can not attayne in this life yet they must doo theyr diligence not to depart far from it By these thinges it manifestly appeareth how much the law helpeth in outward workes what it worketh in the conscience and how much it helpeth them that are regenerate Now resteth this to marke that this sentence of the Apostle pertayneth not only to ceremonies Vnder this sentēce are comprehended not onely ceremonies but also the morall precept but also to the morall preceptes For sinne is by them most chiefely increased and it is of more greater wayght to stray from them then from outward ceremonies But now let vs returne vnto the Apostle That euen as sinne hath raigned in death so might grace also raigne by righteousnes vnto eternall life through Iesus Christ Here he sheweth a reason why grace in the elect after the increases of sinne abounded namely that by it we should obteyne righteousnes and so at the length come to eternall life For euen as sinne brought death so grace also and righteousnes which must be ioyned together haue brought eternall life The argument is taken of contraries An argument taken of contraries For seing that sinne which is opposite vnto righteousnes brought death it is meete that of grace and righteousnesse shoulde followe life Neyther is it in vayne that righteousnesse is ioyned wyth grace For thereby we are taughts that our righteousnesse consisteth not of woorkes but of grace The wonderfull order also of thynges is here to be noted In the firste place is put the A very godly gradation law then the increase of sinne and then the aboundance of grace afterward righteousnes last of all eternall life and all these things by Iesus Christ As touching the wordes sinne is sayd to haue raigned in death bycause sinne could not be taken away by the law and death was for his cause inflicted as a punishmēt In the 1. to y◠Corrinth Paul hath in a maner the selfe same sentence saying that the dart of death is sinne For nether could death otherwise wound mankind but by sinne Ether of them are sayd to raigne both grace and sinne when we are moued and stirred vp by them for in Publike welthes kinges raigne and gouerne How grace and sinne a◠sayd to raigne as it pleaseth them In godlye men righteousnes raigneth for they after they haue receaued remission of sinnes study to geue theyr members weapons vnto righteousnes and holines as before they had permitted them to sinne And this is called the kingdome of Christ which is therefore ascribed vnto grace by Why this kingdome is called the kingdome of Christ The rootes of death and life A similitude Grace and life cleaue together of necessity cause it consisteth freely and without workes In this place as Chrisostome noteth are set forth vnto vs the rootes of death and life The fountaine of life is grace and righteousnes the foūtayne of death is sinne And he addeth that death is like a souldier whiche is aypointed armed of sin as of his king wherfore take away the king then death being vnarmed can not destroy mē for euer Farther he admonisheth that forasmuch as haue alredy obteyned grace we should not doubt of the obteynement of life For these things cleaue of necessity the one to the other But why the Apostle bringeth this similitude we may easely shew Bicause grace was of more force to make new agayne then sinne was of force to kill And in that it is added by Iesus Christ we must call to rememberance the Analogy or proposition set at the beginning betwene Adam and Christe For euen as from Adam came sinne and death so from one Iesus Christ came grace and life This place admonisheth vs somwhat to speake of grace Nounes which as the Logicians say are put abstractly are vsually declared by their cōcrets whose significations Of Grace Abstractes are knowne by theyr concretes What is to be gracious are more present vnto the sence Wherefore let vs first sée what this worde Gratiosus that is gratious signifieth with the Latines And he amongest men is called Gratiosus whome all men fauour and whome the common people do loue So in the holy scriptures men are called gratious which haue found grace with God For so the scripture vseth to speake of those whom God fauoureth and We are one way gracibefore God and an other way before men whom he loueth But yet as touching this there is great differēce betwene God men For men fauour none but them in whome they finde those things whereby they may be allured and drawen to loue them It behoueth therfore that he which will be beloued of men haue in himselfe the causes of loue and beneuolence But God contrariwise found in men nothing worthy to be beloued wherby he mought be led to loue them For he hath loued vs first and out of that loue he bestoweth vpon vs whatsoeuer we haue that is acceptable vnto him Wherfore the name of The grace of God is taken too o◠manner of wayes grace is in holy scriptures taken two manner of wayes first and principally it signifieth the beneuolence of God towardes men and the frée fauour which he heareth towards the elect Secondly bicause God endueth his elect with excellēt gifts Grace sometymes signifieth also those giftes which are fréely bestowed vppon vs by God This two fold signification of grace beyng well noted declareth with how great diuersitie our aduersaries and we affirme one and the selfe same sentence for either of vs say that a man is iustified by grace But in this is
the difference They by the name of Grace vnderstand those giftes which are geuen vnto them that are iustified namely the habites or qualities which are poured into theÌ„ more ouer good workes and other such like which God worketh in the elect But we forasmuch as we sée that these giftes so long as we liue here are through our corruption vnperfect do deny that we can by them be iustified and that by them by any meanes we are able to satisfy the iudgement of God Wherfore we vnderstande that to be iustified by grace is to be iustified by the only mere and sincere good will of God which he of his only mercy beareth towards vs. We say also that we are iustified by the grace of Christ which his father beareth towards hym For forasmuch as he is most gracious before him he bringeth to passe that he loueth would in him as hys members and brethren adopted by faith But the schoolemen haâ—â— What it is to be iustified by grace and by the grace of Christ The imagination of the Schole men sprang out of the Ethikes of Aristotle fayned vnto themselues that grace is an habite or quality poured into the soule yâ— the foule may more easely rise vp and more redely do good workes Which theyr fayned inuention they can by no meanes confirm by the holy scriptures But they séeme to haue taken it from the philosophers who in the Ethikes teach that the faculties powers of the minde are by an habite strengthned so that they are able to perform those things which before they wer not able or if they were able yet they were not able without great difficulty The self same thing do these meÌ„ iudge of yâ— mynd that forasmuch as of hys owne nature it can not so lift vp it self to be acceptable vnto God and to do yâ— workes which should please him it hath nede of a heauenly and spirituall habite to performe these things And whilest they thus follow their philosophy they depart from the vulgare and receyued sence of this worde grace For when we say that a souldiour is acceptable vnto a kyng or vnto a captaine A similitude we do not say that in the souldiour is grace or fauour but rather in the king or captayne which beareth fauour vnto the souldiour So we in thys case if we would speake plainly or aright should not say that in vs is powred or geueÌ„ grace but rather that we are receiued of GOD into grace or fauour which before were hys enemies But that we may the better fynde out the error of the scholemen we will here sette foorth their definition for they defyne grace to be an habite of goodnes and charity infused of God like vnto his whereby he that hath it is To haue grace of God is to be receiued into fauour of him The definition which the scholemen assigne vnto grace made acceptable vnto God and doth workes that are acceptable vnto him and meritorious When they say that it is an habite infused of God they seperate it from naturall vertues Farther when they make it to be like vnto the goodnes and loue of God they thinke that they bring a reasoÌ„ why they which be adorned with this habite are acceptable vnto God namely because of that similitude And because they can not by the scriptures proue that grace is a thing created in the soule they labour to confirme it with reasons For Thomas sayth that the beneuolence of God can not be idle for God is saide to loue when he geueth any good thing Wherefore he saith that God to do good to some or to loue some is to geue or infuse into them such an habite or quality as we haue now described But this is a very weake argument For we graunt that the loue of God lyeth not idle The loue of God towardes the elect is not idle but filleth vs with benifites and those very manifold But how followeth this argument God geueth very many giftes Ergo he createth or powreth in such an habite Farther this is no small error that they will that by this habite or creature we are made acceptable vnto God For it must nedes follow that seing he hath geuen vs such a gift he therefore loued vs before for the loue of God goeth before all his giftes The vertues in dede which follow may haue some consideration The loue of God towards vs goeth before all his giftes why they should be geuen but yet they can not haue that force to allure God to loue vs for he loued vs euen before he gaue them vnto vs. An other of their reasons is this If they which are conuerted vnto Christ say they haue the holy ghost which before they had not then of necessity it followeth that there happened some mutation But in God there is no mutacion Wherefore we must appoint it to be in our selues namely that we haue such an habite of grace which before we had not But this likewise is of no force for God differreth his aydes God is not chaunged although he do that now which before he did not is as semeth good vnto him and moueth the hartes of men at an appointed time when as before he moued them not which thing yet we doubt but is done without any his change at all For we know that God at an appoynted time created the world which before was not extant and yet we can not say that God is therefore changed Now resteth for vs to confirme by the scriptures that the grace of God signifieth his frée and vndeserued loue secondly that it signifieth also the rewardes It is proued that the grace of God is the fauor which he beareth towardes vs. or giftes which are bestowed vpon the Saintes thirdly that the grace of Christ is that whereby he is of force with the father and by reason of whiche we are loued of the father As concerning the first Paul fayth to the Ephesians that we were elected of God before the foundacions of the world were layde according to his good pleasure to the prayse of the glory of his grace In which place we sée that the cause of our election is that the frée loue and grace of God towardes vs should be commended And in the latter epistle to Timothe he sayth Which hath called vs wyth his holy vocation not by workes but according to his purpose and grace And Peter exhorteth vs to hope in that grace which is offred But it is not lawfull to hope in a thing created And as touching Christ Paul saith vnto the Ephesians that God hath made vs acceptable in hys beloued that is in Christ whome most dearely and especially he loueth And in this epistle he calleth grace eternall life This therefore is the The true definition of Grace true definition of Grace and agréeable vnto the holy scriptures That it is the frée beneuolence of God whereby he counteth vs deare in Christ Iesus and
ought to haue bene stirred vp to the workes whiche he did And that he erred he hymselfe testifieth of himself in many places Vnto the Eph. the. 2. cha he sayth And you that wer dead in sins wherin in times past the walked according to the course of this world after the prince that ruleth in the ayre euen the spirite that now worketh in the children of distrust Among whome we also had our conuersation in times past in the lusts of our fleshe in fulfilling the will of the flesh and of affections and we were by nature the children of wrath as well as others But GOD which is rich in mercye thorough hys greate loue wherewith he loued vs euen when we were dead by sinnes hath quickened vs together with Christ And vnto Titus For we also were once fooles disobedient straying out of the way seruing the desires and pleasures in maliciousnes and enuy one of vs hating an other Such a one was Paul before he was conuerted vnto Christ although he mought not vnworthely make great boast of his outward righteousnes And that thou shouldest not say that he was changed and deliuered frō these sinnes when he began earnestly to apply himselfe vnto the doctrine of the lawe wherein he so much profited that he coulde now be neither accused nor slayne of it he hymselfe in the selfe same epistle to Titus auoutcheth that he was Paul affirmeth that he was iustified by Christ only by Christ only iustified and by the benefite of the holy ghost acquited Wherefore before he was come to Christe the knowledge of the lawe coulde do nothing but kill him For thus he sayth but when the bountifulnes and loue of God our Sauiour towardes man appeared not by the workes of righteousnes which we haue done but according to his mercy he saued vs by the washing of regeneration and of the renuing of the holy ghost which he shed on vs most aboundantly through Iesus Christ our Sauiour that being iustified by his grace we might be made heyres according to the hope of eternall life But vnto that which he writeth vnto Timothe that he had from his elders serued God with a pure conscience answere may thus be made That although he had not in him his conscience accusing him yet this acquited him not from sinne For there are many and haue bene many Scribes and Pharises which being instructed with an ill conscience had an ill iudgement of the law of God They which are not well instructed in the lawe ar not sometimes reproued of their conscience whome yet Christ manifestly reproueth Wherefore when as afterward came a more sounder knowledge of the lawe by it by reason of sinne now known were they slayne Farther we must see what it is that Paul goeth about in that place to perswade vnto Timothe he sayth that he geueth thankes vnto God that without ceassing he maketh mencion of him in his prayers and desireth to see him And that he should not think that he spake this after any common maner as though he did it only to flatter him but spake not from the hart he sayth that he had neuer bene accustomed to lye And although his conscience could not reproue hym of lying yet were there a greater many other thinges which the lawe being truely knowen mought reproue in him And that he had not the perfect knowledge of the lawe hereby it is manifest for that he persecuted Christ in hys Paul before his cōuersion knew not the law perfectly church who is the ende of the lawe In which thing he did nothing agaynst his conscience for it was then in no other sort enstructed And therfore he sayth be did it through ignorance and infidelity Neither hath the law of God that power to kill through sinne but when it is perfectly known And these thinges are spoken of Paul when he was yet of the Iewishe religion And how these thinges pertayned vnto him after he knew Christ and how they pertayne to vs shall afterward be declared Howbeit in the meane time these things ought to moue vs to detest the naturall sinne grafted in vs. That sinne might be out of measure sinfull by the commaundement Here the Apostle declareth that he entreateth not only of the knowledge of sinne which is perceaued by the lawe but also of the comming of that wickednes which is wrought by taking an occasion of the law For by y◠figure Hyperbole Why the Apostle vseth the figure Prosopopeia he saith that sinne is made sinfull aboue measure And vnto sinne by a figure he fayneth a person which sinneth deceaueth and slayeth Which he therefore did for that he considered that we are slow and blockishe and vnderstand not the pernicious blot of our originall sinne But because the lattin translatiō hath aboue measure sinfull Ambrose demaundeth whether paraduenture there be any measure of sinne granted by the lawe And he answereth that there is none for the lawe condemneth all sinnes vniuersally although he confesse that there is The law cōdemneth all sinnes a certayne measure as touching the seuerity of God aboue which measure God differreth not his punishements and vengeance As it may be sayd of the Chananites There is with God a certaine measure of sinnes aboue which they are not suffered to escape vnpunished Sodoma Gomorrha and other nations whome God suffered a longe while to escape vnpunished But afterward when they exceded that measure whiche God coulde no longer suffer to excede he vtterly ertinguished and destroyed them Although some say that sinne aboue measure encreased after the law was geuen if it be compared with that tyme wherein the lawe was not For then mought haue bene pretended some ignorance but that ignorance so soone as the lawe was geuen and published was taken away But I would rather expound this by the figure Hyperbole that is vnmeasurably For when lust waxeth of force we fall into all kindes of sinnes But the kindes of sinnes can not be expressed For euen as archers but one only way hit the marke but yet infinite wayes mysse it A similitude so vertue consisting in the middest as a marke we may infinite wayes erre from it but there is but one only way to attaine vnto it That which is in the Greke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may thus be turned in Lattin Peccatum peccator that is sinne a sinner But because that soundeth not so well it may be turned sinne out of measure vicious Aristotle in his 3. of Ethikes sayth that of extreames the one is more vitious and the other lesse The lawe is spirituall but I am carnall being sold vnder sinne Here is rendred a reason why it is not to be imputed vnto the lawe that of the knowledge thereof followeth death For saith he the lawe is spirituall but the propriety of the spirite is to geue life And this thing experience well teacheth vs. For we sée that bodyes do so long liue how long there is in
large prosecute the same and chiefely by thys reason for that aduersities helpe forward our saluation And when he had seuerally declared that we are holpen by hope and by the intercessioÌ„ of the spirite and had before taught that all creatures grone with vs now he pronounceth vniuersally that all thinges woorke vnto vs vnto good He sayth not that God prouideth that we should not be vexed with aduersities but teacheth that the nature of them is after a sort inuerted as which of themselues are able to engender nothing else but our destruction but now contrariwise they bring vnto vs commodity saluatioÌ„ But this thing doo they not of theyr owne force but by the election and predestination of God Nether is it to be meruayled at if we attribute vnto God so greate a force For we see that phisitions somtimes doo the like For they oftentimes expell out of yâ— A similitude bodies of men venome or poyson by venemous medicines hemlock although otherwise it be present poyson yet being tempered by that art it is so farre of from hurting that it also expelleth poysen So afflictions in godly men fight not against them but rather fighte againste the remnants of sinne And by these wordes of the Apostle we may inferre of the contrary that vnto those whiche An argument taken from the contrary Examples either loue not or hate God all thinges turne to theyr destruction which thyng we know came to passe in Iudas in others For wheÌ„ he began to hate Christ no good occasions or quickening wordes of the Gosple or power to worke miracles could any thing profite him The Iewes also when they were led about thorough the wildernes and were adorned of God with excellent and manifold giftes yet oftentimes became worse and worse Ambrose thus knitteth together thys sentence with that which went before Although we be enfected with great ignoraunce so that ether we aske those thinges which are not to be asked or els we out of time aske those thinges whiche are to be asked yet oughte not that therefore to be a let vnto vs when as by the benefite of the spirite thorough the mercy of God al thinges worke vnto vs vnto good Howbeit this is to be noted that the verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is worketh together may be taken in the singular nomber and be referred vnto the spirite namelye that the spirite worketh and conuerteth all thinges to good to those which loue God And so this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is All shal be the accusatiue case But the receaued sence is more playne it is a phrase of speach much vsed of the Attike writers to ioyne vnto nownes newter being in the plurall nomber a verbe of the third person singular Augustine Vnto the elect sins also are profitable De correptione gratia so largly taketh this senteÌ„ce the he doubted not to write that vnto holy men sinnes also are profitable Which saying indede although I will not deny but to be true yet wil I not easely graunt that it agréeth with the sentence of Paul For both those thinges which are alredy spoken and whiche shall afterward be spoken pertayne to calamities and afflictions But the same Augustine else where more diligently weighing this place vnderstandeth by The sentence of Paul is to be referred vnto calamities and afflictions Why the burthens of Christians are said to be lighte Paul entrâ—ateth not here of of pleasantnes but of commodity How aduersities profite the godly The contrary endeuor of the Deuill it the whole burtheÌ„ of grieues and tribulatioÌ„s which he sayth is by this meanes made the lighter for that we loue God For he which loueth any man from the hart so for his sake beareth calamities that he is nothing grieued at them Iacob for Rachel serued 14. yeares and that so long space by reason of his loue semed but short And this is it that Christ sayth that his burtheÌ„ is light and his yoke pleasant not that those thinges which the Christians both do and suffer are not hard and difficile but bicause by reason of the loue which they beare vnto God all thinges be they neuer so hard shal be pleasant vnto theÌ„ But Paul here entreateth not of that kinde of good thinge which is light and pleasant but which is profitable vnto the godly vnto saluation And if thou demaund how aduersities are profitable vnto the godly I answere bycause God by theÌ„ auocateth his froÌ„ the delightes and pleasures of thys world and from themselues For such are we thorough the fault of nature and naturall corruption that we can not with out some hurt of ours be driuen vnto those things which are in very dede good On the contrary part the deuil laboureth as much as lieth in him by tribulations and aduersities to draw vs from God which thing he oftentimes bringeth to passe in the vngodly but in the elect the prouidence of God ouercommeth hys malicious purpose Farther by these afflictions calamities sin which perpetually froÌ„ our birth cleaueth fast vnto vs is dayly more more diminished The Apostle saith that this commeth to passe vnto them that loue God for that they are first loued of God For Iohn testifieth that we preuent not the loue of God God in louing preueÌ„teth vs. for no man can loue him vnles he be first loued of him It may peraduenture seme wonderfull why Paul sayd Vnto them that loue and not rather vnto theÌ„ that beleue especially when as at other times he attributeth iustification vnto fayth But this is to be knowen that in this place is not entreated of iustification For he writeth of the suffring of aduersities The cause whereof if thou wilt serch from the bottome then must thou go vnto grace and vnto the holy ghost Of grace and the holy ghost streight way springeth fayth by whiche after we haue embrased the goodnes and promises of God without any delaye springe hope and charitye Wherefore Paul tooke that thinge which is in aduersities next ioyned vnto fortitude For streight way so sone as we loue God for hys Loue is not the chiefest cause that maketh vs paciently to fuâ—â—er aduersities but the â—iest cause Charity distinguisheth the true faith from the false The connexion of faith and charity The most holiest men haue but a slender loue towardes God Why vnto loue can not be ascribed iustification Difference betwene the godly the vngodly sake we patiently beare all aduersities Wherefore he declared not the chiefe and principall cause but the niest And to the ende we should not stay there he streight way adioyned the roote and fouÌ„taine of that good thing For he saith Vnto those which are called according to purpose Farther he therefore maketh mencion of loue to put a difference betwene true faith and a fayned counterfeate and dead faith which is no faith at all For some boast of faith which bere no loue at all vnto God
slight signe or onely of a probable signe but of a necessary signe which the Grecians call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He hath geuen saith he his sonne for vs. What things theÌ„ shall he spare for our sake which hath not spared his owne sonne Fathers wil not God hath done contrary to the accustâ—med manner of men An argument taken of an example sticke to spend all that euer they haue to redeme their children But God contrariwise to redeme vs hath deliuered his own sonne When Abraham had led forth his sonne vnto the aulter and would at the commaundement of God haue offered him vp God himselfe testified that he then at the length saw how much he estemed him If thys by the testimony of God himselfe was an argument of great loue and of sincere charity what oughte we to iudge of God whiche for our sakes hath geuen his owne sonne So God loued the world that he gaue his only begotten sonne for it This is that signe which Paul continually entreateth of and adorneth For before he said God setteth forth hys loue towardes vs in that when we were yet ennemies Christ dyed for vs. And vnto the Gal. Who hath loued me and hath deliuered hymselfe for me And vnto the Corrinthians I thynke my selfe to know nothyng but onelye Iesus Christ and hym crucified Augustine in his 2. booke and 33. chap. de nuptijs concupiscentia â–ª diligently peyseth this which Paul sayth That Christ was deliuered The originall sinne of infants is here proued for all Infantes saith he are not here exempted wherefore Christ dyed for them also Wherfore they ar obnoxious vnto originall sin also For otherwyse what should they haue neded any such sacrifice The Pelagians said that they are innocents and especially after that Christ had suffred death for them Yea rather contrariwyse saith Augustine forasmuch as Christ dyed for them that ought to be a sufficient argument that they are not innocentes How shall he not with hym geue vs all thinges also All things are geuen All thinges are geuen to worke vnto our saluation not to hurt vs. vnto vs not to hurt vs but to worke to our saluation For we haue Christ a defender of vs from euill and a Sauiour For euen as God by his crosse and death hath healed yâ— world so shall he bring to passe that whatsoeuer afflictions we suffer shall be made healthfull vnto vs. These things doubtles in mans iudgement and at the first sight séeme terrible but as waspes when their sting is taken away can only A similitude make a bussing can not sting so although aduersities sometimes assaile godly men yet they deiect theÌ„ not But forasmuch as all things yâ— we haue are geuen vnto vs through Christ vndoubtedly they conduce vnto vs for the obteynement of felicity To this purpose sayth Paul in the first to the Cor. All thynges are yours and ye are Christes and Christ is Gods And what are the principall thinges which Christ hath brought vnto vs are in the same epistle thus declared He is made vnto vs of God wysedome ryghteousnes holines and redemption And in Esay the â—0 chap. are described his miracles truth of doctrine innocency of life and most greuous paynes and these are exceding great singuler good thinges But when Paul in this place saith vniuersally that all things are geuen vnto vs we may not therby vnderstaÌ„d these thinges onely but also all other thinges whatsoeuer they be And seyng we haue Christ the Lord of all good thinges we ought not to doubt but that al things that are his are ours for he is the heire of all thinges and we are declared to be his fellow heires And as he is geuen vnto vs of the father so againe we are of the The father hath geuen vnto vs all thinges through Christ and he hath geuen vs also vnto Christ same father geuen vnto him Therfore he saith no man can take away from hym those which are geuen vnto him of the father And Dauid vnder the person of the father saith Aske of me and I wyll geue vnto thee the Gentles for thyne inheritaunce And yet is there som difference betwene those two gifts For Christ is geuen vnto vs fréely without any our merites But Christ hath gotten vs vnto himself not fréely but by his bloud and crosse Neither skilleth it much whether a man read 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is shall geue or in the preter tempse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is hath geuen For either is true For those thinges which we shal haue in our countrey that is in heauen we haue now by hope and before God it is all one as if we now had them in very dede Farther the greatest parte of those thinges which Christe hath gotten for vs are already bestowed vpon vs. Who shall accuse agaynst the elect of God It is God which iustifieth Who shall condemne It is Christ which died and whiche rose againe and sitteth at the right hand of the father and maketh intercession for vs. Who shall accuse against the elect of God This may be red two manner of wayes First that there be two interrogations ioyned together in this maner Who shall accuse agaynst the elect of God Shall God which iustifieth And then adde therunto this worde No as though it is not very likely that one and the selfe same which iustifieth wil also accuse And then followeth who shall condemne shal Christ which hath dyed for vs and rose agayne and sitteth at the ryght hand of God and prayeth for vs As though againe shoulde be aunswered No. For it is not credible that Christ which hath done so many and so great things for vs can be brought to condemne vs. Otherwise it may be thus red Who shall accuse and so to vnderstand No body And a reason why is geuen bicause God iustifieth Also Who shall condemne and againe vnderstand No body And so is added an other reason For that Christ hath died for vs as though it were a figure in Rhetorike called subiectio We can nether be accused nor condemned for that we are elect We haue in vs by nature many thinges whiche might iustly be accused If we should be accused our satisfaction is at hande This second interpretation is easier and playner then the first And this is to be noted that these things are not spoken of them which worke neither are referred vnto merites nor ascribed vnto our worthines For here is mencion made onely of the elect vnto them belong these things in as much as they are elected of God for yâ— they are iustified fréely For otherwise we al haue in our selues many thinges which may by very good right be both accused condemned But if any would presume to accuse vs yet is our satisfactioÌ„ at haÌ„d Wherfore the accusatioÌ„ should be in vain For Christ maketh intercessioÌ„ by his merite maketh he intercession for childreÌ„ now adopted maketh he
We are not taught by any parte of thâ—â—anonicall scripture â—hâ—t the â—â—â—â—tes departed do pray for vs. Althoughe the saintes do praye for vs. yet are not they to be inuocated do make intercession for vs we can not proue by any parte of the canonicall scripture Wherefore we ought to haue Christ only for our mediator aduocate neither are thinges vncertaine to be admitted for certaine Although I can easely graunt that the saintes in our countrey with most feruent desires wishe the saluation of the elect Yet dare I not say that they pray for them especially seyng the scripture no where teacheth any such thing And although I should confesse this yet should it not therof follow that we ought to cal vpon saintes departed For we are not certaine out of the worde of God that they can heare our prayers Wherfore they greuously offend both against religion and against Christ himself which appoint vnto themselues saintes for new mediators and aduocates wheÌ„ as there is but one onely mediator betwene God and men namely the man Christ Iesus who now as Paul saith maketh intercession for vs. The same thing doth Iohn testify saying I write vnto you that ye sinne not And if we sinne we haue an aduocate with the father euen Iesus Christ the iust Augustine against the epistle of Parmenianus in the 8. chap. in these wordes noteth that the Apostle excluded not himselfe None so holy but that he hath nede of the intercession of Christ from yâ— rest For he said not ye haue an aduocate but we haue For there is none so holy but yâ— he hath nede of Christ to be his aduocate and mediator Farther he saith not ye haue an intercessor but we haue an aduocate Iesus Christe Augustine in that place reproueth Permenianus for that he had in some places written that Bishops are mediators betwene God and the people which thing he sayth is not It is a thing intollerable that bishops should be mediators betwene God and the people We must not pray vnto Angels to be suffred of the faithfull The same Augustine in his 10. booke of confessions the 42. chapter thus writeth Whome should I haue found which mought reconcile me vnto thee Should I haue gone vnto Aungels But with what prayers With what Sacramentes And he addeth That there were many which would haue bene reconciled by Angels and were miserably deceyued for that an euill Aungell oftentymes transformeth hymselfe into an Aungell of lyght And if it be not lawfull for vs to pray vnto Aungels much les is the same lawfull for vs to doo vnto dead sayntes For here is no les perill to be deceaued then there These things writeth Augustine in that place both godly and soundly who yet in other places was not so circumspect in eschewing the errour of hys tyme. Who shall separate vs from the loue of God shall affliction shal anguishe shall persecution shall hunger â–ª shall nakednes â–ª shall danger shall the sworde As it is written For thy sake are we deliuered to the death all the day long we are counted as sheepe for the slaughter Neuertheles in all these things we are more then conquerors thorough hym that loued vs. For I am persuaded that nether death nor lyfe nor Aungels nor principalities nor powers nor thinges present nor thinges to come nor heigth nor depth nor any other creature shal be able to seperate vs froÌ„ the loue of God which is in Christ Iesus our Lord. Who shall separate vs from the loue of God After that Paul had by so many reasons confirmed the exceding great loue of God towardes vs now by way of interrogacion he crieth out that there is nothing which can interrupt that loue wherewith God loueth vs. Let aâ—cuse vs whosoeuer wil let come aduersities be they neuer so great yet all things shal work vnto vs to good For this is the property of one that loueth continually to do good vnto him whom he loueth Wherfore seing God so loueth vs what soeuer he doth or whatsoeuer he sendeth vpon vs we must beleue that it shall be helthfull vnto vs neither ought any aduersities to perswade vs but that we are continually loued of God Wherfore this is a conclusion of all those thinges which haue bene before entreated of And that which the Apostle â—aith he is most fully persuaded of I would to God we were also persuaded of the same He reckoneth vp those thinges which seme commonly to be most harde and wherby men are oftentimes broken and euen these things he auoucheth hinder not the loue of God towardes vs so far is it of that they can plucke it away from vs. The Apostle the longer abideth in this place for that our flesh humane reason can hardly be perswaded of this thing For oftentymes when we are afflicted we cry My God my God why hast thou forsaken me And that with a farre other manner of affect then Christ pronounced those wordes We cry Howe long Men think aduersities to be tokeÌ„â— of Gods anger Ambrose vnderstandeth these thinges of our loue wylt thou be angry O Lord With many such other like For whatsoeuer aduersity happeneth we thinke the same to be a token of Gods wrath towardes vs wheÌ„ as yet he of a singuler loue suffreth vs so to be afflicted I know that Ambrose Augustine and very many other take loue in this place for that loue wherwith we loue God as though the meaning of Paul should be Seing God hath so loued vs ought not we agayne on the other side most constantly to loue hym And thys sentence is neither vnapte nor impious Howbeit I rather preferre the other for that it séemeth to serue better to the scope of the Apostle for hee in thys place goeth about to perswade vs that we should not be in doubt of the loue of God towardes vs. And therefore he sayth that he foreknewe vs predestinated called iustified and glorified vs gaue hys sonne vnto vs together with hym all thinges and that Christ hym selfe maketh intercession vnto yâ— father for vs. All these thinges pertain vnto yâ— loue which God beareth towardes vs. And a litle afterward the Apostle addeth But in all these thinges we are conquerours through hym which hath loued vs. These words most plainely serue to my sentence wherunto also subscribeth Chrisostom I confesse in dede that of this good will of God towardes vs is stirred vp our loue towardes hym howbeit Paul semeth to entreat of that first loue and not of thys our loue But they which will haue these wordes to be vnderstand of our loue towardes God somewhat do doubt whether the elect they yâ— be in very deede iustified may at any time leese faith charity and other vertues or no. But that semeth Paul to denye for he sayth yâ— there is nothing can plucke vs away from the loue of GOD. For this sence is gathered out of the interrogation which he here putteth But whatsoeuer other
with him hath geuen vnto vs all thinges Farther many logicial probable reasons takeÌ„ of those excellent benefites which we féele are daily bestowed vpon vs perswade vs of the same thinges For those benefites although oftentimes they are common also vnto wicked men yet haue they the force both to cheare our hartes and also to comfort vs after that we are once perswaded by other more firmer reasons For argumentes probable althoughe of themselues they are not able throughlye to persuade yet being ioyned vnto reasons firme and demonstratiue they make the Whereunto argumentes probable serue thing more euident Farther if we will follow examples of other most excellent men we shal perceiue with how singuler a loue God loued them Let vs also euery one of vs loke vpon our own priuate doinges in theÌ„ we shall sée how we haue bene oftentimes holpen and preserued of God And although our sence be vtterly rude in these thinges for it is strange from thinges celestial yet it also in the godly The senses are made after a sorte spirituall in godly men is made after a sort spirituall euen as contrariwise in the vngodly euen the very mind also is made carnall wherfore al thinges which the godly vnderstand also by their senses testifie vnto them the good will of God towardes them By this meanes Dauid by contemplation considering all thinges which were offered vnto Why Dauid inuiteth thinges insensible to praise God his senses as pledges of the loue of God inuiteth and prouoketh them to praise God Not that he thought that they could either heare or speake but to declare that they are of that nature that they can stirre vp euerye attentiue and godlye man which hath the vse of them by his sences to praise God and to geue thankes vnto him There are also certaine thinges which of the minde it selfe are most certainly perfectly knowen for that they are the first principles wherunto we only at the sight of them without any farther triall geue our assent And in this knowledge of The first principles of the knoledge of the loue of God â–ª the loue of God towardes vs we haue for the first principle the holy ghost He beareth witnes vnto vs inwardly and in the minde that we are the sonnes of GOD. Wherfore seing the loue of God towards vs is so many waies proued Paul rightly This place serueth to the certainty oâ— saluation saith that he is fully perswaded But all these reasons are such that they cleane fast vnto faith Which faith being taken away we shall herein haue nothing that we can vnderstand nothing that we can know This place serueth wonderfully to establish the certainty of our saluation Neither must we harken vnto them whiche to the ende they woulde wreste this place from vs vse to aunswere that these thinges pertaine only to Paul as though he alone and a few other which by This place is to be taken vniuersally and not perticulerly as though it pertaineth to Paul onlye reuelation were made certaine of their saluation could say that they were fully persuaded that they should neuer be plucked away froÌ„ the loue of God Here doutles is not set forth an history neither is it declared how Paul was called in yâ— way neither is it written how he was let downe from the wall in a basket onely is brought in a conclusion of those reasons wherby he would proue that God most feruently loueth vs. Wherfore this place pertaineth not only to Paul but also to all the faithfull For it maketh nothing against vs that Paul pronounced his sentence vnder the first person For otherwise we should say that that which is written The thinges that are spoken vnder the person of Paul oftentymes pertaine to all men to the Gal. I lyue but now not I bâ—t Christ lyueth in me is to be vnderstande of Paul onely and pertaineth nothing to vs and that which he saith to the Phil. Vnto me to lyue is Christ and to dye is gayne And that which he writeth vnto the Corrinthians I do not thinke that I know any thyng but Christ Iesus and hym crucified and a great many such like sentences should be vnderstand of no other body but of Paul all which thinges yet euery christian ought to apply vnto himselfe that that sentence of the Poet may hereunto be very aptly framed Hogh thou sirra the name is chaunged but the tale is tolde of thee And if sometimes we wauer as touching this Whereof springeth our doubting touching saluation A similitude certainty that is not to be attributed vnto the defaut of faith but for that we haue not a perfect and an absolute faith As if a man professing yâ— Mathematicals should doubt of the principals of his arte that ought not to be attributed vnto his art for it is of all other artes most certaine but rather vnto his vnskilfulnes which hath not yet perfectly learned his arte Wherfore if we at any time as it happeneth in dede be in doubt of our saluation there is no other presenter remedy then to pray with the Apostles Encrease our fayth So did Peter when he saw himself at yâ— point Remedy against doubting Two principal points of thinges against vs. to be ouerwhelmed of the waues of the sea All those things which are against vs Paul in his epistle vnto the Ephe. reduceth to two principall pointes For some coÌ„sist in nature and other some are brought vnto vs of aduersary spirites We wrestle not against flesh and bloud but against spirituall wickednesses which ar in celestiall places These two thinges the Apostle mingleth together to the ende he would leaue out nothing And these things which he speaketh of are of so great force that they may seme able to alienate a man froÌ„ God By life and death he vnderstandeth all maner of daungers whereby we are endaungered touching life death All these things are not of so great force yâ— they can breake in sonder the loue of God towards vs. But wheÌ„ we are in these daÌ„gers we must say as Paul admonisheth vs in this What we must say when we are oppressed with aduersities epistle Whether we lyue or whether we dye we are the Lordes For to thys end Christ dyed and rose agayne to be Lord of the quicke and of the dead And vnto the Phillippiaus Now euen as before Christ shal be glorified in my body whether it be by lyfe or by death Nor Angels Angels as it is written in the epistle vnto the Hebrewes are ministring spirites which are sent forth to be ministers for their sakes which shal be heyres of saluation which can not be vnderstand but of good angels For euill angels are oftentimes sent forth to punishe the vngodly and to tempt men although their temptation is not vnprofitable vnto the predestinate And it is certaine that euill angels séeke by all maner of meanes to leade vs away from God which thing yet
they shall not bring to passe so great is the loue of God towardes vs. But we can not suspect any such matter of good angels for they as much as lieth in them cal home againe to God those that go astray and wonderfully reioyce of the repentance of sinners although they also somtimes are sent forth to punish Howbeit Chrisostome declareth that this place may by the figure Hyperbole or by supposition be vnderstand also of good angels For although good angels do not so in déede yet if they should their endeuor should be voyde For after the same maner Paul writeth vnto the Galathyans If an angell from heauen teach you any other Gospell then thys which ye haue learned be he accursed vnto you And vnto the Corrinthyans If I haue all faith so that I can remoue mountaines and haue not charity I am nothyng Those wordes are not so to be taken as though true faith can in deede be without charity but if it were possible so to be yet it should nothing profite Nor principalities Paraduenture he vnderstandeth the higher spirites who haue no other charge committed vnto them but ouer prouinces empires and kingdomes This ment Daniell when he wrote of the Prince of the Grecians and of the Persians and brought in Michaell the Prince of the people of God Nor powers Power called in Greke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Paul taketh for that power which is geuen of God to worke miracles whereby are restrayned the vngodly whereunto is opposite 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the gift of healing For euen as by that power Power and the gift of healing are opposite wicked men were chastised so by this they that were vexed were healed By this power Peter slew Ananias and Saphira Paul made blinde Elimas the sorcerer and deliuered vnto Sathan many which had gréeuously sinned But here by angels he meaneth those which are sent of God to punishe the wicked as were those which destroyed Sodoma and Gomorha And such was that Angell which went betwéene Angels haue sometimes inflicted punishmentes the host of the Egiptians and the people of God and which drowned Pharao with all his in the sea and whome Dauid saw standing on the threshold destroying the people of God and which destroyed with fire the host of Senacharib Although God sometimes do the selfe same thinges by euill angels For so Dauid writeth in the Psalme that God inflicted plages vpon the Egiptians by euill angels Wherefore Paul in this place nameth the orders of the angels by their ministeries and offices And that the selfe same titles are assigned both vnto good angels The titles of orders are assigned as well to euell Angels as to good The ministeries of Angels shall not be perpetual and vnto euill it is manifest by y◠epistle vnto the Ephesians in two places For thus it is there writtē Against the principalities and powers that are gouerners of the world And in the 2. chapter he saith That we once liued according to the course of this world and after the prince that hath power in the ayre And these ministeries of Angels shall not be perpetuall For Paul writeth in the first vnto the Corrinthyans That all principality and power shal be blotted out when Christ shall deliuer vp the kingdome vnto God and vnto the father but yet not that the very natures and substances of angels shal be abolished but for that these offices shall serue to no more vse after we shall be once transferred vnto eternall felicity And this is worthy We haue but few thinges in the holy scriptures touching Angels of notinge that in the holy scriptures are very fewe thinges mencioned of angels For exactly and subtelye to enquire touching them serueth rather to pertayne to our curiosity then to our saluation But those thinges which serue to edification are most diligently set forth in the scriptures Which thing I would to God the Shoolemen had obserued For then had they left many intricate and vnprofitable thinges which at this day are in vayne and with great offence disputed of It is profitable for vs to vnderstand that there are some angels appointed to our ministeries for therby we vnderstand the goodnes of God towards vs. On the other side it is profitable for vs to vnderstand that there are some euill spirites of whom we are continually assaulted both that we may beware of them and also that we may implore the helpe of God againste them And these thinges vndoubtedly forasmuch as they are profitable to be knowen the holy scripture hath not kept in silence Ambrose expounding this place sheweth that we are in vayne assaulted of euill spirites For he saith that Simeon the forcerer being lifted vp into the ayre flew all about that this was openly séene and yet did the truth of God geue place to these deceates Nor thinges present nor thinges to come These wordes may be vnderstand of this world and of the world to come or of good thinges and euill which are offred vnto vs presently or of those thinges which are promised shall happen vnto vs well or ill as it happened in the temptacion of the first parents For then the fruit forbidden offred it selfe beutifull to sée vnto and swete to tast of There was promised a likenes to God and a new wisedome as though then they were blynd and had their eyes shut The lattin interpreter addeth Fortitude which word yet is not found in the Greke bookes Wherefore I thinke it best to omitte it and especially seing it hath not his Antithesis which we see is diligently added vnto the other wordes Nor heigth nor depth Heigth signifieth whatsoeuer new and vnaccustomed thing happeneth from heauen depth signifieth whatsoeuer bursteth forth out of y◠lower parts regions of y◠erth And heigth may be takē otherwise for y◠heigh goodly shew of humaine reasons which are cōmonly takē out of philosophy For Paul in the latter to the Cor. saith The weapons of our warrefare are not carnall but mighty through God to the ouerthrowyng of all munitiōs wherby we ouerthrow coūsels and euery heigth that exalteth it selfe against the knowledge of God And after this sētence by depth we may vnderstand humblenes of minde and hurting of the body after the precepts and doctrines of men which in wordes haue a shew of wisdom as it is written vnto the Col. in the 2 chapter Nor any creature can seperate vs from the loue of God which is in Christ Iesus our Lord. This part Paul addeth as Ambrose thinketh to declare y◠we can not be plucked away frō God by any other creature which is brought forth of new As though before he had reckoned vp those creatures which are extant and thē afterward addeth that neither any other creature if it could be brought forth shall haue so much strēgth to breake that loue of God wherwith he loueth vs. And he citeth Iannes and Mambres which when before Pharao they resisted
〈◊〉 that is dedicated vnto God Because that they are either seperated or els suspended by this declaration it sufficiently appeareth what it was that Paul wished vnto himselfe The proues of his principall sentence wherein he sayde that he had conceaued so great a griefe that he would gladly be made Anathema for his bretherne are of two sortes The one is taken of witnesses and the other of the cause And the cause is for that they were Israelites vnto whome pertayneth the adoption the lawe the glory the testamentes the promises and for that Christ as touching the fleshe came of their fathers And as touching the first poynt concerning witnesses he affirmeth that he sayth the truth in Christ as though he should haue to do before him and should cite him for a witnesse of his saying Farther he bringeth his owne conscience as a witnes and that rightly especially seing he entreateth of that thinge whiche no man could knowe but Paul himselfe For none knoweth our affections but we our selues onely and therefore Paul calleth his conscience for a witnes as before the iudgement seate of God And because the conscience may sometimes be deceaued forasmuch as euery man flattereth himselfe more then is meete and maketh his affections greater then they are in very deede therefore addeth he In the holy ghost For the conscience being by it directed and tempred is neuer deceaued Wherefore this othe of the Apostle consisteth of thre notable witnesses And he swereth with great waight not in a light or trifling cause but Of what greate waight the othe of the Apostle is in such a cause as bringeth a greate helpe to saluation and also vnto them vnto whome he writeth is very profitable And seing he so earnestly affirmeth with an othe that he had conceaued so greate a sorrow as he hath now expressed it most manifestly appeareth that that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is lacke or want of affectioÌ„s of the Stoikes agreeth not with Christians For certaine things are so framed of nature that strength way so sone as they are offred vnto vs we by a certaine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the Stoâ—ke not agreable with Christians naturall motion abhorre from them as is death and as also are bitter chances when they happen vnto them which are ioyned vnto vs either by kinred or by countrey Christ vndoubtedly wept for the discention of Ierusalem and was heauy when his time was come that he should sone after dye And Paul in the latter to the Corrinthians sayth that when he shall come he shal hewayle them which haue not repented Samuell powred out teares for Saul bycause God had reiected him For whome also when he was slayne Dauid wept with a publike sorrow Ieremy also with many teares ditties bewayled the captiuity and ouerthrow of his people But these thinges thou wilt say happen vnto our freÌ„ds by the prouidence and commaundement of God wherefore when they so happen Whether it be lawful to be grieued for the aduersities of our neighbours holy men ought not to lament for them For we must chearefully obey the will of God otherwise why do we dayly pray Thy will be done But thou must vnderstand that we may doo both as our minde hath a respect vnto diuerse thinges For when a man beholdeth the aduersities and calamities of men and especially of those men vnto whome he is by any familiar aquaintaunce ioyned then is he both grieued and also would gladly with a greate price redeme those euilles And contrariwise when we behold the decrée prouidence and will of God we do not only take them in good part whatsoeuer thinges they be but The Prophets differ in theyr kindes of speach according to the diuersity of the respect also we receaue them gladly and with a cherefull mynde Wherefore in the Prophets there are red sundry kindes of speach according as they had a respect to diuerse thinges Sometimes they seme to desire God to turne away the calamities of sinners and seme to bewepe and lament them and sometimes they seme to wish that they which hate God may be punished and perish For our mynde like a Kameleon which way soeuer it bendeth it selfe putteth an affecte according to the nature of the thing which it beholdeth Crassus when he saw his sonne slayne and his legions go to the worse Ye souldiers sayth he fight cheare An example of Crassus fully manfully defende your Pub. welth For this mourning is my priuate mourning WheÌ„ he looked vpoÌ„ his own mischance he could not but lameÌ„t but when he set before his eyes yâ— helth of yâ— publike welth he called back his mind to cherefulnes So did Brutus so did Torquatus sley theyr own childreÌ„ yâ— the discipline Whether it wer lawfull for Paul to wish to be made Anathema from Christ of war publike liberty might be preserued But here ariseth an other question more difficâ—l â–ª how it was lawful for Paul to wish to be seperated froÌ„ Christ when as we ought to loue God aboue all thinges and when as we rede in the Gospel He which loueth his father or mother or bretherne more then me is not worthy of me This thing sayth Chrisostome is so obscure that Paul semeth to speake ridles For forasmuch as before he had said that he was perswaded that he could by no creature be plucked away from yâ— loue of Christ by what meanes can he now wish to be made Anathema for his brethern There haue bene some which thought that Anathema in this place is Kimelion that is a deare treasure and of greate price such as noble men vse to haue greate store of made of gold and siluer and fashioned with wonderfull greate conning but this is a triflinge and childishe interpretacion For if Paul had ment so he should not haue sayd from Christ but before Christ Farther what a great acte were this I pray you For there is none which desireth not to be acceptable vnto God and to pertaine vnto his flocke especiallye seinge he knoweth that he is the chiefe goodnes Farther if Paul haâ— bene in steade of a treasure before Christ what should that haue profited his brethern according to yâ— flesh But a man peradueÌ„ture wil say that he might then the better make intercession for them before God But forasmuch as the prayers of the faythfull lene not vnto the merites or dignity of theÌ„ that pray but only to a true and liuely fayth the Apostle ought not so diligently to put in these words in this place For he prayed without intermissioÌ„ for other men although according to those mens opinion he should not be Anathema In The commentaries ascribed vnto Ierome dede Chrisostome reherseth this expositioÌ„ but yet he coÌ„fesseth it to be ridiculous and folish The commeÌ„taries which are ascribed vnto Ierome say that these are to be referred vnto that time wherein Paul persecuted the Church of Christ as though he would say that he
learning sake I attribute very much But in considering it I finde two greate doubtes As touching the first Augustine in his booke de Sermone domini in monte saith How this is to be vnderstand that we should do vnto others that which we would should be done vnto vs. That that sentence of Christ that we should do vnto others that which we would should be done vnto our selues is to be vnderstand of an vpright and iust will For when we desire to haue any thing done vnto vs which is vpright and iust it is mete that we performe the same thing vnto an other man But if we our selues should desire any thing that is filthy or vniust then is it not mete that we should doo the same thing vnto our neighboure For suppose there were an vnchast and wicked maÌ„ which through filthy counsell would be content his wife should play the harlote shall he therfore with out sinne defile an other mans wife And if a man being in desperation in aduersities would desire that one should kill him shall it for that cause be Lawefull for hym to kill hys neighboure Wherefore It is not iust that a man should desire to haue an other man â–ª punished for himself for as much as I do not thinke yâ— the will of yâ— man is iust which to be deliuered from the punishment of death would desire to haue an other to suffer in hys place neither also can I thinke that a man is bound to desire vnto hym selfe dammantion to the end an other man should be deliuered bycause he desireth to haue such thinges vnto him selfe For as I haue sayde he desireth yâ— against reason and iustice Wherefore if damnation be sometimes wished for the brethren sake it is for some other cause to be wished for The second doubt is concerning Christ For although he for our sakes suffered death yet was he not in very dede seperated from God but that his humanity was holpen when vpon Christ was not for our sakes seperated from God the Crosse he suffered all extreme payns He was also made a curse as touching the punishement of the law which punishment he suffred for our saluation sake and he was counted as a blasphemer and an vngodly person and being as it were conuinced of these crimes he was condemned but yet was he not by eternall damnation seperated from God Erasmus sayth Optarim by the potentiall mode which signifieth I would haue wished namely if it were possible But this exposition disolueth not the doubt For herein is the doubt whether it be lawfull for the saluation of our neighbour to wishe or to desire to be made accursed from Christ And it might seme that although it were possible yet a good man ought neuer to haue any such thought to enter into his harte to desire this thing especially seing there can nothing be found better then God There are others whiche thynke that Paul when he wished these thyngs had his cogitatioÌ„ fixed only vpon the destruction perdition of the Iewes and â—or yâ— cause he was so much greued that straight way by a certayne force of charity he would redeme them euen with his owne condemnation Which force forasmuch as it came from the holy ghost and from charity could not but please God These are not say they the wordes of a man conterpesing himselfe betwéene God and the saluation of his neighbour as one which as it were after a déepe deliberation would preferre the Holy men are liberall of theyr owne thinges saluation of his neighbours before Christ but as holy men are liberall of their owne thinges so he considering the damnation of the Iewes for as much as he was desirous by some meanes whatsoeuer it were to put it away was willing to offer for them if it were possible euen his owne damnation that as it were by an exchange made they might be deliuered Neither offred he himselfe in such maner as though he would be a sacrifice for them or that he thought himselfe worthy so great honour that if he himselfe were condemned they should be delyuered but because he had no greater thing to offer But this opinion is hereby weakened because it is not very likely that Paul wrote not those thinges which he wrote with great deliberation and aduisement Wherefore he was not by violence or rashely impelled to speake these thinges but by great and wayghty deliberation that by what meanes so euer it were he might redeme the saluation of his brethren Neither know I whether such a will which afterward nedes to be corrected by the iust rule of the loue of God whome we ought to loue aboue all thinges may be ascribed vnto the holy ghost or no. And forasmuch as Paul speaketh as it appeareth of a matter of vehement charity it séemeth not probable that only a certayne first motion stirred him whereof we may doubt whether it procede from the holyghost and whether it a gree with the perfect loue of God if it be not amended Now resteth to rehearse the opinion of Chrisostome which for as much is my iudgement is of all other most playne easy and true ought to be taken as agreeable vnto the wordes of the Apostle First saith he the cause of this desire in Paul is to be sought for which if we be ignorant of then may we easely erre As when he circumcised Timothe when he polled his hed when he tooke vpon him the vow vnles a man know to what end he did these thinnges he might easely suspect that he was become an open Iewe. But if a maÌ„ wil more narrowly consider the thing he shall easely discharge him of all maner of Iewishnes Neither is this consideration to be had in Paul only but also in Abraham in Phinees and in Elias which men vnles thou diligently examine their causes thou maist What cause braue Paul to this desire count for homicides Wherfore let vs demaund of Paul Who moued thée O Paul vnto this thing to be made accursed from Christ He will answere vndoubtedly No man perswaded me so to do but Christ himselfe I would wishe in déede that my brethren according to the fleshe should be saued Howbeit I haue not fixed the end of my desire in them For this haue I wished not only for their sakes but chiefely for Christes sake that in this thing his grace and truth might most of all shine abroade And it ought not to séeme absurde vnto any man if I haue preferred It is not absurd for a man to preferre the dignity of Christ before his owne saluation the dignity and honour of Christ before mine owne saluation But this séemeth much to be against this sentence for that Paul made no mencion of this principall end and of this his chiefe entent But neither did he yâ— without a cause For he entended warely to set forth his matter which if he should haue openly spoken should not so well haue serued his turne
For while he wente aboute to persuade his bretherne according to the flesh how much he loued them in that he said that he wished for theyr sakes to be accursed from Christe if he had added that he had done it for the honor of Christ whom he worshipped I cannot tell what might seme to be dimished of that loue which he sayd that he bare towards his brethren Wherefore he cunningly kept that in silence wherein yet was the chiefe and principall cause of his desire Howbeit least the prudent reader should in any wise Why he made no mencion of the principall cause of his desire erre he hath so tempred his wordes which follow that by them he may very easely gather what his meaning was For thus he writeth To whome pertayneth the adoption the couenantes the glory the geuing of the lawe the worshippyng the promises of whome are the fathers of whome is Christ according to the flesh who is God ouer all blessed for euer Amen These wordes being well and diligently examined do declare what Paul had a regard vnto in this his so feruent desire Let vs call to memory that the Israelites were called of God that they abode long in the profession of God that they kept the lawes of God a longe tyme that they by innumerable Prophetes receaued promises of Christ to come and of other good thynges Forasmuch therefore as they had bene such men and yet semed now to be excluded and other nations which were ignoraunt of God and geuen to most filthy idolatry were placed in their stede many began to be offended at the prouideÌ„ce fayth and gouernmeÌ„t of God Wherfore ether they blasphemed him or ells they made exclamation openly that this was not the Christ promised in the Law These thinges troubled Paul excedingly much For he would not that in the affayres of the Gospel should be brought in a stage matter or a matter of pastime as though that which god had promised to one people he would geue to an other and as though Christ was borne for the Iewes but profited none but the Gentiles And that Paul was by this reason chiefely moued that manifestly declareth which is a litle afterward added Not as though the word of God The end of Moses request hath fallen away By which wordes he declareth that he admonished vs of these thinges lest any maÌ„ should thinke that the promises of God were not sure And none other entent had Moses wheÌ„ he desired to be blotted out of the booke which God had writen theÌ„ that God should spare the people For he geueth this reasoÌ„ Lest peraduenture it be said that God hath brought a people out of Egipt but was not able to bring to passe that they should obteyne the Land which he had promised them and therefore would he kill them in the desert Nether doth Paul in this place say that he Paul desired not to cease of froÌ„ louing of God Euery man ought to preferre the honor of God before his owne felicity Why Paul wished not this thinge for the Gentils wisheth to be seperated from the loue of God for he would by no meanes cease of from louing of him only he wisheth to be excluded from the blessed coniunction with God to be deuided from the fellowshippe of the Angelles and of the sayntes to be depriued of the fruition of eternall felicity And this thing ought euery one of vs to desire namely to preferre the honor of God before his owne felicity And Paul speaketh not these thinges of the Gentiles as he doth of the Iewes not that he would not doo as much for them also when the like danger of the honour of God shoulde happen but bycause then he entreated not of the Gentiles For they on euerye side of theyr owne accord came vnto Christ wheÌ„ as the Iewes most vehemeÌ„tly resisted him The same Chrisostome vpon Mathew expounding this place It is better that one member bee cutte of and cast away then that the whole body should perishe saith That Paule considered this thing that rather he being cut of and made accursed God might haue glory of the greate body being saued theÌ„ that he himselfe should be saued and a greate multitude of Iewes which were like vnto a certayne greate body should be cast into hell fire This so greate loue of Paul â—arre passeth the affect of all parentes toward theyr Children And so greate was it that Chrisostome writing touching priesthode sayth that he was for a iust cause feared a way from that office bycause he saw himselfe to be farre distant from such kinde of loue The same Chrisostome de prouideÌ„tita dei writeth That Paul desired rather to liue in hell then to se his brethern condemned And he addeth that it was a greater vexation vnto Paul to se the distruction of hys brethern the Iewes then if he himselfe should haue bene tormented in hell For he desired that torment rather then to se his brethern perish miserably Nether was he deceaued in this iudgment For it came not from reason or vnderstanding but from the impulsion of the spirite of God The Schoolemen differ not muche from thys interpretation of Chrisostome For Thomas sayth That Paule neuer wished for the seperation from God which coÌ„meth through sinne nether coulde he wish for it keping charity but for the aduauncement of the glory of God it was Lawfull for him to wish for the seperation from felicity Yea yâ— same Thomas addeth That Paul somtimes desired for his bretherns sake to be seperated from that felicity and to haue it differred for a time For vnto the Phillipians he writeth That to dye should be vnto hym gayne howbeit it was profitable for them that he should abide in the flesh he sheweth that he both desired and also hoped that God would graunt that he might be conuersante with them for a time So saith Thomas mought he also in this place for the helth of hys brethern wish to be seperated from God ether for euer or else for a time But that these These words cannot be vnderstande of a seperation for a time wordes can not be vnderstand of a seperation for a time this word Anathema sufficiently declareth For Anathema signifieth yâ— seperation from commoÌ„ vse which can neuer by any meanes be reuoked or restored againe But this Greke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may signify not only I did wishe but also I did pray Neyther Paul wished for that thing which could not be done The will is sometimes rauished to thinges impossible ought we to meruayle that Paul wished for this thing although it coulde not come to passe for there is no doubt but that he was one of the predestinate for our will is oftentimes rauished vnto those thinges which are not possible to be done For so prayed Dauid Who shall geue me power to dy for thee my sonne Absolon When yet it could not be that he should dye for Absolon That are
touching Ismaell and Esau whether they be faued or whether they be condemned And the like some do touching Salomon Origen and others such like But I omitte these thinges and thinke of Esau and Ismaell so much onely as the holy scripture hath set forth vnto vs. And I think that there are What is to be thought of Esau no places extant by which we may define any thing touching their saluation The scripture thus speaketh of Esau that he so vehemently hated his brother that he sought to kill him that he sold his birth right that he prouoked h 〈…〉 â—arentes to anger when he had take strange women for wiues that he was a violent man and despised the land of Chanaan promised vnto the fathers and in the epistle to the Hebrues it is written that he although he poured out many teares yet found he no place of repentance Of Ismaell also we reade that he was reiected not only What is to be thought of their stocke by the will of Sara but also by the will of God But touching both their posterities I deny not but that some of them mought be saued no les then some of the stocke of Iacob might become runnagates and obstinate For it is sufficient to the election and reiection of God that some part of ech stocke be either elected or reiected And touching this sentence I haue Ambrose on my side who affirmeth that the most holy man Iob was of the famely of Esau Which saying yet how much it is to be regarded I know not This thing only I dare affirme yâ— as many as were saued that came of Israell those were saued by the grace of God and had a promise of their saluation and on the other side as many as were saued of the stocke of Esau those also were saued by the mere grace of God but there was no peculiar promise touching their saluation But as many as were of that stocke condemed Indefinite promises at not to be vnderstanded of euery one perticulerly they were condemned for their sinnes And the sentence of the reiection of the posterity of Esau is indefinite neither is to be vnderstanded of euery one perticularly But it may séeme more then wonderfull that God in his election worketh not only contrary to our iudgement but also contrary to his own lawes For not only after the mauer of men the first borne are preferred before the rest of the brethern but also by the prescript of the lawe of God they were holy and obtayned a dooble portion of the inheritance But God therefore so doth that we should God doth thinges contrary to his lawes vnderstand that we are saued only by grace and not through any priuiledges or conditions of this life and moreouer to geue vs to vnderstand that he is vtterly free from all lawes For his will is euen iustice it selfe and the rule of all thinges that are vpright and iust But because men can not attayne to the knowledge of of this hidden election therefore we ought to frame our selues to the lawes of of God which are published abroade and set forth to all men For Isaack circumcised his sonne Esau as God had commaunded him neither was he greatly carefull whether he were elected of God or reiected for he was then vtterly ignorant of the counsaile of God But the mother for that she had hard the oracle gaue faith vnto it as it became her and had a care that the blessing mought be distributed according to the will of God And so by her industry it came to passe that Iacob preuented his brother of the blessing Touching which will when the father also was by the spirite of God made more certayne he would by no meanes make voide that which had now passed betwene him and Iacob Paul mought now seme to haue thoroughly defended the truth of the promises of God when as after the example of Ismaell and Isaack which were borne of diuers parentes and at diuers tymes he with so great diligence bringeth in also an other coople of bretheren Iacob and Esau in whome all thinges in a maner were equall For they were borne both of one and the selfe same parentes and in one and the selfe same day and as Augustine saith in his epistle to Sixtus both conceaued at one and the selfe same time least any man mought cauell that the father was better when he begat the one then he was when he begat the other And the mother which bare them both was one and the selfe same woman And although she myght in that space of time whilest she was with child alter her maners and disposition yet that could not in such sort profit the one to be a let vnto the other Although by the Greke it appeareth not that they were both conceaued at one and the selfe same tyme. Howbeit this is red That Rebecka had fellowship by one euen by our father Isaack But Augustine followed the latine translation Farther it is not vnlikely to be true yâ— they which were borne in one and the selfe same tyme were also begotten atone the selfe same tyme especially seing that the Apostle in this place endeuoreth The industry of yâ— holye ghost in Paul in this coople of twynes vtterly to take away all maner of differences In Paul also is to be considered the industry of the holy ghost who when he had affirmed out of the holy scriptures that of these two brethern the one was elected the other reiected bringeth no other reason or cause of the counsell of God but that election should abide according to purpose But because he saw that this would in no case satisfy humane reason therefore he confirmed his sentence by an oracle of Malach. who straight way at the the beginning of his first chapiter thus writeth The Lord hath loued you And ye haue sayd wherein hath the Lord loued vs And the Prophet maketh answere Iacob and Esau were they not brethern But I haue loued Iacob and haue hated Esau Wherefore with Malachy to loue is all one wyth that which Paul hath That the Election of God shoulde abide according to purpose Neither is this to be passed ouer that the Apostle in thus ioyning together these Paul most diligently red the scriptures two testimonies declareth that he had not negligently red the scriptures Wherfore we also must endeuor our selues to do the like when as we shall see places of the scriptures alleadged either of the Apostles or of other writers Paul when he red the Prophet Malachy and saw that God proueth his loue towardes the Iewes by that that he had loued Iacob and hated Esau when yet notwithstanding they were brethern and twines straight way turned himselfe to the history of Genesis and there considered many thinges which mought conduce to adorne and amplifye this matter namelye that they were borne bothe at one and the same time and of one and the selfe same parentes and that the
that they had God fauorable vnto them And God as touching those whose God he will peculiarly be prouideth for thē not only commodities in this life for he is the God of the whole man and hath no les care ouer the soule then he hath ouer the body that not only in this life but also in this life to come but let vs peise the entent of Malachy He reproueth God prouideth for his not onely things erthly but also eternall the people of ingratitude towardes God God saith he is your father and Lorde Howbeit ye neither loue him nor reuerence him when yet he hath loued you And that loue he proueth by a double benefite of God towards them first for that he loued Iacob and preferred him before Esau when yet notwithstanding they were brethern and twines secondly for that he gaue vnto the one a sertile and plentifull land to inhabite but vnto the other he gaue an vnfruitful and barren land and for that he deliuered the one from theyr captiuity but would haue the captiuity of the other to be perpetuall So the loue of God is proued by the effectes but of that loue is alledged no cause I graunt indede that the posterity of Esau were alwayes wicked men and enemies vnto the people of Israell although by affinity they were ioyned vnto them yet they were alwaies aduersaries and enemies vnto them Some say also that Mahumet came of that natiō although there are others which referre his stock to the Ismalites Farther the earth also The earth is by reason of sinnes made barrē is by reason of sinnes made barren Therfore Dauid sayth That for the sins of the people the earth is turned into a wildernes and is made of God vnfruit full But neither Paul nor the prophet describe these thinges as causes of the loue of God Yea rather if we should fayne any such exposition vnto Malachie his reprehension should somewhat be extenuated For when he vpbraydeth vnto the people ingratitude for that God had loued thē they mought in one word haue made answere Therefore hath he loued vs bycause we deserued it for he foresaw that our workes should be good and for that cause he loued vs. Wherefore much wayght is taken away from this reprehension if we admitte this opinion Many trouble theyr heddes about the hatred and loue of God and say that he neither loueth nor hateth as we vse to doo Which thing in dede I graunt for God loueth with out all maner of troubled affection and loueth perpetually for he is not changed he hateth also without perturbation and for that he is not mutable he perpetually hateth those whom he hateth They say moreouer that these thinges are to be considered by the effectes so that God is sayd to loue him to whome he doth good and to hate him whome he ouerpasseth and leueth in sinnes and for his sinnes which he hath committed afterward greuously punisheth Herein I will not contend with them although in graunting thys God in dede loueth and in dede hateth I also affirme wyth the holy scripture that God truly and in dede loueth and hateth and that thereof followe those effectes which we haue now mencioned And bycause we can not by it selfe vnderstand the force and might of the loue hatred of God therfore we consider thē by the effects namely ether by his gifts or by his punishmēts But the ground of y◠question is whither y◠loue come of our merites or fréely The Apostle excludeth merites other some fayne woorkes Whether God loue or hate in respect of works fore sene foreséene Wherefore it shall not be amisse to recite theyr opinions that we maye see how this is to be vnderstanded that God either hateth or loueth Chrisostome thinketh that God therefore loued Iacob because he was good and reiected Esau because he was euill And if thou saye that they forasmuche as they were not yet horne had done neither good nor euill he maketh aunswere that vnto God if is not needefull to waite for the euent of thinges For he by the most sharpe sighte of his foreknowledge seeth before all eternitie what thinges shal afterward come to passe and he alone knoweth truly who shall be woorthy of his election who vnworthy But here Chrisostome somewhat strayeth from the truth when hee saith God findeth not in men an◠worthines for which they should be elected that God findeth in men any woorthinesse for which they ought to be elected For what thing els is that but not onely to diminishe but also vtterly to take awaye euen the grounde of grace For if of our selues we be worthy to be elected verely the grace of GOD is not geuen vnto vs freely Howbeit he confesseth that the Apostle speaketh not this for if he had made aunswere that Iacob was therefore elected for that he was good and Esau reiected for that he was euil he saith that the Iewes mought straightway haue replied if we be reiected for our wickednes what were the Gentiles whiche are now receaued any better then we This thinge also woulde they vtterly haue denied For the Gentiles were infected with most gréeuous sinnes howbeit he sayth it moughte be graunted that the Gentiles which were nowe called were good for that they had receiued the saith of Christe which the Iewes by all maner of meanes withstoode But Paul would not in such sorte make aunswer but referred the whole matter to the foreknowledge of God against which doubtles saith he none that hath his righte wittes will stande For Paul resolueth not the question into the fore knowledgeof God but into his wil by it God foreseeth who shal be good and who euill But here againe he is far out of the waye For Paul resolueth not the question into the foreknowledge of God but into his will mercy and power For he sayth that it is not of hym that willeth nor of him that rūneth but of God that hath mercy that he hath mercy on whom he will and hardeneth whome he wyll and lastly that the potter maye of one and the selfe same masse or lompe make one vessell to honor and an other to contumely And to the Ephesians he saith that we are elected accordinge to the good pleasure of his will Chrisostome addeth that when it is sayd that the elder shall serue the younger thereby is shewed that the right and dignity of the first birth should nothing profite hym which came first out of the wombe but the vertue which God foresaw before workes Here it is a harde matter to vnderstand what manner a thinge that vertue is whiche should goe before works For what doth he peraduēture thinke y◠these men are borne endued with vertue But there cā no such thing be foūd in the scriptures for they testifie y◠mē are borne the children of wrath obnoxious vnto sinne But as far as we can coniecture A mynde prone to good things is not in
if they should be receaued he saith Grace can no more be grace And thus much touching Chrisostome Now let vs sée what Ieromes minde is touching this matter He in his 10. question to Hedibia The opinioÌ„ of Ierome beginneth doubtles in my iudgement not very souÌ„dly For he saith that this is a most obscure place when as otherwise in the wordes of the Apostle as touching the question there is no ambiguity at all But he and other such like make the thing obscure whilest they labour to eschew more theÌ„ is nedeful the offence of humane We must not pretend any obscurenes in this chapter reason For Paul if a man haue a regard to the grammaticall sence if in any other place then moste of all in this place obserued both in his interrogation and answere and prospiâ—uous placing of his wordes whatsoeuer mought seme requisite And should be not a litle contumelius against the holy ghost if he would of purpose haue so obscured the doctrine concerning the principall ground of our saluation so that we should not be able to vnderstand it For in this place is entreated Here is entreated of the chiefe promise of our saluatioÌ„ of a matter which is of all other of most waight namely to what thing we ought to attribute our saluation and election whether to our workes foresens or to the frée mercy of God Ierome vsing this for his preface turneth himselfe afterward to reproue Origen howbeit he leueth his name vnexpressed For Origen labouring to iustify God as touching the loue of Iacob and hatred of Esau which as yet had done neither good nor euil sayth yâ— that came to passe by reason of those Plato Pithagoras things which their soules had done before they came into their bodies For of those merites it coÌ„meth yâ— meÌ„ in this life are of diuers estates These things Ierome worthely reproueth For they pertain not to Christian piety but to the doctrine of Plato and of Pithagoras For they fayned sondry courses departures returnes of the soules Why do we not rather saith Ierome confesse our own ignorance This sentence as I commend so also se I that it is not alwayes kept of him which spake it For if he would haue bene content with a godly ignorance he had not fained imagined those questions and suppositioÌ„s of Paul which in very déede are none at all But he would not that the Apostle should seme to haue tought these thinges contrary to common sence For when Paul had said Iacob haue I loued but Esau haue I hated and afterward had added What is there iniquity wyth God and had made answere Ieromes discourse vpon this place God forbid proued by testemonies of the scriptures that God tempereth and moderateth his election according to his wil mercy and power Ierome sought to bow and to wrest those thinges which Paul had most simply spoken as if they were importunatly obiected vnto Paul by way of interrogation as though when Paul had answered God forbid the importunate caueler should go on and say If God sayd vnto Moses I wyll haue mercy on whome I wyll haue mercy and wyll shew compassion on whome I wyll shew compassion then shall it not now be neither of hym that wylleth nor of hym that runneth but of God that hath mercy And if he to thys ende raysed vp Pharao to declare in him hys power what could he then do wythall And if we be as clay in the hand of the potter why do we yet complayne Who can resist hys wyll Shall there be nothing remayning of free wyll Let Paul make answere to these impudent obiections what art thou o man which thus reasonest wyth God Euen by thyne owne malepertnes thou mayst sufficiently vnderstand that thou art not as clay in the hand of the potter For the clay complayneth not of hys maker but thou I wyll not say greuously complaynest but also powrest out blasphemy agaynst the creator and callest hym vniust and euen in thys thou declarest that thou hast free wyll when as thou speakest what thou list yea euen agaynst God himselfe And if God woulde by his greate patience long suffer Pharao and declare his mercy towardes others he is not therefore to be accused of thee the faulte is rather to be layde vppon the sinnes of men For euen as by one and the selfe same heate of the sunne clay is made hard and waxe made soft so by one and the selfe same goodnes of God some are made more obstinate and other some returne to health And therefore were the Gentles admitted into saluation for that they receaued the fayth of Christ and the Iewes were for saken and reiected for that they resisted that fayth Wherefore not the men themselues but theyr wylles are elected Wherfore by these thinges it is euident that Ierome also was of that mynde that the election of God dependeth of the wyll and workes of men And toward the An interpretation of an author not named end of this tenth question he sayth that he had red in a certaine author whose name yet he kepeth in silence that the Apostle doth not only not dissolue the question but also maketh it more intricate by testimonies of the scriptures and reproueth the curious inquisitor after this maner O man what art thou forsoth clay in the hand of the potter Wherefore kepe downe this thy malepertnes with eternall silence and be mindfull of the infirmity which is in man As touching This question caÌ„ not so be dissolued to satisfie humane reason Ierome vpon Malachy yâ— dissolution of the question if Ierome meane of that wherin humane wisdome may be satisfied we also do graunt that the question is not dissolued but if he speake of that kind of solution which ought to be sufficient vnto Christian piety and which may be had in this life there is nothing wanting to this dissolution Of the selfe same matter Ierome vpon Malachy expounding the place which we are now in hand with writeth after this maner The loue and hatred of God is either of foreknowledge or of workes For those God loueth whome he seeth to be haters of sinne and those he hateth whome he seeth wyll build vp those thynges which he wyll haue to be ouerthrowen Finally he saith that God is sayde to loue or to hate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 â–ª that is after the maner of men euen as he is sayde to be angry to be sory to reioyce and therefore is he sayd to hate the wicked that we shoulde eschew those thinges whiche we know he hateth I know also that the Rabines of the Hebrues and especially Chimhi when they expound this place of Malachy do runne vnto workes But although in properties phrases of wordes I iudge those men worthy som what to be estemed yet as touching the sence of scripture and doctrine I do not geue much credit vnto them For they are vtterly blinded neither will they
any to such as would haue vsed theÌ„ wel Further remember that in these wordes it is not sayd that they which had not miracles should if peradueÌ„ture they had haâ— any haue beleued of themselues as though yâ— that lay in their owne nature or fre wil. For that thing would God haue geuen vnto theÌ„ And forasmuch as it is a senteÌ„ce coÌ„ditional there ought not of it to be inferred a proposition categoricall or affirmatiue As wheÌ„ it is sayd If a horse should flye he should haue winges it followeth not thereof that a horse hath winges or that to flye is of the nature of the horse or that the horse Neither election nor reprobation depende of works fore sene The difference betwene election and reprobation could flye if he had winges when as vnto flyeng are required moe things then winges Wherefore herein election and reprobation agrée together that neither of them depâ—ndeth of workes foresene Howebeit they differ two maner of wayes Firste for that although sinnes are not causes of reprobation yet are they causes of eternall damnation wherunto the reprobate are ordeined For they are not condemned but by iuste iudgemente neyther haue they any thing that they can iustlye complayne of the iniustice of God But good workes are neither the beginning of the election of God nor true causes of eternall felicity Neither must we here harken to the scholemen which put in them merite as they vse to speake of condignity For Paul contrariwise teacheth that the suffringes Merite is not to be admitted of this tyme are not condignae that is worthy the glory to come which shal be reueled in vs. The other difference is for that the good workes where vnto we are predestinate to be by them led to felicity are not of our selues but of the predestination of God But sinne is grafted in vs euen from our birth Good workes we haue of God but not sinnes For in iniquityes are we conceaued and in sinnes hath our mother conceaued vs. Howbeit some haue gone aboute to proue that the loue of God dependeth of workes by the 8. chap. of the boke of Prouerbes For there God thus speaketh Those that loue me I loue But of those wordes can not be inferred that which they seke I graunt indede that they are loued of God which loue God but yet it followeth not that therefore God beginneth to loue them because they loue him Yea rather it followeth contrarily that they therefore loue God because God beginneth not therfore to loue vs for that we loue him God loueth them For so Iohn teacheth vs Not that we haue loued God for he hath loued vs first But that we may the plainlier vnderstand both that which I haue alredy spoken and also that which shall afterward be spoken I will declare the signification of fower wordes which are of Paul vsed in this treatise namely the loue of God election predestination and purpose The loue of God is it as we haue sayd whereby he willeth vnto any man felicity Election is whereby he preferreth one before an other PredestinatioÌ„ is whereby he directeth those whome he hath so loued and preferred before others to the ende which he hath appoynted vnto them namely vnto eternall life by apt meanes And The order betwene loue electioÌ„ and predestination these are in such order ioyned together that predestination followeth loue and election For as we haue sayde whom God hath loued hath preferred before others those he directeth to their ende But touching loue and election we must otherwise consider of them in God then we see commonly commeth to passe in men For men when they see a man adorned with excellent giftes him they elect Loue and election are after an other maner of sorte in God then they are in men aboue others and then they wishe well vnto him and to their power seeke to do hym good but God forasmuch as in men he findeth nothyng that is good yet of his mere mercy and singular goodnes he loueth some and decreeth vnto them many good thinges and thereof followeth election For for this cause onely are they preferred before others for that they are loued of God and not for any their owne worthines And as loue is to election so is hatred to reprobation Wherefore I mislike not that which the master of the sentences citeth out of Augustine that predestination is a preparation to glory and reprobation a preparation to eternal punishementes so that those differences which we haue a little before mencioned be added Nowe resteth to declare the fourth worde namely purpose And that we say is nothing els but his good pleasure 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 What the purpose of God is which signification we gather out of the epistle to the Ephesians the 1. chap. where it is thus written which hath predestinated vs to adopt vs into children vnto himselfe thorough Iesus Christe according to the good pleasure of hys wyll And straight way he addeth Predestinate according to his purpose This declareth that Purpose is the generall worde of predestination What is predestination after Augustine purpose and good pleasure are taken for one and the selfe same thing and do pertayne vnto wil. Wherefore the purpose of God is the pleasure of his wil and is taken as the generall worde to define predestination and reprobation For Augustine sayth that predestination is the purpose to haue mercy and reprobation the purpose not to haue mercy And according to this sentence Paul sayth in this chapiter That election mought abide according to purpose But touching all these matters we will hereafter more at large entreate What shall we say then Is there vnrighteousnes with God God forbid For he sayth to Moses I will haue mercy on whome I will haue mercy and will haue compassion on whome I will haue compassion Wherefore it is not of hym that wylleth nor of hym that runneth but of God that sheweth mercy For the scripture sayth vnto Pharao For thys same purpose haue I stirred thee vp that I myght shewe my power in thee and that my name mought be declared thoroughout all the earth Therefore he hath mercy on whome he wyll and whome he wyll he hardeneth Thou wilt say then vnto me why doth he yet complayne â–ª for who can resist his wyll But O man who art thou which pleadest agaynst God shall the thyng formed saye to hym that formed it why hast thou made me thus Hathe not the potter power to make of one and the same lompe one vessell to honour and an other to dishonour VVhat shall we say then Is there iniquity with God God forbid When fleshe and humane wisedome heareth that all things are to be referred vnto the wil of God it beginneth to stirre For it can not abide that and pretendeth reuerence to the name of God when as in very dede it abhorreth mortification neither can abide to subdue all whatsoeuer it hath to the
ioyned wyth foreknowledge and what it differeth from it Now let vs see what it hath common or diuerse with prouidence This it hath common with prouidence that either of them requireth a knowledge and is referred vnto the will and that either of them hath a consideration to thinges to come But herein they differ for that prouidence comprehendeth all creatures but predestination as we spake of it pertayneth onely to the sainctes and vnto the elect Farther prouidence directeth things to their naturall endes but predestination leadeth to those endes which are aboue nature as is this to be adopted into the sonne of God to be regenerate to be endued with grace whereby to liue vprightly and last of all to come vnto glory Wherefore we do not say that brute beastes are predestinate Brute beastes are not predestinate for they are not able to receaue this supernaturall ende Neyther are Angels now predestinate for they haue already attayned vnto their ende but predestination hath a respect vnto thinges to come Whereas we sayde Why the prouidence of God is said to be common to all thinges that prouidence pertayneth to all thynges that may thus be proued because nothyng is hydden from God otherwyse he shoulde not be most wyse And if he know all things eyther he gouerneth all those thinges or els he abiecteth the care of many of them If he abiecte the care of any thing he therefore doth it eyther because he can not or bycause he will not take vpon him the care of those thinges If he can not then is he not most mighty if he will not then is he not most good But to deny that God is most wise most mighty and most good were playnly to deny him to be God Wherefore it remaineth that Gods prouidence is ouer all thinges which thing the scriptures in infinite places most manifestly testefie For they teach that the care of God extendeth euen to the leaues of trées euen vnto the heares of the hed euen vnto sparrowes Prouidence may thus by the way be defined prouidence is Gods appoynted vnmoueable and perpetuall administration of all thinges When I say God I Dâ—finition of prouideÌ„ce The gouernment of God is not tyrannous say that he is endewed with greate authority and that he is mighty AdministratioÌ„ signifieth that his gouerment is not tiraÌ„nious but quiet gently and fatherly For tirannes violently oppresse theyr subiects and referre all thinges to to theyr owne commodity and lust But God violently presseth no man neither by this gouerment getteth any commodity vnto himselfe but only communicateth his goodnes vnto creatures And this administration extendeth vnto all thinges For there is nothing free from it neyther can without it indure It is called appoynted bycause it is ioyned with most excellent wisedome so that it Why prouidence is vn vnmoueable admitteth no confusioÌ„ It is vnmoueable bicause yâ— knowledge of this gouernor is not deceaued neyther can his power be made frustrate It is also perpetuall bycause God himselfe is present with the thinges For neyther did he when he had created thinges leue them vnto them selues yea rather he him selfe is in them and perpetually moueth theÌ„ For in him we liue we moue and haue our being And thus much of prouidence Vnto these thinges also is fate or desteny of very nigh affinity From which word if as we haue before sayd it be taken for a certaine ireuitable necessity which dependeth of yâ— power of stars the fathers haue not without iust cause absteined But if it signifie nothing ells but a certayne connextion of second causes which is not caried rashely or by chance but is gouerned by the prouidence of God and may at his wil be changed I se no cause why the thing it selfe should be of any man reiected Howbeit bicause there is danger that error might sometimes crepe in Augustine thinketh it best that we vtterly refrayne from that worde We ought also to remember that which we haue in an other place taught namely that the loue election and predestination of God are so ordered together that they follow one an other in a certaine Loue election predestination how they are ioyned together course First vnto the knowledge of God are offred all men not being in happy estate yea rather being nedy and miserable whome God of his pure and singular mercy loueth those he careth for and putteth a parte from other whome he ouerpasseth and embraseth not with his beneuolence and they by this seperation are sayd to be elected And those so elected are destinied or appoynted vnto an end Augustine in his booke de predestinatione sanctorum the 10. chapter thus defineth predestination that it is a preparation of Grace and and in the 12. chapter How Augustine defineth predestination he sayth it is foreknowledge and a preparatioÌ„ of the gifts of God by which they are certainly deliuered which are deliuered but the rest are left in the masse or lompe of perdition In an other place he called it the purpose of hauing mercy The Master of the sentences in the first booke distinction 40 defineth it to be a preparation of grace in this present time of glory in time to come These definitions I reiect not howbeit bicause they compreheÌ„d not the whole matter I will bring an other definition more full as nigh as I can I say therefore that predestination is the most wise purpose of God whereby he hath before al A full definition of predestination eternity constantly decreed to call those whome he hath loued in Christ to the adoption of his children to iustification by fayth and at the length to glorye through good workes that they may be made like vnto the image of the sonne of God and that in them should be declared the glory and mercy of the creator Thys definition as I thinke comprehendeth all thinges that pertayne vnto the nature of predestination And all the partes thereof may be proued by the holye scriptures First we take purpose for the generall word For that word is common both to predestination and vnto reprobation Paul vnto the Ephesians sayth Purpose is common to predestination vnto reprobation That we are predestinate according to the purpose of God And in this Epistle to the Romanes he sayth That the purpose might abide according to election But what thys purpose is we vnderstand by the first chapter vnto the EphesiaÌ„s For there thus it is written That God hath predestinate vs according to his good pleasure By The purpose of God is his good pleasure Purpose pertayneth vnto yâ— wil. these wordes it is manifest that that is called his good pleasure which Paul afterward called purpose And that this purpose pertayneth vnto the will those thinges whiche afterward followe doo declare By whose power sayth he God woorketh all thinges accordinge to the counsell of hys will But by thys will we ought to vnderstand that will whiche is of
is reduced all those things which follow in this chap. he shall sée that the Apostle draweth those thinges which he teacheth of predestination to these principall pointes namely vnto power For he saith Hath not the potter power Vnto purpose or good pleasure for vnto the Ephesians he vseth both words Vnto will for he saith He hath mercy on whome he will and whome he will he hardeneth Vnto mercy or loue for he saith It is not of him that willeth nor of him that runneth but of God that hath mercy Also Iacob haue I loued but Esau haue I hated Seing Paul what cause soeuer he eyther here or in any other place geueth of predestination reduceth them to these fower principall pointes can we doubt of his meaning or shall we take vpon vs to geue sentence otherwise But as touching works he speaketh not so much as one worde wheresoeuer he entreateth of this matter but onely to exclude them Farther consider this that there is nothing more against the scope and meaning of Paul then to put workes foreséene to be the causes of predestination IustificatioÌ„ should come by workes if election should depende of workes forsene For by that meanes woorkes shoulde be the causes of iustification But that doctrine the Apostle hath in this Epistle by all manner of meanes oppugned And I hereby proue this reason to be firme because the Apostle maketh predestination to be the cause of vocation and vocation the cause of iustification Wherefore if workes be causes of predestination they shall also be causes of iustification For this is a firme rule among the Logicians whatsoeuer is the cause of any cause is also the cause of the effect Farther no man can deny but that good workes procéede of predestination For we are sayd to be predestinate that we shoulde be holye and blameles And God by predestination hath prepared good woorkes in whiche we should walke And Paul himselfe confesseth that he obteined mercy to be faithful Good workes are the effectes of predestination Against the good vse of of free wil. Wherfore if workes be the effectes of predestination howe can we then say that they are the causes thereof and chiefly those kinde of causes which are called efficient causes For that vse of frée will is nothing worth which they so often boast of as though we haue it of our selues and not of the mercye of God For Paul sayth that it is God which worketh in vs both to will and to performe And God in Ezechiell sayth I will take away from them theyr stony hart and wil geue vnto them a fleshy hart We can not saith Paul thinke any thing of our selues as of our selues And if we had in our selues that good vse which they speake of what shoulde let but that we mighte glory thereof Vndoubtedly the Lord sayth No man commeth vnto me vnles my father draw him And Ierome against the Pelagians excelleÌ„tly wel writeth that those which are sayd to be drawen are by that woord signified to haue bene before withstanding He which is drawen was before vnwillyng resisting and vnwilling but afterward God so worketh that he chaungeth them This selfe same thing also doth the nature of grace proue For Paul sayth That the remnantes might be saued according to the election of grace yâ— is according to gracious or frée electioÌ„ For so is the genetiue case after yâ— Hebrue phrase to be resolued Farther in the definition of predestinatioÌ„ in yâ— first place we haue put this word purpose which seing it signifieth nothing els as we haue declared out of the Epistle vnto the Ephe. but the good pleasure of God thereby it euidentlye appeareth that from no other where must we séeke the cause of predestinatioÌ„ More Workes caÌ„not be the causes of our calling ouer workes can not be the causes of our vocation and much les of our predestination for predestination goeth before vocation And that woorkes are not the causes of vocation is declared by the Epistle vnto Timothy God hath called vs sayth Paul with his holy calling not by our works but according to his purpose and the grace which we haue in Christ before the times of the world Hereby it most manifestly appeareth that works are not the causes of our calling Yea neither also are works the causes of our saluation whiche yet were farre more likely for by good woorkes If we should be predestinate by workes thâ— exclamatioÌ„ of Paul were to no purpose God bringeth vs to felicity But Paul to Titus sayth that God hath saued vs not by the workes of righteousnes but according to his mercy Farther what néeded Paul after this disputation to cry out O the depth of the riches of the wisedom knowledge of God how vnsearcheable are his iudgementes and how vnaccessable are his waies For if he would haue followed these mens opinion he might with one poore word haue dispatched the whole matter and haue sayd that some are predestinate and other some reiected because of the works which God foresaw should be in both of them Those men Augustine in mockage called sharpe witted men which so trimly and so easly saw those things which Paul could not sée But say they the Apostle in thys place assoileth not the questioÌ„ But it is absurd so to say especially seing yâ— he broght it in of purpose the solucioÌ„ therof serued very much vnto yâ— which he had in hand And how in Gods name can he seme not to haue assoyled the question when he The question is assoyled when it is reduced to the highest cause reduced that euen vnto the highest cause namely vnto the will of God And therewithall sheweth that we ought not to go any farther when God had appointed limities at the fote of the mounte Sina if any man had gone beyond those limites he was by the law punished Wherefore let these men beware with what boldnes they presume to go further then Paul would they should But they say that the Apostle here rebuketh the impudent Be it so But yet is this rebuking a most true solution of the question For Paul by this reprehension prohibiteth vs not to enquire any thing beyond the mercy and will of God If these men meane such a solution which may satisfye humane reason I will How the questioÌ„ may be said to be assâ—yled not to be assoyled easely graunt that the question is not in such sorte assoyled But if they seke yâ— solution which fayth ought to embrace and to reste therein they are blind if they se not the solution But let vs se what moued these men to say that workes foresene are the causes of predestination Vndoubtedly that was nothing ells but to satisfy humane iudgement which thing yet they haue not attayned vnto For they haue The aduersaries satisfie not humane reason nothing to answere touching an infante which being grafted into Christ dieth in his infancy For if they will haue him to
thinges worke to good as though foreknowledge and predestination whereof he afterwarde maketh mencion should depende of that sentence And to this purpose A place of Salomon they cite this sentence out of the Prouerbes of Salomon Those that loue me I loue Neither cōsider they as we haue said y◠Paul in this place entēdeth to declare who they are vnto whō it is geuen to loue God and to haue all thinges to worke vnto them to good And those he saith are they which are by the predestination of God elected And as touching Salomon we also confesse that those whiche loue God are againe loued of him But this is now in question whether the loue of God whereby he embraceth vs do spring of our loue or no. This thinge doth Iohn by expresse wordes decalre in his Epistle Not saith he for that we haue loued him He hath The loue of God springeth not of our loue but contrariwise first loued vs. The second thing that we gather of these wordes of Paul is that the predestinatiō of God if it be of this force to confirme vs touching the good wil and loue of God towardes vs can not depende of our woorkes For our woorkes are both weake and of moste sclender righteousnes Farther this is to be considered that Paul kept not in silence those causes which might be geuen for he expressedly putteth the ende namely that the mercy and iustice of God might be made manifest But when he commeth to the efficient cause he will haue vs so fully to stay our selues on the will of God that he compareth God to a potter and vs to clay In which comparison he declareth that there is nothing whiche oughte farther to be enquired of I know that the aduersaries say that that comparison is brought onely Of the comparison of God to the potter to suppresse the malepertnes of the demaunder not that the matter is on either behalfe in very déede so For God electeth men by workes foreséene But if it so be how then by this similitude shall the mouth of the murmurers be stopped For they will saye if the iustice of God requyre thys that election be of woorkes soreséene what needed Paul to saye Before they had done eyther good or euill it was sayde The elder shall serue the younger Iacob haue I loued and Esau haue I hated Agayne Not of woorkes but of hym that calleth that election mighte abide firme accordinge to purpose And why is this similitude of the potter brought when as the thinge it selfe is farre otherwyse and neyther doth God as a potter do all thynges as pleaseth hym neyther are we as clay vtterly without difference doubtles by this reason of these men the malepert demaunder is not repressed yea rather there is offred an occasion of caueling for that the similitude which is brought serueth not to the purpose There is also an other sentence of Paul vnto the Ephesians wherby is strongly confirmed this our sentence For whē he had said that we are predestinated according to the purpose of God he added God worketh according to his will not accordyng to oures By the power whereof he worketh all thinges according to the counsell of hys wyll But if it were so as these men imagine God should not worke all things according to his will but according to the will of an other For as we should order our works so should he moderate his election and that is to be led by an other mans wil and not by his own This self thing testifieth Paul to the Corrinthians saying God hath chosen the foolishe weake and vile thinges of thys world to confound the wise mighty and noble men Looke brethren saith he vpon your vocation not many wyse men not many mighty men not many noble men are called And in the selfe same epistle when he had described the former estate of the elect had reckoned vp a great many greuous sinnes at the length he added And these thinges were ye but ye are washed but ye are sanctified And vnto the Ephesians Ye were saith he once with out God without hope in the world These things proue that the vocation and predestination of God depend not of our merites But as Augustine writeth vnto Simplicianus God ouerhippeth many philosophers men of sharpewit of notable learning he hath also ouerhipped many which if a man haue a respect vnto ciuill maners were innocentes and of a good vertuous life Neither doubtles is this to be meruailed at For if God to this ende predestinateth to make manifest the riches of his mercy that is sooner accomplished if he bring to saluation The mercy of God is more declared if we be predestinated frely then if of workes those which both more resist and by reason of their desertes of life are more stranger from it then if he should elect those whom humane reason may iudge to be more mete Hereof it came that Christ gathered the flocke of his disciples out of sinners publicanes and vile men neither disdained he to call vnto hym thieues and harlots In all which men what consideration I besech you was there to be had vnto merites Paul also writeth vnto the Corrinthyans We preach Christ crucified vnto the Iewes in dede an offence and vnto the Grekes foolishenes but to them that are called both Iewes and Gentiles Christ the power of God and wisdome of God We see also in this place wherehence the Apostle seeketh the difference when he affirmeth that some thinke well of Christ preached and some ill For The difference of the beleuers of the vnbeleuers ▪ dependeth of vocation God said that he would deliuer his people not for their works but for his name sake The Iews were not of God preferred before the Gentles for their workes all this he saith commeth wholy of vocation For he sayth But vnto the called as if he should haue said They which are not called haue Christ for an offence and for foolishenes But they which are called do both follow him and also embrace him for the power and wisdome of God In the prophets also when God promiseth that he will deliuer his people he sayth not that he will do it for their workes or merites sake but I wil do it saith he for my names sake From this reason Paul departeth not For he sheweth that God by predestinatiō will make open the riches of his glory that all men might know how litle the Iewes had deserued this election of God that other nations being ouerhipped they alone should be counted for the people of God Which thing Steuen expresseth in the Actes of the Apostles when he saith That they had euer resisted God and had bene alwayes stiffe necked What good workes then did God see in them to preferre that nation aboue all other nations Ezechiell notably describeth howe GOD looked vpon the people of the Iewes at the beginning namely as vpon a maiden naked and on
Gospell and we must chiefely beware that we geue not them occasion to suspect that we are by hatred enuy desire of vengeance or by some wicked lust moued to We must not flatter them that sinne speake those things which we seme to speake somwhat vehemētly Furthermore on the other side we must beware of the other extremity y◠we flatter not thē y◠sinne making a marchādise of y◠word of God either to win mēs fauour or for lucre sake or for pleasure sake For doubtles the truth as touching doctrine ought neuer to be kept in silēce neither are they which sinne to be spared although troubles should therof arise or that we should therfore suffer greuous things Christ knew right An example of Christ well that by teaching the truth and by reprouing of vices he should at the length be crucified and be also forsaken of his disciples and yet did he not therefore ceasse either from necessary doctrine or from profitable reprehensions Of that that the The autoritie of the Iews was great in the Church Apostle so diligently seketh to auoide the offending of the Iewes we gather that the authority of that nation was great in the primitiue Church for they before other nations beleued the Gospell and the iudgement of them was had in great estimation For the Iewes were studious in the scriptures and most diligent obseruers of the worshipping of God wherefore the offence of them could not be in curred without excéeding great hurt to the Gospell He calleth them bretherne the more to conciliate them vnto him For these are no small degrées of beneuolence to wish well vnto a man to pray for him and to call him by a gentle and louing name Howbeit there is a difference betweene A differēce worthy to be noted the reasō which he vseth in the ninth chapter and betwene that which he vseth in this chapter to proue his loue towardes the Iewes For there he saide that he so feruently loued them that for the redéeminge of theyr destruction he desired to be made accursed but here he writeth that he powreth out prayers for theyr saluatiō Of this difference this is the reason In the. 9. chapter he entreated of election or predestination which is not chaunged by prayers and therfore it had bene in vain there to haue made mencion of them But in this place is entreated of the righteousnes of fayth which faith forasmuch as it is the the gift of God there is no doubt but that by faithfull prayers it may be obteyned for our neighbours He bringeth moreouer an other argumente of his loue towardes the Iewes whereby he excuseth theyr incredulity as much as the nature of the thing suffreth but yet he so excuseth it that thereunto he addeth a most gréeuous accusation I beare them record saith he that they haue the zeale of God but not according to knowledge And yet must we not thinke that all the Iewes had this zeale for in that nation there were a greate many which were manifest wicked filthy liuers But when Paul thus wrote he had a consideration to the sounder sort and vnder this common name ment them onely And to be briefe he vseth the figure Synecdoche whereby an indefinite proposition is by reason of some partes y◠it containeth taken for true This selfe same excuse Peter in the Actes vsed when he said For I know that ye did it thorow ignorance c. Paul nowe attributeth vnto them zele but he reproueth their ignorance as an haynous sinne For séeing that they were by the law and by the scriptures dayly tought they ought not to haue bene ignorant of those thinges Theyr ignoraunce he hereby proueth for What was the ignorance of the Iewes y◠they knew not the difference betwene the righteousnes of God and their owne righteousnes neither saw they that by establishing their owne they fell away frō the true and perfect righteousnes That they had a zeale he therfore saith for that What zeale signifieth they sought to worship God and that diligently but they knew not the manner of true worshipping wherefore their zeale was a blinde zeale And to declare what zeale is we wil first consider the etimology thereof 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is zeale is a Gréeke word deriued of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And this word signifieth to loue but yet vehementlye to loue so that after loue followeth admiration after admiration imitation and thē after that a grief if he may not enioy the thing which he loueth or if others be admitted to enioy the same This is the proper signification of the word Wherfore Definition of zeale we may thus define it Zeale is an affection whiche consisteth in that parte of the minde which lusteth or desireth after which by reason of the vehemēcy followeth grief both because of the fellowship of others and also for the wante of the thinge which is desired But the nature of it is not of one sort For there is a good zeale an euill zeale Of the good zeale Paul spake when he saide I am zelous for you with the A good zel◠an euill zeale of God for I haue betrouthed you that ye should geue your selues a chast virgen vnto one man Christ Also in the first to the Corrinthians Be zealous of the better gracious giftes God himselfe also is affected towards vs with a most perfect zeale as the scripture oftentimes teacheth although affectes are not properly attributed vnto him But of the euill zeale is not at this presente entreated But of it Paul to the Galathians thus writeth that the false Apostles loued them with a zeale that they might glory in theyr flesh and leade them away from Christ into the bondage of the law And in many other places is mencion made of it But the cause whereof The cause of a good euill zele either a good or euill zeale springeth may be thys The manner is a lyke in thys affection as it is in other affections Wherfore euen as boldnes lust and anger are so long time good or euill how long they kéepe themselues within certaine bondes prescribed vnto them by prudence or passe those bondes so also commeth it to passe in zeale But this we ought to know that accordinge to morall doctrine prudence commeth by naturall vse or discipline but in very déede as it is here considered it can not be gathered but out of the holy scriptures by the breathing of the holy gost Wherefore zeale is then good when it is thorow faith brideled by a iust and godly knowledge and it is then euill whē it is not by such knowledge restrayned as a ship when y◠maister or gouerner is present is preserued but he being absent goeth A similitude to wracke Wherfore Paul spake most warely for when he condēneth their zeale he taketh away from them knowledge and by one word that which mought haue bene an excellent vertue he
would declare that this his assent to the truth resembled some We are also sorye by reason of the morall workes of the Ethnikes certaine shew of piety and of duty Wherefore in such workes which are morally called good the minde of the godly delighteth although therewithall also it sorroweth that those workes are not done as they ought to be done And as touching this present sentence of the Apostle we must not gather that he of sinne that is of zeale without true knowledge conceaued a loue and good will towardes the Iewes for he reasoneth not from the cause yea rather by the effect he declareth his loue towardes them namely in that he not onely prayeth for saluation for them but also agrauateth not the crime which they were guilty of but rather Paul loued not the Iews for their euill zeale as much as the thing suffreth excuseth it It should be a false kind of reasoning a non causa vt causa that is taking that for the cause which is not the cause if a man would hereby proue that Paul had a delight in the sinnes of the Iewes But if a man will nedes contend that this argument is taken from the cause we say that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is englished harts desire is in this place an affect What 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in this place signifieth The zele of the Iewes was sinne which pertaineth to mercy and so Paul had compassion vpon the Iewes for that he saw the Iewes so miserably erred And this sentence is of no small force to proue that that zeale of the Iewes though it were goodly to the shew was sinne for nothing stirreth vp mercy but only misery and calamity neither are we moued to pray for any that they might be conuerted from euil workes vnles the same workes were sinnes and that very hurtfull Wherefore I wonder at the Nicodemites of our tyme which obiect the history of Elizeus and of Naaman The Nicodemites of our time The fact of Naamā the Siriā very ill cited the Sirian to proue that it is lawful for them so that they thinke wel in in their hart to be present at vngodly supersticions For Naaman the Sirian although he were newly conuerted yet he vnderstoode that that was sinne and for that he had not as yet so farre gone forwarde to departe from his commodities he required of the Prophet to pray for him which declareth that he iudged that such a sinne neded pardon Wherefore we conclude that this zeale of the Iewes whereunto the Apostle now beareth record was in very deede sinne and although it haue some shew of vertue yet is it very farre of from it For as it is plaine by moral philosophy that vertues and vices are as touching Vices and vertues are occupied about one the same matter where about they are occupied one and the same but in forme much differ as fortitude and feare temperaunce and intemperance iustice and iniustice For one and the selfe same affectes when they are by right reason bridled to a mediocrity and when thorough vice they either want or exceede differ not in matter although the habites or qualities which are occupied about them are much differing And that which the Philosophers speake of vertues and of vpright reason we ought to transferre also vnto the holighost and vnto faith geuen vnto the scriptures And although in a good and euil zeale the affect be one and the same yet is the difference most great when it is gouerned by true knowledge and faith and when it is gouerned of it selfe and wanteth true knowledge As A similitude the water of the sea and rayne water although they agree together in matter of moisture yet are they sundred by very many proprieties differences These A good intent is not sufficient to make the worke good thinges haue I therefore alleadged to confute those which oftentimes defend wicked actes for that they are done of a good minde purpose or as they say entent as though euery zeale were sufficient to make the worke good Whose sentence if it were true mought easely excuse the Iewes in that they killed Christ and afflicted his Apostles for they beleued that by these meanes they defended the lawe of God and ceremonies of their fathers But the Apostle Errors in matters of faith is hurtfull Against workes of preparation saith otherwise when he attributeth vnto them zeale but yet a zeale ioyned with error but when error lighteth in matters of faith it is a deadly sinne Wherfore let them well aduise themselues what to say which so stoutly defend workes preparatory doubtles their meaning is nothing els but that men although before iustification they absolutely worke not good workes yet by reason of a certaine vpright purpose and zeale of congruity they deserue grace Such workes for as muche as they want true knowledge whiche is fayth it followeth that they are such a zeale as the Apostle nowe speaketh of We deny not but that God sometimes vseth suche our wycked workes by thē at length to bring vs vnto iustification but that we our selues do thorow them deserue iustification it is farre from the truth yea rather oftentimes Goodly workes are sometyme a let vnto saluation it commeth to passe that such workes are a great let vnto saluation For the Philosophers and Pharesies being dronken glutted with those goodly workes were ouermuch puffed vp and for that they delighted in thē selues they contented them selues with those workes neither endeuoured they to ascend vnto the true degree of righteousnes We are by this doctrine also of Paul We must not streight way geue place to zele admonished not straight way to geue place vnto zeale we must first trye and diligently examine it for oftentimes vnder the goodly shew thereof lyeth hidden most great impietie as it is manifest in the Iewes which slew Christ and persecuted the Apostles and as this place euidently declareth It is a greuous sinne to refuse to be subiet vnto God A rule to try zeale For they being ignorant of the righteousnes of God and going about to stablish their own righteousnes are not subiect vnto the rightousnes of God What more wickednes could haue bene deuised then to refuse to be subiect vnto God and to seeke to prefer their own righteousnes before the righteousnes of God The Apostle in these wordes geueth vs a rule whereby we may be able to trye and examine our zeale And that rule is this to see whether we will be subiect vnto God whether we can abide that all thinges shoulde bee attributed vnto God and claime nothing vnto our selues as the true knowledge of God requireth There are a great many in our daies which as it were by a certain zeale labour to defend worshipping of Images pilgrimages and other suche supersticious actes vnto whom if a man manifestly declare that those thinges are repugnant vnto the word of God they
he willeth not And without doubt God is most gentle and most plentifull of mercy but he is also most iust and therfore it is not to be meruayled at if somtimes he punish with this kind of punishment Pigghius that most trifling Sophister laboureth to inuert this place cited of all the Euangelistes to the end to proue that God is by no maner of meanes the cause of sinne But how farre wide he is from the doctrine of Paul hereby it may plainly be proued in that he maketh election common vnto all men and affirmeth that God hath a like appointed all men vnto eternall life when as Paul not only in very many other places but also here chiefly deuideth the Israelites into chosen and into not chosen and saith that others were made blind and that only election obtained saluation The first place he bringeth out of the 4. chapiter of Marke when Christ was asked why he spake in parables he answered Vnto you it is geuen to know the mistery of the kingdome of God but vnto them which are without all thinges are shewed by parables Here by an vntimely allegory he reproueth vs as though we are without and the flocke of the Papists are within And therefore he saith that we vnderstand not the scriptures But I would gladly know of this man whether they are to be counted out of the church which embrace the holy scriptures which obserue the sacraments and rightly Who are to be counted to be in the Church administer them which deny not the holy ghost wherby the life of the body of the Church is nourished and which confesse the selfe same articles of faith which all Christians confesse What I pray you claymeth he vnto himselfe that we haue not but only mere supersticions and bondage wherin he flattereth the Antechrist of Rome Verely that we are without these things and haue escaped them we are exceding ioyfull and he if he had any witte would much lament that he is within and abiding in them Marke sayth That seing they should see and not perceaue These words are most playne and vnles he had thornes in his eyes without any doubt God because of the wicked deserts of the Iewes would make them By what meanes Christ 〈…〉 seth to make blind blind thereto he vsed these meanes namely the foretellinges of the Prophetes the preachinges of Christ and of the Apostles which when they heard they were more irritated and skipt backe from the truth And therfore Christ sayth Vnto theÌ„ I speake in parables that thereby they may receaue for their sinnes the iust reward of obstinacy and pricking But saith he the obscurenes which is in the words of Mark touching this may be explaned by the brightnes and light which shineth in the words of Mathew For he in the 13. chapiter saith Therefore do I speake vnto them in parables for that seing they see not and hearing they heare not But he willingly ouerhippeth that which was before said Vnto you it is geuen to knowe the mistery of the kingdome of heauen but vnto them it is not geuen for in these words is manifest yâ— inequality of the grace gifts of God Vnto him that hath saith he it shal be geueÌ„ but he which hath not euen that which he hath shal be taken away froÌ„ him They are Hou 〈…〉 them that haue â—â— geuen and froÌ„ them that haue not is takeÌ„ away sayd to haue vnto whom is graunted election vnto saluation and of election commeth faith vnto those I say are continually many heauenly giftes aboundauntly geuen They are sayd not to haue which are reprobate and which are destitute of faith and lose also euen yâ— which they haue for the natural gifts wherwith they were sometimes excellently adorned are made vnto them vnprofitable and the wordes of God and miracles which are offred vnto them bring forth no fruite in their minds Therefore vnto them I speake by parables for yâ— seing they sée not Now sayth Pigghius thou séest the cause why Christe spake in parables for that they were blinde and obstinate not that they were such because that Christe so spake but for that they were such therfore Christe spake vnto them in parables and so neyther in Christ nor in God is there any cause of excecation But this man is farre deceaued for that word quia that is for that or because alwayes signifieth not the cause of a thing to make it to be but rendreth a cause of the knowledge that it may be and that by the effect As in Luke it is written of the sinfull woman Many sinnes are forgeuen her because she hath loued much This vehement aboundaunt loue was the effect and did set open the remission of sinnes which lay before hidden So also is it in the parable of the debters He loueth more vnto whom more is forgeueÌ„ So here also when the Apostles demaund Why speakest thou in parables The reason is geuen by the effect because that they seing see not Hereof commeth the excecation of these men Do ye not sée what here followeth I shewe the effect I declare the euent which is that these men in seing sée not in hearing heare not and are made blind And that Pigghius expositioÌ„ aptly agréeth not I will proue by two reasons First for that this sentence of Esay where as in the Hebrue is written God coÌ„maunding In Paul is not expressed the name God as the efficieÌ„t cause of this madnes and obstinacy but in other places of the scripture it is put and especially as we shall sée it is most plainly set forth in Iohn Secondly for that it agréeth not with the question of the Disciples They asked Why speakest thou in parables If Christ had aunswered that their blindnes was the cause therof it mought be thought that therfore he ought not to haue spoken vnto them in parables but ought rather to haue spoken vnto them more manifestly and more plainly to ouercome their blindnes with the brightnes of his doctrine But for that he would punishe them for their rebellion against God to the ende they should be made blind such a doctrine was sette forth vnto them whiche for that they vnderstood not they hated and fled away from it If one man to an other would speake obscurely that they which stand by should not vnderstand hym should afterward be asked why speakest thou so obscurely would he say thinke you for yâ— they which stand by are blockes vnderstaÌ„d not Doubtles this should be a ridiculous aunswere But he would aunswere if he would aunswere with reason Therfore spake I obscurely that they which stoode by should not vnderstand The Apostles asked not why those men beleued not whiche if they had then mought this cause haue bene geuen because that they are blind and heare not the thinges which are spoken But they asked why dost thou speake vnto them in parables and then caÌ„ not their blockishnes and blindnes be rendred as a
ye not heare what the lawe saith For it is written that Abraham had two sonnes one of an handemayden an other of a free woman and he whyche came of the handemayden was borne accordynge to the fleshe but hee which came of the free woman was borne acoording to promise which thinges are spoken by an allegorye for these are two testamentes the one from the mounte Sina which gendreth vnto bondage which is Agar for Agar is mount Sina in Arabia is ioyned vnto the city which is now called Ierusalem and is in bondage with her children But Ierusalem which is aboue is free which is the mother of vs all In these words this thing is chiefly to be noted yâ— the law gendreth not but as Agar did vnto boÌ„dage But if by the workes therof it could iustifie it should gender to liberty for what thing els is iustification then a certain liberty from sinne But forasmuch as it is both called a seruant and gendreth to bondage we ought not then by it to looke for iustification In the .v. chapter it is written If ye be circumcised Christe shall nothing profite The 39. you And he bringeth a reason of the said sentence For saith he he which is circumcised is debter to kepe the whole law So much doth Paul take iustification from circumcision and woorkes that he saith that Christe nothing profiteth them if in case after they beleue they will be circumcised And still he more stronglye confirmeth that which was said Christ is become in vaine vnto you for if ye haue iustification as the fruite of your woorkes then the comming death and bloudsheding of Christe should not haue bene necessary And I if I yet preach circumcisiom why do I suffer persecution Then is the offence of the crosse abolished the offeÌ„ce and slaunder of the crosse The 40. is that meÌ„ being wicked and otherwise sinners are counted of God iust throughe Christ crucified and faith in him here the flesh is offended here doth reason vtterly resiste whiche thing happeneth not when iustification is preached to come of workes whether they be ceremonial or morall But God would haue this offence The 41. to remaine bicause it pleased him by the foolishenes of preaching to saue them that beleue Vnto the Ephesians the. 2. chapter it is written And ye when ye were deade to trespasses and sinnes in whiche in time passed ye walked accordinge to the course of thys world euen after the gouernor that ruleth the ayre and the spirite that now woorketh in the children of vnbelief among whome also we all had our conuersation in time past in the lusts of our flesh and fulfilling the will of the flesh and of our thoughts and as it is in the Greke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and were by nature the children of wrath euen as others are Let vs note in these woordes yâ— men at the beginning before they come to Christ are dead in sinnes and therfore are not able to moue themselues to this that they should liue and be iustified who euer saw that a deade man coulde helpe himselfe Further by those wordes is shewed that they were in the power of the Prince of darkenes which worketh and is of efficacy in the children of vnbelief Seing therfore they are gouerned by him how then can they by their workes tende to iustification And because we shoulde not thinke that he spake onely of some other certaine vngodly persons he addeth All we comprehending also the Apostles a 〈…〉 them saith he were we And what did we then we were conuersante in the lustes of our flesh And to the end we might vnderstand that these lustes were not onely the wicked affections of the grosser part of the soule it foloweth we doing the will of the flesh and of the minde or of reason did follow also the thoughtes or inuentions of humane reason If we were all such from whence then commeth saluation and iustification But God which is riche in mercy for his exceeding loue sake wherwith he loued vs yea euen when we were dead in sinnes hath quickened vs together with Christ But The 42. what instrumente vsed he to geue vnto vs our saluation For by grace saith he were ye saued through faith and that not of your selues For it is the gifte of God not of workes least any man should boast Could workes be more manifestly excluded In what place then shall we put them Certeinely they follow iustification For the Apostle addeth For we are his workemanship created in Christ Iesus vnto good workes which God hath prepared that we should walke in them but before they could not be The 43. in vs which thing is very well thus described Ye were at that time without Christe being alienated from the common wealth of Israell straungers from the testamentes of promise hauing no hope and being without God in this world Who can in this state faine vnto himselfe good woorkes by which men may merite iustification And to the Phillippians the. 3. chapter If any other man maye seeme that he hath whereof he The 44. might trust in the flesh I haue more being circumcised the eight day of the kinred of Israell of the tribe of Beniamin an Hebrue borne of the Hebrues as concerning the law a Pharisey as touching feruentnes I persecuted the church of God as touching the righteousnes which is of the law I was vnrebukeable Seing that Paul had so manye and so great thinges before his conuersion and that he had whereof to â—rust and boast in the flesh let vs heare what he at the lenth pronounceth of all these thinges These thinges saith he if they be compared vnto the true righteousnes whiche is throughe the faith of Christ I count losse vile and dounge If we should thereby obteine righteousnes should so profitable thinges be counted for losses so precious and holy things for vile thinges and thinges acceptable and pleasaunte vnto God for donge Let Paul take héede what he saith here or rather let the readers take héede that they beleue not Sophisters rather then Paul And to the Colossians the first chapter And The 45. you which were sometimes farre of and through euill workes enemies in your harts hath he yet now reconciled in the body of his flesh through death Here ought euery word diligently to be noted that we may sée that they which are farre of from God ought not to haue a regarde to those thinges thereby to come into fauor Peace which is ioyned with iustification can not be obteined of those which are enemies in mind there can not come good woorkes from those whiche before they be chaunged are saide to be full of euil workes But what manner of workes those were is described in the ii chapter when as it is there written And ye when ye wer dead through sinnes and through the vncircumcisioÌ„ of your flesh hath he quickned together with him The 46. forgeuing all your sinnes and hath
abideth in death and therby he concludeth that of loue is had iustification life This is al one as if a man should say he which can not laugh is not a man Ergo by the power of laughing a man obtaineth to be a man But how absurd this is euery man may easely perceiue For to be men we haue it of the soule endued with reason Vnto which soule for as muche as the power of laughing is of necessitie ioyned this proposition which we haue brought is euer true He which can not laughe is not a man So is that most certaine which Iohn saith That he which loueth not abideth in deathe although he haue not life of loue but of faith wherewith loue is of necessity ioyned He citeth also those wordes of Christ If ye had God to your father doubtlesse ye should loue me Therfore sayth he of loue we haue the adoption whereby we are made the childrē of God But here also he vseth the self same forme of reasoning For they which loue not Christ are not the children of God and yet haue we not of loue to be the children of God but of faith out of which loue springeth After the selfe same maner a man mought say if thou wert liberall thou shouldest also be prudent And this in déede is a true proposition And yet it foloweth not that a mā is by liberalitie made prudent Yea much rather of prudence springeth liberalitie To be brief these arguments and such other like conclude nothing else then that iustification can not consist without loue and other christian vertues And yet cā not thereof be rightly gathered that a man is iustified for these vertues sake Pighius addeth moreouer this sentence of Christ If any man loue me he will keepe my commaundementes and I and my father will come to him and make ou◠abiding with him By these words it appeareth saith he that iustification foloweth of loue and the obseruing of the commaundements of God For those being obserued Christ promiseth that he will come with his father and abide with vs. For he thinketh that to receiue and to retaine Christ is nothing ells then to be iustified We confesse that when Christians being now regenerate and iustified doo liue vprightly and by good workes doo shew forth theyr fayth God commeth vnto them and heapeth them vp with greater giftes and a more ample grace For God although otherwise he be euery where yet is expressedly sayd to come vnto them in whome he beginneth to worke new workes And sithen he dayly encreaseth and adorneth his which behaue themselues vprightly and godly and faythfully excercise the talents committed vnto them it is very well sayd that he dayly cōmeth vnto them by reason of new giftes And this is that kind of visiting wherof Christ speaketh in the Gospell of Iohn But if we will know the first accesse of God comming of Christ vnto our hartes to dwell in them Paul teacheth it vs to the Ephesians For thus he writeth That Christ may thorough fayth dwell in your hartes Wherfore this sentence of Christ teacheth not that iustification commeth of loue For iustification goeth before it although not in time yet in order Pighius procedeth and maketh such a distinction of testaments that some he sayth are absolute and fre by which the heyre may streight way enter vpō the inheritance other some are conditionall which make no heyre but vpon certayne conditions And to this latter kind referreth he the testamēt of God And therfore contendeth he y◠except those conditions be performed none can be iustified Here we deny his assumpt namely that the testament of God touching the remission The promise concerning iustification hath not a condition ioyned of sinnes in Christ hath any condition ioyned with it Which thing Paul testifieth in his 3. chapiter to the Galathians when he thus writeth ▪ Brethern I speake accorto the maner of men Though it be but a mans testament yet when it is confirmed no mā doth abrogate it or adde any thing therunto Now to Abraham were made the promises and to his sede he sayd not To the sedes as speaking of many but as of one and in thy sede which is Christ. And this I say that the law whiche began 430. yeares after can not disanul the testament before approued of God towards Christ that it should make the promises of none effect These wordes most manifestly declare that the testament which God made with Abraham was pure and absolute without any condition of y◠law Which thing the words of Genesis declare For God once promised vnto Abraham the blessing Afterward was geuen the law which vnto those promises should adde conditions of precepts so that if men would be iustified and obteyne them they should know that they must performe accomplish all the commaundementes of God But this latter way of iustification although it can by no meanes be accomplished can not let or make voyd the first way But that first way was nothing ells but the Gospell thorough Christ And that men should the more willingly come vnto it there was set forth also the latter way of iustificatiō by works that men when they vnderstode that they were not able to performe them should fly vnto Christ of whome when as being iustified they endeuored themselues to liue vprightly they might fréely receaue the promises set forth in the law Now let vs sée what be those conditions which this man ascribeth vnto the Testament of God In the. 103. Psalme it is written The mercy of the Lord is from generation vnto generation vpon them that feare him and his righteousnesse vpon childrens children vpon those which kepe his testament and are mindfull of his commaundements to doe them Of these words Pighius gathereth that the feare of God the mindefulnes of the Testament of God the endeuor to performe his commaundements are the conditions of the promises of God But here I do not a litle meruail y◠Pighius would affirme that a man is iustified by loue whē as he confesseth that the holy scripture attributeth the same vnto feare But we wil not stick with Pighius y◠he be contrary vnto himselfe But if we wil harken vnto the scriptures in y◠33. Psalme Mercy is promised vnto thē that hope For thus it is written And him that hopeth in God mercy shall compasse about Also in an other place it is written he which beleueth shall not be confounded and he which calleth vpon the name of the Lord shall be made safe But who séeth not that all these vertues are in a man already iustified and that God hath mercy vpon him But here lay all the controuersie vnto which of these vertues chiefly iustification is to be ascribed Vndoubtedly by the testimony of the scriptures the same is to be attributed vnto faith Pighius saith moreouer that in that condition which he alleaged is sayde that they should be mindfull of the commaundements of God
of a sharpe witte at the last this he fayneth That God is not knowen by fayth onely but also by loue But who euer would so say but this man onely Vndoubtedly by loue we know not but by loue we loue But that which is spoken in the booke of wisedome whiche yet with me is not of so great authority Christ himselfe hath most manifestly testified in the Gospel saying This is eternall life that they know thee the onely true God Although of this saying also of our sauior Winchester hath fained a new deuise I know not what namely that to know God is not properly eternall life although it somewhat helpe forwarde thereunto But forasmuch as neither the Fathers nor Paul nor Christ himselfe can satisfy these men there is no hope that we shall any thing preuayle with our reasons They adde moreouer That the fathers say that onely faith iustifieth that is is the principallest thing whereby we are iustified I confesse indéede that only sometime signifieth principall But this sense can not agrée with Pauls purpose This word Only some tymes signifieth principall For if charity be compared with faith charity is excellenter and better as Paul sayth Wherefore if both of them iustify as these men will haue it then shoulde charity haue the chiefest part and not faith And this also is a great let vnto these men which I haue oftentimes spoken of that Paul so ascribeth iustification vnto faith that he sayth without workes But Augustine say they vnto Simplicianus writeth That by fayth we beginne to be iustified Vnto this we may answere two maner of wayes first that that beginning is such that in very déede it hath the very full and whole iustification So that Augustines meaning is that we are iustified so soone as we haue faith Or if this please them not we will say as the truth is indéede that Augustine ment of the righteousnes which cleaueth in vs. They cite also Ambrose vpoÌ„ the 5. chapiter vnto yâ— Galathians In Christ c. For saith he we haue nede of fayth onely in charity to iustification Behold say they vnto iustification we haue no lesse nede of charity then of fayth But they are far deceaued For by those words Ambrose ment nothing els but to make a distinction betwene true faith and a vaine opinion Therfore he sayth that we haue néede of faith only namely which is ioyned with charity But Ierome vppon the 5. chapiter vnto the Galathians sayth That it is charity onely which maketh cleane the hart What other thing els shall we here aunswere but yâ— this his saying if it be vrged roughly simply is false For it is faith also which purifieth the hartes as it is written in the Actes of the Apostles And Paul to Timothe sayth Charity out of a pure hart good conscience c. By which words it is playne tâ—at the hart must of necessity first be pure before charity can come Wherefore we will interprete that sentence by the effect and as touching our knowledge For then is it most certayne that we are regenerate and haue a cleane hart when we be endued with charity After this maner also â—aue we before expounded this Many sinnes are forgeuen her because she hath loued much And by the selfe same meanes also may that saying of Augustine in his booke de natura Gratia the 38. chapiter be aunswered vnto It is the charity of God saith he by which onely he is iust whosoeuer is iust But this séemeth vnto me best to vnderstand such sayinges of the fathers of that righteousnes which cleueth vnto vs. For that consisteth not onely of fayth but also of all vertues and good workes But because amongst all vertues charity is the principallest therefore the fathers sometimes Why our righteousnes is attributed sometymes vnto charity attribute righteousnes vnto it onely And that which our aduersaries haue most vniustly vsurped to expound this word Only for principall or chiefe may in this place most iustly serue vs. For here we entreat not of that iustificatioÌ„ which is had by imputation but of that which we attayne vnto after regeneration Wherefore in this our proposition we exclude not from a man that is iustified hope charitie and other good woorkes but this only we say that they haue not the power or cause or merite of iustifieng And when we say that a man is iustified by fayth only we say nothing ells vndoubtedly but that a man is iustified only by the mercy of God and by the merite of Christ only which we can not apprehend We must not leaue oâ— from vsyng this worde Only by any other instrument then by fayth only Neither must we geue place vnto our aduersaries not to vse this worde Only though they cry out neuer so much that of it springeth great offence and mens mindes are by this persuasion somwhat weakned in the excercise of vertues For by sound doctrine we may easely remedy these discommodities For we alwayes inculcate that it is not true iustification or true fayth which wanteth the fruites of good life But we se the subtle and craftie deuise of these men For if we should say that a man is simply iustified by fayth leauing out this word Only Sreight way they would adde of theyr own that a maÌ„ indede is iustified by faith but yet is he no les iustified by hope and charity and other good woorkes For this selfe same cause the Catholikes in times past would not permit vnto the Arrians this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is of like substance bicause they would A like example streight way haue sayd That the sonne indede by appellation or name is GOD like vnto the father in a maner equall vnto him but yet not of one and the selfe same nature and substance Wherefore they did with tooth and naile defend and kepe still this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is of one and the selfe same substance as a word most apt to expresse the truth of that controuersie which they might also by good right doo and chiefely for that they saw that that word was of necessity concluded out of the holy scriptures out of which also is most euidently concluded thys our word Only and is thought of vs a word most mete to confute the errors of those which would haue iustification to come of workes Moreouer Gardiner bishop of winchester counted this our proposition to be absurd and agaynst it amongst other arguments vsed this and it is to me more then wonderfull how much it is estemed of certayne Papists his parasites The righteousnes sayth he that is geuen vs of God wherby we are iustefied pertayneth to all the faculties of the mind or rather to the wholâ— man Ergo we are not iustified by fayth only For that pertayneth only vnto the higher part of the soule Here gentle reader lest thou shouldest be deceaued lieth hidden a double fallace or disceate For first graunt
publique ministers of yâ— Church which he not without iust cause calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yâ— is frée giftes For all these thinges although it seme they may be gotten by humane art and industry yet by our endeuor we shall neuer bring any thing to passe yâ— way vnles we be holpen by the grace of God whereby those thinges which we doo are made profitable and of efficacy For they which are occupied in these offices without the helpe of God may indede winne prayse of men and commendation of the people but they are not able to aduance the saluation of the soules and the commodities of the Church And as touching this matter oftentimes they haue God fauorable prosperous vnto theÌ„ which yet obey him not with a sincere will But this is excedingly to be lamented that this gouernance of the Church is so miserably decayed that at this day not so much as the names of these functions are any where extaÌ„t They haue put in stede of them Taper cariers Accoluthes and Subdeacons which haue light and trifling effects appoynted to them pertayning to theyr supersticious alters Let loue be without dissimulation hating that wbich is euill and cleauing to that which is good Being affectioned with a brotherly loue to loue one an other In geuing honor go one before an other Not slouthfull to do seruice feruent in spirite seruing the time Reioysing in hope patient in tribulation continuing in prayer communicating to the necessities of the Sayntes geuing your selues to hospitality Let loue be without dissimulation Men are of theyr owne nature very prone to hipocrisie Therefore Paul expressedly prohibiteth it For God as Iohn sayth will not that we should loue in woordes in toung but in dede and in truth And Paul to Timothe writeth Loue ought to come from a pure hart and a good conscience and a fayth vnfayned Origen sayth He which loueth God and those thinges which God willeth that man hath loue without dissimulation But he which loueth not either God and those thinges which God willeth he I say loueth not but only dissembleth and pretendeth loue As if a man see his neighbor fallen into some greuous crime doo not admonishe him or reproue him his loue is conterfeate For he willeth not those thinges towardes his neighbor which God willeth The fauor of his neighbor is more deare to him then the will of God Hating that which is euill and cleuing to that which is good Good and euil in this place may signifie profite and disprofite And so the sence here is he loueth Good signifieth two thinges his neighbour without hipocrisie which hateth all thinges whatsoeuer he seeth shal be discommodious and hurtefull vnto him but those thinges which may by any maner of meanes be profitable or commodious vnto him he both vehemently desireth and as much as he can helpeth forward It may be also that Good and Euill signifie honest and dishonest And so they which loue truly abhorre from wicked and filthy woorkes and as much as they can apply themselues to holy and honest woorkes Which is therefore sayd for that some are so foolish that they thinke they loue theyr neighbours when they consent to them in theyr wicked lusts and great extorcions But this is not that loue which the Apostle describeth when he sayth that we ought to abhorre from wickednes and to embrase as much as lieth in vs that which is honest iust Chrisostome noteth that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is hating The affâ—ct of hatred is not in vaine planted in vs. The Stoikes vniustly reiected affectes is spoken with a vehemency For this preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which Paul signifieth vehemency of speach as in the 8. to the Romanes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth not any common but a great and vehement carefulnes and anguish And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth more then to waite for For it signifieth diligently to wait for And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is redemption not euery kinde of redemption but an absolute redemption Moreouer we sée that the affect of hatred is not in vayne planted in our myndes but to the end we should exercise it vpon vices Wherefore the Stoikes vniustly reiected affects For affects are the matter of vertues And as in an harpe when to the wood pegges of bone and stringes are applied number proportion and measure is brought forth a most swéete harmonye so when to these affectes is added the spirite and grace of God of them spring forth notable and excellent vertues But we are in the fault which abuse those giftes of God and hate those thinges which both are honest and please God and contrariwise the thinges which are filthy and displease him we embrace And so peruerse oftentymes is our iudgement that we call good euill euill good Although the nature of the thinges themselues be not chaunged by our iudgement For thinges that are filthy Thinges are not chaÌ„ged by our iudgement are alwayes filthye although we iudge otherwise of them Wherefore he wisely answered 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is That which is filthy is filthy whether thou so iudgest it or no. And this is to be noted that as the Apostle commaundeth vs to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which word as we haue declared signifieth an hatred with vehemency so willeth he vs not simply and absolutely to cleaue vnto God but addeth the particle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to be ioyned together not sclenderly but as it were with a strong and indissoluble bond Being affectioned to loue one an other with a brotherly loue In Greke it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 What Storge signifieth in which woords is declared what maner of affect loue is namely a brotherly affect And it is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which woord signifieth an affect not comming of election such as are frendshippes which men enter into one with an other but grafted in by nature and therefore so ioyned to our minds that it can neuer in a maner vtterly be shaken of And forasmuch as of these naturall affections there are sondry sortes or kindes for either they are betwene the pareÌ„ts and the children or betwene the husband and the wife or betwene brethern the Apostle mencioneth that kind which most agréed with his exhortacion which he had begonne namely to geue vs to vnderstand yâ— our loue towardes others ought to be a brotherly loue which is therefore more vehement then are common freÌ„dshippes for yâ— these frendshipâ—â—â—e dissolued euen among honest men when they perceiue yâ— theyr frendes haue fallen away froÌ„ iustice are become wicked corrupt But as touching our parents brethern children it is vndoubtedly a griefe vnto vs if we se theÌ„ behaue them selues otherwise theÌ„ we would they should yet is not therfore yâ— affection of our mind towardes theÌ„ extinguished Moreouer in these affections of loue we seke not yâ— in our louing one should recompense an
other with mutual benefites For of our owne accord we loue both our children and brethen although they haue not bound vs vnto theÌ„ by any theyr benefit to vs ward And forasmuch as these things ought to be obserued in christiaÌ„ loue therfore Paul calleth it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 although it come not of nature but of the spirite of God and of grace And how much the consideration of brotherhoode is of force to stirre vp loue betwene The loue of brethren is of great efficacy Christian men we are taught by the example of Moses For he the next day after that he had slayne the Egiptian when he went to visite the Hebrues and saw a certayne Hebrew doing iniury to an other Hebrew as S. Stephan reciteth the history sayd vnto them Ye are bretherne why doo ye in this sorte iniury one an other The force of this affect Ioseph also declareth For he when he ment vpon the sodayne to reconcile himselfe to his brethren who had solde to be a bondman sayde vnto them I am your brother Ioseph And so soone as he had spoken that he could not restrayne him selfe from teares So great is the force of this affect with the godly Neither is the mutuall loue betwéene Christians without iust cause called a brotherly loue For Christ called his disciples brethreÌ„ and yâ— at that time chiefly when after his resurrection he was now endued with immortality Aristotle in his 9. booke of Ethiks wheÌ„ he entreteth of frendship Amongst brethreÌ„ saith he one and the self same thing is distributed amongst many and therefore for as much as they communicate among themselues in one and the selfe same thing they by good right loue the one the other By that one and the selfe same thing wherin brethren communicate he vnderstandeth the substaunce of the father and of the mother whereof eche haue their part The like consideration also is there betwene the faithful For as Peter sayth they are made partakers of the nature of God wherfore they ought to loue one an other as brethren which thing if they neglect to doe they are worthely called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is without naturall affections Which vice as a sinne most greuous Paul in the first chapiter of this Epistle attributed to those which fell away from the true worshipping of God and were therefore deliuered of him into a reprobate minde In geuing honor â–ª go one before an other This is the proper effect of brotherly The â—ffects of honour of contempt loue that whome we loue those we labour by all meanes to honoure and in so doing we allure those whome we honour to loue vs again as contrariwise when we contemn our brethren we breake in sonder the senewes of loue and prouoke our brethren to hatred and enmities towardes vs. For what thing els is anger but a desire of vengeance sprong by reason of contempt Honor is here taken not only for a certaine outward reuerence wherby we reuerence the dignitye of our What honour signifieth neighbour but also for an outwarde helpe succor and aide wherby we help those which stand in néede So Paul admonisheth Timothe to honoure widowes And Christ reproued the Phariseis for that they contemned the precept of God which commaunded that parents should be honored when they gaue counsell to yâ— children to offer vp those things in the temple which ought rather to haue ben bestowed towards the relief of their parents And of how great force the neglecting of this kinde of helpe towardes our brethren is to stirre vp hatred and enmities we The neglecting of our brethren stirreth vp contentioÌ„s may gather out of the Actes of the Apostles For straight way in the primitiue Churche there arose a grudge for that the widowes of the Gréekes were contemned in the daily ministery Hereunto Christ exhorted his when he willed that they should not prease for the first roomes in the sinagoges and that being bidden to feasts they should sit downe in the lowest rowme This worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is in this text may haue a double sense by reason of the diuers significatioÌ„ of the verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For sometimes it is taken for existimo or reputo that is to estéeme or make accompt of And so the sence shall be let euery man thinke that others are more worthy of honour then him selfe As to the Philippians in the. 2. Chapiter it is written 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is in humblenesse of minde euery man esteeming others better then him selfe And sometimes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth nothing els but to be a captaine and to goe before And so the sense is let euery one of you preuent the other with honour and suffer not himself to be preuented Not slouthfull to doe seruice For as much as these things which he hath now reckened vp ought not slenderly to be put in vre therfore Paul sayth therein we must doe our diligence And the slouthfulnes which he commaundeth to be put away is that slownes in executyng of offices whereby men declare that they doe those things which they do grudgingly From which fault they are cleare which doe it with such cherefulnes and willingnes that sometimes they contemne euen their own commodities In suÌ„me Paul requireth that we loue not only in words but also in very dede and with an effectual endeuor and that we be not professors of this Philosophy 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is all in words but nothing in dedes which thing was reproued in diuers wise men amongst the Ethnikes Feruent in spirite Those things which he hath now made mention of for that they bring with them troubles lothsomnes laboures and costes therefore commonly seme irksome vnto the fleshe Wherfore Paul requireth that we suffer not our selues to be seduced by the flesh but rather that we be feruent in spirite Men neither hot nor colde highly displease God I would to God sayth he thou wert either hot or colde but for that thou art luke warme and neither hot nor colde I will begin to spew thee out of my mouth This word spirit may here signifie two things either the power and instincte of God or els our soule And it is doubtfull whether sense Spirit somtymes signiâ—eth our soule we ought here to sollow And that spirite sometimes signifieth our soule it may be gathered by many places of the scriptures For it is written blessed are the pore in spirite Againe he bowed downe his head and yelded vp the spirite â–ª Againe that the spirite may be saued in the day of the Lord. Again that it may be holy both in body and in spirite Againe the body without the spirite is dead Againe Christ went to the spirites whiche were in prison Howbeit I graunt that this word spirite hath either signification And I here thinke that it hath either signification namely bothe our soule and also the power of the spirite of God
the one the other For so of rayne are engendred cloudes and agayne of cloudes is brought forth rayne And as the philosophers say of good actioÌ„s spring vertues and contrariwise of vertues spring good actions Chrisostome as we before admonished testefieth that the honor which we geue vnto brethern hath not only loue to the roote thereof but also engendreth the selfe same loue in those whom we honor Now hope to expresse the nature thereof is a certayne faculty or power breathed into vs of God whereby with a constant and patient mind not thorough our owne strengthes but thorough Iesus Christ we wayt for the saluation now begone in vs which by fayth we haue receaued vntill at the length it be accomplished They which hope are mery and reioyce for that they are assured that they Hope maketh glad maketh sory shall one day obteyne the things which they hope for Howbeit in the meane time they are somewhat sory and it greueth them for that they haue not as yet obteyned those thinges Moreouer they which hope for thinges hard and difficile which Hope is of things hard but not of things impossible yet are not impossible For vnles we thought that we may by the grace and spirite of Christ obteyne eternall life we would neuer hope for it Paul before in the 8. chapiter obserued eueÌ„ this selfe same order For he taught that of hope springeth patieÌ„ce For the hope sayth he which is sene is no hope For who hopeth for that which he seeth And a litle afterward If we hope for that which we se not we wayte for it thorough patience Doubtles the mind is not a litle stirred vp to suffer all thinges where great rewardes are set forth And therefore in the selfe same chapiter Paul sayth The suffringes of this time are not worthy the glory to come which shal be reueled in vs. But here it may be doubted why Paul vnto hope attributeth ioye especially seing that ioye is an affect comming of a preseÌ„t good thing but hope is of a thing to come I answere that those good thinges which are hoped for are in dede absent but such is the force of hope that that which is absent it after a sort maketh present Hope maketh things absent present Faith also maketh thinges absent present Of the Eucharist Therefore Paul in the 8. chapiter very aptly wrote that by hope we are made safe and vnto the Ephesians That God thorough Christ hath brought to passe that we now sitte together with him in heauen at the right hand of God And according to this forme of doctrine we vse to say that they which beleue truly hope doo make the body and bloud of Christ euen present although otherwise in very dede they be in heauen and they wholy in mind and in spirite haue the fruition of them so often as they rightly and godly come together to the supper of the Lord. But how great a good thing it is to haue in tribulations a patient mind hereby may be gathered for that it is a common saying That it is a great euil not to be able to suffer euill as if a man should say that aduersities and tribulations which commonly It is a gret euill not to be able to suffer euil A most profitable chaine are called euill are not in very déede euill but only for that they can not be borne or suffred Continwing in prayers Chrisostome gathereth together in good order those thinges which may mitigate the painefulnes of those offices which haue now ben mencioned Which chayne or order he thinketh Paul hath diligently prosecuted The first remedy is loue and that such a loue which coÌ„meth of a brotherly affect For there is nothing hard to him that loueth Secondly is required the feruentnes of the spirite of God thirdly the hope of that which is most excellent fourthly ayd helpe obtayned at Gods hand by affectuall prayers Wherefore Paul here admonisheth vs of prayers that we should continew in them But wheras he here saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is continwing to the Tessalonians he sayth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is vncessantly For we ought to pray vnto God without ceassing and intermissioÌ„ so much as humane imbecillitie will suffer And euery man so often as any thing happeneth which eyther troubleth the mind or stirreth vp a feare or desire ought to turne his mind to God which can either deliuer him or accomplish the thinges which he desireth And this is done in a moment and in the twinkling of an eye Yea those prayers are chiefely commended which are as burning firebrandes cast vp into heauen by a sodayne conuersion to God and doo not thorough multitude of woordes waxe cold And Christ in Luke the 19. chapiter admonisheth vs to pray alwayes and not to be weary In Greke it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are sometimes those which are slouthfull and sluggish And that we should not become such nor be discouraged in prayeng Christ hath set forth vnto vs the parable of the widow and of the vniust iudge to declare vnto vs that God will without doubt heare those thinges which we incessantly aske of him And at the end of the parable he addeth The Lord will take vengeaunce of theÌ„ quickely But how doth he it quikely when oftentimes God quickly auengeth his There is no tarying in God but in our thinking he differeth it so long He is sayd to doo a thing quickely which doth that that is to be done so soone as occasion offreth it selfe Wherfore the tarieng is not in God but in our thinking But if we should be admitted into the inward parts and secrets of the counsell of God we should se that we are very rashe and hedlong in making our peticions Wherefore that is to be cast away from vs that we be not letted from enduring and perseuering in prayers Communicating to the nessâ—ties of the Sayntes geuing your selues to hospitality He chiefely maketh mencion of the sayntes for that they aboue all others haue most nede as those whome the world hateth And he rightly addeth Straungers The saintes haue most nede aboue all others Why the flesh abhorreth the poore for at that time the sayntes being turned out of all theyr goods liued ofteÌ„times as wanderers abrode and exiles Wherefore Paul exhorteth the Romanes to entertayne such men with a louing mind and with liberall hospitalitie The flesh is not redy to doo good to this kind of men For when it séeth them in misery it iudgeth that they can by no means be recompensed agayne at theyr hands and therfore whatsoeuer is bestowed vpon them it thinketh to be lost And they which follow this affect count nothing more blessed then to receaue Wherefore they willingly geue nothing but where they thinke there shall returne vnto them agayne either as much or rather more God oftentimes in the law commendeth Of the poore and of straungers
commeth of a manly and strong faith And therfore I thinke Iames sayd that patience hath a perfect worke vnles peraduenture a man will thus vnderstande it that perfection is not in any work vnles we perseuer in the same For when we leaue of we bring not the worke to his ende and so without patience it is left vnperfect And besides all this our enemies are by this meanes chiefly feared away from continuing to persecute vs For when they sée yâ— we are not moued by their iniuries they thinke that they lose their labour And therfore they take not so great pleasure of the reproches wherwith they reproched vs. But if they perceiue that we are out of quiet and take it in ill parte they will thinke that theyr iniuryes haue taken good successe and will afterward be more bolde in theyr wicked endeuors By this we may sée why the Lord sayd blessed are ye when they reuile you and persecute you and speake all maner of euill and make lies against you for my sake Reioyse and be glad for your rewarde is great in heauen This commaundement of Christ the Apostles executed For they returned from the presence of the Counsell reioysing that they were counted worthy to be reuiled for his name sake And Paule in the first to the Corinthians sayth we are euill spoken of and we blesse In Greke it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Paule alwayes wished not weâ— to his enemy 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 How be it this counsell Paul alwayes obserued not For to the Galathians he sayth I would to God they were cut of which trouble you And Dauid saythe let theyr table be made a snare before them let theyr eyes be made dimme that they may not see and bow downe theyr backe all wayes And other bookes of the Prophets are euery where ful of cursses and imprecations wherewith they cursse the enemies of the people of God Here doubtles as I iudge is it to be sayd that we ought so to deale as Paule now admonisheth so long as we haue a respecte to our owne iniuryes Whether it be lawful at any tyme to curse ouâ— enemies and that we walke the ordinary way and common course whereby we are of loue bound to wishe well to our neighbours But if God open vnto vs his hiddeÌ„ will and declare what shall without doubt come to passe of our enemyes and of those which persecute vs then if we sincerely and truely loue him we ought vndoubtedly to stay our selues in his will and counsell Howbeit this caution is added first to be fully assured whether those things which God hath opened vnto vs pertaine only to a threat or wholy to declare his determinate and assured wil. For where we suspecte that God threatneth only to bring vs to repentaunce we ought not to cease of from prayers euen for the wicked So did Moses when he made supplication to God for his people So did Abraham for the Sodomites so did Samuel for Saul and so did Ieremy for the people But when they are assured that it is the fixed and certaine will of God they doe not only pray against yâ— wicked in prophesying as Augustine thinketh against Faustus in his 16. booke and. 22. chapiter where he thus writeth But cursses when they are spoken by the way of prophesie come not of the euill desire of him that curseth but of the foreknowing spirite of him that denounceth them But also it is done with a minde now consenting vnto God and wishing the self same things that he wisheth Dauid when as otherwise he was so gentle and fauorable towards Semei Absolon Saul and other enemies yet sometime so cursseth and banneth the wicked that it driueth an horror into the readers Christ also first be wailed the infelicitie of the City of Ierusalem for that it knew not the time of his visitation and sayth how often would I haue gathered together thy children as a henne doth her chickens vnder her wings and thou wouldest not Howbeit euen the same Christ when he knew the assured and vnmoueable will of God did burst forth into these words I geue thanks vnto thee O father of heauen and of earth for that thou hast hidden these things from the wise and prudent men and hast reueled them to infants Euen so Lord for that it hath so pleased in thy sight Moreouer men of God when they come to this poynt haue not a respecte to theyr owne cause neither doe regarde theyr owne iniuryes but consider that by the wicked workes of the vngodly the Church of God is hurt the spirituall procedings therof are letted the course of the Gospell is hindred And they moste ardently desire that the name of God might be sanctified his kingdome most amply spred abrode And hereof it commeth that wheÌ„ the godly pray against wicked men they persecute not theyr own enemyes but the enemies of God whom they desire might be most purely worshipped Dauid sawe that he was called of God to the kingdome and vnderstode that the enterprises of the wicked wer not so much repugnant to his honor as to the will of God Wherfore worthely in his prayers he wisheth rather that they should pearish and that most vily then that any iotte of the most iust will of God should be hindred Wherefore bothe in this place and in suche other like we are prohibited not only to cursse but also to speake euill when we are ouercome with the contumelies iniuryes of the wicked by which it is not méete that we shold suffer our mindes to be broken to be led away from the rule of charity Herein doubtles consisteth the noblenes of stomake of Christians their incredible valiantnes of courage not only not to cursse them that persecute them but also to speake well of them and to pray vnto God for them How be it I can not inough wonder that Aquinas should say that by these words of Wherin consisteth the noblenes of â—omacke of the Christians â—n erâ—our of Aquinas Paule Christians are not compelled by the force of the commaundement to shew singularly an affect of loue to theyr enemies or as they vse to speake to shewe signes of beneuolence vnto them except it be in case of necessity For it is inough if they exclude them not from the generall bond of loue wherewith we ought to loue our neighbours Neither sayth he is it necessary that we peculiarly pray for them But this is sufficient if we exclude them not from the common prayers which we make for all men And if any man sayth he besides the case of necessity doo shew vnto his enemy tokens of a singular loue or doo singularly make intercession for him that man followeth the counsell of Christ but obeyeth not the commaundement But Christ and Paul when they spake of these thinges taught not this distinction This doctrine doubtles cutteth in â–ª sonder the strings of Christian religion it abateth the vehemency of the spirite
and of the latter the sword is committed to be ignorant that he is a keper not only of the latter table but also of the first Wherefore he ought to doo his diligence that religion also be rightly administred and that according to the word of God Neither let him thinke which thing many princes at this day perswade theÌ„selues that such a care pertayneth nothing vnto them They wil destribute benefices and Bishoprickes to whome they thinke good but that they whome they haue exalted to such dignities should execute theyr office they nothing at all regard Wherefore you must be subiect not bycause of wrath only but also for conscience sake For for this cause ye pay also tribute for they are Gods ministers applyeng themselues for the same thing Render to all men therfore theyr dewty to whoÌ„ ye ow tribute tribute to whom custome custom to whoÌ„ feare feare to whoÌ„ honor honour Ow nothing to any man but to loue one an other for he yâ— loueth an other hath fullfilled the Lawe For this Thou shalt not commit adultery Thou shalt not kill Thou shalt not steale Thou shalt not beare false witnes Thou shalt not couet and if there be any other commaundement it is briefely comprehanded in this saying euen in thys Thou shalt loue thy neighbour as thy selfe Loue doth not euill to his neighbour therefore is loue the fullfillinge of the Law VVherefore you must be subiect not only bycause of wrath but also for conscience sake In this as it were in a briefe conclusion he concludeth the chiefe reasons which he had before alledged And referreth them either to vengeance or to conscience And into how greate a danger such as are stubborne and rebellious agaynst the magestrate bring themselues we may easely vnderstand by the most greauous punishments which are set forth in the lawes De crimine lesae maiestatis that is of the case of treason and in other such like lawes Moreouer we must haue a regard to our conscience which otherwise condemneth vs and diliuereth vs to the iudgement of God that although we escape the wrath of earthly princes yet let vs know that the vengeance of God doth stil hang ouer our heds But admitte there were no such vengeance hanging ouer our heddes doost thou yet notwithstanding count it so smal a matter to haue thy sicke mind continually scourged with the prickes of thy conscience There is no man I suppose which is ignoraunt how greuous a torment those cogitations accusing and defendyng one an other are These are those auenging furies which as yâ— Poets fayned do alwayes torment guilty men If thou vse thy selfe sediciously or stubbernly against princes a double care straightway afflicteth thy conscience One is for that thâ—â— hast cast A double care afflicteth the coÌ„science of seditious persons away the gouernment instituted of God The other is for that thou hast wyth most great ingratitude impietie iniustice and contumelies sought to hurte the power which deserueth well both at thy handes and also of all mankinde For this cause ye pay also tribute For they are the ministers of God applieng themselues for the same thing Paul declareth by an outward signe that the conscience of rebellious and stubborne men may iustly be reproued for that they pay tributes vnto their princes And that this is done iustly and rightly and orderly For two â—auses tribute is payd he taketh as a thyng graunted and knowen of all men and of all nations For tribute is geuen either that meÌ„ should testifie that they are subiect to theyr princes for for this cause God also commaunded that men should offer some what vnto him not that he hath any nede of our thinges for whatsoeuer we haue we haue it of him otherwise if he should haue nede of our good thinges he should not be God as Dauid sayth Or ells tributes are geuen in stede of a reward that we might some way recompence those greauous paynes which the maiestrates take for the common wealth and that they may be able to beare the burtheÌ„ of publique costs and charges Wherfore tribute admonisheth the conscience of men that that power is exellent to whome that tribute is geuen and that the same power is instituted of God and set and placed amongest men in the stede of God which also we ought to reuerence and highly to esteme For that is the thing which euery man in payeng tribute promiseth to doo This also we are thereby put in mind of that the Common wealth is by theyr care and industry very much holpen and therefore they ought to be susteyned with our riches which are priuate men as with a reward most iustly dew to theyr labours For to the end we should liue quietly and at ease they are continually troubled with the affaire of the common welth They are compelled oftentimes to be abrode and to neglect theyr owne busines for publique affayres sake that thou mayst abide at home and looke to thine owne affayres They defend the borders they fight agaynst the enemy they suffer all maner of labors they put themselues into most great dangers that we may peaceably and securely haue the fruition of our goods and possessions They decide matters in controuersy they make lawes they set forth decrées they sit in counsell that no man shoulde by violence be put from his owne that no man shoulde haue any vilany or hurt doone vnto him They persecute the euill doers murtherers and theâ—es they destroy that we may safely iorney and that no daÌ„ger should be wrought agaynst vs either at home or abrod For these so many benefits none ought to thinke it a thing greuous if tribute be payd vnto them as a iust reward We ought to helpe the maiestrates with prayers But besides tributes Paul admonisheth vs to helpe them also with our prayers yâ— vnder them we may lead a quiet peacable life with all piety and temperance I would to God princes one the other side when they receaue tributes customes would thinke with themselues to what end they are geuen I would to God they would thus say within them selues These things are for this cause geuen vnto me that I should aduaunce vertues that I should represse vices and defende the peace and tranquilitie of the common wealth I will not for nought receyue so great a reward I will not neglect those things which my people by this kindâ— of honor requireth or rather vrgeth at my hands If all Princes would do thus then should be taken away that ignominie which prouerbe is in euery mans mouth That all good Princes may be written in one ring For they are the ministers of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Here we sée that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and Liturgia pertayneth not onely to holy seruices It is against iustice not to pay or to diminish tributes Why he so many ways setteth forth obedieÌ„ce towards magistrateâ— â–ª 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pertaine not as some
that none can by good conscience denye tribute vnto Princes if it be required Nether ought Pope Bonifacius in any wise to haue taken vpon him to make that vnreasonable and outragious decrée It is already concluded of Paul that all owe subiection and obedience to publike powers Neither ought the godly sayth Chrysostome to take it in ill part to be subiect to magestrates although they themselues are the children of God and appoynted to the kingdome of heauen For theyr glory is not in the state of this life They wayt vntill Christ appeare in whome as yet is hidden theyr life But in yâ— meane time they ought not to count it a thing greuous if they rise vppe if they vncouer the head if they geue the vpper hande if they obey Magestrates Here is nothing vnméete or vncomely Yea rather what so euer is done of them accordynge to the prescript of the worde of God is full of all comelinesse and worthinesse Owe nothing to any man but this to loue one an other Paul will haue vs so perfectly and fully to render to euery man that which we owe vnto him that we should cease to be any more in debt Howbeit there is one certain thing which Charity is alwaâ—s tâ—e for that the cause of that det always remaineth can neuer be fully payd namely the debt of loue and charity For although thou both hast and dost loue thy neighbour yet notwistanding art thou still bound to loue him For there alwayes remayneth a cause why thou oughtest to loue him namely God whose image he is He made him he gaue him to thée to be thy neighbour he hath commaunded that thou shouldest loue him as thy selfe For he that loueth an other hath fulfilled the law Some referre this to that part of the law only which is here spoken of True it is that the discourse of thys treatise is of that part of the law which pertayneth to our neighbour So that the sence should be he which loueth an other hath fullfilled yâ— who le law as touching Our neyghbour is not rightly loued vnâ—es God be loued in him We haue God in our neighboure after a sort visible We must not hereby affirm that we can pâ—eforme the law the secoÌ„d table But I se no let but that we may simply vnderstaÌ„d yâ— who le law For we can not loue our neighbour well vnles we loue God in him For these are so knit together as the cause and the effect and therefore they can not be seperated the one from the other For the loue of our neighbour is a testimony of that loue wherwith we loue God If we loue not God being in a neighbour after a sort visible and present how do we boast that we loue him in himselfe whiche is not séene of vs but is of some thought to be very farre of from vs I would not that our aduersaries should here triumph as though Paul should say that we performe and fullfill the law Paul indede affirmeth that the law is fullfilled of him which loueth his neighbour but yet of such a one which in such sort loueth as the law coÌ„maundeth But this is no man able to performe For this thou shalt not committe adultery thou shalt not kill The proofe is hereof taken for that all those preceptes are summarily comprehended in that which is sayd Thou shalt loue thy neighbour as thy selfe And this commaundement as Chrisostome here noteth is sayd of Christ to be like that great commaundemeÌ„t Thou shalt loue thy Lord thy God with all thy hart with all thy soule and with all thy strengths For seing that we ought to loue our neighbours as our selues there waÌ„teth litle but that we ought to loue him as we loue God For we omitte nothing Why the commaundement of hanoring the parents is ouer hipped which may serue to our owne commodity or saluation He made no mencion of the loue towards our pareÌ„ts eyther bycause that precept as the Hebrews thinke pertayneth to the first table or ells for that he would not reckon vp all all the coÌ„maundements For therfore he added And if there be any other commaundement Or ells for that he had alredy before sufficiently spoken of the obedience due to magestrates in which order are parentes also to be placed Loue woorketh not euill to his neighbour This is easely gathered of that which haue bene spoken For in these commaundemeÌ„ts are prohibited all things whatsoeuer may offeÌ„ded our brother Wherfore Paul aptly added that such is the force of loue that it suffreth not any man to hurt his neighbour And that considering the season that it is nowe time that we should arise from slepe for now is our saluation nerer then when we beleued The night is past and the day is at hand let vs therefore cast away the woorkes of darkenes and let vs put on the armour of light So that we may walke honestly as in the day not in glottonie and dronckenes neyther in chambring and waÌ„tonnes nor in strife and enuieng But put ye on the Lorde Iesus Christe and take no thought for the flesh to fulfill the lustes of it And that considering the season that it is now time that we shold arise from slepe After that Paul had now geuen many rules touching the dewties of loue and of an holy life lest paradueÌ„ture they should slippe out of our minds he thought it good to vrge them by an argument taken of time The summe is at this present all these thinges are diligently and with an earnest endeuor to be sene vnto for that oportunity serueth excedingly thereunto For so signifieth the Greke woorde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which Paul vseth All this whole talke is metaphoricall â–ª For he maketh mencion of slepe of night of day of arising from slepe and of darkenes Waking Aristotle calleth a liberty of yâ— sences to execute theyr functioÌ„s contrariwise slepe is a bond of the sences Which commeth by the euaporation of the noorishements to the hed The meaning is this That before the fayth of Christ was reaceaued What waking is What â—â—â—pe is that is before regeneration men were conuersant in great darkenes of ignoraÌ„ce and therefore as it had bene men on sleepe they were hindred from all good works which mought be gratefull and acceptable to God But now after fayth and the grace of regeneration the bright knowledge of God hath shined forth as it were the day and therfore the strengths both of the soule and of the body are new after a sort losed and made frée to performe the woorkes of righteousnes Wherefore it is not mete that men should at this time be idle and senceles And therefore euery one ought to be awaked vp to execute the will of God seing that he séeth that he walketh in the light and in the day Paul vsed this selfe same forme of speach in yâ— first epistle to the Thes in the last chap. All ye sayth he are the children of
more excellency then the effect especially in that it is such a cause wherfore if workes be the causes of predestinatiō they are also more worthy of more excellency Our works cannot be of more worthines then predestination That which is constant certaine dependeth not of that which is vncertain vnconstant then predestination Moreouer predestinatiō is sure cōstāt infallible How thē shall we appoint y◠it depēdeth of y◠works of frée will which are vncertaine vncōstant may be bowed hither thither if a mā cōsider thē perticulaly For men are a like prone vnto this or y◠kinde of sinne as occasions are offred For otherwise if we will speake generally by reason of the sinne of the firste parentes frée will before regeneration can do nothing els but sinne Wherefore according to the sentence of these men it must néedes follow that the predestination of God which is certaine dependeth of the workes of men which are not onely vncertaine but also are sinnes Neither can they say that they mean of those works which follow regeneration For those as we haue taught spring of Grace and of predestination Neither do these men consider that they to satisfye humane reason We must not so defēd ou◠liberty that we spoile God of his libertie and to auoutch I know not what liberty in men spoyle God of his due power liberty in electing which power and liberty yet the Apostle setteth forth and saith that God hath no les right ouer men then hath the potter ouer the vessels whiche he maketh But after these mens sentence God can not elect but him only whom he knoweth shal behaue himselfe wel neither can he reiect any man but whom he séeth shal be euill But this is to go about to bring God into an order and to make him subiect vnto the lawes of our reason As for Erasmus he in vaine speaketh against this reason For he sayth that it is not absurde to take away from God that power which he himselfe will not haue attributed vnto him namelye to do any thing vniustly For we say that Paul hath in vaine yea rather falsly set foorth this We must geue vnto God that liberty whiche the scripture geueth vnto him liberty of God if he neither haue it nor will that it should be attributed vnto him But how Paul hath proued this libertye in God that place whiche we haue cited most manifestly declareth They also to no purpose obiect vnto vs the iustice of God for here is entreated onely of his mercy Neither can they deny but y◠they by this their sentence do rob God of a greate deale of his loue and good will towardes men For the holy scripture when it would commend vnto vs the fatherly loue of God affirmeth that he gaue his sonne and that vnto the death and that then when we were yet sinners enemies and children of wrath But these men will haue no man to be predestinated which hath not good woorkes foreséene in the minde of God And so euerye man may say with himselfe If I be predestinated the cause thereof dependeth of my selfe But an other which féeleth truely in his harte that he is fréely elected of Loue towards God is kindled of the true feling of predestination God for Christes sake when as he of himselfe was all maner of wayes vnworthy of so greate loue will without all doubt be wonderfullye inflamed to loue God againe It is also profitable vnto vs that our saluation shoulde not depende of our works For we oftentimes wauer and in liuing vprightly are not very constant Doubtles if we should put confidence in our owne workes we should vtterly dispayre But if we beleue that our saluation abideth in God fixed and assured for Christes sake we cannot but be of good comfort Farther if predestination shoulde come vnto vs by our woorkes foreséene the beginning of our saluation should be of our selues against which sentence the scriptures euery where cry out For that were to raise vp an idoll in our selues Moreouer the iustice of God shoulde then The consideration of the election of God ▪ and of the election of man is diuers haue néede of the externe rule of our workes But Christ sayth Ye haue not elected me but I haue elected you Neither is that consideration in God which is in men when they beginne to loue a man or to picke out a frende For men are moued by some excellente giftes wherewith they sée a man adorned But God can finde nothing good in vs which first proceedeth not from him And Ciprian saith as Augustine oftentimes citeth him that we therefore can not glory for that we haue nothinge that is our owne and therefore Augustine concludeth that we oughte not to parte stakes betwene God and vs to geue one parte to him and to kéepe an other vnto Vnto God is all whole to be ascribed our selues touching the obteinement of saluation for all whole is without doubte to be ascribed vnto him The Apostle when he writeth of predestination hath alwaies this ende before him to confirme our confidence and especially in afflictiōs out of which he saith that God will deliuer vs. But if the purpose of God shoulde be referred vnto our workes as vnto causes thereof then could we by no meanes conceaue any such confidence For we oftentimes fall and the righteousnes of our If predestinatiō shold depend of workes i◠woulde make vs not to hope but to dispayre workes is so sclender that it cannot stand before the iudgement seate of God And that the Apostle for this cause chiefly made mencion of predestination we maye vnderstand by the. 8. chapter of this Epistle For when he described the effectes of iustification amongst other things he saith that we by it haue obteined the adoption of sonnes and that we are moued by the spirit of God as the sonnes of God and therfore with a valiant minde we suffer aduersities and for that cause euery creature groneth and earnestly desireth to be at the length deliuered And the spirite it self also maketh intercession for vs. And at the last addeth That vnto them that loue God all thinges worke to good And who they be y◠loue God he straightway declareth Which are called saith he according to purpose These seketh Paul to make secure that they shoulde not thinke that they are hindred when they are excercised with aduersities for that they are foreknowne predestinated called and iustified And that he had a respect vnto this security those thinges declare whiche In which wordes of Paul the aduersaries a◠deceiued follow If God be on our side who shal be against vs Who shall accuse against the elect of God First by this methode is gathered that the aduersaries much erre supposinge that by this place they may inferre that predestination commeth of workes foreséene For Paul before that gradation wrote these wordes To them that loue God all