Selected quad for the lemma: love_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
love_n	beget_v	son_n	world_n	6,574	5	5.0285	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A56313	A modest account from Pensylvania of the principal differences in point of doctrine, between George Keith, and those of the people called Quakers, from whom he separated : shewing his great declension, and inconsistency with himself therein : recommended to the serious consideration of those who are turned aside, aud [sic] joyned in his schism.	Pusey, Caleb, 1650?-1727.	1696 (1696)	Wing P4248; ESTC R40087	25,043	138

is Christ the only Mediator and Saviour and that so to assert is not to assert another Christ than Jesus of Nazareth c. Then surely Jesus of Nazareth cannot be something else than the Light Power and Spirit within because Jesus of Nazareth is the only Christ Mediator and Saviour and so is the Light Power and Spirit within acknowledged to be And if the same then not any thing else Eighthly Seeing according to G. K. the Light within is God and Christ and yet not sufficient without something else is not this as much as to say God and Christ is not sufficient without something else or something besides For so he saith the word else signifies And how it is then said in Hosea c. 13. 4. Thou shalt know no God but me for there is no Saviour besides me Where is now the something else And whereas he owns the Light within to be Christ in express words but by that something else he saith he means the Man-Christ doth not this imply two Christs to wit Christ one thing and the Man Christ some other thing or something besides Christ But now though we cannot yield to G. K. in these his Terms that the Light is not able of it self and consequently that God by G. K's own words who saith the Light is God is not able to save because we believe besides him there is no Saviour yet we do not in the least question but dearly own and acknowledge and believe the way and means that the Lord was pleased out of his infinite Love and Good Will to Mankind to take in order to redeem him from Sin and Death as sending his only begotten Son into the World not only as a Light to shew us the way we should go and a Spirit to convince and reprove us of our Sins and enable us against the Act thereof But also as Man in the prepared Body to offer up himself a most acceptable Sacrifice for the Sins of the whole World Which Offering the Lord was pleased to accept of and by his Spirit and Power it is made effectual for the Reconciliation and Salvation of all those that repent of their Sins and truly believe in his Name And that God doth not save any without respect to that great Offering we all grant and truely believe For as G. K. saith The Lord having Light of Truth p. 6. ordained it so to be how can or dare we say therefore That he was or is not sufficient by his Light Power and Spirit to save without something else Surely this seems to me too presumptuous Acts 2. 22. ptuous an Expression For was not that Body prepared of God And what was done in it is it not said God did it by him So that the scruple with us is not in the least what God hath done or doth do for lost Man as G. K. often dis-ingeniously words it by altering the state of the Controversie which never was What God or Christ hath done for us nor of the Way and Means he hath taken to Redeem us according as it 's recorded in the Holy Scripture but What He by his Light and Spirit is sufficient to do For we say He being God can do as he pleaseth else how is he God Almighty and Omnipotent Therefore let us not undertake to argue as if there were any thing that God by his Light Spirit and Power is not sufficient to do and we need not debate any longer about it Ninthly If according to that Faithful Friend and Brother Edward Burroughs That We meaning the Quakers would have such to Reign who Rule for the Lord Exercising and Executing Righteous Judgments by the Spirit of God Then must it not be such who are lead by the Spirit of God And if so then Sons of God And surely as Edward Burroughs saith such are of us Now how does your Faith agree with his in this matter that say No Christians can Rule And if it be our Faith as G. K. saith it is That Magistrates may preach then surely it is our Faith that Preachers may be Magistrates Against which Practice it self G. K. hath all of a sudden very Unmanly as well as Unchristianly appeared exposing Friends to the World in Print about it without ever admonishing them before-hand of it For was not that his place to have done when he reckoned himself an Elder in the Church among us as well as that he was a Neighbour inhabiting in the Town among Friends that then were in place of Government But which is most to be observed that instead of reproving them for Retaking a Sloop for which Act he has since exposed them or admonishing about it he comes to them and Commended them for what they did and said It was very well done c. Methinks you should consider these things But to the matter How it should be our Faith that Magistrates may preach according to G. K's former Doctrine and yet against our Faith that Preachers should be Magistrates according to his latter Doctrine and yet that there is no Contrariety between his present and former Doctrine as he saith there is not is sure too hard to reconcile Tenthly Since according to G. K's express words Christ's glorified Body now in Heaven is no more a Body of Flesh Blood and Bones but a pure ethereal or Heavenly Body like unto which the Bodies of the Saints are to be at the Resurrection as before and that we firmly believe that one Mediator between God and Man to be the Man Christ Jesus according to the express Testimony of Scripture and that he ever lives to make Intercession for us according to the will of God so we desire to rest satisfied therein without aspiring to attain to high things beyond our reach or as David said Not to exercise our selves in things too high for us Eleventhly Concerning the Resurrection since it is enough according to that Faithful Friend and Brother William Penn That we believe in the Resurrection and that of a Glorious and Incorruptible Body without farther Nicities And if in Spirit and Doctrine you are one with him herein why then do you obtrude such Questions upon us Shall the same Body rise Or Shall any thing of this Body rise But seeing it is safest in this and all At the Bank Meeting House in the 4th Month 1693. other matters of Faith to keep to Scripture-words according to J. C. why then would not our Faith be taken when so often offered to be delivered in the very words of Scripture But more of this hereafter I shall now sum up in short the substance of some of the aforesaid Passages c. wherein he is to me so clearly inconsistent with the Doctrine of Faithful Friends as also greatly in contradiction to himself as well as that he is guilty of strange Absurdities therein which take as followeth viz. Men may be saved who are ignorant R. Barclay of Christs Death and Sufferings None are saved but who

so as to Collect or Gather by Just and True Consequences other things that lie out of the view of their weaker Brethren they ought not to obtrude them upon any to be received as Principles of Faith but in that case to have Faith to themselves and receive them as peculiar Discoveries or Revelations of the Spirit to them and such others as God hath so enlighten'd That which by the Apostle Paul is called The Word of Wisdom to wit Such a peculiar Degree of Wisdom or Understanding in the Depth of the Scriptures which others who yet are true Christians did not reach unto And concerning such a peculiar Gift of Divine Wisdom he said We speak Wisdom among the Perfect This certainly could be no common Article of Faith eIse he should have preached it unto all And this by the same Apostle is called The Knowledge of Mysteries as distinguished from the common Faith and Knowledge of the whole Church Now if this were but receiv'd among those called Christians That nothing should be required by one sort from another as an Article of Faith or Doctrine or Principle of the Christian Religion in common to be believed but what is expresly delivered in the Scripture in plain express Scripture-Terms of how great an Advantage might it be to bring a true Reconcilement among them and beget true Christian Unity Peace Love and Concord And as for the Consequential part of peculiar Doctrines whether True or False to leave every one a Freedom or Latitude without Imposing the Affirmative or Negative as any Bond or Tye of Christian Fellowship For if such Consequential be false it 's more Unreasonable to impose it and therefore in Observe this is Charity which G. K. now wants for us that Case a Dissenter should have his Liberty to differ in Judgment without any Breach of Brotherly Unity and Society And if it be true yet not being Opened or Revealed to another it cannot be in Justice pressed upon him where God has not given him the true Freedom and Clearness of Mind to receive it And to do otherwise is to transgress that Golden Rule delivered by Paul viz. To walk by the same Rule according to what we have attained And if any be otherwise minded saith he God will reveal it unto him Or if this Advice could find place it would bring the Differences among those called Christians in point of Judgment to a very small and narrow compass and they would derstand one another far better than now they do Thus far G. Keith in his said Book Now pray Friends consider of it for if this advice either had or yet could find place with you that are gone after G. K. or could it have found place with G. K. himself when so often desired it might it is well known the difference had never come to this furious Printing and Separation as it did But if you say G. K. is of another Mind now we do not Question that in the least but then surely the more insincere Man he still to pretend to be of the same Mind for in his Answer to the New England Priests he speaking of the Fall of Adam c. saith thus What the Scripture saith of it is readily believed and granted and it is safest saith he in this and all other Matters of Faith to keep to Scripture VVords especially in all Cases and Matters that are in Controversie for the Scripture is a Rich Treasure or Storehouse sufficient to afford us Words whereby to express our Faith in all Matters of Christian Doctrine and saith he it is not safe to leave the Scripture Words c. Nay in his last great Book so much talkt of before it came out for a profound piece of Divinity though as little heeded by many since they see what it is I say in that Book he hath these Words viz. But against the Doctrine of the Resurrection Truth advanced page 118. here delivered and opened by plain evidence of Holy Scripture VVords and Terms to which it is only safe in this and in all other matters of Faith to keep close c. Thus far again G. K. Again Now whereas you say we have given you to understand VVe have a sense contrary to Scripture VVords it is surely more likely contrary to your Meanings upon Scripture VVords But what uncharitableness is this when we offer to express our Faith in Scripture Words for you to say we have another sense then what we speak Now I ask how do you know that did we either at any time make or offer to make any Confession but in Scripture Words expresly For though here and there a particular Man may have dropt an unadvised Expression contrary to the Principles of the Church they belong to both among us you and others yet certainly in this Case I verily believe the fault hath been chiefly in you for perverting our VVords Now whereas you alledge The Papists say they keep to Scripture Words when they say from Christ's Words This is my Body c. that the very Bread they eat in the Sacrament is the very Body of Christ that was crucified on the Cross c. Now I say the Papists erring here is not by keeping but adding to Scripture Words because the Scripture saith no such things only This is my Body c. Now in what sense Christ called the Bread of the Passover his Body in that sense 't was his Body even as in what sence he called himself a Door and a Vine in that sence he is a Door and a Vine and so we may conclude without any danger of perverting the Text or running into Error about that or such like Texts of Scripture But if some of you think yet That it is not safe enough to express our Faith in the express words of Scripture and should offer any Reasons for it let them be offered to G. K. and see how you can reconcile your Reasons with the Method he hath laid down as the only Means to reconcile differences as abovesaid and if you are one with G. K's Method then I say it being according to him not only safest but the only safe way to reconcile differences in Religion to keep to express Scripture Then surely all other ways are unsafe and why should not this only safe way be accepted of us when we so often offered to take that way to express our Christian Belief by And seeing according to G. K. there is no other Truth advanced page 17. safe way to express our Faith but in express Scripture VVords Let me therefore a little Query with you about it First Where are the express Words of Scripture that say The same Body for Matter and Substance shall rise Secondly Where are the express Scripture Road Island ●●eet page 7. Words that say None but those that have the Faith of Christ crucified and raised again can love Enemies c. according to G. K's Doctrine G. K. himself saith That many