Consequence from Scripture is either a necessary Consequence and being according to Scripture is of as full force as any plain Scripture as John Rogers granted in his Answer to the first Question or else it is a Consequence seemingly deduced from Scripture but is really a perverting of and contrary to the Scripture as some unlearned and unstable who wrest the Scriptures to their own destruction 2 Pet. 3.16 and then it is far off from being of the same force with the Scripture But we have given Iohn Rogers necessary deductions from plain Scriptures in the Old and New Testament to prove that the first day of the week is the Lords day and our Christian Sabbath and it is in vain for Iohn R. to deny this until the Arguments be confuted Qu 7. Iohn Rogers his seventh Question Whether or no there be a possibility to take out the day commanded out of the fourth Commandment and put in one of the six working dayes in the room thereof and not alter one jott or one tittle of the former Law if there be a possibility of such a thing or ever such a thing was I desire a Copy of it may be sent me to the Prison as soon as may be Ans My Answer to this seventh Question is that I have already proved in my Reply to his Answer to the tenth Question that this change of the Sabbath from the seventh day to the first day of the week is no destructive but a perfecting change and so far from destroying the Law in a jott or tittle of it that it is a fulfilling of the Law as really and fully as the performances of Prophecies are the fulfilling of Prophecies and it is too late for John Rogers now to question whither that be possible to be done which is already certainly performed and done as we have proved already and as for some fragments of Objections and Cavils which I. R. hath gathered out of some late Authors and yet if all these be put together he is unable to defend his seventh day Sabbath And it is as possible for I. R. to hinder the charge of the Moon as he can hinder the change of the seventh day Sabbath seeing it is founded upon the works of Creation which is given to change but who can hinder the stability immutability of the first day of the Week the Lords day which is grounded upon the unchangeable work of our Redeemer according to an immutable and everlasting Covenant And if it be not possible for I. R. yet to see the reason of this but admire at his legal light and despise Gospel visions Behold ye despisers wonder and perish for I work a work in your dayes a work which you shall in no wise believe though a man declare it unto you Act. 13.41 and yet those who have the Revelations of the Spirit of Wisdom in the Gospel shall say this is the Lords doings it is marvellous in our eyes this is the day which the Lord hath made Save now I beseech thee O Lord blessed is he that cometh in the Name of the Lord Psal 118.23 24 25 26. And if he that despised the Law of Moses and particularly did prophane the seventh day Sabbath was so severely punished as Iohn R. did note of how much sorer punishment shall he be thought worthy who hath despised the Gospel Commandment and particularly the Lords day the Christian Sabbath the Ordinance and Institution of Christ which he hath by his Blood purchased Heb. 10.28 29. And thus I have done likewise with Iohn R. his Questions at present and if I. R. or any for him shall undertake to make a Reply to that which hath been said I expect they should answer my Arguments interminis according as they are in the frame and method of them I do not intend for the future to trouble my self with an Answer to such Lax Discourses as have nothing of the frame of an Argument with them And thus at present I have done speaking to Man but this I may say Oh Lord I have not desired the woful day that which came out of my â—ips was right before thee be not thou a terror to me thou art my hope in the day of evil Jerem. 17.16 17. And if in any thing I have said for matter or manner or in any respect whatsoever I have erred let it not be confirmed but confuted and let me be convinced but if that which hath been said be according to thy Holy Word revealed by the Apostâ—es of the Lord Jesus let those who do or shall oppose be converted and repent of this their Wickedness and pray God if perhaps the thought of their heart may be forgiven them or else let them be confounded and cut off Act. 8.22 Gal. 5.12 And whereas the Plague is come into a neighbouring Plantation and some Families already shut up the Lord have mercy upon them and humble us deeply for our great unfruitfulness and especially for our prophanation of the Lords Dâ—y what is the cauâ—e of this so fierce wrath to let loose a Spirit of Error anâ— Delusion thus to rage that those who received not the love of the truth may be delivered up to believe a lye and damned that have pleasure in unrighteousnesâ— 2 Thess 10.11 12 And whilst some rise up that they might cast down the Christian Sabbath under a pretence of advancing the seventh day Sabbath Oh Lord let not the evil one prevail with the prophaneness of others to cause them to neglect holy time and holy things Do good O Lord to those that are good and to them that are upright in their hearts As for such as turn aside to their crooked wayes the Lord shall lead them forth with the workers of iniquity but peace shall be upon Israel Psal 125.4 5. Decemb. 12. 1682. JAMES FITCH Senior FINIS
given to the Lord is too manifest and we are prone through fear or favour or not observance to neglect admonishing such the Church doth appoint some Brethren to take notice of such Children and timely meekly wisely and faithfully to admonish them and their Parents as the matter shall require and if private means doth not prevail then to manage the complaint orderly in other steps Fifthly Whereas the Sacrament of the Lords Supper the Seal of Communion ought oâ—â—en to be celebrated for the prevention of neglect we do determine God granting opportunity that we will be in the use of that Ordinance once in every six Weeks Sixthly Whereas it is too often seen that many through fear or favour or sense of inability do behave themsâ—lves to their Brethren as if they were not concerned in that gâ—est Duty of Admonishing their Brother for offensive behaviours unless it be in cases whâ—rein they themselves suffer wrong and hâ—nce love decayeth and offences abound and Christs Government in works denied We do solâ—mnly prâ—mise that we will in any wâ—sâ— rebuke aâ—d â—oâ— suffer sin to rest upon our Broâ—her but deal faithfully according to Christâ— Order And seeing we feel by woful Experience how prâ—ne we are soon to forget the works of the Lord and our own Vows We do agree and determine that this Writing or Contents of it shall be once in every Year read in a Day of Fasting and Prayer before the Lord and his Congregation and shall leave it with our Children that they do the same in their solemn dayes of mourning before the Lord that they may never forget how their Fathers ready to perish in a strange Land and with sore grief and trembling of heart and yet with hope in the tender mercy and good will of him who dwelt in the burning Bush did thus solemnly renew their Covenant with God And that our Children after us may not provoke the Lord and be cast off as a degenerate Off-spring but may tremble at the Commandment of God and learn to place their hope in him who although he hath given us a Cup of Astonishment to drink yet will display his Banner over them who fear him A BRIEF DISCOURSE Proving that the First Day of the Week is the Christian Sabbath Wherein also the Objections of the Anti-Christian Sabbatarians of late risen up in Connecticut Colony are refuted By Mr. James Fitch Pastor of the Church in Norwich in New-England Gal. 4.10 11. Ye observe dayes and moneths and times and years I am afraid of you lest I have bestowed upon you labour in vain Gal. 5.12 I would they were even cut off which trouble you Col. 2.16 17. Let no man therefore judge you in meat or in drink or in respect of an holy day or of the New Moon or of the Sabbath dayes Which are a shadow of things to come but the body is of Christ Printed in the Year 1683. ARguments Grounded upon the Word of God to prove that the First Day of the Week is by Divine Appointment the Day separated for Holy Worship and ought to be kept Holy unto the Lord according to the Rules of Sanctifying the Sabbath and consequently the Cessation of the seventh Day Sabbath in these Gospel Dayes And then a Reply to John Rogers his Answers to some Questions sent to him from the Honourable Governour of Connecticut and likewise an Answer to John R. his seven Questions with which he concluded Concerning the Arguments the Question is not now concerning the Name whether to be called a Christian Sabbath which some take to be Analogically a resemblance to the Jewish Sabbath or whither to be called the Lords Day which some have thought to be a more Gospel Name But the Subject of our Discourse at this time is not concerning the Name but the thing and far be it from me to imagine that I can add any thing to or do so well as those Worthies Doctor Bound Mr. Abbot Dr. Owen Mr. Baxter Mr. Shepard and others have done in their Learned Elaborate Discourses upon this Subject only I shall take some Arguments which to me seem most suitable to my present purpose 1. The first is from Rev. 1.10 in which the Apostle declared that he was in the Spirit on the Lords Day For the opening of which words to make way for the Argument we may Consider First It was some particular Day in the week which the Apostle calls the Lords Day for his Scope is to notifie at what particular time he had the Visions and Revelations of so great concernment to all the Churches in all Ages to the end of the World and this he calleth the Lords Day Arg. Which was either some particular day or some general name applicable to any day of divine Vision if so then the answer should be the same with the Question and prove and make evident nothing for the question is what day he had these divine visions and the Answer then should be in the day of divine Visions far be it from us to think that the Apostle guided by the Spirit of God in every word he said could speak such nonsence therefore it must be understood of some particular day in the week 2. Secondly It was some particular Day well known to the Churches of Christ to whom he wrote by that name of the Lords Day Arg. For it was a Day well known to the Churches by the name of the Lords Day or else unknown and obscure and would want an Exposition far be it likewise from us to think that the Apostle guided by the Spirit of God and having undertaken to make known to the Churches in what particular Day he had those Divine Revelations should put an obscure and unknown name upon the Day by which the Churches could not know what he meant therefore it is to be understood of a particular day well known to the Churches of Christ 3. Thirdly This particular Day so well known to the Churches by the name of the Lords Day was a Day of divine Institution a Holy Day Arg. For it is called the Lords Day either because it was a day of divine Revelation or a Day by divine Institution but it was not called the Lords Day because it was a day of divine Revelation for as we heard before this would be to speak nonsense and nothing to the Question therefore it was called the Lords Day because it was so by divine Institution and so a Holy Day Take one Argument more for the clearing of this That which is honoured by the Holy Ghost in the Apostle with the same honourable and holy Title and Name as belongs to the Lords Supper and other holy Institutions is holy as these are Arg. The reason is for if the Holy Ghost should honour this particular Day with as sacred a Name of Honour as Ordinances are and yet not be a holy Day it would be to honour it above its due and consequently to degrade other divine Institutions but
solemn and steady attendance to these duties Job 15.9 unless it be in some fit of distress and then they cry to God and say Arise and save us Jer. 2.27 2. Or if they do daily attend to these Duties and yet neglect that which is of most personal and special concernment to their own Souls you may be in a secret place with a Friend and have much discourse and that in secret and yet not one word of secret things but that which any one may hear likewise you may be in prayer alone in secret and yet not one word of that which is of most secret concernment to your Soul but that which may be exprest before a Family or a Congregation and thus one principal end of Secret Prayer is lost which respecteth the Confession of secret sins Psal 19.12 and the petitioning for those personal and secret favours which may not so conveniently be exprest before others Psal 38.9 But the specialty intended in the handling of this is to shew how far the neglect of these secret Duties doth argue a declension from Religion 1. Those who neglect secret Duties have lost one main evidence of sincere worshipping of God not only because they live in the neglect of a known command of Christ Matth. 6.6 and not only because they do decline from the usual practice of the godly who are wont to perform these secret duties daily morning and evening and sometimes thrice a day Psal 55.17 Dan. 6.10 but how is it possible these can have an evidence of sincere worshipping of God seeing they attend no worship but what is before men and therefore must be judged to act the part of a Hypocrite so our Saviour Christ reasoneth Mat. 6.5 2. Those who neglect these secret Duties have lost the sense of personal inward Soul-difficulties for whosoever feels in a broken-hearted manner his Soul pinched and press'd with difficulties he must and will have an out-let by secret Prayer Acts 9.11 Behold he Prayeth he embraceth Prayer not only as a duty but as a gracious liberty but amongst his Soul difficulties he ever finds some which cannot be so particularly and expediently reached but by secret Prayer and calleth for a praying apart Zech. 12.14 but those who neglect these secret duties are past feeling of these difficulties and as they feel no such need of secret prayer so Christ passeth by them as those who have no work for Christ to do for them in secret and what will they do in that time when Hezekiah like they must turn their face towards the wall and then if secret prayer be not the means to take the last step right they fall into the everlasting pit Isai 38.2 3. These have lost the presence of Christ in secret and as they have forsaken him in secret so he will forsake them openly There are many are very desirous to hold the presence of Christ openly although they neglect his presence in secret but this cannot be they have no promise and grounded hope of his presence openly who do neglect the means of his presence in secret Mat. 6.5 Apostasie first beginneth in closets and secret places and that which is in secret evil in the sight of God 2 King 17.9 and then behold greater and more open abominations than these And so we proceed to the Second 2. A neglect of Family Duties as Prayer in the Family morning and evening and are of the number of those Families which do not call upon the Name of God Jer. 10.25 or neglect reading the Word of God daily in the Family or occasional repeating of Sermons or of that daily instructing the Family by Catechising or other profitable means as is commanded Deut. 6.7 and this neglect is 1. Either total and are under the same sentence of wrath with the Heathen and are heathenish Families Jer. 10.25 2. Or those who are inconstant in these Duties if prayer in the evening yet none in the morning or if prayer yet have strangely forgot that by Word and Prayer all is sanctified 1 Tim. 4.5 but the specialty I intend in this is not so much to prove these to be duties for who knoweth not this who knoweth any thing of the Word of God and of the practice of godly Families but let us consider how far a neglect of these doth argue Apostacy from Religion 1. These want true sanctified love to their Families the natural love doth incline them to take care and provide for their Families in things of concernment to the outward Man 1 Tim. 5.8 Otherwise they are worse than an Infidel and if they had true sanctified love to their families this would make them as readily to take care for their Families in their Soul concernments and Abraham-like as a head of the Family to instruct yea command an attendance to the great things of God Gen. 18.19 but these want natural affection truly sanctified 2. These want love to God and to their own Souls 1. They want love to God for this would dispose them to a through care to bring up their Family in the nurture and admonition of the Lord Eph. 6.4 2. They want love to their own Souls it s not possible for one to pitty his own Soul but presently he will pitty and take care of the Souls of others especially of those who are nearly related to him if a Master of a Family be under a strong impression and a Bowel melting working of a Spirit of love to his own Soul Ephraim-like to bemoan himself Jer. 31.18 he will then need no other motive to make him pray in his Family Instruct Catechise and use all possible means for the good of his Family 3. These want true love to Church and Common-wealth they cannot but know that such as Families are such at last the Church and Common-wealth must be How can it be that a Master of Family who liveth in neglect of Family Duties should prove a true Friend to the purity and power of Religion in Church or to a true pious Government in the Common wealth he that will not serve God in his own House will not be a true Servant of God in the house of the Lord nor in the Common wealth let us view well Joshuah's speech and practice Josh 24.15 and what David saith Psal 101.2 The third Particular followeth and that is a neglect of private Christian Meetings 1. As those set and solemn Meetings for Conference about the great things of God and to pray together and sometimes adding Fasting and Prayer 2. Or those occasional Meetings of Christians taking opportunities as they have occasions one with another to converse about their Soul concerns And the neglect of these is either 1. Total there are some who have wholly forsaken these Assembling of themselves together or 2. If they hold up some set Meetings yet as to those intimate Discourses by laying together their Observations of the times and other Soul-concerns as those Jewels spoken of in Mal. 3.16 from these they
their backs upon the visible Covenant and the administrations of it do by their practice disown God and say the true God is not their God for how can God be their God but by Covenant and what is the Church Covenant but an Administration of the Covenant of Grace and that Soul who doth by words or works by opinion or practise turn away from the Covenant by neglecting to prepare for it or take hold of it is a stranger from the Covenant and liveth without God Eph. 2.12 and if by his Parentage and Birth he is in visible Covenant and when grown up yet doeth neglect to look after it or take hold of it he doth by his practise despise his Birth right and the time may come when he may seek for a Blessing with tears and yet find no place of Repentance Heb. 12.16 17. 2. Or those who neglect the Sacrament of the Lords Supper and can content themselves to be Baptized or to have their Children Baptized but are insensible of the need of the Lords Supper that great Seal of Communion with Christ and his Church 1 Cor. 10.16 17. or that hastening to this great Ordinance without due and that worthy preparation in the way of self-examination and discerning the Lords body and these do eat and drink their own damnation 1 Cor. 11.29 and if the Church doth admit those to the Lords Table who are visibly unworthy they will provoke the Lord against them as the Church at Corinth did that for this cause many amongst them were weak and many sickly and some were taken away by death 1 Cor. 11.30 3. Or those who in their Church Relation do live in the neglect of Church Discipline that is they give offence but will not give satissaction Mat. 5.23 or they will take offence but not manage it according to Christs Order Mat. 18.15 Lev. 19.19 and whatever their goodly words are yet they are but as a Hind let loose Gen. 49.21 and their works say they will not have Christ to rule over them and the quarrel the Lord hath against these the alâ—rementioned is that which is called the quarrel of his Covenant Lev. 26.25 a most searful quarrel And to conclude this Discourse we may consider 1. Some do despise the Covenant in the administrations of it or by their practice profess that the Covenant is not worthy of their care labour and cost and it may be drop some scoff or mocking expression but will not seek the Lord in the way of his Covenant these are in the high way to that unpardonable sin against the Holy Ghost of counting the blood of the Covenant an unholy thing and of doing despite to the spirit of Grace Heb. 10.27 28. 2. Some have visibly taken hold of the Covenant but do live in the breach of it Psal 78.37 38. 50.16 17. and the Lord saith what hast thou to do to take my Covenant into thy mouth seeing thou hatest instructions and castest my words behind thee And the quarrel the Lord hath against a People or particular persons whether it be for despising his Covenant or breach of Covenant ever implieth 1. These are guilty of sinning against the greatest love for the love of God in condescending to enter into Covenant with a sinner is the highest act of love and to despise this Covenant or the things of it or live in the breach of it is to spit reproach and contempt in the most beautiful face of divine Love do you thus require the Lord O foolish People and unwise Deut. 32.6 2. These sin against the only Remedy What cure and relief can there be for sinners but from Christ and how doth Christ relieve but in the way of his Covenant in the administration of it how can those escape who neglect this great Salvation Heb. 2.3 and hence follows the greatest punishment for the quarrel of the Covenant Amos 3.3 You I have known of all the Families of the Earth and you I will punish when the inquiry is made when they see what plagues sicknesses come upon the Land wherefore hath the Lord done thus to this Land and the Answer is because they have forsaken the Covenant of the Lord God of their Fathers Deut. 29.23 24 25. and thus we see how Apostasie doth shew it self in the degrees of it 1. How gradual it is First A growing cold in secret Duties then remiss and formal in Family duties and at length slighty and cold in communion with Saints in private and publick Ordinances and at last twice dead and pulled up by the roots Jude 12. they were dead as to a principle of spiritual life as all are by nature and they are dead as to the life and zeal of visible Profession which they sometimes had 2. As these declensions are gradual so they grow on upon an Apostatizing people insensibly at first somewhat afraid and startled but by a customary declension grow insensible of the danger and so ready to heal themselves with lazy desires and pretended good meanings and formal covenantings until at last they are left to a good opinion of their state that they say Wherein shall they return as if they were not convinced although from the dayes of their Fathers they had gone away from the Ordinances of the Lord and not kept them in that purity and power as they were left to them by their Fathers Mal. 3.7 Jer 8.5 6. In the next place follows the consideration of the bitter fruits of Apostasie as they are specified in the advertisement of our Rulers and for the clearing the particulars let us especially observe how it comes to pass that a People living under the means of Grace are left to those abominations and the Question in the first place is How it comes to pass that some living under the means of grace are left to gross Ignorance or abuse of their light and knowledge Ans Because some under the means of Grace have rejected the knowledge of God and therefore are left to gross ignorance or not loving truth as truth and therefore are left to abuse their light and knowledge to their destruction 1. Some have rejected knowledge that its become the object of their hatred as if instruction was not worthy of their love and if they be reproved they do despise reproof and the reprover and will not obey the voice of their Teachers Prov. 5.12 13. the reading good Books the Writing and Repeating of Sermons the Schools of Learning the conversing with the wise and all good means of knowledge in their hearts they despise Prov. 1.22 How long ye simple ones will ye love simplicity and scorners delight in scorning and fools hate knowledge Prov. 1.22 2. The punishment upon these followeth therefore they are left to a sottish ignorance they have not so much light as shall keep them from sottish and bruitish ignorance Jer. 4.22 they are sottish Children they have no understanding Jer. 5.4 surely they are poor and foolish they know
not the way of the Lord and the judgement of their God they have rejected the knowledge of God and are therefore left to the darkness of gross Ignorance A second sort are those upon whose Consciences the light hath shined but have not loved truth as truth these have knowledge and will be searching and proving excellent things and having a form of knowledge may be guids to the blind and hold forth light to those who are in darkness Rom. 2.18 19 20. and these love to live under an able Ministry and will uphold Schools of Leaaning and be in the use of all means of knowledge but yet never did receive the love of the truth 2 Thes 2.10 the truth it self and the true knowledge of it was never the ultimate and principal object of their love but only a mediate object that by means of their light and knowledge they set up advance and serve some Idol in their hearts but do not like to retian to God in knowledge as its the knowledge of God Rom. 1.28 2. The punishment upon these is therefore they are left to abuse their light and knowledge to their destruction either to pride and vain glory their knowledge hath puffed them up 1 Cor. 8.1 or they are by means of their light become the more subtile to devise coverts for sin and the more slye in opposing secretly the life and power of Godliness the more crafty to deceive others and to cheat their own Souls the more wise to do evil but to do good they have no knowledge and are blinded at last with self conceitedness and say the Law of the Lord is with them but they have rejected the Word of the Lord and what wisdome is in them Jer. 8.8 9. 1. Some truths of greatest concernment to them they shall not see but groap for light at noon day as if it were night Deut. 28.29 Isai 59.10 2. Those Truths which they do see yet they shall be left to misapply pervert and wrest to their destruction Act. 13.10 11. 2 Pet. 3.16 3. Those Truths which they do apply rightly yet their hearts shall not be affected with them and not be reformed by them but to them it shall be as if they knew nothing Isai 6.8 9. these have often perverted their understanding and abused their knowledge and their understanding and knowledge shall pervert and mislead them Isai 47.10 The second follows concerning Prophaneness the Question is How it comes to pass that some under the means of Grace are givtn up to Prophaneness The Answer is Because some under the means of Grace have rejected saving Grace in the Gospel and therefore the Lord withdraws common restraining Grace from them and they become prophane 1. Some are prophane although they live under the means of Grace these will not shew a civil respect to Religion and that good manners which civility will teach their words are scornful and mocking abusing the Holy Scriptures in a jesting and deriding manner like those Scoffers who said where is the promise of his coming 2 Pet. 3.3 4. these are a pest and a most dangerous infection in societies by their evil communication do corrupt good manners 1 Cor. 15.33 their Countenance Gestures and Lives do declare them to be like a mocking Ishmael or prophane Esau Heb. 12.15 16. look diligently lest any man fail of the Grace of God lest there be any Fornicator or Prophane Person as Esau 2. These have rejected saving Grace in the Gospel the God of all Grace by the means of his Grace the Ordinances and by the gracious Examples of the godly seconded by some afflicting providences and sometimes with convictions and terrors of Conscience hath been striving with these but they would not hearken to his voice and would have none of him and his saving Grace and therefore are given up to their hearts lusts Psal 81.11 12. Wo unto thee wilt thou not be clean when will it once be Jer. 13.27 3. Hence the Lord hath withdrawn restraining Grace that those who reject saving Grace in the Gospel and will not live as becometh godly men the Lord withdraws common restraining Grace from them that they shall not live as becometh men this is the reason why some are so lewdly filthy that in their filthiness is lewdness because they would not be purged and therefore the Lord saith they shall not be purged but the Lords fury shall rest upon them Ezek. 24.13 this is the reason why some under the means of Grace are more prophane than some others who enjoy no such means to reform them and that they are become more prophane then before they enjoyed the means of Grace because they have provoked the Lord by their resistings of the strivings of the Spirit of Grace to give them up to most horrid and hellish prophanenss that as Israel's abominations shall exceed the filth of Samaria and Sodom Ezek. 16.51 and of this bitter fruit of Apostasie that Man of God of most blessed memory Mr Thomas Hooker was wont frequently to warn New-England saying do you wonder that some in New-England are left to such abominations I tell you that some in New-England will be given up to greater prophaneness His Sermons upon Psal 81.11 12 and Rom. 1.28 do at large declare this The third bitter fruit concerning gross neglects of relative Duties And the Question is Why are some under the means of Grace left to those palpable neglects of relative Duties in Family Church and Common-Wealth The Answer Because some under the means of Grace living in neglect of Duties towards God and of duties towards others in the Lord its just with the Lord to leave them to gross neglects of relative duties one towards another 1. There are some who though they enjoy the means of Grace yet they live in the neglect of duties in Relation to the God of Grace he hath profered a holy Marriage Covenant to them and himself as the only suitable March and Husband for the immortal Soul Isai 54.5 but they have loved Strangers and after them they will go Jer. 2.25 neither will they honour him as a Father nor fear him as their Master but despise his Name Mal. 1.6 if they call him their God yet they cast off the thing that is good Hos 8.2.5 2. Hence it follows these never did perform duties in relation to others in the Lord for this is the Religious and true Gospel band in all Relations Husbands love your Wives as Christ loved his Church Eph. 5.25 Wives submit your selves to your Husbands as is fit in the Lord Col. 3.18 Children obey your Parents in the Lord Ephes 6.1 Servants obey your Masters in singleness of heart fearing the Lord Col. 3.22 But those who do not conscientiously attend duties in Relation to the Lord do feel no such Religious band upon their hearts and Consciences in relation to others but act only as moved by some natural or moral Principles which are too weak to resist the violence of temptations
Job for trial chiefly and when affliction cometh for probation and trial principally it will appear upon examination that the person afflicted is found walking in his uprightness before God Iob 1.8 12. and in the night of affliction there shall be nothing found against this afflicted Saint but that which is consistent with uprightness Psal 17.3 but who is able to make this desence for New-England as to the generality of them and as for those who are called the upright what their innocency is and what their guilt is this will appear in that which is in the place of it spoken concerning the divers manners and sorts of guilt 2. Neither did New England in the tiâ—e of the Wars suffer as witnesses for righteousness sake although so far as the Antichristian Malice of some might be stirring up and working in and with the rage of the Heathen and might by the provocations of New England against the Lord take occasion to persecute that of Christ and the Christian Religion which yet remained in the Churches of Christ in the Wilderness in this respect Meat came out of the Eâ—â—er to the godly of the Land and they might say as that holy Martyr Bradford said It is not the condemnation of Bradford simply intended by the Adversary but Christ and Truth and Bradford is nothing but an instrument in which Christ and Truth is condemned and persecuted by the Adversary and in this respect the Lord saith and hath and will do for his People as sometimes he said by the Prophet Zech. 1.15 I am very sore displeased with the Heathen for I was a little displeased and they helped forward their affliction But yet our sins must be confessed to be the Traitors which gave the opportunity into the hands of our Enemies against us and the Lord said of us as sometimes of that People Isai 42.24 Who gave Jacob to the spoil and Israel to the Robbers did not the Lord be against whom we have sinned In the next place Affirmatively concerning the causes of the Judgements upon New-England that New-England is found guilty of those very sins mentioned in the writing of our Rulers and that these are the causes of those judgements will be made most manifest if we consider the divers manners and wayes by which a People are involved in guilt 1. Some are guilty by actual Commission and that is 1. Either openly after the manner of the Prophane sort whose Countenance doth witness against them and they declare their sin as Sodom they hide it not wo unto their Soul Isai 3.9 2. Or secretly and sometimes God doth inflict publick Judgements upon a People for secret sins and that is 1. When they are such sins as are not in the nature and kind of themsecret but as they are by the transgressor bound up and hiden by some deceiving Excuses and fallacious pretences Hos 13.12 and the ignorance these pretend is wilful and they are condemned by the Lord for willing ignorance 2 Pet. 3.5 2. Or such secret sins as go before the open sins and the others do follow them and together do provoke the Lord 2 King 17.9 and cannot be hid 1 Tim. 5.25 both these openly or secretly are guilty of provocations by actual Commission 2. Some are guilty by way of approbation by consenting Psal 50.18 or countenancing and thus Jehosaphat's love unto and helping of ungodly Ahab did provoke the Lord to wrath against him 2 Chron. 19.2 3. Some are guilty by way of toleration and thus Solomon did provoke the Lord to wrath by his tolerating of the Idolatry of his Wives 1 King 11.4 4. Some are guilty by their omission and neglect of means 1. To prevent the provocations and thus some able Expositors have thought that in this sense it was that Israel became guilty and were blamed by the Lord himself for taking the accursed thing even that which was taken by Achan Josh 7.11 2. Or a neglect of means to reform the provocations committed and thus Ely's neglect of a through reforming and removing the abominations of his Sons did provoke the Lord to wrath against him and his house 1 Sam. 2.22 23. Many in New-England are guilty of provoking sins by actual Commission and these kindle the fire and are Fire brands in the hand of Gods wrath and some by approbation do blow up the fire and are as the bellows to make the fire of Gods wrath burn and some by toleration do in their practise say Let the fire burn will do nothing to quench it and at last some come who with their luke warmness and cold practices are but as a dish of water dropping upon a great and vehement flame but doth nothing effectually to extinguish the fire of wrath kindled and flaming by reason of provoking sins the Lord guid every one of us by his Spirit to consider and in a self-examining manner to see and say What have I done to provoke the Lord Jer. 8.5 6. But as to fact the provocations of New-England are proved by many witnesses 1. The witness of the Ministry especially upon most solemn occasions in the most publick assembly have as watchmen warned us of the Lords controversie against New-England and of the evil coming upon them Ezek. 33.7 and this warning was given not only since the Wars but before that evil day come 2. Witness that great Hand writing of our Ruleâ— published by their order in the Congregations of this Colony in a day of Fasting Prayer in that calamitous year 1675. and many Writings and Orders since that calling for a renewed Confession of those crying abominations specified in that Writing and explained in our former Discourse 3. Witness the sighing of those whom the Lord hath marked in our Ierusalem because they do afflict and vex their righteous Souls for the provocations they see or hear of Ezek 9.4 4. Witness the self condemnation the generality of Professors have received within themselves and do frequently at this day express it one to another saying we and our posterity are an undone people if more be not done for Reformation then yet is done yea who can say and prove it that there hath been any considerable reformation wrought in any one matter of weight after all that the Lord hath spoken and done against us But to conclude this Discourse let us state one Question more Qu. What are the Reasons why the work of Reformation doth not proceed but is hindred after these solemn Advertisements by our godly Rulers and after all the awful warnings from the Lords uplifted hand Ans Because some do not see what ought to be reformed some who see but have no heart to this work some who have a heart but little strength some who have strength but do not agree to carry on together every one his part or they spend their labour upon a people who are under the power of Judicial impenitency 1. Some do not see what ought to be reformed and those are either 1.
remaineth John 9 41. Bot to help the mind and memory of those who are sensible of their weakness but are willing to hear and see Let us gather up briefly that which hath been said out of Rev. 1.10 as followeth The day called the Lords Day is some particular day well known to the Churches of Christ otherwise it was in vain and to no purpose for the Apostles to have spoken a word of the Day And this day called the Lords day was a Holy Day otherwise it could not have the holy name proper unto holy things and holy time And that the day called the Lords Day is the first day of the week this hath been proved both by the Testimonies of all Churches in all ages though cavelled against by some in late times yet this their Testimony may well pass for legal Testimony in any Court of Justice upon Earth and they who oppose it must be legally condemned for Liars And more then all this it hath been infallably proved by the Word of God and his Works that the first day of the Week is the very day which the Lord by his Prophets foretold he would make to be the day in which above all other dayes we should rejoyce Psal 118 24. And with his Almighty hand he hath performed it by the working of his mighty power which he wrought in Christ Jesus when he raised him from the dead Eph. 1.20 And in this very day revealing himself to his Disciples as the exalted head of his Church and People And in this very day Commissioning his Apostles and breathing the Holy Ghost in the same day upon them to impower and enable them in all things respecting their work as Apostles of Christ and particularly by the Holy Ghost guiding the Apostles to settle the first day of the Week in all the Churches of Christ as it is the Lords day and our Christian Sabbath but more of this in that which followeth And thus that which the Lord hath wrought according to his Word may well pass or divine Testimony in the Court of Consecience that the first day of the week is by Divine Institution the Lords Day and our Christian Sabbath And now let us proceed in the second place to prove that the first day of the week which the Lord hath made by his word and works to be the Lords Day and our Christian Sabbath was settled by the Apostles in all the Churches in the primitive time First By their Doctrine Secondly By their Practice 1. By their Doctrine for for the clearing of this let us consider Heb. 4.8.9 Where the Apostle doth by his Doctrine inform us of a Rest which remaineth to the People of God and another day of Rest and to make way for the Argument let us open that Scripture 1. First he speaks of a Sabbatism so the Word in the Original is a Rest resembled by the seventh day Rest spoken of in the third and fourth verses and by the Rest in the Land of Canaan mentioned in the seventh and eighth verses 2. This is another Rest and therefore another day for this Rest thus in 8 9 verses and I shall at present content my self with Pareus his Exposition until I meet with a better that 〈◊〉 in the Psalms to which the Apostle had respect did speak of another Rest and a day of Rest which is neither the seventh day Rest nor the Rest in the Land of Canaan but signified and exemplified by the one and shadowed out by the other and the Apostles demonstration of this Doctrine may be expounded by ad sjunctive Syllogisme Arg. Either it is of the first rest of God in which he ceased from the Works of Creation or of that rest in Canaan or of some other rest and of another day of rest but not of the two former and therefore the conclusion of the Apostle is in the 8th and 9th verses of another Sabbath of rest 3. This rest and day of rest spoken of by the Apostle remaineth so it is express in the words of the 9th verse which remaining properly belongs to this rest intimating by this his Doctrine that the other rest the seventh day rest is removed for the remaining signifieth the stability and permanency of this Gospel rest and the day of that rest but the removing of the thing shaken that those things which cannot be shaken may remain Heb. 12.27 The rest on the seventh day and that day of rest was miserably shaken by the sin and fall of man which brought the Curse not only upon himself and his Posterity but upon the works of Creation and therefore the Lord did not only threaten to destroy Man but likewise to destroy the Beasts the Creeping things and the Fowls of the Air for saith the Lord it repenteth me that I have made them Gen. 6.7 Thus was the seventh dayes Sabbath which was a memorial of Gods resting from and complacency in his works of Creation shaken by Mans sin and Gods curse upon the Creatures because of Man and the Commandment for the sanctifying the seventh dayes Sabbath did remain as a hand-writing against sinful and fallen Man as other Ordinances and Hand-writings did until Christ comes and brings in better Ordinances and a better day of rest which remaineth as the Apostle by his Doctrine instructeth us 4. The Rest and day of Rest which remaineth is that into which Christ first entred and at length did perfectly possess and into which he leadeth his People but Christ entred into his rest the first day of the week when he rose from the dead and at length he passed into the full possession of the Mansions and resting places ver 14. and he that entred into his rest ceased from his Works as God did from his ver 10. 5. The remaining of this day of Rest is spoken of in the present tense it is said therefore there remaineth a Rest so that it is that which at present the people of God do possess although the perfection of it is reserved for them when they shall come to the Mansions prepared by Christ for them Joh. 14.2 2 Pet. 1.11 the words being thus opened the Argument now follows Arg. That if the People of God have another day of Rest which is not the seventh day rest but that which Christ doth lead them into by his own Example and by way of communion with him who entred into his rest in the first day of the week then the first day of the week is the day of our Gospel Rest and of our Christian Sabbath and consequently a cessation of the seventh dayes Sabbath but the proof of all these particulars we have in the former and concerning Christs entring into his Rest on the first day of the Week I shall yet speak more fully concerning that as I shall meet with it in some of the Objections of John Rogers In the second place to prove that the Apostles by their Doctrine did settle the first day of the week
to be our Christian Sabbath we may see in 1 Cor. 16.12 1. That which is there exprest is by way of precept and injunction for so the Apostle saith he had given order concerning the collection of the Saints and therefore not left it as a matter of indifferency or liberty but whosoever did neglect this did transgress the Apostolical precept and order 2. This order for the collection for the Saints was not only sent to the Churches at Corinth but to the Churches at Galatia so that it was an order and injunction common to the Churches 3. The order did not only respect the collection it self but the time and day of it that upon the first day of the week let every one lay by him in store as God hath prospered him so it is express in the 2 d. verse now the Argument follows Arg. The first day of the week was either a common and indifferent day or a holy day the day of the Christian Sabbath but no common and indifferent day for how could the Apostle by his injunction and order make it necessary for the Churches to attend this work of mercy collection for the Saints on the first day of the week if it was but a common day and thus esteem one common day above another contrary to his Doctrine Rom. 14.5 far be it from us to think that the Apostle could so contradict his own Doctrine but it was because the first day of the week was made to be a holy day and such works of mercy are very suitable unto the day 2 Arg. Or thus the Apostle did order collection for the Saints to be on the first day of the week either because it was the Christian Sabbath or for some other reasons but I have so long waited to heâ—r of some other reasons why the Apostle should lay an injunction upon all Churches to have such an honourable respect to this day without any consideration of it as the Lords Day and Christian Sabbath and all the Objectors and Cavillers against the first day of the week the Lords day have not brought forth the least appearance of any reason to the contrary that I confess I begin to think that the Opponents themselves within themselves have received a Sentence of despair of giving any reason only they have travelled and brought forth one poor Objection that there is not a word spoken of a Sabbath here and who saith there is but the Argument is taken from the Apostles Order and by Apostolical Order advanced the first day of the week above any other day and that the reason of this is either because it is the day of the Christian Sabbath or for some other reason which never yet was brought to light and therefore we conclude as in the former that the Apostle by his Doctrine did settle the first day of the week to be a holy day a Christian Sabbath Now in the next place concerning the practice of the Apostles the practice of the Churches of which much may be said in order to their attendance to holy Duties in the first day of the week because it was a day separated for holy Worship but at present we may consider Acts 20.7 First it was a Church assembly there spoken of for it is said the Disciples came together 2. Secondly the end for the sake of which they came together it was for the sake of religious duties that they might partake of the Lords Supper called breaking of Bread in this place as in Act. 2.42 and did not go alone without other Religious performances viz. Prayer and hearing the Word Preached 3. Thirdly It is spoken of as a custom and usuall practice of the Disciples therefore it is said on the first day of the week when the Disciples came together Paul having waited for and taking this opportunity to Preach to them for he abode seven dayes among them but this was the last day his being ready to depart on the morrow as is exprest in the 7th verse Arg. Hence the Argument is Paul and the Disciples with him either kept the Seventh day Sabbath or the first day of the week a Christian Sabbath or else they kept no Sabbath at all if they had kept the seventh day Sabbath that was the day before this First day of the Week then they had a meeting after a Sabbath manner for Religious Duties then the Evangelist would not have spoken of this Meeting on the First day as the only Church Meeting of the seven dayes of the Apostles abode amongst them therefore it was the first day of the Week in which Paul and the Disciples assembled and kept as a Christian Sabbath Much more hath been said by others and I have somewhat more in readiness to say if the occasion calleth for it and God giveth opportunity But at present having proved that the first day of the Week was by the Lord himself made by his Word and by his Works to be the Lords day and our Gospel and Christian Sabbath and his Apostles were guided by the Holy Ghost to settle it in the room and place of the seventh day both by their Doctrine and by their Practice we proceed to make Reply to John R. his Answers to the Questions And concerning his Preface to his Answers I shall at present omit it until I come to his Conclusion and then consider both his Preface and Conclusion together these and the Superscription being to the same Purpose and the same for substance Quest 1. The first Question Are not just and necessary Consequences from Scripture to be taken for the mind of the Holy Ghost in Scripture or else how shall we Answer the Papists against the error of Transubstantiation John R. his Answer is Ans If the Consequence drawn from Scripture is agreeable to the Scripture and no wayes contrary to the Scripture it must be granted truth because it speaks what the Scripture speaks But as to the Papists John R. saith they had no Scripture that said a piece of Bread was the body of our Lord or that our Lord was turned into a piece of Bread or that Bread was turned into our Lord for our Lord did not say to his Disciples Take eat this Bread is my Body as the Papists did affirm therefore they said that which the Scripture did not say so do you say that which the Scripture doth not say for you call the first day of the Week the Christian Sabbath but the Scripture doth not you call every first day of the Week the Lords Day but the Scripture doth not so Reply The Reply to Iohn R. his Answer follows His Answer consists of two parts 1. First partly of a seeming Concession granting that Consequences drawn from Scripture and agreeable to Scripture are truth c. 2. Secondly he compareth us unto the Papists for saying that which the Scripture doth not say and the Argument he gives is If we say the first day of the Week is the Lords day
them and if he should say that their Example ought not to be followed by Christians this would be so un-Gospel-like and un-un-Christian like and therefore Iohn R. concludes it is best for him to say he cannot tell Qu. 9. If the old Jewish Covenant be expired and sundry Ordinances about time and place c. altred why not the time of the old Sabbath alterable by the Lord of the Sabbath upon a Gospel account as a memorial of Redemption Ans Iohn R. his Answer is I know not what thou dost mean by old Jewish Covenant I know no Covenant in Scripture by that name if thou dost mean the Covenant which the two Tables of Stone the Tables of the Covenant which did contain the ten Commandments which Israel did enter into a Covenant with God by engaging to perform the same which Covenant they brake and perished in the Wilderness for the same God did ordain by the hand of Moses Ceremonies as a figure of the Mediatorship of Jesus Christ at this time at Mount Sinai when Israel entred into the Covenant of works to shew that there was mercy to be obtained by Jesus Christ though the first Covenant was broken by them that is to say upon Repentance and Faith Now though the first Covenant which was dedicated with the blood of Bulls and Goats and accompanied with many Rites and Ceremonies which were figures of the Mediatorship of Jesus Christ which Rites and Ceremonies are done away but none of them placed in the two Tables for that Law is spiritual and it is as easie by Gods Decree for Heaven and Earth to pass as for a tittle of it to fail Now the other Law contained in the former Covenant called the Hand-writing of Ordinances which was nailed to the Cross of Christ which did contain meats and drinks New Moons and Sabbaths which Sabbaths was besides the Sabbaths of the Lord but Gods seventh day-Sabbaths were commanded by the mouth of the Lord with an audible voice written with the finger of God in Stone death inflicted upon the breaker of it Exod. 31.12 Reply The Reply is this John Rogers his Answer is full of confusion jombling the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace together 1. First The Covenant of Works was made with Adam 2. Secondly The Covenant of Grace may be considered either as Ceremonially and Legally Administred and this John R. calls the Covenant of Works or as it is attended with Gospel Administrations and there the Question ariseth Whether another day might not be more suitable upon a Gospel account than the seventh day Sabbath and what reason doth Iohn R. give to the contrary I confess I begin to grow weary of forming his Arguments for him because I find it more difficult to find out his reason and to form it for him than to answer it and could even determine for the future that if he cannot or will not form his Arguments himself I shall leave them as I find them covered with darkness and void of form but if there be any face of reason in this his Answer at length it is That the seventh day being commanded in the Decalogue is therefore unalterable but we have proved that Christ hath altered it and by the Holy Ghost guided his Apostles to settle the first Day of the Week the Lords Day and our Christian Sabbath and because I shall meet with this Objection more fully in the next Answer I proceed to that Qu. 10. Is there not room left in the Words of the fourth Command for the seventh Day to be altered and our Lords day to be sanctified by the Lord of the Sabbath See the Preface of the Commannment Remember the Sabbath to keep it holy and the Conclusion only saith the Lord blessed the Sabbath and when the seventh day is named it saith only is and not shall be for ever so observed Ans John R. his Answer is No there is no room for the seventh day is the very day commanded and Jesus Christ hath left it upon Record that it is easier for Heaven and Earth to pass than one tittle of the Law to fail and hath forbid his Disciples for entertaining such a thought in these words saying think not I am come for to destroy the Law and again saith he For verily I say unto you till Heaven and Earth pass one jott or tittle shall in no wise pass from the Law who dare therefore attempt such a thing against Gods Law given in such a terrible manner being spoken by his own mouth the Earth trembling at his Word and so terrible was the sight that Moses said I exceedingly fear and quake and not only so but the Son of God testifying that it shall abide as long as Heaven and Earth as is already specified threatning also any that attempt such a wicked act saying Whosoever therefore breaks the least of these Commandments and shall teach Men so c. therefore who dare attempt such a presumptuous act against Gods Law and Christs confirmation of the same Law and what is that to purpose in the Preface and Conclusion seeing the day commanded is the seventh day and no other so that Sabbath is proper only to the seventh day and no other but as to the conclusion of the commandment some Translate it therefore the Lord blessed the seventh day and ballowed it which is most agreeable it being taken from Gods seventh day rest Gen. 2.3 See Beza's Translation Exod. 31.12 and death not infflicted upon any ceremonial Law but Excommunication but death upon the prophaning of the seventh day Sabbath the Reply is Reply Iohn R. in this Answer is fled to his seeming Fort and he knows if he be driven out from this that neither he nor any for the seventh dayes Sabbath have any Castle nor Covering for their conceited confidence but the scope of the Question if rightly stated and plainly expressed is That a Sabbath as a Sabbath is first and last in the Precept and shall not be changed but the particular day is secondarily specified and is mutable as other positive Laws are the Lord having reserved a liberty to himself to change them according to his Royal pleasure and who shall say he hath done iniquity And as for Iohn R. his Argument so far as it hath any colour of reason in it is That seeing Christ came not to destroy the Law but to fulfil it and that in every jot and tittle of it and therefore not to change the seventh dayes Sabbath into the first day of the Week and to this we shall positively and plainly Reply 1. First There is that which may be called an actual fulfilling in all and every particular point and duty required in the Decalogue but Christ did never actually fulfil the particular Duties of Parents to Children of a Husband to a Wise and many other particular points and duties contained in the Decalogue and yet his fulfilling all and every one of those Duties which had any suitableness
AN EXPLANATION OF THE SOLEMN ADVICE Recommended by the COVNCIL in Connecticut Colony to the Inhabitants in that Jurisdiction Respecting the Reformation of those EVILS which have been the Procuring Cause of the late Judgments upon New-England By Mr. James Fitch Pastor of the Church in Norwich 1 Sam. 7.3 And Samuel spake unto all the house of Israel saying If ye do return unto the Lord with all your hearts then put away the strange gods and Ashtaroth from among you and prepare your hearts unto the LORD and serve him only and he will deliver you out of the hand of the Philistines 2 Chron. 19.4 And Jehosaphat c. BOSTON IN NEW-ENGLAND Printed by S. Green for I. Vsher of Boston 1683. To the Reader COncerning those Brief and Nervous Discourses which are emitted herewith the Reverend and Worthy Author had no thoughts of Publishing them until such time as others did Importune him thereunto As for the first Treatise it was thus occasioned In the distressing time of the late War with the Indians in N-England many of the Rulers both Civil and Ecclesiastical in Connecticut Colony being sensible that publick Judgements seldome come but as Intimations of Heavens displeasure and that then of all Men the Leaders of the People are concerned to enquire into the Causes of the Lords Controversie 2 Sam. 21.1 they did accordingly meet for that purpose The Ministers drew up in writing what they conceived to be the mind of God respecting the solemn Question before them which Result was approved of by their Magistrates and Recommended to the Consideration of the Inhabitants in that Jurisdiction This faithful Servant of Christ did wifely take hold on that opportunity in his publick Ministry to insist upon both the Malady and the Remedy which there is so great cause to be enquiring into and did reduce his Instructions into a Catechetical Method for the better edification of the younger sort in his Congregation Sundry Persons of Worth and Judgement hapning to be present at some of those Exercises were very earnest to have them made more publick to gratifie whose desires the Worthy Author has been prevailed with to grant the Copy of what was more inlargedly viva voce delivered A Discourse of this nature is very seasonable and needful and I hope will be blessed for the good of many As for the small tractate respecting the Christian Sabbath the Author has so far as I am able to discern with very good judgement and in few words asserted and proved the Truth whose confirmation he has undertaken The most plausible Argument which our Jewish Sabbatarians insist upon is their pretending the Morality of the fourth Commandment Nor do we deny but that by virtue thereof a seventh part of time or one day in the Hebdomadel Revolution ought to be kept as an holy Rest unto God But it is evident that some expressions in the Decalogue do in a peculiar manner respect the Jewish State This is true of the Preface to the Moral Law and of the promise annexed to the fifth Commandment and some particulars in the tenth Commandment are accommodated to the then state of Israel And why some Expressions in the fourth Commandment may not be so too our seventh day Men have as yet given us no solid and sufficient reason Nay the Learned Jews themselves acknowledge it to be so And therefore they are not offended when they see Christians doing servile works upon the seventh day of the week for they say the Gentiles are not obliged to the strict and legal observation of their Sabbath The Jews in Amsterdam told Jackson Sands and other keepers of the seventh day that except they were also Circumcised their observation of that day was groundless There is no place in the New Testament which the Iews do so much object against Christians as Mat. 5.17 18. They perversely cavil and say that the Apostles did act contrary to the Doctrine of their Master Christ by telling Men that they ought not to observe the Ceremonial Law R. Maimon In misna L. 1. C. 9. has a whole Chapter full of Blasphemy against those who teach that the Law is destroyed in whole or in part The most Judicious and Learned of our Writers acknowledge that the place mentioned has respect both to the Ceremonial and to the Moral Law And that as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is set in oppposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as destroying is opposite to fulfilling christ did not evert the ceremonial Law he did himself conform to the ceremonies of the law and require other men to do so as long as the author of that law did see meet to continue it and every way fulfilled those Types which pointed at the Messiah that was to come Our Iewish Sabbatarians who abuse those words of Christ to countenance their Error might as well from thence argue that the Ceremonial Law is still in force For its certain it was not abolished until every tittle contained therein was fulfilled It has been objected that Christians in the Primitive times observed the seventh day The Christian Iews in the Apostles time had a religious respect not only for the seventh day Sabbath but for Circumcision and other Ceremonies until such time as the Iudaical World was utterly destroyed but the Apostles never allowed Christianized Gentiles so to Iudaize The Ebionites kept the seventh day but they were never accounted true Christians The Constitutions which pass under the Name of Clement L 7. C. 24. commend the observation both of the seventh and of the first day of the week And Eusebius speaks of some that observed both dayes Such Christians were certainly leavened with Iudaism At this day the Abyssine Christians observe the seventh day they also observe Circumcision and if Men will Iudaize in one particular it is not to to be wondred at if they be left to Iudaize in more Of later times there have not been many of any great Fame or Note in the World that have stood up for this Opinion There was in England formerly Braborn and Trask but they afterwards recanted Within these few years Mr. Bramfield of Sherborn was strangely drawn away into this Error But his weightiest Objections are answered with great judgment and candour by the Reverend Mr. William Ben of Dorchester in Dorset a Man whose Conversion was occasioned by a Sermon of his own after which he continued an eminent Light in the Church of God for fifty years together and than whom I never knew Man upon Earth that did maintain a greater intimacy of Communion with God Nor has Mr. Bramfield made any Reply to Mr. Ben's Book so far as I have seen or heard As for the present Jewish Sabbatarians in Connecticut Colony they out-do all their Predecessors as to Insolent Behaviour being arrived unto that height of impudent Prophaneness that they fear not in the sight of the Sun to bid defiance unto the Christian Sabbath by following the servile works of their particular Callings on the
Lords Day So that it was high time for the Magistrate who is Custos utriusque tabulae to interpose And truly if it had not been so there is reason to fear that the hand of Heaven would have done the Magistrates work after a â—ar more terrible manner We cannot with truth affirm that visible Judgments from Heaven have befallen Christians for not religiouslâ— observing the seventh Day but Histories abound with Examples of Gods awful and tremendous punishments inflicted upon the Prophaners of the Lords Day which is a very convincing Argument that the observation of the first day of the week is of Divine Institution Concerning the Objector here Animadverted upon the truth is his Allegations are feeble and frivolous so that some may think 't is pity a Man of Mr. Fitch's Strength and Ability should be improved in a Service which a far meaner hand might with ease have undertaken Yet considering that sometimes as senseless an Apostate as Mahomet was may possibly leven a World of deluded Souls if due care be not taken to prevent it others have judged it necessary that he should be answered 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 What is written will tend either to his Conversion which if possible the Lord grant or else to his being left the more inexcusable condemned in himself while he opposeth the light of Truth The Apostle does both allow and require that some and in special Judaizers should be rebuked sharply that they may be sound in the faith Tit. 1.13 Had the Antichristian Sabbatarian here refuted only modestly scrupled whether the seventh day were not still of Divine institution more gentleness in Expression would have been used with him but he is not a person to be Saved in that way If by any means he be plucked out of the fire neither himself nor those that have aimed at his Salvation will be sorry Jude 23. The Lord give a blessing to Faithful Endeavours and vindicate his Truth Name and Sabbath in such a way as shall be most for his own Glory Boston July 1683. INCREASE MATHER In Order to some Explication of the Solemn Advice which our Honoured Magistrates did in the Time of our Calamity send abroad unto the several Churches and Congregations in this Colony we have occasion to reflect upon both THe Provocations of New-England and the Impediments of Reformation and to make way for the following Discourse we may consider what Moses that great Prophet of the Lord and chief Ruler in Israel did inculcate upon that People in Deut. 9.7 Remember and forget not how thou provokedst the Lord thy God to wrath in the Wilderness We ought to have and hold a remembrance what our Transgressions have been by which the Lord hath been provoked to wrath against us 1. The Remembrance ought to be clear and full the Pen-men of the Holy Scriptures were moved by the Spirit of God to Record clearly and fully the Provocations of which the People of God had been guilty as is manifest in Psal 78. Psal 106. and through the History of the Church in the Book of God and some of the spots of the most beautiful Saints God would not suffer these to be forgotten and left out of the Holy Scripture Record 1 King 15.5 Psal 106.32 32. 2. The Remembrance ought to be affectionate with a heart suitably affected Remembring what our cares and fears grief and tears were in that day when the wrath of the Lord appeared to be a consuming fire and we as combustible matter and had not the Lord quenched the fire of his wrath with his own Bowels of Mercies we had perished Ezek. 16 61. Lam. 3.19 20. 3. The Remembrance ought to be particularly Reforming considering how our sins have driven us into a perillous state and we ready to perish in the Ocean of miseries and shall we again provoke the Lord to wrath will he not be angry until he hath consumed us Ezra 9.14 if we do not remember our Provocations to our Humiliation and Reformation the Lord will remember them against us to our own confusion and destruction although we wash our selves as with Nitre and take much Sope yet our iniquities are marked before the Lord Jer. 2.22 Psal 50.21 22. And we may see what Record of Providences respecting a People or particular persons is most agreeable to holy Scripture Rule That Record which doth declare the Righteous acts of the Lord our unrighteous deeds the superabounding Grace of God although our sins have abounded That Record which doth set forth the Lords Justice Mercy Truth Faithfulness and Almighty arm by uncovering the feebleness sickleness falseness many other bitter Provocations both of Rulers people Dan. 9.7 8. This is most like the Record in Holy Scripture and the Church History therein contained but such a faithful Record seldom comes forth in that age in which the then present Providences were acted few will suffer a plain Remembrance of their Provocations but the Lord hath hitherto provided some faithful Recorder who hath left that in Record to succeeding Ages which the present Generation would not endure to hear of Psal 10.4 Rom. 3.5 Psal 78.36 37 38. And that we may have and hold a convincing hearty Reforming effectual Remembrance what our Provocations have been let us consider according to that most Solemn Advice of our Rulers First What that sin is which is the root actually and nextly of all the other sins An. Apostasie from the true Religion considered not only absolutely but comparatively as it is a declension from the stricter part of Religion or a decay of the Beauty of a Religious Profession and this Apostacy doth shew it self in the various degrees of it and in the bitter fruits and effects of the same 1. Apostasie may be taken either Absolutely or Comparatively 1. Absolutely and so it s a total turning from the Faith 1 Tim. 1.19 20. and thus the Apostate is become a Blaspheming Infidel or a falling from Profession to Prophaneness thus the Apostate is turned like the Dog to his Vomit 2 Pet. 2.22 or a forsaking all Godliness and godly wayes and loving the present World and thus the Apostate is become a meer Worldling 2 Tim. 4.10 2. Or Apostasie taken Comparatively 1. In comparison of that which these Professors have been and done and thus they are not the lovers of God and doers of good works which sometimes formerly they have been Rev. 2.4 5. 2. Fallen away in comparison of the examples of their godly Predecessors whose Children they are after the Flesh but not after the Spirit Joh. 8.37.44 a noble Vine and right Seed in respect of their Parentage but a degenerate Plant in respect of their own practice Jer. 2.21 and have gone away from the Ordinances of the Lord from the dayes of their Fathers and not kept them in that purity and power as they were left with them by their Predecessors Mal. 3.7 3. In comparison of what they yet profess in words to