fecerit eaÌ„ viuet in illa vt cum quisque infirmitatem suam cognouerit non per suas vires neque per literam ipsius legis quod fieri non potest sed per fidem concilians iustificatorem perueniat et faciat et viuat in eam Opus rectum quod qui fecerit viuit in eo non fit nisi in iustificato Iustificatio autem ex fide impetratur i. For therfore is the iustyce of the lawe propowned that who dothe it shall lyue in it so that when euery man shal knowe hys owne infyrmity he may attayne it and do it and lyue in it not by hys owne powers neyther by the letter of the lawe which can nat be done but reconcylyng the iustyfier by fayth A ryght worke whiche who dothe shal lyue in it is not done but in a iustifyed person And iustificacyon is purchased by faythe Here he saythe clerely that the iustifyer is reconcyled by faythe and iustifycacyon is purchased by faythe And a lytle furder he sayth Ex lege timemus deum ex fide speramus in deum sed timentibus penam absconditur gratia sub quo timore anima Laborans c. per fidem confugiat ad misericordiam dei vt det quod iubet That is to saye By the lawe we feare god by fayth we truste in god but from theÌ„ that feare payne grace is hyd With whiche feare the soule oppressed must fle by fayth to the mercy of god that he maye gyue the thynge that he commaundeth Here Saynt Austine teacheth that by the lawe the hartes be made aferde but by fayth they receyue coÌ„solatyon And he teacheth that fyrste by faythe we muste purchase mercy or we go about to do the lawe we wyll recyte a lytle after other thinges also Truely it is a wonderfull thynge that the aduersaryes be nothinge moued with so many places of scrypture whiche openly gyue iustyficacyon to faythe and take it from workes Thynke they that the same thynge is so ofte repeted in vayne Or suppose they that the thynge so ofte repeted eschaped out of theyr mouthe inspired with the holy goste vnaduysedly But these idle workers haue inuented a proper cauillation to defete this matter They saye that Paule muste be vnderstonded be side formata so that they wyll not attrybute iustificacyon vnto faythe but by reason of loue nay vtterly they wyll not attrybute iustyfycacyon to faythe but only to loue For they dreame that faythe maye stande with mortall synne To what purpose belonge thys but that they wyll agayne dysanul the promyse and returne to the lawe If faythe receyueth remyssyon of synnes for loue remissyon of synnes shal be alwayes vncertayne for we neuer loue so moch as we owe yea we loue not onles our hartes be assured that our synnes be perdoned so the aduersaryes whyles in remyssyon of synnes and in iustyfycacyon they requyre a trustynge of theyr owe loue they vtterly disanull the Euangell of free remyssyon of synnes where as yet they nether performe that loue nor vnderstande it onles they beleue that remyssyon of synnes is frely receyued We also say that loue ought to folowe fayth as Paule also teacheth saynge In Chryste Iesu neyther cyrcumcysyon is any thyng worth nor vncircumcision but faythe workynge by loue And yet we maye not for al thys thynke that we shal be pardoned our synnes or be reconciled because of thys loue as we receyue not remyssyon of synnes for other workes folowynge but only by faythe in the proper sygnifycatyon we receyue remyssyon of synnes For the promyse can nat be taken but by faythe But fayth in the proper sence is thassentynge to goddes promyse For of thys faythe speketh scrypture And because it receyueth remyssyon of synnes and reconcyleth vs to god we be fyrst accompted ryghtwyse by faythe oâ— we loue do the lawe notwithstandynge loue ensueth And yet thys is nat an idle knowledge nor it can nat stande with synne but it is the worke of the holy goste wherby we be delyuered froÌ„ deathe and the myndes whiche tofore were affrayed erecte and viuifyed And because thê faythe receyueth onely remyssyon of synnes and maketh vs acceptable to god and quiet of conscyence it myght better be called gracia gratum faciens â— a grace makynge a maÌ„ acceptable then loue may whiche is theffecte ensuynge Hethervnto we haue very copiously shewed aswele by authorities of scrypture as by reasons deryued out of scrypture that by onely faythe is graunted remyssyon of synnes and that only faythe iustyfyeth that is maketh of iniust iust and regenerate It is easely iudged howe necessary the knowledge of thys faythe is For in this onely is espyed thoffyce of Chryst by this only we receyue the benefites of Chryst this only bryngeth vnto godly myndes a sure and ferme consolacyon And it is a necessarye thynge that some doctryne be publyshed in the churche by which men may conceiue a sure hope of helth For thaduersaries gyue vnhappy couÌ„sel vnto men which byd them doute whether they haue obtayned remyssyon or no. Howe shall these felowes bere vp them selues in deathe whiche haue harde nothiÌ„g of this faith which thinke that they owe to doute whether they haue obteyned remyssyon of synnes or no furthermore the Euaungell of Chryste must nedes be reteyned in the churche that is to say the promyse that synnes be frely remitted for Christ thys Euaungell they vtterly dysanull whiche teach nothynge of this fayth But the schole men of thys faythe speake nat one worde And our aduersaryes all to gether folowe them and do dysalowe thys faythe Nor they see nat that they defete the hole promyse of the fre remyssyon of synnes and of the iustyce of Chryst where as they dysproue thys faythe ¶ Of loue and fulfyllynge of the lawe HEre thaduersaryes obiecte Si vis ad vitam ingredi serua mandata That is to saye If thou wylte entre into lyfe kepe the commaundemeÌ„tes Also The doers of the law be iustified and many other lyke senteÌ„cies of the law to whiche before we make answere we wyll shewe our opinion of loue and of the fulfyllynge of the lawe It is wrytten in the prohete I wyll gyue my lawe in theyr hartes And Paule sayth that the lawe is establyshed and nat abrogate by fayth And Christ sayth If thou wylt enter into lyfe kepe the coÌ„maundementes Also If I haue not loue I am nothyng These and suche lyke sentencyes testifye that the lawe must begynne in vs although nat absolutely in an hyghe perfectyon and oweth to to encrease as moche as may be more more We speake not of the ceremonyes but of that law which is made of the motions of the hart I meane the Decalogye And bycause faythe bringeth with it the holy gost and engeÌ„dereth a newe lyfe in the hartes it muste of necessitie also engeÌ„der spiritual motions in the hartes And which be tho mocyons the prophete sheweth when he saythe I wyll gyue my loue into
shuld ouercome synne and dethe that our loue shulde be a purgation for which god shulde be reconciled the medyator Christ omitted that our loue shulde be ryghtwysnes without the mediator Christ For this loue yf any there were shulde be a iustyce of the lawe and not of the gospell which promyseth to vs reconcilement and ryghtwisnes yf we beleue that for Christe our redemer the father be pacifyed and that Christes merites be our satisfaction Therfore Peter a lytle before byddeth vs cum to Christe that we may be buylt vpon Christ and he addeth who beleueth in hym shall nat be confunded our loue delyuereth vs nat from confusion syth god iudgeth and reproueth vs but fayth in Christ delyuereth vs iÌ„ these affrayes because we knowe that we be pardoned for Christes sake Howe be it this sentence of charitie is taken forthe of the prouerbes where the circumstaÌ„ce of the place whiche renneth in contrarieties dothe clearly shewe howe it ought to be vnderstaÌ„de For there thus is it wrytteÌ„ Odium suscitat rixas et vniuersa delicta operit charitas i. Hatred styrreth coÌ„tentions but charitie couereth al faultes Thys sentence teacheth euen the same selfe thyng that the sayeng of Paule takeÌ„ out of the Collossenses dothe whiche is if any dissensions falle they shulde be mitigate and pacified by our owne indifferencie and gentle â—ebauour â–ª Dissentions he sayeth do encreace by â–ª â—aâ—redes as we ofte tymes see that of very lyte offensies most busynes dothe ryse There fell certayne lyte displeasures betwixt Gaius Cesar and Pompeius in which if the one had gyuen place a lytle to the other the ciuile batell shulde neuer haue rysen But whyles eche of theÌ„ pursued hê owne puate hatred of a thiÌ„g of nought rose moste greuous troubles And many heresâ—es haue rysen in the churche only of priuate hatredes of teachers betwixt them selues Wherfore when he sayeth charitie couereth offensies he speketh nat of a mans owne offensies but of other mens as who shulde say although any offensies or displeasures do fall yet loue dissembleth wynketh at them pardoneth them gyueth place doth nat all thynges with extremitie Peter therfore meaneth nat this that loue before god deserueth remission of synnes that it is a redemption of synnes Christe the mediatour excluded that for loue we be accepted and nat for Christ our mediatour but that towardes men it is nat disdaynfull nat roughe nat intractable that it dissembleth the smalle offensies of fryndes and the manners of other yea thoughe they be somewhat ouer boystuous dothe take theÌ„ in worth accordyng to the byddyng of a certayne vulgare sayeng whiche is this Mores amici noueris non oderis .i. Knowe the manners of thy frende hate them nat Nor the Apostles do nat with out cause so ofte admonishe vs of thys office of charitie whiche the philosophers call an Epikee that is to say a moderation or mitigation For thys vertue is hyghly necessarie to the reteynyng of publyk concorde which can nat endure onles they wynke at muche forgyue muche eche to other aswell the pastours as the congregations ⧠⧠Out of saynt Iames they cite Videtis igiturque ex operibus iustificatur homo et non ex fide sola .i. Ye se then that man is iustified by workes and nat by fayth alonly Nor ther is none other place whiche semeth to make more agaynst our opinion then this dothe Howbeit the answere is easy and playne If the aduersaries wolde nat shewe vnto it theyr owne opinions of the merites of workes saynt Iames wordes had no incommoditie But where so euer mencion is made of workê the aduersaries do adde theyr owne wycked gloses that by good workes we deserue remission of synnes that good workê be a raunsum and price for whiche god is recoÌ„ciled vnto vs that good workes before god for theyr owne goodnes be accepted nor nede nat mercie or Christe to be our mediatour But none of al these thynges cam in to saynt Iames mynde whiche all together the aduersaries do nowe defende vnder the pretence of the sayeng of S. Iames. Fyrste therfore this is to be weyed pondered that thys place rather maketh agaynst the aduersaries than agaynst vs. For the aduersaries teache man to be iustified by loue workes but of fayth wherby we receyue our mercystocke Christe they speake nothyng at all yea rather they disproue thys fayth and disproue it nat onely with wordes and sentencies but also they go about to put it away with the swerde and greuous punyshementes Howe muche better teacheth Iames whiche omitteth nat faythe nor putteth nat loue in the place of fayth but reteyneth it lest the mercystocke Christe shulde be excluded in iustification Lyke as Paule when he teacheth the SuÌ„me of the christian lyfe compriseth fayth and loue as when he sayeth The ende of the commaundement is charitie issuyng out of a pure harte and good conscience and fayth vnfayned Secondly The matter it selfe speaketh that here it is spoken of workes which ensue fayth and whiche shewe that fayth is nat deade but lyuyshe and workynge in the harte Wherfore Iames meant nat that we by good workes deserue remission of synnes and grace for he speketh of the workes of them that be iustifyed whiche be alredy reconciled accepted and whiche haue obteyned remission of synnes Wherfore the aduersaries erre when they out of this place gather that Iames teacheth vs that by good workê we haue a cuÌ„myng to god without Christe the mediatour Thyrdly Iames a litle before spake of regeneration that it is made by the gospell For thus he sayeth wyllyngly he generated vs by the worde of trouth to the ende we shulde be the fyrste frutes or the begynnynges of al his creatures WheÌ„ he sayeth that we be regenerate by the gospel he teacheth that by fayth we be regenerate and iustified Thus it appereth thaâ— Iames is nat agaynste vs who in blamyng the ydle and careles myndes whiche dreame that they haue fayth and haue it nat made a distinction betwixt the deade fayth and the lyuyshe faythe He calleth it deade which bryngeth forthe no good workê But he calleth that a quycke faythe whiche bryngeth forth good workes Doubtles we haue oftentymes nowe shewed what we calle faythe For we speake nat of the ydle knoweledge whiche is also iÌ„ deuyls but of the fayth whiche resisteth the fearfull troubles of the conscience whiche erecteth and conforteth the feared hartes Suche fayth is neyther an easy thyng as our aduersaries do dreame nor yet in mans power but a diuine power by whiche we vaynquyshe the deuyll and deathe as Paule to the Colossenses sayeth that fayth is myghty by the power of god and ouercuÌ„meth deathe In whiche ye be sayeth Paule resuscitate by fayth whiche is the myght and efficacitie of god Thys faythe sythe it is a newe lyfe necessaryly engendreth newe motions and workes Therfore Iames doth ryghtly deny that we be iustified by suche fayth whiche
him Thys coÌ„tempt doth marre al theyr good workes for god iudgeth the harte Finally this is very vnaduysedly wrytten of our aduersaryes that men gyltye of eternall punyshement deserue remyssyon of synnes by the acte of loue sythe it is not possyble to loue god onles we fyrste purchase forgiuenes of sinnes by fayth for it is ympossyble for an harte whiche in dede felethe the ire of god to loue god before he perceyue hym pacyfyed I saye so longe as god feareth vs and semeth to cast vs froÌ„ hym into eternall dethe mans nature can not lyfte vp it selfe to loue the angrye iuge punysher It is easye for euyll persons to fayne these dreames of loue that a mortall synner maye loue god aboue all thynges for they fele not what is the ire or iudgemente of god But in the trouble of conscyence and in the very conflycte there the conscyence proue howe false theyr phylosophycal conclusyons be Paule saythe ☞ The lawe workethe anger ☜ he saythe not that by the lawe men deserue remyssyon of synnes for the lawe alwaye accuseth the conscyence and put it in feare Ergo it iustifyeth not for the coÌ„science terrified by the lawe fleeth the iudgement of god wherefore they erre that truste to wynne remyssyon of synnes be the workes of the lawe Thys suffyseth of the iustyce of reasoÌ„ or lawe which the aduersaries teache for here after when we shall shewe our mynde of the iustyce of fayth â–ª the matter it selfe shal constrayne vs to bryng out more recordes whiche maye also helpe to destroye the erroures of our aduersaryes here to fore aledged Bycause therfore that men can not by theyr owne powers do the lawe of god and bycause all be vnder synne and condemned to euerlastynge dethe for thys cause we can not be delyuered from syn by the lawe nor be iustyfyed but the promyse of remissyon of synnes and of iustyfycatyon is geuen for Chryst who is geuen for vs to satysfy for the synnes of the worlde and is set vp as a medyator and a pourger of sinnes This promyse hathe no condycyon annexed of our merites but freely offereth forgyuenes of synnes and iustyfycatyon as Paule sayth ☞ Yf by workes Ergo it is no grace ☜ And in an other plase ☞ The iustyce of god is nowe declared without the lawe ☜ that is remyssyon of synnes shulde hange on our merytes and the reconciliation shuld be by the lawe so it were vnprofytable for we can not do the lawe it shulde also ensue that the promyse of reconcilement shuld neuer chaunce vnto vs. Thus reasoneth Paule Rom. 4. ☞ Yf our enherytaunce shuld cum by the lawe voyde were our fayth and the promyse were of none effecte For yf the promyse shulde requyre a condycyon annexed of our merytes and of the lawe syth we neuer fulfyll the lawe it shulde folowe that the promyse were vnprofytable But syth it is so â–ª that iustyfycatyon chaungeth by free promyse it foloweth that we can not iustyfye our selues For otherwyse what neded god to promise And where as the promyse caÌ„ not be taken without fayth the gospell which is properly the promyse of remyssyon of synnes and of iustyfycatyon for Chryst teacheth the iustyce of fayth which the lawe doth not Nor it is not the iustyce of the lawe For the lawe requyreth of vs our workes and our perfection but the promyse offereth vnto vs whiche be oppressed with synne and deathe frelye reconciliacyon for Chryste which reconciliatyon is receyued not by workes but by onely fayth This fayth bryngeth not with it a trust of the owne workes but onely the trust of promyse or of the promysed mercye in Chryste wherfore thys specyall fayth by which we beleue that our synnes be forgyuen for Chryste and that god is pacyfyed and mercyfull for Chryste obteyneth remyssyon of synnes and iustifyeth vs and by cause in repentaunce that is in the trouble of conscyence it comforteth and plucketh vp our hartes and regenerateth vs and bryngeth vnto vs the holye spirite so that from thenseforth â—e maye do the lawe of god that is loue God feare God thynke that god heareth vs obey god in all afflyctyons it mortyfyeth the coÌ„cupiscence c. Thus fayth whiche freely receyueth remyssyon of sinnes bycause it pleadeth Chryst in estopell agaynst the ire of god as a mediator and mercy stocke pleadeth not in barr our owne merytes or our owne loue which fayth is the true knowledge of Chryste and vseth the benyfytes of Chryst and regenerateth our hartes and goeth before the fulfyllynge of the lawe Of thys fayth ye shall not fynde one syllable in the doctrine of our aduersaryes wherfore we reproue the aduersaryes bycause they only teach the iustyce of the lawe and teach not the iustyce of the Euaungell which preacheth vnto vs the iustyce of faythe in Chryste ⧠What is the iustyfyenge faythe THe aduersaries only fayne that fayth is a knowledge of the hystorye and therfore they teache that it may stonde with mortall syn They speake therfore nothiÌ„ge of fayth by which Paule so oft tymes saythe that men be iustyfyed for they whiche be reputed iust before god walke nat in mortal synne But that fayth whiche iustyfyeth is nat only a knoweledge of the hystorye but it is to assent to the promyse of God in whiche frelye for Chryste is offered remyssyon of synnes iustificacyon And lest a man shulde suspecte that it is only a knowledge we wyl adde more ouer that it is to wyll and to receyue the offered promyse of remyssyon of synnes and of iustification And a man maye easely se the diuersytye betwyxte this fayth and betwyxt the iustyce of the lawe Fayth is a seruice which receiueth of god the offered benifites The iustyce of the lawe is a seruyce which offereth vnto god our merites with fayth on thê fashyon wyll god be serued that we maye receyue of hym the thynges whiche he promyseth and offereth Nowe that fayth sygnifieth not only the knowledge of the hystorye but rather a trust which assenteth to the promise Paule clerely wytnesseth when he sayth Iustyce therfore is by fayth to thentente the promyse shulde be ferme and stable For he meaneth that the promyse caÌ„ not be receyued but by fayth wherfore he compareth and knytteth together as correlatiues promyse and fayth Howe be it it is sone iudged what faythe is yf we consyder the Crede where this artycle is put Remission of synnes wherefore it is not ynoughe to beleue that Chryste was borne dyd suffer and ryse agayne oneles we adde also thys artycle Remyssyon of synnes whiche is the fynal cause of the hystorye To thys artycle we muste refere the reste as that for Chryste and nat for our owne merites we be pardoned of our synnes For what neded Chryste to begyuen for our synnes if our owne merytes maye satysfye for our synnes ⧠wherfore so ofte as we speake of the iustyfyenge faythe it is to be knowen that these .3 obiectes muste mete together
thy lorde god c. But howe shall they gather hereby that loue iustifieth Mary saye they bycause the greatest vertue iustifieth Nat so for lyke as the greatest or fyrste lawe dothe nat iustify so dothe neyther the greatest vertue of the lawe For there is no lawe whiche more accuseth vs which maketh more that our conscience is angrye with the iudgement of god thaÌ„ this greatest lawe doth Loue thy lorde god with al thy harte For what one of all the sayntes saue only Christe dare boste that he hath satisfyed this lawe Ergo the vertue of the lawe iustifyeth nat But that vertue iustifieth which taketh reconcilement that is gyuen for Christes sake This vertue is fayth nor it iustifyeth nat for the owne worthynes but only because it receyueth mercy by which for Christes sake we be recoumpted iuste For we be iuste that is to saye accepted to god nat for our owne ê‘fectioÌ„ but by mercy for Christ. if it so be that we take it and lay it agaynst the wrathe of god But the aduersaries do gyue iustification to loue for none other cause but for as muche as they teache the lawe dreame that ryghtwisenes is the obedieÌ„ce of the lawe For mans reason only loketh to the lawe and vnderstandeth none other iustice than thobedience of the lawe And the scholemen lyke wytty felowes goyng aboute to seke out a science in diuine matters haue propouned vnto theÌ„ selues the lawe euen as the philosophers in Morall matters do propoune vnto theÌ„ selues preceptes of manners But Paule cryeth out agaynst it and teacheth that iustice is an other thynge that is to were an obedience towarde the promyse of reconcilement gyuen for Christ and that is to receyue mercy gyueÌ„ for Christ. For so be we accepted vnto god so be the conscience pacifyed when we fele that god is merciful vnto vs for Christê sake Wherfore mens myndes must be plucked away from the lawe to the promyse as we haue oft tymes nowe sayde and shal expoune the thyng more largely a lytle here after wheÌ„ we shal examine the scholasticall argumentes of the worde of ryghtwysenes The aduersaries in theyr confutation cyted also thê place of Paule to the Coloss. agaynst vs. Charitie is the bonde of perfection vpon this they reason that loue iustifieth because it maketh men perfyte Althoughe it may here be answered in sundry wyses of perfection yet we wyl simpely recite the meaning of Paule Certayne it is that Paule speaketh of the loue of the neyghbour Nor it is nat to be thought that Paule attributeth eyther iustificatioÌ„ or perfectioÌ„ before god to the workê of the seconde table rather than to the workê of the fyrste Furthermore if loue be the perfyte fulfyllyng of the lawe and satisfyeth the lawe theÌ„ we nede nat Christe to be our mediatour and redemer But Paule teacheth that we be therfore accepted for Christ and nat for the fulfyllyng of the lawe because the fulfyllyng of the lawe is nat perfyte Wherfore syth in other place as he manifestly plucketh from vs perfection it is nat to be thought that he speaketh here of the personall perfection of euery particular persone but speaketh of the comune integritie and vnitie of the churche For to this entent he sayeth yâ— loue is a bonde or knyttyng together â–ª because he wolde signifie vnto vs that he speketh of the couplyng or knyttyng together of all the membres of the churche For as in all families in all publyke weales concorde is to be nouryshed with mutuall officies of loue nor tranquillitie can nat be reteined onles some lytle offensies be wynked at and forgyuen so commaundeth Paule that in the churche be kept loue and charitie to the reteynyng of coÌ„corde and whiche shall beare otherwhyles when nede requyreth the boystous manners of theyr bretherne dissemblyng certayne lyte offensies lest the churche runne into sundry Schismes and dissensions and of Schismes do ryse hatredes secres heresies For it can no otherwyse be but that concorde shal be broken when the byshoppes do laye on the peoples backes harder burdens than is expedyent and haue no manner regarde of the peoples imbecilitye Also discordes do ryse whan the people iudgeth ouer sharpely of the maners of theyr teachers or dispiseth theÌ„ for certayne lyte causes sekinge then an other kinde of doctryne and other teachers On the contrary syde the perfectyon that is to saye the entiernes and vnitie of the churche is kepte whan the stronge do suffer and beare the weake whan the people taketh in worthe certayne incommodities whiche be in the maners of theyr teachers when the byshoppes do permyt somewhat to the imbecillitie of the people Of these preceptes of equitie al the bokes of the wyse meÌ„ be ful to th end we shulde remytte and forgyue many thinges betwixte our selues in thys state of lyfe for a coÌ„mune tranquillitie And of it Paule aswele in thê place as in many other speketh and gyueth commaundement Wherfore thaduersaryes do imprudently fetche forth a reason out of this worde perfection that loue iustifieth syth Paule speketh here of the coÌ„mune vnitie and tranquillitie And so Ambrose expouneth thys place whose wordes be these Siaut ' edificium dicitum perfâ—ctum seu integrum cum omnes partes apte inter seco agmentatae sunt Euen quod Ambrose lyke as a buyldynge is called perfyte or hole wheÌ„ al the partes be aptly framed and coÌ„ioyned togyther cÌ„ It is a shame for the aduersaryes so hyghly to auaunce loue and so litle at any tyme to perfourme it For what do they nowe They disseuer churches or congregations they wryte lawes with mens bloude and propowne theÌ„ to the Emperours maiestie a prynce moste mercyful to be promulgate and inacted They kylle prestes and other good men yf any do but a lytle touche that he doth nat altogyther allowe some manifest abuses But thys agreeth nat with suche auauncemeÌ„tes and hyghe prayses of charitie whiche yf our aduersaryes wolde folowe the churches shulde be in tranquillitie and the publyke weales in vnitie and peace For these tumultes ruffelinges shuld cease if thaduersaryes wold nat thus rigorously exact certayne traditions vnprofytable to godlynes of whiche the most parte not they them selues do kepe whiche do most stoutly defende them They easely pardone them selues but other they wyll not so euen as Meuius dothe in Horace Egomet mi ignosco Meuius inquit I saythe Meuius do forgyue myne owne selfe Undoutedly thys nothynge agreeth with these noble prayses of charytye whiche they here cyte out of Paule and vnderstande hym no more then the walles vnderstonde the voyce that commeth vnto them Out of Peter they cyte also this senteÌ„ce Charite hideth a multitude of sinneâ— But it is also certayne that Peter speaketh of the loue towarde the neyghboure who applyeth this place to the precepte in whiche he commaundeth men to loue eche another Nor truly it coulde nat come to the mynde of any of the Apostles that our loue
se what confession auayleth without absolutioÌ„ But if they do nat seperate the receyuing of absolution from confession they muste nedes thynke that faythe is a parte of penauÌ„ce For absolution is nat receiued but by fayth And that absolution is nat receiued but by faythe it may be proued by Paule whiche teacheth that the promyse can nat be receiued but by faythe Howe absolution is the promyse of the remission of synnes Therfore it dothe necessarily require faythe And we do nat se howe he can be sayde to receiue absolution whiche dothe nat assente and agre to it And what other thyng is it nat to agre to the absolution then to accuse god of a lye If the barte dothe doubte it thynketh that those thynges be vncerteyne vayne whiche god dothe promise Therfore it is wrytten in the epistle of Iohan whosoeuer beleueth nat god maketh hym a lyer because he dothe nat beleue in the testimonye whiche god hathe witnessed of his sonne Secondaryly we suppose that our aduersaries do graunt that remission of synnes is eyther parte or the ende or terminus ad queÌ„ as they vse to speake of penauÌ„ce or repentauÌ„ce ergo that thyng wherby remissioÌ„ of synnes is receyued is of ryght added to the partes of penaunce But most certayne it is most vndoubted although al the gates of helle wolde crye agaynste it that remission of synnes can nat be receiued but only by fayth whiche beleueth that sinnes be forgyuen for Christê sake according to that sayeng of Paule to the Romaines whom god hathe set forthe a propitiator by faythe in the bloude of hym Also in the fyfthe to the Romaynes By whom we haue waye throughe faythe into grace c. For the troubled arraryed coâ—icence can nat plede nor laye agaynste the wrathe of god theyr owne workes or loue but so is only the conscience made quiete when it receiueth the mediatour Christe and beleueth the promises gyuen for hys sake for they do nat perceyue what remission of synnes is or howe it cometh to vs which dreame that hartes be set at peace without faythe in Christe Peter alledgeth out of Esaye thys sayeng whosoeuer shall beleue in hym shall nat be confounded or ashamed â–ª Wherfore hypocrites muste neues be confounded which truste that they receiue remission of synnes for theyr owne workê and nat for Christes sake And Peter sayth in the actes To him all the prophetes beare witnes that al whiche beleue in him do receiue remission of synnes throughe his name It coulde nat be spoken more manifestly than yâ— he sayth throughe his name And he addeth all that beleue in hym We do only therfore thus receiue remission of synnes through the name of Christe that is to wete for Christes sake â–ª and nat for any meritê or workes of our owne And this is so done when we beleue that synnes be forgyuen vs for Christes sake Our aduersaries crye out that they be the churche that they do folowe the coÌ„sent of the church But Peter here in thys our cause alledgeth also the coÌ„sent of the churche To him sayth he al the prophetes beare wytnes that by his name they receiue remission cÌ„ Undoubtedly the consente of the prophetes is to be iudged the consente of the vniuersall churche We do neyther grauÌ„t to the byshop of Rome neither yet vnto the church power or authoritie to decre agaynst this coÌ„sent of the ê“phetes But the Bulle of Leo byshop of Rome do openly condempne this article of remission of sinnes our aduersaries do also coÌ„dempne it in theyr confutation By whiche thynge it appereth what maner churche theyr churche is to be iudged whiche not onely with decrees disalowe this sentence that remission of synnes is purchased by faith not for our workes but for Christ but also coÌ„maunde to destroy that sentence and opinion with violence and with the swerde They coÌ„mauÌ„de also with all kynd of crueltie to destroye the good men whiche be of the same opinion and mynde But they wyll saye that they haue greate and famous authours for them as maister Duns Gabriel â–ª and other lyke the sayenges also of fathers â–ª whiche be recited in the decrees but maymed and vnperfecte Certes if we shulde falle to numbring of testimonies they haue the better bande For there is a great rablement of tryfelyng wryters vpon the mayster of the Sentencies whiche do euen as it were conspire to gether in defendyng these figmentes lyes of the merite of attricion and of workes and the thynges whiche we haue here to fore recyted But let no man be moued with the multitude of them For thauctoritie is not greate of the late wryters whiche were not the fathers of theyr owne wrytynges but onely embesylyng and robbyng the olde fathers dyd shyfre and turmoyle opinions forth of one boke in to an other They vsed no maner iugemeÌ„t but only after the fashyon of the Senatours whiche were called Pedarij without any wordes allowed the errours of them that had writen before whom they perceyued not We therfore wyll not be afraide to set this sayenge of Peter who allegeth the consente of the prophetê agaynst the legions of sententiaries be they neuer so manye And to this preachynge of Peter is added the testimonie of the holy gost For thus sayth the texte Adhuc loquente Petro uerba haec cecidit spiritus sanctus sup omnes qui audiebant uerbum .1 And as Peter was yet speakynge these wordes the holy ghoste lyghted vpon al them which dyd heare the worde Let all good godly consciences therfore knowe that this is the coÌ„maundement of god that they shulde beleue theyr synnes to be freelye forgyuen them for Christes sake and not for our owne workes And with this coÌ„maundement of god let them strengthen and susteyne them selues agaynst desperation and agaynst the terrours of synne and of deathe And let them knowe that this senteÌ„ce opinion hath always remayned in the churche amoÌ„ge holy and good men sythe the begynnynge of the worlde For Peter dothe clearely alledge the consent of the prophetes And the writynges of thapostles testifie that they were of the same mynde we haue also testimonies of the fathers For Barnarde sayth the sawe in playn and open wordes Necesse est enim primo omnium credere quod remissionem peccatoruÌ„ habere noÌ„ possis nisi per indulgeÌ„tiam dei sed adde adhuc ut credas hoc quod per ipsum peccata tibi donantur Hoc est testimonium quod ê‘hibet spiritus sanctus in corde tuo dicens dimissa sunt tibi peccata tua Sic enim arbitratur apostolus gratis iustificari hominem per fidem .i. For it is necessarye fyrste of all to beleue that thou canste not haue forgyuenes of synnes but by the indulgence of god but adde yet hereunto so that thou doste beleue this also that by hym thy synnes be forgyuen the. This is the testimonie which the holy ghost heareth in thy herte
sayenge Thy synnes be released the. For thus iudgeth thapostle that man is freely iustified by fayth These wordes of Barnarde do wonderfullye illustrate and set forthe our cause for he not onely requireth in a generalitie that we shulde beleue our synnes to be pardoned throughe mercye but byddethe vs also put to a speciall faythe by whiche we may beleue that euen vnto our owne selues sinnes be pardoned And he teacheth howe we may be assured of remission of synnes that is to saye whan by faythe hertes be lifted vp and be made quiete and set at rest by the holy ghoste What do our aduersaries require more Dare they yet deny that we obteyne remission of synnes through fayth Or that faythe is a parte of penaunce Thyrdly Our aduersaries say that synne is in this wyse forgyuen because he that is attrite or contrite doth brynge forthe an acte of the loue of god that by this acte he meriteth to receyue remission of synnes This is nothyng els but to teache the lawe and to destroy and abrogate the gospell and to disanull the promyse coÌ„cernyng Christ. For they do onely require the lawe and our workes for the lawe requireth loue Besydes this they do teache vs to truste that we obteyne remission of synnes bicause of contrition and loue What other thynge is this than to sette oure trust and confidence vpon our owne workes and not vpon the worde and promyse made by god of Christe Nowe if the lawe be sufficieÌ„t to the obteynyng of remission of synnes to what purpose nede we the Gospell what nede haue we of Christe if for our workes we obteyne forgyuenes of synnes But we contrarywyse do calle agayne consciences from the lawe vnto the gospell and from the truste in theyr owne workê to truste and to haue sure confidence in the promyse and in Christe because the gospell setteth forthe Christe vnto vs and promyseth remission of synnes freely for Christê sake By this promyse the gospel byddeth vs trust that for Christes sake we be recoÌ„ciled to the father and brought in to his fauour agayne and not for our owne contrition or for our owne loue For there is none other mediator or pacifier than Christe Neyther can we worke the lawe oneles we be fyrste reconciled by Christe And though we coulde do any thyng yet we ought to thinke that not for these workê we obteyne remission of synnes but for Christes sake whiche is the mediator and mercye stocke Yea it is iniurie and dishonour to Christe and a defeatyng of the gospell to thynke that we do obteyne remission of synnes for the law or by any other wayes than through faythe in Christe And this reason we haue handeled before in the title of iustification whan we tolde wherfore we do holde opinion that men be iustified by fayth and not by loue Therfore the doctrine of our aduersaries where as they teache that men for contrition and loue obteyne forgyuenes of synnes and bydde them truste in this contrition and loue is only a doctrine of the lawe and that not vnderstaÌ„ded Lykewyse as the Iewes dyd loke vpon the couered face of Moyses For admitte that we had loue let vs imagyne that we had workes yet can neither loue neither workes be a price raunsome or propitiation for synne Neyther can they be set and pleded as it were in barre agaynste the wrathe and iudgement of god accordyng to that sayenge of Dauid in the psalme Thou shalte nat entre in to iudgement with thy seruaunt for no creature lyuyng shall be iustified in thy syghte Neyther ought the honoure of Christ to be plucte from hym gyuen to our workê For these causes Paule dothe styffly affirme that we be not iustified by the lawe and he setteth agaynst the lawe the ê“myse of remission of synnes whiche is gyuen for Christes sake and reacheth vs that we freelye for Christis sake thrugh fayth receiue remission of sinnes To this promyse Paule dothe calle vs backe from the lawe Upon this promyse be byddeth vs stedfastly to beholde which doutles shal be voyde and of no strength if we be iustified before by the lawe or euer we be iustified by the promyse or if we obteyne remission of synnes for our owne iustice But the case is cleare that therfore the promyse was made vnto vs and therfore Christ was gyuen to vs because we can not worke and fulfyll the lawe wherfore it is necessary that we be fyrst reconciled by the promyse or euer we do worke the lawe But the promyse is onely receyued by fayth Ergo it is necessarye that contrite persones do by fayth receyue the promise of remission of synnes whiche is gyuen for Christis sake and that they do decree with them selfes that they haue the father recoÌ„ciled vnto them selfes freely for Christis sake This is the senteÌ„ce and mynde of Paule in the epistle to the Romanes â–ª where he saythe Therfore by fayth that accordyng to grace or fauour the promise myght be ferme and stable And to the Galathianes he sayth The scripture hath coÌ„cluded al thinges vnder synne that the promyse by the fayth of Iesu Christe myght be gyuen to them that beleue that is to say All men be vnder synne can not otherwyse be delyuered onles by fayth they do take and receyue the promyse of remission of synnes Fyrste therfore we must by faythe receyue remission of synnes before or we do worke the lawe al be it as it was aboue saide loue foloweth faythe because they that be regenerate do receyue the holy ghoste and therfore they begynne to worke the lawe We wolde recite mo testimonies and authorities if it were not so that they be open and at hande to euery deuoute and godlye reader in the scriptures For we couet not to be ouerloÌ„ge and tedious to thentente that this cause or mater may the more easelye be perceyued Neyther is it any doubte but that this is the senteÌ„ce of Paule whiche we do defeÌ„de that by fayth we receyue remission of sinnes for Christis sake and that by fayth we ought to set Christe the mediator agaynst the wrathe of god not our workes And let not the myndes of good men be troubled although our aduersaries do calumniate and corrupte the sentences of Paule There is nothynge spoken so purely and truelye but it may be depraued by captious cauillations We assuredly knowe that this which we haue recited is the very ryghte and true sentence and meanynge of Paule we knowe this oure sentence doth brynge ferme and stable coÌ„forte to godly coÌ„sciences without whiche no man is able to stande in the iudgement of god Wherfore let these pharisaical opinioÌ„s of our aduersaries be reiected and thrust out of mens â—ertes that we do not by fayth receyue remission of synnes but that we must merite remission with our loue and with our workes and that we ought to set our loue and our workes agaiÌ„st the wrath of god· This is the doctrine of
the lawe not of the gospell whiche doth fayne and imagine that man is fyrste iustified by the lawe before that he be reconciled by Christ to god notwithstandyng that Christe hym selfe saythe Without me â—e can do nothynge Also I am the true vine and ye be the braunches But oure aduersaries do imagine that we be the braunches not of Christ but of Moyses For they wyll fyrst be iustified by the law and offre theyr loue workê vnto god before that they be reconciled to god by Christe before that they be braunces of Christe Paule contrarywyse sayth playnly that the law can not be wroughte nor fulfylled without Christe Therfore the promyse is fyrst to be receyued that by faythe we maye be reconciled to god for Christis sake or that we worke the lawe These thynges we do iudge to be clere euident ynough to godly coÌ„sciences And herof they shall playnely ê‘ceyue the cause why we dyd heretofore holde opinion professe that men be iustified by fayth and not by loue For we muste plede agaynst the wrathe of god not our loue or our workes nor truste in our loue and workes but Christe the mediator and we muste fyrste receyue the promyse of remission of synnes or euer we worke the lawe Finally Whan shall the conscience be set at reste if we do receyue remission of synnes because we loue or worke the lawe For the law wyll always accuse vs bicause we neuer satisfie the lawe of god accordyng to the sayenge of saynte Paule Lex iram operatur The lawe worketh wrathe Chrisostome asketh the question concernyng penaunce wherby we be assured that our synnes be forgyuen vs our aduersaries also in the senteÌ„ces do aske the question concernyng the same thynge This can not be declared neyther consciences can not be made quiete onles they know that it is the coÌ„maundement of god and the very gospell that they shulde be assured that for Christes sake synnes be freely forgyuen and that they shulde not doubte but that they be freely forgyuen vnto them selfes If any manne dothe doubt he as IohnÌ„ sayth accuseth the diuine promyse of a lye This certeyntie and assuraunce of faythe we teache is required in the gospell But oure aduersaries leaue mennes conscieÌ„ces vncertayne and in a doubtfulnes Nowe coÌ„sciences do worke nothyng by fayth whan they do coÌ„tinually doubt whether they haue remission Howe can they in this doubtfulnes call vpon god Howe can they ê‘suade them selues be assured that they be herde Thus all theyr lyfe is without god and without the very true honoure and worshyppynge of god This is it that Paule saythe that what soeuer is not done of faythe is synne And bicause they continue alwayes in this doubtfulnes they neuer haue experieÌ„ce what faythe is So it coÌ„meth to passe at the laste that they fall in to desperation Suche is the doctrine of our aduersaries euen a verye doctrine of the lawe a dissanullyng and an aâ—rogation of the gospell and a doctrine of desperation Nowe we do gladly permitte vnto all good men to gyue iugement of this place concernyng penaunce for it is playne ynoughe without any maner of obscuritie and to pronounce whiche of vs haue taughte the more godly and more holsome doctrine for consciences whether we or our aduersaries Certes these dissensioÌ„s in the churche do nothyng delyte vs wherfore if we had not great and necessarie causes to dissent from our aduersaries we wolde with ryghte good wyll holde our peace Nowe sith it is so that they condempne the manifest and open veritie it standeth not with our profession neither is it laufull for vs to leaue this cause vndefended whiche is not ours but Christê cause and the cause of the churche We haue shewed for what causes we haue put these two partes of penauÌ„ce contrition and faythe And we haue done it so moche the rather bicause there be borne aboute many sayenges concernyng penaunce whiche be alledged of the fathers but maymed and vnperfecte whiche our aduersaries haue detorted wrested to the defacynge of faythe As for example Penaunce is to sorowe bewayle the offeÌ„ces coÌ„mitted and not to coÌ„mitte agayne whiche thou oughteste to bewayle and sorowe Also penaunce is a certeyne punyshement or vengeaunce of the sorower aueÌ„gyng in hym selfe the offence whiche he is sorye that he hath coÌ„mitted In these sayenges is no mention of fayth no not so moche as in the scholes whan they do interprete and declare them is any thyng at all added of faythe Wherfore we to th entent that the doctrine of faythe myght be the better espied haue nombred faythe amonge the partes of penauÌ„ce For those sayenges whiche do require coÌ„trition or good workes and whiche make no mention of faythe that iustifiethe the very thynge it selfe shewethe that they be very perylous And doubtles it may be thoughte and that not without cause that those men lacked a poynt of prudence wysedome whiche haue heaped together these peced and patched rablemeÌ„tes of sentences and decrees For where as the fathers in diuerse other places do speake of the other parte of Penaunce it shulde haue bene profitable to haue pyked out the sentences of both partes â–ª and to haue ioyned them together not only out of one parte For Tertulliane speakethe ercellently of faythe amplifienge the othe of the lorde whiche is in the prophete â–ª Viuo ego dicit dominus nolo mortem peccatoris sed ut conuertatur et uiuat .i. I lyue saythe the lorde I wyll not the deathe of a synner but that he be conuerted lyue For in as moche as the lorde dothe sweare ther he wyll not the deathe of a synner he shewethe and declareth that credence fayth is required by whiche we shuld beleue his othe surely reken with our selues that he dothe forgyue vs. The promyses of god ought to be of greate auctoritie with vs although they be made without any othe put vnto them at all But this ê“myse is also coÌ„fermed and bounde with an othe Wherfore if any man doth not surely reken with hym selfe that he is forgyueÌ„ he denyeth that god hath sworne a true othe whiche is so great a blasphemie that there can none be imagined more haynous For thus saythe Tertulliane He calleth vs to saluation with a reward swearyng also in that he saythe I lyue and couetethe that we gyue credece vnto hym O blessed be they for whose cause god sâ—â—eareth O moste wretched be we if we beleue not the lorde whan he also sweareth And here it is to be knowen that this faythe oughte to thiÌ„ke that god freely forgyueth vs for Christis sake bicause of his owne ê“myse and not because of our workes or contrition confession satisfaction or loue For if faythe shulde leane vnto these workes be grounded vpon them anone it is made vncerteine and doubtfull For the fearefull coÌ„science doth se that these workes be vnworthy Therfore saythe Ambrose very
lawes in al comeÌ„ wealthes wel ordered yea with the hethen men haue furnyshed and adourned matrymonie with moste hyghe honours But nowe men shal lose theyr lyues yea and that prestes agaynst the mynde of the canon lawes for none other cause but for maryage Paule calleth it the doctrine of deuylles which prohibiteth matrimony This thynge to be true may be easely perceyued nowe when the prohibition of mariage is defended with such punyshmentes But nowe as no mans lawe can take away the commaundement of god so no vowe can take away the commaundement of god Therfore CypriaÌ„ also perswadeth that women be maried which kepe not theyr chastytie promysed these be hys wordes in the fyrst boke the .11 epistle yf ether they wyl nat or elles they can not perseuer and abyde styl it is better that they be maried then that they fal into the fyer with theyr deyntiâ—s at the leste waye that they gyue none occasyon of euyll to theyr brethern and sustern And the canon lawes them selues do vse a certayn equitie shewe fauour towarde them whiche before they be of sufficieÌ„t age haue vowed as comenly it hath ben accustomed to be done ontyl thê day ¶ Of the Masse OUr churches be falsely accused that they vtterly destroy and take away the Masse for the Masse is retayned and holde styll with vs and is celebrate with hygh reuerence Also the vsuall and customable ceremonies all moste all are obserued and kepte sauynge that amonge the laten songes be mixed here there Germane soÌ„gê which be added to teach the people For ceremonies serue to teach the vnexpert rude people and that the intreatinge or handlinge of the worde of god may stirre vppe some men to the true feare faythe and prayer And nat allonly Paule commaundeth to vse in the Churche a tonge which the people do perceyue and vnderstonde but also it is so constitute and ordeyned by mans lawe The people be accustomed to vse the sacrament together yf any be apte therto and that also dothe augment and encrease the reuerence and the religion of publik ceremonies for none be admitted and allowed to receyue the sacrament but such as be examined before They be also monyshed warned of the dignitie and vse of the sacrament howe greate comforte it bringeth to feareful and tremblinge consciences to theÌ„â—ent that they may lerne to beleue and gyue credence to god and to loke for aâ— thynges that good is of god and to aske all thinge that good is of god This honour deliteth god such vse of the sacrament dothe noryshe loue and reuerence towardes god therfore it appereth not that the Masses be done more religiously with our aduersaries theÌ„ with vs. It is vndoubtedly euideÌ„tly knoweÌ„ also that this hath bene a comeÌ„ a very greuous complaynte of all good men a longe season that the Masses haue bene shamefully abused and applied to lucre and euery maÌ„ seeth howe wyde this abuse dothe appere in all temples and of what maner of men Masses be soâ—ge and sayde allonly for rewarde or stipende hoâ—e many agaynste the inhibiâ—ion of the Canons do celebrate But Paule greuously thretneth them whiche entreate and receyue the sacâ—ameÌ„t vnworthily wheÌ„ he sayeth who eaâ—eth thys breade or drynketh the cuppe of the lorde vâ—worâ—hely shal be gilty of the body and bloude oâ—â—he lorde Therâ—ore when prestes were monished with vs of that syn priuaâ—e Masses ceased with vs because almoste no priuate Masses were done but for lucre and aduauntage And the byshoppes dyd knowe of these abuses well ynoughe whiche yf they had corrected them in tyme there shuld haue bene nowe lesse dissentioÌ„ then there is Before by reason of theyr dissimulaâ—ion nothinge willynge to here and se what was amysse they suffered many vices to creape inâ—o the churche Nowe they begyn ouer late to complayne of the calamities and miseries of the churche where as in dede all thys busynes and ruffelinge toke occasion of none other thiÌ„g then of those abuses whiche were so manifeste that they coulde be suffred no lenger There be nowe great dissentions rysen as touchinge the Masse and the sacramente And paraduenture the worlde is punished for so longe prophaning and abusinge of Masses which these byshopes haue suffred so many hundred yeres in the churches and yet bothe myght also ought to haue ameÌ„ded them for it is writen in the boke of the tenne commaundementes of god called the Decalogie that he that abuseth the name of God shall not be vnpunished But syth the world beganne nothyng that euer god ordayned hathe bene so abused and turned to fylthy lucre as it appereth that the Masse hath ben There was added and putte to an opinion which encreased priuate Masses aboue measure that is to saye that Christe with hys passyon dyd satisfye and make amendes for origynall synne and dyd institute and ordeyne the Masse that in it shulde be made an oblation for quotidian and daylye synnes bothe mortall and veniall Of thys dyd sprynge forth a comen opinion that the Masse is a worke that taketh awaye the synnes of the quycke and of the deade by vertue of the worke wrought Then they beganne to dispute whether one Masse sayde for many were as moche worthe as yf for euery maÌ„ were sayde a seueral Masse Thys dysputation brought forthe and caused thys infinite multitude of Masses Of these opinions our prechers lerned men gaue warninge that they dyd varie and dissente from holy scripture did hurt diminyshe the glorie of the passion of Christ for the passon of Christ was an oblation and a satisfactyon not onely for the synne of byrthe called origynall syn but also for all other synnes as it is wryten to the Ebrues we are sanctifyed by the oblatyon of Iesu Christ ones for euer Also he made perfect the sanctifyed without oblation for euer Also the scrypture teacheth vs to be iustifyed before god by faythe in Christe when we beleue that our synnes be forgyuen vs for Christe Nowe if the Masse dothe take awaye the synnes of the quicke and of the deade euen of the owne proper vertue then iustifycation dothe chaunce come of the worke of Masses not of fayth Whiche thynge scripture doth not suffer but Christ commaundeth to do it in rememberaunce of hym Wherfore the Masse was institute to thentente that fayth in them that vse the sacrameÌ„t shulde remember what benefytes it taketh by Christe and so shulde rayse vp and comforte the trembling and fearful consciences For to remembre Christe is to remember the benefytes of Christ and to fele perceyue and thynke that truly and in very dede they be exhibited and gyueÌ„ vnto vs Nether is it ynough to remember the historie for thys maye also Iewes and wycked men remember Wherfore the Masse is to be done for this entent that the sacrament may be reached forthe and ministred vnto those that haue nede of comforte as Ambrose sayth Quia semper pecco semper
god which the scole men for the most parte in theyr disputacyons do nat touche These were the causes why in the descripcion of originall synne we made mencyon of concupiscence and also detracted from the naturall powers of man the feare and trust toward god For our intent was to declare that original synne conteyned also these diseases ignoraunce of god contempte of god voydaunce of feare and truste towarde god the impotencie of louyng god These be the pryncypal vices of mans nature disagreyng properly with the fyrste table of the Decalogie ⧠Nor it is no newe matter that we haue spoken The olde definicion ryghtly vnderstande sounde to the same effecte when it sayeth that originall synne is a lackynge of originall iustice But what is iustice Scolemen do here brable of logicall questions but they expound nat what is originall iustyce Undoubtedly iustice in scriptures conteyneth nat onely the seconde table of the Decalogie but the fyrste also whiche coÌ„maundeth the feare of god the faythe in god the loue of god So that iustice originall shulde haue had nat onely an egall temperameÌ„t of the qualities of the bodie but also these gyftê a notice of god more certain the feare of god the affiauÌ„ce in god or at leste a direction and power to do these thynges And the wytnesseth the scripture whaÌ„ it sayeth that man was create to the image similitude of god which is nothyng else but that to man this wysdome and iustice was naturally gyueÌ„ with whiche he myght compasse and conceiue god and in whiche god myght be apparantly noted and sene this is to say that to maÌ„ were gyueÌ„ these gyftê the notice of god the dreade of god the truste in god and suche lyke For thus dothe Ireneus interprete the similitude of god and also Ambrose whiche besyde other thyngê which he spake for this purpose dothe expresly gather in this wyse Non est ergo anima ad imaginem dei in qua deus non semper est It is nat then the soule that was made to the ymage of god for in it god is nat alwayes And Paule to the Ephesians and Colossenses shewe the ymage of god to be the notice of god iustice and veritie And Longobardus is nat aferde to say that iustice originall is the very similitude of god which god gaue to man â–ª we recite the sentencies of the olde fathers whiche do nothynge lette saynt Austins interpretacyon of the ymage ⧠wherfore the olde definicion that calleth originall synne the lacke of iustice detracteth nat only the obedieÌ„ce of the inferiour powers of man but also detracteth the notice of god the truste in god the feare and loue of god or at lest it detracteth the power of doyng these For the deuynes theÌ„ selues in the scoles teache that these be nat done without a peculiar gyfte and ayde of grace we do name the gyftê expressly that the thynge may be vnderstaÌ„de the notice of god the feare and truste towarde god By this it appereth that the olde definicion dothe speake the same thyng that we do detractyng or plucking away the feare of god and hope that is to say nat only actual dedes but also the gyftes and myght to do this The same sentence hathe the definicyon of Austyne who vsethe to define originall synne to be concupiscence For he meaneth that wheÌ„ iustice was loste concupiscence succeded For the decayed nature because it can nat feare loue and truste god it seketh and loueth carnall thynges The iudgement of god thys sycke corrupte nature eyther voyde of feare despyseth or beynge replenyshed with feare hateth Thus Austyne compriseth aswele the defaulte or faylyng as the viciouse qualitie whiche therof ensueth Nor this coÌ„cupisceÌ„ce is nat only a corruptioÌ„ of the qualities of the bodie but also an vnryght turnyng to thyngê carnal in the superiour powers Nor they se nat what they saye whiche do bothe attribute to man concupiscence nat mortified of the holy ghoste also the loue of god aboue althyngê we therfore haue ryghtly expressed bothe two in the description of original synne that is to saye those defautes as nat to be of power to beleue god nat to be of power to dreade and loue god And also to haue a concupiscence whiche agaynste the worde of god seketh carnalitie that is to say seketh nat only corporal pleasures but also carnal wysdome and iustice and hathe confidence in worldly goodes contemnyng god And nat onely the olde but the late doctours namely that be of any iudgemeÌ„t do teache that original synne is aswel the lackes or defaultes which I haue remembred as concupiscence or luste For thus saythe saynt Thomas Peccatum originis habet priuationeÌ„ originalis iusticie cum hoc inordinatam dispositionem partium anime vnde non est priuatio pura sed quidam â—abitus corruptus Originall synne saythe Thomas hathe a priuacyon of originall iustice and with it an inordinate disposicion of the partê of the soule so that it is nat a pure priuacion but rather a corrupte habite And Bonauenture wryteth thus when it is demauÌ„ded what is original synne it may be wel answered that it is an immoderate concupiscence It is well answered also that it is a lackynge of the due iustice And in the one of these answeres is included the other Hugo is of the same opinioÌ„ whiche sayeth original synne is an ignorance in the mynde and a coÌ„cupiscence in the fleshe For he meaneth that whaÌ„ we be borne we briÌ„g with vs an vnknowynge of god a mystruste a diffidence a contempte a hatyng of god For these thynges he compriseth when he nameth ignorance And these sentencyes be agreynge to scriptures For Paule otherwhyles expresly nameth the lacke or defaulte as in the fyrst to the Corinthes yâ— .2 chapitre Animalis homo non percipit ea quae spiritus dei sunt A naturall maÌ„ perceyueth nat the thynges that be of the spirite of god In another place he nameth concupisceÌ„ce to be of power and efficacitie in the meÌ„bres to bryng forth euyl frutes â—e could recite more places for bothe partes but a manifest thyng nedeth no testimonies Undoubtedly a prudent reader maye easyly iudge that to be without feare and to be without faythe is euen very actual synne For they be perdurable defaultes in a nature vnrenewed ⧠wherfore our opinion of original synne dothe nat varie froÌ„ scripture nor froÌ„ the catholicke churche we do nothyng but repurge clarifie brynge agayne into lyght the moste graue sentencies of scripture and of the fathers here to fore obscured and hydde by the sophisticall questions of these late diuines For the thyng it selfe speaketh that these newe diuines perceyued nat what the father 's meante whaÌ„ they spake of default Truly the knowledge of originall synne is ryght necessarie For the greatnes of the grace of Christe can nat be otherwyse vnderstande onles we fyrste knowe our owne infirmities The hole iustice of man is mere hypocrisie before god onles we
promyse that free and the merytes of Chryst as a raunsom and redeÌ„ption Promyse is receiued by fayth this worde fre excludeth our merites signyfyeth that only by mercye is offered the benefyte of Chryst the merytes be the rauÌ„som for there must be some certaine redeÌ„pcion for our siÌ„nes The scripture oft times cryeth for mercy And the holy fathers many tymes say that we be saued by mercy So oft then as mencioÌ„ is made of mercy it is to be knoweÌ„ that fayth is ther requyred which receiueth the ê“mise of mercy And agayn so oft as we speke of faith we wyll that the obiecte be vnderstaÌ„de that is to say the promised mercy For faith doth not therfore iustify or saue because it is of it selfe a worthy worke but only because it receyueth the mercy promysed And thê seruice thêlatria is most highly coÌ„mended in prophetes psalmes wher as the law teacheth not fre remissioÌ„ of sinnes But the fathers knowe the promyse made of Christ that God for Christ wolde remyt synnes wherfore when they vnderstode that Chryst shuld be a pryce and raunsome for our synnes they knewe that our workes were not a raunsome of so great a thyng Therfore they receiued by fayth fre mercy and remissyoÌ„ of siÌ„nes lyke as the holy fathers of the newe testament do Here vnto belong tho oft repetycyons of mercye and faythe in the psalmes and prophetes as here Si iniquitates obseruaueris domine c. Yf thou markest iniquities o lorde lorde who shall susteyne Here he coÌ„fesseth hys synnes and yet he alledgeth not hê merytes He addeth For with the is mercyfulnes Here he lyfteth vp him selfe with the truste of the mercye of God And cytethe the promyse Sustinuit anima mea in verbo eius sperauit anima mea in domino My soule is susteyned in hys worde my soule hathe trusted in the lorde that is to saye because thou haste promysed remyssyon of synnes by thys thy promyse I am susteyned And Paule cyteth the hystorye of Abraham Abraham beleued God and it was recompted vnto hym for ryghtwysnes That is to wytte Abraham perceyued that God was vnto hym mercyful only for hys promyse sake He assented to the promyse of God nor suffered not hym selfe to be plucked away frome it all thoughe he sawe hym selfe vnclene and vnworthye He perceyued that God performeth hys promyse for hê owne truthe and not for our workes or merytes Trulye the affrayed hartes can haue no rest if they shulde thynke that for theyr owne workes or owne loue or fulfylliÌ„ge of the lawe they shulde please God for in the fleshe stycketh synne whiche alwaye accuseth vs. But then the hartes haue rest wheÌ„ in such affrayes they assure them selues that we therfore please God be cause he hathe promysed and that God perfourmeth hys promyse for hys owne truthe and not for our worthynes Thus Abraham herde thys saynge Feare thou not for â–ª I am thy protector Here he raysed vp him selfe and felte God mercyful vnto him not for hys owne deseruynge but because the promyse of god must nedes be iuged true this faythe therfore is imputed to hym for ryghtwysnes that is because he assenteth to the promyse and taketh the offered reconsilement he is nowe truelye iuste and accepted vnto God not for hys owne workes but bycause he taketh the free promyse of god Thys auctoryte of Genyses pleased Paule not without cause we se howe he layth on howe ernestlye he taryeth vpon that poynte because he sawe that the nature of fayth myght in that poynt be easaly espyed He sawe that the recorde of the imputacyon of iustice was added not with out a greate skyll He sawe that the lawde of desernynge iustyfycacyon and of pacyfyenge the conscyence was taken away from workes â–ª when Abraham is therfore pronounced ryght wyse because he assenteth to the promyse and taketh the offered reconcilement he pleadeth not in barre of goddes ire hys owne merytes or workes wherfore thys place dylygently consydered may plenteouslye instructe godlye myndes in thys matter whiche shall so be vnderstonde yf the affrayed myndes haue it before them and assure theÌ„ selue that they ought to assente to the free promyse For otherwyse they can not be quyete onles they presuppose that they haue god theyr good lorde because he hath so promysed and not bycause our nature lyfe and workes be worthye Therfore also the fathers were iustifyed not by the law but by the promyse and fayth And it is a wonderfull thynge that the aduersaryes do make so lytle of faythe syth they se it throughe out al scrypture praysed for the moste hyghe seruyce as in the .49 Psal. Call on me in tyme of trybulacyon and I shal delyuer the. Thus wyll god be knowen thus he wyll be worshyped by receyuynge benefytes of hym and receyuynge them for hys mercyes sake and not for our owne demerytes Thys is the moste ample consolacyon in all afflyctyons And such consolacyons our aduersaryes go about to destroye and putte out of vre in that they make faythe so lytle a seruyce and onlye â—eache men to contende with god by our owne workes and merytes ¶ That the only faythe in Chryst iustyfyeth FYrste leste a man wolde thynke that we speake of the ydle knowledge of the Hystorye we wyll shewe howe faythe cummeth After we wyl shewe that it iustyfyeth and howe thys must be vnderstande then we wyll assoyle thobiections of the aduersaryes Chryste in the last of Luke coÌ„maundeth his dyscyples to preache repentaunce in hys name and remyssyon of synnes For the gospell argueth euery man to be vnder synne and to be gyltye of eternal ire and deth and offereth for Chryst remissyon of sinnes iustificacion which is receyued by fayth Preaching of penauÌ„ce which reproueth vs dothe fray the conscyence with true ernest afrayes In these the hartê ought agayne to conceyue consolacyon which shal be yf they trust to the promyse of Chryst that for hym we haue remyssyon of synnes Thys faythe erectyng and comfortynge vs in those affrayes takethe remyssyon of synnes iustyfyeth and viuifyeth For that consolacion is a newe and a spiritual lyfe These be plaine and open and the godlye maye vnderstande them also the churche haue recorded the same The aduersaryes neuer shewe truly howe the holye gost is gyuen They fayne that the sacramentes gyue the holye gooste ex opere operato sine bono motu accipientis euen of the verye worke it selfe without any good motyon of the receyuer as thoughe the geuynge of the holy goste were an idle thynge But where as we speake of suche faythe whiche is not an idle thought but which deliuereth from dethe and createth a newe lyfe in our hartes and nedeth the holy gost it standeth not with mortall synne but so longe as it is present it bryngeth forthe good frures as we shall say here after what can be spoken of the conuertynge of the vngodly or of the maner of regeneratynge more sympely and more
through faythe Ergo by fayth in Christe we receyue remissioÌ„ of synnes and we can nat lay agaynste the yre of god our loue and our workes Secondly It is certayne yâ— synnes be remitted because of Christ our mercystocke 〈◊〉 whoÌ„ god hath ordeined to be a mercistocke And Paule addeth through faythe wher fore this mercystocke shal ayde vs if by fayth we stycke to the mercy promysed in hym and plede it in arreste of the iudgement and yre of god And to this purpose it is wrytten ad Hebreos .4 hauiÌ„g a byshope cÌ„ let vs approche with truste He byddeth vs approche to god nat by trust of our owne meritê but by trust of our byshop Christe Ergo he requyreth fayth Thyrdly Peter in the actê cap. x. sayeth thus To hym al the prophetes bere wytnes that all whiche beleue in him receyue remission of synnes through hys name Howe myght he speke it more clearly we receyue he sayteh remission of synnes throughe hys name that is to say for his sake Ergo nat for our merites nat for our contricion attricion loue ceremonies workes And he addeth that beleue in hym Ergo he requyreth fayth For we caÌ„ nat cleaue to the name of Christ but by fayth Furthermore he alledgeth the coÌ„sent of al the prophetes This is truly to allege the authoritie of the church But of this place we shal speake here after in the tytle of penaunce Fourthly RemissioÌ„ of synnes is a thyng promised for Christ. Ergo it can nat be receyued but by fayth only For the promyse can nat be receyued but by only fayth RomÌ„ 4. Therfore is it by fayth to the ende it may be a sure promyse hangyng vpon grace as who shuld say If the matter shulde hange vpon our merites the promyse were vncertayne and vnprofitable because we can neuer determyne when we haue merited ynoughe And that the assayed conscience vnderstande ryght wele Therfore Paule sayth Galat. 3. God hath concluded all thyngê vnder synne that the promise through the faythe of Iesu Christe myght be gyuen to the beleuers Here he plucketh away merite froÌ„ vs because he sayeth that all be gylty and concluded vnder synne then he addeth that the promyse meanyng of remission of synnes and iustificacion is gyuen and telleth howe the promysse may be receyued that is to say by faythe And thys reason taken out of the nature of promysse is moste chief with Paule ofte repeted Nor there can nat be any thyng inueÌ„ted or feined to auoyde this argument of Paule wherfore let nat godly myndes suffre them selues to be dryuen from thys opinion that by onely faythe we receyue remission for Christ. For in this they haue a sure and ferme coÌ„solacion agaynst the terrours of synne and agaynst euerlastyng death and agaynst all the gates of helle And syth by only faythe we receyue remission of synnes and reconciliacion for Christe ergo only fayth iustifieth because the reconciled be reputed ryghtwyse and the chyldern of god nat for theyr owne clennes â–ª but through mercy for Christ if so be that we cleaue to thys mercye by fayth and therfore the scripture recordeth that by faythe we be reputed ryghwyse we wyll adde therfore authorities fyrste of scripture theÌ„ of doctours that shal clearely testifye that onely fayth is the very iustice by whiche we be reputed iuste before god that is to say nat because it is a worke worthy of it selfe but because it receyueth the promisse by whiche god hath promised that for Christ he wyll be mercifull to the beleuers in him or be cause it beleueth that Christe is made for vs by god a wysdom iustice sanctificacion and redempcion Paule in the epystle to the Romanes disputeth principally of thê place and propouneth that we be frely iustified by fayth if we beleue that god is pacified with vs for Christe And in the thyrde chapitre he bryngeth in this proposicion whiche conteyneth the sum of his hole disputacion Arbitramur igitur hominem fide iustificari non ex operibus legis .i. we iudge therfore that maÌ„ is iustified by â—ayth and nat by the workes of the lawe Here the aduersaries do iÌ„terprete the workê of the lawe to be the Leuitical ceremonies But Paule nat only speketh of the ceremonies but of the hole lawe For he alledgeth a litle after forth of the Decalogie Non concupisces .i. thou shalte nat couet Moreouer if the morall workê myght deserue remission of synnes and iustificacion then neded nat Christe nor the promise then all were to no purpose that Paule speketh of promyse He shulde wryte also amys to the Ephesians that we be saued frely and that it is a gyfte of god and procedeth nat of workê Also Paule alledgeth Abraham he alledgeth Dauid But these had a coÌ„mauÌ„dement of god of circumcision wherfore if any workes iustifyed it was necessary that tho workes whiche then were commaunded shulde haue iustifyed But Austyne doth ryghtly teache that Paule spake of the hole lawe as he disputeth copiously in his boke de spiritu litera where at last he sayeth thus His igitur coÌ„sideratis pertractatisâ—â— pro viribus quas dominus donare dignatur colligimê° non iustificare â—ominem preceptis bone vite nisi per fidem Iesa Christi .i. These therfore consydered and handled accordyng to the power whiche god vouchsaueth to gyue vs we gather that man is nat iustifyed by the preceptes of good lyfe but by faythe of Iesu Christe And leaste we shulde thynke that this sentence fell from Paule vnwares that fayth iustifieth he mainteyneth and confyrmeth it with a longe disputacyon in the fourthe chapitre to the Rom. And after he repeteth it in all the epystles In the .4 chap. to the Romanes he sayeth thus Operanti merces non imputatur secundum graciâ— sed secundum debitum Ei autem qui non operatur credit autem in eum qui iustificat impium reputatur fides eius ad iusticiam .i. To him that worketh is geueÌ„ a rewarde nat of fauour but of dutie CoÌ„trary wyse to him that worketh nat but trusteth on hym that iustifieth the wycked hys beleue is accompted for ryghtwysnes Here he clerely pronounceth that very faythe is accompted for ryghtwysenes Faythe then is the thynge whiche god pronounceth to be ryghtwysnes and he addeth that it is frely imputed And he denieth that it can be frely imputed if it shuld be due for workes Ergo he also excluded the merite of morall workes For if to these were due the iustifycacion before god faythe shuld nat be accompted ryghwysenes without workes And after he sayeth â–ª For we saye that fayth was iÌ„puted to AbrahaÌ„ for ryghtwysnes In the fyfthe chapitre he sayeth Iustifyed by fayth we haue peace towarde god .i. we haue quyet and glad consciences before god Roma 10. with the harte it is beleued for ryghtwysnes Here he pronounceth faythe to be the iustice of the harte Gal. 2. Nos in Christo hesu credimê° vt
their hartes wherfore after that by faith we be iustified and renewed we begyn to feare god to loue god to craue loke after socoure of god to gyue thankes vnto hym to preache hym and to obeye him in afflictions we begyn also to loue our neybours because our hartes haue spiritual and holy mocions These thinges can not be done onles after that we be iustified by fayth and regenerate we receyue the holye goste fyrste because the lawe can not be done without christe also the lawe can nat be done without the holye goste But the holye goste is receyued by faythe accordinge to the saynge of Paule That we may receyue the promyse of the spirite by faythe Also howe can mans harte loue god so longe as he feleth hym greuously dyspleased with vs and to oppresse vs with temporall and perpetuall calamities but the lawe alwayes accuseth vs alwayes sheweth that god is angry God therfore is not loued vntyl we haue receyued mercy by fayth So at laste is made an amiable obiect Althoughe therfore cyuyle workes that is to saye thexterne workes of the lawe without Chryste and with out the holy gost may be in some parte done â–ª yet it appereth by that which we haue sayde that the thinges which be properlye apperteynynge to the diuyne lawe I meane thaffectyons of the harte towarde god whiche be commaunded in the fyrste table can nat be done without the holye goste But our aduersaryes be plesaunt diuynes They beholde the seconde table and the polityke workes but the fyrst table they nothinge regarde as though it pertayned nothynge to the purpose or at lest waye they requyre only externe workes That eternall lawe and farre put aboue the sence and vnderstandynge of al creatures whiche is Thou shalte loue thy lorde God with all thy harte they vtterly not consyder But Chryste was for thys ende gyuen vnto vs that for him remission of synnes the holy gost shulde be graunted vs which myght create in vs a newe and euerlastynge lyfe and an euerlastynge ryghtwysnes which myght fyrste of al shewe vnto vs Chryst as it is wrytten He shall notirize me for of myne he shal take and shewe it vnto you And after brynge also other giftes as loue inuocation thankes gyuynge chastitye pacyence cÌ„ wherfore the lawe can not be truely perfourmed onles we fyrste receyue the holy goste by faythe Therfore Paule saythe that by faythe the lawe is establyshed and not abrogate or auoyded For then or els neuer is the lawe fulfylled when the holy gost is in that man And Paule teacheth that the vayle with whiche the face of Moyses was muffled can nat be take awaye but by fayth in Chryste by which is receyued the holy gost For thus he sayth But vntyll thys daye when Moyses is red the vayle is put ouer theyr hartes But when they shal be conuerted to God the vayle shall be take awaye The lorde is a spirite and where the spirite of the lorde is there is lybertye By the vayle vnderstaÌ„deth Paule an humane opinion of the hole lawe of the Decalogie and ceremonyes that is to saye that hypocrites do thynke that externe and ciuile workes do satysfye the lawe of god and that sacryficies and ceremonies euen of them selfe do iustyfye before god But then thys vayle is plucked from vs that is to say this errour is taken away when god sheweth to our hartes our vncleÌ„nes and greatnes of synne There fyrst we se our selues to be farre from the fulfyllynge of the lawe There we acknoweledge howe that the fleshe beinge idle and careles feareth not god not thynketh verely that god regardeth vs but that we be casually borne and vanyshe away lyke brute bestes There we fynde thexperyence that we beleue not that god forgyueth vs and heareth vs but when we hearynge thevangell and forgyuenes of synnes begynne to lyfte vp our selues by faythe we conceyue the holy goste so that nowe we may thinke ryghtly of god and dreade god and beleue hym cÌ„ By this appereth that without Chryste and without the holy gooste the lawe can not be done wherfore we professe that we muste neades inchoate or begynne to fulfyll vnto our powers the lawe and euer more attempte to do it more and more And we compryse here bothe two aswell the spirituall mocyons as the outwarde good workes wherfore the aduersaryes do falsly calumnyate vs in reportynge that we teache not good workes sythe we nat only requyre them but also shewe howe they maye be done The very proufe of the thyng doth condeÌ„pne and bewraye the ypocrites whiche attempt by theyr owne powers to do the lawe that they can nat perfourme the thyng that they attempt For the nature of man is farre to weke of the owne powers to resyst the deuyll who hath al in his holde as captiues prisoners which be nat delyuered by fayth The powers of Christ is requisite agaynst the deuyll and therfore because we knowe that for Christe we be herde receyue a promyse it is requisyt that we pray that the holy ghoste may gouerne vs and protect vs lest we fortune to erre deceyuyng our selues and leaste by wycked impulsion we take vpon vs any thyng agaynste the wyll of god As the Psalme teacheth He led captiuitie a captiue he gaue gyftes to men For Christ hath veynquyshed the deuyl and hathe gyuen vnto vs a promyse and the holy ghoste to the ende that we may also vaynquyshe by yâ— socoure of god And IohaÌ„ sayeth To this intent appered the son of god that he myght losen the workes of the deuyll Furthermore we teache nat only how the law may be done but also howe the thynge that is done may please god which is nat because we satisfy the lawe but because we be iÌ„ Christe as it shal be sayde a lytle here after So it is euideÌ„t that we requyre good workes yea we adde also that it is impossible to seuere the loue of god though it be lytle from faythe For by Christe we approche to the father and after the receite of remissioÌ„ of synnes we be assured that we haue god that is to say that we be regarded of god we make inuocacion we gyue thankes we feare we loue as Iohan teacheth in the fyrst epystle we loue hym quod he because he fyrst loued vs meanyng because he gaue for vs his son and remitted our synnes Thus he signifyeth that fayth goeth before and loue foloweth Also the fayth of whiche we speake â—s declared in penaunce .i. it is conceyued in â—eares of the coÌ„scieÌ„ce which feleth the wrath of god kyndled against our synnes and seketh remission of synnes and a gayle deliuery from synne And in suche feares and other afflictions this fayth oweth to encreace and be confirmed wherfore it can nat be in them whiche lyue after theyr fleshe whiche delyte in theyr lustes and obey them Therfore Paule sayeth There is no condempnacion nowe to these whiche be in Christe Iesu
whiche walke nat after theyr fleshe but after the spirite Also we be dettours nat to the fleshe that we shulde lyue after the fleshe For if ye lyue after the fleshe ye shall dye But if in spirite ye mortifye the actes of the bodye ye shall lyue Wherfore this fayth whiche receyueth remission of synnes in the troubled and affrayed herte and fleyng synne dwelleth nat in them whiche folowe theyr lustes nor staÌ„deth nat with deadly synne Out of these effectes or operacions of fayth the aduersaries pycke out one and that is loue â–ª and teache that it iustifyeth Thus it manifestly appereth that they only teache the lawe They reache nat fyrste that we receyue remissioÌ„ of synnes by fayth They teache nat of the mediatour Christe that for Christe we haue God our good lorde but for our owne loue And yet what maner of loue that is they tell nat nor can nat tell They bragge glory that they fulfyll the lawe where as this glory is properly due to Christ and they lay the affiaâ—Ì„ce of theyr owne workes to the iudgemeÌ„t of god for tâ—ey say that they deserue grace eternall lyfe de condigno .i. of theyr owne worthynes This is vtterly a wycked and a vayne affiaunce For in this lyfe we can nat satisfye the lawe because the carnall nature ceaseth nat to bryng forth euyll affections al though the spirite in vs resysteth theÌ„ But a man may demaunde of vs a question sythe that we also confesse that loue is the worke of the holy ghost and syth it is ryghtwysnes for it is the fulfyllyng of the law why do nat we teache that it iustifieth â–ª To this we answere Fyrst it is certayne that we receiue nat remission of synnes neyther by loue nor for or loue but for Christ by only fayth Only faythe whiche loketh to the promyse and is assured that god forgiueth because Christ dyed nat in vaine ouercometh the feares of synne of death If a man doubteth whether hys synnes be forgyuen hym he disworshyppeth Christe sythe he iudgeth hys synne greater or stronger then the death and promyse of Christe where Paule sayeth that grace surmounteth synne that is to say that mercye is aboue synne who thynketh that he attayneth remission of synnes because he loueth dishonoreth Christ and he shal fynde in the daye of gods iudgement this affyaunce of his owne propre iustice to be wycked voyde Ergo fayth must recoÌ„cile make of the iniust iust And as we receiue nat remissioÌ„ of synnes by the other vertues or for the other vertues of the lawe as for pacience chastitie obedieÌ„ce towarde the superiours cÌ„ and yet these vertues must ensue so we neyther receyue remissyon of synnes because of the dilectioÌ„ of god Howbeit it is a commune fourme of speakyng otherwhyles to comprise in one worde bothe the cause and the effect by a figure called Synecdoche as in the seuenth of Luke Christ sayeth Many synnes be forgyueÌ„ her because she loued muche For Christ expouneth him selfe wheÌ„ he addeth Thy fayth hathe saued the. Christ then meant nat that the woman by that worke of loue shulde deserue remissioÌ„ of synnes and therfore he clearly sayeth Thy faythe hathe saued the. But fayth is the thyng which conceiueth mercy for the worde of god freely If ye deny that thê is fayth ye vtterly knowe nat what faythe meaneth The very historye of it selfe sheweth sufficiently what he calleth loue in this place The woman cam brynging with her this opinion of Christe that in hym â–ª she shulde fynde remission of synnes This worshyp is the most hyghe worshyp of Christ she coulde gyue no greater worshyp vnto hym This is the trewe fashyon of acknowledgyng Messias to seke at hym remission of synnes And to conceiue this opinion of Christ thus to worship him is rightly and truly to beleue But this worde loue Christe vsed nat to the womaÌ„ but to the Pharisee for he coÌ„pared the hole worshyppyng of the Pharisee with the hole worshyppyng of the woman He chydeth the Pharisee because he acknoweledged hym nat to be Messias although he dyd vnto hym these externe officies as vnto a straunger and an holy greate man he poynteth to the woman and commendeth her worshyppyng her oyntment â—eares cÌ„ whiche all were sygnes of fayth a certayne coÌ„fession that at Christ she sought remission of synnes Undoutedly this was a greate example which nat without cause moued Christe to chyde the Pharisee whiche was a wyse and an honest man but one that beleued nat This impietie he vpbraideth him and instructeth him by the example of the woman signifieng that it was a shame yâ— where as an vnlerned woman beleued god he a doctour of the lawe beleued nat and acknowleged nat Messias nor sought nat at hym remission of synnes saluacion So theÌ„ he prayseth the hole worshyppyng as it is ofte done in scripture that in one worde we shuld coÌ„prise many as here after we shall shewe more at large in lyke places as in this saying Gyue almes and all shal be clene he requyreth nat only almesdedê but also the iustice of faythe so also here wheÌ„ he sayeth Many synnes be remytted vnto her because she loued muche that is to saye because she hath worshypped me truly by fayth and excercises and signes of fayth he coÌ„pryseth the hole worshyppyng but in the meane seasoÌ„ yet he teacheth thys that properly remission of synnes is receyued by fayth althoughe loue confession and other good workes do necessaryly ensue wherfore he meaneth nat this that those frutê be a recoÌ„pense or raunsum for whiche remission of synnes is gyuen whiche may reconcile vs to god we dispute of a greate thing euen of the honour of Christe and from whens the godly myndes may fetche a sure ferme consolacion whether our truste is to be put in Christe or in our workes If so be that we owe to set our trust in our workes then we must plucke from Christe the honour and title of a mediatour and redemer And yet we shall fynde in the iudgement of god that this confidence is vayne and that the conscience from thens shall ruÌ„ne into despayre That if remission of synnes and reconciliacyon chaunseth nat frely for Christ but for our loue and merites no man shal haue remission of synnes but where he fulfylleth the hole lawe for the lawe iustifieth vs nat so longe as it can accuse vs. It is euident then syth iustificacion is reconciliacion for Christ that by fayth we be iustified for it is most certayne that by only fayth is receyued remission of synnes Nowe therfore let vs answere to the question afore proposed why loue iustifyeth nat The aduersaries thynke ryghtly that loue is the fulfilling of the lawe And doubtles the obedience towarde the lawe were ryghwisnes if we coulde do the lawe But we haue here tofore shewed that the promisses were therfore gyuen because we coulde nat do the lawe And for this selfe cause denyeth Paule
and the body of the deuell who driueth them and hath them captiues and thralles vnto hiÌ„ These thingê be clerer then the light at none daye whiche yet yf our aduersaries wyll procede to desprayse and calumniate it shall nat greue vs to make answere more largely Our aduersaryes do condempne also this ê‘te of the seuenth artycle where we sayde that it sufficed to the true vnite of the churche to agre in the doctryne of the gospell and in the administratyon of the sacramentes and that it is not necessarie that in all places there be lyke humayne â—raditions rytes and ceremonies instituted by men Here they make a distinction betwixt the vnyuersall and partycular rites and they do allowe our article yf it be vnderstonded of the partyculer rites but if it be vnderstanded of the vniuersal rites they do nat receyue nor allowe it In feythe we do nat well perceyue what our aduersaryes do meane We speake of the true that is to say of the spirituall vnite without whiche there can be no faythe in the harte or ryghtuousnes of the harte in the syght of god To thys vnite we saye that the lykenes and conformitie of humayne rytes whether they be vniuersall or particuler is nothynge necessarye For the iustyce of fayth is nat a iustice which is bouÌ„d vnto certayne traditions as the iustice of the lawe was bounde to the ceremonies commauÌ„ded by Moyses for the ryghtuousnes of the harte is a thynge quyckenynge hartes To this viuifycation or quickenynge maÌ„nes traditions helpe nothynge at all whether they be vniuersall or particuler Neyther be they effectes and warkes of the holy goste so as be chastyte patience the dreade of god the loue of the neyghboure and the warkes of loue And they were no lyght causes whiche induced vs to put this artycle For it is euâ—â—eÌ„tly knowen that many folishe opinions concernynge tradityons be crept into the churche Some men haue thought that humayne traditions be necessary honours and sacrifyces to deserue iustifycatioÌ„ And afterwardes they disputed howe it might be that god coulde be worshypped with so greate varietie as who shulde saye that those obseruaunces were diuine honours and nat rather outwarde and polyticall ordenaunces nothynge appertaynynge to the iustyce of the harte or to the honourynge of god Which do varye sometymes by chaunce sometimes for reasonable causes Also dyuerse churches haue excomunicated one an other for suche tradytions as for the kepyng of Easter for images or pictures and such other lyke thiÌ„ges By the reason wherof vnlerned men haue thought that fayth or iustyce of the harte in the syght of god can not stande without these obseruaunces for ther be concernynge this busynes many folyshe wrytynges of summistes other but in lyke wyse as the vnlyke spaces of dayes and nightes do not hurte the vnite of the churche so we do thinke that the true vnite of the church is nat hurte with vnlyke rites instituted by meÌ„ howe be it it lyketh vs wel that the vniuersall rites and obseruauÌ„ces be kept for the mayntenauÌ„ce of the comon tranquilitie lyke wyse as we in our churches do with good wyll kepe the order of the masse the Sonday and other highe feastes And with a verie glade mynde we obserue and kepe the profytable and olde ordenaunces namely when they conteyne suche disciplyne and instruction by whiche the people maye be allured and also accustomed vnto vertuous occupations But we do nat nowe dispute whether it be profitable for the comeÌ„ tranquilitie or corporal vtilite to obserue and kepe theÌ„ We haue nowe another mater iÌ„ haÌ„de for we do dispute whether the obseruatioÌ„s of humaine traditioÌ„s be seruices necessary to iustice iÌ„ the syght of god This is the principal poynt to be iudged in this controuersy which ones determined it may be iudged afterwardê whether it be necessarye to the true vnite of the church that there be lyke humayne traditions in al places For if humaine traditioÌ„s be nat honours or seruices necessary to iustice in the syght of god it foloweth that men may be ryghtuouse the sonnes of god although they haue nat some traditioÌ„s whiche be receiued in other places As if the fourme and fascioÌ„ of the Douche apparaile be nat an honouryng of god necessary to iustice in the syght of god it foloweth that there may be ryghtuous men and the chyldren of god the churche of Christe although some men do nat vse the Douche maner of apparell but the Frenshe fashyon of apparell Thys dothe Paule playnely teache to the Colossians â–ª when he sayeth let no man iudge you in meate and drynke or in parte of the holyday or of the newe mone or of the sabbot dayes Whiche be but shadowes of thynges to come but the body is Christ also if ye be deade with Christe from the elementes of the worlde why as if ye â— ere lynynge to the worlde do ye make decrees Touche nat taste nat haÌ„dle nat Which thynges euery one do peryshe beyng coÌ„sumed by vse â–ª and they be preceptes and doctrines of men hauyng the semblance of wysdome in superstition and humilite For thys is the mynde of Paule In asmuche as the ryghtousnes of the harte is a spiritual thyng quickenynge hartes â–ª and that it is certayne that humane traditions do nat quicken the hartes neyther be the effectê and workes of the holy ghoste as is loue of the neyghbour chastite cÌ„ nor be any instrumeÌ„tê by which god dothe moue styrre hartes to beleue as by the word and the sacramentes gyuen by god but be exercises of thynges nothyng perteining to the harte and whiche do peryshe by vse it is nat to be thought that they be necessary to iustice in the syght of god And accordyngly to the same sentence he sayeth The kyngdome of god is neyther meate nor drynke but ryghtuousnes and peace and ioy in the holy ghoste But it is no nede to alledge many testimonies forasmuche as the scripture runneth full of them And we also haue gathered a greate sorte together iÌ„ our confession in the latter articles And the principall poynte of this coÌ„trouersy shal be rehersed agayne a lytle herafter that is to wyte whether traditions of men be honours or seruices necessary to ryghtuousnes in the syght of god where we shall dispute more largely of thys matter Our aduersaries do say that vniuersall tradicions be therfore to be kepte because they be thought to haue ben taught by the apostelles Oh religious and deuout men They wyll that the rites ceremonies taken of the apostelles be kepe and maynteined but they wyl nat that the doctrine of the apostles be reserued and kepte It is so to be iudged of those rytes as the apostles theÌ„ selues do iuge in theyr wrytynges For the apostelles wolde nat that we shulde thynke ourselues iustifyed by suche rites or that suche rites and ceremonies be necessary to iustice in the syghht of god The apostles wolde nat lay