exhort unto Works of Piety and by the Authority of Scripture thunder the Iudgments of God against Harlots Adulterers Covetous Persons Highway-men Sorcerers that they may know there will be no place for such in the Kingdom of God and Christ except they amend their lives Who was more zealous than Paul in exalting the Righteousness of Faith And who was more Holy in Life than he or more fervent against the sins of those that walked not after the Spirit but after the flesh The Books of our Divines do evidence the same in which they discourse no less of Repentance and good Works than of Faith joyning always the one with the other Therefore as touching the manner of Teaching you will find that it is not Faith only which is Treated of in the Churches and Books of Men of our perswasion But if the matter of debate between us be about the cause of Salvation and Iustification there is nothing more agreeable to sound Doctrine than that an ungodly sinner is Iustified before God by Faith only without Works But you may object this Doctrine hardens the People in their sinful courses If you understand it of all it is false If of evil doers that run on in sin against their Conscience and take no care to restrain their Lusts As for such who ever said or taught that they are Iustified by Faith only And yet nevertheless the Truth of this Assertion remains invincible whereby we affirm that a wicked Man is Iustified by Faith only without Works if the Scope and meaning thereof be well understood Which will be easie if by adding that which supplies the room of a predicate the proposition be made entire As when Faith only is said to Iustifie add unto the Subject of this Enunciation it s own proper predicate or I may rather say add the proper Subject of Iustification and understand aright who they are whom Faith only Iustifies without Works according to the saying of Paul For herein chiefly lies the difficulty of this Controversie Neither is there any thing wherein the Adversaries are more grosly mistaken And herein they follow the Foot-steps of those concerning whom Cyprian justly complains saying They look at that which is said in the first place but regard not what follows after They catch at that which we assert of Faith only Exclusively and think there is injury done to good Works if Faith only is sufficient to Salvation But they take no notice what manner of Persons they are to whom this Iustification by Faith belongs It is the Advice of those School Divines to consider the reasons of things proposed according to their Subject matter and why then do they not observe their own Rule in this Evangelical Assertion Christ affirms it Paul confirms it yea the common practice of life natural Reason and Experience and the Conscience of all good Men proclaim that Ruine comes only from our Works and Salvation only from Christ. And because we receive this only Mediatour Christ by Faith only hence it is that we assert it is Faith that justifies believing sinners before God But let us see what manner of Sinners they are whom Faith Iustifies Is it the Rebellious and Impenitent No verily Then it must be such sinners as are Converted and Humbled and have the fear of God before their Eyes But there is no fear that such will continue to wallow in their former filthiness but on the contrary they are hereby so much the more stirred up to amend their lives All Ages have abounded with Examples of those to whom the Doctrine of free Iustification by Faith in Christ as it conduced much to their necessary consolation so it was no hinderance to their leading an holy life If Charity according as the Adversaries themselves do testifie is the perfection of the Law which is the Rule of Life I would ask such men whether he to whom more or he to whom fewer sins are forgiven hath the strongest obligation to love either God or his Neighbour which of these two mentioned in the Gospel loved Christ with the greater ardency of affection Simon the Pharisee or Mary that brought with her no good works at all but a great multitude of sins And why was her Love to the Lord more vehement but because she had more sins forgiven her But let us proceed Wherefore were so many and so great offences forgiven her but for her Faith which guided her Love for she did not therefore believe in Christ because she loved him but because she knew him to be the Son of God her Faith being thereby incited to act the more vigorously she loved much For Love proceeds from Faith and not Faith from Love Because we believe therefore we Love but we do not believe because we Love-Whence the Lord regarding more her Faith then her Love said unto her thy Faith not thy Love hath saved thee How Love and Repentance are concerned in Iustification BUT You may say Is Faith alone here Is it not joyned together with Love and Repentance I grant indeed that they are all three together in the person of the Believer But in the Case of Iustification Faith only is regarded And the other do follow as Fruits and Effects thereof For as that Woman unless she had believed in the Mediatour made known unto her by Faith she had nevor loved him So she had never come unto him as her Physician unless the Disease of her Troubled Conscience had driven her Wherefore if we reason aright about Causes these things follow 〈◊〉 as Effects and Fruits thereof but they are no causes of obtaining Salvation We have spoken of Mary Magdalene let us now behold the Pharisee and compare the one with the other If the Woman that was a Sinner by her love mericed as they speak Iustification What shall we say of the Pharisee Did not he also love the Lord Would he have gone to him so Courteously or invited him so lovingly or received him into his House so kindly or entertained him at Dinner so honourably unless he had been moved with some Affection of Love What shall I say of his Faith Did he not believe being instructed by the Holy Scriptures in God the Father Almighty Maker of Heaven and Earth Did he not receive Christ as a Prophet Now he believing in the Father and receiving the Son with Affectionate Love What could be wanting to him that was necessary to Iustification If so be all our Iustification is perfected by Charity And yet I suppose no Man will say that this Pharisee was justified by Christ that is set free from all Condemnation by this love of his Why Because Faith in Christ as a Saviour was wanting But suppose he had Faith and he trusting to his own Righteousness and being puffed up with Pride upon that account had begged no help and imagined he needed no Pardon would this Faith have availed him to Iustification I do no not believe it But
unreasonable so to do as if a man disputing concerning Osorius should thus conclude that because he hath no power of governing in the Kings Chamber therefore he hath nothing he can do at home amongst his own family Or because he is not at all excellent in military vertue to gain a victory that therefore he hath no faculty or dexterity in managing the affairs of his own business Luther separates charity from faith and the Law from the Gospel and does it not without cause But it must be considered where in what place and for what cause he does it Not to cause the godly works of good men to be despised nor to discourage the exercise thereof but that the power of justifying should not be attributed to the performance of them Not that faith should not work by love before Men but that it should not work before God For it is one thing to work before Men and another thing to work before God Therefore one and the same faith acteth both ways but one way before God and another way before men for before men it works by love that it may perform obedience to the will of God and be serviceable for the benefit of our Neighbour but before God it works not by any love but by Christ only that it may obtain the pardon of sins and eternal life By which you see what is the difference between faith and vertue and wherein they both agree and how different the working of both is How faith is alone without works and again how the same is not alone for in the mean while Godly works are not therefore condemned because they are not admitted to the justification of life but the trusting in works is only overturned Here then a wise and suitable division should be used that things may be distinguished each by their own places and bounds lest one thing should rashly rush into the possession of another and disturb the order of its station Therefore let the praise-worthy merits of the greatest vertues have their own honour and dignity which no man withholds from them Nevertheless by their dignity they will never be so available in the presence of the Heavenly Iudge as to redeem us from our sins to satisfie Iustice to deliver us from the wrath of God and everlasting destruction to restore us that are so many ways ruinated unto grace and life to unite us as Sons and Heirs to God and to overcome Death and the World These things cost a far dearer price than that we should ever be able to pay so many and so great debts by any works or merits or means of our own For so great is the severity of Iustice that there can be no reconciliation unless Iustice be satisfied by suffering the whole punishment that was due The wrath is so very great that there is no hope of appeasing the Father but by the price and death of the Son And again so great is the mercy that the Father grudged not to send his own Son and bestow him on the World and so to bestow him that he gives Life Eternal to them that believe in him Moreover so great is the loving kindness of the Son towards us that he grudged not for our sakes to bring upon himself this infinite load of wrath which otherways our frailty however assisted with all the help of moral vertues had never been able to sustain Whence Faith hath received its efficacy BEcause Faith alone with fixed eyes looks upon this Son and Mediator and cleaves unto him who only could bring about this Atchievement of our Redemption with the Father therefore it is that it alone hath this vertue and power of justifying not with works nor for works but only for the sake of the Mediator on whom it relies Therefore that is false and worthy to be rejected with disdain which some unhappy and wicked School-Divines affirm in discoursing of Charity to wit that it is the form of Faith and that it must not by any means be separated from faith no more than the vital Soul can be separated from the body or the essential form from matter which otherwise is a rude and unweildy Mass. In answering of whom I think there is no need of many words seeing the whole meaning and drift of Scripture if rightly understood the very end of the Law seeing Christ and the instruction of the Apostles and the whole nature of the Gospel seem to be manifestly against them and wholly to overturn that most absur'd Opinion by so many Oracles so many Signs Examples and Arguments to the contrary Now if that be form which gives subsistence to a thing how much more truly must it be said that faith is the form of charity without which all the works of charity are base and contemptible as again the form of faith is not charity but Christ only and the promise of the word But what say they are not the pious works of Charity acceptable to God being so many ways prescribed unto us and commanded by him Are not these also remunerated with plentiful fruits of Righteousness and heaped up with manifold Rewards in the Gospel I was hungry says he and ye fed me I thirsted and ye refreshed me with drink so that not so much as a cup of cold water shall want a reward when it is given in the name of Christ besides an infinite number of other things of that kind which being taken out of the Scriptures are enlarged upon to the praise of Charity Indeed no man denys that pious and holy works of Charity are greatly approved of God and it is an undoubted truth that the love of God and of our Neighbour as it comprehends the Summary of both Tables and is the greatest complement of the whole Law so it hath excellent promises annexed unto it Neither is there any Controversie between us about that But when we affirm that Charity pleases God we ask this how it pleases whether simply of it self in respect of the very work or upon the account of faith and the Mediatour and then whether the same Charity so pleases that it justifies us before God and obtains the pardon of sins and overcomes the terrours of death and sin that it may be opposed to the judgment and anger of God Moreover whether it hath the promises of Eternal Life annexed unto it If without a Mediatour and the faith of him there is nothing which can please God and it is impossible that works should please him before the person of him that worketh be reconciled it follows that Charity depends on Faith and not Faith on Charity But that it rather goes before Love and is so far from being joyned with it for justification that it also justifies Charity and makes all the works of Charity acceptable to God The matters appear more evident by Example Suppose a Iew or Turk does daily bestow great gifts upon the poor with very great cost
Vertue c. Who ever denied that it is God only that can do those things But what say you O good friend Is our whole Salvation and Righteousness in the sight of God contained in that only in driving out of the Mind those little Heats of all evil Lusts whereof you speak in abolishing the roots of all vices and in maintaining duely and constantly the office of perfect Vertue How far the Works of Human Life are from the perfection of Righteousness But now do you your self perform all these things which you require in us for the perfection of righteousness Hath the great Husbandman watered the happy ground of your mind with so great a vigor and verdure of his bounty that no wild Vines nor Briars do any where appear in all your life That no Lust draws you aside from your duty No perturbation of affections throws you down from your state of constancy No concupisence of the eyes defiles the purity of your mind He that seeth a Woman saith he to lust after her hath already committed adultery with her in his Heart What if a man is accounted unchast before God if so much as his Eyes are Adulterous if he is next to a Murtherer that is so much as rashly angry at his Brother if he that calls his Brother Racha or bespatters the name of his Neighbour with the smallest reproach is in danger of the Council what shall be said to him who hath poured forth not only volumes of reproaches but Cart-loads of spiteful speeches against his Brethren and fellow Servants with so much virulency and gall of bitterness So that I need not here go through all the Precepts of the Divine Law as concerning loving God above all concerning the strictest love to our Neighbour concerning shunning offences puting up injuries praying for enemies the abdication of this World the framing the Life to a Dove-like simplicity and other such like things Which things seeing they are so various in kind and so difficult in the observation I would know of you not what ought to be done but what you your self do express in deeds Not what the Divine Grace is able to do in you but what it does in effect Whether he heaps you up with so many and so great gifts of his that you are able to perform all things that are written in the royal Law Which if you can avouch so to be I willingly congratulate your happiness and I am not at all against your obtaining by way of merit that which your works do merit but that you may go up to the Kingdom and may take your self Unpinioned Wings as Arnobius saich wherewith you may go happily to Heaven and ' may fly to the Stars where you may reign with Christ and you only all other sinners being shut out may with God overcome when you are judged But in the interim here it comes into my mind to ask you a thing How will this consist with that which the Church sings in a holy Hymn and sings so aright Thou only art holy For how shall he only have the praise of that thing as saith Hierom which he hath common to himself with many What if you think there is no difference between his Righteousness and ours and you suppose there is no Righteousness but what proceeds chiefly from Works either let your life shew to us the same Works which Christ wrought or if you cannot let him only have the honour of this Title that Christ only may be righteous and Osorius may confess himself to be unrighteous and à sinner that now that saying may truely have place here which just now I cited out of Augustine Let man take sin to himself which is his own and leave Righteousness to God But you will say what then is there no Righteousness which belongs to men I do not deny that there is but it is such a righteousness as must be sought elsewhere than in works But you may say where then Not only I but also St. Paul will tell you the Righteousness of God saith he to all and upon all that believe And again in the same Epistle The Gentiles which followed not after Righteousness laid hold on Righteousness to wit the Righteousness of Faith On the contrary Israel which followed after the Law of Righteousness attained not unto the Law of Righteousness Why so Because they sought it not by Faith but as by the Works of the Law And writing to the Galatians knowing saith he that a man is not justified by the Works of the Law but by the Faith of Iesus Christ we also believe in Iesus Christ that we may be justified by the Faith of Iesus Christ and not by the Works of the Law because no flesh shall be justified by the Works of the Law c. who is so dim-sighted but he may clearly see what the meaning of the Apostle is in these words Wherefore I the more wonder with my self how great a stupidity darkens the minds of some of our own Country-men and especially those Iesuits who in a thing so perspicuous yield not unto Apostolick Authority so that they seem to have sallied out of some Trophonian Den for no other purpose but that waging War with St. Paul they may differ wholly from him in their opinion For what things can more fiercely encounter than such an opposition as this Christ is our Righteousness Faith is imputed for Righteousness If of Work then Grace is not Grace The Iust lives by Faith And after this manner doth the Apostle and Prophet instruct us What say they We are Iustified by Works and yet Grace is no less Grace The Iust doth not live by Faith but the Believer Liveth by the righteousness of Works And whereas Paul doth so attribute our Righteousness to Faith only that he attributes nothing to Works so often repeating these exclusive words without works apart from works not according to works If it is Grace then it is not of Works That I may be found in him not having my own Righteousness which is of the Law but that which is of the Faith of Iesus Christ To him that believeth in him that Iustifies the Ungodly Faith is imputed unto Righteousness also placing Iews and Gentiles as in a Scheme that by experience it self it may be evident how hazardous it is to seat the hope of Salvation any otherways than in the Faith of Christ only On the contrary those men overthrowing all these sayings of Paul endeavour this only by all the means they can that they may measure the whole sum of our Iustification by the performance of Works and not by Faith that they may take away all imputation of the Righteousness of another from us that Faith may no more contribute any thing to Righteousness but that it may render us worthy and fit on whom the Divine Grace should confer freely for the Merit of Christ the first infusion of inherent Righteousness By
their own default as if a Prince send forth an Ambassador any whither very sound and whole to whom afterwards he had commanded some things which he could easily have performed unless he had made himself Cripple lame thro' his own default Now if in performing the Commands the Ambassador wants ability is there cause why this impotency should be imputed to the Prince and not rather to the Ambassador who deprived himself of his own soundness And that is it which Augustine signifies lib. de Iustic perfect Yea therefore saith he it is man's fault because it came to pass by the will of Man only that he is come to that necessity which the will of Man only cannot shake off Therefore that representation which is brought in by you of a Servant in Bonds is nothing to the purpose unless you likewise prove this that this impediment was cast upon him not thro' any fault or cause in himself which seeing it cannot be denied by you what cruelty should there be reckoned to be in it if a Lord require just punishment to be inflicted on a Servant that is corrupt and flagitious Yea behold rather singular Clemency in the Lord who is so far from inflicting upon the Servant the punishment which he deserved that he receives him into favour without any merit yea moreover exposes his dearly beloved Son to undergo punishment for the Servant Go now Osorius and when you have sufficiently considered with your self about this matter then tell who those are that are enraged with so great fury that so impudently cast such a filthy blot of Injustice and Cruelty upon Eternal Goodness What if you judge so of Luther and Calvin of whom you speak so bitterly what other thing do they but proclaim according to the Gospel the free pardoning grace of God to all that by Faith embrace Christ who was slain for us They are so far from being guilty of this Calumny which you most unjustly cast upon them that you can no where find any who with greater earnestness do declare the infinite Riches of Divine Grace to Mortal Men. How Christ takes away Sins With an Answer to the Objections of Osorius BUT this goodly Antagonist rushes upon us again with another caption which at the first sight may somewhat puzzle the mind of the Reader For he asks of those that deny Sin to be utterly extirpated by the Grace of Christ in this Life Whether they distrust his Power or his Clemency For if Christ doth not abolish all Sins in them whom he receives into favour that comes to pass either because he cannot or because he will not If you say he cannot you take away his Power If you plead that he is not willing you rob him not only of the praise of his Clemency but also of his Faithfulness Therefore whatsoever way you defend your Opinion you trample upon the Son of God and cast great reproach upon him Well said most excellent Man And now by what confirmation do you prove this For seeing his Infinite Power cannot be hindered by any difficulties from performing suddenly the things which he willeth And seeing his Love is so great that of old he bath engaged his Faithfulness that through Christ he would abolish Sins and would deliver Mankind from all wickedness what boldness then is this of most impure men who deny that Sin is utterly destroyed in those whom he hath joyned to himself with a holy Love and assert that Sin is not wholly cut off nor plucked up by the roots that all the remainders thereof are not extirpated These things said he Argument Ma. Nature can shut out all Sin being helped by the Grace of God Mi. The Grace of God helps those who are born again in Christ. Concl. Therefore all necessity of sinning is excluded in those that are born again If you understand it of the perfect help of of Grace which is hindered by no difficulties but that the infirmity of Nature may be taken away so the Major is true but the Minor false For though I confess that the Riches of Divine Grace are infinite and that the Gifts are excellent which God bestows upon his own yet this grace of God doth not so perfect any man in this Life but that oft in small things we offend all and pray daily that our debts may be forgiven us Yea what is all the discourse of the Saints to God but a continual praying and deprecating as Hierom witnesses whereby it extorts the Clemency of the Creatour that we who cannot be saved by our own strength may be saved by his Mercy Concerning which there is also heard a Mystical Song of the Psalm For this saith he shall every Saint pray unto thee in a time when thou mayest be found Whence Hierom infers not without reason If he is a Saint saith he how doth he pray for the pardon of sin If he hath iniquity upon what account is he called holy to wit after that manner whereby it is elsewhere said A just man falleth seven times a day and riseth up again And again A just man is an accuser of himself in the beginning of his speech c. Therefore the Grace of God helps our infirmities that they may be diminished But we deny that he so helps them that they are wholly taken away It helps indeed infirmities as hath been said but yet it leaves us infirm that it may always help us No man is ignorant how great power of Christ appeared in the holy Apostles which yet did not fully compleat their strength but it was rather perfected by their infirmity We know saith he in part and we prophesie in part But when that which is perfect is come then that which is in part shall be done away We now see darkly through a Glass but then face to face Now I know in part but then I shall know as I am known Therefore that I may answer in a word If you suppose there is that help of Divine Grace which makes Obedience in this Life to be wholly unblameable and perfect Augustine will presently deny that Who discoursing of the first Precept of Righteousness whereby we are commanded to love God with all our heart and our Neighbour as our selves We shall fulfil that saith he in that Life where we shall see face to face and presently And therefore that man hath profited much in this Life in that Righteousness which is to be perfected who by profiting knows how far he is from the perfection of Righteousness Moreover that which is argued from the power of Divine Grace is not sufficient to exclude the necessity of sin They say indeed that by the perfect Grace of God it is possible that a man may not sin at all in this life Be it so Yet all things are not made which can be made by the singular power of God So by the power of God helping us we could flie yet
Therefore seeing God is altogether so just in his own Nature that he cannot but hate Sin and on the contrary Man is so wholly drowned in sin that in every good work according to the Opinion of Luther the Saints themselves also do sin in this so great dissimilitude of things that are opposite to one another how can it be that Infinite Holiness can be joyned by any Communion with Man if he is such a one as Luther describes him For so Osorius from things well said by Luther but badly understood by him and worse wrested for the occasion of cavilling doth very ill argue not because it is true but because it seems so to him But let us first oppose the frivolous Objection and then let us take Luther's part as well as we can against the cruel Incursions of his Adversaries And first indeed it cannot be denied that Iustice and Sin are repugnant to one another by the most contrary opposition Likewise we must confess that it is no less true that all impurity of sin is hateful and abominable to God For the Anger of God is revealed from Heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men who ditain the Truth in unrighteousness as the Apostle speaks very evidently Which being so what remains then but that the Life of the Godly should either be free of all sin in this World as Osorius contends or if that cannot be as Luther affirms all must be liable to the Wrath of God I answer with the Apostle Paul That indeed would follow unless there comes a Mediatour who may interpose himself against the Anger of God in the sinners behalf who may satisfie for sin who may obtain pardon who may mollifie the rigour of Iustice yea who may transpose all the Iudgment given against the guilty upon himself and that now he himself may be Iudge of the Cause who is the forgiver of the Crime For so we hear in the Gospel My Father judgeth no man but hath given all Iudgment to the Son And again All things are delivered unto me by Father All which benefits seeing we receive from Christ the most bountiful Mediatour in such plenty as exceeds all belief there is no cause O Osorius why in such great abundance of grace you should press us with such strict weights of Iustice as if we were now under the Law and not under Grace But how much more agreeable would it be both to your Duty and Salvation that you should by a submission common to you and us give place to the Grace of God and acknowledge the benefits of the Mediatour and apply your self with all gratitude of mind to his everlasting praises that are worthy to be celebrated through all Generations Therefore that we may expedite a matter not very difficult in a few words Whereas you say sin is hateful to God nothing is more true But it is one thing to speak of sin and another thing to speak of Man that is a sinner he indeed hates sin and the Physician also hates the disease but yet not so that he should destroy the diseased person but that he should heal him Concerning which thing if you do not trust me hear Augustin he is not a God that condemns some sins and justifies and praises other sins He praises none but hates all as a Physician hates the disease and by curing endeavours to drive away the disease So God by his Grace procures that sin is consumed in us But how is it consumed It is diminished in the life of them that are going on to Perfection it shall be consumed in the life of the perfect c. The Assertion of Luther against Osorius concerning the Sins of the Saints is defended I Come now to Luther whom you reproach after such an unworthy manner and with such shameful slanders yea and lyes so tragically Why so to wit because he durst accuse the Saints themselves of sin which seems to you so execrable a wickedness as if no greater reproach could be cast not only on holy men themselves but also on the Author and Prince of all Holiness You may upon the same account cast reproaches in like manner upon Hierom Augustin and Bernard and other most approved Writers of the Primitive Times Whom you must either by necessary consequence absolve with Luther or not condemn Luther without them Seeing there is none of all these that thought this Title of Honour should be attributed to any man but Christ only that he should be wholly without all stain of sin No but Luther say you pleads that all mortal men though confirmed in Faith are yet in a state of sinning and that sin is lively also in the Saints even so long as they live by Faith and also he profeses that the same do sin in every good work And what hath any man said or done so rightly but it may be depraved by relating it wrong especially when calummy makes the Interpretation That which Luther asserts concerning the sins of the Saints if the words be suitably weighed with the state of the Question there is no offence in it As if it be asked whether the works of the Regenerate should be called good in this Life or sins Luther denies not that the pious deeds of the Regenerate are good but affirms this very thing That they are good in the sight of God and pleasing to him which comes not to pass upon the account of the work it self but upon the account of Faith and a Mediatour for whose sake the pious endeavours of his own are pleasing to God and their begun obedience though it is otherways of its own nature imperfect Therefore this is not the Controversie whether the Regenerate by the help of the Grace of God can do any thing in this Life piously and commendably Neither is this the Controversie whether the absolute Grace of God in the Regenerate is able to perform this that their work should be free of all sin But whether the Grace of God in this flesh furnishes any of the Regenerate with so great a power of perfecting Righteousnns that any work of his is so compleat and perfect if it be examined according to the Rule of the Divine Law that it needs no Pardon nor Mediatour But if it needs Mercy then it is necessarily joyned with pollution and sin so that now the Praise belongs to the Mediatour and not to Man to Imputation not to Action to Grace not to Merit to Faith not to Works that God accepts of the Works of the Regenerate and most holy men Neither is the rectitude of our good things any thing else but the forgiveness of God and the remission of his just severity Whence the Apostle rightly concludes that those who are of the Works of the Law not speaking of evil works but the most perfect Works are under the Curse and upon this account it is true which Luther says that a righteous man sins in every
perfect to day whilest he always endeavours after better things the morrow he finds it imperfect These things said Hierom. Therefore if Paul being in perpetual motion could find no ftate of Righteousness in which he could rest It follows by consequence from hence that either there is no Iustification of a Christian in this Life or that surely it is not defined by its right terms by Thomas or the Thomists whence a just connexion is framed on this manner Argument Ma. Where there is a perpetual Race there is no station nor term of motion Mi. There is a perpetual Race in this Life towards obtaining Life Con. Therefore there is no station of attaining to Righteousness in this Life and end of notion which Thomas sets down By these things I think it is sufficiently evidenced what is the Iustification of a Wicked Man in the Scriptures and in what thing it chiefly consists not in a transmutation of inherent qualities by a voluntary receiving of Grace as they of Trent would have it but in the judiciary absolution of the Iudge whereby he that is guilty is sent away free and indemnity is given to him Whence Iustification seems to be defined not amiss by some That it is an action of God whereby he absolves the condemned Sinner from the Law in his free mercy for the sake of Christ justifies him from his Sins and glorifies him being justified Though in the mean while it is not denied that it is a matter of great concernment how every Man leads his Life and amends it But yet it is one thing to speak of Righteousness and another thing to speak of Iustification And again it is one thing to be exercised in the common use of Life and another thing to be exercised in judicatories There the amendment of Life hath praise but in judicatories no regard uses to be of what you are to do but of what you have done not what new qualities better Grace hath brought but by what remedy former Sins may be done away And now I pray you what then must be said and looked for in that most strict Iudgment of the most high God where the scene and sink of the wholeLife comes to be brought forth from its lurking places to the light where impurity of Life Deceits Injuries Filthiness of Lusts the Defilement of Conscience and Concupiscence the Wickedness of Words Works Counsels and Thoughts the Ambition of a pust up Mind the stubborness of Hatred Love Envy and the other Affections Rebelling against Reason the Love of the World Earthly Desires the Contempt and Ignorance of God The neglect of Duty Moreover the whole sink of things formerly done will be all at once laid open What will the miserable Sinner say here What will he bring To what will he fly Will he fly to his secret Confessions and Expiatory Penances and Satisfactions that will not be sufficient These things may declare thee to be a Sinner and a Penitent but not at all Righteous What then you will say hath not God promised to the Penitent the pardon of their Sins Be it so but where then is the Tridentine Iustification which is denied to consist of Remission only whereas you bring nothing into Iudgement but Confessions Penances and Deprecatory Tears For what need is there of any Satisfaction or Repentance when you have committed no Sin But if otherways Where then is your Righteousness whereof you boast To wit say you Remission of Sins being once received by Repentance together with Remission it self flows in Sanctification and the Renovation of the inner Man and the other gifts of Grace by the Holy Spirit whence Man of Unjust becomes Iust and of an Enemy a Friend c. What and dare you trusting in this Righteousness of yours enter the lists with the Majesty of so great a Iudgment And think you that your Vertues are such that they will overcome at this Iudgment Seat when they are Iudged Not by the Righteousness say you of my Vertues but by those works which the efficacious Grace of God works in me Which Righteousness is not mine but God's Not of my own Free will but of Grace acting in me Now then wherein will this Righteousness of yours differ from that Pharisee in the Parable of the Gospel Whose Life if you look into you see it is honest enough and unblamable if you look upon Grace he seems no less to acknowledge it and to attribute all his Vertues to it Otherways why did he with so much reverence and so carefully give thanks to God that he was not like other Men unless he had thought that whatsoever good Works he had were received of his gift and bounty For his Prayer doth sufficiently declare that wherein he seems not so much to Glory in his own good deeds as in the grace of God which he had received to which he ascribes all these things which he had done Therefore if it be true that these Roman Catholicks define That true Iustification consists in no other thing but in Works of Righteousness done by the grace of God what then doth hinder but this Catholick Pharisee according to their Catholick Opinion should be sent away to his House justified Which not being so it remains therefore that another manner of Iustification should be sought for by us than in VVorks of Righteousness which inheres and is planted in us by the grace of God But here the Roman Legions fight with all vehemency for their Catholick Righteousness as for their Camp First by Natural Reason that it is contrary to Nature for any Man to receive the Name or Essence of Righteousness from the Righteousness of another Moreover that it is much less reasonable for God who is the highest perfection of Righteousness and the Eternal Verity to will or be able to pronounce Men Iust that are impure and defiled with wickedness and Evil deeds and who are not truly righteous That I may answer these men two things offer themselves to be considered one which belongs to the cause of Iustification and another which belongs to the explication of the word In both of which the Adversaries are greatly mistaken First in this that treating of the cause of Iustification they seem to place it in no other thing next and immediately but in every man 's own Righteousness not which is imputed being received from another but which every one hath within himself trusting to this foundation That because every thing receives its name and essence only from the form that is inherent hence they gather that none should be accounted just but those only whom their own life and not another's makes righteous If they understand it of Formal Righteousness only and not Iudicial it hath no absurdity and may without any inconvenience be granted to them But what then what is this so much to the purpose for this is not the matter of debate what we are or are not formally in our selves
there was little Faith in him I know not in whom it is great Except in those successors of Peter and the Fathers of Trent Paul himself though he was taken up into the third Heaven yet writing to the Philippians openly professes that he had not yet attained unto that which he sought for but having forgot those things that were behind he pressed forward with all his might towards those things that were before And does any in this life hope to attain unto that which Paul with all his endeavours was not able to attain unto But why should I prosecute this matter any further The Moon shall be confounded said the Prophet and the Sun ashamed when the Lord of Hosts shall reign before his Ancients gloriously and in another place the Heavens are not clean in his sight and he charged his Augels with folly The Moon is ashamed and the Sun consounded and the Heaven is covered with Sack-cloth Wherefore then are not the Tridentines affraid to appear in the presence of so great a Iudge as if they were free from all guilt whilst they have nothing to trust to but their own Inherent Righteousness The frivolus Objection of the Adversaries is more largely exa mined and confuted BUT what shall be said to those unruly Persons and Deceivers who though they have undertaken a cause that they cannot defend being convinced by so many Testimonies of Scripture and Examples Yet such is their obstinacy they do not submit to the Truth when they are overcome by its Evidence What then have they to say for themselves By one you may understand what they all are 〈◊〉 Tiletanus a Commentator upon the Council of Trent arguing against Chemnitius thinks his cause is well enough defended by this curiously contrived Sophistry Whereas the Holy Scriptures reser all the concernments of Man's Iustification to the Grace of Remission only he interprets it thus by the Authority of the Council To wit he acknowledges it to be true in the first Iustification or in respect of the beginning of Iustification For they say when a wicked Man is first Iustified by Faith no Works or Merits of Works go before but by the free grace of God for Faith and the Merit of the Son of God the Mediatour he is received into favour obtains a Pardon and is made an Heir Well said But what then Sirs do ye think that this is not sufficient to Establish a Man in everlasting Felicity No indeed if your Opinion be true unless there be added hereunto in the lives of those that are come to years a perfect Obedience to the Law of Righteousness which they affirm to be easie and possible to every Man And because Human frailty can by no means attain unto this Therefore there is need of the assisting grace of God which being altogether infused at once as Alphonsus affirms doth so renew a Man in the Spirit of his Mind and endues him with so great Charity that there is nothing so hard in the Law of Commandments but he can perform it with ready Obedience Whence it comes to pass that he is called Righteous not only by Name and by Imputation But is in very deed and as they speak really Righteous and Merits Eternal Life Ye have here briefly set before you a Summary of Catholick Divinity concerning the perfection of Righteousness which though there is no Man but sees how absurd and unreasonable it is yet that it may appear the more evidently it will not be a miss to reduce all the debates of the Adversaries into a short form of argument The Tridentine Argument Ma. Whosoever perform all the Commands of God they are truly Righteous not by Imputation but by true Vertue and Merit Eternal Life Mi. The Regenerate by renewing grace obtained through Faith and the Merits of Christ perform all the Commands of God Conolu Therefore the Regenerate 〈◊〉 not only accounted but also are really madeRighteous by grace and Merit Eternal Life In this one Syllogism if it be attentively considered as in a little Map all the Polution and Deceit of the Popish Doctrine is comprehended and it is no hard thing to answer it And first I would not unwillingly grant them that which they assume in the Major for the Laws appointed by God comprehending all Righteousness within the limits of their Circumference if there were any Man whose life was exactly squared according to the strict Determinations of this Law and defective in no Circumstance I should esteem him to be worthy not only of the Title of Righteousness but also of the Rewards that are due to a Righteous Man Let us proceed to the other parts of the Argument The Minor follows next But the Regenerate in Christ whom Faith hath once justified having just now received Divine grace they attain unto such a degree of Charity that they are wanting in nothing that is requisite to the most perfect Obedience of the Law But I would fain know where those Regenerate Men are and who they are for it is abundantly evident that they who are the maintainers of this Doctrine are no such Men themselves Their lives are so well known that there is no need of other Arguments to prove it They brag of so many and great things 〈◊〉 Righteousness Grace and Charity whose Vertues whereof they so much boast and manner of life if they be compared with their profession what is more disagreeing What more differing from Righteousness Whereby hath Peace and Grace less flourished and Iniquity more abounded in manners In what times hath the love if not of all at least of most Men waxed so cold It is needless here to complain of the vulgar This complaint chiefly concerns those that sit in the Chair of Hierarchy and are employed in Ecclesiastical Functions and I wish there were 〈◊〉 as just cause thereof as we see in most of 〈◊〉 But perhaps they will defend themselves 〈◊〉 the example of the Pharisees Of whom 〈◊〉 is said that they sat in the Chair of Moses 〈◊〉 taught that which was true though they 〈◊〉 not act according to what they taught And indeed the Example whereunto they compare themselves would please me well 〈◊〉 unless I judged them to be worse then 〈◊〉 Pharisees of those days For though the lives of those Men are Condemned yet their manner of Doctrine was not so contrary to Divine Institutions but the case is otherways with them For not only their lives are far from that Righteousness which they teach but their Doctrine also concerning this Righteousness and many other things is without any Foundation from Scripture But you may say what then Doth Christ the Bride-groom forsake his Bride Or is his grace lessened that he is unwilling or unable to help his Servants What think you of Charity Which being the fulfilling of the Law according to the Testimony of the Apostle will it do nothing in the Hearts of those in whom it is shed abroad towards the fulfilling of
the cause of blessedness this manner of arguing will appear to be more forcible by an evident Testimony of Scripture Argument Ma. That which is the cause of blessedness the same is the cause of Iustification Mi. Remission of Sins is the cause of blessedness and Salvation Con. Theresore Remission of Sins is the cause of Iustification But you may say What must then be answered to the Words of Christ who seems to promise the blessedness of the Kingdom as a reward of Works You may find an answer to this objection in the Book of Iacobus Cartusiensis who hath written on this manner Men do accept and love the persons of others for their Works that are acceptable and profitable to them but God accepts the Works for the sake of the person c. Therefore here there is need of a distinction between the Work and the person of the Worker But you may say Are not Works that are performed in Charity for the relief of the Poor pleasing and acceptable to God We deny not that our selves But we enquire into the cause wherefore they become acceptable Which that it may appear the more evidently let us examine these words of Scripture I was an hungred said Christ and ye gave me Meat I was thristy and ye gave me Drink c. I ask in the first place who is it here that was an hungred You will say Christ either himself in his own Body or in a Member of his Body Did you then feed Christ when he was an hungred That was Piously done indeed Therefore I see and commend what you have done But I ask what was it that stirred you up to do it Whether was it Charity setting Faith a work or was it not rather Faith setting Charity a work But what if some other that was no Member of Christ whether Heathen or Turk had need of your Meat Would you in your Charity have fed him I doubt of that But suppose you your self had not believed in Christ but had been an Enemy to him if you had seen one that belonged to Christ almost ready to perish for hunger would you have relieved him I do not believe so Why Because it is only believers that feed Christ but Infidels persecute him The Lord was thirsty on the Cross and he had Vinegar given him for drink which was a Hellish wickedness But why did they give him Vinegar Was it want of Love or was it not rather want of Faith in those unbelieving Pharisees Who if they had not wanted Faith they would not have wanted Charity to administer help and Charity would not have been unrewarded But let us proceed Suppose one that is not a believers whether Turk or Heathen should refresh a hungry Christian by giving him of his Meat as old Simon the Pharisee entertained Christ with a Dinner And many of the Heathens have been Eminent in offices of kindness and Love Can the giving of Meat and Drink by any such without Faith merit Eternal Life Surely not But if a believer gives his Christian Brother so much as a Cup of cold Water in his necessity shall he lack his Reward Christ himself says he shall not Hereby you may see whence it is that our Vertues and good deeds are acceptable to God and dignified with Rewards not for themselves but for the Faith of him that works them which first justifies the person before all works And after the person is justified his performances are accepted and though they are of small value in themselves yet they are looked upon as great and rewarded plentifully Wherefore we deny not that sometimes in the Scriptures the name of Reward is joyned with Eternal Life and that the works of Brotherly Charity may in some sense be called meritorious if so be these works are performed by persons who are already justified and received into favour by remission of sins and have obtained a right unto the promise of Eternal Life Not that their works are of such value that they should make satisfaction to the Law of God or merit any thing with God ex congruo or condigne as they phrase it either by congruity or worthiness But they are imputed as Merit by Grace Not that Eternal Life is due to the works themselves but because there are consolations laid up in Heaven for Saints and persons in a justified state to support them in their afflictions Eternal Life not being due to them for their works but by right of the promise just as a Son and Heir to whom his Father's Inheritance is due doth not merit the right of Sonship by any duties that he performs but he being born a Son his duties upon that account are meritorious so that he wants not a due reward and recompence Therefore in this Popish Argument there is a fallacy Another Argument taken from the words of Christ Matth. 25. Da. HE that doth the will of the Father shall enter into the Kingdom of Heaven Ti. It is the will of the Father that we should do good works that are commanded in his Law Si. Therefore an entrance into Heaven is obtained by the works of the Law Answer Suppose we grant all contained in this Argument what will these Roman Iusticiaries infer from thence Therefore as Vega speaks Faith is not sufficient to Salvation without the keeping of the Commandments It is easie to answer him in a word Let him keep the Commandments according to the exact Rule of the Divine Will and he shall be saved But neither he nor any other man can perfectly keep the Commands of God in this Life From whence we infer this by necessary consequence That either there is no hope of obtaining the Kingdom or else that it lies not in the works of the Law Now if it be so what remains but that finding this is not the way to Heaven we should seek for another way and because there is no door of Salvation opened to sinners in the Law of Commandments therefore we must flie to another Refuge But what that Refuge is appearing to us from Heaven it self the Divine Will declares unto us which is not set forth in the Old Law but in the New Testament of the Gospel And this is his Will that every one who believeth in the Son should not perish but have Eternal Life For whereas the Law was weak because of the flesh God sent his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin condemned sin in the flesh that the Righteousness of the Law might be fulfilled in us that walk not after the flesh but after the spirit Objection But here some may object Will the Faith of Christ justifie us in such a manner that there may be a Legality and Impunity for us to disobey the Will of his Father God forbid The Liberty of the Gospel allows not that for it openly affirms That they who are justified by the Faith of Christ walk not after the flesh but
by performing these Offices of Life which are contained in the Law O miserable condition of Mortal Men if those things are true which you Evangelize to us But by what Authority of the Gospel do you confirm those things which you assert You say There is no reason that any Man should be joyned to God unless he be a Friend to him I hear you What then But no Man can be his friend unless he be like him That is harder Let the induction proceed But the Divine similitude consists wholly of the study and exercise of true Vertue From all this therefore it is concluded That there is no other way that joyns us to God but what consists in the performance of Vertue and in worthy Offices And now what will become of those who being Iust Men fall seven times a Day and yet rise up again What also will become of all those concerning whom Iames speaking saith in many things we offend all Moreover what will become of those whom Christ bids Pray Lord forgive us our debts Moreover whereas you say that no Man is joyned to God or received into favour but he that is his Friend If that be so How then doth God agree to his own Law which commands not only to love Friends but to pray for Enemies I beseech you when God so loved the World that he gave his only begotten Son what else was this World then but an Enemy to God which yet he had so great a favour to Yea Paul expresly testifies that we were reconciled to God not when we were Friends but Enemies and therefore he says the love of Christ is commended in this that he dyed for Enemies And again if whilst we were Enemies we were reconciled unto God by the Death of his Son much more being reconciled we shall be saved by his Life See I beseech you how great a difference is between Paul's Assertion and yours Osorius He affirms we were reconciled to God when we were Enemies you admit no Man unto favour but him that is a Friend to him and conform to him in the whole fimilitude of his Life And how then will that command of Christ consist concerning loving Enemies and that by the example of his Father's bounty who bestows the benefit both of Sun and Rain not only on Friends but also on Enemies if so be the Grace of Divine favour is accessible to none but Friends and those that are like himself And that I may by the by touch something here of the Mysteries of Prophetical Scriptures tell me what else is pointed at unto us by the reception of Iacob and his Sons into the Land of AEgypt Gen. chap. 47. Whom that very loving King being brought unto him to whom they had not been so much as known before received for Inhabitants of Foreigners and for dear Subjects of Men unknown not only into the Common Wealth but into Friendship not at all for their own sakes who brought nothing with them but hunger and poverty But only for the sake of Ioseph whom the King had a very dear love for What else doth Ioseph represent to us but the sublime Son of God dearly beloved of him What else should you understand in the Brethren Father and the whole Kindred but us miserable Sinners whom being dead in Sins Christ hath quickned and of Enemies reconciled us in Friendship to his Father not for any merit of our Works or Conformity but only by that favour whereby he is powerful with the Father But now let us briefly bring the Osorian Argument into a regular form that we may the better view each part thereof Argument Ma. Those only are joyned in friendship with God who are like unto him Mi. They who are infected with the pollution of Sins are not like God Concl. Therefore none of those to whom pollution of Sin cleaves have any Union with God And thence on the contrary sense it is gathered that it must be concluded by necessary consequence that all spots of Sins being abolished That man who desires Union with God should agree with him by a certain eminent resemblance I Answer First to the major which is not always true Though the similitude of manners hath oftimes no small strength to procure Friendship in the common use of Life as Cicero says yet all things that are any way unlike are not so opposed that they cannot consist together without fighting one against another As there are many differences in things yet every difference doth not unty the bond of love As again neither do all Men every where cleave to one another by a firm bond of Friendship whosoever do some way agree in endowments and Ingeny Verily in the Divine Love this agreement of Conformity hath no place That they should be received into favour who came nearest to his Image For so it would come to pass that all other Creatures being excluded Almighty God would embrace only Angelical Vertues with his Divine Favour Though neither here if you look to Angels themselves doth any proportion of similitude unite into one with the Divine Holyness according to the Testimony of Roffensis Who says that the Righteousness of Men is another than that of Angels and again that their Righteousness is another than that of God As therefore this Righteousness of Angels if you compare it with the Righteousness of God will seem imperfect and beyond all comparison coming short of that highest Righteousness and which yet perhaps is without Sin So if you compare Human Perfection with Angelical it will have some Imperfection yet so that all its works are not subject to Sin Hitherto spake Roffensis Augustin also comes to this Point who comparing our Righteousness which now is with that which is to come hath these words concerning its dissimilitude when that Righteousness saith he according to which they live shall be and where no evil concupiscence shall be let every Man measure himself what he is now and what he shall be then and he will find in comparison of that Righteousness that all his works now are loss and dung c. And presently after In the Resurrection we believe we shall fulfil Righteousness that is that we shall have full Righteousness In comparison of that all the Life we live now is dung c. And now Osorius what Agreement of similitude will you find between this Life of dung and that highest Author and Prince of all Holiness The Assertion of Osorius whereby he proves that there can be no Reconciliation to God unless all the Relicks of Sin be utterly cut off BUT perhaps some Osorian will here again object Though dissimilitude doth not divide the connexion of friendship but yet things that are so different that they are opposed to one another by a mutual repugnancy it cannot by any means be that those things should be joyned together of which sort are Virtue and Vice Righteousness and Sin Love and Hatred