Colledges and Vniuersities of this Realmes are abrogated as are also the conseruators Ecclesiasticall of the Vniuersities together with the priuiledged of this Crowne It forbiddeth such as haue made vowe of Religion in any wise to dispose of their gotten goodes whether moueable or immoueable contrary to the ordinance of the States of Orleans conformably with the decree of the Counsaile of Mogonce holden in y e time of Charlemaign It permitteth the begging Fryers to enioye and possesse rents landes reuenues and immoueable goodes contrary to the Counsaile of Vienna holden in the yeere of 1310. and infinite auncient arrestes of the Court It taketh from the King the nomination in Couents and Monasteries reguler which to him apperteyneth also the Triennalitie of Abbesses and Prioresses appointed by the sayde Estates It permitteth Munckes to meete and hold congregations and Chapters generall which in an Estate is perilous and daungerous and a matter whereby they bee accustomed to withdrawe themselues from vnder the authoritie and power of the King and all other temporall Magistrates in respect whereof also such assemblies haue by the arrest of the Court bene many tymes declared abusiue It giueth the Bishop authoritie to institute newe Feastes which haue bene reproued by many arrestes of Parliament namely by the prouinciall Counsayle holden at Sens in the yeere 1527. It encrocheth Lay patronages if the patrones by authenticall writings proue not the presentations continued and hauing taken effect 50. yeeres together and reiecteth al other kinde of proofe It giueth to the Ecclesiasticall Iudge notice of the right and possession of the sayd patronages obteyned by foundation donation or construction within these fortie yeeres which is a great intrusion vpon the King and his Magistrates It erecteth a newe kind of Iudges delegate whom it calleth Apostolick and authorizeth the Bishops to choose them euery one in his owne Dioces without the Kings knowledge or authoritie which are so many creatures not subiect to that Maiestie where-vnder they liue It declareth the Pope to be aboue him and forbiddeth Bishops to humble and submit themselues to Kings and Lordes It commaundeth all Clergie hauing of right and custome voyce in the prouincial Counsaile to receiue this preteÌ„ded Counsaile to sweare obedience to the Pope and thereof to make publicke profession It enioyneth Vniuersities not to teach any thing but what shalbe conformable to the decrees of the sayde Counsaile and to take solemne and yeerely oathes to his holinesse It commaundeth all Lordes Princes to keepe the sayd Canons renewing the auncient vsurpatorie Decretals of Boniface the eight and others heretofore abrogated in Fraunce as well by Edicts and ordenances Royall as by the arrestes of the Courtes of Parliament and great Counsaile By the sayd Counsaile the causes of our French Bishops are drawne to the Court of Rome and Popes Consistorie contrary to the dignitie of the royall Maiestie and the auncient Canons of the vniuersall Church whereby the criminall causes of Bishops yea in cace the same concerned their depriuation or discharging did belong to the Bishops of the Countrey or Synodes prouinciall and not to the Pope as by many the arrestes of the Court concurring with the generall Counsailes of Constantinople and Carthage it doth appeare besides that herein the sayd Counsaile greatly derogateth froÌ„ the Kings soueraigntie and Iurisdiction that euermore he hath had ouer the Bishops of his Realm witnesse the examples of Giles Bishop of Rheims of Pretextatus Bishop of RoaÌ„ of Didier Archbishop of Vienna and many others of whom Gregory of Tours Aimoinus Ado Vincent the Historiall doe make mention In brief to vse few words this pretended Counsaile taketh away the most auncient liberties of our Church so to make a Proppe to the Popes abuâ—ions It also dissolueth reuoketh and maketh voyde Mariages not contracted in the face of the Romish Church wherein consisteth the Seede of a million of troubles Ouarels Processes and strifes in infinite families of this realme which vnder the authoritie of the King with his good liking and vnder the protection of his Edicts of pacification haue contracted Matrimony and begotten Children who thereby should be declared illegitimate depriued of their Parents Successions and their â—Wues denounced Concubines Harlots to their true Housbands contrarie to all equitie which in summe is as much as to bend themselues against God to erect in other mens Realmes assemblies of people not subiect to the same to bring into the Church a greater deformation and to make the King of Fraunce his Serieant or executioner of his commaundements yea such a one as should haue no authoritie to order his Realme So that those which now so earnestly doe prosecute that publication of the sayd Counsaile shall neuer perswade mee that they are French men but rather that they shewe them selues Solliciters of the Popes affayres and dignitie rather his Seruants theÌ„ their Kings and soueraigne lords Thus doe you seee howe by the aduice and iudgement of the honestest greatest French Catholikes liuing vnder the traditions of the Romish Church this Counsaile of Trent may not be accompted other then a notorious conspiracie and coniuration against the authoritie and dignitie of this Crowne aud of the Subiectes thereof of whatsoeuer calling that shall find them selues offended and therfore we should greatly iniury any one of ours of whatsoeuer estate in calling him Heretick for not obeying submitting him selfe or consenting against his Countrey to the malicious conspiracies of the Pope and straungers that doe enuie the greatnesse of this Estate Especially the King of Nauarre whome the matter chiefliest doth concerne should haue greatest cause to be agrieued in respect that at this day he hath the Honor to be the principall branch of the Royall tree of France and so consequently more neerely bound then any other to preserue and mainteyne the rightes liberties and dignities of this glorious and redoubtable Monarchie 56 Moreouer the sayd Lord King of Nauarre demaundeth of you by vertue of what doe you esteeme hym an Heretick and obstinat parson For it is certaine that he onely may be tearmed an Heretick who vpholdeth a false doctrine contrary to the holy Scriptures of the ould and newe Testament beleeuing amisse in any one of the Articles of our faith as did y e Manicheans Nestorians Sabellians Arrians and their like Now to say trueth they would perswade vs that the opinion houlden by the saide Lorde King of Nauarre was monstrous we haue bene hallowed after them like Dogges wee haue bene forbidden their company as of infidels and miscreants I beseech you therefore let vs carefully looke into the confession of their faith and we shall find them Christians such as agree with vs in the articles of our belief doe worship the same God seeking saluation in the same Iesus Christ Chrildren of the same father beleeuing the same Bible assuring them selues in the same Gospell as in the same Buckler of their faith requiring part in the same inheritance and in vertue of
beeing second after God of whom he houldeth his authoritie and hath nothing greater thē the heauenly power Constantius Valens Zeno Anastazius Iustinian the first and second Heraclius Leo the 3. Phillip Bardanes Constantin the 5. Leo the 4. and some other Emperours who were adiudged hereticks were neuer deposed notwithstanding the Catholicke Church condemned their errors which neuerthelesse is permitted to excommunicate Kings and Princes Sectaries of false opinions or otherwise euill liuers in cace the same will not acknowledge their vice or trāsgression which one onely Bishoppe or high Priest whatsoeuer may not doe without the iudgement and notice of the Church after it hath heard the King or Prince in his exeptiōs and defences wherein vndoubtedly ought to be strictly obserued all order of Iustice in respect aswell of the grauitie of the cause as of the qualitie of the person in question wherevpon may depend the trouble and subuertion of Christiā policie through such ciuil warres as might ensue together with the bloud of the poore faithfull which the weapons of the prouoked Prince might shed as Sainct Augustin to the same purpose doth confesse and discourse vpon in his Glose vpon that precept whereby wee are commaunded to obeye our Kings Moreouer excommunication denoūced contrary to the orders of the auncient fathers obserued in the Church and without the knowledge thereof would proue vniust and vtterly voyde and thereby not the taxed but the taxer might take harme as Gratian teacheth expounding a place of S. Hierome vpō Leuiticus Pope Leo also affirmeth that the priuiledge of Peter is in force wheresoeuer iudgemēt is giuen according to his equitie Innocent the third how zealous he was of his authoritie confesseth that if the excommunicated pretende that vniustly hee was so denounced hee maye complaine and exhibite the cace of his innocencie In France by the priuiledges of the Flowerdeluce it hath often by arrest of y ◠Court bene adiudged y t the King his officers or subiects in body or communaltie cannot bee excommunicated by the Pope or any other Bishop whosoeuer Whervpon Charles du Molin a famous aduocate and one of the greatest Lawyers of his time testified that he had to that ende an expresse Bull of Pope Martin the 5. which was nothing repugnant to the lawe by the Popes commonly obserued for Iohn the 22. declareth that he may graunt priuiledge to some one that hee shall not bee excommunicated whereupon Pope Eugenius the fourth concurring with the Court of the holy Apostolick Sea graunted to the French that no Bishop whatsoeuer should entangle them in the sentēce of excōmunication But we haue not for this occasiō to deale either with Bulls or priuiledges of y e Church of Rome for by the rights authority dignitie of the Maiestie of our king it is not lawfull for the Pope or any Bishop whatsoeuer to excommunicate either towne or communaltie subiect to the Realm of Fraunce By reason whereof in the yeere 1488. the Atturney generall appealed as of abuse from the excommunication that the Pope had laid vpō the Inhabitants of Gaūt because they had dealt hardly with the Emperour Maximilian their Earle and Vassall to the King of Fraunce to whome onely hee ought to haue had recourse as vnto his Lord for remedie the Pope hauing no authoritie ouer the subiects of this Crowne To y ◠same ende also Charles the fifth by an Edict verefied in his Parliament in the yeere 1369. expressely forbad all Bishops and Prelates for whatsoeuer cause to lay the sentence of excōmunicatiō vpon any Towne Communaltie Colledge or body corporate of his Realme the same beeing vnder the onely correction and power of himselfe and of none other in the world which Edict was also renewed by Lewes the 11. in the yeere 1467. whereof is growne a custome inuiolably obserued in France as the Oracle of Apollo of Appellations as of abuse in the Court of Parliament against the Pope and his Cleargie without which remedy the Priestes would in France erect an other and more mightie Monarchie then the Kings for the maintenance and dignitie of the which al good Frenchmen ought rather to dye then suffer it to be diminished So that the Pope and Bishops can proceede no further then to excommunication of perticuler persons according to the order of old tyme obserued by the holy Decrees and Canonicall constitutions Thus to conclude you see how to proceede against Kings and soueraigne Princes Hereticks or otherwise offensiue to the Christian Church which excommunicatiōs being by order of law euermore obserued in the florishing and Primitiue Church denounced wee are to dispute whether by the same we bee discharged of y t faith and oath that by nature wee owe vnto them Wherein are but too euidently knowne the constitutions of the Popes Gregorie the 7. Honorius the 3. Lucius the 3. Innocent the 3. and others by the which they doe not onely declare the subiects of an hereticall or excommunicate Prince absolued from their oath of fidelitie but which is more doe vpon the like penaltie forbid the vassals to obey their Lord after he is adiudged such a one Neuerthelesse I thinke not but such decrees proceeded of a meruelous passion of the Popes of those daies against the Princes of their time And in deede Iohn Andrew Innocent Archidiaconus Panorme many other learned glozers vpon the Decretals being of a contrary aduice doe alledge great difficulties therevpon and in their hypotheses doe perticulerly expounde them in cace by the sentence of excommunication it bee expressely set downe that y ◠subiects shall be discharged of all right of vasselage otherwise they doe iudge the obligation not to be extinct or diminished by the excommunication of their Lord which last in sundry considerations full of Religion and ciuill pietie seemeth to be of great apparēce and too too true First that we are bound to obeye our Kings whether good or bad because they are chosen giuē to vs by the hād of God euen such as it please him to giue to rule ouer vs. Secondly that the excommunication importeth no alteration or diminutiō of the qualitie of the person nec habetis capitis minutionem as the Lawyers doe saye to conteine or comprehend therein depriuation or publication of goodes sed motionem ab ordine Christianorum coetu as saith Modestin of Senator qui Senatu motus capite minutus non est Romae morari potest Moreouer excommunication is a Spirituall discipline medicine and admonition and hath no participation with worldly and temporall goodes and meanes whether great or small as S. Paule saith The armors of our warres are not carnall therfore sith Realmes and Lordships are for the most parte patrimoniall or at the least terestriall whose propertie and possessiō doth no way concerne the kingdome of God the declaratiō of the losse of the one bringeth no consequence for the depriuation from the other Paul the Lawier
this example hath relation also the same iudgement that Pausanius writeth of the Senat of Sparta aboue 400. yeeres after Licurgus concerning the children of their King Cleomenes who had two sonnes Cleonimus and Acrotatus the elder who dying beforr his father and leauing his sonne Areus the Realm came in question betweene them where senteÌ„ce passed for Areus against Cleonimus who was so wroth therewith that he called Pirrhus King of Epiro sonne to Earida and caused him to enter the land whereupon he was declared enemie to the Commonwealth In Italy Robert the second King of Sicill sonne to Charles the second about the yere of Iesus Christ 1310. when there was controuersie for the County of S. Seuerin betweene Thomas sonne to the elder and Iames the younger gaue sentence for the neuewe so that the sayd Robert whome our Doctors terme an other Salomon being in Auignon accompanyed with a number of Doctors and other skilfull personages adiudged the sayd Countie to him Ottho of Frisingen rehearseth the custome of Bourgondy which saith he was euermore obserued among the Gaules concerning the fathers succession which was adiudged to the eldest and his posteritie vnto whom the rest as to their Lordes ought to yeeld all respect honor and duetie Demosthenes also maketh mention of the Athenians lawe whereby brothers children had parte in the succession of their Grandfather as braunches and bodies substituted in the Roumes of their deceased parents So as the great number of arrestes passed might at this day be reason sufficient to restrain the Lord Cardinall of Bourbon and those who vnder pretence of fauouring his cause do practize their own aduancement by the destruction of the Royall famelie especially sith these iudgements passed not without great notice of the cause ripe most sound considerations which learned men shal conceiue as drawne out of the fountaine of the Ciuill and Cannon lawes from whence the best and most of our pollicie is taken 3 The first reason is because the father and the sonne sayth Iustinian are natura but one person so as the father seemeth not dead in respect of the substitution that nature hath made in the person of his sonne who is parte of his flesh and bones and is therefore termed sonne of the houshould as the other father of houshould with the sole difference of the title of generation And in Ecclesiastes it is written The father is dead and in a maner not dead because he hath left one like himselfe And after the fathers decease the sonne purchaseth not a newe his rightes and succession but taketh vpon him the administration and vse of the same whereby the same matter that was to bee considered in the father is no doubt transported to the person of the sonne how personall soeuer the same be and he is thereof capable as a straunger enheritour cannot be in such wise that the sonne by nature and ciuill lawe substituted in his fathers roume and place is to enioye all priuiledges dignities and rightes that might to the deceased haue apperteyned This ciuill reason conformeth it selfe to infinite examples of the lawe First wee knowe that the sonne dying before his father the neuewe entereth the roume of the deceased and enioyeth the same rights as his father if he had liued should in his GraÌ„dfathers succession as appeareth in the Counsaile of Gallus Aquilius by the law Vellea and other the heades of our wisedome so that no reason can be alleadged why we should otherwise thincke in this deede which dependeth of the right obteyned by the father in respect of seuioritie in the succession of his predecessors for although the sonne of the deceased elder doe maintaine the seuioritie to bee his by his owne right and person yet is he as it were substituted in the place and person of his sayd father and admit the qualitie of senioritie were by the fathers decease dead and extinct yet the power habilitie to succeede thereby is not extinct and lost which beeing diuers and seperated from the eldership is continued and transported into the person of the sonne Wherevpon in lawe we doe say that the same departing before the father his sonne succeedeth in his possibilitie because the same occasion if any dyeth without children is accomplished in the wise counsaile of the testator if there remaine any issue of the afore deceased sonne Hereupon by the arrest of the Court in the yeere 1555. was the daughter of the eldest sonne of Thibault of Vitry preferred before her Vnckles in the right of eldership to the landes and noble Lordships of the said Thibault Secondly it was determined that the free borne childreÌ„ were not bound to lay together their owne goodes in pertitioÌ„ of their fathers or if it happened the same beeing vnder his fathers iurisdiction to decease leauing his sonne alienated to some one of his brethren of the same calling the neuew who in his owne person could not attend the relation of his Vnckles proper goodes in the succession of his Grandfather might neuerthelesse demaund the same in the behalfe and as substitute to the person of his deceased father and therefore the same right that he had in the same relation is adiudged to his sonne who of himselfe was vnperfect badly grouÌ„ded in his demaund By our Lawes also the brother by father and mother is in the succession of his deceased brother to bee preferred before the rest of his brethren of the same bellie or kinsmen Let vs now presuppose the brother both waies were deceased leauing one sonne The sonne is to take vp the inheritance of his Vnkle before the rest of the brethren of the deceased beeing of one bellie or kindred which hee cannot doe by his owne right because he was not brother to the deceased and therefore necessarily he taketh it in right of substitution and succession to his late father transported into his person wherby he not onely succeedeth with his Vnkles but which is more excludeth them as might his father haue done if he had liued Moreouer that which is noted in parte must take place in the whole and yet in the substitution of the deceased fathers succession the children of the deceased do take their part and portion of their deceased Grandfathers goodes by stocke not by head that is in consideration of their fathers person which wee call in stirpes non in capita which also concurreth with Gods lawe as wee may note in the portion that Abraham gaue to his neuewe Lot the sonne of his brother Aram in the succession of their generall father Thare In the collaterall ligne the text of Iustinians nouell saith that the neuâ—we sonne to the brother succeedeth in such part as his deceased father might haue done why theÌ„ should we not obserue the same in things wholly vndeuided as in a Realme Empire Dutchie and such other like which can haue but one maister so that the neuewe taking his fathers roume
the Tyrants tormentors of their consciences and abusers of the honors that they haue receiued of our Kings and the Princes of the bloud of the house of France Let them marke the miserable ende of Absalon and Achitophel his counsaylor against the Maiestie of Dauid of Adonias Athalia and infinite others who with their conspiraties haue dyed in confusioÌ„ and miserie Oh noble Frenchmen will you abide in the world I will not say to looke vppon but which is more to hasten and aduance the cursed drift of the translation of the scepter of the Flowerdeluce out of the hands of your King and the Princes of his house to whom only you doe owe your condition your welth and your very life not in courtesie and honestie onely but by Gods expresse coÌ„mandement who hath therewith burdened your consciences Wil you more then villanously forgoe that great commendation which all nations in the world haue so greatly commeÌ„ded and honored in you for being more faithfull and ielous of the hononr and seruice of your Kings and Princes of their bloud then any nation that euer was vpon the face of the earth Will you stand as instruments and offer the ladder to those y â— wrongfully would make them selues Kinges and cause you to commit the most abhominable fellonie that euer was conspired Doe you not plainly see that those who doe sollicite you are not able to vphoulde you as hauing no other meanes then such as your enemies minister vnto theÌ„ to whom both you and they shall serue for pasture the next day after Is it not most certaine that they cannot pretend sith God hath giuen vs a King I will speake without sâ—atterie as wanting the honor to bee knowne of his Maiestie of whom the least of them can not saye the pertinent occasion of his discontentment but yet when GOD shall haue wrought his wil vpon him are ye not certain who ought to be his successor Liue you not vnder a Christian Monarchy that hath lawes established for that purpose Would you liue to be called corrupters and perturbers of the foundations of the Crowne vnder the which and by the succession whereof your fathers haue obteyned and left vnto you the name honor and title of Nobilitie which ye beare What weene you the curious posteritie may thinke of you when they finde it written that the French Nobilitie tooke Armes against their King to name vnto him a successor and vnder the pretence thereof to depriue him of all authoritie respect honor vnto him due euen by him that should succeede him according to the Salick law who with this declaration should stil be assisted by these firebraÌ„ds of this tyme to the ende to make him withstand and ecclipse the bright sunne of his Maiestie What opinion would you wish Christian Princes to conceiue of your fidelitie when they shall knowe that without regarde of your bond to this Crowne you shall haue assisted the enemies therof against your King and the Lawes of the Realme Would you your King should haue occasion of ielouzy against him whom they pretend to cause to be nominated who also by such as shall haue aduaunced him might bee perswaded to lift his hornes ouer high and so to become a censor ouer his Lorde To be briefe I tell you the world could neuer beare two SuÌ„nes What greater recoÌ„pence may ye hope for of straungers that you knowe not then of your naturall Princes whoÌ„ God by his holy wil hath established ouer you Is it not felicitie enough for you to bee borne men to bee made Christians to haue bene brought vp Frenchmen See ye not well enough that the Lord Cardinall of Bourbon is but the vizard and pretence to runne into armes for the glutting of their ambition there is great zeale and likelihood in their deedes wheÌ„ they would name a successor aboue 60. yeeres olde broken and crooked to succeede a young King healthie lustie moderate in his exercizes and maner of dyet yea and all this contrary to Iustice and the lawes not onely of this Realme but also of all other the best ordered Estates that euer were whereby together with infinite reasons I haue shewed you that it is the King of Nauarre to whom the same should apperteyne Shall I with Cicero speaking of Cesar and Pompey tell you all They here offer vnto vs y e Image of the Lord Cardinall of Bourbon but would set vp their owne They will with that good man arme them selues and become more Kings then he whoÌ„ they make shew to loue more then any other and yet doe they loue themselues better euen to the preiudice of your honor life memorie and reputation if ye take not heede so that God will vndoubtedly suffer them to be swallowed vp when they haue bene the occasions of infinite murders robberies and spoyles For the letting whereof as also of all other mishap or destruction that wee attende of such ciuill warres as vnder this contention are brewed let vs withdrawe our selues to God and most humbly beseech him to order our hearts in one consent according to his holy will to the ende according thereunto wee may acknowledge and embrace our King who is the same to whom next after God we owe al and after the diuine power ought to bee vnto vs aboue all Let vs also weete that next vnto him we are bound to haue respect vnto him whom it hath pleased God to cause to be borne into the world to gouerne vs in the Royall dignitie whensoeuer it should please him to call away our king without issue capable of y e Crowne and together with him whom for vs he hath elected and blessed in his mothers wombe let vs with one heart and minde crye peace peace bee among vs glory to the Lorde on high and peace and good will vnto men Amen FINIS Sigisbert in his Chron. Sigisb fol. 233. Idem fol. 595. Idem fol. 596. Idem fol. 597. Idem fol. 599. Idem fol. 601. Sigis. in his Chron. Heman in his contraction of Chron. Idem Sigis. fol. 611. Idem fol. 612. Idem fol. eodem Munster Cosmog Sanso in his Chron. Vign in the orig of the French leg Salic lib. p. ca. 26 Paul Aem. in Philip. Vales Concil vol. 2. cap. 4. fol. 739. I. vel agnatis ff de relig l. ius sepulchri C. cod Ign. in disput an rex Franc. recog snper Mol. in coÌ„s paris tit p. ff 8. Bald. in ff vnic de feud March Ioh. de Teran in lib. coÌ„t reb reg Tract p art p. coÌ„cil 9. 10. 11. 12. Guil. de Month. in tract de suc reg Franc. l. 9. ff desp l. 32. parag si quis spon sam ff de don int vir l. 66. ff de iur dot l. 65. ff de don int vir l. 30. ff quand die leg ccd â— 10. ff de cond de monst l. 13. parag si minor ff ad leg iul de adult l. 4. ff de rit nupt l. 17. 18 ff de
A CATHOLICKE APOLOGIE AGAINST THE LIBELS DECLARATIONS ADVICES AND CONSVLTATIONS MADE WRITTEN and published by those of the League perturbers of the quiet Estate of the Realme of France Who are risen since the decease of the late Monsier the Kings onely brother By E. D. L. I. C. Answere a foole according to his folly least he should thincke him selfe wise Prouerb 26. ⧠Imprinted at London for Edward Aggas THE PREFACE to the Reader O Christian and Catholick Frenchman neuer was there offered better meanes then at this time to discouer and smel out the subtelties of our enemies with what money Sathan vsually paieth his seruants whē we see some of thē so blinded that beeing vppon the poynt of their destruction they promise to themselues all assuraunce still coueting to conceale their abhominable wickednesse with sleights shiftes and lyes Neuerthelesse when they do most hide themselues they are foonest spied For to say the trueth what goodlier or more apparant pretēce could the perturbers of the quiet of our Fraunce take holde of then Religion and the reliefe of the people but as the enemie of trueth hath allured thē vnto him by lyes so hath hee for their repaste left them no other foode vpon his Table and yet doth that also faile them when they make it an vsuall messe and trueth remaineth Mistresse According hereto the lyes and horrible slaūders that to this day haue bene spued foorth against the King of Nauarre the Lord Prince of Condie by certaine straungers enemies to this Crowne the Royall Progenie vnder the pretence of zeale of Religion doth ouerthrowe them because cōtinually they haue sought to perswade our souraigne Lord the King and all the French Nation that these Princes were his euill seruaunts Rebels and disobedient persons enemies to his Estate in the preseruation and encrease whereof they haue greater interest then any other worldly person next vnto his Maiestie vnto whom they haue the honor very nerely to appertaine As also in truth we are hartely to giue GOD thankes especially in that after so many false and slaunderous inductions made vnto the most Christian Maiestie against these two Princes his good kinsmen and most faithfull subiects and seruants by whose reliefe this feeble weake and pale Realme hath oftentimes escaped falling it hath pleased him to open the Kings eyes to let him perceiue that all the illusions vnto him presented tended only to the ouerthrow of himself his Crowne and Estate in offering hetherto to his viewe one thing in liewe of an other For herevpon his Maiestie smelling out the causes of passed mischiefe hath finally in earnest done as the good Phisitiō who whē he seeth his Patient pale weake faint and grieuously sicke beginneth his cure with bringing him to his bed discharging him frō all painfull toyle causing him to take some rest euen so our King casting his eyes vpō his poore realm afflicted with ciuill warres which so long haue bene kindled vnder a false and slaunderous pretence to the end to begin the cure hath first sought to set it in peace that after some time of rest he might haue better opportunitie to heale the rest of the causes of the disease to put from about him those who vnder his authoritie had by their false wicked perswasiōs so hardly entreated it Which when his euill Councellors perceiued seeing that they could no longer goe forward in the same path they haue sought with open play to compasse that which so lōg they had craftely practised now haue plainly shewed that it was the State Crowne that they leueled at procuring the writing of diuers Libels aduices and consultations of their suffragās to the end not only to diminish and blemish the King of Nauarres vndoubted lawfull succession if it should please God to worke his will of the Kings Maiestie without leauing any issue Male but also to aduaūce their own false slaunderous and supposed titles and pretēces Howbeit although the said Lord King of Nauarre neede not yet to pleade his cause or presently to aunswere all these sleights and counsailes of the wicked in respect of the sufficient terme small likelihood of occasion euer to put the same in executiō cōsidering the King is thāks be to God yong in health in good disposition together with the small interest that in my opinion the sayd Lord King of Nauarre pretendeth to any such successiō as being a Prince both wise circumspect such a one as hath not so smal forecast but that he knoweth vndoubtedly that the greatest wealth reliefe good hap contentation that may redound to him cōsisteth in the prosperitie health long and happie life of the King his Lord to the ende perpetually to be vnder him the same that he is to liue vnder his liking in his protection wherby vnder the fauour wherof he shalbe not only preserued from the cōspiraties which his enemies worke against him but also which is more if it please God to encrease him he shal alwaies be by the King fauoured aduanced vnto whō he hath the honor to be the first Prince of his bloud Neuerthelesse how euer it be I do not thinke that any man at this day cā with reason and iudgement conceiue any bad or sinister opinion of the sayde Lorde King of Nauarre though he lay open his iust causes sith those that haue no right and for whō there can be no likelihood at all are so impudent rash vndiscreete as to bring to the barre a matter wherevpon euen their most affectionate seruāts durst not before haue thought which to saye the trueth is one of the cōsideratiōs that moued me to set hand to the pen to the aunswering of such diffamatorie Lybelles discourses aduices cōsultatiōs as within this yeere haue come to my hands and I protest that I haue done it without either cōmaundemēt or commission of the sayd Lord King of Nauarre vnto whom I neuer had the honor to approach neither is it of any affectiō or desire to aduaunce the Religiō that he professeth sith my self am and all my life time haue bene a Catholick and liued vnder the authoritie of the Apostolicke Romish Church But the onely cause hath bene that being borne a Frenchman I haue thought it my duetie to vphold the rightful cause of the French Princes vnto whome after his soueraigne Maiestie for whose seruice we are naturally bounde and holden to procure all honor wealth prosperitie to maintain and defend them from slaūders and such deceipts as Sathan would stirre vp against their excellēcie greatnesse besides that euery mā may perceiue that these Tragedies are kindled to the vtter ruine losse fubuertion of this miserable Realm so as the loue of my Countrey Christian piety and that compassiō that I take in beholding my fellow Citizens and my self with them in daunger to consume our selues in that fire that by those ciuill warres which vnder this
of the same were led by the will of God or whether therein they enterprised any thing repugnant thereto especially sith the question concerneth the maintenance of the peace liues and soules of so many millions of parsons who either might or are already lost vpon this quarell And this I will say more that sith the fault hath proceeded of our Prelates who haue fallen a sleepe and haue not mainteined the fare that they ought for the nourishment of their Flockes who being ignorant in the most part of the principles of their religion haue gone out of their ranck and doe perticulerly require the reasons thereof it is most necessary gently to giue them a taste of the same without sword or fire vntil the condemned bee at large heard in their defences and lawfully conuict 14 Moreouer I dare aduowe that in Realmes and Empires natural Succession receiued by the estates is of such force that the best and most Catholicke Parsons neuer enterprized against y ◠progresse of the same as occasions haue bene ministred no not for Heresie although it were condemned and with all solemnitie accursed by the Church of GOD Notwithstanding vndoubtedly by other dealing they might haue hoped for better and that they were in maner assured of manifold afflictions at hand Had not certein Bishops Arriens infected Constantius whē he succeeded his father although he were very yong What was the cause that Zeno being an heritick was neuerthelesse made Emperour after his father in lawe Leo but that the Empire was atteyned for his wife AriadNe and little Leo sonne to the said Zeno whom his Grandfather had instituted to bée his heire in consideration whereof the Christians were content to beare that affliction Constantine the third and the fifth whē they were called to the Empire were heretickes but yet in asmuch as they were lawfull successors to the last deceased the Church would not meddle with them When Anastaze the first was chosen no other cause moued y e Patriarke of Constantinople and the people to force a promise from him that afterward hee should be a Catholicke or at the least that he should not make any alteration or stirre vp any broyle in the Church of God but onely because he was then an Eutichian who was condemned by the Counsaile of Chalcedon and the same is the onely caution that you may exact or require of your King in cace he were other then a Catholicke sith the Christian Church neuer desired greater assurance of the aforenamed then their faith and royall promise I might bee tedious if I should rehearse vnto you an infinite number of other examples whereby euery one may manifestly perceiue that the holy Primitiue Church neuer accoumpted it so smal a matter to violate the lawes of the Estate or to habandon that obligation that wee owe to such a Prince as is either lawfull successor to the deceased or els solemnly elected Who is he that wil not thinke the Bishoppes of those former tymes that I speake of to haue bene farre more zealous in their charge and better liuers thē the most parte of ours in respect whereof they might euen with their credite only haue sooner perswaded the people that thei gouerned for Religion and godlinesse sake to haue expelled deposed and banished those hereticall Emperours aswel as to haue admitted them into that succession that by the politick order of the Empire was vnto them due either to obey or yeeld them al fidelitie was it want of power all the world being Christian euen in the Prime of the Church about one hundred yeeres after that the Temples of the Greeke Idols had bene shut vp whereby not so much as the memorie of them remained among the subiects of this great Monarchie I will by the way rehearse vnto you a Decree of the Church made for y e posteritie of Kings least you shuld thinck me either to be led by affection or to haue told you fables Heare therfore the wordes of the Fathers assembled in a Counsaile Like as the Insolencie of wicked Kings haue euermore bene odious and abominable to the subiects so haue the people alwaies liked wel of the prouident foresight of the good who therefore could suffer or beholde a Christian offending in that poinct or that were desirous to expell the posteritie or ligne Royall from such rights and dignities as thereto doe apperteyne Such dealing doe we therefore expressely forbid in fauour of the posteritie of the most excellent Prince Chintillus we doe renew and cōfirme the decree that was made the last yere at the Synode houlden in this Church concerning the loue and good will that euery one is bound to beare to the Kings ligne and to the defence and preseruation which all subiectes of the Estate doe owe thereto to the ende the successors be not maliciously defrauded of the merites of their predecessors in the augmentation of their Crowne or their great liberalitie toward their subiects Also that none doe enterprize to hurt them because it is meete that by the authoritie of a Counsaile we do graūt peace to the succession and posteritie of those by whose meanes and vnder whose protection wee haue aforetyme bene preserued Admit therfore that the Church made this Decree in respect of that obligation that she deemed the subiectes ought to the posteritie of their Kings either for the loue and reuerence of those that had well gouerned their Commonwealths euen as GOD who is the author and holder vp of Monarchies would neuer take the Scepter wholy from Iuda for his seruaunt Dauids sake yet if our selues would but call to mind so many good Kings of this race especially the father of the house of Bourbon the Lorde S. Lewes whō for his good life the Church hath canonized and whose memorie ought to be vnto vs holy honorable we should shewe our selues most wicked periurde vnthankful and disloyall persons if wee should seeke or but make any countenaunce to thinke vpon innouating any thing against this posteritie 15 Good men are not ignorant of the pretences that these great bucklers of the faith doe take hold of which are first that the King of Nauarre being King would polute subuert abolish Catholick Religiō in France and force his subiects to become huguenots But to say the trueth this vizard is lesse then nothing for his former behauiours will presently force vs to confesse the cōtrary because our selues haue seene with what importunacie he hath besought our Kinges as beeing their subiect and perswaded them to suffer him and his partakers to liue vnder their obedience in all libertie of conscience Wherefore then should we thinke that when he were soueraign he would practize against his people any enterprize repugnant to that lawe which himselfe being in their race sought to enioye vnder the Kings his Lords Shal we presume that such a Christiā wise Prince instructed in the feare of God would become a Tyrant torment the soules of his subiects against
also teacheth vs that quod alicui debetur certis modis deberi desinit among which is not to bee found the excommunicatioÌ„ of him to whom we acknowledge our selues bound for otherwise the vassal and subiect should reap benefite commoditie and discharge in the destruction and hinderance of his Lorde Besides that the excommunication tendeth not in worldly matters to impouerish the partie condemned but onely to depriue and declare hym vnworthy the fellowship of men or to be thought a member of the Church of GOD. He is also denounced such a one first to be an instruction and example to all other the faithfull when they shall consider the grauitie of the offence and thereby waie the publick slaunder arising thereof Secondly to driue the condemned to call to mind abhorre and be contrite for his offence seeing hym selfe deliuered into the handes of his mortall ennemy Satan and humbly to craue reconsiliation at the catholick Church from whence he is banished in exilio sinitimo said Alexander the Martir which wee may sufficiently learne by the auncient forme of satisfaction which the Primetiue Chnrch enioyned to the parson excommunicate that is to confesse his fault before the Priests and assembly of the faithfull in whose presence hee was reproued blamed and condemned to abyde in a certaine place without the communion aud assembly of the Church with certaine outwarde workes of a penetontiary as well in habit and behauiour as especially in his dyet in which forme he should exhibit petition and supplication both to the Priestes and to the whole coÌ„gregation to be forgiuen and vnbound from his offence whervpon the Church by the aduice of the Ministers thereof sometimes condemned hym in greate amends and so by litle and litle receiued hym againe as she thought good For at the first he was onely admitted to heare the worde of God after that he was receiued to the prayers of the Church and so consequently to the Communion of the faithfull finally by the imposition of the Priestes handes he was restored to his former estate and then was it not lawfull for any to reproch vnto him what was passed So as by this forme of excommunication and penance or satisfaction extract out of the auncient Counsailes of Ancira and Nice we may euidently iudge that it no way concerned the temporall goodes as of those that the Church hath not to dispose of neither did it importe other then the exemplary correction of the excoÌ„municated for the sâ—auÌ„der by his offence committed against the Church either els according to y e holy scripture for the subduing of the flesh whereby the soule may be saued in the day of our Lord Iesus Moreouer it seemeth that Gregorie the seauenth Innocent the third and other the high Priestes did so vnderstand it wheÌ„ in the excommunication of the Lords and of those that were conuersant and had dealings with theÌ„ they would not include their officers seruants and others who by necessitie doe owe them obedience as doe the vassalles and subiects of the Crowne who naturally and ciuilly are bound to their Kings and Princes So that the necessitie of their bondage exempteth theÌ„ by the iudgement of the Church out of the generall excommunication denouÌ„ced against all other persons that haue dealing with the excommunicated And perticulerly Innocent the third in his decretall Epistle written to the Doctors of Boulogne declareth that the debtes letters and obligatioÌ„s of excommunicated persons are not called in question neither are the debtors discharged of the same much lesse to be blamed for paying and satisfying their creditors considering that the necessitie of their obligatioÌ„s doe thereto bind them And there is no doubt but the priuate famelie and household of euery one is likewise a little Commonwealth aswell as the Commonwealth is a great famelie whereof the King that ruleth it is the father and defender so elected and ordeyned by God as father of the household among the children Innocent the third therfore exepted out of the excoÌ„munication of those that were conuersant with the condemned all such persons as by necessitie of the lawes of houshold were bounde to yeelde their due obedience which shall neuer bee more strickt great or commendable in the children of the household seruants toward the father of the household then it ought to bee in the subiects towarde their King or soueraigne Prince And effectually to shewe that the excommunication of the King dischargeth not his subiects from their vowed faith let vs call to mind the auncient examples meete and commodious for this argument The Emperour Theodosius the first was iustly excommunicated for the murder of the Inhabitants of Thessalonica His sonne Arcadius for expelling and deposing S. Iohn Chrisostome from the Church of Constantinople Zeno and Anastazius for being Eutichians Lothaire the first for his adulterie committed with Gualdrade which notwithstanding their subiects were not discharged of their bondes and oathes whereby they were to them bound against the which also they neuer made any difficultie to obeye those Emperours as their lawfull Lordes Dagobert King of Fraunce who became a Nero and after the first yeres of his quiet and Catholicke gouernement began about the yeere 637. to trouble the Churches destroye the Temples banish the Cleargie and commit an infinite number of other insolencies for the which Seuerinus Bishop of Roome did greatly reprooue him was not neuerthelesse driuen awaye by his subiects who with earnest prayer obteyned at the grace of God that this Prince repented and euer after serued God faithfully all the dayes of his life When Pope Celestin the third had excommunicated Phillip Augustus King of FraÌ„ce in y â— yere 1197. for forsaking without lawfull occasion his wife Isambergue sister to King Iohn of Denmarke his States and subiects did not neuerthelesse expell him or denye to acknowledge him to be their King and Soueraigne When Boniface the eight had cast foorth his poysoned Bull against Phillip the Faire the Nobles Prelates of the Realme assembled at Paris declâ—red that the Bishop of Rome had no authoritie so to doe When Pope Iulius the 2. excommunicated and interdicted King Lewes the 12. whome iustly wee terme father of the people the Prelates and Nobilitie assembled at Tours protested it to be lawful to coÌ„temne the said Thunderbolt the same notwithstanding did sweare to him their due faith and homage When King Henry the 2. of England was by Alexander the 3. excommunicated interdicted for banishing Thomas Archbishop of Canterbury whom after his death the Pope canonized yet was he not cast out froÌ„ his kingdome neither did his subiects with earnest affection denye him their accustomed obedience Iohn without Land King of the same Ile was neuer dispossed neither did his subiects molest him in respect of the curse that Innocent the third had denounced against him in the yere 1212. vntill he became a TyraÌ„t and extreme oppressor of the people who then beeing
prouoked vnder pretence of the sayd interdiction did him some displeasure Howbeit so soone as hee seemed willing to mend his maners toward the English natioÌ„ they fell at his feete and expulsed Lewes of Fraunce whom they had subrogated in his place so soone as the sayd Iohn was dead admitted his sonne Henry King Henry the eight of the same Ile was very faithfully obeyed by his subiects after that Pope Paule the third had excommunicated interdicted aggrauated and reaggrauated the curse against him wherby some were somewhat shaken froÌ„ his obedieÌ„ce Suâ—noo King of Denmarke about the yeere of our Lord 850. was iustly excoÌ„municated by y â— Bishop of Roscholech for becomming an Apostata and procuring to slay sundry of the Princes of his blood in the Church founded in the name of the holy Trinitie in the same Towne of Rhoscholech the entry into which Church this Bishop forbad him together with the communioÌ„ of the faithfull but he did not neuerthelesse depriue him of his Crowne neither did his subiects refuse him their faithfull seruice although Canutus and Wademarus two of his chiefest fauorites and priuy Counsailors who sought to share the Realme with Suercherus King of Sueden did thereto suborne them Brigerus King of Sueden who raigned about the yere 1300. was one of the most wicked and cruell Kings that could be especially against the Church and Churchmen but chiefly against Nicholas Archbishop of Vpsale whom together with the rest of his Bishops he committed to prison wherevpon they excommunicated him and Turgillus Canutus his Lieutenant general and author of his behauiours neuerthelesse the people though therby stirred vp against their King and hauing greater opportunitie to rebel and shake of the yoke of his obedience vnder the conduct of Wademarus and Henry his brothers who sought no better occasion to put out their brother would neuer hearken to theÌ„ neither hinder or become cruell to their naturall Lord so as the two brothers were forced to employe their other friendes for the executing of their inteÌ„ts against Brigerus whom when they had taken prisoner they were neuerthelesse compelled to force al the townes neither found they any one that would yeeld to them so greatly did the Subiectes of the Realme accoumpt themselues bound to the seruice of their King whom they knew to be wicked excommunicate and an euill liuer besides a prisoner and captiue in the power of his brethren whom in the ende they forced to set him at libertie to submit themselues to his obedience Of such force is the bond of good people to their King whatsoeuer he be In Poland Bolesâ—aus a Prince of most wicked life a commoÌ„ adulterer an enemie to the Church and Cleargie after Stanisâ—aus Bishop of Cracouy had often admonished him to amend was by him at length excommunicated whereat the King being offended did put the sayd Bishop to death for which cause Pope Gregory the seuenth did confirme and aggrauate the sayd excommunication with a generall interdiction against the Realme about the yeere 1079. yet did he still raigne by the consent and with the obedience of the Polonians ouer whom he ruled a whole yere and more vntill in his iourney to Ladislaus King of Hungary hee flewe himselfe peraduenture through the iust iudgement of God The Emperour Sigismund and his faction could neuer winne the Bohemians from the due affection that they ought to his brother Winceslaus their naturall King though vicious wicked filthy for the which offences through the practises of the said Sigismund he was often emprisoned and excommunicated by the Bishops of that couÌ„trey yea by the Electors deposed from the Empire so as in the ende he dyed in Boheme still taking the place order and qualitie Royall through the goodwill of his Subiects who deemed that the same could not perticulerly conteyne any dispensation to discharge the subiects therof of the oath and faith that to him they ought as also they may not be discharged froÌ„ his bondage but onely by death or his owne liberall cession which he would make to an other as did Albert King of Sueden about the yeere 1388. beeing prisoner to Margaret Queene of Denmark and Norway to whom he yeelded whatsoeuer his right to the Crowne of Gothland and Sueden whereby the States of the countrey sware their faith and homage to the sayde Margaret and after they had secretly enquired of their King sundry times solemnly desired him to shew them his mind or els to discharge them of the duetie wherein they stood bound to him although vndoubtedly the Suedens had great cause to seeke his mishap for all Histories doe agree that neuer Prince committed so many outrages and wrought so many iniuries to his subiects as had this Albert. It therefore remaineth that by the lawe of Nations the inuiolable keeping of the obligation that the subiectes doe owe to their naturall Prince and not to depart therefro at the appetite or sentence of others haue euen among the most barbarous people bene euermore obserued so as wee ought in respect of the bonde that wee owe him say of the King and his bloud as of Matrimonie whom God hath ioyned together let no man put a sunder 22 But let vs more perticulerly learne whether the sentence of excommunication were lawfully vppon reasonable cause and exemplary occasion pronounced against a King and done by the iudgements of many Popes of Roome within these fiue hundred yeeres against such Kings and Emperours to whoÌ„ they haue borne bad minds Although I thinke it not meete to ground any lawe vpon the examples of these men in troth full fraught with ambition more then humaine affection but it is requisite to examine this question by the rules of Gods lawe and politicke reason established for the preseruation of the societie of mankinde Herein therefore I say y t the sentence of excoÌ„municatioÌ„ denouÌ„ced against a King how iust soeuer the cause bee and conteyneth dispensation for the oath and duetie that the subiects do owe vnto him this licence and tolleration vnto the people graunted is repugnant to the lawe of God and all mans reason For sith the subiects are by Gods commandement bound to obeye their Princes whatsoeuer without any further enquirie of their consciences and behauiours they cannot by any tradition or permission of man either generall or perticuler be dispensed with because no man can enterprize vpon Gods ordenances and euery dispensation so graunted is voyde as beeing repugnant to the deuine prouidence As Pope Leo and Vrban haue very wisely confessed Especially sith this dispensation cannot bee put in execution without great sclaunder and shedding of bloud by reason of such warres and quarels as will be raysed through the rebellion of the Subiects against their Prince their Kings resistance not onely in respect of his conscience but also for his Estate and the defence of his Crowne In such necessities therefore Pope Gelasius teacheth vs that we are especially